Re: OT:Linux
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote: This weekend I installed Ubuntu on my scanning PC - tonight I finally fired up the scanner running the linux version of VueScan and it is churning away, batch scanning 12 35mm exposures. Great! Huray! Welcome to the Linux world! However I would love to hear your feedback on your experience with Linux for photography, thus keep us (or at least me :) ) posted on this topic. After installing Unbuntu I learned that there are several other linux builds out there. Is there one better suited for photo processing? To directly answer your question of which Linux distribution is better suited for photo processing, I don't think there is such a distribution out there, although I guess Ubuntu fits the bill. A distribution mainly boils down to the following: * the selection of packages --- how many are available, and how old are the versions; (in essence they all run the same software;) * the choice of desktop environment --- KDE vs. Gnome mainly; (in essence you can choose one or another on any distribution;) * the choice of management tools (saving you the trouble of getting your hands dirty in the configuration files) --- my guess is that Ubuntu / OpenSUSE win here; * the size of the community, which is proportional to the amount of available documentation and support; * the bling, i.e., default colors, fonts, logos, backgrounds, etc.; Out of all the Linux distributions, the most popular and stress free for the end-user would be the following (or at least to my opinion): * Ubuntu; (use the LTS edition 14.04 when it appears, if you don't intend to upgrade / reinstall it every two years or so;) out of all I think it offers the most stream-line experience for non-technical people, it features quite a lot of software, although not at the latest version; (however there is the thing called PPA repositories which tends to solve this issue;) * Debian (which Ubuntu is based on); however although it has in its repositories almost all the software you can get running on Linux, the versions tend to be quite old especially in the stable version; (I would recommend this for more experienced people with Linux;) * OpenSUSE (use the latest 13.x variant), which could be as streamline in experience as Ubuntu for the end-user, although I have the feeling they have less software ready available than Ubuntu; * ArchLinux (the one I use), which has the advantage of having always the bleeding-edge software versions, although probably in lesser numbers than Ubuntu; (and I guess you'll have more hassle in installing and managing it than the others, thus I'll recommend it to more experienced users;) * of course there is http://distrowatch.com/ which provides a lot of information (statistics, overviews, etc.) of various Linux and BSD distributions; (Please note that when I say software available I actually mean precompiled ready to be installed software from their repositories, because you can certainly compile software yourself even if it's not in their repositories, but this can be a daunting task sometimes.) Are there any good LInux Photo Editors out there? I am scanning BW and need something that support 16 bit gray scale, which I think excludes Gimp. To my knowledge there is no stable (and open-source) 16 bit image editor for Linux. There is however CinePaint which is a GIMP fork (?) to support 16 bit image manipulation: http://www.cinepaint.org/ , however I haven't used it thus I can't say much about it. For RAW processing --- which you could try to use with your 16 bit TIFF --- I can recommend RawTherapee (the one I use, although there are others like Darktable), and there was discussion about this in July 2013 with the subject: `Linux RAW editor/manager? (was Re: OT - Lightzone Open Source Photo Editor (Windows, Linux))`. The following is my reply regarding Darktable and RawTherapee: http://pdml.net/pipermail/pdml_pdml.net/2013-July/351722.html Related to this topic, I've made a list of software related to photography (which run on Linux, that I have used, and that I can recommend): http://wiki.volution.ro/CiprianDorinCraciun/Notes/Public/Photography/Software Looking at ArchLinux's wiki it seems they have an even more comprehensive list: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/List_of_applications/Multimedia#Image Can anyone recommend a primer on Linux? I think the best place to start is the distribution's tutorial / documentation / wiki, and any of the previously mentioned distributions have good documentation (or wiki). Unfortunately in the Linux world things move very fast, especially when it comes to desktop environments and tools, thus books tend to stay behind. Good luck, Ciprian. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Re: K-3 and CS3 fail
Change the file extension to DNG? (someone just HAD to say that!) Chris On 27 March 2014 04:49, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote: A friend tells me the DGN's from his new K-3 can't be processed in CS3. Any suggestions??? Regards, Bob S. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT:Linux
On Mar 26, 2014, at 6:03 PM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote: This weekend I installed Ubuntu on my scanning PC - tonight I finally fired up the scanner running the linux version of VueScan and it is churning away, batch scanning 12 35mm exposures. Great! So far this meets all my main goals - - Dual Boot with WinXp so I can run old NikonScan and Canon Filmget programs. - Supports Vuescan (which I use for most scanning these days) - Access USB drives 2TB (something my WInXP install could not do and needed to access my photo library) - Platform for a backup PC to my my box (which XP could not do since it could not access my photo libraries) I am still having problems getting the screen resolution set properly (seems to be an issue in Ubuntu)... Before I get too deep into this - Ciprian gave a thorough reply, but throwing in my two cents.. After installing Unbuntu I learned that there are several other linux builds out there. Is there one better suited for photo processing? There are two main families of distributions out there, based on how software packages are installed: Debian (apt) and RedHat (RPM). I have a slight preference for the debian families. in theory, running ubuntu, you should be able to install any software packaged using .deb/apt packaging. Are there any good LInux Photo Editors out there? I am scanning BW and need something that support 16 bit gray scale, which I think excludes Gimp. You may want to check out bibble, though I see that they are now part of corel: http://www.bibblelabs.com/ Six years ago the other big stumbling block was monitor calibration, though it seems to be much better now. I’m afraid that when the dust settles, it’s very hard to beat lightroom. Can anyone recommend a primer on Linux? I able to get around DOS pretty well and the command line interface is similar, but when I try to do things like install software I am more or less aping what I read with no real comprehension (well, what else in new….) Try to find a local Linux users group. They can be very helpful. I think I may have just tossed out the first several years of the Linux Journal, but their online presence may be very helpful. Two commands that you want to learn are “man” and “apropos”. man commandname will give you the manual page for the command “commandname”. So, a good place to start is man man you will also want to try man apt-get apropos searchterm will list all commands that have “searchterm” in their summary. So, try typing apropos apt What it really does is a command called “grep”, which is a little arcane and amazingly powerful. It prints out any lines that match the search string you type in. Actually the “regular expression”. There were some incredibly helpful tutorials on unix etc dating back to the 70’s. The best suggestion I can make is if you can find someone locally to just give you a hands on guided tour. For what it’s worth, just about anything that you learn for the command prompt (bash) on Linux, also works on the Mac command prompt. For what it’s worth, I think I just recently hit my 20 year mark of running Linux. Cheers - Mark -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Because inquiring minds want to know (more on the 1.4x)
A good lens to test with this TC if someone has it would be the 50-200 since it is on the slow side. At 200mm, it would be a bit over f6.3 combined? It also is a lens that tends to hunt and struggles sometimes to find the correct end to focus on. I imagine it would be really slow. The optical performance would be curious though as the 50-200 is pretty sharp. On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Stanley Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote: My slowest are the 4-5.6 zoom and the 5-6.3 zoom that I tried earlier. Anything I've thought of to simulate a slower smaller widest aperture would only affect the taking aperture, not the focusing aperture. Except filters. I'll play with a polarizer a bit tomorrow, that will give some (unknown degree of) reduction in light available. I don't have any ND filters. Ken, I think you may need to bring your 600 by and try out the 1.4x yourself. stan On Mar 26, 2014, at 9:50 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: Your right of course. I don't own a slower autofocus lens. Paul via phone On Mar 26, 2014, at 9:22 PM, P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote: Since the lens was wide open it wasn't really focusing at f22, it was focusing at ~f5.6. Now the relatively slow Pentax FA 28-105 with an effective aperture wide open of 8.0 with a 1.4x TC is getting to be a test. There ate two things that effect auto focus, absolute aperture, and absolute light level. I expect that in bright light that even f8 lenses of a long enough focal length will have no great issue auto focusing. On 3/26/2014 8:09 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: I shot a frame at f22 last week with the 1.4x and 60-250. It focused quickly. Paul via phone On Mar 26, 2014, at 7:01 PM, Stanley Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote: I'll further explore that question tomorrow. stan On Mar 26, 2014, at 2:59 PM, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote: I'm more interested in the smaller aperatures at which it fails to focus. It would be nice to be able to use it on my 600. I have both the A-1.4X-L A2.0X-L but of course I lose AF with those. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Because inquiring minds want to know (more on the 1.4x) Thanks for the report Stan, it does look useful, but I will have to sell a K5 body to afford it :( On 21 March 2014 02:38, Stanley Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote: I just did a couple of focus tests with my two slowest lenses. I won't post any results - I was just handholding on random twigs, turkeys, lawn sculptures, trees, etc. The images would tell you nothing about sharpness. All of the following using center-point focus, K-3. 1. Sigma DG 150-500mm f5-6.3 APO HSM + Pentax 1.4x TC With the Sigma at 150mm zoom (presumably f/5.0) - Sigma AF OFF: nothing happens - no AF. - Sigma AF ON: snappy AF, no searching or other bad behaviors With the Sigma at 500mm zoom (presumably f/6.3) - Sigma AF ON: Quite a bit of searching on low contrast targets (e.g., tree trunks.) Fairly quick snap to focus on a weed seed head 20 feet away against a backdrop of the river ice 150 feet aw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT:Linux
