Any 3270 emulator for Android Tablet?

2011-02-18 Thread Tony Thigpen
Has anyone found a 3270 emulator for Android yet?

-- 

Tony Thigpen


Re: Any 3270 emulator for Android Tablet?

2011-02-18 Thread Dave Jones
No yet, Tony. I just looked yesterday in the Android Market for one
for my Motorola Android phone.

DJ

On 02/18/2011 07:20 AM, Tony Thigpen wrote:
 Has anyone found a 3270 emulator for Android yet?
 

-- 
Dave Jones
V/Soft Software
www.vsoft-software.com
Houston, TX
281.578.7544


Web based archive?

2011-02-18 Thread JURASCHEK, DAVID F (CTR)
Is there a web address where the archives of the IBM-VM list can be
reviewed from?

Many of the other LISTSERVers provide such an interface.

Thanks.

-Dave


Re: Web based archive?

2011-02-18 Thread Dave Jones
Dave, you can  view and search the current list and archives back to
January 1994 via this:

http://listserv.uark.edu/archives/ibmvm.html



On 02/18/2011 07:45 AM, JURASCHEK, DAVID F (CTR) wrote:
 Is there a web address where the archives of the IBM-VM list can be
 reviewed from?
 
 Many of the other LISTSERVers provide such an interface.
 
 Thanks.
 
 -Dave
 

-- 
Dave Jones
V/Soft Software
www.vsoft-software.com
Houston, TX
281.578.7544


Re: DEVICES stmt in SYSTEM CONFIG

2011-02-18 Thread George Henke/NYLIC
The truly paranoid keep a .iso copy of the DVD in each location (or burn 
extra physical copies and keep it with your emergency ops manual).

Just because we're paranoid, does not necessarily mean everyone is not out 
to get us.

 








Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com 
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
02/17/2011 09:23 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU


To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: DEVICES stmt in SYSTEM CONFIG






On Thursday, 02/17/2011 at 05:48 EST, Mike Walter 
mike.wal...@aonhewitt.com wrote:

 If you're reading this and are new to z/VM, take one thing away... build 

a 
 stable (tested and rarely changed) 1-pack z/VM recovery system.  It 
could save 
 your job one day (or dark night).

The truly paranoid keep a .iso copy of the DVD in each location (or burn 
extra physical copies and keep it with your emergency ops manual).  The 
ramdisk-based installation system can be used to repair other systems.  It 

will run even if nothing else will.

Alan Altmark

z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
IBM System Lab Services and Training 
ibm.com/systems/services/labservices 
office: 607.429.3323
mobile; 607.321.7556
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
IBM Endicott



Defining FCP devices to z/VM

2011-02-18 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
I maintain one operating system configuration in z/OS HCD which includes my 
z/OS lpars, as well as, my linux ifl.
If I want to access storage on a FCP device from the linux IFL, what, 
specifically, do I have to add to HCD on the z/OS side? (just channel paths?)
What, specifically, so I have to add to SYSTEM CONFIG on the z/VM side?  
(EDEVICE statements?)

Does anyone know if any of the SHARE sessions (in Anaheim) would help me 
address this?

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax



AUTO: Roger Lunsford is out of the office. (returning 02/22/2011)

2011-02-18 Thread Roger Lunsford

I am out of the office until 02/22/2011.

I will respond to your message when I return. Please contact my manager
Hanif Dandia if you need assistance before my return. Or other Level2 folks
in my department.


Note: This is an automated response to your message  Re: Any 3270 emulator
for Android Tablet? sent on 2/18/2011 8:30:55 AM.

This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.

Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

2011-02-18 Thread Mark Pace
Define CHPID, Control Unit, and I/O Devices all as type FCP.


On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D
anne.d.crabt...@wv.govwrote:

  I maintain one operating system configuration in z/OS HCD which includes
 my z/OS lpars, as well as, my linux ifl.

 If I want to access storage on a FCP device from the linux IFL, what,
 specifically, do I have to add to HCD on the z/OS side? (just channel
 paths?)

 What, specifically, so I have to add to SYSTEM CONFIG on the z/VM side?
 (EDEVICE statements?)



 Does anyone know if any of the SHARE sessions (in Anaheim) would help me
 address this?



 Anne D. Crabtree

 System Programmer

 WV Office of Technology Data Center

 1900 Kanawha Blvd East

 Charleston, WV  25305

 (304)558-5914 ext 58292

 (304)558-1441 fax






-- 
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems


Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

2011-02-18 Thread Brian France

CHPD described as FCP

A cntlunit using FCP

How ever many devices  FCP   We have 64.

Nothing in System config.

Use the dedicate statement in the user direct file to attach the device.

On 2/18/2011 10:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:


I maintain one operating system configuration in z/OS HCD which 
includes my z/OS lpars, as well as, my linux ifl.


If I want to access storage on a FCP device from the linux IFL, what, 
specifically, do I have to add to HCD on the z/OS side? (just channel 
paths?)


What, specifically, so I have to add to SYSTEM CONFIG on the z/VM 
side?  (EDEVICE statements?)


Does anyone know if any of the SHARE sessions (in Anaheim) would help 
me address this?


Anne D. Crabtree

System Programmer

WV Office of Technology Data Center

1900 Kanawha Blvd East

Charleston, WV  25305

(304)558-5914 ext 58292

(304)558-1441 fax



--

--

Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edu mailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan


IBM 100: System 360 From Computers to Computer Systems

2011-02-18 Thread Pamela Christina - springtime in Endicott NY
Cross posted to IBMVM,IBMMAIN, LINUX390 for you
mainframe enthusiasts.

Today's IBM 100:
System 360 From Computers to Computer Systems
http://www.ibm.com/ibm100/us/en/icons/system360/

Enjoy.

Regards,
Pam C


Re: DEVICES stmt in SYSTEM CONFIG

2011-02-18 Thread Tom Huegel
Here is what I do.

In SYSTEM CONFIG file I have these statements.
 System_Identifier 2094 09A123 ZVMHOME
 System_Identifier 2817 09B123 ZVMDR

/**/
/* IMBED -SYSTEM- SYSTEM */
 IMBED -SYSTEM- SYSTEM
/**/

Then I have two files on CF1
ZVMHOME SYSTEM    All of the system config statements for my home
system
ZVMDR  SYSTEM    All of the system config statements for my D/R
system

This technique requires you to know some things about the D/R system like
the CPUID etc. you can use the different names throught the system to decide
if you are at home or at a D/R sught.








On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:01 AM, George Henke/NYLIC 
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:

 The truly paranoid keep a .iso copy of the DVD in each location (or burn
 extra physical copies and keep it with your emergency ops manual).

 Just because we're paranoid, does not necessarily mean everyone is not out
 to get us.









   *Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com*
 Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

 02/17/2011 09:23 PM
   Please respond to
 The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

To
 IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 cc
   Subject
 Re: DEVICES stmt in SYSTEM CONFIG




 On Thursday, 02/17/2011 at 05:48 EST, Mike Walter
 mike.wal...@aonhewitt.com wrote:

  If you're reading this and are new to z/VM, take one thing away... build
 a
  stable (tested and rarely changed) 1-pack z/VM recovery system.  It
 could save
  your job one day (or dark night).

 The truly paranoid keep a .iso copy of the DVD in each location (or burn
 extra physical copies and keep it with your emergency ops manual).  The
 ramdisk-based installation system can be used to repair other systems.  It
 will run even if nothing else will.

 Alan Altmark

 z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
 IBM System Lab Services and Training
 ibm.com/systems/services/labservices
 office: 607.429.3323
 mobile; 607.321.7556
 alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
 IBM Endicott




Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

2011-02-18 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
It won't let me define FCP devices on the z/os side because my config is type 
MVS.

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Mark Pace
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:52 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

Define CHPID, Control Unit, and I/O Devices all as type FCP.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D 
anne.d.crabt...@wv.govmailto:anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov wrote:
I maintain one operating system configuration in z/OS HCD which includes my 
z/OS lpars, as well as, my linux ifl.
If I want to access storage on a FCP device from the linux IFL, what, 
specifically, do I have to add to HCD on the z/OS side? (just channel paths?)
What, specifically, so I have to add to SYSTEM CONFIG on the z/VM side?  
(EDEVICE statements?)

Does anyone know if any of the SHARE sessions (in Anaheim) would help me 
address this?

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax




--
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems






Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

2011-02-18 Thread Brian France

I make mine VM. Are you running VM or just linux in an lpar?

On 2/18/2011 11:15 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:


It won't let me define FCP devices on the z/os side because my config 
is type MVS.


Anne D. Crabtree

System Programmer

WV Office of Technology Data Center

1900 Kanawha Blvd East

Charleston, WV  25305

(304)558-5914 ext 58292

(304)558-1441 fax

*From:*The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] 
*On Behalf Of *Mark Pace

*Sent:* Friday, February 18, 2011 10:52 AM
*To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
*Subject:* Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

Define CHPID, Control Unit, and I/O Devices all as type FCP.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D 
anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov mailto:anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov wrote:


I maintain one operating system configuration in z/OS HCD which 
includes my z/OS lpars, as well as, my linux ifl.


If I want to access storage on a FCP device from the linux IFL, what, 
specifically, do I have to add to HCD on the z/OS side? (just channel 
paths?)


What, specifically, so I have to add to SYSTEM CONFIG on the z/VM 
side?  (EDEVICE statements?)


Does anyone know if any of the SHARE sessions (in Anaheim) would help 
me address this?


Anne D. Crabtree

System Programmer

WV Office of Technology Data Center

1900 Kanawha Blvd East

Charleston, WV  25305

(304)558-5914 ext 58292

(304)558-1441 fax




--

Mark D Pace

Senior Systems Engineer

Mainline Information Systems



--

--

Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edu mailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan


Re: DEVICES stmt in SYSTEM CONFIG

2011-02-18 Thread George Henke/NYLIC
Tom Huegel wrote:

This technique requires you to know some things about the D/R system like 
the CPUID etc



Why CPUID?

We are upgrading from z9 to z196 soon.

Is there a CPUID carried in SYSTEM CONFIG which I must change?






Tom Huegel tehue...@gmail.com 
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
02/18/2011 11:15 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU


To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: DEVICES stmt in SYSTEM CONFIG






Here is what I do.
 
In SYSTEM CONFIG file I have these statements.
 System_Identifier 2094 09A123 ZVMHOME  
 System_Identifier 2817 09B123 ZVMDR
 
/**/ 
/* IMBED -SYSTEM- SYSTEM */  
 IMBED -SYSTEM- SYSTEM   
/**/   

 
Then I have two files on CF1
ZVMHOME SYSTEM    All of the system config statements for my home 
system
ZVMDR  SYSTEM    All of the system config statements for my 
D/R system
 
This technique requires you to know some things about the D/R system like 
the CPUID etc. you can use the different names throught the system to 
decide if you are at home or at a D/R sught.
 
