Re: Excessive bugs mean Mozilla's death!

2002-02-05 Thread JTK

Ben Tremblay wrote:
> 
> JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
>news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > DeMoN LaG wrote:
> > > JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:3C5DB7AD.6578A3D7
> > > @hgdjaggd.com, on 03 Feb 2002:
> > > >  the cache bug,
> > > Sorry, I don't recall you "fixing" this one, just bitching for a week
> > > when a 30 second "Edit, Preferences, Advanced, Cache, Clear disk cache"
> > > would have fixed it for you.  Do you have a bug number, or a copy of the
> > > patch you "made" that fixed this bug?
> > Fished in LaGgy.  As I already posted, that's not me, but somebody so
> > empty inside that they want, need, to pretend they're me.
> I was going to call you a pathetic pain in the ass ...

But of course you thought better of it.

> I've been
> reading the NG for 30 minutes or so and I' totally sick of you ...

It was not meant that all should hear.

> but
> it just dawned on me: you think you're contributing by playing devil's
> advocate!

That would require a "devil" to advocate, would it not?

> OMG, that's so sad!

Well I'll agree with you there; this project is simply too far gone for
even me to resurrect, and it's sad, almost sick in a way, that I even
bother trying.  But this St. Jude medal weighs heavy upon my breast.

> You think straining at gnats is evidence of your
> ability?

Serving up week-old CNN is a "gnat"?

> You poor dear thing! You know, there's the _chance_ that you
> aren't iredeemably compulsive ...

Nope, none.  I'm as compulsive as they get when it comes to software
that's actually usable.

> I mean, vanishing slight that it
> might be, there's a chance that the dumb-assed persistence you share
> with so many coders might be turned to good use.
> 
> Is there a chance that you can concentrate on something for as long as
> u 15 or 20 minutes?

What was that again?  Sorry, I wasn't concentrating.

> Gawd knows XCOPMPTR is as close to rocket
> science as I've seen lately, but there's more to the project than CPP
> ... and a damned site more than just pissing over everything 24/7
> 

I don't follow... you're suggesting that *urine* would cure what ails
Mozilla?  Well I don't know, guess we've tried everything else




Re: onmousewheel=""

2002-02-05 Thread Travis Crump

Maybe I am missing something, but in the place where they said they were 
going to implement it, did they say why?  The mousewheel is essentially 
just the mouse equivalent of the down and up arrows on the keyboard, 
what conceivable use could an "onmousewheel" event have?

Sören Kuklau wrote:
> Duh, just read that Microsoft were to implement "onmousewheel" as 
> attribute in IE 6 SP1. Then checked whether HTML 4.01 and / or XHTML 1.1 
> have it - which is unsurprisingly not the case. So I have to ask: when 
> will they finally stop with the standards-violation-crap.





Re: SVG Support?

2002-02-05 Thread daa

Siegfried Heintze wrote:

> What is the scoop with SVG support? Are those croczilla folks still working
> on it? Is anyone working on it?
>
> I'm really need  for my web presentation and I'm wondering if I
> can expect it soon. I bought corel draw specifically becaue it could output
> SVG but now I have learned that Mozilla only takes a small subset of SVG.

svg is slowly coming along , parts are working , but lots remains to do.

there are daily win32 svg+mathml builds posted to :
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest/mozilla-win32-svg-mathml.zip

dave





Re: onmousewheel=""

2002-02-05 Thread grayrest

Sören Kuklau wrote:
> Duh, just read that Microsoft were to implement "onmousewheel" as 
> attribute in IE 6 SP1. Then checked whether HTML 4.01 and / or XHTML 1.1 
> have it - which is unsurprisingly not the case. So I have to ask: when 
> will they finally stop with the standards-violation-crap.

The question is not whether they'll stop standards violations (we know 
they won't, it keeps developers locked into their product), but rather 
when will they ADD REAL SUPPORT FOR PNG. >:-(





Re: slashdot.org not getting saved in history?

2002-02-05 Thread grayrest

Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> For some reason slashdot.org isnt being saved in the URL history and 
> isnt autocompleting when I type it in. Is there a reason for that or is 
> it a problem on my end (like a corrupt history)
> 

worksforme 2002012608, try deleting history.mab in your user directory.





Re: SVG Support?

2002-02-05 Thread grayrest

Siegfried Heintze wrote:
> What is the scoop with SVG support? Are those croczilla folks still working
> on it? Is anyone working on it?
> 
> I'm really need  for my web presentation and I'm wondering if I
> can expect it soon. I bought corel draw specifically becaue it could output
> SVG but now I have learned that Mozilla only takes a small subset of SVG.
> 

You can get an SVG/MathML enabled build for win32 (nightlies only) by 
hitting up ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest/ but I've 
heard of people having trouble with it. I seem to recall the Adobe 
Plugin working with moz, but it's been a while and I could just be 
making that up :].

grayrest





onmousewheel=""

2002-02-05 Thread Sören Kuklau

Duh, just read that Microsoft were to implement "onmousewheel" as 
attribute in IE 6 SP1. Then checked whether HTML 4.01 and / or XHTML 1.1 
have it - which is unsurprisingly not the case. So I have to ask: when 
will they finally stop with the standards-violation-crap.
-- 
Regards,
Sören Kuklau ('Chucker')
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Can anybody help

2002-02-05 Thread Bob Lathe

I have used Netscape for 15 years. I have 6 Compaq computers and just 
bought a new 5660AP, 1.8 with XP OEM. The first thing I did was load 
Netscape 6.2-1 and made it the default mail/browser.

My problem is that it will not auto connect to the server. In other 
words when I open netscape it does not even try to dial up However 
it does with Explorer even though Netscape is the default!! Is this a BG 
special???

Can anybody help.

Bob Lathe





Re: Java2 1.4.0 Release Candidate not compatible with Mozilla 0.9.8 for Windows?

2002-02-05 Thread Jim Patterson

Jeffrey W. Franklin wrote:
> I am having trouble getting Java2 Runtime Plugin 1.4 Release Candidate
> to run with Mozilla 0.9.8 and also Netscape 4.7x on Windows platforms.
> I am getting a the following error:
> 
> The Java Runtime Environment cannot be loaded from
> <\bin\hotspot\jvm.dll>
> 
> The error box title is Java(TM) Plug-in 1.4 Fatal Error.
> 
> What is really strange, this version of Java Runtime is working fine
> with Opera 6.  The last beta version of Java Runtime Plugin was the
> exact opposite working on Netscape 4.7x and Mozilla but not Opera 6.
> 
> Anyone else having this problem?  Anyone gotten this to work?

Take a look in netscape.public.mozilla.java . You aren't alone. It seems 
to have been broken over a month ago, and isn't back together yet.

Java 2 version 1.3 works just fine for me though (if that is any help).

-- 
Jim Patterson
Ottawa, Ont
CANADA





slashdot.org not getting saved in history?

2002-02-05 Thread Jonathan Wilson

For some reason slashdot.org isnt being saved in the URL history and 
isnt autocompleting when I type it in. Is there a reason for that or is 
it a problem on my end (like a corrupt history)





Re: How can I import all my newsgoups from another Moz profile?

2002-02-05 Thread Christopher Jahn

And it came to pass that Al Rider wrote:

> Incidently, I asked how to import or copy the newsgroups,
> not mail. 

I can read, if I can't type.  Substitute NEWS for MAIL.

> 
> That's the way the old Netscape [e.g. 4x] worked; but Moz
> DOES NOT. 
> 
> Try it.

Hmm, works here.
But it should import the profile (including news) during 
install.

OK, try this:

re-run the installer
"(path)/mozilla.exe" -installer





-- 
}:-)   Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
  
If she doesn't scare ya, no evil thing will...
 
To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom




Re: Excessive bugs mean Mozilla's death!

2002-02-05 Thread Ben Tremblay

dman84 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Chris, that is where I come in.  I have a project that I'd like to start 
> after mozilla's 1.0 codebase is API fixed.. to then create a new bugzill 
> a tool.. that will help this problem.  I need to learn the programming 
> of the XUL & XML, and probably how all the XPCOM & XPAPPS, Tools & 
> Widgets stuff work..
No entailment here ... that's like saying you need to master C++ to
reconceptualize bug tracking; it just ain't so. Those requirements are
excessive.

>   I would need to write specs first too.
Yaa, now that's the track you need to follow.

> It only exists as a project  idea on paper.
Thongs have a way of starting that way, yes? Now, if you want to go
off track real quick, set yourself the goal of learning XML, and
XPCOM, and all of that. (Of course I'm not depreciating an
understanding of how the system works ... for that matter, get a good
sense of DOM while you're at it.)

The best project manager I worked with had precious little
appreciation for the finer points of how embedded processors worked
with phased-array switching, and his intelligent triage paid off in
spades.

hfx_ben

p.s. ain't nuthin' wrong with lending a hand on triage!




Re: Excessive bugs mean Mozilla's death!

2002-02-05 Thread Ben Tremblay

JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> jesus X wrote:
> > Blake Ross wrote:
> > > Fact: you are terribly misinformed.
> > > The number of bugs has skyrocketed over the years because the number of
> > > people reporting them has skyrocketed over the years, and because we
> > > have more features and components than we used to. [...]
> > You are 100% right. In fact, I call it Bugzilla Inflation, and go into
> > detail in that article under the Bugzilla Inflation and Bugzilla Facts
> > sections. thanks go to Asa for helping me compile those numbers, too.
> AH!  So *THE LORD* is the one behind that article!  Wonderful!  Why no
> attribution, or did I just miss it?
What is this in aid of? We all know you're an asshole ... no need for
further evidence of that.

> Anyway, perhaps then rabbi you could explain this little gem of apologetics
> from that gem of an apologetic article:
> "To get technical for just a moment, the total number of bugs at any
> given time is a function of the number of Bugzilla reporters, not a
> function of the quality of Mozilla."
> So you mean to say that:
> N_bugs_in_bugzilla = A * N_registered_bugzilla_users
> for some suitable A?

