Re: [newbie] Mac OS X versus Linux - factual please

2002-02-14 Per discussione NDPTAL85


On Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 03:16  AM, Andrei Raevsky wrote:

 Hi guys,
 Thanks for all your comments which, while very interesting, do not 
 quite answer my maybe poorly formulated question.  So I will re-phrase 
 it: do you know of any comparisons between MAC OS X and Linux which 
 would look at aspects such as connectivity, multi-tasking, multi-user 
 capability, telnet (how many simultaneous sessions), file system 
 comparison (journalling), crash recovery, users and group 
 administration, etc.
 Rather than a philosophical comparison with praise or blame I would 
 simply seek an objective technical/factual comparison of the compare 
 and contrast type.
 Many thanks in advance,
 Andrei


Ok to save you some time the only differences are in the file system. 
Linux can use the ext2, ext3, JFS, ResierFS or XFS file systems. All 
except ext2 are journaling. Mac OS X can use the HFS+ (which is the 
recommended one) or the BSD UFS filesystem. At the moment there are no 
journaling capabilities available under OS X although FreeBSD's 
SoftUpdates are under consideration.

As for the rest I'll run it down item by item

Connectivity? What do you mean by that?

Multi-tasking: Both Linux and Mac OS X have pre-emptive multitasking.

Multi-user: Both OS's can have multiple users logged in at any one time.

Telnet: Thats a setting that can be changed on either OS. Suffice it to 
say under normal circumstances no one will reach the limit on either OS.

Crash recovery: What do you mean by this? It crashes, you reboot. You 
can use backup software/hardware with either OS.

User and group administration: In addition to the normal Unix users and 
groups, you can use NIS on both OS's. OS X on its own has a unique 
Netinfo Domain Database system that can be used to admin networks 
consisting of clients of any OS. Additionaly SAMBA (SMB) can be 
installed and used on both to replicate Windows networking capabilities 
(PDC's BDC's...etc).

Mac OS X is closely related to FreeBSD Unix (www.freebsd.org). The core 
of OS X (Darwin) inherited a lot of technology/features from FreeBSD. 
Since FreeBSD and Linux were already very similar (although not 
identical) the differences the user would see were already very little. 
This remains so on OS X. By comparing Mac OS X to Linux you're really 
just comparing one Unix to another, like Solaris to AIX or HP-UX to 
Tru64. What sets Mac OS X apart from other Unix's is its ability to run 
regular applications in addition to Unix apps. Things like Microsoft 
Office, Adobe Photoshop, Macromedia Freehand, Internet Explorer, 
Quicken, and video games such as Quake, Doom, StarCraft, WarCraftetc 
that are all native to the platform.

And no I don't know of any sites that have an exact comparison, if 
anyone else does please post a link to it! It really would be redundant 
though since more or less *NIX is *NIX.






--
Blonde Klingons: Because it was a good day to dye!
--




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: Re(4): [newbie] Mac OS X versus Linux?!

2002-02-14 Per discussione NDPTAL85


On Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 11:30  AM, Mike Settle wrote:

 I thought this was supposed to be a Mandrake forum - For the last three
 days, all I've seen is Mac OS related !!!  Why don't you guys find a
 chatroom, or something.

Have you actually been reading the emails? This entire thread stopped 
talking about Mac OS dozens of messages ago and is now talking about the 
Linux hardware support situation.






--
Mac OS X, FreeBSD, Mandrake Linux and Windows XP Pro are my OS's. I am 
GEEK, hear me roar.
--




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Mac OS X versus Linux?!

2002-02-12 Per discussione NDPTAL85
 On Tuesday, February 12, 2002, at 11:12  AM, Andrei Raevsky wrote:

Hi,

I am looking for a good, thourough and detailed, technical comparison of Mac OS X versus Linux.  A friend of mine is a really "religious" Mac user and it will take a lot to make him try Linux.  I would like to help him with this.

Please send me any good articles (or links) you have.

Thanks,

Andrei

I use both Mac OS X and Mandrake Linux. Either one is fine for desktop usage. Let him stick to what he has, there really is no need for you to convince him to switch. Mac OS X is an excellent Unix by the way. There isn't much you can do with one that you can't do with the other.



--
Mac OS X, FreeBSD, Mandrake Linux and Windows XP Pro are my OS's. I am GEEK, hear me roar.
--

Re: [newbie] Mac OS X versus Linux?!

2002-02-12 Per discussione NDPTAL85
On Tuesday, February 12, 2002, at 11:12  AM, Andrei Raevsky wrote:

Hi,

I am looking for a good, thourough and detailed, technical comparison of Mac OS X versus Linux.  A friend of mine is a really "religious" Mac user and it will take a lot to make him try Linux.  I would like to help him with this.

