RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-20 Thread Tim Øsleby
I think it is two problems. The WB is off, yes, and the shots are overexposed 
because of extreme contrast. 
I believe the combination of the two is what makes it so hard to correct the 
colour afterwards. What is blown is blown, I'm afraid. No highlight details to 
restore, and therefore hard or impossible to get the WB right, I believe.

But I'd be happy, to be proven wrong though ;-)


Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jens Bladt
Sent: 15. februar 2007 23:39
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

Yeah, I know this too, Tim.
But that reddish cast was not exactly what I meant.
The problem you discibe is porbably caused by bad WB tuning.
This was corrected:
http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/25108348/
This was not:
http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/25164846/in/set-572671/

HEr name is Nicole (no pun intended) RUSSO!

Regards

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Tim
Řsleby
Sendt: 12. februar 2007 20:32
Til: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Emne: RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)


I've noticed this with my DS too. It is a real PITA in difficult light (read
concert shooting). If I don't have time to do proper spot metering I tend to
end up with reddish skin cast that is impossible to get rid of in
processing. I've blown a few gigs doing this.


Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jens
Bladt
Sent: 11. februar 2007 16:14
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
quality?)

PPS:
I  have added a little test to my Flickr pages as well:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157594529582033/

Regards

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
Bladt
Sendt: 11. februar 2007 13:36
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)


William, PauI, Godfrey, Rob, Peter, David, John ...

I don't know what the  went wrong yesterday, testing exposure of the
K10D.
Perhaps the FA* 2.8/80-200mm is not working right with the K10D?
Perhaps changing leses many times, metering by manually by Green Button etc.
did confuse the cameras or me, or the light perhaps changed betewwn
switching camera bodies ? I have no idea.

Anyway, today I did some new test shots - comparing the K10D and the *ist D,
using two samples of the same Pentax lens:
The old SMC Pentax-F 4-5.6 35-80mm.

So, I put one of these lenses on both cameras and did a few test shots. I
shot the same scenery twice -using the same shutterspeed, same settings
(multi-segnment, WB, contrast, sharpness, saturation, ISO 200, RAW).

And guess what? The results are quite surpirsing.
It seems to me that the K10D in fact does a better job, dealing with
contrast.
The K10D shots are consistantly the most pleasing shots, despite of the dark
scenery/bright sky. Such conditions are very common in our (northern) parts
of the world (low sun). Very often our contrasty environment requires manual
exposure corrections. It seems the K10D handeled the situation quite well.
Much better than the *ist D.
I am pleasantly surprised!

Judge for your selves. What do you think?

http://www.jensbladt.dk/Test/K10D-vs-istD/K10D-test-album.html

Thanks for looking - comments area welcome.

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
Bladt
Sendt: 11. februar 2007 01:03
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: RE: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?


No
I've done this right a 1000 times. And the strategy for a (too) bright sky
sky IS the same as for a backlit scenry.
And - so why does the *ist D do the exact scenery right (not over
compensating)?
Regards
Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af William
Robb
Sendt: 10. februar 2007 19:55
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?



- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?



 Regarding exposure, I'll do som emore test

RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-20 Thread Tim Øsleby
I think it is two problems. The WB is off, yes, and the shots are overexposed 
because of extreme contrast. 
I believe the combination of the two is what makes it so hard to correct the 
colour afterwards. What is blown is blown, I'm afraid. No highlight details to 
restore, and therefore hard or impossible to get the WB right, I believe.

But I'd be happy, to be proven wrong though ;-)


Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jens Bladt
Sent: 15. februar 2007 23:39
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

Yeah, I know this too, Tim.
But that reddish cast was not exactly what I meant.
The problem you discibe is porbably caused by bad WB tuning.
This was corrected:
http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/25108348/
This was not:
http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/25164846/in/set-572671/

HEr name is Nicole (no pun intended) RUSSO!

Regards

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Tim
Řsleby
Sendt: 12. februar 2007 20:32
Til: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Emne: RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)


I've noticed this with my DS too. It is a real PITA in difficult light (read
concert shooting). If I don't have time to do proper spot metering I tend to
end up with reddish skin cast that is impossible to get rid of in
processing. I've blown a few gigs doing this.


Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jens
Bladt
Sent: 11. februar 2007 16:14
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
quality?)

PPS:
I  have added a little test to my Flickr pages as well:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157594529582033/

Regards

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
Bladt
Sendt: 11. februar 2007 13:36
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)


William, PauI, Godfrey, Rob, Peter, David, John ...

I don't know what the  went wrong yesterday, testing exposure of the
K10D.
Perhaps the FA* 2.8/80-200mm is not working right with the K10D?
Perhaps changing leses many times, metering by manually by Green Button etc.
did confuse the cameras or me, or the light perhaps changed betewwn
switching camera bodies ? I have no idea.

Anyway, today I did some new test shots - comparing the K10D and the *ist D,
using two samples of the same Pentax lens:
The old SMC Pentax-F 4-5.6 35-80mm.

So, I put one of these lenses on both cameras and did a few test shots. I
shot the same scenery twice -using the same shutterspeed, same settings
(multi-segnment, WB, contrast, sharpness, saturation, ISO 200, RAW).

And guess what? The results are quite surpirsing.
It seems to me that the K10D in fact does a better job, dealing with
contrast.
The K10D shots are consistantly the most pleasing shots, despite of the dark
scenery/bright sky. Such conditions are very common in our (northern) parts
of the world (low sun). Very often our contrasty environment requires manual
exposure corrections. It seems the K10D handeled the situation quite well.
Much better than the *ist D.
I am pleasantly surprised!

Judge for your selves. What do you think?

http://www.jensbladt.dk/Test/K10D-vs-istD/K10D-test-album.html

Thanks for looking - comments area welcome.

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
Bladt
Sendt: 11. februar 2007 01:03
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: RE: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?


No
I've done this right a 1000 times. And the strategy for a (too) bright sky
sky IS the same as for a backlit scenry.
And - so why does the *ist D do the exact scenery right (not over
compensating)?
Regards
Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af William
Robb
Sendt: 10. februar 2007 19:55
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?



- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?



 Regarding exposure, I'll do som emore test

RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-15 Thread Jens Bladt
Yeah, I know this too, Tim.
But that reddish cast was not exactly what I meant.
The problem you discibe is porbably caused by bad WB tuning.
This was corrected:
http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/25108348/
This was not:
http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/25164846/in/set-572671/

HEr name is Nicole (no pun intended) RUSSO!

Regards

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Tim
Řsleby
Sendt: 12. februar 2007 20:32
Til: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Emne: RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)


I've noticed this with my DS too. It is a real PITA in difficult light (read
concert shooting). If I don't have time to do proper spot metering I tend to
end up with reddish skin cast that is impossible to get rid of in
processing. I've blown a few gigs doing this.


Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jens
Bladt
Sent: 11. februar 2007 16:14
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
quality?)

PPS:
I  have added a little test to my Flickr pages as well:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157594529582033/

Regards

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
Bladt
Sendt: 11. februar 2007 13:36
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)


William, PauI, Godfrey, Rob, Peter, David, John ...

