RE: Virtualize Terminal Server or not?

2008-02-21 Thread Andy Crellin

Hi Phil,

 

Yes - most use ADSL links so downstream  (from user to TS) could be up
to 8Mbps and upstream (TS to user) could be up to about 750Kbps.  We
also have a few on a 100Mbps WAN link who get a blinding performance of
course :-)

 

Cheers,

 

Andy

 

Andy Crellin 
Technical Services Manager
Leonard Cheshire Disability
Telephone: 01904 479200
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Phil Guevara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 20 February 2008 20:36
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Virtualize Terminal Server or not?

 

Andy,

 

Do your users access TS across the WAN?  and if so, what type of
bandwidth do you have?

 

Thanks for your help.

 

Best,

 

Phil  

 

 



From: Andy Crellin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 1:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Virtualize Terminal Server or not?

We are running TS virtualised on ESX with about 40 users and its running
fine. They are reasonably well specified, with the 2  hosts being
ProLiant DL380 64bit dual quad-core + 16Gb memory and each VM having 2Gb
memory and a single core to play with. We also use 2X to load balance. I
don't use the facility myself but my colleagues tell me that they and
their users are happy with the response.

 

Andy Crellin 
Technical Services Manager
Leonard Cheshire Disability
Telephone: 01904 479200
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Phil Guevara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 20 February 2008 00:34
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Virtualize Terminal Server or not?

 

Anyone know if it makes sense to virtualize a core terminal server that
will have about 50 concurrent users connecting to it?  Or is it better
to get a new server that will be dedicated for this purpose?

Best Regards,

Phil

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire
Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this
message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability.
If you have received this transmission in error, please contact the
sender and delete it immediately.

Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee,
registered in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186
(England  Wales) and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75.
Registered office: 30 Millbank, London SW1P 4QD.

 

 


Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire 
Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this message. Any 
views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not 
necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please contact the sender and delete it 
immediately.
 
Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee, registered in 
England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186 (England  Wales) and 
no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered office: 30 Millbank, 
London SW1P 4QD.
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Terminal Server 2003 and IE's Enhanced Security Configuration

2008-02-21 Thread Kyle Plummer
I have one GPO for terminal server users. I glanced back at the settings
yesterday and did not see it. I also downloaded Microsoft's white paper
and sample admin template to turn it off and applied it. It still
stubbornly refuses to go away.

I guess I'll try Microsoft's first suggestion in one of their knowledge
base articles: rebuild the box.

Thanks for everyone's help.

Kyle B. Plummer

-Original Message-
From: Mike Semon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 6:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Terminal Server 2003 and IE's Enhanced Security
Configuration

Also if you have a Group Policy applied to Terminal Servers or users
make
sure it is not enabled in policy.

-Original Message-
From: Kyle Plummer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Terminal Server 2003 and IE's Enhanced Security
Configuration

Never actually installed it, but yes the checkbox is clear for both
admins and users. I haven't cleared the cache, but I have logged off and
back on between changes. 


Kyle B. Plummer


-Original Message-
From: Mike Semon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Terminal Server 2003 and IE's Enhanced Security
Configuration

Did you uninstall it for Administrators and Users? Also try clearing IE
Cache and deleting profile.

-Original Message-
From: Kyle Plummer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Terminal Server 2003 and IE's Enhanced Security
Configuration

Tried that first. The box is not checked indicating that it is not
installed.

Kyle B. Plummer

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Boggs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Terminal Server 2003 and IE's Enhanced Security
Configuration

Its in add/remove windows components

Christopher Boggs
Security System Administrator
Miltec Corporation   

office.256-428-1370  
mobile.256-468-0922
fax.256-428-1461

Painstakingly sent to you from my Blackberry...

- Original Message -
From: Kyle Plummer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Wed Feb 20 13:39:09 2008
Subject: Terminal Server 2003 and IE's Enhanced Security Configuration

Any pointers on how to remove IE's Enhanced Security Configuration
would be appreciated. I'm running TS on a W2K3 member server. When
logged in as a regular user, IE's blasted enhanced security is
supposedly installed and is preventing me from running one of my
programs that has a web interface. It does not affect admin users.

 

The enhanced security configuration is not installed (at least
add/remove programs shows it is not installed). I have set the IEHarden
registry value to 0 for each user. I have created a GPO using
Microsoft's adm template specifically disabling the enhanced security. I
have applied the GPO and forced a gpupdate.

 

I still receive the enhanced security is installed dialog box. Short of
rebuilding the server, anyone have experience with getting rid of this
thing?

 

Thanks in advance,

 

Kyle B. Plummer

 







This written advice is not intended or written to be used, and can not
be used, by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be
imposed on the taxpayer.




Norman, Jones, Enlow  Co.  - CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION


This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521, is
confidential, and is intended solely for the use of the individuals or
entities to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient
or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended
recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and
that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this
e-mail and any file attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by telephone
toll-free at (866) 841-6888 or by reply e-mail to the sender. You must
destroy the original transmission and its contents. You will be
reimbursed for reasonable costs incurred in notifying us. 



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~





~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~





~ Upgrade to Next Generation 

GPMC html errors

2008-02-21 Thread Benjamin Zachary

Hi all, Im having an issue with GPMC. I can view my policies and edit them
without issue, but whenever I goto Modeling or Results and create it I will
get error generating html report. I heard this was an IE7 issue (which we
have across the board) but everyone was stating that when that happens
nothing works (view policy etc). Nothing shows up in event logs. I tried
exporting the report and the export is just the error message :-)

Anyone else seen this? I have 2 2003sp2 DC's and 1 XPsp2 cd all happening.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Backup Exec 12

2008-02-21 Thread Stephen Wimberly
I'm still using 10D, because 11D did not solve the _one_ problem I'm
having... I'm curious if 12 comes with a fix?

When backing up a DFS share that is replicated via FSRM I get the error: A
failure occurred accessing the object list and the job status reports
failed.  I have tried creating reports in the xml format and saving them
to the local server, but this does not stop the error.

Any idea if BE12 can backup a DFS share replicated via FSRM?  What used to
be FRS prior to R2.

==

Stephen Wimberly

==


-Original Message-
From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Exec 12

Just did the upgrade to BUE12.  Now I have another 60 days to my trial.
I'll pass on any issues I find after tonight's jobs run.



Roger Wright 
Network Administrator 
Evatone, Inc. 
727.572.7076  x388 
 

An idle mind is worth two in the bush. 
  
  
From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 1:01 PM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Backup Exec 12 
  
Has it been released?  I'm still in my trial for 11D. 
Roger Wright 
Network Administrator 
Evatone, Inc. 
727.572.7076  x388 
 
Go directly to jail.  Do not pass Go, do not collect $200. 
  
  
From: Stefan Jabs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 8:48 AM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: Backup Exec 12 
  
Has anyone installed v12? Any problems? 
  
__ 
Stefan Jafs 
  
  
  
  
  





~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Lenovo?

2008-02-21 Thread Cesare' A. Ramos
Ryan,

In regards to your original question on the Lenovo rep, do you mean
reseller or a Lenovo employee?

To thread:

I agree with what someone posted that pcs = problems but I would add a
second part to that equation, users + pcs = problems.

We have all encountered systems, whether they be servers / laptops / pcs
/ peripherals, that were crap to some and others believe they are the
best thing next to whatever turns your noodle.  

Our experience from a support perspective, IBM and Lenovo blow Dell out
of the water.  But again that is our experience.

My 2 cents.  I step off the soap box and allow the next one on.

CAR

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 10:37 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Lenovo?

Can also one recommend a good Lenovo rep?

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: ntbackup scripts

2008-02-21 Thread Christopher Boggs
How about a cut and paste over at pastebin.com ?

Or do you actually want a file upload?


-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 8:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ntbackup scripts

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Christopher Boggs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Rename it with a .txt extension :)

  Thought of that, but it might still run afoul of signature matching
somewhere, plus it's just an ugly method.  Surely there's gotta be a
website somewhere that's appropriate to use to share this kind of
stuff with?

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Backup Exec 12

2008-02-21 Thread Tom Strader
If it involves Symantec, expect several fixes, DOH!!!

 

-Original Message-
From: Stephen Wimberly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Exec 12

I'm still using 10D, because 11D did not solve the _one_ problem I'm
having... I'm curious if 12 comes with a fix?

When backing up a DFS share that is replicated via FSRM I get the error:
A
failure occurred accessing the object list and the job status reports
failed.  I have tried creating reports in the xml format and saving
them
to the local server, but this does not stop the error.

Any idea if BE12 can backup a DFS share replicated via FSRM?  What used
to
be FRS prior to R2.

==

Stephen Wimberly

==


-Original Message-
From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Exec 12

Just did the upgrade to BUE12.  Now I have another 60 days to my trial.
I'll pass on any issues I find after tonight's jobs run.



Roger Wright 
Network Administrator 
Evatone, Inc. 
727.572.7076  x388 
 

An idle mind is worth two in the bush. 
  
  
From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 1:01 PM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Backup Exec 12 
  
Has it been released?  I'm still in my trial for 11D. 
Roger Wright 
Network Administrator 
Evatone, Inc. 
727.572.7076  x388 
 
Go directly to jail.  Do not pass Go, do not collect $200. 
  
  
From: Stefan Jabs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 8:48 AM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: Backup Exec 12 
  
Has anyone installed v12? Any problems? 
  
__ 
Stefan Jafs 
  
  
  
  
  





~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Spacenavigator PE... Hardware licensing?

2008-02-21 Thread Phillip Partipilo
I noticed on buy.com you can get the SpaceNavigator PE for $40.  This is the
same thing that, a few years ago, our company bought for around $200 each.
It says personal use license. WTF is that?  You cannot license hardware,
IIRC, if you buy it, it is yours to do with however you please...  Don't
they all use the same drivers?  I can't see how they could have a legal foot
to stand on using this thing in a commercial environment, but licensing
experts please direct me otherwise if I am wrong here.

 
Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107
 
 



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Ghost DHCP settings

2008-02-21 Thread David Florea, SysAdmin
 
By mistake yesterday, both of my DCs were down at the same time.  Of
course, the entire network croaked for a few minutes.  But ever since
then, several of my machines are picking up a weird DNS setting.
Instead of 192.168.1.15 and .5, they are showing 192.168.1.1 for a DNS
server, and therefore have great trouble seeing network resources.  I've
doublechecked the DHCP scope and server options, they're correct.  I
don't even have a 1.1 network address on my system.  Where the heck is
that coming from?  I've even had a couple of machines pick it up again a
couple of hours after I've done a /release and /renew.

Thanks,

David
___

The information contained in this E-mail message, including any attached files 
transmitted, is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only 
for the sole use of the individual(s) named above. If you are the intended 
recipient, be aware that your use of any confidential or personal information 
may be restricted by state and federal privacy laws. If you, the reader of this 
message, are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you 
should not further disseminate, distribute or forward this E-mail message. If 
you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete the 
material from your computer system. This message is provided for information 
purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell 
any securities or related financial instruments in any jurisdiction.




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Lyris must be down

2008-02-21 Thread Jon Harris
Looks like Lyris is acting up again.

Jon

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

Re: ntbackup scripts

2008-02-21 Thread Kurt Buff
This is most excellent.

Thanks very much!

Kurt

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Here's a script I use. It requires grep, blat and recode.

  You will have to create your BKS file (it must be Unicode).

  Watch for line wrap.

  rem *
  rem *
  rem * Perform fullback to whatever tape is in the drive and email
  rem * report
  rem *
  rem * Ken Cornetet - 06/10/2002
  rem *
  rem * Revision History
  rem *
  rem * WhenWhoWhat
  rem * ---
  rem * 06/10/2002  Ken Cornetet   Original Issue
  rem * 06/24/2002  Ken Cornetet   Added RSM command per Q267574
  rem *
  rem *
  rem * Requires external programs blat, grep, and recode
  rem *
  rem *

  set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  set SMTP={Name of your SMTP relay host here}
  set NAME=FULL BACKUP %DATE% %TIME%
  set LOGS=%USERPROFILE%\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Windows
  NT\NTBackup\data

  c:
  cd \backup

  rem Delete any extraneous log files
  del %LOGS%\backup*.log

  rem 
  rem * Have removable storage management look at tape in drive
  rem * (See Q267574 for details)
  rem 

  start /wait rsm refresh /lfBNCHMARK DLT1 SCSI Sequential Device
  c:\bin\sleep 30

  rem 
  rem * Do Backup
  rem 

  start /wait ntbackup backup @c:\backup\everything.bks /M normal /J
  %NAME% /P DLT /N %NAME% /l:s /HC:on /UM /D %NAME%

  rem 
  rem * find newest (should be only) log file
  rem 

  dir /s /b /o-d %LOGS%\backup*.log c:\backup\backup.tmp
  set /P FILE= c:\backup\backup.tmp

  rem 
  rem * Make ASCII version of log file
  rem 

  c:\bin\recode -f unicode..us %FILE% log.txt


  rem 
  rem * Set subject for email
  rem 

  set SUBJ=Backup ran OK
  grep -v Error: You do not have permission log.txt  log1.txt

  findstr /i error: log1.txt
  if not ERRORLEVEL 1 set SUBJ=Backup ran - FAILED

  rem 
  rem * Send email
  rem 

  c:\bin\blat log.txt -t %RECIPIENT% -subject %SUBJ% -server %SMTP% -f
  %RECIPIENT%

  rem 
  rem * Move log file to our directory
  rem 

  move /Y %FILE% c:\backup






  -Original Message-
  From: Christopher Boggs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:16 PM
  To: NT System Admin Issues


 Subject: Re: ntbackup scripts

  Rename it with a .txt extension :)
  
  Christopher Boggs
  Security System Administrator
  Miltec Corporation

  office.256-428-1370
  mobile.256-468-0922
  fax.256-428-1461

  Painstakingly sent to you from my Blackberry...