 
 
 
 


 
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:01 AM, George Henke/NYLIC 
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
The truly paranoid keep a .iso copy of the DVD in each location (or burn 
extra physical copies and keep it with your emergency ops manual). 

Just because we're paranoid, does not necessarily mean everyone is not out 
to get us. 

  







Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com 
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 
02/17/2011 09:23 PM 


Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU


To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 
cc

Subject
Re: DEVICES stmt in SYSTEM CONFIG









On Thursday, 02/17/2011 at 05:48 EST, Mike Walter 
mike.wal...@aonhewitt.com wrote:

 If you're reading this and are new to z/VM, take one thing away... build 

a 
 stable (tested and rarely changed) 1-pack z/VM recovery system.  It 
could save 
 your job one day (or dark night).

The truly paranoid keep a .iso copy of the DVD in each location (or burn 
extra physical copies and keep it with your emergency ops manual).  The 
ramdisk-based installation system can be used to repair other systems.  It 

will run even if nothing else will.

Alan Altmark

z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
IBM System Lab Services and Training 
ibm.com/systems/services/labservices 
office: 607.429.3323
mobile; 607.321.7556
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
IBM Endicott




Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

2011-02-18 Thread Mark Pace
Define any VM lpars as type VM.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Brian France b...@psu.edu wrote:

  I make mine VM. Are you running VM or just linux in an lpar?

 On 2/18/2011 11:15 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:

  It won’t let me define FCP devices on the z/os side because my config is
 type MVS.



 Anne D. Crabtree

 System Programmer

 WV Office of Technology Data Center

 1900 Kanawha Blvd East

 Charleston, WV  25305

 (304)558-5914 ext 58292

 (304)558-1441 fax



 *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System 
 [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUIBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]
 *On Behalf Of *Mark Pace
 *Sent:* Friday, February 18, 2011 10:52 AM
 *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 *Subject:* Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM



 Define CHPID, Control Unit, and I/O Devices all as type FCP.



 On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov
 wrote:

 I maintain one operating system configuration in z/OS HCD which includes my
 z/OS lpars, as well as, my linux ifl.

 If I want to access storage on a FCP device from the linux IFL, what,
 specifically, do I have to add to HCD on the z/OS side? (just channel
 paths?)

 What, specifically, so I have to add to SYSTEM CONFIG on the z/VM side?
 (EDEVICE statements?)



 Does anyone know if any of the SHARE sessions (in Anaheim) would help me
 address this?



 Anne D. Crabtree

 System Programmer

 WV Office of Technology Data Center

 1900 Kanawha Blvd East

 Charleston, WV  25305

 (304)558-5914 ext 58292

 (304)558-1441 fax






 --

 Mark D Pace

 Senior Systems Engineer

 Mainline Information Systems










 --

 --

  Brian W. France
 Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
 Pennsylvania State University
 Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
 Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
 814-863-4739
 b...@psu.edu

 To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

 Carl Sagan




-- 
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems


Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

2011-02-18 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
I am running Linux under z/vm.  Maybe I don't care if the devices connect to my 
os config?  That's where the problem pops up.  It actually let me define them, 
it just won't let me connect them to the os config.  Opinions?

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Brian France
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:22 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

I make mine VM. Are you running VM or just linux in an lpar?

On 2/18/2011 11:15 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:
It won't let me define FCP devices on the z/os side because my config is type 
MVS.

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Mark Pace
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:52 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUmailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

Define CHPID, Control Unit, and I/O Devices all as type FCP.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D 
anne.d.crabt...@wv.govmailto:anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov wrote:
I maintain one operating system configuration in z/OS HCD which includes my 
z/OS lpars, as well as, my linux ifl.
If I want to access storage on a FCP device from the linux IFL, what, 
specifically, do I have to add to HCD on the z/OS side? (just channel paths?)
What, specifically, so I have to add to SYSTEM CONFIG on the z/VM side?  
(EDEVICE statements?)

Does anyone know if any of the SHARE sessions (in Anaheim) would help me 
address this?

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax




--
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems





--
--
Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edumailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan


Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

2011-02-18 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
When I try to do a second os config of type VM, I open up a whole other can of 
worms.

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Mark Pace
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:23 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

Define any VM lpars as type VM.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Brian France 
b...@psu.edumailto:b...@psu.edu wrote:
I make mine VM. Are you running VM or just linux in an lpar?

On 2/18/2011 11:15 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:
It won't let me define FCP devices on the z/os side because my config is type 
MVS.

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Mark Pace
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:52 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUmailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

Define CHPID, Control Unit, and I/O Devices all as type FCP.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D 
anne.d.crabt...@wv.govmailto:anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov wrote:
I maintain one operating system configuration in z/OS HCD which includes my 
z/OS lpars, as well as, my linux ifl.
If I want to access storage on a FCP device from the linux IFL, what, 
specifically, do I have to add to HCD on the z/OS side? (just channel paths?)
What, specifically, so I have to add to SYSTEM CONFIG on the z/VM side?  
(EDEVICE statements?)

Does anyone know if any of the SHARE sessions (in Anaheim) would help me 
address this?

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax




--
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems





--
--
Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edumailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan



--
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems






Re: DEVICES stmt in SYSTEM CONFIG

2011-02-18 Thread Tom Huegel
That depends.. If you have CPUID's in the system config file then you will
need to update them for the new cpu.. On the other hand if you just have a
stetement like this you don't need to do anything.
System_Identifier_Default ZVMHOME

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:22 AM, George Henke/NYLIC 
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:

 Tom Huegel wrote:

 This technique requires you to know some things about the D/R system like
 the CPUID etc



 Why CPUID?

 We are upgrading from z9 to z196 soon.

 Is there a CPUID carried in SYSTEM CONFIG which I must change?





   *Tom Huegel tehue...@gmail.com*
 Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

 02/18/2011 11:15 AM
   Please respond to
 The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

To
 IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 cc
   Subject
 Re: DEVICES stmt in SYSTEM CONFIG




 Here is what I do.

 In SYSTEM CONFIG file I have these statements.
  System_Identifier 2094 09A123 ZVMHOME
  System_Identifier 2817 09B123 ZVMDR

 /**/
 /* IMBED -SYSTEM- SYSTEM */
  IMBED -SYSTEM- SYSTEM
 /**/

 Then I have two files on CF1
 ZVMHOME SYSTEM    All of the system config statements for my home
 system
 ZVMDR  SYSTEM    All of the system config statements for my
 D/R system

 This technique requires you to know some things about the D/R system like
 the CPUID etc. you can use the different names throught the system to decide
 if you are at home or at a D/R sught.








 On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:01 AM, George Henke/NYLIC *
 george_he...@newyorklife.com* george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
 The truly paranoid keep a .iso copy of the DVD in each location (or burn
 extra physical copies and keep it with your emergency ops manual).

 Just because we're paranoid, does not necessarily mean everyone is not out
 to get us.








   *Alan Altmark **alan_altm...@us.ibm.com* alan_altm...@us.ibm.com**
 Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
 *IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU*IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 

 02/17/2011 09:23 PM


   Please respond to
 The IBM z/VM Operating System 
 *IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU*IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 

To
 *IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 cc
   Subject
 Re: DEVICES stmt in SYSTEM CONFIG






 On Thursday, 02/17/2011 at 05:48 EST, Mike Walter
 *mike.wal...@aonhewitt.com* mike.wal...@aonhewitt.com wrote:

  If you're reading this and are new to z/VM, take one thing away... build
 a
  stable (tested and rarely changed) 1-pack z/VM recovery system.  It
 could save
  your job one day (or dark night).

 The truly paranoid keep a .iso copy of the DVD in each location (or burn
 extra physical copies and keep it with your emergency ops manual).  The
 ramdisk-based installation system can be used to repair other systems.  It
 will run even if nothing else will.

 Alan Altmark

 z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
 IBM System Lab Services and Training *
 **ibm.com/systems/services/labservices*http://ibm.com/systems/services/labservices
 office: 607.429.3323
 mobile; 607.321.7556*
 **alan_altm...@us.ibm.com* alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
 IBM Endicott





Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

2011-02-18 Thread Brian France
I define mine under my z/OS system config. So I have MVS lpars and VM 
lpars and I only connect the FCP chpids and devs to VM.


On 2/18/2011 11:25 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:


I am running Linux under z/vm.  Maybe I don't care if the devices 
connect to my os config?  That's where the problem pops up.  It 
actually let me define them, it just won't let me connect them to the 
os config.  Opinions?


Anne D. Crabtree

System Programmer

WV Office of Technology Data Center

1900 Kanawha Blvd East

Charleston, WV  25305

(304)558-5914 ext 58292

(304)558-1441 fax

*From:*The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] 
*On Behalf Of *Brian France

*Sent:* Friday, February 18, 2011 11:22 AM
*To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
*Subject:* Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

I make mine VM. Are you running VM or just linux in an lpar?

On 2/18/2011 11:15 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:

It won't let me define FCP devices on the z/os side because my config 
is type MVS.


Anne D. Crabtree

System Programmer

WV Office of Technology Data Center

1900 Kanawha Blvd East

Charleston, WV  25305

(304)558-5914 ext 58292

(304)558-1441 fax

*From:*The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] 
*On Behalf Of *Mark Pace

*Sent:* Friday, February 18, 2011 10:52 AM
*To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
*Subject:* Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

Define CHPID, Control Unit, and I/O Devices all as type FCP.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D 
anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov mailto:anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov wrote:


I maintain one operating system configuration in z/OS HCD which 
includes my z/OS lpars, as well as, my linux ifl.


If I want to access storage on a FCP device from the linux IFL, what, 
specifically, do I have to add to HCD on the z/OS side? (just channel 
paths?)


What, specifically, so I have to add to SYSTEM CONFIG on the z/VM 
side?  (EDEVICE statements?)


Does anyone know if any of the SHARE sessions (in Anaheim) would help 
me address this?


Anne D. Crabtree

System Programmer

WV Office of Technology Data Center

1900 Kanawha Blvd East

Charleston, WV  25305

(304)558-5914 ext 58292

(304)558-1441 fax




--

Mark D Pace

Senior Systems Engineer

Mainline Information Systems

--

--

Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edu mailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan



--

--

Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edu mailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan


Re: DEVICES stmt in SYSTEM CONFIG

2011-02-18 Thread George Henke/NYLIC
This is all I have in SYSTEM CONFIG, so I guess it's ok?

