Re: Orion Clustering problems..
kevin, i've also been able to set up clustering but have not reproduced your error. i did notice that while i was investigating the various config settings, there was an entry in rmi.xml that i never used, but i could still cluster, i.e. load balancer redirected my request to one of the orion boxes, and i could kill a box, then login again, and my request would be sent to box2. i never did work out what this setting did. do you know what this does? does it maybe handle transmission of session data between boxes? remember, according to the docs you need boxes that are supposed to share session info to have the same cluster-island id. cluster host=230.0.0.1 id=123 password=123abc port=9127 username=cluster-user / Tag that is defined if the application is to be clustered. Used to set up a local multicast cluster. A username and password used for the servers to intercommunicate also needs to be specified. host - The multicast host/ip to transmit and receive cluster data on. The default is 230.0.0.1. id - The id (number) of this cluster node to identify itself with in the cluster. The default is based on local machine IP. password - The password configured for cluster access. Needs to match that of the other nodes in the cluster. port - The port to transmit and receive cluster data on. The default is 9127. username - The username configured for cluster access. Needs to match that of the other nodes in the cluster. i'd be very interested if you're able to get session clustering/failover working. cheers, greg. - Original Message - From: Duffey, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:27 PM Subject: Orion Clustering problems.. HI all, Hopefully this will make the list. I am working on a chapter for a book about scalability. I am also needing to get our site ready for scaling. I am using Orion to test my web-app that needs to be a demonstration of a scalable Servlet 2.2 web application. I have a couple of questions to ask about session fail-over, and how to get Orion to do this. I followed the cluster doc to the tee, and everything works fine except that the SessionServlet example does NOT keep the count going when I shut down the server that the first request to it created a session on. It starts over on the count. So I assume either my config is somehow just not correct, or that this is a bug with Orion. Here is what I have in my web-site.xml file: snip
Re: Orion and JMS: javax.naming.NameNotFoundException]
Hi Michael, I apologize if any of the facts that I exposed on my mail seemed to you to be a complain. My intention was to explain that I had sent two messages to the list that I had not seen, just to warn people so if they got too copies, they would know it was not intentional. And the second part to let people know that I was not sure whether nobody was reading my messages, or no one was actually using Orion JMS. I the way I expressed it offended you, I apologize but I don't think it deserved such a harsh response. regards, D. Michael J. Cannon wrote: What browser/MTA? Alos check the Oracle knowledge bank on OTN.oracle.com The server is up, the server is down...so what? Your messages eventually make it here and you eventually get an answer. You didn't pay anything for your answer, so quit complaining, or go to a support company (or switch and get a slower server or pay upwards of USD$6000 minimum for it. Your problem is that JMS and the agents for it aren't yet mature and, besides commercial ISVs, few use the libs. Try the Sun and usenet lists, If you're having probs w/ Orion's JMS, perhaps you should try JBoss (slower) or Jakarta's or the Sun RI. Michael J. Cannon
RE: Strange jsp-error.
I use only jikes, the reason being that it is not only the fast but is much more sensitive to bugs in the code. -Original Message- From: Mike Cannon-Brookes [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:22 2001 12:43 To: Orion-Interest Subject:RE: Strange jsp-error. I've had this error using Jikes before, I switched to javac and it went away. It's something to do with the compiler giving bad bytecodes. Also try commenting out large chunks of your JSP page to find out where the bad bytecode is, I'm sure the IronFlare guys will want to know (I believe mine was in a jsp:useBean block). -mike Mike Cannon-Brookes :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Atlassian :: http://www.atlassian.com Supporting YOUR J2EE World -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michiel Meeuwissen Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:43 PM To: Orion-Interest Subject: Strange jsp-error. Hello, Does anybody know what the following error means? Error creating jsp-page instance: java.lang.VerifyError: (class: __jspPage0_mmbase_edit_change_node_jsp, method: _jspService signature: (Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletRequest;Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpSe rvletResponse;)V) Register 31 contains wrong type (using Orion 1.5.2) It does not occur in all jsp-pages, but I've no idea what's happening, neither how to solve it. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen - NOS internet Mediacentrum kamer 203 - tel. +31 (0)35 6773065 http://www.mmbase.org http://www.purl.org/NET/mihxil/
Orion/AIX
Hello, is anybody running Orion on AIX? with/without problems ? which AIX? 4.3.x? required patches? which jdk? thanks a lot klaus -- Klaus Thiele - Personal Informatik AG mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change to take effect.
RE: Strange jsp-error.
Title: RE: Strange jsp-error. pls check your e-mails as i am being cc'd in on all of your comms. Bobby Paul. Senior Consultant. 1st IT People. 0207 940 3900. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Magnus Rydin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:22 PM To: Orion-Interest Subject: SV: Strange jsp-error. Hi. Try to remove the files from your persistence dir for the web-app and see if that solves it. WR -Ursprungligt meddelande- Fran: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]For Michiel Meeuwissen Skickat: den 17 augusti 2001 15:43 Till: Orion-Interest Amne: Strange jsp-error. Hello, Does anybody know what the following error means? Error creating jsp-page instance: java.lang.VerifyError: (class: __jspPage0_mmbase_edit_change_node_jsp, method: _jspService signature: (Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletRequest;Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletRespo nse;)V) Register 31 contains wrong type (using Orion 1.5.2) It does not occur in all jsp-pages, but I've no idea what's happening, neither how to solve it. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen - NOS internet Mediacentrum kamer 203 - tel. +31 (0)35 6773065 http://www.mmbase.org http://www.purl.org/NET/mihxil/
RE: Invoke a method on myself in a Stateful Session Bean.
Neat. I've been having similar problems trying to execute a findByPrimaryKey in the ejbCreate method of a bean. Errors, however, just come and go away randomly. The error I get seems to occur consistently.
Fw: JSP Bean Introspection in Orion
... and again - is anyone at least trying to fix
this mailing list?
- Original Message -
From: Richard
Taylor
To: Orion-Interest
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:26 PM
Subject: Fw: JSP Bean Introspection in Orion
Reposted..
- Original Message -
From: Richard
Taylor
To: Orion-Interest
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 6:27 PM
Subject: JSP Bean Introspection in Orion
ORION: 1.5.2
OS: RedHat7.1
JAVA: Blackdown-1.3.1-FCS
REF: Tomcat3.2.1
We've been having a lot of discrepencies with bean
introspection in Orion and I'd appreciate it if someone knows whether this is a
development issue (for us) or an Orion bug.
Firstly we have a number of instances where there
is a multi-select box with integer values. These values (to my
understanding) should be set as an int[] upon bean introspection. Here is
the code in the bean (TestBean.java):
//
integerArray private int[]
integerArray; // integerArray
setter public void setIntegerArray(int[] s)
{
System.out.println("Called the setIntegerArray int[] -
CORRECT"); this.integerArray =
s; } //
integerArray getter public int[]
getIntegerArray()
{ System.out.println("Called
getIntegerArray"); return
this.integerArray; }
And this is the JSP (test.jsp):
jsp:useBean
class="com.rt.test.TestBean" id="test"/
jsp:setProperty name="test"
property="*"/
form method="GET"
action="test.jsp" select
name="integerArray" multiple="true" size="4"
style="width:200"
option
value="1"Stuff1/option
option
value="2"Stuff2/option
option
value="3"Stuff3/option
option
value="4"Stuff4/option
/select
input type="submit"/ /form
Upon submission the bean methods are not
called. The same code in Tomcat3.2.1 does work.
We have also had a number of instances with a
boolean value. Instead of providing get and set methods we have used is
and set. I believe this is valid accoring to the spec. Orion has
also failed to call the set methods in a number of instances, however in a piece
of test code i wrote - it did work.
Can anyone help me out with the spec / a detailed
description of what and how Orion is doing introspection??
Thanks.
Richard.
