Re: VMARC download date

2008-10-02 Thread Shimon Lebowitz
a) regarding DMSPLU, I have an exec named SETDATI which 
embeds DMSPLU. IIRC, it was based on an ancient EXECSERV
function. My exec supports ! (exclamation point) instead
of / (slash) as the date delimiter, allowing me to use it 
from Filelist.

b) when I am unsure if a 'new' VMARC is different from the 
one I have, I usually run a simple COMPARE. Only if they
show up as different do I actually compare the files and
dates in them, by dumping each to a different tdisk or
sfs dir. I have an MDSKCMPR exec that will compare all 
the files on two supplied filemodes, giving 4 outputs:
equal files, unequal, only found on first, only on second.

Shalom,
Shimon


 Original message 
Date:   Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:23:17 EDT
From:   Fran Hensler [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Subject:   Re: VMARC download date  
To:   IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

On my VM Download Site ( http://zvm.sru.edu/~download ) I 
always use
DMSPLU to make the date of the VMARC file be the same as the 
latest
file it contains.

For those unfamiliar with DMSPLU the syntax is:
DMSPLU fn ft fm mm/dd/yy hh:mm:ss

/Fran Hensler at Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania 
USA for 45 years
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://zvm.sru.edu/~fjh  
+1.724.738.2153
  Yes, Virginia, there is a Slippery Rock
-
-
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:46:30 -0400 Phil Smith III said:
(Mike Walter wrote about VMARCs not having a timestamp on a 
VMARC.)

Seems to me that the real problem here is with the 
originating site.


Re: Tracking Hot Spots

2008-10-02 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:33 AM, Schuh, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 We have a situation where we need to discover what hot spots exist in
 specific virtual machines, where they are spending the most execution time,
 from outside the machines in question. Are there any tools that can do this
 type of monitoring? Turning on traces in the machines has been rejected
 because of the impact to the machines.

The ideal is to have some kind of high-frequency sampling. With Linux,
we enable the 100 Hz timer and record the old PSW on timer ticks. The
overhead of measuring that is normally acceptable. Don't know whether
TPF has such a thing (hope not, since it hurts performance).
I've also done things in the past by analysis of the CP trace table.
You need to cut down to trace just the runuser type entries for the
user you profile, otherwise it gets too big. The sampling is not
uniform, but since I think TPF does a lot of I/O, it may be frequent
enough.
-Rob


Re: VMARC download date

2008-10-02 Thread Jeff Gribbin
I'm not wholly comfortable with the :TLR implementation and the (then) 

inevitable problem that VMARC would be generating archives that were 
incompatible with older versions of VMARC (and, probably, VMAGUI - 
something that I've just recently come to seriously appreciate).

I'd like to propose that, rather than introducing a new record-type, it 

would be more friendly to introduce a dummy file, placed last in the 
archive, which contains all the desired tracking information. In addition
 
to preserving backward-compatibility, this solution would be more amenabl
e 
to future, improvements as space would be, effectively, unlimited.

Regards,
Jeff


Re: VMARC download date

2008-10-02 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Jeff Gribbin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'd like to propose that, rather than introducing a new record-type, it
 would be more friendly to introduce a dummy file, placed last in the
 archive, which contains all the desired tracking information. In addition
 to preserving backward-compatibility, this solution would be more amenable
 to future, improvements as space would be, effectively, unlimited.

When I was looking at adding an index, the idea was indeed to make it
a dummy file at the end. You can overwrite that when you add files to
the archive, and the time stamp of the dummy file would correspond to
the last update of the archive. But never had time to write the
wrapper to maintain that index.

Part of that code is here now:
http://rvdheij.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/listing-the-contents-of-vmarc/

-Rob


Re: VMARC download date

2008-10-02 Thread Phil Smith III
Humbly submitted, the following EXEC to show you the most recent file in a 
VMARC. Seems to me that since you need to download the file anyway to see the 
:TLR info, this solves the problem in a similar way. (Yes, there could be a bad 
VMARC that is *missing* or has an invalid copy of an *older* file, but at that 
point, I think you're in a world o' hurt anyway...)

/**/
   address command
   arg fn ft fm . '(' options ')'
   all = '| take first 1'
   do while options  ''
  parse var options option options
  select
 when option = 'ALL' then all = ''
 otherwise
 say 'Invalid option 'option''
 exit 24
  end
   end
   if abbrev('?', fn) then signal Help
   if ft = '' then ft = 'VMARC'
   if fm = '' then fm = '*'
   'PIPE (name ArcLast endchar ?)' ,
 '| ' fn ft fm ,
 '| strfind /:CFF/' ,
 '| specs 11.18 1 31-33 20' ,
 '| specs 1.8 1 9.8 10' ,
 '20.1 c2x 22 @/@ 24 21.1 c2x 25 @/@ 27 22.1 c2x 28' ,
 '| nineties: locate 22 /0/' , /* Send 19xx away */
 '| specs 1-18 1 /20/ 20 22-* n' ,
 '| rejoin: faninany' ,
 '| sort 20-25 d' ,
 all ,
 '| cons' ,
 '?' ,
 'nineties:' ,
 '| specs 1-18 1 /19/ 20 22-* n' ,
 '| rejoin:'
   exit
Help:
   say 'ARCLAST lists the most recent file in a VMARC (or, optionally,'
   say 'all files in a VMARC, sorted with most recent files first).'
   say ''
   say 'Format is:'
   say ''
   say 'ARCLAST fn ft fm ( ALL ) '
   say ''
   say 'where fn ft fm is the fileid of a VMARC file; ft fm'
   say 'default to VMARC *.'
   say ''
   say 'The ALL option lists all files, not just the most recent.'
   say ''
   say 'Comments/complaints/suggestions/cash to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'


Re: GONE exec

2008-10-02 Thread Bruce Hayden
Wayne's is based on WAKEUP.  I've never used it, since I wrote my own
way back when, and it is based on WAKEUP also.

On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Rick Troth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Is Wayne's the GONE which is based on PROP?
 The first GONE I ever encountered was PROP based
 and required that you STOP when reconnecting.  Very annoying.
 (But maybe Wayne Preism's GONE is driven by WAKEUP or something.)

 -- R;   


-- 
Bruce Hayden
Linux on System z Advanced Technical Support
IBM, Endicott, NY


Re: GONE exec

2008-10-02 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Bruce Hayden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Wayne's is based on WAKEUP.  I've never used it, since I wrote my own
 way back when, and it is based on WAKEUP also.

And I recall that some versions of GONE floating around in IBM would
also waste some CPU resources so that the user was not considered idle
and thus forced off the system...

Rob


Re: VMARC download date

2008-10-02 Thread Jim Bohnsack
This index type of file would really be the same a a PACKAGE file in an 
offering from the IBM Download site, at least some of the offerings.  
The Package file did everything that you both are referring to plus a 
little extra.  I never knew if there was a special tool to help generate 
a PACKAGE file.  It's basically output of listfile fn ft fm (da with 
extra stuff in it such as comments and heading info with author, date, etc.


Jim

Rob van der Heij wrote:

On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Jeff Gribbin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  

I'd like to propose that, rather than introducing a new record-type, it
would be more friendly to introduce a dummy file, placed last in the
archive, which contains all the desired tracking information. In addition
to preserving backward-compatibility, this solution would be more amenable
to future, improvements as space would be, effectively, unlimited.



When I was looking at adding an index, the idea was indeed to make it
a dummy file at the end. You can overwrite that when you add files to
the archive, and the time stamp of the dummy file would correspond to
the last update of the archive. But never had time to write the
wrapper to maintain that index.

Part of that code is here now:
http://rvdheij.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/listing-the-contents-of-vmarc/

-Rob

  


--
Jim Bohnsack
Cornell University
(972) 596-6377 home/office
(972) 342-5823 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: VMARC download date

2008-10-02 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Phil Smith III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Humbly submitted, the following EXEC to show you the most recent file in a 
 VMARC. Seems to me that since you need to download the file anyway to see the 
 :TLR info, this solves the problem in a similar way. (Yes, there could be a 
 bad VMARC that is *missing* or has an invalid copy of an *older* file, but at 
 that point, I think you're in a world o' hurt anyway...)

Even more humbly, with the REXX stage I referred to, it would go like:
  pipe  alex vmarc | vmarclst iso | sort 57.19 | take last | cons

and if you want to change the time stamp of your VMARC file, you stick
before the cons stage
 | dateconvert w4 iso short | spec ,DMSPLU ALEX VMARC A, 1 57.19 nw | command

-Rob


Re: Tracking Hot Spots

2008-10-02 Thread LOREN CHARNLEY
Your best bet would be to investigate the Velocity Software Suite, they
are the only ones to have the performance monitor for VM. You would
probably have to customize the reports that you would need but that is
fairly straight forward. Velocity also has an excellent support staff.

 

Loren Charnley, Jr.