I don't know what the  went wrong yesterday, testing exposure of the
K10D.
Perhaps the FA* 2.8/80-200mm is not working right with the K10D?
Perhaps changing leses many times, metering by manually by Green Button etc.
did confuse the cameras or me, or the light perhaps changed betewwn
switching camera bodies ? I have no idea.

Anyway, today I did some new test shots - comparing the K10D and the *ist D,
using two samples of the same Pentax lens:
The old SMC Pentax-F 4-5.6 35-80mm.

So, I put one of these lenses on both cameras and did a few test shots. I
shot the same scenery twice -using the same shutterspeed, same settings
(multi-segnment, WB, contrast, sharpness, saturation, ISO 200, RAW).

And guess what? The results are quite surpirsing.
It seems to me that the K10D in fact does a better job, dealing with
contrast.
The K10D shots are consistantly the most pleasing shots, despite of the dark
scenery/bright sky. Such conditions are very common in our (northern) parts
of the world (low sun). Very often our contrasty environment requires manual
exposure corrections. It seems the K10D handeled the situation quite well.
Much better than the *ist D.
I am pleasantly surprised!

Judge for your selves. What do you think?

http://www.jensbladt.dk/Test/K10D-vs-istD/K10D-test-album.html

Thanks for looking - comments area welcome.

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
Bladt
Sendt: 11. februar 2007 01:03
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: RE: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?


No
I've done this right a 1000 times. And the strategy for a (too) bright sky
sky IS the same as for a backlit scenry.
And - so why does the *ist D do the exact scenery right (not over
compensating)?
Regards
Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af William
Robb
Sendt: 10. februar 2007 19:55
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?



- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?



 Regarding exposure, I'll do som emore test tomorrow, evenly lit scenes
 (walls, grey card etc.) as well ad contraty ones, im order tio figure out
 if
 the meter is off or if the matrix metering is over reacting. Surely I
 can't
 live with this.

 When photographing a a scenery with a very bright sky (very common in the
 northern parts og the world) I must dial in MINUS CORRECTION, when using
 the
 K10D. This is the exact opposite of what I have done for the last 30
 years!
 I could never get used to this. My K10D requires reversed backlight
 compensation. Surely that can't be right!


It soulds to me like the metering is compensating the sky as if it was a
backlit scene (overexposing to ensure sufficient exposure

RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-15 Thread Jens Bladt
There it is again, Rob.
I'll have to read it sometime...
But I don't use the Adobe engine - I use Phase One LE (love it) and - at for
the time being - Adobe Lightroom (Beta version), since I'm still waitng for
the PH LE up-grade in order to deal with the K10D RAW files. I kinda like
Adobe Lightroom too - except for the stupid long file-names it makes.

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Digital
Image Studio
Sendt: 12. februar 2007 21:59
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)


On 13/02/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  What is ACR, Rob? I curious, since I am definitely going to keep my *ist
D!
 Regards

Adobe Camera RAW, the import engine, see the following article on
calibration of ACR for your camera:

http://www.rags-int-inc.com/PhotoTechStuff/AcrCalibration/

--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.37/682 - Release Date: 02/12/2007
13:23

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.39/687 - Release Date: 02/14/2007
16:17


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-15 Thread Jens Bladt
Thanks, William.
Is this something more sofisticated than just shooting Raw files?
http://www.rags-int-inc.com/PhotoTechStuff/ColorCalibration/
Regards


Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af William
Robb
Sendt: 12. februar 2007 18:01
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)



- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: SV: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
quality?)


 What is ACR, Rob? I curious, since I am definitely going to keep my *ist
 D!

Adobe Camera RAW.

William Robb


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.37/682 - Release Date: 02/12/2007
13:23

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.39/687 - Release Date: 02/14/2007
16:17


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-15 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image 
quality?)


 Thanks, William.
 Is this something more sofisticated than just shooting Raw files?
 http://www.rags-int-inc.com/PhotoTechStuff/ColorCalibration/

Oh yes.
This is how to calibrate ACR so that your pictures come out the right colour 
without fiddling.
At least, I think thats what it is.
Rob S pointed us towards that link, then ran away.
At some point, I'm going to have to try to get my head around this stuff.

William Robb 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-15 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi

On Feb 15, 2007, at 7:59 PM, William Robb wrote:

 Is this something more sofisticated than just shooting Raw files?
 http://www.rags-int-inc.com/PhotoTechStuff/ColorCalibration/

 Oh yes.
 This is how to calibrate ACR so that your pictures come out the  
 right colour
 without fiddling.
 At least, I think thats what it is.
 Rob S pointed us towards that link, then ran away.
 At some point, I'm going to have to try to get my head around this  
 stuff.

I believe the technique is documented in Real World Camera Raw with  
Photoshop CS/CS2 by Bruce Fraser.

G

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: SV: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-13 Thread John Whittingham
 Personally, I've tried several different sets of ACR calibrations 
 for  the *ist DS and K10D that people have posted here and elsewhere 
 ...  and all of them produced results as default starting points for 
 color  balance that were farther off the mark than just opening the 
 DNG file  and setting white balance with the eyedropper tool. 
 Lightroom's white  balance adjustment works even better.

It's great when you have a definitive reference for white, but caused me no 
end of trouble with my recent Cormorant cock-up 8) 

Eventually selecting as shot for the starting point, some of the other 
default settings seem way off the mark, such as daylight, cloudy 
and shade!!!?

The eyedropper in Capture One Pro seems to do a better job, but no support 
for K10D yet, I'm saving my one free upgrade for that :)

On the flip side, Capture One has a real dogs dinner of a GUI but I guess 
it's a case of RTFM 8)

John 



The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error 
please notify Carmel College
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
attachments for viruses we cannot
guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
responsibility for viruses.

Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate 
content, the college cannot
be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel 
College cannot be held
responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: SV: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-13 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 13/02/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm with Godders on this one. What's more, the ideal color
 temperature varies depending on the situation, IMO. For example, when
 I shot wedding reception pics in a somewhat dark restaurant with
 tungsten lighting, I chose to keep the look warm. When I shot ice-
 storm pics, I went for a cold, slightly bluish cast. The tonality is
 part and parcel to the subject meter. Setting it by eye is usually
 the best alternative.

You can choose your preferred WB for any given situation and benefit
from camera RAW calibration, the processes aren't mutually exclusive.

-- 
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: SV: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-13 Thread Paul Stenquist
That makes sense. In any case, I do intend to try the calibration. I 
bookmarked your reference page.
Paul
On Feb 13, 2007, at 7:01 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:

 On 13/02/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm with Godders on this one. What's more, the ideal color
 temperature varies depending on the situation, IMO. For example, when
 I shot wedding reception pics in a somewhat dark restaurant with
 tungsten lighting, I chose to keep the look warm. When I shot ice-
 storm pics, I went for a cold, slightly bluish cast. The tonality is
 part and parcel to the subject meter. Setting it by eye is usually
 the best alternative.

 You can choose your preferred WB for any given situation and benefit
 from camera RAW calibration, the processes aren't mutually exclusive.

