Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory Rescue mkinitrd
On 2007/04/09 14:18 (GMT+0200) Carlos E. R. apparently typed: 2007-04-08 at 20:47 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: I then tried to mount and chroot to it in order to run grub-install. Grub-install failed due to the non-existent target device. It could be because the /mnt/dev tree is not populated. Copying the hda19 device file from the 10.1 / and trying again didn't help. Ah, so you saw that. The trick is this, before chrooting: mount -o bind /proc /mnt/proc mount -o bind /sys /mnt/sys mount -o bind /dev /proc/dev and then, chroot (as posted here by Anders Johansson about a month ago). The man page for mkinitrd is now rather different: 1-mount root device on /mnt 2-mount --bind /dev /mnt/dev 3-chroot /mnt 4-mount /proc 5-mount /sys 6-mkinitrd When I try it this way, I get a lot of Constant Prototype error messages from line 66 of Exporter.pm. -- In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. John 1:1 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory Rescue mkinitrd
Felix Miata wrote: On 2007/04/09 14:18 (GMT+0200) Carlos E. R. apparently typed: 2007-04-08 at 20:47 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: I then tried to mount and chroot to it in order to run grub-install. Grub-install failed due to the non-existent target device. It could be because the /mnt/dev tree is not populated. Copying the hda19 device file from the 10.1 / and trying again didn't help. Ah, so you saw that. The trick is this, before chrooting: mount -o bind /proc /mnt/proc mount -o bind /sys /mnt/sys mount -o bind /dev /proc/dev and then, chroot (as posted here by Anders Johansson about a month ago). The man page for mkinitrd is now rather different: 1-mount root device on /mnt 2-mount --bind /dev /mnt/dev 3-chroot /mnt 4-mount /proc 5-mount /sys 6-mkinitrd When I try it this way, I get a lot of Constant Prototype error messages from line 66 of Exporter.pm. I have seen these on 2 x86_64 boxes, but the initrd gets built and the kernel boots fine. Still needs fixing though. Regards Sid. -- Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support Specialist, Cricket Coach Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] Factory tree
Hello, my factory tree is deleted :(. I have the factory on my local system and update it with drpmsync (cron). last night all files from factory are deleted :(. Now is starting a new download ... -- mit freundlichen Grüßen / best Regards Günther J. Niederwimmer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory tree
Am Mittwoch 16 Januar 2008 schrieb Günther J. Niederwimmer: Hello, my factory tree is deleted :(. I have the factory on my local system and update it with drpmsync (cron). last night all files from factory are deleted :(. Now is starting a new download ... Well, another fallout from download.o.o having crashed. Don't worry, we didn't do it on purpose. Greetings, Stephan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory-Upgrade impossible due to gnomekeyring.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cristian Rodríguez schreef: M9. escribió: But now new deps are troublesome: nfs-client, needs libevent-1.3b.so.1() Probably not all pakcages have synced out yet, factory provides libevent-1.3e atm. thnx... - -- Have a nice day, M9. Now, is the only time that exists. OS: Linux 2.6.24-rc6-2-default x86_64 Huidige gebruiker: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systeem: openSUSE 11.0 (x86_64) Alpha0 KDE: 3.5.8 release 28 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHgLJ8X5/X5X6LpDgRAh2GAJ9C4nl0Fwl0tLcDLGqvVk+IpaF0ngCfX+XD iWQTOyaIUOMTjcD6TRmlHDY= =iuU3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory-Upgrade impossible due to gnomekeyring.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 M9. schreef: JP Rosevear schreef: On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 14:01 +0100, Dirk Mueller wrote: On Sunday 30 December 2007, M9. wrote: Many pkgs depend on this. The most annoying is that not installing totem would be the right solution, but it is impossible to apply that proposel... Please post error messages, do not interpret them. I was able to do a factory update just fine. libtasn1 is a new requirement and has not been synced to the external factory tree yet. You can get libtasn1* from GNOME:UNSTABLE as a work around for now. -JP True, adding gnome unstable fullfilled the required deps. But now new deps are troublesome: nfs-client, needs libevent-1.3b.so.1() And the deps cannot be saved to a list: YaST2 conflicts list - generated 2008-01-05 17:17:31 YaST2 conflicts list END ### Upgrading nfs-client, and yast2nfs-client manualy, rose no problems. Factory update was possible after this. Filed a bug about this: Bug 351894 - -- Have a nice day, M9. Now, is the only time that exists. OS: Linux 2.6.24-rc5-git2-2-default x86_64 Huidige gebruiker: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systeem: openSUSE 11.0 (x86_64) Alpha0 KDE: 3.5.8 release 25 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHf7IZX5/X5X6LpDgRArgbAJ0a3hgW6pHjMkK2kZmDqcoG4JekiwCgiCGP 9iZor3rygskTqTxTMw4g9jg= =T4Vz -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory-Upgrade impossible due to gnomekeyring.
M9. escribió: But now new deps are troublesome: nfs-client, needs libevent-1.3b.so.1() Probably not all pakcages have synced out yet, factory provides libevent-1.3e atm. -- The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education. - Albert Einstein Cristian Rodríguez R. Platform/OpenSUSE - Core Services SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Research Development http://www.opensuse.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory-Upgrade impossible due to gnomekeyring.
JP Rosevear wrote: On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 14:01 +0100, Dirk Mueller wrote: On Sunday 30 December 2007, M9. wrote: Many pkgs depend on this. The most annoying is that not installing totem would be the right solution, but it is impossible to apply that proposel... Please post error messages, do not interpret them. I was able to do a factory update just fine. libtasn1 is a new requirement and has not been synced to the external factory tree yet. You can get libtasn1* from GNOME:UNSTABLE as a work around for now. -JP As suggested in the bug report, I downloaded and installed libtasn1 x86_64 from Fedora core 8 and that fixed the problem with gnome-keyring. Regards Sid. -- Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support Specialist, Cricket Coach Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] Factory-Upgrade impossible due to gnomekeyring.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Many pkgs depend on this. The most annoying is that not installing totem would be the right solution, but it is impossible to apply that proposel... Yast solver does not apply: not install gnomekeyring. - -- Have a nice day, M9. Now, is the only time that exists. OS: Linux 2.6.24-rc5-git2-2-default x86_64 Huidige gebruiker: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systeem: openSUSE 11.0 (x86_64) Alpha0 KDE: 3.5.8 release 25 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHd5D+X5/X5X6LpDgRAl4vAJ0bXEh5aGsgl/nNYhzq9I09YD/UEQCfR2Qy +iqLk7K5AYfDBAj5NLjCFhs= =Sr8/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory repos corrupt?
Am Montag 24 Dezember 2007 schrieb Greg KH: - File /var/cache/zypp/raw/factoryYGzNXo/content.key doesn't contain public key data - Valid metadata not found at specified URL(s) Please, check if the URLs defined for this repository are pointing to a valid repository. Skipping repository 'factory' because of the above error. Could not refresh the repositories because of errors. You're only writing to -factory? Because this very problem was discussed in the last 5 mails :) gpg was deinstalled for some weired reasons in a previous run and you might need to reinstall it manually before you can continue. Greetings, Stephan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] Factory repos corrupt?
