RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!
Ah, I get you. I thought you may get into trouble having links to pictures on your site as well (well in the archives anyway). Cheers Tristan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Posted At: 15 January 2007 17:54 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Subject: Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! On Jan 15, 2007, at 3:54 AM, Tristan Leask wrote: Oh dear. I've looked around the site, and apparently it's a PocketPC site that had posted a way to copy the look of iPhone to a PocketPC. They weren't just showing pictures, but rather were copying the iPhone images. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: FoxPro on Vista
Al, VFP9 Works No Problems (so far) on mine. I fired it up on Saturday. I'm still not convinced about the speed of it though. I think my 2Bb of memory is insufficient. Dave Crozier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen Pollard Sent: 16 January 2007 11:17 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: FoxPro on Vista Hi foxgang Just tried out Vista ultimate on my Acer laptop. So much for VFP running on it though. VFP5 comes up with cant start application yet works VFP7 is ok VFP7 moans about MSXML4 and the task manager does not work. All good stuff so it looks like back to XP for me Allen -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.12/631 - Release Date: 16/01/2007 08:25 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxPro on Vista
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 6:17 am, Allen Pollard wrote: Hi Allen! So this is how they intend to kill the fox. Just tried out Vista ultimate on my Acer laptop. So much for VFP running on it though. VFP5 comes up with cant start application yet works VFP7 is ok VFP7 moans about MSXML4 and the task manager does not work. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: FoxPro on Vista
Surely 2Bb sounds like a huge amount of memory? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Sent: 16 January 2007 11:26 To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: FoxPro on Vista Al, VFP9 Works No Problems (so far) on mine. I fired it up on Saturday. I'm still not convinced about the speed of it though. I think my 2Bb of memory is insufficient. Dave Crozier ___ Associated Packaging is the trading name of Eurohill Traders Ltd. Registered in England and Wales : 1114987 VAT : GB210390611 Eurohill Labels Ltd Registered in England and Wales : 1372024 VAT : GB312955757 195 Vale Road, Tonbridge, Kent, TN9 1SU. Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxPro on Vista
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 6:54 am, Adam Buckland wrote: Hi Adam! Elephant computer. Surely 2Bb sounds like a huge amount of memory? Al, VFP9 Works No Problems (so far) on mine. I fired it up on Saturday. I'm still not convinced about the speed of it though. I think my 2Bb of memory is insufficient. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: FoxPro on Vista
Adam, It may well sound like it but in development mode with a couple of VFP sessions and 3 VFP on line programs, Outlook, Messenger and a few other apps I've used up nearly 1Gb as opposed to XP equivalent which normally runs at about 400Kb-500Kb. All the blurb from M$ seems to say it runs faster, and when there is lots of free memory this is true, but adding multiple apps and decreasing available memory below 512Kb makes it run like a dog. Haven't found out how to cap memory for an application yet as this may well help, but I'm looking! Dave Crozier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Buckland Sent: 16 January 2007 11:55 To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: FoxPro on Vista Surely 2Bb sounds like a huge amount of memory? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Sent: 16 January 2007 11:26 To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: FoxPro on Vista Al, VFP9 Works No Problems (so far) on mine. I fired it up on Saturday. I'm still not convinced about the speed of it though. I think my 2Bb of memory is insufficient. Dave Crozier ___ Associated Packaging is the trading name of Eurohill Traders Ltd. Registered in England and Wales : 1114987 VAT : GB210390611 Eurohill Labels Ltd Registered in England and Wales : 1372024 VAT : GB312955757 195 Vale Road, Tonbridge, Kent, TN9 1SU. Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] MS certs - I'm on the way
Jeff Fisher wrote: MCAD using C# Windows based then C#-XML Good for you. I am going to take the SQL2005 base exam in Feb, I believe. Exam 70–431 that is. Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.12/631 - Release Date: 1/16/2007 8:25 AM ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxPro on Vista
Dave Crozier wrote: Al, VFP9 Works No Problems (so far) on mine. I fired it up on Saturday. I'm still not convinced about the speed of it though. I think my 2Bb of memory is insufficient. Rumor had it that you'd need a lot more horsepower (read: RAM) under the hood for it to be effective. -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxPro on Vista
Pete Theisen wrote: On Tuesday 16 January 2007 6:17 am, Allen Pollard wrote: Hi Allen! So this is how they intend to kill the fox. FUD nonsense. C'mon Pete...do they say that about everything that doesn't work with Vista? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxPro on Vista
Dave Crozier wrote: snipped Haven't found out how to cap memory for an application yet as this may well help, but I'm looking! Ed Leafe had a utility on his Downloads page (http://leafe.com/dls/vfp) that you could run in your VFP programs called SetMemory. It's near the bottom of the page. Routine to be called to limit Visual FoxPro to using only physical RAM, not virtual memory. Can vastly improve performance, especially when running queries. Author: Ed Leafe Freeware - 1K Last updated: 2000-01-20** -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxPro on Vista
Allen Pollard wrote: Hi foxgang Just tried out Vista ultimate on my Acer laptop. So much for VFP running on it though. VFP5 comes up with cant start application yet works VFP7 is ok VFP7 moans about MSXML4 and the task manager does not work. All good stuff so it looks like back to XP for me Allen VFP6 on Vista worked fine for us. Casey ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
VFP: Object Names Quirk
To All, I just came across a quirk in the way that VFP names added objects to a container which I've never noticed before. The textbox entry in a grid column by default is named Text1 and is retrieved back in mixed case. However, if you add an Editbox object to the column and call it Edit1 then retrieve the name it comes back as EDIT1 i.e in capital letters. I don't know why I've never picked this up before in the distant (yawn) past but it has caused me a couple of hours of pain in that I was scanning all the contained objects in the grid looking for ones called Edit1 so as to bind an event to them - and consequently never found them pesky varmints! Ah well - 2 hours of the working day wasted and another fact added into the book of bludners BG Dave Crozier ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: FoxPro on Vista
I use Ed's SetMemory between Data Translation processes (very intense translations) just to make certain each process is best prepared to use my PC RAM most efficiently. Before using SetMemory I would get c005 errors every once in a while between processes (VFP7. After implementing SetMemory I never got c005 errors again. Another wonderful gift to the VFP community by our own Ed Leafe! Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MB Software Solutions Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 7:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FoxPro on Vista Dave Crozier wrote: snipped Haven't found out how to cap memory for an application yet as this may well help, but I'm looking! Ed Leafe had a utility on his Downloads page (http://leafe.com/dls/vfp) that you could run in your VFP programs called SetMemory. It's near the bottom of the page. Routine to be called to limit Visual FoxPro to using only physical RAM, not virtual memory. Can vastly improve performance, especially when running queries. Author: Ed Leafe Freeware - 1K Last updated: 2000-01-20** -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Microsoft Caught out - Naughty, Naughty!