Mark, Also I have recently installed just for fun Ubuntu 12.04 on my old PC, replacing Vista which had crashed completely, as well as Win XP which is no longer secure. I had to change the graphic driver from generic to NVDI, so this route may also be a solution for you to get the right screen resolution. I have no experience yet with photo editing as I run Win 8.1/LR on my new desktop to which my scanner is attached. But I like Ubuntu with addition of the ClassicMenu Indicator giving pulldown menus and am looking forward to v. 14.04 to be released in April.There is a manual online at https://ubuntu-manual.org. I have tried Linux Mint 16 but had trouble with the menus. The light weight Lubuntu now gives a great boost to my old laptop which was very slow with XP. Ubuntu and Linux Mint 16 appear to be the most used distros. Henk Mark C schreef op 27-3-2014 02:03: This weekend I installed Ubuntu on my scanning PC - tonight I finally fired up the scanner running the linux version of VueScan and it is churning away, batch scanning 12 35mm exposures. Great! So far this meets all my main goals - - Dual Boot with WinXp so I can run old NikonScan and Canon Filmget programs. - Supports Vuescan (which I use for most scanning these days) - Access USB drives 2TB (something my WInXP install could not do and needed to access my photo library) - Platform for a backup PC to my my box (which XP could not do since it could not access my photo libraries) I am still having problems getting the screen resolution set properly (seems to be an issue in Ubuntu)... Before I get too deep into this - After installing Unbuntu I learned that there are several other linux builds out there. Is there one better suited for photo processing? Are there any good LInux Photo Editors out there? I am scanning BW and need something that support 16 bit gray scale, which I think excludes Gimp. Can anyone recommend a primer on Linux? I able to get around DOS pretty well and the command line interface is similar, but when I try to do things like install software I am more or less aping what I read with no real comprehension (well, what else in new) Cheers - Mark -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT:Linux
On 3/27/2014 12:05 AM, David Mann wrote: On Mar 27, 2014, at 2:03 pm, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote: This weekend I installed Ubuntu on my scanning PC - tonight I finally fired up the scanner running the linux version of VueScan and it is churning away, batch scanning 12 35mm exposures. Great! So far this meets all my main goals - - Dual Boot with WinXp so I can run old NikonScan and Canon Filmget programs. Any reason you're not using Virtualbox? That'll save you having to dual boot. I don't know what hardware interface you're using for the scanners but it's possible to capture USB devices. Firewire isn't supported. Don't know about SCSI. I'm not much help with your questions, I only use Linux for server-side stuff :) Cheers, Dave Thanks, Dave - I actually didn't know about Virtual box so that's one reason... But on the hardware side the Nikon scanner is Firewire and backup Canoscan is either USB 1.1 or SCSI (when I used it I used SCSI). So the hardware issues moved me to put the scanner on a separate machine. I have not yet tested the SCSI card in Ubuntu. Mark -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT:Linux
Thanks - I will check out Darktable. I will be doing serious editing on another computer with Photoshop, but like to be able to check scans and see if I need to tweak settings etc. So I really just need something that is functional. I just kept a copy of PS CS3 on the XP box. I scan at 16 bits (especially for BW) and that is the major stumbling block. Mark On 3/27/2014 1:34 AM, Brian Walters wrote: It's been a few years since I dabbled with Linux, although I still have Ubuntu 804 and Kubuntu 1110 available in VirtualBox. I understand that Darktable has become an effective Photo editor with RAW support. No first hand experience, though - but probably worth checking out. http://www.darktable.org/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT:Linux
On 3/27/2014 2:48 AM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote: This weekend I installed Ubuntu on my scanning PC - tonight I finally fired up the scanner running the linux version of VueScan and it is churning away, batch scanning 12 35mm exposures. Great! Huray! Welcome to the Linux world! However I would love to hear your feedback on your experience with Linux for photography, thus keep us (or at least me :) ) posted on this topic. Thanks - it was really quite a simple install, easier than when I last installed XP. The PC is ~10 years old and I expected to have to hunt for drivers, but aside from the the screen resolution issue it went perfectly. After installing Unbuntu I learned that there are several other linux builds out there. Is there one better suited for photo processing? To directly answer your question of which Linux distribution is better suited for photo processing, I don't think there is such a distribution out there, although I guess Ubuntu fits the bill. ... I will probably stick with this one... I noticed that there were versions Ubuntu and Kubuntu (?) that were tweak very specifically - e.g. a Bioscience version, a multimedia version (video editing, I think) etc... I was hoping there might be a photographers version! Are there any good LInux Photo Editors out there? I am scanning BW and need something that support 16 bit gray scale, which I think excludes Gimp. To my knowledge there is no stable (and open-source) 16 bit image editor for Linux. There is however CinePaint which is a GIMP fork (?) to support 16 bit image manipulation: http://www.cinepaint.org/ , however I haven't used it thus I can't say much about it. For RAW processing --- which you could try to use with your 16 bit TIFF --- I can recommend RawTherapee (the one I use, although there are others like Darktable), and there was discussion about this in July 2013 with the subject: `Linux RAW editor/manager? (was Re: OT - Lightzone Open Source Photo Editor (Windows, Linux))`. The following is my reply regarding Darktable and RawTherapee: http://pdml.net/pipermail/pdml_pdml.net/2013-July/351722.html Related to this topic, I've made a list of software related to photography (which run on Linux, that I have used, and that I can recommend): http://wiki.volution.ro/CiprianDorinCraciun/Notes/Public/Photography/Software Looking at ArchLinux's wiki it seems they have an even more comprehensive list: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/List_of_applications/Multimedia#Image Thanks! Lots of good option to try there! I will dig up the old thread in the archives Can anyone recommend a primer on Linux? I think the best place to start is the distribution's tutorial / documentation / wiki, and any of the previously mentioned distributions have good documentation (or wiki). Unfortunately in the Linux world things move very fast, especially when it comes to desktop environments and tools, thus books tend to stay behind. I've been trying to wrap my head around the basic design of Linux - thinks like sudo and chmod were totally alien to me. Ditto with the different command prompts based on the status of user permissions. Makes sense one you unravel it but it is not intuitive, to me at least. Starting to get an understanding of it The only program I actually installed myself - VueScan - is sitting in the downloads folder. So even things like figuring out where to install programs is a mystery (I assume they should go somewhere in the usr folder...) But part of my motivation for using this was to learn it in hopes of someday unshackling from Windows completely. Thanks again Mark -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT:Linux
On 3/27/2014 5:33 AM, Larry Colen wrote: Are there any good LInux Photo Editors out there? I am scanning BW and need something that support 16 bit gray scale, which I think excludes Gimp. You may want to check out bibble, though I see that they are now part of corel: http://www.bibblelabs.com/ Six years ago the other big stumbling block was monitor calibration, though it seems to be much better now. I’m afraid that when the dust settles, it’s very hard to beat lightroom. Thanks, Larry - another one I will be sure to check out. Can anyone recommend a primer on Linux? I able to get around DOS pretty well and the command line interface is similar, but when I try to do things like install software I am more or less aping what I read with no real comprehension (well, what else in new….) Try to find a local Linux users group. They can be very helpful. I think I may have just tossed out the first several years of the Linux Journal, but their online presence may be very helpful. Two commands that you want to learn are “man” and “apropos”. man commandname will give you the manual page for the command “commandname”. So, a good place to start is man man you will also want to try man apt-get apropos searchterm will list all commands that have “searchterm” in their summary. So, try typing apropos apt Thanks - those will surely be helpful. The command line structure can be a little cryptic, to say the least... What it really does is a command called “grep”, which is a little arcane and amazingly powerful. It prints out any lines that match the search string you type in. Actually the “regular expression”. There were some incredibly helpful tutorials on unix etc dating back to the 70’s. The best suggestion I can make is if you can find someone locally to just give you a hands on guided tour. For what it’s worth, just about anything that you learn for the command prompt (bash) on Linux, also works on the Mac command prompt. For what it’s worth, I think I just recently hit my 20 year mark of running Linux. I have read about grep and will have to give it a try. Good suggestion about looking for a hands on guide - there might even be a class around here I could take (actually hadn't thought about that...) Thanks again - Mark -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Recommendations for a Third party K-5 battery
El 27/03/2014 2:33, P.J. Alling escribió: I though the K20D battery took a long time to fully charge. Started to do some research and then decided ask the people who know. I have a Meike battery grip for my K-7 (it is the same model for the K-5, as they share the same camera body). It works well and it is well built (for a knockoff). The only disadvantage is that it is not weather sealed as the original Pentax. It also comes with an adpater for 6 AA batteries, besides of the adapter for DL-90 lithium battery. It was quite cheap, about 35 euros. Carlos -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-3 and CS3 fail
On 26/03/2014 10:49 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: A friend tells me the DGN's from his new K-3 can't be processed in CS3. Any suggestions??? Regards, Bob S. Tell him to set the camera for DNG rather than PEF. His K3 DNGs have to work in CS3. I was able to process K3 DNGs in CS (though it took a while, slow computer, big files). bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-3 and CS3 fail
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote: On 26/03/2014 10:49 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: A friend tells me the DGN's from his new K-3 can't be processed in CS3. Any suggestions??? Regards, Bob S. Tell him to set the camera for DNG rather than PEF. His K3 DNGs have to work in CS3. I was able to process K3 DNGs in CS (though it took a while, slow computer, big files). My version of PSCS reads the K-5 DNG's fine Dave bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Recommendations for a Third party K-5 battery
I don't think that saving few pennies on the battery and then accidentally having to deal with the issues that may arise is worth it. I had some 3rd party batteries for my K10D, one was really weak, another was satisfactory. But since I upgraded to K-7 I resolved to use OEM batteries only. No regrets here. The same by the way applies to the battery grip. The 3rd party grip turned out to be not very well made as far as electronics went. So again I have OEM grip and it is performing flawlessly... On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:33 AM, P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote: I though the K20D battery took a long time to fully charge. Started to do some research and then decided ask the people who know. -- A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy, crazier. - H.L.Mencken -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
The use of Canned gas for cleaning sensors
One of the things that will turn grown men into mewling kittens is any mention of using canned gas as a dust removing method for cameras. Don't do it, they say, it is instant death for your camera. Sometimes so stridently that one would think they were having kittens. But really, how unsafe is it? What is the very worst case scenario? How about a blast of liquid straight from the can? I invite you to watch a short 1 minute (very amateur) video. The white blast at the 15 second mark is a blast from an upside down canned gas container being unloaded into the mirror box of a Pentax *istD camera. The camera suffered absolutely no ill effects from this abuse. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fI3rk1sAPxc as always, have fun. bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Tried IR but want something different?
