Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 7/2/07 8:10:51 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A few years ago we couldn't have imagined that our government would ban public demonstrations by forcing protesters into Free Speech Zones behind fences, miles away from other Americans. The unimaginable has now become real. ~~ RJ Eskow A few years ago we weren't dealing with a world wide movement of terrorism hell bent on destroying our civilization and using our values of freedom, tolerance and diversity against us either. You might look back in history and see what other presidents did in times of war that temporarily curbed freedoms. Lincoln and Roosevelt come to mind immediately. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 7/2/07 9:23:05 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hermann Göring explains how the Nazis were able to make use of this Oh Palease! How assinine! ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 7/2/07 8:10:51 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A few years ago we couldn't have imagined that our government would ban public demonstrations by forcing protesters into Free Speech Zones behind fences, miles away from other Americans. The unimaginable has now become real. ~~ RJ Eskow A few years ago we weren't dealing with a world wide movement of terrorism hell bent on destroying our civilization and using our values of freedom, tolerance and diversity against us either. You might look back in history and see what other presidents did in times of war that temporarily curbed freedoms. Lincoln and Roosevelt come to mind immediately. There have always been terrorists throughout history. To the British there were some in a colony of theirs back around the 1770s they wanted to get rid of. One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Bush and company are using terrorism as an excuse to control the masses. I was listing to the talking chimp last night trying to freak Americans out again over terrorism. I'm not going along with it. Lincoln was not as popular as our grade school history books like to make out. I think you mean Woodrow Wilson and his sedition act not Roosevelt. We don't need these either.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 7/2/07 11:23:32 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Nooz I never have doubted that Al Qaeda are nothing more than freedom fighters to you. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 7/2/07 11:38:30 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BushCo didn't hesitate to conflate Saddam with 9/11 over and over and over and over again. Actually, he didn't. Indeed, at the time, he went out of his way to say that there wasn't a connection. Thank you Shemp! This is their mantra. But Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11! Trying to confuse people even more. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 7/2/07 11:41:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time, do.rfl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BushCo didn't hesitate to conflate Saddam with 9/11 over and over and over and over again. Actually, he didn't. Indeed, at the time, he went out of his way to say that there wasn't a connection. You're either lying or you're really extremely self-deluded.Yo possibly beyond hope. Last Updated: Thursday, 18 September, 2003, 02:03 GMT 03:03 UK Bush rejects Saddam 9/11 link US President George Bush has said there is no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved in the 11 September attacks. The comments - among his most explicit so far on the issue - come after a recent opinion poll found that nearly 70% of Americans believed the Iraqi leader was personally involved in the attacks. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 7/2/07 3:35:51 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Although there was suspicion that there was a link, it wasn't over and over and over again as you say. Of course, the reality is that there WAS a link: _http://www.frontpaghttp://wwhttp://wwhttp://www.fhttp://www.f_ (http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13323) That claim has been debunked by the FBI. I believe the link of Saddam to AlQaeda was originally made during the Clinton administration after the bombing of the Aspirin factory in Sudan. Please point out the paragraph where Bush says Saddam was involved with 911. I saw a lot about not trusting Saddam not to help AlQaeda which is reasonable since Saddam was helping Palestinian suicide bombers and giving their families $ 20,000.00. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 7/2/07 3:52:34 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: do.rflex: Whatever you have reproduced here does NOT back up your claim that Bush over and over and over again tried to tie Saddam to 9/11. Show us evidence of THAT instead of distracting us with pap. Exactly ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 7/2/07 11:23:32 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Nooz I never have doubted that Al Qaeda are nothing more than freedom fighters to you. You mean Al CIA-da? They're more you ilk than mine.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 6/30/07 6:25:00 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Whether they are or not has no bearing on Trent Lott. Right wingers like to play the somebody else is a scumbag like our guy card and try to make it a partisan issue. As if that somehow justifies or exonerates the actual person being discussed. For what it's worth much fewer than 25% of blacks vote in Mississippi. You still dodge the question. I guess you can't admit that Beiden and Byrd are racist. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 6/30/07 7:06:21 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The point is that he complained about too much freedom of speech. IOW, he is for restraining freedom of speech which is something we cannot tolerate. Fire Fire Fire! There is a Fire in the Theater! So I guess freedom of speech is an absolute? ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 6/30/07 7:06:21 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The point is that he complained about too much freedom of speech. IOW, he is for restraining freedom of speech which is something we cannot tolerate. Fire Fire Fire! There is a Fire in the Theater! So I guess freedom of speech is an absolute? Now you're being childish just like your right wing gurus.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 7/1/07 11:43:05 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The point is that he complained about too much freedom of speech. IOW, he is for restraining freedom of speech which is something we cannot tolerate. Fire Fire Fire! There is a Fire in the Theater! So I guess freedom of speech is an absolute? Now you're being childish just like your right wing gurus. No Nooz, freedom of speech is not an absolute. There are all kinds of restrictions on it. Think about it. Do you have a right to slander somebody, incite a riot, yell fire in a crowd theater? The list can go on and on what you can't do that involves free speech. What is sacred, is free political speech and even that now has limitations on it. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 7/1/07 11:43:05 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The point is that he complained about too much freedom of speech. IOW, he is for restraining freedom of speech which is something we cannot tolerate. Fire Fire Fire! There is a Fire in the Theater! So I guess freedom of speech is an absolute? Now you're being childish just like your right wing gurus. No Nooz, freedom of speech is not an absolute. There are all kinds of restrictions on it. Think about it. Do you have a right to slander somebody, incite a riot, yell fire in a crowd theater? The list can go on and on what you can't do that involves free speech. What is sacred, is free political speech and even that now has limitations on it. That is beside the point. Our discussion was about Republicans calling for restrictions on free speech. Just as Judy points out who decides what restrictions there should be? How would you like it if I were in charge of policing speech? Better to have a free-for-all. We know that the Republicans want speech restrictions not for stopping terrorism (which it won't anyway) but to restrict speech critical of them. Though not Republican or an American, Tony Blair on leaving office called for a shutdown of 9-11 truth sites on the internet as he said they endanger government. To quote V for Vendetta, it is better for the government to be afraid of the people than people afraid of their government. You challenged me a concrete source of a Republican wanting to ban free speech and I found one with Gingrich (Lott's interview was on the NYTime's site and would require a subscription for you to read). You lost and therefore like a lot of righties changed the topic.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 7/1/07 2:35:25 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That is beside the point. Our discussion was about Republicans calling for restrictions on free speech. You never said what restrictions they called for. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 6/30/07 9:51:46 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But it doesn't matter that Trent Lott is a racist because Albert Gore Sr. was too. You really haven't proven Trent Lott is a Racist. The excuse you use is lame at best since he was honoring an old, mind you, very old colleague on his birthday. It did take somemind reading to assume what was assumed by those who took offense. Plus a high percentage of blacks vote for Lott each time he runs. A racist wouldn't have apologized let alone apologized multiple times even on BET for any offense taken. Let me ask you, is Robert Byrd a racist or Joe Beiden or were they just misunderstood when their slips of the tongue were much more direct and to the point? So for you to assume Trent Lott is a racist without any more proof than what you have sited make you prejudice. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 6/30/07 11:08:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Call for references for this high percentage of black votes. A racist wouldn't have apologized let alone apologized multiple times even on BET for any offense taken. Sure they would, especially if it's politically expedient. Let me ask you, is Robert Byrd a racist or Joe Beiden or were they just misunderstood when their slips of the tongue were much more direct and to the point? So for you to assume Trent Lott is a racist without any more proof than what you have sited make you prejudice. Again, any other person's racism doesn't exonerate Trent Lott I'll provide a source in the near future but I had heard he had received about 25% of the black vote. Quite high for a Republican. You still haven't said what Lott said that was racist. You only assume that because he spoke kindly of a Strom Thurmond at his birthday party that he was racist. You assumed that when he said had Thurmond been elected we wouldn't have had all these problems was directed specifically towards race when Thurmond was a strong proponent of law and order, avid anti-communist and fiscal conservative . You never answered my question, is Robert Byrd or Joe Beiden a racist? ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
Furthermore on this topic I recalled that Newt Gingrich had said there is too much freedom of speech on the Internet. Here's the article: Former House Speaker and presumptive 2008 Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich addressed a freedom-of-speech awards dinner in New Hampshire last night and said the problem with the Internet in an age of terrorism is that it allows too damn much freedom of speech. the rest is here: http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/9383
