[hugin-ptx] Re: Enblend: CMake (Windows) broken
The exact same thing happens also on OSX. I just removed the line from the
CMakeLists.txt file. I will try tonight.
I had not reported it yet as I was working on 2 Hugin things and 2 other
things.
Harry
2009/9/22 Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de
Am Tuesday 22 September 2009 schrieb Yuval Levy:
The CMake error, at line 33 of src/CMakeLists.txt says:
set_target_properties called with incorrect number of arguments
I only see this line in enblend's cmake.
It looks like OpenMP_CXX_FLAGS were not defined. Could you please check
CMakeCache.txt for a similar variable (mybe only difference in case)
Anyway it sholud read like:
if(OpenMP_CXX_FLAGS)
set_target_properties(${_cmd} PROPERTIES LINK_FLAGS ${OpenMP_CXX_FLAGS})
message(STATUS Adding PROPERTIES LINK_FLAGS to ${_cmd})
endif(Boost_FOUND)
The output of running cmake should give you an indication of the value of
OpenMP_CXX_FLAGS
And it seems to be _my_ doing.
this is unrelated to Christoph's recent changes (rev. 524+) - it happens
already in rev. 523.
Yuv
Could you please try?
Kornel
--
Kornel Benko
kornel.be...@berlin.de
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Enblend: CMake (Windows) broken
Am Tuesday 22 September 2009 schrieb Harry van der Wolf: The exact same thing happens also on OSX. I just removed the line from the CMakeLists.txt file. I will try tonight. I had not reported it yet as I was working on 2 Hugin things and 2 other things. Harry Harry, I already commited. Clearly my error. Kornel -- Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.2.0_RC1 source code distribution released
Did you have to execute anything other than cmake / make? I am having trouble with Fedora10 x86_64: I can compile Hugin, but it crashes upon execution. I would like some help to clarify whether I am compiling it properly, before filling in a bug report... Thanks. On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Tduell tdu...@iinet.net.au wrote: Hullo Yuv, On Sep 21, 12:10 pm, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote: Panorama stitching and more. A powerful software package for creation and processing of panoramic images. hugin-2009.2.0_RC1 (release candidate 1) tarball is available here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/hugin/files/hugin-2009.2_beta/hugin-.. . This is a release candidate and may be declared final in the coming days. I have successfully built RC1 and done some limited testing on Fedora 11 x86_64, and thus far all seems OK. Hugin 'about' reports svn 4461. I have also successfully built (using mock) a fedora 11 i586 version. I will pass these binary packages to Bruno so he can put them on his server for all to access. The packages are... hugin-2009.2.0-0.1.20090921svn.fc11.x86_64.rpm hugin-base-2009.2.0-0.1.20090921svn.fc11.x86_64.rpm hugin-2009.2.0-0.1.20090921svn.fc11.i586.rpm hugin-base-2009.2.0-0.1.20090921svn.fc11.i586.rpm Cheers, Terry --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.2.0_RC1 source code distribution released
On Tue 22-Sep-2009 at 09:31 +0200, Eduardo Perez Esteban wrote: Did you have to execute anything other than cmake / make? I am having trouble with Fedora10 x86_64: I can compile Hugin, but it crashes upon execution. I would like some help to clarify whether I am compiling it properly, before filling in a bug report... What version of libpano13 do you have? The 2.9.14 'stable' release is fine, but the two 2.9.15_beta releases have had problems. If you want to use a current libpano13, at the moment you need to fetch the SVN trunk. -- Bruno --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.2.0_RC1 source code distribution released
Am Tuesday 22 September 2009 schrieb Eduardo Perez Esteban: Did you have to execute anything other than cmake / make? I am having trouble with Fedora10 x86_64: I can compile Hugin, but it crashes upon execution. I would like some help to clarify whether I am compiling it properly, before filling in a bug report... Thanks. This is, what I have done 5 minutes ago: cd /usr/src/hugin/hugin svn up cd /usr/BUILD/BuildHugin cmake /usr/src/hugin/hugin -DENABLE_LAPACK=YES -DCPACK_BINARY_RPM:BOOL=ON make -j3 package sudo rpm --nodeps --force -U /usr/BUILD/BuildHugin/hugin-2009.3.0-Linux.rpm This hugin does not crash here. OpenSuSE 10.3, 64bit. Kornel -- Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2008_masking
Carl von Einem wrote: Would a few people please give me some examples of how they would like to use masking within Hugin? Today I often enough have to edit masks of images that are already loaded in a hugin project. To see the difference I need to newly load the whole project. I'd prefer a button in the preview window that allows to just reload all images (or maybe also just one). Maybe it's not such a good idea to add yet another button to the preview window. As a possible interface I'd suggest a pop-up window just like the CP list (instead of F3 maybe option+F3), only with a list of loaded images. When that window is opened it compares the time stamp of the actual file on disk with the time stamp of the originally loaded version. One 'update' button to reload the marked image file, also one 'update all modified files' button would be great. I have a screenshot from a similar window that is used in QuarkXPress. http://einem.net/panotools/hugin/ Should I submit a feature request? Carl --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] hugin https access to svn broken?
Hi, I'm already trying for over 24 hours to sync the trunk to my local repository (and then upload the cpclean XCode changes) but I don't get access. I try: svn co https://hugin.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/hugin/hugin/trunkhugin; but to no avail. anyone else having the same problems or being succesful? Harry --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin https access to svn broken?