Fascinating images, Dave, especially that motorcycle and the high-heeled foot. Thanks for sharing! On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:03 PM, David Mann dmann...@gmail.com wrote: Doctors might say meh but it looks quite interesting to me. http://proof.nationalgeographic.com/2014/01/21/hugh-turvey-inside-the-life-of-an-x-ray-artist/ Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Recommendations for a Third party K-5 battery
On 27/03/2014 7:58 AM, Boris Liberman wrote: I don't think that saving few pennies on the battery and then accidentally having to deal with the issues that may arise is worth it. I had some 3rd party batteries for my K10D, one was really weak, another was satisfactory. But since I upgraded to K-7 I resolved to use OEM batteries only. No regrets here. The same by the way applies to the battery grip. The 3rd party grip turned out to be not very well made as far as electronics went. So again I have OEM grip and it is performing flawlessly... I felt the same way, but last year I wanted to have a few extra batteries for an extended trip where I wouldn't have reliable access to electricity. The Fuji especially is a battery hog, getting at best a few hundred shots on a battery, so I bit the bullet and bought a couple of aftermarket batteries for the Pentax and 3 for the Fuji. My net outlay was about 1/3 of the cost of OEM batteries, and the dealer is in Canada so if there are problems I can resolve them without having the hassle of dealing with a foreign company. The end result is that I have 5 extra batteries for my cameras that are indistiguishable in performance from their OEM cousins. The Fuji batteries are listed as a couple of hundred milli amps lower capacity, but I haven't noticed a performance difference. The new Fuji is a battery hog, I will probably buy a few more batteries for it. At best, I get a couple of hundred shots on a battery with it. bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Recommendations for a Third party K-5 battery
El 27/03/2014 2:33, P.J. Alling escribió: I though the K20D battery took a long time to fully charge. Started to do some research and then decided ask the people who know. I'm sorry but the answer I gave in my previous message was all wrong, I understood you wanted to know about third party battery grips, nor 3rd party batteries. I have to learn to read again. Besides the original battery DL-90 which came with the K-7, I bought an Energizer branded compatible battery. It works as well as the original, so I can recommend it. Carlos -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: The use of Canned gas for cleaning sensors
On 27/03/2014 8:22 AM, David J Brooks wrote: There may be no dut but you seemed top have sprayed a large fox figure onto the sensor. It happened to be close at hand. bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Recommendations for a Third party K-5 battery
Bill, it only proves that with 3rd party batteries it is a bit of a gamble... Some say that their 3rd party batteries are good. Some say the opposite. I am yet to see a person report that they bought an OEM battery that did not perform properly... On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote: On 27/03/2014 7:58 AM, Boris Liberman wrote: I don't think that saving few pennies on the battery and then accidentally having to deal with the issues that may arise is worth it. I had some 3rd party batteries for my K10D, one was really weak, another was satisfactory. But since I upgraded to K-7 I resolved to use OEM batteries only. No regrets here. The same by the way applies to the battery grip. The 3rd party grip turned out to be not very well made as far as electronics went. So again I have OEM grip and it is performing flawlessly... I felt the same way, but last year I wanted to have a few extra batteries for an extended trip where I wouldn't have reliable access to electricity. The Fuji especially is a battery hog, getting at best a few hundred shots on a battery, so I bit the bullet and bought a couple of aftermarket batteries for the Pentax and 3 for the Fuji. My net outlay was about 1/3 of the cost of OEM batteries, and the dealer is in Canada so if there are problems I can resolve them without having the hassle of dealing with a foreign company. The end result is that I have 5 extra batteries for my cameras that are indistiguishable in performance from their OEM cousins. The Fuji batteries are listed as a couple of hundred milli amps lower capacity, but I haven't noticed a performance difference. The new Fuji is a battery hog, I will probably buy a few more batteries for it. At best, I get a couple of hundred shots on a battery with it. bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: The use of Canned gas for cleaning sensors
The frozen gas hitting your focusing screen will spiderweb it. Hitting your mirror can remove the silver, On a sensor it probably won't do the glass cover plate a lot of good either. That said, I've never had a problem using a name brand, that produces a relatively soft stream of gas. I prefer 3m because Sam's Club sells three packs for a considerable savings over what you'd pay for a similar product in most other stores. I've never had one of their cans expel the frozen gas if handled as directed. In fact it takes quite a bit of mishandling to get that to happen. I've also used Falcon Dust Off, which was quite expensive, but the only game in town really for a long time. Never had a problem with them either. When I was using it to blow dust off negatives I had a few bargain brands spit frozen gas onto the negative. On 3/27/2014 10:02 AM, Bill wrote: One of the things that will turn grown men into mewling kittens is any mention of using canned gas as a dust removing method for cameras. Don't do it, they say, it is instant death for your camera. Sometimes so stridently that one would think they were having kittens. But really, how unsafe is it? What is the very worst case scenario? How about a blast of liquid straight from the can? I invite you to watch a short 1 minute (very amateur) video. The white blast at the 15 second mark is a blast from an upside down canned gas container being unloaded into the mirror box of a Pentax *istD camera. The camera suffered absolutely no ill effects from this abuse. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fI3rk1sAPxc as always, have fun. bill -- A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy, crazier. - H.L.Mencken -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: The use of Canned gas for cleaning sensors
There may be no dut but you seemed top have sprayed a large fox figure onto the sensor. Dave On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote: One of the things that will turn grown men into mewling kittens is any mention of using canned gas as a dust removing method for cameras. Don't do it, they say, it is instant death for your camera. Sometimes so stridently that one would think they were having kittens. But really, how unsafe is it? What is the very worst case scenario? How about a blast of liquid straight from the can? I invite you to watch a short 1 minute (very amateur) video. The white blast at the 15 second mark is a blast from an upside down canned gas container being unloaded into the mirror box of a Pentax *istD camera. The camera suffered absolutely no ill effects from this abuse. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fI3rk1sAPxc as always, have fun. bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Recommendations for a Third party K-5 battery
The Sony A7 is another power hog. I bought a Wasabi set including two batteries and a charger. Cost was $30; they seem to work as well as the OEM batteries so far. Godfrey Quoting P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com: I though the K20D battery took a long time to fully charge. Started to do some research and then decided ask the people who know. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: The use of Canned gas for cleaning sensors
On 27/03/2014 8:36 AM, P.J. Alling wrote: The frozen gas hitting your focusing screen will spiderweb it. Hitting your mirror can remove the silver, On a sensor it probably won't do the glass cover plate a lot of good either. Except that there were no harmful results from the frozen spray hitting the insides of the camera. This was the point, debunking exactly what you are saying as being untrue. bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Recommendations for a Third party K-5 battery
Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote: The Sony A7 is another power hog. I bought a Wasabi set I would imagine that's the hot setup... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Recommendations for a Third party K-5 battery
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote: Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote: The Sony A7 is another power hog. I bought a Wasabi set I would imagine that's the hot setup... Another pun thread is going to get a chili reception. But my own kit bag is peppered with spare non-OEM batteries. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: The use of Canned gas for cleaning sensors
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote: On 27/03/2014 8:36 AM, P.J. Alling wrote: The frozen gas hitting your focusing screen will spiderweb it. Hitting your mirror can remove the silver, On a sensor it probably won't do the glass cover plate a lot of good either. Except that there were no harmful results from the frozen spray hitting the insides of the camera. This was the point, debunking exactly what you are saying as being untrue. bill And dont forget it was Bil that debunked the 6x7 mirror shake theory. Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: The use of Canned gas for cleaning sensors
That's true, it didn't happen this time, but I've seen focusing screens ruined by frozen gas. Hell it might not happen in 10 times or 20 times. It just has to happen once to ruin your whole day. I think that the demonstration was proof that Pentax made a very robust product in the *ist-D. I know I certainly put mine through hell. On 3/27/2014 10:45 AM, Bill wrote: On 27/03/2014 8:36 AM, P.J. Alling wrote: The frozen gas hitting your focusing screen will spiderweb it. Hitting your mirror can remove the silver, On a sensor it probably won't do the glass cover plate a lot of good either. Except that there were no harmful results from the frozen spray hitting the insides of the camera. This was the point, debunking exactly what you are saying as being untrue. bill -- A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy, crazier. - H.L.Mencken -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Recommendations for a Third party K-5 battery
That is kind of why I asked advice. I bought a Flashpoint battery with better specifications that the OEM battery for the K20D. It's reliable, charges quickly, and in keeping with that seems to hold about 1/2 the power of the OEM battery. It's good in a pinch, but... I'm looking for a sense of the list, if a particular brand gets decent reviews. I'll look into buying it. On 3/27/2014 10:35 AM, Boris Liberman wrote: Bill, it only proves that with 3rd party batteries it is a bit of a gamble... Some say that their 3rd party batteries are good. Some say the opposite. I am yet to see a person report that they bought an OEM battery that did not perform properly... On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote: On 27/03/2014 7:58 AM, Boris Liberman wrote: I don't think that saving few pennies on the battery and then accidentally having to deal with the issues that may arise is worth it. I had some 3rd party batteries for my K10D, one was really weak, another was satisfactory. But since I upgraded to K-7 I resolved to use OEM batteries only. No regrets here. The same by the way applies to the battery grip. The 3rd party grip turned out to be not very well made as far as electronics went. So again I have OEM grip and it is performing flawlessly... I felt the same way, but last year I wanted to have a few extra batteries for an extended trip where I wouldn't have reliable access to electricity. The Fuji especially is a battery hog, getting at best a few hundred shots on a battery, so I bit the bullet and bought a couple of aftermarket batteries for the Pentax and 3 for the Fuji. My net outlay was about 1/3 of the cost of OEM batteries, and the dealer is in Canada so if there are problems I can resolve them without having the hassle of dealing with a foreign company. The end result is that I have 5 extra batteries for my cameras that are indistiguishable in performance from their OEM cousins. The Fuji batteries are listed as a couple of hundred milli amps lower capacity, but I haven't noticed a performance difference. The new Fuji is a battery hog, I will probably buy a few more batteries for it. At best, I get a couple of hundred shots on a battery with it. bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy, crazier. - H.L.Mencken -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Recommendations for a Third party K-5 battery
On 27/03/2014 9:30 AM, P.J. Alling wrote: That is kind of why I asked advice. I bought a Flashpoint battery with better specifications that the OEM battery for the K20D. It's reliable, charges quickly, and in keeping with that seems to hold about 1/2 the power of the OEM battery. It's good in a pinch, but... I'm looking for a sense of the list, if a particular brand gets decent reviews. I'll look into buying it. My third party batteries come from batterycanada.com. No problems at all. It occurs to me I bought a laptop battery from them as well, also no problems. I'm not sure if it makes a difference, but I suspect buying directly from Asia might be more of a crap shoot. bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: The use of Canned gas for cleaning sensors
David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote: On 27/03/2014 8:36 AM, P.J. Alling wrote: The frozen gas hitting your focusing screen will spiderweb it. Hitting your mirror can remove the silver, On a sensor it probably won't do the glass cover plate a lot of good either. Except that there were no harmful results from the frozen spray hitting the insides of the camera. This was the point, debunking exactly what you are saying as being untrue. And dont forget it was Bil that debunked the 6x7 mirror shake theory. Bill revealed the truth behind that video to me at GFM! :) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT:Linux
On 3/27/14 13:25, Mark C wrote: On 3/27/2014 2:48 AM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote: This weekend I installed Ubuntu on my scanning PC - tonight I finally fired up the scanner running the linux version of VueScan and it is churning away, [ ... ] I've been trying to wrap my head around the basic design of Linux - thinks like sudo and chmod were totally alien to me. Ditto with the different command prompts based on the status of user permissions. Makes sense one you unravel it but it is not intuitive, to me at least. Starting to get an understanding of it The only program I actually installed myself - VueScan - is sitting in the downloads folder. So even things like figuring out where to install programs is a mystery (I assume they should go somewhere in the usr folder...) Actually, for this kind of thing, the recommended location these days is /opt, or a sub-directory of /opt named after the software vendor. Most of the time you shouldn't think about this, though, but instead use software packages that have built-in target locations. You probably want to find out more about about APT and software repositories (a.k.a. repos). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Packaging_Tool might be a good starting point... - Toralf But part of my motivation for using this was to learn it in hopes of someday unshackling from Windows completely. Thanks again Mark -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT:Linux
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote: On 3/27/2014 2:48 AM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote: To directly answer your question of which Linux distribution is better suited for photo processing, I don't think there is such a distribution out there, although I guess Ubuntu fits the bill. ... I will probably stick with this one... I noticed that there were versions Ubuntu and Kubuntu (?) that were tweak very specifically - e.g. a Bioscience version, a multimedia version (video editing, I think) etc... I was hoping there might be a photographers version! There seems to be an Ubuntu Studio distribution, which is geared towards Audio, Graphics, Photography, etc. However I have the feeling that the only difference between this and the classical Ubuntu is the default packages that come installed, maybe some menus, and the bling; else they (and the others like Kubuntu, etc.) share the same software packages. http://ubuntustudio.org/ Ciprian. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Photoshop fakery in big prize winner?
