RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!
I wonder if Ed has had an email from Apple about this post? http://www.modaco.com/index.php?s=0cc2b08f572c749e2acefd4d30ef1f41showt opic=251112 We represent Apple Computer, Inc. (Apple) and are authorized to act on Apple's behalf to investigate and take legal action with respect to the unauthorized dissemination of Apple's copyrighted material Oh dear. Tristan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Felton Posted At: 12 January 2007 01:16 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Subject: RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! I think I spy an iPhoney Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tristan Leask Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 10:48 AM To: profox@leafe.com Subject:RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! http://www.tleask.plus.com/iphone.bmp And here is the post with the plugins... http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=1097832postcount=70 Tristan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tristan Leask Posted At: 11 January 2007 15:46 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Subject: RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Doh, hang on Tristan -- This email was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless otherwise agreed expressly in writing by Marine Software Limited, this communication and attachments are to be treated as confidential and the information in it may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it was sent. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication you should destroy it without copying, disclosing or otherwise using its contents. Please notify the sender immediately of the error. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Pete Theisen wrote: On Sunday 14 January 2007 3:07 pm, Bill Arnold wrote: snip The only real way to stop them is to stop people from wanting to use them. Hi Bill! That is called appeasement Never worked. Wow! And you know the 'correct' word. How's that called? Anyway, if you know it is called 'appeasement' you MUST be right. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Michael Madigan wrote: Retard, Where did I say deport? I said they would obviously be more happy in another country. Maybe they can all go to Argentina where all the other Nazis went. Nah! We are all retards around here. Ask your SS (a.k.a. secret service). --- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: Thanks Jeff. Sometimes you wonder if some of the people on this list wouldn't enjoy the rest of their life better in some other country. What's keeping them here? Isn't it immoral for them to remain in such a terrible place? I think maybe they should move to France. I wonder what you'll have to say about my post. At least you won't be telling me to go live somewhere else hahaha. BTW, what happened with the land of the free? Are you now deporting those who don't follow Big Brother's line of thought? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Michael Madigan wrote: Of course the dirty Arabs attacked Israel on a Jewish holy day. But of course a Jew-hater like you would conveniently forget that. Did you mean to say Israeli-hater? Can you perceive the difference? --- Bill Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It wouldn't matter to us much if they didn't control a commodity that the whole world has developed a dependence on. Oil When OPEC decided to flex their muscle in the mid 70's, it sent shock waves through out the entire world economically speaking. Double digit inflation, double digit unemployment and the deepest economic problems that the U.S. had faced since the great depression. Yup, that really sucked. You seem to forget that was due to the fact that USA broke the Bretton Woods agreement which stated that dollar was to be tied to gold reserves in USA. The dollar stopped being backed by gold, it started devaluating and the OPEC took action. The 1973 oil crisis first began on October 17, 1973 when the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC), consisting of the Arab members of Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries(OPEC) plus Egypt and Syria, announced as a result of the ongoing Yom Kippur War, that they would no longer ship petroleum to nations that had supported Israel in its conflict with Syria and Egypt. This included the United States and its allies in Western Europe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_oil_crisis But on October 17, OPEC struck back against the West by imposing an oil embargo on the U.S., while increasing prices by 70% to America's Western European allies. Overnight, the price of a barrel of oil to these nations rose from $3 to $5.11. [In January 1974, they raised it further to $11.65.] The U.S. and the Netherlands, in particular, were singled out for their support of Israel in the war. http://www.buyandhold.com/bh/en/education/history/2002/arab.html The embargo was applied to oil-importing countries on a sliding scale depending on each country's relationship with Israel. The United States, the Netherlands, and South Africa were Israel's strongest supporters and thus bore the brunt of the embargo-a total ban on the shipment of Arab oil. http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/Oli-Per/Organization-of -Petroleum-Exporting-Countries-OPEC.html Bill ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] the root of our problem
Pete Theisen wrote: On Saturday 13 January 2007 8:46 am, Bill Arnold wrote: A major example of what I'm saying, which I should have mentioned, is Bush's recent speech. While listening to it, I found myself really wanting that, for each point he made, equal space existed - in that same space - for counter-points. Hi Bill! Oh, that's right. That you are the status to debate Bush. Regards, Pete Yeah Bill! You should get a lobotomy first. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Ricardo, Haven't you worked out yet that in Michaels mind, if you criticize anything to do with Israel you are a Jew Hater. Likewise were you to criticize GWB's tie then you'd be a traitor, were you to be American Citizen. If you criticicized and are not a US citizen then you're a terrorist. ::a PS He doesn't know the definition of liberal either. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: 15 January 2007 09:16 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan Michael Madigan wrote: Of course the dirty Arabs attacked Israel on a Jewish holy day. But of course a Jew-hater like you would conveniently forget that. Did you mean to say Israeli-hater? Can you perceive the difference? --- Bill Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It wouldn't matter to us much if they didn't control a commodity that the whole world has developed a dependence on. Oil When OPEC decided to flex their muscle in the mid 70's, it sent shock waves through out the entire world economically speaking. Double digit inflation, double digit unemployment and the deepest economic problems that the U.S. had faced since the great depression. Yup, that really sucked. You seem to forget that was due to the fact that USA broke the Bretton Woods agreement which stated that dollar was to be tied to gold reserves in USA. The dollar stopped being backed by gold, it started devaluating and the OPEC took action. The 1973 oil crisis first began on October 17, 1973 when the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC), consisting of the Arab members of Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries(OPEC) plus Egypt and Syria, announced as a result of the ongoing Yom Kippur War, that they would no longer ship petroleum to nations that had supported Israel in its conflict with Syria and Egypt. This included the United States and its allies in Western Europe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_oil_crisis But on October 17, OPEC struck back against the West by imposing an oil embargo on the U.S., while increasing prices by 70% to America's Western European allies. Overnight, the price of a barrel of oil to these nations rose from $3 to $5.11. [In January 1974, they raised it further to $11.65.] The U.S. and the Netherlands, in particular, were singled out for their support of Israel in the war. http://www.buyandhold.com/bh/en/education/history/2002/arab.html The embargo was applied to oil-importing countries on a sliding scale depending on each country's relationship with Israel. The United States, the Netherlands, and South Africa were Israel's strongest supporters and thus bore the brunt of the embargo-a total ban on the shipment of Arab oil. http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/Oli-Per/Organization-of -Petroleum-Exporting-Countries-OPEC.html Bill [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] The end of desktop software development?
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:28:37 -0500, Hal Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: However could you please provide a definition for ... FIDDLINESS Fiddly (Adjective) Awkward to do or use, requiring a degree of manual dexterity FURTLE Well, I used it in the South Yorkshire context of messing around with, possibly in a furtive manner. However there is another very hilarious usage of an adult nature. -- Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.fastmail.fm - IMAP accessible web-mail ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Weird menu effect for SkipFor clause (VFP8 SP1)
MB Software Solutions wrote: I've got some future online menu options that I disabled with a 1=1 in the SkipFor clause. Yet my tester is still able to run that menu option when he does his testing??!?!??? Anyone else encounter something like this? The only odd thing I've had to do with skipping menus was when having say a public var ps_edit and I would put skip for !ps_edit in the expression. This did not work for some reason but skip for ps_edit = .f. did work. Don't know why but as long as it works! Peter ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Returned Messages From Profox
On 1/15/07, Dave Crozier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Today I received 2 x failed message email regarding messages that I sent to Profox some time ago and which appeared correctly on the List some time ago. Has anyone else had this happen? I got one a few days ago. The post definately made it because there were replies... -- Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Returned Messages From Profox
I received one this morning from a post I made several days ago. Dave Crozier wrote: Today I received 2 x failed message email regarding messages that I sent to Profox some time ago and which appeared correctly on the List some time ago. Has anyone else had this happen? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] No, Bush is the new Keating
http://welcome-to-pottersville.blogspot.com/2007/01/paul-krugman- texas-strategy ( -or- http://tinyurl.com/yzdwkw ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hundreds of news articles and opinion pieces have described President Bush’s decision to escalate the Iraq war as a “Hail Mary pass.” But that’s the wrong metaphor. Mr. Bush isn’t Roger Staubach, trying to pull out a win for the Dallas Cowboys. He’s Charles Keating, using other people’s money to keep Lincoln Savings going long after it should have been shut down — and squandering the life savings of thousands of investors, not to mention billions in taxpayer dollars, along the way. The parallel is actually quite exact. During the savings and loan scandal of the 1980s, people like Mr. Keating kept failed banks going by faking financial success. Mr. Bush has kept a failed war going by faking military success. The “surge” is just another stalling tactic, designed to buy more time. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] No, Bush is the new Keating
based on what I'm reading here you would advocate giving up before you even got started granted its a fine line but most people give up when they're nearly there kind of like the old saying its allways darkest before the dawn -Original Message- From: Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj: [OT] No, Bush is the new Keating Date: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:34 am Size: 1K To: ProFox Mailing List profox@leafe.com http://welcome-to-pottersville.blogspot.com/2007/01/paul-krugman- texas-strategy ( -or- http://tinyurl.com/yzdwkw ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hundreds of news articles and opinion pieces have described President Bushs decision to escalate the Iraq war as a Hail Mary pass. But thats the wrong metaphor. Mr. Bush isnt Roger Staubach, trying to pull out a win for the Dallas Cowboys. Hes Charles Keating, using other peoples money to keep Lincoln Savings going long after it should have been shut down and squandering the life savings of thousands of investors, not to mention billions in taxpayer dollars, along the way. The parallel is actually quite exact. During the savings and loan scandal of the 1980s, people like Mr. Keating kept failed banks going by faking financial success. Mr. Bush has kept a failed war going by faking military success. The surge is just another stalling tactic, designed to buy more time. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
We're at war today, and I believe it's in large measure due to the influence of 'Soliders of Israel' in our gov't and media. They've teamed up with bedfellows in Big Oil and the MI Complex to pull off The most dangerous foreign policy blunder in this country since Vietnam, as Sen Hagel put it. I think we have yet to fully appreciate the depth of what they've done - that this war is more of a go-for-broke proposition then Vietnam ever was. If we don't stop them, they'll keep steering us into a storm that will make war in Vietnam look like a sun shower. This war isn't about Iraq, Afghanistan, or even Iran; and it's not about terrorism (which is nothing more or less then a tactic), it's about authority in the ME - something that we will *never* achieve, yet they are dedicated to exactly that cause, and they've managed to sucker many Mr Mrs Smith's into sending their children to kill and die for their cause - not to mention the staggering debt and transfer of still more money-thus-power to the MI Complex and Big Oil. Distilled to a word, this is about attitudes. Their attitude - and the attitude of our gov't under their influence - is foreign and anathema to the core values that - I thought - made America great. For example, all that's being done in the name of 'security' is the exact opposite of what should be done in the name of 'freedom'. Soon we'll have less privacy then we could have ever imagined, and more people around the world hating us then we can live with. Then, when everything is said and done, and someone finally asks what happened?, the one-word answer will be attitude. If we really want to fix this problem before they make it worse, we'll put the neocon gang on trial for war crimes and get people into Washington that care about THIS country. And, yes, it is criminal to dupe a nation into war. There was no faulty intelligence, there was deceit. Bill Ricardo, Haven't you worked out yet that in Michaels mind, if you criticize anything to do with Israel you are a Jew Hater. Likewise were you to criticize GWB's tie then you'd be a traitor, were you to be American Citizen. If you criticicized and are not a US citizen then you're a terrorist. ::a PS He doesn't know the definition of liberal either. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
MSDN Path to Product Key?