...Microsoft used undocumented APIs that allowed its developers to write programs that worked better with Windows than competitors', according to the latest testimony in the Iowa antitrust action against the company .Alepin had earlier claimed that Microsoft ran special demonstration programs whose sole purpose was to crash rival products and alleged that the company had subverted developers who used Microsoft's version of Java 'thinking they were developing multi-platform applications, but were actually developing Windows-specific applications'.. http://tinyurl.com/yj7oxy Naughty Microsoft, As if they would do this sort of thing. It must be spin put out by the opposition BG. Dave Crozier ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Showing the time only portion of a VFP datetime field in a gridcolumn
Dave Crozier wrote: Michael, Controlsource==Substr(Transform(Datetime()),12) Dave Crozier This didn't work for me, with VFP8 complaining about it needing to be a variable reference. Can it only be done programatically instead of in the Properties box? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Microsoft Caught out - Naughty, Naughty!
Dave Crozier wrote: ...Microsoft used undocumented APIs that allowed its developers to write programs that worked better with Windows than competitors', according to the latest testimony in the Iowa antitrust action against the company .Alepin had earlier claimed that Microsoft ran special demonstration programs whose sole purpose was to crash rival products and alleged that the company had subverted developers who used Microsoft's version of Java 'thinking they were developing multi-platform applications, but were actually developing Windows-specific applications'.. http://tinyurl.com/yj7oxy Naughty Microsoft, As if they would do this sort of thing. It must be spin put out by the opposition BG. But will they be held accountable (i.e., be punished) for their misdeeds or get off scott free ??? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Microsoft Caught out - Naughty, Naughty!
On 1/16/07, Dave Crozier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Naughty Microsoft, As if they would do this sort of thing. It must be spin put out by the opposition BG. No, a search for Windows Undocumented APIs hardly reveals any decades-long patterns at all... -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxPro on Vista
Good luck finding a laptop that has more than 2 gig of RAM. Perhaps later this year, but it's hard enough to find a laptop with 2 gig now. Come to think of it, I'm not sure if anyone is selling desktops with a standard 2 gig right now without special ordering it. Maybe some of the gaming machines. Adam Buckland wrote: Surely 2Bb sounds like a huge amount of memory? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Sent: 16 January 2007 11:26 To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: FoxPro on Vista Al, VFP9 Works No Problems (so far) on mine. I fired it up on Saturday. I'm still not convinced about the speed of it though. I think my 2Bb of memory is insufficient. Dave Crozier ___ Associated Packaging is the trading name of Eurohill Traders Ltd. Registered in England and Wales : 1114987 VAT : GB210390611 Eurohill Labels Ltd Registered in England and Wales : 1372024 VAT : GB312955757 195 Vale Road, Tonbridge, Kent, TN9 1SU. Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Showing the time only portion of a VFP datetime field ina gridcolumn
Michael, Miss out the = if you are doing it at design time. Dave Crozier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions Sent: 16 January 2007 14:08 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: Showing the time only portion of a VFP datetime field ina gridcolumn Dave Crozier wrote: Michael, Controlsource==Substr(Transform(Datetime()),12) Dave Crozier This didn't work for me, with VFP8 complaining about it needing to be a variable reference. Can it only be done programatically instead of in the Properties box? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Microsoft Caught out - Naughty, Naughty!