Hi Harry Harry van der Wolf wrote: Hi, I'm already trying for over 24 hours to sync the trunk to my local repository (and then upload the cpclean XCode changes) but I don't get access. it works from here (switzerland). What happens if you point your web browser to https://hugin.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/hugin/hugin/trunk/ ? you should either see a directory containing the hugin files or and error message that may shed some light on your svn co troubles. With kind regards Stefan Peter --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2008_masking
Carl von Einem wrote: Carl von Einem wrote: Would a few people please give me some examples of how they would like to use masking within Hugin? Today I often enough have to edit masks of images that are already loaded in a hugin project. To see the difference I need to newly load the whole project. I'd prefer a button in the preview window that allows to just reload all images (or maybe also just one). Maybe it's not such a good idea to add yet another button to the preview window. As a possible interface I'd suggest a pop-up window just like the CP list (instead of F3 maybe option+F3), only with a list of loaded images. I think there are two separate issues here: one is editing the mask and the other is updating the images in the project to make the edits visible. Abstracting for a moment if a pop-up or an extra-tab (I prefer the latter), the current status of the masking [editor] is a list of (loaded) images, exactly like the preview - it actually borrowed its user interface, which should make it convenient e.g. to see where the selected mask lands on an underneath picture by activating / deactivating pictures in the tabs. When that window is opened it compares the time stamp of the actual file on disk with the time stamp of the originally loaded version. One 'update' button to reload the marked image file, also one 'update all modified files' button would be great. I have a screenshot from a similar window that is used in QuarkXPress. http://einem.net/panotools/hugin/ If I understand the mockup correctly, we don't really need it (sorry). An appropriate update mechanism can and should be automated. Currently, opening a project is a relatively fast operation when the preview window is closed. The cost of this operation is that when I click on the preview button for the first time, it loads each individual image (look at the status bar); and this takes a lot of time (on my dyno-book 1.6GHz 2GB RAM 5400RPM HDD it took long enough to load 23 images that I almost finished this paragraph in the meantime). The logic does not require human intervention, just a smarter image cache that a) load the images automatically in the background (assuming there is enough image cache memory. if it reaches the limit, it should test if more memory is available in the system and suggest to the user to change the preferences setting - currently the default is 75MB). b) is triggered by actions, such as editing a mask, to reload the image automatically - no human intervention here c) checks in the background for changes by external program (i.e. the timestamp check you suggest) and reloads if necessary (or warns if the image is no longer available). I think the only way to implement (c) is with a timer - I am not aware of the possibility to watch a file for changes. But checking timestamps should not be too time consuming, so doing it once a minute or so should be enough. Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Enblend: CMake (Windows) broken
Kornel Benko wrote:
It looks like OpenMP_CXX_FLAGS were not defined. Could you please check
CMakeCache.txt for a similar variable (mybe only difference in case)
makes sense - I'm on MSVC EE and it looks like Microsoft wants to cap
the wings of developers for its plattform / extract a tax from them -
OpenMP is not supported in MSVC EE, just in the higher up, paying editions.
Anyway it sholud read like:
if(OpenMP_CXX_FLAGS)
set_target_properties(${_cmd} PROPERTIES LINK_FLAGS ${OpenMP_CXX_FLAGS})
message(STATUS Adding PROPERTIES LINK_FLAGS to ${_cmd})
endif(Boost_FOUND)
The output of running cmake should give you an indication of the value of
OpenMP_CXX_FLAGS
Could you please try?
I'm not on Windows at the moment. Will try when I have access and time
later in the day.
Yuv
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin https access to svn broken?
Harry van der Wolf wrote: I try: svn co https://hugin.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/hugin/hugin/trunkhugin; looks like whitespace is missing - .../trunk hugin instead of .../trunkhugin Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2008_masking
On Tue 22-Sep-2009 at 08:14 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: c) checks in the background for changes by external program (i.e. the timestamp check you suggest) and reloads if necessary (or warns if the image is no longer available). I think the only way to implement (c) is with a timer - I am not aware of the possibility to watch a file for changes. But checking timestamps should not be too time consuming, so doing it once a minute or so should be enough. Applications that do this sort of checking in a loop really mess up power saving features of operating systems. On Unix you use gamin/FAM to ask the system to tell the application if a file has changed, it is possible wxwidgets has a cross-platform abstraction for this. -- Bruno --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching
Hi Matt, If you experiment on this further, it would be really sweet if you did a tutorial writeup here even if it doesn't work out perfect right now. 0. Get and compile the current trunk of libpano13 If you so happens to build panotools on windows, pls drop me a mail. (and I'll give this a try too) 4. Now you need to select which variables to optimize, using by adding them to the v line in optimize.txt. I would try optimizing roll, pitch, yaw and Tx, Ty, Ts for all but the first image. Run $ PToptimizer optimize.txt to perform the optimisation. Check the file to see some information about the errors. Here some trial and error with different parameter sets is probably needed. I would think you should optimize for x(d), y(e), Tx, Ty, Tz and Ts. Yaw, pitch and roll would put the result off, as it is done though panorama center and not camera center. Cheers -- /O --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Enblend: CMake (Windows) broken
-Original Message- From: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com [mailto:hugin-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Yuval Levy Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 8:20 AM To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Enblend: CMake (Windows) broken SNIP makes sense - I'm on MSVC EE and it looks like Microsoft wants to cap the wings of developers for its plattform / extract a tax from them - OpenMP is not supported in MSVC EE, just in the higher up, paying editions. Not entirely accurate. You probably want to view http://blog.codekills.net/archives/25-OpenMP-and-Visual-C++-the-free-way-sor ta.html It turns out OpenMP is like x64 compilation - It's possible, just requires a little... finesse. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching
2009/9/21 Pablo d'Angelo pablo.dang...@web.de: Hi Matt, The general workflow for proper orthorectification (as used by the professionals) is: 1. Measure some ground control points (GCPs) in the images. These associate an image point with a 3D world position (lat, lon, height). If a full bundle adjustment is used, this is not needed for every images as tie points (called control points in hugin) can also be used. These are usually measured against maps, orthoimages, gps traces. The height is often derived from the SRTM dataset, or from high precision GPS measurements with post processing at specific corner (centre of roundabouts etc.). 2. With the GCPs and tie points, the position and orientation of each photo is estimated using bundle adjustment. This works a bit similar to what hugin/panotools does, but it solves for full 3D geometry. 3. Orthorectification is preformed using the estimated positions and orientations and a digital terrain model. If there is a lot of overlap in the photos, the terrain model can also be computed from the photos itself (This is actually what I currently do in my day job). All data that is required for this is freely available. You can use well traces streets in OSM for establishing the ground control points in step 1). The SRTM model required for orthorectification is available in the public domain (at least for areas south of 60° northern latitude). The main problem is that there is no complete open source software package for this job. All the components are available in various software packages, but they are not integrated: - Tie points can be created in hugin or with other matching software. With a bit of scripting, GCPs can be derived from tie points measured against OSM maps (its just coordinate transformation and lookup in the elevation model). - A complete package that takes care of most steps required for 1) and 2) is bundler, http://phototour.cs.washington.edu/bundler/ however, this is not designed to handle ground control points, so it won't give you absolute coordinates. It uses a customized version of SBA http://www.ics.forth.gr/~lourakis/sba/ for the bundle adjustment. SBA recently been extended so that it supports both tie points and ground control points. Yes, I've been experimenting with using bundler for analysing the camera positions but it's fairly undocumented so it'll be a while before I can get it to work for me. I'll also have a closer look at SBA. I've compiled the latest version so I'll see what it can tell me. - Orthorectification can be done using open source remote sensing software packages such as http://www.ossim.org or http://www.orfeo-toolbox.org. However, these packages are mostly designed for handling commercial satellite and aerial imagery, and I'm not sure if the support a simple camera model. I'll have a look at them to see if they can be of any use. Even if they're not suitable for our purpose, I'm sure that I'll learn something :) Then there is e-foto, which I have just downloaded as tried, but I didn't manage to do something useful with it. Yes, I've got e-foto but I couldn't get it to do anything useful either yet. It seems it's more of a research project and as such, it's rather underdocumented (at least in English). So the correct way to produce nice orthophotos as shown by the map providers is not that simple using open source software, and needs quite some gluing together of several packages. Hugin is currently not really suited for aligning all your images. However, the latest work in panotools (as mentioned in the reply by Lukas) might help if your area is reasonably flat. The new parameters Tx, Ty and Ts parameters in panotools should allow you to orthorectify your images to a plane. As these are are very new, they are not supported in hugin yet. This means that you need to use the panotools script interface from the command line directly. Maybe the following procedure might work (disclamer: I haven't tried anything of that myself!): 0. Get and compile the current trunk of libpano13 1. Load a few overlapping images captured from different viewpoints (maybe start with 3 or so) into hugin, and create a few good control points between them (make sure that they are good, to avoid confusion due to mismatched control points later on). Try to load a very well downwards looking image as first image. This image will define the plane to which the other images are warped later on. Do not optimize yet. Make sure that the field of view of the images is reasonably correct. (Computation from EXIF data is probably good for the first try). 2. Set the projection to rectilinear, and choose a wide HFOV and VFOV, such as 90 degrees or so. Press the compute optimum size button. 3. Export everything as panotools compatible project. The 100% bulletproof way is to go to the optimisation tab, tick the edit script before optimisation (or similar) checkbox,
[hugin-ptx] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching
2009/9/22 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com: Hi Matt, If you experiment on this further, it would be really sweet if you did a tutorial writeup here even if it doesn't work out perfect right now. I absolutely will. This won't be the last time that OSM hire a plane for some aerial photography and so it's important that we find a decent way of doing it. The final images (like the source images) will be creative-commons licensed and will be available to the public for tracing (or whatever) so I'll be sure to update this list when I've got something good-looking. 0. Get and compile the current trunk of libpano13 If you so happens to build panotools on windows, pls drop me a mail. (and I'll give this a try too) Sorry, I'm on Linux. I found Panotools really quick and easy to build though. 4. Now you need to select which variables to optimize, using by adding them to the v line in optimize.txt. I would try optimizing roll, pitch, yaw and Tx, Ty, Ts for all but the first image. Run $ PToptimizer optimize.txt to perform the optimisation. Check the file to see some information about the errors. Here some trial and error with different parameter sets is probably needed. I would think you should optimize for x(d), y(e), Tx, Ty, Tz and Ts. Yaw, pitch and roll would put the result off, as it is done though panorama center and not camera center. Ok, I'll have a try with those parameters to see if it gives any better results. I'm still getting used to the notations and parameters used by Panotools so I'm pretty much going by what people suggest and trial and error at the moment. -- Matt Williams http://milliams.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Matt Williams schreef: 2009/9/22 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com: Hi Matt, If you experiment on this further, it would be really sweet if you did a tutorial writeup here even if it doesn't work out perfect right now. I absolutely will. This won't be the last time that OSM hire a plane for some aerial photography and so it's important that we find a decent way of doing it. Thats why we got money for http://www.openstreetphoto.org/ see our blog: http://blog.opengeo.nl/ We have two aircrafts and get two more, this time 3 meter wide electro-gliders :) Stefan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREKAAYFAkq42eAACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn1VaQCeNMnl08L9SyZTzM8zIkexmDCt GaoAoIFiKZtVOpH4N7jW7Nl/eydxBoIw =9oji -END PGP SIGNATURE- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2008_masking