I've received my DVDs for the M$ Empower program (MSDN) and I'm trying to install XP inside of VMware on my Linux laptop. All is going well until ... I have to enter the product key. They gave me a card with several product keys but not for any of the XP OSs. The card states to do this and that and to click the Request Keys button. I have yet to find it. The instructions don't match the web site, of course. I called the 800 number but it's a holiday today. Could someone provide me with a walk through of the web site on how to get the product keys? If only there was an OS where it didn't need a product key to get it installed and working!!! g ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Bill Arnold wrote: We're at war today No. The war ended almost 4 years ago. We are an occupying army now. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!
On Jan 15, 2007, at 3:54 AM, Tristan Leask wrote: I wonder if Ed has had an email from Apple about this post? Why would they write to me? http://www.modaco.com/index.php? s=0cc2b08f572c749e2acefd4d30ef1f41showt opic=251112 We represent Apple Computer, Inc. (Apple) and are authorized to act on Apple's behalf to investigate and take legal action with respect to the unauthorized dissemination of Apple's copyrighted material Oh dear. What, did you think that Apple's lawyers are nice? Apple Legal is nearly as evil as Microsoft Legal. They're lawyers, every one. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Returned Messages From Profox
On Jan 15, 2007, at 2:44 AM, Dave Crozier wrote: Today I received 2 x failed message email regarding messages that I sent to Profox some time ago and which appeared correctly on the List some time ago. Has anyone else had this happen? I'm not sure, but if one of the subscriber's ISP actively bounces an email, my server will forward the bounce to the originator. I get them occasionally when I post to the list, too, so it isn't just picking on you. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
you don't know that for a fact I believe its just a matter of time before new york is hit again one thing I do agree with bill on if you watched 24 last night there is a guy taking all rights away forget his name, just look for the weasel -Original Message- From: Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan Date: Mon Jan 15, 2007 8:43 am Size: 653 bytes To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Bill Arnold wrote: We're at war today No. The war ended almost 4 years ago. We are an occupying army now. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: MSDN Path to Product Key?
1. Go to http://msdn.microsoft.com 2. There should be a link almost at the top on the right hand side named Manage My Subscriptions, click on this. Do you Passport stuff if necessary. 3. You should be on the MSDN Subscription Management page. The first link should be Subscriber Downloads and Product Keys. I can't go any farther than that because it seems that my employer has let my subscription expire. But, that should get you close enough to where you can view/request the needed installation keys. Regards Rodney -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Cully Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 9:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MSDN Path to Product Key? I've received my DVDs for the M$ Empower program (MSDN) and I'm trying to install XP inside of VMware on my Linux laptop. All is going well until ... I have to enter the product key. They gave me a card with several product keys but not for any of the XP OSs. The card states to do this and that and to click the Request Keys button. I have yet to find it. The instructions don't match the web site, of course. I called the 800 number but it's a holiday today. Could someone provide me with a walk through of the web site on how to get the product keys? If only there was an OS where it didn't need a product key to get it installed and working!!! g [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you don't know that for a fact Two words: Mission Accomplished. I believe its just a matter of time before new york is hit again Hey, I believe that it's just a matter of time until the Packers win the Super Bowl. See, I can throw out irrelevant predictions, too. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: MSDN Path to Product Key?
Whew. I think I finally figured it out. I had to associate my Partner program subscription with the MSDN thingie and then all sorts of other things showed up. One of them allowed me to get product keys. Confusing as heck! Thanks Rodney! Rodney Dixon wrote: 1. Go to http://msdn.microsoft.com 2. There should be a link almost at the top on the right hand side named Manage My Subscriptions, click on this. Do you Passport stuff if necessary. 3. You should be on the MSDN Subscription Management page. The first link should be Subscriber Downloads and Product Keys. I can't go any farther than that because it seems that my employer has let my subscription expire. But, that should get you close enough to where you can view/request the needed installation keys. Regards Rodney ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
let's hope you're right and I'm wrong -Original Message- From: Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan Date: Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:14 am Size: 867 bytes To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you don't know that for a fact Two words: Mission Accomplished. I believe its just a matter of time before new york is hit again Hey, I believe that it's just a matter of time until the Packers win the Super Bowl. See, I can throw out irrelevant predictions, too. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] I wonder how many suicides Kristyne is responsible for?
= = Steve will be going in about a month from now for a hip = replacement on his right hip. We do seem to be getting the = care we need after a few false starts here and there, but we = also wonder about what it would be like if we weren't so = pushy about making sure we got it. = = Kristyne McDaniel = I hope all goes well. Fortunately that is not an uncommon procedure so the odds are well in your favor for a complete and successful recovery. As far as what would happen if you weren't so pushy ... you're intelligent and savvy, I think you know the answer to that question. Medical attention is like anything else that you buy. Caveat emptor. B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: MSDN Path to Product Key?
I ran into that same problem when I went from a subscription that was individually purchased to one that was on a volume license. It took several attempts to get it associated correctly with my Passport. I just love the way MS makes things simple Regards Rodney -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Cully Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MSDN Path to Product Key? Whew. I think I finally figured it out. I had to associate my Partner program subscription with the MSDN thingie and then all sorts of other things showed up. One of them allowed me to get product keys. Confusing as heck! Thanks Rodney! Rodney Dixon wrote: 1. Go to http://msdn.microsoft.com 2. There should be a link almost at the top on the right hand side named Manage My Subscriptions, click on this. Do you Passport stuff if necessary. 3. You should be on the MSDN Subscription Management page. The first link should be Subscriber Downloads and Product Keys. I can't go any farther than that because it seems that my employer has let my subscription expire. But, that should get you close enough to where you can view/request the needed installation keys. Regards Rodney [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
We're at war today No. The war ended almost 4 years ago. We are an occupying army now. We've got our finger stuck in Muslim/Arab eyes, and we're one more serious attack away from a far deeper appreciation of what's been wrought on us by the warmongers occupying our capital and information supply. We don't understand or respect our enemy. Despite all the lessons of history, we've been led to believe that all we have to do is send in the Marines and our enemies will cower under our shock and awe. What actually happened on the way to that throne is already history; what happens next is anyone's guess, but by now we should already know it's not going to be the grand and glorious victory-over-evil bill of goods we've been sold on. Decades ago, we went through the Cuban missile crisis, and a brush with disaster the likes of which we still can't imagine, yet with that experience solidly under our belt, we have not taken the steps necessary to prevent that possibility from ever happening again - instead we did the opposite: more weapons, more bombs, more shock and awe - and more belligerence. What will it take for us to finally learn that war in the nuclear age is not an option? Why can't we grasp a simple truth: that when we disagree with the rulers of another country, the solution isn't to kill or starve all the people in that country, who were just victims themselves, but to use national and international diplomacy to deal with the errant ruler? We are aware that those bunker-busters being readied for Iran are actually nuclear weapons, right? I know - these are all statements of the obvious, and shouldn't even have to be said, but here we are today, closer to nightmare scenarios at home (Big Brother) and abroad (war) then we could have imagined not too many years ago. The scariest part isn't what's happening already, but what is very likely to happen next if we don't do what we have to do. We, the American people, didn't bring this on, it was done for us, by that gang and their cohorts. They're not telling us this, but I'll say it: we need to choose between their attitude and their direction - and the principles we want to live by. Bill -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: MSDN Path to Product Key?