Please send me any good articles (or links) you have.

Thanks,

Andrei

Sorry, I forgot to ask this in my first reply but why do you feel the need to convert your friend to Linux if he is happy with Mac OS X?






--
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.
-- 

Re: [newbie] Mac OS X versus Linux?!

2002-02-12 Per discussione NDPTAL85

 On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:04:56 -0500, NDPTAL85 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 Meanwhile ArsDigita has closed up shop

 http://www.arsdigita.com/

 All the links seem to work. Maybe you meant ADUniversity? The ACS is 
 still
 open source and still available, though it's been converted from TCL to 
 Java.


Yeah its closed. Went out of business. It was announced on Slashdot last 
week. There's OpenACS too but who knows where that will lead.






--
Computers come in two styles - prototype and obsolete!
--




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] Urpmi Problems

2002-01-28 Per discussione NDPTAL85

For some reason whenever I add a source to my urpmi database it becomes 
corrupted in a way that won't let me update it. For example no matter 
which Cooker source I add, whenever I use urpmi.update to update it I 
get this back:

[root@Dreadnaught ndptal85]# urpmi.update
the entry to update is missing
(one of ¨K)


Now this is really strange because I keep clearing and adding the 
sources but urpmi can never find them when it comes to updating them. 
When I use them to install something however it DOES work.








---
Avast, Ye land lubbers!
---




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] A bit dangerous?

2001-12-25 Per discussione NDPTAL85


On Monday, December 24, 2001, at 08:30  PM, Doug Lerner wrote:

 Not really. But then again Mac OS 9 does the same thing. You can click 
 on
 any partition on the Desktop and then choose Initialize from the
 Special Menu and without a single word or warning the partition is
 initialized!

 doug


Well thats not true at all. First of all Mac OS 9 won't let you 
initialize the startup partition/disk at all. You have to boot from 
another volume/CD to do that. This is the prompt you get The disk 'USS 
ENTERPRISE' could not be erased, because it is the startup disk, which 
contains the active system software.

Next when you go to initialize a volume which you CAN format you get 
this warning Completely erase 'DEEP SPACE NINE' (ATA Bus 0 Dev 0, 
v3.2.5)?

So as you can see you get warnings whenever you go to format a disk or 
drive for any reason under Mac OS 9. Where did you get the without a 
single word or warning the partition is initialized from?





---
Linux is Luke. FreeBSD is Yoda.
---




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Just to let you know

2001-12-20 Per discussione NDPTAL85
On Thursday, December 20, 2001, at 06:27 PM, Bob B. Bomar wrote:

I have been using FreeBSD for about a year now, and I love it.  I wanted to see what the major diffrences between BSD and Linux for my self.  I am impressed by the graphic install, though, I am used to the text install of FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and NetBSD.  I will admit that it is easier to install, but the FreeBSD install gives a little more control over what and where you install everything, but that is a problem with those who do not understand what is going on.  Iam impressed to Mandrakes ability to have an easy installer.  I do think that Mandrake is a contender for the Desktop OS if people will rid them selves of ignorance and open their eyes.
 
Bob Bomar


As you can see in this particular random sig of mine, I run FreeBSD too. Its a great OS. Mandrake is the only distro of Linux that I could find that gave me the same level of conveience. 






--
Mac OS X, FreeBSD, Mandrake Linux and Windows XP Pro are my OS's. I am GEEK, hear me roar.
--








Re: [newbie] Freeserve, trouble with mail

2001-12-19 Per discussione NDPTAL85

On Wednesday, December 19, 2001, at 09:49 AM, Adrian Lynch wrote:

 I'm having trouble subscribing to this list using Freeserve. I have all 
 the
 posts coming to my work account but people are complaining that 20,000
 emails on the server is too much :O)

 Hass anyone else had problem with them, they don't seem to answer my 
 emails,
 and it will pain me to call their help line. I am getting mail from 
 them,
 but I can't seem to get the subscription confirmation to come back. Is 
 it a
 problem with the list or should I hound Freeserver some more?

 Thanks in advance people

I don't know what Freeserve is but it sounds like an ISP or email 
service. In any case if you need free reliable Pop 3 email check out 
softhome.net




-
Fate protects fools, little children, and ships named Enterprise.
-




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Warning for newbies, learn from my mistake

2001-12-17 Per discussione NDPTAL85

For future reference, urpmi is a safe way to update your kernel. su to 
root and enter urpmi kernel. Its the CLI end to the Software Manager 
so if you want newer kernels put the cooker ftp's in your sources.