Ever heard of abstraction, dipshit? How about Heisenburg's cat? How
about the sound of a tree falling if no one's there to hear it? How
about granularity? Ooops, I forgot that your thought is contrained by
the need to piss on something.

Given a complex project, the number of bugs reported is directly
related to the number of eyes looking and the number of hands typing,
yes. Welcome to the wonderful world of OpenSource, ya friggin' twit.

> All it does then is track entries made by registered users, which may in
> fact be bugs in Mozilla, or bugs in other products, or recipies, or
> porn, or maybe they're just using it as a substitute for NNTP or email,
> whatever.
yada yada yada ... the sound of one twit flapping

> BTW: I know you won't take this for what it's worth, but I read both
> articles in their entirety.  While yours is written better, his is more
> factually correct and less biased.

*Yikes!* I _knew_ you weren't iredeemable! *I'mma gonna shoot that
word!* _credit where credit is due_ ... wow ... JTK is not _entirely_
bereft of positive aspects! Man, ain't that a light on the horizon!

hfx_ben




Re: Excessive bugs mean Mozilla's death!

2002-02-05 Thread Ben Tremblay

JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> DeMoN LaG wrote:
> > JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:3C5DB7AD.6578A3D7
> > @hgdjaggd.com, on 03 Feb 2002:
> > >  the cache bug,
> > Sorry, I don't recall you "fixing" this one, just bitching for a week
> > when a 30 second "Edit, Preferences, Advanced, Cache, Clear disk cache"
> > would have fixed it for you.  Do you have a bug number, or a copy of the
> > patch you "made" that fixed this bug?
> Fished in LaGgy.  As I already posted, that's not me, but somebody so
> empty inside that they want, need, to pretend they're me.
I was going to call you a pathetic pain in the ass ... I've been
reading the NG for 30 minutes or so and I' totally sick of you ... but
it just dawned on me: you think you're contributing by playing devil's
advocate!
OMG, that's so sad! You think straining at gnats is evidence of your
ability? You poor dear thing! You know, there's the _chance_ that you
aren't iredeemably compulsive ... I mean, vanishing slight that it
might be, there's a chance that the dumb-assed persistence you share
with so many coders might be turned to good use.

Is there a chance that you can concentrate on something for as long as
u 15 or 20 minutes? Gawd knows XCOPMPTR is as close to rocket
science as I've seen lately, but there's more to the project than CPP
... and a damned site more than just pissing over everything 24/7

hfx_ben




Re: LittleMozilla is updated for latest builds (0.9.8-)

2002-02-05 Thread Ben Tremblay

Fulvio Perini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Mozilla0.9.6 seemed on its way to something,but things went downhill after
> that. Please,tell me that I am wrong.
> Thanks.
To echo someone else's succinct reply, you're wrong. But that misses
the point ... the expectation of linear progress is *sigh* not
appreciative of how regressions come about. We don't sit around in
circles testing our faith by supplicating the deities of software,
manifesting our virtue by appealing to the gods for effective patches
... it doesn't work like that.

If you want a sense of what's entailed in the development cycle, why
doncha hike over and crawl the material at mozilla.org ... this isn't
a commerical product where you're getting intentionally incremental
releases *glares in the general direction of Redmond* ... these are
snapshots of a development cycle that is, politics aside, always
wheels within wheels. This project is _paradigmatic_ of "herding
cats", and in a good number of cases _new breeds_ of cats (who'd uh
thunk that XUL rhymes with "zool"?!) Which isn't to intimate that it's
a paradigm of good process, just that's it's an awesome project and
IMHO a really whack vision.

Grunting from effort is a very nice alternative to groaning with
disatisfaction. (Besides which, I doubt that there's another
opportunity for Joe Public to crawl around on the inside watching how
this stuff is actually produced!)

totally freakin' amazing ... and OpenSource to boot!

hfx_ben




Re: Mozilla becomes viable in 2007 (if the world stands still) (was: Re: Excessive bugs mean Mozilla's death!)

2002-02-05 Thread JTK

DeMoN LaG wrote:
> 
> JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on
> 05 Feb 2002:
> 
> > 0.73%.  Suck it down LaGgy.
> >
> 
> http://www.upsdell.com/BrowserNews/stat_trends.htm
> 
> "
> * Mozilla and Netscape 6.x: ~0.85% of page accesses. This has grown
> significantly since the release of Netscape 6.1.
> "
>

Yeah, according to my numbers, a whopping 2.6 ***TIMES*** since a year
ago.  From a mere 0.28% to an embarassing 0.73% now.

But look out in 2007!!!

Pfhht.




Re: Mozilla becomes viable in 2007 (if the world stands still) (was: Re: Excessive bugs mean Mozilla's death!)

2002-02-05 Thread Ben Tremblay

DeMoN LaG  wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 
> 05 Feb 2002:
> > 0.73%.  Suck it down LaGgy.
> http://www.upsdell.com/BrowserNews/stat_trends.htm
> * Mozilla and Netscape 6.x: ~0.85% of page accesses. This has grown 
> significantly since the release of Netscape 6.1.
> Since it already beat's Opera's stats on the same 3 sources, I'd say 
> it's winning.  One could argue that Opera can spoof as IE, but so can 
> Mozilla, so that's a moot point.
Why are you engaging him in a pissing contest? First, he's full of
piss, as anyone readings these NGs can see. Second, if *!Ha!* he
should happen to see sense one day, what would he have left?
FUD's for chumps.

hfx_ben




Re: Moz 0.9.8 completely fails for me

2002-02-05 Thread Ben Tremblay

basic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> note that it is advisable to uninstall previous versions or at least install a 
> new version to a seperate directory because there might be conflicts and 
> problems due to differences between versions (specially if one has installed 
> addons and have done some customization).
Bearing in mind that nightlies are there for developers / hackers,
this is entirely reasonable. The milestones are always there for folkz
who want to take the moz-lizard for a test flight.
 
> Sometimes older profiles could also be causing issues. If you want you could 
> investigate exactly what is causing the problem (by maybe trying to narrow
> down  which file and then which line is causing the problem).
Good entry into productive hacking / debugging. Not being a C
programmer doens't mean not getting into the cycle.

> Alternatively backup of all your profiles (including the registry.dat file). 
1
> Delete the profiles dir (including the registry.dat file).
2

> Start moz. Create new profiles.
Count that as one more ... so, 3

> Shut down moz.
3.5

> copy old profiles info into new profiles.
4.5 ... no, 5

> remember not  to copy XUL.mfl and panacea.dat.
*sigh*

> Remember to search all files within the profile for the absolute path of
> the old profile (there is at least some in the the  prefs.js file if you are
> using mailnews) and replace it with the path of the new  profile.
Good grief!   I'm gonna call it 7 steps, just cuz I'm feeling grouchy.


_That_ is not so simple; _that_ is a royal pain.
The fact that so many folkz are diligent about this sorta thing (bad
in the beginning, bad in the end ... ya can't be debugging if you
don't know what you started with) doesn't change the fact that it's a
royal pain. For all those good people who are looking at this as the
only thing to do (which it is, if you wanna walk a deterministic
path), I think it should be acknowledged as such.

> basic
hfx_ben




Java2 1.4.0 Release Candidate not compatible with Mozilla 0.9.8 for Windows?

2002-02-05 Thread Jeffrey W. Franklin

I am having trouble getting Java2 Runtime Plugin 1.4 Release Candidate
to run with Mozilla 0.9.8 and also Netscape 4.7x on Windows platforms.
I am getting a the following error:

The Java Runtime Environment cannot be loaded from
<\bin\hotspot\jvm.dll>

The error box title is Java(TM) Plug-in 1.4 Fatal Error.

What is really strange, this version of Java Runtime is working fine
with Opera 6.  The last beta version of Java Runtime Plugin was the
exact opposite working on Netscape 4.7x and Mozilla but not Opera 6.

Anyone else having this problem?  Anyone gotten this to work?

Thank-you kindly in advance.





Are you Paying Too Much For Life Insurance? GZF

2002-02-05 Thread termquotes
  Term Quotes    Life Insurance Companies    Since 1996, term life insurance rates have been reduced by as much as 70%40 year old male - $250,000 - 10 year level termAs low as $10.45 per month!At TermQuotes Life Insurance Companies of America, we will survey the top life insurance companies for you and provide you with the best rates available. The quote is free. There is no obligation to buy. Compare the rates and see for yourself. Fill out this quick form below for further information.Results of computer survey 07-09-01Sample Annual Premiums* 10 Year Level Premium Term Rates *Age$250,000$500,000$1,000,00035$115$175$30545$210$375$67055$500$935$1,37065$1,305$2,550$4,92070$2,265$4,480$7,510*Above rates guaranteed to remain level for 10 yearsRates based on male preferred class 1 non-smoker Policies are guaranteed renewable to age 95Policies with 15, 20, 25, and 30 year level premiums also availableAttention All Smokers,you may qualify for special reduced smoker rates!Universal Life, Second-to-Die and Estate Planning products also provided.Submit This Form for a Free Term Insurance Quote!Name Insured:  Amount of Coverage:    $250,000$300,000$400,000$500,000$600,000$700,000$800,000$900,000$1,000,000Date of Birth: Month  010203040506070809101112  Day  01020304050607080910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031 Year Sex:  Male  Female Height:  FT in Weight:  lbs.Occupation:  xxxHave You Ever Had:High Blood Pressure  Yes  No Heart Attack or Stroke  Yes  No Cancer  Yes  No Diabetes  Yes  No Mother, Father, Sister, Brother Diagnosed or Died of Cancer or Cardiovascular Disease Before Age 60  Yes  No Have You  Smoked Within the Last 12 Months  Yes  No xxxPerson Completing Request:  Mailing Address:   City:  State  Zip Daytime Phone:  Evening Phone:   Email Address:   Best time to contact:  Morning After noon Evening Weekend When you click submit it may start your spell check, so please click "Ignore" if it does.  YOUR INTERNET ADVERTISING CopyrightÿA91999-2002. All Rights ReservedThis could be your ad!Email Us for free quotes and consultations.If you think, that you will not benefit from this correspondence, please reply with ÿ93remove keyÿ94 as the subject matter.





