Re: [leaf-user] How to mount NFS Drive on Bering
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Thitiporn Pornpirunrak wrote: Hi all I am using Bering Rc3 and want to mount nfs drive on by bering box. I use command mount 192.168.1.100:/tmp /mnt But My bering box show this messages .. mount: Mounting 192.168.1.100:/tmp on /mnt1 failed: Operation not supported by device I Create NFS Server on FreeBSD and Test with another computer to make sure that my nfs server is work. But I can't mount nfs drive on bering box. Anyone who know please tell me. Perhaps you should load the nfs.o module. --- Jeff NewmillerThe . . Go Live... DCN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go... Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#. #.O#. with /Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...2k --- --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] ppp0 problem with PPPOE and FreeS/WAN
Hi all, I've searched around on google, but info is scant on this. I'm running on an ADSL link that uses PPPOE, and I cannot get FreeS/WAN to identify my ppp0 for some reason. Could it be that I do not have ifconfig? Here is what shows up when I start ipsec from /etc/init.d ipsec_setup: Starting FreeS/WAN IPsec 1.97... ipsec_setup: unable to determine address of `ppp0' Any pointers would be fantastic! Thanks all, Christopher --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Problem with Wisp Init!
Samuel Abreu wrote about Re: [leaf-user] Problem with Wisp Init!: Ok, i confused things, sorry! I have already working, one soekris board with 2 orinoco cards, with bridge, that i change the parprouted line in the parpbridging startup script, to 3 lines: /sbin/parprouted $IFACES sleep 2 /sbin/parprouted $IFACES In if.config: IFACES=netcs0 netcs1 Hmm... That shouldn't be required. Anyway, the build is old. I try recently, do the bridge with the new version, with the 3 interfaces, unsuccessfuly, but i didn't made many tests, it was 2am, and i let that station without bridge! Please, look at the logs and report what's going on. Or you can give me access to your board and I can check myself. Also I got a 2-PCMCIA Soekris board yesterday, and I plan to do some testing on it. One question about how arp bridge works, if i want to put one eth and one netcs in bridge, in what interface i put the IP of the station, in the help, say that the interfaces must have a IP, even a dummy address, but if a put a dummy address in eth, will not the eth be the IP of station will correspont??? It depends on what your Ethernet station uses as a default gateway. If it uses the IP of the CPE itself as a default gateway, then obviously IP on the eth0 should be from the same subnet as the IP of the station; however I don't recommend doing this. -- Best Regards, Vladimir Systems Engineer (RHCE) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Re:[leaf-user] ppp0 problem with PPPOE and FreeS/WAN
Hi all, I've searched around on google, but info is scant on this. I'm running on an ADSL link that uses PPPOE, and I cannot get FreeS/WAN to identify my ppp0 for some reason. Could it be that I do not have ifconfig? Here is what shows up when I start ipsec from /etc/init.d ipsec_setup: Starting FreeS/WAN IPsec 1.97... ipsec_setup: unable to determine address of `ppp0' You don't tell us which version of LEAF you are using. I suspect - since your output mention ipsec 1.97 - that you are using either Bering rc2 or rc3. If that is the case I would suggest you to switch to 1.0-stable since there was a problem with ipsec ppp connections in earlier releases of the Bering distro. Jacques - SPECIAL ADSL L'ADSL Tiscali est à partir de 15,95 EUR/mois ! Plus modem ADSL et frais d'activation gratuits ! Pour profiter de cette offre, cliquez ici: http://register.tiscali.fr/adsl/ Offre soumise à conditions. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] denied, 3000 a day
--- C. Dummy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.echogent.com/cgi-bin/fwlog.pl
at above address you can check what it means. I'm
not sure what image
are you using but go to system settings and read
lrp.conf (Master LRP
settings file) about spacecheck.
Andrey
gary wrote:
My log file is filling with this peticular entry,
any help would be greatly
appriciated
Nov 18 07:06:22 LEAF kernel: Packet log: input DENY
eth0 PROTO=17
10.190.0.1:67 255.255.255.255:68 L=360 S=0x00
I=57806 F=0x T=255 (#8)
thanks,
{{SNIP}}
It's a UDP- PROTO=17, DHCP Ports- :67 :68, Broadcast
to network- 255.255.255.255
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.charleshbaker.com/~chb/
Hacking is a Good Thing!