IT Systems Engineer

FAMILY DOLLAR

(704) 847-6961 Ext. 3327

(704) 814-3327

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 6:33 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Tracking Hot Spots

 

We have a situation where we need to discover what hot spots exist in
specific virtual machines, where they are spending the most execution
time, from outside the machines in question. Are there any tools that
can do this type of monitoring? Turning on traces in the machines has
been rejected because of the impact to the machines.

Regards,
Richard Schuh 

 




-
 NOTE:
This e-mail message contains PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL
information and is intended only for the use of the specific
individual or individuals to which it is addressed. If you are not
an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that
any unauthorized use, dissemination or copying of this e-mail or
the information contained herein or attached hereto is strictly
prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, notify the person
named above by reply e-mail and please delete it. Thank you.

Recovery question

2008-10-02 Thread Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Hi

 

I am trying to bring up my test LPAR which is a clone of another VM
LPAR. Before I did this I needed to update the SYSTEM CONFIG file and
the USER DIRECTORY to point to different RES, PAGE, SPOOL..etc.

 

I attached the RES of the system I am trying to bring up to the working
system, I then issued a DEFINE MDISK 991 39 120 53DRES and then ACC 991
M.

 

After I did this I was pointing to my SYSTEM CONFIG file on the TEST
RES. I made the changes to the SYSTEM CONFIG file and saved it.

 

Next, I wanted to change the USER DIRECT to point to different RES and
such. I did another DEFINE MDISK 991 511 175 53DRES and then ACC 991 M.

 

After I did this I was pointing to my USER DIRECT file on the TEST RES.
I made the changes to the USER DIRECT file and saved it.

 

Next, I tried IPLing the TEST LPAR and I noticed that it was still
looking at the SYSTEM CONFIG without my changes from above as well the
USER DIRECT without my changes from above. It appears that the changes
did not take.

 

Where did I go wrong?

 

Thank You,

 

Terry Martin

Lockheed Martin - Information Technology

z/OS  z/VM Systems - Performance and Tuning

Cell - 443 632-4191

Work - 410 786-0386

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 



Re: Question

2008-10-02 Thread Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Point taken!

Thank You,
 
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Information Technology
z/OS  z/VM Systems - Performance and Tuning
Cell - 443 632-4191
Work - 410 786-0386
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richard Corak
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 7:55 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Question

Perhaps I could suggest that one not use as subject a content-free 
term like question.  I'm guessing that the overwhelming majority of 
threads start with a question.  We might all be better served with a 
subject line that does, in fact, mention the subject.

Richard Corak


Re: Tracking Hot Spots

2008-10-02 Thread Dean, David (I/S)
Any experience out there with Omegamon for zvm and linux that sits on
top of Perfkit?  Does it give more / better info?  Easier?  We currently
use Perfkit for real time monitoring and are fairly satisfied with that.


 

We do not have the drill down into the linux boxes set up (rmfpms?), any
links, input, etc. on that would also be really appreciated.

 

Thanks for all the excellent info I am getting here.

 

David Dean

Information Systems

*bcbstauthorized*

 

 

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of LOREN CHARNLEY
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 9:36 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Tracking Hot Spots

 

Your best bet would be to investigate the Velocity Software Suite, they
are the only ones to have the performance monitor for VM. You would
probably have to customize the reports that you would need but that is
fairly straight forward. Velocity also has an excellent support staff.

 

Loren Charnley, Jr.

IT Systems Engineer

FAMILY DOLLAR

(704) 847-6961 Ext. 3327

(704) 814-3327

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 6:33 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Tracking Hot Spots

 

We have a situation where we need to discover what hot spots exist in
specific virtual machines, where they are spending the most execution
time, from outside the machines in question. Are there any tools that
can do this type of monitoring? Turning on traces in the machines has
been rejected because of the impact to the machines.

Regards,
Richard Schuh 

 



 NOTE: This
e-mail message contains PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL information and is
intended only for the use of the specific individual or individuals to
which it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized use, dissemination
or copying of this e-mail or the information contained herein or
attached hereto is strictly prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in
error, notify the person named above by reply e-mail and please delete
it. Thank you. 

Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail 
disclaimer:  http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm


Re: Recovery question

2008-10-02 Thread Kris Buelens
I don't see any mistakes.  However
- For SYSTEM CONFIG:
  are you sure that DEFINE MDISK 991 39 120 53DRES points to the CF1
of the new system,
  and/or that the new system is IPLed with CF1 as its IPL input?
- For the CP directory
  You did mention you changed the directory source, but not that you placed
  the changed directory online on the RES of the new system, So
   DEFINE MDISK 991 511 175 53DRES #ACC 991 M
   DETACH 123
   DEFINE MDISK 123 0 END 53DRES
   DIRECTXA fn DIRECT M
   DET 123 991

2008/10/2 Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Hi



 I am trying to bring up my test LPAR which is a clone of another VM LPAR. 
 Before I did this I needed to update the SYSTEM CONFIG file and the USER 
 DIRECTORY to point to different RES, PAGE, SPOOL..etc.



 I attached the RES of the system I am trying to bring up to the working 
 system, I then issued a DEFINE MDISK 991 39 120 53DRES and then ACC 991 M.



 After I did this I was pointing to my SYSTEM CONFIG file on the TEST RES. I 
 made the changes to the SYSTEM CONFIG file and saved it.



 Next, I wanted to change the USER DIRECT to point to different RES and such. 
 I did another DEFINE MDISK 991 511 175 53DRES and then ACC 991 M.



 After I did this I was pointing to my USER DIRECT file on the TEST RES. I 
 made the changes to the USER DIRECT file and saved it.



 Next, I tried IPLing the TEST LPAR and I noticed that it was still looking at 
 the SYSTEM CONFIG without my changes from above as well the USER DIRECT 
 without my changes from above. It appears that the changes did not take.



 Where did I go wrong?



 Thank You,



 Terry Martin

 Lockheed Martin - Information Technology

 z/OS  z/VM Systems - Performance and Tuning

 Cell - 443 632-4191

 Work - 410 786-0386

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support


Re: Recovery question

2008-10-02 Thread Bob Bates
First another question. When you updated the USER DIRECT did you expect
the changes made there to b online when you IPL's the system? You did
not mention a DIRECTXA of the USER DIRECT to the new RES pack (assuming
that is where the DRCT space is allocated). Without those changes you
may not be seeing any of the changes you expect to see.
 
The USER DIRECT file is just a source file. The DRCT space allocated for
the system is where CP reads all the definitions.
 

Bob Bates 
Enterprise Hosting Services - Enterprise Virtualization - z/VM and
z/Linux
http://ehs.homestead.wellsfargo.com/Mainframe/zSS/zSE/zVM-zLinux/Pages/
default.aspx 

w. (469)892-6660 
c. (214) 907-5071 

This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information herein.  If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.


 

  _  

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:42 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Recovery question



Hi

 

I am trying to bring up my test LPAR which is a clone of another VM
LPAR. Before I did this I needed to update the SYSTEM CONFIG file and
the USER DIRECTORY to point to different RES, PAGE, SPOOL..etc.

 

I attached the RES of the system I am trying to bring up to the working
system, I then issued a DEFINE MDISK 991 39 120 53DRES and then ACC 991
M.

 

After I did this I was pointing to my SYSTEM CONFIG file on the TEST
RES. I made the changes to the SYSTEM CONFIG file and saved it.

 

Next, I wanted to change the USER DIRECT to point to different RES and
such. I did another DEFINE MDISK 991 511 175 53DRES and then ACC 991 M.

 

After I did this I was pointing to my USER DIRECT file on the TEST RES.
I made the changes to the USER DIRECT file and saved it.

 

Next, I tried IPLing the TEST LPAR and I noticed that it was still
looking at the SYSTEM CONFIG without my changes from above as well the
USER DIRECT without my changes from above. It appears that the changes
did not take.

 

Where did I go wrong?

 

Thank You,

 

Terry Martin

Lockheed Martin - Information Technology

z/OS  z/VM Systems - Performance and Tuning

Cell - 443 632-4191

Work - 410 786-0386

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 



Re: Recovery question

2008-10-02 Thread Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Hi

Thanks, I did not bring the new DIRECTORY online I thought about this
but I did not know the exact procedure to accomplish under the working
system. I guess I also thought that at IPL time it would bring in the
USER DIRECTORY that was sitting at 511 175(in my case). I understand now
how this is working. 

Thanks again for the help it is much appreciated. I am LEARNING!!

