Strange

[Cross, Tom]

NT4 SP6a/5.5 SP4/Outlook (all flavors)

  We recently exmerged some users from one site another and removed the old
server and site from our org.  Everything worked great except all Outlook
clients attempt to connect to the old server at startup.  If you cancel it,
Outlook resumes and everything works fine.  Unfortunately it causes some
delay.  They have created new profiles, reloaded Outlook,  and no old
offline folders exist.

  Any ideas on what Outlook is looking for?


Thanks in advance,

Tom Cross
Viasystems


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange

[Rick Ward - HQ]

Title: RE: Strange





OST?
If they have offline stores on there desktops.. Delete them and let Exchange re-create.


-Original Message-
From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Strange



NT4 SP6a/5.5 SP4/Outlook (all flavors)


  We recently exmerged some users from one site another and removed the old server and site from our org.  Everything worked great except all Outlook clients attempt to connect to the old server at startup.  If you cancel it, Outlook resumes and everything works fine.  Unfortunately it causes some delay.  They have created new profiles, reloaded Outlook,  and no old offline folders exist.

  Any ideas on what Outlook is looking for?



Thanks in advance,


Tom Cross
Viasystems



List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange

[Cross, Tom]

My thought exactly, but the admin over there said that he just built his
client and put a clean install of Outlook 2k on it.  No ost's to be found.
 
Tom

-Original Message-
From: Rick Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange



OST? 
If they have offline stores on there desktops.. Delete them and let Exchange
re-create. 

-Original Message- 
From: Cross, Tom [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:08 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: Strange 


NT4 SP6a/5.5 SP4/Outlook (all flavors) 

  We recently exmerged some users from one site another and removed the old
server and site from our org.  Everything worked great except all Outlook
clients attempt to connect to the old server at startup.  If you cancel it,
Outlook resumes and everything works fine.  Unfortunately it causes some
delay.  They have created new profiles, reloaded Outlook,  and no old
offline folders exist.

  Any ideas on what Outlook is looking for? 


Thanks in advance, 

Tom Cross 
Viasystems 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>  

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange

[Rick Ward - HQ]

Title: RE: Strange





Hmmm.. Just so I understand.
The clients desktop is "brand new" freshly formatted with new OS and Outlook installed on the computer, yes?
Just trying to make sure I am not missing anything and understanding your nomenclature. If they just did a uninstall of outlook, that doesn't clean the PC from outlook files/settings believe me.

If they are running a new pristine desktop with new outlook then how does it point to the old server by default? That's not possible. The client decides where to go for it's exchange server. Something doesn't smell right..

Oh geez.. It's me.. Sorry.. 


-Rick
-Original Message-
From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange



My thought exactly, but the admin over there said that he just built his client and put a clean install of Outlook 2k on it.  No ost's to be found.

 
Tom


-Original Message-
From: Rick Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange




OST? 
If they have offline stores on there desktops.. Delete them and let Exchange re-create. 


-Original Message- 
From: Cross, Tom [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:08 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: Strange 



NT4 SP6a/5.5 SP4/Outlook (all flavors) 


  We recently exmerged some users from one site another and removed the old server and site from our org.  Everything worked great except all Outlook clients attempt to connect to the old server at startup.  If you cancel it, Outlook resumes and everything works fine.  Unfortunately it causes some delay.  They have created new profiles, reloaded Outlook,  and no old offline folders exist.

  Any ideas on what Outlook is looking for? 



Thanks in advance, 


Tom Cross 
Viasystems 



List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>  


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange

[Cross, Tom]

  Just going by what I've been told.  I took a look at it remotely and I
recreated the profile and searched for .ost's and it still did it.  The
profile is set to the new (correct) server.  Once the user cancels the
prompt where it is trying to connect to the old server, they work fine from
that point on as long as they don't close/open Outlook again.
 
  Any chance of an entry in a offline address book causing this?
 
  Not it's not you, it's my left-over SPAM sandwich.
 
Tom

-Original Message-
From: Rick Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange



Hmmm.. Just so I understand. 
The clients desktop is "brand new" freshly formatted with new OS and Outlook
installed on the computer, yes? 
Just trying to make sure I am not missing anything and understanding your
nomenclature. If they just did a uninstall of outlook, that doesn't clean
the PC from outlook files/settings believe me.

If they are running a new pristine desktop with new outlook then how does it
point to the old server by default? That's not possible. The client decides
where to go for it's exchange server. Something doesn't smell right..

Oh geez.. It's me.. Sorry.. 

-Rick 
-Original Message- 
From: Cross, Tom [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:21 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Strange 


My thought exactly, but the admin over there said that he just built his
client and put a clean install of Outlook 2k on it.  No ost's to be found.

  
Tom 

-Original Message- 
From: Rick Ward - HQ [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:16 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Strange 



OST? 
If they have offline stores on there desktops.. Delete them and let Exchange
re-create. 

-Original Message- 
From: Cross, Tom [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:08 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: Strange 


NT4 SP6a/5.5 SP4/Outlook (all flavors) 

  We recently exmerged some users from one site another and removed the old
server and site from our org.  Everything worked great except all Outlook
clients attempt to connect to the old server at startup.  If you cancel it,
Outlook resumes and everything works fine.  Unfortunately it causes some
delay.  They have created new profiles, reloaded Outlook,  and no old
offline folders exist.

  Any ideas on what Outlook is looking for? 


Thanks in advance, 

Tom Cross 
Viasystems 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>  
< http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm> >  

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>  



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>  

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange

[Rick Ward - HQ]

Title: RE: Strange





Was the MS document(Q152959) followed on taking the server out of the site? Was it the first server in the site? I assume so.. There is a certain order that must happen to take the first server out of the site correctly.

I also assume that this old server has been deleted already from the site?


Here's another thought.. Try having the users having this problem try logging on to a different PC and create an Outlook profile there with just Exchange and Address Book and see if it does the same thing.

Something is rotten here.. I just don't know what without deeper troubleshooting.


Anyone else with ideas on this?


-Rick
-Original Message-
From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange



  Just going by what I've been told.  I took a look at it remotely and I recreated the profile and searched for .ost's and it still did it.  The profile is set to the new (correct) server.  Once the user cancels the prompt where it is trying to connect to the old server, they work fine from that point on as long as they don't close/open Outlook again.

 
  Any chance of an entry in a offline address book causing this?
 
  Not it's not you, it's my left-over SPAM sandwich.
 
Tom


-Original Message-
From: Rick Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange




Hmmm.. Just so I understand. 
The clients desktop is "brand new" freshly formatted with new OS and Outlook installed on the computer, yes? 
Just trying to make sure I am not missing anything and understanding your nomenclature. If they just did a uninstall of outlook, that doesn't clean the PC from outlook files/settings believe me.

If they are running a new pristine desktop with new outlook then how does it point to the old server by default? That's not possible. The client decides where to go for it's exchange server. Something doesn't smell right..

Oh geez.. It's me.. Sorry.. 


-Rick 
-Original Message- 
From: Cross, Tom [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:21 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Strange 



My thought exactly, but the admin over there said that he just built his client and put a clean install of Outlook 2k on it.  No ost's to be found.

  
Tom 


-Original Message- 
From: Rick Ward - HQ [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:16 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Strange 




OST? 
If they have offline stores on there desktops.. Delete them and let Exchange re-create. 


-Original Message- 
From: Cross, Tom [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ] 

Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:08 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: Strange 



NT4 SP6a/5.5 SP4/Outlook (all flavors) 


  We recently exmerged some users from one site another and removed the old server and site from our org.  Everything worked great except all Outlook clients attempt to connect to the old server at startup.  If you cancel it, Outlook resumes and everything works fine.  Unfortunately it causes some delay.  They have created new profiles, reloaded Outlook,  and no old offline folders exist.

  Any ideas on what Outlook is looking for? 



Thanks in advance, 


Tom Cross 
Viasystems 



List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>  
< http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm> >  


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>  




List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>  


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange

[Cross, Tom]

Yeah, I followed the procedure on removing them in the right order.  The old
server is out of the site and the site has been removed from our org.  In
the meantime, I'll have them try your suggestion, they are across the pond,
so I'll get with them in the morning.  I think this is an interesting
problem, something a little different than what we're used to seeing.
 
Thanks for the feedback,
 
Tom

-Original Message-
From: Rick Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 5:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange



Was the MS document(Q152959) followed on taking the server out of the site?
Was it the first server in the site? I assume so.. There is a certain order
that must happen to take the first server out of the site correctly.

I also assume that this old server has been deleted already from the site? 

Here's another thought.. Try having the users having this problem try
logging on to a different PC and create an Outlook profile there with just
Exchange and Address Book and see if it does the same thing.

Something is rotten here.. I just don't know what without deeper
troubleshooting. 

Anyone else with ideas on this? 

-Rick 
-Original Message- 
From: Cross, Tom [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:45 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Strange 


  Just going by what I've been told.  I took a look at it remotely and I
recreated the profile and searched for .ost's and it still did it.  The
profile is set to the new (correct) server.  Once the user cancels the
prompt where it is trying to connect to the old server, they work fine from
that point on as long as they don't close/open Outlook again.

  
  Any chance of an entry in a offline address book causing this? 
  
  Not it's not you, it's my left-over SPAM sandwich. 
  
Tom 

-Original Message- 
From: Rick Ward - HQ [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:33 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Strange 



Hmmm.. Just so I understand. 
The clients desktop is "brand new" freshly formatted with new OS and Outlook
installed on the computer, yes? 
Just trying to make sure I am not missing anything and understanding your
nomenclature. If they just did a uninstall of outlook, that doesn't clean
the PC from outlook files/settings believe me.

If they are running a new pristine desktop with new outlook then how does it
point to the old server by default? That's not possible. The client decides
where to go for it's exchange server. Something doesn't smell right..

Oh geez.. It's me.. Sorry.. 

-Rick 
-Original Message- 
From: Cross, Tom [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:21 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Strange 


My thought exactly, but the admin over there said that he just built his
client and put a clean install of Outlook 2k on it.  No ost's to be found.

  
Tom 

-Original Message- 
From: Rick Ward - HQ [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:16 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Strange 



OST? 
If they have offline stores on there desktops.. Delete them and let Exchange
re-create. 

-Original Message- 
From: Cross, Tom [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >  < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ] 

Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:08 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: Strange 


NT4 SP6a/5.5 SP4/Outlook (all flavors) 

  We recently exmerged some users from one site another and removed the old
server and site from our org.  Everything worked great except all Outlook
clients attempt to connect to the old server at startup.  If you cancel it,
Outlook resumes and everything works fine.  Unfortunately it causes some
delay.  They have created new profiles, reloaded Outlook,  and no old
offline folders exist.

  Any ideas on what Outlook is looking for? 


Thanks in advance, 

Tom Cross 
Viasystems 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>  
< http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm> >  
< http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>  
< http://www.sunbelt-software.co

Strange occurrance

[Joseph Ambrose]

Hello!

I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was delivered to a
small lists of recipients.

How could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered. 

I know the deferred mail option is one.  but i don't think anyone
would push the delivery date that far into the future.

Let's play Stump the Exchange mavens.

Good luck!

Joseph Ambrose
System and Network Manager
The Conference Board
P: 001-212-339-0443
F: 001-212-836-3802
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Strange problem

[Blake R. Fowkes]

Title: Strange problem





I have been scratching my head on this one for a few days now.  I am having a problem sending internet email.  But here's the real kicker, I am only having problems sending to one domain.  I have not made any changes to my server, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4 SP6a.  I know that the company that I am trying to send message to has just recently put there server behind a firewall.  Wait it gets even stranger, I can telnet to there server and it does respond properly.  When I try and send them a message I get Host Unreachable.  Do any of you have any ideas for me?

Thanks,
Blake Fowkes
Waid and Associates




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Strange problem

[Blake R. Fowkes]

Title: Strange problem





I have been scratching my head on this one for a few days now.  I am having a problem sending internet email.  But here's the real kicker, I am only having problems sending to one domain.  I have not made any changes to my server, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4 SP6a.  I know that the company that I am trying to send message to has just recently put there server behind a firewall.  Wait it gets even stranger, I can telnet to there server and it does respond properly.  When I try and send them a message I get Host Unreachable.  Do any of you have any ideas for me?

Thanks,
Blake Fowkes
Waid and Associates




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Strange NDR's

[Pocock, Andy]

Can anybody tell me the reason why some emails sent externally, receive
NDR’s?  Which lists the following info.

Reporting-MTA: dns;GBGBCGB.GBCDE.COM
Received-From-MTA: dns;eugate.e-mail.com
Arrival-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 15:14:24 +0100

Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Action: failed
Status: 5.6.1
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;554 5.6.1 Body type not supported by Remote Host

The mail is delivered from the ISP to an IIS server which then relays to
various exchange servers.





List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

strange question

[MHR(Michael Ross)]

Title: Message



ive installed e5.5 
sp4 on my test lan
i then upgraded it 
to e2k sp2
i installled sp3 
today..
 
ever since it went 
to e2k i cannot logon via OWA
it prompts me for 
username and password, but never accepts it..
anyone else ever see 
this?
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange problem

[dp]

Title: Message



dont u 
mean 
http://orbz.org/
 
Close...

  
  -Original Message-From: Boswell Tim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 
  09:09To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
  problem
  orbz.com
  
-Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 01 November 2001 
13:40To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
problem
How do I check that?
 
Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 


  -Original Message-From: Richard McMahon 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 
  01, 2001 7:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Strange problem
  Could you have been black holed?
  
-Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 
1:09 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Strange problem
Yup that worked as well.
 
C:\>nslookup -q=mx swrinc.comServer:  
ns1.sprintlink.netAddress:  204.117.214.10
 
swrinc.com  MX preference = 10, mail 
exchanger = 
dogbert.swrinc.comdogbert.swrinc.com  
internet address = 63.170.243.210
I know someone is going to say something about sending out the 
real address.  Well at this point I dont care any 
more.
 
I am able to telnet to their server as well.
 
Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and 
Associates 

  -Original Message-From: Simon Taylor 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 
  6:09 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
      Strange problem
  whoops.. too early for me coffee hasn't kicked in 
  yet
  you will have more luck with
  nslookup -q=mx domain.com.
  

-Original Message-From: Simon 
Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 November 2001 
11:45To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
    Strange problem
try c:\>nslookup q=mx domain.com
this should give you their smtp relays then telnet into the 
highest priority one (lowest un) on port 25 - if this all works then 
turn logging on to full on the IMS and watch the logs when it tries 
to send - you should get something you can use..
Cheers
Simon

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 November 2001 
  05:46To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
      RE: Strange problem
  Yes.
   
  C:\>nslookup x.xx.xxxServer:  
  Address:  xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
   
  Non-authoritative answer:Name:    
  x.xx.xxxAddress:  
  xx.xxx.xxx.xxx
  
-Original Message-From: 
Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 
October 31, 2001 5:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
problem
Can you see their MX record 
ok?
 
William
 
-Original Message-From: 
Blake R. Fowkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: Strange 
problem
I have been scratching my head on 
this one for a few days now.  I am having a problem sending 
internet email.  But here's the real kicker, I am only 
having problems sending to one domain.  I have not made any 
changes to my server, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4 SP6a.  I know 
that the company that I am trying to send message to has just 
recently put there server behind a firewall.  Wait it gets 
even stranger, I can telnet to there server and it does respond 
properly.  When I try and send them a message I get Host 
Unreachable.  Do any of you have any ideas for 
me?
Thanks, 
Blake Fowkes 
Waid and 
Associates 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 

Strange IMS problem

[Scott Burgin]

I'm baffled!
All NT 4.0 network, Exchange 5.5 with sp4, server NT 4 with sp6.
Our email comes through our parent company so the email address is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  We have a partial T1 connection our site with our
parent.
Here is what's happening.  External Incoming SMTP comes in fine. External
Outgoing goes out, but extremely slow.  Our IMS Queue has a lot of emails
in it.  Yesterday, when I would click on details of a message in the
queue, it would say "host unreachable".  It was weird because I could
email out to a colleges domain and a yahoo account, but not a hotmail or
aol account.  This morning, I noticed the hotmail emails finally went out
after hours of sitting in the queue.  Apparently, all the emails willgo
out, but it takes 1 - 3 hours.  Looking in event viewer, the only error
that appears to be applicable is an IMC error under application.  The
error message is event ID 4132, Technet shows that exact event and error
message and suggests incorrect information in the Routing Address tab of
the Connected Sites property page of the Interent Mail Connector.  I
checked and all the information is correct.  DNS is working properly.  Any
suggestion of theories would be helpful and appreciated.
Thanks, 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Strange problem

[Bill Nosie]

I may have come up with a solution to this.  I have been experiencing the
same problem sending to other Exchange servers.  Another problem I hav
seen is Protocol Error NDR's that contain an error similar to "Polite
people say HELO first."