I'm getting the following when trying to refresh with zypper: # zypper -v ref factory Verbosity: 1 Non-option program arguments: 'factory' Initializing Target Checking whether to refresh metadata for factory Downloading: content * Downloading [100%] Downloading: media * Downloading [100%] Refreshing 'factory' Downloading: content * Downloading [100%] Downloading: media * Downloading [100%] Downloading: media * Downloading [100%] Downloading: content.asc * Downloading [100%] Downloading: content.key * Downloading [100%] Repository 'factory' is invalid. History: - File /var/cache/zypp/raw/factoryYGzNXo/content.key doesn't contain public key data - Valid metadata not found at specified URL(s) Please, check if the URLs defined for this repository are pointing to a valid repository. Skipping repository 'factory' because of the above error. Could not refresh the repositories because of errors. And the url for factory that I'm using is: http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/ which used to work just fine a few days ago. Anything odd just happen, or is this a stupid error on my side? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] factory kernel-default-2.6.24_rc5_git2-2.i586.rpm
Hi, http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/suse/i586/ kernel-default-2.6.24_rc5_git2-2.i586.rpm used in factory installation in VirtualBox (latest) can start only with acpi=off, but then system timer runs very fast. Old kernel is, as usually, removed. Booting in runlevel 3 and changing clock source from pit to tsc seems to be work. I guess it is a time to reload Alpha0 and start again. -- Regards, Rajko - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] factory marked 'invalid' by zypper, and switched off.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Updating gets tyresome with the network bug: incompatible sender/receiver protocols, resultingi update-server time-out errors, and reinserting the commands. Now showing the extreme use for the command memory in the navigation keys :-), (briljant solution, who-ever invented that!) - -- Have a nice day, M9. Now, is the only time that exists. OS: Linux 2.6.24-rc4-git1-2-default x86_64 Huidige gebruiker: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systeem: openSUSE 11.0 (x86_64) Alpha0 KDE: 3.5.8 release 22 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHX9kpX5/X5X6LpDgRAh01AKDSo8MdsSVmmP6srZm1UAb/keZ6CgCg0Se7 gTguuYyaVNQ7hvG+m0JsInY= =hrXw -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] factory drpmsync ?
Hello, I have a new problem with drpmsync d inst-source/suse/noarch/glest-data-3.0.0-3.noarch.rpm chmod /data2/SUSE/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/drpmsync/wip/glest-data-3.0.0-3.noarch.rpm: No such file or directory Please make a sync. -- mit freundlichen Grüßen / best Regards Günther J. Niederwimmer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] Factory not prominently enough featured on opensuse.org?
Just a comment from Mr. LWN Said grumpy editor has actively looked for an opensuse development distribution a few times, with no luck. The folks who create opensuse.org don't make the factory distribution easy to find - the latest development version link does not go anywhere near it. I suspect I'm not the only one who has come up empty-handed in this search. Nonetheless, I clearly blew my research and apologize for any resulting confusion. why he stated that there was no publicly available development version of openSUSE available. It's true that it is not that easy to find: When I went to opensuse.org, download, then the link latest development version points to 10.3RC1 A prominent link to factory might help to prevent this from happening too often? Maybe there are some other places where links to factory might be added (but I think it is properly referenced at the main wiki page). Ciao Joerg PS: The article on lwn.net will become available in a week for non-subscribers (The Grumpy Editor's guide to (some) development distributions). Apart from that goof, the article was a nice read. PPS: Googling for: opensuse development version showed the (good) development version page and the (bad) download page as its first two hits in that order -- Joerg Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory -- What's going on?
Stephan Kulow wrote: Am Donnerstag 01 November 2007 schrieb Sid Boyce: Sid Boyce wrote: lrwxrwxrwx1 rootroot 26 Oct 27 00:22 /usr/lib64/libgda-report-3.0.so - libgda-report-3.0.so.3.0.0 # rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libgda-report-3.0.so.3.0.0 error: file /usr/lib64/libgda-report-3.0.so.3.0.0: No such file or directory That's right, it does not exist. I have seen this on 2 x86_64 boxes after zypper update -t package recently and reported in #336969. ldconfig -v showed no broken links or missing stuff last night before I did the update. Regards Sid. Checking Factory, packages are definitely missing. Yes, it's a general problem we're facing, which is a combination of these 3: - people want factory synced out as soon as possible - we're required to review all new packages if we're are legally allowed to distribute them - developers split packages - creating new packages Basically you can't have all 3 of them without problems you see. Additionally zypper up -t package is a pretty dumb tool, it only looks at one package at a time and doesn't see that requirements are no longer full filled. So what you should prefer with factory is using yast2-update-FACTORY - it will at least be able to tell you, that there is a library missing _before_ you update. And yes, zypper distupgrade is being worked on. Greetings, Stephan yast2 -- Factory Update still exhibits the old behaviour - can't update from 10.3.1 to 10.3.1, which means you have to boot off CD/DVD in order to do an update from Factory. Regards Sid. -- Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support Specialist, Cricket Coach Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory -- What's going on?
Am Donnerstag 01 November 2007 schrieb Sid Boyce: Sid Boyce wrote: lrwxrwxrwx1 rootroot 26 Oct 27 00:22 /usr/lib64/libgda-report-3.0.so - libgda-report-3.0.so.3.0.0 # rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libgda-report-3.0.so.3.0.0 error: file /usr/lib64/libgda-report-3.0.so.3.0.0: No such file or directory That's right, it does not exist. I have seen this on 2 x86_64 boxes after zypper update -t package recently and reported in #336969. ldconfig -v showed no broken links or missing stuff last night before I did the update. Regards Sid. Checking Factory, packages are definitely missing. Yes, it's a general problem we're facing, which is a combination of these 3: - people want factory synced out as soon as possible - we're required to review all new packages if we're are legally allowed to distribute them - developers split packages - creating new packages Basically you can't have all 3 of them without problems you see. Additionally zypper up -t package is a pretty dumb tool, it only looks at one package at a time and doesn't see that requirements are no longer full filled. So what you should prefer with factory is using yast2-update-FACTORY - it will at least be able to tell you, that there is a library missing _before_ you update. And yes, zypper distupgrade is being worked on. Greetings, Stephan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] Factory -- What's going on?
lrwxrwxrwx1 rootroot 26 Oct 27 00:22 /usr/lib64/libgda-report-3.0.so - libgda-report-3.0.so.3.0.0 # rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libgda-report-3.0.so.3.0.0 error: file /usr/lib64/libgda-report-3.0.so.3.0.0: No such file or directory That's right, it does not exist. I have seen this on 2 x86_64 boxes after zypper update -t package recently and reported in #336969. ldconfig -v showed no broken links or missing stuff last night before I did the update. Regards Sid. -- Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support Specialist, Cricket Coach Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory -- What's going on?
Sid Boyce wrote: lrwxrwxrwx1 rootroot 26 Oct 27 00:22 /usr/lib64/libgda-report-3.0.so - libgda-report-3.0.so.3.0.0 # rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libgda-report-3.0.so.3.0.0 error: file /usr/lib64/libgda-report-3.0.so.3.0.0: No such file or directory That's right, it does not exist. I have seen this on 2 x86_64 boxes after zypper update -t package recently and reported in #336969. ldconfig -v showed no broken links or missing stuff last night before I did the update. Regards Sid. Checking Factory, packages are definitely missing. ldconfig: Cannot stat /usr/lib64/libgda-report-3.0.so: No such file or directory ldconfig: Cannot stat /usr/lib64/libgnutls-extra.so: No such file or directory ldconfig: Cannot stat /usr/lib64/libgnutls.so: No such file or directory ldconfig: Cannot stat /usr/lib64/libgnutls-openssl.so: No such file or directory ldconfig: Cannot stat /usr/lib64/libgnutlsxx.so: No such file or directory ldconfig: Cannot stat /usr/lib/libopencdk.so: No such file or directory ldconfig: Cannot stat /opt/kde3/lib64/libgmcop.so: No such file or directory Regards Sid. -- Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support Specialist, Cricket Coach Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] Factory synced out
Hi! Just so you know: RC2 is not yet done, we're still waiting for more fixes to be verified before we can do give it officially to QA. But Factory has been synced out again, so if you do a zypper update -t package it should pull in RC2 Candidate and you can test the latest fixes of the system. Greetings, Stephan -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory synced out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephan Kulow schreef: Hi! Just so you know: RC2 is not yet done, we're still waiting for more fixes to be verified before we can do give it officially to QA. But Factory has been synced out again, so if you do a zypper update -t package it should pull in RC2 Candidate and you can test the latest fixes of the system. Greetings, Stephan I noticed ;-) - -- Have a nice day, M9. Now, is the only time that exists. OS: Linux 2.6.22.5-29-default x86_64 Huidige gebruiker: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systeem: openSUSE 10.3 (x86_64) KDE: 3.5.7 release 71 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG9/Y6X5/X5X6LpDgRAjZlAJ9p4brbl6Pq2QIlTwAMbIg9l6a5JQCdGmvH d60h56t2cdkCeIR90E1dx28= =C1/l -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] Factory synced out
Hi! We made sure yesterday that Factory gets synced out, so you see what we're testing. Note that you will see a missing dependency from desktop-file-utils to /etc/profile.d/xdg-enviroment.sh (sic!), which was fixed after the rebuild you see synced out. Just ignore that and keep testing with it, but please mention in your bug reports if you updated. Greetings, Stephan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] Factory update remains impossible?
