Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-09-02 Thread Heather/Femme
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 10:06, Tom Brinkman wrote:

 What motherboard? IIRC, you've got a i875somethin chipset? 
 Looks like sensors doesn't like it.  As the error message suggests, 
 did you try 'selective' probes?  You might need to just keep doin 
 that by trial'n error to see if you get thru the tests.
 
OTOH, some motherboards don't support the i2c/SMbus (hardware 
 monitoring). Many ready made or OEM boards don't. The acid test is 
 if you see temps, fan speeds and voltages in bios. If you don't the 
 board probly doesn't support monitoring. If you do, it definitely 
 does.  You might need to go to their homepage for more info  
 http://secure.netroedge.com/~lm78/

THx ya the bios shows temps  Stuff... I have an i875 IIRC yes..ty Tom I
will check their page. :)

I'll get back to you luv.

Femmes


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-30 Thread Heather/Femme
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 06:43, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
 On Thursday 28 August 2003 05:20 pm, Heather/Femme wrote:
 
  Ran your cpuburn...but couldn't for the life of me get gkrellm to show
  me any temps.  Said it couldn't fnd any.
 
 Did you (as root) run sensors-detect and follow the instructions first?
 Gkrellm uses lmsensors for its data.
 

No I did not... didn't know I had to... went to do it while
stoned...gave up. sigh.. and the questions it asked me were confusing. 
Do i need GKrellm installed to use lm-sensors?? no?yes? help?

  all I did was: cpuburn -60 (ran it 60Mins) it came out fine.
 
  I hope thats how you use it...I read the readme..thats all it said to
  do.
 
  FemmesStoned(again)
 
 That doesn't sound like the cpuburn I used. Its commands are:
 
 burnBX   burnK6   burnMMX  burnP5   burnP6
 
 depending on what CPU you are using.
 
 I got mine from the Mandrake CDs. The package was named:
 
 cpuburn-1.4-3mdk
 
 Just do a urpmi cpuburn Femme - it should work.

ya i installed that one ... the one i found i provided a url for...diff
package... same name tho? ...wtf?

FreakyFemme


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-30 Thread Heather/Femme
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 21:49, Dennis Myers wrote:
SNip
 Uh, how about typing YES instead of just y? Looks like that is what it is 
 looking for. HTH

seems it worked..wasn't hung but didn't find any sensors. :(

sigh

oh well i give up

Femme


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-30 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Friday 29 August 2003 10:04 pm, Heather/Femme wrote:

 No I did not... didn't know I had to... went to do it while
 stoned...gave up. sigh.. and the questions it asked me were confusing.
 Do i need GKrellm installed to use lm-sensors?? no?yes? help?

No, with lm-sensors installed (correctly) you can just type in sensors and get 
a report. Gkrellm is much nicer to look at though. :-)

You need to let sensors-detect work its magic - just follow the prompts, its 
not that hard. You will have to cut 'n paste a few commands to other places, 
but if I can do it, you can. :-)

 ya i installed that one ... the one i found i provided a url for...diff
 package... same name tho? ...wtf?

 FreakyFemme

Must be a different one then. Oh well, you should wind up with 5-6 burn 
commands. Just type burn and hit tab to see which ones show up. You have to 
use the one for your CPU though.

-- 
  
  /\  
DarkLord 
  \/  


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-30 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Friday August 29 2003 09:21 pm, Heather/Femme wrote:
  We are now going to do the adapter probings. Some adapters may
 hang halfway
  through; we can't really help that. Also, some chips will be
 double detected;
  we choose the one with the highest confidence value in that
 case. If you found that the adapter hung after probing a certain
 address, you can
  specify that address to remain unprobed. That often
  includes address 0x69 (clock chip).

 Next adapter: Velleman K8000 (Bit-shift algorithm)
 Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively): y


 It hangs / stops there.  Idea?  help?  Never done this
 before...rtfm?

 anything?

 FF

What motherboard? IIRC, you've got a i875somethin chipset? 
Looks like sensors doesn't like it.  As the error message suggests, 
did you try 'selective' probes?  You might need to just keep doin 
that by trial'n error to see if you get thru the tests.