Ted Roche wrote: On 1/16/07, Dave Crozier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Naughty Microsoft, As if they would do this sort of thing. It must be spin put out by the opposition BG. No, a search for Windows Undocumented APIs hardly reveals any decades-long patterns at all... Why would they not document themis it merely an oversight or as Dave's reference suggests, something underhanded? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: FoxPro on Vista
Toshiba selling 2GB + 200GB hard drives standard... am using one to type this on A100-998... But 2Bb of memory must be far bigger than 2GB surely! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Cully Sent: 16 January 2007 14:20 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: FoxPro on Vista Good luck finding a laptop that has more than 2 gig of RAM. Perhaps later this year, but it's hard enough to find a laptop with 2 gig now. Come to think of it, I'm not sure if anyone is selling desktops with a standard 2 gig right now without special ordering it. Maybe some of the gaming machines. Adam Buckland wrote: Surely 2Bb sounds like a huge amount of memory? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Sent: 16 January 2007 11:26 To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: FoxPro on Vista Al, VFP9 Works No Problems (so far) on mine. I fired it up on Saturday. I'm still not convinced about the speed of it though. I think my 2Bb of memory is insufficient. Dave Crozier ___ Associated Packaging is the trading name of Eurohill Traders Ltd. Registered in England and Wales : 1114987 VAT : GB210390611 Eurohill Labels Ltd Registered in England and Wales : 1372024 VAT : GB312955757 195 Vale Road, Tonbridge, Kent, TN9 1SU. Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Invalid Terms
Ed Foster's Gripelog || Reader Voices: Invalid Terms At what point is it clear that a nasty license provision goes so far across the line that it must be deemed invalid? That seems to be an increasingly hot topic, due in large part to recent discussions here and elsewhere about various terms in Microsoft's Windows Vista EULA. http://www.gripe2ed.com/scoop/story/2007/1/15/11529/2390 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: FoxPro on Vista
To All, especially Adam for the Spot, Sorry to mislead you all I Finger burped there and the post should have read should have read 1Gb (one) not 2Bg - whatever a Bg is!! You see, not only are the eyes going now...but also the fingers...the end is surely soon in sight! Dave Crozier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Buckland Sent: 16 January 2007 14:36 To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: FoxPro on Vista Toshiba selling 2GB + 200GB hard drives standard... am using one to type this on A100-998... But 2Bb of memory must be far bigger than 2GB surely! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Cully Sent: 16 January 2007 14:20 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: FoxPro on Vista Good luck finding a laptop that has more than 2 gig of RAM. Perhaps later this year, but it's hard enough to find a laptop with 2 gig now. Come to think of it, I'm not sure if anyone is selling desktops with a standard 2 gig right now without special ordering it. Maybe some of the gaming machines. Adam Buckland wrote: Surely 2Bb sounds like a huge amount of memory? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Sent: 16 January 2007 11:26 To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: FoxPro on Vista Al, VFP9 Works No Problems (so far) on mine. I fired it up on Saturday. I'm still not convinced about the speed of it though. I think my 2Bb of memory is insufficient. Dave Crozier ___ Associated Packaging is the trading name of Eurohill Traders Ltd. Registered in England and Wales : 1114987 VAT : GB210390611 Eurohill Labels Ltd Registered in England and Wales : 1372024 VAT : GB312955757 195 Vale Road, Tonbridge, Kent, TN9 1SU. Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] MS certs - I'm on the way
As the husband of an aggressive (but lovely) attorney, I am a huge advocate of certification. It provides significant increases in culpability with minimal additional cost. These are some near-facts that support my position: * 100% of commercial airline accidents occur while the aircraft is under the control of certified operators, mechanics, etc. * 100% of professional liability claims (medical, legal, accounting) involve alleged malfeasance of a certified practitioner. * 70% of all automobile accidents occur while the vehicle is being operated by a licensed driver. Using certified people to get a job done is never a guarantee of success, but should failure come your way, you (or your survivors) will always recover more damages if a certified operator, practitioner, or professional was involved. And higher damages mean higher fees for the attorney winning the case (i.e. my wife). B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] MS certs - I'm on the way
You certainly are certifiable. --- Hal Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As the husband of an aggressive (but lovely) attorney, I am a huge advocate of certification. It provides significant increases in culpability with minimal additional cost. These are some near-facts that support my position: * 100% of commercial airline accidents occur while the aircraft is under the control of certified operators, mechanics, etc. * 100% of professional liability claims (medical, legal, accounting) involve alleged malfeasance of a certified practitioner. * 70% of all automobile accidents occur while the vehicle is being operated by a licensed driver. Using certified people to get a job done is never a guarantee of success, but should failure come your way, you (or your survivors) will always recover more damages if a certified operator, practitioner, or professional was involved. And higher damages mean higher fees for the attorney winning the case (i.e. my wife). B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] MS certs - I'm on the way
And Michael speaks with vast experience... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: 16 January 2007 15:05 To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] MS certs - I'm on the way You certainly are certifiable. ___ Associated Packaging is the trading name of Eurohill Traders Ltd. Registered in England and Wales : 1114987 VAT : GB210390611 Eurohill Labels Ltd Registered in England and Wales : 1372024 VAT : GB312955757 195 Vale Road, Tonbridge, Kent, TN9 1SU. Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: FoxPro on Vista
It's really funny that Microsoft is claiming better speed for Vista ... they are the ones who stole the speed to begin with. If you want fast buy fast hardware and lots of it. I just built a machine with an Intel E6700 dual core, separate 10K RPM system and page disks (max page file size), 1TB of Raid0, some NVidia board with 256 Mb, and 2GB (or Bb if you don't like metric prefixes) of DDR 800 Ram. If this machine were any faster, it would be clairvoyant. Oh yes, running XP SP2 with most of the pretty stuff turned off. B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxPro on Vista
On 1/16/07, Dave Crozier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry to mislead you all I Finger burped there and the post should have read should have read 1Gb (one) not 2Bg - whatever a Bg is!! As the Queen said, it can mean whatever I want it to mean: http://it.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?string=exactacronym=BGs=r ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] MS certs - I'm on the way
= = And Michael speaks with vast experience... = Adam, the poor lad cannot resist. But this is a bit early for him to be posting. Could it be that he has a new parole officer or did they change the reporting schedule at the unemployment office? B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxPro on Vista
Hal Kaplan wrote: It's really funny that Microsoft is claiming better speed for Vista ... they are the ones who stole the speed to begin with. If you want fast buy fast hardware and lots of it. I just built a machine with an Intel E6700 dual core, separate 10K RPM system and page disks (max page file size), 1TB of Raid0, some NVidia board with 256 Mb, and 2GB (or Bb if you don't like metric prefixes) of DDR 800 Ram. If this machine were any faster, it would be clairvoyant. Oh yes, running XP SP2 with most of the pretty stuff turned off. Cool! And how much did that puppy cost to build? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: FoxPro on Vista
= On 1/16/07, Dave Crozier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: = = Sorry to mislead you all I Finger burped there and the = post should = have read should have read 1Gb (one) not 2Bg - whatever a Bg is!! = = = As the Queen said, it can mean whatever I want it to mean: = = http://it.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?string=exactacronym=BGs=r = Ted, that is very astute but you must remember that the Queen was on some powerful stuff that even Timothy Leary could not get his hands on. But I love the quote. I thought Dave meant Billion instead of Giga- and that he was just avoiding CGS prefixes. B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] OO upgrade path?