  - Original Message -
  From: Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
  Sent: Wed Feb 20 13:12:58 2008
  Subject: Re: ntbackup scripts

  On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have any ntbackup scripts they'd care to share?

   NTBACKUP is, in my experience, idiosyncratic and poorly-documented.
  Reporting/logging is limited, and selective restores are somewhat
  cumbersome.  All that said, one you know what works and what doesn't,
  it is very servicable.  And, of course, you already paid for it, so it
  doesn't cost extra.  It use it on some servers here at %DAYJOB%.

   The biggest limitation I find is that anything other than unmanaged
  media mode (i.e., /UM switch) doesn't appear to work in any sane or
  reliable fashion.  There's some kind of drain bamage involved which
  I've never figured out.

   I've got a set of batch files that automate things reasonably well
  for our purposes.  Notable features include hands-off operation, tape
  name reporting and preservation, and the ability to email the log
  file.  The design is basically put a tape in and it will run the
  backup to it that night.  If that tape is ejected the next morning, it
  worked.  Media rotation scheduling has to be handled manually, but I
  use a basic daily/weekly/monthly scheme that makes that a no-brainer.
  KISS.

   I attempted to attach the scripts to this message, but Gmail refuses
  

NTBackup to 50 diskettes

2008-02-21 Thread Matt Plahtinsky
I have a relative that used NTBackup wizard on XP to backup his My
Documents.  NTBackup put it on like 50 diskettes.   Well PC died and
he is trying to restore his files and disk 29 is bad so NTBackup
fails.  Anyone know of a way to get around this if disk 29 cannot be
recovered/fixed?

There has got be be some tool that can recover some of the data if
only one of the disks are bad.


My GoogleFU is failing me.

Thanks

Matt

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Mass Computer Rename

2008-02-21 Thread Chris Blair
Do I need to reboot right away? None of these workstations have printer
or file shares. 

 

I was hoping to rename the PC and just wait for the user to reboot to
make it official. 

 



From: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mass Computer Rename

 

If you have your workstations listed in a text file, then you just need
a simple for /f command using NETDOM with the renamecomputer
operator. The workstations have to be powered up and on the network
first, and they will have to be rebooted after the change.

 

Malcolm 

From: Chris Blair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, 20 February, 2008 13:01
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Mass Computer Rename

 

I need to rename all of our workstations to adhere to a new naming
standard. These machines, for now, will remain in the same domain. I
have found various scripts on Google, but I would like to hear from
someone that has done this. Any pitfalls?

 

Thanks

 

 
 
 
 This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged and/or proprietary.
If you 
are not the intended recipient, any review, disclosure, copying, or use
of 
this e-mail is prohibited.



This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and
privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient.  Any
review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly
prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to
receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. 

 

 



 This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged and/or proprietary. If you 
are not the intended recipient, any review, disclosure, copying, or use of 
this e-mail is prohibited.
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

Re: ntbackup scripts

2008-02-21 Thread Kurt Buff
1) It's Symantec - I'm prejudiced, and it's probably irrational, but
there you have it.

2) If I want to get supported, I'll have to buy a copy after a
while,and upgrade - see point one, above, plust is will cost. That's
not going to be popular.

Kurt

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Sherry Abercrombie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Indeed, why not BE?  Backup Exec 11d has a built in media rotation policy
 for Grandfather, Father, Son that is customizable.

 I've actually been happy with Backup Exec since Symantec bought out Veritas,
 they haven't messed up the product, it's still a very good product.


 On Feb 20, 2008 11:08 AM, René de Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Why don't you want to use Backup Exec?
 
 
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 1:18 PM
  To: NT System Admin Issues
 
  Subject: ntbackup scripts
 
  I've got a nice shiny new LTO3 drive and 21 tapes for the UK office.
  It came with BE 11d, but I'd like to avoid that if possible.
 
  I want to use ntbackup to set up a parent/child/grandchild rotation,
  so that I can have them send tapes offsite - the capacity of the tape
  is more than sufficient for a full backup each day, but I want to make
  sure that I extend the functionality as long as possible, as I won't
  be back for quite some time.
 
  Anyone have any ntbackup scripts they'd care to share? We use Tivoli
  in the US office, so I haven't had to touch ntbackup in 6 years, and
  I've been frustrated by what I found on the web.
 
  Kurt
 
 
  ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
  ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~
 
 
 
  ***
  The information in this e-mail is confidential and intended solely for the
 individual or entity to whom it is addressed.  If you have received this
 e-mail in error please notify the sender by return e-mail delete this e-mail
 and refrain from any disclosure or action based on the information.
  ***
 
 
 
 
 
  ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
  ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~



 --
 Sherry Abercrombie

 Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
 Arthur C. Clarke






~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Terminal Server 2003 and IE's Enhanced Security Configuration

2008-02-21 Thread Miller Bonnie L .
As a last ditch, maybe try adding it (check the box, install the stuff, etc), 
and then remove it again afterwards?

-Bonnie

-Original Message-
From: Kyle Plummer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 1:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Terminal Server 2003 and IE's Enhanced Security Configuration

Tried that first. The box is not checked indicating that it is not
installed.

Kyle B. Plummer

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Boggs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Terminal Server 2003 and IE's Enhanced Security
Configuration

Its in add/remove windows components

Christopher Boggs
Security System Administrator
Miltec Corporation

office.256-428-1370
mobile.256-468-0922
fax.256-428-1461

Painstakingly sent to you from my Blackberry...

- Original Message -
From: Kyle Plummer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Wed Feb 20 13:39:09 2008
Subject: Terminal Server 2003 and IE's Enhanced Security Configuration

Any pointers on how to remove IE's Enhanced Security Configuration
would be appreciated. I'm running TS on a W2K3 member server. When
logged in as a regular user, IE's blasted enhanced security is
supposedly installed and is preventing me from running one of my
programs that has a web interface. It does not affect admin users.



The enhanced security configuration is not installed (at least
add/remove programs shows it is not installed). I have set the IEHarden
registry value to 0 for each user. I have created a GPO using
Microsoft's adm template specifically disabling the enhanced security. I
have applied the GPO and forced a gpupdate.



I still receive the enhanced security is installed dialog box. Short of
rebuilding the server, anyone have experience with getting rid of this
thing?



Thanks in advance,



Kyle B. Plummer









This written advice is not intended or written to be used, and can not
be used, by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be
imposed on the taxpayer.




Norman, Jones, Enlow  Co.  - CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION


This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521, is
confidential, and is intended solely for the use of the individuals or
entities to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient
or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended
recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and
that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this
e-mail and any file attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by telephone
toll-free at (866) 841-6888 or by reply e-mail to the sender. You must
destroy the original transmission and its contents. You will be
reimbursed for reasonable costs incurred in notifying us.



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: TrackIT Issue

2008-02-21 Thread Lumumba, Juma (ILRI-ICRAF)
Much thanks Eric, will explore it.



From: Eric E Eskam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 19 February 2008 18:18
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: TrackIT Issue



Lumumba, Juma \(ILRI-ICRAF\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/19/2008
07:51:43 AM:

 We use TrackIT for the Helpdesk software. Has anybody explored a
feature
 whereby other than a technician closing a job or ticket as being done,
 the user can also comment if the job was done satisfactorily or can
add
 comments? We want this feature as part of feedback from ou customers. 

We use:  http://www.thinkhdi.com/services/csi.aspx
http://www.thinkhdi.com/services/csi.aspx   in conjunction with our
ticketing software and really like it.  Very flexible and the reporting
is excellent. 

Eric Eskam
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The contents of this message are mine personally and do not reflect any
position of the U.S. Government
The human mind treats a new idea the same way the body treats a strange
protein; it rejects it.
-  P. B. Medawar 


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

Re: NTBackup to 50 diskettes

2008-02-21 Thread Albert L
How about some disk repair software, see if they can repair that disk or
not. Also, make a copy of all the file into the hard drive.

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:42 AM, Matt Plahtinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 I have a relative that used NTBackup wizard on XP to backup his My
 Documents.  NTBackup put it on like 50 diskettes.   Well PC died and
 he is trying to restore his files and disk 29 is bad so NTBackup
 fails.  Anyone know of a way to get around this if disk 29 cannot be
 recovered/fixed?

 There has got be be some tool that can recover some of the data if
 only one of the disks are bad.


 My GoogleFU is failing me.

 Thanks

 Matt

 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

Cisco List

2008-02-21 Thread John Bonner
Good Afternoon,

I am having some trouble with my Zone Based Policies between a couple
Cisco VPN routers. Can anyone recommend a good resource or list that
would be a better forum for this?


Thanks
JB

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Backup Exec 12

2008-02-21 Thread Roger Wright
I'm clueless on this one...


Roger Wright
Network Administrator
Evatone, Inc.
727.572.7076  x388


Always do right: Gratify some and astonish the rest.


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Wimberly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Exec 12

I'm still using 10D, because 11D did not solve the _one_ problem I'm
having... I'm curious if 12 comes with a fix?

When backing up a DFS share that is replicated via FSRM I get the error:
A failure occurred accessing the object list and the job status
reports failed.  I have tried creating reports in the xml format and
saving them to the local server, but this does not stop the error.

Any idea if BE12 can backup a DFS share replicated via FSRM?  What used
to be FRS prior to R2.

==

Stephen Wimberly

==


-Original Message-
From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Exec 12

Just did the upgrade to BUE12.  Now I have another 60 days to my trial.
I'll pass on any issues I find after tonight's jobs run.



Roger Wright
Network Administrator
Evatone, Inc. 
727.572.7076  x388
 

An idle mind is worth two in the bush. 
  
  
From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 1:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Exec 12 
  
Has it been released?  I'm still in my trial for 11D. 
Roger Wright
Network Administrator
Evatone, Inc. 
727.572.7076  x388

Go directly to jail.  Do not pass Go, do not collect $200. 
  
  
From: Stefan Jabs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 8:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Backup Exec 12 
  
Has anyone installed v12? Any problems? 
  
__
Stefan Jafs 
  
  
  
  
  





~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: NTBackup to 50 diskettes

2008-02-21 Thread Miller Bonnie L .
A couple of things I can think of:

1) Try to use diskcopy a: a: to copy disk 29 to another (good) disk.  It might 
take a while, but you can try to use the copy if it works.
2) Chkdsk a: /r on disk 29 to see if it can recover.  I wouldn't do this one 
until you are out of other options though.  Of course, if sector 0 is toast, 
this won't help.

-Bonnie

-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 5:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: NTBackup to 50 diskettes

I have a relative that used NTBackup wizard on XP to backup his My
Documents.  NTBackup put it on like 50 diskettes.   Well PC died and
he is trying to restore his files and disk 29 is bad so NTBackup
fails.  Anyone know of a way to get around this if disk 29 cannot be
recovered/fixed?

There has got be be some tool that can recover some of the data if
only one of the disks are bad.


My GoogleFU is failing me.

Thanks

Matt

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Ghost DHCP settings

2008-02-21 Thread Webb, Brian (Corp)
Make sure no one has plugged a home router (Linksys, Netgear, etc.) into
your network that is now pumping out DHCP responses. 

-Brian


-Original Message-
From: David Florea, SysAdmin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 1:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Ghost DHCP settings

 
By mistake yesterday, both of my DCs were down at the same time.  Of
course, the entire network croaked for a few minutes.  But ever since
then, several of my machines are picking up a weird DNS setting.
Instead of 192.168.1.15 and .5, they are showing 192.168.1.1 for a DNS
server, and therefore have great trouble seeing network resources.  I've
doublechecked the DHCP scope and server options, they're correct.  I
don't even have a 1.1 network address on my system.  Where the heck is
that coming from?  I've even had a couple of machines pick it up again a
couple of hours after I've done a /release and /renew.

Thanks,

David
___

The information contained in this E-mail message, including any attached
files transmitted, is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is
intended only for the sole use of the individual(s) named above. If you
are the intended recipient, be aware that your use of any confidential
or personal information may be restricted by state and federal privacy
laws. If you, the reader of this message, are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that you should not further
disseminate, distribute or forward this E-mail message. If you have
received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete the
material from your computer system. This message is provided for
information purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or
offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments in
any jurisdiction.




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Determining Logon Location

2008-02-21 Thread Roger Wright
What's the easiest method to tell which workstation a user is logged in
at any given time?



Roger Wright 
Network Administrator 
Evatone, Inc. 
727.572.7076  x388 
 

All things are difficult before they are easy. 
  
  


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Mass Computer Rename

2008-02-21 Thread Malcolm Reitz
Nice. I do need to keep working at picking up Powershell...

 

Malcolm 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, 20 February, 2008 21:18
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mass Computer Rename

 

I just had to throw this in:

 

http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2008/02/04/Rename-
Reboot-with-Powershell.aspx

 

I needed to do this to a bunch of computers recently:

 

Get-Content Filename.csv |% { $ary = $_.Split(,); renameAndReboot
$ary[0] $ary[1]; }

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 10:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mass Computer Rename

 

If you have your workstations listed in a text file, then you just need
a simple for /f command using NETDOM with the renamecomputer
operator. The workstations have to be powered up and on the network
first, and they will have to be rebooted after the change.

 

Malcolm 

From: Chris Blair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, 20 February, 2008 13:01
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Mass Computer Rename

 

I need to rename all of our workstations to adhere to a new naming
standard. These machines, for now, will remain in the same domain. I
have found various scripts on Google, but I would like to hear from
someone that has done this. Any pitfalls?

 

Thanks

 

 
 
 
 This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged and/or proprietary.
If you 
are not the intended recipient, any review, disclosure, copying, or use
of 
this e-mail is prohibited.



This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and
privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient.  Any
review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly
prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to
receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. 

 

 

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Lenovo?

2008-02-21 Thread Sam Cayze
You never mentioned what type of support contracts you have from either
vendor.  

For example, with Dell, you probably don't have the Gold support, which
cost a whole $40 for new systems.
Since you mentioned 'Return to Depot' - you obviously skimped on your
Dell Support Contracts.  They only do return to dept on their basic
support plans.