These errors are usually when sending to non-Exchange servers.  The errors
are because the default protocol Exchange uses is ESMTP, which tries to
initiate a session with the remote server with EHLO, not the SMTP standard
HELO.  I disabled outbound ESMTP and both the Protocol Errors and the Host
Unreachable errors went away.

Details on disabling this can be found in TechNet article Q194132
"Disabling Outbound ESMTP."

ESMTP should be backward-compatable with SMTP, but this doesn't appear to
be the case in all instances.  I believe this to be a bug.



> I have been scratching my head on this one for a few days now.  I am having
> a problem sending internet email.  But here's the real kicker, I am only
> having problems sending to one domain.  I have not made any changes to my
> server, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4 SP6a.  I know that the company that I am
> trying to send message to has just recently put there server behind a
> firewall.  Wait it gets even stranger, I can telnet to there server and it
> does respond properly.  When I try and send them a message I get Host
> Unreachable.  Do any of you have any ideas for me?
> 
> Thanks,
> Blake Fowkes
> Waid and Associates

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Strange Outlook behaviour

[Simon Sculthorp]

Title: Strange Outlook behaviour





Our infrastructure = Exchange 5.5, SP4, NT4 SP6a, TCPIP.
Client = OL2002 with August 16th update using HTML format


Don't laugh, but has anybody come across an anomaly where part of the text of a message has changed colour by the time it reaches the recipient?  It has also reported that recipients have observed characters that move i.e. the first character of a word will be tagged on to the previous character. I'd be grateful for any pointers.




Attachments in this message have been swept
by NAIs TVD (version 4.0.4164) for the presence
of known computer viruses.
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




_
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[Don Ely]

Is this internal mail or external?  Anything strange happen to the mail
server lately?

-Original Message-
From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Strange occurrance


Hello!

I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was delivered to a small
lists of recipients.

How could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered. 

I know the deferred mail option is one.  but i don't think anyone would
push the delivery date that far into the future.

Let's play Stump the Exchange mavens.

Good luck!

Joseph Ambrose
System and Network Manager
The Conference Board
P: 001-212-339-0443
F: 001-212-836-3802
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[STEVE BROOK]

Is that internal e-mail or external? The presumption is internal as you say
re-delivered
SB

-Original Message-
From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Strange occurrance


Hello!

I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was delivered to a small
lists of recipients.

How could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered. 

I know the deferred mail option is one.  but i don't think anyone would
push the delivery date that far into the future.

Let's play Stump the Exchange mavens.

Good luck!

Joseph Ambrose
System and Network Manager
The Conference Board
P: 001-212-339-0443
F: 001-212-836-3802
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[Klaren, Bart]

I think the system time of the senders computer could be a little bit
off-time.

Regards,

Bart.

-Original Message-
From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: donderdag 18 oktober 2001 16:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Strange occurrance


Hello!

I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was delivered to a
small lists of recipients.

How could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered. 

I know the deferred mail option is one.  but i don't think anyone
would push the delivery date that far into the future.

Let's play Stump the Exchange mavens.

Good luck!

Joseph Ambrose
System and Network Manager
The Conference Board
P: 001-212-339-0443
F: 001-212-836-3802
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[Joseph Ambrose]

Maybe, but 6 MONTHS??


> I think the system time of the senders computer could be a little bit
> off-time.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Bart.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: donderdag 18 oktober 2001 16:05
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Strange occurrance
> 
> 
> Hello!
> 
> I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was delivered to a
> small lists of recipients.
> 
> How could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered. 
> 
> I know the deferred mail option is one.  but i don't think anyone
> would push the delivery date that far into the future.
> 
> Let's play Stump the Exchange mavens.
> 
> Good luck!
> 
> Joseph Ambrose
> System and Network Manager
> The Conference Board
> P: 001-212-339-0443
> F: 001-212-836-3802
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[Joseph Ambrose]

Don,

It appears to be an email sent FROM us to a combination of internal and
external recipients.

No, nothing unusual has happened to our Exchange server lately.



> Is this internal mail or external?  Anything strange happen to the mail
> server lately?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:05 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Strange occurrance
> 
> 
> Hello!
> 
> I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was delivered to a small
> lists of recipients.
> 
> How could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered. 
> 
> I know the deferred mail option is one.  but i don't think anyone would
> push the delivery date that far into the future.
> 
> Let's play Stump the Exchange mavens.
> 
> Good luck!
> 
> Joseph Ambrose
> System and Network Manager
> The Conference Board
> P: 001-212-339-0443
> F: 001-212-836-3802
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[Don Ely]

Let's get back to the real questions...

Email from internal or external users?

-Original Message-
From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange occurrance


Maybe, but 6 MONTHS??


> I think the system time of the senders computer could be a little bit 
> off-time.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Bart.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: donderdag 18 oktober 2001 16:05
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Strange occurrance
> 
> 
> Hello!
> 
> I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was delivered to a 
> small lists of recipients.
> 
> How could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered.
> 
> I know the deferred mail option is one.  but i don't think anyone 
> would push the delivery date that far into the future.
> 
> Let's play Stump the Exchange mavens.
> 
> Good luck!
> 
> Joseph Ambrose
> System and Network Manager
> The Conference Board
> P: 001-212-339-0443
> F: 001-212-836-3802
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at: 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[Klaren, Bart]

Maybe the Windows time was incorrectly set.
I have also seen a faultive systemclock (hardware) which was running way to
fast.

Bart.


-Original Message-
From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: donderdag 18 oktober 2001 16:32
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange occurrance


Maybe, but 6 MONTHS??


> I think the system time of the senders computer could be a little bit
> off-time.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Bart.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: donderdag 18 oktober 2001 16:05
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Strange occurrance
> 
> 
> Hello!
> 
> I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was delivered to a
> small lists of recipients.
> 
> How could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered. 
> 
> I know the deferred mail option is one.  but i don't think anyone
> would push the delivery date that far into the future.
> 
> Let's play Stump the Exchange mavens.
> 
> Good luck!
> 
> Joseph Ambrose
> System and Network Manager
> The Conference Board
> P: 001-212-339-0443
> F: 001-212-836-3802
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[Stuart Tonge]

I had a user the other day who's sys clock was set at 2092.. 

But doesn't the exchange server timestamp the mail with it's own sys time?

-Original Message-
From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 October 2001 15:32
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange occurrance


Maybe, but 6 MONTHS??


> I think the system time of the senders computer could be a little bit
> off-time.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Bart.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: donderdag 18 oktober 2001 16:05
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Strange occurrance
> 
> 
> Hello!
> 
> I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was delivered to a
> small lists of recipients.
> 
> How could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered. 
> 
> I know the deferred mail option is one.  but i don't think anyone
> would push the delivery date that far into the future.
> 
> Let's play Stump the Exchange mavens.
> 
> Good luck!
> 
> Joseph Ambrose
> System and Network Manager
> The Conference Board
> P: 001-212-339-0443
> F: 001-212-836-3802
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


**

Website - WWW.COOP.CO.UK


This  document should only be read by those persons to whom it is addressed and is not 
intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent written confirmation of 
its contents.   Accordingly,  United Co-op disclaims all responsibility and accept no 
liability (including  in negligence) for the consequences for any person acting, or 
refraining from acting, on such information prior to the receipt by those persons of 
subsequent written confirmation.
If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us immediately by 
telephone. Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer.
Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, 
distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited.


**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[Don Ely]

Hang tight Joe, I gotta wake my brain up for that one.  I've seen it before,
but need to remember what it was.

-Original Message-
From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange occurrance


Don,

It appears to be an email sent FROM us to a combination of internal and
external recipients.

No, nothing unusual has happened to our Exchange server lately.



> Is this internal mail or external?  Anything strange happen to the 
> mail server lately?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:05 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Strange occurrance
> 
> 
> Hello!
> 
> I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was delivered to a 
> small lists of recipients.
> 
> How could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered.
> 
> I know the deferred mail option is one.  but i don't think anyone 
> would push the delivery date that far into the future.
> 
> Let's play Stump the Exchange mavens.
> 
> Good luck!
> 
> Joseph Ambrose
> System and Network Manager
> The Conference Board
> P: 001-212-339-0443
> F: 001-212-836-3802
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at: 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[Joseph Ambrose]

Don,

All good things come to he who waits..

User told me the email went out 4 times.


> Hang tight Joe, I gotta wake my brain up for that one.  I've seen it before,
> but need to remember what it was.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:31 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Strange occurrance
> 
> 
> Don,
> 
> It appears to be an email sent FROM us to a combination of internal and
> external recipients.
> 
> No, nothing unusual has happened to our Exchange server lately.
> 
> 
> 
> > Is this internal mail or external?  Anything strange happen to the 
> > mail server lately?
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:05 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Strange occurrance
> > 
> > 
> > Hello!
> > 
> > I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was delivered to a
> > small lists of recipients.
> > 
> > How could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered.
> > 
> > I know the deferred mail option is one.  but i don't think anyone
> > would push the delivery date that far into the future.
> > 
> > Let's play Stump the Exchange mavens.
> > 
> > Good luck!
> > 
> > Joseph Ambrose
> > System and Network Manager
> > The Conference Board
> > P: 001-212-339-0443
> > F: 001-212-836-3802
> > E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at: 
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[Eugene Pesochin]

Title: RE: Strange occurrance





Did you run any utilities lately?


Eugene Pesochin
Systems Manager
ClubMom, Inc.
200 Madison Ave. 6th Fl
New York, New York 10016
tel    646.435.6565
fax    646.435.6600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
www.clubmom.com
 


-Original Message-
From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange occurrance


Don,


All good things come to he who waits..


User told me the email went out 4 times.



> Hang tight Joe, I gotta wake my brain up for that one.  I've seen it before,
> but need to remember what it was.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:31 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Strange occurrance
> 
> 
> Don,
> 
> It appears to be an email sent FROM us to a combination of internal and
> external recipients.
> 
> No, nothing unusual has happened to our Exchange server lately.
> 
> 
> 
> > Is this internal mail or external?  Anything strange happen to the 
> > mail server lately?
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:05 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Strange occurrance
> > 
> > 
> > Hello!
> > 
> > I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was delivered to a
> > small lists of recipients.
> > 
> > How could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered.
> > 
> > I know the deferred mail option is one.  but i don't think anyone
> > would push the delivery date that far into the future.
> > 
> > Let's play Stump the Exchange mavens.
> > 
> > Good luck!
> > 
> > Joseph Ambrose
> > System and Network Manager
> > The Conference Board
> > P: 001-212-339-0443
> > F: 001-212-836-3802
> > E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at: 
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[Joseph Ambrose]

No.

Don, Are you still thinking? 


> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
> this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
> 
> --_=_NextPart_001_01C158C7.620119A0
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> Did you run any utilities lately?
> 
> Eugene Pesochin
> Systems Manager
> ClubMom, Inc.
> 200 Madison Ave. 6th Fl
> New York, New York 10016
> tel646.435.6565
> fax646.435.6600
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> www.clubmom.com
>  
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:40 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Strange occurrance
> 
> Don,
> 
> All good things come to he who waits..
> 
> User told me the email went out 4 times.
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Strange occurrance

[Joseph Ambrose]

Anybody gonna try this one? 

I haven't heard anything in about a week.


> Hello!
> 
> I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was delivered to a
> small lists of recipients.
> 
> How could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered. 
> 
> I know the deferred mail option is one.  but i don't think anyone
> would push the delivery date that far into the future.
> 
> Let's play Stump the Exchange mavens.
> 
> Good luck!
> 
> Joseph Ambrose
> System and Network Manager
> The Conference Board
> P: 001-212-339-0443
> F: 001-212-836-3802
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[STEVE BROOK]

Get a copy of the mail and check the header information ??
Maybe someone is living in the past - or future

SB

-Original Message-
From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Strange occurrance

Anybody gonna try this one? 

I haven't heard anything in about a week.


> Hello!
> 
> I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was delivered to a
> small lists of recipients.
> 
> How could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered. 
> 
> I know the deferred mail option is one.  but i don't think anyone
> would push the delivery date that far into the future.
> 
> Let's play Stump the Exchange mavens.
> 
> Good luck!
> 
> Joseph Ambrose
> System and Network Manager
> The Conference Board
> P: 001-212-339-0443
> F: 001-212-836-3802
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[Briggs, Bruce]

1)  The e-mail client provides the date that the e-mail was generated.
Perhaps the client has a 6 month out of date Time/Date.

2) perhaps the e-mail was stuck in some SMTP servers pending or problem
queue and some server admin recently found it and moved it to an active
queue, which sent then it out.

-Original Message-
From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Strange occurrance


Anybody gonna try this one? 

I haven't heard anything in about a week.


> Hello!
> 
> I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was delivered to a
> small lists of recipients.
> 
> How could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered. 
> 
> I know the deferred mail option is one.  but i don't think anyone
> would push the delivery date that far into the future.
> 
> Let's play Stump the Exchange mavens.
> 
> Good luck!
> 
> Joseph Ambrose
> System and Network Manager
> The Conference Board
> P: 001-212-339-0443
> F: 001-212-836-3802
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[RZorz]

Title: RE: Strange occurrance





Was it sent by an inhouse employee?  Maybe someone had it in their sent, deleted, or whatever folder and copied it to their outbox by mistake.


-Original Message-
From: Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Strange occurrance



Anybody gonna try this one? 


I haven't heard anything in about a week.



> Hello!
> 
> I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was delivered to a
> small lists of recipients.
> 
> How could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered. 
> 
> I know the deferred mail option is one.  but i don't think anyone
> would push the delivery date that far into the future.
> 
> Let's play Stump the Exchange mavens.
> 
> Good luck!
> 
> Joseph Ambrose
> System and Network Manager
> The Conference Board
> P: 001-212-339-0443
> F: 001-212-836-3802
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrence

[Ellery July]

If the exchange server date and time are or is the email was created on one
date and sent out on another .

ellery

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[Ellery July]

Title: RE: Strange occurrance



Which 
will be more stable Don or XP is my question? 

  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 
  11:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
  occurrance
  It 
  is likely an unusual circumstance.  Now if you get repeats of this event, 
  then a closer look would be warranted.
   
  Speaking of unusual events, Microsoft releases XP on Don Ely's 
  birthday.  Coincidence?
   
  William
   
  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 
  2001 8:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Strange occurrance
  Was it sent by an inhouse employee?  Maybe someone had it 
  in their sent, deleted, or whatever folder and copied it to their outbox by 
  mistake.
  -Original Message- From: 
  Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: 
  Strange occurrance 
  Anybody gonna try this one? 
  I haven't heard anything in about a week. 
  > Hello! > > I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was delivered 
  to a > small lists of recipients. > > How could an email 6 months+ old be 
  re-delivered. > > I know 
  the deferred mail option is one.  but i don't think anyone 
  > would push the delivery date that far into the 
  future. > > Let's play 
  Stump the Exchange mavens. > 
  > Good luck! > 
  > Joseph Ambrose > 
  System and Network Manager > The Conference 
  Board > P: 001-212-339-0443 > F: 001-212-836-3802 > E: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Visit our Award 
  Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org List Charter and 
  FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[Lefkovics, William]

Title: RE: Strange occurrance



It is 
likely an unusual circumstance.  Now if you get repeats of this event, then 
a closer look would be warranted.
 
Speaking of unusual events, Microsoft releases XP on Don Ely's 
birthday.  Coincidence?
 
William
 
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 
8:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
occurrance
Was it sent by an inhouse employee?  Maybe someone had it 
in their sent, deleted, or whatever folder and copied it to their outbox by 
mistake.
-Original Message- From: Joseph 
Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Strange 
occurrance 
Anybody gonna try this one? 
I haven't heard anything in about a week. 
> Hello! > > I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was delivered to 
a > small lists of recipients. > > How could an email 6 months+ old be 
re-delivered. > > I know 
the deferred mail option is one.  but i don't think anyone 
> would push the delivery date that far into the 
future. > > Let's play 
Stump the Exchange mavens. > > Good luck! > > 
Joseph Ambrose > System and Network Manager 
> The Conference Board > P: 
001-212-339-0443 > F: 001-212-836-3802 
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  
www.conference-board.org 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[RZorz]

Title: RE: Strange occurrance



That 
easy.  DOS.
 
