Re: [leaf-user] Linksys HPN200
On Tue, 21 May 2002, Robert Chambers wrote: > Anyone know what driver is for the Linksys HPN200 nic? > Robert Chambers Doesn't look like one exists. --- Jeff NewmillerThe . . Go Live... DCN:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go... Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#. #.O#. with /Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...2k --- ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] A NET question
On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 16:10, Omar D. Samuels wrote: > > > > [ snip ] > > > > > > Bottomline, if you identify the root cause of this message flooding, > > > > and correct it, then you will no longer witness these 'NET ... > > > > suppressed' messages. > > > > Please, reconsider what I am saying in the statement above. IMHO, that > > is really what you want to do . . . > > > > > Hey, y'know what, that actually makes a lot of sense. Omar, I concur with Michael. You need to correct this problem. It's not something you want to ignore. Please provide us with the additional information he requested. Instructions for transferring logs and other information to your email client are in the FAQ below. > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html Just a WAG: did you connect the cat5 cables to the correct NICs? -- Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] A NET question
"Omar D. Samuels" wrote: > > Hey I stopped the sysklogd as well as commented out the *.emerg * line and > I still get those NET messages. > Any suggestions? ps aux | grep sys Do you have any running process like syslog? If yes, then you can kill it. If not, as I mentioned, these messages are generated by the kernel itself and it maybe that kernel generated messages *must* goto console. Either way, as I have been insisting, you need to correct the root cause of these symptomatic messages. What is the underlying cause? -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 888.250.3987 Dare to fix things before they break . . . Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] A NET question
"Omar D. Samuels" wrote: > [ snip ] > I think you are THE MAN! I really appreciate this man. I'm gonna give it a > try. I don't want to really shut off syslog. The thing is I gotta get rid > of those messages. The box needs to, when it is installed, just sit there, > running maybe something like Sniffit, which has interface that is messed up > by the NET msgs. I'm hoping that whatever those emergency msgs are all > about, then they will not occur when I do the final installation of the box. > > I'm gonna try commenting out the *.emerg line. Thanks again man. > I'll definitely keep you posted. Please, post a few lines from /var/log/kern.log or /var/log/syslog that immediately precede some of these `NET ... suppressed' messages -- we can help you eliminate the root cause. Trust me, you will not be satisfied with your firewall until you eliminate this problem. Whatever this problem is, it is a bad thing and you must correct it and not ignore it. hth -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 888.250.3987 Dare to fix things before they break . . . Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Linksys HPN200
Anyone know what driver is for the Linksys HPN200 nic? Robert Chambers ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] A NET question
Hey I stopped the sysklogd as well as commented out the *.emerg * line and I still get those NET messages. Any suggestions? - Original Message - From: "Michael D. Schleif" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 5:51 PM Subject: Re: [leaf-user] A NET question > > "Omar D. Samuels" wrote: > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Michael D. Schleif" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > "Omar D. Samuels" wrote: > > > > > > > > Now that I'm over that hurdle and I am getting more the hang of this > > mialing > > > > list, I would like to dare to ask for help with another issue... please. > > > > > > > > I a using Eigerstein2... does anyone know if there is any way to > > suppress > > > > the NET messages? They look like this: > > > > > > > > "NET: # messages suppressed" > > [ snip ] > > > > Bottomline, if you identify the root cause of this message flooding, and > > > correct it, then you will no longer witness these 'NET ... suppressed' > > > messages. > > Please, reconsider what I am saying in the statement above. IMHO, that > is really what you want to do . . . > > > Hey, y'know what, that actually makes a lot of sense. Based on what you > > have said, is it possible to turn of syslogd and stop getting those > > messages? The thing is that I don't at all mind it suppressing, but I don't > > want it printing the message to screen. > > Yes: > > svi sysklogd stop > > However, you really do *NOT* want to do this! > > Look near the end of your /etc/syslog.conf -- is there something like > these? > > *.emerg * > > *.err |/dev/console > > I'm not familiar with Eigerstein, so I don't know what the installed > default it; but, on Dachstein the default is the *.emerg line. That > line means that any messages of priority `emerg' or higher will go to > every local tty. The problem is, the only severity higher than emerg is > panic. My point here is that the underlying cause of this message is > probably important if it is showing up on your console. > > Besides, even if this message is *not* important, shutting off syslogd > will shutdown most logging on your system. Logging is good. Logging > allows you to troubleshoot things when they go wrong. Things will go > wrong. > > What do you think? > > -- > > Best Regards, > > mds > mds resource > 888.250.3987 > > Dare to fix things before they break . . . > > Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we > think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . > > ___ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] A NET question