 -- 
 Rob Studdert
 HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
 Tel +61-2-9554-4110
 UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
 Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: SV: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-13 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
The key to getting a good white balance is to find and sample a light  
gray area, not a white area...

G

On Feb 13, 2007, at 2:23 AM, John Whittingham wrote:

 It's great when you have a definitive reference for white, but  
 caused me no
 end of trouble with my recent Cormorant cock-up 8)

 Eventually selecting as shot for the starting point, some of the  
 other
 default settings seem way off the mark, such as daylight, cloudy
 and shade!!!?

 The eyedropper in Capture One Pro seems to do a better job, but no  
 support
 for K10D yet, I'm saving my one free upgrade for that :)

 On the flip side, Capture One has a real dogs dinner of a GUI but I  
 guess
 it's a case of RTFM 8)


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: SV: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-13 Thread John Whittingham
 The key to getting a good white balance is to find and sample a 
 light  gray area, not a white area...

I've tried that at first but it never seemed right, maybe I need to re-
install. BTW which version of ACR are you using?


John 



The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error 
please notify Carmel College
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
attachments for viruses we cannot
guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
responsibility for viruses.

Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate 
content, the college cannot
be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel 
College cannot be held
responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: SV: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-13 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Feb 13, 2007, at 8:09 AM, John Whittingham wrote:

 The key to getting a good white balance is to find and sample a
 light  gray area, not a white area...

 I've tried that at first but it never seemed right, maybe I need to  
 re-
 install. BTW which version of ACR are you using?

Right now I'm using Camera Raw v3.6. But the technique isn't limited  
to Camera Raw ... I use the same in Lightroom and in Photoshop on RGB  
images using a Layers Adjustment Layer with the sampler tools. For  
the latter, I set up samplers on target areas with a 5x5 sampling,  
then use the grayscale eyedropper after the white point and black  
point droppers.

I doubt you have to re-install anything, though. Finding the *right*  
gray spot to sample is the trick. ;-)

G


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-13 Thread Tim Øsleby
It ain't easy if it's way overexposed. 
And getting the exposure right at a rock concert ain't easy, with the
constant changes in lighting and people running around way faster than my
manual focusing capabilities. 

On second thought; maybe I should have a second look at the photos. I'm
better at raw converting now. Some of the pictures are of my youngest son
with one of his bands. So it is worth a try.


Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam
Maas
Sent: 13. februar 2007 00:13
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
quality?)

Caucasian skin tones are apparently a problem for Bayer Matrix sensors 
because they are within the frequency response curves for both green and 
red sensor sites, which tends to give an additional red cast to 
caucasian skin. This can be corrected in post fairly easily if you shoot 
RAW of course.


-Adam
Who was just reading about this in a rather good book about 
photographing and post-processing people shots, a book called Skin by 
Lee Varis. And no, it's not about nudes.


Tim Øsleby wrote:
 I've noticed this with my DS too. It is a real PITA in difficult light
(read
 concert shooting). If I don't have time to do proper spot metering I tend
to
 end up with reddish skin cast that is impossible to get rid of in
 processing. I've blown a few gigs doing this.
 
 
 Tim
 Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jens
 Bladt
 Sent: 11. februar 2007 16:14
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Subject: RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
 quality?)
 
 PPS:
 I  have added a little test to my Flickr pages as well:
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157594529582033/
 
 Regards
 
 Jens Bladt
 Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
 http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html
 
 http://www.jensbladt.dk
 +45 56 63 77 11
 +45 23 43 85 77
 Skype: jensbladt248
 
 -Oprindelig meddelelse-
 Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
 Bladt
 Sendt: 11. februar 2007 13:36
 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Emne: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)
 
 
 William, PauI, Godfrey, Rob, Peter, David, John ...
 
 I don't know what the  went wrong yesterday, testing exposure of the
 K10D.
 Perhaps the FA* 2.8/80-200mm is not working right with the K10D?
 Perhaps changing leses many times, metering by manually by Green Button
etc.
 did confuse the cameras or me, or the light perhaps changed betewwn
 switching camera bodies ? I have no idea.
 
 Anyway, today I did some new test shots - comparing the K10D and the *ist
D,
 using two samples of the same Pentax lens:
 The old SMC Pentax-F 4-5.6 35-80mm.
 
 So, I put one of these lenses on both cameras and did a few test shots. I
 shot the same scenery twice -using the same shutterspeed, same settings
 (multi-segnment, WB, contrast, sharpness, saturation, ISO 200, RAW).
 
 And guess what? The results are quite surpirsing.
 It seems to me that the K10D in fact does a better job, dealing with
 contrast.
 The K10D shots are consistantly the most pleasing shots, despite of the
dark
 scenery/bright sky. Such conditions are very common in our (northern)
parts
 of the world (low sun). Very often our contrasty environment requires
manual
 exposure corrections. It seems the K10D handeled the situation quite well.
 Much better than the *ist D.
 I am pleasantly surprised!
 
 Judge for your selves. What do you think?
 
 http://www.jensbladt.dk/Test/K10D-vs-istD/K10D-test-album.html
 
 Thanks for looking - comments area welcome.
 
 Jens Bladt
 Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
 http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html
 
 http://www.jensbladt.dk
 +45 56 63 77 11
 +45 23 43 85 77
 Skype: jensbladt248
 
 -Oprindelig meddelelse-
 Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
 Bladt
 Sendt: 11. februar 2007 01:03
 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Emne: RE: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?
 
 
 No
 I've done this right a 1000 times. And the strategy for a (too) bright sky
 sky IS the same as for a backlit scenry.
 And - so why does the *ist D do the exact scenery right (not over
 compensating)?
 Regards
 Jens Bladt
 Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
 http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html
 
 http://www.jensbladt.dk
 +45 56 63 77 11
 +45 23 43 85 77
 Skype: jensbladt248
 
 -Oprindelig meddelelse-
 Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
William
 Robb
 Sendt: 10. februar 2007 19:55
 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Emne: Re: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?
 
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Jens Bladt
 Subject: RE: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?
 
 
 
 Regarding exposure, I'll do som emore test tomorrow, evenly lit scenes
 (walls, grey card etc.) as well ad contraty ones, im order tio figure

Re: SV: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-13 Thread John Whittingham
 I doubt you have to re-install anything, though. Finding the *right* 
  gray spot to sample is the trick. ;-)

You mean like using the grey card as we all did with film, yes? I never 
considered that *light* grey.

John 



The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error 
please notify Carmel College
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
attachments for viruses we cannot
guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
responsibility for viruses.

Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate 
content, the college cannot
be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel 
College cannot be held
responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: SV: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-13 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi

On Feb 13, 2007, at 10:40 AM, John Whittingham wrote:

 I doubt you have to re-install anything, though. Finding the *right*
  gray spot to sample is the trick. ;-)

 You mean like using the grey card as we all did with film, yes? I  
 never
 considered that *light* grey.

The old standard reference, 18% gray, is a little dark for white  
balance use although it does work fine in good light ... that's  
supposed to be a Zone V gray. I prefer to use a Zone VIII gray, about  
60% gray reflectance.