SVG Support?

2002-02-05 Thread Siegfried Heintze

What is the scoop with SVG support? Are those croczilla folks still working
on it? Is anyone working on it?

I'm really need  for my web presentation and I'm wondering if I
can expect it soon. I bought corel draw specifically becaue it could output
SVG but now I have learned that Mozilla only takes a small subset of SVG.

 Thanks,
 Sieg






You don't have to be alone on Valentine's day... 300,000 women are ready to hook up!

2002-02-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]















		









This Valentine's Day, find yourself the company of a REAL woman who wants to meet you! Don't be home alone on this holiday for lovers - wouldn't you rather be in the 
company of a , SEXY WOMAN who wants to 
show off her new lingerie?



Find your Valentine at BestMatch.com  
Over 300,000 SINGLE WOMEN are waiting for you 
at the Internet's most successful matchmaking site.

300,000 REAL WOMEN want a 
REAL MAN for REAL ROMANCE, 
and you are just the man to give it to them!
REAL SECRETARIES, REAL STUDENTS, REAL 
EXECUTIVES, REAL NURSES, REAL NEIGHBORS	



Contact them now!


		







	
		NOTE: This is not SPAM! This email was sent to you because your email was entered on a website requesting to be a registered subscriber. If you did not request this email, click here to unsubscribe
		
	









Re: In Agent just use kill filter Author: JTK

2002-02-05 Thread spot

On Tue, 05 Feb 2002 18:57:31 GMT, El Torito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>works great!


It does!  This is a great newgroup again.






Re: Wish - key bindings for switching tabs

2002-02-05 Thread Neil Durant

Pratik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On 02/05/2002 02:53 PM, Neil Durant wrote:
>> It would be great to be able have key bindings for moving to the 
>>next/previous Mozilla tab window!
>
>Your wish was granted a long time ago. Try Ctrl-PgUp, Ctrl-PgDown

Aha, splendid, thanks!  8)

Is this documented anywhere in Mozilla?  I couldn't find it in the help.

Neil
-- 
Neil Durant
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




Re: Google search from URL line gone?

2002-02-05 Thread Dan Howard

grayrest wrote:
> Bill Sheppard wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>> Just installed Moz 0.98.  It looks like the Google search option while 
>> entering text in the URL box is gone.  Is this by design?
>>
>> Bill
>>
> 
> No, I'm using 0.9.8+ (nighlies since the branch and the google search 
> has always been there, as well as on branch builds and pre-branch). You 
> may want to check the preferences to make sure that google is your 
> selected search engine (edit>preferences>navigator>Internet Search), but 
> I find it more convenient to set up a keyword shortcut, as seen at 
> . I set gg for a 
> google search, gi for a google image search, ggr for a google group 
> search, it's much easier.
> 
> grayrest
> 

Also check the Location Bar Autocomplete setting on the Smart Browsing 
tab.  Advanced lets you control the autocomplete behavior, including 
whether to show a search link.





Re: Just installed Mozilla 0.9.8 (Linux)

2002-02-05 Thread Kryptolus

John F. Kohler wrote:
> Hello, everyone,
> 
> I just installed the rpm version of 0.9.8 in my AMD PC under Red Hat
> Linux 7.2
> and it is working ok so far.
> 
> It does not have Java in it as received.  I need to learn where to
> download
> a copy of Java to use with the browser.
> 
> John Kohler
> Daly City
> 
> 
> 
> 

http://java.sun.com ... have fun =)





Just installed Mozilla 0.9.8 (Linux)

2002-02-05 Thread John F. Kohler

Hello, everyone,

I just installed the rpm version of 0.9.8 in my AMD PC under Red Hat
Linux 7.2
and it is working ok so far.

It does not have Java in it as received.  I need to learn where to
download
a copy of Java to use with the browser.

John Kohler
Daly City





Re: 0.9.8 and news.bbc.co.uk

2002-02-05 Thread David King

I see the large font problem, which is fixed by hitting the reload 
button, except as you note the "around the world" section.

I'd suggest you file a bug report on this.

I'm running Win 98SE using 0.9.8 release. (2002020406)

michael lefevre wrote:
> just upgraded from 0.9.7 and now http://news.bbc.co.uk/ looks rather
> screwy (fonts too large for the spaces they are in - selecting the text
> selects the area where the text should be, not where it is - first page
> load all the news was in a large font, on reloading the page only the
> "around the world now" section was affected.






Re: installing milestones

2002-02-05 Thread Bill Sheppard

Bob Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>I have been installing milestones since about 0.9.1.
>They have worked well.
>1. uninstall mozilla
>2. copy plugins to temp dir
>3. remove directory just in case \program files\mozilla.org
>4. install milestone
>5. copy plugins back

>I have read that some people recommend removing the profile info also. 
>What are the advantages? Disadvantages?
>If I do it how do I save my mail history?
>1. copy "Mail" and "ImapMail" dirs to temp
>2. Setup new profile
>3. copy back mail dirs.

>Would this work? Is there a better way?

I've been taking a simpler approach.  When I see a new release is available 
(only been doing this with milestones) I rename the old Mozilla directory to 
Mozilla.97 (or whatever's appropriate), install the new release to Mozilla 
(which means it is creating a new directory), and then delete the second 
previous version (Mozilla.96).  This means that I've still got the old version 
to fall back on if necessary, and I can easily copy plugins from the previous 
version to the current version.  I haven't seen any problems with profile 
information, although you could certainly take the advice of the previous 
poster and delete all profile information other than bookmarks, news, mail, 
and prefs.

Bill
-- 
@@@   *** Delete obvious part of email address for direct replies ***
* @@@ * 
  *@@*  
 -\*cyclone "at" sonic "dot" net




Re: Mozilla becomes viable in 2007 (if the world stands still) (was: Re: Excessive bugs mean Mozilla's death!)

2002-02-05 Thread rkaa

JTK wrote:
[snip]

> 0.73%.

[snip]

TheCounter.Com is the only counter I found which over the past half year 
shows Windows 3.* growth accellerating. To me that sounds unlikely to be 
correct, and it might indicate that theCounter.com are also targeting 
some "narrow groups".

But regardless: I find a timeline more interesting than a single figure.
So here are the "worst case" numbers: theCounter.com's percentages for 
"Netscape 5" and Netscape 6.* at end of months:

2001   2001   2001   2002
June   Okt.   Nov.   Jan.

0.26   0.51   0.66   0.86


It may be accurate or not, but it does seems to show a trend. It also 
indicates that since July 2001, users have more than tripled.

During these months, corresponding figures for Opera are:

0.28   0.31   0.33   0.41

Not impressive, but I thought it might interest.


K.





Re: Odd page rendering

2002-02-05 Thread Mikhail Sogrine

barney wrote:
> http://www.everywine.co.uk/preston17/brownbros/BBgift.html
> 
> When this page is first loaded, it's usually layed out all wrong.  Hit
> Reload, and the layout fixes itself for the most part, but the
> stylesheet isn't applied.  I didn't see anything in the source code that
> might cause this odd rendering, then I looked at the Page Info and
> Character Encoding UTF-16LE caught my eye.  There isn't any charset
> coded in the page itself, so I guess this is coming from the server.
> 
> Is UTF-16LE for real, and is it the likely reason the page renders badly
> and the stylesheet is ignored?  BTW, all of the links on this page lead
> to generated pages, iso-8859-1, that render perfectly fine, styles and
> all.  This static page seems to be the odd man out.
> 
> 

For me it was even stranger. First, page was loaded and looked fine. But 
after reload, it showed the html-text in some unicode format, probably 
not recognizing that it is unicode (i.e. it shows 2 symbols for 1 
character). Changing charset manually to UTF-16LE fixes page again.





Re: Odd page rendering

2002-02-05 Thread barney

Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
> barney wrote:
>> http://www.everywine.co.uk/preston17/brownbros/BBgift.html
>> 
>> When this page is first loaded, it's usually layed out all wrong.  Hit
>> Reload, and the layout fixes itself for the most part, but the
>> stylesheet isn't applied.
> 
> I see a lot of questions marks instead of letters. Reload fixes it. No 
> problems with the style sheet for me.
> 
> 

At least you're initially seeing question marks, so there is something
quirky about this page.  In mozilla, my default font gets used, but I
see a mix of question marks and Asian characters in the status bar when
I mousover links.  It's odd that the stylesheet loads for you and
refuses to do so for me.

In NS 6.2 (old stuff, I know), all I see is a bunch of squares instead
of text no matter what character encoding or font I pick.  At least it's
readable in mozilla, but nothing seems to get the stylesheet loaded on
this page.  It loads just dandy the first time in NS4 and Opera5.

I notice you're in Europe, I'm in the US, and it's a UK site.  Maybe
it's a European thing that I don't happen to have in my mozilla or NS6
configuration?  I'd hate to file a bug only to find out it's something
in my setup.  That's embarassing. :)





Re: Default paper size

2002-02-05 Thread Parish

Pratik wrote:
> On 02/05/2002 02:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> is there a way to set the default paper size to a4? Mozilla doesn't 
>> remember a thing about the paper size.
>> 
>> Thanx
>> 
>> Christoph
>> 
>> 
> 
> Thats annonying bug 118563
> 
> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118563
> 

It just got my vote.

> Pratik.
> 
> 



-- 
Software is like sex, it's better when it's free  - Linus Torvalds

Anti-spam e-mail address, change _AT_, sorry for the inconvenience





Re: Default paper size

2002-02-05 Thread Parish

Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
> Try quiting Moz/N6/ Communicator/whatever then going to printer setup
> from Control Panels (I believe I'm right on this been a while since I
> looked at PC side of things.) go to printer Setup and try setting to A4 there.
> 

It is already set to A4 there, and always has been, every other app I 
print from defaults to A4. This is also true at work where my PC alsd 
runs W2K and has 5 printers (all network) set up - all default to A4 in 
every app.