   OTOH, some motherboards don't support the i2c/SMbus (hardware 
monitoring). Many ready made or OEM boards don't. The acid test is 
if you see temps, fan speeds and voltages in bios. If you don't the 
board probly doesn't support monitoring. If you do, it definitely 
does.  You might need to go to their homepage for more info  
http://secure.netroedge.com/~lm78/
-- 
Tom Brinkman  Corpus Christi, Texas


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-29 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Thursday 28 August 2003 05:20 pm, Heather/Femme wrote:

 Ran your cpuburn...but couldn't for the life of me get gkrellm to show
 me any temps.  Said it couldn't fnd any.

Did you (as root) run sensors-detect and follow the instructions first?
Gkrellm uses lmsensors for its data.

 all I did was: cpuburn -60 (ran it 60Mins) it came out fine.

 I hope thats how you use it...I read the readme..thats all it said to
 do.

 FemmesStoned(again)

That doesn't sound like the cpuburn I used. Its commands are:

burnBX   burnK6   burnMMX  burnP5   burnP6

depending on what CPU you are using.

I got mine from the Mandrake CDs. The package was named:

cpuburn-1.4-3mdk

Just do a urpmi cpuburn Femme - it should work.

-- 
  
  /\  
DarkLord 
  \/  


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock! - or how to overlook the obvious

2003-08-29 Thread Anne Wilson
Well I got a full health check from my supplier, and he also could 
find nothing wrong with the hardware.  Since it could happen with 
nothing at all open in windows and my granddaughter actually out of 
the room it seemed fairly safe to say that it probably wasn't 
software.  I checked out whether the power supply fan could be 
blasting against a barrier, but that wasn't the problem, so I talked 
to the tech guy about any other factors that I may have missed.  He 
said that the only thing he could think of that I hadn't covered was 
dirty power - possible spikes.  On checking I find she doesn't have 
any surge protection fitted, so could it be the washing machine 
changing to spin cycle?  I think it could, so it's out to buy surge 
protection now.

All of this has made me wonder if it is something similar that's 
causing my router box to go haywire, too.  That is not properly 
protected either, so I guess it's time to go through the whole lan 
and see what else isn't covered before I shop.

Just thought it might be a useful thought to anyone else 
troubleshooting.

Anne

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-29 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Thursday August 28 2003 04:25 pm, Heather/Femme wrote:
 On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 13:21, Tom Brinkman wrote:
 snip

  run the appropriate 'burn' module on your
  (her) system, it's not stable IMO.  Many store bought (ready
  made) computers won't pass. Any laptop surely won't. There's no
  reportin, the system either stays up or fails. Usually just a
  spontaneous reboot.  CPU temp monitoring durin the test is
  almost imperative. If it gets too high, Ctrl+C will abort the
  test.
 
  For ready mades an laptops, I'd suggest a lengthly run of
  mprime-17, the torture test. That's as close as you'll get.
  These tools, mprime an cpuburn, are old overclockers tools to
  test stability. Not really a check for Winblows faults.

 Hm...just went to the link you provided... I used a diff cpuburn
 program I guess.

 I found it originally thru google IIRC here:

 http://users.bigpond.net.au/cpuburn/

 is that not the same program!?

 Confuzzled Femme

'urpmi cpuburn'  The Mandrake rpm is on your CD's and on the 
mirrors. cpuburn-1.4-4mdk
[tom /tom] $ burn
burnBX   burnK6   burnK7   burnMMX  burnP5   burnP6

 IIRC, you've got a Intel cpu, so use 'burnP6'
-- 
Tom Brinkman  Corpus Christi, Texas


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-28 Thread Tom Brinkman

   Keep in mind my usual advice on this list is that hardware needs 
to be eliminated from any problems, specially if it's a ready made, 
in the first place. OC'd or not. OTOH, if it's there, RUN IT!!

   Windoze reviews: the current darlings are the nforce an newer KT 
400a/600 chipset boards runnin AMD XP's. P4's are bitin the dust, 
still no decent chipsets to run on. OTOH, are these winsux reviews 
applicable to Linux?  As far as chipsets go yes an no. nforce* 
chipset boards have several unresolved issues with Linux, gcc, an 
GNU. Forget anything SiS. As far as Winblows reviews on hardware 
sites, disregard, IMO, is usually the better idea. They have little 
to do with a real OS.