Rodney Dixon wrote: I ran into that same problem when I went from a subscription that was individually purchased to one that was on a volume license. It took several attempts to get it associated correctly with my Passport. I just love the way MS makes things simple I ran into similar problems when I entered my name to associate my Passport, it kept telling me it was invalid... turns out the data entry idiots at MSFT spelled my name wrong - despite the fact that my email address, with my name in it, was the next item to enter. Quality is Job 1.1 over there Whil Regards Rodney -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Cully Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MSDN Path to Product Key? Whew. I think I finally figured it out. I had to associate my Partner program subscription with the MSDN thingie and then all sorts of other things showed up. One of them allowed me to get product keys. Confusing as heck! Thanks Rodney! Rodney Dixon wrote: 1. Go to http://msdn.microsoft.com 2. There should be a link almost at the top on the right hand side named Manage My Subscriptions, click on this. Do you Passport stuff if necessary. 3. You should be on the MSDN Subscription Management page. The first link should be Subscriber Downloads and Product Keys. I can't go any farther than that because it seems that my employer has let my subscription expire. But, that should get you close enough to where you can view/request the needed installation keys. Regards Rodney [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: MSDN Path to Product Key?
On 1/15/07, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quality is Job 1.1 over there Well, it was supposed to be in Job 1.1, but it didn't make the cut: when Job 1.1 was due to ship, Microsoft decided that Quality didn't meet its standards, so it has been deferred to Job 1.1 Service Pack 2, which Microsoft says should be ready first half of 2005, er, 2006, no, 2007... -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: MSDN Path to Product Key?
LOL Regards Rodney -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Roche Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 11:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MSDN Path to Product Key? On 1/15/07, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quality is Job 1.1 over there Well, it was supposed to be in Job 1.1, but it didn't make the cut: when Job 1.1 was due to ship, Microsoft decided that Quality didn't meet its standards, so it has been deferred to Job 1.1 Service Pack 2, which Microsoft says should be ready first half of 2005, er, 2006, no, 2007... -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Wrong show. You should watch Battlestar Galactica. On 1/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: one thing I do agree with bill on if you watched 24 last night there is a guy taking all rights away forget his name, just look for the weasel --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: MSDN Path to Product Key?
On Jan 15, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote: turns out the data entry idiots at MSFT spelled my name wrong - despite the fact that my email address, with my name in it, was the next item to enter. Did they see Whil and oh-so-helpfully correct it for you? I suppose that there are at least a few folks who would assume _you_ made a data entry error, just because they hadn't seen it before. How many variations of Whil do you get? I admit that I did a triple take on it the first time I saw it. (Then again, etching in stone isn't usually as prone to errors as plain ol' typing!) Ken ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Showing the time only portion of a VFP datetime field in a grid column
VFP8 SP1 -- I've got a datetime field that is essentially used to store start/stop times. I want to only show the time portion in the grid column. The source for the grid is a view. I'm thinking I should just create a field in the view with the TTOC(tField,2) expression. Does anyone have a better idea? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: MSDN Path to Product Key?
* XP Is full installed * 63 patches installed * VFP Installed with SP1 installed ... and it's pretty peppy! My vfp benchmarks are showing that it's about twice as fast inside of VMware with XP on my Duo Core 2 1.8GHz than my XP P4 2.4GHz. Of course, I'm not running virus protection, firewall, or adware either. And it hasn't had a chance to slow down over the years of registry abuse. g I'm going to keep doing my major VFP development on the P4. It's nice to know that VFP is there for me when I visit a client. Kevin Cully wrote: Whew. I think I finally figured it out. I had to associate my Partner program subscription with the MSDN thingie and then all sorts of other things showed up. One of them allowed me to get product keys. Confusing as heck! Thanks Rodney! Rodney Dixon wrote: 1. Go to http://msdn.microsoft.com 2. There should be a link almost at the top on the right hand side named Manage My Subscriptions, click on this. Do you Passport stuff if necessary. 3. You should be on the MSDN Subscription Management page. The first link should be Subscriber Downloads and Product Keys. I can't go any farther than that because it seems that my employer has let my subscription expire. But, that should get you close enough to where you can view/request the needed installation keys. Regards Rodney [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Showing the time only portion of a VFP datetime field in a gridcolumn
Michael, Controlsource==Substr(Transform(Datetime()),12) Dave Crozier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions Sent: 15 January 2007 16:57 To: Profox Subject: Showing the time only portion of a VFP datetime field in a gridcolumn VFP8 SP1 -- I've got a datetime field that is essentially used to store start/stop times. I want to only show the time portion in the grid column. The source for the grid is a view. I'm thinking I should just create a field in the view with the TTOC(tField,2) expression. Does anyone have a better idea? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
On Jan 15, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Bill Arnold wrote: No. The war ended almost 4 years ago. We are an occupying army now. We don't understand or respect our enemy. We should be able to understand that they aren't that different from us when it comes to dealing with an occupying army. Imagine being in the same situation: don't you think that, no matter how nice and sweet the intentions of the occupiers were, that every patriotic American would be doing anything they could to attack them? To drive them out? To take back our country from this occupying force? -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!
On Jan 15, 2007, at 3:54 AM, Tristan Leask wrote: Oh dear. I've looked around the site, and apparently it's a PocketPC site that had posted a way to copy the look of iPhone to a PocketPC. They weren't just showing pictures, but rather were copying the iPhone images. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: MSDN Path to Product Key?
Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote: On Jan 15, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote: turns out the data entry idiots at MSFT spelled my name wrong - despite the fact that my email address, with my name in it, was the next item to enter. Did they see Whil and oh-so-helpfully correct it for you? I suppose that there are at least a few folks who would assume _you_ made a data entry error, just because they hadn't seen it before. How many variations of Whil do you get? Nope, it was the 'hentzen' part. Of course, on my msdn sub, it's '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. And that part was found in their database. Just not Whil Hentzen. Step 1. I send them this email: I've received an MSDN subscription as part of the MVP program (where MVPs can offer a complementary one year MSDN sub to a business associate). I have received the MSDN box and am trying to install WinXP on a test machine, but I need a Benefit Access Number: . https://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-US/subscriptions/add/default.aspx I can't find this number on any of the paperwork I've got here. I've tried the MSDN Subscriber ID I received in an email (see below) as well as the ID on the shipping paper (nn) but neither were found in your system. Step 2. They answer: Hello Whil, Thank you for your question. The Benefit Access Number is your MSDN Subscriber number: nn Step 3. I respond: Yes, I know that. (Look in the Subscriber Information section below.) As I stated in my email, I've already tried that, and I still get the The data you provided could not be located in our system Step 4. They respond: Thank you for your reply. However, we do not have a fix or work around for this problem at this time. Don't you just love them? I admit that I did a triple take on it the first time I saw it. (Then again, etching in stone isn't usually as prone to errors as plain ol' typing!) Yes, many people look at me odd when they first see it. I've thought about switching it back but that would cause even more problems Prolly shouldn't have ever gone to college in the first place. Whil ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Its only irrelevant if it doesn’t happen. Way too soon for you to say it ain't going to happen. But for what its worth, I hope you're right and I'm wrong. Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 9:14 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you don't know that for a fact Two words: Mission Accomplished. I believe its just a matter of time before new york is hit again Hey, I believe that it's just a matter of time until the Packers win the Super Bowl. See, I can throw out irrelevant predictions, too. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] SQL Server: Bulk insert error
On Monday, January 15, 2007 1:04 PM I wrote: I am creating a temporary cursor then a bulk insert and I get an error: The current user is not the database or object owner of table '#temptable'. Cannot perform the SET operation. I found the KB #302621 that says it is a Bug. Thanks anyway... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
I agree with everything you're saying except for the last two lines. Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Arnold Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 9:52 AM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan We're at war today No. The war ended almost 4 years ago. We are an occupying army now. We've got our finger stuck in Muslim/Arab eyes, and we're one more serious attack away from a far deeper appreciation of what's been wrought on us by the warmongers occupying our capital and information supply. We don't understand or respect our enemy. Despite all the lessons of history, we've been led to believe that all we have to do is send in the Marines and our enemies will cower under our shock and awe. What actually happened on the way to that throne is already history; what happens next is anyone's guess, but by now we should already know it's not going to be the grand and glorious victory-over-evil bill of goods we've been sold on. Decades ago, we went through the Cuban missile crisis, and a brush with disaster the likes of which we still can't imagine, yet with that experience solidly under our belt, we have not taken the steps necessary to prevent that possibility from ever happening again - instead we did the opposite: more weapons, more bombs, more shock and awe - and more belligerence. What will it take for us to finally learn that war in the nuclear age is not an option? Why can't we grasp a simple truth: that when we disagree with the rulers of another country, the solution isn't to kill or starve all the people in that country, who were just victims themselves, but to use national and international diplomacy to deal with the errant ruler? We are aware that those bunker-busters being readied for Iran are actually nuclear weapons, right? I know - these are all statements of the obvious, and shouldn't even have to be said, but here we are today, closer to nightmare scenarios at home (Big Brother) and abroad (war) then we could have imagined not too many years ago. The scariest part isn't what's happening already, but what is very likely to happen next if we don't do what we have to do. We, the American people, didn't bring this on, it was done for us, by that gang and their cohorts. They're not telling us this, but I'll say it: we need to choose between their attitude and their direction - and the principles we want to live by. Bill -- Ed Leafe [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