Have a look: http://petapixel.com/2014/03/18/hipa-grand-prize-winner-looks-like-may-big-photoshop-fail/ I'm just about to head off to class but to me this looks like a photoshop fake that one of my students would do (not very good, that is). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Photoshop fakery in big prize winner?
The teacher’s arm does seem to have been pasted on, but that could be an illusion. The position of the arm juxtaposed against the cloak makes it appear to be unnatural. The teacher could have long arms, and the second layer of very loose fitting clothing might disguise the position of his arm. His left arm would also have to be bent at the elbow, making it appear to be shorter than the right arm.So it might be kosher. Although I’d have to say it’s probably a bad fake. But difficult to prove. On Mar 27, 2014, at 12:51 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote: Have a look: http://petapixel.com/2014/03/18/hipa-grand-prize-winner-looks-like-may-big-photoshop-fail/ I'm just about to head off to class but to me this looks like a photoshop fake that one of my students would do (not very good, that is). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Mac Digital Camera Raw 5.04 adds K-3
I just got the notice for the Mac Digital Camera Raw 5.04 update which adds compatibility with the K-3. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
BESO - Cone of Shame or Cone of Happiness?
Hell out there! It's been a long, cold winter here, and my photo mojo has been MIA for a while. Last week, I found inspiration in the strangest of places - The Cone of Shame. Wally the Dog had surgery, and has been sentenced to wearing one of those aggravating Elizabethan collars as he heals. My kids have been getting creative with it, and I have been shooting the results. I've even resurrected my long-neglected blog for posting the images. So, for your amusement... http://www.crapmanagement.com If nothing else, I've finally busted out the new-to-me 31mm ltd, which I enabled myself with earlier this winter, thanks to Miserere... I think I'm gonna like it. :) -c http://christinenielsen.com http://facebook.com/ChristineNielsenPhotography -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Photoshop fakery in big prize winner?
Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: The teachers arm does seem to have been pasted on, but that could be an illusion. The position of the arm juxtaposed against the cloak makes it appear to be unnatural. The teacher could have long arms, and the second layer of very loose fitting clothing might disguise the position of his arm. His left arm would also have to be bent at the elbow, making it appear to be shorter than the right arm. So it might be kosher. Although Id have to say its probably a bad fake. But difficult to prove. Look at the magnified crop below the main picture. The sleeve is clearly a different material than the rest of the outer garment. Could be a different garment under a cloak? Nope, because it extends outside the cloak (or whatever it is) at bottom left. And try drawing a mental picture (or a physical one, in Photoshop) of how that arm is positioned. Where's his elbow? You'll find no remotely plausible location for his elbow, given the angle of his arm. I just loaded the image into Photoshop and brightened it up with Curves. It's even more obviously a ghastly fake. On Mar 27, 2014, at 12:51 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote: Have a look: http://petapixel.com/2014/03/18/hipa-grand-prize-winner-looks-like-may-big-photoshop-fail/ I'm just about to head off to class but to me this looks like a photoshop fake that one of my students would do (not very good, that is). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: BESO - Cone of Shame or Cone of Happiness?
Those are great, Christine. Your kids are very imaginative indeed! And you all managed to do this without making Wally look depressed, which is a big plus. :-) On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Christine Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net wrote: Hell out there! It's been a long, cold winter here, and my photo mojo has been MIA for a while. Last week, I found inspiration in the strangest of places - The Cone of Shame. Wally the Dog had surgery, and has been sentenced to wearing one of those aggravating Elizabethan collars as he heals. My kids have been getting creative with it, and I have been shooting the results. I've even resurrected my long-neglected blog for posting the images. So, for your amusement... http://www.crapmanagement.com If nothing else, I've finally busted out the new-to-me 31mm ltd, which I enabled myself with earlier this winter, thanks to Miserere... I think I'm gonna like it. :) -c http://christinenielsen.com http://facebook.com/ChristineNielsenPhotography -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Photoshop fakery in big prize winner?
Yeah. It really becomes obvious when you lighten it some. That's a really ham-handed job of photoshopping. -p On 3/27/2014 12:47 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: The teacher’s arm does seem to have been pasted on, but that could be an illusion. The position of the arm juxtaposed against the cloak makes it appear to be unnatural. The teacher could have long arms, and the second layer of very loose fitting clothing might disguise the position of his arm. His left arm would also have to be bent at the elbow, making it appear to be shorter than the right arm. So it might be kosher. Although I’d have to say it’s probably a bad fake. But difficult to prove. Look at the magnified crop below the main picture. The sleeve is clearly a different material than the rest of the outer garment. Could be a different garment under a cloak? Nope, because it extends outside the cloak (or whatever it is) at bottom left. And try drawing a mental picture (or a physical one, in Photoshop) of how that arm is positioned. Where's his elbow? You'll find no remotely plausible location for his elbow, given the angle of his arm. I just loaded the image into Photoshop and brightened it up with Curves. It's even more obviously a ghastly fake. On Mar 27, 2014, at 12:51 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote: Have a look: http://petapixel.com/2014/03/18/hipa-grand-prize-winner-looks-like-may-big-photoshop-fail/ I'm just about to head off to class but to me this looks like a photoshop fake that one of my students would do (not very good, that is). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Being old doesn't seem so old now that I'm old. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Photoshop fakery in big prize winner?
On Mar 27, 2014, at 1:47 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: The teacher’s arm does seem to have been pasted on, but that could be an illusion. The position of the arm juxtaposed against the cloak makes it appear to be unnatural. The teacher could have long arms, and the second layer of very loose fitting clothing might disguise the position of his arm. His left arm would also have to be bent at the elbow, making it appear to be shorter than the right arm. So it might be kosher. Although I’d have to say it’s probably a bad fake. But difficult to prove. Look at the magnified crop below the main picture. The sleeve is clearly a different material than the rest of the outer garment. Could be a different garment under a cloak? Nope, because it extends outside the cloak (or whatever it is) at bottom left. Look at this magnified, brightened and sharpened crop of the magnified crop:-). http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17719831size=lg The inter garment appears to be merely protruding from the outer garment, and there is a suggestion of the inner garment material behind the left hand as well. While it may very iell be a fake there doesn’t appear to be definitive evidence here. Perhaps more telling than the material of the garment on the arm is the bit of blur where it intersects the outer garment and the overlap of the light colored material. But none of that is positive proof of fakery.. Powerful suggestion, yes, but not posit proof. An examination of the high-res version may be much more revealing of course. Paul And try drawing a mental picture (or a physical one, in Photoshop) of how that arm is positioned. Where's his elbow? You'll find no remotely plausible location for his elbow, given the angle of his arm. I just loaded the image into Photoshop and brightened it up with Curves. It's even more obviously a ghastly fake. On Mar 27, 2014, at 12:51 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote: Have a look: http://petapixel.com/2014/03/18/hipa-grand-prize-winner-looks-like-may-big-photoshop-fail/ I'm just about to head off to class but to me this looks like a photoshop fake that one of my students would do (not very good, that is). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-3 and CS3 fail
Thanks for the reply Ken, Brian, Bill and Dave. And Brian, I viewed the Creative Live 3 day presentation from Jared Platt on Lightroom 5. It was good to see a pro working Lightroom! Just seeing how much he adjusted sliders was instructive. Thanks for the recommendation. Regards, Bob S. On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:48 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote: On 26/03/2014 10:49 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: A friend tells me the DGN's from his new K-3 can't be processed in CS3. Any suggestions??? Regards, Bob S. Tell him to set the camera for DNG rather than PEF. His K3 DNGs have to work in CS3. I was able to process K3 DNGs in CS (though it took a while, slow computer, big files). My version of PSCS reads the K-5 DNG's fine Dave bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: The use of Canned gas for cleaning sensors
Bought some canned air at Fry's Electronics and noticed a residual. The spray left something behinda kind of film. I wish I had a video of when I used it on the barbecue grill. The hair on the back of my hand was gone in a flash, and nearly my eyebrows as well. But if your's doesn't do that, great! Regards, Bob S. On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote: One of the things that will turn grown men into mewling kittens is any mention of using canned gas as a dust removing method for cameras. Don't do it, they say, it is instant death for your camera. Sometimes so stridently that one would think they were having kittens. But really, how unsafe is it? What is the very worst case scenario? How about a blast of liquid straight from the can? I invite you to watch a short 1 minute (very amateur) video. The white blast at the 15 second mark is a blast from an upside down canned gas container being unloaded into the mirror box of a Pentax *istD camera. The camera suffered absolutely no ill effects from this abuse. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fI3rk1sAPxc as always, have fun. bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Photoshop fakery in big prize winner?
Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: On Mar 27, 2014, at 1:47 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: The teachers arm does seem to have been pasted on, but that could be an illusion. The position of the arm juxtaposed against the cloak makes it appear to be unnatural. The teacher could have long arms, and the second layer of very loose fitting clothing might disguise the position of his arm. His left arm would also have to be bent at the elbow, making it appear to be shorter than the right arm. So it might be kosher. Although Id have to say its probably a bad fake. But difficult to prove. Look at the magnified crop below the main picture. The sleeve is clearly a different material than the rest of the outer garment. Could be a different garment under a cloak? Nope, because it extends outside the cloak (or whatever it is) at bottom left. Look at this magnified, brightened and sharpened crop of the magnified crop:-). http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17719831size=lg Shame about that genetic deformity he as. With the 20-inch-long forearm and the 8-inch-long upper arm. Sorry, but that just makes the fakery even more obvious. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Recommendations for a Third party K-5 battery
on 2014-03-27 7:58 Boris Liberman wrote I don't think that saving few pennies on the battery and then accidentally having to deal with the issues that may arise is worth it. hmmm, this sounds like a truism - issues may arise either way, so i don't think buying brand names is a clear predictor of risk; and it's not just pennies so there's an opportunity cost - on what else of greater benefit could the difference in cost be spent? in my case the two ebay batteries i bought last November have been problem free and the capacity difference is not evident in moderate use; as i mentioned then, their rated capacity is 1400mAh, or 75% of OEM; capacity was not my goal - i rarely ran my one battery down, but i wanted to have a spare to carry and a third to allow for when one is charging; for a net price of about $5 each, i met my goal and saved about $80 the seller was power-alternatives, but no D-Li90s in stock currently; those for whom higher capacity *is* the goal might consider the 2800mAh models going for $8.50 each right now on eBay -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: BESO - Cone of Shame or Cone of Happiness?