With Dell Gold support, just send a chat to Dell with the steps you took
to troubleshot, and the parts you need to swap.  If you need a tech
onsite, you can request it.  Part and tech will be there next day, no
questions asked.

I have replaced a lot of Mobos, parts, power supplies, etc this way.
I've even replaced whole systems.  It never takes me more than 5
minutes.





-Original Message-
From: Vincent Medina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 11:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Lenovo?

If you pay for the support contract you get support, that is exactly
what
you should expect from DELL. I find IBM backs their products without all
the
nonsense DELL puts you through. We support 3 networks totaling 100 +
Desktops and 20 + Notebooks. IBM and DELL split 40/40 with clones making
up
the rest. In our shop as I type are:

1 - IBM NetFinity (Bad HD - IBM support called back within 15 min of
support
request and will be sending a replacement HD tomorrow)
1 - Samba (Clone) (Bad HD - In house repair)
1 - CPQ POS NB(Virus - In house repair)
1 - IBM T43 (User Dropped, Bad Mobo - Sending to Depot see If we get
lucky -
BTW called back in less than 15 min after requesting service online.)
2 - Dell Latitude (Bad Power Jack - Tech did not bring a mobo - Will
return
tomorrow, 2nd NB has Bad LCD - 30 min. on hold and will have a tech out
by
tomorrow)
1 - Dell OptiPlex (Bad Pwr Supply - 25 minutes on hold - got a moron on
the
phone and hung up on him. I called back a second time, 30 minutes on
hold -
got someone who was Good and is sending part + tech in the morning)
1 - IBM X61t - Bad Fingerprint reader (Sent on Fri to depot got it back
Tuesday, good as new)
1 - Dell Server Dual Xeon (Bad Video - No Support Contract / Ran out -
Need
to send in, will not send part, Gonna live with it because it is running
CentOS and we can access fine via SSH.) BTW they want to charge me $200
for
the motherboard.

Day in the trenches 

IBM by far makes my life easy! At least for now. ;)


 

 


-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 1:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Lenovo?

On Feb 19, 2008 10:34 AM, Vincent Medina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Wow... dell = problems.

  computers = problems

  (I can hear Shook already...)

 We use to use Dell as early as 1 year ago, their support is horrible.

  I find Dell support to be excellent.  Quick to answer, speak English
very well, eager and able to help.  Of course, we're buying the
business line (OptiPlex, Latitude) and with support contracts.  If
you're buying the $400 home machines, that may be a different story.
With Dell, you always get what you pay for.  If you want to go the
cheap route, they are happy to sell you something cheap.

 I have never waited more than 3 days for a depot repair from IBM ...

  I've never done a depot repair with Dell.  They always have parts,
or parts and a technician, on-site the next business day.

  My anecdote can beat-up your anecdote!  ;-)

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Determining Logon Location

2008-02-21 Thread Steve Pruitt
Option 1: send them an email and ask. :)
Option 2: login script that logs the time, userid and computername to some 
central location

Steve

  - Original Message - 
  From: Roger Wright 
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 12:31 PM
  Subject: Determining Logon Location


  What's the easiest method to tell which workstation a user is logged in at 
any given time?



  Roger Wright 
  Network Administrator 
  Evatone, Inc. 
  727.572.7076  x388 
   

  All things are difficult before they are easy. 











~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Ghost DHCP settings

2008-02-21 Thread Roger Wright
Got a rouge Linksys router on your network perhaps?  Maybe it's handing
out DHCP...


Roger Wright
Network Administrator
Evatone, Inc.
727.572.7076  x388


People are always available for work in the past tense.


-Original Message-
From: David Florea, SysAdmin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 2:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Ghost DHCP settings

 
By mistake yesterday, both of my DCs were down at the same time.  Of
course, the entire network croaked for a few minutes.  But ever since
then, several of my machines are picking up a weird DNS setting.
Instead of 192.168.1.15 and .5, they are showing 192.168.1.1 for a DNS
server, and therefore have great trouble seeing network resources.  I've
doublechecked the DHCP scope and server options, they're correct.  I
don't even have a 1.1 network address on my system.  Where the heck is
that coming from?  I've even had a couple of machines pick it up again a
couple of hours after I've done a /release and /renew.

Thanks,

David
___

The information contained in this E-mail message, including any attached
files transmitted, is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is
intended only for the sole use of the individual(s) named above. If you
are the intended recipient, be aware that your use of any confidential
or personal information may be restricted by state and federal privacy
laws. If you, the reader of this message, are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that you should not further
disseminate, distribute or forward this E-mail message. If you have
received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete the
material from your computer system. This message is provided for
information purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or
offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments in
any jurisdiction.




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: retry - ntbackup scripts

2008-02-21 Thread Kurt Buff
Nice to know.

Thanks.

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Bill Songstad (WCUL)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I use task scheduler to run this nightly.  It does a full backup using
  whatever tape happens to be in the drive.  Windows Help and Support has
  all the command line parameters for ntbackup.exe.

  C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntbackup.exe backup @C:\Documents and
  Settings\administrator.WCUL\Local Settings\Application
  Data\Microsoft\Windows NT\NTBackup\data\Daily.bks  /v:no /r:no /rs:no
  /hc:on /m normal /j Daily /l:f /p 4mm DDS /um


  Daily.bks is text file containing what you want backed up.  In my
  case, the c drive, the e drive and the systemstate:

  C:\
  E:\
  SystemState


  On my exchange server it is a little different because you need to
  exclude some things:

  C:\
  D:\
  D:\WSUS\ /Exclude
  D:\rsgtemp\ /Exclude
  D:\Program Files\Sunbelt Software\ /Exclude
  D:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\
  D:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA\ /Exclude
  JET MERCURY\Microsoft Information Store\First Storage Group\
  SystemState


  Bill Songstad



  -Original Message-
  From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 8:33 AM
  To: NT System Admin Issues
  Subject: retry - ntbackup scripts

  I didn't see this come back, so I'm trying again

  Kurt


  I've got a nice shiny new LTO3 drive and 21 tapes for the UK office.
   It came with BE 11d, but I'd like to avoid that if possible.

   I want to use ntbackup to set up a parent/child/grandchild rotation,
   so that I can have them send tapes offsite - the capacity of the tape
   is more than sufficient for a full backup each day, but I want to make
   sure that I extend the functionality as long as possible, as I won't
   be back for quite some time.

   Anyone have any ntbackup scripts they'd care to share? We use Tivoli
   in the US office, so I haven't had to touch ntbackup in 6 years, and
   I've been frustrated by what I found on the web.

   Kurt

  ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
  ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

  ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
  ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Lenovo?

2008-02-21 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Vincent Medina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  2 - Dell Latitude (Bad Power Jack - Tech did not bring a mobo - Will return
  tomorrow, 2nd NB has Bad LCD - 30 min. on hold and will have a tech out by
  tomorrow)
  1 - Dell OptiPlex (Bad Pwr Supply - 25 minutes on hold - got a moron on the
  phone and hung up on him. I called back a second time, 30 minutes on hold -
  got someone who was Good and is sending part + tech in the morning)

  Every time I've called the Gold Tech Support line provided with
the service contract documentation Dell puts in the box, I've gotten
to speak to a tech in well under five minutes, who has been eager to
help, knowledgeable, and took my word for it if I already had a
diagnosis.

  I've never had a field tech arrive without parts.  Quality of the
field techs does vary.  Some are very good, most are competent but not
outstanding.  I did have one guy, once, who was kind of a moron.  I
called Dell and complained.  Never saw him again.

  1 - Dell Server Dual Xeon (Bad Video - No Support Contract / Ran out - Need
  to send in, will not send part, Gonna live with it because it is running
  CentOS and we can access fine via SSH.) BTW they want to charge me $200 for
  the motherboard.

  The nerve of Dell, not giving you free parts for an out-of-waranty
system!  Next you'll be telling me they didn't give you the server for
free, either!

  FYI, you should be able to buy any Dell part you have a DP/N for by
calling Dell Spare Parts at 800-357-3355.

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Mass Computer Rename

2008-02-21 Thread Malcolm Reitz
I'm not sure what will happen if you leave the workstations in a
half-renamed state for a while though it sounds potentially
problematic to me. Try it on a test box or two and let us know.

 

Malcolm 

From: Chris Blair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, 21 February, 2008 08:29
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mass Computer Rename

 

Do I need to reboot right away? None of these workstations have printer
or file shares. 

 

I was hoping to rename the PC and just wait for the user to reboot to
make it official. 

 



From: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mass Computer Rename

 

If you have your workstations listed in a text file, then you just need
a simple for /f command using NETDOM with the renamecomputer
operator. The workstations have to be powered up and on the network
first, and they will have to be rebooted after the change.

 

Malcolm 

From: Chris Blair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, 20 February, 2008 13:01
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Mass Computer Rename

 

I need to rename all of our workstations to adhere to a new naming
standard. These machines, for now, will remain in the same domain. I
have found various scripts on Google, but I would like to hear from
someone that has done this. Any pitfalls?

 

Thanks

 

 
 
 
 This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged and/or proprietary.
If you 
are not the intended recipient, any review, disclosure, copying, or use
of 
this e-mail is prohibited.



This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and
privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient.  Any
review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly
prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to
receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged and/or proprietary.
If you 
are not the intended recipient, any review, disclosure, copying, or use
of 
this e-mail is prohibited.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

Re: Lyris must be down

2008-02-21 Thread Mike Sullivan
Is it acting up or down? :-)

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Looks like Lyris is acting up again.

 Jon




-- 
Mike Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: TrackIT Issue

2008-02-21 Thread John Bonner
We mark the tickets for follow up and then run a Crystal report weekly
that tells us who needs follow up. The girls go into the ticket and add
a private tech note about the response then move status from follow up
to billable.

 

Is that kinda what you are thinking?

 

From: Lumumba, Juma (ILRI-ICRAF) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 4:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: TrackIT Issue

 

Much thanks Eric, will explore it.

 



From: Eric E Eskam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 19 February 2008 18:18
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: TrackIT Issue


Lumumba, Juma \(ILRI-ICRAF\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/19/2008
07:51:43 AM:

 We use TrackIT for the Helpdesk software. Has anybody explored a
feature
 whereby other than a technician closing a job or ticket as being done,
 the user can also comment if the job was done satisfactorily or can
add
 comments? We want this feature as part of feedback from ou customers. 

We use:  http://www.thinkhdi.com/services/csi.aspx
http://www.thinkhdi.com/services/csi.aspx   in conjunction with our
ticketing software and really like it.  Very flexible and the reporting
is excellent. 

Eric Eskam
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The contents of this message are mine personally and do not reflect any
position of the U.S. Government
The human mind treats a new idea the same way the body treats a strange
protein; it rejects it.
-  P. B. Medawar 

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Determining Logon Location

2008-02-21 Thread Christopher Boggs
Option 3:  Make or find some kind of script that crawls the domain
security logs and reports on interactive logon events, if you set up the
auditing for it.

 

 



From: Steve Pruitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 1:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Determining Logon Location

 

Option 1: send them an email and ask. :)

Option 2: login script that logs the time, userid and computername to
some central location

 

Steve

 

- Original Message - 

From: Roger Wright mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

To: NT System Admin Issues
mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com  

Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 12:31 PM

Subject: Determining Logon Location

 

What's the easiest method to tell which workstation a user is
logged in at any given time?

Roger Wright 
Network Administrator 
Evatone, Inc. 
727.572.7076  x388 
 

All things are difficult before they are easy. 
  
  

 

 
 
 

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Mass Computer Rename

2008-02-21 Thread Glen Johnson
I didn't run into any problems when we did this about 3 months ago.

Couple machines didn't get re-booted for about 2 days.

 

From: Chris Blair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 9:29 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mass Computer Rename

 

Do I need to reboot right away? None of these workstations have printer
or file shares. 

 

I was hoping to rename the PC and just wait for the user to reboot to
make it official. 

 



From: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mass Computer Rename

 

If you have your workstations listed in a text file, then you just need
a simple for /f command using NETDOM with the renamecomputer
operator. The workstations have to be powered up and on the network
first, and they will have to be rebooted after the change.

 

Malcolm 

From: Chris Blair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, 20 February, 2008 13:01
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Mass Computer Rename

 

I need to rename all of our workstations to adhere to a new naming
standard. These machines, for now, will remain in the same domain. I
have found various scripts on Google, but I would like to hear from
someone that has done this. Any pitfalls?

 

Thanks

 

 
 
 
 This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged and/or proprietary.
If you 
are not the intended recipient, any review, disclosure, copying, or use
of 
this e-mail is prohibited.



This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and
privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient.  Any
review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly
prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to
receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged and/or proprietary.
If you 
are not the intended recipient, any review, disclosure, copying, or use
of 
this e-mail is prohibited.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Determining Logon Location

2008-02-21 Thread Za Vue
I use the script below to track when my users log off and when they log on.
You can also enable auditing.
 
Step 1: Create the following two files using Notepad or your favorite text
editor: 

--logon.cmd
echo logon %username% %computername% %date% %time% 
\\server\share\logon.log file:///\\server\share\logon.log 

-logoff.cmd-
echo logoff %username% %computername% %date% %time% 
\\server\share\logon.log file:///\\server\share\logon.log 
Step 2: Update Group Policy to run the appropriate batch file. In Group
Policy, go to:
User Configuration- Windows Settings- Scripts (Logon/Logoff)- Logon
Step 3: As users log on and off, your log file should look something like
this:

logon June VSXP Tue 22/02/2005 10:39:51.12
logoff June VSXP Tue 22/02/2005 10:41:08.45
logon MickM VSXP Tue 22/02/2005 10:42:01.07
logoff MickM VSXP Tue 22/02/2005 10:42:46.81
 
 
From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 12:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Determining Logon Location
 
What's the easiest method to tell which workstation a user is logged in at
any given time?
Roger Wright 
Network Administrator 
Evatone, Inc. 
727.572.7076  x388 
 
All things are difficult before they are easy. 
  