-Original Message-From: Ellery July 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:48 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
occurrance
Which 
will be more stable Don or XP is my question? 

  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 
  11:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
  occurrance
  It 
  is likely an unusual circumstance.  Now if you get repeats of this event, 
  then a closer look would be warranted.
   
  Speaking of unusual events, Microsoft releases XP on Don Ely's 
  birthday.  Coincidence?
   
  William
   
  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 
  2001 8:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Strange occurrance
  Was it sent by an inhouse employee?  Maybe someone had it 
  in their sent, deleted, or whatever folder and copied it to their outbox by 
  mistake.
  -Original Message- From: 
  Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: 
  Strange occurrance 
  Anybody gonna try this one? 
  I haven't heard anything in about a week. 
  > Hello! > > I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was delivered 
  to a > small lists of recipients. > > How could an email 6 months+ old be 
  re-delivered. > > I know 
  the deferred mail option is one.  but i don't think anyone 
  > would push the delivery date that far into the 
  future. > > Let's play 
  Stump the Exchange mavens. > 
  > Good luck! > 
  > Joseph Ambrose > 
  System and Network Manager > The Conference 
  Board > P: 001-212-339-0443 > F: 001-212-836-3802 > E: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Visit our Award 
  Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org List Charter and 
  FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[Martin Blackstone]

Title: Message




XP will be easier 
on lUsers, but computer experts will enjoy working with 
Don

  -Original Message-From: Ellery July 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:48 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
  occurrance
  Which will be more stable Don or XP is my question? 

  
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 
2001 11:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Strange occurrance
It 
is likely an unusual circumstance.  Now if you get repeats of this 
event, then a closer look would be warranted.
 
Speaking of unusual events, Microsoft releases XP on Don Ely's 
birthday.  Coincidence?
 
William
 
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 
2001 8:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Strange occurrance
Was it sent by an inhouse employee?  Maybe someone had 
it in their sent, deleted, or whatever folder and copied it to their outbox 
by mistake.
-Original Message- From: 
Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: 
Strange occurrance 
Anybody gonna try this one? 
I haven't heard anything in about a week. 
> Hello! > > I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was 
delivered to a > small lists of 
recipients. > > How 
could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered. > 
> I know the deferred mail option is 
one.  but i don't think anyone > would 
push the delivery date that far into the future. > > Let's play Stump the Exchange 
mavens. > > 
Good luck! > > Joseph 
Ambrose > System and Network Manager 
> The Conference Board > P: 
001-212-339-0443 > F: 001-212-836-3802 
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  
www.conference-board.org List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: Strange occurrance



TRS-DOS, IBM-DOS, MS-DOS, DR-DOS, MULTI-DOS?
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen, 
Best Regards, Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator 

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 
  2001 1:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Strange occurrance
  That 
  easy.  DOS.
   
  -Original Message-From: Ellery July 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:48 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
  occurrance
  Which will be more stable Don or XP is my question? 

  
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 
2001 11:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Strange occurrance
It 
is likely an unusual circumstance.  Now if you get repeats of this 
event, then a closer look would be warranted.
 
Speaking of unusual events, Microsoft releases XP on Don Ely's 
birthday.  Coincidence?
 
William
 
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 
2001 8:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Strange occurrance
Was it sent by an inhouse employee?  Maybe someone had 
it in their sent, deleted, or whatever folder and copied it to their outbox 
by mistake.
-Original Message- From: 
Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: 
Strange occurrance 
Anybody gonna try this one? 
I haven't heard anything in about a week. 
> Hello! > > I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was 
delivered to a > small lists of 
recipients. > > How 
could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered. > 
> I know the deferred mail option is 
one.  but i don't think anyone > would 
push the delivery date that far into the future. > > Let's play Stump the Exchange 
mavens. > > 
Good luck! > > Joseph 
Ambrose > System and Network Manager 
> The Conference Board > P: 
001-212-339-0443 > F: 001-212-836-3802 
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  
www.conference-board.org List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[RZorz]

Title: RE: Strange occurrance



Yes.
 
-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence 
Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
Thursday, October 25, 2001 10:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Strange occurrance
TRS-DOS, IBM-DOS, MS-DOS, DR-DOS, MULTI-DOS?
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen, 
Best Regards, Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator 

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 
  2001 1:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Strange occurrance
  That 
  easy.  DOS.
   
  -Original Message-From: Ellery July 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:48 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
  occurrance
  Which will be more stable Don or XP is my question? 

  
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 
2001 11:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Strange occurrance
It 
is likely an unusual circumstance.  Now if you get repeats of this 
event, then a closer look would be warranted.
 
Speaking of unusual events, Microsoft releases XP on Don Ely's 
birthday.  Coincidence?
 
William
 
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 
2001 8:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Strange occurrance
Was it sent by an inhouse employee?  Maybe someone had 
it in their sent, deleted, or whatever folder and copied it to their outbox 
by mistake.
-Original Message- From: 
Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: 
Strange occurrance 
Anybody gonna try this one? 
I haven't heard anything in about a week. 
> Hello! > > I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was 
delivered to a > small lists of 
recipients. > > How 
could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered. > 
> I know the deferred mail option is 
one.  but i don't think anyone > would 
push the delivery date that far into the future. > > Let's play Stump the Exchange 
mavens. > > 
Good luck! > > Joseph 
Ambrose > System and Network Manager 
> The Conference Board > P: 
001-212-339-0443 > F: 001-212-836-3802 
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  
www.conference-board.org List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange problem

[Lefkovics, William]

Title: Strange problem



Can 
you see their MX record ok?
 
William
 
-Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:56 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Strange 
problem
I have been scratching my head on this one for a few 
days now.  I am having a problem sending internet email.  But here's 
the real kicker, I am only having problems sending to one domain.  I have 
not made any changes to my server, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4 SP6a.  I know 
that the company that I am trying to send message to has just recently put there 
server behind a firewall.  Wait it gets even stranger, I can telnet to 
there server and it does respond properly.  When I try and send them a 
message I get Host Unreachable.  Do any of you have any ideas for 
me?
Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange problem

[Blake R. Fowkes]

Title: Strange problem



Yes.
 
C:\>nslookup x.xx.xxxServer:  
Address:  xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
 
Non-authoritative answer:Name:    
x.xx.xxxAddress:  xx.xxx.xxx.xxx

  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 
  2001 5:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Strange problem
  Can 
  you see their MX record ok?
   
  William
   
  -Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:56 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Strange 
  problem
  I have been scratching my head on this one for a 
  few days now.  I am having a problem sending internet email.  But 
  here's the real kicker, I am only having problems sending to one domain.  
  I have not made any changes to my server, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4 SP6a.  I 
  know that the company that I am trying to send message to has just recently 
  put there server behind a firewall.  Wait it gets even stranger, I can 
  telnet to there server and it does respond properly.  When I try and send 
  them a message I get Host Unreachable.  Do any of you have any ideas for 
  me?
  Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange problem

[Simon Taylor]

Title: Message



try 
c:\>nslookup q=mx domain.com
this 
should give you their smtp relays then telnet into the highest priority one 
(lowest un) on port 25 - if this all works then turn logging on to full on the 
IMS and watch the logs when it tries to send - you should get something you can 
use..
Cheers
Simon

  
  -Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 November 2001 
  05:46To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
  problem
  Yes.
   
  C:\>nslookup x.xx.xxxServer:  
  Address:  xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
   
  Non-authoritative answer:Name:    
  x.xx.xxxAddress:  xx.xxx.xxx.xxx
  
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 
2001 5:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Strange problem
Can you see their MX record ok?
 
William
 
-Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:56 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Strange 
problem
I have been scratching my head on this one for a 
few days now.  I am having a problem sending internet email.  But 
here's the real kicker, I am only having problems sending to one 
domain.  I have not made any changes to my server, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 
4 SP6a.  I know that the company that I am trying to send message to 
has just recently put there server behind a firewall.  Wait it gets 
even stranger, I can telnet to there server and it does respond 
properly.  When I try and send them a message I get Host 
Unreachable.  Do any of you have any ideas for me?
Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange problem

[Blake R. Fowkes]

Title: Message



Yup 
that worked as well.
 
C:\>nslookup -q=mx swrinc.comServer:  
ns1.sprintlink.netAddress:  204.117.214.10
 
swrinc.com  MX preference = 10, mail 
exchanger = 
dogbert.swrinc.comdogbert.swrinc.com  internet 
address = 63.170.243.210
I know 
someone is going to say something about sending out the real address.  Well 
at this point I dont care any more.
 
I am 
able to telnet to their server as well.
 
Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 

  -Original Message-From: Simon Taylor 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 6:09 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
  problem
  whoops.. too early for me coffee hasn't kicked in 
  yet
  you 
  will have more luck with
  nslookup -q=mx domain.com.
  

-Original Message-From: Simon Taylor 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 November 2001 
11:45To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
problem
try c:\>nslookup q=mx domain.com
this should give you their smtp relays then telnet into the highest 
priority one (lowest un) on port 25 - if this all works then turn logging on 
to full on the IMS and watch the logs when it tries to send - you should get 
something you can use..
Cheers
Simon

  
  -Original Message-From: Blake R. 
  Fowkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 November 2001 
  05:46To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Strange problem
  Yes.
   
  C:\>nslookup x.xx.xxxServer:  
  Address:  xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
   
  Non-authoritative answer:Name:    
  x.xx.xxxAddress:  xx.xxx.xxx.xxx
  
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 
31, 2001 5:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Strange problem
Can you see their MX record ok?
 
William
 
-Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 
12:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
    Strange problem
I have been scratching my head on this one 
for a few days now.  I am having a problem sending internet 
email.  But here's the real kicker, I am only having problems 
sending to one domain.  I have not made any changes to my server, 
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4 SP6a.  I know that the company that I am 
trying to send message to has just recently put there server behind a 
firewall.  Wait it gets even stranger, I can telnet to there server 
and it does respond properly.  When I try and send them a message I 
get Host Unreachable.  Do any of you have any ideas for 
me?
Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and 
Associates List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange problem

[Richard McMahon]

Title: Message



Could 
you have been black holed?

  -Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:09 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
  problem
  Yup 
  that worked as well.
   
  C:\>nslookup -q=mx swrinc.comServer:  
  ns1.sprintlink.netAddress:  204.117.214.10
   
  swrinc.com  MX preference = 10, mail 
  exchanger = 
  dogbert.swrinc.comdogbert.swrinc.com  
  internet address = 63.170.243.210
  I 
  know someone is going to say something about sending out the real 
  address.  Well at this point I dont care any more.
   
  I am 
  able to telnet to their server as well.
   
  Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 
  
  
-Original Message-From: Simon Taylor 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 6:09 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
problem
whoops.. too early for me coffee hasn't kicked in 
yet
you will have more luck with
nslookup -q=mx domain.com.

  
  -Original Message-From: Simon Taylor 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 November 2001 
  11:45To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Strange problem
  try c:\>nslookup q=mx domain.com
  this should give you their smtp relays then telnet into the highest 
  priority one (lowest un) on port 25 - if this all works then turn logging 
  on to full on the IMS and watch the logs when it tries to send - you 
  should get something you can use..
  Cheers
  Simon
  

-Original Message-From: Blake R. 
Fowkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 November 2001 
05:46To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Strange problem
Yes.
 
C:\>nslookup x.xx.xxxServer:  
Address:  xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
 
Non-authoritative answer:Name:    
x.xx.xxxAddress:  xx.xxx.xxx.xxx

  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 
  31, 2001 5:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Strange problem
  Can you see their MX record ok?
   
  William
   
  -Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 
  12:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
      Strange problem
  I have been scratching my head on this one 
  for a few days now.  I am having a problem sending internet 
  email.  But here's the real kicker, I am only having problems 
  sending to one domain.  I have not made any changes to my server, 
  Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4 SP6a.  I know that the company that I am 
  trying to send message to has just recently put there server behind a 
  firewall.  Wait it gets even stranger, I can telnet to there 
  server and it does respond properly.  When I try and send them a 
  message I get Host Unreachable.  Do any of you have any ideas for 
  me?
  Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and 
  Associates 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange problem

[Blake R. Fowkes]

Title: Message



How do 
I check that?
 
Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 

  -Original Message-From: Richard McMahon 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 
  2001 7:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Strange problem
  Could you have been black holed?
  
-Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:09 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
problem
Yup that worked as well.
 
C:\>nslookup -q=mx swrinc.comServer:  
ns1.sprintlink.netAddress:  204.117.214.10
 
swrinc.com  MX preference = 10, mail 
exchanger = 
dogbert.swrinc.comdogbert.swrinc.com  
internet address = 63.170.243.210
I 
know someone is going to say something about sending out the real 
address.  Well at this point I dont care any more.
 
I 
am able to telnet to their server as well.
 
Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 


  -Original Message-From: Simon Taylor 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 
  6:09 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
      Strange problem
  whoops.. too early for me coffee hasn't kicked in 
  yet
  you will have more luck with
  nslookup -q=mx domain.com.
  

-Original Message-From: Simon 
Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 November 2001 
11:45To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
    Strange problem
try c:\>nslookup q=mx domain.com
this should give you their smtp relays then telnet into the 
highest priority one (lowest un) on port 25 - if this all works then 
turn logging on to full on the IMS and watch the logs when it tries to 
send - you should get something you can use..
Cheers
Simon

  
  -Original Message-From: Blake R. 
  Fowkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 November 2001 
  05:46To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Strange problem
  Yes.
   
  C:\>nslookup x.xx.xxxServer:  
  Address:  xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
   
  Non-authoritative answer:Name:    
  x.xx.xxxAddress:  xx.xxx.xxx.xxx
  
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 
October 31, 2001 5:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Strange problem
Can you see their MX record ok?
 
William
 
-Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 
2001 12:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: Strange problem
I have been scratching my head on this 
one for a few days now.  I am having a problem sending internet 
email.  But here's the real kicker, I am only having problems 
sending to one domain.  I have not made any changes to my 
server, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4 SP6a.  I know that the company 
that I am trying to send message to has just recently put there 
server behind a firewall.  Wait it gets even stranger, I can 
telnet to there server and it does respond properly.  When I 
try and send them a message I get Host Unreachable.  Do any of 
you have any ideas for me?
Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and 
Associates 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange problem

[Richard McMahon]

Title: Message



Give 
the following url a try.
 
http://mail-abuse.org/rbl/
 
Link 
may wrap...
 
Hope 
this helps
 
Richard

  -Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:40 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
  problem
  How 
  do I check that?
   
  Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 
  
  
-Original Message-From: Richard McMahon 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 
01, 2001 7:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Strange problem
Could you have been black holed?

  -Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:09 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
  problem
  Yup that worked as well.
   
  C:\>nslookup -q=mx swrinc.comServer:  
  ns1.sprintlink.netAddress:  204.117.214.10
   
  swrinc.com  MX preference = 10, mail 
  exchanger = 
  dogbert.swrinc.comdogbert.swrinc.com  
  internet address = 63.170.243.210
  I know someone is going to say something about sending out the real 
  address.  Well at this point I dont care any 
more.
   
  I am able to telnet to their server as well.
   
  Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and 
  Associates 
  
-Original Message-From: Simon Taylor 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 
6:09 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
    Strange problem
whoops.. too early for me coffee hasn't kicked in 
yet
you will have more luck with
nslookup -q=mx domain.com.

  
  -Original Message-From: Simon 
  Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 November 2001 
  11:45To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
      Strange problem
  try c:\>nslookup q=mx domain.com
  this should give you their smtp relays then telnet into the 
  highest priority one (lowest un) on port 25 - if this all works then 
  turn logging on to full on the IMS and watch the logs when it tries to 
  send - you should get something you can use..
  Cheers
  Simon
  

-Original Message-From: Blake 
R. Fowkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 November 
2001 05:46To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
    RE: Strange problem
Yes.
 
C:\>nslookup x.xx.xxxServer:  
Address:  xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
 
Non-authoritative answer:Name:    
x.xx.xxxAddress:  
xx.xxx.xxx.xxx

  -Original Message-From: 
  Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 
  October 31, 2001 5:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Strange problem
  Can you see their MX record ok?
   