Thank You,
 
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Information Technology
z/OS  z/VM Systems - Performance and Tuning
Cell - 443 632-4191
Work - 410 786-0386
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 10:10 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Recovery question

I don't see any mistakes.  However
- For SYSTEM CONFIG:
  are you sure that DEFINE MDISK 991 39 120 53DRES points to the CF1
of the new system,
  and/or that the new system is IPLed with CF1 as its IPL input?
- For the CP directory
  You did mention you changed the directory source, but not that you
placed
  the changed directory online on the RES of the new system, So
   DEFINE MDISK 991 511 175 53DRES #ACC 991 M
   DETACH 123
   DEFINE MDISK 123 0 END 53DRES
   DIRECTXA fn DIRECT M
   DET 123 991

2008/10/2 Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Hi



 I am trying to bring up my test LPAR which is a clone of another VM
LPAR. Before I did this I needed to update the SYSTEM CONFIG file and
the USER DIRECTORY to point to different RES, PAGE, SPOOL..etc.



 I attached the RES of the system I am trying to bring up to the
working system, I then issued a DEFINE MDISK 991 39 120 53DRES and then
ACC 991 M.



 After I did this I was pointing to my SYSTEM CONFIG file on the TEST
RES. I made the changes to the SYSTEM CONFIG file and saved it.



 Next, I wanted to change the USER DIRECT to point to different RES and
such. I did another DEFINE MDISK 991 511 175 53DRES and then ACC 991 M.



 After I did this I was pointing to my USER DIRECT file on the TEST
RES. I made the changes to the USER DIRECT file and saved it.



 Next, I tried IPLing the TEST LPAR and I noticed that it was still
looking at the SYSTEM CONFIG without my changes from above as well the
USER DIRECT without my changes from above. It appears that the changes
did not take.



 Where did I go wrong?



 Thank You,



 Terry Martin

 Lockheed Martin - Information Technology

 z/OS  z/VM Systems - Performance and Tuning

 Cell - 443 632-4191

 Work - 410 786-0386

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support


Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux

2008-10-02 Thread Daniel Allen
We are running z/VM 5.2 service level 0602.
 
I have issued the following commands:
 
DEFINE VSWITCH SWITCH1 RDEV 203 CONNECT
 
SET VSWITCH SWITCH1 GRANT SUSESP2
 
In the SUSESP2 directory entry, I have the following:
 
NICDEF 340 TYPE QDIO DEV 3 LAN SYSTEM SWITCH1 
 
When I bring up the SUSESP2 machine, I see the message that device 340
has been defined.
 
The SUSESP2 machine comes up normally.
 
Here is the output from the Q VSWITCH DET command:
 
 
q vswitch det

VSWITCH SYSTEM SWITCH1  Type: VSWITCH Connected: 1Maxconn: INFINITE

  PERSISTENT  RESTRICTEDNONROUTER Accounting: OFF

  VLAN Unaware

  State: Ready

  IPTimeout: 5 QueueStorage: 8

  Portname: UNASSIGNED RDEV: 0203 Controller: DTCVSW2  VDEV:  0203

VSWITCH Connection:

  RX Packets: 205Discarded: 293Errors: 0

  TX Packets: 0  Discarded: 0  Errors: 0

  RX Bytes: 106924   TX Bytes: 0

  Device: 0203  Unit: 000   Role: DATA

Adapter Owner: SUSESP2  NIC: 0340  Name: UNASSIGNED

  RX Packets: 205Discarded: 0  Errors: 0

  TX Packets: 29 Discarded: 0  Errors: 0

  RX Bytes: 106924   TX Bytes: 2268

  Device: 0342  Unit: 002   Role: DATA

  Options: Broadcast Multicast IPv6 IPv4 VLAN

Unicast IP Addresses:

  10.35.11.183 MAC: 02-00-00-00-00-01

  FE80::200:0:100:1MAC: 02-00-00-00-00-01 Local

Multicast IP Addresses: 
  224.0.0.1MAC: 01-00-5E-00-00-01   
  224.0.1.22   MAC: 01-00-5E-00-01-16   
  239.255.255.253  MAC: 01-00-5E-7F-FF-FD   
  FF02::1  MAC: 33-33-00-00-00-01 Local 
  FF02::1:FF00:1   MAC: 33-33-FF-00-00-01 Local 
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 08:09:01 
 
However, I cannot ping the machine SUSESP2.
 
If I take SUSESP2 out of the VSWITCH and use 3 OSA addresses, I can ping
the machine SUSESP2.
 
What am I doing wrong ?
 

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any 
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are 
not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and 
destroy all copies of the original message. 
**



Re: VMARC download date

2008-10-02 Thread Phil Smith III
Updated version of ARCLAST, now with comments (!) plus detection of ASCII-ified 
VMARCs and non-VMARCs. To test: ARCLAST PROFILE EXEC or XEDIT a VMARC, issue:

set hex on
c/:CFF/x'3a434646'/*
file bad

Then issue ARCLAST BAD

...phsiii
-

/* ARCLAST EXEC -- List last-updated file in a VMARC, or all files */
   address command
   all = '| take first 1' /* By default, only show last file */
   arg fn ft fm . '(' options ')'  /* Parse command line */
   if abbrev('?', fn) then signal Help/* No parms/wants help */
   do while options  ''   /* Parse options */
  parse var options option options  /* Get an option */
  select
 when option = 'ALL' then all = ''/* If ALL, kill filter */
 otherwise
 say 'Invalid option 'option''
 exit 24
  end
   end
   if ft = '' then ft = 'VMARC'  /* Default filetype */
   if fm = '' then fm = '*'  /* Default filemode */
   'PIPE (name ArcLast endchar ?)' ,   /* Get fileids/timestamps */
 '| ' fn ft fm ,  /* Read the VMARC */
 '| rest: strfind /:CFF/' ,  /* Get file headers */
 '| specs 11.18 1 31-33 20' ,  /* Just keep fileids  timestamps */
 '| specs 1.8 1 9.8 10' , /* Reformat timestamps */
 '20.1 c2x 22 @/@ 24 21.1 c2x 25 @/@ 27 22.1 c2x 28' ,
 '| nineties: locate 22 /0/' , /* Send 19xx away */
 '| specs 1-18 1 /20/ 20 22-* n' ,  /* Add 20 for 20xx files */
 '| rejoin: faninany' ,   /* 19xx files come back in */
 '| sort 20-25 d' ,/* Sort, newest first */
 all ,   /* Just keep most recent, maybe */
 '| console' ,/* And display the file(s) */
 '| count lines' ,   /* See whether we found any */
 '| var count' ,/* And remember that */
 '?' ,
 'rest:' ,/* Non-file header lines come here */
 '| strfind x3A434646' ,   /* Look for ASCII version */
 '| count lines' ,  /* See if there were any */
 '| var ascii' ,   /* And remember if so */
 '?' ,
 'nineties:' ,   /* 19xx files come here */
 '| specs 1-18 1 /19/ 20 22-* n' ,/* Add century */
 '| rejoin:' /* And go rejoin 20xx files */
   if count = 0 then do
  if ascii  0 then
  say 'File appears to have been translated to ASCII and thus' ,
   'destroyed.'
  else say 'Not a VMARC file.'
   end
   exit
Help:
   say 'ARCLAST lists the most recent file in a VMARC (or, optionally,'
   say 'all files in a VMARC, sorted with most recent files first).'
   say ''
   say 'Format is:'
   say ''
   say 'ARCLAST fn ft fm ( ALL ) '
   say ''
   say 'where fn ft fm is the fileid of a VMARC file; ft fm'
   say 'default to VMARC *.'
   say ''
   say 'The ALL option lists all files, not just the most recent.'
   say ''
   say 'Comments/complaints/suggestions/cash to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'


Re: Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux

2008-10-02 Thread Dean, David (I/S)
What if you LEAVE SUSE2P in and define the 3 OSA addresses?  I am not
sure the two are related.  I am GUESSING the 3 OSA's work but nicdef 340
does not.

 

 

 

David Dean

Information Systems

*bcbstauthorized*

 

 

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daniel Allen
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:12 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux

 

We are running z/VM 5.2 service level 0602.

 

I have issued the following commands:

 

DEFINE VSWITCH SWITCH1 RDEV 203 CONNECT

 

SET VSWITCH SWITCH1 GRANT SUSESP2

 

In the SUSESP2 directory entry, I have the following:

 

NICDEF 340 TYPE QDIO DEV 3 LAN SYSTEM SWITCH1 

 

When I bring up the SUSESP2 machine, I see the message that device 340
has been defined.

 

The SUSESP2 machine comes up normally.