Re: Orion/AIX
ciao Klaus i've a customer using with success oc4j on AIX 4.3.2 , they had to patch the ibm jdk 1.3 but raally i don't know with patch level, however it working really fine now. ciao Paolo Klaus Thiele wrote: Hello, is anybody running Orion on AIX? with/without problems ? which AIX? 4.3.x? required patches? which jdk? thanks a lot klaus -- Klaus Thiele - Personal Informatik AG mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change to take effect. begin:vcard n:ramasso;paolo x-mozilla-html:FALSE adr:;; version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fn:paolo ramasso end:vcard
RE: I think, I will start a support site too....
I usually don't step into these times of discussions but I must object to your statement about sites going down. In the bad old days before the web, client/server, etc. a system manager would be fired for having a system go down as many times as this list and the sites you mentioned have. It is time the IT world stops saying gee that's life stuff doesn't work every now and then. In the mainframe/minicomputer world 99.9% up time is the norm. That is what the IT world needs to have as a goal 100% reliable. The list reliability is very poor even by Internet standards. Simply moving the list to a list service would solve the issue once and for all if Ironflare would do that the list would be stable. Having the list stable is the first step to projecting a sense of support and stability of Ironflare. That would stop the complaints about support. Heck if Ironflare [hell I would do] take about an hour to setup a list on the list services this issue would die. Secondly, spending a week or less to build a portal site and have it hosted at tier1 or tier2 web hosting companying would handle the minimum that Ironflare's owners wish to put out on support. Total cost to Ironflare probably less than $2k a year or the revenue from the sale of one copy of Orion. -Original Message- From: Michael J. Cannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:43 PM To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: I think, I will start a support site too I personally think third-party support sites are a good thing. All of them I have seen so far are primarily commercial in nature, in order to counter the complaints of the corporate users that there was no 'credible support.' It's capitalism in action: see a need in the market and meet it. ...as to what the maillist runs, it really doesn't matter. All websites go down...Hotmail, Yahoo, even Slashdot...the rumor - never confirmed - was that it did indeed run on Orionserver. So what? Now you have another place to go when it is down (the new support sites). ...and if Orion is good enough for you to run a web site - (and it is: http:/www.standardset.com/ ) well, it should be good enough for Orion, especially since they developed it and this is one of the 'load and valence test platforms (if it does indeed run on Orion) for the product. Finally, the more info the merrier, and, given the levels of interest and participation by the people who have started these support sites and the support they have shown everyone on this maillist, I don't think any of us are going to suffer. Michael J. Cannon - Original Message - From: Alex Paransky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 9:13 PM Subject: I think, I will start a support site too (in style of Andy Rooney) I see everyone is starting their support sites for Orion. I think it's a poor solution for something that's broken, mainly, this mailing list. How many support sites do we actually have now? Why is it such a problem to keep the mailing list up and running? Now, we need to post the message to at least 3 places to make sure it gets maximum exposure. I think I will start a support site, that posts to all other support sites, just so that people don't have to search various support sites for help. I don't mind so many support sites starting up, I just think they are starting up for poor reasons and fragmenting what little knowledge we already have about this product. What is the problem with the list? Why is it down half the time? I hope it's not running under Orion... -AP_
I think, I will start a support site too....
This is great -- the more the merrier. Just like other little guys like Orion, such as Jboss (www.jboss.org) and Blazix (www.blazix.com), give the competition like BEA and Websphere a run for the money, databases like mysql (www.mysql.com), postgresql (www.postgresql.org), firebird interbase (http://firebird.sourceforge.org) and sapdb (www.sapdb.oeg) give Oracle competition. If I don't like picking the high cost application servers like BEA and Websphere, or the high priced databases like Oracle, I have more options to choose from. And if the third party support is no good, I can pick another third party support candidate and try them out. * From: Michael J. Cannon * Subject: Re: I think, I will start a support site too * Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:34:58 -0700 I personally think third-party support sites are a good thing. All of them I have seen so far are primarily commercial in nature, in order to counter the complaints of the corporate users that there was no 'credible support.' It's capitalism in action: see a need in the market and meet it. ...as to what the maillist runs, it really doesn't matter. All websites go down...Hotmail, Yahoo, even Slashdot...the rumor - never confirmed - was that it did indeed run on Orionserver. So what? Now you have another place to go when it is down (the new support sites). ...and if Orion is good enough for you to run a web site - (and it is: http:/www.standardset.com/ ) well, it should be good enough for Orion, especially since they developed it and this is one of the 'load and valence test platforms (if it does indeed run on Orion) for the product. Finally, the more info the merrier, and, given the levels of interest and participation by the people who have started these support sites and the support they have shown everyone on this maillist, I don't think any of us are going to suffer. Michael J. Cannon - Original Message - From: Alex Paransky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 9:13 PM Subject: I think, I will start a support site too (in style of Andy Rooney) I see everyone is starting their support sites for Orion. I think it's a poor solution for something that's broken, mainly, this mailing list. How many support sites do we actually have now? Why is it such a problem to keep the mailing list up and running? Now, we need to post the message to at least 3 places to make sure it gets maximum exposure. I think I will start a support site, that posts to all other support sites, just so that people don't have to search various support sites for help. I don't mind so many support sites starting up, I just think they are starting up for poor reasons and fragmenting what little knowledge we already have about this product. What is the problem with the list? Why is it down half the time? I hope it's not running under Orion... -AP_ * References: * I think, I will start a support site too msg15852.html * From: Alex Paransky -- msg15853.html Chronological maillist.html -- msg15855.html -- msg15852.html Thread index.html -- msg15851.html Top of Form 1 ...OLE_Obj... ...OLE_Obj... ...OLE_Obj... ...OLE_Obj... Reply via email to ...OLE_Obj... Bottom of Form 1
FW: I think, I will start a support site too....
resend to list -Original Message- From: Rabi Satter Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:24 AM To: 'Orion-Interest' Subject: RE: I think, I will start a support site too I usually don't step into these times of discussions but I must object to your statement about sites going down. In the bad old days before the web, client/server, etc. a system manager would be fired for having a system go down as many times as this list and the sites you mentioned have. It is time the IT world stops saying gee that's life stuff doesn't work every now and then. In the mainframe/minicomputer world 99.9% up time is the norm. That is what the IT world needs to have as a goal 100% reliable. The list reliability is very poor even by Internet standards. Simply moving the list to a list service would solve the issue once and for all if Ironflare would do that the list would be stable. Having the list stable is the first step to projecting a sense of support and stability of Ironflare. That would stop the complaints about support. Heck if Ironflare [hell I would do] take about an hour to setup a list on the list services this issue would die. Secondly, spending a week or less to build a portal site and have it hosted at tier1 or tier2 web hosting companying would handle the minimum that Ironflare's owners wish to put out on support. Total cost to Ironflare probably less than $2k a year or the revenue from the sale of one copy of Orion. -Original Message- From: Michael J. Cannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:43 PM To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: I think, I will start a support site too I personally think third-party support sites are a good thing. All of them I have seen so far are primarily commercial in nature, in order to counter the complaints of the corporate users that there was no 'credible support.' It's capitalism in action: see a need in the market and meet it. ...as to what the maillist runs, it really doesn't matter. All websites go down...Hotmail, Yahoo, even Slashdot...the rumor - never confirmed - was that it did indeed run on Orionserver. So what? Now you have another place to go when it is down (the new support sites). ...and if Orion is good enough for you to run a web site - (and it is: http:/www.standardset.com/ ) well, it should be good enough for Orion, especially since they developed it and this is one of the 'load and valence test platforms (if it does indeed run on Orion) for the product. Finally, the more info the merrier, and, given the levels of interest and participation by the people who have started these support sites and the support they have shown everyone on this maillist, I don't think any of us are going to suffer. Michael J. Cannon - Original Message - From: Alex Paransky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 9:13 PM Subject: I think, I will start a support site too (in style of Andy Rooney) I see everyone is starting their support sites for Orion. I think it's a poor solution for something that's broken, mainly, this mailing list. How many support sites do we actually have now? Why is it such a problem to keep the mailing list up and running? Now, we need to post the message to at least 3 places to make sure it gets maximum exposure. I think I will start a support site, that posts to all other support sites, just so that people don't have to search various support sites for help. I don't mind so many support sites starting up, I just think they are starting up for poor reasons and fragmenting what little knowledge we already have about this product. What is the problem with the list? Why is it down half the time? I hope it's not running under Orion... -AP_
RE: Orion and JMS: javax.naming.NameNotFoundException]
Title: RE: Orion and JMS: javax.naming.NameNotFoundException]
Daniel,
This
my second reply to your question. Apperantly my first was lost since another
reply submitted after yours appeared on the list yesterday but not
yours.