/**/ 
/*   System_Identifier Information*/ 
/**/ 
 
System_Identifier_Default zVM-81 
 



Tom Huegel tehue...@gmail.com 
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
02/18/2011 11:44 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU


To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: DEVICES stmt in SYSTEM CONFIG






That depends.. If you have CPUID's in the system config file then you will 
need to update them for the new cpu.. On the other hand if you just have a 
stetement like this you don't need to do anything.
System_Identifier_Default ZVMHOME 

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:22 AM, George Henke/NYLIC 
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
Tom Huegel wrote: 

This technique requires you to know some things about the D/R system like 
the CPUID etc 



Why CPUID? 

We are upgrading from z9 to z196 soon. 

Is there a CPUID carried in SYSTEM CONFIG which I must change? 





Tom Huegel tehue...@gmail.com 
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 
02/18/2011 11:15 AM 


Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU


To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 
cc

Subject
Re: DEVICES stmt in SYSTEM CONFIG









Here is what I do. 
  
In SYSTEM CONFIG file I have these statements. 
 System_Identifier 2094 09A123 ZVMHOME  
 System_Identifier 2817 09B123 ZVMDR 
  
/**/ 
/* IMBED -SYSTEM- SYSTEM */  
 IMBED -SYSTEM- SYSTEM   
/**/   

  
Then I have two files on CF1 
ZVMHOME SYSTEM    All of the system config statements for my home 
system 
ZVMDR  SYSTEM    All of the system config statements for my 
D/R system 
  
This technique requires you to know some things about the D/R system like 
the CPUID etc. you can use the different names throught the system to 
decide if you are at home or at a D/R sught. 
  
  
  
  
  


  
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:01 AM, George Henke/NYLIC 
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote: 
The truly paranoid keep a .iso copy of the DVD in each location (or burn 
extra physical copies and keep it with your emergency ops manual). 

Just because we're paranoid, does not necessarily mean everyone is not out 
to get us. 

  






Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com 
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 
02/17/2011 09:23 PM 



Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU


To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 
cc

Subject
Re: DEVICES stmt in SYSTEM CONFIG












On Thursday, 02/17/2011 at 05:48 EST, Mike Walter 
mike.wal...@aonhewitt.com wrote:

 If you're reading this and are new to z/VM, take one thing away... build 

a 
 stable (tested and rarely changed) 1-pack z/VM recovery system.  It 
could save 
 your job one day (or dark night).

The truly paranoid keep a .iso copy of the DVD in each location (or burn 
extra physical copies and keep it with your emergency ops manual).  The 
ramdisk-based installation system can be used to repair other systems.  It 

will run even if nothing else will.

Alan Altmark

z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
IBM System Lab Services and Training 
ibm.com/systems/services/labservices 
office: 607.429.3323
mobile; 607.321.7556
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
IBM Endicott





Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

2011-02-18 Thread Brian France
I don't remember any worms with mine. Seemed pretty straight forward. 
Defined any ckd chpds to have z/VM access ( sharing with z/OS). Then any 
consoles and such. What kinda worms if I may ask?


On 2/18/2011 11:25 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:


When I try to do a second os config of type VM, I open up a whole 
other can of worms.


Anne D. Crabtree

System Programmer

WV Office of Technology Data Center

1900 Kanawha Blvd East

Charleston, WV  25305

(304)558-5914 ext 58292

(304)558-1441 fax

*From:*The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] 
*On Behalf Of *Mark Pace

*Sent:* Friday, February 18, 2011 11:23 AM
*To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
*Subject:* Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

Define any VM lpars as type VM.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Brian France b...@psu.edu 
mailto:b...@psu.edu wrote:


I make mine VM. Are you running VM or just linux in an lpar?


On 2/18/2011 11:15 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:

It won't let me define FCP devices on the z/os side because my config 
is type MVS.


Anne D. Crabtree

System Programmer

WV Office of Technology Data Center

1900 Kanawha Blvd East

Charleston, WV  25305

(304)558-5914 ext 58292

(304)558-1441 fax

*From:*The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] 
*On Behalf Of *Mark Pace

*Sent:* Friday, February 18, 2011 10:52 AM
*To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
*Subject:* Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

Define CHPID, Control Unit, and I/O Devices all as type FCP.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D 
anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov mailto:anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov wrote:


I maintain one operating system configuration in z/OS HCD which 
includes my z/OS lpars, as well as, my linux ifl.


If I want to access storage on a FCP device from the linux IFL, what, 
specifically, do I have to add to HCD on the z/OS side? (just channel 
paths?)


What, specifically, so I have to add to SYSTEM CONFIG on the z/VM 
side?  (EDEVICE statements?)


Does anyone know if any of the SHARE sessions (in Anaheim) would help 
me address this?


Anne D. Crabtree

System Programmer

WV Office of Technology Data Center

1900 Kanawha Blvd East

Charleston, WV  25305

(304)558-5914 ext 58292

(304)558-1441 fax




--

Mark D Pace

Senior Systems Engineer

Mainline Information Systems

--

--

Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edu mailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan




--

Mark D Pace

Senior Systems Engineer

Mainline Information Systems



--

--

Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edu mailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan


Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

2011-02-18 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
So, you don't connect them to your operating system config under z/os in HCD, 
you just define them there and then connect on the VM side under VM? (boy that 
question even confuses me..lol  Hope you know what I'm asking!)

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Brian France
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:46 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

I define mine under my z/OS system config. So I have MVS lpars and VM lpars and 
I only connect the FCP chpids and devs to VM.

On 2/18/2011 11:25 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:
I am running Linux under z/vm.  Maybe I don't care if the devices connect to my 
os config?  That's where the problem pops up.  It actually let me define them, 
it just won't let me connect them to the os config.  Opinions?

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Brian France
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:22 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUmailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

I make mine VM. Are you running VM or just linux in an lpar?

On 2/18/2011 11:15 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:
It won't let me define FCP devices on the z/os side because my config is type 
MVS.

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Mark Pace
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:52 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUmailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

Define CHPID, Control Unit, and I/O Devices all as type FCP.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D 
anne.d.crabt...@wv.govmailto:anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov wrote:
I maintain one operating system configuration in z/OS HCD which includes my 
z/OS lpars, as well as, my linux ifl.
If I want to access storage on a FCP device from the linux IFL, what, 
specifically, do I have to add to HCD on the z/OS side? (just channel paths?)
What, specifically, so I have to add to SYSTEM CONFIG on the z/VM side?  
(EDEVICE statements?)

Does anyone know if any of the SHARE sessions (in Anaheim) would help me 
address this?

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax




--
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems





--
--
Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edumailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan

--
--
Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edumailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan


Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

2011-02-18 Thread Brian France

I do not connect them to my z/OS LPARs under my z/OS contolled HCD.

I do however, create VM OS LPARs under my z/OS controlled HCD and 
connect my FCP chpds/dev to VM only.


On the chpid itself I only code VM access. I don't even put MVS as a 
candidate.



On 2/18/2011 11:49 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:


So, you don't connect them to your operating system config under z/os 
in HCD, you just define them there and then connect on the VM side 
under VM? (boy that question even confuses me..lol  Hope you know what 
I'm asking!)


Anne D. Crabtree

System Programmer

WV Office of Technology Data Center

1900 Kanawha Blvd East

Charleston, WV  25305

(304)558-5914 ext 58292

(304)558-1441 fax

*From:*The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] 
*On Behalf Of *Brian France

*Sent:* Friday, February 18, 2011 11:46 AM
*To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
*Subject:* Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

I define mine under my z/OS system config. So I have MVS lpars and VM 
lpars and I only connect the FCP chpids and devs to VM.


On 2/18/2011 11:25 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:

I am running Linux under z/vm.  Maybe I don't care if the devices 
connect to my os config?  That's where the problem pops up.  It 
actually let me define them, it just won't let me connect them to the 
os config.  Opinions?


Anne D. Crabtree

System Programmer

WV Office of Technology Data Center

1900 Kanawha Blvd East

Charleston, WV  25305

(304)558-5914 ext 58292

(304)558-1441 fax

*From:*The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] 
*On Behalf Of *Brian France

*Sent:* Friday, February 18, 2011 11:22 AM
*To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
*Subject:* Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

I make mine VM. Are you running VM or just linux in an lpar?

On 2/18/2011 11:15 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:

It won't let me define FCP devices on the z/os side because my config 
is type MVS.


Anne D. Crabtree

System Programmer

WV Office of Technology Data Center

1900 Kanawha Blvd East

Charleston, WV  25305

(304)558-5914 ext 58292

(304)558-1441 fax

*From:*The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] 
*On Behalf Of *Mark Pace

*Sent:* Friday, February 18, 2011 10:52 AM
*To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
*Subject:* Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

Define CHPID, Control Unit, and I/O Devices all as type FCP.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D 
anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov mailto:anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov wrote:


I maintain one operating system configuration in z/OS HCD which 
includes my z/OS lpars, as well as, my linux ifl.


If I want to access storage on a FCP device from the linux IFL, what, 
specifically, do I have to add to HCD on the z/OS side? (just channel 
paths?)


What, specifically, so I have to add to SYSTEM CONFIG on the z/VM 
side?  (EDEVICE statements?)


Does anyone know if any of the SHARE sessions (in Anaheim) would help 
me address this?


Anne D. Crabtree

System Programmer

WV Office of Technology Data Center

1900 Kanawha Blvd East

Charleston, WV  25305

(304)558-5914 ext 58292

(304)558-1441 fax




--

Mark D Pace

Senior Systems Engineer

Mainline Information Systems

--

--

Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edu mailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan

--

--

Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edu mailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan



--

--

Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edu mailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan


Re: DEVICES stmt in SYSTEM CONFIG

2011-02-18 Thread Tom Huegel
You should be fine.



On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:46 AM, George Henke/NYLIC 
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:

 This is all I have in SYSTEM CONFIG, so I guess it's ok?

 /**/
 /*   System_Identifier Information*/
 /**/

 System_Identifier_Default zVM-81



   *Tom Huegel tehue...@gmail.com*
 Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

 02/18/2011 11:44 AM
   Please respond to
 The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

To
 IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 cc
   Subject
 Re: DEVICES stmt in SYSTEM CONFIG




 That depends.. If you have CPUID's in the system config file then you will
 need to update them for the new cpu.. On the other hand if you just have a
 stetement like this you don't need to do anything.
 System_Identifier_Default ZVMHOME

 On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:22 AM, George Henke/NYLIC *
 george_he...@newyorklife.com* george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
 Tom Huegel wrote:

 This technique requires you to know some things about the D/R system like
 the CPUID etc



 Why CPUID?