  
 
 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Spacenavigator PE... Hardware licensing?

2008-02-21 Thread Tim Evans
I wouldn't say that you can't license hardware, there are quite a few
manufactures that seem to think they can. See
http://www.gripe2ed.com/scoop/story/2008/1/24/94733/7581 and some of the
links from there for examples.

IANALE, but it seems that not much of this stuff has been hashed out in
court, and it all boils down to what a judge decides you can do (how how
good your lawyer is compared to theirs).


...Tim


 -Original Message-
 From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 11:03 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Spacenavigator PE... Hardware licensing?
 
 I noticed on buy.com you can get the SpaceNavigator PE for $40.  This
 is the
 same thing that, a few years ago, our company bought for around $200
 each.
 It says personal use license. WTF is that?  You cannot license
 hardware,
 IIRC, if you buy it, it is yours to do with however you please...
 Don't
 they all use the same drivers?  I can't see how they could have a
legal
 foot
 to stand on using this thing in a commercial environment, but
licensing
 experts please direct me otherwise if I am wrong here.
 
 
 Phillip Partipilo
 Parametric Solutions Inc.
 Jupiter, Florida
 (561) 747-6107
 
 
 
 
 
 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Determining Logon Location

2008-02-21 Thread Rankin, James R
Use psloggedon against every workstation that is online (details from DHCP)

 

Filter by target user

 

  _  

From: Steve Pruitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 21 February 2008 19:55
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Determining Logon Location

 

Option 1: send them an email and ask. :)

Option 2: login script that logs the time, userid and computername to some
central location

 

Steve

 

- Original Message - 

From: Roger Wright mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

To: NT System Admin Issues mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com  

Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 12:31 PM

Subject: Determining Logon Location

 

WhatÂ’s the easiest method to tell which workstation a user is logged in at
any given time?

Roger Wright 
Network Administrator 
Evatone, Inc. 
727.572.7076  x388 
 

All things are difficult before they are easy. 
  
  

 

 
 
 

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

Re: Ghost DHCP settings

2008-02-21 Thread Jon Harris
When ever I have to reboot the primary DNS server I always ask all the staff
to reboot their systems.  It usually saves me the trouble that comes from
allowing the systems to re-find the domain and network resources.

Jon

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:05 PM, David Florea, SysAdmin 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 By mistake yesterday, both of my DCs were down at the same time.  Of
 course, the entire network croaked for a few minutes.  But ever since
 then, several of my machines are picking up a weird DNS setting.
 Instead of 192.168.1.15 and .5, they are showing 192.168.1.1 for a DNS
 server, and therefore have great trouble seeing network resources.  I've
 doublechecked the DHCP scope and server options, they're correct.  I
 don't even have a 1.1 network address on my system.  Where the heck is
 that coming from?  I've even had a couple of machines pick it up again a
 couple of hours after I've done a /release and /renew.

 Thanks,

 David
 ___

 The information contained in this E-mail message, including any attached
 files transmitted, is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is
 intended only for the sole use of the individual(s) named above. If you are
 the intended recipient, be aware that your use of any confidential or
 personal information may be restricted by state and federal privacy laws. If
 you, the reader of this message, are not the intended recipient, you are
 hereby notified that you should not further disseminate, distribute or
 forward this E-mail message. If you have received this E-mail in error,
 please notify the sender and delete the material from your computer system.
 This message is provided for information purposes and should not be
 construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
 related financial instruments in any jurisdiction.




 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

Re: Ghost DHCP settings

2008-02-21 Thread Joe Fox
I'd check your network for any rogue devices, especially wireless.

Linksys uses 192.168.1.1 as a default address in a lot of their gear.

HTH

Joe

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:05 PM, David Florea, SysAdmin 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 By mistake yesterday, both of my DCs were down at the same time.  Of
 course, the entire network croaked for a few minutes.  But ever since
 then, several of my machines are picking up a weird DNS setting.
 Instead of 192.168.1.15 and .5, they are showing 192.168.1.1 for a DNS
 server, and therefore have great trouble seeing network resources.  I've
 doublechecked the DHCP scope and server options, they're correct.  I
 don't even have a 1.1 network address on my system.  Where the heck is
 that coming from?  I've even had a couple of machines pick it up again a
 couple of hours after I've done a /release and /renew.

 Thanks,

 David
 ___

 The information contained in this E-mail message, including any attached
 files transmitted, is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is
 intended only for the sole use of the individual(s) named above. If you are
 the intended recipient, be aware that your use of any confidential or
 personal information may be restricted by state and federal privacy laws. If
 you, the reader of this message, are not the intended recipient, you are
 hereby notified that you should not further disseminate, distribute or
 forward this E-mail message. If you have received this E-mail in error,
 please notify the sender and delete the material from your computer system.
 This message is provided for information purposes and should not be
 construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
 related financial instruments in any jurisdiction.




 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~




-- 
Joe Fox
Systems/Network Administrator

Mobile# (716) 846-9308
http://www.linkedin.com/in/josephfoxjr

The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached
files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be advised
that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking
of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately
notify the sender via telephone at 716-846-9308 or by return e-mail.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Lenovo?

2008-02-21 Thread David Lum
Just $200 for a server motherboard? We had IBM fix an out-of-warranty
motherboard for an xSeries server last month ...the PART was $2300,
labor to replace was cheap at $230...

Lemme say that again...T W E N TY   T H R E E   H U N D R E D dollars
for a motherboard. Still, that's cheaper than a single HDD for our SAN
enclosures from what I understand.

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands 

-Original Message-
From: Vincent Medina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Lenovo?

If you pay for the support contract you get support, that is exactly
what
you should expect from DELL. I find IBM backs their products without all
the
nonsense DELL puts you through. We support 3 networks totaling 100 +
Desktops and 20 + Notebooks. IBM and DELL split 40/40 with clones making
up
the rest. In our shop as I type are:

1 - IBM NetFinity (Bad HD - IBM support called back within 15 min of
support
request and will be sending a replacement HD tomorrow)
1 - Samba (Clone) (Bad HD - In house repair)
1 - CPQ POS NB(Virus - In house repair)
1 - IBM T43 (User Dropped, Bad Mobo - Sending to Depot see If we get
lucky -
BTW called back in less than 15 min after requesting service online.)
2 - Dell Latitude (Bad Power Jack - Tech did not bring a mobo - Will
return
tomorrow, 2nd NB has Bad LCD - 30 min. on hold and will have a tech out
by
tomorrow)
1 - Dell OptiPlex (Bad Pwr Supply - 25 minutes on hold - got a moron on
the
phone and hung up on him. I called back a second time, 30 minutes on
hold -
got someone who was Good and is sending part + tech in the morning)
1 - IBM X61t - Bad Fingerprint reader (Sent on Fri to depot got it back
Tuesday, good as new)
1 - Dell Server Dual Xeon (Bad Video - No Support Contract / Ran out -
Need
to send in, will not send part, Gonna live with it because it is running
CentOS and we can access fine via SSH.) BTW they want to charge me $200
for
the motherboard.

Day in the trenches 

IBM by far makes my life easy! At least for now. ;)


 

 


-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 1:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Lenovo?

On Feb 19, 2008 10:34 AM, Vincent Medina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Wow... dell = problems.

  computers = problems

  (I can hear Shook already...)

 We use to use Dell as early as 1 year ago, their support is horrible.

  I find Dell support to be excellent.  Quick to answer, speak English
very well, eager and able to help.  Of course, we're buying the
business line (OptiPlex, Latitude) and with support contracts.  If
you're buying the $400 home machines, that may be a different story.
With Dell, you always get what you pay for.  If you want to go the
cheap route, they are happy to sell you something cheap.

 I have never waited more than 3 days for a depot repair from IBM ...

  I've never done a depot repair with Dell.  They always have parts,
or parts and a technician, on-site the next business day.

  My anecdote can beat-up your anecdote!  ;-)

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Terminal Server 2003 and IE's Enhanced Security Configuration

2008-02-21 Thread Kyle Plummer
I doubt it could hurt at this point. I'll let you know what happens.

Thanks,

Kyle B. Plummer


-Original Message-
From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 9:16 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Terminal Server 2003 and IE's Enhanced Security
Configuration

As a last ditch, maybe try adding it (check the box, install the stuff,
etc), and then remove it again afterwards?

-Bonnie

-Original Message-
From: Kyle Plummer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 1:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Terminal Server 2003 and IE's Enhanced Security
Configuration

Tried that first. The box is not checked indicating that it is not
installed.

Kyle B. Plummer

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Boggs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Terminal Server 2003 and IE's Enhanced Security
Configuration

Its in add/remove windows components

Christopher Boggs
Security System Administrator
Miltec Corporation

office.256-428-1370
mobile.256-468-0922
fax.256-428-1461

Painstakingly sent to you from my Blackberry...

- Original Message -
From: Kyle Plummer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Wed Feb 20 13:39:09 2008
Subject: Terminal Server 2003 and IE's Enhanced Security Configuration

Any pointers on how to remove IE's Enhanced Security Configuration
would be appreciated. I'm running TS on a W2K3 member server. When
logged in as a regular user, IE's blasted enhanced security is
supposedly installed and is preventing me from running one of my
programs that has a web interface. It does not affect admin users.



The enhanced security configuration is not installed (at least
add/remove programs shows it is not installed). I have set the IEHarden
registry value to 0 for each user. I have created a GPO using
Microsoft's adm template specifically disabling the enhanced security. I
have applied the GPO and forced a gpupdate.



I still receive the enhanced security is installed dialog box. Short of
rebuilding the server, anyone have experience with getting rid of this
thing?



Thanks in advance,



Kyle B. Plummer









This written advice is not intended or written to be used, and can not
be used, by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be
imposed on the taxpayer.




Norman, Jones, Enlow  Co.  - CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION


This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521, is
confidential, and is intended solely for the use of the individuals or
entities to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient
or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended
recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and
that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this
e-mail and any file attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by telephone
toll-free at (866) 841-6888 or by reply e-mail to the sender. You must
destroy the original transmission and its contents. You will be
reimbursed for reasonable costs incurred in notifying us.



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: SCCM / SCOM..

2008-02-21 Thread Palmer, Neal
I'm trying out SCOM now and if I could just get a client agent to talk
to the server I'd be a happy man. I will get there, but I could do
without all the hacking. Why don't things... just... work?

BTW

www.mms2008.com - This page is parked free, courtesy of GoDaddy.com.




-Original Message-
From: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 19 February 2008 17:23
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SCCM / SCOM..

We've moved to SCCM from SMS and we like it a lot. Some of the new
features caused us some initial headaches (particularly the new patch
management), but we've adapted. It does seem to be more powerful and
robust than SMS.

We haven't implemented SCOM outside our lab yet, though. Still running
MOM 2005.

If you want to learn about what you can do with either product, I'd
recommend a trip to Microsoft Management Summit 2008. I've really
learned a lot at the MMS events in past years. www.mms2008.com

Malcolm
-Original Message-
From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, 19 February, 2008 11:04
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SCCM / SCOM..

Does anyone here use either (or both) System Center Configuration
Manager (SCCM...aka SMS) and/or SCOM (System Center Operations
Manager...aka MOM)? We currently have SMS 2003 - albeit underutilized -
and I'd like to know how people rate their experiences with these two
applications.

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands 




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~
This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and
privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient.  Any
review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly
prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to
receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Mass Computer Rename

2008-02-21 Thread Christopher J. Bosak
I'd force a restart just to be on the safe side.

 

From: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 14:31 hrs
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mass Computer Rename

 

I'm not sure what will happen if you leave the workstations in a
half-renamed state for a while though it sounds potentially problematic to
me. Try it on a test box or two and let us know.

 

Malcolm 

From: Chris Blair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, 21 February, 2008 08:29
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mass Computer Rename

 

Do I need to reboot right away? None of these workstations have printer or
file shares. 

 

I was hoping to rename the PC and just wait for the user to reboot to make
it official. 

 

  _  

From: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mass Computer Rename

 

If you have your workstations listed in a text file, then you just need a
simple for /f command using NETDOM with the renamecomputer operator. The
workstations have to be powered up and on the network first, and they will
have to be rebooted after the change.

 

Malcolm 

From: Chris Blair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, 20 February, 2008 13:01
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Mass Computer Rename

 

I need to rename all of our workstations to adhere to a new naming standard.
These machines, for now, will remain in the same domain. I have found
various scripts on Google, but I would like to hear from someone that has
done this.. Any pitfalls?

 

Thanks

 

 
 
 
 This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged and/or proprietary. If
you 
are not the intended recipient, any review, disclosure, copying, or use of 
this e-mail is prohibited.
  _  


This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and
privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient.  Any
review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information
for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and
delete all copies of this message. 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged and/or proprietary. If
you 
are not the intended recipient, any review, disclosure, copying, or use of 
this e-mail is prohibited.

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Ghost DHCP settings

2008-02-21 Thread David Florea, SysAdmin
Good standard procedure.  But I've had 2 of these machines just today
that I renewed the DHCP lease early this morning, and by noon they had
picked up that rogue DNS address.  I don't have any wireless devices on
the network.  Is 192.168.1.1 a default for anything else??
 
David
 



From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 12:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Ghost DHCP settings


When ever I have to reboot the primary DNS server I always ask all the
staff to reboot their systems.  It usually saves me the trouble that
comes from allowing the systems to re-find the domain and network
resources.
 
Jon


On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:05 PM, David Florea, SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



By mistake yesterday, both of my DCs were down at the same time.
Of
course, the entire network croaked for a few minutes.  But ever
since
then, several of my machines are picking up a weird DNS setting.
Instead of 192.168.1.15 http://192.168.1.15/  and .5, they are
showing 192.168.1.1 http://192.168.1.1/  for a DNS
server, and therefore have great trouble seeing network
resources.  I've
doublechecked the DHCP scope and server options, they're
correct.  I
don't even have a 1.1 network address on my system.  Where the
heck is
that coming from?  I've even had a couple of machines pick it up
again a
couple of hours after I've done a /release and /renew.