Great shots Christine, and I'm sure you'll enjoy the 31mm Limited. It rarely leaves my K-5IIs. Regards, Bob S. On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Christine Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net wrote: Hell out there! It's been a long, cold winter here, and my photo mojo has been MIA for a while. Last week, I found inspiration in the strangest of places - The Cone of Shame. Wally the Dog had surgery, and has been sentenced to wearing one of those aggravating Elizabethan collars as he heals. My kids have been getting creative with it, and I have been shooting the results. I've even resurrected my long-neglected blog for posting the images. So, for your amusement... http://www.crapmanagement.com If nothing else, I've finally busted out the new-to-me 31mm ltd, which I enabled myself with earlier this winter, thanks to Miserere... I think I'm gonna like it. :) -c http://christinenielsen.com http://facebook.com/ChristineNielsenPhotography -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: The use of Canned gas for cleaning sensors
On 27/03/2014 1:11 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: Bought some canned air at Fry's Electronics and noticed a residual. The spray left something behinda kind of film. I wish I had a video of when I used it on the barbecue grill. The hair on the back of my hand was gone in a flash, and nearly my eyebrows as well. But if your's doesn't do that, great! I've heard that. I try to use Dust-Off specifically. Not all canned gasses are the same, there's seems to be the cleanest. And yes, it is a volatile. bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Photoshop fakery in big prize winner?
On 27/03/2014 12:21 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: Look at this magnified, brightened and sharpened crop of the magnified crop:-). http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17719831size=lg The inter garment appears to be merely protruding from the outer garment, and there is a suggestion of the inner garment material behind the left hand as well. While it may very iell be a fake there doesn’t appear to be definitive evidence here. Perhaps more telling than the material of the garment on the arm is the bit of blur where it intersects the outer garment and the overlap of the light colored material. But none of that is positive proof of fakery.. Powerful suggestion, yes, but not posit proof. An examination of the high-res version may be much more revealing of course. His arm appears to be growing out of the middle of his chest. Hopefully this was a mercy win given to a grade 4 student. bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
OT - getting great dog portraits
500px has a blog entry up on Elke Vogelsang's wonderful and whimsical dog portraiture and how she does it ... http://500px.com/blog/1091/the-secrets-to-taking-awesome-dog-portraits-by-elke-vogelsang -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Photoshop fakery in big prize winner?
On Mar 27, 2014, at 3:23 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: On Mar 27, 2014, at 1:47 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: The teacher’s arm does seem to have been pasted on, but that could be an illusion. The position of the arm juxtaposed against the cloak makes it appear to be unnatural. The teacher could have long arms, and the second layer of very loose fitting clothing might disguise the position of his arm. His left arm would also have to be bent at the elbow, making it appear to be shorter than the right arm. So it might be kosher. Although I’d have to say it’s probably a bad fake. But difficult to prove. Look at the magnified crop below the main picture. The sleeve is clearly a different material than the rest of the outer garment. Could be a different garment under a cloak? Nope, because it extends outside the cloak (or whatever it is) at bottom left. Look at this magnified, brightened and sharpened crop of the magnified crop:-). http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17719831size=lg Shame about that genetic deformity he as. With the 20-inch-long forearm and the 8-inch-long upper arm. Sorry, but that just makes the fakery even more obvious. Yes, it does make it more obvious, but I still contend it’s not a slam dunk. His arm could be bent within that sleeve, so we might be seeing both part of the forearm and upper arm there. It doesn’t look right, but I’m not sure that the weirdness isn’t an illusion created by the garments. I do agree that it’s probably a fake, but I’m not sure that a jury could convict. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
PESO: Moving House
It's amazing the lengths they'll go to to move a house around here... http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/789/#peso Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Moving House
very cute :-) On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:38 PM, David Mann dmann...@gmail.com wrote: It's amazing the lengths they'll go to to move a house around here... http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/789/#peso Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Photoshop fakery in big prize winner?
Just for discussion; Appears as though he is wearing something, perhaps of different material, draped over his shoulders. I think I can make out what MIGHT be an elbow bump near the bottom of a very full sleeve and in a possibly logical position.(??) All very murky and, maybe, for good reason. Jack - Original Message - From: Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Cc: Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 10:47 AM Subject: Re: Photoshop fakery in big prize winner? Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: The teacher’s arm does seem to have been pasted on, but that could be an illusion. The position of the arm juxtaposed against the cloak makes it appear to be unnatural. The teacher could have long arms, and the second layer of very loose fitting clothing might disguise the position of his arm. His left arm would also have to be bent at the elbow, making it appear to be shorter than the right arm. So it might be kosher. Although I’d have to say it’s probably a bad fake. But difficult to prove. Look at the magnified crop below the main picture. The sleeve is clearly a different material than the rest of the outer garment. Could be a different garment under a cloak? Nope, because it extends outside the cloak (or whatever it is) at bottom left. And try drawing a mental picture (or a physical one, in Photoshop) of how that arm is positioned. Where's his elbow? You'll find no remotely plausible location for his elbow, given the angle of his arm. I just loaded the image into Photoshop and brightened it up with Curves. It's even more obviously a ghastly fake. On Mar 27, 2014, at 12:51 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote: Have a look: http://petapixel.com/2014/03/18/hipa-grand-prize-winner-looks-like-may-big-photoshop-fail/ I'm just about to head off to class but to me this looks like a photoshop fake that one of my students would do (not very good, that is). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
PESO: Bug on a Flower
Here's a bug I found on a marigold flower a few weeks ago. http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/790/#peso I had to do a bit of contortion to get this view. As usually happens I took two photos and preferred the composition of the first but the second had better focus. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Moving House
LoL... J - Original Message - From: David Mann dmann...@gmail.com To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Cc: Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 1:38 PM Subject: PESO: Moving House It's amazing the lengths they'll go to to move a house around here... http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/789/#peso Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: BESO - Cone of Shame or Cone of Happiness?
How embarrassing for the pup! Nice pics! Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Christine Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net Subject: BESO - Cone of Shame or Cone of Happiness? Hell out there! It's been a long, cold winter here, and my photo mojo has been MIA for a while. Last week, I found inspiration in the strangest of places - The Cone of Shame. Wally the Dog had surgery, and has been sentenced to wearing one of those aggravating Elizabethan collars as he heals. My kids have been getting creative with it, and I have been shooting the results. I've even resurrected my long-neglected blog for posting the images. So, for your amusement... http://www.crapmanagement.com If nothing else, I've finally busted out the new-to-me 31mm ltd, which I enabled myself with earlier this winter, thanks to Miserere... I think I'm gonna like it. :) -c http://christinenielsen.com http://facebook.com/ChristineNielsenPhotography -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Fwd: OT_ If it's not one thing.. (off again, and back again)
I believe Credit Unions are by law Not-for-profit, which I don't think applies to Mutual Banks. You have to be a member of a Credit Union, and there are limits on who can become a member. You have to have some common interest with the other members in order to become a member. Sometimes that interest can be a bit tenuous and you'll still be eligible to join. The two big Credit Unions around here are Coastal Federal Credit Union and North Carolina State Employees' Credit Union. You had to have some affiliation with someone who worked for the Federal Government to be eligible for the former and/or an affiliation with the state government here in North Carolina to be eligible for the latter. I was in the North Carolina National Guard, so that was close enough to make me eligible to join the NC SECU. And because it was the ARMY National Guard, I could have joined Coastal Federal if I had wanted to. SECU had more convenient branch offices at the time, so I chose them. I know there are other credit unions around here. IBM had a large presence out at Research Triangle Park, and their employees had a credit union available to them. On 3/26/2014 7:34 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: That's also a description of an old fashioned, Mutual savings bank, after they were allowed to offer Checking accounts, (called something else but I don't remember what right now). Credit unions have one advantage, they're tax free, also I don't think it's legal to convert a Credit Union into a Stock company, but it was perfectly legal to do that with Mutual banks, Hence the current dearth of Mutual banks, (especially as the converters could often make hefty profits). On 3/26/2014 4:07 PM, steve harley wrote: on 2014-03-26 12:53 Ann Sanfedele wrote Thanks, Steve.. I confess, I really don't understand what a credit union is, actually.. a non-profit cooperative bank, basically; all the same services except checks are called share drafts; plus you get a small say in how things are run I need a bank that has lots of locations and near me - the one I chose seems very good - I should have switched long ago. the credit union i use belongs to a network of credit unions that share ATMs and physical branch services; so i have free ATMs and teller services at locations nationwide; when i'm traveling an app tells me where find them perhaps not worth pursuing now that you are settled, but for others' reference: http://www.co-opsharedbranch.org/participating-cus/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: Eagle Cam
On 3/27/2014 12:13 AM, David Mann wrote: On Mar 27, 2014, at 12:27 pm, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote: The Bald Eagle has been on the comeback everywhere in the US since they banned DVD Did they go on strike until they got Blu-Ray? Cheers, Dave Duh! I don't know how that got through. I *do* try to proof-read before hitting send. That should have been since they banned DDT. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-3 and CS3 fail
Quoting Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com: On 26/03/2014 10:49 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: A friend tells me the DGN's from his new K-3 can't be processed in CS3. Any suggestions??? Regards, Bob S. Tell him to set the camera for DNG rather than PEF. His K3 DNGs have to work in CS3. I was able to process K3 DNGs in CS (though it took a while, slow computer, big files). The failure of Bob's friends K-3 DNGs to be read by CS3 surprised me as I thought shooting DNGs future-proofed newer cameras from having to continually upgrade Photoshop. That's why I wanted to check out the problem. I couldn't find any sample K-3 DNGs online so I grabbed a K-3 PEF and put it through DNG converter, which opened in CS3 just fine. It seems odd that an out-of-camera DNG would choke in CS3 but a PEF DNG converted file opens OK. Bob, is your friend actually shooting PEFs (which won't open in CS3 - I checked) rather than DNGs? I think the K-3's default RAW format is PEF. -- Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Fwd: OT_ If it's not one thing.. (off again, and back again)
on 2014-03-27 15:09 John wrote You have to be a member of a Credit Union, and there are limits on who can become a member. You have to have some common interest with the other members in order to become a member. Sometimes that interest can be a bit tenuous and you'll still be eligible to join. the rules have gradually become quite loose; as an example, the Denver Community Credit Union (not mine) accepts memberships from anyone who lives or works in one of three counties; once you're a member, a member of your family may also join (i was also surprised to learn it accepts business members - didn't realize credit unions could do that) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT:Linux
I ran across one called AV Linux that is aimed at multimedia production. I don't know how well suited it would be for still photography. http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=avlinux I mean, still photography is a component of multimedia isn't it? I was looking for something I could do with the old computers my mom no longer needs was searching for audio recording tools. AV Linux looked real interesting. But, I don't think that old Pentium 3 system is powerful enough to run it, even if I maxed out the memory. It's just too old, too obsolete. I have the feeling that it is fated for the scrap heap sooner, rather than later. Apparently, even Linux has minimum hardware requirements. I have more hope for the other system. On 3/27/2014 2:48 AM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote: This weekend I installed Ubuntu on my scanning PC - tonight I finally fired up the scanner running the linux version of VueScan and it is churning away, batch scanning 12 35mm exposures. Great! Huray! Welcome to the Linux world! However I would love to hear your feedback on your experience with Linux for photography, thus keep us (or at least me :) ) posted on this topic. After installing Unbuntu I learned that there are several other linux builds out there. Is there one better suited for photo processing? To directly answer your question of which Linux distribution is better suited for photo processing, I don't think there is such a distribution out there, although I guess Ubuntu fits the bill. A distribution mainly boils down to the following: * the selection of packages --- how many are available, and how old are the versions; (in essence they all run the same software;) * the choice of desktop environment --- KDE vs. Gnome mainly; (in essence you can choose one or another on any distribution;) * the choice of management tools (saving you the trouble of getting your hands dirty in the configuration files) --- my guess is that Ubuntu / OpenSUSE win here; * the size of the community, which is proportional to the amount of available documentation and support; * the bling, i.e., default colors, fonts, logos, backgrounds, etc.; Out of all the Linux distributions, the most popular and stress free for the end-user would be the following (or at least to my opinion): * Ubuntu; (use the LTS edition 14.04 when it appears, if you don't intend to upgrade / reinstall it every two years or so;) out of all I think it offers the most stream-line experience for non-technical people, it features quite a lot of software, although not at the latest version; (however there is the thing called PPA repositories which tends to solve this issue;) * Debian (which Ubuntu is based on); however although it has in its repositories almost all the software you can get running on Linux, the versions tend to be quite old especially in the stable version; (I would recommend this for more experienced people with Linux;) * OpenSUSE (use the latest 13.x variant), which could be as streamline in experience as Ubuntu for the end-user, although I have the feeling they have less software ready available than Ubuntu; * ArchLinux (the one I use), which has the advantage of having always the bleeding-edge software versions, although probably in lesser numbers than Ubuntu; (and I guess you'll have more hassle in installing and managing it than the others, thus I'll recommend it to more experienced users;) * of course there is http://distrowatch.com/ which provides a lot of information (statistics, overviews, etc.) of various Linux and BSD distributions; (Please note that when I say software available I actually mean precompiled ready to be installed software from their repositories, because you can certainly compile software yourself even if it's not in their repositories, but this can be a daunting task sometimes.) Are there any good LInux Photo Editors out there? I am scanning BW and need something that support 16 bit gray scale, which I think excludes Gimp. To my knowledge there is no stable (and open-source) 16 bit image editor for Linux. There is however CinePaint which is a GIMP fork (?) to support 16 bit image manipulation: http://www.cinepaint.org/ , however I haven't used it thus I can't say much about it. For RAW processing --- which you could try to use with your 16 bit TIFF --- I can recommend RawTherapee (the one I use, although there are others like Darktable), and there was discussion about this in July 2013 with the subject: `Linux RAW editor/manager? (was Re: OT - Lightzone Open Source Photo Editor (Windows, Linux))`. The following is my reply regarding Darktable and RawTherapee: http://pdml.net/pipermail/pdml_pdml.net/2013-July/351722.html Related to this topic, I've made a list of software related to photography (which run on Linux, that I
Re: BESO - Cone of Shame or Cone of Happiness?