In
addition, you might want to apply the following edits to
jms.xml:
.- Configure jms.xml with this content:
jms-server port="9127" host=""
queue name="Demo Queue" location="jms/demoQueue"
descriptionA dummy queue/description
/queue
log
file path="../logs/jms.log" /
/log
/jms-server
This
class might simplify your use of messaging:
public
class MessageSender implements Serializable{ public
MessageSender(String queueName, String topicName) throws
MagnetException
{ this.queueName =
queueName; this.topicName =
topicName;
initMessaging(); }
private void
initMessaging()
{
try
{ if
(queueName == null topicName ==
null)
{
throw new IllegalArgumentException("MessageSender: initMessaging: No topic name
or queue
name");
}
InitialContext jndiEnc = new
InitialContext();if
(queueName !=
null)
{
QueueConnectionFactory factory =
(QueueConnectionFactory)
jndiEnc.lookup(JNDINames.QUEUE_CONNECTION_FACTORY);qConnect
=
factory.createQueueConnection();
qConnect.start();
qSession = qConnect.createQueueSession(false,
Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
try
{
requestQ = (Queue)jndiEnc.lookup(JNDINames.JMS_DIRECTORY +
queueName);
}
catch (NameNotFoundException
nnfex)
{
requestQ =
qSession.createQueue(queueName);}
qSender =
qSession.createSender(requestQ);
} if
(topicName !=
null)
{
TopicConnectionFactory factory =
(TopicConnectionFactory)
jndiEnc.lookup(JNDINames.TOPIC_CONNECTION_FACTORY);
System.out.println("MessageSender: initMessaging: got connection factory " +
factory);
tConnect =
factory.createTopicConnection();
tConnect.start();
tSession = tConnect.createTopicSession(false,
Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
try
{
requestT = (Topic)jndiEnc.lookup(JNDINames.JMS_DIRECTORY +
topicName);
}
catch (NameNotFoundException
nnfex)
{
requestT =
tSession.createTopic(queueName);}
publisher =
tSession.createPublisher(requestT);
}
} catch (JMSException
jmsex)
{ throw
new UndeclaredThrowableException(jmsex, "MessageSender: initMessaging: " +
jmsex.getMessage());
} catch (NamingException
nex)
{ throw
new
UndeclaredThrowableException(nex,
"MessageSender: initMessaging: Problem looking up
JmsQueueConnectionFactory");
}
}
protected void
finalize() {
try
{ if (qConnect !=
null)
qConnect.close(); qConnect =
null; qSession =
null; qSender =
null; requestQ =
null;
if
(tConnect !=
null)
tConnect.close(); tConnect =
null; tSession =
null; publisher =
null; requestT =
null;
} catch (JMSException
jex)
{ }
}
private void
writeObject(java.io.ObjectOutputStream out) throws
IOException
{
try
{ if (qConnect !=
null)
qConnect.close(); qConnect =
null; qSession =
null; qSender =
null; requestQ =
null;
if
(tConnect !=
null)
tConnect.close(); tConnect =
null; tSession =
null; publisher =
null; requestT =
null;
} catch (JMSException
jex)
{ throw
new IOException("MessageSender: writeObject: " +
jex.getMessage());
} }
protected String queueName =
null; protected transient QueueConnection qConnect =
null; protected transient QueueSession
qSession = null; protected transient
QueueSender qSender = null;
protected transient Queue requestQ = null;
protected String topicName =
null; protected transient TopicConnection tConnect =
null; protected transient TopicSession
tSession = null; protected transient
TopicPublisher publisher =
null; protected transient Topic requestT =
null;}
You will need to define the JNDINames interface with the appropriate values
for its attributes.
Then any class that needs to send messages can extend MessageSender and use
the appropriate attributes
This works for me. Let me know if you still have problems or
questions
Dave
-Original Message-From: Kesav Kumar
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:17
PMTo: Orion-InterestSubject: RE: Orion and JMS:
javax.naming.NameNotFoundException]
If you want to get any resource in your Servlet/jsp you got
define resource-ref in your web.xml. One basic
information as long as you are in the same container you don't need any
parameters to JDNI context. You need
jndi.properties only when you try to access from outside the container.
Your servlets/jsp/ejb/applicationclient
are in the same orion container so in all these components you
can directly get JNDI context by Context ctx = new
InitialContext(); As long as you are in the same
container there is no need for jndi.properties.
Regarding the JMS you got define resource-ref in your
web.xml. Any container resource of ejb resource you want to use in web
tier i.e in servlets/jsp you have to define resource-ref and ejb-ref
correspondingly. For JMS which is a resource so
Re: I think, I will start a support site too....
Rabi Satter wrote: I usually don't step into these times of discussions but I must object to your statement about sites going down. In the bad old days before the web, client/server, etc. a system manager would be fired for having a system go down as many times as this list and the sites you mentioned have. It is time the IT world stops saying gee that's life stuff doesn't work every now and then. In the mainframe/minicomputer world 99.9% up time is the norm. That is what the IT world needs to have as a goal 100% reliable. [...] Of course, your point is completely moot, since nobody gets paid to maintain this mailing list. Who're you going to fire? cheers, Chris
Re: I think, I will start a support site too....
Another good point on this lousy list. I am unable to comprehend how a mailing list like this could be so bad. Could whoever is responsible for this list please answer one of these threads and explain yourself? This list could be hosted on a free listserver like Yahoo lists with much better results. Is there anyone out there on the list that would be able to host it? We could then just start our own list with a competent administrator and let this one die. I would like to hear more opinions on this so when you get this message in 4 or 5 hours or so, please reply. I am looking forward to your responses, which I should get sometime tomorrow around 12:00 est. Bill Alex Paransky wrote: (in style of Andy Rooney) I see everyone is starting their support sites for Orion. I think it's a poor solution for something that's broken, mainly, this mailing list. How many support sites do we actually have now? Why is it such a problem to keep the mailing list up and running? Now, we need to post the message to at least 3 places to make sure it gets maximum exposure. I think I will start a support site, that posts to all other support sites, just so that people don't have to search various support sites for help. I don't mind so many support sites starting up, I just think they are starting up for poor reasons and fragmenting what little knowledge we already have about this product. What is the problem with the list? Why is it down half the time? I hope it's not running under Orion... -AP_
EJB 2.0 Availability Timeline
For planing purposes, it would be very valuable to know what the orion timeline for EJB2.0 availability is. JWS This e-mail communication and any attachments are confidential and intended only for the use of the designated recipients named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, or distribution of it or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify USPowerSolutions Corporation immediately by telephone at (617)547-3800 or via e-mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and destroy all copies of this communication and any attachments.
RE: I think, I will start a support site too....
How about moving the mailing list onto yahoogroups? They seem to be quite reliable. -Original Message- From: Christopher J. Woods [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 August 2001 15:53 To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: I think, I will start a support site too Rabi Satter wrote: I usually don't step into these times of discussions but I must object to your statement about sites going down. In the bad old days before the web, client/server, etc. a system manager would be fired for having a system go down as many times as this list and the sites you mentioned have. It is time the IT world stops saying gee that's life stuff doesn't work every now and then. In the mainframe/minicomputer world 99.9% up time is the norm. That is what the IT world needs to have as a goal 100% reliable. [...] Of course, your point is completely moot, since nobody gets paid to maintain this mailing list. Who're you going to fire? cheers, Chris http://www.iii.co.uk Interactive Investor International is a leading UK Internet personal finance service that provides individuals with the capability to identify, compare, monitor and buy online a number of financial products and services. Interactive Investor Trading Limited, a subsidiary of Interactive Investor International plc, is regulated by the SFA.