I've not been able to update factory for a while now. I expected it to return to a sane state once beta1 was available, but I'm still getting nowhere. Is it still inconsistent, or am I hitting a bug I've missed while looking through bugzilla? Relevant excerpt from a zypper update; Problem: No valid solution found with only resolvables of best architecture. Problem: Can't satisfy requirement /usr/bin/awk for openldap2-2.3.35-12.i586 Problem: RealPlayer-10.0.8-97.i586[opensuse_non_oss] cannot be installed due to missing dependencies Problem: java-1_6_0-sun-1.6.0.u1-16.i586[opensuse_non_oss] cannot be installed due to missing dependencies Problem: hp-officeJet-0.91-183.i586 cannot be installed due to missing dependencies Problem: Can't satisfy requirement pilot-link == 0.12.1 for pilot-link-devel-0.12.1-73.i586 Problem: Can't satisfy requirement /sbin/update-bootloader for kernel-kdump-2.6.22_rc4-2.i586 Problem: Can't satisfy requirement /usr/bin/gconftool-2 for planner-0.14.2-7.i586[opensuse_oss] Problem: Can't satisfy requirement /sbin/isserial for setserial-2.17-645.i586[opensuse_oss] Problem: kdebluetooth-1.0_beta5-8.i586[opensuse_oss] cannot be installed due to missing dependencies Problem: metamail-2.7.19-1123.i586[opensuse_oss] cannot be installed due to missing dependencies Problem: Can't satisfy requirement /usr/bin/gconftool-2 for gnome-presence-applet-0.3.1-113.i586[opensuse_oss] Problem: java-1_4_2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0-140.i586[opensuse_oss] cannot be installed due to missing dependencies Problem: kdegraphics3-scan-3.5.7-31.i586[opensuse_oss] cannot be installed due to missing dependencies Problem: yudit-2.7.8-83.i586[opensuse_oss] cannot be installed due to missing dependencies Problem: Can't satisfy requirement /usr/bin/wish for convert-1.3-867.i586[opensuse_oss] Problem: Can't satisfy requirement /usr/bin/gconftool-2 for tomboy-0.7.3-5.i586[opensuse_oss] Problem: Can't satisfy requirement /etc/init.d/network for klogd-1.4.1-622.i586[opensuse_oss] Problem: Can't satisfy requirement /sbin/mkdosfs for kdeutils3-3.5.7-32.i586[opensuse_oss] Problem: openct-0.6.12-6.i586[opensuse_oss] cannot be installed due to missing dependencies Problem: No valid solution found with only resolvables of best architecture. With this run only resolvables with the best architecture has been regarded. Regarding all possible resolvables takes time but can come to a valid result. Solution 1: Make a solver run with ALL possibilities. Regarding all resolvables with compatible architecture. number, (r)etry or (c)ancel 1 Applying solution 1 Problem: Can't satisfy requirement /usr/bin/awk for openldap2-2.3.35-12.i586 === openldap2-2.3.35-12.i586 === gawk-3.1.5g-12.i586 provides /usr/bin/awk, but is scheduled to be uninstalled. openldap2-2.3.35-12.i586 depends on binutils openldap2-2.3.35-12.i586 is missing the requirement /usr/bin/strings Solution 1: delete openldap2 delete openldap2-2.3.35-12.i586 Solution 2: Ignore this requirement just here Solution 3: Ignore this requirement generally number, (r)etry or (c)ancel Followed by lots of similar dependency problems with core packages, which I'm loath to blow through without some reassurance that I'll have a usable system at the end. Using the opensuse ftp site for updates; zypper sl Got: sl # | Enabled | Refresh | Type | Name | URI --+-+-+++--- 1 | Yes | Yes | rpm-md | opensuse_non_oss | http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-Factory-non-oss/inst-source-extra/suse 2 | Yes | Yes | rpm-md | opensuse_oss | http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/suse 3 | Yes | Yes | rpm-md | opensuse_oss_debug | http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory-debug/inst-source-debug/suse/ Manually installed the latest zypp packages; # rpm -qa zypper libzypp libzypp-3.13.13-2 zypper-0.8.9-2 Thanks, Jason - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory update remains impossible?
Am Montag 13 August 2007 schrieb Jason Boissiere: --+-+-+++-- - 1 | Yes | Yes | rpm-md | opensuse_non_oss | http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-Factory-non-oss/inst-s ource-extra/suse 2 | Yes | Yes | rpm-md | opensuse_oss | http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-sourc e/suse 3 | Yes | Yes | rpm-md | opensuse_oss_debug | http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory-debug/inst -source-debug/suse/ You should use inst-source/ as yast2 type. Not sure it would fix your problems though. Greetings, Stephan -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory update remains impossible?
Using the inst-source level URL to define the sources appears to have resolved my problems. Is that expected behaviour? Jason On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 14:36 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote: Am Montag 13 August 2007 schrieb Jason Boissiere: --+-+-+++-- - 1 | Yes | Yes | rpm-md | opensuse_non_oss | http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-Factory-non-oss/inst-s ource-extra/suse 2 | Yes | Yes | rpm-md | opensuse_oss | http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-sourc e/suse 3 | Yes | Yes | rpm-md | opensuse_oss_debug | http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory-debug/inst -source-debug/suse/ You should use inst-source/ as yast2 type. Not sure it would fix your problems though. Greetings, Stephan -- Jason Boissiere Senior QA Engineer Ingres 01753559529 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory update remains impossible?
Am Montag 13 August 2007 schrieb Jason Boissiere: Using the inst-source level URL to define the sources appears to have resolved my problems. Is that expected behaviour? I wonder where you found a hint to use the suse/ subdir Greetings, Stephan -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory update remains impossible?
* Stephan Kulow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Aug 13. 2007 16:13]: Am Montag 13 August 2007 schrieb Jason Boissiere: Using the inst-source level URL to define the sources appears to have resolved my problems. Is that expected behaviour? I wonder where you found a hint to use the suse/ subdir Didn't zypper warn you that there are no repository files ? Klaus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory update remains impossible?
On 13-08-2007 at 17:30, Klaus Kaempf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Stephan Kulow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Aug 13. 2007 16:13]: Am Montag 13 August 2007 schrieb Jason Boissiere: Using the inst-source level URL to define the sources appears to have resolved my problems. Is that expected behaviour? I wonder where you found a hint to use the suse/ subdir Didn't zypper warn you that there are no repository files ? Well, AFAK the suse subdir ist just a perfectly valid repository as well (yum style). you find the directory repodata inside, so zypper is not supposed to fail. It has to work, even if not yast style is used (patterns are not working in this mode, but package installation should not be a problem). Dminique TMF is a global management and accounting outsourcing firm with 72 offices in 56 countries and over 2,000 professionals (2007). TMF is expanding rapidly throughout the world. Learn more about our unique network and our services and visit our website at www.tmf-group.com. The information contained in this e-mail communication is confidential and solely intended for the person to whom it is addressed. If someone other than the intended recipient should receive or come into possession of this e-mail communication, he/she will not be entitled to read, disseminate, disclose or duplicate it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested to notify the sender and to destroy the original e-mail communication. TMF is neither liable for the correct and complete transmission of the information contained in this e-mail communication nor for any delay in its receipt. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for the presence of computer viruses. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory update remains impossible?