See http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Bering backup
Thank you for your reply. I neverintended to back up all of the files in the ramdisk, just the .lrps and such. i.e., to mount -t msdos /dev/hda1 /mnt and then copy everything from the /mnt directory to another machine. Since I'm doing this from a Windows machine, I found WS_FTP, and it does quite nicely. Again, thanks for yor help. :CH --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] ppp0 problem with PPPOE and FreeS/WAN
Hi. Thanks for answering. The PPPOE part is working fine - that's not the problem. It's getting FreeS/WAN to _see_ the ppp0 interface I'm stuck on. Without FS, the box is working fine. Should I post this to a FS list instead? Anybody have this setup on LEAF running? Thanks, Christopher On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 04:16, Stephane wrote: Hi Best thing to do is to read the users guide http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/busers.html) where you can find the ppp/pppoe setup :) Stephane Christopher Barry a écrit: Hi all, I've searched around on google, but info is scant on this. I'm running on an ADSL link that uses PPPOE, and I cannot get FreeS/WAN to identify my ppp0 for some reason. Could it be that I do not have ifconfig? Here is what shows up when I start ipsec from /etc/init.d ipsec_setup: Starting FreeS/WAN IPsec 1.97... ipsec_setup: unable to determine address of `ppp0' Any pointers would be fantastic! Thanks all, Christopher --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: Re:[leaf-user] ppp0 problem with PPPOE and FreeS/WAN
AHA! Thank You! I'm not entirely nuts! (hopefully) Regards, Christopher On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 06:45, Jacques Nilo wrote: Hi all, I've searched around on google, but info is scant on this. I'm running on an ADSL link that uses PPPOE, and I cannot get FreeS/WAN to identify my ppp0 for some reason. Could it be that I do not have ifconfig? Here is what shows up when I start ipsec from /etc/init.d ipsec_setup: Starting FreeS/WAN IPsec 1.97... ipsec_setup: unable to determine address of `ppp0' You don't tell us which version of LEAF you are using. I suspect - since your output mention ipsec 1.97 - that you are using either Bering rc2 or rc3. If that is the case I would suggest you to switch to 1.0-stable since there was a problem with ipsec ppp connections in earlier releases of the Bering distro. Jacques - SPECIAL ADSL L'ADSL Tiscali est à partir de 15,95 EUR/mois ! Plus modem ADSL et frais d'activation gratuits ! Pour profiter de cette offre, cliquez ici: http://register.tiscali.fr/adsl/ Offre soumise à conditions. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] QMail email gateway
I would like to use the qmail.lrp package for Bering in a firewall/gateway capacity only to shuffle mail from my internal mail server out and deliver external mail to the mail server. I was wondering if the current package as-is is sufficient and what configuration changes might be needed? Any help or point in the right direction would be appreciated. Or you could just wait a bit until Lince is released. We have found a great alternative for smtp without needing hard disk, if you have a real smtp inside (your own) and outside (your isp). smtp without disk? hum ... what if your LEAF dies when the queue is not empty?? you end up loosing mail! I believe there are 2 answers to the problem: without disk: * you should be able to add a DNAT line in Shorewall to forward all traffic from the Internet to the FW:25 to your Mail server:25 inside the firewall ... and configure NATing to allow your Mailserver to send mail out ( or to your ISP mail relay) with disk: * you can mount /dev/hdaX /var/qmail/queue in /etc/init.d/qmail start ( and umount it in stop ) to keep your queue on disk. The trick is to modify the /var/lib/lrp/qmail.list and qmail.exclude.list in qmail.list replace var/qmail/queue/lock by var/qmail/queue (you need to create the mount point ) and add var/qmail/queue/* in exclude.list when performing the installation the first time, you'll have to get all the files [ the one created dynamically and the lock directory ] from /var/qmail/queue to the Hard Disk of course you'll need a fs driver ( ext2/ext3?). voila... I think I didn't miss anything ? --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] wireless/PCI
Anyone using an 802.11b PCI ( NOT PCMCIA) card with Linux drivers and Linux setup utilities which you like very much? Thanks. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] QMail email gateway