  William
   
  -Original Message-From: 
  Blake R. Fowkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: Strange 
  problem
  I have been scratching my head on this 
  one for a few days now.  I am having a problem sending 
  internet email.  But here's the real kicker, I am only having 
  problems sending to one domain.  I have not made any changes 
  to my server, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4 SP6a.  I know that the 
  company that I am trying to send message to has just recently put 
  there server behind a firewall.  Wait it gets even stranger, 
  I can telnet to there server and it does respond properly.  
  When I try and send them a message I get Host Unreachable.  
  Do any of you have any ideas for me?
  Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and 
  Associates 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.h

RE: Strange problem

[Simon Taylor]

Title: Message



go to 
http://relays.osirusoft.com/cgi-bin/rbcheck.cgi
I have 
checked waid.com and they are not blacklisted - try the logging or have a look 
in MS KB for the manual smtp commands and try sending a test through the telnet 
terminal to their postmaster.

  
  -Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 November 2001 
  13:40To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
  problem
  How 
  do I check that?
   
  Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 
  
  
-Original Message-From: Richard McMahon 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 
01, 2001 7:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Strange problem
Could you have been black holed?

  -Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:09 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
  problem
  Yup that worked as well.
   
  C:\>nslookup -q=mx swrinc.comServer:  
  ns1.sprintlink.netAddress:  204.117.214.10
   
  swrinc.com  MX preference = 10, mail 
  exchanger = 
  dogbert.swrinc.comdogbert.swrinc.com  
  internet address = 63.170.243.210
  I know someone is going to say something about sending out the real 
  address.  Well at this point I dont care any 
more.
   
  I am able to telnet to their server as well.
   
  Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and 
  Associates 
  
-Original Message-From: Simon Taylor 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 
6:09 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
    Strange problem
whoops.. too early for me coffee hasn't kicked in 
yet
you will have more luck with
nslookup -q=mx domain.com.

  
  -Original Message-From: Simon 
  Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 November 2001 
  11:45To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
      Strange problem
  try c:\>nslookup q=mx domain.com
  this should give you their smtp relays then telnet into the 
  highest priority one (lowest un) on port 25 - if this all works then 
  turn logging on to full on the IMS and watch the logs when it tries to 
  send - you should get something you can use..
  Cheers
  Simon
  

-Original Message-From: Blake 
R. Fowkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 November 
2001 05:46To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
    RE: Strange problem
Yes.
 
C:\>nslookup x.xx.xxxServer:  
Address:  xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
 
Non-authoritative answer:Name:    
x.xx.xxxAddress:  
xx.xxx.xxx.xxx

  -Original Message-From: 
  Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 
  October 31, 2001 5:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Strange problem
  Can you see their MX record ok?
   
  William
   
  -Original Message-From: 
  Blake R. Fowkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: Strange 
  problem
  I have been scratching my head on this 
  one for a few days now.  I am having a problem sending 
  internet email.  But here's the real kicker, I am only having 
  problems sending to one domain.  I have not made any changes 
  to my server, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4 SP6a.  I know that the 
  company that I am trying to send message to has just recently put 
  there server behind a firewall.  Wait it gets even stranger, 
  I can telnet to there server and it does respond properly.  
  When I try and send them a message I get Host Unreachable.  
  Do any of you have any ideas for me?
  Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and 
  Associates 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at

RE: Strange problem

[Boswell Tim]

Title: Message



orbz.com

  -Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 01 November 2001 13:40To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
  problem
  How 
  do I check that?
   
  Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 
  
  
-Original Message-From: Richard McMahon 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 
01, 2001 7:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Strange problem
Could you have been black holed?

  -Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:09 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
  problem
  Yup that worked as well.
   
  C:\>nslookup -q=mx swrinc.comServer:  
  ns1.sprintlink.netAddress:  204.117.214.10
   
  swrinc.com  MX preference = 10, mail 
  exchanger = 
  dogbert.swrinc.comdogbert.swrinc.com  
  internet address = 63.170.243.210
  I know someone is going to say something about sending out the real 
  address.  Well at this point I dont care any 
more.
   
  I am able to telnet to their server as well.
   
  Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and 
  Associates 
  
-Original Message-From: Simon Taylor 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 
6:09 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
    Strange problem
whoops.. too early for me coffee hasn't kicked in 
yet
you will have more luck with
nslookup -q=mx domain.com.

  
  -Original Message-From: Simon 
  Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 November 2001 
  11:45To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
      Strange problem
  try c:\>nslookup q=mx domain.com
  this should give you their smtp relays then telnet into the 
  highest priority one (lowest un) on port 25 - if this all works then 
  turn logging on to full on the IMS and watch the logs when it tries to 
  send - you should get something you can use..
  Cheers
  Simon
  

-Original Message-From: Blake 
R. Fowkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 November 
2001 05:46To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
    RE: Strange problem
Yes.
 
C:\>nslookup x.xx.xxxServer:  
Address:  xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
 
Non-authoritative answer:Name:    
x.xx.xxxAddress:  
xx.xxx.xxx.xxx

  -Original Message-From: 
  Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 
  October 31, 2001 5:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Strange problem
  Can you see their MX record ok?
   
  William
   
  -Original Message-From: 
  Blake R. Fowkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: Strange 
  problem
  I have been scratching my head on this 
  one for a few days now.  I am having a problem sending 
  internet email.  But here's the real kicker, I am only having 
  problems sending to one domain.  I have not made any changes 
  to my server, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4 SP6a.  I know that the 
  company that I am trying to send message to has just recently put 
  there server behind a firewall.  Wait it gets even stranger, 
  I can telnet to there server and it does respond properly.  
  When I try and send them a message I get Host Unreachable.  
  Do any of you have any ideas for me?
  Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and 
  Associates 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange problem

[msharik]

Title: Message



>I am able to 
telnet to their server as well.
 
Were you able to complete 
an SMTP session?  or merely connect?
 
-MichèleImmigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our 
new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley 
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk 
- "If there 
really is a God who created the entire universe with all of its glories, and He 
decides to deliver a message to humanity, He WILL NOT use, as His messenger, a 
person on cable TV with a bad hairstyle." - Dave Barry 
- 
-Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 8:09 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
problem
Yup 
that worked as well.
 
C:\>nslookup -q=mx swrinc.comServer:  
ns1.sprintlink.netAddress:  204.117.214.10
 
swrinc.com  MX preference = 10, mail 
exchanger = 
dogbert.swrinc.comdogbert.swrinc.com  internet 
address = 63.170.243.210
I know 
someone is going to say something about sending out the real address.  Well 
at this point I dont care any more.
 
I am 
able to telnet to their server as well.
 
Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 

  -Original Message-From: Simon Taylor 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 6:09 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
  problem
  whoops.. too early for me coffee hasn't kicked in 
  yet
  you 
  will have more luck with
  nslookup -q=mx domain.com.
  

-Original Message-From: Simon Taylor 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 November 2001 
11:45To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
problem
try c:\>nslookup q=mx domain.com
this should give you their smtp relays then telnet into the highest 
priority one (lowest un) on port 25 - if this all works then turn logging on 
to full on the IMS and watch the logs when it tries to send - you should get 
something you can use..
Cheers
Simon

  
  -Original Message-From: Blake R. 
  Fowkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 November 2001 
  05:46To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Strange problem
  Yes.
   
  C:\>nslookup x.xx.xxxServer:  
  Address:  xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
   
  Non-authoritative answer:Name:    
  x.xx.xxxAddress:  xx.xxx.xxx.xxx
  
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 
31, 2001 5:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
    IssuesSubject: RE: Strange problem
Can you see their MX record ok?
 
William
 
-Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 
12:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
Strange problem
I have been scratching my head on this one 
for a few days now.  I am having a problem sending internet 
email.  But here's the real kicker, I am only having problems 
sending to one domain.  I have not made any changes to my server, 
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4 SP6a.  I know that the company that I am 
trying to send message to has just recently put there server behind a 
firewall.  Wait it gets even stranger, I can telnet to there server 
and it does respond properly.  When I try and send them a message I 
get Host Unreachable.  Do any of you have any ideas for 
me?
Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and 
Associates List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

strange calendar problem.

[Stuart Pittwood]

Hi everyone.

I have a users who claims that all of his appointments in the calendar have changed, 
looking at his calendar all of his appointments are now scheduled for 23:00 hours on 
the relevant day and some have gone completely.

I know there isn't a lot of info there but getting that small bit was like getting 
blood from a stone.  Has anyone seen anything similar? Has he stuffed up and just 
doesn't want to admit it?

We are running Exchange 2000 SP2 and Outlook 2000 SP1

Any insights appreciated

Stuart Pittwood

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Strange DC Reference

[mqcarp]

My Exchange server keeps recording event error 8026 stating that an
LDAP bind was unsuccessful on a DC that no longer exists. In fact this
DC has been gone for years. We checked AD and everything is clean for
our DC references. Is there a different area of Exchange that would
reference this? I have heard of metadata clean ups on Exchange but
have not done one before. Is there a reference for this type of issue?

Thank you

EXCH03

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Strange Exchange Freeze

[Harry Singh]

All -

Exchange 2003 SP1 sitting on Windows 2000 SP4
AD 2003 R2

I noticed that my mail server froze completely, i couldn't RDP get into task
manager, nothing. I had to physically shut it down and bring it back up.
Prior to the freeze i noticed some users were getting the Outlook prompt in
their sys trays "Outlook is retrieving information from your server", I
KVM'd into the box and everything froze, hence the reboot.

Now rebooted, everything is up but i notice an that at times a few users are
getting the same prompt -- I've never received or experienced this on the
mail server, and it's been up and running for over 3 years without this kind
of issue.

What can i do to start the troubleshooting process ?

I checked my physical disks and they are all okay. Memory utilization is
abnormal either. Is there a specific counter inside Perfmon i can monitor ?

Looking forward to your help and suggestions,

Thanks,

Strange attachment problem

[Silvio L. Nisgoski]

Hello,

When receiving emails from one particular source, the attachments ( pdf
files ) are not shown. When viewing the email through OWA, the little clip
is shown, indicating the message has an attachment, but when opening the
message, there is no attachment shown.

If I access the server through Outlook Express, the attachment is correctly
shown and accessible.

If I forward the message, inside OWA, the attachment is accessible.

Viewing the message source in OE, it seems that there is not a MIME header
before the attachment, and neither a blank line. After forwarding the
message, the MIME headers appear.

I tried to forward myself a copy of the message, to post the mail headers in
the list, but outlook mangled the contents, and didn´t send them. Silly me,
should have saved the message and attached it  to another message, not
forward it.

Only special thing I can remember of the headers, now, is that they show to
having been sent from some SAP Web processing app. Customer tells me that
these emails are generated inside their client´s system.

I´ve given up in trying to convince them that the problem is at their
client´s side, because said client will just say that this place is the only
complaining...

Is there a way that in our side I can mangle/dismangle or script something
to make Exchange accept the ill-formatted attachment ?


Thanks.


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Strange OWA redirection

[E. Peeters]

Hello people,
 
My problem is with Exchange 2003 on Windows 2003.
 
Whenever someone attempts to access my OWA for the first time (per
session), the connection is being redirected to an internal
(non-routable) IP. Hitting Refresh on the browser opens OWA correctly,
and the problem does not occur again until the user begins a new session
(logs off or reboots their PC).
 
The IP is the internal IP that the Exchange box was assigned in an
earlier deployment, prior to OWA being made available. The Exchange box
has a new IP and everything seems to be functioning normally, except for
this OWA issue.
 
On the first attempt to connect to OWA, the user is prompted to
authenticate and after succesfully doing so, both OWA frames are loaded
but their respective content isn't displayed. Rather, the generic "web
page could not be found" is shown. Looking at what each frame does, they
are both attempting to load their respective page, but they use the old
internal IP for Exchange rather than the FQDN.
 
If the user hits Refresh, the content of each frame is loaded using the
FQDN and OWA will function as expected right up until the user logs off
or reboots their PC. Afterwards, the first attempt to use OWA will again
fail, etc...
 
I have combed the registry to see if I could find any entry that would
somehow point to the old Exchange's internal IP, to no avail.
 
This issue started when one box was performing all Exchange functions. I
now have front-end and back-end boxes, but the problem hasn't changed.
 
Any suggestion ?
 
Eric

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: strange question

[Garland Mac Neill]

Title: Message









Did you use your domain as part of the
logon?

 

As in your domain\username

 

-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:54
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: strange question

 



ive installed e5.5 sp4 on my test
lan





i then upgraded it to e2k sp2





i installled sp3 today..





 





ever since it went to e2k i cannot
logon via OWA





it prompts me for username and
password, but never accepts it..





anyone else ever see this?



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: strange question

[MHR(Michael Ross)]

Title: Message



yes
i 
tried that, as well as [EMAIL PROTECTED] and 
my password.
 
the 
server USED to be e5.5, at which time it was company.com, but the site was 
site1.company.com
now 
that its upgraded, the M drive shows m:\site1.company.com  is that 
right?
i 
looked at 
q282805
and 

q322309 
with 
no benefit.

  
  -Original Message-From: Garland Mac 
  Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 
  12:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: strange 
  question
  
  Did you use your 
  domain as part of the logon?
   
  As in your 
  domain\username
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:54 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: strange 
  question
   
  
  ive installed e5.5 sp4 on my test 
  lan
  
  i then upgraded it to e2k 
  sp2
  
  i installled sp3 
  today..
  
   
  
  ever since it went to e2k i cannot 
  logon via OWA
  
  it prompts me for username and 
  password, but never accepts it..
  
  anyone else ever see 
  this?
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: strange question

[Garland Mac Neill]

Title: Message









What URls have
you tried?

 

http://url/exchange
?

Or

http://url/exchange/username
?

 

-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 12:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: strange question

 



yes





i tried that, as well as [EMAIL PROTECTED] and my password.





 





the server USED to be
e5.5, at which time it was company.com, but the site was site1.company.com





now that its upgraded,
the M drive shows m:\site1.company.com  is that right?





i looked at 





q282805





and 





q322309 





with no benefit.





-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 12:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: strange question

Did you use your domain
as part of the logon?

 

As in your
domain\username

 

-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: strange question

 



ive installed e5.5 sp4 on my test
lan





i then upgraded it to e2k sp2





i installled sp3 today..





 





ever since it went to e2k i cannot
logon via OWA





it prompts me for username and
password, but never accepts it..





anyone else ever see this?



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: strange question

[MHR(Michael Ross)]

Title: Message



http://servername/exchange
 

  
  -Original Message-From: Garland Mac 
  Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 
  1:22 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: strange 
  question
  
  What URls have you tried?
   
  http://url/exchange 
  ?
  Or
  http://url/exchange/username 
  ?
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 
  2002 12:19 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: strange 
  question
   
  
  yes
  
  i tried 
  that, as well as [EMAIL PROTECTED] and my 
  password.
  
   
  
  the 
  server USED to be e5.5, at which time it was company.com, but the site was 
  site1.company.com
  
  now that 
  its upgraded, the M drive shows m:\site1.company.com  is that 
  right?
  
  i looked 
  at 
  
  q282805
  
  and 
  
  
  q322309 
  
  
  with no 
  benefit.
  
-Original 
Message-From: Garland 
Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 
2002 12:56 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: strange 
question
Did 
you use your domain as part of the logon?
 
As in 
your domain\username
 
-Original 
Message-From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 
2002 11:54 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: strange 
question
 

ive installed e5.5 sp4 on my 
test lan

i then upgraded it to e2k 
sp2

i installled sp3 
today..

 

ever since it went to e2k i 
cannot logon via OWA

it prompts me for username and 
password, but never accepts it..

anyone else ever see 
this?
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: strange question

[William Lefkovics]

Title: Message



Have 
you been able to login to OWA at all since the upgrade?
Is the 
default website (or whichever hosts OWA) running?
 
 

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:19 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: strange 
  question
  yes
  i 
  tried that, as well as [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  and my password.
   
  the 
  server USED to be e5.5, at which time it was company.com, but the site was 
  site1.company.com
  now 
  that its upgraded, the M drive shows m:\site1.company.com  is that 
  right?
  i 
  looked at 
  q282805
  and 
  
  q322309 
  with 
  no benefit.
  