No, it all worked well enough for long enough that I assumed it was a valid alternative repo URL. The fact that zypper identifies the type (rpm-md) and includes it in the sl output suggests it has been usable at some point. I think I started using those repo definitions when the yast level URLs weren't working at some point and never saw any particular reason to move back, since it functioned fine until recently. Jason On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 16:30 +0200, Klaus Kaempf wrote: * Stephan Kulow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Aug 13. 2007 16:13]: Am Montag 13 August 2007 schrieb Jason Boissiere: Using the inst-source level URL to define the sources appears to have resolved my problems. Is that expected behaviour? I wonder where you found a hint to use the suse/ subdir Didn't zypper warn you that there are no repository files ? Klaus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jason Boissiere Senior QA Engineer Ingres 01753559529 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory x86_64 still broken ?
Markus Koßmann wrote: Am Sonntag, 5. August 2007 schrieb Stephan Kulow: Am Sunday 05 August 2007 schrieb Markus Koßmann: which seems to be a known problem IIRC. Does zypper refresh help? Yes, that seems to fix the problem. - I was on a totally parallel track, so I didn't recognise the bug as the same. On a couple of occasions last week, doing YaST -- Software Management -- Installtion Sources ended up with no repositories visible, YaST -- Software Repositories looked OK, clicked on Refresh and that fixed it. Regards Sid. -- Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support Specialist, Cricket Coach Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory x86_64 still broken ?
Am Samstag, 4. August 2007 schrieb Stephan Kulow: Am Saturday 04 August 2007 schrieb Markus Koßmann: Is factory x86_64 still known to be broken ? No, not known. Unfortunately searching for error or warn in /var/log/zypper.log shows nothing usable. zypper is zypper-0.8.5-3, libzypp is libzypp-3.12.1-2 which seem to be the current versions from the thursday update. And zypper -v up? With zypper -v no change. But zypper -vv shows: linux-n04x:/var/log # zypper -vv up Verbosity: 2 Initializing Target Repository 'inst_source' not cached. Caching... * Building repository 'inst_source' cache Problem loading data from 'inst_source': Unsupported kind of Filesystem Capability'filesystem(minix)-64bit ' Resolvables from 'inst_source' not loaded because of error. * Reading installed packages [100%] (1224 resolvables) Establishing status of aggregates Establishing status of aggregates Resolving dependencies... Summary: Nothing to do. Exiting main() which seems to be a known problem IIRC. But it's not nice that you need -vv to get an usable error message and that the problem is not clearly marked as error in the logfile. So I filed bug 297626. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory x86_64 still broken ?
Am Sunday 05 August 2007 schrieb Markus Koßmann: which seems to be a known problem IIRC. Does zypper refresh help? But it's not nice that you need -vv to get an usable error message and that the problem is not clearly marked as error in the logfile. So I filed bug 297626. Yes, I agree Greetings, Stephan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory x86_64 still broken ?
Filled bug #297627 -- Regards, Nikolay Derkach - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory x86_64 still broken ?
Am Sonntag, 5. August 2007 schrieb Stephan Kulow: Am Sunday 05 August 2007 schrieb Markus Koßmann: which seems to be a known problem IIRC. Does zypper refresh help? Yes, that seems to fix the problem. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] Factory x86_64 still broken ?
Is factory x86_64 still known to be broken ? When running zypper up I get : linux-n04x:~ # zypper up * Building repository 'inst_source' cache Problem loading data from 'inst_source' Resolvables from 'inst_source' not loaded because of error. * Reading installed packages [100%] with every mirror I tried. That includes gwdg, rwth-aachen,fr.rpmfind.net. It starts building the cache and inrementing the percentage until about 17% then jump to about 30% and then finaly the error message comes up. Unfortunately searching for error or warn in /var/log/zypper.log shows nothing usable. zypper is zypper-0.8.5-3, libzypp is libzypp-3.12.1-2 which seem to be the current versions from the thursday update. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory x86_64 still broken ?
Am Saturday 04 August 2007 schrieb Markus Koßmann: Is factory x86_64 still known to be broken ? No, not known. Unfortunately searching for error or warn in /var/log/zypper.log shows nothing usable. zypper is zypper-0.8.5-3, libzypp is libzypp-3.12.1-2 which seem to be the current versions from the thursday update. And zypper -v up? Greetings, Stephan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory x86_64 still broken ?
В сообщении от Saturday 04 August 2007 21:32:23 Stephan Kulow написал(а): Am Saturday 04 August 2007 schrieb Markus Koßmann: Is factory x86_64 still known to be broken ? No, not known. Unfortunately searching for error or warn in /var/log/zypper.log shows nothing usable. zypper is zypper-0.8.5-3, libzypp is libzypp-3.12.1-2 which seem to be the current versions from the thursday update. And zypper -v up? Greetings, Stephan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Same here. zypper up shows nothing interesting, but refresh revealed a error: Refreshing factory Downloading: ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/content to /var/adm/mount/AP_0x00db/content * Downloading [100%] Creating repository cache... * Cleaning repository 'factory' cache * Building repository 'factory' cache Error reading repository 'factory': Cache exception Skipping repository 'factory' because of the above error. What did I get from zypper.log: 2007-08-04 21:55:57 1 tau(5404) [zypp] RepoManager.cc(cleanCache):613 factory cleaning cache... 2007-08-04 21:55:58 5 tau(5404) [zypp] Exception.cc(log):119 sqlite3x_reader.cpp(read):71 THROW:sqlite3x_reader.cpp(read):71: SQL log ic error or missing database 2007-08-04 21:55:58 5 tau(5404) [zypp] Exception.cc(log):119 CacheStore.cc(cleanRepository):780 THROW:CacheStore.cc(cleanRepository): 780: Cache exception 2007-08-04 21:55:58 1 tau(5404) [zypp] CacheStore.cc(~Impl):140 name cache hits: 0 | cache size: 0 2007-08-04 21:55:58 1 tau(5404) [zypp] CacheStore.cc(~Impl):140 name cache hits: 0 | cache size: 0 2007-08-04 21:55:58 3 tau(5404) [zypper] zypper-sources.cc(refresh_repos):192 Error reading repository 'factory': 2007-08-04 21:55:58 3 tau(5404) [zypper] zypper-sources.cc(refresh_repos):192 Cache exception 2007-08-04 21:55:58 3 tau(5404) [zypper] zypper-sources.cc(refresh_repos):194 Skipping repository 'factory' because of the above error. Is it worth to file a bug report? -- Regards, Nikolay Derkach - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory x86_64 still broken ?