Orion/OpenVMS was RE: Orion/AIX
Wondering if anyone was running Orion on OpenVMS? What 7.x version, patches, etc.? Ben Galde \u263A -Original Message- From: Paolo Ramasso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 6:06 AM To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: Orion/AIX ciao Klaus i've a customer using with success oc4j on AIX 4.3.2 , they had to patch the ibm jdk 1.3 but raally i don't know with patch level, however it working really fine now. ciao Paolo Klaus Thiele wrote: Hello, is anybody running Orion on AIX? with/without problems ? which AIX? 4.3.x? required patches? which jdk? thanks a lot klaus -- Klaus Thiele - Personal Informatik AG mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change to take effect.
Re: I think, I will start a support site too....
Um.. are you serious with this example? I am sure I can find an example of a website running on IIS where some pre-teenage girl posts pictures of her pet cat - that doesn't mean I can use it for a high-availablilty load-balanced application. I reread your post searching for where I missed the joke, but I think you are serious. So, I will agree with you: the quality of the orion mailing list is appropriate for a product meant to host collections of personal under construction pages. Bill Michael J. Cannon wrote: snip and if Orion is good enough for you to run a web site - (and it is: http:/www.standardset.com/ ) well, it should be good enough for Orion, especially since they developed it and this is one of the 'load and valence test platforms (if it does indeed run on Orion) for the product. snip
RE: Registering PL/SQL table OUT parameter in jdbcandretrieving ( challenging question)
Hi Bombalaa,
Thank Very much for your Help.
Could You please send me example or where can i find full information.
I was not able find registerIndexTableOutParameter method.
(cstmt.registerIndexTableOutParameter(1,30, Types.INTEGER,0);
cstmt.registerIndexTableOutParameter(2,30, Types.VARCHAR,0);)
thanks once again,
Regards,
Komal Kandi.
-Original Message-
From: bombalaa-orion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 6:59 PM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: Registering PL/SQL table OUT parameter in jdbc
andretrieving ( challenging question)
Hi Komal.
seems that your procedure has 2 OUT Parameters ...
TYPE id_tab IS TABLE OF pmnt_rsch_scn.PMNT_RSRCH_SCN_ID%TYPE
INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
TYPE scn_tab IS TABLE OF pmnt_rsch_scn.SCENARIO_DESC%TYPE
INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
For table of index , RegisterOutParameter does not work ...
also if you are using thin client then also it would not work ...
works for oci ...
Instead try this :
cstmt.registerIndexTableOutParameter(1,30, Types.INTEGER,0);
cstmt.registerIndexTableOutParameter(2,30, Types.VARCHAR,0);
and then you have to use Datum to get the values...
if u still want more info then mail me ..
bombalaa.
---Original Message---
From: Orion-Interest mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 08:05:05 AM
To: Orion-Interest mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Registering PL/SQL table OUT parameter in jdbc and retrieving (
challenging question)
Hi All,
Thanks in advance if i would be given the suggestion.I'm now
calling a stored proceudre in Oracle from Java,where I use
CallableStatement,but i've got to stop at the point that when i
register the output parameter,i found no data type matches this
nested table type within this procedure in Oracle.
could you please any body have any idea.
Thanks
Komal Kandi.
pls see here
import java.sql.*;
import java.util.*;
public class GetTsysNoteOptions
{
public static void main(String args[])throws SQLException
{
String url=jdbc:odbc:PRA;
try
{
Class.forName(sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver);
}catch(ClassNotFoundException e)
{
System.err.println(ClassNotFoundException thrown);
System.err.println(e.getMessage());
}
Connection
conn=DriverManager.getConnection(url,pmtrsh_tmp,pmtrsh_tmp2000
);
CallableStatement callst=conn.prepareCall({call
Call_Proc(?,?)});
callst.registerOutParameter(1, ???);
callst.registerOutParameter(2, ???); // what i have to register i tried
other type but it's not working
callst.execute();
/*
case 1:??? --- java.sql.Types.OTHER
int that case iam geting these error
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PLS-00306: wrong number or types of arguments in call to
'GET_ARCHIVE_DATE'
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PL/SQL: Statement ignored
case 2:??? --- java.sql.Types.OTHER,type
int that case iam geting these error
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PLS-00306: wrong number or types of arguments in call to
'GET_ARCHIVE_DATE'
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PL/SQL: Statement ignored
or some other tries iam geting Sql type cast exception
*/
System.out.println(The TSYS Variables are :);
System.out.println(intArr[1]);
System.out.println(strArr[1]);
callst.close();
}
}
the procedure( in a package):
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE GetTSYSNoteOpt_Pkg AS
TYPE id_tab IS TABLE OF pmnt_rsch_scn.PMNT_RSRCH_SCN_ID%TYPE
INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
TYPE scn_tab IS TABLE OF pmnt_rsch_scn.SCENARIO_DESC%TYPE
INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
PROCEDURE Sp_GetTSYSNoteOptions (id out id_tab,scn out scn_tab);
END GetTSYSNoteOpt_Pkg;
/
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY GETTSYSNOTEOPT_PKG AS
cursor c1 is select
pmnt_rsch_scn.PMNT_RSRCH_SCN_ID,pmnt_rsch_scn.SCENARIO_DESC from
pmnt_rsch_scn;
procedure Sp_GetTSYSNoteOptions(id out id_tab,scn out scn_tab) is
--type rec is record
--( l_id pmnt_rsch_scn.PMNT_RSRCH_SCN_ID%type,
-- l_scn pmnt_rsch_scn.SCENARIO_DESC%type);
--rec1 rec;
begin
open c1;
for i in 1..40
loop
fetch c1 into id(i),scn(i);
exit when c1%notfound;
end loop;
close c1;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('An Exception has occured');
for i in 1..40
loop
dbms_output.put_line(id(i));
dbms_output.put_line(scn(i));
end loop;
end;
end GetTSYSNoteOpt_Pkg;
/
_
IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved -
http://www.incredimail.com/redir.asp?ad_id=109 Click Here
Re: I think, I will start a support site too....