> > [ snip ] > > > > Bottomline, if you identify the root cause of this message flooding, and > > > correct it, then you will no longer witness these 'NET ... suppressed' > > > messages. > > Please, reconsider what I am saying in the statement above. IMHO, that > is really what you want to do . . . > > > Hey, y'know what, that actually makes a lot of sense. Based on what you > > have said, is it possible to turn of syslogd and stop getting those > > messages? The thing is that I don't at all mind it suppressing, but I don't > > want it printing the message to screen. > > Yes: > > svi sysklogd stop > > However, you really do *NOT* want to do this! > > Look near the end of your /etc/syslog.conf -- is there something like > these? > > *.emerg * > > *.err |/dev/console > > I'm not familiar with Eigerstein, so I don't know what the installed > default it; but, on Dachstein the default is the *.emerg line. That > line means that any messages of priority `emerg' or higher will go to > every local tty. The problem is, the only severity higher than emerg is > panic. My point here is that the underlying cause of this message is > probably important if it is showing up on your console. > > Besides, even if this message is *not* important, shutting off syslogd > will shutdown most logging on your system. Logging is good. Logging > allows you to troubleshoot things when they go wrong. Things will go > wrong. > > What do you think? > I think you are THE MAN! I really appreciate this man. I'm gonna give it a try. I don't want to really shut off syslog. The thing is I gotta get rid of those messages. The box needs to, when it is installed, just sit there, running maybe something like Sniffit, which has interface that is messed up by the NET msgs. I'm hoping that whatever those emergency msgs are all about, then they will not occur when I do the final installation of the box. I'm gonna try commenting out the *.emerg line. Thanks again man. I'll definitely keep you posted. > -- > > Best Regards, > > mds > mds resource > 888.250.3987 > > Dare to fix things before they break . . . > > Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we > think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . > > ___ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] A NET question
"Omar D. Samuels" wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Michael D. Schleif" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > "Omar D. Samuels" wrote: > > > > > > Now that I'm over that hurdle and I am getting more the hang of this > mialing > > > list, I would like to dare to ask for help with another issue... please. > > > > > > I a using Eigerstein2... does anyone know if there is any way to > suppress > > > the NET messages? They look like this: > > > > > > "NET: # messages suppressed" [ snip ] > > Bottomline, if you identify the root cause of this message flooding, and > > correct it, then you will no longer witness these 'NET ... suppressed' > > messages. Please, reconsider what I am saying in the statement above. IMHO, that is really what you want to do . . . > Hey, y'know what, that actually makes a lot of sense. Based on what you > have said, is it possible to turn of syslogd and stop getting those > messages? The thing is that I don't at all mind it suppressing, but I don't > want it printing the message to screen. Yes: svi sysklogd stop However, you really do *NOT* want to do this! Look near the end of your /etc/syslog.conf -- is there something like these? *.emerg * *.err |/dev/console I'm not familiar with Eigerstein, so I don't know what the installed default it; but, on Dachstein the default is the *.emerg line. That line means that any messages of priority `emerg' or higher will go to every local tty. The problem is, the only severity higher than emerg is panic. My point here is that the underlying cause of this message is probably important if it is showing up on your console. Besides, even if this message is *not* important, shutting off syslogd will shutdown most logging on your system. Logging is good. Logging allows you to troubleshoot things when they go wrong. Things will go wrong. What do you think? -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 888.250.3987 Dare to fix things before they break . . . Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] A NET question