Hi, On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, Nikolay Derkach wrote: Same here. Well, actually it doesn't happen with download.opensuse.org Maybe this issue is gwdg specific. Impossible. Viele Grüße Eberhard Mönkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
[opensuse-factory] Factory update breaks the system (resmgr problem)
I have just performed an update to latest factory, and there must be something broken with resmgr. /dev/null is not accessible by my user, I get /dev/null permission denied when I log in the console, and KDE does not start at all. I have stopped the resmgr service and then chmod a+rw /dev/null, to be able to use KDE. I'll file a bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory update breaks the system (resmgr problem)
Silviu Marin-Caea wrote: I have just performed an update to latest factory, and there must be something broken with resmgr. /dev/null is not accessible by my user, I get /dev/null permission denied when I log in the console, and KDE does not start at all. I have stopped the resmgr service and then chmod a+rw /dev/null, to be able to use KDE. resmgr is completely unrelated here, it's syslog-ng. cu Ludwig -- (o_ Ludwig Nussel //\ V_/_ http://www.suse.de/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory update breaks the system (resmgr problem)
Silviu Marin-Caea escribió: I have just performed an update to latest factory, and there must be something broken with resmgr. /dev/null is not accessible by my user, I get /dev/null permission denied when I log in the console, and KDE does not start at all. I have stopped the resmgr service and then chmod a+rw /dev/null, to be able to use KDE. I'll file a bug. Reproduced here as well. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory update breaks the system (resmgr problem)
Am Dienstag 24 Juli 2007 schrieb Silviu Marin-Caea: I have just performed an update to latest factory, and there must be something broken with resmgr. /dev/null is not accessible by my user, I get /dev/null permission denied when I log in the console, and KDE does not start at all. I have stopped the resmgr service and then chmod a+rw /dev/null, to be able to use KDE. This has nothing to do with resmgr. The problem is in /etc/syslog-ng/syslog-ng.conf. There is a perm(-1) close to /dev/null - change that one to perm(0666) and reboot. Greetings, Stephan -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory update breaks the system (resmgr problem)
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 04:07:28 pm Stephan Kulow wrote: Am Dienstag 24 Juli 2007 schrieb Silviu Marin-Caea: I have just performed an update to latest factory, and there must be something broken with resmgr. /dev/null is not accessible by my user, I get /dev/null permission denied when I log in the console, and KDE does not start at all. I have stopped the resmgr service and then chmod a+rw /dev/null, to be able to use KDE. This has nothing to do with resmgr. The problem is in /etc/syslog-ng/syslog-ng.conf. There is a perm(-1) close to /dev/null - change that one to perm(0666) and reboot. I have added your reply to https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294146 If this is already in another bug (I searched), then I'll close this one. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory update breaks the system (resmgr problem)
Stephan Kulow wrote: Am Dienstag 24 Juli 2007 schrieb Silviu Marin-Caea: I have just performed an update to latest factory, and there must be something broken with resmgr. /dev/null is not accessible by my user, I get /dev/null permission denied when I log in the console, and KDE does not start at all. I have stopped the resmgr service and then chmod a+rw /dev/null, to be able to use KDE. This has nothing to do with resmgr. The problem is in /etc/syslog-ng/syslog-ng.conf. There is a perm(-1) close to /dev/null - change that one to perm(0666) and reboot. Greetings, Stephan I just checked the above file in Alpha 5 and didn't find null. So is this a new problem in Alpha 6? -- 73 de Donn Washburn 307 Savoy Street Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sugar Land, TX 77478 LL# 1.281.242.3256 Ham Callsign N5XWB HAMs : [EMAIL PROTECTED] VoIP via Gizmo: bmw_87kbike / via Skype: n5xwbg BMW MOA #: 4146 - Ambassador http://counter.li.org #279316 Did you know? The transistor was invented by three white men. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory update breaks the system (resmgr problem)
Donn Washburn wrote: Stephan Kulow wrote: Am Dienstag 24 Juli 2007 schrieb Silviu Marin-Caea: I have just performed an update to latest factory, and there must be something broken with resmgr. /dev/null is not accessible by my user, I get /dev/null permission denied when I log in the console, and KDE does not start at all. I have stopped the resmgr service and then chmod a+rw /dev/null, to be able to use KDE. This has nothing to do with resmgr. The problem is in /etc/syslog-ng/syslog-ng.conf. There is a perm(-1) close to /dev/null - change that one to perm(0666) and reboot. Greetings, Stephan I just checked the above file in Alpha 5 and didn't find null. So is this a new problem in Alpha 6? I should read the screen before sending - It did find /dev/null and no problem for a user to write to it. -- 73 de Donn Washburn 307 Savoy Street Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sugar Land, TX 77478 LL# 1.281.242.3256 Ham Callsign N5XWB HAMs : [EMAIL PROTECTED] VoIP via Gizmo: bmw_87kbike / via Skype: n5xwbg BMW MOA #: 4146 - Ambassador http://counter.li.org #279316 Did you know? The transistor was invented by three white men. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] factory?
Peter Czanik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, When will we see the next factory update? In its current form PPC can't be installed :-( I guess, all the developers are now happy about finishing SP1 and gone to holiday? ;-) Once everything is build through again, we'll sync out again. This might take until sunday in worst case since we check in packages as well. What is broken on PPC right now? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Director Platform/openSUSE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgpxheTqA9xyv.pgp Description: PGP signature
[opensuse-factory] factory?
Hello, When will we see the next factory update? In its current form PPC can't be installed :-( I guess, all the developers are now happy about finishing SP1 and gone to holiday? ;-) Bye, CzP - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] Factory upgrades from NON-OSS Repo
Hi, I experiance some strange things lately with updating (using zen-updater and rug). Whenever I select a package from the NON-OSS repo, it fails with the error, Can not provide /var/cache/./suse/i586/foo.rpm (containing the whole path representing where from it came on the server). I confirm it and of course the package is not updated. Anyhow, I can go to /var/cache/./suse/i586/ and type 'rpm -Fhv *' and it updates all the packages without issues, so the downloads of them were no problem (would also be surprising, as from the OSS repo on the same server, there is no problem). Somebody else experiances similiar errors lately? I'm on latest factory, the system announces itself as 10.3 Alpha0Plus. Dominique - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] factory sync
On 1/20/07, Hans Witvliet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 21:14 +0100, Claes Bäckström wrote: Is there some problems with the sync to factory? Been a lot of commits to the commit mailinglist but nothing new at the mirrors since 15 Jan. You mean brand-new or new-upgrades? yesterday (19-jan) i got in my rsync a new snort-2.4.5-26 rpm (And lots of others..) Both. I see nothing new at all. The version of snort on ftp.opensuse.org is snort-2.4.5-1.i586.rpm from 12-Jan. Warm Regards, Claes Backstrom
[opensuse-factory] factory sync
Is there some problems with the sync to factory? Been a lot of commits to the commit mailinglist but nothing new at the mirrors since 15 Jan. Warm Regards, Claes Backstrom - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] factory sync
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 21:14 +0100, Claes Bäckström wrote: Is there some problems with the sync to factory? Been a lot of commits to the commit mailinglist but nothing new at the mirrors since 15 Jan. Warm Regards, Claes Backstrom You mean brand-new or new-upgrades? yesterday (19-jan) i got in my rsync a new snort-2.4.5-26 rpm (And lots of others..) Hans -- pgp-id: 926EBB12 pgp-fingerprint: BE97 1CBF FAC4 236C 4A73 F76E EDFC D032 926E BB12 Registered linux user: 75761 (http://counter.li.org) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] Factory Woes
Hi, Many of the mirrors do not carry the openSUSE factory. Those that do appear to have mirrored a problem. To wit: http://linux.nssl.noaa.gov/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source Can't provide /suse/setup/descr/packages.sk from http://linux.nssl.noaa.gov/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source Gwdg.de is so vastly overburdened as to be worthless. What's an early adopter to do? Randall Schulz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory source for Internet installation
Rajko, On Monday 16 October 2006 22:11, Rajko M wrote: On Monday 16 October 2006 20:11, Randall R Schulz wrote: Felix, On Monday 16 October 2006 17:13, Felix Miata wrote: ... Note that you need not download even the mini iso if your installation target already has a working grub. All you need is the linux and initrd from the appropriate boot/*/loader directory placed where a grub stanza can find it. This is good to know, but lacks sufficient detail to be put to use. Could you either explain how to create or modify this stanza or point us to the relevant on-line documentation? Thanks. Is this what you meant: http://en.opensuse.org/Installation_without_CD title #Installing_from_data_saved_on_your_local_machine That and #Grub, I guess. But I think I'm still missing something, because I understand Network Install to mean that I don't need to first download anything (not any packages, anyway), but rather that the installer will access the network directly to retrieve packages. But I suppose it's moot for me at this point, since I have a functioning 10.2a5 (w/ some subsequent updates) already in place and YaST is working well, though some of the servers are clearly overtaxed (I'm making do with mirrors.kernel.org for the time being, even though it's been reported that it's tardy in syncing new releases). Randall Schulz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory source for Internet installation