-Original Message-From: Garland Mac 
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 
12:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
strange question

Did you use your 
domain as part of the logon?
 
As in your 
domain\username
 
-Original 
Message-From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:54 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: strange 
question
 

ive installed e5.5 sp4 on my 
test lan

i then upgraded it to e2k 
sp2

i installled sp3 
today..

 

ever since it went to e2k i 
cannot logon via OWA

it prompts me for username and 
password, but never accepts it..

anyone else ever see 
this?
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: strange question

[MHR(Michael Ross)]

Title: Message



no i 
havent been able to logon via OWA at all since the upgrade
yes 
the default website is running.

  
  -Original Message-From: William 
  Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 
  2002 1:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  strange question
  Have 
  you been able to login to OWA at all since the upgrade?
  Is 
  the default website (or whichever hosts OWA) running?
   
   
  

-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:19 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: strange 
question
yes
i 
tried that, as well as [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and my password.
 
the server USED to be e5.5, at which time it was company.com, but the 
site was site1.company.com
now that its upgraded, the M drive shows m:\site1.company.com  
is that right?
i 
looked at 
q282805
and 
q322309 
with no benefit.

  
  -Original Message-From: Garland Mac 
  Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 
  2002 12:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: strange question
  
  Did you use your 
  domain as part of the logon?
   
  As in your 
  domain\username
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:54 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: strange 
  question
   
  
  ive installed 
  e5.5 sp4 on my test lan
  
  i then upgraded 
  it to e2k sp2
  
  i installled sp3 
  today..
  
   
  
  ever since it 
  went to e2k i cannot logon via OWA
  
  it prompts me for 
  username and password, but never accepts 
  it..
  
  anyone else ever 
  see this?
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: strange question

[Garland Mac Neill]

Title: Message









Then try http://servername/exchange/mailbox


 

-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 12:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: strange question

 



no i havent been able to
logon via OWA at all since the upgrade





yes the default website
is running.





-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: strange question



Have you been able to
login to OWA at all since the upgrade?





Is the default website
(or whichever hosts OWA) running?





 





 





-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: strange question



yes





i tried that, as well as [EMAIL PROTECTED] and my password.





 





the server USED to be
e5.5, at which time it was company.com, but the site was site1.company.com





now that its upgraded,
the M drive shows m:\site1.company.com  is that right?





i looked at 





q282805





and 





q322309 





with no benefit.





-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 12:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: strange question

Did you use your domain
as part of the logon?

 

As in your
domain\username

 

-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: strange question

 



ive installed e5.5 sp4 on my test
lan





i then upgraded it to e2k sp2





i installled sp3 today..





 





ever since it went to e2k i cannot
logon via OWA





it prompts me for username and
password, but never accepts it..





anyone else ever see this?



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: strange question

[MHR(Michael Ross)]

Title: Message



ill 
try that.. in the meantime.. look at this article
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q247731
 

  
  -Original Message-From: Garland Mac 
  Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 
  1:38 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: strange 
  question
  
  Then try http://servername/exchange/mailbox 
  
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 
  2002 12:30 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: strange 
  question
   
  
  no i 
  havent been able to logon via OWA at all since the 
  upgrade
  
  yes the 
  default website is running.
  
-Original 
Message-From: William 
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 
2002 1:27 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: strange 
question

Have 
you been able to login to OWA at all since the 
upgrade?

Is the 
default website (or whichever hosts OWA) 
running?

 

 
-Original 
  Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 
  2002 11:19 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: 
  strange question
  
  yes
  
  i 
  tried that, as well as [EMAIL PROTECTED] and my 
  password.
  
   
  
  the 
  server USED to be e5.5, at which time it was company.com, but the site was 
  site1.company.com
  
  now 
  that its upgraded, the M drive shows m:\site1.company.com  is that 
  right?
  
  i 
  looked at 
  
  q282805
  
  and 
  
  
  q322309 
  
  
  with 
  no benefit.
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 
2002 12:56 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
strange question
Did you use 
your domain as part of the logon?
 
As in your 
domain\username
 
-Original 
Message-From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 
2002 11:54 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: strange 
question
 

ive installed 
e5.5 sp4 on my test lan

i then upgraded 
it to e2k sp2

i installled 
sp3 today..

 

ever since it 
went to e2k i cannot logon via OWA

it prompts me 
for username and password, but never accepts 
it..

anyone else 
ever see this?
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter 
and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: strange question

[Zangara, Jim]

Title: Message



do you have log in locally 
rights on the owa box?
 
 

Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
We know that communication is a 
problem, but the company is not going to discuss it with the employees. 
(AT&T Long Lines Division) 

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:54 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: strange 
  question
  ive installed e5.5 
  sp4 on my test lan
  i then upgraded it 
  to e2k sp2
  i installled sp3 
  today..
   
  ever since it went 
  to e2k i cannot logon via OWA
  it prompts me for 
  username and password, but never accepts it..
  anyone else ever 
  see this?List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: strange question

[Garland Mac Neill]

Title: Message









You also want to make sure that the
mailbox name is the reply to address. 

 

So in your case it would be….

 

http://servername/exchange/mhr


 

then the logon would come up.

 

-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 12:40
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: strange question

 



ill try that.. in the
meantime.. look at this article





http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q247731





 





-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 1:38
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: strange question

Then try http://servername/exchange/mailbox


 

-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 12:30
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: strange question

 



no i
havent been able to logon via OWA at all since the upgrade





yes the
default website is running.





-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 1:27
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: strange question



Have you
been able to login to OWA at all since the upgrade?





Is the default
website (or whichever hosts OWA) running?





 





 





-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:19
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: strange question



yes





i tried
that, as well as [EMAIL PROTECTED] and my
password.





 





the
server USED to be e5.5, at which time it was company.com, but the site was
site1.company.com





now that
its upgraded, the M drive shows m:\site1.company.com  is that right?





i looked
at 





q282805





and 





q322309 





with no
benefit.





-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 12:56
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: strange question

Did you
use your domain as part of the logon?

 

As in
your domain\username

 

-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:54
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: strange question

 



ive installed e5.5 sp4 on my test
lan





i then upgraded it to e2k sp2





i installled sp3 today..





 





ever since it went to e2k i cannot
logon via OWA





it prompts me for username and
password, but never accepts it..





anyone else ever see this?



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: strange question

[MHR(Michael Ross)]

Title: Message



yep, i 
even tried as the actual admin account same result

  
  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 
  1:46 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: strange 
  question
  do you have log in 
  locally rights on the owa box?
   
   
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
  Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
  15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 
  461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  We know that communication is a 
  problem, but the company is not going to discuss it with the employees. 
  (AT&T Long Lines Division) 
  

-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:54 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: strange 
question
ive installed 
e5.5 sp4 on my test lan
i then upgraded 
it to e2k sp2
i installled sp3 
today..
 
ever since it 
went to e2k i cannot logon via OWA
it prompts me 
for username and password, but never accepts it..
anyone else ever 
see this?List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: strange question

[William Lefkovics]

Title: Message



the 
LSA handles this in 2000.  No 'log in locally' rights 
required.
 
What 
browser is being used?  What authentication method?
 
 

Authentication
A number of options are available for Outlook Web Access authentication. 
Choosing the appropriate mechanism is usually a matter of the capabilities of 
the client operating system and specific security policies. 
The default authentication methods for Outlook Web Access in a single-server 
environment are Basic and Integrated Windows authentication. You set 
authentication on the HTTP virtual servers configured for Outlook Web Access. 
Note Outlook Web Access does not have a button for logging off. To log 
off the session, the user must close the browser. 
The following are the available options for authentication: 
Method 1–Basic: Uses clear text to perform a simple challenge and 
response.
Method 2–Integrated Windows: Leverages the native security 
attributes of the client.
Method 3–Anonymous: Provides access to public folders that are 
intended for general access.
Method 4–Secure Sockets Layer (SSL): Although not an authentication 
method, SSL provides a secure communications channel that can be used in 
combination with any of the above methods.

  
  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 
  11:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: strange 
  question
  do you have log in 
  locally rights on the owa box?
   
   
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
  Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
  15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 
  461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  We know that communication is a 
  problem, but the company is not going to discuss it with the employees. 
  (AT&T Long Lines Division) 
  

-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:54 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: strange 
question
ive installed 
e5.5 sp4 on my test lan
i then upgraded 
it to e2k sp2
i installled sp3 
today..
 
ever since it 
went to e2k i cannot logon via OWA
it prompts me 
for username and password, but never accepts it..
anyone else ever 
see this?List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: strange question

[MHR(Michael Ross)]

Title: Message



i was 
just trying for basic authentication

  
  -Original Message-From: William 
  Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 
  2002 1:59 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  strange question
  the 
  LSA handles this in 2000.  No 'log in locally' rights 
  required.
   
  What 
  browser is being used?  What authentication method?
   
   
  
  Authentication
  A number of options are available for Outlook Web Access authentication. 
  Choosing the appropriate mechanism is usually a matter of the capabilities of 
  the client operating system and specific security policies. 
  The default authentication methods for Outlook Web Access in a 
  single-server environment are Basic and Integrated Windows authentication. You 
  set authentication on the HTTP virtual servers configured for Outlook Web 
  Access. 
  Note Outlook Web Access does not have a button for logging off. To 
  log off the session, the user must close the browser. 
  The following are the available options for authentication: 
  Method 1-Basic: Uses clear text to perform a simple challenge and 
  response.
  Method 2-Integrated Windows: Leverages the native security 
  attributes of the client.
  Method 3-Anonymous: Provides access to public folders that are 
  intended for general access.
  Method 4-Secure Sockets Layer (SSL): Although not an 
  authentication method, SSL provides a secure communications channel that can 
  be used in combination with any of the above 
methods.
  

-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 
11:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
    strange question
do you have log in 
locally rights on the owa box?
 
 

Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
(818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
We know that communication is a 
problem, but the company is not going to discuss it with the employees. 
(AT&T Long Lines Division) 

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 
  10:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: strange 
  question
  ive installed 
  e5.5 sp4 on my test lan
  i then 
  upgraded it to e2k sp2
  i installled 
  sp3 today..
   
  ever since it 
  went to e2k i cannot logon via OWA
  it prompts me 
  for username and password, but never accepts it..
  anyone else 
  ever see this?List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: strange question

[M2web]

Title: Message



I have had this problem for the past 3 weeks. No 
one, discussion lists or article has ever been able to help!!!

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) 
  
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 12:01 
PM
  Subject: RE: strange question
  
  i 
  was just trying for basic authentication
  

-Original Message-From: William 
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 
22, 2002 1:59 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: strange question
the LSA handles this in 2000.  No 'log in 
locally' rights required.
 
What browser is being used?  What 
authentication method?
 
 

Authentication
A number of options are available for Outlook Web Access authentication. 
Choosing the appropriate mechanism is usually a matter of the capabilities 
of the client operating system and specific security policies. 
The default authentication methods for Outlook Web Access in a 
single-server environment are Basic and Integrated Windows authentication. 
You set authentication on the HTTP virtual servers configured for Outlook 
Web Access. 
Note Outlook Web Access does not have a button for logging off. To 
log off the session, the user must close the browser. 
The following are the available options for authentication: 
Method 1-Basic: Uses clear text to perform a simple challenge 
and response.
Method 2-Integrated Windows: Leverages the native security 
attributes of the client.
Method 3-Anonymous: Provides access to public folders that are 
intended for general access.
Method 4-Secure Sockets Layer (SSL): Although not an 
authentication method, SSL provides a secure communications channel that can 
be used in combination with any of the above 
methods.

  
  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 
  11:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
      strange question
  do you have log in 
  locally rights on the owa box?
   
   
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
  Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
  15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
  (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  We know that communication is a 
  problem, but the company is not going to discuss it with the employees. 
  (AT&T Long Lines Division) 
  

-Original Message-From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 
22, 2002 10:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: strange question
ive 
installed e5.5 sp4 on my test lan
i then 
upgraded it to e2k sp2
i installled 
sp3 today..
 
ever since 
it went to e2k i cannot logon via OWA
it prompts 
me for username and password, but never accepts it..
anyone else 
ever see this?List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: strange question

[William Lefkovics]

Title: Message



It's 
an odd problem. 
 
Anything in the security event log to indicate failed 
or even attempted authentication?  (on the DC's)
 

  
  -Original Message-From: M2web 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 2:33 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: strange 
  question
  I have had this problem for the past 3 weeks. No 
  one, discussion lists or article has ever been able to 
  help!!!
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) 

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 

Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 12:01 
PM
Subject: RE: strange question

i 
was just trying for basic authentication

  
  -Original Message-From: William 
  Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 
  22, 2002 1:59 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: strange question
  the LSA handles this in 2000.  No 'log in 
  locally' rights required.
   
  What browser is being used?  What 
  authentication method?
   
   
  
  Authentication
  A number of options are available for Outlook Web Access 
  authentication. Choosing the appropriate mechanism is usually a matter of 
  the capabilities of the client operating system and specific security 
  policies. 
  The default authentication methods for Outlook Web Access in a 
  single-server environment are Basic and Integrated Windows authentication. 
  You set authentication on the HTTP virtual servers configured for Outlook 
  Web Access. 
  Note Outlook Web Access does not have a button for logging off. 
  To log off the session, the user must close the browser. 
  The following are the available options for authentication: 
  Method 1-Basic: Uses clear text to perform a simple challenge 
  and response.
  Method 2-Integrated Windows: Leverages the native security 
  attributes of the client.
  Method 3-Anonymous: Provides access to public folders that are 
  intended for general access.
  Method 4-Secure Sockets Layer (SSL): Although not an 
  authentication method, SSL provides a secure communications channel that 
  can be used in combination with any of the above 
  methods.
  

-Original Message-From: Zangara, 
Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 
22, 2002 11:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
    IssuesSubject: RE: strange question
do you have log in 
locally rights on the owa box?
 
 

Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel 
Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 
91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
We know that communication is 
a problem, but the company is not going to discuss it with the 
employees. (AT&T Long Lines Division) 

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
  July 22, 2002 10:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
      IssuesSubject: strange question
  ive 
  installed e5.5 sp4 on my test lan
  i then 
  upgraded it to e2k sp2
  i 
  installled sp3 today..
   
  ever since 
  it went to e2k i cannot logon via OWA
  it prompts 
  me for username and password, but never accepts 
  it..
  anyone 
  else ever see this?List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: strange question

[M2web]

Title: Message



Absolutely nothing on any logs.
 
I am thinking of removing (as this is not a 
production server) the E2K and reinstalling it after I have run the forestprep 
and domainprep once again just to make sure I have not screwed up anything. 

However having gone thru Q252486 and done all of what it says. I still see the Server-SA 
mailbox in the M drive. Thus when I try to remove the E2K using the E2K setup on 
the CD, I get an error that there still exists a mailbox (which I suppose it is 
the one mentioned above). Is there something that I have not done? What else do 
I need to do. I really do not want to go thru the manual 
removal.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  William Lefkovics 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 2:47 PM
  Subject: RE: strange question
  
  It's 
  an odd problem. 
   
  Anything in the security event log to indicate failed 
  or even attempted authentication?  (on the DC's)
   
  

-Original Message-From: M2web 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 2:33 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: strange 
question
I have had this problem for the past 3 weeks. 
No one, discussion lists or article has ever been able to 
help!!!

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  MHR(Michael 
  Ross) 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 12:01 
  PM
  Subject: RE: strange question
  
  i was just trying for basic authentication
  

-Original Message-From: William 
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
July 22, 2002 1:59 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: strange question
the LSA handles this in 2000.  No 'log in 
locally' rights required.
 
What browser is being used?  What 
authentication method?
 
 

Authentication
A number of options are available for Outlook Web Access 
authentication. Choosing the appropriate mechanism is usually a matter 
of the capabilities of the client operating system and specific security 
policies. 
The default authentication methods for Outlook Web Access in a 
single-server environment are Basic and Integrated Windows 
authentication. You set authentication on the HTTP virtual servers 
configured for Outlook Web Access. 
Note Outlook Web Access does not have a button for logging 
off. To log off the session, the user must close the browser. 
The following are the available options for authentication: 
Method 1-Basic: Uses clear text to perform a simple 
challenge and response.
Method 2-Integrated Windows: Leverages the native security 
attributes of the client.
Method 3-Anonymous: Provides access to public folders that 
are intended for general access.
Method 4-Secure Sockets Layer (SSL): Although not an 
authentication method, SSL provides a secure communications channel that 
can be used in combination with any of the above 
methods.