- Original Message - From: "Michael D. Schleif" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 5:06 PM Subject: Re: [leaf-user] A NET question > > "Omar D. Samuels" wrote: > > > > Now that I'm over that hurdle and I am getting more the hang of this mialing > > list, I would like to dare to ask for help with another issue... please. > > > > I a using Eigerstein2... does anyone know if there is any way to suppress > > the NET messages? They look like this: > > > > "NET: # messages suppressed" > > > > I think they are messages that come whenever the firewall blocks something. > > I am asking for your help please. > > Everybody has tap danced around your original question for a reason; > but, nobody has come out and explained it to you. > Thanks, I was beginning to wonder if I was going crazy :-) > Consider this: > > May 19 11:09:32 trout kernel: martian source c521fea9 for fea9, dev > eth1 > May 19 11:09:32 trout kernel: ll header: ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 01 03 79 > 6c a9 08 00 > May 19 11:09:36 trout kernel: NET: 6 messages suppressed. > > The 'NET ... suppressed' message is symptomatic of some other problem. > Please, re-read my last sentence. > > In my example, above, the *real* problem is an influx of `martians' and > `ll headers' messages. > > Sometimes, when the there is a flood of messages through syslogd, it > recognizes that repetition and consolidates repeated messages, like > this: > > May 19 21:34:51 trout last message repeated 3 times > > Can you imagine how many more messages you'd be dealing with, if it > actually logged every one, instead of this consolidation? Imagine if > that number `3' was actually `300' ;< > > In your case, the kernel itself recognizes the repetition and > consolidates repeated messages. > > Bottomline, if you identify the root cause of this message flooding, and > correct it, then you will no longer witness these 'NET ... suppressed' > messages. Hey, y'know what, that actually makes a lot of sense. Based on what you have said, is it possible to turn of syslogd and stop getting those messages? The thing is that I don't at all mind it suppressing, but I don't want it printing the message to screen. > > hth > > -- > > Best Regards, > > mds > mds resource > 888.250.3987 > > Dare to fix things before they break . . . > > Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we > think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . > Hey thanks man, I like your attitude. > ___ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] A NET question
"Omar D. Samuels" wrote: > > Now that I'm over that hurdle and I am getting more the hang of this mialing > list, I would like to dare to ask for help with another issue... please. > > I a using Eigerstein2... does anyone know if there is any way to suppress > the NET messages? They look like this: > > "NET: # messages suppressed" > > I think they are messages that come whenever the firewall blocks something. > I am asking for your help please. Everybody has tap danced around your original question for a reason; but, nobody has come out and explained it to you. Consider this: May 19 11:09:32 trout kernel: martian source c521fea9 for fea9, dev eth1 May 19 11:09:32 trout kernel: ll header: ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 01 03 79 6c a9 08 00 May 19 11:09:36 trout kernel: NET: 6 messages suppressed. The 'NET ... suppressed' message is symptomatic of some other problem. Please, re-read my last sentence. In my example, above, the *real* problem is an influx of `martians' and `ll headers' messages. Sometimes, when the there is a flood of messages through syslogd, it recognizes that repetition and consolidates repeated messages, like this: May 19 21:34:51 trout last message repeated 3 times Can you imagine how many more messages you'd be dealing with, if it actually logged every one, instead of this consolidation? Imagine if that number `3' was actually `300' ;< In your case, the kernel itself recognizes the repetition and consolidates repeated messages. Bottomline, if you identify the root cause of this message flooding, and correct it, then you will no longer witness these 'NET ... suppressed' messages. hth -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 888.250.3987 Dare to fix things before they break . . . Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] ISDN with 16 lines/modems possible with Bering ?
For the hardware I had good luck with Eicon's Diva Server boards, although I only used them under NT. Two 4BRI PCI cards would give you 16 B channels. The following message describes some linux specific driver issues: http://groups.google.com/groups?q=eicon+4bri+linux&hl=nl&lr=&ie= UTF8&oe=UTF8&selm=94mmpl%24cpa%241%40news.connect- x.de&rnum=5 A new driver with binaries for kernel 2.4.18 seems to be avalible "real soon now". Alternatively an open source driver is availible, which would require rolling your own kernel. groeten, Sjaak > > But, my question is other today : > One of my friends want to have 15/20 ISDN lines/modems to connect > externals employees to his company's mail server. This server have not > other access, no Internet or WAN. > > CISCO has a router to do that, but, is it possible to do with Bering ? > ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] PS
P.S. my uname -a reponse line is: Linux NRP-413 2.2.16 #1 Sun Jun 11 11:33:38 CDT 2000 i386 unknown ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] A NET question
Now that I'm over that hurdle and I am getting more the hang of this mialing list, I would like to dare to ask for help with another issue... please. I a using Eigerstein2... does anyone know if there is any way to suppress the NET messages? They look like this: "NET: # messages suppressed" I think they are messages that come whenever the firewall blocks something. I am asking for your help please. Thanks ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] ISDN with 16 lines/modems possible with Bering ?