Christine Nielsen wrote: http://www.crapmanagement.com Great stuff! My class really enjoyed 'em :) -- Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT:Linux
I already mentioned this to Mark, but it is a good way to understand why unix shells work the way they do: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_philosophy One suggestion that I have, if you can, is to put /home and any other directory trees that have data, rather than system files on them, on a disk other than you root / system disk. This way, if you want to try another distribution, you can easily swap system drives and immediately have all of your important data. It also makes it easy to back up all of your important data. One thing that is a little bit inconsistent is that there are two main editors: vi and emacs. Commands like less (less is more, only better) use the vi search commands ( /, ?) while bash (the command line) uses the emacs search commands: ^R and ^S. The vi and emacs religious war would put ford/chevy or nikon/canon debates to shame, and is only slightly less productive. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT:Linux
On 3/27/2014 8:25 AM, Mark C wrote: I've been trying to wrap my head around the basic design of Linux - thinks like sudo and chmod were totally alien to me. Ditto with the different command prompts based on the status of user permissions. Makes sense one you unravel it but it is not intuitive, to me at least. Starting to get an understanding of it The only program I actually installed myself - VueScan - is sitting in the downloads folder. So even things like figuring out where to install programs is a mystery (I assume they should go somewhere in the usr folder...) But part of my motivation for using this was to learn it in hopes of someday unshackling from Windows completely. Thanks again Mark Unix (and/or Linux) isn't so much an operating system as it is an agglomeration of programmers tools that hang around together, all striving to outdo all the others with their geekness. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: BESO - Cone of Shame or Cone of Happiness?
It's all fun and games, until, someone ends up in a cone. On 3/27/2014 1:43 PM, Christine Nielsen wrote: Hell out there! It's been a long, cold winter here, and my photo mojo has been MIA for a while. Last week, I found inspiration in the strangest of places - The Cone of Shame. Wally the Dog had surgery, and has been sentenced to wearing one of those aggravating Elizabethan collars as he heals. My kids have been getting creative with it, and I have been shooting the results. I've even resurrected my long-neglected blog for posting the images. So, for your amusement... http://www.crapmanagement.com If nothing else, I've finally busted out the new-to-me 31mm ltd, which I enabled myself with earlier this winter, thanks to Miserere... I think I'm gonna like it. :) -c http://christinenielsen.com http://facebook.com/ChristineNielsenPhotography -- A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy, crazier. - H.L.Mencken -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-3 and CS3 fail
On 3/27/2014 1:23 AM, Brian Walters wrote: Quoting Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com: A friend tells me the DGN's from his new K-3 can't be processed in CS3. Any suggestions??? Regards, Bob S. I don't have a K-3 but this is an interesting problem so I downloaded a K-3 PEF from Pentax Forums (http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pentax-k-3-full-size-samples.html). As expected, CS3 couldn't open the PEF file so then I ran it through the latest DNG Converter. The resultant DNG opened in CS3 without problems. So one solution seems to be to shoot PEFs, batch convert to DNG with the latest Adobe DNG Converter and then open them in CS3. I'm not sure if DNG Converter will convert K-3 DNGs to CS3-compatible DNGs, so this solution might not help with any existing RAWs that your friend has. He might have to use the Silkypix software that came with the K-3 to process those DNGs. Still, that begs the question about K-3 DNG files. Isn't the whole idea of DNG files was that they were supposed to be compatible with any software that processed DNG files without having to worry about the files from newer cameras not working? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Recommendations for a Third party K-5 battery
On 3/27/2014 1:27 AM, Brian Walters wrote: Quoting P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com: I though the K20D battery took a long time to fully charge. Started to do some research and then decided ask the people who know. I bought some third party batteries for my K-5 on eBay (they're branded 'DSTE'). I haven't noticed any difference in performance or charging time in comparison with the OEM Pentax battery - not that I've done any specific tests. What about a charger for the D-LI90 battery? Is there a good aftermarket charger available? I looked on the Pentax site and it seems like the Pentax chargers are out of stock. Also, what about a charger that would work off the 12V socket in the car? (Assuming there's a time when it's not in use powering a cell phone, gps, etc.) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Photoshop fakery in big prize winner?
On 3/27/2014 12:51 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Have a look: http://petapixel.com/2014/03/18/hipa-grand-prize-winner-looks-like-may-big-photoshop-fail/ I'm just about to head off to class but to me this looks like a photoshop fake that one of my students would do (not very good, that is). Gotta' wonder about the judges that they couldn't see it. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Fwd: OT_ If it's not one thing.. (off again, and back again)
On 3/27/2014 5:39 PM, steve harley wrote: on 2014-03-27 15:09 John wrote You have to be a member of a Credit Union, and there are limits on who can become a member. You have to have some common interest with the other members in order to become a member. Sometimes that interest can be a bit tenuous and you'll still be eligible to join. the rules have gradually become quite loose; as an example, the Denver Community Credit Union (not mine) accepts memberships from anyone who lives or works in one of three counties; once you're a member, a member of your family may also join (i was also surprised to learn it accepts business members - didn't realize credit unions could do that) There are some credit unions set up to provide business services, but most are not, especially due to the power commercial banks have over banking regulators to block credit union competition. More surprising than the existence of a credit union that offers business services is that such a credit union would still offer services to natural persons. I think generally credit unions are chartered to serve one or the other, but not both. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-3 and CS3 fail
Quoting John johnsess...@yahoo.com: Still, that begs the question about K-3 DNG files. Isn't the whole idea of DNG files was that they were supposed to be compatible with any software that processed DNG files without having to worry about the files from newer cameras not working? That was the theory as I understood it. I'd like to get hold of a K-3 DNG to try it on my copy of CS3. -- Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
PESO -- Special Pleading.
This is Sally the escape artist. The neighbor's Golden Doodle which despite her lineage is a very black dog. In fact up until now with any DSLR I've owned I would have struggled to get any detail in her fir and not blow out the white door behind her. I was able to render this with very little fiddling, though I'm really going to have to build a new Photo Editing machine, a couple of operations were beyond painfully slow. Sally's story is slightly complex. Her owners had a fenced in back yard which kept their other dog nicely confined, but not Sally she could leave and return anytime she liked. Easily jumping the five foot fence. They finally figured this out and apparently gave up. The fence is being removed and Sally has the run of the neighborhood. This is both good and bad for Sally, she gets to explore and visit all her friends, however if she isn't home before everyone has to leave she's condemned to stay out until someone arrives to let her in. This is what seems to have happened today, so after running over to greet me and my Cocker Spaniel, she wanted me to let her into her house... Smart but not smart enough. Anyway the story is more interesting than the picture. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20specialpleading.html Equipment: Pentax K-5II w/vmc Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm f2,8~4.0 (Komane) As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored. -- A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy, crazier. - H.L.Mencken -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Recommendations for a Third party K-5 battery
I have a Pearstone charger for D-Li90’s. The same basic charger is sold with various slide-in clip-in battery cradles for various battery styles. The unit plugs directly into the wall with fold-out prongs - no messy cords to cope with. I’ve used this for a least a couple of years with no issues. Charging speed compared to OEM? I have no idea. I put the battery in, eventually it is ready, I take it out and repeat as needed with additional batteries.But I don’t think it is appreciably slower than the Pentax charger. Do the D-Li90’s get as completely charged? Over-charged? Do they hold the charge as long? Again, I have no idea. That is why I carry spare batteries so I needn’t worry about such details. My spares are mostly OEM with 1-2 3rd party purchased via BH IIRC. Never any issues. The only non-Pentax that I can lay my hands on at the moment is labeled Watson, 7.4v, 1800mAh. stan On Mar 27, 2014, at 6:16 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote: On 3/27/2014 1:27 AM, Brian Walters wrote: Quoting P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com: I though the K20D battery took a long time to fully charge. Started to do some research and then decided ask the people who know. I bought some third party batteries for my K-5 on eBay (they're branded 'DSTE'). I haven't noticed any difference in performance or charging time in comparison with the OEM Pentax battery - not that I've done any specific tests. What about a charger for the D-LI90 battery? Is there a good aftermarket charger available? I looked on the Pentax site and it seems like the Pentax chargers are out of stock. Also, what about a charger that would work off the 12V socket in the car? (Assuming there's a time when it's not in use powering a cell phone, gps, etc.) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-3 and CS3 fail
OK. I’ll put one in my Dropbox later and send you a link off-list. stan On Mar 27, 2014, at 7:04 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote: Quoting John johnsess...@yahoo.com: Still, that begs the question about K-3 DNG files. Isn't the whole idea of DNG files was that they were supposed to be compatible with any software that processed DNG files without having to worry about the files from newer cameras not working? That was the theory as I understood it. I'd like to get hold of a K-3 DNG to try it on my copy of CS3. -- Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia h -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-3 and CS3 fail
Here’s a K-3 DNG for you: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/79914167/_IMG2191.DNG Paul On Mar 27, 2014, at 7:04 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote: Quoting John johnsess...@yahoo.com: Still, that begs the question about K-3 DNG files. Isn't the whole idea of DNG files was that they were supposed to be compatible with any software that processed DNG files without having to worry about the files from newer cameras not working? That was the theory as I understood it. I'd like to get hold of a K-3 DNG to try it on my copy of CS3. -- Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO -- Special Pleading.