There is no difference. I haven't met one Israeli hater that wasn't a Jew-hater. --- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: Of course the dirty Arabs attacked Israel on a Jewish holy day. But of course a Jew-hater like you would conveniently forget that. Did you mean to say Israeli-hater? Can you perceive the difference? --- Bill Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It wouldn't matter to us much if they didn't control a commodity that the whole world has developed a dependence on. Oil When OPEC decided to flex their muscle in the mid 70's, it sent shock waves through out the entire world economically speaking. Double digit inflation, double digit unemployment and the deepest economic problems that the U.S. had faced since the great depression. Yup, that really sucked. You seem to forget that was due to the fact that USA broke the Bretton Woods agreement which stated that dollar was to be tied to gold reserves in USA. The dollar stopped being backed by gold, it started devaluating and the OPEC took action. The 1973 oil crisis first began on October 17, 1973 when the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC), consisting of the Arab members of Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries(OPEC) plus Egypt and Syria, announced as a result of the ongoing Yom Kippur War, that they would no longer ship petroleum to nations that had supported Israel in its conflict with Syria and Egypt. This included the United States and its allies in Western Europe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_oil_crisis But on October 17, OPEC struck back against the West by imposing an oil embargo on the U.S., while increasing prices by 70% to America's Western European allies. Overnight, the price of a barrel of oil to these nations rose from $3 to $5.11. [In January 1974, they raised it further to $11.65.] The U.S. and the Netherlands, in particular, were singled out for their support of Israel in the war. http://www.buyandhold.com/bh/en/education/history/2002/arab.html The embargo was applied to oil-importing countries on a sliding scale depending on each country's relationship with Israel. The United States, the Netherlands, and South Africa were Israel's strongest supporters and thus bore the brunt of the embargo-a total ban on the shipment of Arab oil. http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/Oli-Per/Organization-of -Petroleum-Exporting-Countries-OPEC.html Bill ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Thought for the Day
Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter - the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
I haven't met on Israeli hater that wasn't a Jew Hater. Holocaust deniers included. --- Adam Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ricardo, Haven't you worked out yet that in Michaels mind, if you criticize anything to do with Israel you are a Jew Hater. Likewise were you to criticize GWB's tie then you'd be a traitor, were you to be American Citizen. If you criticicized and are not a US citizen then you're a terrorist. ::a PS He doesn't know the definition of liberal either. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: 15 January 2007 09:16 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan Michael Madigan wrote: Of course the dirty Arabs attacked Israel on a Jewish holy day. But of course a Jew-hater like you would conveniently forget that. Did you mean to say Israeli-hater? Can you perceive the difference? --- Bill Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It wouldn't matter to us much if they didn't control a commodity that the whole world has developed a dependence on. Oil When OPEC decided to flex their muscle in the mid 70's, it sent shock waves through out the entire world economically speaking. Double digit inflation, double digit unemployment and the deepest economic problems that the U.S. had faced since the great depression. Yup, that really sucked. You seem to forget that was due to the fact that USA broke the Bretton Woods agreement which stated that dollar was to be tied to gold reserves in USA. The dollar stopped being backed by gold, it started devaluating and the OPEC took action. The 1973 oil crisis first began on October 17, 1973 when the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC), consisting of the Arab members of Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries(OPEC) plus Egypt and Syria, announced as a result of the ongoing Yom Kippur War, that they would no longer ship petroleum to nations that had supported Israel in its conflict with Syria and Egypt. This included the United States and its allies in Western Europe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_oil_crisis But on October 17, OPEC struck back against the West by imposing an oil embargo on the U.S., while increasing prices by 70% to America's Western European allies. Overnight, the price of a barrel of oil to these nations rose from $3 to $5.11. [In January 1974, they raised it further to $11.65.] The U.S. and the Netherlands, in particular, were singled out for their support of Israel in the war. http://www.buyandhold.com/bh/en/education/history/2002/arab.html The embargo was applied to oil-importing countries on a sliding scale depending on each country's relationship with Israel. The United States, the Netherlands, and South Africa were Israel's strongest supporters and thus bore the brunt of the embargo-a total ban on the shipment of Arab oil. http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/Oli-Per/Organization-of -Petroleum-Exporting-Countries-OPEC.html Bill [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] IE7 and MS Virtual Earth Mapping conflict with FireFox
At 09:25 AM 1/14/2007 -0500, Bill Arnold wrote: Ran into a problem yesterday that might affect others, so will mention. I'm using the MS Virtual Earth mapping service (customized based on Dave Crozier's example), and it worked fine, but this week my customer started getting 'access denied' messages when using it. ... Lessons learned: 1. FireFox cannot be running when the mapping service is accessed (and IE7 is installed). 2. It seems that having (temporarily) made IE7 the default browser was a factor in solving this Why the hell are people still using IE Better lesson learned: get the hell away from MS stuff! -Charlie ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: MSDN Path to Product Key?
Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote: snippedStep 3. I respond: Yes, I know that. (Look in the Subscriber Information section below.) As I stated in my email, I've already tried that, and I still get the The data you provided could not be located in our system Step 4. They respond: Thank you for your reply. However, we do not have a fix or work around for this problem at this time. Don't you just love them? snipped That's because they have something in their call center logic like this: IF Caller = 'HENTZEN' then f*ck with him since he's a Linux guy do quality1_1 ELSE regular customer do quality2_0 endif -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
The same old shit. Mission Accomplished. He can't come up with anything better. --- Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you don't know that for a fact Two words: Mission Accomplished. I believe its just a matter of time before new york is hit again Hey, I believe that it's just a matter of time until the Packers win the Super Bowl. See, I can throw out irrelevant predictions, too. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Based on past performance, what are the odds that Ed is right about it? Zero? --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: let's hope you're right and I'm wrong -Original Message- From: Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan Date: Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:14 am Size: 867 bytes To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you don't know that for a fact Two words: Mission Accomplished. I believe its just a matter of time before new york is hit again Hey, I believe that it's just a matter of time until the Packers win the Super Bowl. See, I can throw out irrelevant predictions, too. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Kennedy stared the bastards in the eye and the Russians backed down. That's what we have to do with the rag heads. --- Bill Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're at war today No. The war ended almost 4 years ago. We are an occupying army now. We've got our finger stuck in Muslim/Arab eyes, and we're one more serious attack away from a far deeper appreciation of what's been wrought on us by the warmongers occupying our capital and information supply. We don't understand or respect our enemy. Despite all the lessons of history, we've been led to believe that all we have to do is send in the Marines and our enemies will cower under our shock and awe. What actually happened on the way to that throne is already history; what happens next is anyone's guess, but by now we should already know it's not going to be the grand and glorious victory-over-evil bill of goods we've been sold on. Decades ago, we went through the Cuban missile crisis, and a brush with disaster the likes of which we still can't imagine, yet with that experience solidly under our belt, we have not taken the steps necessary to prevent that possibility from ever happening again - instead we did the opposite: more weapons, more bombs, more shock and awe - and more belligerence. What will it take for us to finally learn that war in the nuclear age is not an option? Why can't we grasp a simple truth: that when we disagree with the rulers of another country, the solution isn't to kill or starve all the people in that country, who were just victims themselves, but to use national and international diplomacy to deal with the errant ruler? We are aware that those bunker-busters being readied for Iran are actually nuclear weapons, right? I know - these are all statements of the obvious, and shouldn't even have to be said, but here we are today, closer to nightmare scenarios at home (Big Brother) and abroad (war) then we could have imagined not too many years ago. The scariest part isn't what's happening already, but what is very likely to happen next if we don't do what we have to do. We, the American people, didn't bring this on, it was done for us, by that gang and their cohorts. They're not telling us this, but I'll say it: we need to choose between their attitude and their direction - and the principles we want to live by. Bill -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Thought for the Day
Where are the white women at? - Martin Luther King --- Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter - the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