http://www.theregister.com/2007/01/08/openoffice_bugs/ The security bugs stem from flaws in the image processing components of the packages involved in handling common graphic formats, WMF and EMF, as explained here. As a result users who open malformed documents using vulnerable versions of the software are liable to become infected. These heap-based buffer overflow flaws were discovered by security researcher John Heasman of NGSSoftware, the UK-based security software tools developer. OpenOffice users are advised to upgrade to versions 2.1.0 respectively to guard against possible exploit. Users of StarOffice version 6,7 and 8 need to apply relevant patches from the SunSolve website as explained here. ® ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: FoxPro on Vista
Sorry spec has just gone up to a quad core which is min spec for Vista SP1 Didn't you see the revised spec at the bottom of the EULA? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Ragsdale Sent: 16 January 2007 15:28 To: profox@leafe.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: FoxPro on Vista I think you can get the pieces from Tiger Direct for $9.99 */**/*** * Price after mail-in rebate (price before rebate: $1,479.99). ** To receive mail-in rebate, you must register on our website, download, print, complete, and mail-in seventy-seven (77) separate rebate forms. Please allow 3 to 6 months for rebate. Rebate forms must be accompanied by original UPC's from the original packaging. *** No refunds, exchanges, or customer service unless original packaging contains the original UPC. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 9:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FoxPro on Vista Hal Kaplan wrote: It's really funny that Microsoft is claiming better speed for Vista ... they are the ones who stole the speed to begin with. If you want fast buy fast hardware and lots of it. I just built a machine with an Intel E6700 dual core, separate 10K RPM system and page disks (max page file size), 1TB of Raid0, some NVidia board with 256 Mb, and 2GB (or Bb if you don't like metric prefixes) of DDR 800 Ram. If this machine were any faster, it would be clairvoyant. Oh yes, running XP SP2 with most of the pretty stuff turned off. Cool! And how much did that puppy cost to build? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxPro on Vista
Kevin Ragsdale wrote: I think you can get the pieces from Tiger Direct for $9.99 */**/*** * Price after mail-in rebate (price before rebate: $1,479.99). ** To receive mail-in rebate, you must register on our website, download, print, complete, and mail-in seventy-seven (77) separate rebate forms. Please allow 3 to 6 months for rebate. Rebate forms must be accompanied by original UPC's from the original packaging. *** No refunds, exchanges, or customer service unless original packaging contains the original UPC. Ah, I see you've got the scars from those rebate scams! Don't get Chet (or whomever it was) started on those rebate scams!! ;-) -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxPro on Vista
On Jan 16, 2007, at 9:28 AM, Kevin Ragsdale wrote: I think you can get the pieces from Tiger Direct for $9.99 */**/*** I bought/built my last machine through them. My wife is the rebate queen: never lets one go unclaimed. She gave up on this one, though I followed through. The rebate stuff was so bad I reported them to the MN Attorney General. Designed specifically to make it just-short-of- impossible. I will ***NEVER*** buy anything from those a$$holes again. Ken ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Invalid Terms
Ted Roche wrote: Ed Foster's Gripelog || Reader Voices: Invalid Terms At what point is it clear that a nasty license provision goes so far across the line that it must be deemed invalid? That seems to be an increasingly hot topic, due in large part to recent discussions here and elsewhere about various terms in Microsoft's Windows Vista EULA. http://www.gripe2ed.com/scoop/story/2007/1/15/11529/2390 When do you think we'll see a challenge in court to this kind of crap? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Invalid Terms
On Jan 16, 2007, at 11:08 AM, MB Software Solutions wrote: When do you think we'll see a challenge in court to this kind of crap? Whenever someone with deep pockets decides to do so. Until then, the Golden Rule applies. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] IE7 and MS Virtual Earth Mapping conflict with FireFox
Lessons learned: 1. FireFox cannot be running when the mapping service is accessed (and IE7 is installed). 2. It seems that having (temporarily) made IE7 the default browser was a factor in solving this Why the hell are people still using IE Good question, especially since he (and I) use FireFox instead. I don't know what possessed him to download/install IE7, but that's what he did. When this problem started, something made me ask about whether he had recently installed IE7, and that was the case, so we knew that was a factor in this problem - but it wasn't until he had the idea to try making it the default browser that we noticed the effect it had. Seems the story doesn't end there - he now informs me that map retrievals are timing out where they weren't before. Dave G., if you catch this - I see this test in your code to loop until the map is ready, but it seems that it doesn't work? Do While thisform.oMap.ReadyState4 DoEvents Enddo Better lesson learned: get the hell away from MS stuff! MS likes dependencies! That whole thing about not being able to separate IE from the OS is a big one. Bill -Charlie ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Invalid Terms
Ed Leafe wrote: Whenever someone with deep pockets decides to do so. Until then, the Golden Rule applies. But when they (M$) are the deepest pockets for miles around, that time will never seem to come? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] IE7 and MS Virtual Earth Mapping conflict with FireFox