2009/9/22 Bruno Postle br...@postle.net On Unix you use gamin/FAM to ask the system to tell the application if a file has changed, it is possible wxwidgets has a cross-platform abstraction for this. -- Bruno Gamin and FAM do not exist on OSX. There are several third-party (free, shareware and commercial) tools for OSX (some based on the kevent() kernel event) that do the same, but nothing official. Harry --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: svn 4450 hugin installer for Windows Vista
I don't get this install to work properly. (I used hugin uninstall for previous installation first) It doesn't find any control point matches for me with (default installation options), although it reports features found. This seems to happen on all projects. after a few tries with different sets of images previously used in other projects i tried create control point in an already optimized project, and got this error. User or developer fault? ;-) /O 2009/9/21 Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch Thanks, Ad. Ad Huikeshoven wrote: Last night I did build from scratch and got 4 fatal compile errors. This morning I build from scratch and got a new installer for hugin for Windows Vista, you can find at http://hugin.huikeshoven.org/ for all practical purposes, this is Hugin 2009.2.0_RC1. although the results differ from the results on OSX and on Linux depending on the dependencies (pun intended). I admit that the spurious errors are worrying me. they may indicate problems in the build chain and thus in the quality of the result. As attachment I do include two files: thanks, will look at them and integrate them in the SVN repository, with your notes. this one differs from the previous one I posted tweaked to compile a 2009.2 version so if I understand correctly, this bat file is for 2009.2 and the previous one is for trunk? or are there also other changes? Yuv -- /O --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- attachment: error_autopano-sift-c.jpg
[hugin-ptx] Re: svn 4450 hugin installer for Windows Vista
I forgot the installation options... Destination location: C:\Program Files\Hugin Setup type: Default installation (Autopano-SIFT-C) Selected components: Hugin Hugin Language Pack Enblend/Enfuse Autopano-SIFT-C (Patent issues in the USA!) Panotools Command Line Tools Start Menu folder: Hugin Additional tasks: System: Set Default Settings? (partially implemented) Additional icons: Create desktop icons only for the current user Hugin Enblend Droplets Enfuse Droplets Create additional entries in Program Files menu 2009/9/22 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com I don't get this install to work properly. (I used hugin uninstall for previous installation first) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching
2009/9/22 Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de: Matt Williams schreef: 2009/9/22 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com: Hi Matt, If you experiment on this further, it would be really sweet if you did a tutorial writeup here even if it doesn't work out perfect right now. I absolutely will. This won't be the last time that OSM hire a plane for some aerial photography and so it's important that we find a decent way of doing it. Thats why we got money for http://www.openstreetphoto.org/ see our blog: http://blog.opengeo.nl/ We have two aircrafts and get two more, this time 3 meter wide electro-gliders :) Hey Stefan. I was wondering when you might turn up. I guessed you don't read talk...@osm.org but I knew you were working on stuff in this area. From what I could tell, you haven't made much progress with processing the images yet (although I do like the quadcopter thing :D). If I'm mistaken or if you could be of help with the Stratford Imagery it would be much appreciated. I haven't been able to find any mailing list discussions of your work. In the mean time, I've found that some people have started a project based on Orfeo-toolbox for simplifying the workflow and it sounds like it could be useful for our purpose, they even mention OpenStreetMap (http://wiki.orfeo-toolbox.org/index.php/Monteverdi). Perhaps we'd do well to take this discussion to an OSM list of some kind (maybe 'photos@' or 'talk@')? -- Matt Williams http://milliams.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Enblend: CMake (Windows) broken
Kornel Benko wrote:
Anyway it sholud read like:
if(OpenMP_CXX_FLAGS)
set_target_properties(${_cmd} PROPERTIES LINK_FLAGS ${OpenMP_CXX_FLAGS})
message(STATUS Adding PROPERTIES LINK_FLAGS to ${_cmd})
endif(Boost_FOUND)
it works (after replacing the small error - it should read
endif(OpenMP_CXX_FLAGS) and not endif(Boost_FOUND), and it goes before
the endif(Boost_FOUND).
I've commmitted to Hg.
the next error to fix (maybe related to Chris' changes:
CMakeError: Unknown Target referenced: doc1
and the same for doc2
I guess on OSX doc1 and doc2 build well?
Yuv
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Enblend: CMake (Windows) broken
Ryan Sleevi wrote: makes sense - I'm on MSVC EE and it looks like Microsoft wants to cap the wings of developers for its plattform / extract a tax from them - OpenMP is not supported in MSVC EE, just in the higher up, paying editions. Not entirely accurate. You probably want to view http://blog.codekills.net/archives/25-OpenMP-and-Visual-C++-the-free-way-sor ta.html It turns out OpenMP is like x64 compilation - It's possible, just requires a little... finesse. right now it takes more than just... finesse. They removed it from the SDK (see comments #4 - #6 on the blog post that you linked). I had found that blog post a few weeks ago (when you, I and others were discussing the Windows build of Enblend); I did download the SDK; I did install it; and I ended up making the same experience as the guys from #4 - #6. I don't know if it is legal to redistribute older versions of the SDK; nor if anybody does it. I have not checked any further. If Microsoft wants to make it difficult for me to build bleeding edge software on their architecture, I'll happily build it (and use it) elsewhere. Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.2.0_RC1 source code distribution released
On 21 сен, 06:10, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote: * Updated Translations: - Swedish (Ulf Wilhelmson) - Hungarian (Höss Lajos) Just have committed ru.po update to 2009.2 branch. Alexandre --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Enblend: CMake (Windows) broken
2009/9/22 Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch
Kornel Benko wrote:
Anyway it sholud read like:
if(OpenMP_CXX_FLAGS)
set_target_properties(${_cmd} PROPERTIES LINK_FLAGS
${OpenMP_CXX_FLAGS})
message(STATUS Adding PROPERTIES LINK_FLAGS to ${_cmd})
endif(Boost_FOUND)
it works (after replacing the small error - it should read
endif(OpenMP_CXX_FLAGS) and not endif(Boost_FOUND), and it goes before
the endif(Boost_FOUND).