   So, just a report. I changed out a tired an old oc'd 1.4 Athlon 
(1.553g) on a Soyo KT133a chipset with sdram, for an XP 3000+ with 
Kingston DDR400 on an Aopen AK77-400 Max with a KT400a chipset. 
Didn't really wanna but the ancient (8 years!) ram was startin to 
fsck'up on the old mobo. Run hard, put up wet. Might'a been the cpu 
L caches anyhow...

   Pulled the case out from under the table, changed out the 
motherboard/ram/cpu. What'a heck, tryin boot. .. No problemo,
harddisk recognized a differnet NIC (now onboard), different AC97, 
now 5.1 surround, and 9.2 cooker went about it's business. No 
disruption for aDSL or sound. HDD's love the new board /cpu/ram/ 
controllers.

So went to testin and clockin. The Kingston ram was a 
convienice. I got it bundled with the cpu/mobo. It was a variable, 
even a concern since it's only sold by Mwave as Cas 3 DDR ram. 
After several weeks testin tho, the ram has performed flawlessly at 
Cas2.5, Ras/Cas 2, pre-Charge 2, at 2-bank, now DDR427. Way over 
it's specs. Ram is what'll do, an I'm not sure I've found the top 
of this Kingston yet. Still, I wish I'd gone to the trouble of 
gettin Crucial or Corsair.

   Currently (as I type), the XP is at 2301mhz (13x177, 354 FSB, PCI  
35.2mhz) and rock steady. I keep inchin it up. Might go a bit or 
more further. I haven't tried reducin the multiplier and goin to a 
200+ FSB yet. I reckon I'm better off stay'in with oc'd 166@ 177 
since the PCI is only out'a spec @ 35.2mhz, an the AGP is just over 
70mhz. Some view this mistakenly as overclocked. It's not. It's 
just out'a spec. Damn nVidia card was complain, but recent cooker 
updates to XFree86 cooled that off. (XFree86-4.3-19mdk)
 
I know y'all believe memtest86 is _THE_ test, an I confess I run 
it first too. But it's a weak test. It sort'a sux. Better is 
mprime's #17, the torture test. Harder still, the acid test is, 
cpuburn's 'burnK7'. One or two passes with memtest is a breeze, run 
mprime's torture test thru test #1800 or so, run burnK7 for 25 
minutes . then you know your hardware is stable. So far I am 
with an XP core at 2301, CL2.5-2-2-2 DDR427. 

  So I gott'a XP Whatever (3600+?) that RUNS like a scalded ape. 
Glibc compiles are a lot shorter ;)   No Winsux ;)
-- 
Tom Brinkman  Corpus Christi, Texas


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-28 Thread ed tharp
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 01:22, Tom Brinkman wrote:
Keep in mind my usual advice on this list is that hardware needs 
 to be eliminated from any problems, specially if it's a ready made, 
 in the first place. OC'd or not. OTOH, if it's there, RUN IT!!
 
Windoze reviews: the current darlings are the nforce an newer KT 
 400a/600 chipset boards runnin AMD XP's. P4's are bitin the dust, 
 still no decent chipsets to run on. OTOH, are these winsux reviews 
 applicable to Linux?  As far as chipsets go yes an no. nforce* 
 chipset boards have several unresolved issues with Linux, gcc, an 
 GNU. Forget anything SiS. As far as Winblows reviews on hardware 
 sites, disregard, IMO, is usually the better idea. They have little 
 to do with a real OS.
 
So, just a report. I changed out a tired an old oc'd 1.4 Athlon 
 (1.553g) on a Soyo KT133a chipset with sdram, for an XP 3000+ with 
 Kingston DDR400 on an Aopen AK77-400 Max with a KT400a chipset. 
 Didn't really wanna but the ancient (8 years!) ram was startin to 
 fsck'up on the old mobo. Run hard, put up wet. Might'a been the cpu 
 L caches anyhow...
 
Pulled the case out from under the table, changed out the 
 motherboard/ram/cpu. What'a heck, tryin boot. .. No problemo,
 harddisk recognized a differnet NIC (now onboard), different AC97, 
 now 5.1 surround, and 9.2 cooker went about it's business. No 
 disruption for aDSL or sound. HDD's love the new board /cpu/ram/ 
 controllers.
 