Hi there: smtp without disk? Yep hum ... what if your LEAF dies when the queue is not empty?? you end up loosing mail! Not really. OK, I will try to explain myself. Im not talking about a real smtp server but a SMTP proxy. The proxy listens on port 25 for a connection and passes it toan internal real SMTP server WITHOUT ackoledging the origin server. When the inside server receives the email, and says everything is OK, the proxy tells the origin server that it was OK. So if during the process the power goes down, as you have not acknowledge the message yet, the origin server as not deleted it from its HD and will try again. We have tested it and promise it works wonders. Actually it was quite hard to find the solution as only 1 piece of software really acted as a proxy. The beauty is, you can process the email in the proxy and scan it for viruses or antirelay or in the future antispam. Please, just be calm, we are in the middle of a big project for our company and we havent found time to upload the iso now that we have our CVS ready (that was just a few days ago). Also we are considering releasing just with stable 1.0 instead of 1.0rc3 with some bugfixes that we are using). Its just we are very high on the todo list. I believe there are 2 answers to the problem: without disk: * you should be able to add a DNAT line in Shorewall to forward all traffic from the Internet to the FW:25 to your Mail server:25 inside the firewall ... and configure NATing to allow your Mailserver to send mail out ( or to your ISP mail relay) Of course this solution is viable, but doesnt allow for processing in the firewall. Lets say you have an inside E2000 server (ugghhh) and want to protect it from relaying email or viruses, now you have this choice. with disk: * you can mount /dev/hdaX /var/qmail/queue in /etc/init.d/qmail start ( and umount it in stop ) to keep your queue on disk. The trick is to modify the /var/lib/lrp/qmail.list and qmail.exclude.list in qmail.list replace var/qmail/queue/lock by var/qmail/queue (you need to create the mount point ) and add var/qmail/queue/* in exclude.list when performing the installation the first time, you'll have to get all the files [ the one created dynamically and the lock directory ] from /var/qmail/queue to the Hard Disk Surelly this is another option, but most of the times if the traffic ismoderate you will be able to get by with our solution without moving parts :) Regards. -- Jaime Nebrera Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] Wisp host_ap
I'm sure this isn't the place for feature requests but, is the modules for the wisp dist already setup for authentication of mac address via Radius? If so has anyone gotten this to work and can you share your config on that. And if not, Vlad, can we make this happen? Marty Buchaus CTO Dabuke Internet Services (ASI / BigSky) RHCE - 807101943103186 ICQ - 10579998 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Wisp host_ap
Marty Buchaus wrote about RE: [leaf-user] Wisp host_ap: I'm sure this isn't the place for feature requests but, is the modules for the wisp dist already setup for authentication of mac address via Radius? If so has anyone gotten this to work and can you share your config on that. And if not, Vlad, can we make this happen? Hi, Yes, I'm planning to add 802.1X support in one of the future releases. Which also means RADIUS support provided that your RADIUS server supports EAP/TLS (such as FreeRADIUS). I think I'll make one more maintenance release with the old hostap_cs driver first though. -- Best Regards, Vladimir Systems Engineer (RHCE) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] Wisp host_ap
I seem to have lost the ftp directory where you push the pre production stuff. Can you send that to the list or off list.. Marty Buchaus CTO Dabuke Internet Services (ASI / BigSky) RHCE - 807101943103186 ICQ - 10579998 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Vladimir I. Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 12:23 PM To: Marty Buchaus Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Wisp host_ap Marty Buchaus wrote about RE: [leaf-user] Wisp host_ap: I'm sure this isn't the place for feature requests but, is the modules for the wisp dist already setup for authentication of mac address via Radius? If so has anyone gotten this to work and can you share your config on that. And if not, Vlad, can we make this happen? Hi, Yes, I'm planning to add 802.1X support in one of the future releases. Which also means RADIUS support provided that your RADIUS server supports EAP/TLS (such as FreeRADIUS). I think I'll make one more maintenance release with the old hostap_cs driver first though. -- Best Regards, Vladimir Systems Engineer (RHCE) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html -- -- leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Wisp host_ap
