freeradius and syslog-ng

2010-08-25 Thread mack ragan
Hi,

I have freeradius v2.0.5.  I modified the log{} section of radiusd.conf to
send logs to syslog-ng.  In syslog-ng, I filter them out to a log
collector.  This seems to be working well.  Now, I would like to get detail
and auth to the log collector.  Anyone know if this is possible?

Thanks!
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

CA.all problem

2007-09-06 Thread Mack Ragan

Hi,

Using the provided script CA.all, trying to create self-signed certs 
on a new freeradius box and running into a missing serial file problem.  
Executing the commands in the script line-by-line shows that the command 
openssl ca  -policy policy_anything  -out newcert.pem -passin 
pass:whatever -key whatever -extensions xpserver_ext -extfile 
xpextensions -infiles newreq.pem is what is looking for the file 
./demoCA/serial which does not exist.  I think it is normally created 
during CA.pl -newca but this doesn't appear to happen with the 
script's command of echo newreq.pem | /usr/local/ssl/misc/CA.pl 
-newca.  I'm using OpenSSL version 0.9.8e.  Anyone have this experience?


Thanks!
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: CA.all problem

2007-09-06 Thread Mack Ragan
Thanks Alan.  I have actually figured out some openssl commands that 
seem to have worked ok for me.  I'll post them a little later for what 
it's worth to anyone.


Alan DeKok wrote:

Mack Ragan wrote:
  

Using the provided script CA.all, trying to create self-signed certs
on a new freeradius box and running into a missing serial file problem. 
Executing the commands in the script line-by-line shows that the command

openssl ca  -policy policy_anything  -out newcert.pem -passin
pass:whatever -key whatever -extensions xpserver_ext -extfile
xpextensions -infiles newreq.pem is what is looking for the file
./demoCA/serial which does not exist.  I think it is normally created
during CA.pl -newca but this doesn't appear to happen with the
script's command of echo newreq.pem | /usr/local/ssl/misc/CA.pl
-newca.  I'm using OpenSSL version 0.9.8e.  Anyone have this experience?



  OpenSSL has changed the way their scripts run a number of times.  I've
pretty mich given up trying to keep up.

  Instead, use the certificate generation tools in 2.0.0-pre2.  They're
simple and easy to use.

  Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
  

-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: eap_ttls and eap_peap linking problem SOLVED

2004-06-25 Thread Mack
SOLVED -- sort of

Using CVS snapshopt 20040625, still had same problem.  Using ./configure --with-
system-libtool did not work either...same results.

Using ./configure --disable-shared results in an error free make and make 
install.  Now, radiusd runs fine.  Configured eap_ttls and it seems to work fine so 
far, 
to.  Must have been a problem with my version of libtool (1.5.2).  Any 
thoughts/comments as to advantages/disadvantages of enabling/disabling shared 
libs?

Hope this helps someone --

mack


On 23 Jun 2004 at 16:04, Mack wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Problem linking eap_ttls and eap_peap on the following system:
 
 Gentoo Linux
 gcc-3.3.3
 glibc-2.3.3
 libtool-1.5.2
 openssl-0.9.7d
 kernel 2.6.7
 
 I am using the latest nightly CVS build (20040623).
 
 Here's some of the output of make:
 
 .
 
 Making static dynamic in rlm_eap_peap...
 gmake[9]: Entering directory `/home/mack/sources/freeradius-snapshot-
 20040623/src/modules/rlm_eap/types/rlm_eap_peap' gmake[9]: Nothing to
 be done for `static'.
 /home/mack/sources/freeradius-snapshot-20040623/libtool --mode=compile
 gcc  -g - O2 -D_REENTRANT -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5
   -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-qual
 -Wcast-align - Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
 -Wmissing-declarations - Wnested-externs -W -Wredundant-decls -Wundef 
 -I../../../../include  -I../..   - I../rlm_eap_tls -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5
 -I./../../libeap -c rlm_eap_peap.c mkdir .libs
  gcc -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -
 DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -
 Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes
 -Wmissing-prototypes - Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -W
 -Wredundant-decls -Wundef - I../../../../include -I../..
 -I../rlm_eap_tls -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -I./../../libeap -c rlm_eap_peap.c 
 -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/rlm_eap_peap.o rlm_eap_peap.c: In function
 `eappeap_authenticate': rlm_eap_peap.c:190: warning: passing arg 2 of
 `record_plus' from incompatible pointer type
  gcc -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -
 DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -
 Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes
 -Wmissing-prototypes - Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -W
 -Wredundant-decls -Wundef - I../../../../include -I../..
 -I../rlm_eap_tls -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -I./../../libeap -c rlm_eap_peap.c
 -o rlm_eap_peap.o /dev/null 21
 /home/mack/sources/freeradius-snapshot-20040623/libtool --mode=compile
 gcc  -g - O2 -D_REENTRANT -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5
   -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-qual
 -Wcast-align - Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
 -Wmissing-declarations - Wnested-externs -W -Wredundant-decls -Wundef 
 -I../../../../include  -I../..   - I../rlm_eap_tls -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5
 -I./../../libeap -c peap.c
  gcc -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -
 DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -
 Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes
 -Wmissing-prototypes - Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -W
 -Wredundant-decls -Wundef - I../../../../include -I../..
 -I../rlm_eap_tls -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -I./../../libeap -c peap.c  -fPIC
 -DPIC -o .libs/peap.o peap.c: In function `eappeap_process':
 peap.c:578: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
  gcc -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -
 DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -
 Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes
 -Wmissing-prototypes - Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -W
 -Wredundant-decls -Wundef - I../../../../include -I../..
 -I../rlm_eap_tls -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -I./../../libeap -c peap.c -o
 peap.o /dev/null 21
 /home/mack/sources/freeradius-snapshot-20040623/libtool --mode=link
 gcc -release 1.1.0-pre0 \ -module -export-dynamic  -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT
 - D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5   -Wall - D_GNU_SOURCE
 -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wwrite- strings
 -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations
 -Wnested- externs -W -Wredundant-decls -Wundef  -I../../../../include 
 -I../..   -I../rlm_eap_tls - DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -I./../../libeap  \ -o
 rlm_eap_peap.la -rpath /usr/local/lib rlm_eap_peap.lo peap.lo
 ../../../../lib/libradius.la \ ../rlm_eap_tls/rlm_eap_tls.la
 -L./../../libeap -leap  -lcrypto -lssl -lcrypto -lnsl -lresolv  -
 lpthread -lcrypto 
 