Elephant walker is capable and I registered oionsig.org a while ago (when this was an issue for me - I think it was April). My ISP allows GNU Mailman, so that shouldn't be a problem. Also, you're free to start a Yahoo Club, or host the site on SourceForge (you could set it up so that it was a MBSD or ASL licensed site for extensions, mods, etc. specifically slanted to Orion's implementation of J2EE). What do you suggest, keeping in mind that this only accomplishes the task of further fragmenting the community (as IronFlare will still only post the link to their mailserver on their site, so part of the admin's job would be to spam this list with announcements and run copy-to scripts). Michael J. Cannon PM/COO - hsqldb.org, Inc. - Original Message - From: Bill Clinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:06 AM Subject: Re: I think, I will start a support site too Another good point on this lousy list. I am unable to comprehend how a mailing list like this could be so bad. Could whoever is responsible for this list please answer one of these threads and explain yourself? This list could be hosted on a free listserver like Yahoo lists with much better results. Is there anyone out there on the list that would be able to host it? We could then just start our own list with a competent administrator and let this one die. I would like to hear more opinions on this so when you get this message in 4 or 5 hours or so, please reply. I am looking forward to your responses, which I should get sometime tomorrow around 12:00 est. Bill Alex Paransky wrote: (in style of Andy Rooney) I see everyone is starting their support sites for Orion. I think it's a poor solution for something that's broken, mainly, this mailing list. How many support sites do we actually have now? Why is it such a problem to keep the mailing list up and running? Now, we need to post the message to at least 3 places to make sure it gets maximum exposure. I think I will start a support site, that posts to all other support sites, just so that people don't have to search various support sites for help. I don't mind so many support sites starting up, I just think they are starting up for poor reasons and fragmenting what little knowledge we already have about this product. What is the problem with the list? Why is it down half the time? I hope it's not running under Orion... -AP_
Ant to compile and deploy one file
Title: Ant to compile and deploy one file Hey if i have one file to update is there an easier way to compile it and re jar it??? I am using ant ... and if i have one i can only seem to recompile them alll which takes some time. Joseph Faisal Nusairat, Sr. Project Manager WorldCom tel: 614-723-4232 pager: 888-452-0399 textmsg: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EJB 2.0 Availability Timeline
Since, according to the JCP, at http://jcp.org/jsr/stage/proposed.jsp the EJB 2.0 spec is currently in Proposed Final Draft Status and, according to the EJB 2.0 JSR Detail, the Final Ballot on the Reference Implementation (RI) and Compatibility Technology Kit (CTK) does not come until 04 September, 2001, after which there are probably going to be changes to the spec and it will require further review, I would guess that it would be sometime subsequent to that. Son't worry, though. Oracle is on the Expert Group (shudder-and-hope). Some interesting notes about the spec from the JCP detail: QUOTE: The Enterprise JavaBeans 2.0 architecture is targeted to be released as an important feature of the next major release of the Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition. It will require that a reference implementation and compatibility test suite be developed as a part of that platform. ENDQUOTE meaning time until the spec is a testable, verifiable and compliable (is that a word?) spec...in other words: real... and QUOTE In the absence of this specification, it is highly likely that Enterprise JavaBeans container providers will develop container-specific mechanisms to support integration with JMS, container-managed persistence of entity beans, query syntaxes, and specialized containers. This will in turn result in a proliferation of beans that are not portable across vendors' products. ENDQUOTE which is the status of the non-existent spec now. I would prefer to see the limited development resources of IronFlare (and Oracle) devoted to bugfixes and compliance with the existing spec, rather than waste time on a moving target. The problem is that until there is a standards process in place for certification-to-compliance, EJB 2.0 is vapor and companies that devote scarce resources to compliance efforts for a non-existent spec are doing their customers a disservice. Michael J. Cannon - Original Message - From: Solinsky, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jason (Alias) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:26 AM Subject: EJB 2.0 Availability Timeline For planing purposes, it would be very valuable to know what the orion timeline for EJB2.0 availability is. JWS This e-mail communication and any attachments are confidential and intended only for the use of the designated recipients named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, or distribution of it or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify USPowerSolutions Corporation immediately by telephone at (617)547-3800 or via e-mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and destroy all copies of this communication and any attachments.
RE: I think, I will start a support site too....
Well, what I don't understand is how after getting at least some sum of money, Orion hasn't hired people to do the job of support. Maybe they haven't got any money yet because Orion still has alot of bugs and is a ways away from what Oracle 9i promises in their app server. You gotta believe Oracle licensing Orion is a great thing for Orion, and perhaps they are very very busy working on alot of fixes for Oracle's version of Orion. I can say that if clustering isn't working (at least from what I have tried), and HTTPS clustering doesn't work, and there are other bugs too, that Oracle isn't going to launch 9i with a buggy product, even though Orion is pretty stable for most things. I still can't figure out why it hangs randomly when I am working, but it has proved pretty stable in production. On the note of support, has anyone load-tested the hell out of Orion to see how much it really can handle before it crawls? I think these are issues support (or perhaps a white paper) should address. What the hell am I talking about anyways? Oh well..Orion still rocks, but JBoss is much more enticing with its better architecture (at least in the EJB container), open source, and free price for deployment, production, distribution, etc. Now if only I could find a free open-source powerful scalable servlet 2.3/JSP 1.2 engine with a built in web server that is as good as orion. -Original Message- From: Rabi Satter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 6:24 AM To: Orion-Interest Subject: RE: I think, I will start a support site too I usually don't step into these times of discussions but I must object to your statement about sites going down. In the bad old days before the web, client/server, etc. a system manager would be fired for having a system go down as many times as this list and the sites you mentioned have. It is time the IT world stops saying gee that's life stuff doesn't work every now and then. In the mainframe/minicomputer world 99.9% up time is the norm. That is what the IT world needs to have as a goal 100% reliable. The list reliability is very poor even by Internet standards. Simply moving the list to a list service would solve the issue once and for all if Ironflare would do that the list would be stable. Having the list stable is the first step to projecting a sense of support and stability of Ironflare. That would stop the complaints about support. Heck if Ironflare [hell I would do] take about an hour to setup a list on the list services this issue would die. Secondly, spending a week or less to build a portal site and have it hosted at tier1 or tier2 web hosting companying would handle the minimum that Ironflare's owners wish to put out on support. Total cost to Ironflare probably less than $2k a year or the revenue from the sale of one copy of Orion. -Original Message- From: Michael J. Cannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:43 PM To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: I think, I will start a support site too I personally think third-party support sites are a good thing. All of them I have seen so far are primarily commercial in nature, in order to counter the complaints of the corporate users that there was no 'credible support.' It's capitalism in action: see a need in the market and meet it. ...as to what the maillist runs, it really doesn't matter. All websites go down...Hotmail, Yahoo, even Slashdot...the rumor - never confirmed - was that it did indeed run on Orionserver. So what? Now you have another place to go when it is down (the new support sites). ...and if Orion is good enough for you to run a web site - (and it is: http:/www.standardset.com/ ) well, it should be good enough for Orion, especially since they developed it and this is one of the 'load and valence test platforms (if it does indeed run on Orion) for the product. Finally, the more info the merrier, and, given the levels of interest and participation by the people who have started these support sites and the support they have shown everyone on this maillist, I don't think any of us are going to suffer. Michael J. Cannon - Original Message - From: Alex Paransky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 9:13 PM Subject: I think, I will start a support site too (in style of Andy Rooney) I see everyone is starting their support sites for Orion. I think it's a poor solution for something that's broken, mainly, this mailing list. How many support sites do we actually have now? Why is it such a problem to keep the mailing list up and running? Now, we need to post the message to at least 3 places to make sure it gets maximum exposure. I think I will start a support site, that posts to all other support sites, just so that people don't
Re: I think, I will start a support site too....
How about running the list on yahoogroups? My 2c, Nicki - Original Message - From: Rabi Satter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:23 PM Subject: RE: I think, I will start a support site too I usually don't step into these times of discussions but I must object to your statement about sites going down. In the bad old days before the web, client/server, etc. a system manager would be fired for having a system go down as many times as this list and the sites you mentioned have. It is time the IT world stops saying gee that's life stuff doesn't work every now and then. In the mainframe/minicomputer world 99.9% up time is the norm. That is what the IT world needs to have as a goal 100% reliable. The list reliability is very poor even by Internet standards. Simply moving the list to a list service would solve the issue once and for all if Ironflare would do that the list would be stable. Having the list stable is the first step to projecting a sense of support and stability of Ironflare. That would stop the complaints about support. Heck if Ironflare [hell I would do] take about an hour to setup a list on the list services this issue would die. Secondly, spending a week or less to build a portal site and have it hosted at tier1 or tier2 web hosting companying would handle the minimum that Ironflare's owners wish to put out on support. Total cost to Ironflare probably less than $2k a year or the revenue from the sale of one copy of Orion. -Original Message- From: Michael J. Cannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:43 PM To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: I think, I will start a support site too I personally think third-party support sites are a good thing. All of them I have seen so far are primarily commercial in nature, in order to counter the complaints of the corporate users that there was no 'credible support.' It's capitalism in action: see a need in the market and meet it. ...as to what the maillist runs, it really doesn't matter. All websites go down...Hotmail, Yahoo, even Slashdot...the rumor - never confirmed - was that it did indeed run on Orionserver. So what? Now you have another place to go when it is down (the new support sites). ...and if Orion is good enough for you to run a web site - (and it is: http:/www.standardset.com/ ) well, it should be good enough for Orion, especially since they developed it and this is one of the 'load and valence test platforms (if it does indeed run on Orion) for the product. Finally, the more info the merrier, and, given the levels of interest and participation by the people who have started these support sites and the support they have shown everyone on this maillist, I don't think any of us are going to suffer. Michael J. Cannon - Original Message - From: Alex Paransky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 9:13 PM Subject: I think, I will start a support site too (in style of Andy Rooney) I see everyone is starting their support sites for Orion. I think it's a poor solution for something that's broken, mainly, this mailing list. How many support sites do we actually have now? Why is it such a problem to keep the mailing list up and running? Now, we need to post the message to at least 3 places to make sure it gets maximum exposure. I think I will start a support site, that posts to all other support sites, just so that people don't have to search various support sites for help. I don't mind so many support sites starting up, I just think they are starting up for poor reasons and fragmenting what little knowledge we already have about this product. What is the problem with the list? Why is it down half the time? I hope it's not running under Orion... -AP_
Re: I think, I will start a support site too....
