Lucene.NET and OpenWebBeans cleanup (was: svn commit: r893641 - in /incubator/public/trunk: clutch.pkl...)

[Gavin]

 -Original Message-
 From: cross...@apache.org [mailto:cross...@apache.org]
 Sent: Thursday, 24 December 2009 8:30 AM
 To: public-comm...@incubator.apache.org
 Subject: svn commit: r893641 - in /incubator/public/trunk: clutch.pkl
 site-author/clutch.xml site-author/report_due_1.txt site-
 publish/clutch.html site-publish/report_due_1.txt
 
 Author: crossley
 Date: Wed Dec 23 22:30:21 2009
 New Revision: 893641
 
 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=893641view=rev
 Log:
 Not sure what is happening with lucene.net mail archives.
 

As per http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2361 

They were moved.

I see 3 emails including a test one I sent on the 22nd still in moderation
for their dev list.

Lucene.net has some cleaning up to do of their incubator resources.

For the record, I moved all of OpenWebBeans stuff to TLP yesterday too,
including their mail lists, so they have some incubator clean up work to do
also. (See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2386 )

Let me know if I can help with anything.

Gav...


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Apache OpenWebBeans Has Graduated

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

We have just received confirmation that the Board has established Apache
OpenWebBeans as a project.

I would like to thank the Incubator PMC and all the others that have
supported OpenWebBeans during the incubation for their guidance, effort and
time.

I am very proud to be part of the Apache family

Thanks to all!

Gurkan Erdogdu



  ___
Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı!  http://yahoo.com.tr
İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!

Re: Apache OpenWebBeans Has Graduated

[Matthias Wessendorf]

BIT congrats!!!

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

 We have just received confirmation that the Board has established Apache
 OpenWebBeans as a project.

 I would like to thank the Incubator PMC and all the others that have
 supported OpenWebBeans during the incubation for their guidance, effort and
 time.

 I am very proud to be part of the Apache family

 Thanks to all!

 Gurkan Erdogdu



      ___
 Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı!  http://yahoo.com.tr
 İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Apache OpenWebBeans Has Graduated

[Matthias Wessendorf]

BIG!! congrats!

-Matthias

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

 We have just received confirmation that the Board has established Apache
 OpenWebBeans as a project.

 I would like to thank the Incubator PMC and all the others that have
 supported OpenWebBeans during the incubation for their guidance, effort and
 time.

 I am very proud to be part of the Apache family

 Thanks to all!

 Gurkan Erdogdu



      ___
 Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı!  http://yahoo.com.tr
 İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[RESULT]Re: [VOTE] Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation to an Apache TLP

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

The VOTE has passed with 6 +1 votes and no 0 or -1.

Here are the votes;

+1 Kevan Miller
+1 Matthias Wessendorf
+1 Bertrand Delacretaz
+1 Niall Pemberton
+1 Martijn Dashorst
+1 Craig L Russell

Thank you for all the support. As a next step, we will send the proposed 
resolution to the board for approval.

Best Regards;

--Gurkan




From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Mon, December 7, 2009 10:32:04 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation to an Apache TLP

Hi;

After  over  one  years  in  the  incubator  with   providing   three   releases
OpenWebBeans community with  the  support  of  our  mentors  feel  that  we  are
ready  to  propose  to  the  Incubator  PMC  to  graduate  OpenWebBeans   to   a
Top Level Project. 

See the following community graduation vote thread in the archives:

http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01687.html

To  that  end  we  have  prepared   the   resolution   for   the   Board   below
to  be  presented   for   consideration   at   the   upcoming   Board   meeting.

Please  vote  on  recommending  OpenWebBeans  graduation  to  the   ASF   board.

The vote is open for  the  next  72  hours,  and  only  IPMC  member  votes  are
binding.

[] +1 Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation
[] -1 OpenWebBeans shoud not graduate yet, because

Unless  they  explicitly   vote   otherwise,   I'm   including   the   following
IPMC  member  votes  from  the  community  vote  also  in  the  tally  of   this
vote:

+1 Kevan Miller
+1 Matthias Wessendorf

Incubator Page : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans
Status Page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html

Thanks;

--Gurkan Erdogdu

Board Resolution Report
--

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the
Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project,
to be known as Apache OpenWebBeans, related to the implementation of the
JSR-299,i.e Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform, for
distribution at no charge to the public.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC) is
hereby established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans Project be and hereby is
responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software
project related to JSR299, Context and Dependency Injection for the
Java EE Platform; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC be and hereby is charged with the
creation and maintenance of Apache OpenWebBeans; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans be and hereby
is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the
Board of Directors as the chair of Apache OpenWebBeans, and to have primary
responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility
of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed
to serve as the initial members of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC:

* Gurkan Erdogdu (gurkanerdogdu at yahoo dot com)
* Kevan Miller  (kevan dot miller at gmail dot com)
* Mark Struberg  (struberg at yahoo dot com)
* Joe Bergmark  (bergmark at gmail dot com)
* Eric Covener (covener at gmail dot com)
* David Blevins (david dot blevins at visi dot com)

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gurkan Erdogdu be appointed to the
office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans, to serve in accordance with and
subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the
Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or
until a successor is appointed; and be it further

RESOLVED, that Apache OpenWebBeans be and hereby is tasked with the migration
and rationalization of the Apache Incubator OpenWebBeans podling; and be it
further

RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator
OpenWebBeans podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter
discharged.


  ___
Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı!  http://yahoo.com.tr
İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!


  ___
Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı!  http://yahoo.com.tr
İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!

Re: [VOTE] Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation to an Apache TLP

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

This is a reminder email that 72 hours have already passed.

What other IPMC members think about graduation?  So far we have three
binding +1 votes from

Kevan Miller,
Matthias Wessendorf,
Bertrand Delacretaz

Thanks;

--Gurkan

2009/12/7 Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com

 Hi;

 After  over  one  years  in  the  incubator  with   providing   three
 releases
 OpenWebBeans community with  the  support  of  our  mentors  feel  that  we
  are
 ready  to  propose  to  the  Incubator  PMC  to  graduate  OpenWebBeans
 to   a
 Top Level Project.

 See the following community graduation vote thread in the archives:


 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01687.html

 To  that  end  we  have  prepared   the   resolution   for   the   Board
 below
 to  be  presented   for   consideration   at   the   upcoming   Board
 meeting.

 Please  vote  on  recommending  OpenWebBeans  graduation  to  the   ASF
 board.

 The vote is open for  the  next  72  hours,  and  only  IPMC  member  votes
  are
 binding.

 [] +1 Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation
 [] -1 OpenWebBeans shoud not graduate yet, because

 Unless  they  explicitly   vote   otherwise,   I'm   including   the
 following
 IPMC  member  votes  from  the  community  vote  also  in  the  tally  of
 this
 vote:

 +1 Kevan Miller
 +1 Matthias Wessendorf

 Incubator Page : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans
 Status Page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html

 Thanks;

 --Gurkan Erdogdu

 Board Resolution Report
 --

 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the
 Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a
 Project,
 to be known as Apache OpenWebBeans, related to the implementation of the
 JSR-299,i.e Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform, for
 distribution at no charge to the public.

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC)
 is
 hereby established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans Project be and hereby is
 responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software
 project related to JSR299, Context and Dependency Injection for the
 Java EE Platform; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC be and hereby is charged with
 the
 creation and maintenance of Apache OpenWebBeans; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans be and
 hereby
 is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the
 Board of Directors as the chair of Apache OpenWebBeans, and to have primary
 responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of
 responsibility
 of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
 appointed
 to serve as the initial members of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC:

 * Gurkan Erdogdu (gurkanerdogdu at yahoo dot com)
 * Kevan Miller  (kevan dot miller at gmail dot com)
 * Mark Struberg  (struberg at yahoo dot com)
 * Joe Bergmark  (bergmark at gmail dot com)
 * Eric Covener (covener at gmail dot com)
 * David Blevins (david dot blevins at visi dot com)

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gurkan Erdogdu be appointed to
 the
 office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans, to serve in accordance with
 and
 subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the
 Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or
 disqualification, or
 until a successor is appointed; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that Apache OpenWebBeans be and hereby is tasked with the
 migration
 and rationalization of the Apache Incubator OpenWebBeans podling; and be it
 further

 RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator
 OpenWebBeans podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter
 discharged.


  ___
 Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı!  http://yahoo.com.tr
 İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!




-- 
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com

Re: [VOTE] Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation to an Apache TLP

[Niall Pemberton]

+1

Niall

2009/12/11 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com:
 Hi;

 This is a reminder email that 72 hours have already passed.

 What other IPMC members think about graduation?  So far we have three
 binding +1 votes from

 Kevan Miller,
 Matthias Wessendorf,
 Bertrand Delacretaz

 Thanks;

 --Gurkan

 2009/12/7 Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com

 Hi;

 After  over  one  years  in  the  incubator  with   providing   three
 releases
 OpenWebBeans community with  the  support  of  our  mentors  feel  that  we
  are
 ready  to  propose  to  the  Incubator  PMC  to  graduate  OpenWebBeans
 to   a
 Top Level Project.

 See the following community graduation vote thread in the archives:


 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01687.html

 To  that  end  we  have  prepared   the   resolution   for   the   Board
 below
 to  be  presented   for   consideration   at   the   upcoming   Board
 meeting.

 Please  vote  on  recommending  OpenWebBeans  graduation  to  the   ASF
 board.

 The vote is open for  the  next  72  hours,  and  only  IPMC  member  votes
  are
 binding.

 [] +1 Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation
 [] -1 OpenWebBeans shoud not graduate yet, because

 Unless  they  explicitly   vote   otherwise,   I'm   including   the
 following
 IPMC  member  votes  from  the  community  vote  also  in  the  tally  of
 this
 vote:

 +1 Kevan Miller
 +1 Matthias Wessendorf

 Incubator Page : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans
 Status Page    : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html

 Thanks;

 --Gurkan Erdogdu

 Board Resolution Report
 --

 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the
 Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a
 Project,
 to be known as Apache OpenWebBeans, related to the implementation of the
 JSR-299,i.e Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform, for
 distribution at no charge to the public.

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC)
 is
 hereby established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans Project be and hereby is
 responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software
 project related to JSR299, Context and Dependency Injection for the
 Java EE Platform; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC be and hereby is charged with
 the
 creation and maintenance of Apache OpenWebBeans; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans be and
 hereby
 is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the
 Board of Directors as the chair of Apache OpenWebBeans, and to have primary
 responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of
 responsibility
 of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
 appointed
 to serve as the initial members of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC:

 * Gurkan Erdogdu (gurkanerdogdu at yahoo dot com)
 * Kevan Miller  (kevan dot miller at gmail dot com)
 * Mark Struberg  (struberg at yahoo dot com)
 * Joe Bergmark  (bergmark at gmail dot com)
 * Eric Covener (covener at gmail dot com)
 * David Blevins (david dot blevins at visi dot com)

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gurkan Erdogdu be appointed to
 the
 office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans, to serve in accordance with
 and
 subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the
 Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or
 disqualification, or
 until a successor is appointed; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that Apache OpenWebBeans be and hereby is tasked with the
 migration
 and rationalization of the Apache Incubator OpenWebBeans podling; and be it
 further

 RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator
 OpenWebBeans podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter
 discharged.


      ___
 Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı!  http://yahoo.com.tr
 İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!




 --
 Gurkan Erdogdu
 http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation to an Apache TLP

[Martijn Dashorst]

+1

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

 After  over  one  years  in  the  incubator  with   providing   three   
 releases
 OpenWebBeans community with  the  support  of  our  mentors  feel  that  we  
 are
 ready  to  propose  to  the  Incubator  PMC  to  graduate  OpenWebBeans   to  
  a
 Top Level Project.

 See the following community graduation vote thread in the archives:

 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01687.html

 To  that  end  we  have  prepared   the   resolution   for   the   Board   
 below
 to  be  presented   for   consideration   at   the   upcoming   Board   
 meeting.

 Please  vote  on  recommending  OpenWebBeans  graduation  to  the   ASF   
 board.

 The vote is open for  the  next  72  hours,  and  only  IPMC  member  votes  
 are
 binding.

 [] +1 Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation
 [] -1 OpenWebBeans shoud not graduate yet, because

 Unless  they  explicitly   vote   otherwise,   I'm   including   the   
 following
 IPMC  member  votes  from  the  community  vote  also  in  the  tally  of   
 this
 vote:

 +1 Kevan Miller
 +1 Matthias Wessendorf

 Incubator Page : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans
 Status Page    : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html

 Thanks;

 --Gurkan Erdogdu

 Board Resolution Report
 --

 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the
 Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a 
 Project,
 to be known as Apache OpenWebBeans, related to the implementation of the
 JSR-299,i.e Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform, for
 distribution at no charge to the public.

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC) is
 hereby established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans Project be and hereby is
 responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software
 project related to JSR299, Context and Dependency Injection for the
 Java EE Platform; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC be and hereby is charged with the
 creation and maintenance of Apache OpenWebBeans; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans be and 
 hereby
 is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the
 Board of Directors as the chair of Apache OpenWebBeans, and to have primary
 responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of 
 responsibility
 of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are 
 appointed
 to serve as the initial members of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC:

 * Gurkan Erdogdu (gurkanerdogdu at yahoo dot com)
 * Kevan Miller  (kevan dot miller at gmail dot com)
 * Mark Struberg  (struberg at yahoo dot com)
 * Joe Bergmark  (bergmark at gmail dot com)
 * Eric Covener (covener at gmail dot com)
 * David Blevins (david dot blevins at visi dot com)

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gurkan Erdogdu be appointed to 
 the
 office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans, to serve in accordance with and
 subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the
 Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, 
 or
 until a successor is appointed; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that Apache OpenWebBeans be and hereby is tasked with the migration
 and rationalization of the Apache Incubator OpenWebBeans podling; and be it
 further

 RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator
 OpenWebBeans podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter
 discharged.


      ___
 Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı!  http://yahoo.com.tr
 İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!



-- 
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.0

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation to an Apache TLP

[Craig L Russell]

+1

Congratulations!

Craig

On Dec 7, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:


Hi;

After  over  one  years  in  the  incubator  with   providing
three   releases
OpenWebBeans community with  the  support  of  our  mentors  feel   
that  we  are
ready  to  propose  to  the  Incubator  PMC  to  graduate   
OpenWebBeans   to   a

Top Level Project.

See the following community graduation vote thread in the archives:

http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01687.html

To  that  end  we  have  prepared   the   resolution   for   the
Board   below
to  be  presented   for   consideration   at   the   upcoming
Board   meeting.


Please  vote  on  recommending  OpenWebBeans  graduation  to  the
ASF   board.


The vote is open for  the  next  72  hours,  and  only  IPMC   
member  votes  are

binding.

[] +1 Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation
[] -1 OpenWebBeans shoud not graduate yet, because

Unless  they  explicitly   vote   otherwise,   I'm   including
the   following
IPMC  member  votes  from  the  community  vote  also  in  the   
tally  of   this

vote:

+1 Kevan Miller
+1 Matthias Wessendorf

Incubator Page : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans
Status Page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ 
openwebbeans.html


Thanks;

--Gurkan Erdogdu

Board Resolution Report
--

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests  
of the
Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish  
a Project,
to be known as Apache OpenWebBeans, related to the implementation  
of the
JSR-299,i.e Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE  
platform, for

distribution at no charge to the public.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee  
(PMC) is
hereby established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it  
further


RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans Project be and hereby is
responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software
project related to JSR299, Context and Dependency Injection for the
Java EE Platform; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC be and hereby is charged  
with the

creation and maintenance of Apache OpenWebBeans; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans  
be and hereby
is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction  
of the
Board of Directors as the chair of Apache OpenWebBeans, and to have  
primary
responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of  
responsibility

of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby  
are appointed

to serve as the initial members of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC:

* Gurkan Erdogdu (gurkanerdogdu at yahoo dot com)
* Kevan Miller  (kevan dot miller at gmail dot com)
* Mark Struberg  (struberg at yahoo dot com)
* Joe Bergmark  (bergmark at gmail dot com)
* Eric Covener (covener at gmail dot com)
* David Blevins (david dot blevins at visi dot com)

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gurkan Erdogdu be  
appointed to the
office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans, to serve in  
accordance with and
subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of  
the
Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or  
disqualification, or

until a successor is appointed; and be it further

RESOLVED, that Apache OpenWebBeans be and hereby is tasked with the  
migration
and rationalization of the Apache Incubator OpenWebBeans podling;  
and be it

further

RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator
OpenWebBeans podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are  
hereafter

discharged.


  
___

Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı!  http://yahoo.com.tr
İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere  
sunuyor!


Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation to an Apache TLP

[Kevan Miller]

Recording my +1, again.

--kevan
On Dec 7, 2009, at 3:32 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:

 Hi;
 
 After  over  one  years  in  the  incubator  with   providing   three   
 releases
 OpenWebBeans community with  the  support  of  our  mentors  feel  that  we  
 are
 ready  to  propose  to  the  Incubator  PMC  to  graduate  OpenWebBeans   to  
  a
 Top Level Project. 
 
 See the following community graduation vote thread in the archives:
 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01687.html
 
 To  that  end  we  have  prepared   the   resolution   for   the   Board   
 below
 to  be  presented   for   consideration   at   the   upcoming   Board   
 meeting.
 