I like the show, but I'm having a hard time figuring it out. I don't watch it all the time, but it seems everytime I do, the president is going along with a plan to kill Jack Bauer. Jack just keeps on keeping on though, and winds up shooting a bunch of people, saving the day and then goes right back into the fold. Am I missing something, or is this what is happening? John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Virgil Bierschwale Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 12:22 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan Never saw it... Was typing on the treo earlier so couldn't type much.. 24 last night has a little weasel that advises the president.. He's doing his best to throw all the laws out and arrest everybody... This is one area that I do agree with bill on and that is that there are people who would like to do this to us now. Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Helio W. Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:26 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan Wrong show. You should watch Battlestar Galactica. On 1/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: one thing I do agree with bill on if you watched 24 last night there is a guy taking all rights away forget his name, just look for the weasel --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Nope that’s it Its interesting how they mix current day events into the show though.. If you're looking for something more then fiction though, well its just entertainment... I try not to watch too many shows because they are a big time killer and I have things I want to accomplish. I do like this one and ncis and the unit... Other then that, its just an occasional movie Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of john harvey Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 12:37 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan I like the show, but I'm having a hard time figuring it out. I don't watch it all the time, but it seems everytime I do, the president is going along with a plan to kill Jack Bauer. Jack just keeps on keeping on though, and winds up shooting a bunch of people, saving the day and then goes right back into the fold. Am I missing something, or is this what is happening? John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Virgil Bierschwale Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 12:22 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan Never saw it... Was typing on the treo earlier so couldn't type much.. 24 last night has a little weasel that advises the president.. He's doing his best to throw all the laws out and arrest everybody... This is one area that I do agree with bill on and that is that there are people who would like to do this to us now. Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Helio W. Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:26 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan Wrong show. You should watch Battlestar Galactica. On 1/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: one thing I do agree with bill on if you watched 24 last night there is a guy taking all rights away forget his name, just look for the weasel --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
What is it that makes it wrong to hate Jews, but correct to hate Islamic Arabs of the Muslim religion or anyone else for that matter. Hitler hated (eg feared) the Jewish race. Hate sentiments today are being driven by propaganda against Islamic Arabs of ME decent. Compare and contrast what happened to the Jewish people under Hitler's Nazi regime, and what is happening today against people of the ME who are of Islamic Arab decent under the Neoconservative leader of the US. 1) Hitler cames to power using propaganda that the Jewish people were the root of all Germany's problems. 2) When Hitler gained enough power, he required that all Jewish people identify themselves by wearing a big, bright, yellow star of David on their clothing. This made it easy to identify the Jewish people for discrimination and shunning. 3) Hitler enacted laws that divested ownership and rights to property in the hand of the Jewish people. 4) Hitler physically separated the Jewish people; isolating them in designated ghetto areas. The Jewish people were stripped of all their property and driven into the ghettos with nothing more than the clothes on their backs. 5) Last came the Final Solution; the extermination of the Jewish people from the face of the earth. I don't think Hitler originally planned an extermination of all Jews. In reaching the final solution, Hitler, and the German people, went through a progression of baby steps; each step lending itself to the next, as Hitler's Germany marched towards the final solution. Anyone examining the progression of step should have realized early on that the final solutions was the destination of Hitler's anti-semitic ship, even if Hitler, and the German people, did not at the time know they were on a course to a final solution. The ship's rudder and sails had been set, and nothing shot of a conscience change in course could have prevented the Holocaust. Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: I haven't met on Israeli hater that wasn't a Jew Hater. Holocaust deniers included. --- Adam Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ricardo, Haven't you worked out yet that in Michaels mind, if you criticize anything to do with Israel you are a Jew Hater. Likewise were you to criticize GWB's tie then you'd be a traitor, were you to be American Citizen. If you criticicized and are not a US citizen then you're a terrorist. ::a PS He doesn't know the definition of liberal either. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: 15 January 2007 09:16 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan Michael Madigan wrote: Of course the dirty Arabs attacked Israel on a Jewish holy day. But of course a Jew-hater like you would conveniently forget that. Did you mean to say Israeli-hater? Can you perceive the difference? --- Bill Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It wouldn't matter to us much if they didn't control a commodity that the whole world has developed a dependence on. Oil When OPEC decided to flex their muscle in the mid 70's, it sent shock waves through out the entire world economically speaking. Double digit inflation, double digit unemployment and the deepest economic problems that the U.S. had faced since the great depression. Yup, that really sucked. You seem to forget that was due to the fact that USA broke the Bretton Woods agreement which stated that dollar was to be tied to gold reserves in USA. The dollar stopped being backed by gold, it started devaluating and the OPEC took action. The 1973 oil crisis first began on October 17, 1973 when the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC), consisting of the Arab members of Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries(OPEC) plus Egypt and Syria, announced as a result of the ongoing Yom Kippur War, that they would no longer ship petroleum to nations that had supported Israel in its conflict with Syria and Egypt. This included the United States and its allies in Western Europe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_oil_crisis But on October 17, OPEC struck back against the West by imposing an oil embargo on the U.S., while increasing prices by 70% to America's Western European allies. Overnight, the price of a barrel of oil to these nations rose from $3 to $5.11. [In January 1974, they raised it further to $11.65.] The U.S. and the Netherlands, in particular, were singled out for their support of Israel in the war. http://www.buyandhold.com/bh/en/education/history/2002/arab.html The
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
On Jan 15, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote: I remember walking down an alley in the late 70's looking for a bar in alexandria egypt.. A little ole guy come up missing an arm and knife cuts on his face and said you don't belong here. Sounds like some of the locals in Mississippi or Alabama, who aren't exactly known for their hospitality and openness to people from other parts of the country, especially folks from up north, or those whose ethnic heritage doesn't match theirs. Not much difference between them and your Egyptian friend. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Lets see. Israel has never attacked us. --- Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is it that makes it wrong to hate Jews, but correct to hate Islamic Arabs of the Muslim religion or anyone else for that matter. Hitler hated (eg feared) the Jewish race. Hate sentiments today are being driven by propaganda against Islamic Arabs of ME decent. Compare and contrast what happened to the Jewish people under Hitler's Nazi regime, and what is happening today against people of the ME who are of Islamic Arab decent under the Neoconservative leader of the US. 1) Hitler cames to power using propaganda that the Jewish people were the root of all Germany's problems. 2) When Hitler gained enough power, he required that all Jewish people identify themselves by wearing a big, bright, yellow star of David on their clothing. This made it easy to identify the Jewish people for discrimination and shunning. 3) Hitler enacted laws that divested ownership and rights to property in the hand of the Jewish people. 4) Hitler physically separated the Jewish people; isolating them in designated ghetto areas. The Jewish people were stripped of all their property and driven into the ghettos with nothing more than the clothes on their backs. 5) Last came the Final Solution; the extermination of the Jewish people from the face of the earth. I don't think Hitler originally planned an extermination of all Jews. In reaching the final solution, Hitler, and the German people, went through a progression of baby steps; each step lending itself to the next, as Hitler's Germany marched towards the final solution. Anyone examining the progression of step should have realized early on that the final solutions was the destination of Hitler's anti-semitic ship, even if Hitler, and the German people, did not at the time know they were on a course to a final solution. The ship's rudder and sails had been set, and nothing shot of a conscience change in course could have prevented the Holocaust. Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: I haven't met on Israeli hater that wasn't a Jew Hater. Holocaust deniers included. --- Adam Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ricardo, Haven't you worked out yet that in Michaels mind, if you criticize anything to do with Israel you are a Jew Hater. Likewise were you to criticize GWB's tie then you'd be a traitor, were you to be American Citizen. If you criticicized and are not a US citizen then you're a terrorist. ::a PS He doesn't know the definition of liberal either. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: 15 January 2007 09:16 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan Michael Madigan wrote: Of course the dirty Arabs attacked Israel on a Jewish holy day. But of course a Jew-hater like you would conveniently forget that. Did you mean to say Israeli-hater? Can you perceive the difference? --- Bill Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It wouldn't matter to us much if they didn't control a commodity that the whole world has developed a dependence on. Oil When OPEC decided to flex their muscle in the mid 70's, it sent shock waves through out the entire world economically speaking. Double digit inflation, double digit unemployment and the deepest economic problems that the U.S. had faced since the great depression. Yup, that really sucked. You seem to forget that was due to the fact that USA broke the Bretton Woods agreement which stated that dollar was to be tied to gold reserves in USA. The dollar stopped being backed by gold, it started devaluating and the OPEC took action. The 1973 oil crisis first began on October 17, 1973 === message truncated === ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: MSDN Path to Product Key?
Don't you just love them? snipped That's because they have something in their call center logic like this: IF Caller = 'HENTZEN' then f*ck with him since he's a Linux guy do quality1_1 ELSE regular customer do quality2_0 endif HAVEN'T YOU BEEN READING THE THREAD?? They've got my last name _misspelled_!! So it'd have to be if caller = Hentzen or caller = Henten or caller = Henzen or caller = Hertzen or caller = Hanson or caller = Henson that muppet guy? or caller = Hansin or caller = Hertzenwerke or bg Whil ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: MSDN Path to Product Key?
Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote: Don't you just love them? snipped That's because they have something in their call center logic like this: IF Caller = 'HENTZEN' then f*ck with him since he's a Linux guy do quality1_1 ELSE regular customer do quality2_0 endif HAVEN'T YOU BEEN READING THE THREAD?? They've got my last name _misspelled_!! So it'd have to be if caller = Hentzen or caller = Henten or caller = Henzen or caller = Hertzen or caller = Hanson or caller = Henson that muppet guy? or caller = Hansin or caller = Hertzenwerke or bg Whil ROFL! -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Neither has Iraq ever attacked the US. We were attacked by a small group of Terrorist/Pirate on 9/11. The attackers pledged alliance to no country, nor any flag, other than to the flag of Al Qauda's Jolly Roger's skill and bones. g The attackers of 9/11 were not of a single race; although, they we likely all of the same Islamic Sunni Muslim religion. Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: Lets see. Israel has never attacked us. --- Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is it that makes it wrong to hate Jews, but correct to hate Islamic Arabs of the Muslim religion or anyone else for that matter. Hitler hated (eg feared) the Jewish race. Hate sentiments today are being driven by propaganda against Islamic Arabs of ME decent. Compare and contrast what happened to the Jewish people under Hitler's Nazi regime, and what is happening today against people of the ME who are of Islamic Arab decent under the Neoconservative leader of the US. 1) Hitler cames to power using propaganda that the Jewish people were the root of all Germany's problems. 2) When Hitler gained enough power, he required that all Jewish people identify themselves by wearing a big, bright, yellow star of David on their clothing. This made it easy to identify the Jewish people for discrimination and shunning. 3) Hitler enacted laws that divested ownership and rights to property in the hand of the Jewish people. 4) Hitler physically separated the Jewish people; isolating them in designated ghetto areas. The Jewish people were stripped of all their property and driven into the ghettos with nothing more than the clothes on their backs. 5) Last came the Final Solution; the extermination of the Jewish people from the face of the earth. I don't think Hitler originally planned an extermination of all Jews. In reaching the final solution, Hitler, and the German people, went through a progression of baby steps; each step lending itself to the next, as Hitler's Germany marched towards the final solution. Anyone examining the progression of step should have realized early on that the final solutions was the destination of Hitler's anti-semitic ship, even if Hitler, and the German people, did not at the time know they were on a course to a final solution. The ship's rudder and sails had been set, and nothing shot of a conscience change in course could have prevented the Holocaust. Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: I haven't met on Israeli hater that wasn't a Jew Hater. Holocaust deniers included. --- Adam Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ricardo, Haven't you worked out yet that in Michaels mind, if you criticize anything to do with Israel you are a Jew Hater. Likewise were you to criticize GWB's tie then you'd be a traitor, were you to be American Citizen. If you criticicized and are not a US citizen then you're a terrorist. ::a PS He doesn't know the definition of liberal either. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: 15 January 2007 09:16 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan Michael Madigan wrote: Of course the dirty Arabs attacked Israel on a Jewish holy day. But of course a Jew-hater like you would conveniently forget that. Did you mean to say Israeli-hater? Can you perceive the difference? --- Bill Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It wouldn't matter to us much if they didn't control a commodity that the whole world has developed a dependence on. Oil When OPEC decided to flex their muscle in the mid 70's, it sent shock waves through out the entire world economically speaking. Double digit inflation, double digit unemployment and the deepest economic problems that the U.S. had faced since the great depression. Yup, that really sucked. You seem to forget that was due to the fact that USA broke the Bretton Woods agreement which stated that dollar was to be tied to gold reserves in USA. The dollar stopped being backed by gold, it started devaluating and the OPEC took action. The 1973 oil crisis first began on October 17,
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
We were still at war from their 1991 invasion of Kuwait. --- Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Neither has Iraq ever attacked the US. We were attacked by a small group of Terrorist/Pirate on 9/11. The attackers pledged alliance to no country, nor any flag, other than to the flag of Al Qauda's Jolly Roger's skill and bones. g The attackers of 9/11 were not of a single race; although, they we likely all of the same Islamic Sunni Muslim religion. Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: Lets see. Israel has never attacked us. --- Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is it that makes it wrong to hate Jews, but correct to hate Islamic Arabs of the Muslim religion or anyone else for that matter. Hitler hated (eg feared) the Jewish race. Hate sentiments today are being driven by propaganda against Islamic Arabs of ME decent. Compare and contrast what happened to the Jewish people under Hitler's Nazi regime, and what is happening today against people of the ME who are of Islamic Arab decent under the Neoconservative leader of the US. 1) Hitler cames to power using propaganda that the Jewish people were the root of all Germany's problems. 2) When Hitler gained enough power, he required that all Jewish people identify themselves by wearing a big, bright, yellow star of David on their clothing. This made it easy to identify the Jewish people for discrimination and shunning. 3) Hitler enacted laws that divested ownership and rights to property in the hand of the Jewish people. 4) Hitler physically separated the Jewish people; isolating them in designated ghetto areas. The Jewish people were stripped of all their property and driven into the ghettos with nothing more than the clothes on their backs. 5) Last came the Final Solution; the extermination of the Jewish people from the face of the earth. I don't think Hitler originally planned an extermination of all Jews. In reaching the final solution, Hitler, and the German people, went through a progression of baby steps; each step lending itself to the next, as Hitler's Germany marched towards the final solution. Anyone examining the progression of step should have realized early on that the final solutions was the destination of Hitler's anti-semitic ship, even if Hitler, and the German people, did not at the time know they were on a course to a final solution. The ship's rudder and sails had been set, and nothing shot of a conscience change in course could have prevented the Holocaust. Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: I haven't met on Israeli hater that wasn't a Jew Hater. Holocaust deniers included. --- Adam Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ricardo, Haven't you worked out yet that in Michaels mind, if you criticize anything to do with Israel you are a Jew Hater. Likewise were you to criticize GWB's tie then you'd be a traitor, were you to be American Citizen. If you criticicized and are not a US citizen then you're a terrorist. ::a PS He doesn't know the definition of liberal either. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: 15 January 2007 09:16 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan Michael Madigan wrote: Of course the dirty Arabs attacked Israel on a Jewish holy day. But of course a Jew-hater like you would conveniently forget that. Did you mean to say Israeli-hater? Can you perceive the difference? --- Bill Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: === message truncated === ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: MSDN Path to Product Key?
Hey Will gdrvf They've got my last name _misspelled_!! So it'd have to be if caller = Hentzen or caller = Henten or caller = Henzen or caller = Hertzen or caller = Hanson or caller = Henson that muppet guy? or caller = Hansin or caller = Hertzenwerke or ROFL! That reminds me of Bugs Bunny in the episode with Hansel, Gretel and the Witch when he was saying Hansel? Hansel? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
No, Iraq invaded Kuwait, a US Ally. Germany never attacked us either. --- Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, Iraq has never attacked the US, but we have attacked Iraq at least twice. Is that correct? Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: We were still at war from their 1991 invasion of Kuwait. --- Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Neither has Iraq ever attacked the US. We were attacked by a small group of Terrorist/Pirate on 9/11. The attackers pledged alliance to no country, nor any flag, other than to the flag of Al Qauda's Jolly Roger's skill and bones. g The attackers of 9/11 were not of a single race; although, they we likely all of the same Islamic Sunni Muslim religion. Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: Lets see. Israel has never attacked us. --- Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is it that makes it wrong to hate Jews, but correct to hate Islamic Arabs of the Muslim religion or anyone else for that matter. Hitler hated (eg feared) the Jewish race. Hate sentiments today are being driven by propaganda against Islamic Arabs of ME decent. Compare and contrast what happened to the Jewish people under Hitler's Nazi regime, and what is happening today against people of the ME who are of Islamic Arab decent under the Neoconservative leader of the US. 1) Hitler cames to power using propaganda that the Jewish people were the root of all Germany's problems. 2) When Hitler gained enough power, he required that all Jewish people identify themselves by wearing a big, bright, yellow star of David on their clothing. This made it easy to identify the Jewish people for discrimination and shunning. 3) Hitler enacted laws that divested ownership and rights to property in the hand of the Jewish people. 4) Hitler physically separated the Jewish people; isolating them in designated ghetto areas. The Jewish people were stripped of all their property and driven into the ghettos with nothing more than the clothes on their backs. 5) Last came the Final Solution; the extermination of the Jewish people from the face of the earth. I don't think Hitler originally planned an extermination of all Jews. In reaching the final solution, Hitler, and the German people, went through a progression of baby steps; each step lending itself to the next, as Hitler's Germany marched towards the final solution. Anyone examining the progression of step should have realized early on that the final solutions was the destination of Hitler's anti-semitic ship, even if Hitler, and the German people, did not at the time know they were on a course to a final solution. The ship's rudder and sails had been set, and nothing shot of a conscience change in course could have prevented the Holocaust. Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: I haven't met on Israeli hater that wasn't a Jew Hater. Holocaust deniers included. --- Adam Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ricardo, Haven't you worked out yet that in Michaels mind, === message truncated === ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Returned Messages From Profox
= = I'm not sure, but if one of the subscriber's ISP = actively bounces an email, my server will forward the bounce = to the originator. I get them occasionally when I post to = the list, too, so it isn't just picking on you. = = -- Ed Leafe = So Marge is a little behind in her work, eh? Not a problem except that emails such as this one is very similar to a rash of spam that has been circulating recently. IMHO, it's a counterproductive message. B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Returned Messages From Profox