 So went to testin and clockin. The Kingston ram was a 
 convienice. I got it bundled with the cpu/mobo. It was a variable, 
 even a concern since it's only sold by Mwave as Cas 3 DDR ram. 
 After several weeks testin tho, the ram has performed flawlessly at 
 Cas2.5, Ras/Cas 2, pre-Charge 2, at 2-bank, now DDR427. Way over 
 it's specs. Ram is what'll do, an I'm not sure I've found the top 
 of this Kingston yet. Still, I wish I'd gone to the trouble of 
 gettin Crucial or Corsair.
 
Currently (as I type), the XP is at 2301mhz (13x177, 354 FSB, PCI  
 35.2mhz) and rock steady. I keep inchin it up. Might go a bit or 
 more further. I haven't tried reducin the multiplier and goin to a 
 200+ FSB yet. I reckon I'm better off stay'in with oc'd 166@ 177 
 since the PCI is only out'a spec @ 35.2mhz, an the AGP is just over 
 70mhz. Some view this mistakenly as overclocked. It's not. It's 
 just out'a spec. Damn nVidia card was complain, but recent cooker 
 updates to XFree86 cooled that off. (XFree86-4.3-19mdk)
  
 I know y'all believe memtest86 is _THE_ test, an I confess I run 
 it first too. But it's a weak test. It sort'a sux. Better is 
 mprime's #17, the torture test. Harder still, the acid test is, 
 cpuburn's 'burnK7'. One or two passes with memtest is a breeze, run 
 mprime's torture test thru test #1800 or so, run burnK7 for 25 
 minutes . then you know your hardware is stable. So far I am 
 with an XP core at 2301, CL2.5-2-2-2 DDR427. 
 
   So I gott'a XP Whatever (3600+?) that RUNS like a scalded ape. 
 Glibc compiles are a lot shorter ;)   No Winsux ;)


damn what a screamer... I am sure jealous.
What became of the old box, or parts?


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-28 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Thursday 28 August 2003 01:22 am, Tom Brinkman wrote:

snip

 I know y'all believe memtest86 is _THE_ test, an I confess I run
 it first too. But it's a weak test. It sort'a sux. Better is
 mprime's #17, the torture test. Harder still, the acid test is,
 cpuburn's 'burnK7'. One or two passes with memtest is a breeze, run
 mprime's torture test thru test #1800 or so, run burnK7 for 25
 minutes . then you know your hardware is stable. So far I am
 with an XP core at 2301, CL2.5-2-2-2 DDR427.

Tom, I know you remember when I was having the spontaneous reboot problems? 
Well, you're right about memtest - I ran it overnight 2/3 different times and 
never found anything - cpuburnnow thats *another* story! 

   So I gott'a XP Whatever (3600+?) that RUNS like a scalded ape.
 Glibc compiles are a lot shorter ;)   No Winsux ;)

You're better off. :-)

-- 
  
  /\  
DarkLord 
  \/  


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-28 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 28 Aug 2003 1:41 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
 On Thursday 28 August 2003 01:22 am, Tom Brinkman wrote:

 snip

  I know y'all believe memtest86 is _THE_ test, an I confess I
  run it first too. But it's a weak test. It sort'a sux. Better is
  mprime's #17, the torture test. Harder still, the acid test is,
  cpuburn's 'burnK7'. One or two passes with memtest is a breeze,
  run mprime's torture test thru test #1800 or so, run burnK7 for
  25 minutes . then you know your hardware is stable. So far I
  am with an XP core at 2301, CL2.5-2-2-2 DDR427.

 Tom, I know you remember when I was having the spontaneous reboot
 problems? Well, you're right about memtest - I ran it overnight 2/3
 different times and never found anything - cpuburnnow thats
 *another* story!

Care to tell us more?  My granddaughter's 1-year-old (win98) box 
suffers from recurrent problems, and I'm wondering if this test would 
help.  So - what's involved in running it, how risky is it, and what 
sort of reporting does it give?