Thanks,

David
___

The information contained in this E-mail message, including any
attached files transmitted, is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended only for the sole use of the individual(s)
named above. If you are the intended recipient, be aware that your use
of any confidential or personal information may be restricted by state
and federal privacy laws. If you, the reader of this message, are not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you should not
further disseminate, distribute or forward this E-mail message. If you
have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete
the material from your computer system. This message is provided for
information purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or
offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments in
any jurisdiction.




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~




___

The information contained in this E-mail message, including any attached files 
transmitted, is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only 
for the sole use of the individual(s) named above. If you are the intended 
recipient, be aware that your use of any confidential or personal information 
may be restricted by state and federal privacy laws. If you, the reader of this 
message, are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you 
should not further disseminate, distribute or forward this E-mail message. If 
you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete the 
material from your computer system. This message is provided for information 
purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell 
any securities or related financial instruments in any jurisdiction.



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Determining Logon Location

2008-02-21 Thread Tim Evans
Or Sysinternals psloggedon

 

 

...Tim

 

From: Steve Pruitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 11:55 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Determining Logon Location

 

Option 1: send them an email and ask. :)

Option 2: login script that logs the time, userid and computername to
some central location

 

Steve

 

- Original Message - 

From: Roger Wright mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

To: NT System Admin Issues
mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com  

Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 12:31 PM

Subject: Determining Logon Location

 

What's the easiest method to tell which workstation a user is
logged in at any given time?

Roger Wright 
Network Administrator 
Evatone, Inc. 
727.572.7076  x388 
 

All things are difficult before they are easy. 
  
  

 

 
 
 

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: SCCM / SCOM..

2008-02-21 Thread Rod Trent
www.mms-2008.com 

The MMS Wiki:

http://www.myitforum.com/myITWiki/MMS.ashx 

-Original Message-
From: Palmer, Neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 7:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SCCM / SCOM..

I'm trying out SCOM now and if I could just get a client agent to talk
to the server I'd be a happy man. I will get there, but I could do
without all the hacking. Why don't things... just... work?

BTW

www.mms2008.com - This page is parked free, courtesy of GoDaddy.com.




-Original Message-
From: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 19 February 2008 17:23
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SCCM / SCOM..

We've moved to SCCM from SMS and we like it a lot. Some of the new
features caused us some initial headaches (particularly the new patch
management), but we've adapted. It does seem to be more powerful and
robust than SMS.

We haven't implemented SCOM outside our lab yet, though. Still running
MOM 2005.

If you want to learn about what you can do with either product, I'd
recommend a trip to Microsoft Management Summit 2008. I've really
learned a lot at the MMS events in past years. www.mms2008.com

Malcolm
-Original Message-
From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, 19 February, 2008 11:04
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SCCM / SCOM..

Does anyone here use either (or both) System Center Configuration
Manager (SCCM...aka SMS) and/or SCOM (System Center Operations
Manager...aka MOM)? We currently have SMS 2003 - albeit underutilized -
and I'd like to know how people rate their experiences with these two
applications.

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands 




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~
This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and
privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient.  Any
review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly
prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to
receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Annoying Microsoft Home Pages

2008-02-21 Thread Greg Mulholland



Anyone know how to stop those annoying Microsoft Default pages in IE7.
Everytime we reset the Internet explorer settings for a user or a new user
logs on to a new computer, they get this ridiculous download
ie7 (which is already installed) or setup your search
option and doesnt get directed to the gpo homepage.

This
plays havoc with our gpo settings and is a constant frustration for users,
im looking for a way to kill them, anyone know?

Greg

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

TS Default Domain Login

2008-02-21 Thread gsweers
Strange issue that I have not been able to resolve.  After a period of
time, usually occurs with Patch Tuesday during reboot.  All TS users
connect and the default logon is back to the computername not the
domainname.  I can go in to the DefaultLogonDomain and altlogondomain
and change this each time and its fine.  No reboot needed.  Any idea why
this gets cleared in the registry and how to keep it from occurring.
Very annoying for my users.  Is their a GP that I can enforce on the TS
server?

 

Thanks

 

Greg


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: SCCM / SCOM..

2008-02-21 Thread Tim Vander Kooi
Great...Now we have Rod running around with his Wiki hanging out.


-Original Message-
From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 3:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SCCM / SCOM..

www.mms-2008.com 

The MMS Wiki:

http://www.myitforum.com/myITWiki/MMS.ashx 

-Original Message-
From: Palmer, Neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 7:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SCCM / SCOM..

I'm trying out SCOM now and if I could just get a client agent to talk
to the server I'd be a happy man. I will get there, but I could do
without all the hacking. Why don't things... just... work?

BTW

www.mms2008.com - This page is parked free, courtesy of GoDaddy.com.




-Original Message-
From: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 19 February 2008 17:23
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SCCM / SCOM..

We've moved to SCCM from SMS and we like it a lot. Some of the new
features caused us some initial headaches (particularly the new patch
management), but we've adapted. It does seem to be more powerful and
robust than SMS.

We haven't implemented SCOM outside our lab yet, though. Still running
MOM 2005.

If you want to learn about what you can do with either product, I'd
recommend a trip to Microsoft Management Summit 2008. I've really
learned a lot at the MMS events in past years. www.mms2008.com

Malcolm
-Original Message-
From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, 19 February, 2008 11:04
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SCCM / SCOM..

Does anyone here use either (or both) System Center Configuration
Manager (SCCM...aka SMS) and/or SCOM (System Center Operations
Manager...aka MOM)? We currently have SMS 2003 - albeit underutilized -
and I'd like to know how people rate their experiences with these two
applications.

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands 




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~
This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and
privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient.  Any
review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly
prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to
receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Annoying Microsoft Home Pages

2008-02-21 Thread Greg Mulholland


I dont seem to have that setting. Im running 2k3 sp2. Did you install
something extra?


 GPO. 
 
 Computer
Config  Admin Templates  Windows Components  IE  'Prevent

 performance of first run customize settings' 
 
 
 
 
From: Greg Mulholland
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Thursday, February 21,
2008 4:31 PM 
 To: NT System Admin Issues 
 Subject:
Annoying Microsoft Home Pages 
 
 
 

Anyone know how to stop those annoying Microsoft Default pages in IE7. 
 Everytime we reset the Internet explorer settings for a user or a
new 
 user logs on to a new computer, they get this ridiculous
download ie7 
 (which is already installed) or
setup your search option and doesnt 
 get directed to
the gpo homepage. 
 
 This plays havoc with our gpo
settings and is a constant frustration for 
 users, im looking
for a way to kill them, anyone know? 
 
 Greg 


 
 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with
Ninja! ~ 
 ~
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ 


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Annoying Microsoft Home Pages

2008-02-21 Thread David Mazzaccaro
 

What does this do to the settings:

* Use default search engine

* turn on/off phishing filter

 

 



From: Damien Solodow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 4:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Annoying Microsoft Home Pages

 

GPO. 

Computer Config  Admin Templates  Windows Components  IE  'Prevent
performance of first run customize settings'

 

From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 4:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Annoying Microsoft Home Pages

 

Anyone know how to stop those annoying Microsoft Default pages in IE7.
Everytime we reset the Internet explorer settings for a user or a new
user logs on to a new computer, they get this ridiculous download ie7
(which is already installed) or setup your search option and doesnt
get directed to the gpo homepage.

This plays havoc with our gpo settings and is a constant frustration for
users, im looking for a way to kill them, anyone know?

Greg

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

Microsoft iSCSI ini

2008-02-21 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Does anyone if when you stop the ini's service if the file system is un-mounted 
cleanly? I would suspect as much, but am not sure.

Thanks!
jlc

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Annoying Microsoft Home Pages

2008-02-21 Thread Mike Semon
If you have a GPO setup you can disable it under:

 

User Config  Admin Templates  Windows Components
 Internet Explorer. On the right is Prevent performance of first run
customize settings. There is also a setting on the right to control the
phishing filter.

 

Mike

 

  _  

From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 4:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Annoying Microsoft Home Pages

 

 


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Annoying Microsoft Home Pages

2008-02-21 Thread Sam Cayze
You probably need to adm files

 

From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 4:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Annoying Microsoft Home Pages

 

I dont seem to have that setting. Im running 2k3 sp2. Did you install
something extra?


 GPO. 
 
 Computer Config  Admin Templates  Windows Components  IE  'Prevent

 performance of first run customize settings' 
 
 
 
 
From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 4:31 PM 
 To: NT System Admin Issues 
 Subject: Annoying Microsoft Home Pages 
 
 
 
 Anyone know how to stop those annoying Microsoft Default pages in IE7.

 Everytime we reset the Internet explorer settings for a user or a new 
 user logs on to a new computer, they get this ridiculous download
ie7 
 (which is already installed) or setup your search option and doesnt 
 get directed to the gpo homepage. 
 
 This plays havoc with our gpo settings and is a constant frustration
for 
 users, im looking for a way to kill them, anyone know? 
 
 Greg 
 
 
 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ 
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ 


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Annoying Microsoft Home Pages

2008-02-21 Thread Ken Schaefer
Load the necessary ADM files

Cheers
Ken

From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 22 February 2008 9:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Annoying Microsoft Home Pages

I dont seem to have that setting. Im running 2k3 sp2. Did you install something 
extra?


 GPO.

 Computer Config  Admin Templates  Windows Components  IE  'Prevent
 performance of first run customize settings'




From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 4:31 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Annoying Microsoft Home Pages



 Anyone know how to stop those annoying Microsoft Default pages in IE7.
 Everytime we reset the Internet explorer settings for a user or a new
 user logs on to a new computer, they get this ridiculous download ie7
 (which is already installed) or setup your search option and doesnt
 get directed to the gpo homepage.

 This plays havoc with our gpo settings and is a constant frustration for
 users, im looking for a way to kill them, anyone know?

 Greg


 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Lyris must be down

2008-02-21 Thread Stu Sjouwerman
We upgraded to a new version and it was a bad one.
Tried to downgrade but that did not work because they
made database changes. We have a few fixes now that
promise some more stability...  sigh.
 
Warm regards,
 
Stu
 



From: Mike Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 3:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Lyris must be down


Is it acting up or down? :-)


On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Looks like Lyris is acting up again.
 

Jon










-- 
Mike Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

Re: NTBackup to 50 diskettes

2008-02-21 Thread Rick Schmahl
I had great luck with Bad Copy Pro in a similar situation. If I
remember correctly the free download only analyzes and reports what is
recoverable, but at least I knew if it would recover what was needed
before buying it.

http://www.jufsoft.com/badcopy/


-- 
-Rick  


MP I have a relative that used NTBackup wizard on XP to backup his My
MP Documents.  NTBackup put it on like 50 diskettes.   Well PC died and
MP he is trying to restore his files and disk 29 is bad so NTBackup
MP fails.  Anyone know of a way to get around this if disk 29 cannot be
MP recovered/fixed?

MP There has got be be some tool that can recover some of the data if
MP only one of the disks are bad.


MP My GoogleFU is failing me.

MP Thanks

MP Matt

MP ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
MP ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Wiki for Windows

2008-02-21 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
Sure, yes, and why not.  Apache runs fine on IIS.

http://port25.technet.com even has instructions on how to do it:

   
http://port25.technet.com/archive/2008/02/12/technical-analysis-installing-apache-on-windows.aspx

This might be a good exercise for you if you are unfamiliar with Apache.




On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Carl Houseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 OK, I'm looking to break the good/fast/cheap rule.  Here's the deal:

 Good in this case means runs on Windows without feature loss.

 The free Wiki from TWiki.org is written in Perl there's a ready-made Windows
 installer that includes both Perl and Apache.  They also have a ready-made
 VM that runs Debian Linux.

 The ready-made TWiki VM version runs about 3x faster than the ready-made
 Windows version.  This can be seen both in browser response time and CPU
 loading during simple operations.

 So I start googling for the answer to:  Is there another Wiki that runs on
 Windows, for free and fast?

 I run into this web page:
 http://www.yafla.com/dennisforbes/Many-Ways-to-Skin-a-Wiki-Hosting-a-Wiki-on-Windows/Many-Ways-to-Skin-a-Wiki-Hosting-a-Wiki-on-Windows.html

 which describes how to host MediaWiki on, of all things, IIS.

 Has anyone done that, and if so, do you like it?

 thanks,
 Carl













-- 
ME2

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Wiki for Windows

2008-02-21 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
Exactly.  Because no one uses Apache anymore!

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Rod Trent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It's like one of those classes you take in school that you know you'll never
 need in real life.


 -Original Message-
 From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:48 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: Wiki for Windows

 Sure, yes, and why not.  Apache runs fine on IIS.

 http://port25.technet.com even has instructions on how to do it:


 http://port25.technet.com/archive/2008/02/12/technical-analysis-installing-a
 pache-on-windows.aspx

 This might be a good exercise for you if you are unfamiliar with Apache.




 On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Carl Houseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  OK, I'm looking to break the good/fast/cheap rule.  Here's the deal:
 
  Good in this case means runs on Windows without feature loss.
 
  The free Wiki from TWiki.org is written in Perl there's a ready-made
 Windows
  installer that includes both Perl and Apache.  They also have a ready-made
  VM that runs Debian Linux.
 
  The ready-made TWiki VM version runs about 3x faster than the ready-made
  Windows version.  This can be seen both in browser response time and CPU
  loading during simple operations.
 
  So I start googling for the answer to:  Is there another Wiki that runs on
  Windows, for free and fast?
 
  I run into this web page:
 
 http://www.yafla.com/dennisforbes/Many-Ways-to-Skin-a-Wiki-Hosting-a-Wiki-on
 -Windows/Many-Ways-to-Skin-a-Wiki-Hosting-a-Wiki-on-Windows.html
 
  which describes how to host MediaWiki on, of all things, IIS.
 