G

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: SV: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-13 Thread John Whittingham
 The old standard reference, 18% gray, is a little dark for white  
 balance use although it does work fine in good light ... that's  
 supposed to be a Zone V gray. I prefer to use a Zone VIII gray,
 about  60% gray reflectance.

OK, now I'm getting somewhere. I've had less than 300 shutter releases using 
RAW, most were in a controlled environment (testing lenses etc) where I've 
shot film over some 16 years, it was easy to adjust the white balance there, 
now I'm just getting adjusted with my first few outdoor shots, thanks for the 
help.

Regards, 

John 



The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error 
please notify Carmel College
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
attachments for viruses we cannot
guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
responsibility for viruses.

Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate 
content, the college cannot
be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel 
College cannot be held
responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


SV: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-12 Thread Jens Bladt
 What is ACR, Rob? I curious, since I am definitely going to keep my *ist D!
Regards
Jens

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Digital
Image Studio
Sendt: 11. februar 2007 22:47
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)


On 12/02/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 PS:
 I  want to add, that it have always annoyed me a little, that the D has a
 tendency of colouring overexposed areas redish - rendering very bright
parts
 with a reddish cast. That's one of the reasons I had a tendency of
 deliberately underexposing, to totally avoid over exposed parts of the
 images. Thje K10D does not add a reddish cast to the very bright parts.
 My conclusion is that the image quality of K10D images are in fact
superior,
 compared to the quality of a similar *ist D image.

Lots of issues I had with the *ist D rendering went away after I
calibrated ACR to the camera.

--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date: 02/10/2007
21:15

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.37/682 - Release Date: 02/12/2007
13:23


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


SV: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-12 Thread Jens Bladt
Funny, you shoud say that JCO'C. I have been thingking the same since I got
the K10D. The redish cast in the (over) exposed areas have alwasy sbeen a
PITA to me:-)
But unlike the K10D, ito's not possible to fine tune the WB.

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af J. C.
O'Connell
Sendt: 12. februar 2007 03:51
Til: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Emne: RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)


color casts in highlights could be a white balance issue.
jco

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Digital Image Studio
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 4:47 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
quality?)


On 12/02/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 PS:
 I  want to add, that it have always annoyed me a little, that the D
 has a tendency of colouring overexposed areas redish - rendering very
 bright parts with a reddish cast. That's one of the reasons I had a
 tendency of deliberately underexposing, to totally avoid over exposed
 parts of the images. Thje K10D does not add a reddish cast to the very

 bright parts. My conclusion is that the image quality of K10D images
 are in fact superior, compared to the quality of a similar *ist D
 image.

Lots of issues I had with the *ist D rendering went away after I
calibrated ACR to the camera.

--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date: 02/10/2007
21:15

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.37/682 - Release Date: 02/12/2007
13:23


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: SV: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-12 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
Adobe Camera Raw.

Personally, I've tried several different sets of ACR calibrations for  
the *ist DS and K10D that people have posted here and elsewhere ...  
and all of them produced results as default starting points for color  
balance that were farther off the mark than just opening the DNG file  
and setting white balance with the eyedropper tool. Lightroom's white  
balance adjustment works even better.

I don't think that calibration is a waste of time, however. I just  
haven't found anyone's calibration that works better than what is  
offered as a default. It's so easy to adjust color balances when  
dealing with RAW format data I don't know why there's so much fuss  
about it.

G

On Feb 12, 2007, at 8:06 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:

  What is ACR, Rob? I curious, since I am definitely going to keep  
 my *ist D!


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-12 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: SV: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image 
quality?)


 What is ACR, Rob? I curious, since I am definitely going to keep my *ist 
 D!

Adobe Camera RAW.

William Robb 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-12 Thread J. C. O'Connell
Its always possible to fine tune the highlights color
(color correct) any image if you really have to in photoshop
using the color correction adjustments, set on hightlights.
jco

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jens Bladt
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 11:09 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: SV: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
quality?)


Funny, you shoud say that JCO'C. I have been thingking the same since I
got the K10D. The redish cast in the (over) exposed areas have alwasy
sbeen a PITA to me:-) But unlike the K10D, ito's not possible to fine
tune the WB.

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af J.
C. O'Connell
Sendt: 12. februar 2007 03:51
Til: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Emne: RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
quality?)


color casts in highlights could be a white balance issue.
jco

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Digital Image Studio
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 4:47 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
quality?)


On 12/02/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 PS:
 I  want to add, that it have always annoyed me a little, that the D 
 has a tendency of colouring overexposed areas redish - rendering very 
 bright parts with a reddish cast. That's one of the reasons I had a 
 tendency of deliberately underexposing, to totally avoid over exposed 
 parts of the images. Thje K10D does not add a reddish cast to the very

 bright parts. My conclusion is that the image quality of K10D images 
 are in fact superior, compared to the quality of a similar *ist D 
 image.

Lots of issues I had with the *ist D rendering went away after I
calibrated ACR to the camera.

--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date:
02/10/2007 21:15

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.37/682 - Release Date:
02/12/2007 13:23


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-12 Thread Tim Øsleby
I've noticed this with my DS too. It is a real PITA in difficult light (read
concert shooting). If I don't have time to do proper spot metering I tend to
end up with reddish skin cast that is impossible to get rid of in
processing. I've blown a few gigs doing this.


Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jens
Bladt
Sent: 11. februar 2007 16:14
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
quality?)

PPS:
I  have added a little test to my Flickr pages as well:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157594529582033/

Regards

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
Bladt
Sendt: 11. februar 2007 13:36
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)


William, PauI, Godfrey, Rob, Peter, David, John ...

I don't know what the  went wrong yesterday, testing exposure of the
K10D.
Perhaps the FA* 2.8/80-200mm is not working right with the K10D?
Perhaps changing leses many times, metering by manually by Green Button etc.
did confuse the cameras or me, or the light perhaps changed betewwn
switching camera bodies ? I have no idea.

Anyway, today I did some new test shots - comparing the K10D and the *ist D,
using two samples of the same Pentax lens:
The old SMC Pentax-F 4-5.6 35-80mm.

So, I put one of these lenses on both cameras and did a few test shots. I
shot the same scenery twice -using the same shutterspeed, same settings
(multi-segnment, WB, contrast, sharpness, saturation, ISO 200, RAW).

And guess what? The results are quite surpirsing.
It seems to me that the K10D in fact does a better job, dealing with
contrast.
The K10D shots are consistantly the most pleasing shots, despite of the dark
scenery/bright sky. Such conditions are very common in our (northern) parts
of the world (low sun). Very often our contrasty environment requires manual
exposure corrections. It seems the K10D handeled the situation quite well.
Much better than the *ist D.
I am pleasantly surprised!

Judge for your selves. What do you think?

http://www.jensbladt.dk/Test/K10D-vs-istD/K10D-test-album.html

Thanks for looking - comments area welcome.

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
Bladt
Sendt: 11. februar 2007 01:03
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: RE: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?


No
I've done this right a 1000 times. And the strategy for a (too) bright sky
sky IS the same as for a backlit scenry.
And - so why does the *ist D do the exact scenery right (not over
compensating)?
Regards
Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af William
Robb
Sendt: 10. februar 2007 19:55
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?



- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?



 Regarding exposure, I'll do som emore test tomorrow, evenly lit scenes
 (walls, grey card etc.) as well ad contraty ones, im order tio figure out
 if
 the meter is off or if the matrix metering is over reacting. Surely I
 can't
 live with this.

 When photographing a a scenery with a very bright sky (very common in the
 northern parts og the world) I must dial in MINUS CORRECTION, when using
 the
 K10D. This is the exact opposite of what I have done for the last 30
 years!
 I could never get used to this. My K10D requires reversed backlight
 compensation. Surely that can't be right!


It soulds to me like the metering is compensating the sky as if it was a
backlit scene (overexposing to ensure sufficient exposure to the subject).
This is what we call subject failure in the industry.
I think you will find the meter is behaving normally, and that you will need
to adjust your metering strategy for this scene type.

William Robb


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.33/678 - Release Date: 02/09/2007
16:06

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.33/678 - Release Date: 02/09/2007
16:06


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
No virus

Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-12 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 13/02/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  What is ACR, Rob? I curious, since I am definitely going to keep my *ist D!
 Regards

Adobe Camera RAW, the import engine, see the following article on
calibration of ACR for your camera:

http://www.rags-int-inc.com/PhotoTechStuff/AcrCalibration/

-- 
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-12 Thread Adam Maas
Caucasian skin tones are apparently a problem for Bayer Matrix sensors 
because they are within the frequency response curves for both green and 
red sensor sites, which tends to give an additional red cast to 
caucasian skin. This can be corrected in post fairly easily if you shoot 
RAW of course.


-Adam
Who was just reading about this in a rather good book about 
photographing and post-processing people shots, a book called Skin by 
Lee Varis. And no, it's not about nudes.


Tim Øsleby wrote:
 I've noticed this with my DS too. It is a real PITA in difficult light (read
 concert shooting). If I don't have time to do proper spot metering I tend to
 end up with reddish skin cast that is impossible to get rid of in
 processing. I've blown a few gigs doing this.
 
 
 Tim
 Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jens
 Bladt
 Sent: 11. februar 2007 16:14
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Subject: RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
 quality?)
 
 PPS:
 I  have added a little test to my Flickr pages as well:
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157594529582033/
 
 Regards
 
 Jens Bladt
 Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
 http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html
 
 http://www.jensbladt.dk
 +45 56 63 77 11
 +45 23 43 85 77
 Skype: jensbladt248
 
 -Oprindelig meddelelse-
 Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
 Bladt
 Sendt: 11. februar 2007 13:36
 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Emne: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)
 
 
 William, PauI, Godfrey, Rob, Peter, David, John ...
 
 I don't know what the  went wrong yesterday, testing exposure of the
 K10D.
 Perhaps the FA* 2.8/80-200mm is not working right with the K10D?
 Perhaps changing leses many times, metering by manually by Green Button etc.
 did confuse the cameras or me, or the light perhaps changed betewwn
 switching camera bodies ? I have no idea.
 
 Anyway, today I did some new test shots - comparing the K10D and the *ist D,
 using two samples of the same Pentax lens:
 The old SMC Pentax-F 4-5.6 35-80mm.
 
 So, I put one of these lenses on both cameras and did a few test shots. I
 shot the same scenery twice -using the same shutterspeed, same settings
 (multi-segnment, WB, contrast, sharpness, saturation, ISO 200, RAW).
 
 And guess what? The results are quite surpirsing.
 It seems to me that the K10D in fact does a better job, dealing with
 contrast.
 The K10D shots are consistantly the most pleasing shots, despite of the dark
 scenery/bright sky. Such conditions are very common in our (northern) parts
 of the world (low sun). Very often our contrasty environment requires manual
 exposure corrections. It seems the K10D handeled the situation quite well.
 Much better than the *ist D.
 I am pleasantly surprised!
 
 Judge for your selves. What do you think?
 
 http://www.jensbladt.dk/Test/K10D-vs-istD/K10D-test-album.html
 
 Thanks for looking - comments area welcome.
 
 Jens Bladt
 Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
 http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html
 
 http://www.jensbladt.dk
 +45 56 63 77 11
 +45 23 43 85 77
 Skype: jensbladt248
 
 -Oprindelig meddelelse-
 Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
 Bladt
 Sendt: 11. februar 2007 01:03
 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Emne: RE: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?
 
 
 No
 I've done this right a 1000 times. And the strategy for a (too) bright sky
 sky IS the same as for a backlit scenry.
 And - so why does the *ist D do the exact scenery right (not over
 compensating)?
 Regards
 Jens Bladt
 Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
 http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html
 
 http://www.jensbladt.dk
 +45 56 63 77 11
 +45 23 43 85 77
 Skype: jensbladt248
 
 -Oprindelig meddelelse-
 Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af William
 Robb
 Sendt: 10. februar 2007 19:55
 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Emne: Re: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?
 
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Jens Bladt
 Subject: RE: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?
 
 
 
 Regarding exposure, I'll do som emore test tomorrow, evenly lit scenes
 (walls, grey card etc.) as well ad contraty ones, im order tio figure out
 if
 the meter is off or if the matrix metering is over reacting. Surely I
 can't
 live with this.

 When photographing a a scenery with a very bright sky (very common in the
 northern parts og the world) I must dial in MINUS CORRECTION, when using
 the
 K10D. This is the exact opposite of what I have done for the last 30
 years!
 I could never get used to this. My K10D requires reversed backlight
 compensation. Surely that can't be right!

 
 It soulds to me like the metering is compensating the sky as if it was a
 backlit scene (overexposing to ensure sufficient exposure to the subject).
 This is what we call subject failure in the industry.
 I think you will find the meter

Re: SV: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-12 Thread David Savage
ACR = Adobe Camera RAW.

Cheers,

Dave

At 01:06 AM 13/02/2007, Jens Bladt wrote:
  What is ACR, Rob? I curious, since I am definitely going to keep my *ist D!
Regards
Jens

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Digital
Image Studio
Sendt: 11. februar 2007 22:47
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)


On 12/02/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  PS:
  I  want to add, that it have always annoyed me a little, that the D has a
  tendency of colouring overexposed areas redish - rendering very bright
parts
  with a reddish cast. That's one of the reasons I had a tendency of
  deliberately underexposing, to totally avoid over exposed parts of the
  images. Thje K10D does not add a reddish cast to the very bright parts.
  My conclusion is that the image quality of K10D images are in fact
superior,
  compared to the quality of a similar *ist D image.

Lots of issues I had with the *ist D rendering went away after I
calibrated ACR to the camera.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: SV: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-12 Thread Paul Stenquist
I'm with Godders on this one. What's more, the ideal color  
temperature varies depending on the situation, IMO. For example, when  
I shot wedding reception pics in a somewhat dark restaurant with  
tungsten lighting, I chose to keep the look warm. When I shot ice- 
storm pics, I went for a cold, slightly bluish cast. The tonality is  
part and parcel to the subject meter. Setting it by eye is usually  
the best alternative.
Paul
On Feb 12, 2007, at 12:12 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:

 Adobe Camera Raw.