Well, nothing new there so far: http://www.hazard.maks.net/wisp-dist/downloads/ I will announce on the list when something new is available. Marty Buchaus wrote: I seem to have lost the ftp directory where you push the pre production stuff. Can you send that to the list or off list.. Marty Buchaus CTO Dabuke Internet Services (ASI / BigSky) RHCE - 807101943103186 ICQ - 10579998 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Vladimir I. Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 12:23 PM To: Marty Buchaus Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Wisp host_ap Marty Buchaus wrote about RE: [leaf-user] Wisp host_ap: I'm sure this isn't the place for feature requests but, is the modules for the wisp dist already setup for authentication of mac address via Radius? If so has anyone gotten this to work and can you share your config on that. And if not, Vlad, can we make this happen? Hi, Yes, I'm planning to add 802.1X support in one of the future releases. Which also means RADIUS support provided that your RADIUS server supports EAP/TLS (such as FreeRADIUS). I think I'll make one more maintenance release with the old hostap_cs driver first though. -- Best Regards, Vladimir Systems Engineer (RHCE) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html -- -- leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html -- Best Regards, Vladimir Systems Engineer (RHCE) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] shoe box PCs with DOC 4-sale
Hi I still have a number of Industrial quality shoe box size PCs w/2MB Disk on chip, 16MB Ram, 2 Ethernet connections, that make excellent LEAF boxes, booting from DOC is very fast. This is the same unit used by Brad Fritz to write his chapter for the Bering users guide. Thanks Brad! Price $150.00 includes shipping. Each PC has: Advantech PCA-6145B Single Board Computer ISA 486 Half-sized SBC w/VGA, LCD, Ethernet, DOC PC/104 with 486 DX4-100, 16MB SIMM RAM, 2MB Disk-on-chip. Advantech IPC-6806S Desktop 6-slot Chassis with Backplane (6 ISA), with 100W PS Advantech PCL-731 48-bit Digital I/O Card. (something to play with?) 3com 3c509C ethernet card. Manuals, floppy and HD cables, I don't have cables for Digital I/O Card. The chassis has a flip top which allows access without removing the case. Also has a removeable knockout for mounting a 3.5 floppy, and mounting brackets for a hard disk. The overall dimensions are 11.1 deep x 7.7 wide x 6.7 high. The total price for all this from advantech is over $800. If anyone is interested I will sell them for $150 which includes shipping in the US. I am not a vendor, I happened on these boxes when a design was changed at work. They seem to be a perfect fit for someone who wants to play with linux router code. Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if interested. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] shoe box PCs with DOC 4-sale
Additional comments from a satisfied customer On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:15:26 EST Dan wrote: I still have a number of Industrial quality shoe box size PCs w/2MB Disk on chip, 16MB Ram, 2 Ethernet connections, that make excellent LEAF boxes, booting from DOC is very fast. These are high quality units that are built like tanks. $150 is a very good deal if you're looking for something like this. Dan was quick to respond to my emails when I was arranging to purchase one, the unit I bought shipped promptly, and arrived exactly as advertised. I would not hesitate to do business with Dan again. --Brad --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] QMail email gateway
Shon, On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:00:21 EST Shon wrote: I was hoping to configure the already existing qmail.lrp package to work as an email gateway (in conjunction with the existing firewall) for their internal mail servers. I have seen instructions for using qmail with Bering (thanks very much for the assist Jacques), but it required recompiling the package, which is unfortunately not a possibility at this time. Are you referring to the instructions at: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/qmail.html ? If so, can you explain why a recompile is necessary? Someone here might be able to suggest a workaround. --Brad --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] QMail email gateway
Hello Brad. Thanks for the reply. I was actually speaking of a solution that Jacques had presented me available at this link: If you only want the smtp facilities check the mini Qmail how-to from H.D. Lee http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=586953group_id=137 51atid=313751 -Original Message- From: Brad Fritz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 3:36 PM To: Nixon, Anthony S. Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] QMail email gateway Shon, On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:00:21 EST Shon wrote: I was hoping to configure the already existing qmail.lrp package to work as an email gateway (in conjunction with the existing firewall) for their internal mail servers. I have seen instructions for using qmail with Bering (thanks very much for the assist Jacques), but it required recompiling the package, which is unfortunately not a possibility at this time. Are you referring to the instructions at: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/qmail.html ? If so, can you explain why a recompile is necessary? Someone here might be able to suggest a workaround. --Brad This message, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the addressee and contains information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. It may be used only by the addressee and may not be divulged without the express consent of the sender. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately. Thank you. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] QMail email gateway