 Please  vote  on  recommending  OpenWebBeans  graduation  to  the   ASF   
 board.
 
 The vote is open for  the  next  72  hours,  and  only  IPMC  member  votes  
 are
 binding.
 
 [] +1 Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation
 [] -1 OpenWebBeans shoud not graduate yet, because
 
 Unless  they  explicitly   vote   otherwise,   I'm   including   the   
 following
 IPMC  member  votes  from  the  community  vote  also  in  the  tally  of   
 this
 vote:
 
 +1 Kevan Miller
 +1 Matthias Wessendorf
 
 Incubator Page : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans
 Status Page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
 
 Thanks;
 
 --Gurkan Erdogdu
 
 Board Resolution Report
 --
 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the
 Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a 
 Project,
 to be known as Apache OpenWebBeans, related to the implementation of the
 JSR-299,i.e Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform, for
 distribution at no charge to the public.
 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC) is
 hereby established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further
 
 RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans Project be and hereby is
 responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software
 project related to JSR299, Context and Dependency Injection for the
 Java EE Platform; and be it further
 
 RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC be and hereby is charged with the
 creation and maintenance of Apache OpenWebBeans; and be it further
 
 RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans be and 
 hereby
 is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the
 Board of Directors as the chair of Apache OpenWebBeans, and to have primary
 responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of 
 responsibility
 of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC; and be it further
 
 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are 
 appointed
 to serve as the initial members of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC:
 
 * Gurkan Erdogdu (gurkanerdogdu at yahoo dot com)
 * Kevan Miller  (kevan dot miller at gmail dot com)
 * Mark Struberg  (struberg at yahoo dot com)
 * Joe Bergmark  (bergmark at gmail dot com)
 * Eric Covener (covener at gmail dot com)
 * David Blevins (david dot blevins at visi dot com)
 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gurkan Erdogdu be appointed to 
 the
 office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans, to serve in accordance with and
 subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the
 Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, 
 or
 until a successor is appointed; and be it further
 
 RESOLVED, that Apache OpenWebBeans be and hereby is tasked with the migration
 and rationalization of the Apache Incubator OpenWebBeans podling; and be it
 further
 
 RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator
 OpenWebBeans podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter
 discharged.
 
 
  ___
 Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı!  http://yahoo.com.tr
 İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation to an Apache TLP

[Bertrand Delacretaz]

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 ...After  over  one  years  in  the  incubator  with   providing   three   
 releases
 OpenWebBeans community with  the  support  of  our  mentors  feel  that  we  
 are
 ready  to  propose  to  the  Incubator  PMC  to  graduate  OpenWebBeans   to  
  a
 Top Level Project

+1

Note that http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/team-list.html
does not seem to be up to date, a few committers listed at
http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html are
not there.

-Bertrand

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation to an Apache TLP

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

After  over  one  years  in  the  incubator  with   providing   three   releases
OpenWebBeans community with  the  support  of  our  mentors  feel  that  we  are
ready  to  propose  to  the  Incubator  PMC  to  graduate  OpenWebBeans   to   a
Top Level Project. 

See the following community graduation vote thread in the archives:

http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01687.html

To  that  end  we  have  prepared   the   resolution   for   the   Board   below
to  be  presented   for   consideration   at   the   upcoming   Board   meeting.

Please  vote  on  recommending  OpenWebBeans  graduation  to  the   ASF   board.

The vote is open for  the  next  72  hours,  and  only  IPMC  member  votes  are
binding.

[] +1 Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation
[] -1 OpenWebBeans shoud not graduate yet, because

Unless  they  explicitly   vote   otherwise,   I'm   including   the   following
IPMC  member  votes  from  the  community  vote  also  in  the  tally  of   this
vote:

+1 Kevan Miller
+1 Matthias Wessendorf

Incubator Page : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans
Status Page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html

Thanks;

--Gurkan Erdogdu

Board Resolution Report
--

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the
Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project,
to be known as Apache OpenWebBeans, related to the implementation of the
JSR-299,i.e Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform, for
distribution at no charge to the public.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC) is
hereby established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans Project be and hereby is
responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software
project related to JSR299, Context and Dependency Injection for the
Java EE Platform; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC be and hereby is charged with the
creation and maintenance of Apache OpenWebBeans; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans be and hereby
is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the
Board of Directors as the chair of Apache OpenWebBeans, and to have primary
responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility
of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed
to serve as the initial members of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC:

* Gurkan Erdogdu (gurkanerdogdu at yahoo dot com)
* Kevan Miller  (kevan dot miller at gmail dot com)
* Mark Struberg  (struberg at yahoo dot com)
* Joe Bergmark  (bergmark at gmail dot com)
* Eric Covener (covener at gmail dot com)
* David Blevins (david dot blevins at visi dot com)

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gurkan Erdogdu be appointed to the
office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans, to serve in accordance with and
subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the
Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or
until a successor is appointed; and be it further

RESOLVED, that Apache OpenWebBeans be and hereby is tasked with the migration
and rationalization of the Apache Incubator OpenWebBeans podling; and be it
further

RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator
OpenWebBeans podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter
discharged.


  ___
Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı!  http://yahoo.com.tr
İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!

Re: [VOTE] Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation to an Apache TLP

[Matthias Wessendorf]

+1 (again ;-) )

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

 After  over  one  years  in  the  incubator  with   providing   three   
 releases
 OpenWebBeans community with  the  support  of  our  mentors  feel  that  we  
 are
 ready  to  propose  to  the  Incubator  PMC  to  graduate  OpenWebBeans   to  
  a
 Top Level Project.

 See the following community graduation vote thread in the archives:

 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01687.html

 To  that  end  we  have  prepared   the   resolution   for   the   Board   
 below
 to  be  presented   for   consideration   at   the   upcoming   Board   
 meeting.

 Please  vote  on  recommending  OpenWebBeans  graduation  to  the   ASF   
 board.

 The vote is open for  the  next  72  hours,  and  only  IPMC  member  votes  
 are
 binding.

 [] +1 Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation
 [] -1 OpenWebBeans shoud not graduate yet, because

 Unless  they  explicitly   vote   otherwise,   I'm   including   the   
 following
 IPMC  member  votes  from  the  community  vote  also  in  the  tally  of   
 this
 vote:

 +1 Kevan Miller
 +1 Matthias Wessendorf

 Incubator Page : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans
 Status Page    : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html

 Thanks;

 --Gurkan Erdogdu

 Board Resolution Report
 --

 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the
 Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a 
 Project,
 to be known as Apache OpenWebBeans, related to the implementation of the
 JSR-299,i.e Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform, for
 distribution at no charge to the public.

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC) is
 hereby established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans Project be and hereby is
 responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software
 project related to JSR299, Context and Dependency Injection for the
 Java EE Platform; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC be and hereby is charged with the
 creation and maintenance of Apache OpenWebBeans; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans be and 
 hereby
 is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the
 Board of Directors as the chair of Apache OpenWebBeans, and to have primary
 responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of 
 responsibility
 of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are 
 appointed
 to serve as the initial members of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC:

 * Gurkan Erdogdu (gurkanerdogdu at yahoo dot com)
 * Kevan Miller  (kevan dot miller at gmail dot com)
 * Mark Struberg  (struberg at yahoo dot com)
 * Joe Bergmark  (bergmark at gmail dot com)
 * Eric Covener (covener at gmail dot com)
 * David Blevins (david dot blevins at visi dot com)

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gurkan Erdogdu be appointed to 
 the
 office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans, to serve in accordance with and
 subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the
 Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, 
 or
 until a successor is appointed; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that Apache OpenWebBeans be and hereby is tasked with the migration
 and rationalization of the Apache Incubator OpenWebBeans podling; and be it
 further

 RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator
 OpenWebBeans podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter
 discharged.


      ___
 Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı!  http://yahoo.com.tr
 İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

fyi: OpenWebBeans is preparing for graduation

[Kevan Miller]

FYI,
The OpenWebBeans community has started a graduation vote on their dev-list.

--kevan

On Dec 1, 2009, at 2:13 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:

 Hi;
 
 I would like to start a VOTE for graduating OWB as TLP.
 
 Please cast your VOTEs here. VOTE is open for 72 hours.
 
 [-1] Do not graduate as TLP
 [0 ] Do not care TLP or not
 [+1] Graduate as TLP
 
 Here's my +1.
 
 Incubator Status Page
 ---
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html (I have updated 
 checklists, it will appear in a couple of hours)
 
 Board Resolution Report
 ---
 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the
 Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a 
 Project,
 to be known as Apache OpenWebBeans, related to the implementation of the
 JSR-299,i.e Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform, for
 distribution at no charge to the public.
 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC) is
 hereby established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further
 
 RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans Project be and hereby is
 responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software
 project related to JSR299, Context and Dependency Injection for the
 Java EE Platform; and be it further
 
 RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC be and hereby is charged with the
 creation and maintenance of Apache OpenWebBeans; and be it further
 
 RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans be and 
 hereby
 is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the
 Board of Directors as the chair of Apache OpenWebBeans, and to have primary
 responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of 
 responsibility
 of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC; and be it further
 
 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are 
 appointed
 to serve as the initial members of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC:
 
 * Gurkan Erdogdu (gurkanerdogdu at yahoo dot com)
 * Kevan Miller  (kevan dot miller at gmail dot com)
 * Mark Struberg  (struberg at yahoo dot com)
 * Joe Bergmark  (bergmark at gmail dot com)
 * Eric Covener (covener at gmail dot com)
 * David Blevins (david dot blevins at visi dot com)
 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gurkan Erdogdu be appointed to 
 the
 office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans, to serve in accordance with and
 subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the
 Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, 
 or
 until a successor is appointed; and be it further
 
 RESOLVED, that Apache OpenWebBeans be and hereby is tasked with the migration
 and rationalization of the Apache Incubator OpenWebBeans podling; and be it
 further
 
 RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator
 OpenWebBeans podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter
 discharged.
 
 
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

For license issues, aforementioned libraries are included within 
samples/jms-sample-1.0.0-incubating-M3.war/WEB-INF/lib folder. 

For source distribution, we included everything under  the svn/trunk that 
contains LICENSE, NOTICE, READMES, all sources etc.

Thanks;

--Gurkan





From: Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:41:25 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)

The LICENSE.txt from the binary distribution mentions the following jars :
jsf-facelet-1.1.14.jar, jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar,  dom4j-1.6.1.jar,
javassist-3.8.0.GA.jar

But i can't find any of them in the binary distribution...
[apache-openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-binary]$ find . -name \*.jar
./atinject-api-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar
./openwebbeans-api-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar
./openwebbeans-ejb-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar
./openwebbeans-geronimo-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar
./openwebbeans-impl-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar
./openwebbeans-jms-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar
./openwebbeans-jpa-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar
./openwebbeans-jsf-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar
./openwebbeans-resource-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar

I'd say you should either add this to the distribution (as the
README_ME.txt says they are required) or remove them from the
LICENSe.txt.

Similar thing with NOTICE.txt, where it mentions dom4j and javassist,
but they are not really part of the distribution.

These comments should also apply for source distribution, which from
my quick scan is only distributing Apache Licensed source code.


Also, a minor thing is that the source and binary distribution (zip
files at least) are extracting to the same folder...


On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:

 This is why I complained about a podling release procedure.

 We started a voting process to release M3 at September 1 and are still not 
 able to release. This maybe related with not enough IPMC members in our 
 community list to get their binding votes.

 Thanks;

 --Gurkan




 
 From: Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 1:54:55 AM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)

 +1

 On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Niall Pemberton
 niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
 +1

 Niall

 On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
 cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi;


 This is the RC-2 of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3.

 OpenWebBeans is an Apache License, Version 2.0 implementation of the
 JSR-299: Contexts and  Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform
 which is defined as JSR-299.
 OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.

 There is one *binding*  +1 VOTE from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
 to get two more bindings IPMC Member +1 VOTE to publish M3 release.


 RC-2 Artifacts
 -

 Plugins repository
 --

 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
 http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans


 Distribution content
 

 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/
 http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/


 SVN Tag
 

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/


 The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *three* +1
 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

 [VOTE Thread] :
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01303.html

 More information about the project can be found here:

 [Incubation Status Page ] :
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
 [Project Page]:
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
 [Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
 [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/


 This vote is open for 72 hours.

 Thanks;

 -- Gurkan


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org





 --
 Thanks
 - Mohammad Nour
 - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour
 
 Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving
 - Albert Einstein

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org






-- 
Luciano Resende
http

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)

[Kevan Miller]

On Sep 29, 2009, at 11:38 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:



This is why I complained about a podling release procedure.

We started a voting process to release M3 at September 1 and are  
still not able to release. This maybe related with not enough IPMC  
members in our community list to get their binding votes.


Gurkan,
I understand your desire to release M3. The review process has  
discovered several problems in the M3 release. So, that's a good  
thing. Problems are also part of the reason that the release has  
taken so long. Looking back, I see that some of the votes have taken a  
bit of time. I am also at least partly responsible, being a bit slow  
on voting in the initial podling vote.


I have a few suggestions that might be useful:

1. If a vote has been silent for a few days, post a gentle reminder to  
the community. I see you've been doing this, but don't wait 5 days. If  
after 2 or 3 days of a vote being open, I don't mind being reminded...


2. Follow gene...@incubator and legal-discuss@ mailing lists.  
Sometimes, release requirements change or perhaps more accurately,  
people's understanding of release requirements change... Proactively  
addressing changes can help avoid problems during a vote.


3. I notice that some podlings have been pre-reviewing releases on  
gene...@incubator. This could also help reduce review time.


--kevan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)

[Kevan Miller]

On Sep 30, 2009, at 4:16 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:


Hi;

For license issues, aforementioned libraries are included within  
samples/jms-sample-1.0.0-incubating-M3.war/WEB-INF/lib folder.


For source distribution, we included everything under  the svn/ 
trunk that contains LICENSE, NOTICE, READMES, all sources etc.


Luciano,
Does this address your comments?

--kevan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)

[Luciano Resende]

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sep 30, 2009, at 4:16 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:

 Hi;

 For license issues, aforementioned libraries are included within
 samples/jms-sample-1.0.0-incubating-M3.war/WEB-INF/lib folder.

 For source distribution, we included everything under  the svn/trunk
 that contains LICENSE, NOTICE, READMES, all sources etc.

 Luciano,
 Does this address your comments?

 --kevan


Great, I had missed the war in the distro.
It looks good now, here is my +1.



-- 
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE][RESULT]Release OpenWebBeans M3

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is successful.

There are three +1 binding votes, not 0 or -1.

+1 Votes
-
* Kevan Miller
* Niall Pemberton
* Luciano Resende.

I will add distribution artifacts to the  incubator dist/  place.

Thanks to everyone who helps us to pass this hard marathon :) ;

Gurkan Erdogdu


  

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)

[Mohammad Nour El-Din]

+1

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
 +1

 Niall

 On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
 cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi;


 This is the RC-2 of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3.

 OpenWebBeans is an Apache License, Version 2.0 implementation of the
 JSR-299: Contexts and  Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform
 which is defined as JSR-299.
 OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.

 There is one *binding*  +1 VOTE from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
 to get two more bindings IPMC Member +1 VOTE to publish M3 release.


 RC-2 Artifacts
 -

 Plugins repository
 --

 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
 http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans


 Distribution content
 

 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/
 http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/


 SVN Tag
 

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/


 The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *three* +1
 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

 [VOTE Thread] :
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01303.html

 More information about the project can be found here:

 [Incubation Status Page ] :
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
 [Project Page]            :
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
 [Wiki Page]               : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
 [Blog]                    : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/


 This vote is open for 72 hours.

 Thanks;

 -- Gurkan


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org





-- 
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
- LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour

Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving
- Albert Einstein

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

This is why I complained about a podling release procedure.

We started a voting process to release M3 at September 1 and are still not able 
to release. This maybe related with not enough IPMC members in our community 
list to get their binding votes. 

Thanks;

--Gurkan





From: Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 1:54:55 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)

+1

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
 +1

 Niall

 On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
 cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi;


 This is the RC-2 of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3.

 OpenWebBeans is an Apache License, Version 2.0 implementation of the
 JSR-299: Contexts and  Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform
 which is defined as JSR-299.
 OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.

 There is one *binding*  +1 VOTE from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
 to get two more bindings IPMC Member +1 VOTE to publish M3 release.


 RC-2 Artifacts
 -

 Plugins repository
 --

 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
 http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans


 Distribution content
 

 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/
 http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/


 SVN Tag
 

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/


 The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *three* +1
 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

 [VOTE Thread] :
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01303.html

 More information about the project can be found here:

 [Incubation Status Page ] :
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
 [Project Page]:
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
 [Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
 [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/


 This vote is open for 72 hours.

 Thanks;

 -- Gurkan


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org





-- 
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
- LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour

Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving
- Albert Einstein

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


  

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)

[Luciano Resende]

The LICENSE.txt from the binary distribution mentions the following jars :
jsf-facelet-1.1.14.jar, jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar,  dom4j-1.6.1.jar,
javassist-3.8.0.GA.jar

But i can't find any of them in the binary distribution...
[apache-openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-binary]$ find . -name \*.jar
./atinject-api-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar
./openwebbeans-api-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar
./openwebbeans-ejb-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar
./openwebbeans-geronimo-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar
./openwebbeans-impl-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar
./openwebbeans-jms-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar
./openwebbeans-jpa-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar
./openwebbeans-jsf-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar
./openwebbeans-resource-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar

I'd say you should either add this to the distribution (as the
README_ME.txt says they are required) or remove them from the
LICENSe.txt.