Good idea to host it on yahoo. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/orionserver - Original Message - From: Bill Clinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:06 AM Subject: Re: I think, I will start a support site too Another good point on this lousy list. I am unable to comprehend how a mailing list like this could be so bad. Could whoever is responsible for this list please answer one of these threads and explain yourself? This list could be hosted on a free listserver like Yahoo lists with much better results. Is there anyone out there on the list that would be able to host it? We could then just start our own list with a competent administrator and let this one die. I would like to hear more opinions on this so when you get this message in 4 or 5 hours or so, please reply. I am looking forward to your responses, which I should get sometime tomorrow around 12:00 est. Bill Alex Paransky wrote: (in style of Andy Rooney) I see everyone is starting their support sites for Orion. I think it's a poor solution for something that's broken, mainly, this mailing list. How many support sites do we actually have now? Why is it such a problem to keep the mailing list up and running? Now, we need to post the message to at least 3 places to make sure it gets maximum exposure. I think I will start a support site, that posts to all other support sites, just so that people don't have to search various support sites for help. I don't mind so many support sites starting up, I just think they are starting up for poor reasons and fragmenting what little knowledge we already have about this product. What is the problem with the list? Why is it down half the time? I hope it's not running under Orion... -AP_ _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
RE: Registering PL/SQL table OUT parameter in jdbc andretrieving ( challenging question)
Title: RE: Registering PL/SQL table OUT parameter in jdbc andretrieving ( challenging question)
You got to have Oracle8.1.7 oci drivers to execute the following. If you install 8.1.7 you will get documentation with that. These registerIndexTableOutParameter is in OracleCallableStatement. You can find more info in the documentation.
Here is my small example.
import java.io.*;
import java.util.*;
import java.sql.*;
import oracle.sql.*;
import oracle.jdbc.driver.*;
public class OracleTest
{
public static void main(String args[])
{
Connection con = null;
OracleCallableStatement cstmt = null;
try
{
DriverManager.registerDriver(new oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver());
con = DriverManager.getConnection (jdbc:oracle:oci8:@VMSDEV, prism, prism);
cstmt = (OracleCallableStatement)con.prepareCall(begin Test.get(?); end;);
int elemMaxLen = 250;
int maxLen = 100;
int elemSqlType = Types.VARCHAR;
cstmt.registerIndexTableOutParameter (1, maxLen, elemSqlType, elemMaxLen);
cstmt.execute();
String[] values = (String[])cstmt.getPlsqlIndexTable (1);
for(int i=0; ivalues.length; i++)
{
System.out.println(values[i]);
}
} catch(Exception ex)
{
ex.printStackTrace(System.err);
} finally
{
if(cstmt != null) try{cstmt.close();}catch(Exception _ex){}
if(con != null) try{con.close();}catch(Exception _ex){}
}
}
}
Hope this helps you.
Kesav Kumar Kolla
Voquette Inc
650 356 3740(W)
510 889 6840(R)
VoquetteDelivering Sound Information
-Original Message-
From: Komal Kandi (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 9:23 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: Registering PL/SQL table OUT parameter in jdbc
andretrieving ( challenging question)
Hi Bombalaa,
Thank Very much for your Help.
Could You please send me example or where can i find full information.
I was not able find registerIndexTableOutParameter method.
(cstmt.registerIndexTableOutParameter(1,30, Types.INTEGER,0);
cstmt.registerIndexTableOutParameter(2,30, Types.VARCHAR,0);)
thanks once again,
Regards,
Komal Kandi.
-Original Message-
From: bombalaa-orion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 6:59 PM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: Registering PL/SQL table OUT parameter in jdbc
andretrieving ( challenging question)
Hi Komal.
seems that your procedure has 2 OUT Parameters ...
TYPE id_tab IS TABLE OF pmnt_rsch_scn.PMNT_RSRCH_SCN_ID%TYPE
INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
TYPE scn_tab IS TABLE OF pmnt_rsch_scn.SCENARIO_DESC%TYPE
INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
For table of index , RegisterOutParameter does not work ...
also if you are using thin client then also it would not work ...
works for oci ...
Instead try this :
cstmt.registerIndexTableOutParameter(1,30, Types.INTEGER,0);
cstmt.registerIndexTableOutParameter(2,30, Types.VARCHAR,0);
and then you have to use Datum to get the values...
if u still want more info then mail me ..
bombalaa.
---Original Message---
From: Orion-Interest mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 08:05:05 AM
To: Orion-Interest mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Registering PL/SQL table OUT parameter in jdbc and
retrieving (
challenging question)
Hi All,
Thanks in advance if i would be given the suggestion.I'm now
calling a stored proceudre in Oracle from Java,where I use
CallableStatement,but i've got to stop at the point that when i
register the output parameter,i found no data type matches this
nested table type within this procedure in Oracle.
could you please any body have any idea.
Thanks
Komal Kandi.
pls see here
import java.sql.*;
import java.util.*;
public class GetTsysNoteOptions
{
public static void main(String args[])throws SQLException
{
String url=jdbc:odbc:PRA;
try
{
Class.forName(sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver);
}catch(ClassNotFoundException e)
{
System.err.println(ClassNotFoundException thrown);
System.err.println(e.getMessage());
}
Connection
conn=DriverManager.getConnection(url,pmtrsh_tmp,pmtrsh_tmp2000
);
CallableStatement callst=conn.prepareCall({call
Call_Proc(?,?)});
callst.registerOutParameter(1, ???);
callst.registerOutParameter(2, ???); // what i have to
register i tried
other type but it's not working
callst.execute();
/*
case 1:??? --- java.sql.Types.OTHER
int that case iam geting these error
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PLS-00306: wrong number or types of arguments in call to
'GET_ARCHIVE_DATE'
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PL/SQL: Statement ignored
case 2:??? --- java.sql.Types.OTHER,type
int that case iam geting these error
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PLS-00306: wrong number or types of arguments in call to
'GET_ARCHIVE_DATE'
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PL/SQL: Statement ignored
or some other tries iam geting Sql type cast exception
*/
System.out.println(The TSYS Variables are :);
RE: Ant to compile and deploy one file
Title: Ant to compile and deploy one file I have ant and it recompiles only modified .java files (only one). Are you using the latest ant(I think it's 1.3)?. -Original Message-From: Nusairat, Joseph F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Jueves, 23 de Agosto de 2001 13:35To: Orion-InterestSubject: Ant to compile and deploy one file Hey if i have one file to update is there an easier way to compile it and re jar it??? I am using ant ... and if i have one i can only seem to recompile them alll which takes some time. Joseph Faisal Nusairat, Sr. Project Manager WorldCom tel: 614-723-4232 pager: 888-452-0399 textmsg: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo orion list is up..
Damn..I got a response in under 3 minutes! Haven't seen that on the orion list for many months.