On Jan 15, 2007, at 3:25 PM, Hal Kaplan wrote: So Marge is a little behind in her work, eh? Not a problem except that emails such as this one is very similar to a rash of spam that has been circulating recently. IMHO, it's a counterproductive message. The problem is the server originating the message. I think that most bounced messages are counterproductive, too, in these days where spam outnumbers actual traffic by 10 to 1 or more. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Actually, German declared war on the U.S.: http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/timeline/germany-declares.htm The first Gulf war was not without consequence, but what does this all have to do with the attack of 9/11 by a group of terrorist? http://www.historyguy.com/GulfWar.html Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: No, Iraq invaded Kuwait, a US Ally. Germany never attacked us either. --- Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, Iraq has never attacked the US, but we have attacked Iraq at least twice. Is that correct? Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: We were still at war from their 1991 invasion of Kuwait. --- Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Neither has Iraq ever attacked the US. We were attacked by a small group of Terrorist/Pirate on 9/11. The attackers pledged alliance to no country, nor any flag, other than to the flag of Al Qauda's Jolly Roger's skill and bones. g The attackers of 9/11 were not of a single race; although, they we likely all of the same Islamic Sunni Muslim religion. Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: Lets see. Israel has never attacked us. --- Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is it that makes it wrong to hate Jews, but correct to hate Islamic Arabs of the Muslim religion or anyone else for that matter. Hitler hated (eg feared) the Jewish race. Hate sentiments today are being driven by propaganda against Islamic Arabs of ME decent. Compare and contrast what happened to the Jewish people under Hitler's Nazi regime, and what is happening today against people of the ME who are of Islamic Arab decent under the Neoconservative leader of the US. 1) Hitler cames to power using propaganda that the Jewish people were the root of all Germany's problems. 2) When Hitler gained enough power, he required that all Jewish people identify themselves by wearing a big, bright, yellow star of David on their clothing. This made it easy to identify the Jewish people for discrimination and shunning. 3) Hitler enacted laws that divested ownership and rights to property in the hand of the Jewish people. 4) Hitler physically separated the Jewish people; isolating them in designated ghetto areas. The Jewish people were stripped of all their property and driven into the ghettos with nothing more than the clothes on their backs. 5) Last came the Final Solution; the extermination of the Jewish people from the face of the earth. I don't think Hitler originally planned an extermination of all Jews. In reaching the final solution, Hitler, and the German people, went through a progression of baby steps; each step lending itself to the next, as Hitler's Germany marched towards the final solution. Anyone examining the progression of step should have realized early on that the final solutions was the destination of Hitler's anti-semitic ship, even if Hitler, and the German people, did not at the time know they were on a course to a final solution. The ship's rudder and sails had been set, and nothing shot of a conscience change in course could have prevented the Holocaust. Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: I haven't met on Israeli hater that wasn't a Jew Hater. Holocaust deniers included. --- Adam Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ricardo, Haven't you worked out yet that in Michaels mind, === message truncated === [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
So has Islam. Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, German declared war on the U.S.: http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/timeline/germany-declares.htm The first Gulf war was not without consequence, but what does this all have to do with the attack of 9/11 by a group of terrorist? http://www.historyguy.com/GulfWar.html Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: No, Iraq invaded Kuwait, a US Ally. Germany never attacked us either. --- Leland Jackson wrote: So, Iraq has never attacked the US, but we have attacked Iraq at least twice. Is that correct? Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: We were still at war from their 1991 invasion of Kuwait. --- Leland Jackson wrote: Neither has Iraq ever attacked the US. We were attacked by a small group of Terrorist/Pirate on 9/11. The attackers pledged alliance to no country, nor any flag, other than to the flag of Al Qauda's Jolly Roger's skill and bones. The attackers of 9/11 were not of a single race; although, they we likely all of the same Islamic Sunni Muslim religion. Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: Lets see. Israel has never attacked us. --- Leland Jackson wrote: What is it that makes it wrong to hate Jews, but correct to hate Islamic Arabs of the Muslim religion or anyone else for that matter. Hitler hated (eg feared) the Jewish race. Hate sentiments today are being driven by propaganda against Islamic Arabs of ME decent. Compare and contrast what happened to the Jewish people under Hitler's Nazi regime, and what is happening today against people of the ME who are of Islamic Arab decent under the Neoconservative leader of the US. 1) Hitler cames to power using propaganda that the Jewish people were the root of all Germany's problems. 2) When Hitler gained enough power, he required that all Jewish people identify themselves by wearing a big, bright, yellow star of David on their clothing. This made it easy to identify the Jewish people for discrimination and shunning. 3) Hitler enacted laws that divested ownership and rights to property in the hand of the Jewish people. 4) Hitler physically separated the Jewish people; isolating them in designated ghetto areas. The Jewish people were stripped of all their property and driven into the ghettos with nothing more than the clothes on their backs. 5) Last came the Final Solution; the extermination of the Jewish people from the face of the earth. I don't think Hitler originally planned an extermination of all Jews. In reaching the final solution, Hitler, and the German people, went through a progression of baby steps; each step lending itself to the next, as Hitler's Germany marched towards the final solution. Anyone examining the progression of step should have realized early on that the final solutions was the destination of Hitler's anti-semitic ship, even if Hitler, and the German people, did not at the time know they were on a course to a final solution. The ship's rudder and sails had been set, and nothing shot of a conscience change in course could have prevented the Holocaust. Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: I haven't met on Israeli hater that wasn't a Jew Hater. Holocaust deniers included. --- Adam Buckland wrote: Ricardo, Haven't you worked out yet that in Michaels mind, === message truncated === [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Returned Messages From Profox
= = The problem is the server originating the message. I = think that most bounced messages are counterproductive, too, = in these days where spam outnumbers actual traffic by 10 to = 1 or more. = = -- Ed Leafe = Sorry I misunderstood, Ed. I should have known better. g B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Below is a definition of Islam. Based on my understanding of the Bible, as God's word to Christians, and all the divergence it has created among the many Christian branches and denominations, I do not understand how Islam in all of its divergence could unit as a group of terrorist against the US. Could you explain how this is possible, as the term Islam is very broad and encompasses many different interpretations of the Qur'an and many different beliefs. Could you be specific as to the exact branch within Islam that is the threat to the US: #-- Definition of Islam: Major world religion founded by Muhammad http://www.answers.com/topic/muhammad in Arabia in the early 7th century AD. The Arabic word /islam/ means “submission” — specifically, submission to the will of the one God, called Allah http://www.answers.com/topic/allah in Arabic. Islam is a strictly monotheistic religion, and its adherents, called Muslims, regard the Prophet Muhammad as the last and most perfect of God's messengers, who include Adam http://www.answers.com/topic/adam-and-eve, Abraham http://www.answers.com/topic/abraham, Moses http://www.answers.com/topic/moses, Jesus http://www.answers.com/topic/jesus-christ, and others. The sacred scripture of Islam is the Qur'_a_n http://www.answers.com/topic/qur-an, which contains God's revelations to Muhammad. The sayings and deeds of the Prophet recounted in the sunna http://www.answers.com/topic/sunna-religion-in-encyclopedia are also an important source of belief and practice in Islam. The religious obligations of all Muslims are summed up in the Five Pillars of Islam, which include belief in God and his Prophet and obligations of prayer, charity, pilgrimage, and fasting. The fundamental concept in Islam is the Shar_i_'_a_h http://www.answers.com/topic/shari-ah, or Law, which embraces the total way of life commanded by God. Observant Muslims pray five times a day and join in community worship on Fridays at the mosque http://www.answers.com/topic/mosque, where worship is led by an imam http://www.answers.com/topic/imam. Every believer is required to make a pilgrimage to Mecca http://www.answers.com/topic/mecca, the holiest city, at least once in a lifetime, barring poverty or physical incapacity. The month of Ramadan http://www.answers.com/topic/ramadan is set aside for fasting. Alcohol and pork are always forbidden, as are gambling, usury, fraud, slander, and the making of images. In addition to celebrating the breaking of the fast of Ramadan, Muslims celebrate Muhammad's birthday (/see/ /mawlid http://www.answers.com/topic/mawlid-religion-in-encyclopedia/) and his ascension into heaven (/see/ /mi'r_a_j http://www.answers.com/topic/mi-raj/). The '_I_d al-A_d__h__a_ festival inaugurates the season of pilgrimage to Mecca. Muslims are enjoined to defend Islam against unbelievers through jihad http://www.answers.com/topic/jihad. Divisions occurred early in Islam, brought about by disputes over the succession to the caliphate (/see/ caliph http://www.answers.com/topic/caliph). About 90% of Muslims belong to the Sunnite http://www.answers.com/topic/sunnite branch. The Sh_i_'ite http://www.answers.com/topic/shiites broke away in the 7th century and later gave rise to other sects, including the Ism_a_'_i_l_i_ http://www.answers.com/topic/isma-ilis. Another significant element in Islam is the mysticism known as Sufism http://www.answers.com/topic/sufism. Since the 19th century the concept of the Islamic community has inspired Muslim peoples to cast off Western colonial rule, and in the late 20th century fundamentalist movements (/see/ Islamic fundamentalism http://www.answers.com/topic/islamic-fundamentalism) threatened or toppled a number of secular Middle Eastern governments. In the early 21st century, there were more than 1.2 billion Muslims in the world. #-- Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: So has Islam. Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, German declared war on the U.S.: http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/timeline/germany-declares.htm The first Gulf war was not without consequence, but what does this all have to do with the attack of 9/11 by a group of terrorist? http://www.historyguy.com/GulfWar.html Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: No, Iraq invaded Kuwait, a US Ally. Germany never attacked us either. --- Leland Jackson wrote: So, Iraq has never attacked the US, but we have attacked Iraq at least twice. Is that correct? Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: We were still at war from their 1991 invasion of Kuwait. --- Leland Jackson wrote: Neither has Iraq ever attacked the US. We were attacked by a small group of Terrorist/Pirate on 9/11. The attackers pledged alliance to no country, nor any flag, other than to the flag of Al Qauda's Jolly Roger's