 

Here is the output from the Q VSWITCH DET command:

 

 

q vswitch det

VSWITCH SYSTEM SWITCH1  Type: VSWITCH Connected: 1Maxconn: INFINITE

  PERSISTENT  RESTRICTEDNONROUTER Accounting: OFF

  VLAN Unaware

  State: Ready

  IPTimeout: 5 QueueStorage: 8

  Portname: UNASSIGNED RDEV: 0203 Controller: DTCVSW2  VDEV:  0203

VSWITCH Connection:

  RX Packets: 205Discarded: 293Errors: 0

  TX Packets: 0  Discarded: 0  Errors: 0

  RX Bytes: 106924   TX Bytes: 0

  Device: 0203  Unit: 000   Role: DATA

Adapter Owner: SUSESP2  NIC: 0340  Name: UNASSIGNED

  RX Packets: 205Discarded: 0  Errors: 0

  TX Packets: 29 Discarded: 0  Errors: 0

  RX Bytes: 106924   TX Bytes: 2268

  Device: 0342  Unit: 002   Role: DATA

  Options: Broadcast Multicast IPv6 IPv4 VLAN

Unicast IP Addresses:

  10.35.11.183 MAC: 02-00-00-00-00-01

  FE80::200:0:100:1MAC: 02-00-00-00-00-01 Local


Multicast IP Addresses: 
  224.0.0.1MAC: 01-00-5E-00-00-01   
  224.0.1.22   MAC: 01-00-5E-00-01-16   
  239.255.255.253  MAC: 01-00-5E-7F-FF-FD   
  FF02::1  MAC: 33-33-00-00-00-01 Local 
  FF02::1:FF00:1   MAC: 33-33-FF-00-00-01 Local 
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 08:09:01 

 

However, I cannot ping the machine SUSESP2.

 

If I take SUSESP2 out of the VSWITCH and use 3 OSA addresses, I can ping
the machine SUSESP2.

 

What am I doing wrong ?

 

**

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 

**

 

Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail 
disclaimer:  http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm


Re: Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux

2008-10-02 Thread Daniel Allen
If I DEDicate the 3 OSA addresses and comment out the NICDEF, I can ping
the SUSESP2 machine.
 
If I use the NICDEF statement and comment out the DEDicated OSA
addresses, I can not ping the SUSESP2 machine.
 
In either instance, SUSESP2 is re-IPL'd to affect the change.



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dean, David (I/S)
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:36 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux



What if you LEAVE SUSE2P in and define the 3 OSA addresses?  I am not
sure the two are related.  I am GUESSING the 3 OSA's work but nicdef 340
does not.

 

 

 

David Dean

Information Systems

*bcbstauthorized*

 

 

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daniel Allen
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:12 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux

 

We are running z/VM 5.2 service level 0602.

 

I have issued the following commands:

 

DEFINE VSWITCH SWITCH1 RDEV 203 CONNECT

 

SET VSWITCH SWITCH1 GRANT SUSESP2

 

In the SUSESP2 directory entry, I have the following:

 

NICDEF 340 TYPE QDIO DEV 3 LAN SYSTEM SWITCH1 

 

When I bring up the SUSESP2 machine, I see the message that device 340
has been defined.

 

The SUSESP2 machine comes up normally.

 

Here is the output from the Q VSWITCH DET command:

 

 

q vswitch det

VSWITCH SYSTEM SWITCH1  Type: VSWITCH Connected: 1Maxconn: INFINITE

  PERSISTENT  RESTRICTEDNONROUTER Accounting: OFF

  VLAN Unaware

  State: Ready

  IPTimeout: 5 QueueStorage: 8

  Portname: UNASSIGNED RDEV: 0203 Controller: DTCVSW2  VDEV:  0203

VSWITCH Connection:

  RX Packets: 205Discarded: 293Errors: 0

  TX Packets: 0  Discarded: 0  Errors: 0

  RX Bytes: 106924   TX Bytes: 0

  Device: 0203  Unit: 000   Role: DATA

Adapter Owner: SUSESP2  NIC: 0340  Name: UNASSIGNED

  RX Packets: 205Discarded: 0  Errors: 0

  TX Packets: 29 Discarded: 0  Errors: 0

  RX Bytes: 106924   TX Bytes: 2268

  Device: 0342  Unit: 002   Role: DATA

  Options: Broadcast Multicast IPv6 IPv4 VLAN

Unicast IP Addresses:

  10.35.11.183 MAC: 02-00-00-00-00-01

  FE80::200:0:100:1MAC: 02-00-00-00-00-01 Local


Multicast IP Addresses: 
  224.0.0.1MAC: 01-00-5E-00-00-01   
  224.0.1.22   MAC: 01-00-5E-00-01-16   
  239.255.255.253  MAC: 01-00-5E-7F-FF-FD   
  FF02::1  MAC: 33-33-00-00-00-01 Local 
  FF02::1:FF00:1   MAC: 33-33-FF-00-00-01 Local 
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 08:09:01 

 

However, I cannot ping the machine SUSESP2.

 

If I take SUSESP2 out of the VSWITCH and use 3 OSA addresses, I can ping
the machine SUSESP2.

 

What am I doing wrong ?

 

**

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 

**

 

Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee
E-mail disclaimer:  http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm


Re: VMARC download date

2008-10-02 Thread Schuh, Richard
You could make that perhaps a little better:
...| sort 57.19 d | take 1 |...

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 

 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob van der Heij
 Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 6:05 AM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: VMARC download date
 
 On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Phil Smith III 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Humbly submitted, the following EXEC to show you the most 
 recent file 
  in a VMARC. Seems to me that since you need to download the file 
  anyway to see the :TLR info, this solves the problem in a 
 similar way. 
  (Yes, there could be a bad VMARC that is *missing* or has 
 an invalid 
  copy of an *older* file, but at that point, I think you're 
 in a world 
  o' hurt anyway...)
 
 Even more humbly, with the REXX stage I referred to, it would go like:
   pipe  alex vmarc | vmarclst iso | sort 57.19 | take last | cons
 
 and if you want to change the time stamp of your VMARC file, 
 you stick before the cons stage  | dateconvert w4 iso short 
 | spec ,DMSPLU ALEX VMARC A, 1 57.19 nw | command
 
 -Rob
 


Re: Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux

2008-10-02 Thread Rich Smrcina
When using the NICDEF, what does the LAN startup section of the Linux 
bootup messages show?


--
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Phone: 414-491-6001
Ans Service:  360-715-2467
rich.smrcina at vmassist.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richsmrcina

Catch the WAVV!  http://www.wavv.org
WAVV 2009 - Orlando, FL - May 15-19, 2009


Daniel Allen wrote:
If I DEDicate the 3 OSA addresses and comment out the NICDEF, I can ping 
the SUSESP2 machine.
 
If I use the NICDEF statement and comment out the DEDicated OSA 
addresses, I can not ping the SUSESP2 machine.
 
In either instance, SUSESP2 is re-IPL'd to affect the change.




MAXCONN

2008-10-02 Thread Schuh, Richard
What consumes the connections specified in the MAXCONN option of the
TCPIP machine's directory? Does each open socket consume 1 connection,
or is it 1 connection for each guest that opens 1 or more sockets? 

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 




Re: Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux

2008-10-02 Thread Dean, David (I/S)
The 3 OSA's work because they can talk.

 

SUSESP2 is happy with IP / LAN because he can talk.

 

Vswitch and /or  nicdef not happy

 

Try some traceroutes from susesp2 under both scenarios.

 

Got screen screenshot of your controller User in user direct (DTCVSW2)? 

 

David Dean

Information Systems

*bcbstauthorized*

 

 

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daniel Allen
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:48 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux

 

If I DEDicate the 3 OSA addresses and comment out the NICDEF, I can ping
the SUSESP2 machine.

 

If I use the NICDEF statement and comment out the DEDicated OSA
addresses, I can not ping the SUSESP2 machine.

 

In either instance, SUSESP2 is re-IPL'd to affect the change.

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dean, David (I/S)
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:36 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux

What if you LEAVE SUSE2P in and define the 3 OSA addresses?  I am not
sure the two are related.  I am GUESSING the 3 OSA's work but nicdef 340
does not.

 

 

 

David Dean

Information Systems

*bcbstauthorized*

 

 

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daniel Allen
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:12 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux

 

We are running z/VM 5.2 service level 0602.

 

I have issued the following commands:

 

DEFINE VSWITCH SWITCH1 RDEV 203 CONNECT

 

SET VSWITCH SWITCH1 GRANT SUSESP2

 

In the SUSESP2 directory entry, I have the following:

 

NICDEF 340 TYPE QDIO DEV 3 LAN SYSTEM SWITCH1 

 

When I bring up the SUSESP2 machine, I see the message that device 340
has been defined.

 

The SUSESP2 machine comes up normally.