It appears to be Moz specific. I'll keep digging..


> That should make it systemwide.  Then go back to
> Moz/N6/Communicator/Whatever and see what is set.
> 
> Report back with results.
> 
> Parish wrote:
>> 
>> Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
>>  > I don't know about PC/UNIX side of things but, Page size (Print) Mac is
>>  > the responsibility of the print Driver/Chooser file for the printer.
>>  > Communicator/Moz/Netscape 6 add specific items; but page size is not the
>>  > browser's part.  The browser typically  sets: Header and footer items
>>  > whether they print left, right, Center. Whether backgrounds are printed.
>>  > And whether "fit to page", is turned on or off. Nothing else.
>>  >
>>  > Page size is detremined between the Printer, Print driver and the
>> Computer.
>>  >
>> 
>> Hmmm, Moz appears to be "interfering" with that on Windows (W2K at least).
>> 
>> I just printed out this message, File->Print, then clicked the
>> Properties button next to the printer list drop-down, then, on the next
>> dialogue (the layout may vary here depending on your printer - mine's an
>> HP 610C), clicked Advanced on the Layout tab and the paper size was
>> Letter. I changed it to A4, printed the message, then did File->Print
>> again, checked the properties and the paper size had reverted to Letter.
>> 
>> I found a pref, print.use_global_printsettings, which is set to "false".
>> I tried changing that to "true" (and restarting Moz) but it made no
>> difference.
>> 
>>  > On modern USB HP Printers when runing the Driver file(s) The installer
>>  > ask whether to set A4 or 8-1/2 x11 as default setup. (at least the
>>  > installer for the 990cse Does).
>>  >
>>  > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>  >>
>>  >> Hello,
>>  >>
>>  >> is there a way to set the default paper size to a4? Mozilla doesn't
>>  >> remember a thing about the paper size.
>>  >>
>>  >> Thanx
>>  >>
>>  >> Christoph
>>  >
>>  >
>> 
>> --
>> Software is like sex, it's better when it's free  - Linus Torvalds
>> 
>> Anti-spam e-mail address, change _AT_, sorry for the inconvenience
> 
> 



-- 
Software is like sex, it's better when it's free  - Linus Torvalds

Anti-spam e-mail address, change _AT_, sorry for the inconvenience





Re: Moz 0.9.8 completely fails for me

2002-02-05 Thread basic

note that it is advisable to uninstall previous versions or at least install a 
new version to a seperate directory because there might be conflicts and 
problems due to differences between versions (specially if one has installed 
addons and have done some customization).

Sometimes older profiles could also be causing issues. If you want you could 
investigate exactly what is causing the problem (by maybe trying to narrow down 
which file and then which line is causing the problem).

Alternatively backup of all your profiles (including the registry.dat file). 
Delete the profiles dir (including the registry.dat file). Start moz. Create new 
profiles. Shut down moz. copy old profiles info into new profiles. remember not 
to copy XUL.mfl and panacea.dat. Remember to search all files within the profile 
for the absolute path of the old profile (there is at least some in the the 
prefs.js file if you are using mailnews) and replace it with the path of the new 
profile.

basic

Jeroen Roeterd wrote:
> Marc Schuette wrote:
> 
>> i always uninstall old version first and then install new version. 
>> have not
>> had a problem with any of the main point releases. uninstall first then
>> install no matter jeroen says.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>> I just installed the talkback installer over a .97 and it is working
>>> perfectly. Windows 2000.
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>> Jeroen Roeterd
>>>
> 
> I just wanted to point out that installing over an old install is not 
> always generating a problem. I was just informing everybody that, 
> according to my experience, it is not a must to uninstall 0.97 first. 
> You can do it, sure why not.
> 
> :-)
> 
> Greetings,
> Jeroen Roeterd
> 





Re: LittleMozilla is updated for latest builds (0.9.8-)

2002-02-05 Thread Bork

<...>
> Mozilla0.9.6 seemed on its way to something,but things went downhill after
> that. Please,tell me that I am wrong.
> Thanks.
> --
> Fulvio Perini
 Omaha,NE 68124


Yoa are wrong ;))
Tomek





Is there a simple way to limit the browser to only one window?

2002-02-05 Thread Oliver White

Hi folks,

we're developing a web based reports system for our train control
system, based on the mozilla browser with a few XUL customisations.
We'd like to run one and only one window, so that should mozilla be
launched again, the currently running window is put into focus, or if
there is no window open, a new one is launched.

If you kind folks could point me to the appropriate section of code,
that would be great.

TIA,

Oliver White




0.9.8 and news.bbc.co.uk

2002-02-05 Thread michael lefevre

just upgraded from 0.9.7 and now http://news.bbc.co.uk/ looks rather
screwy (fonts too large for the spaces they are in - selecting the text
selects the area where the text should be, not where it is - first page
load all the news was in a large font, on reloading the page only the
"around the world now" section was affected.

does this happen to others? is this a mozilla problem or a problem with
the site?

i'm using:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204

-- 
michael




RE: mozilla.org releases Mozilla 0.9.8

2002-02-05 Thread Curt Hibbs

How do I get a list of the 1500 bugs that were fixed?

Thanks,
Curt Hibbs

> -Original Message-
> From: Asa Dotzler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 7:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: mozilla.org releases Mozilla 0.9.8
> 
> 
> On February 4, 2002 mozilla.org made available for download binaries of 
> the Mozilla 0.9.8 Milestone.  The builds and release notes are
> availbable at http://www.mozilla.org/releases/.  New to this milestone
> are fixes for about 1,500 bugs including:
> 
> * Hebrew is now supported on Solaris. Hebrew and Arabic now supported
>on Mac OS systems that have the proper language pack installed.
>Pasting is busted (Bug 119877) and there are still some open issues
>related to keyboard input and UI fonts. (Bugs 119860, 119882,
>120048, 120334, 121126)
> * Thanks to the new nsITheme API, the classic theme now has native
>looking widgets on Mac OS X and Windows XP.
> * There are several address book improvements.
>* You can now print individual cards (this has been broken for
>  several milestones), print cards from any address book, or print
>  the contents of an entire address book.
>* Much improved performance. (For details see the test results
>  http://www.mozilla.org/mailnews/performance/abookperf.html)
>* You can now export to txt, tab and csv and LDIF.
>* The address book now has quick search.
>* Cards with addresses in the USA have a new Get Map button in the
>  card preview pane which creates a map for that address at
>  mapquest.com
> * Mozilla supports MNG and JNG.
> * Dynamic theme switching works again. You can (usually) switch themes
>without restarting the browser although there are still some bugs.
> * Mozilla no longer reads /favicon.ico images by default although
>Mozilla still reads page icons defined with the  tag. Set the
>following pref to turn the feature back on.
>user_pref("browser.chrome.favicons",true);
> * Files automatically downloaded by clicking on a link are now renamed
>to the correct name when the download finishes.
> * DOM Inspector is now included on Mac OS builds.
> * On Mac OS, downloaded files that are passed off to a helper
>application are no longer deleted when Mozilla exits.
> * Composer is now able to generate CSS inline styles instead of
>deprecated HTML elements and/or attributes.
> 
> See the Release Notes for more info.
> 
> --Asa
> 
> 
> 




Re: IMG ALT as tooltip?

2002-02-05 Thread Christian Biesinger

Pigeon wrote:
> I'm wondering if mozilla has the feature to display the ALT 
> attribute of the  tag as tooltip on mouseover?

No and it will never have. ALT is supposed to be displayed if the
image could not be loaded, while TITLE is intended to be shown as tooltip.

-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  -- Benjamin Franklin





netscape 6.2.1 & linux

2002-02-05 Thread Jens Georg

hi,

i have a nasty bug here with my linuxbox (latest kde 2) running 
netscape 6.2.1: except for the root account, all windows have missing 
menuentries i.e. the "file" menu is missing completely.
i think there is some trouble with the user rights, but i cannot find 
which file i have to alter in order to fix this.

regards,
jens





Re: Some problems please help

2002-02-05 Thread grayrest

Matthias Herrmann wrote:
> Hello Newsgroup
> I've got this problem about last week but my friends don't so I think it 
> isn't a bug...
> There is no possilbility for me to go a page Back in the Browser!
> No Back button no right-click, Back, not even Javascript:history(-1) 
> works. I don't know what do do I've just installed 0.9.8 but it still 
> won't work...

This sounds like a corrupted history file. Delete your history file 
(history.mab in your mozilla user directory) and try again. The rest I 
have no idea about.

grayrest





Re: Some problems please help

2002-02-05 Thread dman84

Matthias Herrmann wrote:
> Hello Newsgroup
> I've got this problem about last week but my friends don't so I think it 
> isn't a bug...
> There is no possilbility for me to go a page Back in the Browser!
> No Back button no right-click, Back, not even Javascript:history(-1) 
> works. I don't know what do do I've just installed 0.9.8 but it still 
> won't work...
> 
> Some smaller probs I've got for a while but which weren't very bad...
> I marked 2 Mail accounts to chekc for new messages at startup but only 
> one of them checks..
> 
> Another question is how can I sort my Newsgroups?
> The're very chaotic
> Hope you can help me
> Hermi
> 

dont install over top of new builds, and use a new profile, and if your 
on windows, try deleting registry keys for Mozilla and Mozilla.org 
folders before reinstalling a new build.  That should fix your problems.

-dman84





Re: IMG ALT as tooltip?