 Personally, I've tried several different sets of ACR calibrations for
 the *ist DS and K10D that people have posted here and elsewhere ...
 and all of them produced results as default starting points for color
 balance that were farther off the mark than just opening the DNG file
 and setting white balance with the eyedropper tool. Lightroom's white
 balance adjustment works even better.

 I don't think that calibration is a waste of time, however. I just
 haven't found anyone's calibration that works better than what is
 offered as a default. It's so easy to adjust color balances when
 dealing with RAW format data I don't know why there's so much fuss
 about it.

 G

 On Feb 12, 2007, at 8:06 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:

  What is ACR, Rob? I curious, since I am definitely going to keep
 my *ist D!


 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-11 Thread Jens Bladt
William, PauI, Godfrey, Rob, Peter, David, John ...

I don't know what the  went wrong yesterday, testing exposure of the
K10D.
Perhaps the FA* 2.8/80-200mm is not working right with the K10D?
Perhaps changing leses many times, metering by manually by Green Button etc.
did confuse the cameras or me, or the light perhaps changed betewwn
switching camera bodies ? I have no idea.

Anyway, today I did some new test shots - comparing the K10D and the *ist D,
using two samples of the same Pentax lens:
The old SMC Pentax-F 4-5.6 35-80mm.

So, I put one of these lenses on both cameras and did a few test shots. I
shot the same scenery twice -using the same shutterspeed, same settings
(multi-segnment, WB, contrast, sharpness, saturation, ISO 200, RAW).

And guess what? The results are quite surpirsing.
It seems to me that the K10D in fact does a better job, dealing with
contrast.
The K10D shots are consistantly the most pleasing shots, despite of the dark
scenery/bright sky. Such conditions are very common in our (northern) parts
of the world (low sun). Very often our contrasty environment requires manual
exposure corrections. It seems the K10D handeled the situation quite well.
Much better than the *ist D.
I am pleasantly surprised!

Judge for your selves. What do you think?

http://www.jensbladt.dk/Test/K10D-vs-istD/K10D-test-album.html

Thanks for looking - comments area welcome.

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
Bladt
Sendt: 11. februar 2007 01:03
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: RE: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?


No
I've done this right a 1000 times. And the strategy for a (too) bright sky
sky IS the same as for a backlit scenry.
And - so why does the *ist D do the exact scenery right (not over
compensating)?
Regards
Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af William
Robb
Sendt: 10. februar 2007 19:55
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?



- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?



 Regarding exposure, I'll do som emore test tomorrow, evenly lit scenes
 (walls, grey card etc.) as well ad contraty ones, im order tio figure out
 if
 the meter is off or if the matrix metering is over reacting. Surely I
 can't
 live with this.

 When photographing a a scenery with a very bright sky (very common in the
 northern parts og the world) I must dial in MINUS CORRECTION, when using
 the
 K10D. This is the exact opposite of what I have done for the last 30
 years!
 I could never get used to this. My K10D requires reversed backlight
 compensation. Surely that can't be right!


It soulds to me like the metering is compensating the sky as if it was a
backlit scene (overexposing to ensure sufficient exposure to the subject).
This is what we call subject failure in the industry.
I think you will find the meter is behaving normally, and that you will need
to adjust your metering strategy for this scene type.

William Robb


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.33/678 - Release Date: 02/09/2007
16:06

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.33/678 - Release Date: 02/09/2007
16:06


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.33/678 - Release Date: 02/09/2007
16:06

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date: 02/10/2007
21:15


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-11 Thread Boris Liberman
Jens, at al. I did not perform any tests such as this one, however my
general impression is that K10D:
1. Has slightly wider dynamic range.
2. Has more consistent auto white balance operation.
3. Renders images in somewhat more faithful way. The colors look more natural.

Just my cents.



On 2/11/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 William, PauI, Godfrey, Rob, Peter, David, John ...
 ...
 And guess what? The results are quite surpirsing.
 It seems to me that the K10D in fact does a better job, dealing with
 contrast.
 ...
 Judge for your selves. What do you think?

 http://www.jensbladt.dk/Test/K10D-vs-istD/K10D-test-album.html

 Thanks for looking - comments area welcome.
-- 
Boris

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-11 Thread J. C. O'Connell
Your conclusion is most likely correct based on overall experiences
with these cameras, but I would question a few things in this specific
test
procedure. The exact same lens should be used on both cameras and the
images should
be tweeked on one of the cameras via fine bracketing for exposure value
to make up for any variations in camera metering or shutter speeds
from camera to camera. It would also be interesting to see what
differences
remain with both images optimized manually in RAW conversion and
photoshop tweeking.

I dont know about the K10D, but my istDS doesnt do that great on a
bright
sunny day scene with lots shadows compared to typical color neg film.
Its more like medium
speed slide film with regards to handling high contrast scenes like
that.
jco

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 7:55 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
quality?)


Jens, at al. I did not perform any tests such as this one, however my
general impression is that K10D: 1. Has slightly wider dynamic range. 2.
Has more consistent auto white balance operation. 3. Renders images in
somewhat more faithful way. The colors look more natural.

Just my cents.



On 2/11/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 William, PauI, Godfrey, Rob, Peter, David, John ...
 ...
 And guess what? The results are quite surpirsing.
 It seems to me that the K10D in fact does a better job, dealing with 
 contrast. ...
 Judge for your selves. What do you think?

 http://www.jensbladt.dk/Test/K10D-vs-istD/K10D-test-album.html

 Thanks for looking - comments area welcome.
-- 
Boris

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-11 Thread Jens Bladt
PS:
I  want to add, that it have always annoyed me a little, that the D has a
tendency of colouring overexposed areas redish - rendering very bright parts
with a reddish cast. That's one of the reasons I had a tendency of
deliberately underexposing, to totally avoid over exposed parts of the
images. Thje K10D does not add a reddish cast to the very bright parts.
My conclusion is that the image quality of K10D images are in fact superior,
compared to the quality of a similar *ist D image.
Regards

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
Bladt
Sendt: 11. februar 2007 13:36
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)


William, PauI, Godfrey, Rob, Peter, David, John ...

I don't know what the  went wrong yesterday, testing exposure of the
K10D.
Perhaps the FA* 2.8/80-200mm is not working right with the K10D?
Perhaps changing leses many times, metering by manually by Green Button etc.
did confuse the cameras or me, or the light perhaps changed betewwn
switching camera bodies ? I have no idea.

Anyway, today I did some new test shots - comparing the K10D and the *ist D,
using two samples of the same Pentax lens:
The old SMC Pentax-F 4-5.6 35-80mm.

So, I put one of these lenses on both cameras and did a few test shots. I
shot the same scenery twice -using the same shutterspeed, same settings
(multi-segnment, WB, contrast, sharpness, saturation, ISO 200, RAW).

And guess what? The results are quite surpirsing.
It seems to me that the K10D in fact does a better job, dealing with
contrast.
The K10D shots are consistantly the most pleasing shots, despite of the dark
scenery/bright sky. Such conditions are very common in our (northern) parts
of the world (low sun). Very often our contrasty environment requires manual
exposure corrections. It seems the K10D handeled the situation quite well.
Much better than the *ist D.
I am pleasantly surprised!