 We are upgrading from z9 to z196 soon.

 Is there a CPUID carried in SYSTEM CONFIG which I must change?




   *Tom Huegel **tehue...@gmail.com* tehue...@gmail.com**
 Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
 *IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU*IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 

 02/18/2011 11:15 AM


   Please respond to
 The IBM z/VM Operating System 
 *IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU*IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 

To
 *IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 cc
   Subject
 Re: DEVICES stmt in SYSTEM CONFIG






 Here is what I do.

 In SYSTEM CONFIG file I have these statements.
  System_Identifier 2094 09A123 ZVMHOME
  System_Identifier 2817 09B123 ZVMDR

 /**/
 /* IMBED -SYSTEM- SYSTEM */
  IMBED -SYSTEM- SYSTEM
 /**/

 Then I have two files on CF1
 ZVMHOME SYSTEM    All of the system config statements for my home
 system
 ZVMDR  SYSTEM    All of the system config statements for my
 D/R system

 This technique requires you to know some things about the D/R system like
 the CPUID etc. you can use the different names throught the system to decide
 if you are at home or at a D/R sught.








 On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:01 AM, George Henke/NYLIC *
 george_he...@newyorklife.com* george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
 The truly paranoid keep a .iso copy of the DVD in each location (or burn
 extra physical copies and keep it with your emergency ops manual).

 Just because we're paranoid, does not necessarily mean everyone is not out
 to get us.







   *Alan Altmark **alan_altm...@us.ibm.com* alan_altm...@us.ibm.com**
 Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
 *IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU*IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 

 02/17/2011 09:23 PM


   Please respond to
 The IBM z/VM Operating System 
 *IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU*IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 

To
 *IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 cc
   Subject
 Re: DEVICES stmt in SYSTEM CONFIG







 On Thursday, 02/17/2011 at 05:48 EST, Mike Walter
 *mike.wal...@aonhewitt.com* mike.wal...@aonhewitt.com wrote:

  If you're reading this and are new to z/VM, take one thing away... build
 a
  stable (tested and rarely changed) 1-pack z/VM recovery system.  It
 could save
  your job one day (or dark night).

 The truly paranoid keep a .iso copy of the DVD in each location (or burn
 extra physical copies and keep it with your emergency ops manual).  The
 ramdisk-based installation system can be used to repair other systems.  It
 will run even if nothing else will.

 Alan Altmark

 z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
 IBM System Lab Services and Training *
 **ibm.com/systems/services/labservices*http://ibm.com/systems/services/labservices
 office: 607.429.3323
 mobile; 607.321.7556*
 **alan_altm...@us.ibm.com* alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
 IBM Endicott






Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

2011-02-18 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
I've tried several times and each time I start over but here's the jist of it:


1.Define os config of type VM

2.Modify the FC chipids I want to use from FC to FCP

3.   Add control units as type FCP

4.   Add devices and attach to those control units with type FCP



If I then print a config report for MVS and VM, they are not at all what I 
thought they should be.   MVS omits all of them but so does VM report?


Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Brian France
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:49 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

I don't remember any worms with mine. Seemed pretty straight forward. Defined 
any ckd chpds to have z/VM access ( sharing with z/OS). Then any consoles and 
such. What kinda worms if I may ask?

On 2/18/2011 11:25 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:
When I try to do a second os config of type VM, I open up a whole other can of 
worms.

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Mark Pace
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:23 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUmailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

Define any VM lpars as type VM.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Brian France 
b...@psu.edumailto:b...@psu.edu wrote:
I make mine VM. Are you running VM or just linux in an lpar?

On 2/18/2011 11:15 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:
It won't let me define FCP devices on the z/os side because my config is type 
MVS.

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Mark Pace
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:52 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUmailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

Define CHPID, Control Unit, and I/O Devices all as type FCP.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D 
anne.d.crabt...@wv.govmailto:anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov wrote:
I maintain one operating system configuration in z/OS HCD which includes my 
z/OS lpars, as well as, my linux ifl.
If I want to access storage on a FCP device from the linux IFL, what, 
specifically, do I have to add to HCD on the z/OS side? (just channel paths?)
What, specifically, so I have to add to SYSTEM CONFIG on the z/VM side?  
(EDEVICE statements?)

Does anyone know if any of the SHARE sessions (in Anaheim) would help me 
address this?

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax




--
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems





--
--
Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edumailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan



--
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems





--
--
Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edumailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan


Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

2011-02-18 Thread Brian France
How about on option 2 when you modified the FC chpids to be FCP, did 
you also just give access to your VM partition under that chpid?




On 2/18/2011 12:04 PM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:


I've tried several times and each time I start over but here's the 
jist of it:


1. Define os config of type VM

2. Modify the FC chipids I want to use from FC to FCP

3.Add control units as type FCP

4.Add devices and attach to those control units with type FCP

If I then print a config report for MVS and VM, they are not at all 
what I thought they should be.   MVS omits all of them but so does VM 
report?


Anne D. Crabtree

System Programmer

WV Office of Technology Data Center

1900 Kanawha Blvd East

Charleston, WV  25305

(304)558-5914 ext 58292

(304)558-1441 fax

*From:*The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] 
*On Behalf Of *Brian France

*Sent:* Friday, February 18, 2011 11:49 AM
*To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
*Subject:* Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

I don't remember any worms with mine. Seemed pretty straight forward. 
Defined any ckd chpds to have z/VM access ( sharing with z/OS). Then 
any consoles and such. What kinda worms if I may ask?


On 2/18/2011 11:25 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:

When I try to do a second os config of type VM, I open up a whole 
other can of worms.


Anne D. Crabtree

System Programmer

WV Office of Technology Data Center

1900 Kanawha Blvd East

Charleston, WV  25305

(304)558-5914 ext 58292

(304)558-1441 fax

*From:*The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] 
*On Behalf Of *Mark Pace

*Sent:* Friday, February 18, 2011 11:23 AM
*To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
*Subject:* Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

Define any VM lpars as type VM.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Brian France b...@psu.edu 
mailto:b...@psu.edu wrote:


I make mine VM. Are you running VM or just linux in an lpar?


On 2/18/2011 11:15 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:

It won't let me define FCP devices on the z/os side because my config 
is type MVS.


Anne D. Crabtree

System Programmer

WV Office of Technology Data Center

1900 Kanawha Blvd East

Charleston, WV  25305

(304)558-5914 ext 58292

(304)558-1441 fax

*From:*The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] 
*On Behalf Of *Mark Pace

*Sent:* Friday, February 18, 2011 10:52 AM
*To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
*Subject:* Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

Define CHPID, Control Unit, and I/O Devices all as type FCP.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D 
anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov mailto:anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov wrote:


I maintain one operating system configuration in z/OS HCD which 
includes my z/OS lpars, as well as, my linux ifl.


If I want to access storage on a FCP device from the linux IFL, what, 
specifically, do I have to add to HCD on the z/OS side? (just channel 
paths?)


What, specifically, so I have to add to SYSTEM CONFIG on the z/VM 
side?  (EDEVICE statements?)


Does anyone know if any of the SHARE sessions (in Anaheim) would help 
me address this?


Anne D. Crabtree

System Programmer

WV Office of Technology Data Center

1900 Kanawha Blvd East

Charleston, WV  25305

(304)558-5914 ext 58292

(304)558-1441 fax




--

Mark D Pace

Senior Systems Engineer

Mainline Information Systems

--

--

Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edu mailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan




--

Mark D Pace

Senior Systems Engineer

Mainline Information Systems

--

--

Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edu mailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan



--

--

Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edu mailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan


Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

2011-02-18 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
yes

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Brian France
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 12:12 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

How about on option 2 when you modified the FC chpids to be FCP, did you also 
just give access to your VM partition under that chpid?



On 2/18/2011 12:04 PM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:
I've tried several times and each time I start over but here's the jist of it:


 Define os config of type VM

 Modify the FC chipids I want to use from FC to FCP

Add control units as type FCP

Add devices and attach to those control units with type FCP



If I then print a config report for MVS and VM, they are not at all what I 
thought they should be.   MVS omits all of them but so does VM report?


Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Brian France
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:49 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUmailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

I don't remember any worms with mine. Seemed pretty straight forward. Defined 
any ckd chpds to have z/VM access ( sharing with z/OS). Then any consoles and 
such. What kinda worms if I may ask?

On 2/18/2011 11:25 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:
When I try to do a second os config of type VM, I open up a whole other can of 
worms.

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Mark Pace
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:23 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUmailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

Define any VM lpars as type VM.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Brian France 
b...@psu.edumailto:b...@psu.edu wrote:
I make mine VM. Are you running VM or just linux in an lpar?

On 2/18/2011 11:15 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:
It won't let me define FCP devices on the z/os side because my config is type 
MVS.

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Mark Pace
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:52 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUmailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

Define CHPID, Control Unit, and I/O Devices all as type FCP.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D 
anne.d.crabt...@wv.govmailto:anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov wrote:
I maintain one operating system configuration in z/OS HCD which includes my 
z/OS lpars, as well as, my linux ifl.
If I want to access storage on a FCP device from the linux IFL, what, 
specifically, do I have to add to HCD on the z/OS side? (just channel paths?)
What, specifically, so I have to add to SYSTEM CONFIG on the z/VM side?  
(EDEVICE statements?)

Does anyone know if any of the SHARE sessions (in Anaheim) would help me 
address this?

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax




--
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems





--
--
Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edumailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan



--
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems





--
--
Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edumailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan

--
--
Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
b...@psu.edumailto:b...@psu.edu

To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Carl Sagan


Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

2011-02-18 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
 Thought this might help:


Specify or revise the following values.

Processor ID . . . . : Z10  Z10 2098 V02 MACHINE
Configuration mode . : LPAR
Channel Subsystem ID : 0

Channel path ID  . . . . 43+PCHID . . . 1B0
Channel path type  . . . FCP   +
Operation mode . . . . . SHR   +
Managed  . . . . . . . . No   (Yes or No)   I/O Cluster   +
Description  . . . . . . EMC CELERRA Z/VM IFL

Specify the following values only if connected to a switch:

Dynamic entry switch ID  __  + (00 - FF)
Entry switch ID  . . . . __  +
Entry port . . . . . . . __  +


¢¢¢ Define Access List ¢¢
Row 1 of
 Command === _ Scroll === PAGE

 Select one or more partitions for inclusion in the access list.