Jamie, On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:31:48 +0100 Jaime wrote: hum ... what if your LEAF dies when the queue is not empty?? you end up loosing mail! Not really. OK, I will try to explain myself. Im not talking about a real smtp server but a SMTP proxy. The proxy listens on port 25 for a connection and passes it toan internal real SMTP server WITHOUT ackoledging the origin server. When the inside server receives the email, and says everything is OK, the proxy tells the origin server that it was OK. Can you tell us what SMTP proxy you used? A URL would be excellent. Thank you. --Brad --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] QMail email gateway
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:16:16 EST Anthony S. Nixon wrote: Hello Brad. Thanks for the reply. I was actually speaking of a solution that Jacques had presented me available at this link: If you only want the smtp facilities check the mini Qmail how-to from H.D. Lee http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=586953group_id=137 51atid=313751 I see. After a brief review, it doesn't look like HDL does anything fancy before or during the compile. If Jacques' 184k qmail.lrp package[1] is too big, you should be able to apply the trimming and configuration suggested in HDL's instructions[2] to the binaries in Jacques' qmail.lrp and avoid compiling qmail yourself. I realize you were probably looking for something more specific or polished, but the good news is that what you want to do should be possible and Jacques' qmail package HowTo[3] would probably help get you started. --Brad [1] http://leaf.sf.net/devel/jnilo/packages/qmail.lrp [2] http://sf.net/tracker/download.php?group_id=13751atid=313751file_id=27796aid=586953 [3] http://leaf.sf.net/devel/jnilo/qmail.html -Original Message- From: Brad Fritz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 3:36 PM To: Nixon, Anthony S. Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] QMail email gateway Shon, On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:00:21 EST Shon wrote: I was hoping to configure the already existing qmail.lrp package to work as an email gateway (in conjunction with the existing firewall) for their internal mail servers. I have seen instructions for using qmail with Bering (thanks very much for the assist Jacques), but it required recompiling the package, which is unfortunately not a possibility at this time. Are you referring to the instructions at: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/qmail.html ? If so, can you explain why a recompile is necessary? Someone here might be able to suggest a workaround. --Brad --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] wireless/PCI
I downloaded and built the hostap-2002-10-12 driver and did insmod hostap.o, good, hostap_crypt.o, good and then hostap_pci.o and got device not found. The card, handed to me by my boss is a DLink DWL 520+ which is SUPPOSED to be Prism2.5 Do you spot anything i've done wrong? If not i'm gonna go get a syslink or SMC. Thanx. Lars Kneschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/20/2002 10:02:44 AM To: Phillip Watts/austin/Nlynx@Nlynx cc: Subject: Re: [leaf-user] wireless/PCI on* Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:31:05 -0600, you wrote*: Anyone using an 802.11b PCI ( NOT PCMCIA) card with Linux drivers and Linux setup utilities which you like very much? Thanks. I use a EZ Connect Wireless PCI Card from SMC Networks(SMC2602W EU). I use the hostap driver. The card is based on a PRISM2 chip. Works very well here. Cu -- Lars Kneschke CCNP --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] wireless/PCI
I use the linksys PCI card (WMP11?). I had a problem using the DLink card as the system I was installing it in wasn't PCI2.2 compliant. --Pat On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone using an 802.11b PCI ( NOT PCMCIA) card with Linux drivers and Linux setup utilities which you like very much? Thanks. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] QMail email gateway
Hi Brad, Jamie, Well, if I recall right, Jamie was a girl's name and Jaime is a guys name :) Dont worry, I spent a whole year in California trying to explain the difference :P Can you tell us what SMTP proxy you used? A URL would be excellent. Thank you. OK, I will exploit the surprise, its emailrelay (http://emailrelay.sourceforge.net) but PLEASE dont jump into it and try to implement it by yourselves as we have already done so, just give us some days to prepare the iso and upload it. Regards -- Jaime Nebrera Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] wireless/PCI