  Has anyone done that, and if so, do you like it?
 
  thanks,
  Carl
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



 --
 ME2

 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~




-- 
ME2

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Wiki for Windows

2008-02-21 Thread Michael B. Smith
Yeah like that IBM Macro-assembler class.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Wiki for Windows

It's like one of those classes you take in school that you know you'll never
need in real life.

-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Wiki for Windows

Sure, yes, and why not.  Apache runs fine on IIS.

http://port25.technet.com even has instructions on how to do it:

 
http://port25.technet.com/archive/2008/02/12/technical-analysis-installing-a
pache-on-windows.aspx

This might be a good exercise for you if you are unfamiliar with Apache.




On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Carl Houseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 OK, I'm looking to break the good/fast/cheap rule.  Here's the deal:

 Good in this case means runs on Windows without feature loss.

 The free Wiki from TWiki.org is written in Perl there's a ready-made
Windows
 installer that includes both Perl and Apache.  They also have a ready-made
 VM that runs Debian Linux.

 The ready-made TWiki VM version runs about 3x faster than the ready-made
 Windows version.  This can be seen both in browser response time and CPU
 loading during simple operations.

 So I start googling for the answer to:  Is there another Wiki that runs on
 Windows, for free and fast?

 I run into this web page:

http://www.yafla.com/dennisforbes/Many-Ways-to-Skin-a-Wiki-Hosting-a-Wiki-on
-Windows/Many-Ways-to-Skin-a-Wiki-Hosting-a-Wiki-on-Windows.html

 which describes how to host MediaWiki on, of all things, IIS.

 Has anyone done that, and if so, do you like it?

 thanks,
 Carl













-- 
ME2

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Wiki for Windows

2008-02-21 Thread Michael B. Smith
To tell the truth, these days I tend to turn up lighttpd on my Unix/Linux
hosts.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Wiki for Windows

Exactly.  Because no one uses Apache anymore!

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Rod Trent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It's like one of those classes you take in school that you know you'll
never
 need in real life.


 -Original Message-
 From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:48 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: Wiki for Windows

 Sure, yes, and why not.  Apache runs fine on IIS.

 http://port25.technet.com even has instructions on how to do it:



http://port25.technet.com/archive/2008/02/12/technical-analysis-installing-a
 pache-on-windows.aspx

 This might be a good exercise for you if you are unfamiliar with Apache.




 On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Carl Houseman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 
  OK, I'm looking to break the good/fast/cheap rule.  Here's the deal:
 
  Good in this case means runs on Windows without feature loss.
 
  The free Wiki from TWiki.org is written in Perl there's a ready-made
 Windows
  installer that includes both Perl and Apache.  They also have a
ready-made
  VM that runs Debian Linux.
 
  The ready-made TWiki VM version runs about 3x faster than the ready-made
  Windows version.  This can be seen both in browser response time and CPU
  loading during simple operations.
 
  So I start googling for the answer to:  Is there another Wiki that runs
on
  Windows, for free and fast?
 
  I run into this web page:
 

http://www.yafla.com/dennisforbes/Many-Ways-to-Skin-a-Wiki-Hosting-a-Wiki-on
 -Windows/Many-Ways-to-Skin-a-Wiki-Hosting-a-Wiki-on-Windows.html
 
  which describes how to host MediaWiki on, of all things, IIS.
 
  Has anyone done that, and if so, do you like it?
 
  thanks,
  Carl
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



 --
 ME2

 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~




-- 
ME2

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Wiki for Windows

2008-02-21 Thread Michael B. Smith
Apache runs fine on IIS?

runs for cover

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Wiki for Windows

Sure, yes, and why not.  Apache runs fine on IIS.

http://port25.technet.com even has instructions on how to do it:

 
http://port25.technet.com/archive/2008/02/12/technical-analysis-installing-a
pache-on-windows.aspx

This might be a good exercise for you if you are unfamiliar with Apache.




On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Carl Houseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 OK, I'm looking to break the good/fast/cheap rule.  Here's the deal:

 Good in this case means runs on Windows without feature loss.

 The free Wiki from TWiki.org is written in Perl there's a ready-made
Windows
 installer that includes both Perl and Apache.  They also have a ready-made
 VM that runs Debian Linux.

 The ready-made TWiki VM version runs about 3x faster than the ready-made
 Windows version.  This can be seen both in browser response time and CPU
 loading during simple operations.

 So I start googling for the answer to:  Is there another Wiki that runs on
 Windows, for free and fast?

 I run into this web page:

http://www.yafla.com/dennisforbes/Many-Ways-to-Skin-a-Wiki-Hosting-a-Wiki-on
-Windows/Many-Ways-to-Skin-a-Wiki-Hosting-a-Wiki-on-Windows.html

 which describes how to host MediaWiki on, of all things, IIS.

 Has anyone done that, and if so, do you like it?

 thanks,
 Carl













-- 
ME2

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Wiki for Windows

2008-02-21 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
Err, Apache on Windows with IIS.   :-P

I first did it maybe 2 years ago without any problems other than a
learning curve.  It was a great experience that helped make dealing
with most web hosts a lot easier.

I was surprised to see port25 put up this primer on doing it.  But I
guess why not:  Someone else already laid down the ground work for
doing it a long time ago.


On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Michael B. Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Apache runs fine on IIS?

 runs for cover

 Regards,

 Michael B. Smith
 MCSE/Exchange MVP
 http://TheEssentialExchange.com


 -Original Message-
 From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:48 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues

 Subject: Re: Wiki for Windows

 Sure, yes, and why not.  Apache runs fine on IIS.

 http://port25.technet.com even has instructions on how to do it:


 http://port25.technet.com/archive/2008/02/12/technical-analysis-installing-a
 pache-on-windows.aspx

 This might be a good exercise for you if you are unfamiliar with Apache.




 On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Carl Houseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  OK, I'm looking to break the good/fast/cheap rule.  Here's the deal:
 
  Good in this case means runs on Windows without feature loss.
 
  The free Wiki from TWiki.org is written in Perl there's a ready-made
 Windows
  installer that includes both Perl and Apache.  They also have a ready-made
  VM that runs Debian Linux.
 
  The ready-made TWiki VM version runs about 3x faster than the ready-made
  Windows version.  This can be seen both in browser response time and CPU
  loading during simple operations.
 
  So I start googling for the answer to:  Is there another Wiki that runs on
  Windows, for free and fast?
 
  I run into this web page:
 
 http://www.yafla.com/dennisforbes/Many-Ways-to-Skin-a-Wiki-Hosting-a-Wiki-on
 -Windows/Many-Ways-to-Skin-a-Wiki-Hosting-a-Wiki-on-Windows.html
 
  which describes how to host MediaWiki on, of all things, IIS.
 
  Has anyone done that, and if so, do you like it?
 
  thanks,
  Carl
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



 --
 ME2

 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~




-- 
ME2

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Lenovo?

2008-02-21 Thread jeff . wilhelm
 Dell gold/enterprise support.  Not a better tech group except Sunbelt
 maybe.  Silver are good, but they are Gold in training basically.
 Anything else you are dealing with India and I just always deal with
 dell chat.  Easy..Parts next day or same day with Enterprise..SonicAir
 baby..

Amen. Had to use Dell support today for a 4-port NIC replacement in a new 
Dell R900. Not sure what happened, but we called, had someone in about 
three minutes, and a new part on the way about five minutes after that 
(and two of those minutes were the rep getting a dispatch number for me). 
The tech was on site in two hours and the part had already arrived about 
20 minutes earlier (SonicAir). We've had nothing but great support from 
Dell.

Sprint and Symantec are on the opposite end of the spectrum. I love the 
Sprint EVDO coverage and our phones and plans... but the worst support 
ever by far. And 90 minutes on hold today with Symantec, for a 10 minute 
call about an error message repeating every two minutes in our Symantec 
Endpoint 11 Manager Console... turns out a patch was just released but 
hadn't yet made it onto LiveUpdate.

Jeff






[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
02/21/2008 04:48 PM
Please respond to
NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com


To
NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
cc

Subject
RE: Lenovo?






We have a bunch of IBM Laptops, love them.  Pricey compared to the
equivalent Dell with Gold support though.

We deal with over 150 clients with all ranges of HW from HP, IBM,
Lenovo, Dell, and yes Acer..

By far Dell and Lenovo are the top of the line in terms of overall
support from our perspective.
Yes you get an occasional dummy who shows up, but that is the same for
any company.  They are all outsourced and none of them are perfect.

With Dell we call and complain and the tech disappears or comes back
retrained.  With HP we have continually had to send the same
stupid(inexperienced I should say) tech and just swap the parts
ourselves.

Dell gold/enterprise support.  Not a better tech group except Sunbelt
maybe.  Silver are good, but they are Gold in training basically.
Anything else you are dealing with India and I just always deal with
dell chat.  Easy..Parts next day or same day with Enterprise..SonicAir
baby..

IBM - Tech support is good, never had to deal with hw onsite(Of course
we only have 2 servers from IBM)

Acer - Anyone got a nuke, I got GPS coordinates of their corporate
office.  Nough said.


-Original Message-
From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 4:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Lenovo?

Just $200 for a server motherboard? We had IBM fix an out-of-warranty
motherboard for an xSeries server last month ...the PART was $2300,
labor to replace was cheap at $230...

Lemme say that again...T W E N TY   T H R E E   H U N D R E D dollars
for a motherboard. Still, that's cheaper than a single HDD for our SAN
enclosures from what I understand.

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands 

-Original Message-
From: Vincent Medina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Lenovo?

If you pay for the support contract you get support, that is exactly
what
you should expect from DELL. I find IBM backs their products without all
the
nonsense DELL puts you through. We support 3 networks totaling 100 +
Desktops and 20 + Notebooks. IBM and DELL split 40/40 with clones making
up
the rest. In our shop as I type are:

1 - IBM NetFinity (Bad HD - IBM support called back within 15 min of
support
request and will be sending a replacement HD tomorrow)
1 - Samba (Clone) (Bad HD - In house repair)
1 - CPQ POS NB(Virus - In house repair)
1 - IBM T43 (User Dropped, Bad Mobo - Sending to Depot see If we get
lucky -
BTW called back in less than 15 min after requesting service online.)
2 - Dell Latitude (Bad Power Jack - Tech did not bring a mobo - Will
return
tomorrow, 2nd NB has Bad LCD - 30 min. on hold and will have a tech out
by
tomorrow)
1 - Dell OptiPlex (Bad Pwr Supply - 25 minutes on hold - got a moron on
the
phone and hung up on him. I called back a second time, 30 minutes on
hold -
got someone who was Good and is sending part + tech in the morning)
1 - IBM X61t - Bad Fingerprint reader (Sent on Fri to depot got it back
Tuesday, good as new)
1 - Dell Server Dual Xeon (Bad Video - No Support Contract / Ran out -
Need
to send in, will not send part, Gonna live with it because it is running
CentOS and we can access fine via SSH.) BTW they want to charge me $200
for
the motherboard.

Day in the trenches 

IBM by far makes my life easy! At least for now. ;)


 

 


-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 1:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Lenovo?

On Feb 19, 2008 10:34 AM, Vincent 

NSLookup - results are not as expected

2008-02-21 Thread Bryan Garmon
I'm losing hair on my head trying to understand what determines the order of
the IP addresses when they are listed in NSLookup?

For example when I run nslookup against my AD Domain name, I receive the
result:

Name: name.domain.com
Addresses: 169.254.0.152, 169.254.0.150, 169.254.0.151

What I am expecting to see is this:

Name: name.domain.com
Addresses: 169.254.0.150, 169.254.0.151, 169.254.0.152


How can the order be changed? 



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Wiki for Windows

2008-02-21 Thread Carl Houseman
What?  Huh?   10 days later?  The world changed while you were sleeping.
Nothing less than TWiki functionality is acceptable.  Wysisyg editing and
such.  It's being moved to a faster box.
 

-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Wiki for Windows

Sure, yes, and why not.  Apache runs fine on IIS.

http://port25.technet.com even has instructions on how to do it:

 
http://port25.technet.com/archive/2008/02/12/technical-analysis-installing-a
pache-on-windows.aspx

This might be a good exercise for you if you are unfamiliar with Apache.




On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Carl Houseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 OK, I'm looking to break the good/fast/cheap rule.  Here's the deal:

 Good in this case means runs on Windows without feature loss.

 The free Wiki from TWiki.org is written in Perl there's a ready-made
Windows
 installer that includes both Perl and Apache.  They also have a ready-made
 VM that runs Debian Linux.

 The ready-made TWiki VM version runs about 3x faster than the ready-made
 Windows version.  This can be seen both in browser response time and CPU
 loading during simple operations.

 So I start googling for the answer to:  Is there another Wiki that runs on
 Windows, for free and fast?

 I run into this web page:

http://www.yafla.com/dennisforbes/Many-Ways-to-Skin-a-Wiki-Hosting-a-Wiki-on
-Windows/Many-Ways-to-Skin-a-Wiki-Hosting-a-Wiki-on-Windows.html

 which describes how to host MediaWiki on, of all things, IIS.

 Has anyone done that, and if so, do you like it?

 thanks,
 Carl













-- 
ME2

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Wiki for Windows

2008-02-21 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
Yea, I was away for a bit so I'm catching up.  You can never have too
much info - especially on this list when it comes to things
non-Microsoft centric!  ;-)

TWiki is a great solution too.  I'm certainly not knocking it.


On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Carl Houseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 What?  Huh?   10 days later?  The world changed while you were sleeping.
 Nothing less than TWiki functionality is acceptable.  Wysisyg editing and
 such.  It's being moved to a faster box.



 -Original Message-
 From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:48 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: Wiki for Windows

 Sure, yes, and why not.  Apache runs fine on IIS.

 http://port25.technet.com even has instructions on how to do it:


 http://port25.technet.com/archive/2008/02/12/technical-analysis-installing-a
 pache-on-windows.aspx

 This might be a good exercise for you if you are unfamiliar with Apache.