On 06/10/16 23:05 (GMT-0700) Randall R Schulz apparently typed: On Monday 16 October 2006 22:11, Rajko M wrote: Is this what you meant: http://en.opensuse.org/Installation_without_CD title #Installing_from_data_saved_on_your_local_machine That and #Grub, I guess. But I think I'm still missing something, because I understand Network Install to mean that I don't need to first download anything (not any packages, anyway), but rather that the installer will access the network directly to retrieve packages. The page could have been organized more clearly, but it's there. All you need to fetch before starting an installation is initrd and linux. -- The Lord is my strength and my shield; my heart trusts in him, and I am helped. Psalm 28:7 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory source for Internet installation
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 06:50, Felix Miata wrote: On 06/10/16 23:05 (GMT-0700) Randall R Schulz apparently typed: On Monday 16 October 2006 22:11, Rajko M wrote: Is this what you meant: http://en.opensuse.org/Installation_without_CD title #Installing_from_data_saved_on_your_local_machine That and #Grub, I guess. But I think I'm still missing something, because I understand Network Install to mean that I don't need to first download anything (not any packages, anyway), but rather that the installer will access the network directly to retrieve packages. Basically is that way. Though network can mean your local network with one machine serving files to the rest, so some kind of download has to be done at least once. The page could have been organized more clearly, but it's there. All you need to fetch before starting an installation is initrd and linux. The page will be reorganized when I find time or somebody jump in and do that :-) I think that splitting it in few articles that describe each of methods will help greatly. -- Regards, Rajko M. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] Factory source for Internet installation
Normally I've used to download the non-OSS dvd iso and burn the DVD for installation. Now I though to try the Internet installation according to http://en.opensuse.org/Development_Version#Internet_Installation First I downloaded and burned the DVD-i386-mini.iso on a CDR. But what is the correct ftp address to enter according to # 4. Point the YaST installer to the installation repository (by pressing F3 and then F4) I tried to enter FTP, but what is the full path to the factory to be entered in the server field? (the rpm location didn't look to work http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/suse/i586/) Terje J. Hanssen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory source for Internet installation
Hi, On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Terje J. Hanssen wrote: Normally I've used to download the non-OSS dvd iso and burn the DVD for installation. Now I though to try the Internet installation according to http://en.opensuse.org/Development_Version#Internet_Installation First I downloaded and burned the DVD-i386-mini.iso on a CDR. But what is the correct ftp address to enter according to # 4. Point the YaST installer to the installation repository (by pressing F3 and then F4) I tried to enter FTP, but what is the full path to the factory to be entered in the server field? (the rpm location didn't look to work http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/suse/i586/) .../inst-source Cheers -e -- Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory source for Internet installation
Terje J. Hanssen schrieb: But what is the correct ftp address to enter according to # 4. Point the YaST installer to the installation repository (by pressing F3 and then F4) [...] (the rpm location didn't look to work http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/suse/i586/) As you already say, this is the rpm directory, but not the root of the installation source. You can easily identify the root of an installation source by the following two files: content (regular file) media.1 (directory) = The repository URL is: http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory source for Internet installation
On 06/10/17 01:50 (GMT+0200) Terje J. Hanssen apparently typed: Normally I've used to download the non-OSS dvd iso and burn the DVD for installation. Now I though to try the Internet installation according to http://en.opensuse.org/Development_Version#Internet_Installation First I downloaded and burned the DVD-i386-mini.iso on a CDR. Note that you need not download even the mini iso if your installation target already has a working grub. All you need is the linux and initrd from the appropriate boot/*/loader directory placed where a grub stanza can find it. -- The Lord is my strength and my shield; my heart trusts in him, and I am helped. Psalm 28:7 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory source for Internet installation
Felix, On Monday 16 October 2006 17:13, Felix Miata wrote: ... Note that you need not download even the mini iso if your installation target already has a working grub. All you need is the linux and initrd from the appropriate boot/*/loader directory placed where a grub stanza can find it. This is good to know, but lacks sufficient detail to be put to use. Could you either explain how to create or modify this stanza or point us to the relevant on-line documentation? Thanks. Randall Schulz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory source for Internet installation
On 06/10/16 18:11 (GMT-0700) Randall R Schulz apparently typed: On Monday 16 October 2006 17:13, Felix Miata wrote: Note that you need not download even the mini iso if your installation target already has a working grub. All you need is the linux and initrd from the appropriate boot/*/loader directory placed where a grub stanza can find it. This is good to know, but lacks sufficient detail to be put to use. Could you either explain how to create or modify this stanza or point us to the relevant on-line documentation? Assuming you understand how /boot/grub/menu.lst works, just copy any or all of the ones the installation CD uses from e.g. here http://mirrors.kernel.org/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/boot/i386/loader/isolinux.cfg and adjust as necessary according to where you actually put linux and initrd. If your motherboard doesn't require any special parameters, the 1st should be plenty, and even if it isn't, you can modify on the fly with grub anyway. -- The Lord is my strength and my shield; my heart trusts in him, and I am helped. Psalm 28:7 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory source for Internet installation
On Monday 16 October 2006 20:11, Randall R Schulz wrote: Felix, On Monday 16 October 2006 17:13, Felix Miata wrote: ... Note that you need not download even the mini iso if your installation target already has a working grub. All you need is the linux and initrd from the appropriate boot/*/loader directory placed where a grub stanza can find it. This is good to know, but lacks sufficient detail to be put to use. Could you either explain how to create or modify this stanza or point us to the relevant on-line documentation? Thanks. Is this what you meant: http://en.opensuse.org/Installation_without_CD title #Installing_from_data_saved_on_your_local_machine -- Regards, Rajko M. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory miniiso dies during startup
Joerg Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I just downloaded the factory miniiso. After I booted it I selected netinstall http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/ The installation repository in factory is broken right now, we're working on fixing it. For now I advise to use the Alpha2 tree, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgpctOAk4ZLdA.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory miniiso dies during startup
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:23:29PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: Joerg Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I just downloaded the factory miniiso. After I booted it I selected netinstall http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/ The installation repository in factory is broken right now, we're working on fixing it. For now I advise to use the Alpha2 tree, How do I do a network install of the Alpha2 tree? It looks like there are only isos available. ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory miniiso dies during startup
Joerg Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:23:29PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: Joerg Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I just downloaded the factory miniiso. After I booted it I selected netinstall http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/ The installation repository in factory is broken right now, we're working on fixing it. For now I advise to use the Alpha2 tree, How do I do a network install of the Alpha2 tree? It looks like there are only isos available. Argh - you're right :-( Sorry. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgps6PueW5Bm2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory miniiso dies during startup
Am Montag, 7. August 2006 15:04 schrieb Joerg Mayer: On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:23:29PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: For now I advise to use the Alpha2 tree, How do I do a network install of the Alpha2 tree? It looks like there are only isos available. No problem, if you have a local server runing and willing to download the isos. If both premises can be fullfilled, ask back.. Pete - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] factory vs alpha2
Hello, 10.2 Alpha2 is just around the corner, it's synced out to mirrors. If I sync my home factory mirror now, will it be the same as Alpha2? Or it's older/newer or any other way different? Bye, CzP - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] factory vs alpha2
Peter Czanik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, 10.2 Alpha2 is just around the corner, it's synced out to mirrors. If I sync my home factory mirror now, will it be the same as Alpha2? Or it's older/newer or any other way different? Bye, Alpha2 and factory are in sync right now, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgpqtyFZLk1X0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[opensuse-factory] Factory sync