2002-02-05 Thread dman84

Chris Gushue wrote:
> Pigeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 
>>  I'm wondering if mozilla has the feature to display the ALT 
>>  attribute of the  tag as tooltip on mouseover?
>>
>>  AFAIK netscape 4 is doing that, and probably IE too.
>>
> 
> The proper way to do that would be to use the TITLE="" attribute of the
> IMG tag. Even IE will show that as the tooltip if it's there. Mozilla
> does the Right Thing in not displaying the ALT attribute as a tooltip.
> 
> If there is an option to make Mozilla display ALT="" as a tooltip, I
> don't know about it...
> 
> I thought it was a bug until I did some searching on it.
> 
> 

I suggested that a while back, probably in the same bug report.





Re: Odd page rendering

2002-02-05 Thread Jonas Jørgensen

barney wrote:
> http://www.everywine.co.uk/preston17/brownbros/BBgift.html
> 
> When this page is first loaded, it's usually layed out all wrong.  Hit
> Reload, and the layout fixes itself for the most part, but the
> stylesheet isn't applied.

I see a lot of questions marks instead of letters. Reload fixes it. No 
problems with the style sheet for me.

-- 
Hvis svaret er Anders Fogh så er spørgsmålet dumt.





Re: M 0.9.8: Mail and News still not working via socks?

2002-02-05 Thread dman84

Alex Baumeister wrote:
> I just installed 0.9.8 (Win).
> Mail/News still ignores my proxy settings.
> I entered my socks server hostname and tried socks 4 as well as socks 5.
> Mozilla always tries to go the direkt way via port 110 (pop3) /119
> (nntp).
> 
> I hardly can believe this. Since 0.9.3 I am waiting for socks to work.
> So, who ever sitting behind a firewall can use mozilla for mail or news?
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
> 

I think there is hidden preference for this.. see pratik.

http://www.geocities.com/pratiksolanki/





Re: Google search from URL line gone?

2002-02-05 Thread grayrest

Bill Sheppard wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Just installed Moz 0.98.  It looks like the Google search option while 
> entering text in the URL box is gone.  Is this by design?
> 
> Bill
> 

No, I'm using 0.9.8+ (nighlies since the branch and the google search 
has always been there, as well as on branch builds and pre-branch). You 
may want to check the preferences to make sure that google is your 
selected search engine (edit>preferences>navigator>Internet Search), but 
I find it more convenient to set up a keyword shortcut, as seen at 
. I set gg for a 
google search, gi for a google image search, ggr for a google group 
search, it's much easier.

grayrest





Re: Moz 0.9.8 completely fails for me

2002-02-05 Thread Jeroen Roeterd

Marc Schuette wrote:
> i always uninstall old version first and then install new version. have not
> had a problem with any of the main point releases. uninstall first then
> install no matter jeroen says.




>>I just installed the talkback installer over a .97 and it is working
>>perfectly. Windows 2000.
>>
>>Greetings,
>>Jeroen Roeterd
>>

I just wanted to point out that installing over an old install is not 
always generating a problem. I was just informing everybody that, 
according to my experience, it is not a must to uninstall 0.97 first. 
You can do it, sure why not.

:-)

Greetings,
Jeroen Roeterd





Re: Default paper size

2002-02-05 Thread Pratik

On 02/05/2002 02:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> is there a way to set the default paper size to a4? Mozilla doesn't 
> remember a thing about the paper size.
> 
> Thanx
> 
> Christoph
> 
> 

Thats annonying bug 118563

http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118563

Pratik.





Re: IMG ALT as tooltip?

2002-02-05 Thread Chris Gushue

Pigeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>   I'm wondering if mozilla has the feature to display the ALT 
>   attribute of the  tag as tooltip on mouseover?
> 
>   AFAIK netscape 4 is doing that, and probably IE too.

The proper way to do that would be to use the TITLE="" attribute of the
IMG tag. Even IE will show that as the tooltip if it's there. Mozilla
does the Right Thing in not displaying the ALT attribute as a tooltip.

If there is an option to make Mozilla display ALT="" as a tooltip, I
don't know about it...

I thought it was a bug until I did some searching on it.

-- 
Chris Gushue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
mutt config files - http://mutt.blackplasma.net
bplog news system - http://bplog.blackplasma.net




Re: IMG ALT as tooltip?

2002-02-05 Thread Pratik

On 02/05/2002 04:41 PM, Pigeon wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
>   I'm wondering if mozilla has the feature to display the ALT attribute of 
> the  tag as tooltip on mouseover?
> 
>   AFAIK netscape 4 is doing that, and probably IE too.
> 
>   Thanks...
> 
> 
> Pigeon.


Sigh... and the question gets asked again... See this thread

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&threadm=slrna60433.orm.choess%40force.stwing.upenn.edu&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dmsgid%253Aslrna60433.orm.choess%2540force.stwing.upenn.edu%26hl%3Den%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch

Pratik.






Re: IMG ALT as tooltip?

2002-02-05 Thread Patrick Gallagher

Pigeon wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'm wondering if mozilla has the feature to display the ALT 
> attribute of the  tag as tooltip on mouseover?
>
> AFAIK netscape 4 is doing that, and probably IE too.
>
> Thanks...
>
>
> Pigeon.
>
use the TITLE attribute of the  tag - the ALT is only for alternate 
text in the event an image doesn't load properly, or someone is using a 
text only browser. Previous browsers allowed for this, but it was an 
incorrect usage.

Patrick





Some problems please help

2002-02-05 Thread Matthias Herrmann

Hello Newsgroup
I've got this problem about last week but my friends don't so I think it 
isn't a bug...
There is no possilbility for me to go a page Back in the Browser!
No Back button no right-click, Back, not even Javascript:history(-1) 
works. I don't know what do do I've just installed 0.9.8 but it still 
won't work...

Some smaller probs I've got for a while but which weren't very bad...
I marked 2 Mail accounts to chekc for new messages at startup but only 
one of them checks..

Another question is how can I sort my Newsgroups?
The're very chaotic
Hope you can help me
Hermi





IMG ALT as tooltip?

2002-02-05 Thread Pigeon

Hi all,

I'm wondering if mozilla has the feature to display the ALT attribute of 
the  tag as tooltip on mouseover?

AFAIK netscape 4 is doing that, and probably IE too.

Thanks...


Pigeon.





Odd page rendering

2002-02-05 Thread barney

When this page is first loaded, it's usually layed out all wrong.  Hit
Reload, and the layout fixes itself for the most part, but the
stylesheet isn't applied.  I didn't see anything in the source code that
might cause this odd rendering, then I looked at the Page Info and
Character Encoding UTF-16LE caught my eye.  There isn't any charset
coded in the page itself, so I guess this is coming from the server.

Is UTF-16LE for real, and is it the likely reason the page renders badly
and the stylesheet is ignored?  BTW, all of the links on this page lead
to generated pages, iso-8859-1, that render perfectly fine, styles and
all.  This static page seems to be the odd man out.





Re: Mozilla becomes viable in 2007 (if the world stands still) (was: Re: Excessive bugs mean Mozilla's death!)

2002-02-05 Thread DeMoN LaG

JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 
05 Feb 2002:

> 0.73%.  Suck it down LaGgy.
> 

http://www.upsdell.com/BrowserNews/stat_trends.htm

"
* Mozilla and Netscape 6.x: ~0.85% of page accesses. This has grown 
significantly since the release of Netscape 6.1.
"

Since it already beat's Opera's stats on the same 3 sources, I'd say 
it's winning.  One could argue that Opera can spoof as IE, but so can 
Mozilla, so that's a moot point.  

-- 
ICQ: N/A (temporarily)
AIM: FlyersR1 9
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_ = m




M 0.9.8: Mail and News still not working via socks?

2002-02-05 Thread Alex Baumeister

I just installed 0.9.8 (Win).
Mail/News still ignores my proxy settings.
I entered my socks server hostname and tried socks 4 as well as socks 5.
Mozilla always tries to go the direkt way via port 110 (pop3) /119
(nntp).

I hardly can believe this. Since 0.9.3 I am waiting for socks to work.
So, who ever sitting behind a firewall can use mozilla for mail or news?

Alex






Re: Excessive bugs mean Mozilla's death!

2002-02-05 Thread Sören Kuklau

Andrea Monni wrote:
> Sören Kuklau wrote:
>> Ihighly doubt that it works on Opera. I highly doubt that it would 
>> ever work on Opera. Those great guys from Norway working on Opera 
>> still didn't get around to implement full DOM support.

> Reading this thread a weird idea came to my mind: what if the Opera guys 
> dropped their rendering engine and swiched to Gecko and focused on the 
> user experience?

Wouldn't be bad. They do know how to make a nice browser from the point 
of user experience. Would support them.

-- 
Regards,
Sören Kuklau ('Chucker')
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: Mozilla becomes viable in 2007 (if the world stands still) (was: Re: Excessive bugs mean Mozilla's death!)

2002-02-05 Thread JTK

DeMoN LaG wrote:
> JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05 Feb 2002:
> 
> 
>>Looks like the most reliable number there is 0.85% today.  A far cry
>>from LaGgy's mystical 3%, no?
>>
> 
> 3 sites targetted: .85, 1.2, 8.1.

Three sites.  My numbers cover thousands.  I win.  Your lies lose.

>  Averaged together, 3.83%.  Far cry 
> off from your mystical .75 also.  You realize a really good reason that 
> Mozilla has no thecounter.com statistics is because of how rare they 
> are?

Rare?  Do they cover more than three sites?

>  And even still, four of my friends use Mozilla's sweet sweet image 
> blocking to block out counters.

Why aren't they using Proxomitron for that?

 >  Couple that with something like
> Proxomitron, and to any counter Mozilla is non existant

And I use proxomitron, so my IE is non-existant to any counter.  And 
since so many more people are using IE, so many more are using 
Proxomitron.  So it balances out, doesn't it LaGgy?  Or don't you 
understand basic statistics?  Or don't you want to?

0.73%.  Suck it down LaGgy.





Re: In Agent just use kill filter Author: JTK

2002-02-05 Thread user

El Torito wrote:
> works great!