I had a Bouvier des Flandres that looked a lot like that when his coat was trimmed. Same kind of personality I think. A six foot fence would keep him from going over, but I ended up having to trench around the perimeter and add a skirt underground to keep him from tunneling under. He was the most lovable dog, but VERY HIGH MAINTENANCE; required hours of combing every day to keep the coat from matting, and he didn't very much like being groomed. I wonder if an invisible fence would work. I worry about dogs on the loose nowadays. It has become a dangerous world out there. On 3/27/2014 7:05 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: This is Sally the escape artist. The neighbor's Golden Doodle which despite her lineage is a very black dog. In fact up until now with any DSLR I've owned I would have struggled to get any detail in her fir and not blow out the white door behind her. I was able to render this with very little fiddling, though I'm really going to have to build a new Photo Editing machine, a couple of operations were beyond painfully slow. Sally's story is slightly complex. Her owners had a fenced in back yard which kept their other dog nicely confined, but not Sally she could leave and return anytime she liked. Easily jumping the five foot fence. They finally figured this out and apparently gave up. The fence is being removed and Sally has the run of the neighborhood. This is both good and bad for Sally, she gets to explore and visit all her friends, however if she isn't home before everyone has to leave she's condemned to stay out until someone arrives to let her in. This is what seems to have happened today, so after running over to greet me and my Cocker Spaniel, she wanted me to let her into her house... Smart but not smart enough. Anyway the story is more interesting than the picture. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20specialpleading.html Equipment: Pentax K-5II w/vmc Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm f2,8~4.0 (Komane) As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT:Linux
On 3/27/2014 12:02 PM, Toralf Lund wrote: ] I've been trying to wrap my head around the basic design of Linux - thinks like sudo and chmod were totally alien to me. Ditto with the different command prompts based on the status of user permissions. Makes sense one you unravel it but it is not intuitive, to me at least. Starting to get an understanding of it The only program I actually installed myself - VueScan - is sitting in the downloads folder. So even things like figuring out where to install programs is a mystery (I assume they should go somewhere in the usr folder...) Actually, for this kind of thing, the recommended location these days is /opt, or a sub-directory of /opt named after the software vendor. Most of the time you shouldn't think about this, though, but instead use software packages that have built-in target locations. You probably want to find out more about about APT and software repositories (a.k.a. repos). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Packaging_Tool might be a good starting point... - Toralf Thanks - I will check that out. Mark -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Recommendations for a Third party K-5 battery
For the D-Li50s that powered the K10D/K20D I have 5 batteries 3 chargers. I have the two Pentax chargers that came with the cameras and an after-market charger I bought that has the folding prongs for 110VAC and plug-in adapter for the 12VDC in the car. The only non-Pentax battery I have is a Konica Minolta NP-400 1500mAh. I've never noticed it being any different than the Pentax branded batteries. The Pentax batteries came with the K10D, the K20D, the K20D battery grip and Wolf Camera when it was going out of business. I like being able to keep the spare battery on the charger even in the car. That way the length of time it takes to charge becomes moot. I'd like to be able to do the same for the D-Li90s. The cost of the Pentax branded batteries doesn't bother me that much, given that I've not yet seen any of the aftermarket batteries with a higher rated capacity. On 3/27/2014 7:14 PM, Stanley Halpin wrote: I have a Pearstone charger for D-Li90’s. The same basic charger is sold with various slide-in clip-in battery cradles for various battery styles. The unit plugs directly into the wall with fold-out prongs - no messy cords to cope with. I’ve used this for a least a couple of years with no issues. Charging speed compared to OEM? I have no idea. I put the battery in, eventually it is ready, I take it out and repeat as needed with additional batteries.But I don’t think it is appreciably slower than the Pentax charger. Do the D-Li90’s get as completely charged? Over-charged? Do they hold the charge as long? Again, I have no idea. That is why I carry spare batteries so I needn’t worry about such details. My spares are mostly OEM with 1-2 3rd party purchased via BH IIRC. Never any issues. The only non-Pentax that I can lay my hands on at the moment is labeled Watson, 7.4v, 1800mAh. stan On Mar 27, 2014, at 6:16 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote: On 3/27/2014 1:27 AM, Brian Walters wrote: Quoting P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com: I though the K20D battery took a long time to fully charge. Started to do some research and then decided ask the people who know. I bought some third party batteries for my K-5 on eBay (they're branded 'DSTE'). I haven't noticed any difference in performance or charging time in comparison with the OEM Pentax battery - not that I've done any specific tests. What about a charger for the D-LI90 battery? Is there a good aftermarket charger available? I looked on the Pentax site and it seems like the Pentax chargers are out of stock. Also, what about a charger that would work off the 12V socket in the car? (Assuming there's a time when it's not in use powering a cell phone, gps, etc.) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Recommendations for a Third party K-5 battery
I bought a battery through Amazon that claims 2800 mAH and the box (High Voltage Technologies) says 2900 mAH. I haven't managed to run it down yet, but I've only had a couple of 4-5 hours shoots so far. Cost under $20 Canadian, free shipping. The OEM battery is easily four times that price here. http://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/B004F0EX5O On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:51 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote: For the D-Li50s that powered the K10D/K20D I have 5 batteries 3 chargers. I have the two Pentax chargers that came with the cameras and an after-market charger I bought that has the folding prongs for 110VAC and plug-in adapter for the 12VDC in the car. The only non-Pentax battery I have is a Konica Minolta NP-400 1500mAh. I've never noticed it being any different than the Pentax branded batteries. The Pentax batteries came with the K10D, the K20D, the K20D battery grip and Wolf Camera when it was going out of business. I like being able to keep the spare battery on the charger even in the car. That way the length of time it takes to charge becomes moot. I'd like to be able to do the same for the D-Li90s. The cost of the Pentax branded batteries doesn't bother me that much, given that I've not yet seen any of the aftermarket batteries with a higher rated capacity. On 3/27/2014 7:14 PM, Stanley Halpin wrote: I have a Pearstone charger for D-Li90’s. The same basic charger is sold with various slide-in clip-in battery cradles for various battery styles. The unit plugs directly into the wall with fold-out prongs - no messy cords to cope with. I’ve used this for a least a couple of years with no issues. Charging speed compared to OEM? I have no idea. I put the battery in, eventually it is ready, I take it out and repeat as needed with additional batteries.But I don’t think it is appreciably slower than the Pentax charger. Do the D-Li90’s get as completely charged? Over-charged? Do they hold the charge as long? Again, I have no idea. That is why I carry spare batteries so I needn’t worry about such details. My spares are mostly OEM with 1-2 3rd party purchased via BH IIRC. Never any issues. The only non-Pentax that I can lay my hands on at the moment is labeled Watson, 7.4v, 1800mAh. stan On Mar 27, 2014, at 6:16 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote: On 3/27/2014 1:27 AM, Brian Walters wrote: Quoting P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com: I though the K20D battery took a long time to fully charge. Started to do some research and then decided ask the people who know. I bought some third party batteries for my K-5 on eBay (they're branded 'DSTE'). I haven't noticed any difference in performance or charging time in comparison with the OEM Pentax battery - not that I've done any specific tests. What about a charger for the D-LI90 battery? Is there a good aftermarket charger available? I looked on the Pentax site and it seems like the Pentax chargers are out of stock. Also, what about a charger that would work off the 12V socket in the car? (Assuming there's a time when it's not in use powering a cell phone, gps, etc.) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: BESO - Cone of Shame or Cone of Happiness?
LOL! Pr doggie! That's quite adorable, though. ann On 3/27/2014 13:43, Christine Nielsen wrote: Hell out there! It's been a long, cold winter here, and my photo mojo has been MIA for a while. Last week, I found inspiration in the strangest of places - The Cone of Shame. Wally the Dog had surgery, and has been sentenced to wearing one of those aggravating Elizabethan collars as he heals. My kids have been getting creative with it, and I have been shooting the results. I've even resurrected my long-neglected blog for posting the images. So, for your amusement... http://www.crapmanagement.com If nothing else, I've finally busted out the new-to-me 31mm ltd, which I enabled myself with earlier this winter, thanks to Miserere... I think I'm gonna like it. :) -c http://christinenielsen.com http://facebook.com/ChristineNielsenPhotography -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Bug on a Flower
Ahem - make that _insect_ on a flower puleeze :-) Looks something like a Katydid to me - or a leaf hopper? But imagine your little beasties down there are a bit different than ours. cute little guy ann On 3/27/2014 16:47, David Mann wrote: Here's a bug I found on a marigold flower a few weeks ago. http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/790/#peso I had to do a bit of contortion to get this view. As usually happens I took two photos and preferred the composition of the first but the second had better focus. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Photoshop fakery in big prize winner?