I've commmitted to Hg.
just synced at 18:30 CET.
cmake runs and finishes correctly but mentions in the end:
-- Sorry, but there is no file
/Users/Shared/development/hugin_related/ExternalPrograms/enblendcs/doc/enblend.pdf
to copy. Leave it out
-- Sorry, but there is no directory
/Users/Shared/development/hugin_related/ExternalPrograms/enblendcs/doc/enblend.html
to copy. Leave it out
-- Sorry, but there is no file
/Users/Shared/development/hugin_related/ExternalPrograms/enblendcs/doc/enfuse.pdf
to copy. Leave it out
-- Sorry, but there is no directory
/Users/Shared/development/hugin_related/ExternalPrograms/enblendcs/doc/enfuse.html
to copy. Leave it out
-- Configuring done
-- Generating done
-- Build files have been written to:
/Users/Shared/development/hugin_related/ExternalPrograms/enblendcs/build
What does Sorry, but there is no file blahblah to copy. Leave it out
mean? Is this the supposed doc1/doc2 phase?
the next error to fix (maybe related to Chris' changes:
CMakeError: Unknown Target referenced: doc1
and the same for doc2
I guess on OSX doc1 and doc2 build well?
Yuv
What is built by doc1 and doc2?
Scanning dependencies of target man
[ 81%] Generating enblend.1
[ 81%] Generating enfuse.1
[ 88%] Built target man
Scanning dependencies of target doc3
[ 88%] Copy
/Users/Shared/development/hugin_related/ExternalPrograms/enblendcs/doc/
enblend.info enblend.info
[ 88%] Copy
/Users/Shared/development/hugin_related/ExternalPrograms/enblendcs/doc/
enfuse.info enfuse.info
[ 88%] Copy
/Users/Shared/development/hugin_related/ExternalPrograms/enblendcs/doc/CMakeLists.txt
CMakeLists.txt
[100%] Built target doc3
I have the idea that doc1 and doc2 are not built. As you can see only the
.info files are built. No pdf, dvi, html and xhtml.
when running make doc1 or make doc2 I get make: *** No rule to make
target `doc1'. Stop. (ditto for doc2)
Harry
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.2.0_RC1 source code distribution released
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: Just have committed ru.po update to 2009.2 branch. Thank you. do updated translation require an additional RC? I would be inclined to simply add the translations to the next tarball and release it as final right away (assuming no code changes), but maybe I am overlooking something? we also have an updated Chinese traditional (thank you, Rick). Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Matt Williams schreef: Hey Stefan. I was wondering when you might turn up. I have posted bounties on this list for increasing documentation and for features ;) So I turned up well before you ;) I guessed you don't read talk...@osm.org but I knew you were working on stuff in this area. From what I could tell, you haven't made much progress with processing the images yet (although I do like the quadcopter thing :D). If I'm mistaken or if you could be of help with the Stratford Imagery it would be much appreciated. I haven't been able to find any mailing list discussions of your work. We did; we have a rectifying program, and like I posted before I was pointed myself to efoto. From there on we can use qgis and mapserver for final positioning. Come and idle in #osp on oftc ;) In the mean time, I've found that some people have started a project based on Orfeo-toolbox for simplifying the workflow and it sounds like it could be useful for our purpose, they even mention OpenStreetMap (http://wiki.orfeo-toolbox.org/index.php/Monteverdi). I guess we should all focus on implementations that already exist? Perhaps we'd do well to take this discussion to an OSM list of some kind (maybe 'photos@' or 'talk@')? Also a possibility. Stefan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREKAAYFAkq5A0IACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn2APwCfczUDKoqrodPiNVdbp/H8kYar mogAn0hnBJuWS3MZamAAXdPzFFlIrnpr =ZbO+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.2.0_RC1 source code distribution released
On Tue 22-Sep-2009 at 12:58 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: Just have committed ru.po update to 2009.2 branch. do updated translation require an additional RC? Yes. -- Bruno --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Enblend: CMake (Windows) broken
Harry van der Wolf wrote: What does Sorry, but there is no file blahblah to copy. Leave it out mean? Is this the supposed doc1/doc2 phase? sounds like it is the same. and there is also doc3 (I did not notice that before). What is built by doc1 and doc2? documentation? I hoped OSX was in a better state than Windows based on your recent publication of the manuals. Maybe you used autotools? current status with Windows: Cmake complains about the doc1/doc2/doc3 but generates the sln file to kick off MSVC. On my box (might be a misconfiguration / missing file on my side) in MSVC some things works, other not. Specifically, for the Release target: 1vigra_impex - 0 error(s), 5 warning(s) 2z:\store\s1tb\hugin_gsoc2009\hugin-sdk-20090509-win32\enblend\src\mask.h(33) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'slist': No such file or directory 2enblend - 1 error(s), 2 warning(s) 3filenameparse.obj : MSIL .netmodule or module compiled with /GL found; restarting link with /LTCG; add /LTCG to the link command line to improve linker performance 3msvcprt.lib(MSVCP90.dll) : error LNK2005: protected: char const * __thiscall std::basic_stringchar,struct std::char_traitschar,class std::allocatorchar ::_Myptr(void)const (?_my...@?$basic_string@du?$char_tra...@d@std@@v?$alloca...@d@2@@std@@IBEPBDXZ) already defined in IlmImf.lib(ImfRgbaFile.obj) and plenty of other such LNK2005 errors, most of them in msvcprt.lib(MSVCP90.dll), two in libcpmt.lib(ios.obj), seven in libcpmt.lib(locale0.obj), two in libcpmt.lib(xlock.obj) 3LINK : warning LNK4098: defaultlib 'LIBCMT' conflicts with use of other libs; use /NODEFAULTLIB:library 3Z:\store\s1tb\hugin_gsoc2009\Hugin-SDK-20090509-win32\enblend.build\bin\Release\enfuse.exe : fatal error LNK1169: one or more multiply defined symbols found 3enfuse - 73 error(s), 6 warning(s) 5man - 0 error(s), 0 warning(s) 4doc3 - 0 error(s), 0 warning(s) what am I doing wrong, and how can I fix this? Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Enblend: CMake (Windows) broken
2009/9/22 Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch What is built by doc1 and doc2? documentation? I hoped OSX was in a better state than Windows based on your recent publication of the manuals. Maybe you used autotools? Yes, I did. And what's more: I did it on my Ubuntu webserver as OSX for some reasons generates errors for fig2dev even though the versions are the same. For the documentation I did: ./configure and in doc: make doc make dvi make pdf make html make xhtml Harry --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.2.0_RC1 source code distribution released