On Tuesday, January 16, 2007 11:30 AM Bill Arnold wrote: Good question, especially since he (and I) use FireFox instead. I don't know what possessed him to download/install IE7, but that's what he did. When this problem started, something made me ask about whether he had recently installed IE7, and that was the case, so we knew that was a factor in this problem - but it wasn't until he had the idea to try making it the default browser that we noticed the effect it had. snipped I have seen IE7 included in the Express option of Windows XP Update like it is one of the security updates. He probably got it that way. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] IE7 and MS Virtual Earth Mapping conflict with FireFox
Bill, Sorry to be late on this thread. I've been keeping track on it though and I'll give the loop and associated running problems a look this evening to see if I can sort anything out. Dave Crozier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Arnold Sent: 16 January 2007 16:30 To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [NF] IE7 and MS Virtual Earth Mapping conflict with FireFox Lessons learned: 1. FireFox cannot be running when the mapping service is accessed (and IE7 is installed). 2. It seems that having (temporarily) made IE7 the default browser was a factor in solving this Why the hell are people still using IE Good question, especially since he (and I) use FireFox instead. I don't know what possessed him to download/install IE7, but that's what he did. When this problem started, something made me ask about whether he had recently installed IE7, and that was the case, so we knew that was a factor in this problem - but it wasn't until he had the idea to try making it the default browser that we noticed the effect it had. Seems the story doesn't end there - he now informs me that map retrievals are timing out where they weren't before. Dave G., if you catch this - I see this test in your code to loop until the map is ready, but it seems that it doesn't work? Do While thisform.oMap.ReadyState4 DoEvents Enddo Better lesson learned: get the hell away from MS stuff! MS likes dependencies! That whole thing about not being able to separate IE from the OS is a big one. Bill -Charlie [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Invalid Terms
Michael, Mass revolt is what is needed. Power to the people and all that. But, Profox Martyr's doesn't have the same ring to it as the Tolpuddle Martyr's does it BG. Back to the drawing board. Dave Crozier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions Sent: 16 January 2007 16:32 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] Invalid Terms Ed Leafe wrote: Whenever someone with deep pockets decides to do so. Until then, the Golden Rule applies. But when they (M$) are the deepest pockets for miles around, that time will never seem to come? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxPro on Vista
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 7:40 am, MB Software Solutions wrote: Pete Theisen wrote: On Tuesday 16 January 2007 6:17 am, Allen Pollard wrote: Hi Allen! So this is how they intend to kill the fox. FUD nonsense. C'mon Pete...do they say that about everything that doesn't work with Vista? Hi Michael! I dunno, maybe now we can FINALLY get fox to work under Linux. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] IE7 and MS Virtual Earth Mapping conflict with FireFox
Bill, Just found a copy of the demo program which I didn't think I had at work - but of course its on my website, so I ran it up. I can't see the problems you are having though even when Firefox is open at the same time as running the demo and IE7 is set as the default browser. It also works fine with IE7 as the default browser so you have something pretty basic wrong somewhere. Question: 1. What exactly does the app do if different to the demo? 3. Have you modified the Javascript in the HTML Page at all? 4. You might try running CCleaner (Crap Cleaner) from www.CCLeaner.com which removes all temporary file crap out of your system first. Just be sure to deselect the delete Cookies or you'll remove all your Webpage login details etc. This will ensure you aren't picking up any cached info. I remember that I did have a few timing problems in the code, hence the Setup Virtual Earth button on the top of the demo screen but as I said, I'll give it a look later tonight and report back tomorrow. Dave Crozier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Arnold Sent: 16 January 2007 16:30 To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [NF] IE7 and MS Virtual Earth Mapping conflict with FireFox Lessons learned: 1. FireFox cannot be running when the mapping service is accessed (and IE7 is installed). 2. It seems that having (temporarily) made IE7 the default browser was a factor in solving this Why the hell are people still using IE Good question, especially since he (and I) use FireFox instead. I don't know what possessed him to download/install IE7, but that's what he did. When this problem started, something made me ask about whether he had recently installed IE7, and that was the case, so we knew that was a factor in this problem - but it wasn't until he had the idea to try making it the default browser that we noticed the effect it had. Seems the story doesn't end there - he now informs me that map retrievals are timing out where they weren't before. Dave G., if you catch this - I see this test in your code to loop until the map is ready, but it seems that it doesn't work? Do While thisform.oMap.ReadyState4 DoEvents Enddo Better lesson learned: get the hell away from MS stuff! MS likes dependencies! That whole thing about not being able to separate IE from the OS is a big one. Bill -Charlie [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Invalid Terms
Dave Crozier wrote: Michael, Mass revolt is what is needed. Power to the people and all that. But, Profox Martyr's doesn't have the same ring to it as the Tolpuddle Martyr's does it BG. Back to the drawing board. Tolpuddle ??? Ah, I see it's a British thing: http://www.tolpuddlemartyrs.org.uk/ g -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxPro on Vista