  
  -Original Message-From: Zangara, 
  Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 
  22, 2002 11:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: strange question
  do you have log 
  in locally rights on the owa box?
   
   
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
  Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel 
  Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 
  91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  We know that communication 
  is a problem, but the company is not going to discuss it with the 
  employees. (AT&T Long Lines Division) 
  

-Original Message-From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
July 22, 2002 10:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
        IssuesSubject: strange question
ive 
installed e5.5 sp4 on my test lan
i then 
upgraded it to e2k sp2
i 
installled sp3 today..
 
ever 
since it went to e2k i cannot logon via OWA
it 
prompts me for username and password, but never accepts 
it..
anyone 
else ever see this?List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charte

RE: strange question

[Garland Mac Neill]

Title: Message









I have run domainprep
to repair an install with out uninstalling E2K. It was a MS suggestion.

 

-Original Message-
From: M2web
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 4:41
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: strange question

 



Absolutely nothing on any logs.





 





I am thinking of removing (as this
is not a production server) the E2K and reinstalling it after I have run the
forestprep and domainprep once again just to make sure I have not screwed up
anything. 





However having gone thru Q252486 and
done all of what it says. I still see the Server-SA mailbox in the M
drive. Thus when I try to remove the E2K using the E2K setup on the CD, I get
an error that there still exists a mailbox (which I suppose it is the one
mentioned above). Is there something that I have not done? What else do I need
to do. I really do not want to go thru the manual removal.







- Original Message - 





From: William
Lefkovics 





To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 





Sent: Monday,
July 22, 2002 2:47 PM





Subject: RE: strange
question





 





It's an odd problem. 





 





Anything in the security
event log to indicate failed or even attempted authentication?  (on the
DC's)





 





-Original Message-
From: M2web
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 2:33
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: strange question



I have had this problem for the past
3 weeks. No one, discussion lists or article has ever been able to help!!!







- Original Message - 





From: MHR(Michael Ross) 





To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 





Sent: Monday,
July 22, 2002 12:01 PM





Subject: RE: strange
question





 





i was just trying for
basic authentication





-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 1:59
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: strange question



the LSA handles this in
2000.  No 'log in locally' rights required.





 





What browser is being
used?  What authentication method?





 





 





Authentication

A number of options are
available for Outlook Web Access authentication. Choosing the appropriate
mechanism is usually a matter of the capabilities of the client operating
system and specific security policies. 

The default
authentication methods for Outlook Web Access in a single-server environment
are Basic and Integrated Windows authentication. You set authentication on the
HTTP virtual servers configured for Outlook Web Access. 

Note Outlook Web Access does not have a button for logging off. To log
off the session, the user must close the browser. 

The following are the
available options for authentication: 

Method 1-Basic: Uses
clear text to perform a simple challenge and response.

Method 2-Integrated Windows: Leverages the native security attributes of the client.

Method 3-Anonymous:
Provides access to public folders that are intended for general access.

Method 4-Secure Sockets Layer (SSL): Although not an authentication method, SSL provides a secure
communications channel that can be used in combination with any of the above
methods.





-Original Message-
From: Zangara, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:46
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: strange question



do you have log in locally rights on
the owa box?





 





 



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



We know
that communication is a problem, but the company is not going to discuss it
with the employees. (AT&T Long Lines Division) 





-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:54
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: strange question



ive installed e5.5 sp4 on my test
lan





i then upgraded it to e2k sp2





i installled sp3 today..





 





ever since it went to e2k i cannot
logon via OWA





it prompts me for username and
password, but never accepts it..





anyone else ever see this?



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Strange Attachment Issue

[Stuart Pittwood]

Hi all,

 

I have a strange problem with one particular e-mail.  This is an email that was sent to about
60 users and has been opened and the attachments have been read before.

 

All of a sudden when someone tries to open 3 of the 4
attachments the user gets “Operation Failed”.  Any other mail with attachments is ok.

 

Am I correct in saying that because of the way exchange 2000
works there is only 1 copy of this particular email in the storage group?

 

Any Ideas?

 
Stuart Pittwood 
Information Technology 
Amery-Parkes Solicitors 

 




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Strange Attachment Names

[Patrick King'ori Kariuki]

Title: NDR problem



From last week, I have been receiving 
MsOffice attachments with strange names. For instance: a mail had an attached 
word 97 document Graduation letter.doc. When I 
double-click on it, I get the confirmation to open the 
docment Graduation letter.26494DEFANGED-doc which 
of course is not associated to any application - it seems to have no 
extension.
 
Can someone tell me what's 
happening?
 

***
"All truth passes 
through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it
is violently opposed. 
Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." 
-Arthur Schopenhauer 
(1788-1860)
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.377 / Virus Database: 211 - Release Date: 7/15/2002
 

Strange OWA problem

[Eldridge, Dave]

I am using Direcway satellite to access the Internet and also use ICS to
share a couple of pc's. Direcway suggests using a proxy statement to speed
up web access. In tools,options,connections,lansettings. I check use proxy
server and go into advanced and enter the gateway pc(192.168.0.1) and port
85 for http only. When i do this it does dramatically speed up inet access
but when i sign into owa after entering my alias i get a white screen. If i
disable this proxy setup it works.
anyone seen this. why would changing my local proxy have any effect on my
owa server at the office.

anyone.
thanks


dave

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange question

[Michael B. Smith]

[1] Yes. Look at the "Type" parameter to Set-Mailbox.
[2] Yes. But why?
[3] What problem are you trying to solve?

From: Heaton, Joseph@DFG [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Monday, October 1, 2012 11:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Strange question

As most know, my organization is in the midst of migrating from Groupwise to 
Exchange.  For some reason, this question hasn't come up until now, when we're 
working on the Proof of Concept.

We have "resources" in Groupwise.  In this particular instance, the resource is 
a Room.  I have a very simple tool to do this migration, which works fine when 
I'm looking at user mailboxes, because I can login to both sides and copy stuff 
over.  With the resource, in Groupwise, there's no credentials.  And on the 
Exchange side, the user account tied to the room mailbox is disabled.  Here's 
my questions:


1)   Can I change a User mailbox to a Room mailbox?  My thought is no, 
since they really are two different animals.

2)   Can I enable the user account for the Room mailbox long enough to do 
the migration, then disable it after?  - After typing this, I realize that you 
guys most likely won't have an answer to that one.

3)   Does anyone else have any experience with this that may have other 
ideas?

Thanks,

Joe Heaton

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Strange question

[Michael B. Smith]

[2] - because rooms don't (by default) have users. :)

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, October 1, 2012 12:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange question

(1) Try "Set-Mailbox -Type Room".
(2) Yes, I really don't know why the account has to be disabled. Probably more 
for security? Anyway.. yes, enable it to do your work and then disable it again 
at your convenience.
(3) No :)

From: 
bounce-9552419-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com<mailto:bounce-9552419-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
 
[mailto:bounce-9552419-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]<mailto:[mailto:bounce-9552419-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]>
 On Behalf Of Heaton, Joseph@DFG
Sent: 01 October 2012 16:50
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Strange question

As most know, my organization is in the midst of migrating from Groupwise to 
Exchange.  For some reason, this question hasn't come up until now, when we're 
working on the Proof of Concept.

We have "resources" in Groupwise.  In this particular instance, the resource is 
a Room.  I have a very simple tool to do this migration, which works fine when 
I'm looking at user mailboxes, because I can login to both sides and copy stuff 
over.  With the resource, in Groupwise, there's no credentials.  And on the 
Exchange side, the user account tied to the room mailbox is disabled.  Here's 
my questions:


1)   Can I change a User mailbox to a Room mailbox?  My thought is no, 
since they really are two different animals.

2)   Can I enable the user account for the Room mailbox long enough to do 
the migration, then disable it after?  - After typing this, I realize that you 
guys most likely won't have an answer to that one.

3)   Does anyone else have any experience with this that may have other 
ideas?

Thanks,

Joe Heaton

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Strange question

[Heaton, Joseph@DFG]

1)   Awesome, thank you.  I'll look into it.

2)  This question was in case the answer to #1 was no.

3)  The resources in question in Groupwise are what we would call Room 
Mailboxes in Exchange.  I have to find a way to migrate the data in these 
calendars over to the Exchange side.  We have some Groupwise calendars that are 
filled out a year plus in advance.  I'd rather not give them a blank calendar 
and ask them to manually input all the classes/meetings, etc.

I apologize for not doing the research footwork before posting, I had/have the 
intention of doing so, but it's getting a bit hectic around here.  Thank you 
for your help, as always, you are greatly appreciated.

Joe Heaton
ITB - Enterprise Server Support

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 9:18 AM
To: Heaton, Joseph@DFG; MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange question

[1] Yes. Look at the "Type" parameter to Set-Mailbox.
[2] Yes. But why?
[3] What problem are you trying to solve?

From: Heaton, Joseph@DFG 
[mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]<mailto:[mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]>
Sent: Monday, October 1, 2012 11:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Strange question

As most know, my organization is in the midst of migrating from Groupwise to 
Exchange.  For some reason, this question hasn't come up until now, when we're 
working on the Proof of Concept.

We have "resources" in Groupwise.  In this particular instance, the resource is 
a Room.  I have a very simple tool to do this migration, which works fine when 
I'm looking at user mailboxes, because I can login to both sides and copy stuff 
over.  With the resource, in Groupwise, there's no credentials.  And on the 
Exchange side, the user account tied to the room mailbox is disabled.  Here's 
my questions:


1)   Can I change a User mailbox to a Room mailbox?  My thought is no, 
since they really are two different animals.

2)   Can I enable the user account for the Room mailbox long enough to do 
the migration, then disable it after?  - After typing this, I realize that you 
guys most likely won't have an answer to that one.

3)   Does anyone else have any experience with this that may have other 
ideas?

Thanks,

Joe Heaton

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Strange Autodiscover

[Al Rose]

I too have the same error running the test but my autodiscover works fine,
so far all i could gather on Google is that test is doing a NLB check, test
that communicates with an NLB *node* in Test-OutlookWebServices.

In my prod. env this is what i have for my 2 servers (cas array members):
[PS] C:\windows\system32>Get-WebServicesVirtualDirectory | fl *URL*


InternalNLBBypassUrl :
https://remcorpexch10.corp.remgroup.local/ews/exchange.asmx
InternalUrl  : https://webmail.remgroup.com/ews/exchange.asmx
ExternalUrl  : https://webmail.remgroup.com/ews/exchange.asmx

InternalNLBBypassUrl :
https://remtc4exch10.corp.remgroup.local/ews/exchange.asmx
InternalUrl  : https://webmail.remgroup.com/ews/exchange.asmx
ExternalUrl  : https://webmail.remgroup.com/ews/exchange.asmx

InternalNLBBypassUrl is the only URL that refers to a single node rather
than my webmail DNS record

Not sure what to do with it, i don't use a NLB for now (just DNS round
robin)


On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Greg Sweers  wrote:

>  When running a test-outlookwebservices | fl everything comes back ok
> except for one line in autodiscover string that has the internal server
> servername.domain.int/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml
>
> ** **
>
> However when you run 
>
> ** **
>
> get-AutodiscoverVirtualDirectory | fl identity,internalurl, externalurl
> get-ClientAccessServer | fl identity,AutodiscoverServiceInternalUri
> get-webservicesvirtualdirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl
> get-oabvirtualdirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl
> get-owavirtualdirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl
> get-ecpvirtualdirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl
> get-ActiveSyncVirtualDirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl
>
> ** **
>
> All of them come back with the correct Internal and External URL pointing
> to our main site.  
>
> ** **
>
> Single Exchange 2010 box.  I don’t know where else to check for setting
> the correct path.  DO we have to have the internal server name in the ssl
> cert.  If that’s the case, I have a REALLY big issue as the domain was
> built years ago by another admin and they used the .int space, which cannot
> be registered in a SAN cert..  and changing domain name is not supported
> with Exchange…
>
> ** **
>
> Oh yeah and everything works, but our spam filtering software requires
> autodiscover to be perfect and we are having filtering issues for the
> longest time and they keep telling me that it’s a problem, but all checks
> report no issues except that one line.  All others report fine.  
>
> ** **
>
> Any ideas??
>
> ** **
>
> *Greg Sweers*
>
> CEO
>
> *ACTS360.com ***
>
> *P.O. Box 1193*
>
> *Brandon, FL  33509*
>
> *813-657-0849 Office*
>
> *813-758-6850 Cell*
>
> ** **
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Strange Autodiscover

[Michael B. Smith]

what does exrca.com say?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://theessentialexchange.com/

From: Greg Sweers [gswe...@acts360.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 4:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Strange Autodiscover

When running a test-outlookwebservices | fl everything comes back ok except for 
one line in autodiscover string that has the internal server 
servername.domain.int/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml

However when you run

get-AutodiscoverVirtualDirectory | fl identity,internalurl, externalurl
get-ClientAccessServer | fl identity,AutodiscoverServiceInternalUri
get-webservicesvirtualdirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl
get-oabvirtualdirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl
get-owavirtualdirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl
get-ecpvirtualdirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl
get-ActiveSyncVirtualDirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl

All of them come back with the correct Internal and External URL pointing to 
our main site.

Single Exchange 2010 box.  I don’t know where else to check for setting the 
correct path.  DO we have to have the internal server name in the ssl cert.  If 
that’s the case, I have a REALLY big issue as the domain was built years ago by 
another admin and they used the .int space, which cannot be registered in a SAN 
cert..  and changing domain name is not supported with Exchange…

Oh yeah and everything works, but our spam filtering software requires 
autodiscover to be perfect and we are having filtering issues for the longest 
time and they keep telling me that it’s a problem, but all checks report no 
issues except that one line.  All others report fine.

Any ideas??

Greg Sweers
CEO
ACTS360.com<http://www.acts360.com/>
P.O. Box 1193
Brandon, FL  33509
813-657-0849 Office
813-758-6850 Cell


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Strange Autodiscover

[Greg Sweers]

Two errors:

Attempting on bellshoals.com/* which is our website so that’s expected, but 
testing on autodiscover.bellshoals.com tests without any errors other than the 
warning about root certificates update may be required.

Otherwise all reports are clean.

Greg Sweers
CEO
ACTS360.com<http://www.acts360.com/>
P.O. Box 1193
Brandon, FL  33509
813-657-0849 Office
813-758-6850 Cell


From: "Michael B. Smith" mailto:mich...@smithcons.com>>
Reply-To: Lyris List 
mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>>
Date: Friday, November 16, 2012 8:19 AM
To: Lyris List 
mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>>
Subject: RE: Strange Autodiscover

what does exrca.com say?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://theessentialexchange.com/

From: Greg Sweers [gswe...@acts360.com<mailto:gswe...@acts360.com>]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 4:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Strange Autodiscover

When running a test-outlookwebservices | fl everything comes back ok except for 
one line in autodiscover string that has the internal server 
servername.domain.int/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml

However when you run

get-AutodiscoverVirtualDirectory | fl identity,internalurl, externalurl
get-ClientAccessServer | fl identity,AutodiscoverServiceInternalUri
get-webservicesvirtualdirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl
get-oabvirtualdirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl
get-owavirtualdirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl
get-ecpvirtualdirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl
get-ActiveSyncVirtualDirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl

All of them come back with the correct Internal and External URL pointing to 
our main site.

Single Exchange 2010 box.  I don’t know where else to check for setting the 
correct path.  DO we have to have the internal server name in the ssl cert.  If 
that’s the case, I have a REALLY big issue as the domain was built years ago by 
another admin and they used the .int space, which cannot be registered in a SAN 
cert..  and changing domain name is not supported with Exchange…

Oh yeah and everything works, but our spam filtering software requires 
autodiscover to be perfect and we are having filtering issues for the longest 
time and they keep telling me that it’s a problem, but all checks report no 
issues except that one line.  All others report fine.

Any ideas??

Greg Sweers
CEO
ACTS360.com<http://www.acts360.com/>
P.O. Box 1193
Brandon, FL  33509
813-657-0849 Office
813-758-6850 Cell


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Strange Autodiscover

[Greg Sweers]

Thanks Al,

We are on a single server, no NLB services even installed.
I don’t think there is anything wrong, but because there is one auto discover 
error our vendor is saying its our problem.  I am about to pull the plug on the 
vendor, but moving to a hosted spam filtering is a significant cost increase.