Be sure to put in "Subject: Truth" in there as well.





Google search from URL line gone?

2002-02-05 Thread Bill Sheppard

Hello,

Just installed Moz 0.98.  It looks like the Google search option while 
entering text in the URL box is gone.  Is this by design?

Bill
-- 
@@@   *** Delete obvious part of email address for direct replies ***
* @@@ * 
  *@@*  
 -\*cyclone "at" sonic "dot" net




Re: Default paper size

2002-02-05 Thread Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.

Try quiting Moz/N6/ Communicator/whatever then going to printer setup
from Control Panels (I believe I'm right on this been a while since I
looked at PC side of things.) go to printer Setup and try setting to A4 there.

That should make it systemwide.  Then go back to
Moz/N6/Communicator/Whatever and see what is set.

Report back with results.

Parish wrote:
> 
> Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
>  > I don't know about PC/UNIX side of things but, Page size (Print) Mac is
>  > the responsibility of the print Driver/Chooser file for the printer.
>  > Communicator/Moz/Netscape 6 add specific items; but page size is not the
>  > browser's part.  The browser typically  sets: Header and footer items
>  > whether they print left, right, Center. Whether backgrounds are printed.
>  > And whether "fit to page", is turned on or off. Nothing else.
>  >
>  > Page size is detremined between the Printer, Print driver and the
> Computer.
>  >
> 
> Hmmm, Moz appears to be "interfering" with that on Windows (W2K at least).
> 
> I just printed out this message, File->Print, then clicked the
> Properties button next to the printer list drop-down, then, on the next
> dialogue (the layout may vary here depending on your printer - mine's an
> HP 610C), clicked Advanced on the Layout tab and the paper size was
> Letter. I changed it to A4, printed the message, then did File->Print
> again, checked the properties and the paper size had reverted to Letter.
> 
> I found a pref, print.use_global_printsettings, which is set to "false".
> I tried changing that to "true" (and restarting Moz) but it made no
> difference.
> 
>  > On modern USB HP Printers when runing the Driver file(s) The installer
>  > ask whether to set A4 or 8-1/2 x11 as default setup. (at least the
>  > installer for the 990cse Does).
>  >
>  > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>  >>
>  >> Hello,
>  >>
>  >> is there a way to set the default paper size to a4? Mozilla doesn't
>  >> remember a thing about the paper size.
>  >>
>  >> Thanx
>  >>
>  >> Christoph
>  >
>  >
> 
> --
> Software is like sex, it's better when it's free  - Linus Torvalds
> 
> Anti-spam e-mail address, change _AT_, sorry for the inconvenience

-- 
---
Phillip M. Jones, CET  |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:276-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
---

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]









Re: Updating

2002-02-05 Thread Travis Crump

short answer: no.

Martin Hoeller wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Is ther a way to update mozilla from 0.9.7 to 0.9.8 without downloading 
> the full release?
> I'm using mozilla for Win32.
> 
> thx, Martin
> 





Re: Wish - key bindings for switching tabs

2002-02-05 Thread Christopher Rued

On 2002.02.05 14:53 Neil Durant wrote:
> It would be great to be able have key bindings for moving to the 
> next/previous Mozilla tab window!

Ctrl+PgUp and Ctrl+PgUp




Re: Shared Address Book Prob

2002-02-05 Thread Roland Felnhofer

Alex Justo wrote:
> I'm trying to get a department to share an address book. I finally
> figured out how to store the address book in a server so that many users
> can access it from a central location. Unfortunately when one user has
> it open, nobody else can open it ! It seems that messenger locks the
> file for excluvive access or something along those lines. Anyone knows
> how to get around this ?? Any help would be appreciated.
> 
> Thank you
> 
> Alex
> 
> 

If your want to share an address book I would recommend to setup an LDAP 
server.

You can use any old PC - install linux and OpenLDAP on it - relay not a 
big deal and not expensive.

I'm using an old ASUS T2P4 with a Pentium 166 MHz and 42 MB Ram. It also 
  acts as Domain controller (Samba TNG), mail server, ...

Cheers
Roland





Re: Mozilla becomes viable in 2007 (if the world stands still) (was: Re: Excessive bugs mean Mozilla's death!)

2002-02-05 Thread DeMoN LaG

JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05 Feb 2002:

> Looks like the most reliable number there is 0.85% today.  A far cry
> from LaGgy's mystical 3%, no?

3 sites targetted: .85, 1.2, 8.1.  Averaged together, 3.83%.  Far cry 
off from your mystical .75 also.  You realize a really good reason that 
Mozilla has no thecounter.com statistics is because of how rare they 
are?  And even still, four of my friends use Mozilla's sweet sweet image 
blocking to block out counters.  Couple that with something like 
Proxomitron, and to any counter Mozilla is non existant

-- 
ICQ: N/A (temporarily)
AIM: FlyersR1 9
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_ = m




Re: Wish - key bindings for switching tabs

2002-02-05 Thread Pratik

On 02/05/2002 02:53 PM, Neil Durant wrote:
> It would be great to be able have key bindings for moving to the 
> next/previous Mozilla tab window!

Your wish was granted a long time ago. Try Ctrl-PgUp, Ctrl-PgDown

Pratik.






Wish - key bindings for switching tabs

2002-02-05 Thread Neil Durant

It would be great to be able have key bindings for moving to the 
next/previous Mozilla tab window!

-- 
Neil Durant
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




anti-aliased fonts in mozilla

2002-02-05 Thread Ralinx

hello
i would _really_ like to get anti-aliased fonts in moz
Now i've heard about ways to enable them in Mozilla but so far i haven't 
been able to get it working.  Could some of u tell me how this can be done?

btw, please don't recommend the  gdkxft patch cuz i already tried that one 
numerous times.




Re: Default paper size

2002-02-05 Thread Parish

Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
 > I don't know about PC/UNIX side of things but, Page size (Print) Mac is
 > the responsibility of the print Driver/Chooser file for the printer.
 > Communicator/Moz/Netscape 6 add specific items; but page size is not the
 > browser's part.  The browser typically  sets: Header and footer items
 > whether they print left, right, Center. Whether backgrounds are printed.
 > And whether "fit to page", is turned on or off. Nothing else.
 >
 > Page size is detremined between the Printer, Print driver and the 
Computer.
 >

Hmmm, Moz appears to be "interfering" with that on Windows (W2K at least).

I just printed out this message, File->Print, then clicked the
Properties button next to the printer list drop-down, then, on the next
dialogue (the layout may vary here depending on your printer - mine's an
HP 610C), clicked Advanced on the Layout tab and the paper size was
Letter. I changed it to A4, printed the message, then did File->Print
again, checked the properties and the paper size had reverted to Letter.

I found a pref, print.use_global_printsettings, which is set to "false". 
I tried changing that to "true" (and restarting Moz) but it made no 
difference.

 > On modern USB HP Printers when runing the Driver file(s) The installer
 > ask whether to set A4 or 8-1/2 x11 as default setup. (at least the
 > installer for the 990cse Does).
 >
 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 >>
 >> Hello,
 >>
 >> is there a way to set the default paper size to a4? Mozilla doesn't
 >> remember a thing about the paper size.
 >>
 >> Thanx
 >>
 >> Christoph
 >
 >



-- 
Software is like sex, it's better when it's free  - Linus Torvalds

Anti-spam e-mail address, change _AT_, sorry for the inconvenience






Re: Default paper size

2002-02-05 Thread gavin long

> I don't know about PC/UNIX side of things but, Page size (Print) Mac is
> the responsibility of the print Driver/Chooser file for the printer. 

Yup.  Just had a quick poke around in win32, and the paper size was 
definitely handled by the windows/print driver side, not by Moz.

-- 
gav





Updating

2002-02-05 Thread Martin Hoeller

Hi!

Is ther a way to update mozilla from 0.9.7 to 0.9.8 without downloading 
the full release?
I'm using mozilla for Win32.

thx, Martin





Re: Default paper size

2002-02-05 Thread Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.

I don't know about PC/UNIX side of things but, Page size (Print) Mac is
the responsibility of the print Driver/Chooser file for the printer. 
Communicator/Moz/Netscape 6 add specific items; but page size is not the
browser's part.  The browser typically  sets: Header and footer items
whether they print left, right, Center. Whether backgrounds are printed.
And whether "fit to page", is turned on or off. Nothing else.

Page size is detremined between the Printer, Print driver and the Computer.

On modern USB HP Printers when runing the Driver file(s) The installer
ask whether to set A4 or 8-1/2 x11 as default setup. (at least the
installer for the 990cse Does).

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> is there a way to set the default paper size to a4? Mozilla doesn't
> remember a thing about the paper size.
> 
> Thanx
> 
> Christoph

-- 
---
Phillip M. Jones, CET  |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:276-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
---

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]









In Agent just use kill filter Author: JTK

2002-02-05 Thread El Torito

works great!







Any NS6 duplicate for MSIE5 slide transition filter?

2002-02-05 Thread M.L.

I'd like to know if Netscape 6 has a slide filter similar to the one in MSIE
5+ which scrolls a new image on a layer from right to left while pushing the
old image (on the same layer) off the viewing container.

Note that this is not an image-swap slideshow, but one that shows part of
both images simultaneously until the old one has rolled off the screen, and
the new one is parked dead-center in the viewing container.

I have a js scroller that can move an image in any direction, but although I
call the scrolling subroutine BEFORE the one that writes to the layer, the
new image gets replaced too soon. It ends up looking like only the new image
has slid from right to left, followed by whitespace.

filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Slide(slideStyle='PUSH', bands=1,
duration=4)

You can see how it works by clicking the "Show Me" button at:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/workshop/author/filter/re
ference/filters/revealtrans.asp

Any ideas will be appreciated. Thanks in advance.