-
Fate protects fools, little children, and ships named Enterprise.
-




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Mandrake illegal?

2001-12-11 Per discussione NDPTAL85

On Tuesday, December 11, 2001, at 09:56 AM, Tom Brinkman wrote:


  http://www.adequacy.org/?op=displaystory;sid=2001/12/2/42056/2147


 BSD, Lunix, Debian and Mandrake are all versions of an illegal hacker
 operation system, invented by a Soviet computer hacker named Linyos
 Torovoltos, before the Russians lost the Cold War.

;)
 --
 Tom Brinkman _ South Texas, USA_

 History is a tool used by politicians to justify their intentions.
 -- Ted Koppel

 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Adequacy.org is a dark humor parody site. Everything they print is a 
joke like the onion.com.





---
All this..and more!
---




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] Re: [expert] DNS problems (Its FIXED! W00 H00!)

2001-12-10 Per discussione NDPTAL85

On Monday, December 10, 2001, at 02:01 PM, Larry Sword wrote:

 NDPTAL85 wrote:

 Here is the results of route -n

 [root@Dreadnaught root]# route -n
 Kernel IP routing table
 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
 Iface
 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00
 eth0
 127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U 0  00
 lo

 I dialup to Earthlink thru a Netgear 4 port 56k router (model RM356). 
 It
 has 4 machines connected to it of which one is the Mandrake box. The
 others are Mac OS X, FreeBSD and Windows XP. They are working fine.

 When using a static address on the Linux machine it

 Sounds like you need to add a gateway address to your
 /etc/sysconfig/nerwork file:

 GATEWAY=the address of your router gateway


 Larry

Larry, thanks! I added what you said to add and its working now. I still 
don't know what caused it to stop working before but at least I know its 
working now and I don't have to re-install. And thanks to everyone else 
who helped too.

(I'm cross-posting so everyone can see the solution)




-
Yoda's answering machine, this is. Leave a message, you might and call 
you back, he will.
-




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] DNS problems

2001-12-09 Per discussione NDPTAL85

After about a week of taking my Mandrake 8.1 box off of DHCP and giving 
it its own permanent IP it can no longer resolve domain names when using 
that IP. When I switch it back to DHCP it starts working fine again. I 
am using kernel 2.4.13-12mdk. Has anyone else come across this problem?








My truck is not leaking, it's marking its territory.





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] DNS problems

2001-12-09 Per discussione NDPTAL85

On Sunday, December 9, 2001, at 07:15 PM, Dave Sherman wrote:

 On Sun, 2001-12-09 at 18:09, NDPTAL85 wrote:
 After about a week of taking my Mandrake 8.1 box off of DHCP and giving
 it its own permanent IP it can no longer resolve domain names when 
 using
 that IP. When I switch it back to DHCP it starts working fine again. I
 am using kernel 2.4.13-12mdk. Has anyone else come across this problem?

 My guess would be that your /etc/resolv.conf file is empty. If you were
 receiving your DNS info via DHCP, then when you disabled DHCP you no
 longer were receiving the IP addresses of your DNS servers. Enter them
 in /etc/resolv.conf, and you should be good to go.

 If it turns out that you already have the correct IP addresses for your
 DNS servers in /etc/resolv.conf, I don't know what is going on.

 Dave
 --
 I think that I shall never hear
 A poem lovelier than beer.
 The stuff that Joe's Bar has on tap,
 With golden base and snowy cap.
 The stuff that I can drink all day
 Until my mem'ry melts away.
 Poems are made by fools, I fear
 But only Schlitz can make a beer.

Yes I have already added the DNS servers into resolve.conf (you can 
actually do that via NetConf as well) and it still isn't working. It was 
working before on its own IP and it just decided to stop working for 
some reason. I haven't changed anything or installed anything on it to 
prompt it, one day SETI@HOME was just unable to retrieve anymore work 
units and the DNS issue was the problem.





--
If God is watching us, the least we can do is be entertaining.
--




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] DNS settings

2001-12-07 Per discussione NDPTAL85

I have 4 boxes on my home network. A WinXP box, a Mac OS X box, Mandrake 
Linux workstation and a FreeBSD workstation. Earthlink is my ISP and 
they have 3 DNS servers. I want to set my Linux and FreeBSD boxes up as 
local DNS servers so I figured I would just add their IPs to the list of 
nameservers bringing that up to a total of 5 nameservers that OS X or XP 
could resolve to. Then someone told me most resolvers only check the 
first 3 entries anyway. Does anyone know if this is true or not? Thanks.