 

Here is the output from the Q VSWITCH DET command:

 

 

q vswitch det

VSWITCH SYSTEM SWITCH1  Type: VSWITCH Connected: 1Maxconn: INFINITE

  PERSISTENT  RESTRICTEDNONROUTER Accounting: OFF

  VLAN Unaware

  State: Ready

  IPTimeout: 5 QueueStorage: 8

  Portname: UNASSIGNED RDEV: 0203 Controller: DTCVSW2  VDEV:  0203

VSWITCH Connection:

  RX Packets: 205Discarded: 293Errors: 0

  TX Packets: 0  Discarded: 0  Errors: 0

  RX Bytes: 106924   TX Bytes: 0

  Device: 0203  Unit: 000   Role: DATA

Adapter Owner: SUSESP2  NIC: 0340  Name: UNASSIGNED

  RX Packets: 205Discarded: 0  Errors: 0

  TX Packets: 29 Discarded: 0  Errors: 0

  RX Bytes: 106924   TX Bytes: 2268

  Device: 0342  Unit: 002   Role: DATA

  Options: Broadcast Multicast IPv6 IPv4 VLAN

Unicast IP Addresses:

  10.35.11.183 MAC: 02-00-00-00-00-01

  FE80::200:0:100:1MAC: 02-00-00-00-00-01 Local


Multicast IP Addresses: 
  224.0.0.1MAC: 01-00-5E-00-00-01   
  224.0.1.22   MAC: 01-00-5E-00-01-16   
  239.255.255.253  MAC: 01-00-5E-7F-FF-FD   
  FF02::1  MAC: 33-33-00-00-00-01 Local 
  FF02::1:FF00:1   MAC: 33-33-FF-00-00-01 Local 
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 08:09:01 

 

However, I cannot ping the machine SUSESP2.

 

If I take SUSESP2 out of the VSWITCH and use 3 OSA addresses, I can ping
the machine SUSESP2.

 

What am I doing wrong ?

 

**

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 

**

 

Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee
E-mail disclaimer:  http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm
Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail 
disclaimer:  http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm


Re: Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux

2008-10-02 Thread Brian Nielsen
One possibility is that your network and SUSESP2 are configured to use 

VLAN's.  They'll work fine with a real OSA but when you stick a VSWITCH i
n 
you need to GRANT SUSESP2 authorithy to access the VLAN it belongs to.

Brian Nielsen

On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 08:47:34 -0700, Daniel Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
:

If I DEDicate the 3 OSA addresses and comment out the NICDEF, I can ping

the SUSESP2 machine.
 
If I use the NICDEF statement and comment out the DEDicated OSA
addresses, I can not ping the SUSESP2 machine.
 
In either instance, SUSESP2 is re-IPL'd to affect the change.



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dean, David (I/S)
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:36 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux



What if you LEAVE SUSE2P in and define the 3 OSA addresses?  I am not
sure the two are related.  I am GUESSING the 3 OSA's work but nicdef 340

does not.

 

 

 

David Dean

Information Systems

*bcbstauthorized*

 

 

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daniel Allen
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:12 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux

 

We are running z/VM 5.2 service level 0602.

 

I have issued the following commands:

 

DEFINE VSWITCH SWITCH1 RDEV 203 CONNECT

 

SET VSWITCH SWITCH1 GRANT SUSESP2

 

In the SUSESP2 directory entry, I have the following:

 

NICDEF 340 TYPE QDIO DEV 3 LAN SYSTEM SWITCH1 

 

When I bring up the SUSESP2 machine, I see the message that device 340
has been defined.

 

The SUSESP2 machine comes up normally.

 

Here is the output from the Q VSWITCH DET command:

 

 

q vswitch det

VSWITCH SYSTEM SWITCH1  Type: VSWITCH Connected: 1Maxconn: INFINITE

  PERSISTENT  RESTRICTEDNONROUTER Accounting: OFF

  VLAN Unaware

  State: Ready

  IPTimeout: 5 QueueStorage: 8

  Portname: UNASSIGNED RDEV: 0203 Controller: DTCVSW2  VDEV:  0203

VSWITCH Connection:

  RX Packets: 205Discarded: 293Errors: 0

  TX Packets: 0  Discarded: 0  Errors: 0

  RX Bytes: 106924   TX Bytes: 0

  Device: 0203  Unit: 000   Role: DATA

Adapter Owner: SUSESP2  NIC: 0340  Name: UNASSIGNED

  RX Packets: 205Discarded: 0  Errors: 0

  TX Packets: 29 Discarded: 0  Errors: 0

  RX Bytes: 106924   TX Bytes: 2268

  Device: 0342  Unit: 002   Role: DATA

  Options: Broadcast Multicast IPv6 IPv4 VLAN

Unicast IP Addresses:

  10.35.11.183 MAC: 02-00-00-00-00-01

  FE80::200:0:100:1MAC: 02-00-00-00-00-01 Local


Multicast IP Addresses:  
   
  224.0.0.1MAC: 01-00-5E-00-00-01   

  224.0.1.22   MAC: 01-00-5E-00-01-16   

  239.255.255.253  MAC: 01-00-5E-7F-FF-FD   

  FF02::1  MAC: 33-33-00-00-00-01 Local 

  FF02::1:FF00:1   MAC: 33-33-FF-00-00-01 Local 

Ready; T=0.01/0.01 08:09:01   
 
 

 

However, I cannot ping the machine SUSESP2.

 

If I take SUSESP2 out of the VSWITCH and use 3 OSA addresses, I can ping

the machine SUSESP2.

 

What am I doing wrong ?

 

**

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are

addressed. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 


**

 

Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee
E-mail disclaimer:  http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm



Re: Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux

2008-10-02 Thread David Kreuter
What does an ifconfig show?
what CP Q V 340-342 show?
When you use the OSA with the dedicates what virtual addresses are you using?
David



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Dean, David (I/S)
Sent: Thu 10/2/2008 12:39 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux



The 3 OSA's work because they can talk.

 

SUSESP2 is happy with IP / LAN because he can talk.

 

Vswitch and /or  nicdef not happy

 

Try some traceroutes from susesp2 under both scenarios.

 

Got screen screenshot of your controller User in user direct (DTCVSW2)? 

 

David Dean

Information Systems

*bcbstauthorized*

 

 

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Daniel Allen
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:48 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux

 

If I DEDicate the 3 OSA addresses and comment out the NICDEF, I can ping the 
SUSESP2 machine.

 

If I use the NICDEF statement and comment out the DEDicated OSA addresses, I 
can not ping the SUSESP2 machine.

 

In either instance, SUSESP2 is re-IPL'd to affect the change.

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Dean, David (I/S)
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:36 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux

What if you LEAVE SUSE2P in and define the 3 OSA addresses?  I am not sure the 
two are related.  I am GUESSING the 3 OSA's work but nicdef 340 does not.

 

 

 

David Dean

Information Systems

*bcbstauthorized*

 

 

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Daniel Allen
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:12 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux

 

We are running z/VM 5.2 service level 0602.

 

I have issued the following commands:

 

DEFINE VSWITCH SWITCH1 RDEV 203 CONNECT

 

SET VSWITCH SWITCH1 GRANT SUSESP2

 

In the SUSESP2 directory entry, I have the following:

 

NICDEF 340 TYPE QDIO DEV 3 LAN SYSTEM SWITCH1 

 

When I bring up the SUSESP2 machine, I see the message that device 340 has been 
defined.

 

The SUSESP2 machine comes up normally.

 

Here is the output from the Q VSWITCH DET command:

 

 

q vswitch det   
VSWITCH SYSTEM SWITCH1  Type: VSWITCH Connected: 1Maxconn: INFINITE 
  PERSISTENT  RESTRICTEDNONROUTER Accounting: OFF   
  VLAN Unaware  
  State: Ready  
  IPTimeout: 5 QueueStorage: 8  
  Portname: UNASSIGNED RDEV: 0203 Controller: DTCVSW2  VDEV:  0203  
VSWITCH Connection: 
  RX Packets: 205Discarded: 293Errors: 0
  TX Packets: 0  Discarded: 0  Errors: 0
  RX Bytes: 106924   TX Bytes: 0
  Device: 0203  Unit: 000   Role: DATA  
Adapter Owner: SUSESP2  NIC: 0340  Name: UNASSIGNED 
  RX Packets: 205Discarded: 0  Errors: 0
  TX Packets: 29 Discarded: 0  Errors: 0
  RX Bytes: 106924   TX Bytes: 2268 
  Device: 0342  Unit: 002   Role: DATA  
  Options: Broadcast Multicast IPv6 IPv4 VLAN   
Unicast IP Addresses:   
  10.35.11.183 MAC: 02-00-00-00-00-01   
  FE80::200:0:100:1MAC: 02-00-00-00-00-01 Local 

Multicast IP Addresses: 
  224.0.0.1MAC: 01-00-5E-00-00-01   
  224.0.1.22   MAC: 01-00-5E-00-01-16   
  239.255.255.253  MAC: 01-00-5E-7F-FF-FD   
  FF02::1  MAC: 33-33-00-00-00-01 Local 
  FF02::1:FF00:1   MAC: 33-33-FF-00-00-01 Local 
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 08:09:01 

 

However, I cannot ping the machine SUSESP2.

 

If I take SUSESP2 out of the VSWITCH and use 3 OSA addresses, I can ping the 
machine SUSESP2.

 

What am I doing wrong ?

 

**

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any 
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are 
not the 

Issue with VSWITCH and SuSE Linux

2008-10-02 Thread Daniel Allen
I have fixed the problem. 
 
z/VM TCPIP uses addresses 100-102.
 