 Channel subsystem ID : 0
 Channel path ID  . . : 43 Channel path type  . : FCP
 Operation mode . . . : SHRNumber of CHPIDs . . : 1

 / CSS ID Partition Name   Number Usage Description
 _ 0  IPO1 1  OS
 _ 0  IPO2 4  OSIPO2
 / 0  LINUX3  OSlinux
 _ 0  TEST 2  OS
 _ 0  WVCF 5  CF


Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Brian France
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:57 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

I do not connect them to my z/OS LPARs under my z/OS contolled HCD.

I do however, create VM OS LPARs under my z/OS controlled HCD and connect my 
FCP chpds/dev to VM only.

On the chpid itself I only code VM access. I don't even put MVS as a candidate.


On 2/18/2011 11:49 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:
So, you don't connect them to your operating system config under z/os in HCD, 
you just define them there and then connect on the VM side under VM? (boy that 
question even confuses me..lol  Hope you know what I'm asking!)

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Brian France
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:46 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUmailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

I define mine under my z/OS system config. So I have MVS lpars and VM lpars and 
I only connect the FCP chpids and devs to VM.

On 2/18/2011 11:25 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:
I am running Linux under z/vm.  Maybe I don't care if the devices connect to my 
os config?  That's where the problem pops up.  It actually let me define them, 
it just won't let me connect them to the os config.  Opinions?

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Brian France
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:22 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUmailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

I make mine VM. Are you running VM or just linux in an lpar?

On 2/18/2011 11:15 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:
It won't let me define FCP devices on the z/os side because my config is type 
MVS.

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Mark Pace
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:52 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUmailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

Define CHPID, Control Unit, and I/O Devices all as type FCP.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D 
anne.d.crabt...@wv.govmailto:anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov wrote:
I maintain one operating system configuration in z/OS HCD which includes my 
z/OS lpars, as well as, my linux ifl.
If I want to access storage on a FCP device from the linux IFL, what, 
specifically, do I have to add to HCD on the z/OS side? (just channel paths?)
What, specifically, so I have to add to SYSTEM CONFIG on the z/VM side?  
(EDEVICE statements?)

Does anyone know if any of the SHARE sessions (in Anaheim) would help me 
address this?

Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV  25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
(304)558-1441 fax




--
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems





--
--
Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 

VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

2011-02-18 Thread Ackerman, Derek
  I always thought that the total VM time, as well as the virtual, would
be less than the connect time. Is it normal for the total time to be
greater than the connect time? This happens a lot...

Derek Ackerman
Enterprise Capacity Planning
 Performance Management
Infocrossing Inc

Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may contain 
material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or Protected Health 
Information, within the meaning of the regulations under the Health Insurance 
Portability  Accountability Act as amended.  If it is not clear that you are 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
transmittal in error, and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of 
this e-mail, including any attachment to it, is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender 
and delete it from your system. Thank you.


Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

2011-02-18 Thread Bruce Hayden
Hopefully you're converting the units.  Virtual and Total time are in
milliseconds and connect time is in seconds.  Are you seeing this even
after converting all of them to the same units?

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Ackerman, Derek
derek.acker...@infocrossing.com wrote:
  I always thought that the total VM time, as well as the virtual, would
 be less than the connect time. Is it normal for the total time to be
 greater than the connect time? This happens a lot...

 Derek Ackerman
 Enterprise Capacity Planning
  Performance Management
 Infocrossing Inc

 Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may 
 contain material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or 
 Protected Health Information, within the meaning of the regulations under 
 the Health Insurance Portability  Accountability Act as amended.  If it is 
 not clear that you are the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
 you have received this transmittal in error, and any review, dissemination, 
 distribution or copying of this e-mail, including any attachment to it, is 
 strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please 
 immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your system. Thank you.




-- 
Bruce Hayden
z/VM and Linux on System z ATS
IBM, Endicott, NY


Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

2011-02-18 Thread Ackerman, Derek
Yes, and I always divide the CPU time by 1000. 



-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Bruce Hayden
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:14 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

Hopefully you're converting the units.  Virtual and Total time are in
milliseconds and connect time is in seconds.  Are you seeing this even
after converting all of them to the same units?

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Ackerman, Derek
derek.acker...@infocrossing.com wrote:
  I always thought that the total VM time, as well as the virtual, would
 be less than the connect time. Is it normal for the total time to be
 greater than the connect time? This happens a lot...

 Derek Ackerman
 Enterprise Capacity Planning
  Performance Management
 Infocrossing Inc

 Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may 
 contain material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or 
 Protected Health Information, within the meaning of the regulations under 
 the Health Insurance Portability  Accountability Act as amended.  If it is 
 not clear that you are the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
 you have received this transmittal in error, and any review, dissemination, 
 distribution or copying of this e-mail, including any attachment to it, is 
 strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please 
 immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your system. Thank you.




-- 
Bruce Hayden
z/VM and Linux on System z ATS
IBM, Endicott, NY

Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may contain 
material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or Protected Health 
Information, within the meaning of the regulations under the Health Insurance 
Portability  Accountability Act as amended.  If it is not clear that you are 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
transmittal in error, and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of 
this e-mail, including any attachment to it, is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender 
and delete it from your system. Thank you.


Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

2011-02-18 Thread Barton Robinson
and for linux servers with multiple cpus, you divide cputime by the 
number of cpus?


Ackerman, Derek wrote:
Yes, and I always divide the CPU time by 1000. 




-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Bruce Hayden
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:14 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

Hopefully you're converting the units.  Virtual and Total time are in
milliseconds and connect time is in seconds.  Are you seeing this even
after converting all of them to the same units?

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Ackerman, Derek
derek.acker...@infocrossing.com wrote:

 I always thought that the total VM time, as well as the virtual, would
be less than the connect time. Is it normal for the total time to be
greater than the connect time? This happens a lot...

Derek Ackerman
Enterprise Capacity Planning
 Performance Management
Infocrossing Inc

Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may contain material that 
is confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or Protected Health Information, 
within the meaning of the regulations under the Health Insurance Portability  
Accountability Act as amended.  If it is not clear that you are the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error, and any review, 
dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, including any attachment to it, is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it 
to the sender and delete it from your system. Thank you.







Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

2011-02-18 Thread Ackerman, Derek
I am simply summing the total CPU times for each CP, for my report I
keep them separate, here is one example for one CP and one interval.


 CPUADDR=0

 INTERVALUSERCONECTTM CPUVIRTCPUTOTAL

 19:30:28AUDITOR5990.1750  0.2220
 19:30:28DISKACNT   5990.0150  0.0380
 19:30:28EREP   5990.  0.0020
 19:30:28FAQSEXEC   5990.  0.
 19:30:28FAQSVM 5990.0030  0.0060
 19:30:28FTPIFOX5990.  0.
 19:30:28FTPSERVE   5990.  0.
 19:30:28FWER   5990.  0.
 19:30:28GCS5990.  0.
 19:30:28HIDRO  599   33.1660 41.8210
 19:30:28IFXSERVE   5990.  0.
 19:30:28LINMON 5990.0020  0.0040
 19:30:28OPERATOR   5990.0070  0.0160
 19:30:28OPERSYMP   5990.  0.
 19:30:28OSASF  5990.  0.
 19:30:28PGAR   5990.  0.
 19:30:28PHRO   5990.  0.
 19:30:28RAHM   5990.  0.
 19:30:28RMCG   5990.0090  0.0320
 19:30:28RMSMASTR   5990.  0.
 19:30:28RSCS   5990.  0.
 19:30:28SESQ   5990.  0.
 19:30:28SKAN   5990.  0.
 19:30:28SK01   5990.0050  0.0130
 19:30:28SPOOLER5990.  0.0010
 19:30:28SUBMITS5990.0020  0.0070
 19:30:28SYBCOM 5990.  0.
 19:30:28SYBLOG 5990.  0.
 19:30:28SYBMON 5990.  0.
 19:30:28SYBUSER5990.0020  0.0030
 19:30:28SYSCHECK   5990.  0.
 19:30:28SYSLOGS5990.  0.
 19:30:28SYSTEM 5990. 11.0860
 19:30:28TCPIFOX5990.0380  0.0550
 19:30:28TCPIP  5990.0070  0.0090
 19:30:28TMON   5990.1720  0.1940
 19:30:28TS09   5990.0740  0.0860
 19:30:28UACSERV5990.  0.
 19:30:28UAFCSERV   5990.  0.
 19:30:28UNIJCL 5990.  0.
 19:30:28UNIPRD2599  316.9930401.7960
 19:30:28UNIPROD599  291.7980302.0340
 19:30:28UNITEST5990.7500  0.8200
 19:30:28VGLIBSRV   5990.0020  0.0020
 19:30:28VMLIB  5990.  0.
 19:30:28VMSERVR5990.  0.
 19:30:28VMSERVS5990.  0.
 19:30:28VMSERVU5990.  0.
 19:30:28VMUTIL 5990.0030  0.0050
 19:30:28VTAM   5990.2320  0.3640
 19:30:28VTAMOP 5990.  0.
 19:30:28WMOO   5990.  0.
 
 INTERVAL643.4550758.6160

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Barton Robinson
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:05 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

and for linux servers with multiple cpus, you divide cputime by the 
number of cpus?

Ackerman, Derek wrote:
 Yes, and I always divide the CPU time by 1000. 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]
On Behalf Of Bruce Hayden
 Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:14 AM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files
 
 Hopefully you're converting the units.  Virtual and Total time are in
 milliseconds and connect time is in seconds.  Are you seeing this even
 after converting all of them to the same units?
 
 On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Ackerman, Derek
 derek.acker...@infocrossing.com wrote:
  I always thought that the total VM time, as well as the virtual,
would
 be less than the connect time. Is it normal for the total time to be
 greater than the connect time? This happens a lot...

 Derek Ackerman
 Enterprise Capacity Planning
  Performance Management
 Infocrossing Inc

 Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it,
may contain material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged
and/or Protected Health Information, within the meaning of the
regulations under the Health Insurance Portability  Accountability Act
as amended.  If it is not clear that you are the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error,
and any review, 

Re: Watson

2011-02-18 Thread A. Harry Williams
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:42:06 -0600 David Boyes said:
 I, too, wished IBM would do more to highlight the z series capabilities
 in public forums, but Watson is a massively parallel system (2K+ cores,
 I believe), and I have my doubts as to whether or not a collection of
 z10s could be integrated together tightly enough to meet the software's
 requirements. I could be wrong, however. :-)
It could be done, but this is a case where it would have been the wrong choice.
This is a vector-oriented SIMD problem (enormous numbers of simple comparisons 
on bits of data to determine if it has a right answer or not), and it's 
embarrassingly parallel in nature (very
little shared data between comparisons, few locks, few context switches 
required). This is POWER's sweet spot, and forcing a Z into this role is 
probably not a good idea. This is not the kind
of problem the Z arch is designed to solve.