--
Hey you kids, get off my lawn!
--




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] DNS settings

2001-12-07 Per discussione NDPTAL85

On Friday, December 7, 2001, at 06:49 PM, Ed Tharp wrote:

 not only true..but legal and any more than three are ill-legal

 On Friday 07 December 2001 17:40, you wrote:
 I have 4 boxes on my home network. A WinXP box, a Mac OS X box, 
 Mandrake
 Linux workstation and a FreeBSD workstation. Earthlink is my ISP and
 they have 3 DNS servers. I want to set my Linux and FreeBSD boxes up as
 local DNS servers so I figured I would just add their IPs to the list 
 of
 nameservers bringing that up to a total of 5 nameservers that OS X or 
 XP
 could resolve to. Then someone told me most resolvers only check the
 first 3 entries anyway. Does anyone know if this is true or not? 
 Thanks.





 --
 Hey you kids, get off my lawn!
 --

 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




What exactly is illegal and why?






There is no right way to do the wrong thing.





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] IP settings

2001-12-04 Per discussione NDPTAL85

How do I manually set or change my IP thru the terminal? Does it have 
something to do with ifconfig? Thanks.




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] How to upgrade to ext3?

2001-11-30 Per discussione NDPTAL85

I have a standard install of Mandrake 8.1 and I have upgraded the kernel 
to the latest Cooker kernel 2.4.13-12mdk. I was wondering how can I 
upgrade my filesystem to ext3 from ext2? Anyone have some sites that 
show you how to do this? Anything Mandrake specific perhaps? Thanks.




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] do I need AMD Kernel

2001-11-30 Per discussione NDPTAL85

up2date is a Red Hat utility. The article may have been specific to RH 
Linux. As far as I know generic kernels work fine on Athlons.


On Friday, November 30, 2001, at 11:40 AM, Mr.E. wrote:

 I have an AMD Athlon Thunderbird processor.

 Do I need to install an Athlon kernel, or just leave everything  
 (Mandrake 8.1) as is?

 Saw this in an issue of Penguin Shell and didn't know if applied to all 
 Linux distros or not:

 Athlon Kernel]
 If you're running an Athlon machine, up2date will update your kernel to 
 i386. Instead of updating it with up2date, download the 
 2.4.9-7.athlon.rpm and rpm -ivh it. Grub will see the old kernel as 
 default so you just need to reset that and you're golden.

 - Ernie Schroder



 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] How to upgrade to ext3?

2001-11-30 Per discussione NDPTAL85

Ok I followed your instructions and I saw the journals being created on 
my partitions but when I power cycle the box its still running fcsk. 
There's no change it keeps running fcsk each time I cycle the box. Any 
ideas? Thanks.


On Friday, November 30, 2001, at 09:37 AM, Dave Sherman wrote:

 On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 04:39, NDPTAL85 wrote:
 I have a standard install of Mandrake 8.1 and I have upgraded the 
 kernel
 to the latest Cooker kernel 2.4.13-12mdk. I was wondering how can I
 upgrade my filesystem to ext3 from ext2? Anyone have some sites that
 show you how to do this? Anything Mandrake specific perhaps? Thanks.

 You're in luck! I just did this yesterday morning, and it was a piece of
 cake.

 1. Make sure you have tune2fs installed. It is probably /sbin/tune2fs,
 and so won't be in your path as a user, but will be as root.

 2. Unmount any unused partitions (nfs or samba mount points, windows
 partitions if you dual-boot).

 3. Run this command as root:
   tune2fs -j /dev/hdxx
 where hdxx is the device name for your hard drive partitions (hda1,
 hda5, etc.). You need to run this for each partition you want to convert
 -- you do not need to do this on your swap partition, only on your ext2
 partitions.

 4. Edit /etc/fstab, and change all instances of ext2 to ext3.

 Dave
 --
 Love may laugh at locksmiths, but he has a profound respect for money
 bags.
   -- Sidney Paternoster, The Folly of the Wise





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] kapm-idled?

2001-11-30 Per discussione NDPTAL85

In top what is kapm-idled and why is it taking up all of my CPU time? Is 
it just marking how much idle CPU time there is?

I'm using Mandrake 8.1 with 2.4.13-12mdk




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] How to upgrade to ext3?

2001-11-30 Per discussione NDPTAL85

Ok got it working. Someone gave me a tip. You also have to have the 
latest e2fsprogs installed so I just ran urpmi e2fsprogs to install it 
and ext3 worked! Thanks again.




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] kapm-idled?

2001-11-30 Per discussione NDPTAL85

I'm running KDE.