Pete Theisen wrote: Hi Michael! I dunno, maybe now we can FINALLY get fox to work under Linux. And that's gonna open up how many new customers to you, Pete? I knowit *would* be a good thing, for sure. It's just like so many have said before: I don't have my user base or prospects beating down my door saying I need a Linux version of whatever software. But then again to be fair, I'm in the middle of nowhere, i.e., the sticks, and technology isn't something that is widely popular in my neck of the woods. g -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] -- Iraq articles
Pete, Interesting, thanks. Looks like the only thing that matters to most of the Iraqis is money. The only question is what is the most effective way to bribe them and keep them bribed. Why do you want to send our troops to fight for people you respect so little? I am tired of people I know going to Iraq. Kristyne McDaniel http://www.mcstyles.com http://www.shamrocktrails.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Invalid Terms
On Jan 16, 2007, at 11:31 AM, MB Software Solutions wrote: Whenever someone with deep pockets decides to do so. Until then, the Golden Rule applies. But when they (M$) are the deepest pockets for miles around, that time will never seem to come? Hence the desire by many to get the government regulators involved. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxPro on Vista
Dave Crozier wrote: should have read 1Gb (one) not 2Bg - whatever a Bg is!! An aging rocker that gives free holidays to Phoney Blair ;-) Peter ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Releasing Multiple Windows - But Not All
I am trying to close all windows except two and am not having much luck. The following code releases all of the windows except the two I want to leave open and the _screen.activeform. I even tried releasing the _screen.activeform first, but it still leaves it open. I also tried ACTIVATE SCREEN and _SCREEN.Show(). Likewise, I tried frmtimer.activate making it the active form. I can't seem to make the active form release. LnForms = _SCREEN.FormCount DO WHILE lnForms 0 IF !(UPPER(_SCREEN.Forms(lnForms).name) $ 'CAPPTOOLBARBASE~FRMTIMER') llSuccess = _SCREEN.Forms(lnForms).QueryUnload() IF llSuccess _SCREEN.Forms(lnForms).Release() ENDIF ENDIF lnForms = lnForms - 1 ENDDO Any ideas? Jeff Jeff Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 623-582-0323 Fax 623-869-0675 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.16.12/630 - Release Date: 1/15/2007 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/signed text/plain (text body -- kept) application/x-pkcs7-signature --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: FoxPro on Vista
= = Cool! And how much did that puppy cost to build? = = Michael J. Babcock, MCP = I was in a hurry, so I overpaid on everything and did not make all the right choices. Right now, the total is about $2700 and that includes the case, extra fans, power supply, 2 DVD recorders, the motherboard, and 8.625% NY sales tax. I bought everything from MicroCenter and CompUSA over-the-counter. I figure that if I had purchased everything from Newegg, I could have saved about $800 total. I also did a really stupid thing by trying to save $50 and getting an open-box mobo. It was a dud and had to be exchanged. So it cost me the extra $50 plus the wasted time trying to fix the bad board, exchanging, and rebuilding. I can get about $200 back on rebates, theoretically (I have to acquire another residence under a different name in a different country because the Western Digital rebate is limited to one per DNA sequence.) B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: FoxPro on Vista
= Dave Crozier wrote: = should have read 1Gb (one) not 2Bg - whatever a Bg is!! = = An aging rocker that gives free holidays to Phoney Blair ;-) = = Peter = LMAO! Nice! B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxPro on Vista
So this is how they intend to kill the fox. So this is how they intend to get you onto VFP9. -- Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] IE7 and MS Virtual Earth Mapping conflict with FireFox
Bill,
Sorry to be late on this thread. I've been keeping track on
it though and I'll give the loop and associated running
problems a look this evening to see if I can sort anything out.
Thanks, Dave. I've made some changes to your code to accommodate this
customer's requirements that I wanted to feed back on. One change is a
save map button with the CLICK event code below.
Bill
* Purpose: Save the current map as a BMP file in the customer
* database's folder. Assigns the map a unique filename
based on the
* customer record's matchcode and FILENO
**
LOCAL loTmp, chWnd, calias
PUBLIC cmapfile
calias = ALIAS()
save work area on entry
* Build a filename to store the map with; erase existing file of this
name if
* one exists (allow operator to replace maps after, say, zooming for
more detail)
cpath = JUSTPATH(DBF('custlist'))
cmapfile =
ADDBS(cpath)+TRIM(custlist.matchcode)+_+ALLTRIM(STR(custlist.fileno))+
_map.bmp
IF FILE(cmapfile)
SET SAFETY OFF
ERASE (cmapfile)
SET SAFETY ON
endif
* Hide the dashboard from the map
* Add a pushpin for customer's address; give it 2 seconds to complete
thisform.oMap_HTML.Dashboard_Hide.Click
thisform.oMap_HTML.cPushpin_Info.Value=ThisForm.txtPushpin_Info.Value
thisform.oMap_HTML.Add_Pin.Click
WAIT 'Adding pushpin' TIMEOUT 2
* Shrink the form to show only the map, and not the controls on the
form.
nsavewid = thisform.Width
save current form width
thisform.Width = thisform.olecontrol1.Width + 40
shrink form width
* Save the Map using FoxForm.Form's SAVEASBMP method
chWnd = _vfp.activeform.hWnd
loTmp = go_objmgr.createobj(loTmp,FoxForm.Form) same
as: loTmp = CREATEOBJECT(FoxForm.Form)
loTmp.SaveAsBMP(chWnd, cmapfile)
save the map
RELEASE loTmp
release foxform.form
loTmp = .null.