Greg Sweers
CEO
ACTS360.com<http://www.acts360.com/>
P.O. Box 1193
Brandon, FL  33509
813-657-0849 Office
813-758-6850 Cell


From: Al Rose mailto:arose...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: Lyris List 
mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>>
Date: Friday, November 16, 2012 5:30 AM
To: Lyris List 
mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>>
Subject: Re: Strange Autodiscover

I too have the same error running the test but my autodiscover works fine, so 
far all i could gather on Google is that test is doing a NLB check, test that 
communicates with an NLB *node* in Test-OutlookWebServices.

In my prod. env this is what i have for my 2 servers (cas array members):
[PS] C:\windows\system32>Get-WebServicesVirtualDirectory | fl *URL*


InternalNLBBypassUrl : 
https://remcorpexch10.corp.remgroup.local/ews/exchange.asmx
InternalUrl  : https://webmail.remgroup.com/ews/exchange.asmx
ExternalUrl  : https://webmail.remgroup.com/ews/exchange.asmx

InternalNLBBypassUrl : 
https://remtc4exch10.corp.remgroup.local/ews/exchange.asmx
InternalUrl  : https://webmail.remgroup.com/ews/exchange.asmx
ExternalUrl  : https://webmail.remgroup.com/ews/exchange.asmx

InternalNLBBypassUrl is the only URL that refers to a single node rather than 
my webmail DNS record

Not sure what to do with it, i don't use a NLB for now (just DNS round robin)


On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Greg Sweers 
mailto:gswe...@acts360.com>> wrote:
When running a test-outlookwebservices | fl everything comes back ok except for 
one line in autodiscover string that has the internal server 
servername.domain.int/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml<http://servername.domain.int/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml>

However when you run

get-AutodiscoverVirtualDirectory | fl identity,internalurl, externalurl
get-ClientAccessServer | fl identity,AutodiscoverServiceInternalUri
get-webservicesvirtualdirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl
get-oabvirtualdirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl
get-owavirtualdirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl
get-ecpvirtualdirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl
get-ActiveSyncVirtualDirectory | fl identity,internalurl,externalurl

All of them come back with the correct Internal and External URL pointing to 
our main site.

Single Exchange 2010 box.  I don’t know where else to check for setting the 
correct path.  DO we have to have the internal server name in the ssl cert.  If 
that’s the case, I have a REALLY big issue as the domain was built years ago by 
another admin and they used the .int space, which cannot be registered in a SAN 
cert..  and changing domain name is not supported with Exchange…

Oh yeah and everything works, but our spam filtering software requires 
autodiscover to be perfect and we are having filtering issues for the longest 
time and they keep telling me that it’s a problem, but all checks report no 
issues except that one line.  All others report fine.

Any ideas??

Greg Sweers
CEO
ACTS360.com<http://www.acts360.com/>
P.O. Box 1193
Brandon, FL  33509
813-657-0849 Office
813-758-6850 Cell


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Strange IMS problem

[msharik]

what happens when you run RESTEST on your Exchange server for those domains?

-Michèle
Immigration site:  <http://LadySun1969.tripod.com>
Our new 2001 Miata:  <http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley>
Tiggercam:  <http://www.tiggercam.co.uk>
-
-1 x -1=+1 is stupid and evil. - Gene Ray, Cubic  <http://www.timecube.com> 
-


-Original Message-
From: Scott Burgin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Strange IMS problem


I'm baffled!
All NT 4.0 network, Exchange 5.5 with sp4, server NT 4 with sp6.
Our email comes through our parent company so the email address is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  We have a partial T1 connection our site with our
parent.
Here is what's happening.  External Incoming SMTP comes in fine. External
Outgoing goes out, but extremely slow.  Our IMS Queue has a lot of emails
in it.  Yesterday, when I would click on details of a message in the
queue, it would say "host unreachable".  It was weird because I could
email out to a colleges domain and a yahoo account, but not a hotmail or
aol account.  This morning, I noticed the hotmail emails finally went out
after hours of sitting in the queue.  Apparently, all the emails willgo
out, but it takes 1 - 3 hours.  Looking in event viewer, the only error
that appears to be applicable is an IMC error under application.  The
error message is event ID 4132, Technet shows that exact event and error
message and suggests incorrect information in the Routing Address tab of
the Connected Sites property page of the Interent Mail Connector.  I
checked and all the information is correct.  DNS is working properly.  Any
suggestion of theories would be helpful and appreciated.
Thanks, 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: strange calendar problem.

[Graham Cathcart]

Title: RE: strange calendar problem.






Hi Stuart,

I had an "almost" exact same problem as you are experiencing. After much guessing by myself,  Microsoft came up with the solution:-

The first suggestion was to try :-

"I have a couple of suggestions that may help 

address this issue. The first thing that I recommend is starting Outlook 

with the /cleanprofile switch. If that does not have and effect on the 

situation, try starting Outlook with the /cleanreminders, /cleanviews, and  

  /CleanFreeBusy

For more information on these and other startup switches available in 

Outlook, please see the following knowledge base article.

OL2000: Additional Command-Line Switches (Q197180) http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q197/1/80.asp "

This for me cleared up the problem TEMPORARILY and it reared its ugly head about a week later

Then they came up with this one which has worked for me now for over 2 weeks and not had a hint of the problem recurring…..

Read 

Q299046

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q299046

Q245822

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q245822


For me this solved the problem we use Norton Anti Virus Corporate Editon and sure enough it was scanning the M Drive…

Hopefully this helps you out.

Cheers

Graham

 

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 April 2002 14:41
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: strange calendar problem.

Hi everyone.

I have a users who claims that all of his appointments in the calendar have changed, looking at his calendar all of his appointments are now scheduled for 23:00 hours on the relevant day and some have gone completely.

I know there isn't a lot of info there but getting that small bit was like getting blood from a stone.  Has anyone seen anything similar? Has he stuffed up and just doesn't want to admit it?

We are running Exchange 2000 SP2 and Outlook 2000 SP1

Any insights appreciated

Stuart Pittwood

List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: strange calendar problem.

[Stuart Pittwood]

Title: RE: strange calendar problem.



Graham, 
 
Thanks 
for your reply I have made the appropriate changes and crossed my fingers 
:-)
 
Stu

  -Original Message-From: Graham Cathcart 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 02 April 2002 
  19:44To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: strange 
  calendar problem.
  Hi 
  Stuart,
  I had an "almost" exact same problem as you are 
  experiencing. After much guessing by myself,  Microsoft came up with the 
  solution:-
  The first suggestion was to try :-
  "I have a couple of suggestions that 
  may help 
  address this issue. The first thing that I 
  recommend is starting Outlook 
  with the /cleanprofile switch. If that does 
  not have and effect on the 
  situation, try starting Outlook with the 
  /cleanreminders, /cleanviews, and  
    /CleanFreeBusy
  For more information on these and other 
  startup switches available in 
  Outlook, please see the following knowledge 
  base article.
  OL2000: 
  Additional Command-Line Switches (Q197180) 
  http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q197/1/80.asp "
  This for me 
  cleared up the problem TEMPORARILY and it reared its ugly head about a week 
  later
  Then they came 
  up with this one which has worked for me now for over 2 weeks and not had a 
  hint of the problem recurring…..
  Read 
  Q299046
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q299046
  Q245822
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q245822
  For me this 
  solved the problem we use Norton Anti Virus Corporate Editon and sure enough 
  it was scanning the M Drive…
  Hopefully this 
  helps you out.
  Cheers
  Graham
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  02 April 2002 14:41To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: strange 
  calendar problem.
  Hi 
  everyone.
  I have a users 
  who claims that all of his appointments in the calendar have changed, looking 
  at his calendar all of his appointments are now scheduled for 23:00 hours on 
  the relevant day and some have gone completely.
  I know there 
  isn't a lot of info there but getting that small bit was like getting blood 
  from a stone.  Has anyone seen anything similar? Has he stuffed up and 
  just doesn't want to admit it?
  We are running 
  Exchange 2000 SP2 and Outlook 2000 SP1
  Any insights 
  appreciated
  Stuart 
  Pittwood
  List Charter 
  and FAQ at:
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange DC Reference

[Jeremy Phillips]

Which version of Exchange?

Thanks,

Jeremy Phillips
Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic  LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | 
BB PIN: 318A6889

From: mqcarp [mqcarpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Strange DC Reference

My Exchange server keeps recording event error 8026 stating that an
LDAP bind was unsuccessful on a DC that no longer exists. In fact this
DC has been gone for years. We checked AD and everything is clean for
our DC references. Is there a different area of Exchange that would
reference this? I have heard of metadata clean ups on Exchange but
have not done one before. Is there a reference for this type of issue?

Thank you

EXCH03

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Strange DC Reference

[Exchange (Sunbelt)]

Looking at his email, it looks like  EXCH03

From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:jere...@cohesivelogic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 10:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange DC Reference

Which version of Exchange?

Thanks,

Jeremy Phillips
Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic  LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | 
BB PIN: 318A6889

From: mqcarp [mqcarpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Strange DC Reference
My Exchange server keeps recording event error 8026 stating that an
LDAP bind was unsuccessful on a DC that no longer exists. In fact this
DC has been gone for years. We checked AD and everything is clean for
our DC references. Is there a different area of Exchange that would
reference this? I have heard of metadata clean ups on Exchange but
have not done one before. Is there a reference for this type of issue?

Thank you

EXCH03

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Strange DC Reference

[Jeremy Phillips]

Thanks, didn't see that.

Anyways, does it still show up in dsaccess as an available DC? Have you trying 
using dscflush to clear the cache?

Thanks,

Jeremy Phillips
Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic  LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | 
BB PIN: 318A6889

From: Steve Moffat [st...@optimum.bm] On Behalf Of Exchange (Sunbelt) 
[exchangead...@optimum.bm]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 2:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange DC Reference

Looking at his email, it looks like  EXCH03

From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:jere...@cohesivelogic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 10:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange DC Reference

Which version of Exchange?

Thanks,

Jeremy Phillips
Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic  LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | 
BB PIN: 318A6889

From: mqcarp [mqcarpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Strange DC Reference
My Exchange server keeps recording event error 8026 stating that an
LDAP bind was unsuccessful on a DC that no longer exists. In fact this
DC has been gone for years. We checked AD and everything is clean for
our DC references. Is there a different area of Exchange that would
reference this? I have heard of metadata clean ups on Exchange but
have not done one before. Is there a reference for this type of issue?

Thank you

EXCH03

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~





~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Strange DC Reference

[mqcarp]

That tool does not work on 2003. We found the issue. Someone did not
remove that server from the recipient services update list. Resolved!
Thanks all

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Jeremy Phillips
 wrote:
> Thanks, didn't see that.
>
> Anyways, does it still show up in dsaccess as an available DC? Have you
> trying using dscflush to clear the cache?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Jeremy Phillips
>
> Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic  LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D:
> 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889
>
> 
> From: Steve Moffat [st...@optimum.bm] On Behalf Of Exchange (Sunbelt)
> [exchangead...@optimum.bm]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 2:42 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Strange DC Reference
>
> Looking at his email, it looks like  EXCH03
>
>
>
> From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:jere...@cohesivelogic.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 10:03 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Strange DC Reference
>
>
>
> Which version of Exchange?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Jeremy Phillips
>
> Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic  LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D:
> 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889
>
> ________
>
> From: mqcarp [mqcarpen...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:57 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Strange DC Reference
>
> My Exchange server keeps recording event error 8026 stating that an
> LDAP bind was unsuccessful on a DC that no longer exists. In fact this
> DC has been gone for years. We checked AD and everything is clean for
> our DC references. Is there a different area of Exchange that would
> reference this? I have heard of metadata clean ups on Exchange but
> have not done one before. Is there a reference for this type of issue?
>
> Thank you
>
> EXCH03
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja    ~
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

strange behavioral on OWA

[Thomas Gonzalez]

Since I restructured or should I say introduced a BE in our Exchange 2k3
environment. My end users, when accessing OWA, are unable to login. They
are presented the login screen but when they enter their username /
psswd it fails and denies access even though it is correct. In the
security logs of the FE and BE there is no recording of failures for
those end users.

 

I have tested the access internally and it works, but strangely enough,
access from the outside perimeter I receive the same result.

 

Puzzled and confused...any ideas...Bueller?

 

 

 

TIA,

 

Thomas




This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of 
Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make 
sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept 
responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or 
attachments.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Strange Exchange Freeze

[Maglinger, Paul]

Event viewer is the first place I'd start.



From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 1:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Strange Exchange Freeze


All -

Exchange 2003 SP1 sitting on Windows 2000 SP4
AD 2003 R2

I noticed that my mail server froze completely, i couldn't RDP get into
task manager, nothing. I had to physically shut it down and bring it
back up. Prior to the freeze i noticed some users were getting the
Outlook prompt in their sys trays "Outlook is retrieving information
from your server", I KVM'd into the box and everything froze, hence the
reboot.

Now rebooted, everything is up but i notice an that at times a few users
are getting the same prompt -- I've never received or experienced this
on the mail server, and it's been up and running for over 3 years
without this kind of issue. 

What can i do to start the troubleshooting process ?

I checked my physical disks and they are all okay. Memory utilization is
abnormal either. Is there a specific counter inside Perfmon i can
monitor ?

Looking forward to your help and suggestions,

Thanks,

Re: Strange Exchange Freeze

[Sherry Abercrombie]

Network issues?  Exchange is probably the most sensitive application to
network throughput issues that I've seen.  Or maybe it's just more
noticeable to users because of it's widespread use and that little pop-up
that the users see.

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Harry Singh  wrote:

> All -
>
> Exchange 2003 SP1 sitting on Windows 2000 SP4
> AD 2003 R2
>
> I noticed that my mail server froze completely, i couldn't RDP get into
> task manager, nothing. I had to physically shut it down and bring it back
> up. Prior to the freeze i noticed some users were getting the Outlook prompt
> in their sys trays "Outlook is retrieving information from your server", I
> KVM'd into the box and everything froze, hence the reboot.
>
> Now rebooted, everything is up but i notice an that at times a few users
> are getting the same prompt -- I've never received or experienced this on
> the mail server, and it's been up and running for over 3 years without this
> kind of issue.
>
> What can i do to start the troubleshooting process ?
>
> I checked my physical disks and they are all okay. Memory utilization is
> abnormal either. Is there a specific counter inside Perfmon i can monitor ?
>
> Looking forward to your help and suggestions,
>
> Thanks,
>



-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke

Re: Strange Exchange Freeze

[Harry Singh]

I have a broadcom team of 2 nics doing dynamic link addregation (LACP) I've
updated the drivers about 3 weeks ago, when the last maintenance window
passed.

I didn't notice anything else on the network at that time, but i'm looking
at the cacti graphs of the switches right now..



On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Sherry Abercrombie wrote:

> Network issues?  Exchange is probably the most sensitive application to
> network throughput issues that I've seen.  Or maybe it's just more
> noticeable to users because of it's widespread use and that little pop-up
> that the users see.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Harry Singh  wrote:
>
>> All -
>>
>> Exchange 2003 SP1 sitting on Windows 2000 SP4
>> AD 2003 R2
>>
>> I noticed that my mail server froze completely, i couldn't RDP get into
>> task manager, nothing. I had to physically shut it down and bring it back
>> up. Prior to the freeze i noticed some users were getting the Outlook prompt
>> in their sys trays "Outlook is retrieving information from your server", I
>> KVM'd into the box and everything froze, hence the reboot.
>>
>> Now rebooted, everything is up but i notice an that at times a few users
>> are getting the same prompt -- I've never received or experienced this on
>> the mail server, and it's been up and running for over 3 years without this
>> kind of issue.
>>
>> What can i do to start the troubleshooting process ?
>>
>> I checked my physical disks and they are all okay. Memory utilization is
>> abnormal either. Is there a specific counter inside Perfmon i can monitor ?
>>
>> Looking forward to your help and suggestions,
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sherry Abercrombie
>
> "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
> Arthur C. Clarke
>

RE: Strange Exchange Freeze

[Steven M. Caesare]

Our HP���s have had *odd* behavior with LAG on the dual onboard NICS(intel I 
think).

 

It seems to have something to do with the phase of the moon and the version of 
the HP driver. Try rolling back the driver upgrade?