fake or real, I wouldn't have shelled out that much for that photo.. ann On 3/27/2014 18:35, John wrote: On 3/27/2014 12:51 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Have a look: http://petapixel.com/2014/03/18/hipa-grand-prize-winner-looks-like-may-big-photoshop-fail/ I'm just about to head off to class but to me this looks like a photoshop fake that one of my students would do (not very good, that is). Gotta' wonder about the judges that they couldn't see it. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT:Linux
On 3/27/2014 12:13 PM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote: There seems to be an Ubuntu Studio distribution, which is geared towards Audio, Graphics, Photography, etc. However I have the feeling that the only difference between this and the classical Ubuntu is the default packages that come installed, maybe some menus, and the bling; else they (and the others like Kubuntu, etc.) share the same software packages. http://ubuntustudio.org/ Ciprian. That looks like it has darktable and a photo organizer called shotwell - I was planning on trying dark table and I'll shotwell to the list of things to try as well. If I wind up re-installing I might try this studio dist instead of vanilla Ubuntu. Thanks - Mark -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT:Linux
A Pentium 3 is getting pretty long in the tooth, but I'm not sure what the minimum standards for various Linux builds are. My scanning machine is an Athlong 64 X2 4200+ and it is too old for Win 8.1 - lacks some instruction set that is now required. It is still a pretty decent machine, though. Mark On 3/27/2014 5:44 PM, John wrote: I ran across one called AV Linux that is aimed at multimedia production. I don't know how well suited it would be for still photography. http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=avlinux I mean, still photography is a component of multimedia isn't it? I was looking for something I could do with the old computers my mom no longer needs was searching for audio recording tools. AV Linux looked real interesting. But, I don't think that old Pentium 3 system is powerful enough to run it, even if I maxed out the memory. It's just too old, too obsolete. I have the feeling that it is fated for the scrap heap sooner, rather than later. Apparently, even Linux has minimum hardware requirements. I have more hope for the other system. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-3 and CS3 fail
Quoting Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net: Here?s a K-3 DNG for you: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/79914167/_IMG2191.DNG Thanks Paul (and Stan). Both of those DNGs opened fine in CS3, so not sure why Bob's friend is having problems (unless he is, in fact, using PEFs). Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ Paul On Mar 27, 2014, at 7:04 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote: Quoting John johnsess...@yahoo.com: Still, that begs the question about K-3 DNG files. Isn't the whole idea of DNG files was that they were supposed to be compatible with any software that processed DNG files without having to worry about the files from newer cameras not working? That was the theory as I understood it. I'd like to get hold of a K-3 DNG to try it on my copy of CS3. -- -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: The use of Canned gas for cleaning sensors
Quoting Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com: One of the things that will turn grown men into mewling kittens is any mention of using canned gas as a dust removing method for cameras. Don't do it, they say, it is instant death for your camera. Sometimes so stridently that one would think they were having kittens. But really, how unsafe is it? What is the very worst case scenario? How about a blast of liquid straight from the can? I invite you to watch a short 1 minute (very amateur) video. The white blast at the 15 second mark is a blast from an upside down canned gas container being unloaded into the mirror box of a Pentax *istD camera. The camera suffered absolutely no ill effects from this abuse. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fI3rk1sAPxc as always, have fun. Bill's mentioned this several times over the years, so a couple of years ago I took a deep breath, crossed fingers and toes and cleaned the sensor of my *ist DS with Dust-Off. No problems. Not long after that I bought a K200D and later a K-5 and found that the in-camera the dust removal was effective enough (especially with the K-5) that I've never needed to repeat the exercise. I'm happy to clean up the few persistent dust spots in post. -- Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: BESO - Cone of Shame or Cone of Happiness?
Thanks, guys... and Ann! Poor Wally, indeed. He puts up with a lot. :) On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote: LOL! Pr doggie! That's quite adorable, though. ann On 3/27/2014 13:43, Christine Nielsen wrote: Hell out there! It's been a long, cold winter here, and my photo mojo has been MIA for a while. Last week, I found inspiration in the strangest of places - The Cone of Shame. Wally the Dog had surgery, and has been sentenced to wearing one of those aggravating Elizabethan collars as he heals. My kids have been getting creative with it, and I have been shooting the results. I've even resurrected my long-neglected blog for posting the images. So, for your amusement... http://www.crapmanagement.com If nothing else, I've finally busted out the new-to-me 31mm ltd, which I enabled myself with earlier this winter, thanks to Miserere... I think I'm gonna like it. :) -c http://christinenielsen.com http://facebook.com/ChristineNielsenPhotography -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- http://christinenielsen.com http://www.facebook.com/ChristineNielsenPhotography -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Recommendations for a Third party K-5 battery
on 2014-03-27 18:28 Bruce Walker wrote I bought a battery through Amazon that claims 2800 mAH and the box (High Voltage Technologies) says 2900 mAH. I haven't managed to run it down yet, but I've only had a couple of 4-5 hours shoots so far. earlier today, i saw some 2800mAh D-Li90s on eBay for $8.50 shipped; they are DSTE brand, seller tianlin2010, and i can't vouch for them, but if i were buying today and not in a hurry (free shipping from Hong Kong), i'd get them -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-3 and CS3 fail
So one solution seems to be to shoot PEFs, batch convert to DNG with the latest Adobe DNG Converter and then open them in CS3. Why not just capture in DNG and use the Adobe convertor? Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org Subject: Re: K-3 and CS3 fail Quoting Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com: A friend tells me the DGN's from his new K-3 can't be processed in CS3. Any suggestions??? Regards, Bob S. I don't have a K-3 but this is an interesting problem so I downloaded a K-3 PEF from Pentax Forums (http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pentax-k-3-full-size-samples.html). As expected, CS3 couldn't open the PEF file so then I ran it through the latest DNG Converter. The resultant DNG opened in CS3 without problems. So one solution seems to be to shoot PEFs, batch convert to DNG with the latest Adobe DNG Converter and then open them in CS3. I'm not sure if DNG Converter will convert K-3 DNGs to CS3-compatible DNGs, so this solution might not help with any existing RAWs that your friend has. He might have to use the Silkypix software that came with the K-3 to process those DNGs. -- Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-3 and CS3 fail
His K3 DNGs have to work in CS3. My K3 DNGS won't work in CS2. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com Subject: Re: K-3 and CS3 fail On 26/03/2014 10:49 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: A friend tells me the DGN's from his new K-3 can't be processed in CS3. Any suggestions??? Regards, Bob S. Tell him to set the camera for DNG rather than PEF. His K3 DNGs have to work in CS3. I was able to process K3 DNGs in CS (though it took a while, slow computer, big files). bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Recommendations for a Third party K-5 battery
Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Recommendations for a Third party K-5 battery On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote: Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote: The Sony A7 is another power hog. I bought a Wasabi set I would imagine that's the hot setup... Another pun thread is going to get a chili reception. But my own kit bag is peppered with spare non-OEM batteries. I'll salt that away for future reference. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: The use of Canned gas for cleaning sensors
On 27/03/2014 8:50 PM, Brian Walters wrote: Not long after that I bought a K200D and later a K-5 and found that the in-camera the dust removal was effective enough (especially with the K-5) that I've never needed to repeat the exercise. I'm happy to clean up the few persistent dust spots in post. I'm happy to report that I haven't had to clean a sensor in several years, it seems. Even the little Fuji has an ultrasonic cleaner that appears to work. bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Bug on a Flower
Here's another one I saw today, on the back of a small sunflower. He/she is a bit smaller than the other one. I took a couple of photos but didn't quite nail the focus. http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/791/#peso There were a few of them out there so I might get a few more chances in days to come. Cheers, Dave On Mar 28, 2014, at 1:38 pm, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote: Ahem - make that _insect_ on a flower puleeze :-) Looks something like a Katydid to me - or a leaf hopper? But imagine your little beasties down there are a bit different than ours. cute little guy ann On 3/27/2014 16:47, David Mann wrote: Here's a bug I found on a marigold flower a few weeks ago. http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/790/#peso I had to do a bit of contortion to get this view. As usually happens I took two photos and preferred the composition of the first but the second had better focus. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Photoshop fakery in big prize winner?
On 27/03/2014 6:39 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: fake or real, I wouldn't have shelled out that much for that photo.. As always, Ann gets right to the heart of the matter. :) bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Moving House
On 27/03/2014 2:38 PM, David Mann wrote: It's amazing the lengths they'll go to to move a house around here... http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/789/#peso Cheers, Dave That is one bad ass balloon. It would be a bitch to keep in the air though. bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO -- Special Pleading.
On 27/03/2014 5:33 PM, John wrote: I had a Bouvier des Flandres that looked a lot like that when his coat was trimmed. Same kind of personality I think. A six foot fence would keep him from going over, but I ended up having to trench around the perimeter and add a skirt underground to keep him from tunneling under. He was the most lovable dog, but VERY HIGH MAINTENANCE; required hours of combing every day to keep the coat from matting, and he didn't very much like being groomed. I wonder if an invisible fence would work. I worry about dogs on the loose nowadays. It has become a dangerous world out there. The problem with them is that if the dog is aroused enough to bull through the fence, it likely won't have the drive to return through it. Now the fence has become a powerful incentive to move someplace else. I'm not above using shock therapy on a dog, but I don't think the shock fences are a good idea. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT:Linux
On Mar 28, 2014, at 1:10 am, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote: Thanks, Dave - I actually didn't know about Virtual box so that's one reason... But on the hardware side the Nikon scanner is Firewire and backup Canoscan is either USB 1.1 or SCSI (when I used it I used SCSI). So the hardware issues moved me to put the scanner on a separate machine. I have not yet tested the SCSI card in Ubuntu. Firewire is a popular feature request but I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for it. It's why I have to keep an old scanner machine too :) I'd expect the SCSI card to work in Linux but won't offer any guarantees! Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-3 and CS3 fail
On 27/03/2014 4:08 PM, John wrote: On 3/27/2014 1:23 AM, Brian Walters wrote: Quoting Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com: A friend tells me the DGN's from his new K-3 can't be processed in CS3. Any suggestions??? Regards, Bob S. I don't have a K-3 but this is an interesting problem so I downloaded a K-3 PEF from Pentax Forums (http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pentax-k-3-full-size-samples.html). As expected, CS3 couldn't open the PEF file so then I ran it through the latest DNG Converter. The resultant DNG opened in CS3 without problems. So one solution seems to be to shoot PEFs, batch convert to DNG with the latest Adobe DNG Converter and then open them in CS3. I'm not sure if DNG Converter will convert K-3 DNGs to CS3-compatible DNGs, so this solution might not help with any existing RAWs that your friend has. He might have to use the Silkypix software that came with the K-3 to process those DNGs. Still, that begs the question about K-3 DNG files. Isn't the whole idea of DNG files was that they were supposed to be compatible with any software that processed DNG files without having to worry about the files from newer cameras not working? Bob's friend is doing something wrong. The image linked below is a DNG conversion through CS3 on my old laptop. Other than being slow, there were no problems. bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-3 and CS3 fail
Quoting Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com: So one solution seems to be to shoot PEFs, batch convert to DNG with the latest Adobe DNG Converter and then open them in CS3. Why not just capture in DNG and use the Adobe convertor? I wasn't sure you could convert DNG to DNG with the converter but I just tested it with Stan's Paul's sample images. Yes, it works - and it makes the files smaller as well. Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org Subject: Re: K-3 and CS3 fail Quoting Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com: A friend tells me the DGN's from his new K-3 can't be processed in CS3. Any suggestions??? Regards, Bob S. I don't have a K-3 but this is an interesting problem so I downloaded a K-3 PEF from Pentax Forums (http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pentax-k-3-full-size-samples.html). As expected, CS3 couldn't open the PEF file so then I ran it through the latest DNG Converter. The resultant DNG opened in CS3 without problems. So one solution seems to be to shoot PEFs, batch convert to DNG with the latest Adobe DNG Converter and then open them in CS3. I'm not sure if DNG Converter will convert K-3 DNGs to CS3-compatible DNGs, so this solution might not help with any existing RAWs that your friend has. He might have to use the Silkypix software that came with the K-3 to process those DNGs. -- Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.