thisform.Width = nsavewid
restore form width
=MESSAGEBOX(Map has been saved as +cmapfile,0,m_product)
IF !empty(calias)
SELECT (calias)
ENDIF
RELEASE cmapfile
RETURN
Dave Crozier
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] MS certs - I'm on the way
Nah, I had a morning rendezvous with a certain lady attorney in the courthouse men's room. Talk about legal briefs. And what she did with my gavel. --- Hal Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: = = And Michael speaks with vast experience... = Adam, the poor lad cannot resist. But this is a bit early for him to be posting. Could it be that he has a new parole officer or did they change the reporting schedule at the unemployment office? B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] The Long Drop
Hi Everybody! Got it right with Saddie but blew it for his brother? http://thespincycle.blogspot.com/2005_11_01_thespincycle_archive.html By the 1860's the principles of the Enlightenment had long informed the basis of civil society and a string of dreadful executions had stained practice of English justice. The hangman of the day (who by convention is not named) introduced a new method which promised an instant and humane death for those who were sentenced to the Extreme Sanction. The mechanics of this method were outlined in the Schedule of Hangman's Weights and Measures, a copy of which is not reproduced here for fear that the foolish may take advantage of it. Rest assured that a copy is in the possession of your diligent correspondent. The fiendish secret of the long drop method was the calculation, by exact formula, of the weight of the condemned against the depth of the drop he or she had to fall to bring around 1000 pounds of force against the cervical spine, the idea being that this would cause the odontoid process to breach the relevant section of the spinal cord producing a clean and quick death. Paralysis and unconsciousness was instant and, after one hour on the rope, the miscreant would assuredly be dead. (End of quote) So today in the news one of the condemned convicts was decapitated. Too long a drop for his body weight? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] The Long Drop
I don't understand why you wouldn't just shoot him in the head. Has to be less painful and more precise. --- Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Everybody! Got it right with Saddie but blew it for his brother? http://thespincycle.blogspot.com/2005_11_01_thespincycle_archive.html By the 1860's the principles of the Enlightenment had long informed the basis of civil society and a string of dreadful executions had stained practice of English justice. The hangman of the day (who by convention is not named) introduced a new method which promised an instant and humane death for those who were sentenced to the Extreme Sanction. The mechanics of this method were outlined in the Schedule of Hangman's Weights and Measures, a copy of which is not reproduced here for fear that the foolish may take advantage of it. Rest assured that a copy is in the possession of your diligent correspondent. The fiendish secret of the long drop method was the calculation, by exact formula, of the weight of the condemned against the depth of the drop he or she had to fall to bring around 1000 pounds of force against the cervical spine, the idea being that this would cause the odontoid process to breach the relevant section of the spinal cord producing a clean and quick death. Paralysis and unconsciousness was instant and, after one hour on the rope, the miscreant would assuredly be dead. (End of quote) So today in the news one of the condemned convicts was decapitated. Too long a drop for his body weight? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Releasing Multiple Windows - But Not All
Jeff Johnson wrote: I am trying to close all windows except two and am not having much luck. The following code releases all of the windows except the two I want to leave open and the _screen.activeform. I even tried releasing the _screen.activeform first, but it still leaves it open. I also tried ACTIVATE SCREEN and _SCREEN.Show(). Likewise, I tried frmtimer.activate making it the active form. I can't seem to make the active form release. LnForms = _SCREEN.FormCount DO WHILE lnForms 0 IF !(UPPER(_SCREEN.Forms(lnForms).name) $ 'CAPPTOOLBARBASE~FRMTIMER') llSuccess = _SCREEN.Forms(lnForms).QueryUnload() IF llSuccess _SCREEN.Forms(lnForms).Release() ENDIF ENDIF lnForms = lnForms - 1 ENDDO Any ideas? Just a WAG, but why not try and loop backwards? For MyLoop = MyCount to 1 * code to release the form(MyLoop) instance endfor Perhaps it's no different? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] -- Iraq articles
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 12:11 pm, Kristyne McDaniel wrote: Hi Kristyne! Oil, democracy, security, etc., etc. Most immediately about oil, if you aren't one of the ones killed. You let that oil supply dry up and we are all in deep stuff for a LONG time. I still have some WW II gas ration stamps somewhere, and MY career was on hold for years in the '70s all because of the stinkin' Arabs and what they want for their oil. We have to put the sensible ones in charge over there and keep them in charge. Forget developing a domestic supply or alternatives, killing kids and Arabs is cheaper so that is what our leaders will do, D or R. Once the Arab oil is ALL gone, then the lefty solutions will look better. I don't favor this, understand, I am just realistic enough to know that this is how it will be. Why do you want to send our troops to fight for people you respect so little? I am tired of people I know going to Iraq. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Releasing Multiple Windows - But Not All
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 10:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Releasing Multiple Windows - But Not All Jeff Johnson wrote: I am trying to close all windows except two and am not having much luck. The following code releases all of the windows except the two I want to leave open and the _screen.activeform. I even tried releasing the _screen.activeform first, but it still leaves it open. I also tried ACTIVATE SCREEN and _SCREEN.Show(). Likewise, I tried frmtimer.activate making it the active form. I can't seem to make the active form release. LnForms = _SCREEN.FormCount DO WHILE lnForms 0 IF !(UPPER(_SCREEN.Forms(lnForms).name) $ 'CAPPTOOLBARBASE~FRMTIMER') llSuccess = _SCREEN.Forms(lnForms).QueryUnload() IF llSuccess _SCREEN.Forms(lnForms).Release() ENDIF ENDIF lnForms = lnForms - 1 ENDDO Any ideas? Just a WAG, but why not try and loop backwards? For MyLoop = MyCount to 1 * code to release the form(MyLoop) instance endfor Perhaps it's no different? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! Hey Michael: The loop above does start at the end and go backwards. That seems to be the only way due to the .forms(x) changing when you release a form. It is the last forms activated .forms(lnforms) that will not release. Jeff Jeff Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 623-582-0323 Fax 623-869-0675 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/signed text/plain (text body -- kept) application/x-pkcs7-signature --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] -- Iraq articles