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 6/30/07 2:16:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: don't know about subsequent elections, but I doubt it improved much. Quite high for a Republican. You still haven't said what Lott said that was racist. What did Lott apologize for? _Kevin L. Martin_ (http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2002/9/30/170651) , government and political affairs director of the _African American Republican Leadership Council_ (http://www.aarlc.com/about/advisory.shtml) , said people were overreacting to the remarks. By no means was he endorsing segregation or anything like that. It was lighthearted, it was humorous. Martin said Lott captures 25 percent of the black vote in Mississippi, which he said couldn't happen if Lott were a racist. Lott apologized for the misunderstanding which was fanned by the media. You still haven't answered my question which you keep dodging. Is Robert Byrd or Joe Beiden racist? ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 6/30/07 2:56:03 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Former House Speaker and presumptive 2008 Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich addressed a freedom-of-speech awards dinner in New Hampshire last night and said the problem with the Internet in an age of terrorism is that it allows too damn much freedom of speech. Naturally you would like for Terrorists to be able to use the Internet freely so they can plan their acts of terrorism. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 6/30/07 2:56:03 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Former House Speaker and presumptive 2008 Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich addressed a freedom-of-speech awards dinner in New Hampshire last night and said the problem with the Internet in an age of terrorism is that it allows too damn much freedom of speech. Naturally you would like for Terrorists to be able to use the Internet freely so they can plan their acts of terrorism. There you go again, obfuscating the point. The point is that he complained about too much freedom of speech. IOW, he is for restraining freedom of speech which is something we cannot tolerate.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 6/28/07 7:57:13 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At least it's not Republicans or conservatives that want to shut down free political speech. Oh really? So Trent Lott who recently called for a shutdown of the internet and talk radio is not a Republican. What is he then? Have any other facts to fabricate for us? In fairness to Trent Lott, he never said, to my knowledge, anything about shutting down the Internet or talk radio. Would you like to quote him? Perhaps you would like to fabricate one to support your accusation. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 6/28/07 7:59:57 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ...as for additional examples, noozguru supplies them himself in this very post with references like Fourth Reich, this breed of right fascism, and dictator. No, the Bush administration is supplying those by the way their behave. Wake up! Oops , did it again! ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 6/28/07 7:40:48 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BTW I gave Sal the example she challenged me for and so did Shemp. Well, let's see. Bill Maher is a libertarian and has never been any kind of spokesman for or even identified with the Democratic party, as far as I know. And the Alec Baldwin quote is from 9! years ago, and he is neither a journalist, nor a writer, nor any kind of spokesman either. The fact that he's written on occasion for the Huffington Post doesn't mean much. Arriana Huffington herself is a recovering Republican. And Ann Coulter is simply a columnist and author. Bill Maher may not be a card carrying Democrat but my God, he sure is a super liberal. You asked for examples and we gave them to you. How many do you want? ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 6/29/07 10:22:10 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Oh really? So Trent Lott who recently called for a shutdown of the internet and talk radio is not a Republican. What is he then? Have any other facts to fabricate for us? In fairness to Trent Lott, he never said, to my knowledge, anything about shutting down the Internet or talk radio. Would you like to quote him? Perhaps you would like to fabricate one to support your accusation. This is what Lott said: Talk radio is running America, Sen. Trent Lott (R-MS) recently told the New York Times. We have to deal with that problem. So where does this statement say anything about shutting down talk radio or any conservative talk show hosts. In fact, Lott doesn't propose a solution to the problem. Dealing with a problem can also mean living with it. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 6/27/07 10:14:52 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My recommendation: work with energy fields and attach a prayer to the energy, saying something like Cheney, may your bad karma return 3-fold, and soon!. That way, the exact manner of the karmic return will be left to circumstancesw A prayer? Sounds more like a curse. The curse binds the Cursor and cursed together for eternity. Enjoy your time with the V.P. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