Interesting, what is PCI2.2? Maybe that is the problem, I am using a BIOSTAR Mainboard, purchased about 6 months ago. [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/20/2002 04:29:05 PM To: Phillip Watts/austin/Nlynx@Nlynx cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] wireless/PCI I use the linksys PCI card (WMP11?). I had a problem using the DLink card as the system I was installing it in wasn't PCI2.2 compliant. --Pat On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone using an 802.11b PCI ( NOT PCMCIA) card with Linux drivers and Linux setup utilities which you like very much? Thanks. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] wireless/PCI
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:42:07 CST you wrote: I downloaded and built the hostap-2002-10-12 driver and did insmod hostap.o, good, hostap_crypt.o, good and then hostap_pci.o and got device not found. The card, handed to me by my boss is a DLink DWL 520+ which is SUPPOSED to be Prism2.5 Do you spot anything i've done wrong? If not i'm gonna go get a syslink or SMC. The DWL 520 is prism2.5, but the 520+ is not (or so I've heard). This posting on the soekris-tech list gives more info: http://lists.soekris.com/pipermail/soekris-tech/2002-September/000758.html There is an OEM version of the 520 available with slightly higher power output too, IIRC. The details should be in the soekris-tech archives, but I don't remember the OEM's name offhand. --Brad --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] wireless/PCI
From hostap mailing list: On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 09:47:29AM +0800, Yanghwee TAN wrote: has anyone tried hostap_cs with this Dlink wireless cards... DWL-650+ (IEEE 802.11b+, 22Mbps Wireless PCMCIA Adapter , 256-bitWEP) DWL-520+ (IEEE 802.11b+, 22Mbps Wireless PCI Adapter, 256-bit WEP) any problem? or good stuffs u encounter pls share with me. No need to try them.. I can tell you without testing that they won't work with Host AP driver. They are not using Prism2 chipset nor firmware. -- Jouni MalinenPGP id EFC895FA [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I downloaded and built the hostap-2002-10-12 driver and did insmod hostap.o, good, hostap_crypt.o, good and then hostap_pci.o and got device not found. The card, handed to me by my boss is a DLink DWL 520+ which is SUPPOSED to be Prism2.5 Do you spot anything i've done wrong? If not i'm gonna go get a syslink or SMC. Thanx. Lars Kneschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/20/2002 10:02:44 AM To: Phillip Watts/austin/Nlynx@Nlynx cc: Subject: Re: [leaf-user] wireless/PCI on* Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:31:05 -0600, you wrote*: Anyone using an 802.11b PCI ( NOT PCMCIA) card with Linux drivers and Linux setup utilities which you like very much? Thanks. I use a EZ Connect Wireless PCI Card from SMC Networks(SMC2602W EU). I use the hostap driver. The card is based on a PRISM2 chip. Works very well here. Cu -- Lars Kneschke CCNP --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html -- Manfred Schuler Beerenweg 4 31275 Lehrte Tel.: (0 51 75) 66 54 Fax: (07 21) 1 51 22 22 17 E_Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] question - Cable Modem
I am new to LPR, but I have been working with linux for years. I have Charter pipeline, they assign Ip using the Hw address of the nic card, so there is no login for user name and password. What is the best way to uses the LPR and which modulars? I am looking at the Bering. The Computer is P-233Mhz, 3c905, kne2000, 128 mb of ram. Thanks Thomas Boore web site == http://www.trainweb.org/mtsvrr/ email == [EMAIL PROTECTED] MCP - Microsoft Certify Professional Windows 2000 Pro and Windows 2000 Server --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 10/15/2002 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] question - Cable Modem
Read good documentation on line for Bering. As for the cable I'm not with cable anymore, but if you are going to use the same NIC for Internet connection like before once you load NIC's modules you should be connected to internet via dhcp. If you are going to use different nic to connect to internet, than you have to release this NIC and than try to connect with new one. That's the only way if I remember. Andrey Thomas Boore wrote: I am new to LPR, but I have been working with linux for years. I have Charter pipeline, they assign Ip using the Hw address of the nic card, so there is no login for user name and password. What is the best way to uses the LPR and which modulars? I am looking at the Bering. The Computer is P-233Mhz, 3c905, kne2000, 128 mb of ram. Thanks Thomas Boore web site == http://www.trainweb.org/mtsvrr/ email == [EMAIL PROTECTED] MCP - Microsoft Certify Professional Windows 2000 Pro and Windows 2000 Server --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 10/15/2002 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Found error in Bering ipsec509 script
Eric found this bug in Bering-v1.0-stable ipsec.lrp and ipsec509.lrp packages
This bug only affects people trying to use ipsec through the ppp interface.
It was corrected in rc4 but the wrong patch was applied to stable.