RE: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Just as bad in new york which is my point. People are different based upon the culture that they were raised in. Some such as myself have been exposed to a lot more by travelling, working, studying and they have learned to adapt.. But for us or the muslim extremists to think that we can change a whole race of people is the height of stupidity. Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 1:14 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan On Jan 15, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote: I remember walking down an alley in the late 70's looking for a bar in alexandria egypt.. A little ole guy come up missing an arm and knife cuts on his face and said you don't belong here. Sounds like some of the locals in Mississippi or Alabama, who aren't exactly known for their hospitality and openness to people from other parts of the country, especially folks from up north, or those whose ethnic heritage doesn't match theirs. Not much difference between them and your Egyptian friend. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Web site statistics package
I use statcounter.com. The free version is fairly good. I have the paid version but I'm thinking of going back to the free version. Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 14, 2007, at 11:26 AM, john harvey wrote: I use nTop. Thanks, John -- I'll check it out. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
Michael Madigan wrote: Kennedy stared the bastards in the eye and the Russians backed down. That's what we have to do with the rag heads. Cool. So please, please go live in the twin towers when they rebuild them. We'll see what the 'rag heads' have to do with you. --- Bill Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're at war today No. The war ended almost 4 years ago. We are an occupying army now. We've got our finger stuck in Muslim/Arab eyes, and we're one more serious attack away from a far deeper appreciation of what's been wrought on us by the warmongers occupying our capital and information supply. We don't understand or respect our enemy. Despite all the lessons of history, we've been led to believe that all we have to do is send in the Marines and our enemies will cower under our shock and awe. What actually happened on the way to that throne is already history; what happens next is anyone's guess, but by now we should already know it's not going to be the grand and glorious victory-over-evil bill of goods we've been sold on. Decades ago, we went through the Cuban missile crisis, and a brush with disaster the likes of which we still can't imagine, yet with that experience solidly under our belt, we have not taken the steps necessary to prevent that possibility from ever happening again - instead we did the opposite: more weapons, more bombs, more shock and awe - and more belligerence. What will it take for us to finally learn that war in the nuclear age is not an option? Why can't we grasp a simple truth: that when we disagree with the rulers of another country, the solution isn't to kill or starve all the people in that country, who were just victims themselves, but to use national and international diplomacy to deal with the errant ruler? We are aware that those bunker-busters being readied for Iran are actually nuclear weapons, right? I know - these are all statements of the obvious, and shouldn't even have to be said, but here we are today, closer to nightmare scenarios at home (Big Brother) and abroad (war) then we could have imagined not too many years ago. The scariest part isn't what's happening already, but what is very likely to happen next if we don't do what we have to do. We, the American people, didn't bring this on, it was done for us, by that gang and their cohorts. They're not telling us this, but I'll say it: we need to choose between their attitude and their direction - and the principles we want to live by. Bill -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Thought for the Day
Michael Madigan wrote: Where are the white women at? - Martin Luther King Mike is plain dumb - Ricardo Araoz --- Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter - the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But the list is long of who Iraq did attack, gas, promoted terrorism against, torture,... Do you really think that list is as long as the list of who did USA 'attack, gas, promoted terrorism against, torture,...'? - Original Message - From: Ricardo_Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:13:43 -0300 Subject: Re: [OT] Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan Michael Madigan wrote: Lets see. Israel has never attacked us. Neither did Iraq ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] End the unjust Jewish occupation of Muslim lands
http://protestwarrior.com/new_signs.php?sign=22 Saddam - Hung for the Holidays http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: MSDN Path to Product Key?
InList() would be a nicer approach, unless they don't have more than 25 of your aliases :) On 1/15/07, Mike yearwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Will gdrvf They've got my last name _misspelled_!! So it'd have to be if caller = Hentzen or caller = Henten or caller = Henzen or caller = Hertzen or caller = Hanson or caller = Henson that muppet guy? or caller = Hansin or caller = Hertzenwerke or ROFL! That reminds me of Bugs Bunny in the episode with Hansel, Gretel and the Witch when he was saying Hansel? Hansel? [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
@M Picture Clause in Textbox
Hello all, is there a way to have a selection in a text box similar to like we can with the get clause? Sample: lc_file= Current @ 2, 10 GET lc_file ; PICTURE @M Current, History, Both Can we use the @M in a form's text box that will allow us to press the space bar and choose only between the 3 selections in the @M list ? Thanks, Philip ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
@M Picture Clause in Textbox
Hello all, is there a way to have a selection in a text box similar to like we can with the get clause? Sample: lc_file= Current @ 2, 10 GET lc_file ; PICTURE @M Current, History, Both Can we use the @M in a form's text box that will allow us to press the space bar and choose only between the 3 selections in the @M list ? Thanks, Philip ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Born Baptist
Born Baptist Each Friday night after work, Bubba would fire up his outdoor grill and cook a venison steak. But, all of Bubba's neighbors were CatholicAnd since it was Lent, they were forbidden from eating meat on Friday. The delicious aroma from the grilled venison steaks was causing such a problem for the Catholic faithful that they finally talked to their priest. The Priest came to visit Bubba, and suggested that he become a Catholic. After several classes and much study, Bubba attended Mass.and as the priest sprinkled holy water over him, he said, You were born a Baptist, and raised a Baptist, but now you are a Catholic. Bubba's neighbors were greatly relieved, until Friday night arrived, and the wonderful aroma of grilled venison filled the neighborhood. The Priest was called immediately by the neighbors, and, as he rushed into Bubba's yard, clutching a rosary and prepared to scold him, he stopped and watched in amazement. There stood Bubba, clutching a small bottle of holy water which he carefully sprinkled over the grilling meat and chanting: You wuz born a deer, you wuz raised a deer, but now you a catfish. Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.12/630 - Release Date: 1/15/2007 8:28 PM ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: @M Picture Clause in Textbox
Philip Borkholder wrote: Hello all, is there a way to have a selection in a text box similar to like we can with the get clause? Sample: lc_file= Current @ 2, 10 GET lc_file ; PICTURE @M Current, History, Both Can we use the @M in a form's text box that will allow us to press the space bar and choose only between the 3 selections in the @M list ? I'm in VFP as of version 5 for UIs, so I can't answer you exactly, but I wonderwhy not just use a dropdown listbox? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Born Baptist
I lak cayatfish, specially elk cayatfish! John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 8:17 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: [OT] Born Baptist Born Baptist Each Friday night after work, Bubba would fire up his outdoor grill and cook a venison steak. But, all of Bubba's neighbors were CatholicAnd since it was Lent, they were forbidden from eating meat on Friday. The delicious aroma from the grilled venison steaks was causing such a problem for the Catholic faithful that they finally talked to their priest. The Priest came to visit Bubba, and suggested that he become a Catholic. After several classes and much study, Bubba attended Mass.and as the priest sprinkled holy water over him, he said, You were born a Baptist, and raised a Baptist, but now you are a Catholic. Bubba's neighbors were greatly relieved, until Friday night arrived, and the wonderful aroma of grilled venison filled the neighborhood. The Priest was called immediately by the neighbors, and, as he rushed into Bubba's yard, clutching a rosary and prepared to scold him, he stopped and watched in amazement. There stood Bubba, clutching a small bottle of holy water which he carefully sprinkled over the grilling meat and chanting: You wuz born a deer, you wuz raised a deer, but now you a catfish. Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.12/630 - Release Date: 1/15/2007 8:28 PM [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] MS certs - I'm on the way
Jeff wrote: Some months ago, I asked the group about Microsoft certifications - your response was the catalyst that I needed. Even though I've been studying for over a year, I just didn't schedule an exam, didn't get serious enough with it. But I took one [70-229 - Designing and Implementing Database with MS SQL 2000 Enterprise - didn't start with an easy one!], passed and received my Welcome Kit last week. I'm patting myself on the back in front of all of you all but thanks again for the extra motivation. Now I'm working on two more to complete my MCAD! Congratulations! What line are you going to go for in the MCAD? Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.12/630 - Release Date: 1/15/2007 8:28 PM ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Born Baptist
john harvey wrote: I lak cayatfish, specially elk cayatfish! Fisrt you have to kill one, then share with friends. ;- Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.12/630 - Release Date: 1/15/2007 8:28 PM ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Born Baptist
Well, I got the first part done this year, but I don't have any friends - only acquaintances (until the elk runs out)G John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen the Cook Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 8:44 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Born Baptist john harvey wrote: I lak cayatfish, specially elk cayatfish! Fisrt you have to kill one, then share with friends. ;- Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.12/630 - Release Date: 1/15/2007 8:28 PM [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] MS certs - I'm on the way
MCAD using C# Windows based then C#-XML Quoting Stephen the Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Congratulations! What line are you going to go for in the MCAD? Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