I was using a VSWITCH with addresses 203-205.
 
I destroyed the above VSWITCH.
 
I defined a VSWITCH with addresses 110-102.
 
I started SuSE Linux again.
 
I was able to ping the Suse Linux machine.
 
 

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any 
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are 
not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and 
destroy all copies of the original message. 
**



Re: SLES10 Client

2008-10-02 Thread Austin, Alyce (CIV)
Hello again.

 

Well, I tried both the starter system default password and the new
password I changed it to

to logon on as root for the full-service starter system from my SSH
client and neither one works.

 

Also, when I logo as root, it does asks for a password.

 

Is there a different default password for root for the full-service
server?

 

Thanks,

Alyce

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scott Rohling
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:18 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SLES10 Client

 

Don't be afraid --  you're not going to break anything...  And besides -
we're here if you do :-)

Best of luck - Scott

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Austin, Alyce (CIV) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

I was afraid I might get locked out


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Walter

Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:54 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SLES10 Client

Why not just try the default NOVSTART root password and find out for
yourself?
If it works (which it should) you have your answer.

But if you followed the instructions, you changed your NOVSTART root
password immediately.
So try that one, if the default fails.

Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
Any opinions expressed herein are mine alone and do not necessarily
represent the opinions or policies of Hewitt Associates.




Austin, Alyce (CIV) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
09/30/2008 04:33 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU



To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: SLES10 Client






OK...i was able to ssh to my new client.  Is the default root password
the same as it was for the starter system?

Thanks,
Alyce


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:20 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SLES10 Client

As long as you left it RUNNING in the bottom right hand corner of the
screen, having issued at some point since logon, (perhaps in the
PROFILE
EXEC), you should be good to SSH in right away.

Also, see SHARE session Installing a Novell SLES 10 Starter System
without a Net(work)
at: http://linuxvm.org/Present/SHARE111/S9287mw.pdf
some parts may have helped you, and still may.  You're right at the end
of
the session.

Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
Any opinions expressed herein are mine alone and do not necessarily
represent the opinions or policies of Hewitt Associates.



Austin, Alyce (CIV) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
09/30/2008 04:01 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU



To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: SLES10 Client






OOPs...I already disonnected from Client  Do I need to start the
process again before SSH'g?

Thanks,
Alyce


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Post
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 1:33 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SLES10 Client

 On 9/30/2008 at  4:20 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Austin,
Alyce
(CIV) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Everyone,

 Well, I made it to:



   ***  login using 'ssh -X [EMAIL PROTECTED]'  ***
   ***  run 'yast' to start the installation  ***



 Am I suppose to disconnect from client and then ssh to it and enter
 YAST; or, do I enter YAST from here?

Neither.  Leave your TN3270 session as it is, since you'll need it
later.  From your desktop, SSH to the IP address shown in the message,
then issue the yast command.


Mark Post







The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents
may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately
alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including
any attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the
contents of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is
strictly prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address
may be monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to
ensure compliance with our internal policies and to protect our
business. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error
free as they can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain
viruses. You are deemed to have accepted these risks if you communicate
with us by e-mail.







The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents
may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
this message has been addressed to you in error, please 

Re: VMARC download date

2008-10-02 Thread Kris Buelens
2008/10/2 Shimon Lebowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 a) regarding DMSPLU, I have an exec named SETDATI which
 embeds DMSPLU. IIRC, it was based on an ancient EXECSERV
 function. My exec supports ! (exclamation point) instead
 of / (slash) as the date delimiter, allowing me to use it
 from Filelist.

My Fixdate supports various date formats, you can even tell to leave
date or time unaltered...
If you use FILELIST (ISODATE, no slash problems, and if you use my
FILELIST extensions commands can contain a /: simply double them, e;g.
   FIXDATE / mm//dd//yy =

--
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support
--- FIXDATE EXEC -
/* This exec allows to change a file's date/time stamp.
   It is a frontend for DMSPLU.
+---+
| format:  | FIXDATE fn ft fm ( date time   |
+---+
   Where:
- fn, ft and fm are the fileid.  We support mixed case fileids:
  we first try without uppercase translation.
- date is mm/dd/yy, any format used by FILELIST, or an = sign
  Examples:   09/30/1997,  9/30/1997,  12/01/97,  1997-12-01
  The latter format is very useful for users of FILELIST (ISODATE
  Note: the 4-digit years require CMS 13 or higher.
- time is hh:mm:ss an = sign or the format used by FILELIST
  Examples:   9:12:45 09:12:45

  Written by: Kris Buelens IBM Belgium;  BUELENSC at IECVM 7 Feb 1992*/
/* 15 Nov 1993: Allow an ( between fid and date*/
/*  6 Aug 1997: Support Year 2000 dates*/
/*  Check if disk is a R/W disk*/
/* 17 Oct 1997: Accept = for date and time */
/*  Accept an ISODATE as input */
address command

parse arg fn ft fm date time .
if left(date,1)='(' then parse arg '('date time .

if fm='' then call errexit 5,'Need at least to specify: fn ft fm date'
if date='' then call errexit 5,'Need at least to specify the new date'

upper fm
'ESTATE' fn ft fm
if rc=28 then upper fn ft

'MAKEBUF'
 'CMDCALL LISTFILE' fn ft fm '(DATE STACK'
 lrc=rc
 if lrc=0 then parse pull . . . . . . . ldate ltime .
'DROPBUF'
 if lrc^=0 then exit lrc

'ESTATEW' fn ft fm
if rc=28 then call ErrExit rc,'File' fn ft fm 'resides on a R/O disk'


 if abbrev('=',time) then time=ltime
 if date='=' then date=ldate
 if length(date)=7 then date=0||date
 if length(date)=9 then date=0||date
 if length(time)=7 then time=0||time
 if verify(date,'1234567890/-')^=0 | find(8 10,length(date))=0 then
call errexit 5,'Invalid date 'date''
 If substr(date,5,1)substr(date,8,1)='--' then
date=translate('Mm/Dd/CcYy',date,'CcYy-Mm-Dd')

 if verify(time,'1234567890:')^=0 | length(time)^=8 then
call errexit 5,'Invalid time 'time''
 'DMSPLU' Fn Ft fm date time
 if rc=24 then call errexit rc,'Date 'date' and/ or time 'time'
invalid for DMSPLU.'
 if rc^=0 then call errexit rc,'Retcode' rc 'of DMSPLU.'
 exit
ERREXIT:
 parse source . . myname mytype . syn .
 Say arg(2)
 Say 'Format is: ' myname 'fn ft fm date time'
 exit arg(1)


AUTOLOG

2008-10-02 Thread Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Hi

 

I am setting some parameters in my AUTOLOG2 PROFILE EXEC, but they do
not seem to be taking affect. Is there something else I am missing?

 

The 'CP XAUTLOG xxx' seems to be working fine but commands such as
the following do not take affect:

 

/* set recommended performance metrics for zLinux */

'CP SET SRM STORBUF 300 250 200'

'CP SET LDBUF 100 100 100'  

/* set Delay for Linux Guest Shutdown */

'CP SET SIGNAL SHUTDOWN 180'  /* Allow Linux Guests 3 mins to shutdown*/

'CP SET MDC STOR 0M 256M'   

'CP SET MDC XSTOR 0M 0M'   

 

To test these I issue the xautolog autolog2 command from MAINT after I
have LINKED to AUTOLOG2.  

 

Thank You,

 

Terry Martin

Lockheed Martin - Information Technology

z/OS  z/VM Systems - Performance and Tuning

Cell - 443 632-4191

Work - 410 786-0386

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 



Re: AUTOLOG

2008-10-02 Thread Fran Hensler
Are you sure the directory entry for AUTOLOG2 has the privilege
necessary to issue those commands?
 
/Fran Hensler at Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania USA for 45 years
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://zvm.sru.edu/~fjh  +1.724.738.2153
  Yes, Virginia, there is a Slippery Rock
--
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:33:22 -0400 Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) said:
Hi



I am setting some parameters in my AUTOLOG2 PROFILE EXEC, but they do
not seem to be taking affect. Is there something else I am missing?



The 'CP XAUTLOG xxx' seems to be working fine but commands such as
the following do not take affect:



/* set recommended performance metrics for zLinux */

'CP SET SRM STORBUF 300 250 200'

'CP SET LDBUF 100 100 100'

/* set Delay for Linux Guest Shutdown */

'CP SET SIGNAL SHUTDOWN 180'  /* Allow Linux Guests 3 mins to shutdown*/

'CP SET MDC STOR 0M 256M'

'CP SET MDC XSTOR 0M 0M'



To test these I issue the xautolog autolog2 command from MAINT after I
have LINKED to AUTOLOG2.