Similar thing with NOTICE.txt, where it mentions dom4j and javassist,
but they are not really part of the distribution.

These comments should also apply for source distribution, which from
my quick scan is only distributing Apache Licensed source code.


Also, a minor thing is that the source and binary distribution (zip
files at least) are extracting to the same folder...


On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:

 This is why I complained about a podling release procedure.

 We started a voting process to release M3 at September 1 and are still not 
 able to release. This maybe related with not enough IPMC members in our 
 community list to get their binding votes.

 Thanks;

 --Gurkan




 
 From: Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 1:54:55 AM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)

 +1

 On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Niall Pemberton
 niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
 +1

 Niall

 On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
 cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi;


 This is the RC-2 of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3.

 OpenWebBeans is an Apache License, Version 2.0 implementation of the
 JSR-299: Contexts and  Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform
 which is defined as JSR-299.
 OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.

 There is one *binding*  +1 VOTE from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
 to get two more bindings IPMC Member +1 VOTE to publish M3 release.


 RC-2 Artifacts
 -

 Plugins repository
 --

 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
 http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans


 Distribution content
 

 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/
 http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/


 SVN Tag
 

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/


 The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *three* +1
 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

 [VOTE Thread] :
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01303.html

 More information about the project can be found here:

 [Incubation Status Page ] :
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
 [Project Page]            :
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
 [Wiki Page]               : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
 [Blog]                    : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/


 This vote is open for 72 hours.

 Thanks;

 -- Gurkan


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org





 --
 Thanks
 - Mohammad Nour
 - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour
 
 Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving
 - Albert Einstein

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org






-- 
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)

[Niall Pemberton]

+1

Niall

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi;


 This is the RC-2 of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3.

 OpenWebBeans is an Apache License, Version 2.0 implementation of the
 JSR-299: Contexts and  Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform
 which is defined as JSR-299.
 OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.

 There is one *binding*  +1 VOTE from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
 to get two more bindings IPMC Member +1 VOTE to publish M3 release.


 RC-2 Artifacts
 -

 Plugins repository
 --

 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
 http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans


 Distribution content
 

 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/
 http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/


 SVN Tag
 

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/


 The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *three* +1
 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

 [VOTE Thread] :
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01303.html

 More information about the project can be found here:

 [Incubation Status Page ] :
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
 [Project Page]            :
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
 [Wiki Page]               : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
 [Blog]                    : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/


 This vote is open for 72 hours.

 Thanks;

 -- Gurkan


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

72 hours are over. We have not receiving  any VOTE to release M3.

Please have a look at the artifacts below, we require to get 2 more IPMC votes.

Thanks;

--Gurkan



From: Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 9:14:21 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)

Hi;


This is the RC-2 of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3.

OpenWebBeans is an Apache License, Version 2.0 implementation of the
JSR-299: Contexts and  Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform
which is defined as JSR-299.
OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.

There is one *binding*  +1 VOTE from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
to get two more bindings IPMC Member +1 VOTE to publish M3 release.


RC-2 Artifacts
-

Plugins repository
--

http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans


Distribution content


http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/
http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/


SVN Tag


http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/


The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *three* +1
votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

[VOTE Thread] :
http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01303.html

More information about the project can be found here:

[Incubation Status Page ] :
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
[Project Page]:
http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
[Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
[Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/


This vote is open for 72 hours.

Thanks;

-- Gurkan



  

[VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;


This is the RC-2 of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3.

OpenWebBeans is an Apache License, Version 2.0 implementation of the
JSR-299: Contexts and  Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform
which is defined as JSR-299.
OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.

There is one *binding*  +1 VOTE from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
to get two more bindings IPMC Member +1 VOTE to publish M3 release.


RC-2 Artifacts
-

Plugins repository
--

http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans


Distribution content


http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/
http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/


SVN Tag


http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/


The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *three* +1
votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

[VOTE Thread] :
http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01303.html

More information about the project can be found here:

[Incubation Status Page ] :
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
[Project Page]:
http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
[Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
[Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/


This vote is open for 72 hours.

Thanks;

-- Gurkan

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

[sebb]

On 18/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi Sebb,


  The several (all?) of the war files in the samples directory tree
  contain jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar.
  This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in
  NOTICE or LICENSE.
  IMO this is a blocker.


 I removed it from the NOTICE file because it appears that JSF Facelet is 
 licensed under Apache License, Version 2.0. You can look at 
 https://facelets.dev.java.net/ for further information.


Nevertheless, IMO it still needs to be mentioned in the LICENSE file.

For example, add something like:

jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar is released under the terms of the Apache
License, version 2.0 which is included at the start of this file.

  The signing key does not have an ASF e-mail address.
  Not a blocker, but please fix for the next release candidate.


 I updated my KEY to include my apache account. 
 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Gurkan+Erdogduop=index contains 
 gerdo...@apache.org


OK, I guess I need to refresh my keyring.

  Not quite sure what the point of the -all archives is.

 As far as I can tell it's just binaries + source; IMO it's unnecessary


  Also, while I think of it - do the archive names (and top-level dirs)
  have to include -distribution-? It makes the name rather long. (not a
  blocker, but please consider for the next release).


 From the 2 points of above comments, we got advices our mentor while we were 
 releasing
  the our first milestone (M1) about how we create distribution bundles and 
 its name.

  Sure, I can remove all packages from the next release.

  Thanks;

  --Gurkan




  
  From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
  To: general@incubator.apache.org
  Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 2:52:31 AM
  Subject: Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)


  On 17/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
   Hi;
  
This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected 
 Sebb's concerns.
  
OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts 
 and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 
 2008.
  
There
are two *binding*  +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE  to publish M3 release.
  
  
Plugins repository
--

 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

  The several (all?) of the war files in the samples directory tree
  contain jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar.
  This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in
  NOTICE or LICENSE.
  IMO this is a blocker.

Distribution content


 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/

  The binary jar contains a war file which contains jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar.
  This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in
  NOTICE or LICENSE.
  IMO this is a blocker.

  The signing key does not have an ASF e-mail address.
  Not a blocker, but please fix for the next release candidate.

  The source archive has a slightly odd directory structure, as it has
  an extra src/ directory in the path (not a blocker, but consider
  removing for the next release)

  Not quite sure what the point of the -all archives is.
  As far as I can tell it's just binaries + source; IMO it's unnecessary
  to provide a combined archive. And because of the combined archive
  stores the source under src/, it contains two copies of all the sample
  source files that are in the binary archive. Not a blocker, but is it
  worth all the extra disk space (not to mention additional time to
  review releases)?  it might make getting votes easier next time if the
  all archive was dropped ...).

  Also, while I think of it - do the archive names (and top-level dirs)
  have to include -distribution-? It makes the name rather long. (not a
  blocker, but please consider for the next release).

SVN Tag


 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/

  Trivial typo in NOTICE.txt: This products  = This product 

The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* 
 +1
votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.
  
[VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html
  
More information about the project can be found here:
  
[Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
[Project Page]: 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
[Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

[Niall Pemberton]

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi Niall;

The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
vote.

Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to
provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate
regardless of their geographic locations.
from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

 I have already know those rules!.

Then I'm surprised you chose to do something different and IMO
impatience isn't a good enough reason.

 Besides, I was a bit of rush because of waiting too much to release :) 
 Otherwise we were not able to release something that our community uses!

Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
vote.

 I responded Sebb explanations. I thought that it may not block this release!

Sebb indicated that he thought that one of the points he raised was a
blocker and although you responded you didn't allow time to see if he
agreed with you. Giving a response is not reaching consensus.
Sometimes you don't end up agreeing, but you need to allow time to see
if its possible.

Niall

 If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we 
 will try to be perfect :)

 Thanks;

 --Gurkan


 
 From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:26:57 AM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
 cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi;

 The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is
 successful.

 There are three +1 binding

 The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
 when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
 etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
 vote.

 Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to
 provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate
 regardless of their geographic locations.
 from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

 The community then tries to gather consensus on an alternative
 proposal that resolves the issue. In the great majority of cases, the
 concerns leading to the negative vote can be addressed.
 from http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#decision-making

 Niall

 +1 Votes
 -
 * Kevan Miller (binding)
 * Matthias Wessendorf (binding)
 * Niall Pemberton (binding)


 I will add distribution artifacts to the  incubator dist/  place and
 upload to m3-incubator-repository

 Thanks to all;

 -- Gurkan


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com 
 wrote:
 Hi Niall;

The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
vote.

Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to
provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate
regardless of their geographic locations.
from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

 I have already know those rules!.

 Then I'm surprised you chose to do something different and IMO
 impatience isn't a good enough reason.

same here


 Besides, I was a bit of rush because of waiting too much to release :) 
 Otherwise we were not able to release something that our community uses!

Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
vote.

 I responded Sebb explanations. I thought that it may not block this release!

 Sebb indicated that he thought that one of the points he raised was a
 blocker and although you responded you didn't allow time to see if he
 agreed with you. Giving a response is not reaching consensus.
 Sometimes you don't end up agreeing, but you need to allow time to see
 if its possible.

 Niall

 If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we 
 will try to be perfect :)

 Thanks;

 --Gurkan


 
 From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:26:57 AM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
 cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi;

 The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is
 successful.

 There are three +1 binding

 The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
 when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
 etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
 vote.

 Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to
 provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate
 regardless of their geographic locations.
 from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

 The community then tries to gather consensus on an alternative
 proposal that resolves the issue. In the great majority of cases, the
 concerns leading to the negative vote can be addressed.
 from http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#decision-making

 Niall

 +1 Votes
 -
 * Kevan Miller (binding)
 * Matthias Wessendorf (binding)
 * Niall Pemberton (binding)


 I will add distribution artifacts to the  incubator dist/  place and
 upload to m3-incubator-repository

 Thanks to all;

 -- Gurkan


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org





-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi Niall;

The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
vote.

Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to
provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate
regardless of their geographic locations.
from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

 I have already know those rules!.

 Besides, I was a bit of rush because of waiting too much to release :) 
 Otherwise we were not able to release something that our community uses!

on goal of incubation is also to LEARN the Apache rules, not only to
produce code. As the main focus is to attract this podling to new
developers, there is no need to rush on providing a release for
use-only users. We want committers. These should be able to get the
svn TAG and work on that...



Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
vote.

 I responded Sebb explanations. I thought that it may not block this release!

 If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we 
 will try to be perfect :)

not sure what exactly he said, but please file a JIRA ticket for it,
to not forget about it.

-Matthias



 Thanks;

 --Gurkan


 
 From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:26:57 AM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
 cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi;

 The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is
 successful.

 There are three +1 binding

 The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
 when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
 etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
 vote.

 Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to
 provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate
 regardless of their geographic locations.
 from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

 The community then tries to gather consensus on an alternative
 proposal that resolves the issue. In the great majority of cases, the
 concerns leading to the negative vote can be addressed.
 from http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#decision-making

 Niall

 +1 Votes
 -
 * Kevan Miller (binding)
 * Matthias Wessendorf (binding)
 * Niall Pemberton (binding)


 I will add distribution artifacts to the  incubator dist/  place and
 upload to m3-incubator-repository

 Thanks to all;

 -- Gurkan


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org






-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com 
 wrote:
 Hi Niall;

The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
vote.

Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to
provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate
regardless of their geographic locations.
from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

 I have already know those rules!.

 Then I'm surprised you chose to do something different and IMO
 impatience isn't a good enough reason.

 Besides, I was a bit of rush because of waiting too much to release :) 
 Otherwise we were not able to release something that our community uses!

Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
vote.

 I responded Sebb explanations. I thought that it may not block this release!

 Sebb indicated that he thought that one of the points he raised was a
 blocker and although you responded you didn't allow time to see if he
 agreed with you. Giving a response is not reaching consensus.
 Sometimes you don't end up agreeing, but you need to allow time to see
 if its possible.

I totally agree, that rushing is not a good practice. Thanks Niall for
jumping in.

-Matthias



 Niall

 If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we 
 will try to be perfect :)

 Thanks;

 --Gurkan


 
 From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:26:57 AM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
 cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi;

 The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is
 successful.

 There are three +1 binding

 The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
 when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
 etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
 vote.

 Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to
 provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate
 regardless of their geographic locations.
 from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

 The community then tries to gather consensus on an alternative
 proposal that resolves the issue. In the great majority of cases, the
 concerns leading to the negative vote can be addressed.
 from http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#decision-making

 Niall

 +1 Votes
 -
 * Kevan Miller (binding)
 * Matthias Wessendorf (binding)
 * Niall Pemberton (binding)


 I will add distribution artifacts to the  incubator dist/  place and
 upload to m3-incubator-repository

 Thanks to all;

 -- Gurkan


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org





-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected 
Sebb's concerns. 

OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and 
Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008. 

There
are two *binding*  +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE  to publish M3 release.


Plugins repository 
--
http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

Distribution content

http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/

SVN Tag

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/

The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1
votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

[VOTE Thread] : 
http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html

More information about the project can be found here:

[Incubation Status Page ] : 
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
[Project Page]: 
http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
[Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
[Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

This vote is open for 72 hours. 

Thanks;

-- Gurkan



  

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Then I'm surprised you chose to do something different and IMO
impatience isn't a good enough reason.
Yes, my fault. 

Sebb indicated that he thought that one of the points he raised was a
blocker and although you responded you didn't allow time to see if he
agreed with you. Giving a response is not reaching consensus.
Sometimes you don't end up agreeing, but you need to allow time to see
if its possible.
Yes agree also. 

Thanks for remindering;

--Gurkan





From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:25:55 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi Niall;

The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
vote.

Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to
provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate
regardless of their geographic locations.
from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

 I have already know those rules!.

Then I'm surprised you chose to do something different and IMO
impatience isn't a good enough reason.

 Besides, I was a bit of rush because of waiting too much to release :) 
 Otherwise we were not able to release something that our community uses!

Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
vote.

 I responded Sebb explanations. I thought that it may not block this release!

Sebb indicated that he thought that one of the points he raised was a
blocker and although you responded you didn't allow time to see if he
agreed with you. Giving a response is not reaching consensus.
Sometimes you don't end up agreeing, but you need to allow time to see
if its possible.

Niall

 If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we 
 will try to be perfect :)

 Thanks;

 --Gurkan


 
 From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:26:57 AM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
 cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi;

 The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is
 successful.

 There are three +1 binding

 The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
 when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
 etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
 vote.

 Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to
 provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate
 regardless of their geographic locations.
 from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

 The community then tries to gather consensus on an alternative
 proposal that resolves the issue. In the great majority of cases, the
 concerns leading to the negative vote can be addressed.
 from http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#decision-making

 Niall

 +1 Votes
 -
 * Kevan Miller (binding)
 * Matthias Wessendorf (binding)
 * Niall Pemberton (binding)


 I will add distribution artifacts to the  incubator dist/  place and
 upload to m3-incubator-repository

 Thanks to all;

 -- Gurkan


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


  

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

[Niall Pemberton]

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu
gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

 This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected 
 Sebb's concerns.

 OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and 
 Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
 defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.

 There
 are two *binding*  +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
 to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE  to publish M3 release.

IMO a second RC requires another vote on openwebbeans-...@. Votes
don't carry over (well mine never does) IMO.

Niall

 Plugins repository
 --
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

 Distribution content
 
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/

 SVN Tag
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/

 The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1
 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

 [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html

 More information about the project can be found here:

 [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
 [Project Page]            : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
 [Wiki Page]               : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
 [Blog]                    : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

 This vote is open for 72 hours.

 Thanks;

 -- Gurkan





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

[sebb]

On 17/09/2009, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu
  gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
   Hi;
  
   This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected 
 Sebb's concerns.
  
   OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts 
 and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
   defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.
  
   There
   are two *binding*  +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
   to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE  to publish M3 release.


 IMO a second RC requires another vote on openwebbeans-...@. Votes
  don't carry over (well mine never does) IMO.

Surely votes are *always* for a specific (immutable) set of artifacts
- otherwise what's the point?

  Niall


   Plugins repository
   --
   
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
  
   Distribution content
   
   
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/
  
   SVN Tag
   
   
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/
  
   The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1
   votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.
  
   [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html
  
   More information about the project can be found here:
  
   [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
   [Project Page]: 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
   [Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
   [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/
  
   This vote is open for 72 hours.
  
   Thanks;
  
   -- Gurkan
  
  
  
  


 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

[sebb]

On 17/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

  This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected 
 Sebb's concerns.

  OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and 
 Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
  defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.

  There
  are two *binding*  +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
  to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE  to publish M3 release.


  Plugins repository
  --
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

The several (all?) of the war files in the samples directory tree
contain jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar.
This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in
NOTICE or LICENSE.
IMO this is a blocker.

  Distribution content
  
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/

The binary jar contains a war file which contains jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar.
This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in
NOTICE or LICENSE.
IMO this is a blocker.

The signing key does not have an ASF e-mail address.
Not a blocker, but please fix for the next release candidate.