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] Cooker and urpmi probelms

2001-11-29 Per discussione NDPTAL85

I'm trying to update my kernel to the latest cooker version. I have 
added cooker to my sources but I keep getting this error:

[root@Dreadnaught ndptal85]# urpmi kernel
--15:15:35--  ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/distributions/mandrake-
devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/kernel-2.4.13-11mdk.i586.rpm
= `/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/.listing'
Connecting to ftp.sunet.se:21... connected!
Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!
== SYST ... done.== PWD ... done.
== TYPE I ... done.  == CWD /pub/Linux/distributions/mandrake-
devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS ... done.
== PASV ... done.== LIST ... done.

 0K .. .. .. .. ..
50K .. .. .. .. ..
   100K .. .. .. .. ..
   150K .. .. 

15:16:24 (4.51 KB/s) - `/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/.listing' saved [182754]

Removed `/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/.listing'.
--15:16:24--  ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/distributions/mandrake-
devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/kernel-2.4.13-11mdk.i586.rpm
= `/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/kernel-2.4.13-11mdk.i586.rpm'
== CWD not required.
== PASV ... done.== RETR kernel-2.4.13-11mdk.i586.rpm ... 
installing /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/kernel-2.4.13-11mdk.i586.rpm

No such file `kernel-2.4.13-11mdk.i586.rpm'.

error: open of /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/kernel-2.4.13-11mdk.i586.rpm 
failed: No such file or directory
Installation failed


Whats going on, does anyone know how to fix this?




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Cooker and urpmi probelms

2001-11-29 Per discussione NDPTAL85

I heard the ability to upgrade the kernel had been temporarily removed 
from the GUI tools but that it would be returned someday. Does anyone 
have an idea on when? It kinda defeats the purpose of having automated 
tools if you have to manually download and upgrade something like the 
kernel yourself.


On Thursday, November 29, 2001, at 04:16 PM, Tom Brinkman wrote:

 On Thursday 29 November 2001 03:26 pm, NDPTAL85 wrote:
 I'm trying to update my kernel to the latest cooker version. I have
 added cooker to my sources but I keep getting this error:

 [root@Dreadnaught ndptal85]# urpmi kernel

I really don't know, so this is only conjecture on my part as I've
 only experimented now an then with 'urpmi'.  I suspect you shouldn't
 use it for the same reasons SoftwareManager or MandrakeUpdate should
 NEVER be used for upgrading a kernel.

Try d/l'g   kernel-2.4.13-11mdk.i586.rpm  to your HDD and then
 installing it with 'rpm -ivh kernel-2.4.13-11mdk.i586.rpm'

Just betch'a it'll work flawlessly ;)
 --
   Tom Brinkman             Galveston Bay, USA

 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Cooker and urpmi probelms

2001-11-29 Per discussione NDPTAL85

Wait I just checked the ftp site manually. The reason why it was 
reporting no file was because it has changed from kernel-2.4.13-11mdk to 
kernel-2.4.13-12mdk! So how do I get urpmi to update itself so it can 
see the new file?


On Thursday, November 29, 2001, at 04:16 PM, Tom Brinkman wrote:

 On Thursday 29 November 2001 03:26 pm, NDPTAL85 wrote:
 I'm trying to update my kernel to the latest cooker version. I have
 added cooker to my sources but I keep getting this error:

 [root@Dreadnaught ndptal85]# urpmi kernel

I really don't know, so this is only conjecture on my part as I've
 only experimented now an then with 'urpmi'.  I suspect you shouldn't
 use it for the same reasons SoftwareManager or MandrakeUpdate should
 NEVER be used for upgrading a kernel.

Try d/l'g   kernel-2.4.13-11mdk.i586.rpm  to your HDD and then
 installing it with 'rpm -ivh kernel-2.4.13-11mdk.i586.rpm'

Just betch'a it'll work flawlessly ;)
 --
   Tom Brinkman             Galveston Bay, USA

 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Cooker and urpmi probelms

2001-11-29 Per discussione NDPTAL85

And why would it not be appropriate for the front end to upgrade the 
kernel as well? That makes no sense. If you don't want to use a front 
end to upgrade the kernel you can just opt not to and install your own. 
Just because its the kernel does not mean it shouldn't be updated with 
the same tools that everything else is updated with.


On Thursday, November 29, 2001, at 05:36 PM, Tom Brinkman wrote:

 On Thursday 29 November 2001 05:36 pm, NDPTAL85 wrote:
 I heard the ability to upgrade the kernel had been temporarily
 removed from the GUI tools but that it would be returned someday.
 Does anyone have an idea on when? It kinda defeats the purpose of
 having automated tools if you have to manually download and upgrade
 something like the kernel yourself.