 On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Carl Houseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  OK, I'm looking to break the good/fast/cheap rule.  Here's the deal:
 
  Good in this case means runs on Windows without feature loss.
 
  The free Wiki from TWiki.org is written in Perl there's a ready-made
 Windows
  installer that includes both Perl and Apache.  They also have a ready-made
  VM that runs Debian Linux.
 
  The ready-made TWiki VM version runs about 3x faster than the ready-made
  Windows version.  This can be seen both in browser response time and CPU
  loading during simple operations.
 
  So I start googling for the answer to:  Is there another Wiki that runs on
  Windows, for free and fast?
 
  I run into this web page:
 
 http://www.yafla.com/dennisforbes/Many-Ways-to-Skin-a-Wiki-Hosting-a-Wiki-on
 -Windows/Many-Ways-to-Skin-a-Wiki-Hosting-a-Wiki-on-Windows.html
 
  which describes how to host MediaWiki on, of all things, IIS.
 
  Has anyone done that, and if so, do you like it?
 
  thanks,
  Carl
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



 --
 ME2

 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~




-- 
ME2

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: ntbackup scripts

2008-02-21 Thread Groups
Where can I get recode for Windows? Google was less than helpful.

 
Dave
 
 ---
|Beach Computers|
|Affordable Hosting Solutions   |
|http://www.beachcomp.com   |
 ===
|Cheap Domain Warehouse |
|Get Your Own Dot!  |
|http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com|
 -- 


Disclaimer and confidentiality note:

The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s)
and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If
you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete
it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender
of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records
can be corrected.
Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated
as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies.
Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has
been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or
interference.

-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ntbackup scripts

Here's a script I use. It requires grep, blat and recode.

You will have to create your BKS file (it must be Unicode).

Watch for line wrap.

rem *
rem *
rem * Perform fullback to whatever tape is in the drive and email 
rem * report 
rem * 
rem * Ken Cornetet - 06/10/2002 
rem * 
rem * Revision History 
rem *
rem * WhenWhoWhat
rem * ---
rem * 06/10/2002  Ken Cornetet   Original Issue
rem * 06/24/2002  Ken Cornetet   Added RSM command per Q267574
rem *
rem *
rem * Requires external programs blat, grep, and recode
rem *
rem *

set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
set SMTP={Name of your SMTP relay host here}
set NAME=FULL BACKUP %DATE% %TIME%
set LOGS=%USERPROFILE%\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Windows
NT\NTBackup\data

c:
cd \backup

rem Delete any extraneous log files
del %LOGS%\backup*.log

rem 
rem * Have removable storage management look at tape in drive 
rem * (See Q267574 for details) 
rem 

start /wait rsm refresh /lfBNCHMARK DLT1 SCSI Sequential Device 
c:\bin\sleep 30

rem 
rem * Do Backup
rem 

start /wait ntbackup backup @c:\backup\everything.bks /M normal /J
%NAME% /P DLT /N %NAME% /l:s /HC:on /UM /D %NAME%

rem 
rem * find newest (should be only) log file
rem 

dir /s /b /o-d %LOGS%\backup*.log c:\backup\backup.tmp
set /P FILE= c:\backup\backup.tmp

rem 
rem * Make ASCII version of log file
rem 

c:\bin\recode -f unicode..us %FILE% log.txt


rem 
rem * Set subject for email
rem 

set SUBJ=Backup ran OK
grep -v Error: You do not have permission log.txt  log1.txt 

findstr /i error: log1.txt 
if not ERRORLEVEL 1 set SUBJ=Backup ran - FAILED

rem 
rem * Send email
rem 

c:\bin\blat log.txt -t %RECIPIENT% -subject %SUBJ% -server %SMTP% -f
%RECIPIENT%

rem 
rem * Move log file to our directory
rem 

move /Y %FILE% c:\backup





-Original Message-
From: Christopher Boggs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ntbackup scripts

Rename it with a .txt extension :)

Christopher Boggs
Security System Administrator
Miltec Corporation   

office.256-428-1370  
mobile.256-468-0922
fax.256-428-1461

Painstakingly sent to you from my Blackberry...

- Original Message -
From: 

RE: ntbackup scripts

2008-02-21 Thread Michael B. Smith
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=windows+download+recode.exe

Four different versions on the first page. At least.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 10:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ntbackup scripts

Where can I get recode for Windows? Google was less than helpful.

 
Dave
 
 ---
|Beach Computers|
|Affordable Hosting Solutions   |
|http://www.beachcomp.com   |
 ===
|Cheap Domain Warehouse |
|Get Your Own Dot!  |
|http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com|
 -- 


Disclaimer and confidentiality note:

The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s)
and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If
you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete
it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender
of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records
can be corrected.
Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated
as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies.
Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has
been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or
interference.

-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ntbackup scripts

Here's a script I use. It requires grep, blat and recode.

You will have to create your BKS file (it must be Unicode).

Watch for line wrap.

rem *
rem *
rem * Perform fullback to whatever tape is in the drive and email 
rem * report 
rem * 
rem * Ken Cornetet - 06/10/2002 
rem * 
rem * Revision History 
rem *
rem * WhenWhoWhat
rem * ---
rem * 06/10/2002  Ken Cornetet   Original Issue
rem * 06/24/2002  Ken Cornetet   Added RSM command per Q267574
rem *
rem *
rem * Requires external programs blat, grep, and recode
rem *
rem *

set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
set SMTP={Name of your SMTP relay host here}
set NAME=FULL BACKUP %DATE% %TIME%
set LOGS=%USERPROFILE%\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Windows
NT\NTBackup\data

c:
cd \backup

rem Delete any extraneous log files
del %LOGS%\backup*.log

rem 
rem * Have removable storage management look at tape in drive 
rem * (See Q267574 for details) 
rem 

start /wait rsm refresh /lfBNCHMARK DLT1 SCSI Sequential Device 
c:\bin\sleep 30

rem 
rem * Do Backup
rem 

start /wait ntbackup backup @c:\backup\everything.bks /M normal /J
%NAME% /P DLT /N %NAME% /l:s /HC:on /UM /D %NAME%

rem 
rem * find newest (should be only) log file
rem 

dir /s /b /o-d %LOGS%\backup*.log c:\backup\backup.tmp
set /P FILE= c:\backup\backup.tmp

rem 
rem * Make ASCII version of log file
rem 

c:\bin\recode -f unicode..us %FILE% log.txt


rem 
rem * Set subject for email
rem 

set SUBJ=Backup ran OK
grep -v Error: You do not have permission log.txt  log1.txt 

findstr /i error: log1.txt 
if not ERRORLEVEL 1 set SUBJ=Backup ran - FAILED

rem 
rem * Send email
rem 

c:\bin\blat log.txt -t %RECIPIENT% -subject %SUBJ% -server %SMTP% -f
%RECIPIENT%

rem 
rem * Move log file to our directory
rem 

move /Y %FILE% c:\backup





-Original Message-
From: Christopher Boggs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 

RE: ntbackup scripts

2008-02-21 Thread Groups
hanging head in shame

 
Dave
 
 ---
|Beach Computers|
|Affordable Hosting Solutions   |
|http://www.beachcomp.com   |
 ===
|Cheap Domain Warehouse |
|Get Your Own Dot!  |
|http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com|
 -- 


Disclaimer and confidentiality note:

The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s)
and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If
you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete
it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender
of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records
can be corrected.
Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated
as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies.
Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has
been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or
interference.

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 10:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ntbackup scripts

http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=windows+download+recode.exe

Four different versions on the first page. At least.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 10:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ntbackup scripts

Where can I get recode for Windows? Google was less than helpful.

 
Dave
 
 ---
|Beach Computers|
|Affordable Hosting Solutions   |
|http://www.beachcomp.com   |
 ===
|Cheap Domain Warehouse |
|Get Your Own Dot!  |
|http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com|
 -- 


Disclaimer and confidentiality note:

The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s)
and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If
you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete
it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender
of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records
can be corrected.
Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated
as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies.
Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has
been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or
interference.

-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ntbackup scripts

Here's a script I use. It requires grep, blat and recode.

You will have to create your BKS file (it must be Unicode).

Watch for line wrap.

rem *
rem *
rem * Perform fullback to whatever tape is in the drive and email 
rem * report 
rem * 
rem * Ken Cornetet - 06/10/2002 
rem * 
rem * Revision History 
rem *
rem * WhenWhoWhat
rem * ---
rem * 06/10/2002  Ken Cornetet   Original Issue
rem * 06/24/2002  Ken Cornetet   Added RSM command per Q267574
rem *
rem *
rem * Requires external programs blat, grep, and recode
rem *
rem *

set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
set SMTP={Name of your SMTP relay host here}
set NAME=FULL BACKUP %DATE% %TIME%
set LOGS=%USERPROFILE%\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Windows
NT\NTBackup\data

c:
cd \backup

rem Delete any extraneous log files
del %LOGS%\backup*.log

rem 
rem * Have removable storage management look at tape in drive 
rem * (See Q267574 for details) 
rem 

start /wait rsm refresh /lfBNCHMARK DLT1 SCSI Sequential Device 
c:\bin\sleep 30

rem 

RE: ntbackup scripts

2008-02-21 Thread Carl Houseman
I had a devil of a time finding this one the first time, been using it for a
couple years now with no complaints.

http://recode.progiciels-bpi.ca/archives

(I don't remember if this is where I got it, but fc/b says this recode.exe
is identical to my copy.)

Carl

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 10:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ntbackup scripts

Where can I get recode for Windows? Google was less than helpful.

 
Dave
 
 ---
|Beach Computers|
|Affordable Hosting Solutions   |
|http://www.beachcomp.com   |
 ===
|Cheap Domain Warehouse |
|Get Your Own Dot!  |
|http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com|
 -- 


Disclaimer and confidentiality note:

The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s)
and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If
you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete
it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender
of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records
can be corrected.
Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated
as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies.
Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has
been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or
interference.

-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ntbackup scripts

Here's a script I use. It requires grep, blat and recode.

You will have to create your BKS file (it must be Unicode).

Watch for line wrap.

rem *
rem *
rem * Perform fullback to whatever tape is in the drive and email 
rem * report 
rem * 
rem * Ken Cornetet - 06/10/2002 
rem * 
rem * Revision History 
rem *
rem * WhenWhoWhat
rem * ---
rem * 06/10/2002  Ken Cornetet   Original Issue
rem * 06/24/2002  Ken Cornetet   Added RSM command per Q267574
rem *
rem *
rem * Requires external programs blat, grep, and recode
rem *
rem *

set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
set SMTP={Name of your SMTP relay host here}
set NAME=FULL BACKUP %DATE% %TIME%
set LOGS=%USERPROFILE%\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Windows
NT\NTBackup\data

c:
cd \backup

rem Delete any extraneous log files
del %LOGS%\backup*.log

rem 
rem * Have removable storage management look at tape in drive 
rem * (See Q267574 for details) 
rem 

start /wait rsm refresh /lfBNCHMARK DLT1 SCSI Sequential Device 
c:\bin\sleep 30

rem 
rem * Do Backup
rem 

start /wait ntbackup backup @c:\backup\everything.bks /M normal /J
%NAME% /P DLT /N %NAME% /l:s /HC:on /UM /D %NAME%

rem 
rem * find newest (should be only) log file
rem 

dir /s /b /o-d %LOGS%\backup*.log c:\backup\backup.tmp
set /P FILE= c:\backup\backup.tmp

rem 
rem * Make ASCII version of log file
rem 

c:\bin\recode -f unicode..us %FILE% log.txt


rem 
rem * Set subject for email
rem 

set SUBJ=Backup ran OK
grep -v Error: You do not have permission log.txt  log1.txt 

findstr /i error: log1.txt 
if not ERRORLEVEL 1 set SUBJ=Backup ran - FAILED

rem 
rem * Send email
rem 

c:\bin\blat log.txt -t %RECIPIENT% -subject %SUBJ% -server %SMTP% -f
%RECIPIENT%

rem 
rem * Move log file to our directory
rem 

move /Y %FILE% c:\backup





-Original Message-
From: Christopher Boggs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, 

RE: NSLookup - results are not as expected

2008-02-21 Thread Michael B. Smith
scratches head

Why does it matter?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Bryan Garmon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 9:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: NSLookup - results are not as expected

I'm losing hair on my head trying to understand what determines the order of
the IP addresses when they are listed in NSLookup?

For example when I run nslookup against my AD Domain name, I receive the
result:

Name: name.domain.com
Addresses: 169.254.0.152, 169.254.0.150, 169.254.0.151

What I am expecting to see is this:

Name: name.domain.com
Addresses: 169.254.0.150, 169.254.0.151, 169.254.0.152


How can the order be changed? 



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: NSLookup - results are not as expected

2008-02-21 Thread Mike Semon
That's not good. The 169.x.x.x address is coming from a Windows service
called APIPA (Automatic Private IP-addressing). APIPA is a service to
dynamically assign IP addresses to network clients when they can't reach the
DHCP server.

Mike
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Garmon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: NSLookup - results are not as expected

I'm losing hair on my head trying to understand what determines the order of
the IP addresses when they are listed in NSLookup?

For example when I run nslookup against my AD Domain name, I receive the
result:

Name: name.domain.com
Addresses: 169.254.0.152, 169.254.0.150, 169.254.0.151

What I am expecting to see is this:

Name: name.domain.com
Addresses: 169.254.0.150, 169.254.0.151, 169.254.0.152


How can the order be changed? 



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Lenovo?

2008-02-21 Thread Vincent Medina
I do not have Dell's GOLD support status, so I would not know their support
response times.. Is this something you must pay for or buy 1 million dollars
worth of their crap in order to achieve. No thanks - I'd rather stay with a
company that stands behind their standard warranty without paying for GOLD
support.. 

Also... I thought I clearly indicated the server was out of warranty ... my
point was their parts are overpriced. I can get dual Xeon Processor boards
for well under $200.00. The Support call referred me to another number
(spare parts replacement) which I waited another 20 minutes for someone to
pickup. 