This is now corrected and I just uploaded the corrected ipsec.lrp and
ipsec509.lrp in the stable/packages directory.
Jacques
Le Mercredi 20 Novembre 2002 20:51, Eric de Thouars a écrit :
Jacques,
Today I went for the upgrade to v1.0-stable, but I had some troubles
getting the ipsec509 package to work. The error message displayed upon
startup of ipsec was:
ipsec_setup: unable to determine address of `ppp0'
After looking at some of the scripts in the package and in pacjages from
previous versions I think I found the cause of the error. In
/lib/ipsec/_startklips I changed two lines in the Berig specific
modification to the script.
Changed
awk '$1 == inet $3 == brd {
to
awk '$1 == inet {
and
print type=pointopoint
to
print type=peer
After this modification everything worked OK.
By the way, I'm using interface ppp0 for my internet connection.
- Eric
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto
Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now:
http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Bering RC4 SLOW PINGS
Folks, I apologize if this is a FAQ, but my net connection is so slow now that I can't effectively search the web for information. I have a Road Runner Commercial Cable account in the Tampa Bay area; I upgraded to the commercial in late September after having the residential service for about 2 years. For that entire time, I'd been using the same box as my firewall/router, a 486/66 w/32M and a pair of SMC Ultra NICs. The software was originally Eigerstein and later Dachstein and worked perfectly the entire time. So, about 2 weeks ago the network performance totally went to hell in a handbasket. Ping times, even to RR internal network machines, are now in the 1600-2000 ms time range. Packet loss is very high, bandwidth is almost nonexistent. In an effort to solve the problem, after RR had been out many times and made multiple hardware repair efforts, I upgraded the software to Bering RC4. The situation ias it stands, is this: 1) Any standalone machine, plugged directly into the ZyXEL cable modem and configured with the correct static IP address and netmask, gets full bandwidth and brisk ping times. 2) The original router/firewall gets miniscule bandwidth and slow pings, whether booted from Dachstein or Bering. 3) A different machine, configured with a 3Com 905TX and a NetGear FA311 and booted from Bering RC4, *also* gets lousy bandwidth and slow pings. 4) That machine, booted before the proper driver was installed to get the FA311 card working, got fast pings and good bandwidth (the 3Com is the external interface). 5) As soon as the 2nd NIC was working properly so that the box was actually acting as a router/firewall, the network bandwidth and pings went to hell. All of this suggests that the problem is in iptables or in Shorewall, but I can find no discussion of this problem in web searches or DejaNews. I have done little to this Bering configuration beyond configuring the static stuff in the networking setup. I did install ntpdate and opened up port 123 as a result. I've got the box acting as a DHCP server for the internal network and have opened up 67 68 internally for that. Ports 80, 25, and 22 are being forwarded to internal machines for web, email, and SSH access. Oh, yes: the dnscache package has been configured and the appropriate ports opened up internally and externally for that. The box is doing NAT for the entire internal network, of course. I can upload the iptables/shorewall setup if necessary, but this really is a fairly vanilla setup. Can anyone suggest what could be causing this problem? Is it a known problem with Bering or Shorewall? The net connection is slowing down so badly now that I have to cut this short. I want to emphasize that this problem started spontaneously and now persists regardless of whether I boot from the new Bering floppy or the old Dachstein floppy. It appears only to happen when there are actually two functioning NICs in the box and it is actually working as a router/firewall. There was a period of about 4 days, from last Thursday afternoon until Tuesday morning, when the old 486 box with the Bering floppy worked properly. I will try to follow up on this tomorrow from a faster access point. regards, Jim Wiggs James Wiggs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICBM: 97 30 18 W, 42 52 27 N --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Bering RC4 SLOW PINGS
If I had to guess where to start from this description, it would be to look for a LAN client that is generating a lot of traffic for some reason. To give a concrete example, we once had similar symptoms here, and we traced them (after we too wasted a lot of time with line tests, NIC tests, and reviews of iptables rulesets) to a mail-forwarding loop between a DMZ server here and an off-site server that chewed up our DSL bandwidth ... not quite all the time, but whenever *both* the local and the remote host were connected to the Internet (most but not all of the time, giving just enough unpredictabililty to make it *look* like it wasn't a configuration error). That's only a guess, though. To me more certain, I'd want to know a bit more about the tests, such as ... 