 I'll offer more conjecture.  I don't believe 'someday' will ever
 come anytime soon. My basis is that package managers, CL or GUI
 fronts for 'em, are for installing or upgrading software, not the OS.
 The kernel is Linux, the OS. Everything else is just GNU (hopefully)
 software, and some pretend files (eg, /proc, /dev) that it interacts
 with and runs.

 Sort'a hard to keep your pickup doin 70 mph 
 while you're changin motors ;)
 --
   Tom Brinkman             Galveston Bay, USA




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Cooker and urpmi probelms (Success!)

2001-11-29 Per discussione NDPTAL85

Alright! urpmi was able to update my kernel after I updated the sources 
list.

[ndptal85@Dreadnaught ndptal85]$ uname -a
Linux Dreadnaught 2.4.13-12mdk #1 Fri Nov 23 18:44:14 CET 2001 i686 
unknown


Urpmi is useful when it works but its still very rough and unpolished. 
For instance why do we have to download a 12-13 meg file just when 
choosing a new source? Shouldn't pointing our machines at the new source 
be enough? Then it would be sorta like Debian's apt system where you 
just edit your sources to download from a different place. No huge file 
to download each time you choose a new source. Oh well at least it 
worked this time. :P




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] SRPMS

2001-11-28 Per discussione NDPTAL85

SRPMS are Source RPM's. RPM's are Red Hat package Manager installs. 
Mandrake, is an RPM based distro so you can use RPM's to install things 
instead of compiling from source as you have been. Enter man rpm into 
your terminal to learn more. Once you have gotten the basic commands 
down check out rpmfind.net and search for new software to install.


On Wednesday, November 28, 2001, at 03:09 AM, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:

 Hi,

 Maybe someone can explain what are the SRPMS? I usually install programs
 from a .tar.bz2 file, using the 'configure, make, make install'
 sequence. What should I do with the other files that I find the SRPM?
 (Especially the SPEC files, and the patches). What is the advantage of
 using these instead of the plain .tar.bz2 files?

 Thanks,
 Moshe

 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] The problem with Linux

2001-11-25 Per discussione NDPTAL85

Just because something is different doesn't mean it should automatically 
be harder. As easy as RPM's are to use they still aren't as good as 
installing something on Windows or the Mac OS. You shouldn't need to 
hunt for an extra anything not even if its as close as your own CD. It 
wouldn't be making Linux Windows-like to fix that problem it would 
just be making it more simpler and easier to use. You could always opt 
to compile from source if you need to personally test your own manhood 
when installing software.
On Sunday, November 25, 2001, at 10:12 AM, Richie wrote:

 ..Wow, what a lazy bunch of buggers!

 First, the 'hunting for libraries' complaint is moot: I have yet to 
 look any
 further than my own LM install disks for libraries-- LM is probably 
 better
 than many distros out there as they actually provide you with more than 
 one
 install CD and all the stuff they offer has been compiled for a Mandrake
 system so it's going to work.

 Second, no one says you *have* to install the latest kernel and it 
 isn't even
 necessary unless you're adding brand new hardware that didn't exist six
 months ago-- how many of you out there are installing kernels just 
 because it
 has a higher number?

 By-and-by the install process is standard-- using RPMs is easy enough 
 and for
 the odd times when I have to compile there's always an install.sh or
 configure.sh-- and another silly thing that even comes with Windoze
 installations: README files-- how many of you have failed to install
 something properly because you didn't read the instructions.

 Bottom line:  If you want something 'Just like Windows' then use 
 Windows.
 There is no such thing as out-and-out replacing an OS.  They all have 
 their
 advantages and disadvantages.

 And while we're at it the day Linux starts acting completely like 
 Windows is
 the same day I have to defragment my ReiserFS partition after I do a 
 virus
 scan because my firewalling software didn't work.

 Linux is different.  Get over it!  I really don't care if my neighbour 
 is
 using it or not, I just want Linux to be there so I have a choice in 
 how I
 use my PC. Period!

 Richie


 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] The problem with Linux

2001-11-25 Per discussione NDPTAL85

Better is a subjective term. Not all would agree. Copying MS isn't the 
goal. Coming to a parity with the Windows UI (Or Mac OS) in terms of 
ease of use is. That is the difference.


On Sunday, November 25, 2001, at 07:48 PM, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:

 On Monday 26 November 2001 01:19, you wrote:  their virtul cave as 
 they need it to be.

 oop!, Linux Nut alert!!


 Stay away from mine!:)

 Anyway! Nobody answered my question: Why would we want to copy M$?
 We're different and better cause we're together! It's as simple 
 as
 that.
 So put your energy in thinking of a better way to get things done with 
 a GUI
 instead of complaining that it doesn't look like the one you don't want 
 it to
 be.