Hello Francois, > Hi folks and gurus ! > I have started Bering this week on PPPoE / WANADOO / > France Telecom with success ! .. > But, my question is other today : > One of my friends want to have 15/20 ISDN lines/modems to connect > externals employees to his company's mail server. > This server have not other access, no Internet or WAN. > > CISCO has a router to do that, but, is it possible to do with Bering ? I didn't try it out yet, as you have ofcourse some hardware problems, most isdncards only allow at most two connections, so you will get out of pci /isa slots and interrupts. I used for the isdn connection the following programm isdn4linux www.isdn4linux.de the faq is rather extensiv, special interest will be : http://www.isdn4linux.de/faq/i4lfaq-5.html#ss5.14 and a few links from this question. http://www.isdn4linux.de/faq/i4lfaq-6.html#config_manycards we limited the number of utilities in the isdn.lrp for reason of size, if you have a problem please feel free to ask again. Please if you succeed in accomplishing this task report back too :) Eric Wolzak member of the Bering Crew > Best Regards. > Francois BERGERET > > France > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ___ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] IPsec client for windows (free)
Try this http://security.nta.no/freeswan-w2k.html For getting W2K and Free Swan to cooperate. ALso, for SSH on WIndows 2000 try loading the Cygwin tools on your system OR several more methods of ssh on WIndows systems http://www.openssh.org/windows.html -sp On Tue, 21 May 2002, "Brock Nanson" wrote > > Have a look at SSH Sentinel (ssh.com). My understanding is that > personal use is free, but you should read the fine print to be sure. > It's know as a solid IPSec client for windows and works well with > FreeS/WAN. > > Brock > > > Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: "Joey Officer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Roberto Pereyra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: [leaf-user] IPsec client for windows (free) > > Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 09:22:28 -0500 > > > > Depending on what version of windows, I believe Win2k has > > some ipsec client built in... > > > > Joey > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Roberto Pereyra > > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:16 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [leaf-user] IPsec client for windows (free) > > > > > > Hi > > > > Someone knows some IPsec client for windows > > (best free) that works with Bering. > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > Roberto Pereyra > > Gualeguaychu > > Argentina > > http://www.linux-net.com.ar > > GnuPG keyID: BB43E337 > > http://pgp.mit.edu > > > ___ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] ISDN with 16 lines/modems possible with Bering ?
Hi folks and gurus ! I have started Bering this week on PPPoE / WANADOO / France Telecom with success ! Previous was K.HADDLEY PPPoE image distro and it was ok during more than one year without any problem or bug/reset. Many thanks to all of you who accept to share you knowledges ! Now, I want to add IPSec between two Bering's PC to connect together two W2K local nets... But, my question is other today : One of my friends want to have 15/20 ISDN lines/modems to connect externals employees to his company's mail server. This server have not other access, no Internet or WAN. CISCO has a router to do that, but, is it possible to do with Bering ? Best Regards. Francois BERGERET France [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] A NET question
On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 10:05, Omar D. Samuels wrote: > Hey, guess what? I'm new to this whole LRP thing, I've been really trying > to follow protocol in seeking help with these hiccups. My apologies if my > descriptions are not a "distinct" and "exact" as you would like them to be. > I am really just grasping at straws, I now see that this probably isn't > necessarily the right place to seek help because I am a newbie, so I feel > confident that if I keep at it I'll get it worked out somehow on my own. > You Linux techies just keep doing your thing, when I get more buffed with > this maybe then I'll come back to the list if needs be. Omar, We're not trying to be difficult. We just need some additional information from you. The first bit that would help is "uname -a". This will tell us which branch/release you're using. The second bit is verification that you're using a null modem/laplink serial cable. A standard cable will not work. Last but not least, please paste in-line the contents of all files you modified in your attempt to get serial console to work. With this information we should be able to help you. I hope this information is useful. -- Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] IPsec client for windows (free)
On Tue, 21 May 2002 11:16:03 -0400 (ART) "Roberto Pereyra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > Someone knows some IPsec client for windows > (best free) that works with Bering. Win2k ipsec client works reliably with Bering with preshared secrets and x509 certificates. Documentation is found at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/buipsec.html -- -- Chad Carr[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] A NET question