Bruno Postle wrote: do updated translation require an additional RC? Yes. will issue one tonight. For future release cycles I am tempted to put forward a motion to speed up the RC process: - if code and build maturity warrant that an RC can be declared final, it is declared final without considering the late translations. - late translation applied after final release go into the next patch release (if somebody cares to release one) and of course in trunk and the next release. The reason behind this motion is that I rather release 2009.4.0_beta1 next, after declaring final what is out there now for 2009.2.0. It's one tarball less to produce, to get to the same place. Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2008_masking
Bruno Postle wrote: On Unix you use gamin/FAM to ask the system to tell the application if a file has changed, it is possible wxwidgets has a cross-platform abstraction for this. Googling a bit I found it was suggested as GSoC 2007 project but not implemented back then. http://wiki.wxwidgets.org/SoC_2007_suggestions I found mentions of wxFAM in their mailing list as early as 2004. Then, with a little bit more digging, I got lucky: http://svn.wxwidgets.org/viewvc/wx/wxWidgets/branches/SOC2009_FSWATCHER/ wxFSwatcher was a GSoC 2009 project. http://wxwidgets.blogspot.com/2009/09/august-news.html it is in their SVN, waiting to go into their trunk. I can't wait for us to bump up the wxWidgets version required to build Hugin :-) Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.2.0_RC1 source code distribution released
On Tue 22-Sep-2009 at 13:36 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: Bruno Postle wrote: do updated translation require an additional RC? Yes. For future release cycles I am tempted to put forward a motion to speed up the RC process: - if code and build maturity warrant that an RC can be declared final, it is declared final without considering the late translations. Yes of course, we are already operating on the principle that 'stable' releases are going to go out with partial translations. -- Bruno --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching
Hi Matt, This is the method I had been using before, but obviously without the Tilt parameters and so it really struggled. Actually, I played around a little, and I wasn't satisfied with the tilt parameters, so changed libpano to allow estimate the X,Y and Z camera position (assuming a planar earth). I still need to do some final testing, but so far it doesn't look too bad. Thanks a lot for all your suggestions. I think I'm going to have to get a working group together within OSM to try to work on these problems. This experiment with aerial photography will likely be repeated again and so I feel it's worthwhile for us to create a strong open source workflow for creating full stitched images. Please keep me updated. Where do you discuss these issues? ciao Pablo --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2008_masking
Harry van der Wolf wrote: Gamin and FAM do not exist on OSX. There are several third-party (free, shareware and commercial) tools for OSX (some based on the kevent() kernel event) that do the same, but nothing official. let's hope they implemented it in wxWidgets. wxFileSystemWatcher seems to be scheduled for 2.9.1 http://trac.wxwidgets.org/changeset/61658 2.9.0 was released two weeks ago. Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: svn 4450 hugin installer for Windows Vista
Oskar Sander wrote: User or developer fault? ;-) nobody's really. Autopano-SIFT-C is known to be unstable/broken in trunk. And the previous version is known to have memory leaks that are fixed in trunk. Ad informs you on his download site about some of the more dynamic dependencies in his installers. Specifically for the hugin-SVN4450 installer he used autopano-SIFT-C SVN 4450. The safest thing for you to do is to go back to that version of Hugin that worked for you. If you're adventurous, you can look into C:\Program Files\Hugin\bin (or wherever Hugin is installed on your system) and replace autopano-sift-c.exe with the older one (from the version of Hugin that worked for you). You can have both versions of Hugin side by side by installing in a folder different than the default folder. In this case, the two versions will share settings (i.e. registry!). If the settings are messed up, there is a convenient reset defaults button in the preferences. thanks for testing and reporting. keep them coming Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.2.0_RC1 source code distribution released
Bruno Postle wrote: On Tue 22-Sep-2009 at 13:36 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: Bruno Postle wrote: do updated translation require an additional RC? Yes. For future release cycles I am tempted to put forward a motion to speed up the RC process: - if code and build maturity warrant that an RC can be declared final, it is declared final without considering the late translations. Yes of course, we are already operating on the principle that 'stable' releases are going to go out with partial translations. oh... I was under the impression that we did not. well, if Rick and Alexandre forgive me, unless there is a code bug in RC1, I'll release their updated translations with 2009.4.0_beta1. can do other things tonight - such as fixing my Windows box... Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching
Matt Williams wrote: 2009/9/22 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com: Hi Matt, If you experiment on this further, it would be really sweet if you did a tutorial writeup here even if it doesn't work out perfect right now. I absolutely will. This won't be the last time that OSM hire a plane for some aerial photography and so it's important that we find a decent way of doing it. I have played a little with the images, and from my perspective, it would be more usable, if the camera with a wide angle lens (maybe 28 mm instead of 50 mm) would be used especially for the nadir shots. Flying at a higher altitude will probably also help. They probably still have enough detail for mapping (you probably do not need 5 cm ground resolution or so, 10 or 20 cm are probably enough to recognize most details required for mapping. At work, we have a full frame camera system ( 3xCanon EOS-1d) with 50 mm lenses. Flying that at 1000m gives reasonable detail when looking straight down and the imaged area is much larger than with your example images, making them easier to handle. ciao Pablo --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.2.0_RC1 source code distribution released