 Good hunting,
 Harm Bathoorn

 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] hostname

2001-11-19 Per discussione NDPTAL85

Which file in /etc do I have to edit to change my hostname on Mandrake 
8.1?


Thanks.




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] hostname

2001-11-19 Per discussione NDPTAL85

There's nothing in hosts that says anything about a hostname. This is 
the only thing in my hosts file:

127.0.0.1   localhost.localdomain localhost





On Monday, November 19, 2001, at 02:48 PM, Mark D'voo wrote:

 /etc/hosts (must be root)

 On Tuesday 20 November 2001 07:44 am, you wrote:
 Which file in /etc do I have to edit to change my hostname on Mandrake
 8.1?


 Thanks.




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] hostname

2001-11-19 Per discussione NDPTAL85

Nope I'm just trying to edit it manually. In FreeBSD there is rc.conf 
and on OS X there's hostname but on Mandrake I can't seem to find the 
right file.


On Monday, November 19, 2001, at 08:55 PM, Anuerin G. Diaz wrote:

 hi,

 i dont know specifically but you can change it using linuxconf. are you 
 trying
 to change your hostname through a script/application?

 ciao!

 NDPTAL85 wrote:

 Which file in /etc do I have to edit to change my hostname on Mandrake
 8.1?

 Thanks.


 --

 Programming, an artform that fights back.

 =
 Anuerin G. Diaz
 Design Engineer
 Millennium Software, Incorporated
 25/F Equitable-PCI Tower
 ADB Avenue cor. Poveda St.
 Ortigas Center, Pasig City

 Tel# 638-3070 loc. 72
 Fax# 638-3079
 =



 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Urpmi help

2001-11-15 Per discussione NDPTAL85

I trust the files on the CD's I would just like to be able to install 
software from the net since its more convienent then walking over to the 
machine and inserting the proper CD. Ok I have some sources I want to 
add but I don't understand the hdlist part. I can't find the hdlist on 
any of the sites I want to add. What does relative path of the hdlist 
mean exactly? For example I want to add this source 
ftp://carroll.cac.psu.edu/pub/linux/distributions/mandrake/8.1/i586/Mandrake/
RPMS/ so what would the path of the hdlist be? Thanks.


On Wednesday, November 14, 2001, at 10:50 PM, bascule wrote:

 i'm assuming that you have set up a source for the same version as is 
 on the
 cd i.e. the original distro 8.1. in that case i think that urpmi must be
 going for hte 'easiest' route to files, i don't recall this being 
 explicitly
 mentioned but it makes sense, assuming that you have correctly set up 
 your
 other source then you can remove the cd sources and urpmi should use 
 the net,
 is it that you don't trust the files on the cds?

 bascule

 On Thursday 15 Nov 2001 3:43 am, you wrote:
 Alright I know how to add media to it but how do I tell it where to get
 the stuff from? It always goes for the CD and never the net. Do I have
 to remove the CD sources for it to go to the net?



 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] urpmi issues continued

2001-11-15 Per discussione NDPTAL85

Ok I entered this in my console to add a source to urpmi and it failed, 
can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong?

[root@dhcppc3 ndptal85]# urpmi.addmedia ftp 
ftp://ftp2.sourceforge.net/pub/mirror
s/mandrake/8.1/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/ with 
ftp://ftp2.sourceforge.net/pub/mirrors/ma
ndrake/8.1/i586/Mandrake/base/hdlist.cz

It always ends up with this error:

unlink: No such file or directory
wget of 
[source_url/ftp://ftp2.sourceforge.net/pub/mirrors/mandrake/8.1/i586/Mandrake/
base/hdlist.cz] failed
no hdlist file found for medium ftp
unable to update medium ftp






Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] linux on a Dell I 4100

2001-11-14 Per discussione NDPTAL85

Linux runs fine on the Dell 4000 Notebook that I have. I bought it to 
run WinXP but it shipped with WinME on it and I couldn't stand that so I 
installed Mandrake and RH on there in the meantime just to see if they 
would work. This was Mandrake 8.1 and RH 7.2. Everything ran fine.

Also check Slashdot.com, a recent story asked the same question about 
Linux compatible laptops yesterday or two days ago.