And to bring it back so the moderator doesn't yell again, as the System P
is improved to handle this better, it will eventually be integrated into the
z196's successor, which will allow using each technology in their sweet spot.
There has been some talk about Watson working in medical diagnosis.
Forgetting HIPPA issues for a minute, imagine having a process of using
medical billing procedure codes to feed into Watson to look at trends, or
assist in recommended procedures.


Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

2011-02-18 Thread Bruce Hayden
When you said total VM time I thought you meant for 1 virtual
machine, since there are 2 fields with CPU time:  All CPU time
(sometimes called the total time) and Virtual time.  But you are
adding up all of the total time values to create an overall total.

But, what you are adding up is the time for one virtual CPU (such as
virtual CPU 0) for all machines.  Virtual CPU 0 is not always run on
Real CPU 0; it could be run on any real CPU, and the virtual CPU 0
from many machines can be run in parallel on your real CPUs.  So, the
total of all of these could add up to more than the connect time.  It
should be true, however, that the total of all of the consumed CPU
time divided by the number of real CPUs should be less than the
connect time.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Ackerman, Derek
derek.acker...@infocrossing.com wrote:
 I am simply summing the total CPU times for each CP, for my report I
 keep them separate, here is one example for one CP and one interval.


snip



-- 
Bruce Hayden
z/VM and Linux on System z ATS
IBM, Endicott, NY


Re: Watson

2011-02-18 Thread Bill Munson
I heard this morning that Watson was going to Columbia University 
Medical Center.





From:   A. Harry Williams ha...@vm.marist.edu
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date:   02/18/2011 03:08 PM
Subject:Re: Watson
Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU



On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:42:06 -0600 David Boyes said:
 I, too, wished IBM would do more to highlight the z series capabilities
 in public forums, but Watson is a massively parallel system (2K+ cores,
 I believe), and I have my doubts as to whether or not a collection of
 z10s could be integrated together tightly enough to meet the software's
 requirements. I could be wrong, however. :-)
It could be done, but this is a case where it would have been the wrong 
choice.
This is a vector-oriented SIMD problem (enormous numbers of simple 
comparisons on bits of data to determine if it has a right answer or not), 
and it's embarrassingly parallel in nature (very
little shared data between comparisons, few locks, few context switches 
required). This is POWER's sweet spot, and forcing a Z into this role is 
probably not a good idea. This is not the kind
of problem the Z arch is designed to solve.


And to bring it back so the moderator doesn't yell again, as the System P
is improved to handle this better, it will eventually be integrated into 
the
z196's successor, which will allow using each technology in their sweet 
spot.
There has been some talk about Watson working in medical diagnosis.
Forgetting HIPPA issues for a minute, imagine having a process of using
medical billing procedure codes to feed into Watson to look at trends, or
assist in recommended procedures.



*** IMPORTANT
NOTE*-- The opinions expressed in this
message and/or any attachments are those of the author and not
necessarily those of Brown Brothers Harriman  Co., its
subsidiaries and affiliates (BBH). There is no guarantee that
this message is either private or confidential, and it may have
been altered by unauthorized sources without your or our knowledge.
Nothing in the message is capable or intended to create any legally
binding obligations on either party and it is not intended to
provide legal advice. BBH accepts no responsibility for loss or
damage from its use, including damage from virus.


Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

2011-02-18 Thread Mark Wheeler

Do you have more than one real CP?
 
Mark Wheeler
UnitedHealth Group

--
 
Excellence. Always. If Not Excellence, What? If Not Excellence Now, When? 
Tom Peters, author of The Little BIG Things




 
 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:55:45 -0700
 From: derek.acker...@infocrossing.com
 Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 
 I am simply summing the total CPU times for each CP, for my report I
 keep them separate, here is one example for one CP and one interval.
 
 
 CPUADDR=0
 
 INTERVAL USER CONECTTM CPUVIRT CPUTOTAL
 
 19:30:28 AUDITOR 599 0.1750 0.2220
 19:30:28 DISKACNT 599 0.0150 0.0380
 19:30:28 EREP 599 0. 0.0020
 19:30:28 FAQSEXEC 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 FAQSVM 599 0.0030 0.0060
 19:30:28 FTPIFOX 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 FTPSERVE 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 FWER 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 GCS 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 HIDRO 599 33.1660 41.8210
 19:30:28 IFXSERVE 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 LINMON 599 0.0020 0.0040
 19:30:28 OPERATOR 599 0.0070 0.0160
 19:30:28 OPERSYMP 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 OSASF 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 PGAR 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 PHRO 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 RAHM 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 RMCG 599 0.0090 0.0320
 19:30:28 RMSMASTR 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 RSCS 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 SESQ 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 SKAN 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 SK01 599 0.0050 0.0130
 19:30:28 SPOOLER 599 0. 0.0010
 19:30:28 SUBMITS 599 0.0020 0.0070
 19:30:28 SYBCOM 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 SYBLOG 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 SYBMON 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 SYBUSER 599 0.0020 0.0030
 19:30:28 SYSCHECK 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 SYSLOGS 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 SYSTEM 599 0. 11.0860
 19:30:28 TCPIFOX 599 0.0380 0.0550
 19:30:28 TCPIP 599 0.0070 0.0090
 19:30:28 TMON 599 0.1720 0.1940
 19:30:28 TS09 599 0.0740 0.0860
 19:30:28 UACSERV 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 UAFCSERV 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 UNIJCL 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 UNIPRD2 599 316.9930 401.7960
 19:30:28 UNIPROD 599 291.7980 302.0340
 19:30:28 UNITEST 599 0.7500 0.8200
 19:30:28 VGLIBSRV 599 0.0020 0.0020
 19:30:28 VMLIB 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 VMSERVR 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 VMSERVS 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 VMSERVU 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 VMUTIL 599 0.0030 0.0050
 19:30:28 VTAM 599 0.2320 0.3640
 19:30:28 VTAMOP 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 WMOO 599 0. 0.
   
 INTERVAL 643.4550 758.6160
 
 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
 Behalf Of Barton Robinson
 Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:05 AM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files
 
 and for linux servers with multiple cpus, you divide cputime by the 
 number of cpus?
 
 Ackerman, Derek wrote:
  Yes, and I always divide the CPU time by 1000. 
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Bruce Hayden
  Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:14 AM
  To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
  Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files
  
  Hopefully you're converting the units. Virtual and Total time are in
  milliseconds and connect time is in seconds. Are you seeing this even
  after converting all of them to the same units?
  
  On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Ackerman, Derek
  derek.acker...@infocrossing.com wrote:
  I always thought that the total VM time, as well as the virtual,
 would
  be less than the connect time. Is it normal for the total time to be
  greater than the connect time? This happens a lot...
 
  Derek Ackerman
  Enterprise Capacity Planning
   Performance Management
  Infocrossing Inc
 
  Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it,
 may contain material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged
 and/or Protected Health Information, within the meaning of the
 regulations under the Health Insurance Portability  Accountability Act
 as amended. If it is not clear that you are the intended recipient, you
 are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error,
 and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail,
 including any attachment to it, is strictly prohibited. If you have
 received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the
 sender and delete it from your system. Thank you.
 
  
  
  
 
 Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may 
 contain material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or 
 Protected Health Information, within the meaning of the regulations under 
 the Health Insurance Portability  Accountability Act as amended. If it is 
 not clear that you are the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
 you have received this transmittal in error, and any review, dissemination, 
 distribution or copying of this e-mail, including any attachment to it, is 
 strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please 
 

Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

2011-02-18 Thread Ackerman, Derek
Yes, there are 3. One or two guests uses the 3rd.

 

Derek Ackerman

Enterprise Capacity Planning

 Performance Management

Infocrossing Inc

(206) 432-9737 || C: (206) 225-3585 || derek.acker...@infocrossing.com

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

 

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Mark Wheeler
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 12:15 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

 

Do you have more than one real CP?
 
Mark Wheeler
UnitedHealth Group

--
 
Excellence. Always. If Not Excellence, What? If Not Excellence Now,
When? 
Tom Peters, author of The Little BIG Things




 
 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:55:45 -0700
 From: derek.acker...@infocrossing.com
 Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 
 I am simply summing the total CPU times for each CP, for my report I
 keep them separate, here is one example for one CP and one interval.
 
 
 CPUADDR=0
 
 INTERVAL USER CONECTTM CPUVIRT CPUTOTAL
 
 19:30:28 AUDITOR 599 0.1750 0.2220
 19:30:28 DISKACNT 599 0.0150 0.0380
 19:30:28 EREP 599 0. 0.0020
 19:30:28 FAQSEXEC 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 FAQSVM 599 0.0030 0.0060
 19:30:28 FTPIFOX 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 FTPSERVE 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 FWER 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 GCS 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 HIDRO 599 33.1660 41.8210
 19:30:28 IFXSERVE 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 LINMON 599 0.0020 0.0040
 19:30:28 OPERATOR 599 0.0070 0.0160
 19:30:28 OPERSYMP 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 OSASF 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 PGAR 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 PHRO 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 RAHM 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 RMCG 599 0.0090 0.0320
 19:30:28 RMSMASTR 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 RSCS 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 SESQ 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 SKAN 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 SK01 599 0.0050 0.0130
 19:30:28 SPOOLER 599 0. 0.0010
 19:30:28 SUBMITS 599 0.0020 0.0070
 19:30:28 SYBCOM 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 SYBLOG 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 SYBMON 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 SYBUSER 599 0.0020 0.0030
 19:30:28 SYSCHECK 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 SYSLOGS 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 SYSTEM 599 0. 11.0860
 19:30:28 TCPIFOX 599 0.0380 0.0550
 19:30:28 TCPIP 599 0.0070 0.0090
 19:30:28 TMON 599 0.1720 0.1940
 19:30:28 TS09 599 0.0740 0.0860
 19:30:28 UACSERV 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 UAFCSERV 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 UNIJCL 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 UNIPRD2 599 316.9930 401.7960
 19:30:28 UNIPROD 599 291.7980 302.0340
 19:30:28 UNITEST 599 0.7500 0.8200
 19:30:28 VGLIBSRV 599 0.0020 0.0020
 19:30:28 VMLIB 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 VMSERVR 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 VMSERVS 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 VMSERVU 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 VMUTIL 599 0.0030 0.0050
 19:30:28 VTAM 599 0.2320 0.3640
 19:30:28 VTAMOP 599 0. 0.
 19:30:28 WMOO 599 0. 0.
   
 INTERVAL 643.4550 758.6160
 
 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]
On
 Behalf Of Barton Robinson
 Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:05 AM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files
 
 and for linux servers with multiple cpus, you divide cputime by the 
 number of cpus?
 