1. Does physically disconnecting from the LAN the host that you forward port 25 to affect system performance? What about port 80 (if it is a different host)? Are you running any peer-to-peer apps that might be consuming a lot of bandwidth? (And BTW, how many hosts are on the LAN?) 2. You wrote that: 1) Any standalone machine, plugged directly into the ZyXEL cable modem and configured with the correct static IP address and netmask, gets full bandwidth and brisk ping times. Any is one of those terms that sounds like is says more than it does. Put this way, it doesn't actually describe any test; instead, it offers your interpretation of an undescribed test. What was the actual test you did to reach this conclusion? Did you really test EVERY host you have (and how many is that?), each in its normal configuration? Or did you just test 3 or 4 different hosts? 3. You wrote: 5) As soon as the 2nd NIC was working properly so that the box was actually acting as a router/firewall, the network bandwidth and pings went to hell. ... and ... It appears only to happen when there are actually two functioning NICs in the box and it is actually working as a router/firewall. From these descriptions, I can't really tell if your test involved connecting the firewall to the LAN or not. My guess assumes that you are describing something that happens only when the LAN is actually connected to the firewall. If I'm wrong ... if you just mean that the 2 NICs are working, but the internal one is not physically connected to anything, then my guess is bad. 4. What traffic levels is the router reporting that it handles? (Calculate this by running ip -s link twice, a minute apart, and seeing how much the total traffic changes by. There may be better ways, but that is one that works reliably.) If my guess is right, the load will show as high on both interfaces. If it is high on the external interface only, then the problem is somewhere in the router's configuration ... might it be running some service you forgot to mention? Do the logs show any unusual pattersn of DENYs or REJECTs? 5. Finally, you wrote: I want to emphasize that this problem started spontaneously From this, I believe that you did nothing to the *router* that caused it. But what about the rest of the LAN? Did you make any changes on the mail server or the Web server? At 08:00 PM 11/20/02 -0800, James K. Wiggs wrote: Folks, I apologize if this is a FAQ, but my net connection is so slow now that I can't effectively search the web for information. I have a Road Runner Commercial Cable account in the Tampa Bay area; I upgraded to the commercial in late September after having the residential service for about 2 years. For that entire time, I'd been using the same box as my firewall/router, a 486/66 w/32M and a pair of SMC Ultra NICs. The software was originally Eigerstein and later Dachstein and worked perfectly the entire time. So, about 2 weeks ago the network performance totally went to hell in a handbasket. Ping times, even to RR internal network machines, are now in the 1600-2000 ms time range. Packet loss is very high, bandwidth is almost nonexistent. In an effort to solve the problem, after RR had been out many times and made multiple hardware repair efforts, I upgraded the software to Bering RC4. The situation ias it stands, is this: 1) Any standalone machine, plugged directly into the ZyXEL cable modem and configured with the correct static IP address and netmask, gets full bandwidth and brisk ping times. 2) The original router/firewall gets miniscule bandwidth and slow pings, whether booted from Dachstein or Bering. 3) A different machine, configured with a 3Com 905TX and a NetGear FA311 and booted from Bering RC4, *also* gets lousy bandwidth and slow pings. 4) That machine, booted before the proper driver was installed to get the FA311 card working, got fast pings and good bandwidth (the 3Com is the external interface). 5) As soon as the 2nd NIC was working properly so that the box was actually acting as a router/firewall, the network bandwidth and pings went to hell. All of this suggests that the problem is in iptables or in
Re: [leaf-user] shoe box PCs with DOC 4-sale
my mail server was down and I've not received the better part of todays list, could you direct me to his email address and how you paid, i am in the need of building one for home in the next month or so and would like one i think joey - Original Message - From: Brad Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 2:10 PM Subject: Re: [leaf-user] shoe box PCs with DOC 4-sale Additional comments from a satisfied customer On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:15:26 EST Dan wrote: I still have a number of Industrial quality shoe box size PCs w/2MB Disk on chip, 16MB Ram, 2 Ethernet connections, that make excellent LEAF boxes, booting from DOC is very fast. These are high quality units that are built like tanks. $150 is a very good deal if you're looking for something like this. Dan was quick to respond to my emails when I was arranging to purchase one, the unit I bought shipped promptly, and arrived exactly as advertised. I would not hesitate to do business with Dan again. --Brad --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