On Wednesday, November 14, 2001, at 10:07 AM, quaylar wrote:

 hiho ppl !

 i am thinking of buying a new Dell Inspiron 4100 notebook and was 
 wondering
 whether anybody could give hints/advice regarding its compatibility 
 with linux.

 i already searched the linux-notebook.com website - but unfortunately 
 its rather outdated (at least regarding the Dell notebooks)
 this NB has a built in 3com 56k modem and 10/100 LAN chip.
 According to some deja.com posts this is a hardware modem and should 
 therefore work under linux.
 but i am simply not sure and would be glad if anybody could post his 
 experience.

 additionally all recommendations for linux-compatible notebooks are 
 welcome ;)

 regards and TIA,

 --quay


 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] Urpmi help

2001-11-14 Per discussione NDPTAL85

Can anyone point me to a site showing me how to fully use urpmi? If not 
can anyone tell me how to get it to download stuff from the web instead 
of from the CD's? Also does anyone know of any http sites I can enter as 
sources? Thanks.




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Urpmi help

2001-11-14 Per discussione NDPTAL85

Alright I know how to add media to it but how do I tell it where to get 
the stuff from? It always goes for the CD and never the net. Do I have 
to remove the CD sources for it to go to the net?


On Wednesday, November 14, 2001, at 06:52 PM, bascule wrote:

 you need to add a source to the list of sources that urpmi uses, have 
 you
 read the man pages for urpmi, urpmi.addmedia and urpmi.update?
 use the list of download sites from www.linux-mandrake.com to find a 
 source
 that is convenient for you and do similar to the following
 (do this as root, you can add yourself to the urpmi group to avoid 
 this-i
 think, though that may just be necessary to actually install using 
 urpmi)

 #urpmi.addmedia somename for your source 
 ftp://host/path/to/../Mandrake/
 with ./base/hdlist.cz

 this should work, the argument after 'with' is the relative path of the 
 file
 'hdlist.cz from the ftp path specified earlier, you can also use an 
 http url
 and you can also add user:password@ options as necessary as you would 
 in a
 url window in a browser i.e. ftp://me:mypass@host/path/to/ etc.

 you can use either current 8.1 mirrors or cooker mirrors to download 
 from,
 you could set up a source for each but then when you run urpmi you will
 always install the latest version of any package which may not be what 
 you
 want, the mandrake software manager front end promises to let you 
 choose what
 sourcess to look in but i've never tried that,

 this help?

 bascule


 On Wednesday 14 Nov 2001 8:48 pm, you wrote:
 Can anyone point me to a site showing me how to fully use urpmi? If not
 can anyone tell me how to get it to download stuff from the web instead
 of from the CD's? Also does anyone know of any http sites I can enter 
 as
 sources? Thanks.

 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Windows XP: EXtra Proprietary

2001-10-31 Per discussione NDPTAL85

Well, you go to a store and buy it. Then when you install it, the 30 
day countdown begins. If you don't activate it within that time frame it 
stops working.

On Thursday, November 1, 2001, at 12:20 AM, Newbie wrote:

 So how do you get ahold of the software
 in the first place if it only lasts for 30 days?

 I would not pay twice for it.

 Thank goodness for Linux :)


 On Wednesday 31 October 2001 11:16 pm, you wrote:
 Alright enough's enough. RH is not subject to an activation scheme. Its
 free software just like any other Linux. What you DO have to do is
 register (for free) with the Red Hat Network for automated updates. You
 can still download the updates in regular RPM's but if you want an
 entire network of RH boxes to use the RH Network then you'll have to 
 pay
 for that privledge. Thats all. There is no activation scheme when using
 RH.

 And for that matter, even though you have to activate WinXP you do have
 30 days to do so before it will shut down. Once activated you can
 upgrade any component within a 120 day period as long as you do not
 cross a certain threshold (i.e. replacing everything at once). So yes
 you can upgrade your RAM and HD both at the same time or RAM and Video
 card or HD and CPU without triggering a re-activation, and thats all
 that happens. A re-activation is triggered and the OS will then 
 function
 again. If no major upgrading is done within 120 days XP resets itself
 meaning you could (but not legally) install WinXP on two different
 computers if you bothered to wait 120 days between installs.

 Now, can we stop the OS bashing please?

 On Wednesday, October 31, 2001, at 11:39 PM, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
 On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:40:39 -0500, Charles A Edwards
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 wrote:
 I do not understand the huecry, especially from linux users, about 
 the
 activation process of Windows XP, or the fact that it is tied to 1
 system.

 This not an unheard of, or unused procedure.

 Red Hat has been using basicly the same in there treatment of
 installations
 since 7.1.

 Ummm... How?

 Red Hat is GPL. You can download it freely of the Internet. What's the
 point in
 a product activation copy protection scheme then?

 --
 Sridhar Dhanapalan

 HTML needs a rant tag. -- Eric S. Raymond


 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com