 Ackerman, Derek wrote:
  Yes, and I always divide the CPU time by 1000. 
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Bruce Hayden
  Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:14 AM
  To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
  Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files
  
  Hopefully you're converting the units. Virtual and Total time are in
  milliseconds and connect time is in seconds. Are you seeing this
even
  after converting all of them to the same units?
  
  On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Ackerman, Derek
  derek.acker...@infocrossing.com wrote:
  I always thought that the total VM time, as well as the virtual,
 would
  be less than the connect time. Is it normal for the total time to
be
  greater than the connect time? This happens a lot...
 
  Derek Ackerman
  Enterprise Capacity Planning
   Performance Management
  Infocrossing Inc
 
  Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it,
 may contain material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged
 and/or Protected Health Information, within the meaning of the
 regulations under the Health Insurance Portability  Accountability
Act
 as amended. If it is not clear that you are the intended recipient,
you
 are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error,
 and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail,
 including any attachment to it, is strictly prohibited. If you have
 received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the
 sender and delete it from your system. Thank you.
 
  
  
  
 
 Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may
contain material that is confidential, 

Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

2011-02-18 Thread Martha McConaghy
Anne,

You'll need a FICON port attached to your SAN first of all.  If one doesn't
exist already, you'll need to get whomever is in charge of the hardware to
do that.  (Its all me here, so I get my hands into every level of it.)  If you
want to do multipathing, which is pretty common for SAN devices, then you'll
need 2 FICON ports, possibly attached to different parts of the SAN topology.
(You would need to consult your SAN folks on that.)

Once you have one or more FICON ports connected to the SAN, you need to use
HCD to define them to the Linux LPAR, including a set of real addresses.
How many you have depends on whether your site is using NPIV for SAN
addressing or not.  (Hopefully, you have SAN people who can handle the fabric,
zoning the WWPNs, etc.)

Once you have the addresses available on your Linux LPAR, you'll need to
define the paths and WWPNs in Linux.  I'm not the expert on that, but I'm
sure one of the others can help you with it.

This was just an overview of the process.  I hope it helps.

Martha


Re: Watson

2011-02-18 Thread Phil Smith
Bill Munson wrote:
 I heard this morning that Watson was going to Columbia University Medical
 Center.

Hope it feels better soon!
--
...phsiii



Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

2011-02-18 Thread Mark Wheeler

Derek,
 
With 3 CP's, there are 3 seconds of CPU time available for each 1 second of 
wall time. That's why the total of all CPU used by all the virtual machines 
exceeds the wall time. In your case, you used 758 seconds of CPU time in 
aggregate over a period of 599 wall seconds on a VM system with 3 real CPUs, or 
about 42% capacity.
 
Mark  

 


Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:37:10 -0700
From: derek.acker...@infocrossing.com
Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU






Yes, there are 3. One or two guests uses the 3rd.
 

Derek Ackerman
Enterprise Capacity Planning
 Performance Management
Infocrossing Inc
(206) 432-9737 || C: (206) 225-3585 || derek.acker...@infocrossing.com
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
 


From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Mark Wheeler
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 12:15 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files
 
Do you have more than one real CP?
 
Mark Wheeler
UnitedHealth Group

--
 
Excellence. Always. If Not Excellence, What? If Not Excellence Now, When? 
Tom Peters, author of The Little BIG Things




 
 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:55:45 -0700
 From: derek.acker...@infocrossing.com
 Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 
 I am simply summing the total CPU times for each CP, for my report I
 keep them separate, here is one example for one CP and one interval.
 
 
 CPUADDR=0
 
 INTERVAL USER CONECTTM CPUVIRT CPUTOTAL
 
snip
   
 INTERVAL 643.4550 758.6160
 
 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
 Behalf Of Barton Robinson
 Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:05 AM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files
 
 and for linux servers with multiple cpus, you divide cputime by the 
 number of cpus?
 
 Ackerman, Derek wrote:
  Yes, and I always divide the CPU time by 1000. 
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Bruce Hayden
  Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:14 AM
  To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
  Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files
  
  Hopefully you're converting the units. Virtual and Total time are in
  milliseconds and connect time is in seconds. Are you seeing this even
  after converting all of them to the same units?
  
  On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Ackerman, Derek
  derek.acker...@infocrossing.com wrote:
  I always thought that the total VM time, as well as the virtual,
 would
  be less than the connect time. Is it normal for the total time to be
  greater than the connect time? This happens a lot...
 
  Derek Ackerman
  Enterprise Capacity Planning
   Performance Management
  Infocrossing Inc
 
  Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it,
 may contain material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged
 and/or Protected Health Information, within the meaning of the
 regulations under the Health Insurance Portability  Accountability Act
 as amended. If it is not clear that you are the intended recipient, you
 are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error,
 and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail,
 including any attachment to it, is strictly prohibited. If you have
 received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the
 sender and delete it from your system. Thank you.
 
  
  
  
 
 Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may 
 contain material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or 
 Protected Health Information, within the meaning of the regulations under 
 the Health Insurance Portability  Accountability Act as amended. If it is 
 not clear that you are the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
 you have received this transmittal in error, and any review, dissemination, 
 distribution or copying of this e-mail, including any attachment to it, is 
 strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please 
 immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your system. Thank you.

Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may contain 
material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or Protected Health 
Information, within the meaning of the regulations under the Health Insurance 
Portability  Accountability Act as amended. If it is not clear that you are 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
transmittal in error, and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of 
this e-mail, including any attachment to it, is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender 
and delete it from your system. Thank you.  

Re: Watson

2011-02-18 Thread August Carideo
Our CE assembled him
wonder if he has to disassemble him now



   
 Phil Smith
 p...@voltage.com 
   To 
 Sent by: The IBM  IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 
 z/VM Operating cc 
 System
 IBMVM@LISTSERV.U Subject 
 ARK.EDU  Re: Watson  
   
   
 02/18/2011 03:50  
 PM
   
   
 Please respond to 
   The IBM z/VM
 Operating System  
 IBMVM@LISTSERV.U 
 ARK.EDU  
   
   




Bill Munson wrote:
 I heard this morning that Watson was going to Columbia University
Medical
 Center.

Hope it feels better soon!
--
...phsiii


Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

2011-02-18 Thread Rich Greenberg
On: Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:05:07AM -0800,Barton Robinson Wrote:

} and for linux servers with multiple cpus, you divide cputime by the
} number of cpus?

Wouldn't it be closer to reality to multiply the connect time by the
number of cpus?

-- 
Rich Greenberg  Sarasota, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com  + 1 941 378 2097
Eastern time.  N6LRT  I speak for myself  my dogs only.VM'er since CP-67
Canines: Val, Red, Shasta, Zero  Casey (At the bridge)Owner:Chinook-L
Canines: Red  Cinnar (Siberians)  Retired at the beach  Asst Owner:Sibernet-L


Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

2011-02-18 Thread Ackerman, Derek



I am simply summing the total CPU times for each CP, for my report I
keep them separate, here is an example. 


CP#Cpu time  Wall clock
 2   198599
 1   684599
 0   758599

1640   1797
 
So you are saying it's okay that CPU0 and CPU1's time  wall clock?
I don't agree with that. 1640  1797 okay, but the accounting is wrong!


 CPUADDR=2

 INTERVAL USER  CONECTTM CPUVIRTCPUTOTAL

 19:30:28SYSTEM  00.  9.3340
 19:30:28UNIPROD   599  181.4350188.9860
    
 INTERVAL   181.4350198.3200

 CPUADDR=1

 INTERVAL USER  CONECTTM CPUVIRTCPUTOTAL

 19:30:28SYSTEM  00.  9.3950
 19:30:28UNIPRD2   599  314.4460398.7250
 19:30:28UNIPROD   599  266.6670276.0360
 19:30:28UNITEST   5990.5780  0.6260
    
 INTERVAL   581.6910684.7820


 CPUADDR=0

 INTERVALUSERCONECTTM CPUVIRTCPUTOTAL

 19:30:28AUDITOR5990.1750  0.2220
 19:30:28DISKACNT   5990.0150  0.0380
 19:30:28EREP   5990.  0.0020
 19:30:28FAQSEXEC   5990.  0.
 19:30:28FAQSVM 5990.0030  0.0060
 19:30:28FTPIFOX5990.  0.
 19:30:28FTPSERVE   5990.  0.
 19:30:28FWER   5990.  0.
 19:30:28GCS5990.  0.
 19:30:28HIDRO  599   33.1660 41.8210
 19:30:28IFXSERVE   5990.  0.
 19:30:28LINMON 5990.0020  0.0040
 19:30:28OPERATOR   5990.0070  0.0160
 19:30:28OPERSYMP   5990.  0.
 19:30:28OSASF  5990.  0.
 19:30:28PGAR   5990.  0.
 19:30:28PHRO   5990.  0.
 19:30:28RAHM   5990.  0.
 19:30:28RMCG   5990.0090  0.0320
 19:30:28RMSMASTR   5990.  0.
 19:30:28RSCS   5990.  0.
 19:30:28SESQ   5990.  0.
 19:30:28SKAN   5990.  0.
 19:30:28SK01   5990.0050  0.0130
 19:30:28SPOOLER5990.  0.0010
 19:30:28SUBMITS5990.0020  0.0070
 19:30:28SYBCOM 5990.  0.
 19:30:28SYBLOG 5990.  0.
 19:30:28SYBMON 5990.  0.
 19:30:28SYBUSER5990.0020  0.0030
 19:30:28SYSCHECK   5990.  0.
 19:30:28SYSLOGS5990.  0.
 19:30:28SYSTEM 5990. 11.0860
 19:30:28TCPIFOX5990.0380  0.0550
 19:30:28TCPIP  5990.0070  0.0090
 19:30:28TMON   5990.1720  0.1940
 19:30:28TS09   5990.0740  0.0860
 19:30:28UACSERV5990.  0.
 19:30:28UAFCSERV   5990.  0.
 19:30:28UNIJCL 5990.  0.
 19:30:28UNIPRD2599  316.9930401.7960
 19:30:28UNIPROD599  291.7980302.0340
 19:30:28UNITEST5990.7500  0.8200
 19:30:28VGLIBSRV   5990.0020  0.0020
 19:30:28VMLIB  5990.  0.
 19:30:28VMSERVR5990.  0.
 19:30:28VMSERVS5990.  0.
 19:30:28VMSERVU5990.  0.
 19:30:28VMUTIL 5990.0030  0.0050
 19:30:28VTAM   5990.2320  0.3640
 19:30:28VTAMOP 5990.  0.
 19:30:28WMOO   5990.  0.
 