 *** Warning: Linking the shared library rlm_eap_peap.la against the
 loadable module *** rlm_eap_tls.so is not portable! gcc -shared 
 .libs/rlm_eap_peap.o .libs/peap.o  -Wl,--rpath -
 Wl,/home/mack/sources/freeradius-snapshot-20040623/src/lib/.libs
 -Wl,--rpath - Wl,/home/mack/sources/freeradius-snapshot-
 20040623/src/modules/rlm_eap/types/rlm_eap_tls/.libs -Wl,--rpath -
 Wl,/home/mack/sources/freeradius-snapshot-
 20040623/src/modules/rlm_eap/libeap/.libs
 ../../../../lib/.libs

Re: eap_ttls and eap_peap linking problem SOLVED

2004-06-25 Thread Mack
Alain,

Thanks for clearing it up for me.  Sounds like shared is the way to go.  I'll look 
into 
using an older version of libtool that will work with freeradius so I can use shared.

thanks,
mack

On 25 Jun 2004 at 14:14, Alain Perry wrote:

  thoughts/comments as to advantages/disadvantages of
  enabling/disabling shared libs?
 
 I'm probably not the best here to answer that, but my first guess
 would be with security issues. If openssl is updated by your package
 management system because of a security hole or anything, you will
 have to recompile freeradius against it to be safe. The second one
 would the code size: if you have another piece of software using
 openssl, for example apache, openssl will be loaded twice into memory.
 That's the two main ones I can think of, but hey, if that's the only
 way to make freeradius work for you, it might be worth it :-)
 
 -- 
 Alain Perry
 
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
 http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 
 -- 
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by the CSU Email Gateway, and is
 believed to be clean.
 



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the CSU Email Gateway, and is
believed to be clean.


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: eap_ttls and eap_peap linking problem SOLVED

2004-06-25 Thread Mack
Alan,

Yep, that's what I figured.  What's the highest version of libtool that freeradius 
supports, and what version did you use in your tests?  Are there any plans for 
freeradius to support a more current version of libtool (i think latest stable is 
1.5.6)?

thanks,
mack

On 25 Jun 2004 at 10:04, Alan DeKok wrote:

 Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Using ./configure --disable-shared results in an error free make
  and make install.  Now, radiusd runs fine.  Configured eap_ttls
  and it seems to work fine so far, to.  Must have been a problem with
  my version of libtool (1.5.2).
 
   libtool 1.5.2 is not supported by the server.

Yep, that's what I figured.  What's that latest version of libtool that freeradius 
supports?  Any plans to support libtool 1.5.2?


 
   In my tests, the eap_ttls  peap work fine with both dynamic 
 static linking.

Which version of libtool was used in these tests?  I'd rather enable shared, so I'm 
willing to revert to an 


 
   Alan DeKok.
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
 http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 
 -- 
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by the CSU Email Gateway, and is
 believed to be clean.
 



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the CSU Email Gateway, and is
believed to be clean.


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


eap_ttls and eap_peap linking problem

2004-06-23 Thread Mack
Hi,

Problem linking eap_ttls and eap_peap on the following system:

Gentoo Linux
gcc-3.3.3
glibc-2.3.3
libtool-1.5.2
openssl-0.9.7d
kernel 2.6.7

I am using the latest nightly CVS build (20040623).

Here's some of the output of make:

.

Making static dynamic in rlm_eap_peap...
gmake[9]: Entering directory `/home/mack/sources/freeradius-snapshot-
20040623/src/modules/rlm_eap/types/rlm_eap_peap'
gmake[9]: Nothing to be done for `static'.
/home/mack/sources/freeradius-snapshot-20040623/libtool --mode=compile gcc  -g -
O2 -D_REENTRANT -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5   
-Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -
Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -
Wnested-externs -W -Wredundant-decls -Wundef  -I../../../../include  -I../..   -
I../rlm_eap_tls -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -I./../../libeap -c rlm_eap_peap.c
mkdir .libs
 gcc -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -
DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -
Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -
Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -W -Wredundant-decls -Wundef -
I../../../../include -I../.. -I../rlm_eap_tls -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -I./../../libeap -c 
rlm_eap_peap.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/rlm_eap_peap.o
rlm_eap_peap.c: In function `eappeap_authenticate':
rlm_eap_peap.c:190: warning: passing arg 2 of `record_plus' from incompatible 
pointer type
 gcc -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -
DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -
Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -
Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -W -Wredundant-decls -Wundef -
I../../../../include -I../.. -I../rlm_eap_tls -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -I./../../libeap -c 
rlm_eap_peap.c -o rlm_eap_peap.o /dev/null 21
/home/mack/sources/freeradius-snapshot-20040623/libtool --mode=compile gcc  -g -
O2 -D_REENTRANT -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5   
-Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -
Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -
Wnested-externs -W -Wredundant-decls -Wundef  -I../../../../include  -I../..   -
I../rlm_eap_tls -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -I./../../libeap -c peap.c
 gcc -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -
DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -
Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -
Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -W -Wredundant-decls -Wundef -
I../../../../include -I../.. -I../rlm_eap_tls -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -I./../../libeap -c 
peap.c  
-fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/peap.o
peap.c: In function `eappeap_process':
peap.c:578: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
 gcc -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -
DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -
Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -
Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -W -Wredundant-decls -Wundef -
I../../../../include -I../.. -I../rlm_eap_tls -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -I./../../libeap -c 
peap.c 
-o peap.o /dev/null 21
/home/mack/sources/freeradius-snapshot-20040623/libtool --mode=link gcc -release 
1.1.0-pre0 \
-module -export-dynamic  -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -
D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5   -Wall -
D_GNU_SOURCE -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wwrite-
strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-
externs -W -Wredundant-decls -Wundef  -I../../../../include  -I../..   
-I../rlm_eap_tls -
DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -I./../../libeap  \
-o rlm_eap_peap.la -rpath /usr/local/lib rlm_eap_peap.lo peap.lo 
../../../../lib/libradius.la \
../rlm_eap_tls/rlm_eap_tls.la -L./../../libeap -leap  -lcrypto -lssl -lcrypto -lnsl 
-lresolv  -
lpthread -lcrypto 

*** Warning: Linking the shared library rlm_eap_peap.la against the loadable module
*** rlm_eap_tls.so is not portable!
gcc -shared  .libs/rlm_eap_peap.o .libs/peap.o  -Wl,--rpath -
Wl,/home/mack/sources/freeradius-snapshot-20040623/src/lib/.libs -Wl,--rpath -
Wl,/home/mack/sources/freeradius-snapshot-
20040623/src/modules/rlm_eap/types/rlm_eap_tls/.libs -Wl,--rpath -
Wl,/home/mack/sources/freeradius-snapshot-
20040623/src/modules/rlm_eap/libeap/.libs ../../../../lib/.libs/libradius.so 
../rlm_eap_tls/.libs/rlm_eap_tls.so -L/home/mack/sources/freeradius-snapshot-
20040623/src/modules/rlm_eap/libeap /home/mack/sources/freeradius-snapshot-
20040623/src/modules/rlm_eap/libeap/.libs/libeap.so -lssl -lnsl -lresolv -lpthread -
lcrypto  -Wl,-soname -Wl,rlm_eap_peap-1.1.0-pre0.so -o .libs/rlm_eap_peap-1.1.0-
pre0.so
(cd .libs  rm -f rlm_eap_peap.so  ln -s rlm_eap_peap-1.1.0-pre0.so 
rlm_eap_peap.so)
ar cru .libs/rlm_eap_peap.a  rlm_eap_peap.o peap.o
ranlib .libs/rlm_eap_peap.a
creating rlm_eap_peap.la
(cd .libs  rm -f rlm_eap_peap.la  ln -s ../rlm_eap_peap.la rlm_eap_peap.la)
gmake[9]: Leaving

Re: radius, 802.1x, eap/tls, and edirectory (ldap)

2004-06-22 Thread Mack
Alan,

At your request, I'll try to reformat this so that it is presented as a 
problem/challenge 
rather than a why doesn't my solution work post:

Problem:
My AP is a 3com 7250.  It requires that you enable 802.1x on itself, the client, and 
the radius server if you want to use the radius server as the authentication server. 
 
My understanding is that 802.1x requires EAP-something.  I chose EAP-TLS 
because my client is stock XP and my understanding is that EAP-TLS is my only 
option with that client.

My boss asked me if it was possible to authenticate our wireless users against 
Novell's eDirectory (LDAP).  He did not specifically require 802.1x/EAP-anything.  
The only reason I'm using 802.1x/EAP is because the AP requires it.

I have successfully implemented EAP-TLS authentication between the client, AP, 
and freeradius.  Now I am attempting to add LDAP authentication, but have not 
been successful.

I can provide any configs/logs if needed.

Solution:
None so far.  Anyone have any suggestions/comments?  What would ya'll do in my 
position?

thanks,
mack



On 21 Jun 2004 at 23:52, Alan DeKok wrote:

 Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  My AP requires that I enable 802.1x in order to use RADIUS
  authentication.  So, I figured I'd use EAP-TLS.
 
   Are you picking it at random, or are youi looking at the features it
 offers, and using your requirements to decide on a solution?
 
   I'm just testing now...using an XP client, so I chose to use
  EAP-TLS.  I want to use LDAP because that's where our userbase is
  stored (Novell eDirectory).  The idea is to authenticate users via
  LDAP.
 
   I thought I had been pretty clear in my response: EAP-TLS and LDAP
 are mutually incompatible.  Stop trying to get them to work togerther.
 
   I'm only using EAP-TLS because the AP won't let me use RADIUS
  otherwise.  Of course, I'm such a newbie that I'm probably getting
  it all wrong.  That's where I was hoping the list would help.
 
   You should ask about how to solve a problem, rather than asking why
 the solution you chose didn't work.
 
  If you were given my task, how would you go about implementing this?
 
   I told you.  Go back and read my message.
 
   If you could describe a problem, I might be able to come up with an
 alternate solution.
 
   Alan DeKok.
 
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
 http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 
 -- 
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by the CSU Email Gateway, and is
 believed to be clean.
 



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the CSU Email Gateway, and is
believed to be clean.


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: radius, 802.1x, eap/tls, and edirectory (ldap)

2004-06-22 Thread Mack
Gary  Alan,

Thanks guys.  Sorry for being so stupid about all of this, but thanks to ya'll and the 
reading that I've done is this short period of time, I have learned a great deal about 
how this stuff works.

When using TTLS or PEAP, it seems that I'll still need EAP-TLS...but just on the 
server-side, not the client (am I right?).  I think that TTLS will be a better fit as 
it 
seems to support more methods, and PEAP seems to be strickly a MS thing.  I 
actually got the PEAP working now, though, thanks to your direction.

I'll look into demoing third party clients.  Know of any free ones, though?

It looks like maybe the 0.9.3 version of freeradius does not support TTLS.  Is this 
correct?  If so, does the CVS version include support?  Sorry if this, too, is 
documented somewhere, but I just thought I'd ask while I was here.

Thanks for the help!

mack



On 22 Jun 2004 at 12:37, Gary McKinney wrote:

 Mack,
 
 Take a look at the following URL:
 
 http://3w.denobula.com:5/EAPTLS.pdf
 
 It may be a little dated but all of the info is still relevent... one
 thing to take notice of is there is NO user password exchanged as
 EAP/TLS does not use a user's password for authentication - that chore
 is handled by the fact the supplicant contains a VALID user
 certificate the server recognizes.
 
 I think the above is what Alan is trying to convey to you - you can
 not use EAP/TLS and LDAP together as there is NO user password
 exchanged between the supplicant and Freeradius (or any other radius
 server) in that mode.  If you are looking to use LDAP and a very
 secure method for the link between the client and the AP you will have
 to use a different method (PEAP or EAP/TTLS come to mind)...
 
 You may want to check out other supplicant software (if you are
 thinking of using the EAP/TTLS method you may want to check out the
 Odyssey Supplicant software from Funk Software (they are the one's who
 came up with TTLS and are working on a RFC to that effect).
 
 I may not have stated all of the above totally correctly but you
 should get the basic meaning [grin]...
 
 There are several RFC's that come with the freeradius package - I
 would strongly suggest reading them as they are the basis for all the
 different protocols and authentication methods Alan and company have
 based the Freeradius software against ( I think )
 
 I hope the above information is helpful and taken in the manner in
 which it was meant (to be informative and helpful)...
 
 gm...
 
 
 -- Original Message --
 From: Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date:  Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:02:33 -0400
 
 Alan,
 
 At your request, I'll try to reformat this so that it is presented as
 a problem/challenge rather than a why doesn't my solution work
 post:
 
 Problem:
 My AP is a 3com 7250.  It requires that you enable 802.1x on itself,
 the client, and the radius server if you want to use the radius
 server as the authentication server.  My understanding is that
 802.1x requires EAP-something.  I chose EAP-TLS because my client is
 stock XP and my understanding is that EAP-TLS is my only option with
 that client.
 
 My boss asked me if it was possible to authenticate our wireless
 users against Novell's eDirectory (LDAP).  He did not specifically
 require 802.1x/EAP-anything.  The only reason I'm using 802.1x/EAP is
 because the AP requires it.
 
 I have successfully implemented EAP-TLS authentication between the
 client, AP, and freeradius.  Now I am attempting to add LDAP
 authentication, but have not been successful.
 
 I can provide any configs/logs if needed.
 
 Solution:
 None so far.  Anyone have any suggestions/comments?  What would ya'll
 do in my position?
 
 thanks,
 mack
 
 
 
 On 21 Jun 2004 at 23:52, Alan DeKok wrote:
 
  Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   My AP requires that I enable 802.1x in order to use RADIUS
   authentication.  So, I figured I'd use EAP-TLS.
  
Are you picking it at random, or are youi looking at the features
it
  offers, and using your requirements to decide on a solution?
  
I'm just testing now...using an XP client, so I chose to use
   EAP-TLS.  I want to use LDAP because that's where our userbase is
   stored (Novell eDirectory).  The idea is to authenticate users
   via LDAP.
  
I thought I had been pretty clear in my response: EAP-TLS and
LDAP
  are mutually incompatible.  Stop trying to get them to work
  togerther.
  
I'm only using EAP-TLS because the AP won't let me use RADIUS
   otherwise.  Of course, I'm such a newbie that I'm probably
   getting it all wrong.  That's where I was hoping the list would
   help.
  
You should ask about how to solve a problem, rather than asking
why
  the solution you chose didn't work.
  
   If you were given my task, how would you go about implementing
   this?
  
I told you.  Go back and read my message.
  
If you could describe a problem, I might be able to come up

Re: radius, 802.1x, eap/tls, and edirectory (ldap)

2004-06-22 Thread Mack
Arnauld,

I am still making sure my configs are okay before starting up the CVS version.  Will 
let you know how it goes.

I am using the drivers provided by 3COM for my wireless nic, which is a 
3CRPAG175a really nice a/b/g card with an xjack antenna.

My supplicant is whatever comes stock with XP, plus whatever Windows Update 
offers on top of that (service packs, recommended update related to wireless, etc.)  I 
did not see any, nor would I recommend using, drivers from the windows update site.

I don't think a supplicant/client was shipped with my card, but to be honest I did not 
look very hard.  I'm just playing with the XP supplicant right now, but will look at 
third-
party next (like Odyssey (Funk), etc.) since they should support TTLS.  I think the 
Window XP supplicant will work with PEAP, but not TTLS (someone correct me if I'm 
wrong).

This is my first attempt at anything wireless (as you may have noticed by my previous 
posts), so I haven't had much experience with the various supplicants out there.  I 
think you can get a fully working demo of Odyssey (double check that) from Funk 
Software...it's supposed to do TTLS, plus some other cool stuff with Novell Client 
signons.  We'll see.

I'll let you know how my TTLS efforts go with the CVS version.  BTW...are you also 
attempting Novell LDAP with TTLS?

later,
mack

On 22 Jun 2004 at 22:14, Arnauld Dravet wrote:

  It looks like maybe the 0.9.3 version of freeradius does not support
  TTLS. Is this correct?  If so, does the CVS version include support?
   Sorry if this, too, is documented somewhere, but I just thought I'd
  ask while I was here.
 
 I grabbed  compiled the CVS few hours ago in the goal to make
 TTLS+mschapv2 and it crashes when i launch radiusd, saying that it
 can't find the rlm_eap module . ..
 
 Anyway, just for my information (still trying to get my auth working
 ..) are you using a supplicant like aegis, or just the one provided
 with your wifi card ? In my case, i used the dell drivers, freeradius
 0.9.3, and got strange things during ssl initialisation. can'tg et the
 logs right now though ..
 
 -- 
 Arnauld Dravet
 
 
 
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
 http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 
 -- 
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by the CSU Email Gateway, and is
 believed to be clean.
 



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the CSU Email Gateway, and is
believed to be clean.


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: radius, 802.1x, eap/tls, and edirectory (ldap)

2004-06-22 Thread Mack
Arnauld,

About your runtime error...

I'm getting this one:

Failed to link to module 'rlm_exec': rlm_exec.a:  cannot open shared object file:  No 
such file or directory

This happens straight out of the box, running radiusd -X...no configuration changes 
made yet (testing if it runs).  I'm running the latest cvs shapshot, 20040622, on a 
gentoo linux system.  Did a standard ./configure, make, make install, with no 
errors.  
Strange...if I comment exec in the instantiate section of radiusd.conf, it then 
gives 
me the same error but this time with rlm_expr.a.

Anyone have any clues what's going on?

thanks


On 22 Jun 2004 at 22:14, Arnauld Dravet wrote:

  It looks like maybe the 0.9.3 version of freeradius does not support
  TTLS. Is this correct?  If so, does the CVS version include support?
   Sorry if this, too, is documented somewhere, but I just thought I'd
  ask while I was here.
 
 I grabbed  compiled the CVS few hours ago in the goal to make
 TTLS+mschapv2 and it crashes when i launch radiusd, saying that it
 can't find the rlm_eap module . ..
 
 Anyway, just for my information (still trying to get my auth working
 ..) are you using a supplicant like aegis, or just the one provided
 with your wifi card ? In my case, i used the dell drivers, freeradius
 0.9.3, and got strange things during ssl initialisation. can'tg et the
 logs right now though ..
 
 -- 
 Arnauld Dravet
 
 
 
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
 http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 
 -- 
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by the CSU Email Gateway, and is
 believed to be clean.
 



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the CSU Email Gateway, and is
believed to be clean.


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: radius, 802.1x, eap/tls, and edirectory (ldap)

2004-06-21 Thread Mack
Alan,

I agree...I should read the docs and the lists more thoroughly.

My AP requires that I enable 802.1x in order to use RADIUS authentication.  So, I 
figured I'd use EAP-TLS.  I'm just testing now...using an XP client, so I chose to use 
EAP-TLS.  I want to use LDAP because that's where our userbase is stored (Novell 
eDirectory).  The idea is to authenticate users via LDAP.  I'm only using EAP-TLS 
because the AP won't let me use RADIUS otherwise.  Of course, I'm such a newbie 
that I'm probably getting it all wrong.  That's where I was hoping the list would help.

If you were given my task, how would you go about implementing this?

thanks,
mack



On 21 Jun 2004 at 11:07, Alan DeKok wrote:

 Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I had scanned them prior to posting, but there seem to be no
  solutions to all of the problems people have with this
  configuration.
 
   From what I can seem you're trying to use EAP-TLS, *and* some kind
 of LDAP authorization/authentication, but you're not putting the
 usernames used by EAP-TLS into LDAP.
 
   The solution is simple:
 
   a) put the usernames into LDAP
   b) or, get the clients to use usernames which are in ldap.
 
My impression is that most of the gurus on the list are assuming
  WAY too much of some of us newbies.  They keep coming back with the
  same replies, like read the faqs, readme, rfc, etc., etc.
 
   A significant number of questions on this list are answered in the
 FAQ, README, documentation, etc.  Those replies are meant to tell
 people to stop wasting their time asking questions on the list, when
 the answer is already in front of them.
 
   But, that begs the question: If that's going to be the reply each
  time, then why even bother with the list in the first place?
 
   If you would read the list, you would see that most of the questions
 involve things which are *not* in the FAQ or README.  Those questions
 are answered.
 
My requirement is to enable 802.1x authentication to the AP's
using EAP/TLS. Additionally, I need to be able to authenticate
the users to Novell via LDAP.
 
   You can't do this.  It's impossible.
 
   EAP-TLS is an authentication mechanism.  LDAP doesn't know about
 EAP-TLS, and therefore won't be able to authenticate any EAP-TLS
 request.
 
The logs keep passing the EAP username (common name from cert)
to ldap and of course ldap spits it out because the object does
not exist.
 
   Have you tried adding that object to LDAP?  I really don't see what
 the problem is here.
 
Maybe this isn't even possible, but here's what I had hoped to
come away with: the wireless user boots their laptop, then gets
authenticated via eap/tls.
 
   That will work.
 
  They then open a browser, and are asked for username and
password (via dialog box?), or either redirected to a login
page.
 
   By who?  The AP won't do this.  And since the AP won't do this,
 *nothing* will.
 
  The username and password are then passed to ldap for
authentication.  Successful authentication results in the client
being given internet access.  Is this possible?
 
   I doubt it.  I also don't understand why you want the user to log in
 twice.
 
   Alan DEKok.
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
 http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 
 -- 
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by the CSU Email Gateway, and is
 believed to be clean.
 



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the CSU Email Gateway, and is
believed to be clean.


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: radius, 802.1x, eap/tls, and edirectory (ldap)

2004-06-21 Thread Mack
Gary,

No, no, not you.  I didn't mean you...sorry.  You've been helpful...more
so, you've shown a willingness to help.  Thanks for that.

I followed your suggestion about looking deeper into the list archives,
and have progressed a bit further (i think).  I stumbled upon PEAP, and configured
my client to use mschapv2, thus answering the question of how to send LDAP username 
password to radius.  This is all with EAP-TLS working (as far as I can
tell).  However, there's one catch...

While running radiusd in debug mode, watching the output while the client
authenticates (sends username  password), it seems to get caught in a 
loop...same output over  over again, and the client never gets totally
authenticated.  The output appears to indicate that the ldap auth and eap
auth were both successful, but this is where it keeps looping...over and over again,
keeps saying both were successful.  Unless I'm just misinterpreting the output
(that's VERY likely).  I've attached some of the output to this email (hope that's
ok...seemed to big to include in the body of the message).

I am using a gentoo ebuild of freeradius now, but will look into the
1.0.0-pre1 version.  I did notice that many of the posts assumed the users were on a 
1.0.0-pre1
build.  If nothing else, I can at least read thru the different docs included in that
build, as you've suggested.

Ready for a really dumb question?  What does ymmv mean?  I've often seen
it on lists/boards, but have never seen a translation.

Thanks for the help,
mack

On 21 Jun 2004 at 6:10, Gary McKinney wrote:

 Mack,
 
 I Was not trying to blow you off by making the statement of reading
 the archives... I am still, what I consider, a newbie as well...
 
 The statement about a lot of discussion on the subject you are
 requesting is true so I thought you would be better served checking
 over those discussions!
 
 As for documentation - have you read the rlm-eap and rlm-ldap
 documentation in the docs directory of the installation package (at
 least the version 1.0.0-pre1 and later source code) has information on
 what you are looking for in terms of using eap/tls and ldap together
 (in the rlm-eap docs).
 
 If you can use the pre-release code I would suggest doing so - while
 0.9.3 is stable I have found the pre-release code does more [ymmv]...
 
 gm..
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 10:30 PM
 Subject: Re: radius, 802.1x, eap/tls, and edirectory (ldap)
 
 
  Gary,
 
  I had scanned them prior to posting, but there seem to be no
  solutions to
 all of the
  problems people have with this configuration.  My impression is that
  most
 of the
  gurus on the list are assuming WAY too much of some of us newbies.
   They
 keep
  coming back with the same replies, like read the faqs, readme, rfc,
  etc.,
 etc.  But,
  that begs the question:  If that's going to be the reply each time,
  then
 why even
  bother with the list in the first place?  Oh, well.  I am definitely
 taking a more indepth
  look at the archives, though, as you've suggested.  If nothing else,
  maybe
 that will
  help me form better questions.  Thanks for the help!
 
  mack
 
  On 19 Jun 2004 at 6:34, Gary McKinney wrote:
 
   Mack,
  
   Check the email archives over the last three months - there is a
   great deal of information on using EAP/TLS and how to use LDAP
   with freeradius (including example snippets).
  
   gm...
   - Original Message - 
   From: Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 11:52 PM
   Subject: radius, 802.1x, eap/tls, and edirectory (ldap)
  
  
Hi,
   
I'm a newbie to all of this, so please bear with me.  This list
is all
   I've got!
   
We are introducing a wireless infrastructure on our campus (a
little late
   in the game).
Right now we're in testing phase.  In this testing phase, We are
using
   several 3com
7250 AP's, some 3com cards capable of 802.1x, and Novell
eDirectory
   (LDAP).  My
requirement is to enable 802.1x authentication to the AP's using
EAP/TLS. Additionally, I need to be able to authenticate the
users to Novell via
   LDAP.  All via
the FreeRADIUS server.
   
I have configured freeradius version 0.9.3 to work successfully
with only
   ldap
authentication against Novell eDirectory.  I have also verified
that
   802.1x
authentication is working with the AP. However, if I attempt to
somehow
   enable both
authentication mechanisms, I fail.  The logs keep passing the
EAP username (common name from cert) to ldap and of course ldap
spits it out because
   the object
does not exist.
   
Again, I'm new to this, and maybe I have made incorrect
assumptions of
   what the
end result should be.  Maybe this isn't even possible, but
here's what I
   had hoped to
come away with:  the wireless user boots their laptop, then gets

Re: radius, 802.1x, eap/tls, and edirectory (ldap)

2004-06-21 Thread Mack
Gary,


I didn't recognize any services as being a wireless network card manager.  Didn't see 
anything in add/remove, either.  Where/how did you find yours?

Thanks for clueing me in on the meaning of ymmv!

I'll keep digging around for more information on my problem.  BTW...did you have a 
chance to look at the output I attached?  If so, what's your interpretation?

thanks,
mack

On 21 Jun 2004 at 20:47, Gary McKinney wrote:

 Hi Mack,
 
 As for the looping problem - one question - do you have a wireless
 network card manager running in the background on the laptop ( I don't
 mean the nic driver) along with the supplicant???
 
 I have EAP/TTLS running at home and ran into a looping problem that
 sounds the same (authenticated but kept on re-authenticating)... I am
 running the Odyssey Supplicant on a Windows 2000 machine and there was
 a Linksys NIC Manager program running at the same time the supplicant
 was running.  The NIC manager was causing the supplicant to disconnect
 from the nic thereby causing the supplicant to re-authenticate
 continuously! (duh!).  Turning off the NIC manager software fixed
 the problem
 
 As for YMMV it means Your Mileage May Vary  [grin]...
 
 gm...
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 8:21 PM
 Subject: Re: radius, 802.1x, eap/tls, and edirectory (ldap)
 
 
  Gary,
 
  No, no, not you.  I didn't mean you...sorry.  You've been
  helpful...more so, you've shown a willingness to help.  Thanks for
  that.
 
  I followed your suggestion about looking deeper into the list
  archives, and have progressed a bit further (i think).  I stumbled
  upon PEAP, and
 configured
  my client to use mschapv2, thus answering the question of how to
  send LDAP
 username 
  password to radius.  This is all with EAP-TLS working (as far as I
  can tell).  However, there's one catch...
 
  While running radiusd in debug mode, watching the output while the
  client authenticates (sends username  password), it seems to get
  caught in a loop...same output over  over again, and the client
  never gets totally authenticated.  The output appears to indicate
  that the ldap auth and eap auth were both successful, but this is
  where it keeps looping...over and
 over again,
  keeps saying both were successful.  Unless I'm just misinterpreting
  the
 output
  (that's VERY likely).  I've attached some of the output to this
  email
 (hope that's
  ok...seemed to big to include in the body of the message).
 
  I am using a gentoo ebuild of freeradius now, but will look into the
  1.0.0-pre1 version.  I did notice that many of the posts assumed the
  users
 were on a 1.0.0-pre1
  build.  If nothing else, I can at least read thru the different docs
 included in that
  build, as you've suggested.
 
  Ready for a really dumb question?  What does ymmv mean?  I've
  often seen it on lists/boards, but have never seen a translation.
 
  Thanks for the help,
  mack
 
  On 21 Jun 2004 at 6:10, Gary McKinney wrote:
 
   Mack,
  
   I Was not trying to blow you off by making the statement of
   reading the archives... I am still, what I consider, a newbie as
   well...
  
   The statement about a lot of discussion on the subject you are
   requesting is true so I thought you would be better served
   checking over those discussions!
  
   As for documentation - have you read the rlm-eap and rlm-ldap
   documentation in the docs directory of the installation package
   (at least the version 1.0.0-pre1 and later source code) has
   information on what you are looking for in terms of using eap/tls
   and ldap together (in the rlm-eap docs).
  
   If you can use the pre-release code I would suggest doing so -
   while 0.9.3 is stable I have found the pre-release code does more
   [ymmv]...
  
   gm..
  
   - Original Message - 
   From: Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 10:30 PM
   Subject: Re: radius, 802.1x, eap/tls, and edirectory (ldap)
  
  
Gary,
   
I had scanned them prior to posting, but there seem to be no
solutions to
   all of the
problems people have with this configuration.  My impression is
that most
   of the
gurus on the list are assuming WAY too much of some of us
newbies.
 They
   keep
coming back with the same replies, like read the faqs, readme,
rfc, etc.,
   etc.  But,
that begs the question:  If that's going to be the reply each
time, then
   why even
bother with the list in the first place?  Oh, well.  I am
definitely
   taking a more indepth
look at the archives, though, as you've suggested.  If nothing
else, maybe
   that will
help me form better questions.  Thanks for the help!
   
mack
   
On 19 Jun 2004 at 6:34, Gary McKinney wrote:
   
 Mack,

 Check the email archives over the last three months - there is
 a great deal of information on using EAP/TLS and how to use

Re: radius, 802.1x, eap/tls, and edirectory (ldap)

2004-06-20 Thread Mack
Gary,

I had scanned them prior to posting, but there seem to be no solutions to all of the 
problems people have with this configuration.  My impression is that most of the 
gurus on the list are assuming WAY too much of some of us newbies.  They keep 
coming back with the same replies, like read the faqs, readme, rfc, etc., etc.  But, 
that begs the question:  If that's going to be the reply each time, then why even 
bother with the list in the first place?  Oh, well.  I am definitely taking a more 
indepth 
look at the archives, though, as you've suggested.  If nothing else, maybe that will 
help me form better questions.  Thanks for the help!

mack

On 19 Jun 2004 at 6:34, Gary McKinney wrote:

 Mack,
 
 Check the email archives over the last three months - there is a great
 deal of information on using EAP/TLS and how to use LDAP with
 freeradius (including example snippets).
 
 gm...
 - Original Message - 
 From: Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 11:52 PM
 Subject: radius, 802.1x, eap/tls, and edirectory (ldap)
 
 
  Hi,
 
  I'm a newbie to all of this, so please bear with me.  This list is
  all
 I've got!
 
  We are introducing a wireless infrastructure on our campus (a little
  late
 in the game).
  Right now we're in testing phase.  In this testing phase, We are
  using
 several 3com
  7250 AP's, some 3com cards capable of 802.1x, and Novell eDirectory
 (LDAP).  My
  requirement is to enable 802.1x authentication to the AP's using
  EAP/TLS. Additionally, I need to be able to authenticate the users
  to Novell via
 LDAP.  All via
  the FreeRADIUS server.
 
  I have configured freeradius version 0.9.3 to work successfully with
  only
 ldap
  authentication against Novell eDirectory.  I have also verified that
 802.1x
  authentication is working with the AP. However, if I attempt to
  somehow
 enable both
  authentication mechanisms, I fail.  The logs keep passing the EAP
  username (common name from cert) to ldap and of course ldap spits it
  out because
 the object
  does not exist.
 
  Again, I'm new to this, and maybe I have made incorrect assumptions
  of
 what the
  end result should be.  Maybe this isn't even possible, but here's
  what I
 had hoped to
  come away with:  the wireless user boots their laptop, then gets
 authenticated via
  eap/tls.  They then open a browser, and are asked for username and
 password (via
  dialog box?), or either redirected to a login page.  The username
  and
 password are
  then passed to ldap for authentication.  Successful authentication
  results
 in the client
  being given internet access.  Is this possible?  Or, am I totally
 misunderstanding how
  this is all supposed to work (very likely)?
 
  I must admit, I'm not very comfortable when working with the config
  files.
 Not too
  sure what I'm doing in there.  I tackled this whole project somewhat
 blindly, with the
  help of various bits of info I gathered from google searches.  I do
  need
 to obtain a
  good book on this stuff...that's obvious...but I am hoping that
  someone on
 this list
  has experience with getting freeradius to work with eap/tls and
  novell
 ldap
  authentication and is willing to share that experience and wisdom.
 
  (Embarrassed) Sorry again for the newbie-ness of this post, and
  thanks in
 advance
  for any help!
 
  mack
 
  -- 
  This message has been scanned for viruses and
  dangerous content by the CSU Email Gateway, and is
  believed to be clean.
 
 
  -
  List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
 http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 
 
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Ant-Virus Scanner]
 
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
 http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 
 -- 
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by the CSU Email Gateway, and is
 believed to be clean.
 



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the CSU Email Gateway, and is
believed to be clean.


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


radius, 802.1x, eap/tls, and edirectory (ldap)

2004-06-18 Thread Mack
Hi,

I'm a newbie to all of this, so please bear with me.  This list is all I've got!

We are introducing a wireless infrastructure on our campus (a little late in the 
game).  
Right now we're in testing phase.  In this testing phase, We are using several 3com 
7250 AP's, some 3com cards capable of 802.1x, and Novell eDirectory (LDAP).  My 
requirement is to enable 802.1x authentication to the AP's using EAP/TLS.  
Additionally, I need to be able to authenticate the users to Novell via LDAP.  All via 
the FreeRADIUS server.

I have configured freeradius version 0.9.3 to work successfully with only ldap 
authentication against Novell eDirectory.  I have also verified that 802.1x 
authentication is working with the AP. However, if I attempt to somehow enable both 
authentication mechanisms, I fail.  The logs keep passing the EAP username 
(common name from cert) to ldap and of course ldap spits it out because the object 
does not exist.

Again, I'm new to this, and maybe I have made incorrect assumptions of what the 
end result should be.  Maybe this isn't even possible, but here's what I had hoped to 
come away with:  the wireless user boots their laptop, then gets authenticated via 
eap/tls.  They then open a browser, and are asked for username and password (via 
dialog box?), or either redirected to a login page.  The username and password are 
then passed to ldap for authentication.  Successful authentication results in the 
client 
being given internet access.  Is this possible?  Or, am I totally misunderstanding how 
this is all supposed to work (very likely)?

I must admit, I'm not very comfortable when working with the config files.  Not too 
sure what I'm doing in there.  I tackled this whole project somewhat blindly, with the 
help of various bits of info I gathered from google searches.  I do need to obtain a 
good book on this stuff...that's obvious...but I am hoping that someone on this list 
has experience with getting freeradius to work with eap/tls and novell ldap 
authentication and is willing to share that experience and wisdom.

(Embarrassed) Sorry again for the newbie-ness of this post, and thanks in advance 
for any help!

mack

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the CSU Email Gateway, and is
believed to be clean.


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html