The source archive has a slightly odd directory structure, as it has
an extra src/ directory in the path (not a blocker, but consider
removing for the next release)

Not quite sure what the point of the -all archives is.
As far as I can tell it's just binaries + source; IMO it's unnecessary
to provide a combined archive. And because of the combined archive
stores the source under src/, it contains two copies of all the sample
source files that are in the binary archive. Not a blocker, but is it
worth all the extra disk space (not to mention additional time to
review releases)?  it might make getting votes easier next time if the
all archive was dropped ...).

Also, while I think of it - do the archive names (and top-level dirs)
have to include -distribution-? It makes the name rather long. (not a
blocker, but please consider for the next release).

  SVN Tag
  
  
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/

Trivial typo in NOTICE.txt: This products  = This product 

  The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1
  votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

  [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html

  More information about the project can be found here:

  [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
  [Project Page]: 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
  [Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
  [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

  This vote is open for 72 hours.

  Thanks;


  -- Gurkan





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi Sebb,

The several (all?) of the war files in the samples directory tree
contain jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar.
This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in
NOTICE or LICENSE.
IMO this is a blocker.

I removed it from the NOTICE file because it appears that JSF Facelet is 
licensed under Apache License, Version 2.0. You can look at 
https://facelets.dev.java.net/ for further information.

The signing key does not have an ASF e-mail address.
Not a blocker, but please fix for the next release candidate.

I updated my KEY to include my apache account. 
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Gurkan+Erdogduop=index contains 
gerdo...@apache.org

Not quite sure what the point of the -all archives is.
As far as I can tell it's just binaries + source; IMO it's unnecessary

Also, while I think of it - do the archive names (and top-level dirs)
have to include -distribution-? It makes the name rather long. (not a
blocker, but please consider for the next release).

From the 2 points of above comments, we got advices our mentor while we were 
releasing
the our first milestone (M1) about how we create distribution bundles and its 
name.

Sure, I can remove all packages from the next release.

Thanks;

--Gurkan





From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 2:52:31 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

On 17/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

  This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected 
 Sebb's concerns.

  OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and 
 Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
  defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.

  There
  are two *binding*  +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
  to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE  to publish M3 release.


  Plugins repository
  --
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

The several (all?) of the war files in the samples directory tree
contain jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar.
This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in
NOTICE or LICENSE.
IMO this is a blocker.

  Distribution content
  
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/

The binary jar contains a war file which contains jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar.
This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in
NOTICE or LICENSE.
IMO this is a blocker.

The signing key does not have an ASF e-mail address.
Not a blocker, but please fix for the next release candidate.

The source archive has a slightly odd directory structure, as it has
an extra src/ directory in the path (not a blocker, but consider
removing for the next release)

Not quite sure what the point of the -all archives is.
As far as I can tell it's just binaries + source; IMO it's unnecessary
to provide a combined archive. And because of the combined archive
stores the source under src/, it contains two copies of all the sample
source files that are in the binary archive. Not a blocker, but is it
worth all the extra disk space (not to mention additional time to
review releases)?  it might make getting votes easier next time if the
all archive was dropped ...).

Also, while I think of it - do the archive names (and top-level dirs)
have to include -distribution-? It makes the name rather long. (not a
blocker, but please consider for the next release).

  SVN Tag
  
  
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/

Trivial typo in NOTICE.txt: This products  = This product 

  The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1
  votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

  [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html

  More information about the project can be found here:

  [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
  [Project Page]: 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
  [Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
  [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

  This vote is open for 72 hours.

  Thanks;


  -- Gurkan





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


  

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

IMO a second RC requires another vote on openwebbeans-...@. Votes
don't carry over (well mine never does) IMO.

Ok. I will create a second round VOTE on dev.

Thanks;

--Gurkan





From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 1:37:51 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu
gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

 This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected 
 Sebb's concerns.

 OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and 
 Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
 defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.

 There
 are two *binding*  +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
 to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE  to publish M3 release.

IMO a second RC requires another vote on openwebbeans-...@. Votes
don't carry over (well mine never does) IMO.

Niall

 Plugins repository
 --
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

 Distribution content
 
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/

 SVN Tag
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/

 The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1
 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

 [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html

 More information about the project can be found here:

 [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
 [Project Page]: 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
 [Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
 [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

 This vote is open for 72 hours.

 Thanks;

 -- Gurkan





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


  

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

[David Crossley]

Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
 
 OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299:
 Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
 defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008. 

(This issue is not a release blocker.)

The phrase ASL-licensed is not correct.

The old license was The Apache Software License, Version 1.1
so i suppose that is where the ASL thing came from.

The current license is Apache License, Version 2.0.

-David

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M3

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hey,

We would like to get one more IPMC VOTE to release!

Why I complained about Incubator Project Release Procedure last time! I
started a release process at September 1 and still we are trying to release
something!

We have already learned those things and rules that how Apache works! We
want to graduate but it requires some more community!

Thanks;

--Gurkan

2009/9/14 Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com

 Hi;


 OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299:
 Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
 defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.

 There are two *binding*  +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@..  We still
 require to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE  to publish M3
 release.


 Plugins repository
 --

 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeanshttp://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

 Distribution content
 

 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/

 SVN Tag
 

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/

 The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1
 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

 [VOTE Thread] :
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html

 More information about the project can be found here:

 [Incubation Status Page ] :
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
 [Project Page]:
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
 [Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
 [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

 This vote is open for 72 hours.

 Thanks;

 -- Gurkan








-- 
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M3

[Niall Pemberton]

+1

Niall

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;


 OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299:
 Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
 defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.

 There are two *binding*  +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require 
 to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE  to publish M3 release.


 Plugins repository
 --
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

 Distribution content
 
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/

 SVN Tag
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/

 The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1
 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

 [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html

 More information about the project can be found here:

 [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
 [Project Page]            : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
 [Wiki Page]               : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
 [Blog]                    : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

 This vote is open for 72 hours.

 Thanks;

 -- Gurkan





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M3

[sebb]

On 14/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;


  OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299:
  Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
  defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.

  There are two *binding*  +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require 
 to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE  to publish M3 release.


  Plugins repository
  --
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

  Distribution content
  
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/

The sigs are OK, however the public key says:

Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com

There is no ASF e-mail attached to the key.
Also, I could not fetch the key from the MIT PGP server.
(blocking)

The key should really be signed by some other ASF people to tie it in
to a Web of Trust
(not blocking)

The NOTICE file refers to various items of 3rd party software using
the phrase includes/uses.
The file should only be used for required notices, and a notice is not
required if the software is not physically included in the archive.
The /uses part should be removed.
Also, as far as I can tell, JUnit is not included in the distribution,
so should not be mentioned in the NOTICE file.
(blocking)

Also, the LICENSE file includes various licenses, but does not say to
what they apply.
(blocking)

  SVN Tag
  
  
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/

Some SVN property problems (not blocking):

svn ps svn:eol-style native
atinject-api/src/main/java/javax/inject/Provider.java
svn pd svn:executable
webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/context/ApplicationScoped.java
svn pd svn:executable
webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/context/ContextNotActiveException.java
svn pd svn:executable
webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/context/ConversationScoped.java
svn pd svn:executable
webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/context/Dependent.java
svn pd svn:executable
webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/inject/Disposes.java


  The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1
  votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

  [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html

  More information about the project can be found here:

  [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
  [Project Page]: 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
  [Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
  [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

  This vote is open for 72 hours.

  Thanks;


  -- Gurkan





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M3

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

There is no ASF e-mail attached to the key.
Also, I could not fetch the key from the MIT PGP server.
(blocking)

The key should really be signed by some other ASF people to tie it in
to a Web of Trust
(not blocking)
I always published other releases with this public key. You can look at it
at http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Gurkan+Erdogduop=index

The NOTICE file refers to various items of 3rd party software using
the phrase includes/uses.
The file should only be used for required notices, and a notice is not
required if the software is not physically included in the archive.
The /uses part should be removed.
Also, as far as I can tell, JUnit is not included in the distribution,
so should not be mentioned in the NOTICE file.
(blocking)
Alswhat they apply.
Last time I corrected NOTICE /LICENCE file that you commented at M2 release.
It does not changed since M2 release.

--Gurkan


2009/9/17 sebb seb...@gmail.com

 On 14/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
  Hi;
 
 
   OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299:
   Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
   defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26,
 2008.
 
   There are two *binding*  +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@..  We still
 require to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE  to publish M3
 release.
 
 
   Plugins repository
   --
 
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeanshttp://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
 
   Distribution content
   
 
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/

 The sigs are OK, however the public key says:

 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com

 There is no ASF e-mail attached to the key.
 Also, I could not fetch the key from the MIT PGP server.
 (blocking)

 The key should really be signed by some other ASF people to tie it in
 to a Web of Trust
 (not blocking)

 The NOTICE file refers to various items of 3rd party software using
 the phrase includes/uses.
 The file should only be used for required notices, and a notice is not
 required if the software is not physically included in the archive.
 The /uses part should be removed.
 Also, as far as I can tell, JUnit is not included in the distribution,
 so should not be mentioned in the NOTICE file.
 (blocking)

 Also, the LICENSE file includes various licenses, but does not say to
 what they apply.
 (blocking)

   SVN Tag
   
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/

 Some SVN property problems (not blocking):

 svn ps svn:eol-style native
 atinject-api/src/main/java/javax/inject/Provider.java
 svn pd svn:executable
 webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/context/ApplicationScoped.java
 svn pd svn:executable

 webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/context/ContextNotActiveException.java
 svn pd svn:executable
 webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/context/ConversationScoped.java
 svn pd svn:executable
 webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/context/Dependent.java
 svn pd svn:executable
 webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/inject/Disposes.java


   The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five*
 +1
   votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.
 
   [VOTE Thread] :
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html
 
   More information about the project can be found here:
 
   [Incubation Status Page ] :
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
   [Project Page]:
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
   [Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
   [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/
 
   This vote is open for 72 hours.
 
   Thanks;
 
 
   -- Gurkan
 
 
 
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-- 
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com

[VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is
successful.

There are three +1 binding

+1 Votes
-
* Kevan Miller (binding)
* Matthias Wessendorf (binding)
* Niall Pemberton (binding)


I will add distribution artifacts to the  incubator dist/  place and
upload to m3-incubator-repository

Thanks to all;

-- Gurkan

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

[Niall Pemberton]

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi;

 The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is
 successful.

 There are three +1 binding

The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
vote.

Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to
provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate
regardless of their geographic locations.
from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

The community then tries to gather consensus on an alternative
proposal that resolves the issue. In the great majority of cases, the
concerns leading to the negative vote can be addressed.
from http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#decision-making

Niall

 +1 Votes
 -
 * Kevan Miller (binding)
 * Matthias Wessendorf (binding)
 * Niall Pemberton (binding)


 I will add distribution artifacts to the  incubator dist/  place and
 upload to m3-incubator-repository

 Thanks to all;

 -- Gurkan


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M3

[sebb]

On 16/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
 There is no ASF e-mail attached to the key.

The key should have some indication that it belongs to an ASF committer.
Just add your ASF e-mail to the key and re-release.

  Also, I could not fetch the key from the MIT PGP server.
  (blocking)

  The key should really be signed by some other ASF people to tie it in
  to a Web of Trust
  (not blocking)

 I always published other releases with this public key. You can look at it
  at http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Gurkan+Erdogduop=index

It's working now - it did not work before (tried twice), so that
objection is removed.


  The NOTICE file refers to various items of 3rd party software using
  the phrase includes/uses.
  The file should only be used for required notices, and a notice is not
  required if the software is not physically included in the archive.
  The /uses part should be removed.
  Also, as far as I can tell, JUnit is not included in the distribution,
  so should not be mentioned in the NOTICE file.
  (blocking)

 Alswhat they apply.
  Last time I corrected NOTICE /LICENCE file that you commented at M2 release.
  It does not changed since M2 release.

Sorry, I must have missed these problems last time round.
But they are blockers IMO.

  --Gurkan


  2009/9/17 sebb seb...@gmail.com


   On 14/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi;
   
   
 OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299:
 Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
 defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26,
   2008.
   
 There are two *binding*  +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@..  We still
   require to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE  to publish M3
   release.
   
   
 Plugins repository
 --
   

  http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeanshttp://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
   
 Distribution content
 
   
   
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/

 
   The sigs are OK, however the public key says:
  
   Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com
  
   There is no ASF e-mail attached to the key.
   Also, I could not fetch the key from the MIT PGP server.
   (blocking)
  
   The key should really be signed by some other ASF people to tie it in
   to a Web of Trust
   (not blocking)
  
   The NOTICE file refers to various items of 3rd party software using
   the phrase includes/uses.
   The file should only be used for required notices, and a notice is not
   required if the software is not physically included in the archive.
   The /uses part should be removed.
   Also, as far as I can tell, JUnit is not included in the distribution,
   so should not be mentioned in the NOTICE file.
   (blocking)
  
   Also, the LICENSE file includes various licenses, but does not say to
   what they apply.
   (blocking)
  
 SVN Tag
 
   
   
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/
  
   Some SVN property problems (not blocking):
  
   svn ps svn:eol-style native
   atinject-api/src/main/java/javax/inject/Provider.java
   svn pd svn:executable
   webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/context/ApplicationScoped.java
   svn pd svn:executable
  
   
 webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/context/ContextNotActiveException.java
   svn pd svn:executable
   webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/context/ConversationScoped.java
   svn pd svn:executable
   webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/context/Dependent.java
   svn pd svn:executable
   webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/inject/Disposes.java
  
  
 The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five*
   +1
 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.
   
 [VOTE Thread] :
   
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html
   
 More information about the project can be found here:
   
 [Incubation Status Page ] :
   http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
 [Project Page]:
   http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
 [Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
 [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/
   
 This vote is open for 72 hours.
   
 Thanks;
   
   
 -- Gurkan

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi Niall;

The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
vote.

Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to
provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate
regardless of their geographic locations.
from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

I have already know those rules!. 

Besides, I was a bit of rush because of waiting too much to release :) 
Otherwise we were not able to release something that our community uses!

Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
vote.

I responded Sebb explanations. I thought that it may not block this release!

If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we 
will try to be perfect :) 

Thanks;

--Gurkan



From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:26:57 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi;

 The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is
 successful.

 There are three +1 binding

The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
vote.

Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to
provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate
regardless of their geographic locations.
from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

The community then tries to gather consensus on an alternative
proposal that resolves the issue. In the great majority of cases, the
concerns leading to the negative vote can be addressed.
from http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#decision-making

Niall

 +1 Votes
 -
 * Kevan Miller (binding)
 * Matthias Wessendorf (binding)
 * Niall Pemberton (binding)


 I will add distribution artifacts to the  incubator dist/  place and
 upload to m3-incubator-repository

 Thanks to all;

 -- Gurkan


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


  

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

I think it is more meaningful to cancel VOTE to apply Sebb concerns and create 
a new release!

Thanks;

--Gurkan





From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 5:01:50 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

Hi Niall;

The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
vote.

Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to
provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate
regardless of their geographic locations.
from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

I have already know those rules!. 

Besides, I was a bit of rush because of waiting too much to release :) 
Otherwise we were not able to release something that our community uses!

Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
vote.

I responded Sebb explanations. I thought that it may not block this release!

If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we 
will try to be perfect :) 

Thanks;

--Gurkan



From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:26:57 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi;

 The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is
 successful.

 There are three +1 binding

The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
vote.

Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to
provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate
regardless of their geographic locations.
from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

The community then tries to gather consensus on an alternative
proposal that resolves the issue. In the great majority of cases, the
concerns leading to the negative vote can be addressed.
from http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#decision-making

Niall

 +1 Votes
 -
 * Kevan Miller (binding)
 * Matthias Wessendorf (binding)
 * Niall Pemberton (binding)


 I will add distribution artifacts to the  incubator dist/  place and
 upload to m3-incubator-repository

 Thanks to all;

 -- Gurkan


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


  

[VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M3

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;


OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299:
Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008. 

There are two *binding*  +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require to 
get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE  to publish M3 release.


Plugins repository 
--
http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

Distribution content

http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/

SVN Tag

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/

The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1
votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

[VOTE Thread] : 
http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html

More information about the project can be found here:

[Incubation Status Page ] : 
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
[Project Page]: 
http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
[Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
[Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

This vote is open for 72 hours. 

Thanks;

-- Gurkan



  

Re: asc.md5 and asc.sha1 (Was: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try))

[Brian Fox]

Agreed, there's no harm here, and they are tiny files. The deploy plugin
adds hashes to all files that pass through it so it would need special logic
to ignore these files.

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,

 On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:21 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
  The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files should be deleted from the plugins
  directory tree before deployment, as they serve no useful purpose.

 These files are automatically produced by the interaction between
 Maven and the Maven GPG plugin. The proper way to get rid of them
 would be to fix this in Maven and/or the GPG plugin. I'm not sure if
 someone is already working on this in.

 Until then I don't see much point in adding special deployment steps
 just to get rid of those files. The extra files cause little damage
 and the cost of a more complicated deployment process or script
 probably outweights the benefits.

 BR,

 Jukka Zitting

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: asc.md5 and asc.sha1 (Was: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try))

[sebb]

On 02/06/2009, Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu wrote:
 Agreed, there's no harm here, and they are tiny files. The deploy plugin
  adds hashes to all files that pass through it so it would need special logic
  to ignore these files.

See wish:

http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEPLOY-73

which was created: 23/Feb/08.

  On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Jukka Zitting 
 jukka.zitt...@gmail.comwrote:


   Hi,
  
   On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:21 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files should be deleted from the plugins
directory tree before deployment, as they serve no useful purpose.
  
   These files are automatically produced by the interaction between
   Maven and the Maven GPG plugin. The proper way to get rid of them
   would be to fix this in Maven and/or the GPG plugin. I'm not sure if
   someone is already working on this in.
  
   Until then I don't see much point in adding special deployment steps
   just to get rid of those files. The extra files cause little damage
   and the cost of a more complicated deployment process or script
   probably outweights the benefits.
  
   BR,
  
   Jukka Zitting
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
  
  


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE][RESULT]Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M2 is successful.

There are three +1 binding  and one non-binding  +0 votes, not  -1.

+1 Votes
-
* Kevan Miller (binding)
* Matthias Wessendorf (binding)
* Ant Elder (binding)

+0 Votes
-
*Sebastian Bazley (non-binding)

I will add distribution artifacts to the  incubator dist/  place and upload 
to m2-incubator-repository

Thanks to all;

-- Gurkan



  

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

[sebb]

I get the following for svn info

URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2
...
Last Changed Rev: 780477
...

So we agree.

==

The top-level NOTICE and LICENSE files are fine now.

The licenses/ directory should now be removed from SVN and the
archives (but that's not a blocker).

Unfortunately, the NOTICE files in the jars are incorrect.

For example openwebbeans-api-1.0.0-incubating-M2.jar/NOTICE:


OpenWebBeans :: WebBeans-API
Copyright 2008-2009 The Apache OpenWebBeans development community

This product includes software developed at
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).


This should be


Apache OpenWebBeans :: WebBeans-API
Copyright 2008-2009 The Apache Software Foundation

This product includes software developed at
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).


Similarly for the Implementation and Specification, Title and Vendor
entries in the Manifest.

I'm afraid these are release blockers; it's vital that the correct
names are used in NOTICE files.

The files guess-1.0.0-incubating-M2.war and
reservation-1.0.0-incubating-M2.war both include a copy of
jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar, however this does not appear to be mentioned
in the NOTICE or LICENSE files in the WAR or at the top-level. I could
not find the jar or its LICENSE on the Sun web-site, so this needs to
be double-checked.

The NL files in the WAR files need to be fixed before release.

The POM in the source archives does not agree with the POM in SVN, as
there is a minor difference in the following line:

ZIP: siteId/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/siteId
SVN: siteId/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/siteId

I don't know what the significance of this is.

There are still some missing SVN eol-style properties in SVN:

svn ps svn:eol-style native webbeans-api/src/site/site.xml
svn ps svn:eol-style native webbeans-api/src/site/apt/index.apt
svn ps svn:eol-style native webbeans-impl/src/it/settings.xml
svn ps svn:eol-style native webbeans-impl/src/it/properties/pom.xml
svn ps svn:eol-style native
webbeans-impl/src/it/properties/src/test/java/org/apache/webbeans/test/spi/configuration/ConfigurationTest.java
svn ps svn:eol-style native
webbeans-impl/src/it/properties/src/test/resources/META-INF/openwebbeans/openwebbeans.properties
svn ps svn:eol-style native
webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/config/OpenWebBeansConfiguration.java
svn ps svn:eol-style native
webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/container/ChildActivityManager.java
svn ps svn:eol-style native
webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/plugins/OpenWebBeansPlugin.java
svn ps svn:eol-style native
webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/plugins/PluginLoader.java
svn ps svn:eol-style native
webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/spi/JNDIService.java
svn ps svn:eol-style native
webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/spi/ServiceLoader.java
svn ps svn:eol-style native
webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/spi/TransactionService.java
svn ps svn:eol-style native
webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/spi/se/JNDIServiceStaticImpl.java
svn ps svn:eol-style native
webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/spi/se/TransactionServiceNonJTA.java
svn ps svn:eol-style native
webbeans-impl/src/main/resources/META-INF/openwebbeans/openwebbeans-default.properties
svn ps svn:eol-style native webbeans-impl/src/site/site.xml
svn ps svn:eol-style native webbeans-impl/src/site/apt/index.apt
svn ps svn:eol-style native
webbeans-impl/src/test/resources/META-INF/persistence.xml

And there are some files marked as executable which should not be:

svn pd svn:executable samples/guess/src/main/resources/log4j.properties
svn pd svn:executable samples/guess/src/main/resources/META-INF/beans.xml
svn pd svn:executable samples/guess/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/beans.xml
svn pd svn:executable samples/reservation/src/main/resources/log4j.properties
svn pd svn:executable samples/reservation/src/main/resources/META-INF/beans.xml
svn pd svn:executable samples/reservation/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/beans.xml
svn pd svn:executable
webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/context/ApplicationScoped.java
svn pd svn:executable
webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/context/ContextNotActiveException.java
svn pd svn:executable
webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/context/ConversationScoped.java
svn pd svn:executable webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/context/Dependent.java
svn pd svn:executable webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/inject/BindingType.java
svn pd svn:executable webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/inject/Disposes.java
svn pd svn:executable webbeans-geronimo/src/test/resources/log4j.properties
svn pd svn:executable
webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/WebBeansConstants.java
svn pd svn:executable
webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/exception

Re: [VOTE] CANCEL Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

JSF Facelet license is Apache License, Version
2.0.http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Is it still required to mention it in the NL?

So, the remaining blocker issues is

* Notice file content in the jars?
* MANIFEST.mf content? (What will be the content of this?)

Is it OK? I will correct this and create new release tag (rc3) in the
evening.

Thanks sebb;

-- Gurkan



2009/6/1 sebb seb...@gmail.com

 I get the following for svn info

 URL:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2
 ...
 Last Changed Rev: 780477
 ...

 So we agree.

 ==

 The top-level NOTICE and LICENSE files are fine now.

 The licenses/ directory should now be removed from SVN and the
 archives (but that's not a blocker).

 Unfortunately, the NOTICE files in the jars are incorrect.

 For example openwebbeans-api-1.0.0-incubating-M2.jar/NOTICE:

 
 OpenWebBeans :: WebBeans-API
 Copyright 2008-2009 The Apache OpenWebBeans development community

 This product includes software developed at
 The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
 

 This should be

 
 Apache OpenWebBeans :: WebBeans-API
 Copyright 2008-2009 The Apache Software Foundation

 This product includes software developed at
 The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
 

 Similarly for the Implementation and Specification, Title and Vendor
 entries in the Manifest.

 I'm afraid these are release blockers; it's vital that the correct
 names are used in NOTICE files.

 The files guess-1.0.0-incubating-M2.war and
 reservation-1.0.0-incubating-M2.war both include a copy of
 jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar, however this does not appear to be mentioned
 in the NOTICE or LICENSE files in the WAR or at the top-level. I could
 not find the jar or its LICENSE on the Sun web-site, so this needs to
 be double-checked.

 The NL files in the WAR files need to be fixed before release.

 The POM in the source archives does not agree with the POM in SVN, as
 there is a minor difference in the following line:

 ZIP: siteId/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/siteId
 SVN: siteId/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/siteId

 I don't know what the significance of this is.

 There are still some missing SVN eol-style properties in SVN:

 svn ps svn:eol-style native webbeans-api/src/site/site.xml
 svn ps svn:eol-style native webbeans-api/src/site/apt/index.apt
 svn ps svn:eol-style native webbeans-impl/src/it/settings.xml
 svn ps svn:eol-style native webbeans-impl/src/it/properties/pom.xml
 svn ps svn:eol-style native

 webbeans-impl/src/it/properties/src/test/java/org/apache/webbeans/test/spi/configuration/ConfigurationTest.java
 svn ps svn:eol-style native

 webbeans-impl/src/it/properties/src/test/resources/META-INF/openwebbeans/openwebbeans.properties
 svn ps svn:eol-style native

 webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/config/OpenWebBeansConfiguration.java
 svn ps svn:eol-style native

 webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/container/ChildActivityManager.java
 svn ps svn:eol-style native

 webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/plugins/OpenWebBeansPlugin.java
 svn ps svn:eol-style native
 webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/plugins/PluginLoader.java
 svn ps svn:eol-style native
 webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/spi/JNDIService.java
 svn ps svn:eol-style native
 webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/spi/ServiceLoader.java
 svn ps svn:eol-style native
 webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/spi/TransactionService.java
 svn ps svn:eol-style native

 webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/spi/se/JNDIServiceStaticImpl.java
 svn ps svn:eol-style native

 webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/spi/se/TransactionServiceNonJTA.java
 svn ps svn:eol-style native

 webbeans-impl/src/main/resources/META-INF/openwebbeans/openwebbeans-default.properties
 svn ps svn:eol-style native webbeans-impl/src/site/site.xml
 svn ps svn:eol-style native webbeans-impl/src/site/apt/index.apt
 svn ps svn:eol-style native
 webbeans-impl/src/test/resources/META-INF/persistence.xml

 And there are some files marked as executable which should not be:

 svn pd svn:executable samples/guess/src/main/resources/log4j.properties
 svn pd svn:executable samples/guess/src/main/resources/META-INF/beans.xml
 svn pd svn:executable samples/guess/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/beans.xml
 svn pd svn:executable
 samples/reservation/src/main/resources/log4j.properties
 svn pd svn:executable
 samples/reservation/src/main/resources/META-INF/beans.xml
 svn pd svn:executable samples/reservation/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/beans.xml
 svn pd svn:executable
 webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/context/ApplicationScoped.java
 svn pd svn:executable
 webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/context/ContextNotActiveException.java
 svn pd svn:executable
 webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/context

Re: [VOTE] CANCEL Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

[sebb]

On 01/06/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
 JSF Facelet license is Apache License, Version
  2.0.http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Ah, I found it eventually on http://facelets.dev.java.net/.

[BTW, when I searched for jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar I found it in
various repos; one of them -
http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/com/sun/facelets/jsf-facelets/1.1.14/jsf-facelets-1.1.14.pom
- said it was licensed under CDDL 1.1. Shows that one needs to check
the License as published by the owner.]

  Is it still required to mention it in the NL?

Yes, I think you need to mention http://facelets.dev.java.net/

  So, the remaining blocker issues is

  * Notice file content in the jars?
  * MANIFEST.mf content? (What will be the content of this?)

Instead of:

Implementation-Title: OpenWebBeans :: WebBeans-API
Implementation-Vendor: The Apache OpenWebBeans development community
...
Specification-Title: OpenWebBeans :: WebBeans-API
Specification-Vendor: The Apache OpenWebBeans development community

you need to put

Implementation-Title: Apache OpenWebBeans :: WebBeans-API
Implementation-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
...
Specification-Title: Apache OpenWebBeans :: WebBeans-API
Specification-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation

  Is it OK? I will correct this and create new release tag (rc3) in the
  evening.

I suggest you start a new e-mail for the vote; please include the SVN
tag revision.

  Thanks sebb;

  -- Gurkan



  2009/6/1 sebb seb...@gmail.com

   I get the following for svn info
  
   URL:
   
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2
   ...
   Last Changed Rev: 780477
   ...
  
   So we agree.
  
   ==
  
   The top-level NOTICE and LICENSE files are fine now.
  
   The licenses/ directory should now be removed from SVN and the
   archives (but that's not a blocker).
  
   Unfortunately, the NOTICE files in the jars are incorrect.
  
   For example openwebbeans-api-1.0.0-incubating-M2.jar/NOTICE:
  
   
   OpenWebBeans :: WebBeans-API
   Copyright 2008-2009 The Apache OpenWebBeans development community
  
   This product includes software developed at
   The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
   
  
   This should be
  
   
   Apache OpenWebBeans :: WebBeans-API
   Copyright 2008-2009 The Apache Software Foundation
  
   This product includes software developed at
   The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
   
  
   Similarly for the Implementation and Specification, Title and Vendor
   entries in the Manifest.
  
   I'm afraid these are release blockers; it's vital that the correct
   names are used in NOTICE files.
  
   The files guess-1.0.0-incubating-M2.war and
   reservation-1.0.0-incubating-M2.war both include a copy of
   jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar, however this does not appear to be mentioned
   in the NOTICE or LICENSE files in the WAR or at the top-level. I could
   not find the jar or its LICENSE on the Sun web-site, so this needs to
   be double-checked.
  
   The NL files in the WAR files need to be fixed before release.
  
   The POM in the source archives does not agree with the POM in SVN, as
   there is a minor difference in the following line:
  
   ZIP: siteId/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/siteId
   SVN: siteId/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/siteId
  
   I don't know what the significance of this is.
  
   There are still some missing SVN eol-style properties in SVN:
  
   svn ps svn:eol-style native webbeans-api/src/site/site.xml
   svn ps svn:eol-style native webbeans-api/src/site/apt/index.apt
   svn ps svn:eol-style native webbeans-impl/src/it/settings.xml
   svn ps svn:eol-style native webbeans-impl/src/it/properties/pom.xml
   svn ps svn:eol-style native
  
   
 webbeans-impl/src/it/properties/src/test/java/org/apache/webbeans/test/spi/configuration/ConfigurationTest.java
   svn ps svn:eol-style native
  
   
 webbeans-impl/src/it/properties/src/test/resources/META-INF/openwebbeans/openwebbeans.properties
   svn ps svn:eol-style native
  
   
 webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/config/OpenWebBeansConfiguration.java
   svn ps svn:eol-style native
  
   
 webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/container/ChildActivityManager.java
   svn ps svn:eol-style native
  
   
 webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/plugins/OpenWebBeansPlugin.java
   svn ps svn:eol-style native
   webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/plugins/PluginLoader.java
   svn ps svn:eol-style native
   webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/spi/JNDIService.java
   svn ps svn:eol-style native
   webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/spi/ServiceLoader.java
   svn ps svn:eol-style native
   webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/spi/TransactionService.java
   svn ps svn:eol-style native
  
   
 webbeans-impl/src/main/java

[VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try)

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

I have corrected  the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs.

OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans 
Specification which is defined as JSR-299.

Proposed released artifacts are:

Plugins repository
--
http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc3/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

Distribution content

http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc3/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/

SVN Tag


Last Changed Rev: 780720
Last Changed Date: 2009-06-01 19:48:02 +0300 (Mon, 01 Jun 2009)

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-RC3/

The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three +1
votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

[VOTES]
Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC)
Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC)
Mark Struberg  +1 (PPMC)

[VOTE Thread] : 
http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html

More information about the project can be found here:
[Incubation Status Page ] : 
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
[Project Page] : 
http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
[Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
[Blog] : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

Thanks;

-- Gurkan



  

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try)

[sebb]

+0

Two files don't have AL headers:

openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml
samples-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml

I'm not sure what these files are for.

The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files should be deleted from the plugins
directory tree before deployment, as they serve no useful purpose.

The licenses/ directory should be deleted from SVN as it is no longer needed.

On 01/06/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

  I have corrected  the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs.

  OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans 
 Specification which is defined as JSR-299.

  Proposed released artifacts are:

  Plugins repository
  --
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc3/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

  Distribution content
  
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc3/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/

  SVN Tag
  

  Last Changed Rev: 780720
  Last Changed Date: 2009-06-01 19:48:02 +0300 (Mon, 01 Jun 2009)

  
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-RC3/

  The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three +1
  votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

  [VOTES]
  Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC)
  Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC)
  Mark Struberg  +1 (PPMC)

  [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html

  More information about the project can be found here:
  [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
  [Project Page] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
  [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
  [Blog] : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

  Thanks;


  -- Gurkan





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try)

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Now,

Kevan Miller (+1 Binding)
Matthias Wessendorf (+1 Binding)
Sebastian Bazley (+ 0 Binding)

Is the above votes enough to create release ? Or one more +1 is still necessary 
?

-- Gurkan






From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 10:21:09 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try)

+0

Two files don't have AL headers:

openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml
samples-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml

I'm not sure what these files are for.

The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files should be deleted from the plugins
directory tree before deployment, as they serve no useful purpose.

The licenses/ directory should be deleted from SVN as it is no longer needed.

On 01/06/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

  I have corrected  the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs.

  OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans 
 Specification which is defined as JSR-299.

  Proposed released artifacts are:

  Plugins repository
  --
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc3/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

  Distribution content
  
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc3/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/

  SVN Tag
  

  Last Changed Rev: 780720
  Last Changed Date: 2009-06-01 19:48:02 +0300 (Mon, 01 Jun 2009)

  
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-RC3/

  The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three +1
  votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

  [VOTES]
  Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC)
  Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC)
  Mark Struberg  +1 (PPMC)

  [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html

  More information about the project can be found here:
  [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
  [Project Page] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
  [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
  [Blog] : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

  Thanks;


  -- Gurkan





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


  

asc.md5 and asc.sha1 (Was: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try))

[Jukka Zitting]

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:21 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
 The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files should be deleted from the plugins
 directory tree before deployment, as they serve no useful purpose.

These files are automatically produced by the interaction between
Maven and the Maven GPG plugin. The proper way to get rid of them
would be to fix this in Maven and/or the GPG plugin. I'm not sure if
someone is already working on this in.

Until then I don't see much point in adding special deployment steps
just to get rid of those files. The extra files cause little damage
and the cost of a more complicated deployment process or script
probably outweights the benefits.

BR,

Jukka Zitting

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try)

[sebb]

On 01/06/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Now,

  Kevan Miller (+1 Binding)
  Matthias Wessendorf (+1 Binding)
  Sebastian Bazley (+ 0 Binding)

Mine is not binding.

  Is the above votes enough to create release ? Or one more +1 is still 
 necessary ?

  -- Gurkan





  
  From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
  To: general@incubator.apache.org
  Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 10:21:09 PM
  Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try)


  +0

  Two files don't have AL headers:

  openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml
  samples-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml

  I'm not sure what these files are for.

  The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files should be deleted from the plugins
  directory tree before deployment, as they serve no useful purpose.

  The licenses/ directory should be deleted from SVN as it is no longer needed.

  On 01/06/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
   Hi;
  
I have corrected  the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below 
 URLs.
  
OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans 
 Specification which is defined as JSR-299.
  
Proposed released artifacts are:
  
Plugins repository
--

 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc3/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
  
Distribution content


 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc3/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/
  
SVN Tag

  
Last Changed Rev: 780720
Last Changed Date: 2009-06-01 19:48:02 +0300 (Mon, 01 Jun 2009)
  

 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-RC3/
  
The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three +1
votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.
  
[VOTES]
Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC)
Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC)
Mark Struberg  +1 (PPMC)
  
[VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html
  
More information about the project can be found here:
[Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
[Project Page] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
[Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
[Blog] : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/
  
Thanks;
  
  
-- Gurkan
  
  
  
  


 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try)

[Matthias Wessendorf]

I think the vote is still up...

@Incubator folks: please review the bit. Kevan and I already voted +1 ...

-M

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Now,

 Kevan Miller (+1 Binding)
 Matthias Wessendorf (+1 Binding)
 Sebastian Bazley (+ 0 Binding)

 Is the above votes enough to create release ? Or one more +1 is still 
 necessary ?

 -- Gurkan





 
 From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 10:21:09 PM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try)

 +0

 Two files don't have AL headers:

 openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml
 samples-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml

 I'm not sure what these files are for.

 The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files should be deleted from the plugins
 directory tree before deployment, as they serve no useful purpose.

 The licenses/ directory should be deleted from SVN as it is no longer needed.

 On 01/06/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

  I have corrected  the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs.

  OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans 
 Specification which is defined as JSR-299.

  Proposed released artifacts are:

  Plugins repository
  --
  http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc3/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

  Distribution content
  
  http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc3/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/

  SVN Tag
  

  Last Changed Rev: 780720
  Last Changed Date: 2009-06-01 19:48:02 +0300 (Mon, 01 Jun 2009)

  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-RC3/

  The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three +1
  votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

  [VOTES]
  Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC)
  Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC)
  Mark Struberg  +1 (PPMC)

  [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html

  More information about the project can be found here:
  [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
  [Project Page]                 : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
  [Wiki Page]                     : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
  [Blog]                             : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

  Thanks;


  -- Gurkan





 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org






-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try)

[ant elder]

+1

 ...ant

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
 I think the vote is still up...

 @Incubator folks: please review the bit. Kevan and I already voted +1 ...

 -M

 On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com 
 wrote:
 Now,

 Kevan Miller (+1 Binding)
 Matthias Wessendorf (+1 Binding)
 Sebastian Bazley (+ 0 Binding)

 Is the above votes enough to create release ? Or one more +1 is still 
 necessary ?

 -- Gurkan





 
 From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 10:21:09 PM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try)

 +0

 Two files don't have AL headers:

 openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml
 samples-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml

 I'm not sure what these files are for.

 The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files should be deleted from the plugins
 directory tree before deployment, as they serve no useful purpose.

 The licenses/ directory should be deleted from SVN as it is no longer needed.

 On 01/06/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

  I have corrected  the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs.

  OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans 
 Specification which is defined as JSR-299.

  Proposed released artifacts are:

  Plugins repository
  --
  http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc3/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

  Distribution content
  
  http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc3/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/

  SVN Tag
  

  Last Changed Rev: 780720
  Last Changed Date: 2009-06-01 19:48:02 +0300 (Mon, 01 Jun 2009)

  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-RC3/

  The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three +1
  votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

  [VOTES]
  Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC)
  Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC)
  Mark Struberg  +1 (PPMC)

  [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html

  More information about the project can be found here:
  [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
  [Project Page]                 : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
  [Wiki Page]                     : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
  [Blog]                             : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

  Thanks;


  -- Gurkan





 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org






 --
 Matthias Wessendorf

 blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
 sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
 twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no purpose.

The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using
1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have
1.0.0-incubating-M2

This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from
the wrong SVN checkout.

OK, I will correct those.

There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.

When we created these file, we got help from our mentors. So we corrected those 
files in the M1 release repeatedly. If you look at the for example, Geronimo 
NOTICE file, it really like to OWB.  I attached Geronimo NOTICE file for 
example.

We have included *licenses* folder to hold third party license texts to ease 
reading of the third party licenses. Is it really necessary to put all of these 
text lines into the LICENCE text? Is it really block release?


Thanks;

--- Gurkan






From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:36:12 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

  OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans 
 Specification which is defined as JSR-299.

  Proposed released artifacts are:

  Plugins repository
  --
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

I've not checked these.

  Distribution content
  
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/

The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no purpose.

The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using
1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have
1.0.0-incubating-M2

This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from
the wrong SVN checkout.

The source archives have an additional top-level src/ directory which
is not usual.

Normally this is included in the parent, e.g.

apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2-src

rather than

apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2/src

This is not a release-blocker.

  SVN Tag
  
  
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/

There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.

The NOTICE file must start with:

Apache OpenWebBeans
Copyright 2008, 2009 The Apache Software Foundation

The preceeding 4 lines need to be removed.
Also, the NOTICE file is much too long, it should be used for required
elements only, so remove any references to other ASF projects and all
the headers enclosed in ==

Some of the other entries include too much data.

The LICENSES file only contains the Apache License. It must contain
all the required licenses.

These are both release blockers.

There is at least one file in SVN with inconsistent line-endings:

svn pl -v openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/samples/guess
Properties on 'openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2\samples\guess':
svn: Inconsistent line ending style

It looks like the svn:eol-style properties are missing from a lot of files.

This makes it difficult to use the code except on OSes with the same
EOL as the file happens to be.

This ought to be fixed before creating any new tags, because the tags
cannot be fixed later.

  The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three +1
  votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

My vote is -1, based on the problems with the N  L files, and the
incorrect version in the pom.xml

  [VOTES]
  Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC)
  Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC)
  Mark Struberg  +1 (PPMC)

  [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html

  More information about the project can be found here:
  [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
  [Project Page] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
  [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
  [Blog] : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

  Thanks;


  Gurkan Erdogdu





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


  =
==  NOTICE file corresponding to section 4(d) of the Apache License,   ==
==  Version 2.0, in this case for the Apache Geronimo distribution.==
=

Apache Geronimo 
Copyright 2003-2009 The Apache Software Foundation

This product includes software

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

[sebb]

On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:


 The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no
 purpose.

 The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are
 using
 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have
 1.0.0-incubating-M2

 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from
 the wrong SVN checkout.

 OK, I will correct those.

 There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.

 When we created these file, we got help from our mentors. So we corrected
 those files in the M1 release repeatedly. If you look at the for example,
 Geronimo NOTICE file, it really like to OWB.  I attached Geronimo NOTICE
 file for example.

I'm afraid that NOTICE file is wrong as well.

See:

http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#notice-content
and
http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-examplenotice

 We have included *licenses* folder to hold third party license texts to
 ease reading of the third party licenses. Is it really necessary to put all
 of these text lines into the LICENCE text? Is it really block release?


Yes, the user must be able to find all the licences by checking the
LICENSE file.

See:

http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses

 Thanks;

 --- Gurkan


 
 From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:36:12 PM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

  On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
  Hi;
 
   OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans
 Specification which is defined as JSR-299.
 
   Proposed released artifacts are:
 
   Plugins repository
   --
 
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

 I've not checked these.

   Distribution content
   
 
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/

 The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no
 purpose.

 The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using
 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have
 1.0.0-incubating-M2

 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from
 the wrong SVN checkout.

 The source archives have an additional top-level src/ directory which
 is not usual.

 Normally this is included in the parent, e.g.

 apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2-src

 rather than

 apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2/src

 This is not a release-blocker.

   SVN Tag
   
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/

 There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.

 The NOTICE file must start with:

 Apache OpenWebBeans
 Copyright 2008, 2009 The Apache Software Foundation

 The preceeding 4 lines need to be removed.
 Also, the NOTICE file is much too long, it should be used for required
 elements only, so remove any references to other ASF projects and all
 the headers enclosed in ==

 Some of the other entries include too much data.

 The LICENSES file only contains the Apache License. It must contain
 all the required licenses.

 These are both release blockers.

 There is at least one file in SVN with inconsistent line-endings:

 svn pl -v openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/samples/guess
 Properties on
 'openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2\samples\guess':
 svn: Inconsistent line ending style

 It looks like the svn:eol-style properties are missing from a lot of files.

 This makes it difficult to use the code except on OSes with the same
 EOL as the file happens to be.

 This ought to be fixed before creating any new tags, because the tags
 cannot be fixed later.

   The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three
 +1
   votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

 My vote is -1, based on the problems with the N  L files, and the
 incorrect version in the pom.xml

   [VOTES]
   Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC)
   Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC)
   Mark Struberg  +1 (PPMC)
 
   [VOTE Thread] :
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html
 
   More information about the project can be found here:
   [Incubation Status Page ] :
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
   [Project Page]:
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
   [Wiki Page]: http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
   [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/
 
   Thanks;
 
 
   Gurkan Erdogdu

Re: [VOTE] CANCEL Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

 I will re-tag the releases and artifacts after correcting the errors.

--Gurkan





From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 2:38:07 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:


 The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no
 purpose.

 The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are
 using
 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have
 1.0.0-incubating-M2

 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from
 the wrong SVN checkout.

 OK, I will correct those.

 There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.

 When we created these file, we got help from our mentors. So we corrected
 those files in the M1 release repeatedly. If you look at the for example,
 Geronimo NOTICE file, it really like to OWB.  I attached Geronimo NOTICE
 file for example.

I'm afraid that NOTICE file is wrong as well.

See:

http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#notice-content
and
http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-examplenotice

 We have included *licenses* folder to hold third party license texts to
 ease reading of the third party licenses. Is it really necessary to put all
 of these text lines into the LICENCE text? Is it really block release?


Yes, the user must be able to find all the licences by checking the
LICENSE file.

See:

http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses

 Thanks;

 --- Gurkan


 
 From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:36:12 PM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

  On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
  Hi;
 
   OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans
 Specification which is defined as JSR-299.
 
   Proposed released artifacts are:
 
   Plugins repository
   --
 
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

 I've not checked these.

   Distribution content
   
 
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/

 The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no
 purpose.

 The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using
 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have
 1.0.0-incubating-M2

 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from
 the wrong SVN checkout.

 The source archives have an additional top-level src/ directory which
 is not usual.

 Normally this is included in the parent, e.g.

 apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2-src

 rather than

 apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2/src

 This is not a release-blocker.

   SVN Tag
   
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/

 There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.

 The NOTICE file must start with:

 Apache OpenWebBeans
 Copyright 2008, 2009 The Apache Software Foundation

 The preceeding 4 lines need to be removed.
 Also, the NOTICE file is much too long, it should be used for required
 elements only, so remove any references to other ASF projects and all
 the headers enclosed in ==

 Some of the other entries include too much data.

 The LICENSES file only contains the Apache License. It must contain
 all the required licenses.

 These are both release blockers.

 There is at least one file in SVN with inconsistent line-endings:

 svn pl -v openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/samples/guess
 Properties on
 'openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2\samples\guess':
 svn: Inconsistent line ending style

 It looks like the svn:eol-style properties are missing from a lot of files.

 This makes it difficult to use the code except on OSes with the same
 EOL as the file happens to be.

 This ought to be fixed before creating any new tags, because the tags
 cannot be fixed later.

   The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three
 +1
   votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

 My vote is -1, based on the problems with the N  L files, and the
 incorrect version in the pom.xml

   [VOTES]
   Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC)
   Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC)
   Mark Struberg  +1 (PPMC)
 
   [VOTE Thread] :
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html
 
   More information about the project can be found here:
   [Incubation Status Page ] :
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
   [Project Page]:
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

I have corrected the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs.

Plugins repository
--
http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

Distribution content

http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/

SVN New Tag

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/

thanks;

--Gurkan






From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 2:38:07 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:


 The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no
 purpose.

 The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are
 using
 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have
 1.0.0-incubating-M2

 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from
 the wrong SVN checkout.

 OK, I will correct those.

 There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.

 When we created these file, we got help from our mentors. So we corrected
 those files in the M1 release repeatedly. If you look at the for example,
 Geronimo NOTICE file, it really like to OWB.  I attached Geronimo NOTICE
 file for example.

I'm afraid that NOTICE file is wrong as well.

See:

http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#notice-content
and
http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-examplenotice

 We have included *licenses* folder to hold third party license texts to
 ease reading of the third party licenses. Is it really necessary to put all
 of these text lines into the LICENCE text? Is it really block release?


Yes, the user must be able to find all the licences by checking the
LICENSE file.

See:

http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses

 Thanks;

 --- Gurkan


 
 From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:36:12 PM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

  On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
  Hi;
 
   OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans
 Specification which is defined as JSR-299.
 
   Proposed released artifacts are:
 
   Plugins repository
   --
 
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

 I've not checked these.

   Distribution content
   
 
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/

 The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no
 purpose.

 The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using
 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have
 1.0.0-incubating-M2

 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from
 the wrong SVN checkout.

 The source archives have an additional top-level src/ directory which
 is not usual.

 Normally this is included in the parent, e.g.

 apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2-src

 rather than

 apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2/src

 This is not a release-blocker.

   SVN Tag
   
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/

 There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.

 The NOTICE file must start with:

 Apache OpenWebBeans
 Copyright 2008, 2009 The Apache Software Foundation

 The preceeding 4 lines need to be removed.
 Also, the NOTICE file is much too long, it should be used for required
 elements only, so remove any references to other ASF projects and all
 the headers enclosed in ==

 Some of the other entries include too much data.

 The LICENSES file only contains the Apache License. It must contain
 all the required licenses.

 These are both release blockers.

 There is at least one file in SVN with inconsistent line-endings:

 svn pl -v openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/samples/guess
 Properties on
 'openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2\samples\guess':
 svn: Inconsistent line ending style

 It looks like the svn:eol-style properties are missing from a lot of files.

 This makes it difficult to use the code except on OSes with the same
 EOL as the file happens to be.

 This ought to be fixed before creating any new tags, because the tags
 cannot be fixed later.

   The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three
 +1
   votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

[sebb]

On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

  I have corrected the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs.

  Plugins repository
  --
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

  Distribution content
  
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/

  SVN New Tag
  
  
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/

You appear to have re-used the same tag name.
Tags are normally supposed to be immutable, otherwise there is no
means of knowing what files they relate to.

Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag.
[The combination of the revision and the tag allows the files to be
uniquely identified, thus getting round the problem of the mutable
tag]

  thanks;

  --Gurkan





  
  From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
  To: general@incubator.apache.org
  Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 2:38:07 PM
  Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

  On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
  
  
   The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no
   purpose.
  
   The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are
   using
   1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have
   1.0.0-incubating-M2
  
   This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from
   the wrong SVN checkout.
  
   OK, I will correct those.
  
   There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.
  
   When we created these file, we got help from our mentors. So we corrected
   those files in the M1 release repeatedly. If you look at the for example,
   Geronimo NOTICE file, it really like to OWB.  I attached Geronimo NOTICE
   file for example.

  I'm afraid that NOTICE file is wrong as well.

  See:

  http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#notice-content
  and
  http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
  http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-examplenotice

   We have included *licenses* folder to hold third party license texts to
   ease reading of the third party licenses. Is it really necessary to put all
   of these text lines into the LICENCE text? Is it really block release?
  

  Yes, the user must be able to find all the licences by checking the
  LICENSE file.

  See:

  
 http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses

   Thanks;
  
   --- Gurkan
  
  
   
   From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
   To: general@incubator.apache.org
   Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:36:12 PM
   Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2
  
On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi;
   
 OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans
   Specification which is defined as JSR-299.
   
 Proposed released artifacts are:
   
 Plugins repository
 --
   
   
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
  
   I've not checked these.
  
 Distribution content
 
   
   
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/
  
   The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no
   purpose.
  
   The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using
   1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have
   1.0.0-incubating-M2
  
   This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from
   the wrong SVN checkout.
  
   The source archives have an additional top-level src/ directory which
   is not usual.
  
   Normally this is included in the parent, e.g.
  
   apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2-src
  
   rather than
  
   apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2/src
  
   This is not a release-blocker.
  
 SVN Tag
 
   
   
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/
  
   There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.
  
   The NOTICE file must start with:
  
   Apache OpenWebBeans
   Copyright 2008, 2009 The Apache Software Foundation
  
   The preceeding 4 lines need to be removed.
   Also, the NOTICE file is much too long, it should be used for required
   elements only, so remove any references to other ASF projects and all
   the headers enclosed in ==
  
   Some of the other entries include too much data.
  
   The LICENSES file only contains the Apache License. It must contain
   all

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag.

Current Tag Revision is 780496

Thanks;





From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:06:00 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

  I have corrected the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs.

  Plugins repository
  --
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

  Distribution content
  
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/

  SVN New Tag
  
  
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/

You appear to have re-used the same tag name.
Tags are normally supposed to be immutable, otherwise there is no
means of knowing what files they relate to.

Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag.
[The combination of the revision and the tag allows the files to be
uniquely identified, thus getting round the problem of the mutable
tag]

  thanks;

  --Gurkan





  
  From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
  To: general@incubator.apache.org
  Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 2:38:07 PM
  Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

  On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
  
  
   The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no
   purpose.
  
   The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are
   using
   1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have
   1.0.0-incubating-M2
  
   This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from
   the wrong SVN checkout.
  
   OK, I will correct those.
  
   There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.
  
   When we created these file, we got help from our mentors. So we corrected
   those files in the M1 release repeatedly. If you look at the for example,
   Geronimo NOTICE file, it really like to OWB.  I attached Geronimo NOTICE
   file for example.

  I'm afraid that NOTICE file is wrong as well.

  See:

  http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#notice-content
  and
  http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
  http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-examplenotice

   We have included *licenses* folder to hold third party license texts to
   ease reading of the third party licenses. Is it really necessary to put all
   of these text lines into the LICENCE text? Is it really block release?
  

  Yes, the user must be able to find all the licences by checking the
  LICENSE file.

  See:

  
 http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses

   Thanks;
  
   --- Gurkan
  
  
   
   From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
   To: general@incubator.apache.org
   Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:36:12 PM
   Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2
  
On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi;
   
 OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans
   Specification which is defined as JSR-299.
   
 Proposed released artifacts are:
   
 Plugins repository
 --
   
   
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
  
   I've not checked these.
  
 Distribution content
 
   
   
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/
  
   The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no
   purpose.
  
   The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using
   1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have
   1.0.0-incubating-M2
  
   This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from
   the wrong SVN checkout.
  
   The source archives have an additional top-level src/ directory which
   is not usual.
  
   Normally this is included in the parent, e.g.
  
   apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2-src
  
   rather than
  
   apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2/src
  
   This is not a release-blocker.
  
 SVN Tag
 
   
   
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/
  
   There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.
  
   The NOTICE file must start with:
  
   Apache OpenWebBeans
   Copyright 2008, 2009 The Apache Software Foundation
  
   The preceeding 4 lines need to be removed

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag.

Current Tag Revision is 780496

Sorry  I have given wrong revision. Current M2 tag is created based on version  
At revision 780504

-- Gurkan





From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:25:14 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag.

Current Tag Revision is 780496

Thanks;





From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:06:00 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

  I have corrected the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs.

  Plugins repository
  --
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

  Distribution content
  
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/

  SVN New Tag
  
  
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/

You appear to have re-used the same tag name.
Tags are normally supposed to be immutable, otherwise there is no
means of knowing what files they relate to.

Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag.
[The combination of the revision and the tag allows the files to be
uniquely identified, thus getting round the problem of the mutable
tag]

  thanks;

  --Gurkan





  
  From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
  To: general@incubator.apache.org
  Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 2:38:07 PM
  Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

  On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
  
  
   The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no
   purpose.
  
   The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are
   using
   1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have
   1.0.0-incubating-M2
  
   This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from
   the wrong SVN checkout.
  
   OK, I will correct those.
  
   There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.
  
   When we created these file, we got help from our mentors. So we corrected
   those files in the M1 release repeatedly. If you look at the for example,
   Geronimo NOTICE file, it really like to OWB.  I attached Geronimo NOTICE
   file for example.

  I'm afraid that NOTICE file is wrong as well.

  See:

  http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#notice-content
  and
  http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
  http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-examplenotice

   We have included *licenses* folder to hold third party license texts to
   ease reading of the third party licenses. Is it really necessary to put all
   of these text lines into the LICENCE text? Is it really block release?
  

  Yes, the user must be able to find all the licences by checking the
  LICENSE file.

  See:

  
 http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses

   Thanks;
  
   --- Gurkan
  
  
   
   From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
   To: general@incubator.apache.org
   Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:36:12 PM
   Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2
  
On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi;
   
 OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans
   Specification which is defined as JSR-299.
   
 Proposed released artifacts are:
   
 Plugins repository
 --
   
   
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
  
   I've not checked these.
  
 Distribution content
 
   
   
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/
  
   The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no
   purpose.
  
   The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using
   1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have
   1.0.0-incubating-M2
  
   This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from
   the wrong SVN checkout.
  
   The source archives have an additional top-level src/ directory which
   is not usual.
  
   Normally this is included in the parent, e.g.
  
   apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2-src
  
   rather than
  
   apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

[sebb]

On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag.

  Current Tag Revision is 780496


 Sorry  I have given wrong revision. Current M2 tag is created based on 
 version  At revision 780504

Neither of those agree with what I have just downloaded.

What is the Last Changed Rev: ?

That should be the same as revision in the SVN commit message.

  -- Gurkan




  
  From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com

 To: general@incubator.apache.org

 Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:25:14 PM

 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

  Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag.

  Current Tag Revision is 780496

  Thanks;




  
  From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
  To: general@incubator.apache.org
  Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:06:00 PM
  Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

  On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
   Hi;
  
I have corrected the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs.
  
Plugins repository
--

 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
  
Distribution content


 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/
  
SVN New Tag


 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/

  You appear to have re-used the same tag name.
  Tags are normally supposed to be immutable, otherwise there is no
  means of knowing what files they relate to.

  Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag.
  [The combination of the revision and the tag allows the files to be
  uniquely identified, thus getting round the problem of the mutable
  tag]

thanks;
  
--Gurkan
  
  
  
  
  

From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 2:38:07 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2
  
On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:


 The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no
 purpose.

 The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are
 using
 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have
 1.0.0-incubating-M2

 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from
 the wrong SVN checkout.

 OK, I will correct those.

 There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.

 When we created these file, we got help from our mentors. So we 
 corrected
 those files in the M1 release repeatedly. If you look at the for 
 example,
 Geronimo NOTICE file, it really like to OWB.  I attached Geronimo NOTICE
 file for example.
  
I'm afraid that NOTICE file is wrong as well.
  
See:
  
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#notice-content
and
http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-examplenotice
  
 We have included *licenses* folder to hold third party license texts 
 to
 ease reading of the third party licenses. Is it really necessary to put 
 all
 of these text lines into the LICENCE text? Is it really block release?

  
Yes, the user must be able to find all the licences by checking the
LICENSE file.
  
See:
  

 http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses
  
 Thanks;

 --- Gurkan


 
 From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:36:12 PM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

  On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
  Hi;
 
   OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans
 Specification which is defined as JSR-299.
 
   Proposed released artifacts are:
 
   Plugins repository
   --
 
 
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

 I've not checked these.

   Distribution content
   
 
 
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/

 The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no
 purpose.

 The POM files in the source archives have

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Sorry I do not understand what you mean. I am also not a svn expert.

I am looking at 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/?pathrev=780504.

When I opened URL, it shows the 

Directory revision: 780477 (of 780556)
Sticky revision : 780504

I think this helps;

But last M2 location is undertags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2. This is the 
last revision. Please VOTE on this.

Thanks;

--Gurkan





From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 1:11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag.

  Current Tag Revision is 780496


 Sorry  I have given wrong revision. Current M2 tag is created based on 
 version  At revision 780504

Neither of those agree with what I have just downloaded.

What is the Last Changed Rev: ?

That should be the same as revision in the SVN commit message.

  -- Gurkan




  
  From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com

 To: general@incubator.apache.org

 Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:25:14 PM

 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

  Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag.

  Current Tag Revision is 780496

  Thanks;




  
  From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
  To: general@incubator.apache.org
  Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:06:00 PM
  Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

  On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
   Hi;
  
I have corrected the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs.
  
Plugins repository
--

 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
  
Distribution content


 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/
  
SVN New Tag


 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/

  You appear to have re-used the same tag name.
  Tags are normally supposed to be immutable, otherwise there is no
  means of knowing what files they relate to.

  Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag.
  [The combination of the revision and the tag allows the files to be
  uniquely identified, thus getting round the problem of the mutable
  tag]

thanks;
  
--Gurkan
  
  
  
  
  

From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 2:38:07 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2
  
On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:


 The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no
 purpose.

 The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are
 using
 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have
 1.0.0-incubating-M2

 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from
 the wrong SVN checkout.

 OK, I will correct those.

 There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.

 When we created these file, we got help from our mentors. So we 
 corrected
 those files in the M1 release repeatedly. If you look at the for 
 example,
 Geronimo NOTICE file, it really like to OWB.  I attached Geronimo NOTICE
 file for example.
  
I'm afraid that NOTICE file is wrong as well.
  
See:
  
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#notice-content
and
http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-examplenotice
  
 We have included *licenses* folder to hold third party license texts 
 to
 ease reading of the third party licenses. Is it really necessary to put 
 all
 of these text lines into the LICENCE text? Is it really block release?

  
Yes, the user must be able to find all the licences by checking the
LICENSE file.
  
See:
  

 http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses
  
 Thanks;

 --- Gurkan


 
 From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:36:12 PM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

  On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
  Hi;
 
   OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans
 Specification which is defined as JSR

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Also this is the commit command

Revision 
*780477*http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revsortby=logsortdir=downrevision=780477-
Directory
Listinghttp://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/?sortby=logsortdir=downpathrev=780477
Modified *Sun May 31 17:28:57 2009 UTC* (12 hours, 13 minutes ago) by *
gerdogdu*
Copied from: 
*incubator/openwebbeans/trunk*http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/trunk?view=logsortby=logsortdir=downpathrev=780474revision
780474

[maven-release-plugin]  copy for tag openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2



2009/6/1 Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com

 Sorry I do not understand what you mean. I am also not a svn expert.

 I am looking at
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/?pathrev=780504
 .

 When I opened URL, it shows the

 Directory revision: 780477 (of 780556)
 Sticky revision : 780504

 I think this helps;

 But last M2 location is undertags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2. This is
 the last revision. Please VOTE on this.

 Thanks;

 --Gurkan




 
 From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 1:11:56 AM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

 On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
  Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag.
 
   Current Tag Revision is 780496
 
 
  Sorry  I have given wrong revision. Current M2 tag is created based on
 version  At revision 780504

 Neither of those agree with what I have just downloaded.

 What is the Last Changed Rev: ?

 That should be the same as revision in the SVN commit message.

   -- Gurkan
 
 
 
 
   
   From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com
 
  To: general@incubator.apache.org
 
  Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:25:14 PM
 
  Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)
 
   Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag.
 
   Current Tag Revision is 780496
 
   Thanks;
 
 
 
 
   
   From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
   To: general@incubator.apache.org
   Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:06:00 PM
   Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)
 
   On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi;
   
 I have corrected the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below
 URLs.
   
 Plugins repository
 --
   
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeanshttp://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
   
 Distribution content
 
   
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/
   
 SVN New Tag
 
   
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/
 
   You appear to have re-used the same tag name.
   Tags are normally supposed to be immutable, otherwise there is no
   means of knowing what files they relate to.
 
   Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag.
   [The combination of the revision and the tag allows the files to be
   uniquely identified, thus getting round the problem of the mutable
   tag]
 
 thanks;
   
 --Gurkan
   
   
   
   
   
 
 From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 2:38:07 PM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2
   
 On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
 
  The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve
 no
  purpose.
 
  The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they
 are
  using
  1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have
  1.0.0-incubating-M2
 
  This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built
 from
  the wrong SVN checkout.
 
  OK, I will correct those.
 
  There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.
 
  When we created these file, we got help from our mentors. So we
 corrected
  those files in the M1 release repeatedly. If you look at the for
 example,
  Geronimo NOTICE file, it really like to OWB.  I attached Geronimo
 NOTICE
  file for example.
   
 I'm afraid that NOTICE file is wrong as well.
   
 See:
   
 http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#notice-content

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

[sebb]

On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

  OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans 
 Specification which is defined as JSR-299.

  Proposed released artifacts are:

  Plugins repository
  --
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

I've not checked these.

  Distribution content
  
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/

The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no purpose.

The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using
1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have
1.0.0-incubating-M2

This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from
the wrong SVN checkout.

The source archives have an additional top-level src/ directory which
is not usual.

Normally this is included in the parent, e.g.

apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2-src

rather than

apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2/src

This is not a release-blocker.

  SVN Tag
  
  
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/

There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.

The NOTICE file must start with:

Apache OpenWebBeans
Copyright 2008, 2009 The Apache Software Foundation

The preceeding 4 lines need to be removed.
Also, the NOTICE file is much too long, it should be used for required
elements only, so remove any references to other ASF projects and all
the headers enclosed in ==

Some of the other entries include too much data.

The LICENSES file only contains the Apache License. It must contain
all the required licenses.

These are both release blockers.

There is at least one file in SVN with inconsistent line-endings:

svn pl -v openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/samples/guess
Properties on 'openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2\samples\guess':
svn: Inconsistent line ending style

It looks like the svn:eol-style properties are missing from a lot of files.

This makes it difficult to use the code except on OSes with the same
EOL as the file happens to be.

This ought to be fixed before creating any new tags, because the tags
cannot be fixed later.

  The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three +1
  votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

My vote is -1, based on the problems with the N  L files, and the
incorrect version in the pom.xml

  [VOTES]
  Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC)
  Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC)
  Mark Struberg  +1 (PPMC)

  [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html

  More information about the project can be found here:
  [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
  [Project Page] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
  [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
  [Blog] : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

  Thanks;


  Gurkan Erdogdu





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi folks;

We require one more binding vote to publish release.

Thanks;

-- Gurkan

2009/5/26 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org

 +1 (binding)

 -Matthias

 On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
  Hi;
 
  OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans
 Specification which is defined as JSR-299.
 
  Proposed released artifacts are:
 
  Plugins repository
  --
 
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeanshttp://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
 
  Distribution content
  
 
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/
 
  SVN Tag
  
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/
 
  The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three
 +1
  votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.
 
  [VOTES]
  Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC)
  Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC)
  Mark Struberg  +1 (PPMC)
 
  [VOTE Thread] :
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html
 
  More information about the project can be found here:
  [Incubation Status Page ] :
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
  [Project Page] :
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
  [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
  [Blog] : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/
 
  Thanks;
 
  Gurkan Erdogdu
 
 
 
 



 --
 Matthias Wessendorf

 blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
 sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
 twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-- 
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com

[VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans 
Specification which is defined as JSR-299.

Proposed released artifacts are:

Plugins repository 
--
http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

Distribution content

http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/

SVN Tag 

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/

The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three +1
votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

[VOTES]
Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC) 
Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC)
Mark Struberg  +1 (PPMC)

[VOTE Thread] : 
http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html

More information about the project can be found here:
[Incubation Status Page ] : 
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
[Project Page] : 
http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
[Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
[Blog] : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/ 

Thanks;

Gurkan Erdogdu



  

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

[Matthias Wessendorf]

+1 (binding)

-Matthias

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

 OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans 
 Specification which is defined as JSR-299.

 Proposed released artifacts are:

 Plugins repository
 --
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

 Distribution content
 
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/

 SVN Tag
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/

 The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three +1
 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

 [VOTES]
 Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC)
 Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC)
 Mark Struberg  +1 (PPMC)

 [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html

 More information about the project can be found here:
 [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
 [Project Page]                 : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
 [Wiki Page]                     : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
 [Blog]                             : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

 Thanks;

 Gurkan Erdogdu







-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[RELEASE] OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M1

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

Apache Incubator project OpenWebBeans has released first M1 version 
successfully. You could obtain the distribution artifacts from the URL,
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/openwebbeans/.

Thanks to all for helping us in this first release process.

Gurkan Erdogdu



  

[VOTE][RESULT]Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M1

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M1 is successful.

There are three +1 binding votes, not 0 or -1.

+1 Votes
-
* Kevan Miller
* Matthias Wessendorf
* Luciano Resende.

I will add distribution artifacts to the  incubator dist/  place.

Thanks;

Gurkan Erdogdu



  

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M1

[Luciano Resende]

Looks good to me

+1

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Feb 9, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:

 The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *four*
 +1
 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

 Just noting that the *four* +1 votes included two IPMC members (Matthias
 Wessendorf and myself). We'll require one more IPMC member vote, but, of
 course, all reviews/votes are much appreciated.

 --kevan

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org





-- 
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M1

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

Now we have three +1 binding votes for releasing the M1 artifacts.

* Kevan Miller
* Matthias Wessendorf
* Luciano Resende.

[VOTE] will be open for next 24 hours for reviewing by anybody else.

Thanks;

/Gurkan Erdogdu





From: Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 10:53:20 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M1

Looks good to me

+1

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Feb 9, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:

 The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *four*
 +1
 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

 Just noting that the *four* +1 votes included two IPMC members (Matthias
 Wessendorf and myself). We'll require one more IPMC member vote, but, of
 course, all reviews/votes are much appreciated.

 --kevan

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org





-- 
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


  

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M1

[Kevan Miller]

On Feb 9, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:

The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in  
*four* +1

votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.


Just noting that the *four* +1 votes included two IPMC members  
(Matthias Wessendorf and myself). We'll require one more IPMC member  
vote, but, of course, all reviews/votes are much appreciated.


--kevan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M1

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans 
Specification which is defined as JSR-299.

Proposed released artifacts are:

Plugins repository 
--
http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M1/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

Distribution content

http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M1/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M1/

SVN Tag (Revision: 740810)

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M1/

The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *four* +1
votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

[VOTE Thread] : 
http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00555.html

More information about the project can be found here:
[Incubation Status Page ] : 
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
[Project Page]  : 
http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html

Thanks;

Gurkan Erdogdu


  

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M1

[Mohammad Nour El-Din]

Congrats :-)

On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

 OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans 
 Specification which is defined as JSR-299.