On Tue 22-Sep-2009 at 14:08 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: Yes of course, we are already operating on the principle that 'stable' releases are going to go out with partial translations. oh... I was under the impression that we did not. well, if Rick and Alexandre forgive me, unless there is a code bug in RC1, I'll release their updated translations with 2009.4.0_beta1. So long as a 'final' tarball doesn't go out without being an 'rc' first. This is the status of translations in the current 2009.2 branch: cs_CZ.po complete. hu.pocomplete. it.pocomplete. nl.pocomplete. sv.pocomplete. zh_TW.po complete. es.po 2 untranslated messages. de.po 3 untranslated messages. ru.po 3 untranslated messages. zh_CN.po 4 untranslated messages. fr.po 25 untranslated messages. sk.po 26 untranslated messages. ja.po 51 untranslated messages. bg.po101 untranslated messages. ko.po109 untranslated messages. pl.po110 untranslated messages. sl.po147 untranslated messages. uk.po176 untranslated messages. pt_BR.po 216 untranslated messages. ca_ES.po 255 untranslated messages. -- Bruno --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching
Stefan de Konink wrote: We did; we have a rectifying program, and like I posted before I was pointed myself to efoto. From there on we can use qgis and mapserver for final positioning. Come and idle in #osp on oftc ;) Do you have a procedure that works nicely for the large amount of image? I couldn't find anything on http://www.openstreetphoto.org ? ciao Pablo --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching
2009/9/22 Pablo d'Angelo pablo.dang...@web.de: Hi Matt, This is the method I had been using before, but obviously without the Tilt parameters and so it really struggled. Actually, I played around a little, and I wasn't satisfied with the tilt parameters, so changed libpano to allow estimate the X,Y and Z camera position (assuming a planar earth). I still need to do some final testing, but so far it doesn't look too bad. I see you've checked some of these changes into SVN, I've uncommented the '#define MOSAIC_XYZ 1' line in adjust.c. Is there anything I need to do elsewhere to allow it estimate these variables? Thanks a lot for all your suggestions. I think I'm going to have to get a working group together within OSM to try to work on these problems. This experiment with aerial photography will likely be repeated again and so I feel it's worthwhile for us to create a strong open source workflow for creating full stitched images. Please keep me updated. Where do you discuss these issues? Well, I only got involved in this a few days ago but Stefan de Konink has been looking at this for a while now. As I understand it, most discussion has gone on in the Dutch language list so far. -- Matt Williams http://milliams.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching
2009/9/22 Pablo d'Angelo pablo.dang...@web.de: Matt Williams wrote: 2009/9/22 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com: Hi Matt, If you experiment on this further, it would be really sweet if you did a tutorial writeup here even if it doesn't work out perfect right now. I absolutely will. This won't be the last time that OSM hire a plane for some aerial photography and so it's important that we find a decent way of doing it. I have played a little with the images, and from my perspective, it would be more usable, if the camera with a wide angle lens (maybe 28 mm instead of 50 mm) would be used especially for the nadir shots. Flying at a higher altitude will probably also help. They probably still have enough detail for mapping (you probably do not need 5 cm ground resolution or so, 10 or 20 cm are probably enough to recognize most details required for mapping. At work, we have a full frame camera system ( 3xCanon EOS-1d) with 50 mm lenses. Flying that at 1000m gives reasonable detail when looking straight down and the imaged area is much larger than with your example images, making them easier to handle. Ok. That's definitely something worth considering for the future. For the shots you've seen, the camera was provided by whoever in the area had a camera and free time for when the plane was booked. It's possible we could obtain a higher quality camera as a community. I guess Stefan won't want to spend his grant money on a camera that is too heavy for a Quadcopter :) -- Matt Williams http://milliams.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching
Matt Williams wrote: 2009/9/22 Pablo d'Angelo pablo.dang...@web.de: Hi Matt, This is the method I had been using before, but obviously without the Tilt parameters and so it really struggled. Actually, I played around a little, and I wasn't satisfied with the tilt parameters, so changed libpano to allow estimate the X,Y and Z camera position (assuming a planar earth). I still need to do some final testing, but so far it doesn't look too bad. I see you've checked some of these changes into SVN, I've uncommented the '#define MOSAIC_XYZ 1' line in adjust.c. Is there anything I need to do elsewhere to allow it estimate these variables? No. With these you could just try to optimize y,p,r,Tx,Ty,Tz for all images except the first one. ciao Pablo --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching (using new mosaic mode)
Pablo d'Angelo schrieb: Matt Williams wrote: 2009/9/22 Pablo d'Angelo pablo.dang...@web.de: Hi Matt, This is the method I had been using before, but obviously without the Tilt parameters and so it really struggled. Actually, I played around a little, and I wasn't satisfied with the tilt parameters, so changed libpano to allow estimate the X,Y and Z camera position (assuming a planar earth). I still need to do some final testing, but so far it doesn't look too bad. I see you've checked some of these changes into SVN, I've uncommented the '#define MOSAIC_XYZ 1' line in adjust.c. Is there anything I need to do elsewhere to allow it estimate these variables? No. With these you could just try to optimize y,p,r,Tx,Ty,Tz for all images except the first one. There is a bug in panotools. Sometimes it does not optimize parameters if they are exactly set to 0. This seems to affect the Tx, Ty and Tz parameters as well (a,b,c parameters are the other parameter that suffer from this). So simply add Tx0.1 Ty0.1 Tz0.1 to i lines, except for the first one. Note: the names of the Tx, Ty, Tz parameters are only valid with the current svn and the MOSAIC_XYZ define in adjust.c. They will be available under another name in the future (probably just X Y Z). Here is the result of merging images 539-549 from http://vps-1005786-1584.united-hoster.de/tmp/539-549.jpg It is not referenced to an OSM map (too