Re: Weird & Ugly ZOOM

2002-02-05 Thread barney

Vincent Nicolas wrote:
> Go to this page :
> http://www.macromedia.com/v1/handlers/index.cfm?ID=20370&Method=Full
> 
> and increase text zoom... you get a very ugly stuff !
> 
> No problem at all in IE. However, it seems than this poorly developped 
> site is not able to recognize Mozilla as it loads the same CSS than the 
> one for Netscape 4.x. Maybe the problem is here ??
> 
> I've tested it with both 0.9.7 and 0.9.8 with the same results.
> 
> 
> 

It's probably http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95267





my latest solaris builds missing Address Book (bug?)

2002-02-05 Thread Rob Somerville

i  am missing the address book icon in the bottom left of all windows, and
it is also missing from the "tasks" menu pull-down. Am i now doing sonethig 
wrong or is it a bug ?

Composer icon is also missing


please also respond to email address, hanks





Re: Moz 0.9.8 completely fails for me

2002-02-05 Thread Marc Schuette

i always uninstall old version first and then install new version. have not
had a problem with any of the main point releases. uninstall first then
install no matter jeroen says.

Jeroen Roeterd wrote:

> basic wrote:
> > firstly, don't install over older builds. Either install it in its own
> > dir or remove the older build and install the newer.
> >
> > basic
> >
> > Chuck Messenger wrote:
> >
> >> I just tried installing 0.9.8 on my Win2k machine -- over 0.9.7.  When
> >> it ran 0.9.8 for the first time, it put up a blank (all gray) window,
> >> covering the entire screen.  I tried starting it a few times, with the
> >> same result.  I tried rebooting and starting -- same result.  I then
> >> tried starting "mozilla -P chuck" to bypass the profile-selection
> >> screen.  This time, it crashed -- invalid memory access.
> >>
> >> I've never had any problems with previous Moz builds.  I tried a
> >> recent nightly -- same problems.  I then re-installed 0.9.7, and
> >> things are back to normal.
> >>
> >> Just a data point from someone out in the field...
> >>
> >>
> >> - Chuck
> >>
> >
>
> I just installed the talkback installer over a .97 and it is working
> perfectly. Windows 2000.
>
> Greetings,
> Jeroen Roeterd

--

Marc Schuette - Consolidated Supply Co.
Voice  (503) 684.5904 ext.125
Fax(503) 598.1086
Email  [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: Mozilla performance:Broadband vs. Dailup

2002-02-05 Thread Will Dormann

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have read/heard amny comments as to Mozilla's performance. Many people 
> claim Mozilla is very slow. I know that DHTML is slow, but other than 
> that I find Mozilla reasonably fast. But then I am connected to the 
> internet by a broadband cable connection.

I installed 0.9.7 on my parents machine and I was amazed at how fast it 
worked with their dialup (33.6) connection!The machine is pretty 
fast itself, though.  Duron 750 with 128MB RAM.






CV : Michelangelo of Search engine Positioning: Roberto Cescon

2002-02-05 Thread Roberto Cescon
CV : Michelangelo of Search engine Positioning: Roberto Cescon
I am Roberto Cescon the Michelangelo of Search engine Positioning.
My CV is at :
Roberto Cescon CV in search engine
optimization


Dear DOT IT,
 I can accept any free lance proposal.
 I can also deliver what I promise.(You can check my ref.)
This is my email to be forwarded to any marketing department.





I am a free freelancer for 2 companies:
A)Rapid Traffic ltd  :  commercial keyword ranking. 
B)Hyksos Eif ltd  :  banking keywords and applied
cryptography.
Hyksos Eif provides
3 things:
- High ranking with banking keywords result targeted traffic (up 10.000.
targeted keyword customer a day).
We are able to put any banking keyword up in 21 days.(with 30 days
written guarantee)
 You can see ranking examples below.
 We will provide you with weekly report about your traffic, your
ranking and may be the identity of the visitors.(only in 60% of the
servers).
 
- Free email certificates for your customers in exchange we may use
your database.(we will build a certificate authority for your company
   to enable free encryption to your sites and your customers
emails. It will be a small Verisign)
- Free anti hacking test on your servers.
We are able to do this you can phone to the Talking Pages asking for
Eif-Rapid  data recovery.
Or
You can write my name in Yahoo.

http://google.yahoo.com/bin/query?p=Roberto+Cescon&hc=0&hs=0
(The entries 1-2-3-4-6 are dedicated to me)
You will find out I am a member of IACR, Netscape Directory etc.
You can see now few example of keyword traffic:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=keyword+traffic+expert&
btnG=Google+Search

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=offshore+merchant+account

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=bank+customer+ranking&
btnG=Google+Search

http://google.yahoo.com/bin/query?p=chase+visa&hc=0&hs=1

http://www.google.com/search?q=%22electronic+payment+system%22

http://search.lycos.co.uk/cgi-bin/pursuit?matchmode=and&mtemp=main&
etemp=error&query=not+anonymous+payment+system&cat=lycos&
x=41&y=3

http://www.google.com/search?q=%22electronic+payment+system%22

http://www.google.com/search?q=SET+SSL+linux+%22Electronic+Payment+System%22
&num=30&hl=zh-CN

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&
q=merchant+account+uk+london

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=uk+merchant+account

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Merchant+Banking%22&
btnG=Google+Search

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=offshore+private+banks+UK

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=banking+offshore+jersey

http://aolsearch.aol.com/dirsearch.adp?query=jersey+offshore

http://google.yahoo.com/bin/query?p=security+tester&hc=0&hs=1

http://www.google.com/search?hl=tr&q=ssl+certificate&lr=
They are few examples of ranking the pages you will see on the domains:
eif.net
rapid-traffic.com
e-1bank.com
hyksos.com
1etrades.com
1edeal.com
Are only examples of ranking.
The only companies having a relation with us,Hyksos Eif ltd are JP
Morgan Chase, Paypal, Ford, Universal Savings Bank, Verisign.
If you will see any other name we do not suggest any kind connection.
If you are interested we can set up a meeting and discuss a small
integration
of us with you.

 
+44 (0) 771 903 50 11
+44 (0) 207 681 27 32 (fax)
+39 (0) 337 52 85 77
Roberto Cescon
MY FACE
I have an endless number of forms to express myself: sometimes simple,
sometimes philosophical, sometimes crass, sometimes artistic, sometimes
romantic, sometimes humorous, sometimes blunt. If you can embrace my
different - maybe endless - sides then you know me well, but if you
criticize me for being what I am then there is nothing I can say, nor
do I care to defend myself.I am a son of the FIRST NETWORK!,A CYBER OBJECT!
if you do not like this write to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: tooltip for image-alt-value

2002-02-05 Thread Chris Hoess

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That's not very friendly 

Pardon?  It's not very friendly to handicapped users, or those surfing 
with images off on dialup connections, to have alt text that's not 
meaningful when one can't see the picture...which is exactly what 
happens when people write tooltips.

> and not backward compatible.

You say this like it's a bad thing.  Seriously, "backward compatibility" 
on the web usually winds up perpetuating some horrible brokenness that no 
one really likes, but is too widespread to change.  Alt text is one of the 
few things we're drawing the line on.

> At least, Mozilla should provide option extending image alt to title.
> 

No.  We don't need clueless webmasters sticking title text in alt 
attributes forever.

-- 
Chris Hoess




Re: installing milestones

2002-02-05 Thread grayrest

Bob Davis wrote:
> I have been installing milestones since about 0.9.1.
> They have worked well.
> 1. uninstall mozilla
> 2. copy plugins to temp dir
> 3. remove directory just in case \program files\mozilla.org
> 4. install milestone
> 5. copy plugins back
> 
> I have read that some people recommend removing the profile info also. 
> What are the advantages? Disadvantages?
> If I do it how do I save my mail history?
> 1. copy "Mail" and "ImapMail" dirs to temp
> 2. Setup new profile
> 3. copy back mail dirs.
> 
> Would this work? Is there a better way?
> 
> thanks
> bob
> 

The removing profile info is due to corruption in nightlies. You 
*should* be okay without doing anything, but if you need to delete 
stuff, delete everything but:

1. Your prefs.js
2. Your bookmarks.html
3. Your mail folder
4. Your news folder

You'll lose your history and all cached information doing this, I do it 
every so often anyway when running nightly installs, most developers do 
as well, I haven't had problems with anything thus far that this hasn't 
solved.

grayrest





Re: Moz 0.9.8 completely fails for me

2002-02-05 Thread Jeroen Roeterd

basic wrote:
> firstly, don't install over older builds. Either install it in its own 
> dir or remove the older build and install the newer.
> 
> basic
> 
> Chuck Messenger wrote:
> 
>> I just tried installing 0.9.8 on my Win2k machine -- over 0.9.7.  When 
>> it ran 0.9.8 for the first time, it put up a blank (all gray) window, 
>> covering the entire screen.  I tried starting it a few times, with the 
>> same result.  I tried rebooting and starting -- same result.  I then 
>> tried starting "mozilla -P chuck" to bypass the profile-selection 
>> screen.  This time, it crashed -- invalid memory access.
>>
>> I've never had any problems with previous Moz builds.  I tried a 
>> recent nightly -- same problems.  I then re-installed 0.9.7, and 
>> things are back to normal.
>>
>> Just a data point from someone out in the field...
>>
>>
>> - Chuck
>>
> 

I just installed the talkback installer over a .97 and it is working 
perfectly. Windows 2000.

Greetings,
Jeroen Roeterd





installing milestones

2002-02-05 Thread Bob Davis

I have been installing milestones since about 0.9.1.
They have worked well.
1. uninstall mozilla
2. copy plugins to temp dir
3. remove directory just in case \program files\mozilla.org
4. install milestone
5. copy plugins back

I have read that some people recommend removing the profile info also. 
What are the advantages? Disadvantages?
If I do it how do I save my mail history?
1. copy "Mail" and "ImapMail" dirs to temp
2. Setup new profile
3. copy back mail dirs.