 Proposed released artifacts are:

 Plugins repository
 --
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M1/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

 Distribution content
 
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M1/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M1/

 SVN Tag (Revision: 740810)
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M1/

 The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *four* +1
 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

 [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00555.html

 More information about the project can be found here:
 [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
 [Project Page]  : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html

 Thanks;

 Gurkan Erdogdu






-- 

Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
- LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour

Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving
- Albert Einstein

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: OpenWebBeans SVN Creation

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

Is it possible to do this thing? Could I get permission to edit the
authorization files?

Thanks;

GE

2008/11/18 David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Kevan Miller wrote:
  Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
  
  I looked at the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1775 for
  creating the SVN, but it is commented with Not an infra task. Needs
  to be
  done by someone on the incubator pmc.
  
  How will we going on?
 
  David Crossley already took care of that -- he mentioned this in an
  earlier email.

 I only did the svn authorization part. The OpenWebBeans
 mentors should be able to handle the rest.

 i.e. I did the second part of:
 http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Set+Up+Repository

 I know that that step is trivial, but i am directing
 people to the documentation. If it is obscure, then
 please help to fix it.

 -David

  Remaining pieces are mailing lists creation (which is just now
  complete) and jira creation (which will be shortly)..
 
  --kevan

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com

Re: OpenWebBeans SVN Creation

[David Crossley]

Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
 Hi;
 
 Is it possible to do this thing? Could I get permission to edit the
 authorization files?

You don't need to edit anything. It is done.

I was referring to the first step which was not done.
Soon after that message someone did the 'svn mkdir ...'
so your repository is ready at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/

You should now co-ordinate on your dev mail list and decide
what directory structure and implement it with 'svn mkdir'.
Look around at other projects for examples.

-David

 David Crossley wrote:
  Kevan Miller wrote:
   Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
   
   I looked at the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1775 for
   creating the SVN, but it is commented with Not an infra task. Needs
   to be
   done by someone on the incubator pmc.
   
   How will we going on?
  
   David Crossley already took care of that -- he mentioned this in an
   earlier email.
 
  I only did the svn authorization part. The OpenWebBeans
  mentors should be able to handle the rest.
 
  i.e. I did the second part of:
  http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Set+Up+Repository
 
  I know that that step is trivial, but i am directing
  people to the documentation. If it is obscure, then
  please help to fix it.
 
  -David
 
   Remaining pieces are mailing lists creation (which is just now
   complete) and jira creation (which will be shortly)..
  
   --kevan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OpenWebBeans SVN Creation

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Ok. Thanks a lot David for your great helping.

GE

2008/11/21 David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
  Hi;
 
  Is it possible to do this thing? Could I get permission to edit the
  authorization files?

 You don't need to edit anything. It is done.

 I was referring to the first step which was not done.
 Soon after that message someone did the 'svn mkdir ...'
 so your repository is ready at:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/

 You should now co-ordinate on your dev mail list and decide
 what directory structure and implement it with 'svn mkdir'.
 Look around at other projects for examples.

 -David

  David Crossley wrote:
   Kevan Miller wrote:
Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:

I looked at the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1775for
creating the SVN, but it is commented with Not an infra task. Needs
to be
done by someone on the incubator pmc.

How will we going on?
   
David Crossley already took care of that -- he mentioned this in an
earlier email.
  
   I only did the svn authorization part. The OpenWebBeans
   mentors should be able to handle the rest.
  
   i.e. I did the second part of:
   http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Set+Up+Repository
  
   I know that that step is trivial, but i am directing
   people to the documentation. If it is obscure, then
   please help to fix it.
  
   -David
  
Remaining pieces are mailing lists creation (which is just now
complete) and jira creation (which will be shortly)..
   
--kevan

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com

Re: OpenWebBeans SVN Creation

[Kevan Miller]

On Nov 17, 2008, at 2:29 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:


Hi;

I looked at the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1775 for
creating the SVN, but it is commented with Not an infra task. Needs  
to be

done by someone on the incubator pmc.

How will we going on?


David Crossley already took care of that -- he mentioned this in an  
earlier email.


Remaining pieces are mailing lists creation (which is just now  
complete) and jira creation (which will be shortly)..


--kevan

Re: OpenWebBeans SVN Creation

[David Crossley]

Kevan Miller wrote:
 Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
 
 I looked at the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1775 for
 creating the SVN, but it is commented with Not an infra task. Needs  
 to be
 done by someone on the incubator pmc.
 
 How will we going on?
 
 David Crossley already took care of that -- he mentioned this in an  
 earlier email.

I only did the svn authorization part. The OpenWebBeans
mentors should be able to handle the rest.

i.e. I did the second part of:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Set+Up+Repository

I know that that step is trivial, but i am directing
people to the documentation. If it is obscure, then
please help to fix it.

-David

 Remaining pieces are mailing lists creation (which is just now  
 complete) and jira creation (which will be shortly)..
 
 --kevan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OpenWebBeans svn authorization (Was: Update Incubator Status Page)

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Thanks, it works.

Gurkan





From: David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 7:14:55 AM
Subject: OpenWebBeans svn authorization (Was: Update Incubator Status Page)

Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
 
 I am the comitter of the recently incubator OpenWebBeans. I tried to do tasks 
 that are explained in the http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html to 
 update OpenWebBeans site (to put it into the site-author/projects/index.xml, 
 and site-author/stylesheets/project.xml, also some updates in the 
 site-author/projects/openwebbeans.xml), but when I tried to commit it gives 
 the error : 
 
 svn: Commit failed (details follow):
 svn: MKACTIVITY of 
 '/repos/asf/!svn/act/51fd909e-853a-4c12-83ff-c597a7a3379e': 403 Forbidden 
 (https://svn.apache.org)
 
 I think, I have no permission to commit changes.
 
 Is it possible to get this permission?

The accounts were already set up for you gerdogdu and
for Conny Lundgren conny but not yet added to the
Subversion authorisation. I just now did that, added the
mentors matzew,kevan, and also added SVN configuration
for the openwebbeans. Is that all correct?

So now you should be okay to do that commit.

-David

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  

OpenWebBeans SVN Creation

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

I looked at the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1775 for
creating the SVN, but it is commented with Not an infra task. Needs to be
 done by someone on the incubator pmc.

How will we going on?

Thanks;
Gurkan Erdogdu



  

OpenWebBeans svn authorization (Was: Update Incubator Status Page)

[David Crossley]

Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
 
 I am the comitter of the recently incubator OpenWebBeans. I tried to do tasks 
 that are explained in the http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html to 
 update OpenWebBeans site (to put it into the site-author/projects/index.xml, 
 and site-author/stylesheets/project.xml, also some updates in the 
 site-author/projects/openwebbeans.xml), but when I tried to commit it gives 
 the error : 
 
 svn: Commit failed (details follow):
 svn: MKACTIVITY of 
 '/repos/asf/!svn/act/51fd909e-853a-4c12-83ff-c597a7a3379e': 403 Forbidden 
 (https://svn.apache.org)
 
 I think, I have no permission to commit changes.
 
 Is it possible to get this permission?

The accounts were already set up for you gerdogdu and
for Conny Lundgren conny but not yet added to the
Subversion authorisation. I just now did that, added the
mentors matzew,kevan, and also added SVN configuration
for the openwebbeans. Is that all correct?

So now you should be okay to do that commit.

-David

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OpenWebBeans] request for mailing lists and SVN

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

We really need for these stuffs to efficiently continue on the development.
There are some great open source developers to work on the project, but I
want that setting up all artifacts of the project in the Apache side, svn,
jira, mailing lists etc is done  before this. I think that discussions must
be on the dev mailing lists, and assigning task to us using JIRA for good
bookmarking.

How long does it take that all these stuffs are done by the infra team?

Thanks

GE

2008/11/6 Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 FYI


 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:07 AM
 Subject: [OpenWebBeans] request for mailing lists and SVN
 To: Infrastructure Apache [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Hi infra@ team,

 I am a mentor of the OpenWebBeans podling ([1]). The project was
 accepted to go into incubation mode. To get this shindig started, we
 need some mailing lists:

 * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 * [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Moderator (currently) will be me matzew AT apache DOT org.

 We also need a SVN repo (see [1]):
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans

 and a JIRA would be great, too:
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPEN-WEBBEANS

 Or, do you want me to file JIRA tickets for this ?

 Thanks,
 Matthias

 [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal

 --
 Matthias Wessendorf

 blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
 sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
 twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf



 --
 Matthias Wessendorf

 blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
 sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
 twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com

Re: OpenWebBeans status page (Was: svn commit: r711682)

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

SVN is not setting now. But you can download all the sources from the
sourceforge side [1] for the time being.

[1] http://bigfaces.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bigfaces/webbeansimpl/.

GE

2008/11/13 Mohammad Nour El-Din [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Hi I am interested to access the src code of OpenWenBeans. But the svn
 repo is not working yet. When it is going to be avail ?

 On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  How will we progress on this? As a committer can I produce these pages?
 Or
  mentors of the project should do?
 
  Thanks;
 
  Gurkan
 
  2008/11/6 David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   Author: kevan
   Date: Wed Nov  5 12:14:38 2008
   New Revision: 711682
  
   URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=711682view=rev
   Log:
   Generate OpenWebBeans status page
  
   Added:
   incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/openwebbeans.xml
 (with
  props)
   incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/openwebbeans.html
  (with props)
 
  Great, but there is more needed. Please see the instructions:
 
 
 http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Initialize+Podling+Status+Page
 
 
 http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Edit+your+project+status+report
  It needs to be added to the index page and right-hand panel.
 
  -David
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
  --
  Gurkan Erdogdu
  http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
 



 --
 
 Thanks
 - Mohammad Nour
 - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour
 
 Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving
 - Albert Einstein

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com

Re: OpenWebBeans status page (Was: svn commit: r711682)

[Mohammad Nour El-Din]

Hi I am interested to access the src code of OpenWenBeans. But the svn
repo is not working yet. When it is going to be avail ?

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 How will we progress on this? As a committer can I produce these pages? Or
 mentors of the project should do?

 Thanks;

 Gurkan

 2008/11/6 David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Author: kevan
  Date: Wed Nov  5 12:14:38 2008
  New Revision: 711682
 
  URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=711682view=rev
  Log:
  Generate OpenWebBeans status page
 
  Added:
  incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/openwebbeans.xml   (with
 props)
  incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/openwebbeans.html
 (with props)

 Great, but there is more needed. Please see the instructions:

 http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Initialize+Podling+Status+Page

 http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Edit+your+project+status+report
 It needs to be added to the index page and right-hand panel.

 -David

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 --
 Gurkan Erdogdu
 http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com




-- 

Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
- LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour

Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving
- Albert Einstein

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OpenWebBeans status page (Was: svn commit: r711682)

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

How will we progress on this? As a committer can I produce these pages? Or
mentors of the project should do?

Thanks;

Gurkan

2008/11/6 David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Author: kevan
  Date: Wed Nov  5 12:14:38 2008
  New Revision: 711682
 
  URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=711682view=rev
  Log:
  Generate OpenWebBeans status page
 
  Added:
  incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/openwebbeans.xml   (with
 props)
  incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/openwebbeans.html
 (with props)

 Great, but there is more needed. Please see the instructions:

 http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Initialize+Podling+Status+Page

 http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Edit+your+project+status+report
 It needs to be added to the index page and right-hand panel.

 -David

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com

Re: OpenWebBeans status page (Was: svn commit: r711682)

[Matthias Wessendorf]

you can produce them and upload them to a jira ticket.
I doubt that you have write access on the page

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 How will we progress on this? As a committer can I produce these pages? Or
 mentors of the project should do?

 Thanks;

 Gurkan

 2008/11/6 David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Author: kevan
  Date: Wed Nov  5 12:14:38 2008
  New Revision: 711682
 
  URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=711682view=rev
  Log:
  Generate OpenWebBeans status page
 
  Added:
  incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/openwebbeans.xml   (with
 props)
  incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/openwebbeans.html
 (with props)

 Great, but there is more needed. Please see the instructions:

 http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Initialize+Podling+Status+Page

 http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Edit+your+project+status+report
 It needs to be added to the index page and right-hand panel.

 -David

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 --
 Gurkan Erdogdu
 http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com




-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OpenWebBeans status page (Was: svn commit: r711682)

[Mohammad Nour El-Din]

Thanks a lot

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 SVN is not setting now. But you can download all the sources from the
 sourceforge side [1] for the time being.

 [1] http://bigfaces.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bigfaces/webbeansimpl/.

 GE

 2008/11/13 Mohammad Nour El-Din [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Hi I am interested to access the src code of OpenWenBeans. But the svn
 repo is not working yet. When it is going to be avail ?

 On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  How will we progress on this? As a committer can I produce these pages?
 Or
  mentors of the project should do?
 
  Thanks;
 
  Gurkan
 
  2008/11/6 David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   Author: kevan
   Date: Wed Nov  5 12:14:38 2008
   New Revision: 711682
  
   URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=711682view=rev
   Log:
   Generate OpenWebBeans status page
  
   Added:
   incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/openwebbeans.xml
 (with
  props)
   incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/openwebbeans.html
  (with props)
 
  Great, but there is more needed. Please see the instructions:
 
 
 http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Initialize+Podling+Status+Page
 
 
 http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Edit+your+project+status+report
  It needs to be added to the index page and right-hand panel.
 
  -David
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
  --
  Gurkan Erdogdu
  http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
 



 --
 
 Thanks
 - Mohammad Nour
 - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour
 
 Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving
 - Albert Einstein

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 --
 Gurkan Erdogdu
 http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com




-- 

Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
- LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour

Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving
- Albert Einstein

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OpenWebBeans status page (Was: svn commit: r711682)

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

Yes, I have mailed signed copy of the CLA to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Gurkan

2008/11/6 Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 also...

 did we already ping infra for the mailing lists?
 If not, let me do that.

 @mail to request the accounts.
 We only have CLA from Conny, but not from Gurkan.

 Gurkan, did you already fax it? (Or is Sam just busy w/ ACon ;))

 -M



 On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:06 PM, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  Author: kevan
  Date: Wed Nov  5 12:14:38 2008
  New Revision: 711682
 
  URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=711682view=rev
  Log:
  Generate OpenWebBeans status page
 
  Added:
  incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/openwebbeans.xml   (with
 props)
  incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/openwebbeans.html
 (with props)
 
  Great, but there is more needed. Please see the instructions:
 
 http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Initialize+Podling+Status+Page
 
 http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Edit+your+project+status+report
  It needs to be added to the index page and right-hand panel.
 
  -David
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 



 --
 Matthias Wessendorf

 blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
 sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
 twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com

Re: OpenWebBeans status page (Was: svn commit: r711682)

[Matthias Wessendorf]

k,

that should be fine.
Just in case... any fax machine nearby ?

-M

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi;

 Yes, I have mailed signed copy of the CLA to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Gurkan

 2008/11/6 Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 also...

 did we already ping infra for the mailing lists?
 If not, let me do that.

 @mail to request the accounts.
 We only have CLA from Conny, but not from Gurkan.

 Gurkan, did you already fax it? (Or is Sam just busy w/ ACon ;))

 -M



 On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:06 PM, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  Author: kevan
  Date: Wed Nov  5 12:14:38 2008
  New Revision: 711682
 
  URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=711682view=rev
  Log:
  Generate OpenWebBeans status page
 
  Added:
  incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/openwebbeans.xml   (with
 props)
  incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/openwebbeans.html
 (with props)
 
  Great, but there is more needed. Please see the instructions:
 
 http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Initialize+Podling+Status+Page
 
 http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Edit+your+project+status+report
  It needs to be added to the index page and right-hand panel.
 
  -David
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 



 --
 Matthias Wessendorf

 blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
 sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
 twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 --
 Gurkan Erdogdu
 http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com




-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fwd: [OpenWebBeans] request for mailing lists and SVN

[Matthias Wessendorf]

FYI


-- Forwarded message --
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:07 AM
Subject: [OpenWebBeans] request for mailing lists and SVN
To: Infrastructure Apache [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi infra@ team,

I am a mentor of the OpenWebBeans podling ([1]). The project was
accepted to go into incubation mode. To get this shindig started, we
need some mailing lists:

* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Moderator (currently) will be me matzew AT apache DOT org.

We also need a SVN repo (see [1]):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans

and a JIRA would be great, too:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPEN-WEBBEANS

Or, do you want me to file JIRA tickets for this ?

Thanks,
Matthias

[1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal

--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OpenWebBeans] request for mailing lists and SVN

[Kevan Miller]

Heh. I'd started this process, yesterday...

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1773

I had not created a request for creating the project within JIRA,  
however.


I submitted a new account request for Conny, but waiting for ICLA for  
Gurkan to show up.


--kevan

On Nov 6, 2008, at 4:07 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:


FYI


-- Forwarded message --
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:07 AM
Subject: [OpenWebBeans] request for mailing lists and SVN
To: Infrastructure Apache [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi infra@ team,

I am a mentor of the OpenWebBeans podling ([1]). The project was
accepted to go into incubation mode. To get this shindig started, we
need some mailing lists:

* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Moderator (currently) will be me matzew AT apache DOT org.

We also need a SVN repo (see [1]):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans

and a JIRA would be great, too:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPEN-WEBBEANS

Or, do you want me to file JIRA tickets for this ?

Thanks,
Matthias

[1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal

--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]