I'm rewrtiting http://en.opensuse.org/Factory that was evidently very outdated. For that purpose, I need an info. Factory is a frequently changing repo. what is approximately the frequency of it's updates, in term of _minimum_ time between two updates. is it possible to have two updates in the same hour? the same day? (the same week, certainly :-). This is to address the problem of using ftp install/update by the user in the middle of a server update. are the servers locked during sync? is it possible for an user to get one file (rpm) updated and not the other one (in case two files are updated) in the page the case where one dependency is not compiled (so not updated) is addressed, but not the case coming from in the middle of sync update case. thanks jdd -- http://www.dodin.net http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html http://lucien.dodin.net http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory repository
Stephan Binner wrote: On Friday, 9. June 2006 18:53, jdd wrote: I know Factory is not really available right now, but in the The mini boot ISOs are back if you refer to that... no. I wanted to note that there is no factory distribution for now (release is sheduled june 16?), the factory repository should be identical to 10.1 one. anyway, all options a noted not available yet on the wiki page :-) jdd -- http://www.dodin.net http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html http://lucien.dodin.net http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory repository
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 06:35:12PM +0200, jdd wrote: http://lists.opensuse.org/archive/opensuse-announce/2006-Mar/0001.html said Our current plan for these snapshots is: ^ Fri, Jun 16 SUSE Linux 10.2 Alpha1 (Jun 15 is a holiday for us) so I was thinking dev for 10.2 started really only then. As you can read above, those Alpha-Releases are just snapshots of the Factory distribution tree. The Factory tree does exist all the time and is continuously updated (according to some rules about feature freeze and stuff like that). You can find a short overview of the current changes at http://en.opensuse.org/Factory/News. ==To be sure.== how is the passage between 10.1 and 10.2 made? Developers do continuous changes to the packages whenever they have time to work at that package. is there a progressive transition through Factory (for example, does factory had the test zen updates?) or is there at some date a massive change? There is a continuous change but when some developers decide to do a major update (e.g. update KDE subsystem) then many packages are affected at that specific point in time. All fixes for the released distribution should go into Factory tree as well but not necessarily in the same way. It might happen that in the Factory tree one does a fix in a probably better but more intrusive (and thus too dangerous for the release branch) way. how/when are important changes like Kde version made? Whenever the packagers feel that the best time for updating has come. I don't see any discussion in opensuse-factory about such things. Well, nobody asked for such information until now. for me it's clear in the middle of a distribution test, not between two ones. I hope it is more clear now. Robert -- Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214 Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. pgpLjsJ6j89IQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
[opensuse-factory] Factory repository
I know Factory is not really available right now, but in the way of translating this page I find: http://fr.opensuse.org/Factory_Distribution#Where_can_I_find_it_.3F with difference between YaST and YUM repositories. is this distinction still usefull? I was understanding the latter should be sufficient now? thanks jdd -- http://www.dodin.net http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html http://lucien.dodin.net http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory updated on our server... - but is broken now :-(
Kastus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 08:12:51AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: Check the inst-source/content file whether it's correct as explained in my message, I checked inst-source/content on mirrors.kernel.org and it looks good. Thank you for the hint. When I try network install from mirrors.kernel.org it fails with the message: No catalog found at 'http://204.152.19139/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source' Does it mean that something is still out of sync on that mirror? Or network install from factory is not possible? I just tested current factory - and it's completely broken, I cannot install at all :-( We're looking at it now, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgpWpfuRlBDnk.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory updated on our server...
2006/4/29, Andreas Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Factory is updated on our server again - and is synced out to the mirrors. We've seen a number of reports of about segmentation faults in YaST with the factory tree. There were two problems: * bad error handling in YaST * Wrong release in distversion in the content file The inst-source/content file should have DISTVERSION 10.1-factory instead of DISTVERSION 10.1-factory-beta (the extra minus was the problem). The second problem is fixed in the factory tree, the first one will be fixed soon. Therefore I advise to check that factory is updated before using the tree before installation. In what package are the description of the version and product? Because I can't register it, and if I execute: /usr/lib/suseRegister/bin # ./suse_release -a Product: Version: Vendor: Dist: Distproduct: Distversion: Baseproduct: Baseversion: How can I complete these options? I have installed RC3 (via updates from alpha 2). Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory updated on our server...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Juan Erbes escribió: In what package are the description of the version and product? Because I can't register it, and if I execute: /usr/lib/suseRegister/bin # ./suse_release -a Product: Version: Vendor: Dist: Distproduct: Distversion: Baseproduct: Baseversion: How can I complete these options? I have installed RC3 (via updates from alpha 2). Thanks Hi: Same here.I have update rc2 to rc3 via smart. - -- Chema Ollés Usuario Linux: #198057 Linux 2.6.16.11-4-smp #1 SMP Tue Apr 25 07:44:27 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEVlS365SpD7GhbzoRAvGwAKCCLbdLKihQwWqFZL7B9YYpliirfwCgrJJV WbGrjly16Xx0ooFHuvvxhcw= =vugk -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory updated on our server...
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 08:12:51AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: Check the inst-source/content file whether it's correct as explained in my message, I checked inst-source/content on mirrors.kernel.org and it looks good. Thank you for the hint. When I try network install from mirrors.kernel.org it fails with the message: No catalog found at 'http://204.152.19139/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source' Does it mean that something is still out of sync on that mirror? Or network install from factory is not possible? Thanks, -Kastus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory updated on our server...
Kastus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 11:05:19PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: Therefore I advise to check that factory is updated before using the tree before installation. Please excuse me if it is an FAQ, but how do I verify that factory is updated? I was trying to run net install from factory which was failing with error 134 (but after download of a 70+MB root image which takes a while). Is there an easier method? Check the inst-source/content file whether it's correct as explained in my message, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgps8Q9o3ykWa.pgp Description: PGP signature
[opensuse-factory] Factory updated on our server...
Factory is updated on our server again - and is synced out to the mirrors. We've seen a number of reports of about segmentation faults in YaST with the factory tree. There were two problems: * bad error handling in YaST * Wrong release in distversion in the content file The inst-source/content file should have DISTVERSION 10.1-factory instead of DISTVERSION 10.1-factory-beta (the extra minus was the problem). The second problem is fixed in the factory tree, the first one will be fixed soon. Therefore I advise to check that factory is updated before using the tree before installation. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgpsFnzArWv7T.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [opensuse-factory] factory update RC1-RC2
Andreas Jaeger wrote: Yes, it should be possible with factory as source, nice, thanks jdd -- http://www.dodin.net http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html http://lucien.dodin.net http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] factory update RC1-RC2
jdd wrote: I really don't like the delta iso process, even if I understand the necessity. I wasn't quite sure either, but it works just fine. I retrieved the deltas last night, started the applydeltaiso, then went to bed. /Per Jessen, Zürich - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] factory update RC1-RC2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 jdd wrote: I really don't like the delta iso process, even if I understand the necessity. but I beg the net install is still possible, with factory as source? How to use smart to upgrade packages with Factory: http://dev-loki.blogspot.com/2006/04/how-to-use-smart-with-suse-linux.html - -- -o) Pascal Bleser http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/ /\\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _\_v The more things change, the more they stay insane. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFESiucr3NMWliFcXcRAlEmAKCyK58AmA3TWsUK28PoK161/JP47QCdFJAB buCIcoQxhkrC/LUY6ktCnT8= =zT0t -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] factory
Hello, Andreas Jaeger wrote: What is the current status of factory? Is it now: factory = beta9 and frozen until Monday? Bye, A final sync is needed :-( Does that mean, that some Radeon and PPC fixes can slip in? I was sad to see, that they are still not in the factory ChangeLog... Bye, -- CzP http://peter.czanik.hu/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] factory
Peter Czanik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, Andreas Jaeger wrote: What is the current status of factory? Is it now: factory = beta9 and frozen until Monday? Bye, A final sync is needed :-( Does that mean, that some Radeon and PPC fixes can slip in? I was sad to see, that they are still not in the factory ChangeLog... Bye, No, it should be just libzypp-zmd-backend, suseRegister, installation-images and yast*, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgp3IyWBu0WQX.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [opensuse-factory] factory