Hey, guess what? I'm new to this whole LRP thing, I've been really trying to follow protocol in seeking help with these hiccups. My apologies if my descriptions are not a "distinct" and "exact" as you would like them to be. I am really just grasping at straws, I now see that this probably isn't necessarily the right place to seek help because I am a newbie, so I feel confident that if I keep at it I'll get it worked out somehow on my own. You Linux techies just keep doing your thing, when I get more buffed with this maybe then I'll come back to the list if needs be. Just for the record I have checked and tried every instruction/documentation I could find related to this issue, checked the capabilities against my LRP distro and done tests on my cable. Don't worry about it tho' I'll get it. - Original Message - From: "Ray Olszewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Omar D. Samuels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:50 AM Subject: Re: [leaf-user] A NET question > I added the LEAF list back in. > > At 11:26 AM 5/21/02 -0500, Omar D. Samuels wrote: > >I'm pretty sure that I have the right cable but it just isn't working out, > >so I dunno if it is the machine's fault... even though the serial port > >initialized okay. Basically everything seems to be in order but I just > >don't get anything coming over to the PC running terminal software. > [old stuff deleted] > > What happened since you sent your prior message to reassure you about > suitability of your cable? And why is "pretty sure" sure enough for a > troubleshooting exercise? Since you *know* there is a problem, isn't it > worth a few minutes of your time to check this as a possible source of the > problem ... especially since you yourself suggested it as a candidate for > the cause? > > Mike, Charles, and I have all tried to respond to your very vague problem > descriptions ... but leaf-user is a troubleshooting list, not the Psychic > Friends Network. We can't read your mind, and we don't get to see what you > are seeing. If you don't actually describe the details of your setup, what > you did, and how it failed, we can't help you spot what is wrong. > > At this point, you haven't even been definite about which LEAF (not LRP) > variant you are using (an early message said you "think" it is Eigerstein 2 > with "a few modifications to tune it to my needs"), let alone anything that > might help us spot the actual problem with your setup. So we've referred > you to standard HowTo-like docs, which describe the procedure (and its > limitations) in general terms; we can do no more in individual responses, > given the absence of any troubleshooting details in your messages. > > > -- > ---"Never tell me the > odds!"-- > Ray Olszewski -- Han Solo > Palo Alto, California, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- - > > ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] A NET question
I added the LEAF list back in. At 11:26 AM 5/21/02 -0500, Omar D. Samuels wrote: >I'm pretty sure that I have the right cable but it just isn't working out, >so I dunno if it is the machine's fault... even though the serial port >initialized okay. Basically everything seems to be in order but I just >don't get anything coming over to the PC running terminal software. [old stuff deleted] What happened since you sent your prior message to reassure you about suitability of your cable? And why is "pretty sure" sure enough for a troubleshooting exercise? Since you *know* there is a problem, isn't it worth a few minutes of your time to check this as a possible source of the problem ... especially since you yourself suggested it as a candidate for the cause? Mike, Charles, and I have all tried to respond to your very vague problem descriptions ... but leaf-user is a troubleshooting list, not the Psychic Friends Network. We can't read your mind, and we don't get to see what you are seeing. If you don't actually describe the details of your setup, what you did, and how it failed, we can't help you spot what is wrong. At this point, you haven't even been definite about which LEAF (not LRP) variant you are using (an early message said you "think" it is Eigerstein 2 with "a few modifications to tune it to my needs"), let alone anything that might help us spot the actual problem with your setup. So we've referred you to standard HowTo-like docs, which describe the procedure (and its limitations) in general terms; we can do no more in individual responses, given the absence of any troubleshooting details in your messages. -- ---"Never tell me the odds!"-- Ray Olszewski-- Han Solo Palo Alto, California, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] IPsec client for windows (free)
Have a look at SSH Sentinel (ssh.com). My understanding is that personal use is free, but you should read the fine print to be sure. It's know as a solid IPSec client for windows and works well with FreeS/WAN. Brock > Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Joey Officer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Roberto Pereyra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [leaf-user] IPsec client for windows (free) > Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 09:22:28 -0500 > > Depending on what version of windows, I believe Win2k has > some ipsec client built in... > > Joey > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Roberto Pereyra > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:16 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [leaf-user] IPsec client for windows (free) > > > Hi > > Someone knows some IPsec client for windows > (best free) that works with Bering. > > Thanks in advance > > Roberto Pereyra > Gualeguaychu > Argentina > http://www.linux-net.com.ar > GnuPG keyID: BB43E337 > http://pgp.mit.edu ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] A NET question