I guess you are used to mediocre support because a far as I am concerned
Dell support is mediocre at best... 

There product is ok in most cases, but my experience with their support has
been so negative I will not go there anymore. 




-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 11:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Lenovo?

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Vincent Medina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  2 - Dell Latitude (Bad Power Jack - Tech did not bring a mobo - Will
return
  tomorrow, 2nd NB has Bad LCD - 30 min. on hold and will have a tech out
by
  tomorrow)
  1 - Dell OptiPlex (Bad Pwr Supply - 25 minutes on hold - got a moron on
the
  phone and hung up on him. I called back a second time, 30 minutes on hold
-
  got someone who was Good and is sending part + tech in the morning)

  Every time I've called the Gold Tech Support line provided with
the service contract documentation Dell puts in the box, I've gotten
to speak to a tech in well under five minutes, who has been eager to
help, knowledgeable, and took my word for it if I already had a
diagnosis.

  I've never had a field tech arrive without parts.  Quality of the
field techs does vary.  Some are very good, most are competent but not
outstanding.  I did have one guy, once, who was kind of a moron.  I
called Dell and complained.  Never saw him again.

  1 - Dell Server Dual Xeon (Bad Video - No Support Contract / Ran out -
Need
  to send in, will not send part, Gonna live with it because it is running
  CentOS and we can access fine via SSH.) BTW they want to charge me $200
for
  the motherboard.

  The nerve of Dell, not giving you free parts for an out-of-waranty
system!  Next you'll be telling me they didn't give you the server for
free, either!

  FYI, you should be able to buy any Dell part you have a DP/N for by
calling Dell Spare Parts at 800-357-3355.

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Lenovo?

2008-02-21 Thread gsweers
Umm. No its just a level of support.

Buy a server and you get 3 yr nbd as standard.  Gold Support simply
entitles you to 4 hr onsite same day support, and Enterprise support
gets you a highly highly skilled technicians instead of simple level 1
and 2 script readers as well as access to SonicAir parts.  Yes you pay
for this, but that's on your level of service.

For the dozen of calls we have done for every major vendor they all are
imperfect.  But with the sheer number of systems that Dell has out there
and the quality of support they have for business grade machines at an
awesome price point well if you still have an issue then its your
perspective.  There are plenty of people very happy with their support.


Nothing wrong with Lenovo either, they are just pricier for our books.

-Original Message-
From: Vincent Medina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 11:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Lenovo?

I do not have Dell's GOLD support status, so I would not know their
support
response times.. Is this something you must pay for or buy 1 million
dollars
worth of their crap in order to achieve. No thanks - I'd rather stay
with a
company that stands behind their standard warranty without paying for
GOLD
support.. 

Also... I thought I clearly indicated the server was out of warranty ...
my
point was their parts are overpriced. I can get dual Xeon Processor
boards
for well under $200.00. The Support call referred me to another number
(spare parts replacement) which I waited another 20 minutes for someone
to
pickup. 

I guess you are used to mediocre support because a far as I am concerned
Dell support is mediocre at best... 

There product is ok in most cases, but my experience with their support
has
been so negative I will not go there anymore. 




-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 11:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Lenovo?

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Vincent Medina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
  2 - Dell Latitude (Bad Power Jack - Tech did not bring a mobo - Will
return
  tomorrow, 2nd NB has Bad LCD - 30 min. on hold and will have a tech
out
by
  tomorrow)
  1 - Dell OptiPlex (Bad Pwr Supply - 25 minutes on hold - got a moron
on
the
  phone and hung up on him. I called back a second time, 30 minutes on
hold
-
  got someone who was Good and is sending part + tech in the morning)

  Every time I've called the Gold Tech Support line provided with
the service contract documentation Dell puts in the box, I've gotten
to speak to a tech in well under five minutes, who has been eager to
help, knowledgeable, and took my word for it if I already had a
diagnosis.

  I've never had a field tech arrive without parts.  Quality of the
field techs does vary.  Some are very good, most are competent but not
outstanding.  I did have one guy, once, who was kind of a moron.  I
called Dell and complained.  Never saw him again.

  1 - Dell Server Dual Xeon (Bad Video - No Support Contract / Ran out
-
Need
  to send in, will not send part, Gonna live with it because it is
running
  CentOS and we can access fine via SSH.) BTW they want to charge me
$200
for
  the motherboard.

  The nerve of Dell, not giving you free parts for an out-of-waranty
system!  Next you'll be telling me they didn't give you the server for
free, either!

  FYI, you should be able to buy any Dell part you have a DP/N for by
calling Dell Spare Parts at 800-357-3355.

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Lenovo?

2008-02-21 Thread Sam Cayze
iirc Gold Support is another $38 for laptops.  

-Original Message-
From: Vincent Medina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 10:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Lenovo?

I do not have Dell's GOLD support status, so I would not know their
support response times.. Is this something you must pay for or buy 1
million dollars worth of their crap in order to achieve. No thanks - I'd
rather stay with a company that stands behind their standard warranty
without paying for GOLD support.. 

Also... I thought I clearly indicated the server was out of warranty ...
my point was their parts are overpriced. I can get dual Xeon Processor
boards for well under $200.00. The Support call referred me to another
number (spare parts replacement) which I waited another 20 minutes for
someone to pickup. 

I guess you are used to mediocre support because a far as I am concerned
Dell support is mediocre at best... 

There product is ok in most cases, but my experience with their support
has been so negative I will not go there anymore. 




-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 11:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Lenovo?

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Vincent Medina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
  2 - Dell Latitude (Bad Power Jack - Tech did not bring a mobo - Will
return
  tomorrow, 2nd NB has Bad LCD - 30 min. on hold and will have a tech 
 out
by
  tomorrow)
  1 - Dell OptiPlex (Bad Pwr Supply - 25 minutes on hold - got a moron 
 on
the
  phone and hung up on him. I called back a second time, 30 minutes on 
 hold
-
  got someone who was Good and is sending part + tech in the morning)

  Every time I've called the Gold Tech Support line provided with the
service contract documentation Dell puts in the box, I've gotten to
speak to a tech in well under five minutes, who has been eager to help,
knowledgeable, and took my word for it if I already had a diagnosis.

  I've never had a field tech arrive without parts.  Quality of the
field techs does vary.  Some are very good, most are competent but not
outstanding.  I did have one guy, once, who was kind of a moron.  I
called Dell and complained.  Never saw him again.

  1 - Dell Server Dual Xeon (Bad Video - No Support Contract / Ran out 
 -
Need
  to send in, will not send part, Gonna live with it because it is 
 running  CentOS and we can access fine via SSH.) BTW they want to 
 charge me $200
for
  the motherboard.

  The nerve of Dell, not giving you free parts for an out-of-waranty
system!  Next you'll be telling me they didn't give you the server for
free, either!

  FYI, you should be able to buy any Dell part you have a DP/N for by
calling Dell Spare Parts at 800-357-3355.

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: NSLookup - results are not as expected

2008-02-21 Thread Phil Brutsche
I think it's more likely he sanitized the output ;)

Mike Semon wrote:
 That's not good. The 169.x.x.x address is coming from a Windows service
 called APIPA (Automatic Private IP-addressing).

-- 

Phil Brutsche
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: NSLookup - results are not as expected

2008-02-21 Thread Phil Brutsche
When you have multiple A resource records for a particular DNS name some
DNS servers return the results in a random order.

Microsoft's DNS service isn't one that randomizes the lookup results.

This is something you typically see when the name server (or the caching
name server) the client is pointing to is BIND on Linux/*BSD/some
commercial UNIX.

In the grand scheme of things it really doesn't make a difference.

Bryan Garmon wrote:
 I'm losing hair on my head trying to understand what determines the order of
 the IP addresses when they are listed in NSLookup?
 
 For example when I run nslookup against my AD Domain name, I receive the
 result:
 
 Name: name.domain.com
 Addresses: 169.254.0.152, 169.254.0.150, 169.254.0.151
 
 What I am expecting to see is this:
 
 Name: name.domain.com
 Addresses: 169.254.0.150, 169.254.0.151, 169.254.0.152
 
 
 How can the order be changed? 

-- 

Phil Brutsche
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: NSLookup - results are not as expected

2008-02-21 Thread Greg Mulholland


From memory lookups can appear in any order. I'm sure ive done lookups to
the same domain and have a varying order of result. It shouldnt make any
difference though.

Greg

 I'm losing hair on my
head trying to understand what determines the order 
 of 
 the IP addresses when they are listed in NSLookup? 
 
 For example when I run nslookup against my AD Domain name, I
receive the 
 result: 
 
 Name: name.domain.com

 Addresses: 169.254.0.152, 169.254.0.150, 169.254.0.151 
 
 What I am expecting to see is this: 
 
 Name: name.domain.com 
 Addresses: 169.254.0.150,
169.254.0.151, 169.254.0.152 
 
 
 How can the
order be changed? 
 
 
 
 ~ Upgrade to
Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ 
 ~
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ 
 


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

Re: Lenovo?

2008-02-21 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Vincent Medina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I do not have Dell's GOLD support status, so I would not know their support
  response times.. Is this something you must pay for or buy 1 million dollars
  worth of their crap in order to achieve.

  Gold Support is/was a line item on the Service and support page of
their configurator.  It's been renamed to ProSupport recently.
Adding it to the standard 1-year warranty cost  $50 for most user
systems.  I think it comes standard with servers.

 No thanks - I'd rather stay with a company that stands behind their
 standard warranty without paying for GOLD support..

  As I mentioned, Dell is happy to sell you cheap crap if that's what
you want..  It sounds like you went the cheap crap route, and got
exactly what you paid for.  Why is this a surprise to you?

  Also... I thought I clearly indicated the server was out of warranty ...

  You did.  But your stated complaint was that Dell's support is
inferior to IBM's.  I fail to see how a refusal to send you a free
part on an out-of-warranty system reflects poorly on Dell.  I'm pretty
sure IBM won't send you free parts on out-of-warranty system, either.

 my point was their parts are overpriced. I can get dual Xeon Processor boards
  for well under $200.00.

  Then why didn't you?  Let me answer that for you: You wanted a board
*for that server*.  Most big-name servers use proprietary parts, which
carry a higher price.  As someone else noted, IBM server parts aren't
cheap, either.  And even generic server motherboards tend to be
expensive.  A quick spot check shows that the Tyan S5397 server board
streets for around $500.  So $200 is actually pretty cheap.

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: NSLookup - results are not as expected

2008-02-21 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Bryan Garmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm losing hair on my head trying to understand what determines the order of
  the IP addresses when they are listed in NSLookup?

  The DNS specification says that if multiple RRs (Resource Records)
exist for a given domain name, they may be returned in any order.

  How can the order be changed?

  Short answer: It cannot.

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Lyris must be down

2008-02-21 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Stu Sjouwerman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 We upgraded to a new version and it was a bad one.
 Tried to downgrade but that did not work because they
 made database changes. We have a few fixes now that
 promise some more stability...  sigh.

  I suggest this fix:

http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/index.html

  Hee hee hee.  ;-)

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Ghost DHCP settings

2008-02-21 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:01 PM, David Florea, SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Is 192.168.1.1 a default for anything else??

  192.168.1.1 is the default used by a *lot* of SOHO NAT equipment,
not just LinkSys.  Almost certainly, somebody has taken their
bitty-box home router with the built-in four-port-switch, and plugged
it into your LAN to get some extra ports, not even knowing they're
screwing up your LAN in the process.

  Assign 192.168.1.42 as an IP address to a test machine, and ping
192.168.1.1 from the test box.  Then check the ARP table to get the
MAC address of the rogue device.  The OUI part of the MAC address will
tell you the brand of device.  Then use your managed switches to track
down the port the rogue device is connected to.  If you don't have
manged switches, use a non-Microsoft ping tool to flood ping the
192.168.1.1 device.  Follow the spastic link lights to find the port.

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Lenovo?

2008-02-21 Thread Vincent Medina
Wow,

Is your real name Michael Dell?  I am only stating my experience. Your
statements will not change those facts. If you call spending 2795.00 on IBM
x61t CHEAP tablets then... I guess you are right.. how about the 3 T61s for
2480.00 I ordered today.. are they cheap too? Tyan Boards are VERY
expensive $500... Because it is a Quad core Xeon Main Board... I am
talking about a Xeon Board that is almost 4 years old... Come on Michael...
arghhh I Mean Ben. Don't get hurt feelings... I still recommend my cheapie
clients to go to Walmart to buy their Dells. At least Walmart will take them
back withing 30 days. 



-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 1:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Lenovo?

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Vincent Medina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I do not have Dell's GOLD support status, so I would not know their
support
  response times.. Is this something you must pay for or buy 1 million
dollars
  worth of their crap in order to achieve.

  Gold Support is/was a line item on the Service and support page of
their configurator.  It's been renamed to ProSupport recently.
Adding it to the standard 1-year warranty cost  $50 for most user
systems.  I think it comes standard with servers.

 No thanks - I'd rather stay with a company that stands behind their
 standard warranty without paying for GOLD support..

  As I mentioned, Dell is happy to sell you cheap crap if that's what
you want..  It sounds like you went the cheap crap route, and got
exactly what you paid for.  Why is this a surprise to you?

  Also... I thought I clearly indicated the server was out of warranty ...

  You did.  But your stated complaint was that Dell's support is
inferior to IBM's.  I fail to see how a refusal to send you a free
part on an out-of-warranty system reflects poorly on Dell.  I'm pretty
sure IBM won't send you free parts on out-of-warranty system, either.

 my point was their parts are overpriced. I can get dual Xeon Processor
boards
  for well under $200.00.

  Then why didn't you?  Let me answer that for you: You wanted a board
*for that server*.  Most big-name servers use proprietary parts, which
carry a higher price.  As someone else noted, IBM server parts aren't
cheap, either.  And even generic server motherboards tend to be
expensive.  A quick spot check shows that the Tyan S5397 server board
streets for around $500.  So $200 is actually pretty cheap.

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~