Hello, Andreas Jaeger wrote: No, it should be just libzypp-zmd-backend, suseRegister, installation-images and yast*, When is it to be expected? I would like to make an install from factory on a test server, and I'm just arrived at the location... Bye, CzP - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] factory
Peter Czanik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, Andreas Jaeger wrote: No, it should be just libzypp-zmd-backend, suseRegister, installation-images and yast*, When is it to be expected? I would like to make an install from factory on a test server, and I'm just arrived at the location... You can go ahead and start right away, everything is working besides registration (repository setup for patches). Factory is currently rebuild, I have no eta, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgpdGfOL6OKnE.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [opensuse-factory] factory
Hello, Andreas Jaeger wrote: When is it to be expected? I would like to make an install from factory on a test server, and I'm just arrived at the location... You can go ahead and start right away, everything is working besides registration (repository setup for patches). OK, I guess, that is something not really important if I want to test Xen on real server hardware instead of my notebook :-) BTW: does this mean, that factory will not be equal to beta9? As I'm already seeding beta9 images... Bye, CzP Factory is currently rebuild, I have no eta, Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] factory
Hello, What is the current status of factory? Is it now: factory = beta9 and frozen until Monday? Bye, CzP -- CzP http://peter.czanik.hu/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] factory
Peter Czanik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, What is the current status of factory? Is it now: factory = beta9 and frozen until Monday? Bye, A final sync is needed :-( I'll freeze after that one, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgpltwkm360ql.pgp Description: PGP signature
[opensuse-factory] Factory Media Exception Error
With Beta 6 I could see the Factory repository, even if I couldn't download much (about every third package seemed to be missing when I went to do updates :-( ), but with Beta 8, I can't add the factory repository. I've tried rug and YaST, but with opensuse.org, gwdg.de and uni-heidelberg.de I get a Media Exception error when adding the url :-( I thought at first that I was typing it incorrectly, so I browsed the repository with Firefox and copy and pasted the url across to YaST and rug, but both of them come up with a Media Exception either when creating the repository (YaST) or trying to install a package (rug). Is this a known problem with Beta 8? I did a search, but it didn't show any results for this... (Searching media exception, factory and yast). Can anyone point me to an open bug, or shall I raise a new one? Dave -- I got to go figure, the tenant said. We all got to figure. There's some way to stop this. It's not like lightning or earthquakes. We've got a bad thing made by men, and by God that's something we can change. - The Grapes of Wrath, by John Steinbeck - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory Media Exception Error
David Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: With Beta 6 I could see the Factory repository, even if I couldn't download much (about every third package seemed to be missing when I went to do updates :-( ), but with Beta 8, I can't add the factory repository. I've tried rug and YaST, but with opensuse.org, gwdg.de and uni-heidelberg.de I get a Media Exception error when adding the url :-( I thought at first that I was typing it incorrectly, so I browsed the repository with Firefox and copy and pasted the url across to YaST and rug, but both of them come up with a Media Exception either when creating the repository (YaST) or trying to install a package (rug). Is this a known problem with Beta 8? I did a search, but it didn't show any results for this... (Searching media exception, factory and yast). Can anyone point me to an open bug, or shall I raise a new one? This is not yet a known bug - file it with component libzypp, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgpbghODvo6HP.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory Media Exception Error
On Saturday 18 March 2006 10:45, Andreas Jaeger wrote: with Beta 8, I can't add the factory repository. I've tried rug and YaST This is not yet a known bug - file it with component libzypp, Andreas I've added Factory (mirrors.kernel.org) to yast installation sources seemed to work fine - installed a couple of packages from it with YaST sw. Though I was having problems installing with rug but I'll look into that a bit further before deeming it a bug. Perhaps this is not the place to make wishes/feature requests - but I was wondering if it were possible to have a popup message box - perhaps even with a progress bar - when downloading repodata.. In my experience noobs dont understand that package info for thousands of packages is not downloaded in a split second on a 128 kbit connection ;) A lot of times people simply think that YaST has frozen - when it is actually downloading or refreshing repodata. cb400f - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory Media Exception Error
Am Samstag, 18. März 2006 10:45 schrieb Andreas Jaeger: David Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: With Beta 6 I could see the Factory repository, even if I couldn't download much (about every third package seemed to be missing when I went to do updates :-( ), but with Beta 8, I can't add the factory repository. I've tried rug and YaST, but with opensuse.org, gwdg.de and uni-heidelberg.de I get a Media Exception error when adding the url :-( I thought at first that I was typing it incorrectly, so I browsed the repository with Firefox and copy and pasted the url across to YaST and rug, but both of them come up with a Media Exception either when creating the repository (YaST) or trying to install a package (rug). Is this a known problem with Beta 8? I did a search, but it didn't show any results for this... (Searching media exception, factory and yast). Can anyone point me to an open bug, or shall I raise a new one? This is not yet a known bug - file it with component libzypp, Andreas Logged as bug 159320 with y2logs attached. I'll try using kernel.org like Martin see if that works in the meantime... Dave -- I got to go figure, the tenant said. We all got to figure. There's some way to stop this. It's not like lightning or earthquakes. We've got a bad thing made by men, and by God that's something we can change. - The Grapes of Wrath, by John Steinbeck - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory Media Exception Error
Am Samstag, 18. März 2006 11:15 schrieb Martin Schlander: On Saturday 18 March 2006 10:45, Andreas Jaeger wrote: with Beta 8, I can't add the factory repository. I've tried rug and YaST This is not yet a known bug - file it with component libzypp, Andreas I've added Factory (mirrors.kernel.org) to yast installation sources seemed to work fine - installed a couple of packages from it with YaST sw. Though I was having problems installing with rug but I'll look into that a bit further before deeming it a bug. Perhaps this is not the place to make wishes/feature requests - but I was wondering if it were possible to have a popup message box - perhaps even with a progress bar - when downloading repodata.. In my experience noobs dont understand that package info for thousands of packages is not downloaded in a split second on a 128 kbit connection ;) A lot of times people simply think that YaST has frozen - when it is actually downloading or refreshing repodata. cb400f I also tried mirrors.kernel.org, that is giving the same Media Exception error when I click on Finish (after about 7-8 minutes of processing). Dave -- I got to go figure, the tenant said. We all got to figure. There's some way to stop this. It's not like lightning or earthquakes. We've got a bad thing made by men, and by God that's something we can change. - The Grapes of Wrath, by John Steinbeck - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] factory problems
Peter Czanik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, I downloaded factory this morning and tried to install it. Some problems: - on both PPC and i386: it starts with a dependency problem: SUSE Linux is missing :-) Ignore that one, we're wokring on it. - i386: lot of Xen dependency problems PLease file bugs. - i386: installation stalls at Finishing Basic Installation. The text over the progress bar is: 'creating initrd' and it stays at 73%. I checked, there is zero load There were some issues with the media yesterday, this should be fixed by now... Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgppuKP19cAiJ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [opensuse-factory] Factory y2pmsh: fetching package - ERROR(Media:file not found)
Am Montag, 13. März 2006 10:33 schrieb Tobias Burnus: Is it normal for Factory that the avilable *rpm and the package data used by y2pmsh mismatch? If the tree is syncing at that very moment: yes. If not: no. Greetings, Stephan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] factory changes
Hello, http://en.opensuse.org/Factory-News does not show anything new, but I see, that almost the full factory tree is refreshed. Is it only due to the new gcc, which I found in the ChangeLog? Is it worth to download it, or there were not yet significant improvements to the package manager (what I could not figure out from the ChangeLog)? Bye, CzP - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] factory changes
On Tuesday, 21. February 2006 13:41, Peter Czanik wrote: http://en.opensuse.org/Factory-News does not show anything new, but I That could be just because nobody filtered the complete changelog for interested stuff and added it to that page. So any volunteer for that? :-) see, that almost the full factory tree is refreshed. Is it only due to All packages of the tree are constantly rebuild to fix possible bad effects but normally you're fine with installing newer revisions (like YaST package manager does when you select Only update if newer version is available). Bye, Steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] factory changes
Am Tuesday 21 February 2006 13:41 schrieb Peter Czanik: Hello, http://en.opensuse.org/Factory-News does not show anything new, but I see, that almost the full factory tree is refreshed. Is it only due to the new gcc, which I found in the ChangeLog? Yes Is it worth to download it, or there were not yet significant improvements to the package manager (what I could not figure out from the ChangeLog)? Bye, AFAIK there are some updates for the YaST/libzypp stuff and so on. An update might work now. But I am not sure ;) -- Adrian Schroeter SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