Thank You,



Terry Martin

Lockheed Martin - Information Technology

z/OS  z/VM Systems - Performance and Tuning

Cell - 443 632-4191

Work - 410 786-0386

[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Received: from *unknown [130.184.5.241] by ZVM.SRU.EDU (IBM VM SMTP Level 3A0)


Re: AUTOLOG

2008-10-02 Thread Schuh, Richard
Does your AUTOLOG2 user have the proper command privileges to issue
those commands? It needs class A  fro SET SRM and class B for SET MDC.
 
I presume you meant SET SRM LDBUF.
 

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 

 




From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR)
(CTR)
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 12:33 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: AUTOLOG



Hi

 

I am setting some parameters in my AUTOLOG2 PROFILE EXEC, but
they do not seem to be taking affect. Is there something else I am
missing?

 

The 'CP XAUTLOG xxx' seems to be working fine but commands
such as the following do not take affect:

 

/* set recommended performance metrics for zLinux */


'CP SET SRM STORBUF 300 250 200'


'CP SET LDBUF 100 100 100'


/* set Delay for Linux Guest Shutdown */


'CP SET SIGNAL SHUTDOWN 180'  /* Allow Linux Guests 3 mins to
shutdown*/

'CP SET MDC STOR 0M 256M'


'CP SET MDC XSTOR 0M 0M'   

 

To test these I issue the xautolog autolog2 command from MAINT
after I have LINKED to AUTOLOG2.


 

Thank You,

 

Terry Martin

Lockheed Martin - Information Technology

z/OS  z/VM Systems - Performance and Tuning

Cell - 443 632-4191

Work - 410 786-0386

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 



Re: AUTOLOG

2008-10-02 Thread Scott Rohling
Try this:

XAUTOLOG AUTOLOG2 SYNCH#SET SECUSER AUTOLOG2 *

That will let you watch the startup of AUTOLOG2 and see what might be
wrong..   as others have said - it's a good bet it's the privileges (or lack
of them) --

Scott Rohling

On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hi



 I am setting some parameters in my AUTOLOG2 PROFILE EXEC, but they do not
 seem to be taking affect. Is there something else I am missing?



 The 'CP XAUTLOG xxx' seems to be working fine but commands such as the
 following do not take affect:



 /* set recommended performance metrics for zLinux */

 'CP SET SRM STORBUF 300 250 200'

 'CP SET LDBUF 100 100 100'

 /* set Delay for Linux Guest Shutdown */

 'CP SET SIGNAL SHUTDOWN 180'  /* Allow Linux Guests 3 mins to shutdown*/

 'CP SET MDC STOR 0M 256M'

 'CP SET MDC XSTOR 0M 0M'



 To test these I issue the xautolog autolog2 command from MAINT after I have
 LINKED to AUTOLOG2.



 *Thank You,*



 *Terry Martin*

 *Lockheed Martin - Information Technology*

 *z/OS  z/VM Systems - Performance and Tuning*

 *Cell - 443 632-4191*

 *Work - 410 786-0386*

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: SLES10 Client

2008-10-02 Thread Mark Post
 On 10/2/2008 at  2:04 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Austin, Alyce
(CIV) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

 Well, I tried both the starter system default password and the new
 password I changed it to
 
 to logon on as root for the full-service starter system from my SSH
 client and neither one works.

I need some clarification here.  Are you trying to SSH to a Linux system that 
you are in the process of installing?  If so, there is no default password.  
During the setup process before you SSH in, you are asked for a temporary root 
password to be used.  That is the password you need to use when you SSH in to 
enter the yast command.

The prompt is right after you select the display type.
Select the display type. 
 
1) X11
2) VNC
3) SSH
 
 3
 
Enter your temporary SSH password 


Or, if you're entering the network information into the parmfile, it is the 
SSHPassword= keyword.


Mark Post


Re: AUTOLOG

2008-10-02 Thread Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Thanks all,

 

 

Yes it was a privilege issue. Thanks again for all the responses!

 

Thank You,

 

Terry Martin

Lockheed Martin - Information Technology

z/OS  z/VM Systems - Performance and Tuning

Cell - 443 632-4191

Work - 410 786-0386

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scott Rohling
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 3:50 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: AUTOLOG

 

Try this:

XAUTOLOG AUTOLOG2 SYNCH#SET SECUSER AUTOLOG2 *

That will let you watch the startup of AUTOLOG2 and see what might be
wrong..   as others have said - it's a good bet it's the privileges (or
lack of them) --

Scott Rohling

On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi

 

I am setting some parameters in my AUTOLOG2 PROFILE EXEC, but they do
not seem to be taking affect. Is there something else I am missing?

 

The 'CP XAUTLOG xxx' seems to be working fine but commands such as
the following do not take affect:

 

/* set recommended performance metrics for zLinux */

'CP SET SRM STORBUF 300 250 200'

'CP SET LDBUF 100 100 100'  

/* set Delay for Linux Guest Shutdown */

'CP SET SIGNAL SHUTDOWN 180'  /* Allow Linux Guests 3 mins to shutdown*/

'CP SET MDC STOR 0M 256M'   

'CP SET MDC XSTOR 0M 0M'   

 

To test these I issue the xautolog autolog2 command from MAINT after I
have LINKED to AUTOLOG2.  

 

Thank You,

 

Terry Martin

Lockheed Martin - Information Technology

z/OS  z/VM Systems - Performance and Tuning

Cell - 443 632-4191

Work - 410 786-0386

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 



Re: AUTOLOG

2008-10-02 Thread Mike Walter
Terry,

1) CP SET SRM commands require privclass 'A' (or a privclass for those 
commands that you added another privclass via CP MODIFY COMMAND). 
   ---Does AUTOLOG2 have that priv? ---
2) Why not just have AUTOLOG1 or OPERATOR issue performance commands, 
thereby letting your External Security Manager benefit from their 
performance change?  If OPERATOR does it, you may want to place those 
special commands on OPERATOR 192 or some other disk that the OPERATOR 
userid cannot LINK R/W.
3) Performance command changes before/after are good to see on the 
OPERATOR console log.  I placed all ours in a single command called 
PERFCMDS EXEC (actually, PERFCMDS VMOPER, since OPERATOR runs them 
after VM:Operator has its own console log started).  PERFCMDS provides 
documentation on OPERATOR of what the setting was before, and of the 
actual command. 

Here's a cut/paste, modified (but not tested) to run on OPERATOR (change 
as needed to run from elsewhere):

---snip---
/* PERFCMDS EXEC */
/* set recommended performance metrics for zLinux */
/* Call PerfCmd 'command , settings' */
/* (the 'command' part is used by CP QUERY and CP SET, 'settings' 
only by CP SET) */ 
 
   Call PerfCmd 'SRM STORBUF , 300 250 200'  
   Call PerfCmd 'SRM LDBUF , 100 100 100' 
 
/* set Delay for Linux Guest Shutdown */ 
   Call PerfCmd 'SIGNAL SHUTDOWN , 180'  /* Allow Linux Guests 3 mins to 
shutdown*/
   Call PerfCmd 'MDC , STOR 0M 256M'  
   Call PerfCmd 'MDC , XSTOR 0M 0M'  /* Will cause repeat QUERY MDC */ 

Exit rc
 
PerfCmd: 
   parse arg cmd ',' settings 
   parse var cmd w1 w2 w3 . 
   say 'CP QUERY' cmd/* Document before setting */
   'CP QUERY' cmd 
   say 'CP SET  ' cmd settings 
   'CP SET  ' cmd settings 
trace o 
Return   
---snip---

Mike Walter 
Hewitt Associates 
Any opinions expressed herein are mine alone and do not necessarily 
represent the opinions or policies of Hewitt Associates.





Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
10/02/2008 02:33 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU



To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
AUTOLOG






Hi
 
I am setting some parameters in my AUTOLOG2 PROFILE EXEC, but they do not 
seem to be taking affect. Is there something else I am missing?
 
The ?CP XAUTLOG xxx? seems to be working fine but commands such as the 
following do not take affect:
 
/* set recommended performance metrics for zLinux */ 
'CP SET SRM STORBUF 300 250 200' 
'CP SET LDBUF 100 100 100' 
/* set Delay for Linux Guest Shutdown */ 
'CP SET SIGNAL SHUTDOWN 180'  /* Allow Linux Guests 3 mins to shutdown*/
'CP SET MDC STOR 0M 256M' 
'CP SET MDC XSTOR 0M 0M' 
 
To test these I issue the xautolog autolog2 command from MAINT after I 
have LINKED to AUTOLOG2. 
 
Thank You,
 
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Information Technology
z/OS  z/VM Systems - Performance and Tuning
Cell - 443 632-4191
Work - 410 786-0386
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 





The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may 
contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from 
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this 
message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender 
by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any attachments. Any 
dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of this message by 
anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. All messages 
sent to and from this e-mail address may be monitored as permitted by 
applicable law and regulations to ensure compliance with our internal policies 
and to protect our business. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to 
be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or 
contain viruses. You are deemed to have accepted these risks if you communicate 
with us by e-mail. 