Would this work? Is there a better way?

thanks
bob





Netscape keeps asking to create profile

2002-02-05 Thread Stephen Bohler

Hello,

For no apparent reason, when I tried to launch Netscape 4.7 today it asked
me to create a new profile (even though I have a perfectly good one). I
tried to go throught its instructions to create another one, but it wouldn't
finish...just ended.

I tried again, same results.

I read in a posting that deleting the nsreg.dat file in the WinNT directory
should do it. When I try to do this, it tells me that it is in use by
another process. I can't seem to understand which one could be locking it.
I've rebooted, but it is still locked.

Ideas??

Thanks in advance,
Steve








Re: Contribute language pack for Mozilla?

2002-02-05 Thread Tim Hunt

Andreas wrote:
> How do I make a language pack for Mozilla?
> I'd like to contribute a norwegian language pack,
> if there is a demand for it.

RTFM

http://www.mozilla.org/docs/refList/i18n/

Tim.





Re: Excessive bugs mean Mozilla's death!

2002-02-05 Thread Andrea Monni

rtwin Glück wrote:
 >

> But what I want to point out is that not 
> individual figures matters but rather an impression, an overall feeling 
> for the state of the project. And this is what disquiets me sometimes. 
> It doesn't really matter what options/ parameters you choose for the bug 
> chart. It always shows the same overall picture: bugs increase.


Check put this link: 
http://www.mozilla.org/events/dev-day2001/community-testing/index.html
it's Asa's presentation at the November Mozilla Developer's Day, it 
gives an overall outlook of the Bugzilla state (and of the Mozilla 
community QA).

Andrea
-- 
Andrea Monni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   "It is our choices, Harry, that
Y! IM: andreamonni  show what we truly are, far
ICQ: 7387142more than our abilities."
Tiscali NetPhone: 178-229-5413x165   A. Dumbledore





Contribute language pack for Mozilla?

2002-02-05 Thread Andreas

How do I make a language pack for Mozilla?
I'd like to contribute a norwegian language pack,
if there is a demand for it.

Andreas.





Re: Excessive bugs mean Mozilla's death!

2002-02-05 Thread Andrea Monni

Sören Kuklau wrote:

> 
> Ihighly doubt that it works on Opera. I highly doubt that it would ever 
> work on Opera. Those great guys from Norway working on Opera still 
> didn't get around to implement full DOM support.


Reading this thread a weird idea came to my mind: what if the Opera guys 
dropped their rendering engine and swiched to Gecko and focused on the 
user experience?

Andrea

-- 
Andrea Monni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   "It is our choices, Harry, that
Y! IM: andreamonni  show what we truly are, far
ICQ: 7387142more than our abilities."
Tiscali NetPhone: 178-229-5413x165   A. Dumbledore





Re: Excessive bugs mean Mozilla's death!

2002-02-05 Thread Andrea Monni

DeMoN LaG wrote:

> 
> Actually it's a complete lie by JTK.  He quoted a website that showed 
> Mozilla had .75% market share.  Last I checked, that same site shows 
> 3.0% market share. 


What I'd like to see is a recent Google zeitgeist: last one didn't even 
mention Mozilla (and neither NS 6.x) and I think Google is a pretty 
democratic site (in the sense that almost everybody use it nowadays).

I don't anything will change soon, at least until the next, major NS 
release.

Andrea
-- 
Andrea Monni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   "It is our choices, Harry, that
Y! IM: andreamonni  show what we truly are, far
ICQ: 7387142more than our abilities."
Tiscali NetPhone: 178-229-5413x165   A. Dumbledore





Re: tooltip for image-alt-value

2002-02-05 Thread user

That's not very friendly and not backward compatible.
At least, Mozilla should provide option extending image alt to title.


Alex


Sören Kuklau wrote:
> The W3C forbids the usage of the alt attributes for "tooltips". The alt
> attribute ("alternative") is for browsers that have image display disabled,
> that can't load the image, or that cannot display images.
> 
> Use the title attribute which is for displaying additional explaining text.
> 
> Regards,
> Sören Kuklau
> 
> "ZZT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>in netscape 4.x and IE5.x I see the "alt" value of an image as tooltip.
>>Where is this feature in mozilla 0.9x ? Do I have to activate it?
>>
>>bye
>>
>>
> 
> 






Re: Moral high ground?

2002-02-05 Thread David Simpson

On Mon, 04 Feb 2002 02:26:45 -0600, JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>David Simpson wrote:
>> 
>> On 3 Feb 2002 07:17:25 GMT, DeMoN LaG  wrote:
>> 
>
>[snip]
>
>> 
>> I don't complain about it. I just don't use it.
>
>WH  He *CAN* write more than one sentence at a time!
>
>Christ.

I don't want to confuse you when I write for you.





Re: Excessive bugs mean Mozilla's death!

2002-02-05 Thread Andrea Monni

Christian Biesinger wrote:

> 
> Sigh. It's always a problem if a product should please everybody, it 
> ends up pleasing nobody...


That's why Mozilla terribly needs third-party "vendor" like Netscape, 
Galeon, K-Meleon and the (not too many, indeed) others: to make 
targetted applications which can please a very well identified group of 
people (customers).

Mozilla (shouldn't it be Seamonkey?) should be seen as a showcase for 
what is developed by mozilla.org and as a tool for users who want to 
explore and to be on top of things.

But I'm not saying nothing new, am I?

Andrea
-- 
Andrea Monni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   "It is our choices, Harry, that
Y! IM: andreamonni  show what we truly are, far
ICQ: 7387142more than our abilities."
Tiscali NetPhone: 178-229-5413x165   A. Dumbledore





Re: Weird & Ugly ZOOM

2002-02-05 Thread Christian Biesinger

Vincent Nicolas wrote:
> Go to this page :
> http://www.macromedia.com/v1/handlers/index.cfm?ID=20370&Method=Full
> 
> and increase text zoom... you get a very ugly stuff !

Looks fine for me, until at least 150% (on Linux, that is)


-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  -- Benjamin Franklin





Weird & Ugly ZOOM

2002-02-05 Thread Vincent Nicolas

Go to this page :
http://www.macromedia.com/v1/handlers/index.cfm?ID=20370&Method=Full

and increase text zoom... you get a very ugly stuff !

No problem at all in IE. However, it seems than this poorly developped 
site is not able to recognize Mozilla as it loads the same CSS than the 
one for Netscape 4.x. Maybe the problem is here ??

I've tested it with both 0.9.7 and 0.9.8 with the same results.


-- 
Le Vintz.
http://membres.tripod.fr/vnicolas/




Re: Mozilla performance:Broadband vs. Dailup

2002-02-05 Thread Raj Bhaskar

> I tried Mozilla on my old computer(166MHz, 32MB ram), and it was 
> unusable to the point where even if there was a 100% performance 

I've been running Moz since about 0.8 on a P166 (albeit with 84MB RAM) 
and although it's quite slow, I find it usable.

> improvement since then I think it would still be unusably slow(though I 
> haven't tried it).  Then I got a new computer(1.2GHz[Athlon], 384MB 
> ram), and I really can't imagine a noticeable performance improvement to 
> be possible for my browsing style...

Heh heh, yes.  On my 1GHz+ (I can't actually remember the speed) PC at 
work, Moz is amazingly fast.

Raj.





BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY OF THE YEAR 8133

2002-02-05 Thread philluk2002uk

Right Now, This is a HOT ticket item.  If you are interested in making an extra income 
with little or no experience then this is for you.  Everything is set-up automatically.
GET YOUR FREE REPORT AT MY WEBSITE

www.productsandprofits.com

Or 
Email me and i'll help in any way i can
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

wwdqovorujronmvskxprcoqukunozncxdusxrofptqobwzk





Re: where is mozilla 0.9.8 for AIX 4.3.3 ?

2002-02-05 Thread Tim Hunt

George Lefter wrote:
> im running mozilla 0.9.7 on aix 4.3.3
> i looked for nightly builds for aix, but i couldnt find any.
> i thought mozilla provides bineries on aix just for releases, but now
> 0.9.8 is out and there's no binary for aix.
> is there any chance that it will appear later on?

Of course it will. The milestone has only been out for a day! You just 
need to be a bit patient.

Different builds for different platforms are contributed by different 
people. Now that mozilla.org has shipped the milestone on win/mac/linux 
other people will be grabbing the source and running the build on other 
platforms. Thier builds will be uploaded to the mozilla.org FTP servers 
in due course.

Tim.





where is mozilla 0.9.8 for AIX 4.3.3 ?

2002-02-05 Thread George Lefter

hello.

im running mozilla 0.9.7 on aix 4.3.3
i looked for nightly builds for aix, but i couldnt find any.
i thought mozilla provides bineries on aix just for releases, but now
0.9.8 is out and there's no binary for aix.
is there any chance that it will appear later on?





We Guarantee to add 1 to 3 inchs to Penis. New Pill

2002-02-05 Thread cdo2


NOW YOU CAN INCREASE YOUR PENIS SIZE BY 3"
OR MORE IN JUST A FEW SHORT WEEKS!
 


Revolutionary pill that is guaranteed to increase your
penis size by 1" ...2" ...3" ... or more in just a few
short weeks! 

Former Viagra pharmacist has now created an amazing product 
new product works by simply taking 2 pills every day...
it will make your penis grow in both length and thickness
by at least 26%, guaranteed!


http://64.118.7.14/extenze/
 
 
Simply try these Amazing pills for 30-days and if after
30-days you do not experience a minimum of 1" gain in length,
we'll refund you 100% of the cost including shipping.

With this guarantee, our product must work for you... or we'll lose money on every 
sale!
 
 
http://64.118.7.14/extenze/


 
LIMITED TIME OFFER. ORDER TODAY!

ORDER DIRECT
626-440-1747 M to F 8:00am to 6:00pm Pacific Standard Time

http://64.118.7.14/extenze/

 

 
RESULTS MAY VARY. NOTE: To be removed go to
http://64.118.7.14/remove/




  1   2   >