YahooGroup orionserver
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/orionserver _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Re[2]: I think, I will start a support site too....
Hello Kevin, I did a stress-test some time ago. It was a JSP page that made a DB Query joining 2 tables and used a findByAll method on a entity bean. Both tables where populated with 5000 items. I ran Jtest with 2 groups of 10 threads, spacing each http query from the same thread by 300mls. The DB server was a IBM Netfinity Single Processor Pentium III 700Mhz, with 512 megs of RAM running Win 2k. Orion was running in a IBM PC-300GL Pentium III 600m 256 megs of RAM and Win NT 4 SP 5. Jtest ran on the same machine. The network was a Ethernet-100. JDK 1.3 and orion 1.2.? (long time ago, indeed) From a clean start (all machines turned off and on), orion ceased to respond after 6 hours. Using oracle and orion on the same machine (the PC-300GL), orion ceased to responde after 1 1/2 hours. DK On the note of support, has anyone load-tested the hell out of Orion to see DK how much it really can handle before it crawls? I think these are issues DK support (or perhaps a white paper) should address. -- Best regards, Rafaelmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ant to compile and deploy one file
Title: Ant to compile and deploy one file worked with the 1.2 that I used as well. I recall having this problem too. I forget the reason. I tried using the tstmp/ as well and that didn't work. What should happen is the compiling should only compile classes that have changed. Check out your source file-date times and see if they are out of the ordinary. Also, you may want to post this to the ANT list..they can probably help you better. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Juan Lorandi (Chile)Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:21 PMTo: Orion-InterestSubject: RE: Ant to compile and deploy one file I have ant and it recompiles only modified .java files (only one). Are you using the latest ant(I think it's 1.3)?. -Original Message-From: Nusairat, Joseph F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Jueves, 23 de Agosto de 2001 13:35To: Orion-InterestSubject: Ant to compile and deploy one file Hey if i have one file to update is there an easier way to compile it and re jar it??? I am using ant ... and if i have one i can only seem to recompile them alll which takes some time. Joseph Faisal Nusairat, Sr. Project Manager WorldCom tel: 614-723-4232 pager: 888-452-0399 textmsg: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Yahoo orion list is up..
6 members so far. Keep em coming --- Duffey, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Damn..I got a response in under 3 minutes! Haven't seen that on the orion list for many months. __ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
RE: Ant to compile and deploy one file
Title: Ant to compile and deploy one file yeah i guess it might be ... it stilll seems to take a while though even when i have just one file though It does take longer when everything needs compiled Joseph Faisal Nusairat, Sr. Project Manager WorldCom tel: 614-723-4232 pager: 888-452-0399 textmsg: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Juan Lorandi (Chile) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:21 PMTo: Orion-InterestSubject: RE: Ant to compile and deploy one file I have ant and it recompiles only modified .java files (only one). Are you using the latest ant(I think it's 1.3)?. -Original Message-From: Nusairat, Joseph F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Jueves, 23 de Agosto de 2001 13:35To: Orion-InterestSubject: Ant to compile and deploy one file Hey if i have one file to update is there an easier way to compile it and re jar it??? I am using ant ... and if i have one i can only seem to recompile them alll which takes some time. Joseph Faisal Nusairat, Sr. Project Manager WorldCom tel: 614-723-4232 pager: 888-452-0399 textmsg: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ant to compile and deploy one file
Ant to compile and deploy one fileYou might want to try VAMP (at http://www.geocities.com/vamp201/ant.html - caution, GEOCITIES site! - mousetraps and webbugs!) Configure (at http://www.dsdelft.nl/~lemval/ant/ - files site only, no web page) or CruiseControl (http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net/ - this, along with VAMP later is probably what you need) or one of the other ANT External and Tasks (at http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/external.html ) depending on your target platform and IDE. CruiseControl works well, has a gradual learning curve and, has the possibility of integrting with VAMP, AJC or Anakia. I use it for both small and large projects and am beginning to port it to the SF environment for HypersonicSQL/hsqldb for builds. Also, I believe thee are some articles on this at the Netbeans.org site. Michael J. Cannon PM/COO -hsqldb.org, Inc. Michael J. Cannon - Original Message - From: Nusairat, Joseph F. To: Orion-Interest Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:35 PM Subject: Ant to compile and deploy one file Hey if i have one file to update is there an easier way to compile it and re jar it??? I am using ant ... and if i have one i can only seem to recompile them alll which takes some time. Joseph Faisal Nusairat, Sr. Project Manager WorldCom tel: 614-723-4232 pager: 888-452-0399 textmsg: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I think, I will start a support site too....
I like the link..Joe has a good point..the community should help. Funny thing is, I tried helping, a few times. I sent some emails to either you, or maybe it was Joe? I can't remember. I was going to demonstrate my Theseus MVC framework, which is built for speed and scalability including clustering support (by calling the setAttribute() method after every request on every bean an action uses to ensure it gets replicated incase any changes were made to it). I wanted to see if Orion would distirbute Theseus (and my examples of how to use it in general, and with Orion). I got no response. My company wanted to distribute an EJB server to a possible 10,000 or more clients. Orion was our choice until I got no response... JBoss has since assumed that responsibility and thus far has returned better performance and you can't beat it on the cost, not to mention the support for it is far better than I have seen from Orion. As a paying customer, I have asked Karl and/or Magnus directly (to them via email) about some detailed info on Orion that I needed to know so that I could properly load-test the site and monitor its scalability capabilities... all to no avail. I have been actively involved with Orion since the .7+ version of it, as I am sure you and a few others that know me are. If you want proof, you can feel free to call any of the developers I work with. They are so sick of hearing me talk about how great Orion is, and what new neat feature I can do with it now that we are deployed on Orion. Hell, even my wife knows more about Orion that most people. Every now and again, the Orion team disappears, not to be heard from. What this list needs to see is some responses from the team directly every week or two, that the product is going to continue or at least some status update of what to look forward to and for God's sake..in what time frame! When is EJB 2.0 going to be fully impelemnted? How about JSP 1.2? Servlet 2.3? I know there are some parts supported, and the final specs are not done yet, but there are many app servers now support the latest EJB 2.0, Servlet 2.3 and JSP 1.2, and Orion, the one app server that used to be dependable to be ahead of the game, is now behind. What is worse, noone has any clue as to when we will see the next build, what it will contain, when all these features that the rest of the pack now has implemented (or is close to it) will make its way into a new build. I haven't seen an update for two months, and there are still some users with production systems having problems because of bugs with Orion that are not getting fixed. HTTPS Clustering doesn't work and thats a big deal for a lot of big companies that would want a scalable app server that is secure. Needless to say, Orion is still a great product, and I have often thought they should charge more for it. But upon not receiving any sort of support from them despite that they say when you pay for it you get 1 year of support (or is it 6 months?), I don't feel that I can recommend Orion over other products that are comparable in price (or free) that offer better support and more features. JBoss is a great example of a damn good piece of software put together in an open-source effort and is free. Again, as soon as I get the rest of our site on EJB, and IF Orion and Jboss both support the same .ear file with no problems, I will definitely do some load testing and post the results so others can see. Oh well, Orion is simple to use, built by two developers which to me is damn impressive when you compare it to the other servers on the market. But still..if your going to have a product and make money from it, you should support it, at least via the very cheap email system. -Original Message- From: Michael J. Cannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:50 AM To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: I think, I will start a support site too answers inline - Original Message - From: Bill Clinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:08 AM Subject: Re: I think, I will start a support site too Um.. are you serious with this example? I am sure I can find an example of a website running on IIS where some pre-teenage girl posts pictures of her pet cat - that doesn't mean I can use it for a high-availablilty load-balanced application. I was just responding to Mr. Paransky, that, despite all of his complaints about using Orion as a basis for communications, he was doing EXACTLY that. I reread your post searching for where I missed the joke, Look at the sender of the original message I was replying to, then look at who owns the web page. but I think you are serious. So, I will agree with you: the quality of the orion mailing list is appropriate for a product meant to host collections of personal under construction pages. Actually, as I said, I think that it is a valuable
Re: I think, I will start a support site too....