Judge for your selves. What do you think?

http://www.jensbladt.dk/Test/K10D-vs-istD/K10D-test-album.html

Thanks for looking - comments area welcome.

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
Bladt
Sendt: 11. februar 2007 01:03
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: RE: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?


No
I've done this right a 1000 times. And the strategy for a (too) bright sky
sky IS the same as for a backlit scenry.
And - so why does the *ist D do the exact scenery right (not over
compensating)?
Regards
Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af William
Robb
Sendt: 10. februar 2007 19:55
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?



- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?



 Regarding exposure, I'll do som emore test tomorrow, evenly lit scenes
 (walls, grey card etc.) as well ad contraty ones, im order tio figure out
 if
 the meter is off or if the matrix metering is over reacting. Surely I
 can't
 live with this.

 When photographing a a scenery with a very bright sky (very common in the
 northern parts og the world) I must dial in MINUS CORRECTION, when using
 the
 K10D. This is the exact opposite of what I have done for the last 30
 years!
 I could never get used to this. My K10D requires reversed backlight
 compensation. Surely that can't be right!


It soulds to me like the metering is compensating the sky as if it was a
backlit scene (overexposing to ensure sufficient exposure to the subject).
This is what we call subject failure in the industry.
I think you will find the meter is behaving normally, and that you will need
to adjust your metering strategy for this scene type.

William Robb


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.33/678 - Release Date: 02/09/2007
16:06

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.33/678 - Release Date: 02/09/2007
16:06


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.33/678 - Release Date: 02/09/2007
16:06

--
No virus found in this outgoing

RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-11 Thread Jens Bladt
PPS:
I  have added a little test to my Flickr pages as well:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157594529582033/

Regards

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
Bladt
Sendt: 11. februar 2007 13:36
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)


William, PauI, Godfrey, Rob, Peter, David, John ...

I don't know what the  went wrong yesterday, testing exposure of the
K10D.
Perhaps the FA* 2.8/80-200mm is not working right with the K10D?
Perhaps changing leses many times, metering by manually by Green Button etc.
did confuse the cameras or me, or the light perhaps changed betewwn
switching camera bodies ? I have no idea.

Anyway, today I did some new test shots - comparing the K10D and the *ist D,
using two samples of the same Pentax lens:
The old SMC Pentax-F 4-5.6 35-80mm.

So, I put one of these lenses on both cameras and did a few test shots. I
shot the same scenery twice -using the same shutterspeed, same settings
(multi-segnment, WB, contrast, sharpness, saturation, ISO 200, RAW).

And guess what? The results are quite surpirsing.
It seems to me that the K10D in fact does a better job, dealing with
contrast.
The K10D shots are consistantly the most pleasing shots, despite of the dark
scenery/bright sky. Such conditions are very common in our (northern) parts
of the world (low sun). Very often our contrasty environment requires manual
exposure corrections. It seems the K10D handeled the situation quite well.
Much better than the *ist D.
I am pleasantly surprised!

Judge for your selves. What do you think?

http://www.jensbladt.dk/Test/K10D-vs-istD/K10D-test-album.html

Thanks for looking - comments area welcome.

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
Bladt
Sendt: 11. februar 2007 01:03
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: RE: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?


No
I've done this right a 1000 times. And the strategy for a (too) bright sky
sky IS the same as for a backlit scenry.
And - so why does the *ist D do the exact scenery right (not over
compensating)?
Regards
Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af William
Robb
Sendt: 10. februar 2007 19:55
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?



- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: *ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?



 Regarding exposure, I'll do som emore test tomorrow, evenly lit scenes
 (walls, grey card etc.) as well ad contraty ones, im order tio figure out
 if
 the meter is off or if the matrix metering is over reacting. Surely I
 can't
 live with this.

 When photographing a a scenery with a very bright sky (very common in the
 northern parts og the world) I must dial in MINUS CORRECTION, when using
 the
 K10D. This is the exact opposite of what I have done for the last 30
 years!
 I could never get used to this. My K10D requires reversed backlight
 compensation. Surely that can't be right!


It soulds to me like the metering is compensating the sky as if it was a
backlit scene (overexposing to ensure sufficient exposure to the subject).
This is what we call subject failure in the industry.
I think you will find the meter is behaving normally, and that you will need
to adjust your metering strategy for this scene type.

William Robb


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.33/678 - Release Date: 02/09/2007
16:06

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.33/678 - Release Date: 02/09/2007
16:06


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.33/678 - Release Date: 02/09/2007
16:06

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date: 02/10/2007
21:15


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date: 02/10/2007
21:15

Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-11 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
Whatever the issue was, i'm glad you have sorted it out to your  
satisfaction.

A proper exposure test would mean, to me,  using the same lens and  
repeating the exact same setup/capture with each of the two camera  
bodies you are comparing.

Godfrey

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-11 Thread Jens Bladt
Godfrey, that's basically what I did!
If not the very same lens -  just two lenses of the exact same model and
make.
Two K10D's or two  *ist D's may be slightlydifferent too.
HAd I used the saqme lens - the time difference woukld have been greater
too. My test shots were done just seconds apart.
You can't really do the exact same thing twice, can you?
Regards

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Godfrey
DiGiorgi
Sendt: 11. februar 2007 16:33
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)


Whatever the issue was, i'm glad you have sorted it out to your
satisfaction.

A proper exposure test would mean, to me,  using the same lens and
repeating the exact same setup/capture with each of the two camera
bodies you are comparing.

Godfrey

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date: 02/10/2007
21:15

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date: 02/10/2007
21:15


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-11 Thread Jens Bladt
JCO, Boris, Godfrey
For my purposes I don't really need scientific tests. I'm not a scientist -
just a photographer, who wnats to know my tools.
I just need to know, if my genral approach to exposure has to change (using
a different strategy for exposure corretions).
And I wanted to know if my camera meter was off. I believe I have a negative
answer to both questions now :-)
Except perhaps that the need for exposure corrections (in order to avoid
over exposed highlights) has become a some what smaller, when using the
K10D.

How the K10D will react to sunny sceneries with deep shadows - I have no
idea. But I'm sure that the 67% increase of the amount of pixels - and a
larger colour depth, will in fact mean improved dynamic range, thus more
room for post editing. This may very well be one of the reasons Pentax to
choose to let this camera render the images a litle bit darker (this suits
me jsut fine). It won't be a huge problem dealing with this later. It would
have been much worse having to deal with burned out highlights - believe me,
I know :-).

Regards
Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af J. C.
O'Connell
Sendt: 11. februar 2007 14:16
Til: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Emne: RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)


Your conclusion is most likely correct based on overall experiences
with these cameras, but I would question a few things in this specific
test
procedure. The exact same lens should be used on both cameras and the
images should
be tweeked on one of the cameras via fine bracketing for exposure value
to make up for any variations in camera metering or shutter speeds
from camera to camera. It would also be interesting to see what
differences
remain with both images optimized manually in RAW conversion and
photoshop tweeking.