Richard J. Williams wrote: MDixon wrote: IS the venom of the left so natural to you that you don't even recognize it when it is spewed? Bhairitu wrote: You are the pot calling the kettle black. Yes, the venom is so natural that Bharat2 didn't even mention Bill Maher's hate speech, or even acknowledge it, yet Bharat2 is a Bill Maher watcher. So, I'd say that rather than Dixon being the pot, that Bharat2 is both pot and kettle, since it was Ann and Bill that made the comments, not Dixon. I was commenting on Dixon's comment not Maher or Coulter.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 6/28/07 1:34:39 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: MDixon wrote: IS the venom of the left so natural to you that you don't even recognize it when it is spewed? Bhairitu wrote: You are the pot calling the kettle black. Yes, the venom is so natural that Bharat2 didn't even mention Bill Maher's hate speech, or even acknowledge it, yet Bharat2 is a Bill Maher watcher. So, I'd say that rather than Dixon being the pot, that Bharat2 is both pot and kettle, since it was Ann and Bill that made the comments, not Dixon. I was commenting on Dixon's comment not Maher or Coulter. Right Nooz, and my comment was too Sal who had asked, Let's see you provide an example. Notice that they never do-they just speak in vague generalities.They can't, which is why they don't. So put my question to Sal in context. Surely she isn't so blind or uninformed that she doesn't hear or read the venom constantly poured out by the left or either it is acceptable in her eyes. What is good for the goose is good for the gander. There seems to be a number of people in this forum that think the left can do no wrong and are justified in anything they say yet if somebody from the right makes an equally offensive remark back, that crosses the line and isn't very nice. BTW I gave Sal the example she challenged me for and so did Shemp. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 6/28/07 1:34:39 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: MDixon wrote: IS the venom of the left so natural to you that you don't even recognize it when it is spewed? Bhairitu wrote: You are the pot calling the kettle black. Yes, the venom is so natural that Bharat2 didn't even mention Bill Maher's hate speech, or even acknowledge it, yet Bharat2 is a Bill Maher watcher. So, I'd say that rather than Dixon being the pot, that Bharat2 is both pot and kettle, since it was Ann and Bill that made the comments, not Dixon. I was commenting on Dixon's comment not Maher or Coulter. Right Nooz, and my comment was too Sal who had asked, Let's see you provide an example. Notice that they never do-they just speak in vague generalities.They can't, which is why they don't. So put my question to Sal in context. Surely she isn't so blind or uninformed that she doesn't hear or read the venom constantly poured out by the left or either it is acceptable in her eyes. What is good for the goose is good for the gander. There seems to be a number of people in this forum that think the left can do no wrong and are justified in anything they say yet if somebody from the right makes an equally offensive remark back, that crosses the line and isn't very nice. BTW I gave Sal the example she challenged me for and so did Shemp. Just turn on Fox or your local Rush outlet and you can here the vague generalities all the time. View Robert Greenwald's Outfoxed documentary where the generalities are clearly demonstrated from Fox clips. Why do you want to affiliate yourself with members of the Fourth Reich which is what this breed of right fascism is about? And do you really expect those of us who are progressives to just roll over and play dead? You've been duped into voting against your own best interests. Bush and Cheney think they are dictators. Do you really want to live in a dictatorship? I listen a bit to talk radio, some of it is Air America where like to listen to Thom Hartmann who has good well research opinions then I like to listen to some of the constitutional conservatives such as Alex Jones and the guests he has on. Alex likes to be well researched too these days. Alex has also been a guest on Thom's show. Sometimes (or too often) Alex goes a little over the top but in general his shows are often interesting and there are a few others on GCN like Webster Tarpley who are interesting to listen too. The thing is some of these folks consider themselves conservative but they hate Bush, Cheney, the NeoCons, the CFR and the NWO. These as well as the preservation of our civil liberties and constitution are things we hold in common. Hell I probably have more in common with Pat Buchanan and Bob Barr than I do with you, Shemp and Willie. You guys don't seem to realize how much you've been duped and what you want to give up. Some of the left has been duped too but most of us know the bigger picture and pull the rope to balance things out.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 6/28/07 4:49:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just turn on Fox or your local Rush outlet and you can here the vague generalities all the time. View Robert Greenwald's Outfoxed documentary where the generalities are clearly demonstrated from Fox clips. Why do you want to affiliate yourself with members of the Fourth Reich which is what this breed of right fascism is about? And do you really expect those of us who are progressives to just roll over and play dead? You've been duped into voting against your own best interests. Bush and Cheney think they are dictators. Do you really want to live in a dictatorship? I think the vague generalities Sal was referring to were Shemp's and mine, in regard to the left's nastiness that they were accusing Ann Coulter of having a monopoly on. We both gave her specific examples that she called for. Fourth Reich, palease, do you know anything about fascism? At least it's not Republicans or conservatives that want to shut down free political speech. You're not progressive, your a common liberal. No neither Bush nor Cheney think they are dictators, just you and a few others. No, I sure don't want to live in a dictatorship but maybe some of your leftist buddies do since they love to adore people like Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