late in the evening...), but the result looks very promising. It also shows that the sideward views are probably not that helpful for mapping, at least when reprojecting them. Quick procedure: 1. panomatic -o 539-549.pto *.jpg 2. hugin 539-549.pto - set focal length to 50mm (~ HFOV 26°) - open fast preview - set projection to rectilinear, - select hfov and vfov ~ 100 - show only the first image. - use the drag tool to move the first image so that it roughly looking like a nadir image - select all images again - Go to the optimizer tab, select (optimize y,p,r) - tick edit script - copy script into a text file 539.549.txt - Edit script, add Tx0.1 Ty0.1 Tz0.1 to i lines, except for the first one. - modify the v lines to include Tx# Ty# Tz# (where # is the image number) - run PToptimizer 539-549.txt - run PTmender -o 539-549 539-549.txt - run PTroller -o 539-549.tif 539-5490*.tif - crop 539-549.tif in your favorite image editor. ciao Pablo --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.2.0_RC1 source code distribution released
Bruno Postle wrote: So long as a 'final' tarball doesn't go out without being an 'rc' first. understood :) This is the status of translations in the current 2009.2 branch: do you have a script to extract this kind of statistics? and what is the total number of strings? I've looked at the .po files and the headers are (excuse my English) quite messy. It's not high priority, but they should be normalized. Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Pablo d'Angelo schreef: Do you have a procedure that works nicely for the large amount of image? Next to just adding them to Hugin and per photo stitching we don't have it. But I saw your last email and I wonder: How did you solve the altitude difference? Because we have many problems with that. If in one flight different altitudes were flown hugin really can't stitch it. Stefan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREKAAYFAkq5UtYACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn2qmQCfTiYr4LxyjFtMO+HVa1em2Jw9 Lw0AnjryTx1OfjSylBBltgHSAh68yvIW =VKWd -END PGP SIGNATURE- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2008_masking
I am looking at this to scratch an itch. I don't like having to load my images into another program to edit the alpha channel. My needs are pretty basic as I had only considered negative masking and really just a way to paint out certain areas before the remapping and blending. So one could consider that a use case. I know there are others. In this case, I thought adding the masking interface to the crop tab would be the best place, as one is attempting to acomplish basically the same thing: remove undesired parts from the source image. Typically, I would just want to paint in the mask with varying sizes of soft brushes. I think the masks should be polylines rather than bitmaps, this way they can be stored in the .pto project itself. There would need to be the facility for more than one loop per input photo, hand-drawn loops would need to be able to extend outside the image canvas and overlap with each other without failing. Although editing the masks in the remapped projection (i.e. in the preview) makes a lot of sense, they need to be stored in the same coordinate space as the original photo and converted back and forth for use. Otherwise just dragging the panorama or optimising would invalidate the masks (this is one of the drawbacks of using tiff2svg/inkscape/enblend-svg). Having said that, initially a simple editor in the 'photo' space, just an extension of the Crop tab would still be very useful. This wouldn't require any code to remap polyline coordinates. If converting back and forth is it likely that spline curves would survive the transformation better than straight edged polygons. The way the masks should operate is at the nona stage, masked-out areas shouldn't be sampled, and as a result will become 100% transparent in the files that are sent to enblend/enfuse. Positive masking would be some what tricky since, as far as I know, the only way to guarantee an area of one image will definately appear is to apply a negative mask to all of the overlapping images of the area. Is that correct? That's right, but it works very well. I would expect that in a full implementation positive and negative masking would be used equally. -- Bruno --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching
There is software out there for model RC planes that will allow you to use an altimeter and get a constant height with a gps combo It'll fly a grid pattern as well. Dale Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:42:30 +0200 From: ste...@konink.de To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Pablo d'Angelo schreef: Do you have a procedure that works nicely for the large amount of image? Next to just adding them to Hugin and per photo stitching we don't have it. But I saw your last email and I wonder: How did you solve the altitude difference? Because we have many problems with that. If in one flight different altitudes were flown hugin really can't stitch it. Stefan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREKAAYFAkq5UtYACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn2qmQCfTiYr4LxyjFtMO+HVa1em2Jw9 Lw0AnjryTx1OfjSylBBltgHSAh68yvIW =VKWd -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that’s right for you. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/choosepc/?ocid=ftp_val_wl_290 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.2.0_RC1 source code distribution released
Bruno Postle wrote: msgfmt --statistics eo_XX.po thanks. I updated http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_translation_guide#Statistics There are 1044 strings in the hugin.pot file. The main translation problem we have now is that many of these strings are in the sourcecode, but not in bits that are used - i.e. there are strings that are being translated unnecessarily (the panodruid for example). and I've added this to the list of issues there. Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2008_masking
Hi All, Based on the responses from this thread I can glean the following: - Masks should be stored as vector paths and attached to the project (pto) files - Editing the masks in the preview is desirable. - positive masking is as useful as negative masking. Strange that those three things are opposite what I normally do or thought I would use. I had originally proposed a simple alpha channel editor with paint brushes. I can see the advantages of the above listed points, I am just surprised at consistency of the replies. Perhaps I need to revisit my workflow :-) Best Regards, - Gerry --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