The documents that Mike referred you to do discuss cable issues, though perhaps briefly enough that you missed it when you read them. To connect 2 computers, you need either a null-modem cable or a regular cable with a null-modem adapter ... this is not a LEAF or even a Linux issue, but a standard bit of PC hardware lore. Unless you are interested in building your own cable, there isn't much point in including diagrams or pictures; you get the right cable or adapter by reading the labels on the packages at the store. If you do want to build your own cable, I'm sure a Google search will direct you to any of the many hardware sites that discuss how to do this. At 10:15 AM 5/21/02 -0500, Omar D. Samuels wrote: >I've pretty much gone through the different documentations out there, even >the ones you gave (btw thank you very much), but still it doesn't seem to be >working. The only thing I could conclude is that there is an issue with the >cable. Would it be possible for you or anyone else to send me some info on >the specs of a cable that should work? I have a simple 9-pin female-female >serial cable connecting my workstation to the LRP box. It is therefore >either my cable or the COM port on the LRP (doubt it though). > >So thanks for any further assistance (pictures are welcomed). [old stuff deleted] -- ---"Never tell me the odds!"-- Ray Olszewski-- Han Solo Palo Alto, California, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] IPsec client for windows (free)
Depending on what version of windows, I believe Win2k has some ipsec client built in... Joey -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roberto Pereyra Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-user] IPsec client for windows (free) Hi Someone knows some IPsec client for windows (best free) that works with Bering. Thanks in advance Roberto Pereyra Gualeguaychu Argentina http://www.linux-net.com.ar GnuPG keyID: BB43E337 http://pgp.mit.edu ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] A NET question
Serial support has been well documented throughout the mailing list. First off, I might try using a real serial console. I use securecrt (w/ serial support) it works really well. Secondly.. I think the first problem might be the fact that there is not serial support by default. You will need either to grab the serial.o file and load it with the other modules (although you won't see kernel boot messages, or you will need to grab a linux kernel w/ serial support compile in. And lastly, just try reading the docs http://lrp.steinkuehler.net/Documentation/LRP-Serial-HOWTO.txt If you have some more specific questions, please ask them... Joey Advocate in Training... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Omar D. Samuels Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 8:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-user] A NET question Could someone pleeez help me. I would really love some help with two things: Is there any way to suppress the "NET: # messages suppressed" messages that come on my LRP box? I am trying just about everything I can find in documentation to allow my LRP (on a single floppy) to allow me to console into it through a serial cable. It is not working for me "echo "hello" > /dev/ttyS0" sends nothing to my Hyperterminal. I would REALLY REALLY appreciate any help. Thanks guys. ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] A NET question
On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 06:55, Omar D. Samuels wrote: > I am trying just about everything I can find in documentation to allow my > LRP (on a single floppy) to allow me to console into it through a serial > cable. It is not working for me "echo "hello" > /dev/ttyS0" sends nothing > to my Hyperterminal. Omar, Did you read this FAQ? http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=1428&group_id=13751 Did you read this HOWTO? http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/doc/howto/LRP-Serial-HOWTO.txt If so, please read the "SR FAQ" link at the bottom of this message, and provide us with the recommended additional information. Thanks. -- Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] IPsec client for windows (free)
Hi Someone knows some IPsec client for windows (best free) that works with Bering. Thanks in advance Roberto Pereyra Gualeguaychu Argentina http://www.linux-net.com.ar GnuPG keyID: BB43E337 http://pgp.mit.edu ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] A NET question
Could someone pleeez help me. I would really love some help with two things: Is there any way to suppress the "NET: # messages suppressed" messages that come on my LRP box? I am trying just about everything I can find in documentation to allow my LRP (on a single floppy) to allow me to console into it through a serial cable. It is not working for me "echo "hello" > /dev/ttyS0" sends nothing to my Hyperterminal. I would REALLY REALLY appreciate any help. Thanks guys. ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