Anne

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-28 Thread Michael Adams
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 00:22:03 -0500
Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
Keep in mind my usual advice on this list is that hardware needs 
 to be eliminated from any problems, specially if it's a ready made, 
 in the first place. OC'd or not. OTOH, if it's there, RUN IT!!
 
Windoze reviews: the current darlings are the nforce an newer KT 
 400a/600 chipset boards runnin AMD XP's. P4's are bitin the dust, 
 still no decent chipsets to run on. OTOH, are these winsux reviews 
 applicable to Linux?  As far as chipsets go yes an no. nforce* 
 chipset boards have several unresolved issues with Linux, gcc, an 
 GNU. Forget anything SiS. As far as Winblows reviews on hardware 
 sites, disregard, IMO, is usually the better idea. They have little 
 to do with a real OS.
 
So, just a report. I changed out a tired an old oc'd 1.4 Athlon 
 (1.553g) on a Soyo KT133a chipset with sdram, for an XP 3000+ with 
 Kingston DDR400 on an Aopen AK77-400 Max with a KT400a chipset. 
 Didn't really wanna but the ancient (8 years!) ram was startin to 
 fsck'up on the old mobo. Run hard, put up wet. Might'a been the cpu 
 L caches anyhow...
 
Pulled the case out from under the table, changed out the 
 motherboard/ram/cpu. What'a heck, tryin boot. .. No problemo,
 harddisk recognized a differnet NIC (now onboard), different AC97, 
 now 5.1 surround, and 9.2 cooker went about it's business. No 
 disruption for aDSL or sound. HDD's love the new board /cpu/ram/ 
 controllers.
 
 So went to testin and clockin. The Kingston ram was a 
 convienice. I got it bundled with the cpu/mobo. It was a variable, 
 even a concern since it's only sold by Mwave as Cas 3 DDR ram. 
 After several weeks testin tho, the ram has performed flawlessly at 
 Cas2.5, Ras/Cas 2, pre-Charge 2, at 2-bank, now DDR427. Way over 
 it's specs. Ram is what'll do, an I'm not sure I've found the top 
 of this Kingston yet. Still, I wish I'd gone to the trouble of 
 gettin Crucial or Corsair.
 
Currently (as I type), the XP is at 2301mhz (13x177, 354 FSB, PCI  
 35.2mhz) and rock steady. I keep inchin it up. Might go a bit or 
 more further. I haven't tried reducin the multiplier and goin to a 
 200+ FSB yet. I reckon I'm better off stay'in with oc'd 166@ 177 
 since the PCI is only out'a spec @ 35.2mhz, an the AGP is just over 
 70mhz. Some view this mistakenly as overclocked. It's not. It's 
 just out'a spec. Damn nVidia card was complain, but recent cooker 
 updates to XFree86 cooled that off. (XFree86-4.3-19mdk)
  
 I know y'all believe memtest86 is _THE_ test, an I confess I run 
 it first too. But it's a weak test. It sort'a sux. Better is 
 mprime's #17, the torture test. Harder still, the acid test is, 
 cpuburn's 'burnK7'. One or two passes with memtest is a breeze, run 
 mprime's torture test thru test #1800 or so, run burnK7 for 25 
 minutes . then you know your hardware is stable. So far I am 
 with an XP core at 2301, CL2.5-2-2-2 DDR427. 
 
   So I gott'a XP Whatever (3600+?) that RUNS like a scalded ape. 
 Glibc compiles are a lot shorter ;)   No Winsux ;)
 -- 
 Tom Brinkman  Corpus Christi, Texas
 

So what were you needing your newbie help with Tom?

-- 
Michael

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-28 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Thursday 28 August 2003 09:55 am, Anne Wilson wrote:

 Care to tell us more?  My granddaughter's 1-year-old (win98) box
 suffers from recurrent problems, and I'm wondering if this test would
 help.  So - what's involved in running it, how risky is it, and what
 sort of reporting does it give?

 Anne

First, I'm not sure if cpuburn is available for Windows? As a pure 'Nix user I 
just don't notice if software runs on more than 1 platform or not... :-(

Anyways, I was having recurrent spontaneous reboots. I mean you're setting at 
the front of your computer, then wham! it shutsdown and goes thru all the 
normal stuff when you bootup. Especially during games, but not just limited 
to them. Many people on the list (including Tom) offered advice, and several 
ways to test the hardware. The general consensus seems to be that you're much 
better off ruling out hardware problems *first* before trying to track down a 
software problem. Memtest, Mprime, cpuburn all check various parts of your 
hardware. 

Basically you just run cpuburn (there are different versions for different 
cpu's) and let it go. If it can run for 20-25 mins on your machine without 
locking up, you're in pretty good shape. If you can run it for an hour, 
you're using a tank with brains. grin

If it locks up within a few minutes - you've got some problems somewhere, and 
it my case - it turned out to be heat. I modded my case a bit, and now run 
about 37c to 39c where I was running about 50c before. No more reboots. :-)

Hmm, did I send the you the picture where I made the changes? I can send you 3 
offlist if you like. Just lemme know! :-)

-- 
  
  /\  
DarkLord 
  \/  


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-28 Thread mike
I'll take them if ther not gone already

Mike McNeese

Tom Brinkman wrote:

On Thursday August 28 2003 06:21 am, ed tharp wrote:
 

 So I gott'a XP Whatever (3600+?) that RUNS like a scalded
ape. Glibc compiles are a lot shorter ;)   No Winsux ;)
 

damn what a screamer... I am sure jealous.
What became of the old box, or parts?
   

 Sittin in a box till I figure out what to do with 'em. The mobo 
and cpu were run hard. Probly not worth hardly anything anymore. 
The ram I kept tho is. 1, 256mb stick; 1, 128mb stick of Crucial 
Micron Cas2 7ns ram. (what y'all call good pc133)

 First one to ask can have the Soyo k7vta pro mobo and the 1.4 gig 
Athlon for the cost of mailin.  Ah, heck, I'll throw in the ram 
too. My brother could use it, but he doesn't know that. 'Sides he 
considers somethin like that  major surgery.
 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 

--
Mike McNeese Springdale, Arkansas USA
==
Dual booting 98lite;MDK 9.1 stock kernel Kde 3.1
Registered Linux User #248955 liquid/acqua  Theme
==
If obstacles are what you see in your path...
   Then you have lost sight of your goal! 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-28 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Thursday August 28 2003 08:55 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
 On Thursday 28 Aug 2003 1:41 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
  On Thursday 28 August 2003 01:22 am, Tom Brinkman wrote:
 
  snip
 
   I know y'all believe memtest86 is _THE_ test, an I
   confess I run it first too. But it's a weak test. It sort'a
   sux. Better is mprime's #17, the torture test. Harder still,
   the acid test is, cpuburn's 'burnK7'. One or two passes with
   memtest is a breeze, run mprime's torture test thru test
   #1800 or so, run burnK7 for 25 minutes . then you know
   your hardware is stable. So far I am with an XP core at 2301,
   CL2.5-2-2-2 DDR427.
 
  Tom, I know you remember when I was having the spontaneous
  reboot problems? Well, you're right about memtest - I ran it
  overnight 2/3 different times and never found anything -
  cpuburnnow thats *another* story!

 Care to tell us more?  My granddaughter's 1-year-old (win98) box
 suffers from recurrent problems, and I'm wondering if this test
 would help.  So - what's involved in running it, how risky is it,
 and what sort of reporting does it give?

 Anne

   All three apps, memtest86, mprime, an cpuburn have Windoze 
versions. memtest is no risk, neither is mprime-17. Cpuburn OTOH, 
really takes the cpu/cache/ram/motherboard/buses to the limit, an 
then some. Read the warning  http://users.ev1.net/~redelm/  An you 
can d/l the software. For Mandrake, it's on your CD's.

   Still if you can't run the appropriate 'burn' module on your 
(her) system, it's not stable IMO.  Many store bought (ready made) 
computers won't pass. Any laptop surely won't. There's no reportin, 
the system either stays up or fails. Usually just a spontaneous 
reboot.  CPU temp monitoring durin the test is almost imperative. 
If it gets too high, Ctrl+C will abort the test.

For ready mades an laptops, I'd suggest a lengthly run of 
mprime-17, the torture test. That's as close as you'll get. These 
tools, mprime an cpuburn, are old overclockers tools to test 
stability. Not really a check for Winblows faults.
-- 
Tom Brinkman  Corpus Christi, Texas


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-28 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Thursday August 28 2003 04:55 am, Michael Adams wrote:
 So what were you needing your newbie help with Tom?

 --
 Michael

  It works both ways. I was jus' braggin an pontificatin ;)
-- 
Tom Brinkman  Corpus Christi, Texas


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-28 Thread Brant Fitzsimmons
Tom Brinkman wrote:

On Thursday August 28 2003 06:21 am, ed tharp wrote:
 

 So I gott'a XP Whatever (3600+?) that RUNS like a scalded
ape. Glibc compiles are a lot shorter ;)   No Winsux ;)
 

damn what a screamer... I am sure jealous.
What became of the old box, or parts?
   

 Sittin in a box till I figure out what to do with 'em. The mobo 
and cpu were run hard. Probly not worth hardly anything anymore. 
The ram I kept tho is. 1, 256mb stick; 1, 128mb stick of Crucial 
Micron Cas2 7ns ram. (what y'all call good pc133)

 First one to ask can have the Soyo k7vta pro mobo and the 1.4 gig 
Athlon for the cost of mailin.  Ah, heck, I'll throw in the ram 
too. My brother could use it, but he doesn't know that. 'Sides he 
considers somethin like that  major surgery.

Consider yourself asked.

--
Brant Fitzsimmons
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Linux user #322847 | Linux machine #207465 | http://counter.li.org/
  AMD Duron 1.3GHz | Mandrake 9.1 | Kernel 2.4.21-0.25mdkduron
   KDE 3.1.3 | Mozilla 1.4 Mail Client
Uptime:
15:30:01 up 57 min,  3 users,  load average: 0.08, 0.08, 0.11
___
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being
self-evident.
-Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-28 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 28 Aug 2003 8:24 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
 On Thursday 28 August 2003 09:55 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
  Care to tell us more?  My granddaughter's 1-year-old (win98) box
  suffers from recurrent problems, and I'm wondering if this test
  would help.  So - what's involved in running it, how risky is it,
  and what sort of reporting does it give?
 
  Anne

 First, I'm not sure if cpuburn is available for Windows? As a pure
 'Nix user I just don't notice if software runs on more than 1
 platform or not... :-(

Yup, there's a version.

 Anyways, I was having recurrent spontaneous reboots. I mean you're
 setting at the front of your computer, then wham! it shutsdown and
 goes thru all the normal stuff when you bootup. 

The only time I've had that was when I was having Star Office / Open 
Office problems with large files.  In her case, it's freezes that 
happen without any obvious pattern.

 Especially during
 games, but not just limited to them. Many people on the list
 (including Tom) offered advice, and several ways to test the
 hardware. The general consensus seems to be that you're much better
 off ruling out hardware problems *first* before trying to track
 down a software problem. Memtest, Mprime, cpuburn all check various
 parts of your hardware.

 Basically you just run cpuburn (there are different versions for
 different cpu's) and let it go. If it can run for 20-25 mins on
 your machine without locking up, you're in pretty good shape. If
 you can run it for an hour, you're using a tank with brains. grin

 If it locks up within a few minutes - you've got some problems
 somewhere, and it my case - it turned out to be heat. I modded my
 case a bit, and now run about 37c to 39c where I was running about
 50c before. No more reboots. :-)

How did you know it was heat?

 Hmm, did I send the you the picture where I made the changes? I can
 send you 3 offlist if you like. Just lemme know! :-)

Yes, please.

Anne

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-28 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 28 Aug 2003 8:21 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
 On Thursday August 28 2003 08:55 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
  On Thursday 28 Aug 2003 1:41 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
   On Thursday 28 August 2003 01:22 am, Tom Brinkman wrote:
  
   snip
  
I know y'all believe memtest86 is _THE_ test, an I
confess I run it first too. But it's a weak test. It sort'a
sux. Better is mprime's #17, the torture test. Harder still,
the acid test is, cpuburn's 'burnK7'. One or two passes with
memtest is a breeze, run mprime's torture test thru test
#1800 or so, run burnK7 for 25 minutes . then you know
your hardware is stable. So far I am with an XP core at 2301,
CL2.5-2-2-2 DDR427.
  
   Tom, I know you remember when I was having the spontaneous
   reboot problems? Well, you're right about memtest - I ran it
   overnight 2/3 different times and never found anything -
   cpuburnnow thats *another* story!
 
  Care to tell us more?  My granddaughter's 1-year-old (win98) box
  suffers from recurrent problems, and I'm wondering if this test
  would help.  So - what's involved in running it, how risky is it,
  and what sort of reporting does it give?
 
  Anne

All three apps, memtest86, mprime, an cpuburn have Windoze
 versions. memtest is no risk, neither is mprime-17. Cpuburn OTOH,
 really takes the cpu/cache/ram/motherboard/buses to the limit, an
 then some. Read the warning  http://users.ev1.net/~redelm/  An you
 can d/l the software. For Mandrake, it's on your CD's.

Still if you can't run the appropriate 'burn' module on your
 (her) system, it's not stable IMO.  Many store bought (ready made)
 computers won't pass. Any laptop surely won't. There's no reportin,
 the system either stays up or fails. Usually just a spontaneous
 reboot.  CPU temp monitoring durin the test is almost imperative.
 If it gets too high, Ctrl+C will abort the test.

 For ready mades an laptops, I'd suggest a lengthly run of
 mprime-17, the torture test. That's as close as you'll get. These
 tools, mprime an cpuburn, are old overclockers tools to test
 stability. Not really a check for Winblows faults.

Thanks, Tom.  This is a custom-build from a local supplier, and I've 
just realised that it's not quite out of guarantee, so it's going 
back tomorrow, and I'll let them do the first round of tests.  If 
they find nothing I'll start on your suggestions g

Anne

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-28 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Thursday August 28 2003 06:21 am, ed tharp wrote:
So I gott'a XP Whatever (3600+?) that RUNS like a scalded
  ape. Glibc compiles are a lot shorter ;)   No Winsux ;)

 damn what a screamer... I am sure jealous.
 What became of the old box, or parts?

  Sittin in a box till I figure out what to do with 'em. The mobo 
and cpu were run hard. Probly not worth hardly anything anymore. 
The ram I kept tho is. 1, 256mb stick; 1, 128mb stick of Crucial 
Micron Cas2 7ns ram. (what y'all call good pc133)

  First one to ask can have the Soyo k7vta pro mobo and the 1.4 gig 
Athlon for the cost of mailin.  Ah, heck, I'll throw in the ram 
too. My brother could use it, but he doesn't know that. 'Sides he 
considers somethin like that  major surgery.
-- 
Tom Brinkman  Corpus Christi, Texas


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-28 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Thursday 28 August 2003 03:35 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:

 Yup, there's a version.

Saw that now. :-)

 How did you know it was heat?

Well, Tom was kind enough to point out to me that (this is my basic 
understanding - he'll correct me if I'm wrong) the reported CPU temp from 
lm-sensors/Gkrellm is actually 10-20c *less* than what it actually is. So, 
when I would run cpuburn, with Gkrellm open so I could watch the temp, it 
would go to about 55c before locking up/rebooting. If you add 10-20c to that, 
you can easily see that my CPU temp might actually have been 75c which, 
needless to say, is a tad bit hot. So I added the case/fan/cpu mod that I'll 
send to you offlist shortly, and now it stays about 37-39c, and the big diff 
is that with cpuburn running for +30mins, it only goes to about 40-41c.

The final argument is that the lockups/reboots went away. grin

-- 
  
  /\  
DarkLord 
  \/  


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Overclock!

2003-08-28 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Thursday August 28 2003 02:20 pm, mike wrote:
 I'll take them if ther not gone already

 Mike McNeese

   First one to ask can have the Soyo k7vta pro mobo and the 1.4
  gig Athlon for the cost of mailin.  Ah, heck, I'll throw in the
  ram too. My brother could use it, but he doesn't know that.
  'Sides he considers somethin like that  major surgery.

 I apologize to the list. Mea Culpa. I should'a specified off 
list responses. In any event, Darklord beat everybody to the punch.

   He's a good guy anyhow ;)   Sort'a helpful around here.

Sorry Mike,
-- 
Tom Brinkman  Corpus Christi, Texas


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com