 INTERVAL643.4550758.6160

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Barton Robinson
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:05 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

and for linux servers with multiple cpus, you divide cputime by the 
number of cpus?

Ackerman, Derek wrote:
 Yes, and I always divide the CPU time by 1000. 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]
On Behalf Of Bruce Hayden
 Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:14 AM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files
 
 Hopefully you're 

Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

2011-02-18 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Ackerman, Derek
derek.acker...@infocrossing.com wrote:

 I am simply summing the total CPU times for each CP, for my report I keep 
 them separate, here is an example.

I believe you're confusing virtual CPUs with logical CPUs.

The CPU number in your account record is for the virtual CPU of the
guest (with exception of the SYSTEM record). A virtual CPU is not tied
to a logical CPU, so your UNIPROD's CPU 00 gets dispatched on logical
CPU 00, 01 or 02 as z/VM likes.
It is even possible for a single virtual CPU to consume more cycles
than the average of any of your logical CPUs (when it hopped from one
to the other).

Rob
-- 
Rob van der Heij
Velocity Software
http://www.velocitysoftware.com/


help with DMSCGR DMSCSR esoterica

2011-02-18 Thread Steve Marak
I have one of those is there ever any situation when ... would not be a 
good default questions, and I need the help of VM-savvy minds capable of 
perverse and twisted logic. I can't imagine a better place to find them 
than this list. (Yes, that was intended as a compliment.)

As you all know, DMSCGR and DMSCSR are CSL routines which retrieve and 
set, respectively, the values of REXX variables. The default behavior is 
that the variable name passed is searched for directly in REXX's list of 
variables, exactly as passed. Optionally, the caller can ask that the name 
be both translated to upper case and that REXX perform variable name 
substitution on it before looking for it.

(Since REXX doesn't care about case in variable names and some quick 
experiments confirm that passing mixed- or lower-case names without this 
option isn't productive [except of non-zero return codes], one could 
reasonably ask why the name is not always translated to upper-case. I 
think it's a very valid question, but more or less irrelevant to my 
problem.)

In situations where everyone involved knows which behavior is desired, the 
choice between substitution or not isn't an issue. But if there's a 
situation where an end user will create REXX execs which pass a variable 
name to a program which will then retrieve or set it via these routines, 
it's more problematic ... or maybe not, if one or the other behavior is 
obviously preferable.

Can anyone think of a situation in which you would *not* want substitution 
performed on the variable name passed? Typically, the whole reason you use 
compound REXX variables is to get that. But the writers of these routines 
didn't make that the default, so I want to know if there's some obvious 
situation we're missing where you wouldn't want it. (We've come up with 
one exotic case involving REXXVARS, but it's not one that seems likely to 
occur. In fact, it seems like the writer of the exec would almost have to 
be out to get you to code it that way.)

Thanks,

Steve

-- Steve Marak
-- sama...@gizmoworks.com


Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

2011-02-18 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Les Koehler vmr...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
 Is a logical cpu equivalent to a physical cpu? I realize that the h/w now
 has multiple physical cpus, but I was brought up on System/360 and never
 have quite grokked how it is all controlled and accounted for!

z/VM itself runs in an LPAR under control of PR/SM. And just like z/VM
does for virtual machines, PR/SM will dispatch the LPAR's logical CPUs
on any physical CPU as it sees fit. Even when you have a dedicated
CPU, it's PR/SM who decides which physical CPU is dedicated to that
logical CPU (for almost all the time).

And we're not even talking about hot-sparing of CPUs  You're in a
maze and all CPUs look the same  ;-)

Rob
-- 
Rob van der Heij
Velocity Software
http://www.velocitysoftware.com/


Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

2011-02-18 Thread George Henke/NYLIC
Rob and Les wrote:

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Les Koehler vmr...@tampabay.rr.com 
wrote:
 Is a logical cpu equivalent to a physical cpu? I realize that the h/w 
now
 has multiple physical cpus, but I was brought up on System/360 and never
 have quite grokked how it is all controlled and accounted for!

z/VM itself runs in an LPAR under control of PR/SM. And just like z/VM
does for virtual machines, PR/SM will dispatch the LPAR's logical CPUs
on any physical CPU as it sees fit. Even when you have a dedicated
CPU, it's PR/SM who decides which physical CPU is dedicated to that
logical CPU (for almost all the time).

And we're not even talking about hot-sparing of CPUs  You're in a
maze and all CPUs look the same  ;-)



So then, suppose we state the problem In terms of PR/SM which is really 
just VM, the SIE (Start Interpretive Execution) instruction in firmware 
where LPARs become similar to Guest Machines.

It is somewhat of an oversimplification though conceptually analogous.

In terms of PR/SM:

Logical CPs (LCPs) vs Physical CPs (PCPs) are simply a way of sharing the 
PCPs across the LPARs with a weighting factor.

The PR/SM Planning Guide, Volume A05:  3.2.10.4 says it best.

But in the following discussion be sure not to confuse logical partition 
(LP or LPAR) which is equivalent to a Guest Machine with a logical CP 
(LCP) which is equivalent to a virtual CP (VCP).

When logical partitions(LPs) are dispatched then, and only then, will 
their logical CPs(LCPs) also get dispatched to physical CPs (PCPs). 

In the following excerpt, whenever you read logical partition think Guest 
Machine and whenever you read logical CP think virtual CP (VCP):

Excerpt:

Use of Processing Weights:  Processing weights can range from 1 to 999
 
   °   The processing weights for all active, sharing logical partitions 
are added together.  This total is considered to be 100% of the processing 
resource available to shared processors.  For example, the total 
processing weights for the logical partitions shown in Figure 52 in topic 
3.3.4.1 is 1,300.

   °   The share of processing resources for each logical partition is 
calculated by dividing the processing weight for each sharing logical 
partition by the total processing weight.  For example, at peak CP 
utilization levels, the dispatcher allocates shared processing resources 
to each of the logical partitions in Figure 52 in topic 3.3.4.1 as 
follows:

 DOSVSE   300/1300 = 23.1%
 MVSTEST  100/1300 =  7.7%
 VMHPO900/1300 = 69.2%

   °   The share of processing resource for each online logical processor 
is calculated by dividing the share for each logical partition by the 
number of online logical processors.  For the logical partitions shown in 
Figure 52 in topic 3.3.4.1, the share for each logical processor is as 
follows:

 DOSVSE 23.1/1 CP  = 23.1%
 MVSTEST 7.7/6 CPs =  1.3%
 VMHPO  69.2/2 CPs = 34.6%


Processing weights are used to specify the portion of the shared processor 
resources allocated to a logical partition.  Although PR/SM always manages 
sharing logical partitions according to the specified processing 
weights,there are times when a logical partition will receive either more 
or less than its processing share:

   °   A logical partition will receive more than its processing share 
when there is excess processor capacity, provided it has work to do and 
other logical partitions are not using their share.

   °   A logical partition will receive less than its processing share 
when its workload demand drops below the capacity specified by its weight.

   °   A logical partition will not receive more than its processing share 
when the processing resources for that logical partition are capped.

   The recommended procedure is to specify processing weights to satisfy 
the peak requirements of the logical partitions.

End of excerpt:

In the above example, although there are 9 LCPs with 900% CPU 
theoretically, in practice the would be allocated across the number of 
PCPs be it 1, 2, 6 or whatever..

And so the important factor is no what % of phyiscal CP (PCP) bu what % of 
logical CPU is being realized in each LPAR, Guest Machine.





Les Koehler vmr...@tampabay.rr.com 
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
02/18/2011 06:17 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU


To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files






Is a logical cpu equivalent to a physical cpu? I realize that the h/w now 
has 
multiple physical cpus, but I was brought up on System/360 and never have 
quite 
grokked how it is all controlled and accounted for!

Les

Rob van der Heij wrote:
 On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Ackerman, Derek
 derek.acker...@infocrossing.com wrote:
 
 I am simply summing the total CPU times for 

Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

2011-02-18 Thread Barton Robinson
how you do the arithmetic relates to the problem you are trying to 
solve


Rich Greenberg wrote:

On: Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:05:07AM -0800,Barton Robinson Wrote:

} and for linux servers with multiple cpus, you divide cputime by the
} number of cpus?

Wouldn't it be closer to reality to multiply the connect time by the
number of cpus?



Re: help with DMSCGR DMSCSR esoterica

2011-02-18 Thread Les Koehler

Oops! The last statement should be:

say city.who

Sorry! blush

Les

Les Koehler wrote:
Rexx vars are always upper-cased *except* for 'content addressable 
arrays' (stemmed variables). For example:


name='Les Koehler'
city.name='Tampa'
say 'Enter the name of the person and I''ll give you the city'
parse pull who
say city.name

The concept is simple yet very powerful. I used it once to improve the 
elapsed time of matching a vendors individual transaction accounting 
records against his end of month accounting records from hours to a 
couple of minutes. The individual records and the monthly records did 
*not* have the same layout, but with this technique it was a snap to 
match them.


Les

Steve Marak wrote:
I have one of those is there ever any situation when ... would not be 
a good default questions, and I need the help of VM-savvy minds 
capable of perverse and twisted logic. I can't imagine a better place 
to find them than this list. (Yes, that was intended as a compliment.)


As you all know, DMSCGR and DMSCSR are CSL routines which retrieve and 
set, respectively, the values of REXX variables. The default behavior 
is that the variable name passed is searched for directly in REXX's 
list of variables, exactly as passed. Optionally, the caller can ask 
that the name be both translated to upper case and that REXX perform 
variable name substitution on it before looking for it.


(Since REXX doesn't care about case in variable names and some quick 
experiments confirm that passing mixed- or lower-case names without 
this option isn't productive [except of non-zero return codes], one 
could reasonably ask why the name is not always translated to 
upper-case. I think it's a very valid question, but more or less 
irrelevant to my problem.)


In situations where everyone involved knows which behavior is desired, 
the choice between substitution or not isn't an issue. But if there's 
a situation where an end user will create REXX execs which pass a 
variable name to a program which will then retrieve or set it via 
these routines, it's more problematic ... or maybe not, if one or the 
other behavior is obviously preferable.


Can anyone think of a situation in which you would *not* want 
substitution performed on the variable name passed? Typically, the 
whole reason you use compound REXX variables is to get that. But the 
writers of these routines didn't make that the default, so I want to 
know if there's some obvious situation we're missing where you 
wouldn't want it. (We've come up with one exotic case involving 
REXXVARS, but it's not one that seems likely to occur. In fact, it 
seems like the writer of the exec would almost have to be out to get 
you to code it that way.)


Thanks,

Steve

-- Steve Marak
-- sama...@gizmoworks.com