On Jun 28, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Bhairitu wrote: BTW I gave Sal the example she challenged me for and so did Shemp. Well, let's see. Bill Maher is a libertarian and has never been any kind of spokesman for or even identified with the Democratic party, as far as I know. And the Alec Baldwin quote is from 9! years ago, and he is neither a journalist, nor a writer, nor any kind of spokesman either. The fact that he's written on occasion for the Huffington Post doesn't mean much. Arriana Huffington herself is a recovering Republican. Still, at least you both tried. The fact that that was all you could come up with speaks for itself. Just turn on Fox or your local Rush outlet and you can here the vague generalities all the time. View Robert Greenwald's Outfoxed documentary where the generalities are clearly demonstrated from Fox clips. Why do you want to affiliate yourself with members of the Fourth Reich which is what this breed of right fascism is about? And do you really expect those of us who are progressives to just roll over and play dead? You've been duped into voting against your own best interests. That's the saddest part of it all, really, IMO. Bush and Cheney think they are dictators. Do you really want to live in a dictatorship?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 6/28/07 4:49:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just turn on Fox or your local Rush outlet and you can here the vague generalities all the time. View Robert Greenwald's Outfoxed documentary where the generalities are clearly demonstrated from Fox clips. Why do you want to affiliate yourself with members of the Fourth Reich which is what this breed of right fascism is about? And do you really expect those of us who are progressives to just roll over and play dead? You've been duped into voting against your own best interests. Bush and Cheney think they are dictators. Do you really want to live in a dictatorship? I think the vague generalities Sal was referring to were Shemp's and mine, in regard to the left's nastiness that they were accusing Ann Coulter of having a monopoly on. We both gave her specific examples that she called for. Fourth Reich, palease, do you know anything about fascism? Yes I do and obviously you don't. What is a dictator other than people who think they are above the law? And what do we see right now with Bush and Cheney, eh? At least it's not Republicans or conservatives that want to shut down free political speech. Oh really? So Trent Lott who recently called for a shutdown of the internet and talk radio is not a Republican. What is he then? Have any other facts to fabricate for us? You're not progressive, your a common liberal. How do you know that? No neither Bush nor Cheney think they are dictators, just you and a few others. No, I sure don't want to live in a dictatorship but maybe some of your leftist buddies do since they love to adore people like Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez. Go get some more beer and crackers.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
shempmcgurk wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 6/28/07 4:49:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just turn on Fox or your local Rush outlet and you can here the vague generalities all the time. View Robert Greenwald's Outfoxed documentary where the generalities are clearly demonstrated from Fox clips. Why do you want to affiliate yourself with members of the Fourth Reich which is what this breed of right fascism is about? And do you really expect those of us who are progressives to just roll over and play dead? You've been duped into voting against your own best interests. Bush and Cheney think they are dictators. Do you really want to live in a dictatorship? I think the vague generalities Sal was referring to were Shemp's and mine, in regard to the left's nastiness that they were accusing Ann Coulter of having a monopoly on. We both gave her specific examples that she called for. ...as for additional examples, noozguru supplies them himself in this very post with references like Fourth Reich, this breed of right fascism, and dictator. No, the Bush administration is supplying those by the way their behave. Wake up! snip
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
Sal Sunshine wrote: On Jun 28, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Bhairitu wrote: BTW I gave Sal the example she challenged me for and so did Shemp. Well, let's see. Bill Maher is a libertarian and has never been any kind of spokesman for or even identified with the Democratic party, as far as I know. And the Alec Baldwin quote is from 9! years ago, and he is neither a journalist, nor a writer, nor any kind of spokesman either. The fact that he's written on occasion for the Huffington Post doesn't mean much. Arriana Huffington herself is a recovering Republican. Still, at least you both tried. The fact that that was all you could come up with speaks for itself. Just turn on Fox or your local Rush outlet and you can here the vague generalities all the time. View Robert Greenwald's Outfoxed documentary where the generalities are clearly demonstrated from Fox clips. Why do you want to affiliate yourself with members of the Fourth Reich which is what this breed of right fascism is about? And do you really expect those of us who are progressives to just roll over and play dead? You've been duped into voting against your own best interests. That's the saddest part of it all, really, IMO. If you've ever read Mien Kampf you can see how the first 50 pages or so swayed the simple minded of Germany into being Hitler's followers just like Fox, Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, O'Reilly and their ilk do to the simple minded here. Real thinking conservatives hate those people and hate what the Bush administration is doing to this country. It us against the Bush zombies or twilight of the living dead.
RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of lurkernomore20002000 Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 10:42 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son --- In HYPERLINK mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.comFairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you've ever read Mien Kampf you can see how the first 50 pages or so swayed the simple minded of Germany into being Hitler's followers just like Fox, Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, O'Reilly and their ilk do to the simple minded here. Having three young kids, we have thoroughly enjoyed the Chronicles of Narnia. Limbaugh reminds me of Shift, the ape, (in the last book). Shift spins everthing in a simple way such that it confuses his friend Puzzle the donkey. The results are disasterous. Limbaugh was obviously only a C student, but he is absolutely gifted in reducing gray issues into stark black and white. Give him credit for that. Must be his TM practice. Why can't the left come up with someone to counter this. Because the left is intelligent and therefore nuanced. See the movie “Idiocracy”. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.10/876 - Release Date: 6/28/2007 10:56 AM
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 6/27/2007 3:27:51 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I remember seeing Ann for the first time on TV about five years ago. Since then I have seen her several times on talk shows on every major network. To me she has always been very heartless. Most women I know are not as heartless as she is. She is a young soul who thinks sarcasm is justified even when she is saying very derogatory things about others. She laughs after each statement showing she is just acting like a three year old. I think people who are buying her books should stop doing so. She has very little political class and makes women look less than when it comes to intelligence of any kind. Lsoma. --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com) , shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it ever appropriate to invoke a candidate's dead son in political commentary? _http://youtube.http://youhttp://youtub_ (http://youtube.com/watch?v=6otjSCjgm48) When you're possessed with evil, as Ann Coulter is, anything goes... She's getting more and more out of control; Yesterday, appearing on 'Hardball'- Chris Mathews, at the end of the interview with her said, I can't get to the confessional fast enough, after this show... Coulter spews pure garbage. Also, black nighty half naked look, seems to turn on the youngins' She's just using her power in the wrong way, and has allowed herself to go down a dark road. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
On Jun 27, 2007, at 7:16 PM, do.rflex wrote: Give us an example of someone on the left who is comparable to Ann Coulter. Have you ever read the huffingtonpost.com? They have dozens of columnists -- all on the left -- and the vitriole and insults they spew out make Ann Coulter look like an alter boy by comparison. Let's see you provide an example. Notice that they never do--they just speak in vague generalities. They can't, which is why they don't. Sal
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 6/27/07 6:29:24 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I challenge you to come up with anything comparable to this from someone of prominence on the left: Video: Ann Coulter wants John Edwards killed _http://www.youtube.http://wwwhttp://www.yo;WBR_ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ws_bXU6Rjkeurl=) Challenge graciously accepted. Bill Mahr, said earlier this spring it was a pity VP Cheney was killed by terrorists. I believe it was said while he was in Afghanistan and some terrorist blew a bomb up near the base Cheney was staying on. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 6/27/07 9:23:04 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In a message dated 6/27/07 6:29:24 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a messag I challenge you to come up with anything comparable to this from someone of prominence on the left: Video: Ann Coulter wants John Edwards killed _http://www.youtube.http://wwwhttp://www.yo;WBR_ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ws_bXU6Rjkeurl=) Challenge graciously accepted. Bill Mahr, said earlier this spring it was a pity VP Cheney was killed by terrorists. I believe it was said while he was in Afghanistan and some terrorist blew a bomb up near the base Cheney was staying on. Correction: Mahr said it was a pity Cheney Wasn't killed. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 6/27/07 7:52:08 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Let's see you provide an example. Notice that they never do--they just speak in vague generalities. They can't, which is why they don't. Sal I did in my last post. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 6/27/07 7:52:08 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Let's see you provide an example. Notice that they never do--they just speak in vague generalities. They can't, which is why they don't. Sal IS the venom of the left so natural to you that you don't even recognize it when it is spewed? ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
In a message dated 6/27/07 9:33:54 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Correction: Mahr said it was a pity Cheney Wasn't killed. Maher was being kind. Cheney is a war criminal of the worst kind. Hanging would be more appropriate. But I'll live with impeachment.appropriate. But I'll live with impeachment.WBR..t Yes, I corrected myself in my next post. And the rest of what you said made my point. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 6/27/07 7:52:08 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Let's see you provide an example. Notice that they never do--they just speak in vague generalities. They can't, which is why they don't. Sal IS the venom of the left so natural to you that you don't even recognize it when it is spewed? You are the pot calling the kettle black.