Also this http://groups.yahoo.com/group/orionsupport this http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EJB-Developer this http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ejb-future this http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JavaSourcer Actually, It would make more sense as a Yahoo Club, since that would give you video and voice conferencing and test chat w/ whiteboards (as well as more file space). Michael J. Cannon PM/COO - hsqldb.org, Inc. - Original Message - From: Mike Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:43 PM Subject: Re: I think, I will start a support site too Good idea to host it on yahoo. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/orionserver - Original Message - From: Bill Clinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:06 AM Subject: Re: I think, I will start a support site too Another good point on this lousy list. I am unable to comprehend how a mailing list like this could be so bad. Could whoever is responsible for this list please answer one of these threads and explain yourself? This list could be hosted on a free listserver like Yahoo lists with much better results. Is there anyone out there on the list that would be able to host it? We could then just start our own list with a competent administrator and let this one die. I would like to hear more opinions on this so when you get this message in 4 or 5 hours or so, please reply. I am looking forward to your responses, which I should get sometime tomorrow around 12:00 est. Bill Alex Paransky wrote: (in style of Andy Rooney) I see everyone is starting their support sites for Orion. I think it's a poor solution for something that's broken, mainly, this mailing list. How many support sites do we actually have now? Why is it such a problem to keep the mailing list up and running? Now, we need to post the message to at least 3 places to make sure it gets maximum exposure. I think I will start a support site, that posts to all other support sites, just so that people don't have to search various support sites for help. I don't mind so many support sites starting up, I just think they are starting up for poor reasons and fragmenting what little knowledge we already have about this product. What is the problem with the list? Why is it down half the time? I hope it's not running under Orion... -AP_ _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Mercury Interactive to support Oracle 9iASQ
QUOTE Mercury Interactive said new custom Oracle9iAS performance monitors in LoadRunner and Topaz, including a Web server monitor, Enterprise Java Bean monitor and cache server monitor, will allow users to quickly isolate and resolve performance problems before going live, as well as in production. The monitors will be available in September. ENDQUOTE Entire story link at: http://www.internetnews.com/asp-news/article/0,,3411_871721,00.html So, yet another site for support. Having been peripherally involved when MERQ got involved in a software project, here is a place (other than the beach) where we might find IronFlare devoting their time. Also, MERQ engineers are excellent at metrics and tracking down issues with code, so combined with Oracle and IronFlare/OrionServer, there may be some good things coming down the pike. Michael J. Cannon PM/COO -hsqldb.org, Inc.
RE: Ant to compile and deploy one file
Another possibility might be file location. If the .java file containing class Z in package x.y is located in com/x/Z.java, it will always be recompiled. If it is located in com/x/y/Z.java, it will only be re-compiled when there are changes. Gary Nusairat, Joseph F. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: yeah i guess it might be ... it stilll seems to take a while though even when i have just one file though It does take longer when everything needs compiled Joseph Faisal Nusairat, Sr. Project Manager WorldCom tel: 614-723-4232 pager: 888-452-0399 textmsg: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Juan Lorandi (Chile) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:21 PM To: Orion-Interest Subject: RE: Ant to compile and deploy one file I have ant and it recompiles only modified .java files (only one). Are you using the latest ant(I think it's 1.3)?. -Original Message- From: Nusairat, Joseph F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Jueves, 23 de Agosto de 2001 13:35 To: Orion-Interest Subject: Ant to compile and deploy one file Hey if i have one file to update is there an easier way to compile it and re jar it??? I am using ant ... and if i have one i can only seem to recompile them alll which takes some time. Joseph Faisal Nusairat, Sr. Project Manager WorldCom tel: 614-723-4232 pager: 888-452-0399 textmsg: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ant to compile and deploy one file
Title: Ant to compile and deploy one file Its all depends how are you writing the build script. If you are touching all source files before compilation then ant will compile all the source files. I have seen couple of people deleting the source files after compilation and copying the sources again next time. In such cases the whole compilation happens. Check the build scripts properly. I am using ant from 1.2 onwards I have not a single problem with that. It always compiles what ever file modified I even gets files from source safe. All operations are checked on the time stamps works perfectly well. Kesav Kumar Kolla Voquette Inc 650 356 3740(W) 510 889 6840(R) VoquetteDelivering Sound Information -Original Message-From: Kevin Duffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:43 AMTo: Orion-InterestSubject: RE: Ant to compile and deploy one file worked with the 1.2 that I used as well. I recall having this problem too. I forget the reason. I tried using the tstmp/ as well and that didn't work. What should happen is the compiling should only compile classes that have changed. Check out your source file-date times and see if they are out of the ordinary. Also, you may want to post this to the ANT list..they can probably help you better. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Juan Lorandi (Chile)Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:21 PMTo: Orion-InterestSubject: RE: Ant to compile and deploy one file I have ant and it recompiles only modified .java files (only one). Are you using the latest ant(I think it's 1.3)?. -Original Message-From: Nusairat, Joseph F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Jueves, 23 de Agosto de 2001 13:35To: Orion-InterestSubject: Ant to compile and deploy one file Hey if i have one file to update is there an easier way to compile it and re jar it??? I am using ant ... and if i have one i can only seem to recompile them alll which takes some time. Joseph Faisal Nusairat, Sr. Project Manager WorldCom tel: 614-723-4232 pager: 888-452-0399 textmsg: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ant to compile and deploy one file
Check your clean target(s) in the build.xml file. I believe if you delete your build directory/files it will assume that all the files need to be recompiled. -Original Message- From: Juan Lorandi (Chile) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:21 PM To: Orion-Interest Subject: RE: Ant to compile and deploy one file I have ant and it recompiles only modified .java files (only one). Are you using the latest ant(I think it's 1.3)?. -Original Message- From: Nusairat, Joseph F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Jueves, 23 de Agosto de 2001 13:35 To: Orion-Interest Subject: Ant to compile and deploy one file Hey if i have one file to update is there an easier way to compile it and re jar it??? I am using ant ... and if i have one i can only seem to recompile them alll which takes some time. Joseph Faisal Nusairat, Sr. Project Manager WorldCom tel: 614-723-4232 pager: 888-452-0399 textmsg: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ant to compile and deploy one file
Hi Joseph, This is really a question for the ant-user group, but ant should not recompile all files everytime. This usually happens when your source directory structure does not match your package name structure. For example if in your source directory you have: com/mycompany/test/mytest.java and your packagename is actually: com.mycompany.newtest ant will recompile everytime. Bill Nusairat, Joseph F. wrote: Hey if i have one file to update is there an easier way to compile it and re jar it??? I am using ant ... and if i have one i can only seem to recompile them alll which takes some time. Joseph Faisal Nusairat, Sr. Project Manager WorldCom tel: 614-723-4232 pager: 888-452-0399 textmsg: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Yahoo orion list is up..
I must have missed it. What are the new list details? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Russell White Sent: Friday, 24 August 2001 6:45 AM To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: Yahoo orion list is up.. 6 members so far. Keep em coming --- Duffey, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Damn..I got a response in under 3 minutes! Haven't seen that on the orion list for many months. __ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
Re: Yahoo orion list is up..
For some reason I can't send any mail to the orion yahoo list - they come back undeliverable :( Martin J. Wells wrote: I must have missed it. What are the new list details? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Russell White Sent: Friday, 24 August 2001 6:45 AM To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: Yahoo orion list is up.. 6 members so far. Keep em coming --- Duffey, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Damn..I got a response in under 3 minutes! Haven't seen that on the orion list for many months. __ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ -- +---+ | Holden GlovaAlchemy Group Limited | | Software Engineer P: +64 3 962-0396 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] F: +64 3 962-0388 | | http://www.alchemy.co.nz | +---+