Re: AUTOLOG

2008-10-02 Thread Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Thanks a lot Mike for the additional information. This looks like
something I will take a shot at.

Thank You,
 
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Information Technology
z/OS  z/VM Systems - Performance and Tuning
Cell - 443 632-4191
Work - 410 786-0386
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 4:05 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: AUTOLOG

Terry,

1) CP SET SRM commands require privclass 'A' (or a privclass for those 
commands that you added another privclass via CP MODIFY COMMAND). 
   ---Does AUTOLOG2 have that priv? ---
2) Why not just have AUTOLOG1 or OPERATOR issue performance commands, 
thereby letting your External Security Manager benefit from their 
performance change?  If OPERATOR does it, you may want to place those 
special commands on OPERATOR 192 or some other disk that the OPERATOR 
userid cannot LINK R/W.
3) Performance command changes before/after are good to see on the 
OPERATOR console log.  I placed all ours in a single command called 
PERFCMDS EXEC (actually, PERFCMDS VMOPER, since OPERATOR runs them 
after VM:Operator has its own console log started).  PERFCMDS provides 
documentation on OPERATOR of what the setting was before, and of the 
actual command. 

Here's a cut/paste, modified (but not tested) to run on OPERATOR (change

as needed to run from elsewhere):

---snip---
/* PERFCMDS EXEC */
/* set recommended performance metrics for zLinux */
/* Call PerfCmd 'command , settings' */
/* (the 'command' part is used by CP QUERY and CP SET,
'settings' 
only by CP SET) */ 
 
   Call PerfCmd 'SRM STORBUF , 300 250 200'  
   Call PerfCmd 'SRM LDBUF , 100 100 100' 
 
/* set Delay for Linux Guest Shutdown */ 
   Call PerfCmd 'SIGNAL SHUTDOWN , 180'  /* Allow Linux Guests 3 mins to

shutdown*/
   Call PerfCmd 'MDC , STOR 0M 256M'  
   Call PerfCmd 'MDC , XSTOR 0M 0M'  /* Will cause repeat QUERY MDC
*/ 

Exit rc
 
PerfCmd: 
   parse arg cmd ',' settings 
   parse var cmd w1 w2 w3 . 
   say 'CP QUERY' cmd/* Document before setting */
   'CP QUERY' cmd 
   say 'CP SET  ' cmd settings 
   'CP SET  ' cmd settings 
trace o 
Return   
---snip---

Mike Walter 
Hewitt Associates 
Any opinions expressed herein are mine alone and do not necessarily 
represent the opinions or policies of Hewitt Associates.





Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
10/02/2008 02:33 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU



To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
AUTOLOG






Hi
 
I am setting some parameters in my AUTOLOG2 PROFILE EXEC, but they do
not 
seem to be taking affect. Is there something else I am missing?
 
The ?CP XAUTLOG xxx? seems to be working fine but commands such as
the 
following do not take affect:
 
/* set recommended performance metrics for zLinux */ 
'CP SET SRM STORBUF 300 250 200' 
'CP SET LDBUF 100 100 100' 
/* set Delay for Linux Guest Shutdown */ 
'CP SET SIGNAL SHUTDOWN 180'  /* Allow Linux Guests 3 mins to shutdown*/
'CP SET MDC STOR 0M 256M' 
'CP SET MDC XSTOR 0M 0M' 
 
To test these I issue the xautolog autolog2 command from MAINT after I 
have LINKED to AUTOLOG2. 
 
Thank You,
 
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Information Technology
z/OS  z/VM Systems - Performance and Tuning
Cell - 443 632-4191
Work - 410 786-0386
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 





The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents
may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately
alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including
any attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the
contents of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is
strictly prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address
may be monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to
ensure compliance with our internal policies and to protect our
business. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error
free as they can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain
viruses. You are deemed to have accepted these risks if you communicate
with us by e-mail. 


Re: SLES10 Client

2008-10-02 Thread Austin, Alyce (CIV)
Hello Everyone,

I am now able to logon to the root userid on my
full-service server SLES10 SP2.

I will start yast tomorrow.  

Thanks for all your support,

Alyce


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Post
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 1:00 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SLES10 Client

 On 10/2/2008 at  2:04 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Austin,
Alyce
(CIV) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

 Well, I tried both the starter system default password and the new
 password I changed it to
 
 to logon on as root for the full-service starter system from my SSH
 client and neither one works.

I need some clarification here.  Are you trying to SSH to a Linux system
that you are in the process of installing?  If so, there is no default
password.  During the setup process before you SSH in, you are asked for
a temporary root password to be used.  That is the password you need to
use when you SSH in to enter the yast command.

The prompt is right after you select the display type.
Select the display type. 
 
1) X11
2) VNC
3) SSH
 
 3
 
Enter your temporary SSH password 


Or, if you're entering the network information into the parmfile, it is
the SSHPassword= keyword.


Mark Post


IPGATE errors

2008-10-02 Thread O'Brien, Dennis L
I've been trying out IPGATE recently, because we have a couple of
systems with no good alternatives for remote SFS access.  One of our
testers is reporting errors accessing a remote directory after the
connection has been idle for several hours.  I would love to open an
ETR, but we all know that IPGATE isn't a supported product.  The user is
seeing the typical errors that I would expect when a filepool has gone
away, e.g.:

DMSJCA1152S File pool SFSDE600 is unavailable; accessed directories for
this file pool are released

DMSFNS1217E Rollback occurred during CMS command processing
DMSEIO632E I/O error in EXECIO; rc=31 from FINIS command
Writing 10003195 RESPONSE B 10/02/08 09:59:42

IPGATE on the client system has some interesting messages in its
console:

05:55:03 IPGATEY39 started.
05:55:04 IPGATEY39 Request from DENNIS for SFSx at 4567
171.xx.xx.xx
06:02:40 IPGATEY40 started.
06:02:40 IPGATEY40 Request from EMIL for SFSy at 4567
171.xx.yy.yy
06:02:40 -
06:03:35 IPGATEY40 ended.
06:31:12 IPGATEY39 ended.
09:59:40 IPGATEY41 started.
09:59:40 IPGATEY41 Request from SERVER for SFSy at 4567
171.xx.yy.yy
09:59:40 -
09:59:41 DMSRXS1419E EventSignal failed for event IPGATEY39;
RC=8 Reason=108

IPGATE on the server system seems happy:

IPGATEI08 started. (6 2 AF_INET 1750 165.zz.zz.zz)

IPGATEI08 User SERVER from 165.zz.zz.zz has been accepted for
SFSy

I find it odd that EventSignal is failing for event 39, which supposedly
ended over 3 hours earlier.  The errors writing the file are happening
on SERVER.  The testers report that this often happens on their first
transaction of the day, then goes away.  The client system is in the UK,
and the server is in the US.  Both systems are mostly idle for several
hours before they start testing, but there are the usual timer pops from
RSCS, VM:Operator, and so on.

HELP for DMS1419E isn't terribly helpful.  The only CSL I can find that
issues reason code 108 is DMSERP, but I don't see DMSERP anywhere in the
IPGATE or MTREXX code.  Does anyone have any idea what might be going
on, or where to look?

A couple of months ago, someone said that IBM has an internal version of
IPGATE with some bugs fixed.  Is there any chance of getting that on the
VM Download page?

   Dennis O'Brien

We are Borg of America.  You will be assimilated.  Resistance is futile.


Re: IPGATE errors

2008-10-02 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 10/02/2008 at 08:20 EDT, O'Brien, Dennis L 
Dennis.L.O'[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 A couple of months ago, someone said that IBM has an internal version of
 IPGATE with some bugs fixed.  Is there any chance of getting that on the
 VM Download page?

Unlikely in the extreme.

First, make sure you have OverridePrecedence in AssortedParms of PROFILE 
TCPIP.  *Everyone* should have that.  There are two RFCs that conflict 
with each other and the later of the two is more common. 
OverridePrecedence induces VM TCP/IP to respect the later RFC.

If that's not the problem, then I suspect that you have routers or traffic 
monitors that are terminating idle connections.  You'd need to see the 
socket trace of both ends to get evidence and a network sniffer trace to 
confirm it.  Or just ask your network folks what the policy is for idle 
connections between Point A and Point B.

You could also write a QD REXX client/server program or PIPE to establish 
an idle TCP connection (not using IPGATE) to see if it is disrupted.  Have 
the program log the disruption and reestablish the connection.  See if 
there is a pattern.  If so, you have empirical evidence of an Outside 
Force.

If it appears at random, network traces are needed (after trying with 
OverridePrecedence).

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott


Re: AUTOLOG

2008-10-02 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 10/02/2008 at 04:05 EDT, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yes it was a privilege issue. Thanks again for all the responses!

Terry, you should do those CP commands in AUTOLOG1's profile, before you 
XAUTOLOG RACFVM.  AUTOLOG2 doesn't need any privilege except to XAUTOLOG 
users.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott