[DISCUSS] [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator (was Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator)
Hi Bertrand, (changing this to DISCUSS thread to avoid continuing hijacking the VOTE thread) Of Spark's IPMC direct mentorship, 5 of the 7 mentors have all VOTEd for its graduation: Chris Mattmann Andrew Hart Henry Saputra Roman Shaposhnik Suresh Marru Still waiting on +1s from: Paul Ramirez Thomas Dudziak That's 71% of Spark's IPMC mentors have already VOTEd +1 for this project to graduate. Note also the 12 +1s from other members of the IPMC. Sebastian Schelter Jean-Baptiste Onofré Ted Dunning Patrick Hunt Chris Douglas Alan Cabrera Jake Ferrell Leif Hedstrom Sergio Fernández Sebastian Schelter Marvin Humphrey Alex Karasulu Further note that there are over 34 community +1s for this project. Of the 3 IPMC -1s: Bertrand Delacretaz Craig Russell sebb Bertrand, you originally VOTEd +1 until Craig mentioned his concerns about accounts not having been filed. Matei and others immediately stepped up (including myself), and explained the situation, and filed the accounts. Sebb's concerns were originally related to the resolution and mix of Apache ids/other mail Ids, etc. If you are suggesting in some thinly veiled way that the board is going to reject both the overwhelming majority of the direct paying attention mentors to the project; along with majority of other members of the IPMC; along with the members of the community who also recommended its graduation, because a minority of IPMC members and others identified issues with people having their accounts, or some others with the use of Git, and/or accusations of not all conversation making it to the list, considering all of the positive things that goes on in Spark, or the 100s of messages PER day that make it to the list, along with conversation and great work and Apache mentality that's being demonstrated by their developers, then I'm disappointed and frankly, I disagree and let's put it to a VOTE at the board level. I'll be there, ready and willing to discuss this with real data and not innuendo, along with the real history of watching the awesomeness of this project and all of the things they have gotten right about the Apache community. Cheers, Chris -Original Message- From: Bertrand Delacretaz Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Date: Friday, February 7, 2014 5:12 AM To: Incubator General Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator >On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:05 AM, David Nalley wrote: >> ...The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the >> community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind >> folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen >> on the mailing list... > >Yes - considering the worrying aspects that this thread brought to the >surface, I would recommend that the Spark mentors take another look >and make a solid case to demonstrate that the project is actually >ready to graduate. > >Remember that the Incubator PMC's vote is only about *recommending* >that the board accepts the incoming project, if there's no strong >consensus I'd assume that the board is likely to reject the resolution >until that strong consensus for graduation is established here. > >-Bertrand > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Hi folks, The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/aEQ). I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as well. Here’s the community tally: +1 Matei Zaharia Reynold Xin Tathagata Das Sean McNamara Patrick Wendell Mark Hamstra Chris Mattmann * Tom Graves Henry Saputra * Andy Konwinski Josh Rosen Mosharaf Chowdhury Mridul Muralidharan Nick Pentreath Andrew Xia Haoyuan Li Sandy Ryza Sebastian Schelter * Kostas Sakellis Christopher Nguyen Aaron Davidson Shivaram Venkataraman Kay Ousterhout Evan Sparks Xuefeng Wu Konstantin Boudnik Rahul Chugh Prashant Sharma Stephen Haberman Prabeesh K. Saisai Shao Junfeng Feng Jason Dai Stevo Slavic Heiko Braun Xia Zhu Manoj Awasthi +0 (none) -1 (none) * indicates IPMC member We’ve made three releases in the incubator, added new committers and IPMC members, checked off the various requirements to migrate the development process to the ASF, and more generally worked to build this community in the Apache way. Please VOTE to graduate Apache Spark from the incubator. I’ll leave the VOTE open for 96 hours, until February 4th, 2014. The graduation resolution is pasted below. Thanks! Matei and the Apache Spark community snip WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis on clusters. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation and sharing across distributed applications; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Spark Project: * Mosharaf Chowdhury * Jason Dai * Tathagata Das * Ankur Dave * Aaron Davidson * Thomas Dudziak * Robert Evans * Thomas Graves * Andy Konwinski * Stephen Haberman * Mark Hamstra * Shane Huang * Ryan LeCompte * Haoyuan Li * Sean McNamara * Mridul Muralidharam * Kay Ousterhout * Nick Pentreath * Imran Rashid * Charles Reiss * Josh Rosen * Prashant Sharma * Ram Sriharsha * Shivaram Venkataraman * Patrick Wendell * Andrew Xia * Reynold Xin * Matei Zaharia NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Spark podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator Project are hereafter discharged. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Hi Everyone, This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. Thanks! [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. [ ] +0 Don't care. [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. Here is my +1 binding for graduation. Cheers, Chris snip WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis on clusters. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Spark Project: * Mosharaf Chowdhury * Jason Dai * Tathagata Das * Ankur Dave * Aaron Davidson * Thomas Dudziak * Robert Evans * Thomas Graves * Andy Konwinski * Stephen Haberman * Mark Hamstra * Shane Huang * Ryan LeCompte * Haoyuan Li * Sean McNamara * Mridul Muralidharam * Kay Ousterhout * Nick Pentreath * Imran Rashid * Charles Reiss * Josh Rosen * Prashant Sharma * Ram Sriharsha * Shivaram Venkataraman * Patrick Wendell * Andrew Xia * Reynold Xin * Matei Zaharia NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Spark podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator Project are hereafter discharged. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator (was Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator)
Hi Chris, On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: >... Bertrand, you originally VOTEd +1 until Craig mentioned his concerns > about accounts not having been filed. Matei and others immediately > stepped up (including myself), and explained the situation, and > filed the accounts. Sebb's concerns were originally related to the > resolution and mix of Apache ids/other mail Ids, etc Fact is, the mentors let the resolution go through with a very wrong list of PMC members. Which I didn't spot either at first...trusting the mentors too much maybe? ;-) And the discussions in the vote thread show some worrying uncertainties about the project's readyness to graduate. I have not analyzed everything in detail so far, maybe everything's clear if one rereads the full thread. But the perception is here. > ...If you are suggesting in some thinly veiled way that the > board is going to reject both the overwhelming majority of the > direct paying attention mentors to the project; along with majority > of other members of the IPMC; along with the members of the community who > also > recommended its graduation... There was nothing behind my comment that the board can reject a graduation resolution - suggesting things in some thinly veiled way is not my style. It's just that a board member who hasn't followed the project or the details of this discussion, but knows that the vote thread here raised lots of questions, might very well recommend to reject the resolution until everything's clear. So, my recommendation is that mentors identify and address the concerns raised in the vote thread in a way that reassures us that the project is indeed ready to graduate. Maybe just as some concise comments in the vote thread once the updated the Spark resolution is fixed. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator (was Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator)
Thanks Bertrand, for your feedback and as I have mentioned, we filed the account requests, and have explained from the community perspective the issues at hand (Matei has done so grandly in the last day and don't have time now to look up the exact thread pointer but look for some replies by Matei over the past day or so). Furthermore, there have been some great recent replies from IPMC members as of last night that summarize my overall feeling with the podling as well. BTW, your comment below about "very wrong list of PMC members", I take exception to and disagree with. It wasn't a wrong list -- it's that some people in that list had not completed the due diligence to obtain their Apache accounts (though in all cases but 1, for Kay, ICLAs had been filed and that has now been remedied). This is no fault of the members of that PPMC -- it was an oversight on my part and the other mentors part; I take full responsibility for that. However, I will make it very clear that the issue was caught, and now it's been dealt with and is in the process of being dealt with. Once the account requests I filed are complete, all of those members on that list will have Apache accounts, but more importantly ICLAs on file. Trusting the mentors too much isn't a bad thing by the way. I myself have done this. You have to be able to mix precision with recall in these situations and you have to have people like Craig and/or sebb that can catch things -- very valuable tools to catch even when mentors like myself miss some of the details. You know, being a Director; a Treasurer; combined with all the list of other things I do? ;) Regardless, like I said, the issues are being dealt with -- the facts have been stated by me below with pure numbers and data that again show an overwhelming majority of IPMC mentors for Spark; of IPMC members who VOTED in the graduation VOTE; along with community members have VOTEd to graduate this project, and to recommend its graduation to the board. I am going to still leave this VOTE open until Monday in the hopes that seeing the diligence performed by the Spark community in the face of these discussions and the very real need to address the raised issues are precisely the spirit of the Apache way and the communities that we grow here and that those acts change the mind of the minority who issued their -1s. Beyond that, I am not going to leave the VOTE open indefinitely, and I am not going to concern myself with what-ifs at the board level. The facts are here. The discussion is here. Neither change the very real fact that Spark deserves TLP status, and I wholeheartedly recommend its graduation to the board; as do the other IPMC members; community members, and others cited in the data I gathered below. Cheers, Chris -Original Message- From: Bertrand Delacretaz Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Date: Friday, February 7, 2014 7:35 AM To: Incubator General Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator (was Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator) >Hi Chris, > >On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Chris Mattmann >wrote: >>... Bertrand, you originally VOTEd +1 until Craig mentioned his concerns >> about accounts not having been filed. Matei and others immediately >> stepped up (including myself), and explained the situation, and >> filed the accounts. Sebb's concerns were originally related to the >> resolution and mix of Apache ids/other mail Ids, etc > >Fact is, the mentors let the resolution go through with a very wrong >list of PMC members. Which I didn't spot either at first...trusting >the mentors too much maybe? ;-) > >And the discussions in the vote thread show some worrying >uncertainties about the project's readyness to graduate. I have not >analyzed everything in detail so far, maybe everything's clear if one >rereads the full thread. But the perception is here. > >> ...If you are suggesting in some thinly veiled way that the >> board is going to reject both the overwhelming majority of the >> direct paying attention mentors to the project; along with majority >> of other members of the IPMC; along with the members of the community >>who >> also >> recommended its graduation... > >There was nothing behind my comment that the board can reject a >graduation resolution - suggesting things in some thinly veiled way is >not my style. > >It's just that a board member who hasn't followed the project or the >details of this discussion, but knows that the vote thread here raised >lots of questions, might very well recommend to reject the resolution >until everything's clear. > >So, my recommendation is that mentors identify and address the
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: > Hi folks, > > The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator > (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread: > http://s.apache.org/aEQ). > > I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as well. Here’s > the community tally: > > +1 > Matei Zaharia > Reynold Xin > Tathagata Das > Sean McNamara > Patrick Wendell > Mark Hamstra > Chris Mattmann * > Tom Graves > Henry Saputra * > Andy Konwinski > Josh Rosen > Mosharaf Chowdhury > Mridul Muralidharan > Nick Pentreath > Andrew Xia > Haoyuan Li > Sandy Ryza > Sebastian Schelter * > Kostas Sakellis > Christopher Nguyen > Aaron Davidson > Shivaram Venkataraman > Kay Ousterhout > Evan Sparks > Xuefeng Wu > Konstantin Boudnik > Rahul Chugh > Prashant Sharma > Stephen Haberman > Prabeesh K. > Saisai Shao > Junfeng Feng > Jason Dai > Stevo Slavic > Heiko Braun > Xia Zhu > Manoj Awasthi > > +0 > (none) > > -1 > (none) > > * indicates IPMC member > > We’ve made three releases in the incubator, added new committers and IPMC > members, checked off the various requirements to migrate the development > process to the ASF, and more generally worked to build this community in > the Apache way. > > Please VOTE to graduate Apache Spark from the incubator. I’ll leave the > VOTE open for 96 hours, until February 4th, 2014. The graduation resolution > is pasted below. > > Thanks! > > Matei and the Apache Spark community > > snip > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation > and sharing across distributed applications; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve > at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the > Apache Spark Project, and to have primary responsibility for > management of the projects within the scope of responsibility > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das > * Ankur Dave > * Aaron Davidson > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam > * Kay Ousterhout > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 (already voted on the community thread) On 02/01/2014 02:00 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: +1 On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: Hi folks, The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/aEQ). I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as well. Here’s the community tally: +1 Matei Zaharia Reynold Xin Tathagata Das Sean McNamara Patrick Wendell Mark Hamstra Chris Mattmann * Tom Graves Henry Saputra * Andy Konwinski Josh Rosen Mosharaf Chowdhury Mridul Muralidharan Nick Pentreath Andrew Xia Haoyuan Li Sandy Ryza Sebastian Schelter * Kostas Sakellis Christopher Nguyen Aaron Davidson Shivaram Venkataraman Kay Ousterhout Evan Sparks Xuefeng Wu Konstantin Boudnik Rahul Chugh Prashant Sharma Stephen Haberman Prabeesh K. Saisai Shao Junfeng Feng Jason Dai Stevo Slavic Heiko Braun Xia Zhu Manoj Awasthi +0 (none) -1 (none) * indicates IPMC member We’ve made three releases in the incubator, added new committers and IPMC members, checked off the various requirements to migrate the development process to the ASF, and more generally worked to build this community in the Apache way. Please VOTE to graduate Apache Spark from the incubator. I’ll leave the VOTE open for 96 hours, until February 4th, 2014. The graduation resolution is pasted below. Thanks! Matei and the Apache Spark community snip WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis on clusters. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation and sharing across distributed applications; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Spark Project: * Mosharaf Chowdhury * Jason Dai * Tathagata Das * Ankur Dave * Aaron Davidson * Thomas Dudziak * Robert Evans * Thomas Graves * Andy Konwinski * Stephen Haberman * Mark Hamstra * Shane Huang * Ryan LeCompte * Haoyuan Li * Sean McNamara * Mridul Muralidharam * Kay Ousterhout * Nick Pentreath * Imran Rashid * Charles Reiss * Josh Rosen * Prashant Sharma * Ram Sriharsha * Shivaram Venkataraman * Patrick Wendell * Andrew Xia * Reynold Xin * Matei Zaharia NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Spark podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator Project are hereafter discharged. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 (binding) Regards JB On 02/01/2014 02:00 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: +1 On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: Hi folks, The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/aEQ). I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as well. Here’s the community tally: +1 Matei Zaharia Reynold Xin Tathagata Das Sean McNamara Patrick Wendell Mark Hamstra Chris Mattmann * Tom Graves Henry Saputra * Andy Konwinski Josh Rosen Mosharaf Chowdhury Mridul Muralidharan Nick Pentreath Andrew Xia Haoyuan Li Sandy Ryza Sebastian Schelter * Kostas Sakellis Christopher Nguyen Aaron Davidson Shivaram Venkataraman Kay Ousterhout Evan Sparks Xuefeng Wu Konstantin Boudnik Rahul Chugh Prashant Sharma Stephen Haberman Prabeesh K. Saisai Shao Junfeng Feng Jason Dai Stevo Slavic Heiko Braun Xia Zhu Manoj Awasthi +0 (none) -1 (none) * indicates IPMC member We’ve made three releases in the incubator, added new committers and IPMC members, checked off the various requirements to migrate the development process to the ASF, and more generally worked to build this community in the Apache way. Please VOTE to graduate Apache Spark from the incubator. I’ll leave the VOTE open for 96 hours, until February 4th, 2014. The graduation resolution is pasted below. Thanks! Matei and the Apache Spark community snip WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis on clusters. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation and sharing across distributed applications; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Spark Project: * Mosharaf Chowdhury * Jason Dai * Tathagata Das * Ankur Dave * Aaron Davidson * Thomas Dudziak * Robert Evans * Thomas Graves * Andy Konwinski * Stephen Haberman * Mark Hamstra * Shane Huang * Ryan LeCompte * Haoyuan Li * Sean McNamara * Mridul Muralidharam * Kay Ousterhout * Nick Pentreath * Imran Rashid * Charles Reiss * Josh Rosen * Prashant Sharma * Ram Sriharsha * Shivaram Venkataraman * Patrick Wendell * Andrew Xia * Reynold Xin * Matei Zaharia NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Spark podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator Project are hereafter discharged. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+ 1 (binding). Suresh On Jan 31, 2014, at 9:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: > Hi folks, > > The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator > (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread: > http://s.apache.org/aEQ). > > I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as well. Here’s the > community tally: > > +1 > Matei Zaharia > Reynold Xin > Tathagata Das > Sean McNamara > Patrick Wendell > Mark Hamstra > Chris Mattmann * > Tom Graves > Henry Saputra * > Andy Konwinski > Josh Rosen > Mosharaf Chowdhury > Mridul Muralidharan > Nick Pentreath > Andrew Xia > Haoyuan Li > Sandy Ryza > Sebastian Schelter * > Kostas Sakellis > Christopher Nguyen > Aaron Davidson > Shivaram Venkataraman > Kay Ousterhout > Evan Sparks > Xuefeng Wu > Konstantin Boudnik > Rahul Chugh > Prashant Sharma > Stephen Haberman > Prabeesh K. > Saisai Shao > Junfeng Feng > Jason Dai > Stevo Slavic > Heiko Braun > Xia Zhu > Manoj Awasthi > > +0 > (none) > > -1 > (none) > > * indicates IPMC member > > We’ve made three releases in the incubator, added new committers and IPMC > members, checked off the various requirements to migrate the development > process to the ASF, and more generally worked to build this community in the > Apache way. > > Please VOTE to graduate Apache Spark from the incubator. I’ll leave the VOTE > open for 96 hours, until February 4th, 2014. The graduation resolution is > pasted below. > > Thanks! > > Matei and the Apache Spark community > > snip > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation > and sharing across distributed applications; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve > at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the > Apache Spark Project, and to have primary responsibility for > management of the projects within the scope of responsibility > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das > * Ankur Dave > * Aaron Davidson > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam > * Kay Ousterhout > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: > Hi folks, > > The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator > (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread: > http://s.apache.org/aEQ). > > I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as well. Here's the > community tally: +1 (binding). Best of luck, guys -- you were one of the most exemplary podlings! Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 Patrick On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: > Hi folks, > > The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator > (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread: > http://s.apache.org/aEQ). > > I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as well. Here's the > community tally: > > +1 > Matei Zaharia > Reynold Xin > Tathagata Das > Sean McNamara > Patrick Wendell > Mark Hamstra > Chris Mattmann * > Tom Graves > Henry Saputra * > Andy Konwinski > Josh Rosen > Mosharaf Chowdhury > Mridul Muralidharan > Nick Pentreath > Andrew Xia > Haoyuan Li > Sandy Ryza > Sebastian Schelter * > Kostas Sakellis > Christopher Nguyen > Aaron Davidson > Shivaram Venkataraman > Kay Ousterhout > Evan Sparks > Xuefeng Wu > Konstantin Boudnik > Rahul Chugh > Prashant Sharma > Stephen Haberman > Prabeesh K. > Saisai Shao > Junfeng Feng > Jason Dai > Stevo Slavic > Heiko Braun > Xia Zhu > Manoj Awasthi > > +0 > (none) > > -1 > (none) > > * indicates IPMC member > > We've made three releases in the incubator, added new committers and IPMC > members, checked off the various requirements to migrate the development > process to the ASF, and more generally worked to build this community in the > Apache way. > > Please VOTE to graduate Apache Spark from the incubator. I'll leave the VOTE > open for 96 hours, until February 4th, 2014. The graduation resolution is > pasted below. > > Thanks! > > Matei and the Apache Spark community > > snip > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation > and sharing across distributed applications; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve > at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the > Apache Spark Project, and to have primary responsibility for > management of the projects within the scope of responsibility > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das > * Ankur Dave > * Aaron Davidson > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam > * Kay Ousterhout > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+2 On Feb 1, 2014 1:15 PM, "Patrick Hunt" wrote: > +1 > > Patrick > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia > wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache > incubator (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread: > http://s.apache.org/aEQ). > > > > I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as well. > Here's the community tally: > > > > +1 > > Matei Zaharia > > Reynold Xin > > Tathagata Das > > Sean McNamara > > Patrick Wendell > > Mark Hamstra > > Chris Mattmann * > > Tom Graves > > Henry Saputra * > > Andy Konwinski > > Josh Rosen > > Mosharaf Chowdhury > > Mridul Muralidharan > > Nick Pentreath > > Andrew Xia > > Haoyuan Li > > Sandy Ryza > > Sebastian Schelter * > > Kostas Sakellis > > Christopher Nguyen > > Aaron Davidson > > Shivaram Venkataraman > > Kay Ousterhout > > Evan Sparks > > Xuefeng Wu > > Konstantin Boudnik > > Rahul Chugh > > Prashant Sharma > > Stephen Haberman > > Prabeesh K. > > Saisai Shao > > Junfeng Feng > > Jason Dai > > Stevo Slavic > > Heiko Braun > > Xia Zhu > > Manoj Awasthi > > > > +0 > > (none) > > > > -1 > > (none) > > > > * indicates IPMC member > > > > We've made three releases in the incubator, added new committers and > IPMC members, checked off the various requirements to migrate the > development process to the ASF, and more generally worked to build this > community in the Apache way. > > > > Please VOTE to graduate Apache Spark from the incubator. I'll leave the > VOTE open for 96 hours, until February 4th, 2014. The graduation resolution > is pasted below. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Matei and the Apache Spark community > > > > snip > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > > on clusters. > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > > and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > > related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation > > and sharing across distributed applications; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be > > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve > > at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the > > Apache Spark Project, and to have primary responsibility for > > management of the projects within the scope of responsibility > > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > > Apache Spark Project: > > > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > > * Jason Dai > > * Tathagata Das > > * Ankur Dave > > * Aaron Davidson > > * Thomas Dudziak > > * Robert Evans > > * Thomas Graves > > * Andy Konwinski > > * Stephen Haberman > > * Mark Hamstra > > * Shane Huang > > * Ryan LeCompte > > * Haoyuan Li > > * Sean McNamara > > * Mridul Muralidharam > > * Kay Ousterhout > > * Nick Pentreath > > * Imran Rashid > > * Charles Reiss > > * Josh Rosen > > * Prashant Sharma > > * Ram Sriharsha > > * Shivaram Venkataraman > > * Patrick Wendell > > * Andrew Xia > > * Reynold Xin > > * Matei Zaharia > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 -Jake On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: > Hi folks, > > The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator > (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread: > http://s.apache.org/aEQ). > > I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as well. Here's > the community tally: > > +1 > Matei Zaharia > Reynold Xin > Tathagata Das > Sean McNamara > Patrick Wendell > Mark Hamstra > Chris Mattmann * > Tom Graves > Henry Saputra * > Andy Konwinski > Josh Rosen > Mosharaf Chowdhury > Mridul Muralidharan > Nick Pentreath > Andrew Xia > Haoyuan Li > Sandy Ryza > Sebastian Schelter * > Kostas Sakellis > Christopher Nguyen > Aaron Davidson > Shivaram Venkataraman > Kay Ousterhout > Evan Sparks > Xuefeng Wu > Konstantin Boudnik > Rahul Chugh > Prashant Sharma > Stephen Haberman > Prabeesh K. > Saisai Shao > Junfeng Feng > Jason Dai > Stevo Slavic > Heiko Braun > Xia Zhu > Manoj Awasthi > > +0 > (none) > > -1 > (none) > > * indicates IPMC member > > We've made three releases in the incubator, added new committers and IPMC > members, checked off the various requirements to migrate the development > process to the ASF, and more generally worked to build this community in > the Apache way. > > Please VOTE to graduate Apache Spark from the incubator. I'll leave the > VOTE open for 96 hours, until February 4th, 2014. The graduation resolution > is pasted below. > > Thanks! > > Matei and the Apache Spark community > > snip > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation > and sharing across distributed applications; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve > at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the > Apache Spark Project, and to have primary responsibility for > management of the projects within the scope of responsibility > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das > * Ankur Dave > * Aaron Davidson > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam > * Kay Ousterhout > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 Regards, Alan On Jan 31, 2014, at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: > The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator > (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion > thread:http://s.apache.org/aEQ). > > I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as well. Here’s the > community tally:
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 -C On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: > Hi folks, > > The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator > (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread: > http://s.apache.org/aEQ). > > I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as well. Here's the > community tally: > > +1 > Matei Zaharia > Reynold Xin > Tathagata Das > Sean McNamara > Patrick Wendell > Mark Hamstra > Chris Mattmann * > Tom Graves > Henry Saputra * > Andy Konwinski > Josh Rosen > Mosharaf Chowdhury > Mridul Muralidharan > Nick Pentreath > Andrew Xia > Haoyuan Li > Sandy Ryza > Sebastian Schelter * > Kostas Sakellis > Christopher Nguyen > Aaron Davidson > Shivaram Venkataraman > Kay Ousterhout > Evan Sparks > Xuefeng Wu > Konstantin Boudnik > Rahul Chugh > Prashant Sharma > Stephen Haberman > Prabeesh K. > Saisai Shao > Junfeng Feng > Jason Dai > Stevo Slavic > Heiko Braun > Xia Zhu > Manoj Awasthi > > +0 > (none) > > -1 > (none) > > * indicates IPMC member > > We've made three releases in the incubator, added new committers and IPMC > members, checked off the various requirements to migrate the development > process to the ASF, and more generally worked to build this community in the > Apache way. > > Please VOTE to graduate Apache Spark from the incubator. I'll leave the VOTE > open for 96 hours, until February 4th, 2014. The graduation resolution is > pasted below. > > Thanks! > > Matei and the Apache Spark community > > snip > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation > and sharing across distributed applications; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve > at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the > Apache Spark Project, and to have primary responsibility for > management of the projects within the scope of responsibility > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das > * Ankur Dave > * Aaron Davidson > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam > * Kay Ousterhout > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On Jan 31, 2014, at 7:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: > Hi folks, > > The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator > (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread: > http://s.apache.org/aEQ). > > I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as well. Here’s the > community tally: +1 (binding) — Leif - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 best luck, guys! On 01/02/14 03:04, Matei Zaharia wrote: Hi folks, The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/aEQ). I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as well. Here’s the community tally: +1 Matei Zaharia Reynold Xin Tathagata Das Sean McNamara Patrick Wendell Mark Hamstra Chris Mattmann * Tom Graves Henry Saputra * Andy Konwinski Josh Rosen Mosharaf Chowdhury Mridul Muralidharan Nick Pentreath Andrew Xia Haoyuan Li Sandy Ryza Sebastian Schelter * Kostas Sakellis Christopher Nguyen Aaron Davidson Shivaram Venkataraman Kay Ousterhout Evan Sparks Xuefeng Wu Konstantin Boudnik Rahul Chugh Prashant Sharma Stephen Haberman Prabeesh K. Saisai Shao Junfeng Feng Jason Dai Stevo Slavic Heiko Braun Xia Zhu Manoj Awasthi +0 (none) -1 (none) * indicates IPMC member We’ve made three releases in the incubator, added new committers and IPMC members, checked off the various requirements to migrate the development process to the ASF, and more generally worked to build this community in the Apache way. Please VOTE to graduate Apache Spark from the incubator. I’ll leave the VOTE open for 96 hours, until February 4th, 2014. The graduation resolution is pasted below. Thanks! Matei and the Apache Spark community snip WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis on clusters. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation and sharing across distributed applications; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Spark Project: * Mosharaf Chowdhury * Jason Dai * Tathagata Das * Ankur Dave * Aaron Davidson * Thomas Dudziak * Robert Evans * Thomas Graves * Andy Konwinski * Stephen Haberman * Mark Hamstra * Shane Huang * Ryan LeCompte * Haoyuan Li * Sean McNamara * Mridul Muralidharam * Kay Ousterhout * Nick Pentreath * Imran Rashid * Charles Reiss * Josh Rosen * Prashant Sharma * Ram Sriharsha * Shivaram Venkataraman * Patrick Wendell * Andrew Xia * Reynold Xin * Matei Zaharia NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Spark podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator Project are hereafter discharged. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Sergio Fernández Senior Researcher Knowledge and Media Technologies Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Jakob-Haringer-Straße 5/3 | 5020 Salzburg, Austria T: +43 662 2288 318 | M: +43 660 2747 925 sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at http://www.salzburgresearch.at - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On 1 February 2014 02:04, Matei Zaharia wrote: > Hi folks, > > The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator > (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread: > http://s.apache.org/aEQ). > > I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as well. Here's the > community tally: > > +1 > Matei Zaharia > Reynold Xin > Tathagata Das > Sean McNamara > Patrick Wendell > Mark Hamstra > Chris Mattmann * > Tom Graves > Henry Saputra * > Andy Konwinski > Josh Rosen > Mosharaf Chowdhury > Mridul Muralidharan > Nick Pentreath > Andrew Xia > Haoyuan Li > Sandy Ryza > Sebastian Schelter * > Kostas Sakellis > Christopher Nguyen > Aaron Davidson > Shivaram Venkataraman > Kay Ousterhout > Evan Sparks > Xuefeng Wu > Konstantin Boudnik > Rahul Chugh > Prashant Sharma > Stephen Haberman > Prabeesh K. > Saisai Shao > Junfeng Feng > Jason Dai > Stevo Slavic > Heiko Braun > Xia Zhu > Manoj Awasthi > > +0 > (none) > > -1 > (none) > > * indicates IPMC member > > We've made three releases in the incubator, added new committers and IPMC > members, checked off the various requirements to migrate the development > process to the ASF, and more generally worked to build this community in the > Apache way. > > Please VOTE to graduate Apache Spark from the incubator. I'll leave the VOTE > open for 96 hours, until February 4th, 2014. The graduation resolution is > pasted below. > > Thanks! > > Matei and the Apache Spark community > > snip > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation > and sharing across distributed applications; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve > at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the > Apache Spark Project, and to have primary responsibility for > management of the projects within the scope of responsibility > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das > * Ankur Dave > * Aaron Davidson > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam > * Kay Ousterhout > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia -1 There is a mix of ASF e-mails and non-ASF e-mails above. All the committers proposed for the initial PMC must (I assume) already have ASF logins, so please can the ASF mails be used consistently throughout? External e-mails are liable to change over time, so are not a good identifier. > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:06 AM, sebb wrote: > ...There is a mix of ASF e-mails and non-ASF e-mails above... That's a problem indeed, please fix the resolution to use all @apache.org addresses. They are used for example to let https://whimsy.apache.org/ validate the IDs. +1 for graduation apart from that, that is once the resolution is fixed. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:06 AM, sebb wrote: > > ...There is a mix of ASF e-mails and non-ASF e-mails above... > > That's a problem indeed, please fix the resolution to use all > @apache.org addresses. They are used for example to let > https://whimsy.apache.org/ validate the IDs. > More importantly, they are used by the secretary and the infrastructure team to add people to the project. The board agenda tools help verify that they are accurate. > +1 for graduation apart from that, that is once the resolution is fixed. > > -Bertrand > - Sam Ruby
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < > bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:06 AM, sebb wrote: >> > ...There is a mix of ASF e-mails and non-ASF e-mails above... >> >> That's a problem indeed, please fix the resolution to use all >> @apache.org addresses. They are used for example to let >> https://whimsy.apache.org/ validate the IDs. >> > > More importantly, they are used by the secretary and the infrastructure > team to add people to the project. The board agenda tools help verify that > they are accurate. > After doing a spot check on a few of the non-apache.org ids, it appears that the individuals in question don't have ICLAs on file. - Sam Ruby
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
-1 for this resolution as written. Some of the proposed PMC members have filed ICLAs but are not committers; some have not even filed ICLAs; some appear to have been part of the original proposal but have not contributed to the project during incubation. Regards, Craig On Jan 31, 2014, at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das This person does not appear to be a committer. > * Ankur Dave This person does not appear to be a committer. > * Aaron Davidson This person does not appear to be a committer. > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam This person does not appear to be a committer. > * Kay Ousterhout There is no ICLA on file for this person. > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid This person does not appear to be a committer. > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha There is no ICLA on file for this person. > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia There is no ICLA on file for this person. > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia Craig L Russell Architect, Oracle http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > ...Some of the proposed PMC members have filed ICLAs but are not committers; > some have not > even filed ICLAs; some appear to have been part of the original proposal but > have not contributed > to the project during incubation... Ouch...thanks for catching that, Craig. Here's my -1 as well, we'll need to see an updated list of PMC members consisting of people who have demonstrated their commitment to the project. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Hi Craig, Thanks for the list, I’m following up with these folks to get them accounts. I think some people filed an ICLA but never received an account and were thus never added to the repo. A couple of questions: - What do you mean by “does not appear to be a committer” — that they weren’t added to the repo? All of these individuals have contributed code, but it was merged by someone else. - Andrew Xia is listed as having an ICLA on file here: http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html Matei On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:12 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: > -1 for this resolution as written. > > Some of the proposed PMC members have filed ICLAs but are not committers; > some have not even filed ICLAs; some appear to have been part of the original > proposal but have not contributed to the project during incubation. > > Regards, > > Craig > > On Jan 31, 2014, at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: > >> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >> Apache Spark Project: >> >> * Mosharaf Chowdhury >> * Jason Dai >> * Tathagata Das > > This person does not appear to be a committer. > >> * Ankur Dave > > This person does not appear to be a committer. > >> * Aaron Davidson > > This person does not appear to be a committer. > >> * Thomas Dudziak >> * Robert Evans >> * Thomas Graves >> * Andy Konwinski >> * Stephen Haberman >> * Mark Hamstra >> * Shane Huang >> * Ryan LeCompte >> * Haoyuan Li >> * Sean McNamara >> * Mridul Muralidharam > > This person does not appear to be a committer. > >> * Kay Ousterhout > > There is no ICLA on file for this person. > >> * Nick Pentreath >> * Imran Rashid > > This person does not appear to be a committer. > >> * Charles Reiss >> * Josh Rosen >> * Prashant Sharma >> * Ram Sriharsha > > There is no ICLA on file for this person. > >> * Shivaram Venkataraman >> * Patrick Wendell >> * Andrew Xia > > There is no ICLA on file for this person. > >> * Reynold Xin >> * Matei Zaharia > > Craig L Russell > Architect, Oracle > http://db.apache.org/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On 4 February 2014 20:26, Matei Zaharia wrote: > Hi Craig, > > Thanks for the list, I'm following up with these folks to get them accounts. > I think some people filed an ICLA but never received an account and were thus > never added to the repo. A couple of questions: > > - What do you mean by "does not appear to be a committer" -- that they > weren't added to the repo? All of these individuals have contributed code, > but it was merged by someone else. > > - Andrew Xia is listed as having an ICLA on file here: > http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html All ICLAs are recorded. The ones currently without availids (ASF login name) are listed here: https://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#unlistedclas > Matei > > > > On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:12 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: > >> -1 for this resolution as written. >> >> Some of the proposed PMC members have filed ICLAs but are not committers; >> some have not even filed ICLAs; some appear to have been part of the >> original proposal but have not contributed to the project during incubation. >> >> Regards, >> >> Craig >> >> On Jan 31, 2014, at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: >> >>> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >>> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >>> Apache Spark Project: >>> >>> * Mosharaf Chowdhury >>> * Jason Dai >>> * Tathagata Das >> >> This person does not appear to be a committer. >> >>> * Ankur Dave >> >> This person does not appear to be a committer. >> >>> * Aaron Davidson >> >> This person does not appear to be a committer. >> >>> * Thomas Dudziak >>> * Robert Evans >>> * Thomas Graves >>> * Andy Konwinski >>> * Stephen Haberman >>> * Mark Hamstra >>> * Shane Huang >>> * Ryan LeCompte >>> * Haoyuan Li >>> * Sean McNamara >>> * Mridul Muralidharam >> >> This person does not appear to be a committer. >> >>> * Kay Ousterhout >> >> There is no ICLA on file for this person. >> >>> * Nick Pentreath >>> * Imran Rashid >> >> This person does not appear to be a committer. >> >>> * Charles Reiss >>> * Josh Rosen >>> * Prashant Sharma >>> * Ram Sriharsha >> >> There is no ICLA on file for this person. >> >>> * Shivaram Venkataraman >>> * Patrick Wendell >>> * Andrew Xia >> >> There is no ICLA on file for this person. >> >>> * Reynold Xin >>> * Matei Zaharia >> >> Craig L Russell >> Architect, Oracle >> http://db.apache.org/jdo >> 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com >> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Hi Bertrand, and Craig, Thanks for the catch. Matei is working the updated PMC members. I just wanted to address the point about "commitment to the project". Spark was a UCB AMP Lab project that operated very much like an Apache project (which is why I was able to convince them that the ASF was a great fit). As far as demonstrating commitment to the project, these folks that were part of the original proposal *did* demonstrate their commitment to the project -- just as we ask podlings to absorb our ASF mentality that "merit doesn't expire" that same thing is true upstream of the project communities that come into the ASF, so long as the ASF Spark community members agree (which they overwhelmingly did through at least one round of VOTE'ing so far). >From my mentor perspective, I wouldn't go around suggesting who's demonstrated commitment to the project and who hasn't - that's really something that the PPMC can speak to and the mentors of the project. We're also proactively working this (Matei responded uber quickly and is handling stuff like a VP which is awesome!) so it should be resolved shortly. Thanks for your patience. Cheers, Chris -Original Message- From: Bertrand Delacretaz Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Date: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 1:34 AM To: Incubator General Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator >On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Craig L Russell > wrote: >> ...Some of the proposed PMC members have filed ICLAs but are not >>committers; some have not >> even filed ICLAs; some appear to have been part of the original >>proposal but have not contributed >> to the project during incubation... > >Ouch...thanks for catching that, Craig. > >Here's my -1 as well, we'll need to see an updated list of PMC members >consisting of people who have demonstrated their commitment to the >project. > >-Bertrand > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Hi Craig, Thanks for your comments. Like I said, we're working through the issues and trying to get them addressed. Comments like significant failure in leadership do little to productively move the discussion forward. For example, Spark has been a model citizen in dealing with other areas of the foundation in which things that should have been taken care of easily an in the first months of Incubation still remain (aka like getting Spark's JIRA migrated which would seem like a simple task, but after numerous emails and JIRA issue comments and discussion still remains to be complete). Members of the Spark PPMC haven't seen a single nasty email to infra nor has there been any use of the words "failure". Spark hasn't done everything perfect, the mentors haven't been perfect, the Incubator hasn't been perfect, and neither has everyone in conversations and discussions like this. Yet, we press on and try and do the best we can. We'll work to ensure that the initial PMC list submitted and VOTEd upon has appropriate ICLAs on file as intended. I hope that Spark can through addressing your comments change your mind on the VOTE of its graduation. In the case that it can't, graduation is a procedural VOTE where we're looking for more +1s than -1s by members of the IPMC and so your VOTE will be recorded appropriately. Thanks. Cheers, Chris -Original Message- From: Craig L Russell Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Date: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 9:05 AM To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator >Hi Matei, > >On Feb 4, 2014, at 12:26 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: > >> Hi Craig, >> >> Thanks for the list, I¹m following up with these folks to get them >>accounts. I think some people filed an ICLA but never received an >>account and were thus never added to the repo. > >This is a significant failure of the leadership of this project to >request accounts. > >The project status on http://incubator.apache.org/projects/spark.html >says that "all active committers have submitted a contributors agreement" >as of a week ago. The project started seven months ago. Setting up the >project, filing ICLAs, and getting accounts for committers is supposed to >be part of the initial activities, not a graduation exercise. > >> A couple of questions: >> >> - What do you mean by ³does not appear to be a committer² ‹ that they >>weren¹t added to the repo? > >They were not given credentials to commit to the repo. > >> All of these individuals have contributed code, but it was merged by >>someone else. > >This is a major issue. At Apache, committers update the repo with their >own code. Occasionally, they commit code on behalf of others but this >should be a rare exception, such as a person from the outside >contributing a patch or two. > >If committers on the project are routinely committing patches on behalf >of other active members of the project, there is something fundamentally >wrong with the leadership of the project. > >Perhaps it is a feature of using git that it's so easy to write code, >create a pull request, and have someone else do the "easy" job of >merging. > >> - Andrew Xia is listed as having an ICLA on file here: >>http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html > >Yes, I missed this. Andrew's public name is different. > >There are some folks on the proposed PMC list who do not appear to have >been active on the mail lists, which are the life blood of a project. > >I'm still -1 on this project graduating without demonstrated >understanding of how Apache projects work. > >Craig >> >> Matei >> >> >> >> On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:12 AM, Craig L Russell >>wrote: >> >>> -1 for this resolution as written. >>> >>> Some of the proposed PMC members have filed ICLAs but are not >>>committers; some have not even filed ICLAs; some appear to have been >>>part of the original proposal but have not contributed to the project >>>during incubation. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Craig >>> >>> On Jan 31, 2014, at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: >>> >>>> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >>>> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >>>> Apache Spark Project: >>>> >>>> * Mosharaf Chowdhury >>>> * Jason Dai >>>> * Tathagata Das >>> >>> This person does not appear to be a committer. >>> >>>> * Ankur Dave >>> >&g
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Hi Matei, On Feb 4, 2014, at 12:26 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: > Hi Craig, > > Thanks for the list, I’m following up with these folks to get them accounts. > I think some people filed an ICLA but never received an account and were thus > never added to the repo. This is a significant failure of the leadership of this project to request accounts. The project status on http://incubator.apache.org/projects/spark.html says that "all active committers have submitted a contributors agreement" as of a week ago. The project started seven months ago. Setting up the project, filing ICLAs, and getting accounts for committers is supposed to be part of the initial activities, not a graduation exercise. > A couple of questions: > > - What do you mean by “does not appear to be a committer” — that they weren’t > added to the repo? They were not given credentials to commit to the repo. > All of these individuals have contributed code, but it was merged by someone > else. This is a major issue. At Apache, committers update the repo with their own code. Occasionally, they commit code on behalf of others but this should be a rare exception, such as a person from the outside contributing a patch or two. If committers on the project are routinely committing patches on behalf of other active members of the project, there is something fundamentally wrong with the leadership of the project. Perhaps it is a feature of using git that it's so easy to write code, create a pull request, and have someone else do the "easy" job of merging. > - Andrew Xia is listed as having an ICLA on file here: > http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html Yes, I missed this. Andrew's public name is different. There are some folks on the proposed PMC list who do not appear to have been active on the mail lists, which are the life blood of a project. I'm still -1 on this project graduating without demonstrated understanding of how Apache projects work. Craig > > Matei > > > > On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:12 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: > >> -1 for this resolution as written. >> >> Some of the proposed PMC members have filed ICLAs but are not committers; >> some have not even filed ICLAs; some appear to have been part of the >> original proposal but have not contributed to the project during incubation. >> >> Regards, >> >> Craig >> >> On Jan 31, 2014, at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: >> >>> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >>> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >>> Apache Spark Project: >>> >>> * Mosharaf Chowdhury >>> * Jason Dai >>> * Tathagata Das >> >> This person does not appear to be a committer. >> >>> * Ankur Dave >> >> This person does not appear to be a committer. >> >>> * Aaron Davidson >> >> This person does not appear to be a committer. >> >>> * Thomas Dudziak >>> * Robert Evans >>> * Thomas Graves >>> * Andy Konwinski >>> * Stephen Haberman >>> * Mark Hamstra >>> * Shane Huang >>> * Ryan LeCompte >>> * Haoyuan Li >>> * Sean McNamara >>> * Mridul Muralidharam >> >> This person does not appear to be a committer. >> >>> * Kay Ousterhout >> >> There is no ICLA on file for this person. >> >>> * Nick Pentreath >>> * Imran Rashid >> >> This person does not appear to be a committer. >> >>> * Charles Reiss >>> * Josh Rosen >>> * Prashant Sharma >>> * Ram Sriharsha >> >> There is no ICLA on file for this person. >> >>> * Shivaram Venkataraman >>> * Patrick Wendell >>> * Andrew Xia >> >> There is no ICLA on file for this person. >> >>> * Reynold Xin >>> * Matei Zaharia >> >> Craig L Russell >> Architect, Oracle >> http://db.apache.org/jdo >> 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com >> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > Craig L Russell Architect, Oracle http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Hi Craig, I am one of the mentors for Spark podling. Currently the Spark operates via the ASF Github mirror to do review and commit requests. The podling uses the Github pull requests mechanism, please see how to contribute page [1] By definition ASF committers are people who CAN commit code to the repository and since currently the Spark podling uses Github Pull Request flow that allow committers to push to his/her own forked repo and allow other people to merge the code to Spark ASF git repository. However, there a mechanism to preserve the actual commit comment and credit to the original individual whom commit the code to his/her own copy of the source repository. >From traditional code commit like with SVN the flow seem to make them like "outsider" but they have been contributing to the podling with the knowledge and participations as committers Love to chat or explain more to you about it if you need more clarification. Hope this helps to ease your concern about Spark podling readiness to become TLP. Thanks, Henry [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: > Hi Matei, > > On Feb 4, 2014, at 12:26 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: > >> Hi Craig, >> >> Thanks for the list, I’m following up with these folks to get them accounts. >> I think some people filed an ICLA but never received an account and were >> thus never added to the repo. > > This is a significant failure of the leadership of this project to request > accounts. > > The project status on http://incubator.apache.org/projects/spark.html says > that "all active committers have submitted a contributors agreement" as of a > week ago. The project started seven months ago. Setting up the project, > filing ICLAs, and getting accounts for committers is supposed to be part of > the initial activities, not a graduation exercise. > >> A couple of questions: >> >> - What do you mean by “does not appear to be a committer” — that they >> weren’t added to the repo? > > They were not given credentials to commit to the repo. > >> All of these individuals have contributed code, but it was merged by someone >> else. > > This is a major issue. At Apache, committers update the repo with their own > code. Occasionally, they commit code on behalf of others but this should be a > rare exception, such as a person from the outside contributing a patch or two. > > If committers on the project are routinely committing patches on behalf of > other active members of the project, there is something fundamentally wrong > with the leadership of the project. > > Perhaps it is a feature of using git that it's so easy to write code, create > a pull request, and have someone else do the "easy" job of merging. > >> - Andrew Xia is listed as having an ICLA on file here: >> http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html > > Yes, I missed this. Andrew's public name is different. > > There are some folks on the proposed PMC list who do not appear to have been > active on the mail lists, which are the life blood of a project. > > I'm still -1 on this project graduating without demonstrated understanding of > how Apache projects work. > > Craig >> >> Matei >> >> >> >> On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:12 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: >> >>> -1 for this resolution as written. >>> >>> Some of the proposed PMC members have filed ICLAs but are not committers; >>> some have not even filed ICLAs; some appear to have been part of the >>> original proposal but have not contributed to the project during incubation. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Craig >>> >>> On Jan 31, 2014, at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: >>> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Spark Project: * Mosharaf Chowdhury * Jason Dai * Tathagata Das >>> >>> This person does not appear to be a committer. >>> * Ankur Dave >>> >>> This person does not appear to be a committer. >>> * Aaron Davidson >>> >>> This person does not appear to be a committer. >>> * Thomas Dudziak * Robert Evans * Thomas Graves * Andy Konwinski * Stephen Haberman * Mark Hamstra * Shane Huang * Ryan LeCompte * Haoyuan Li * Sean McNamara * Mridul Muralidharam >>> >>> This person does not appear to be a committer. >>> * Kay Ousterhout >>> >>> There is no ICLA on file for this person. >>> * Nick Pentreath * Imran Rashid >>> >>> This person does not appear to be a committer. >>> * Charles Reiss * Josh Rosen * Prashant Sharma * Ram Sriharsha >>> >>> There is no ICLA on file for this person. >>> * Shivaram Venkataraman * Patrick Wendell * Andrew Xia >>> >>> There is no ICLA on file for this person. >>> * Reynold Xin * Matei Zaharia >>> >>> Craig L Russell >>> Architect, Oracle >>> http://db.apache.org/jdo >>> 4
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Thanks so much to sebb, Craig, Bertrand for catching the issue. Will work with Apache Spark PPMCs to resolve it. - Henry On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Craig L Russell > wrote: >> ...Some of the proposed PMC members have filed ICLAs but are not committers; >> some have not >> even filed ICLAs; some appear to have been part of the original proposal but >> have not contributed >> to the project during incubation... > > Ouch...thanks for catching that, Craig. > > Here's my -1 as well, we'll need to see an updated list of PMC members > consisting of people who have demonstrated their commitment to the > project. > > -Bertrand > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Hi Craig, On Feb 5, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: >> Hi Craig, >> >> Thanks for the list, I’m following up with these folks to get them accounts. >> I think some people filed an ICLA but never received an account and were >> thus never added to the repo. > > This is a significant failure of the leadership of this project to request > accounts. > > The project status on http://incubator.apache.org/projects/spark.html says > that "all active committers have submitted a contributors agreement" as of a > week ago. The project started seven months ago. Setting up the project, > filing ICLAs, and getting accounts for committers is supposed to be part of > the initial activities, not a graduation exercise. There was definitely a failure here in setting up their expectations and following up to make sure everyone got an account. All the committers who sent an ICLA requested an account name, but I at least wasn’t clear what the process is for getting one (I assumed that secretary@ does that, since as a non-IPMC member, I can’t create accounts). We also didn’t tell the new committers to ask if they haven’t received an account in X time, so because people were immediately added on the private list they might’ve thought everything is under way. But we can definitely take a much more proactive stance on this as a TLP. I would both 1) tell them to expect an account within a week and 2) make sure the PMC leads this process for new committers. As you must’ve seen from our discussion with secretary@, all the proposed committers actually had submitted ICLAs, and the only one you hadn’t received one from was Kay Ousterhout due to spam filtering. She was only added in December. If you look at the VOTE threads or GitHub review activity, all the added committers were highly active members in terms of both new contributions and reviewing before being proposed as committers. >> A couple of questions: >> >> - What do you mean by “does not appear to be a committer” — that they >> weren’t added to the repo? > > They were not given credentials to commit to the repo. > >> All of these individuals have contributed code, but it was merged by someone >> else. > > This is a major issue. At Apache, committers update the repo with their own > code. Occasionally, they commit code on behalf of others but this should be a > rare exception, such as a person from the outside contributing a patch or two. > > If committers on the project are routinely committing patches on behalf of > other active members of the project, there is something fundamentally wrong > with the leadership of the project. What I meant by this is that all code is reviewed by another committer and merged by them. Different projects operate differently, but I believe this is a very normal way to operate. I’ve been a committer on Apache Hadoop, one of the most active Apache projects, since 2009, and nearly all the patches I sent there were reviewed and merged by someone else. If you look at the GitHub code reviews (https://github.com/apache/incubator-spark/pulls), you’ll see that lots of people are contributing to reviewing. But I agree that the new committer onboarding process should include having them do a test commit. > Perhaps it is a feature of using git that it's so easy to write code, create > a pull request, and have someone else do the "easy" job of merging. That might definitely be part of it. GitHub not only makes it easy to send patches but also makes it easy for the reviewer to say “this patch does not merge cleanly”, or “does not pass unit tests”, so a lot of the merging happens at review time. The actual merging is a couple of shell commands. You can look at some of the pull requests if you’re worried about peoples’ activity — discussion is extremely active and many of our proposed committers were reviewing patches before being proposed. > >> - Andrew Xia is listed as having an ICLA on file here: >> http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html > > Yes, I missed this. Andrew's public name is different. > > There are some folks on the proposed PMC list who do not appear to have been > active on the mail lists, which are the life blood of a project. It’s true that some members have been less active in the past six months, but keep in mind that the project existed for 3.5 years before joining the Incubator, and was highly active even then. All the initial committers made major contributions during these first 3.5 years, and as Chris said, our philosophy was to recognize them for their contributions and give them the ability to participate in the project once it moved to Apache. All of the initial committers agreed to being made committers (I asked them before the proposal). If we end up with a problem of inactive committers in the future, we may consider some kind of emeritus status, but I’d personally feel uncomfortable asking anyone to drop their committer status due to the
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
> What I meant by this is that all code is reviewed by another committer and > merged by them. Different projects operate differently, but I believe this is > a very normal way to operate. I’ve been a committer on Apache Hadoop, one of > the most active Apache projects, since 2009, and nearly all the patches I > sent there were reviewed and merged by someone else. > > If you look at the GitHub code reviews > (https://github.com/apache/incubator-spark/pulls), you’ll see that lots of > people are contributing to reviewing. But I agree that the new committer > onboarding process should include having them do a test commit. BTW just to reiterate Henry’s point here, because it’s probably not clear coming from SVN: in Git, when you merge someone else’s patch, they retain authorship for it in the commit history. Just do a "git log" in our repository (e.g. https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-spark.git;a=summary). So it’s not a case of “email your patch to someone else and have them apply it”. Matei - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
> > If you look at the GitHub code reviews > (https://github.com/apache/incubator-spark/pulls), you'll see that lots of > people are contributing to reviewing. But I agree that the new committer > onboarding process should include having them do a test commit. > Matei: Reviews being done on github causes me a bit of concern. Generally dev@ should be the nexus for a project, and most of the projects that have github in the workflow ensure that pull requests get sent to dev@ so the discussions, reviews, and patches themselves are seen and archived there. I see that one of your mentors brought up similar concerns about this (as well as where discussions on strategy or roadmap happen) yesterday on dev@ - that doesn't leave me with warm fuzzy assurance that the project groks the Apache way. --David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review on Review Board? If there's concern that work on Github isn't being adequately mirrored on the mailing lists then that sounds like an Infra problem to me. There are plenty of hooks [1] that makes this easy to do and, if I'm not mistaken, pull requests through Github are already supposed to mail dev@. I would assume that any comment on them should as well. [1] http://developer.github.com/v3/repos/hooks/ -- Joyce On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:22 AM, David Nalley wrote: > > > > If you look at the GitHub code reviews ( > https://github.com/apache/incubator-spark/pulls), you'll see that lots of > people are contributing to reviewing. But I agree that the new committer > onboarding process should include having them do a test commit. > > > > Matei: > > Reviews being done on github causes me a bit of concern. Generally > dev@ should be the nexus for a project, and most of the projects that > have github in the workflow ensure that pull requests get sent to dev@ > so the discussions, reviews, and patches themselves are seen and > archived there. > > I see that one of your mentors brought up similar concerns about this > (as well as where discussions on strategy or roadmap happen) yesterday > on dev@ - that doesn't leave me with warm fuzzy assurance that the > project groks the Apache way. > > --David > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Having developer/committer comments from a github review automatically show up on dev@ lists will ease my concern that the git activities somehow avoid the "if it isn't on the mail lists, it didn't happen" requirement. Craig On Feb 6, 2014, at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce wrote: > How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review on Review > Board? If there's concern that work on Github isn't being adequately > mirrored on the mailing lists then that sounds like an Infra problem to me. > There are plenty of hooks [1] that makes this easy to do and, if I'm not > mistaken, pull requests through Github are already supposed to mail dev@. I > would assume that any comment on them should as well. > > > [1] http://developer.github.com/v3/repos/hooks/ > > > -- Joyce > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:22 AM, David Nalley wrote: > >>> >>> If you look at the GitHub code reviews ( >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-spark/pulls), you'll see that lots of >> people are contributing to reviewing. But I agree that the new committer >> onboarding process should include having them do a test commit. >>> >> >> Matei: >> >> Reviews being done on github causes me a bit of concern. Generally >> dev@ should be the nexus for a project, and most of the projects that >> have github in the workflow ensure that pull requests get sent to dev@ >> so the discussions, reviews, and patches themselves are seen and >> archived there. >> >> I see that one of your mentors brought up similar concerns about this >> (as well as where discussions on strategy or roadmap happen) yesterday >> on dev@ - that doesn't leave me with warm fuzzy assurance that the >> project groks the Apache way. >> >> --David >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> Craig L Russell Architect, Oracle http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
This got me to thinking. If git is the working tool of the team, and actions from the git site are automatically forwarded to dev, how about putting release votes on git? Could an action item be created in git by the release manager to release, say, version 3.4.5 of the code? Voting could be done by comments from the community. After the time expires, votes are tallied. Only PMC votes binding, of course. As long as dev@ contains all the feedback from voters, I'd be satisfied that the "vote on the release" requirement was satisfied. Craig On Feb 6, 2014, at 9:28 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: > Having developer/committer comments from a github review automatically show > up on dev@ lists will ease my concern that the git activities somehow avoid > the "if it isn't on the mail lists, it didn't happen" requirement. > > Craig > > On Feb 6, 2014, at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce wrote: > >> How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review on Review >> Board? If there's concern that work on Github isn't being adequately >> mirrored on the mailing lists then that sounds like an Infra problem to me. >> There are plenty of hooks [1] that makes this easy to do and, if I'm not >> mistaken, pull requests through Github are already supposed to mail dev@. I >> would assume that any comment on them should as well. >> >> >> [1] http://developer.github.com/v3/repos/hooks/ >> >> >> -- Joyce >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:22 AM, David Nalley wrote: >> If you look at the GitHub code reviews ( >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-spark/pulls), you'll see that lots of >>> people are contributing to reviewing. But I agree that the new committer >>> onboarding process should include having them do a test commit. >>> >>> Matei: >>> >>> Reviews being done on github causes me a bit of concern. Generally >>> dev@ should be the nexus for a project, and most of the projects that >>> have github in the workflow ensure that pull requests get sent to dev@ >>> so the discussions, reviews, and patches themselves are seen and >>> archived there. >>> >>> I see that one of your mentors brought up similar concerns about this >>> (as well as where discussions on strategy or roadmap happen) yesterday >>> on dev@ - that doesn't leave me with warm fuzzy assurance that the >>> project groks the Apache way. >>> >>> --David >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >>> > > Craig L Russell > Architect, Oracle > http://db.apache.org/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > Craig L Russell Architect, Oracle http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce wrote: > How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review on Review > Board? One is captured to Apache controlled channels and the other is not. > If there's concern that work on Github isn't being adequately mirrored on > the mailing lists then that sounds like an Infra problem to me. It's not an Infra problem. It's the problem of any PMC which fails to ensure that all of its communications are properly archived. If anyone here is interested in contributing towards this feature, I encourage you to subscribe to the infrastructure-dev@apache list. I also encourage everyone to ponder carefully: * How to ensure that no information is lost when capturing communications in GitHub channels through notifications to our dev lists. * The impact of adding GitHub integration features on long-term ASF Infra labor costs. > There are plenty of hooks [1] that makes this easy to do and, if I'm not > mistaken, pull requests through Github are already supposed to mail dev@. That's right. I've actually worked on the specific hook that does that[1][2]. > I would assume that any comment on them should as well. Why would you "assume" that GitHub comments are being mailed to dev lists? They are not. Every Apache PMC member is tasked with oversight of their project, and that includes ensuring that all decisions happen on the dev list and are properly documented. It is not enough to "assume" that Infra is taking care of archival -- ensuring that the archival actually happens is the PMC's direct responsibility. Marvin Humphrey [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4651 [2] Thread on legal-discuss@apache: http://s.apache.org/Nhx - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
The webhooks are in place to send pr notifications from github to the dev@lists, the problem is that comments do not get sent only the actions of opening and closing of the pr are sent. -Jake On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Michael Joyce wrote: > How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review on Review > Board? If there's concern that work on Github isn't being adequately > mirrored on the mailing lists then that sounds like an Infra problem to me. > There are plenty of hooks [1] that makes this easy to do and, if I'm not > mistaken, pull requests through Github are already supposed to mail dev@. > I > would assume that any comment on them should as well. > > > [1] http://developer.github.com/v3/repos/hooks/ > > > -- Joyce > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:22 AM, David Nalley wrote: > > > > > > > If you look at the GitHub code reviews ( > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-spark/pulls), you'll see that lots > of > > people are contributing to reviewing. But I agree that the new committer > > onboarding process should include having them do a test commit. > > > > > > > Matei: > > > > Reviews being done on github causes me a bit of concern. Generally > > dev@ should be the nexus for a project, and most of the projects that > > have github in the workflow ensure that pull requests get sent to dev@ > > so the discussions, reviews, and patches themselves are seen and > > archived there. > > > > I see that one of your mentors brought up similar concerns about this > > (as well as where discussions on strategy or roadmap happen) yesterday > > on dev@ - that doesn't leave me with warm fuzzy assurance that the > > project groks the Apache way. > > > > --David > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
HI Marvin, The automatic email to dev@ list for github mirror PR, does it happen for all ASF github mirrors or each podling need to do some setup to make it work? - Henry On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce wrote: >> How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review on Review >> Board? > > One is captured to Apache controlled channels and the other is not. > >> If there's concern that work on Github isn't being adequately mirrored on >> the mailing lists then that sounds like an Infra problem to me. > > It's not an Infra problem. It's the problem of any PMC which fails to ensure > that all of its communications are properly archived. > > If anyone here is interested in contributing towards this feature, I encourage > you to subscribe to the infrastructure-dev@apache list. I also encourage > everyone to ponder carefully: > > * How to ensure that no information is lost when capturing communications > in GitHub channels through notifications to our dev lists. > * The impact of adding GitHub integration features on long-term ASF Infra > labor costs. > >> There are plenty of hooks [1] that makes this easy to do and, if I'm not >> mistaken, pull requests through Github are already supposed to mail dev@. > > That's right. I've actually worked on the specific hook that does that[1][2]. > >> I would assume that any comment on them should as well. > > Why would you "assume" that GitHub comments are being mailed to dev lists? > They are not. > > Every Apache PMC member is tasked with oversight of their project, and that > includes ensuring that all decisions happen on the dev list and are properly > documented. It is not enough to "assume" that Infra is taking care of > archival -- ensuring that the archival actually happens is the PMC's direct > responsibility. > > Marvin Humphrey > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4651 > [2] Thread on legal-discuss@apache: http://s.apache.org/Nhx > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Once the mirror is setup and synced to github (24hr window for this potentially to occur) then one of the Github Apache org admins can setup the webhook. The project just needs to put in an infra ticket asking for it -Jake On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > HI Marvin, > > The automatic email to dev@ list for github mirror PR, does it happen > for all ASF github mirrors or each podling need to do some setup to > make it work? > > > - Henry > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce wrote: > >> How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review on > Review > >> Board? > > > > One is captured to Apache controlled channels and the other is not. > > > >> If there's concern that work on Github isn't being adequately mirrored > on > >> the mailing lists then that sounds like an Infra problem to me. > > > > It's not an Infra problem. It's the problem of any PMC which fails to > ensure > > that all of its communications are properly archived. > > > > If anyone here is interested in contributing towards this feature, I > encourage > > you to subscribe to the infrastructure-dev@apache list. I also > encourage > > everyone to ponder carefully: > > > > * How to ensure that no information is lost when capturing > communications > > in GitHub channels through notifications to our dev lists. > > * The impact of adding GitHub integration features on long-term ASF > Infra > > labor costs. > > > >> There are plenty of hooks [1] that makes this easy to do and, if I'm not > >> mistaken, pull requests through Github are already supposed to mail dev@ > . > > > > That's right. I've actually worked on the specific hook that does > that[1][2]. > > > >> I would assume that any comment on them should as well. > > > > Why would you "assume" that GitHub comments are being mailed to dev > lists? > > They are not. > > > > Every Apache PMC member is tasked with oversight of their project, and > that > > includes ensuring that all decisions happen on the dev list and are > properly > > documented. It is not enough to "assume" that Infra is taking care of > > archival -- ensuring that the archival actually happens is the PMC's > direct > > responsibility. > > > > Marvin Humphrey > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4651 > > [2] Thread on legal-discuss@apache: http://s.apache.org/Nhx > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Let's try this again Marvin since you're jumping to the wrong conclusions here. If people are concerned about work on Github not being automatically mirrored to ASF mailing lists that's an Infra problem. They should go talk to them to help get it addressed, which includes the possibility of contributing code. I'm not saying that archiving project relevant discussion is Infra's job. I figured that would be obvious to everyone here, but evidently I'm mistaken. Hopefully this helps to clear that up. Are you really curious as to why I would assume that basic integration with Github would exist when I'm aware of an already existing integration with pull request notifications? When there are hooks that exist for comments being posted to pull requests, I don't think there's a very large leap to assume that we would leverage that. That doesn't mean that I think it's Infra's job to archive for a project. A response like Jake's is exactly the kind of response that this discussion needs. Someone with an understanding of the system explaining exactly what the limitations are. That way, people like me (people who don't bother with the Github mirrors) can better understand exactly what they can do to help improve them in the future if they decide that's what they want to do. Thank you for always being helpful Jake, it's very much appreciated. -- Joyce On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce wrote: > > How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review on > Review > > Board? > > One is captured to Apache controlled channels and the other is not. > > > If there's concern that work on Github isn't being adequately mirrored on > > the mailing lists then that sounds like an Infra problem to me. > > It's not an Infra problem. It's the problem of any PMC which fails to > ensure > that all of its communications are properly archived. > > If anyone here is interested in contributing towards this feature, I > encourage > you to subscribe to the infrastructure-dev@apache list. I also encourage > everyone to ponder carefully: > > * How to ensure that no information is lost when capturing communications > in GitHub channels through notifications to our dev lists. > * The impact of adding GitHub integration features on long-term ASF Infra > labor costs. > > > There are plenty of hooks [1] that makes this easy to do and, if I'm not > > mistaken, pull requests through Github are already supposed to mail dev@ > . > > That's right. I've actually worked on the specific hook that does > that[1][2]. > > > I would assume that any comment on them should as well. > > Why would you "assume" that GitHub comments are being mailed to dev lists? > They are not. > > Every Apache PMC member is tasked with oversight of their project, and that > includes ensuring that all decisions happen on the dev list and are > properly > documented. It is not enough to "assume" that Infra is taking care of > archival -- ensuring that the archival actually happens is the PMC's direct > responsibility. > > Marvin Humphrey > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4651 > [2] Thread on legal-discuss@apache: http://s.apache.org/Nhx > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On 02/06/2014 07:34 PM, Michael Joyce wrote: > Let's try this again Marvin since you're jumping to the wrong conclusions > here. > > If people are concerned about work on Github not being automatically > mirrored to ASF mailing lists that's an Infra problem. They should go talk > to them to help get it addressed, which includes the possibility of > contributing code. I'm not saying that archiving project relevant > discussion is Infra's job. Then PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE stop saying "It's an Infra problem". People are making it seem like the blame is on Infra when $project does something outside the organization and it doesn't get recorded. That responsibility is SOLELY on the project/PMC itself. If however you/they are interested in figuring out how to pull in these off-site/off-org discussions to the mailing lists, then they should talk to Infra and work something out (we _are_ working hard on a solution, for the record). Just stop saying it's an Infra problem - it's a project problem, 100% an issue with the project, but Infra may be able to make convenience archiving for them (I'm stressing *convenience* here, it does not magically make doing all your work on GitHub legit). Having said that, I have yet to see someone step up and tell Infra "Hey, we need your help in doing this, how can we _collaborate_ on a solution?". So...please do. With regards, Daniel. I figured that would be obvious to everyone > here, but evidently I'm mistaken. Hopefully this helps to clear that up. > > Are you really curious as to why I would assume that basic integration with > Github would exist when I'm aware of an already existing integration with > pull request notifications? When there are hooks that exist for comments > being posted to pull requests, I don't think there's a very large leap to > assume that we would leverage that. That doesn't mean that I think it's > Infra's job to archive for a project. > > A response like Jake's is exactly the kind of response that this discussion > needs. Someone with an understanding of the system explaining exactly what > the limitations are. That way, people like me (people who don't bother with > the Github mirrors) can better understand exactly what they can do to help > improve them in the future if they decide that's what they want to do. > Thank you for always being helpful Jake, it's very much appreciated. > > > -- Joyce > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce wrote: >>> How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review on >> Review >>> Board? >> >> One is captured to Apache controlled channels and the other is not. >> >>> If there's concern that work on Github isn't being adequately mirrored on >>> the mailing lists then that sounds like an Infra problem to me. >> >> It's not an Infra problem. It's the problem of any PMC which fails to >> ensure >> that all of its communications are properly archived. >> >> If anyone here is interested in contributing towards this feature, I >> encourage >> you to subscribe to the infrastructure-dev@apache list. I also encourage >> everyone to ponder carefully: >> >> * How to ensure that no information is lost when capturing communications >> in GitHub channels through notifications to our dev lists. >> * The impact of adding GitHub integration features on long-term ASF Infra >> labor costs. >> >>> There are plenty of hooks [1] that makes this easy to do and, if I'm not >>> mistaken, pull requests through Github are already supposed to mail dev@ >> . >> >> That's right. I've actually worked on the specific hook that does >> that[1][2]. >> >>> I would assume that any comment on them should as well. >> >> Why would you "assume" that GitHub comments are being mailed to dev lists? >> They are not. >> >> Every Apache PMC member is tasked with oversight of their project, and that >> includes ensuring that all decisions happen on the dev list and are >> properly >> documented. It is not enough to "assume" that Infra is taking care of >> archival -- ensuring that the archival actually happens is the PMC's direct >> responsibility. >> >> Marvin Humphrey >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4651 >> [2] Thread on legal-discuss@apache: http://s.apache.org/Nhx >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Matei multiple TLPs using it as their main reviewing system? Outside of JClouds I am unaware of any others using it currently. I think this is a good discussion to have, but we should start another thread with it so as to not hijack the Apache Spark graduation thread with it. -Jake On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: > I like the idea of sending these to the dev list. I'm going to open an > INFRA ticket for it. > > While it seems that the current web hook only sends events when a pull > request is opened or closed, GitHub *can* email watchers for comments as > well. I'm watching the project on GitHub and I get an email for every > comment, even on pull requests I never looked at. So maybe we can > investigate adding this to the GitHub hook -- I'm sure it's not a big burden > from their side. > > The other option would be to somehow subscribe dev@ through the standard > GitHub watcher framework by making it the notification address for some > account watching the repo, but this requires confirming the address and I > think anyone on dev might be able to unsubscribe it or take ownership of > that account if we do so. Maybe GitHub can help us do this without going > through the "confirm address" process. Did you guys have a contact over > there helping with the mirroring, or was it all done through their API? I > imagine it's in their interest to make GitHub work with the ASF process > because there are now multiple TLPs using it as their main reviewing system. > > Matei > > On Feb 6, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Jake Farrell wrote: > > > Once the mirror is setup and synced to github (24hr window for this > > potentially to occur) then one of the Github Apache org admins can setup > > the webhook. The project just needs to put in an infra ticket asking for > it > > > > -Jake > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Henry Saputra >wrote: > > > >> HI Marvin, > >> > >> The automatic email to dev@ list for github mirror PR, does it happen > >> for all ASF github mirrors or each podling need to do some setup to > >> make it work? > >> > >> > >> - Henry > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Marvin Humphrey > > >> wrote: > >>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce > wrote: > How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review on > >> Review > Board? > >>> > >>> One is captured to Apache controlled channels and the other is not. > >>> > If there's concern that work on Github isn't being adequately mirrored > >> on > the mailing lists then that sounds like an Infra problem to me. > >>> > >>> It's not an Infra problem. It's the problem of any PMC which fails to > >> ensure > >>> that all of its communications are properly archived. > >>> > >>> If anyone here is interested in contributing towards this feature, I > >> encourage > >>> you to subscribe to the infrastructure-dev@apache list. I also > >> encourage > >>> everyone to ponder carefully: > >>> > >>> * How to ensure that no information is lost when capturing > >> communications > >>>in GitHub channels through notifications to our dev lists. > >>> * The impact of adding GitHub integration features on long-term ASF > >> Infra > >>>labor costs. > >>> > There are plenty of hooks [1] that makes this easy to do and, if I'm > not > mistaken, pull requests through Github are already supposed to mail > dev@ > >> . > >>> > >>> That's right. I've actually worked on the specific hook that does > >> that[1][2]. > >>> > I would assume that any comment on them should as well. > >>> > >>> Why would you "assume" that GitHub comments are being mailed to dev > >> lists? > >>> They are not. > >>> > >>> Every Apache PMC member is tasked with oversight of their project, and > >> that > >>> includes ensuring that all decisions happen on the dev list and are > >> properly > >>> documented. It is not enough to "assume" that Infra is taking care of > >>> archival -- ensuring that the archival actually happens is the PMC's > >> direct > >>> responsibility. > >>> > >>> Marvin Humphrey > >>> > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4651 > >>> [2] Thread on legal-discuss@apache: http://s.apache.org/Nhx > >>> > >>> - > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >>> > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >> > >> > >
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
I agree with Marvin. In addition I find it odd to rely in two sources of truth (and two sets of infrastructure, etc) as far as code goes just so we do code reviews on GitHub. Anybody who wants to commit now needs to have both the Github repo and the Apache repo cloned; you can merge a pull request on GitHub, as that is not authoritative source control. Github will be behind sometimes, etc, etc. What if there are issues with Github (unlikely, I know, but would be out of Apache's control)? Can't we add necessary Apache Infrastructure? Would Apache be able to get a free GitHub license - ala Jira - to run it as part of Apache (or maybe buy a license)? On the Phoenix mailing Gerret was mentioned for git-style code review. -- Lars From: Marvin Humphrey To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2014 9:53 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce wrote: > How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review on Review > Board? One is captured to Apache controlled channels and the other is not. > If there's concern that work on Github isn't being adequately mirrored on > the mailing lists then that sounds like an Infra problem to me. It's not an Infra problem. It's the problem of any PMC which fails to ensure that all of its communications are properly archived. If anyone here is interested in contributing towards this feature, I encourage you to subscribe to the infrastructure-dev@apache list. I also encourage everyone to ponder carefully: * How to ensure that no information is lost when capturing communications in GitHub channels through notifications to our dev lists. * The impact of adding GitHub integration features on long-term ASF Infra labor costs. > There are plenty of hooks [1] that makes this easy to do and, if I'm not > mistaken, pull requests through Github are already supposed to mail dev@. That's right. I've actually worked on the specific hook that does that[1][2]. > I would assume that any comment on them should as well. Why would you "assume" that GitHub comments are being mailed to dev lists? They are not. Every Apache PMC member is tasked with oversight of their project, and that includes ensuring that all decisions happen on the dev list and are properly documented. It is not enough to "assume" that Infra is taking care of archival -- ensuring that the archival actually happens is the PMC's direct responsibility. Marvin Humphrey [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4651 [2] Thread on legal-discuss@apache: http://s.apache.org/Nhx - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
FYI, we have an on-going thread for the git/github discussion here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201402.mbox/%3CCAEWfVJ%3D_wtDRTNEz4ojvUBf50_VdLDUhiQ15q5rfvFi5eh76uw%40mail.gmail.com%3E For Phoenix, we'll likely mimic what JClouds is doing, but I live Lar's ideas as an improvement. Thanks, James On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:04 AM, lars hofhansl wrote: > I agree with Marvin. In addition I find it odd to rely in two sources of > truth (and two sets of infrastructure, etc) as far as code goes just so we > do code reviews on GitHub. > Anybody who wants to commit now needs to have both the Github repo and the > Apache repo cloned; you can merge a pull request on GitHub, as that is not > authoritative source control. > Github will be behind sometimes, etc, etc. > > What if there are issues with Github (unlikely, I know, but would be out > of Apache's control)? > > Can't we add necessary Apache Infrastructure? Would Apache be able to get > a free GitHub license - ala Jira - to run it as part of Apache (or maybe > buy a license)? > On the Phoenix mailing Gerret was mentioned for git-style code review. > > -- Lars > > > > > From: Marvin Humphrey > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2014 9:53 AM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce wrote: > > How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review on > Review > > Board? > > One is captured to Apache controlled channels and the other is not. > > > If there's concern that work on Github isn't being adequately mirrored on > > the mailing lists then that sounds like an Infra problem to me. > > It's not an Infra problem. It's the problem of any PMC which fails to > ensure > that all of its communications are properly archived. > > If anyone here is interested in contributing towards this feature, I > encourage > you to subscribe to the infrastructure-dev@apache list. I also encourage > everyone to ponder carefully: > > * How to ensure that no information is lost when capturing communications > in GitHub channels through notifications to our dev lists. > * The impact of adding GitHub integration features on long-term ASF Infra > labor costs. > > > There are plenty of hooks [1] that makes this easy to do and, if I'm not > > mistaken, pull requests through Github are already supposed to mail dev@ > . > > That's right. I've actually worked on the specific hook that does > that[1][2]. > > > I would assume that any comment on them should as well. > > Why would you "assume" that GitHub comments are being mailed to dev lists? > They are not. > > Every Apache PMC member is tasked with oversight of their project, and that > includes ensuring that all decisions happen on the dev list and are > properly > documented. It is not enough to "assume" that Infra is taking care of > archival -- ensuring that the archival actually happens is the PMC's direct > responsibility. > > Marvin Humphrey > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4651 > [2] Thread on legal-discuss@apache: http://s.apache.org/Nhx > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Jake, yep thanks for suggesting moving this to another thread :) In a few days I plan on tallying the VOTEs from the Spark VOTE thread which at current count is overwhelmingly passing. I'll keep it open through at least Monday and then in time to add it to the agenda for the Feb 2014 meeting of the board for consideration should the current count and trend continue to hold. Thanks to everyone for their thoughtful discussion. Clearly this is a great use case and discussion point for lots of improvement in the ASF, the Incubator, in my own mentorship and others, and in how we can serve our communities best at the ASF. Cheers all. Chris -Original Message- From: Jake Farrell Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" , "jfarr...@apache.org" Date: Thursday, February 6, 2014 10:58 AM To: Matei Zaharia Cc: "general@incubator.apache.org" , "jfarr...@apache.org" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator >Matei >multiple TLPs using it as their main reviewing system? Outside of JClouds >I >am unaware of any others using it currently. > >I think this is a good discussion to have, but we should start another >thread with it so as to not hijack the Apache Spark graduation thread with >it. > >-Jake > > >On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Matei Zaharia >wrote: > >> I like the idea of sending these to the dev list. I'm going to open an >> INFRA ticket for it. >> >> While it seems that the current web hook only sends events when a pull >> request is opened or closed, GitHub *can* email watchers for comments as >> well. I'm watching the project on GitHub and I get an email for every >> comment, even on pull requests I never looked at. So maybe we can >> investigate adding this to the GitHub hook -- I'm sure it's not a big >>burden >> from their side. >> >> The other option would be to somehow subscribe dev@ through the standard >> GitHub watcher framework by making it the notification address for some >> account watching the repo, but this requires confirming the address and >>I >> think anyone on dev might be able to unsubscribe it or take ownership of >> that account if we do so. Maybe GitHub can help us do this without going >> through the "confirm address" process. Did you guys have a contact over >> there helping with the mirroring, or was it all done through their API? >>I >> imagine it's in their interest to make GitHub work with the ASF process >> because there are now multiple TLPs using it as their main reviewing >>system. >> >> Matei >> >> On Feb 6, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Jake Farrell wrote: >> >> > Once the mirror is setup and synced to github (24hr window for this >> > potentially to occur) then one of the Github Apache org admins can >>setup >> > the webhook. The project just needs to put in an infra ticket asking >>for >> it >> > >> > -Jake >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Henry Saputra > >wrote: >> > >> >> HI Marvin, >> >> >> >> The automatic email to dev@ list for github mirror PR, does it happen >> >> for all ASF github mirrors or each podling need to do some setup to >> >> make it work? >> >> >> >> >> >> - Henry >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Marvin Humphrey >>> > >> >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce >> wrote: >> >>>> How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review >>on >> >> Review >> >>>> Board? >> >>> >> >>> One is captured to Apache controlled channels and the other is not. >> >>> >> >>>> If there's concern that work on Github isn't being adequately >>mirrored >> >> on >> >>>> the mailing lists then that sounds like an Infra problem to me. >> >>> >> >>> It's not an Infra problem. It's the problem of any PMC which fails >>to >> >> ensure >> >>> that all of its communications are properly archived. >> >>> >> >>> If anyone here is interested in contributing towards this feature, I >> >> encourage >> >>> you to subscribe to the infrastructure-dev@apache list. I also >> >> encourage >> >>> everyone to ponder carefully: >> >>> >> >>> * How to ensure that no information is lost whe
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
I like the idea of sending these to the dev list. I’m going to open an INFRA ticket for it. While it seems that the current web hook only sends events when a pull request is opened or closed, GitHub *can* email watchers for comments as well. I’m watching the project on GitHub and I get an email for every comment, even on pull requests I never looked at. So maybe we can investigate adding this to the GitHub hook — I’m sure it’s not a big burden from their side. The other option would be to somehow subscribe dev@ through the standard GitHub watcher framework by making it the notification address for some account watching the repo, but this requires confirming the address and I think anyone on dev might be able to unsubscribe it or take ownership of that account if we do so. Maybe GitHub can help us do this without going through the “confirm address” process. Did you guys have a contact over there helping with the mirroring, or was it all done through their API? I imagine it’s in their interest to make GitHub work with the ASF process because there are now multiple TLPs using it as their main reviewing system. Matei On Feb 6, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Jake Farrell wrote: > Once the mirror is setup and synced to github (24hr window for this > potentially to occur) then one of the Github Apache org admins can setup > the webhook. The project just needs to put in an infra ticket asking for it > > -Jake > > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > >> HI Marvin, >> >> The automatic email to dev@ list for github mirror PR, does it happen >> for all ASF github mirrors or each podling need to do some setup to >> make it work? >> >> >> - Henry >> >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Marvin Humphrey >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce wrote: How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review on >> Review Board? >>> >>> One is captured to Apache controlled channels and the other is not. >>> If there's concern that work on Github isn't being adequately mirrored >> on the mailing lists then that sounds like an Infra problem to me. >>> >>> It's not an Infra problem. It's the problem of any PMC which fails to >> ensure >>> that all of its communications are properly archived. >>> >>> If anyone here is interested in contributing towards this feature, I >> encourage >>> you to subscribe to the infrastructure-dev@apache list. I also >> encourage >>> everyone to ponder carefully: >>> >>> * How to ensure that no information is lost when capturing >> communications >>>in GitHub channels through notifications to our dev lists. >>> * The impact of adding GitHub integration features on long-term ASF >> Infra >>>labor costs. >>> There are plenty of hooks [1] that makes this easy to do and, if I'm not mistaken, pull requests through Github are already supposed to mail dev@ >> . >>> >>> That's right. I've actually worked on the specific hook that does >> that[1][2]. >>> I would assume that any comment on them should as well. >>> >>> Why would you "assume" that GitHub comments are being mailed to dev >> lists? >>> They are not. >>> >>> Every Apache PMC member is tasked with oversight of their project, and >> that >>> includes ensuring that all decisions happen on the dev list and are >> properly >>> documented. It is not enough to "assume" that Infra is taking care of >>> archival -- ensuring that the archival actually happens is the PMC's >> direct >>> responsibility. >>> >>> Marvin Humphrey >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4651 >>> [2] Thread on legal-discuss@apache: http://s.apache.org/Nhx >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
> The other option would be to somehow subscribe dev@ through the standard > GitHub watcher framework by making it the notification address jclouds does that for the jclouds-mirror user (which is the one that periodically mirrors the ASF Git repos which are the source of truth to GitHub). See http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jclouds-notifications/201402.mbox/browser We recently decided to send these emails to notifications@ rather than dev@, because, like Matei, all committers are already watching the GitHub repos and end up getting lots of duplicate emails. Subscribers to the dev@ list were also complaining about the signal-to-noise ratio. [1, 2] ap [1] http://markmail.org/message/4s7spzsiyk45upce [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7213
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
> > Hope this helps to ease your concern about Spark podling readiness to > become TLP. > I am a bit conflicted. Part of me is inclined to join Craig, Sebb, and Bertand and issue a -1. At the same time, there exist many +1s here from folks that I respect and trust, including the mentors of the podling; and I think they are far better placed than me to judge the true state of the podling. The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen on the mailing list. That's a pretty foundational concept in my mind for an Apache project. The missing account issues are somewhat troubling, but also not really within the purview of the podling to fix either; though I find it odd that people committed to the podling (and many initial committers) haven't asked for their Apache account or needed to use it. Love to hear opinions, even if they are stating that I am meddling or crazy :) --David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Hey All - chiming in as an active Spark committer. > The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the > community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind > folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen > on the mailing list. That's a pretty foundational concept in my mind > for an Apache project. Henry gave a reminder on the mailing list not because it's a persistent problem but because it never explicitly came up prior to this. We use github for review comments and in one case this week there was a brief discussion that could be interpreted as roadmap - so Henry just gave a reminder not to do that. I can't imagine why any project would *want* to use github review comments for long term roadmap discussion... it's a terrible medium for that anyways! We have a very active developer list and that is where these discussions take place. > The missing account issues are somewhat troubling, but also not really > within the purview of the podling to fix either; though I find it odd > that people committed to the podling (and many initial committers) > haven't asked for their Apache account or needed to use it. This is because those people have still contributed a lot of code via other commiters who merge so it's not an immediate urgency. For perspective I am a committer on two other ASF projects but I've never personally committed code to either - I do it through the more active committers who basically spend all their time merging patches. A few of the initial commiters are not currently active on the project; they've made major contributions over the last few years of development and are committers in recognition of those contributions (see above). Popping up a level. We are happy to have github discussions forward to either our dev- list or a reviews- list or something like that (I beleive Matei is setting that up now). If IPCM folks want to debate whether we should *have* to do that, it seems sensible to fork a thread and discuss elsewhere. If IPMC folks want to debate whether github should be allowed at all, I also think it's better discussed outside of this graduation thread. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 (binding) These wrinkles are not as big as they appear. For instance, the issue with some committers not noticing that their accounts were live is actually due to a better submission and review process than most tlp's exhibit. The spark community has more of the apache spirit in it than most incubator projects lately. Notably they also take feedback about how to tune their processes very well. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 7, 2014, at 4:05, David Nalley wrote: >> >> Hope this helps to ease your concern about Spark podling readiness to >> become TLP. > > > I am a bit conflicted. Part of me is inclined to join Craig, Sebb, and > Bertand and issue a -1. At the same time, there exist many +1s here > from folks that I respect and trust, including the mentors of the > podling; and I think they are far better placed than me to judge the > true state of the podling. > > The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the > community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind > folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen > on the mailing list. That's a pretty foundational concept in my mind > for an Apache project. > > The missing account issues are somewhat troubling, but also not really > within the purview of the podling to fix either; though I find it odd > that people committed to the podling (and many initial committers) > haven't asked for their Apache account or needed to use it. > > Love to hear opinions, even if they are stating that I am meddling or crazy :) > > --David > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
HI David Nalley, Thank you for your comment and concern, really appreciate it. As Patrick had mentioned in his reply, this is not a persistent problem. The reminder I sent was about particular topic which could be interpreted as design or roadmap topic rather than review for a patch. Rather than reminding an individual or two involved in the discussion, I decided to send email to dev@ list to show by example the open and transparent discussions the ASF way. Hope this gives some more clarification about the state of the podling embracing the ASF way. - Henry On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Patrick Wendell wrote: > Hey All - chiming in as an active Spark committer. > >> The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the >> community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind >> folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen >> on the mailing list. That's a pretty foundational concept in my mind >> for an Apache project. > > Henry gave a reminder on the mailing list not because it's a > persistent problem but because it never explicitly came up prior to > this. We use github for review comments and in one case this week > there was a brief discussion that could be interpreted as roadmap - so > Henry just gave a reminder not to do that. I can't imagine why any > project would *want* to use github review comments for long term > roadmap discussion... it's a terrible medium for that anyways! We have > a very active developer list and that is where these discussions take > place. > >> The missing account issues are somewhat troubling, but also not really >> within the purview of the podling to fix either; though I find it odd >> that people committed to the podling (and many initial committers) >> haven't asked for their Apache account or needed to use it. > > This is because those people have still contributed a lot of code via > other commiters who merge so it's not an immediate urgency. For > perspective I am a committer on two other ASF projects but I've never > personally committed code to either - I do it through the more active > committers who basically spend all their time merging patches. A few > of the initial commiters are not currently active on the project; > they've made major contributions over the last few years of > development and are committers in recognition of those contributions > (see above). > > Popping up a level. We are happy to have github discussions forward to > either our dev- list or a reviews- list or something like that (I > beleive Matei is setting that up now). If IPCM folks want to debate > whether we should *have* to do that, it seems sensible to fork a > thread and discuss elsewhere. If IPMC folks want to debate whether > github should be allowed at all, I also think it's better discussed > outside of this graduation thread. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:05 PM, David Nalley wrote: > The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the > community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind > folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen > on the mailing list. That's a pretty foundational concept in my mind > for an Apache project. Thanks for your thoughtful, constructive commentary, David. The issue of GitHub integration is complex, unresolved, and as today's thread demonstrates, controversial. I considered voting -1 because I don't want to hand a hot potato to the Board. However, as you note Spark comes highly recommended, and I am impressed by what I've seen on general@incubator, especially today and in the thread on dealing with binaries in their 0.8 release. I believe that Spark is likely to play a highly constructive role in realizing the promise of integrating the "Community over Code" ASF with "Social Coding" GitHub. +1 (binding) to graduate. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 (binding) Fully agree with Ted's view on the Spark community. On 02/07/2014 06:32 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: +1 (binding) These wrinkles are not as big as they appear. For instance, the issue with some committers not noticing that their accounts were live is actually due to a better submission and review process than most tlp's exhibit. The spark community has more of the apache spirit in it than most incubator projects lately. Notably they also take feedback about how to tune their processes very well. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 7, 2014, at 4:05, David Nalley wrote: Hope this helps to ease your concern about Spark podling readiness to become TLP. I am a bit conflicted. Part of me is inclined to join Craig, Sebb, and Bertand and issue a -1. At the same time, there exist many +1s here from folks that I respect and trust, including the mentors of the podling; and I think they are far better placed than me to judge the true state of the podling. The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen on the mailing list. That's a pretty foundational concept in my mind for an Apache project. The missing account issues are somewhat troubling, but also not really within the purview of the podling to fix either; though I find it odd that people committed to the podling (and many initial committers) haven't asked for their Apache account or needed to use it. Love to hear opinions, even if they are stating that I am meddling or crazy :) --David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 (binding) --Andrew On 2/6/14 10:51 PM, Sebastian Schelter wrote: +1 (binding) Fully agree with Ted's view on the Spark community. On 02/07/2014 06:32 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: +1 (binding) These wrinkles are not as big as they appear. For instance, the issue with some committers not noticing that their accounts were live is actually due to a better submission and review process than most tlp's exhibit. The spark community has more of the apache spirit in it than most incubator projects lately. Notably they also take feedback about how to tune their processes very well. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 7, 2014, at 4:05, David Nalley wrote: Hope this helps to ease your concern about Spark podling readiness to become TLP. I am a bit conflicted. Part of me is inclined to join Craig, Sebb, and Bertand and issue a -1. At the same time, there exist many +1s here from folks that I respect and trust, including the mentors of the podling; and I think they are far better placed than me to judge the true state of the podling. The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen on the mailing list. That's a pretty foundational concept in my mind for an Apache project. The missing account issues are somewhat troubling, but also not really within the purview of the podling to fix either; though I find it odd that people committed to the podling (and many initial committers) haven't asked for their Apache account or needed to use it. Love to hear opinions, even if they are stating that I am meddling or crazy :) --David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Andrew F. Hart http://people.apache.org/~ahart - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
I agree with Ted that these minor issues can be ironed out especially if the community is open to constructive criticism as these folks are. IMHO the health of the community is much more important than minor insignificant shortcomings. Social development is changing many things and causing incongruities in the way we're used to working: we need to adapt to them instead of penalizing podlings. Many projects even years after graduation stumble occasionally but eventually find their way. With that said I also hope some of the mentors continue on with the community's PMC after graduation. +1 (binding) -Alex On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Andrew Hart wrote: > +1 (binding) > > --Andrew > > On 2/6/14 10:51 PM, Sebastian Schelter wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Fully agree with Ted's view on the Spark community. >> >> On 02/07/2014 06:32 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> These wrinkles are not as big as they appear. For instance, the issue >>> with some committers not noticing that their accounts were live is actually >>> due to a better submission and review process than most tlp's exhibit. >>> >>> The spark community has more of the apache spirit in it than most >>> incubator projects lately. Notably they also take feedback about how to >>> tune their processes very well. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Feb 7, 2014, at 4:05, David Nalley wrote: >>> >>> > Hope this helps to ease your concern about Spark podling readiness to > become TLP. > I am a bit conflicted. Part of me is inclined to join Craig, Sebb, and Bertand and issue a -1. At the same time, there exist many +1s here from folks that I respect and trust, including the mentors of the podling; and I think they are far better placed than me to judge the true state of the podling. The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen on the mailing list. That's a pretty foundational concept in my mind for an Apache project. The missing account issues are somewhat troubling, but also not really within the purview of the podling to fix either; though I find it odd that people committed to the podling (and many initial committers) haven't asked for their Apache account or needed to use it. Love to hear opinions, even if they are stating that I am meddling or crazy :) --David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> > > -- > Andrew F. Hart > http://people.apache.org/~ahart > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Best Regards, -- Alex
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Thanks for describing this, Andrew. We’ll do it as well. Matei On Feb 6, 2014, at 1:24 PM, Andrew Phillips wrote: >> The other option would be to somehow subscribe dev@ through the standard >> GitHub watcher framework by making it the notification address > > > jclouds does that for the jclouds-mirror user (which is the one that > periodically mirrors the ASF Git repos which are the source of truth to > GitHub). See > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jclouds-notifications/201402.mbox/browser > > > We recently decided to send these emails to notifications@ rather than dev@, > because, like Matei, all committers are already watching the GitHub repos and > end up getting lots of duplicate emails. Subscribers to the dev@ list were > also complaining about the signal-to-noise ratio. [1, 2] > > ap > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/4s7spzsiyk45upce > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7213 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:05 AM, David Nalley wrote: > ...The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the > community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind > folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen > on the mailing list... Yes - considering the worrying aspects that this thread brought to the surface, I would recommend that the Spark mentors take another look and make a solid case to demonstrate that the project is actually ready to graduate. Remember that the Incubator PMC's vote is only about *recommending* that the board accepts the incoming project, if there's no strong consensus I'd assume that the board is likely to reject the resolution until that strong consensus for graduation is established here. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 Agree with Ted here. I would write more but his input is succinct and right on. --Paul Ramirez On 2/6/14 9:32 PM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: >+1 (binding) > >These wrinkles are not as big as they appear. For instance, the issue >with some committers not noticing that their accounts were live is >actually due to a better submission and review process than most tlp's >exhibit. > >The spark community has more of the apache spirit in it than most >incubator projects lately. Notably they also take feedback about how to >tune their processes very well. > >Sent from my iPhone > >On Feb 7, 2014, at 4:05, David Nalley wrote: > >>> >>> Hope this helps to ease your concern about Spark podling readiness to >>> become TLP. >> >> >> I am a bit conflicted. Part of me is inclined to join Craig, Sebb, and >> Bertand and issue a -1. At the same time, there exist many +1s here >> from folks that I respect and trust, including the mentors of the >> podling; and I think they are far better placed than me to judge the >> true state of the podling. >> >> The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the >> community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind >> folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen >> on the mailing list. That's a pretty foundational concept in my mind >> for an Apache project. >> >> The missing account issues are somewhat troubling, but also not really >> within the purview of the podling to fix either; though I find it odd >> that people committed to the podling (and many initial committers) >> haven't asked for their Apache account or needed to use it. >> >> Love to hear opinions, even if they are stating that I am meddling or >>crazy :) >> >> --David >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
I'm happy to see that my concerns about Spark are being actively addressed in a professional non-confrontational manner. The mismatch between committers and proposed PMC members has been resolved. I guess the only missing bit is updating the graduation resolution. The use of git for pull request and comments is being worked on and I have confidence in the leadership to pursue this to an agreeable solution. I've reviewed the private list and see that it is being used appropriately to discuss and vote new committers and PPMC members. So I'm changing my vote to +1 subject only to the update of the proposed PMC roster to include only committers. Congratulations to the Spark community. Craig On Feb 6, 2014, at 10:01 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:05 PM, David Nalley wrote: > >> The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the >> community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind >> folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen >> on the mailing list. That's a pretty foundational concept in my mind >> for an Apache project. > > Thanks for your thoughtful, constructive commentary, David. > > The issue of GitHub integration is complex, unresolved, and as today's thread > demonstrates, controversial. I considered voting -1 because I don't want to > hand a hot potato to the Board. > > However, as you note Spark comes highly recommended, and I am impressed by > what I've seen on general@incubator, especially today and in the thread on > dealing with binaries in their 0.8 release. I believe that Spark is likely to > play a highly constructive role in realizing the promise of integrating the > "Community over Code" ASF with "Social Coding" GitHub. > > +1 (binding) to graduate. > > Marvin Humphrey > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > Craig L Russell Architect, Oracle http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Thank you so much Craig and it feels good to work to gain your support. Cheers and have a fantastic weekend. Cheers, Chris -Original Message- From: Craig L Russell Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Date: Friday, February 7, 2014 2:28 PM To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator >I'm happy to see that my concerns about Spark are being actively >addressed in a professional non-confrontational manner. > >The mismatch between committers and proposed PMC members has been >resolved. I guess the only missing bit is updating the graduation >resolution. > >The use of git for pull request and comments is being worked on and I >have confidence in the leadership to pursue this to an agreeable solution. > >I've reviewed the private list and see that it is being used >appropriately to discuss and vote new committers and PPMC members. > >So I'm changing my vote to +1 subject only to the update of the proposed >PMC roster to include only committers. > >Congratulations to the Spark community. > >Craig > >On Feb 6, 2014, at 10:01 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:05 PM, David Nalley wrote: >> >>> The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the >>> community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind >>> folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen >>> on the mailing list. That's a pretty foundational concept in my mind >>> for an Apache project. >> >> Thanks for your thoughtful, constructive commentary, David. >> >> The issue of GitHub integration is complex, unresolved, and as today's >>thread >> demonstrates, controversial. I considered voting -1 because I don't >>want to >> hand a hot potato to the Board. >> >> However, as you note Spark comes highly recommended, and I am impressed >>by >> what I've seen on general@incubator, especially today and in the thread >>on >> dealing with binaries in their 0.8 release. I believe that Spark is >>likely to >> play a highly constructive role in realizing the promise of integrating >>the >> "Community over Code" ASF with "Social Coding" GitHub. >> >> +1 (binding) to graduate. >> >> Marvin Humphrey >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > >Craig L Russell >Architect, Oracle >http://db.apache.org/jdo >408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com >P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Ted and Henry: Thanks for the thoughtful replies and indulging my concerns. +1 (binding) --David On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > HI David Nalley, > > Thank you for your comment and concern, really appreciate it. > > As Patrick had mentioned in his reply, this is not a persistent problem. > The reminder I sent was about particular topic which could be > interpreted as design or roadmap topic rather than review for a patch. > Rather than reminding an individual or two involved in the discussion, > I decided to send email to dev@ list to show by example the open and > transparent discussions the ASF way. > > Hope this gives some more clarification about the state of the podling > embracing the ASF way. > > - Henry > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Patrick Wendell wrote: >> Hey All - chiming in as an active Spark committer. >> >>> The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the >>> community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind >>> folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen >>> on the mailing list. That's a pretty foundational concept in my mind >>> for an Apache project. >> >> Henry gave a reminder on the mailing list not because it's a >> persistent problem but because it never explicitly came up prior to >> this. We use github for review comments and in one case this week >> there was a brief discussion that could be interpreted as roadmap - so >> Henry just gave a reminder not to do that. I can't imagine why any >> project would *want* to use github review comments for long term >> roadmap discussion... it's a terrible medium for that anyways! We have >> a very active developer list and that is where these discussions take >> place. >> >>> The missing account issues are somewhat troubling, but also not really >>> within the purview of the podling to fix either; though I find it odd >>> that people committed to the podling (and many initial committers) >>> haven't asked for their Apache account or needed to use it. >> >> This is because those people have still contributed a lot of code via >> other commiters who merge so it's not an immediate urgency. For >> perspective I am a committer on two other ASF projects but I've never >> personally committed code to either - I do it through the more active >> committers who basically spend all their time merging patches. A few >> of the initial commiters are not currently active on the project; >> they've made major contributions over the last few years of >> development and are committers in recognition of those contributions >> (see above). >> >> Popping up a level. We are happy to have github discussions forward to >> either our dev- list or a reviews- list or something like that (I >> beleive Matei is setting that up now). If IPCM folks want to debate >> whether we should *have* to do that, it seems sensible to fork a >> thread and discuss elsewhere. If IPMC folks want to debate whether >> github should be allowed at all, I also think it's better discussed >> outside of this graduation thread. >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Thanks everyone for the votes. Since we now have accounts for everyone, I’ve updated the committer list below to include ASF IDs. Thanks to INFRA, we also now have both pull request postings and comments on them forwarded to the our mailing list. snip WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis on clusters. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation and sharing across distributed applications; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Spark Project: * Mosharaf Chowdhury * Jason Dai * Tathagata Das * Ankur Dave * Aaron Davidson * Thomas Dudziak * Robert Evans * Thomas Graves * Andy Konwinski * Stephen Haberman * Mark Hamstra * Shane Huang * Ryan LeCompte * Haoyuan Li * Sean McNamara * Mridul Muralidharam * Kay Ousterhout * Nick Pentreath * Imran Rashid * Charles Reiss * Josh Rosen * Prashant Sharma * Ram Sriharsha * Shivaram Venkataraman * Patrick Wendell * Andrew Xia * Reynold Xin * Matei Zaharia NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Spark podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator Project are hereafter discharged. On Feb 8, 2014, at 9:02 AM, David Nalley wrote: > Ted and Henry: Thanks for the thoughtful replies and indulging my concerns. > > +1 (binding) > > --David > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Henry Saputra > wrote: >> HI David Nalley, >> >> Thank you for your comment and concern, really appreciate it. >> >> As Patrick had mentioned in his reply, this is not a persistent problem. >> The reminder I sent was about particular topic which could be >> interpreted as design or roadmap topic rather than review for a patch. >> Rather than reminding an individual or two involved in the discussion, >> I decided to send email to dev@ list to show by example the open and >> transparent discussions the ASF way. >> >> Hope this gives some more clarification about the state of the podling >> embracing the ASF way. >> >> - Henry >> >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Patrick Wendell wrote: >>> Hey All - chiming in as an active Spark committer. >>> The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen on the mailing list. That's a pretty foundational concept in my mind for an Apache project. >>> >>> Henry gave a reminder on the mailing list not because it's a >>> persistent problem but because it never explicitly came up prior to >>> this. We use github for review comments and in one case this week >>> there was a brief discussion that could be interpreted as roadmap - so >>> Henry just gave a reminder not to do that. I can't imagine why any >>> project would *want* to use github review comments for long term >>> roadmap discussion... it's a terrible medium for that anyways! We have >>> a very active developer list and that is where these discussions take >>> place. >>> The missing account issues are somewhat troubling, but also not really within the purview of the podling to fix either; though I find it odd that people committed to the podling (and many initial committers) haven't asked for their Apache account or needed to use it. >>> >>> This is because those people have still contributed a lot of code via >>> other commiters who merge so
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
I think it would be better to start a new thread with the updated text. Also, the two scope descriptions are slightly different: "related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis on clusters." v. "related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation and sharing across distributed applications" I don't know whether that is important or not. On 8 February 2014 22:46, Matei Zaharia wrote: > Thanks everyone for the votes. Since we now have accounts for everyone, I've > updated the committer list below to include ASF IDs. Thanks to INFRA, we also > now have both pull request postings and comments on them forwarded to the our > mailing list. > > snip > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation > and sharing across distributed applications; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve > at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the > Apache Spark Project, and to have primary responsibility for > management of the projects within the scope of responsibility > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das > * Ankur Dave > * Aaron Davidson > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam > * Kay Ousterhout > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > > > > > On Feb 8, 2014, at 9:02 AM, David Nalley wrote: > >> Ted and Henry: Thanks for the thoughtful replies and indulging my concerns. >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> --David >> >> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Henry Saputra >> wrote: >>> HI David Nalley, >>> >>> Thank you for your comment and concern, really appreciate it. >>> >>> As Patrick had mentioned in his reply, this is not a persistent problem. >>> The reminder I sent was about particular topic which could be >>> interpreted as design or roadmap topic rather than review for a patch. >>> Rather than reminding an individual or two involved in the discussion, >>> I decided to send email to dev@ list to show by example the open and >>> transparent discussions the ASF way. >>> >>> Hope this gives some more clarification about the state of the podling >>> embracing the ASF way. >>> >>> - Henry >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Patrick Wendell wrote: Hey All - chiming in as an active Spark committer. > The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the > community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind > folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen > on the mailing list. That's a pretty foundational concept in my mind > for an Apache project. Henry gave a reminder on the mailing list not because it's a persistent problem but because it never explicitly came up prior to this. We use github for review comments and in one case this week there was a brief discussion that could be interpreted as roadmap - so Henry just gave a reminder not to do that. I can't imagine why any project would *want* to use gith
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Thanks Matei and sebb. Starting a new thread and collecting the VOTEs all over again would be time consuming. In the [RESULT] [VOTE] thread, we'll have the updated resolution text, and it will be present in the board report shortly thereafter. If discussion needs to continue at that point we can start a [DISCUSS] [RESULT] [VOTE] thread. Thanks for the catch on the different scope descriptions. I think it should be the first one (the 2nd looks to be an omission from a cut/paste from the Mesos graduation resolution). Cheers, Chris -Original Message- From: sebb Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014 7:10 AM To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator >I think it would be better to start a new thread with the updated text. > >Also, the two scope descriptions are slightly different: > >"related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis >on clusters." > >v. > >"related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation >and sharing across distributed applications" > >I don't know whether that is important or not. > > >On 8 February 2014 22:46, Matei Zaharia wrote: >> Thanks everyone for the votes. Since we now have accounts for everyone, >>I've updated the committer list below to include ASF IDs. Thanks to >>INFRA, we also now have both pull request postings and comments on them >>forwarded to the our mailing list. >> >> snip >> >> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the >> public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis >> on clusters. >> >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be >> and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; >> and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is >> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >> related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation >> and sharing across distributed applications; and be it further >> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be >> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve >> at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the >> Apache Spark Project, and to have primary responsibility for >> management of the projects within the scope of responsibility >> of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further >> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >> Apache Spark Project: >> >> * Mosharaf Chowdhury >> * Jason Dai >> * Tathagata Das >> * Ankur Dave >> * Aaron Davidson >> * Thomas Dudziak >> * Robert Evans >> * Thomas Graves >> * Andy Konwinski >> * Stephen Haberman >> * Mark Hamstra >> * Shane Huang >> * Ryan LeCompte >> * Haoyuan Li >> * Sean McNamara >> * Mridul Muralidharam >> * Kay Ousterhout >> * Nick Pentreath >> * Imran Rashid >> * Charles Reiss >> * Josh Rosen >> * Prashant Sharma >> * Ram Sriharsha >> * Shivaram Venkataraman >> * Patrick Wendell >> * Andrew Xia >> * Reynold Xin >> * Matei Zaharia >> >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be >> appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to >> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or >> until a successor is appointed; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is >> tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache >> Incubator Spark podling; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >> Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator >> Project are hereafter discharged. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Feb 8, 2014, at 9:02 AM, David Nalley wrote: >> >>> Ted and Henry: Thanks for the thoughtful replies and indulging my >>>concerns. >>> >>> +1 (bi
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On 9 February 2014 17:11, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: > Thanks Matei and sebb. > > Starting a new thread and collecting the VOTEs all over again would be > time consuming. So? Better to than being confusing, as the current thread has become. Also it may not be clear whether new votes are intended for the update resolution or the old one. Do the original votes even count for the amended resolution? > In the [RESULT] [VOTE] thread, we'll have the updated > resolution > text, and it will be present in the board report shortly thereafter. If > discussion > needs to continue at that point we can start a [DISCUSS] [RESULT] [VOTE] > thread. > > Thanks for the catch on the different scope descriptions. I think it > should be > the first one (the 2nd looks to be an omission from a cut/paste from the > Mesos > graduation resolution). > > Cheers, > Chris > > > > -Original Message- > From: sebb > Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014 7:10 AM > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator > >>I think it would be better to start a new thread with the updated text. >> >>Also, the two scope descriptions are slightly different: >> >>"related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis >>on clusters." >> >>v. >> >>"related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation >>and sharing across distributed applications" >> >>I don't know whether that is important or not. >> >> >>On 8 February 2014 22:46, Matei Zaharia wrote: >>> Thanks everyone for the votes. Since we now have accounts for everyone, >>>I've updated the committer list below to include ASF IDs. Thanks to >>>INFRA, we also now have both pull request postings and comments on them >>>forwarded to the our mailing list. >>> >>> snip >>> >>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >>> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >>> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >>> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >>> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the >>> public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis >>> on clusters. >>> >>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >>> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be >>> and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; >>> and be it further >>> >>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is >>> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >>> related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation >>> and sharing across distributed applications; and be it further >>> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be >>> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve >>> at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the >>> Apache Spark Project, and to have primary responsibility for >>> management of the projects within the scope of responsibility >>> of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further >>> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >>> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >>> Apache Spark Project: >>> >>> * Mosharaf Chowdhury >>> * Jason Dai >>> * Tathagata Das >>> * Ankur Dave >>> * Aaron Davidson >>> * Thomas Dudziak >>> * Robert Evans >>> * Thomas Graves >>> * Andy Konwinski >>> * Stephen Haberman >>> * Mark Hamstra >>> * Shane Huang >>> * Ryan LeCompte >>> * Haoyuan Li >>> * Sean McNamara >>> * Mridul Muralidharam >>> * Kay Ousterhout >>> * Nick Pentreath >>> * Imran Rashid >>> * Charles Reiss >>> * Josh Rosen >>> * Prashant Sharma >>> * Ram Sriharsha >>> * Shivaram Venkataraman >>> * Patrick Wendell >>> * Andrew Xia >>> * Reynold Xin >>> * Matei Zaharia >>> >>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be >>> appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to >>> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >>> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >>> death, resignation, retire
[DISCUSS] [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Hi Sebb, -Original Message- From: sebb Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014 4:39 PM To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator >On 9 February 2014 17:11, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) > wrote: >> Thanks Matei and sebb. >> >> Starting a new thread and collecting the VOTEs all over again would be >> time consuming. > >So? I don't appreciate this tone -- what do you mean "so"? > >Better to than being confusing, as the current thread has become. The thread's not confusing to me at all -- The diligence to update the resolution to the specific Apache IDs has been performed by Matei, so that work is done. I'll make the typo fix in the pasted board resolution, so that will be done too. > >Also it may not be clear whether new votes are intended for the update >resolution or the old one. > >Do the original votes even count for the amended resolution? Actually it's quite clear to me and to those who VOTEd, some multiple times. If folks have an issue as I mentioned, I've left the VOTE open for quite a long bit of time and am closing it tomorrow. That's plenty of time for folks to amend their VOTE should they have wanted to. Cheers, Chris >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: sebb >> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" >> Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014 7:10 AM >> To: "general@incubator.apache.org" >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator >> >>>I think it would be better to start a new thread with the updated text. >>> >>>Also, the two scope descriptions are slightly different: >>> >>>"related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis >>>on clusters." >>> >>>v. >>> >>>"related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation >>>and sharing across distributed applications" >>> >>>I don't know whether that is important or not. >>> >>> >>>On 8 February 2014 22:46, Matei Zaharia wrote: >>>> Thanks everyone for the votes. Since we now have accounts for >>>>everyone, >>>>I've updated the committer list below to include ASF IDs. Thanks to >>>>INFRA, we also now have both pull request postings and comments on them >>>>forwarded to the our mailing list. >>>> >>>> snip >>>> >>>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >>>> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >>>> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >>>> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >>>> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the >>>> public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis >>>> on clusters. >>>> >>>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >>>> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be >>>> and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; >>>> and be it further >>>> >>>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is >>>> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >>>> related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation >>>> and sharing across distributed applications; and be it further >>>> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be >>>> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve >>>> at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the >>>> Apache Spark Project, and to have primary responsibility for >>>> management of the projects within the scope of responsibility >>>> of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further >>>> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >>>> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >>>> Apache Spark Project: >>>> >>>> * Mosharaf Chowdhury >>>> * Jason Dai >>>> * Tathagata Das >>>> * Ankur Dave >>>> * Aaron Davidson >>>> * Thomas Dudziak >>>> * Robert Evans >>>> * Thomas Graves >>>> * Andy Konwinski >>>> * Stephen Haberman >>>> * Mark Hamstra >>>> * Shane Huang >>>> * Ryan LeCompte >>>> * Haoyuan Li >>>> * S
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 To clarify to others, this is an IPCM vote so only the IPCM votes are binding :) On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Sandy Ryza wrote: > +1 > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Mark Hamstra wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Everyone, >> > >> > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate >> > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below >> > the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. >> > >> > Thanks! >> > >> > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. >> > [ ] +0 Don't care. >> > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. >> > >> > Here is my +1 binding for graduation. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Chris >> > >> > snip >> > >> > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >> > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >> > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >> > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >> > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the >> > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis >> > on clusters. >> > >> > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >> > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be >> > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; >> > and be it further >> > >> > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is >> > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >> > related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis >> > on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office >> > of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, >> > the person holding such office to serve at the direction of >> > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark >> > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management >> > of the projects within the scope of responsibility >> > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further >> > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >> > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >> > Apache Spark Project: >> > >> > * Mosharaf Chowdhury >> > * Jason Dai >> > * Tathagata Das >> > * Ankur Dave >> > * Aaron Davidson >> > * Thomas Dudziak >> > * Robert Evans >> > * Thomas Graves >> > * Andy Konwinski >> > * Stephen Haberman >> > * Mark Hamstra >> > * Shane Huang >> > * Ryan LeCompte >> > * Haoyuan Li >> > * Sean McNamara >> > * Mridul Muralidharam >> > * Kay Ousterhout >> > * Nick Pentreath >> > * Imran Rashid >> > * Charles Reiss >> > * Josh Rosen >> > * Prashant Sharma >> > * Ram Sriharsha >> > * Shivaram Venkataraman >> > * Patrick Wendell >> > * Andrew Xia >> > * Reynold Xin >> > * Matei Zaharia >> > >> > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be >> > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to >> > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >> > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >> > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or >> > until a successor is appointed; and be it further >> > >> > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is >> > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache >> > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further >> > >> > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >> > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator >> > Project are hereafter discharged. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 On Feb 10, 2014 8:28 PM, "Chris Mattmann" wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below > the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks! > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. > [ ] +0 Don't care. > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. > > Here is my +1 binding for graduation. > > Cheers, > Chris > > snip > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office > of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, > the person holding such office to serve at the direction of > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management > of the projects within the scope of responsibility > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das > * Ankur Dave > * Aaron Davidson > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam > * Kay Ousterhout > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 -- Mosharaf Chowdhury http://www.mosharaf.com/ On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: > +1 > > On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate > > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below > > the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > > > > Thanks! > > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. > > [ ] +0 Don't care. > > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. > > > > Here is my +1 binding for graduation. > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > snip > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > > on clusters. > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > > and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > > related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > > on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office > > of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, > > the person holding such office to serve at the direction of > > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark > > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management > > of the projects within the scope of responsibility > > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > > Apache Spark Project: > > > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > > * Jason Dai > > * Tathagata Das > > * Ankur Dave > > * Aaron Davidson > > * Thomas Dudziak > > * Robert Evans > > * Thomas Graves > > * Andy Konwinski > > * Stephen Haberman > > * Mark Hamstra > > * Shane Huang > > * Ryan LeCompte > > * Haoyuan Li > > * Sean McNamara > > * Mridul Muralidharam > > * Kay Ousterhout > > * Nick Pentreath > > * Imran Rashid > > * Charles Reiss > > * Josh Rosen > > * Prashant Sharma > > * Ram Sriharsha > > * Shivaram Venkataraman > > * Patrick Wendell > > * Andrew Xia > > * Reynold Xin > > * Matei Zaharia > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1! 2014-02-10 20:27 GMT-08:00 Chris Mattmann : > Hi Everyone, > > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below > the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks! > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. > [ ] +0 Don't care. > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. > > Here is my +1 binding for graduation. > > Cheers, > Chris > > snip > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office > of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, > the person holding such office to serve at the direction of > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management > of the projects within the scope of responsibility > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das > * Ankur Dave > * Aaron Davidson > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam > * Kay Ousterhout > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below > the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks! > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. > [ ] +0 Don't care. > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. > > Here is my +1 binding for graduation. > > Cheers, > Chris > > snip > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office > of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, > the person holding such office to serve at the direction of > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management > of the projects within the scope of responsibility > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das > * Ankur Dave > * Aaron Davidson > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam > * Kay Ousterhout > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 (binding) On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Mosharaf Chowdhury wrote: > +1 > > -- > Mosharaf Chowdhury > http://www.mosharaf.com/ > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Matei Zaharia >wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate > > > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below > > > the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. > > > [ ] +0 Don't care. > > > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. > > > > > > Here is my +1 binding for graduation. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Chris > > > > > > snip > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > > > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > > > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > > > on clusters. > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > > > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > > > and be it further > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > > > related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > > > on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office > > > of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, > > > the person holding such office to serve at the direction of > > > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark > > > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management > > > of the projects within the scope of responsibility > > > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > > > Apache Spark Project: > > > > > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > > > * Jason Dai > > > * Tathagata Das > > > * Ankur Dave > > > * Aaron Davidson > > > * Thomas Dudziak > > > * Robert Evans > > > * Thomas Graves > > > * Andy Konwinski > > > * Stephen Haberman > > > * Mark Hamstra > > > * Shane Huang > > > * Ryan LeCompte > > > * Haoyuan Li > > > * Sean McNamara > > > * Mridul Muralidharam > > > * Kay Ousterhout > > > * Nick Pentreath > > > * Imran Rashid > > > * Charles Reiss > > > * Josh Rosen > > > * Prashant Sharma > > > * Ram Sriharsha > > > * Shivaram Venkataraman > > > * Patrick Wendell > > > * Andrew Xia > > > * Reynold Xin > > > * Matei Zaharia > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > > > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > > > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > > > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > > > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > > > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > > > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > > > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > > > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Best Regards, -- Alex
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 (binding) On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Mosharaf Chowdhury < > mosharafka...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > -- > > Mosharaf Chowdhury > > http://www.mosharaf.com/ > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Matei Zaharia > >wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > > > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate > > > > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below > > > > the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. > > > > [ ] +0 Don't care. > > > > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. > > > > > > > > Here is my +1 binding for graduation. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > snip > > > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > > > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > > > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > > > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > > > > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > > > > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > > > > on clusters. > > > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > > > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > > > > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > > > > and be it further > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > > > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > > > > related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > > > > on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office > > > > of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, > > > > the person holding such office to serve at the direction of > > > > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark > > > > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management > > > > of the projects within the scope of responsibility > > > > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > > > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > > > > Apache Spark Project: > > > > > > > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > > > > * Jason Dai > > > > * Tathagata Das > > > > * Ankur Dave > > > > * Aaron Davidson > > > > * Thomas Dudziak > > > > * Robert Evans > > > > * Thomas Graves > > > > * Andy Konwinski > > > > * Stephen Haberman > > > > * Mark Hamstra > > > > * Shane Huang > > > > * Ryan LeCompte > > > > * Haoyuan Li > > > > * Sean McNamara > > > > * Mridul Muralidharam > > > > * Kay Ousterhout > > > > * Nick Pentreath > > > > * Imran Rashid > > > > * Charles Reiss > > > > * Josh Rosen > > > > * Prashant Sharma > > > > * Ram Sriharsha > > > > * Shivaram Venkataraman > > > > * Patrick Wendell > > > > * Andrew Xia > > > > * Reynold Xin > > > > * Matei Zaharia > > > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > > > > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > > > > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > > > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > > > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > > > > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > > > > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > > > > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > > > > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > > > > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Best Regards, > -- Alex >
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 Dan On Feb 10, 2014, at 11:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below > the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks! > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. > [ ] +0 Don't care. > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. > > Here is my +1 binding for graduation. > > Cheers, > Chris > > snip > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office > of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, > the person holding such office to serve at the direction of > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management > of the projects within the scope of responsibility > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das > * Ankur Dave > * Aaron Davidson > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam > * Kay Ousterhout > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 -- Joyce On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > +1 > > Dan > > > > On Feb 10, 2014, at 11:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate > > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below > > the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > > > > Thanks! > > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. > > [ ] +0 Don't care. > > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. > > > > Here is my +1 binding for graduation. > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > snip > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > > on clusters. > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > > and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > > related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > > on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office > > of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, > > the person holding such office to serve at the direction of > > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark > > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management > > of the projects within the scope of responsibility > > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > > Apache Spark Project: > > > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > > * Jason Dai > > * Tathagata Das > > * Ankur Dave > > * Aaron Davidson > > * Thomas Dudziak > > * Robert Evans > > * Thomas Graves > > * Andy Konwinski > > * Stephen Haberman > > * Mark Hamstra > > * Shane Huang > > * Ryan LeCompte > > * Haoyuan Li > > * Sean McNamara > > * Mridul Muralidharam > > * Kay Ousterhout > > * Nick Pentreath > > * Imran Rashid > > * Charles Reiss > > * Josh Rosen > > * Prashant Sharma > > * Ram Sriharsha > > * Shivaram Venkataraman > > * Patrick Wendell > > * Andrew Xia > > * Reynold Xin > > * Matei Zaharia > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 On 2/11/14, 5:08 AM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: >+1 (binding) > > > > >On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Alex Karasulu >wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Mosharaf Chowdhury < >> mosharafka...@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >> > +1 >> > >> > -- >> > Mosharaf Chowdhury >> > http://www.mosharaf.com/ >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Matei Zaharia >>> > >wrote: >> > >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi Everyone, >> > > > >> > > > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate >> > > > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below >> > > > the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks! >> > > > >> > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. >> > > > [ ] +0 Don't care. >> > > > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. >> > > > >> > > > Here is my +1 binding for graduation. >> > > > >> > > > Cheers, >> > > > Chris >> > > > >> > > > snip >> > > > >> > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >> > > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >> > > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >> > > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >> > > > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the >> > > > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis >> > > > on clusters. >> > > > >> > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >> > > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be >> > > > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; >> > > > and be it further >> > > > >> > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is >> > > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >> > > > related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis >> > > > on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office >> > > > of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, >> > > > the person holding such office to serve at the direction of >> > > > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark >> > > > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management >> > > > of the projects within the scope of responsibility >> > > > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further >> > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >> > > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >> > > > Apache Spark Project: >> > > > >> > > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury >> > > > * Jason Dai >> > > > * Tathagata Das >> > > > * Ankur Dave >> > > > * Aaron Davidson >> > > > * Thomas Dudziak >> > > > * Robert Evans >> > > > * Thomas Graves >> > > > * Andy Konwinski >> > > > * Stephen Haberman >> > > > * Mark Hamstra >> > > > * Shane Huang >> > > > * Ryan LeCompte >> > > > * Haoyuan Li >> > > > * Sean McNamara >> > > > * Mridul Muralidharam >> > > > * Kay Ousterhout >> > > > * Nick Pentreath >> > > > * Imran Rashid >> > > > * Charles Reiss >> > > > * Josh Rosen >> > > > * Prashant Sharma >> > > > * Ram Sriharsha >> > > > * Shivaram Venkataraman >> > > > * Patrick Wendell >> > > > * Andrew Xia >> > > > * Reynold Xin >> > > > * Matei Zaharia >> > > > >> > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be >> > > > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to >> > > > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >> > > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >> > > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or >> > > > until a successor is appointed; and be it further >> > > > >> > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is >> > > > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache >> > > > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further >> > > > >> > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >> > > > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator >> > > > Project are hereafter discharged. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> -- Alex >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 - binding Regards, Alan On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below > the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks! > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. > [ ] +0 Don't care. > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. > > Here is my +1 binding for graduation. > > Cheers, > Chris > > snip > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office > of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, > the person holding such office to serve at the direction of > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management > of the projects within the scope of responsibility > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das > * Ankur Dave > * Aaron Davidson > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam > * Kay Ousterhout > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 Craig On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below > the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks! > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. > [ ] +0 Don't care. > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. > > Here is my +1 binding for graduation. > > Cheers, > Chris > > snip > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office > of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, > the person holding such office to serve at the direction of > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management > of the projects within the scope of responsibility > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das > * Ankur Dave > * Aaron Davidson > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam > * Kay Ousterhout > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > Craig L Russell Architect, Oracle http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+ 1 (binding). Suresh On Feb 10, 2014, at 11:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below > the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks! > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. > [ ] +0 Don't care. > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. > > Here is my +1 binding for graduation. > > Cheers, > Chris > > snip > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office > of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, > the person holding such office to serve at the direction of > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management > of the projects within the scope of responsibility > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das > * Ankur Dave > * Aaron Davidson > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam > * Kay Ousterhout > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. > [ ] +0 Don't care. > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. +1 (binding) Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 (binding) -Jake On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below > the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks! > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. > [ ] +0 Don't care. > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. > > Here is my +1 binding for graduation. > > Cheers, > Chris > > snip > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office > of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, > the person holding such office to serve at the direction of > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management > of the projects within the scope of responsibility > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das > * Ankur Dave > * Aaron Davidson > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam > * Kay Ousterhout > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below > the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks! > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. > [ ] +0 Don't care. > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. +1 (binding) Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below > the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks! > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. > [ ] +0 Don't care. > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. > > Here is my +1 binding for graduation. > > Cheers, > Chris > > snip > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office > of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, > the person holding such office to serve at the direction of > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management > of the projects within the scope of responsibility > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das > * Ankur Dave > * Aaron Davidson > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam > * Kay Ousterhout > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 !!! On 2/10/14, 9:27 PM, "Chris Mattmann" wrote: >Hi Everyone, > >This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate >from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below >the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > >Thanks! > >[ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. >[ ] +0 Don't care. >[ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. > >Here is my +1 binding for graduation. > >Cheers, >Chris > > snip > >WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the >public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis >on clusters. > >NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be >and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; >and be it further > >RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is >responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis >on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office >of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, >the person holding such office to serve at the direction of >the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark >Project, and to have primary responsibility for management >of the projects within the scope of responsibility >of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further >RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >Apache Spark Project: > >* Mosharaf Chowdhury >* Jason Dai >* Tathagata Das >* Ankur Dave >* Aaron Davidson >* Thomas Dudziak >* Robert Evans >* Thomas Graves >* Andy Konwinski >* Stephen Haberman >* Mark Hamstra >* Shane Huang >* Ryan LeCompte >* Haoyuan Li >* Sean McNamara >* Mridul Muralidharam >* Kay Ousterhout >* Nick Pentreath >* Imran Rashid >* Charles Reiss >* Josh Rosen >* Prashant Sharma >* Ram Sriharsha >* Shivaram Venkataraman >* Patrick Wendell >* Andrew Xia >* Reynold Xin >* Matei Zaharia > >NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be >appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to >serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or >until a successor is appointed; and be it further > >RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is >tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache >Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > >RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator >Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Sean McNamara wrote: > +1 !!! > > On 2/10/14, 9:27 PM, "Chris Mattmann" wrote: > > >Hi Everyone, > > > >This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate > >from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below > >the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > > > >Thanks! > > > >[ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. > >[ ] +0 Don't care. > >[ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. > > > >Here is my +1 binding for graduation. > > > >Cheers, > >Chris > > > > snip > > > >WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > >interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > >Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > >Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > >open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > >public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > >on clusters. > > > >NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > >Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > >and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > >and be it further > > > >RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > >responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > >related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > >on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office > >of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, > >the person holding such office to serve at the direction of > >the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark > >Project, and to have primary responsibility for management > >of the projects within the scope of responsibility > >of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > >RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > >hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > >Apache Spark Project: > > > >* Mosharaf Chowdhury > >* Jason Dai > >* Tathagata Das > >* Ankur Dave > >* Aaron Davidson > >* Thomas Dudziak > >* Robert Evans > >* Thomas Graves > >* Andy Konwinski > >* Stephen Haberman > >* Mark Hamstra > >* Shane Huang > >* Ryan LeCompte > >* Haoyuan Li > >* Sean McNamara > >* Mridul Muralidharam > >* Kay Ousterhout > >* Nick Pentreath > >* Imran Rashid > >* Charles Reiss > >* Josh Rosen > >* Prashant Sharma > >* Ram Sriharsha > >* Shivaram Venkataraman > >* Patrick Wendell > >* Andrew Xia > >* Reynold Xin > >* Matei Zaharia > > > >NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > >appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > >serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > >Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > >death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > >until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > > >RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > >tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > >Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > > >RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > >Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > >Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 Yours, Xuefeng Wu 吴雪峰 敬上 > On 2014年2月11日, at 下午12:27, Chris Mattmann wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below > the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks! > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. > [ ] +0 Don't care. > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. > > Here is my +1 binding for graduation. > > Cheers, > Chris > > snip > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office > of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, > the person holding such office to serve at the direction of > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management > of the projects within the scope of responsibility > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das > * Ankur Dave > * Aaron Davidson > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam > * Kay Ousterhout > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 Doug On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below > the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks! > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. > [ ] +0 Don't care. > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. > > Here is my +1 binding for graduation. > > Cheers, > Chris > > snip > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office > of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, > the person holding such office to serve at the direction of > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management > of the projects within the scope of responsibility > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das > * Ankur Dave > * Aaron Davidson > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam > * Kay Ousterhout > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
+1 (binding) --David On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below > the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks! > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. > [ ] +0 Don't care. > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. > > Here is my +1 binding for graduation. > > Cheers, > Chris > > snip > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be > and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis > on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office > of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, > the person holding such office to serve at the direction of > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management > of the projects within the scope of responsibility > of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Spark Project: > > * Mosharaf Chowdhury > * Jason Dai > * Tathagata Das > * Ankur Dave > * Aaron Davidson > * Thomas Dudziak > * Robert Evans > * Thomas Graves > * Andy Konwinski > * Stephen Haberman > * Mark Hamstra > * Shane Huang > * Ryan LeCompte > * Haoyuan Li > * Sean McNamara > * Mridul Muralidharam > * Kay Ousterhout > * Nick Pentreath > * Imran Rashid > * Charles Reiss > * Josh Rosen > * Prashant Sharma > * Ram Sriharsha > * Shivaram Venkataraman > * Patrick Wendell > * Andrew Xia > * Reynold Xin > * Matei Zaharia > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or > until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is > tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[RESULT] [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Hi Everyone, This VOTE has passed with the following tallies: +1 Chris Mattmann* Andrew Or Matei Zaharia Mosharaf Chowdhury Prabeesh K Henry Saputra* Reynold Xin Aaron Davidson Prashant Sharma Shivaram Venkataraman Evan Sparks Ameet Talwalkar Nan Zhu Azuryy Yu Kay Outserhout Bharath Mundlapudi Mark Hamstra Sandy Ryza Andy Konwinski Patrick Wendell Zongheng Yang Matt Massie Nick Pentreath Sebastian Schelter* Alex Karasulu* Ted Dunning* Daniel Kulp* Michael Joyce Debo Dutta Mridul Muralidharan Haoyuan Li Xuefeng Wu Andrew Psaltis Alan Cabrera* Sean McNamara Tom Graves Jyotiska NK Craig L Russell* Suresh Marru* Marvin Humphrey* Junfeng Feng Jake Farrell* Nat Padmanabhan Josh Rosen Roman Shaposhnik* Dave Lester Doug Cutting* David Nalley* I will paste the resolution into the board agenda and we'll await the result of the board meeting. Thanks for VOTE'ing and for being patient while we got everything squared away. Cheers, Chris -Original Message- From: Chris Mattmann Reply-To: "d...@spark.incubator.apache.org" Date: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:27 PM To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Cc: "d...@spark.incubator.apache.org" Subject: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator >Hi Everyone, > >This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate >from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below >the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours. > >Thanks! > >[ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator. >[ ] +0 Don't care. >[ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because.. > >Here is my +1 binding for graduation. > >Cheers, >Chris > > snip > >WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the >public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis >on clusters. > >NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be >and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; >and be it further > >RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is >responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis >on clusters; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office >of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, >the person holding such office to serve at the direction of >the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark >Project, and to have primary responsibility for management >of the projects within the scope of responsibility >of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further >RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >Apache Spark Project: > >* Mosharaf Chowdhury >* Jason Dai >* Tathagata Das >* Ankur Dave >* Aaron Davidson >* Thomas Dudziak >* Robert Evans >* Thomas Graves >* Andy Konwinski >* Stephen Haberman >* Mark Hamstra >* Shane Huang >* Ryan LeCompte >* Haoyuan Li >* Sean McNamara >* Mridul Muralidharam >* Kay Ousterhout >* Nick Pentreath >* Imran Rashid >* Charles Reiss >* Josh Rosen >* Prashant Sharma >* Ram Sriharsha >* Shivaram Venkataraman >* Patrick Wendell >* Andrew Xia >* Reynold Xin >* Matei Zaharia > >NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be >appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to >serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or >until a successor is appointed; and be it further > >RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is >tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache >Incubator Spark podling; and be it further > >RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator >Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Chris no offense but all we can do is vote on what you put in front of us. As soon as you realized that that document was a mess the vote should have been cancelled. Right now you have no clear picture of what each vote *means* because the thing we are supposed to be approving is in flux. Right now you have people voting on the subject on moral grounds, eg whether the project deserves to graduate, all mixed in with votes cast on technical objective grounds. The only way to fix this is with a fresh start IMO. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 9, 2014, at 8:19 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" > wrote: > > Hi Sebb, > > -Original Message- > > From: sebb > Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014 4:39 PM > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator > >> On 9 February 2014 17:11, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) >> wrote: >>> Thanks Matei and sebb. >>> >>> Starting a new thread and collecting the VOTEs all over again would be >>> time consuming. >> >> So? > > I don't appreciate this tone -- what do you mean "so"? > >> >> Better to than being confusing, as the current thread has become. > > The thread's not confusing to me at all -- The diligence to update > the resolution to the specific Apache IDs has been performed by Matei, > so that work is done. I'll make the typo fix in the pasted board > resolution, > so that will be done too. > >> >> Also it may not be clear whether new votes are intended for the update >> resolution or the old one. >> >> Do the original votes even count for the amended resolution? > > Actually it's quite clear to me and to those who VOTEd, some multiple > times. > If folks have an issue as I mentioned, I've left the VOTE open for quite a > long > bit of time and am closing it tomorrow. That's plenty of time for folks to > amend > their VOTE should they have wanted to. > > Cheers, > Chris > > >>> >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: sebb >>> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" >>> Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014 7:10 AM >>> To: "general@incubator.apache.org" >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator >>> >>>> I think it would be better to start a new thread with the updated text. >>>> >>>> Also, the two scope descriptions are slightly different: >>>> >>>> "related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis >>>> on clusters." >>>> >>>> v. >>>> >>>> "related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation >>>> and sharing across distributed applications" >>>> >>>> I don't know whether that is important or not. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 8 February 2014 22:46, Matei Zaharia wrote: >>>>> Thanks everyone for the votes. Since we now have accounts for >>>>> everyone, >>>>> I've updated the committer list below to include ASF IDs. Thanks to >>>>> INFRA, we also now have both pull request postings and comments on them >>>>> forwarded to the our mailing list. >>>>> >>>>> snip >>>>> >>>>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >>>>> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >>>>> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >>>>> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >>>>> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the >>>>> public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis >>>>> on clusters. >>>>> >>>>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >>>>> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be >>>>> and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; >>>>> and be it further >>>>> >>>>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is >>>>> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >>>>> related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation >>>>> and sharing across distributed applications; and be it further >>>>> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice Pr
Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Joe, Thanks for your cordial tone and to the point email. Thinking about it, I agree with you. We'll start a new VOTE in a day or so to clean up the resolution per Matei's updates and the typo fix caught by Sebb. Cheers, Chris -Original Message- From: Joseph Schaefer Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014 5:29 PM To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator >Chris no offense but all we can do is vote on what you put in front of >us. As soon as you realized that that document was a mess the vote >should have been cancelled. Right now you have no clear picture of what >each vote *means* because the thing we are supposed to be approving is in >flux. Right now you have people voting on the subject on moral grounds, >eg whether the project deserves to graduate, all mixed in with votes cast >on technical objective grounds. The only way to fix this is with a fresh >start IMO. > >Sent from my iPhone > >> On Feb 9, 2014, at 8:19 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" >> wrote: >> >> Hi Sebb, >> >> -Original Message- >> >> From: sebb >> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" >> Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014 4:39 PM >> To: "general@incubator.apache.org" >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator >> >>> On 9 February 2014 17:11, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) >>> wrote: >>>> Thanks Matei and sebb. >>>> >>>> Starting a new thread and collecting the VOTEs all over again would be >>>> time consuming. >>> >>> So? >> >> I don't appreciate this tone -- what do you mean "so"? >> >>> >>> Better to than being confusing, as the current thread has become. >> >> The thread's not confusing to me at all -- The diligence to update >> the resolution to the specific Apache IDs has been performed by Matei, >> so that work is done. I'll make the typo fix in the pasted board >> resolution, >> so that will be done too. >> >>> >>> Also it may not be clear whether new votes are intended for the update >>> resolution or the old one. >>> >>> Do the original votes even count for the amended resolution? >> >> Actually it's quite clear to me and to those who VOTEd, some multiple >> times. >> If folks have an issue as I mentioned, I've left the VOTE open for >>quite a >> long >> bit of time and am closing it tomorrow. That's plenty of time for folks >>to >> amend >> their VOTE should they have wanted to. >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: sebb >>>> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" >>>> >>>> Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014 7:10 AM >>>> To: "general@incubator.apache.org" >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator >>>> >>>>> I think it would be better to start a new thread with the updated >>>>>text. >>>>> >>>>> Also, the two scope descriptions are slightly different: >>>>> >>>>> "related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis >>>>> on clusters." >>>>> >>>>> v. >>>>> >>>>> "related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation >>>>> and sharing across distributed applications" >>>>> >>>>> I don't know whether that is important or not. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 8 February 2014 22:46, Matei Zaharia >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> Thanks everyone for the votes. Since we now have accounts for >>>>>> everyone, >>>>>> I've updated the committer list below to include ASF IDs. Thanks to >>>>>> INFRA, we also now have both pull request postings and comments on >>>>>>them >>>>>> forwarded to the our mailing list. >>>>>> >>>>>> snip >>>>>> >>>>>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >>>>>> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >>>>>> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management &g
Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
I agree with Joe, voting on a moving target is not going to produce a result anyone can look back on and understand. Chris, you may be able to understand what is happening but I'm having trouble from my attempts to follow this thread. thanks david jencks On Feb 9, 2014, at 5:29 PM, Joseph Schaefer wrote: > Chris no offense but all we can do is vote on what you put in front of us. > As soon as you realized that that document was a mess the vote should have > been cancelled. Right now you have no clear picture of what each vote > *means* because the thing we are supposed to be approving is in flux. Right > now you have people voting on the subject on moral grounds, eg whether the > project deserves to graduate, all mixed in with votes cast on technical > objective grounds. The only way to fix this is with a fresh start IMO. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Feb 9, 2014, at 8:19 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" >> wrote: >> >> Hi Sebb, >> >> -Original Message- >> >> From: sebb >> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" >> Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014 4:39 PM >> To: "general@incubator.apache.org" >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator >> >>> On 9 February 2014 17:11, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) >>> wrote: >>>> Thanks Matei and sebb. >>>> >>>> Starting a new thread and collecting the VOTEs all over again would be >>>> time consuming. >>> >>> So? >> >> I don't appreciate this tone -- what do you mean "so"? >> >>> >>> Better to than being confusing, as the current thread has become. >> >> The thread's not confusing to me at all -- The diligence to update >> the resolution to the specific Apache IDs has been performed by Matei, >> so that work is done. I'll make the typo fix in the pasted board >> resolution, >> so that will be done too. >> >>> >>> Also it may not be clear whether new votes are intended for the update >>> resolution or the old one. >>> >>> Do the original votes even count for the amended resolution? >> >> Actually it's quite clear to me and to those who VOTEd, some multiple >> times. >> If folks have an issue as I mentioned, I've left the VOTE open for quite a >> long >> bit of time and am closing it tomorrow. That's plenty of time for folks to >> amend >> their VOTE should they have wanted to. >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: sebb >>>> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" >>>> Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014 7:10 AM >>>> To: "general@incubator.apache.org" >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator >>>> >>>>> I think it would be better to start a new thread with the updated text. >>>>> >>>>> Also, the two scope descriptions are slightly different: >>>>> >>>>> "related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis >>>>> on clusters." >>>>> >>>>> v. >>>>> >>>>> "related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation >>>>> and sharing across distributed applications" >>>>> >>>>> I don't know whether that is important or not. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 8 February 2014 22:46, Matei Zaharia wrote: >>>>>> Thanks everyone for the votes. Since we now have accounts for >>>>>> everyone, >>>>>> I've updated the committer list below to include ASF IDs. Thanks to >>>>>> INFRA, we also now have both pull request postings and comments on them >>>>>> forwarded to the our mailing list. >>>>>> >>>>>> snip >>>>>> >>>>>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >>>>>> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >>>>>> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >>>>>> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >>>>>> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the >>>>>> public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis >>>