 

-sc

 

From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Strange Exchange Freeze

 

I have a broadcom team of 2 nics doing dynamic link addregation (LACP) I've 
updated the drivers about 3 weeks ago, when the last maintenance window passed.

I didn't notice anything else on the network at that time, but i'm looking at 
the cacti graphs of the switches right now..




On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Sherry Abercrombie  wrote:

Network issues?  Exchange is probably the most sensitive application to network 
throughput issues that I've seen.  Or maybe it's just more noticeable to users 
because of it's widespread use and that little pop-up that the users see.

 

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Harry Singh  wrote:

All -

Exchange 2003 SP1 sitting on Windows 2000 SP4
AD 2003 R2

I noticed that my mail server froze completely, i couldn't RDP get into task 
manager, nothing. I had to physically shut it down and bring it back up. Prior 
to the freeze i noticed some users were getting the Outlook prompt in their sys 
trays "Outlook is retrieving information from your server", I KVM'd into the 
box and everything froze, hence the reboot.

Now rebooted, everything is up but i notice an that at times a few users are 
getting the same prompt -- I've never received or experienced this on the mail 
server, and it's been up and running for over 3 years without this kind of 
issue. 

What can i do to start the troubleshooting process ?

I checked my physical disks and they are all okay. Memory utilization is 
abnormal either. Is there a specific counter inside Perfmon i can monitor ?

Looking forward to your help and suggestions,

Thanks,





-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." 
Arthur C. Clarke

 

RE: Strange Exchange Freeze

[Andy Shook]

What switch(es) is(are) this server connected to?  If you���re doing LaCP on 
the server via Broadcom control suite, you have to let the switches know at the 
port level, did anything change on the switch after the driver upgrade, I 
assume this was working as needed before the new Broadcom bits?

Shook
From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Strange Exchange Freeze

I have a broadcom team of 2 nics doing dynamic link addregation (LACP) I've 
updated the drivers about 3 weeks ago, when the last maintenance window passed.

I didn't notice anything else on the network at that time, but i'm looking at 
the cacti graphs of the switches right now..

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Sherry Abercrombie 
mailto:saber...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Network issues?  Exchange is probably the most sensitive application to network 
throughput issues that I've seen.  Or maybe it's just more noticeable to users 
because of it's widespread use and that little pop-up that the users see.

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Harry Singh 
mailto:hbo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
All -

Exchange 2003 SP1 sitting on Windows 2000 SP4
AD 2003 R2

I noticed that my mail server froze completely, i couldn't RDP get into task 
manager, nothing. I had to physically shut it down and bring it back up. Prior 
to the freeze i noticed some users were getting the Outlook prompt in their sys 
trays "Outlook is retrieving information from your server", I KVM'd into the 
box and everything froze, hence the reboot.

Now rebooted, everything is up but i notice an that at times a few users are 
getting the same prompt -- I've never received or experienced this on the mail 
server, and it's been up and running for over 3 years without this kind of 
issue.

What can i do to start the troubleshooting process ?

I checked my physical disks and they are all okay. Memory utilization is 
abnormal either. Is there a specific counter inside Perfmon i can monitor ?

Looking forward to your help and suggestions,

Thanks,


--
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke

Re: Strange Exchange Freeze

[Harry Singh]

3com 5500G-EI switches. I've defined LACP on the port level and yup,
everything has working as it should for weeks now.

My first supposition is the network, but it's just plain weird how the box
itself locked up and i had to physically shut it down. Nothing in the event
log, that i've seen, triggers much of anything else..



On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Andy Shook  wrote:

>  What switch(es) is(are) this server connected to  а If yo  АЩre doing
> LaCP on the server via Broadcom control suite, you have to let the switches
> know at the port level, did anything change on the switch after the driver
> upgrade, I assume this was working as needed before the new Broadcom bits?
>  а
>
>
>
> Shook
>
> *From:* Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:35 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Strange Exchange Freeze
>
>
>
> I have a broadcom team of 2 nics doing dynamic link addregation (LACP) I've
> updated the drivers about 3 weeks ago, when the last maintenance window
> passed.
>
> I didn't notice anything else on the network at that time, but i'm looking
> at the cacti graphs of the switches right now..
>
>  On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Sherry Abercrombie 
> wrote:
>
> Network issues?  Exchange is probably the most sensitive application to
> network throughput issues that I've seen.  Or maybe it's just more
> noticeable to users because of it's widespread use and that little pop-up
> that the users see.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Harry Singh  wrote:
>
> All -
>
> Exchange 2003 SP1 sitting on Windows 2000 SP4
> AD 2003 R2
>
> I noticed that my mail server froze completely, i couldn't RDP get into
> task manager, nothing. I had to physically shut it down and bring it back
> up. Prior to the freeze i noticed some users were getting the Outlook prompt
> in their sys trays "Outlook is retrieving information from your server", I
> KVM'd into the box and everything froze, hence the reboot.
>
> Now rebooted, everything is up but i notice an that at times a few users
> are getting the same prompt -- I've never received or experienced this on
> the mail server, and it's been up and running for over 3 years without this
> kind of issue.
>
> What can i do to start the troubleshooting process ?
>
> I checked my physical disks and they are all okay. Memory utilization is
> abnormal either. Is there a specific counter inside Perfmon i can monitor ?
>
> Looking forward to your help and suggestions,
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>   --
> Sherry Abercrombie
>
> "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
> Arthur C. Clarke
>
>
>

RE: Strange Exchange Freeze

[Andy Shook]

Wow; yore = you���re

Musgo���homcat ���wormu�longer.


Did you hear the one about ���sc not being a total dork-fish?
Me neithe

Shook

From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 8:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange Exchange Freeze

What switch(es) is(are) this server connected to If yore doing LaCP on the 
server via Broadcom control suite, you have to let the switches know at the 
port level, did anything change on the switch after the driver upgrade, I 
assume this was working as needed before the new Broadcom bits?

Shook
From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Strange Exchange Freeze

I have a broadcom team of 2 nics doing dynamic link addregation (LACP) I've 
updated the drivers about 3 weeks ago, when the last maintenance window passed.

I didn't notice anything else on the network at that time, but i'm looking at 
the cacti graphs of the switches right now..
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Sherry Abercrombie 
mailto:saber...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Network issues?  Exchange is probably the most sensitive application to network 
throughput issues that I've seen.  Or maybe it's just more noticeable to users 
because of it's widespread use and that little pop-up that the users see.

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Harry Singh 
mailto:hbo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
All -

Exchange 2003 SP1 sitting on Windows 2000 SP4
AD 2003 R2

I noticed that my mail server froze completely, i couldn't RDP get into task 
manager, nothing. I had to physically shut it down and bring it back up. Prior 
to the freeze i noticed some users were getting the Outlook prompt in their sys 
trays "Outlook is retrieving information from your server", I KVM'd into the 
box and everything froze, hence the reboot.

Now rebooted, everything is up but i notice an that at times a few users are 
getting the same prompt -- I've never received or experienced this on the mail 
server, and it's been up and running for over 3 years without this kind of 
issue.

What can i do to start the troubleshooting process ?

I checked my physical disks and they are all okay. Memory utilization is 
abnormal either. Is there a specific counter inside Perfmon i can monitor ?

Looking forward to your help and suggestions,

Thanks,


--
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke

Re: Strange Exchange Freeze

[Harry Singh]

Word..

On 8/12/09, Andy Shook  wrote:
> Wow; yore = you  Öre
>
> Mus  ÇŽgo  Žhom  ÇŽca  ÇÖt   Žwor  ÇŽmu  Ô Žlonger.
>
>
> Did you hear the one about   ôsc not being a total dork-fish?
> Me neithe  ÇŽ
>
> Shook
>
> From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 8:12 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Strange Exchange Freeze
>
> What switch(es) is(are) this server connected to If yore doing LaCP on the
> server via Broadcom control suite, you have to let the switches know at the
> port level, did anything change on the switch after the driver upgrade, I
> assume this was working as needed before the new Broadcom bits?
>
> Shook
> From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:35 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Strange Exchange Freeze
>
> I have a broadcom team of 2 nics doing dynamic link addregation (LACP) I've
> updated the drivers about 3 weeks ago, when the last maintenance window
> passed.
>
> I didn't notice anything else on the network at that time, but i'm looking
> at the cacti graphs of the switches right now..
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Sherry Abercrombie
> mailto:saber...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Network issues?  Exchange is probably the most sensitive application to
> network throughput issues that I've seen.  Or maybe it's just more
> noticeable to users because of it's widespread use and that little pop-up
> that the users see.
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Harry Singh
> mailto:hbo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> All -
>
> Exchange 2003 SP1 sitting on Windows 2000 SP4
> AD 2003 R2
>
> I noticed that my mail server froze completely, i couldn't RDP get into task
> manager, nothing. I had to physically shut it down and bring it back up.
> Prior to the freeze i noticed some users were getting the Outlook prompt in
> their sys trays "Outlook is retrieving information from your server", I
> KVM'd into the box and everything froze, hence the reboot.
>
> Now rebooted, everything is up but i notice an that at times a few users are
> getting the same prompt -- I've never received or experienced this on the
> mail server, and it's been up and running for over 3 years without this kind
> of issue.
>
> What can i do to start the troubleshooting process ?
>
> I checked my physical disks and they are all okay. Memory utilization is
> abnormal either. Is there a specific counter inside Perfmon i can monitor ?
>
> Looking forward to your help and suggestions,
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> --
> Sherry Abercrombie
>
> "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
> Arthur C. Clarke
>
>
>

RE: Strange Exchange Freeze

[Steven M. Caesare]

ll ignore that little factoid I would have preferred you keep under wraps 
and ask: did you have characters just disappear out of your messages?

Happens to me on this list.

-sc

From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 8:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange Exchange Freeze

Wow; yore = yore

Musthomecanworkmuclonger.


Did you hear the one abousc not being a total dork-fish?
Me neith

Shook

From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 8:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange Exchange Freeze

What switch(es) is(are) this server connected to If yore doing LaCP on the 
server via Broadcom control suite, you have to let the switches know at the 
port level, did anything change on the switch after the driver upgrade, I 
assume this was working as needed before the new Broadcom bits? 

Shook
From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Strange Exchange Freeze

I have a broadcom team of 2 nics doing dynamic link addregation (LACP) I've 
updated the drivers about 3 weeks ago, when the last maintenance window passed.

I didn't notice anything else on the network at that time, but i'm looking at 
the cacti graphs of the switches right now..
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Sherry Abercrombie  wrote:
Network issues��� Exchange is probably the most sensitive application to 
network throughput issues that I've seen��� Or maybe it's just more noticeable 
to users because of it's widespread use and that little pop-up that the users 
see.

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Harry Singh  wrote:
All -

Exchange 2003 SP1 sitting on Windows 2000 SP4
AD 2003 R2

I noticed that my mail server froze completely, i couldn't RDP get into task 
manager, nothing. I had to physically shut it down and bring it back up. Prior 
to the freeze i noticed some users were getting the Outlook prompt in their sys 
trays "Outlook is retrieving information from your server", I KVM'd into the 
box and everything froze, hence the reboot.

Now rebooted, everything is up but i notice an that at times a few users are 
getting the same prompt -- I've never received or experienced this on the mail 
server, and it's been up and running for over 3 years without this kind of 
issue. 

What can i do to start the troubleshooting process ?

I checked my physical disks and they are all okay. Memory utilization is 
abnormal either. Is there a specific counter inside Perfmon i can monitor ?

Looking forward to your help and suggestions,

Thanks,



-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." 
Arthur C. Clarke

Re: Strange Exchange Freeze

[Harry Singh]

Same characters happen to me..

On 8/12/09, Steven M. Caesare  wrote:
> ÿÿ€™ll ignore that little factoid I would have preferred you keep under
> wraps and ask: did you have characters just disappear out of your messages?
>
> Happens to me on this list.
>
> -sc
>
> From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 8:16 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Strange Exchange Freeze
>
> Wow; yore = yore
>
> Musthomecanworkmuclonger.
>
>
> Did you hear the one abousc not being a total dork-fish?
> Me neith
>
> Shook
>
> From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 8:12 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Strange Exchange Freeze
>
> What switch(es) is(are) this server connected to If yore doing LaCP on the
> server via Broadcom control suite, you have to let the switches know at the
> port level, did anything change on the switch after the driver upgrade, I
> assume this was working as needed before the new Broadcom bits?
>
> Shook
> From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:35 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Strange Exchange Freeze
>
> I have a broadcom team of 2 nics doing dynamic link addregation (LACP) I've
> updated the drivers about 3 weeks ago, when the last maintenance window
> passed.
>
> I didn't notice anything else on the network at that time, but i'm looking
> at the cacti graphs of the switches right now..
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Sherry Abercrombie 
> wrote:
> Network issuesÿÿ  Exchange is probably the most sensitive application to
> network throughput issues that I've seenÿÿ  Or maybe it's just more
> noticeable to users because of it's widespread use and that little pop-up
> that the users see.
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Harry Singh  wrote:
> All -
>
> Exchange 2003 SP1 sitting on Windows 2000 SP4
> AD 2003 R2
>
> I noticed that my mail server froze completely, i couldn't RDP get into task
> manager, nothing. I had to physically shut it down and bring it back up.
> Prior to the freeze i noticed some users were getting the Outlook prompt in
> their sys trays "Outlook is retrieving information from your server", I
> KVM'd into the box and everything froze, hence the reboot.
>
> Now rebooted, everything is up but i notice an that at times a few users are
> getting the same prompt -- I've never received or experienced this on the
> mail server, and it's been up and running for over 3 years without this kind
> of issue.
>
> What can i do to start the troubleshooting process ?
>
> I checked my physical disks and they are all okay. Memory utilization is
> abnormal either. Is there a specific counter inside Perfmon i can monitor ?
>
> Looking forward to your help and suggestions,
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> --
> Sherry Abercrombie
>
> "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
> Arthur C. Clarke
>
>

Re: Strange Exchange Freeze

[Kurt Buff]

Are you using a mail client, or posting in the forum?

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 18:05, Steven M. Caesare wrote:
> ÿÿ€™ll ignore that little factoid I would have preferred you keep under wraps 
> and ask: did you have characters just disappear out of your messages?
>
> Happens to me on this list.
>
> -sc
>
> From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 8:16 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Strange Exchange Freeze
>
> Wow; yore = yore
>
> Musthomecanworkmuclonger.
>
>
> Did you hear the one abousc not being a total dork-fish?
> Me neith
>
> Shook
>
> From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 8:12 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Strange Exchange Freeze
>
> What switch(es) is(are) this server connected to If yore doing LaCP on the 
> server via Broadcom control suite, you have to let the switches know at the 
> port level, did anything change on the switch after the driver upgrade, I 
> assume this was working as needed before the new Broadcom bits?
>
> Shook
> From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:35 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Strange Exchange Freeze
>
> I have a broadcom team of 2 nics doing dynamic link addregation (LACP) I've 
> updated the drivers about 3 weeks ago, when the last maintenance window 
> passed.
>
> I didn't notice anything else on the network at that time, but i'm looking at 
> the cacti graphs of the switches right now..
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Sherry Abercrombie  
> wrote:
> Network issuesÿÿ  Exchange is probably the most sensitive application to 
> network throughput issues that I've seenÿÿ  Or maybe it's just more 
> noticeable to users because of it's widespread use and that little pop-up 
> that the users see.
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Harry Singh  wrote:
> All -
>
> Exchange 2003 SP1 sitting on Windows 2000 SP4
> AD 2003 R2
>
> I noticed that my mail server froze completely, i couldn't RDP get into task 
> manager, nothing. I had to physically shut it down and bring it back up. 
> Prior to the freeze i noticed some users were getting the Outlook prompt in 
> their sys trays "Outlook is retrieving information from your server", I KVM'd 
> into the box and everything froze, hence the reboot.
>
> Now rebooted, everything is up but i notice an that at times a few users are 
> getting the same prompt -- I've never received or experienced this on the 
> mail server, and it's been up and running for over 3 years without this kind 
> of issue.
>
> What can i do to start the troubleshooting process ?
>
> I checked my physical disks and they are all okay. Memory utilization is 
> abnormal either. Is there a specific counter inside Perfmon i can monitor ?
>
> Looking forward to your help and suggestions,
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> --
> Sherry Abercrombie
>
> "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
> Arthur C. Clarke
>
>