I dont know about the K10D, but my istDS doesnt do that great on a
bright
sunny day scene with lots shadows compared to typical color neg film.
Its more like medium
speed slide film with regards to handling high contrast scenes like
that.
jco

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 7:55 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
quality?)


Jens, at al. I did not perform any tests such as this one, however my
general impression is that K10D: 1. Has slightly wider dynamic range. 2.
Has more consistent auto white balance operation. 3. Renders images in
somewhat more faithful way. The colors look more natural.

Just my cents.



On 2/11/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 William, PauI, Godfrey, Rob, Peter, David, John ...
 ...
 And guess what? The results are quite surpirsing.
 It seems to me that the K10D in fact does a better job, dealing with
 contrast. ...
 Judge for your selves. What do you think?

 http://www.jensbladt.dk/Test/K10D-vs-istD/K10D-test-album.html

 Thanks for looking - comments area welcome.
--
Boris

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date: 02/10/2007
21:15

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date: 02/10/2007
21:15


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-11 Thread J. C. O'Connell
yes, but by using two different lenses (even of same model) you
may be seeing variations due to the lens both optically and
mechanically( fstop variation causing exposure variation). This
along with possible shutter speed variations from body to body
is why I suggested you should have fine bracketed one of the
bodies so you could get an overall exposure (density) that matched the
other for
sure, and then compare the dynamics.
jco

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jens Bladt
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 10:52 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
quality?)


Godfrey, that's basically what I did!
If not the very same lens -  just two lenses of the exact same model and
make. Two K10D's or two  *ist D's may be slightlydifferent too. HAd I
used the saqme lens - the time difference woukld have been greater too.
My test shots were done just seconds apart. You can't really do the
exact same thing twice, can you? Regards

Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sendt: 11. februar 2007 16:33
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
quality?)


Whatever the issue was, i'm glad you have sorted it out to your
satisfaction.

A proper exposure test would mean, to me,  using the same lens and
repeating the exact same setup/capture with each of the two camera
bodies you are comparing.

Godfrey

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date:
02/10/2007 21:15

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date:
02/10/2007 21:15


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-11 Thread J. C. O'Connell
I didnt say your conclusions were incorrect, I just stated
some ways to improve your tests ( for next time you might
try running one like that). If you are running a test, might
as well run best one easily possible.
jco

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jens Bladt
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 11:12 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
quality?)


JCO, Boris, Godfrey
For my purposes I don't really need scientific tests. I'm not a
scientist - just a photographer, who wnats to know my tools. I just need
to know, if my genral approach to exposure has to change (using a
different strategy for exposure corretions). And I wanted to know if my
camera meter was off. I believe I have a negative answer to both
questions now :-) Except perhaps that the need for exposure corrections
(in order to avoid over exposed highlights) has become a some what
smaller, when using the K10D.

How the K10D will react to sunny sceneries with deep shadows - I have no
idea. But I'm sure that the 67% increase of the amount of pixels - and a
larger colour depth, will in fact mean improved dynamic range, thus more
room for post editing. This may very well be one of the reasons Pentax
to choose to let this camera render the images a litle bit darker (this
suits me jsut fine). It won't be a huge problem dealing with this later.
It would have been much worse having to deal with burned out highlights
- believe me, I know :-).

Regards
Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af J.
C. O'Connell
Sendt: 11. februar 2007 14:16
Til: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Emne: RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
quality?)


Your conclusion is most likely correct based on overall experiences with
these cameras, but I would question a few things in this specific test
procedure. The exact same lens should be used on both cameras and the
images should be tweeked on one of the cameras via fine bracketing for
exposure value to make up for any variations in camera metering or
shutter speeds from camera to camera. It would also be interesting to
see what differences remain with both images optimized manually in RAW
conversion and photoshop tweeking.

I dont know about the K10D, but my istDS doesnt do that great on a
bright sunny day scene with lots shadows compared to typical color neg
film. Its more like medium speed slide film with regards to handling
high contrast scenes like that. jco

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 7:55 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
quality?)


Jens, at al. I did not perform any tests such as this one, however my
general impression is that K10D: 1. Has slightly wider dynamic range. 2.
Has more consistent auto white balance operation. 3. Renders images in
somewhat more faithful way. The colors look more natural.

Just my cents.



On 2/11/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 William, PauI, Godfrey, Rob, Peter, David, John ...
 ...
 And guess what? The results are quite surpirsing.
 It seems to me that the K10D in fact does a better job, dealing with 
 contrast. ... Judge for your selves. What do you think?

 http://www.jensbladt.dk/Test/K10D-vs-istD/K10D-test-album.html

 Thanks for looking - comments area welcome.
--
Boris

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date:
02/10/2007 21:15

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date:
02/10/2007 21:15


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-11 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
Using the same lens will give you more accuracy as lenses vary one to  
another.

Of course, you're testing just one sample of K10D against one sample  
of *ist D bodies, but I thought that's what you were after.

You can make the exact same test regardless of time, if you work with  
controlled lighting as opposed to outdoor lighting.

G


On Feb 11, 2007, at 7:52 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:

 Godfrey, that's basically what I did!
 If not the very same lens -  just two lenses of the exact same  
 model and
 make.
 Two K10D's or two  *ist D's may be slightlydifferent too.
 HAd I used the saqme lens - the time difference woukld have been  
 greater
 too. My test shots were done just seconds apart.
 You can't really do the exact same thing twice, can you?


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-11 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 12/02/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 PS:
 I  want to add, that it have always annoyed me a little, that the D has a
 tendency of colouring overexposed areas redish - rendering very bright parts
 with a reddish cast. That's one of the reasons I had a tendency of
 deliberately underexposing, to totally avoid over exposed parts of the
 images. Thje K10D does not add a reddish cast to the very bright parts.
 My conclusion is that the image quality of K10D images are in fact superior,
 compared to the quality of a similar *ist D image.

Lots of issues I had with the *ist D rendering went away after I
calibrated ACR to the camera.

-- 
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


RE: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-11 Thread J. C. O'Connell
color casts in highlights could be a white balance issue.
jco

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Digital Image Studio
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 4:47 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image
quality?)


On 12/02/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 PS:
 I  want to add, that it have always annoyed me a little, that the D 
 has a tendency of colouring overexposed areas redish - rendering very 
 bright parts with a reddish cast. That's one of the reasons I had a 
 tendency of deliberately underexposing, to totally avoid over exposed 
 parts of the images. Thje K10D does not add a reddish cast to the very

 bright parts. My conclusion is that the image quality of K10D images 
 are in fact superior, compared to the quality of a similar *ist D 
 image.

Lots of issues I had with the *ist D rendering went away after I
calibrated ACR to the camera.

-- 
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Better K10D exposure-tests (Was:*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?)

2007-02-11 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 12/02/07, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 color casts in highlights could be a white balance issue.

It could be but generally if the WB has been made from a reference
patch of mid-range exposure and your shadows still show tints then the
default Shadow Tint (advanced calibrate tab) may not be appropriate
for the camera. The following article is worth a read:

http://www.rags-int-inc.com/PhotoTechStuff/AcrCalibration/

-- 
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net