If we pull out of Iraq, oil prices will skyrocket as Iran will move into Iraq and control both Iraqi and Iranian oil. --- Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 16 January 2007 12:11 pm, Kristyne McDaniel wrote: Hi Kristyne! Oil, democracy, security, etc., etc. Most immediately about oil, if you aren't one of the ones killed. You let that oil supply dry up and we are all in deep stuff for a LONG time. I still have some WW II gas ration stamps somewhere, and MY career was on hold for years in the '70s all because of the stinkin' Arabs and what they want for their oil. We have to put the sensible ones in charge over there and keep them in charge. Forget developing a domestic supply or alternatives, killing kids and Arabs is cheaper so that is what our leaders will do, D or R. Once the Arab oil is ALL gone, then the lefty solutions will look better. I don't favor this, understand, I am just realistic enough to know that this is how it will be. Why do you want to send our troops to fight for people you respect so little? I am tired of people I know going to Iraq. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] IE7 and MS Virtual Earth Mapping conflict with FireFox
Bill, Just found a copy of the demo program which I didn't think I had at work - but of course its on my website, so I ran it up. I can't see the problems you are having though even when Firefox is open at the same time as running the demo and IE7 is set as the default browser. It also works fine with IE7 as the default browser so you have something pretty basic wrong somewhere. Question: 1. What exactly does the app do if different to the demo? I didn't make too many changes, just rearranged the form a bit. See http://www.wjarnold.com/downloads/map_test_1.gif I did add parms to pass it one or two addresses (to map a location or a route). The problem that occurred was that he started getting ACCESS DENIED messages last week, when attempting to pull up a map. I don't have a saved copy the message, but it seemed to be pointing to the HTML file with the javascript. I couldn't reproduce the problem here, but I did see it on his screen when using VNC to look at the problem. 3. Have you modified the Javascript in the HTML Page at all? No 4. You might try running CCleaner (Crap Cleaner) from www.CCLeaner.com which removes all temporary file crap out of your system first. Just be sure to deselect the delete Cookies or you'll remove all your Webpage login details etc. This will ensure you aren't picking up any cached info. I'll send this info off to him now. Thanks. I remember that I did have a few timing problems in the code, hence the Setup Virtual Earth button on the top of the demo screen but as I said, Yeah, I ran into that too. I tried to get around the need for operator action because I wanted to run the process in a batch mode, but couldn't get it to work due to the timing problem. I'll give it a look later tonight and report back tomorrow. Thanks, Dave Dave Crozier ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Born Baptist
No problema.. Come on down... Bring the beer because we'ze a mite low down here.. Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen the Cook Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 8:44 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Born Baptist john harvey wrote: I lak cayatfish, specially elk cayatfish! Fisrt you have to kill one, then share with friends. ;- Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.12/630 - Release Date: 1/15/2007 8:28 PM [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] The Long Drop
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 12:45 pm, Michael Madigan wrote: Hi Michael! Tradition, ceremony, cost, mess. I don't understand why you wouldn't just shoot him in the head. Has to be less painful and more precise. Got it right with Saddie but blew it for his brother? http://thespincycle.blogspot.com/2005_11_01_thespincycle_archive.html By the 1860's the principles of the Enlightenment had long informed the basis of civil society and a string of dreadful executions had stained practice of English justice. The hangman of the day (who by convention is not named) introduced a new method which promised an instant and humane death -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] IE7 and MS Virtual Earth Mapping conflict with FireFox
Bill Arnold wrote: I didn't make too many changes, just rearranged the form a bit. See http://www.wjarnold.com/downloads/map_test_1.gif I did add parms to pass it one or two addresses (to map a location or a route). Bill -- if you get this working consistently, and have time to implement this into my app, let me know. We can discuss rates/fees at that time. I'd like to incorporate this into FabMate if possible. Same offer for whomever is able to consistently get this working. I'd like for my clients to be able to plug in a To/From address like in maps.google.com and get driving directions, along with the ability to save the file locally for later recollection on demand. Thanks! --Mike -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] -- Iraq articles
Pete, Oil, democracy, security, etc., etc. Most immediately about oil, if you aren't one of the ones killed. You let that oil supply dry up and we are all in deep stuff for a LONG time. What oil? We aren't getting any oil to speak of from Iraq. Kristyne McDaniel http://www.mcstyles.com http://www.shamrocktrails.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Determining the type of active index
Hi all, I've got a Search box on my form that will let the user search the active table based upon whatever the current sort order is (the currently active index tag). For example, my Customers table. I want them to be able to enter either a Customer Number or a Customer Name, and have it search the table based upon whichever index tag is currently selected. If they enter a digit (for example, 9), I need to know if it should be treated as a digit (for example, Customer Number 9) or a character (for example, 9 Industries) depending on what the currently active index order is. Using vartype() for the fields Name or Number wouldn't be good enough because the current index tag may be comprised of more than one field that aren't all numeric or all character. Thanks much, John The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but lack of will. - Vince Lombardi * All mail scanned by Norton AntiVirus. No AV software on your computer? Remove me from your address book, please. * Please respect my privacy. Do not forward my address to anyone else or include me in emails sent to multiple recipients. Use BCC. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] -- Iraq articles
Yes we are, or more specificly, the world oil supply is. That keeps oil prices lower than it would otherwise be. --- Kristyne McDaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pete, Oil, democracy, security, etc., etc. Most immediately about oil, if you aren't one of the ones killed. You let that oil supply dry up and we are all in deep stuff for a LONG time. What oil? We aren't getting any oil to speak of from Iraq. Kristyne McDaniel http://www.mcstyles.com http://www.shamrocktrails.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Determining the type of active index
I just re-read my post and am not sure I was clear enough in the question I'm asking here, so lemme try again: I realize vartype() will tell me if a field is numeric, character, etc., but what can I do to determine what type an index tag is? For example: Number N(5) Name C(25) ZipN(5) Index tag Number is based on Number Index tag Name is based on Name Index tag Zipname is based on str(zip)+name Even though Zip is a numeric field, I need a way to know that the current index tag is the character type if it's Zipname. I hope this makes more sense. Thanks, John The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but lack of will. - Vince Lombardi * All mail scanned by Norton AntiVirus. No AV software on your computer? Remove me from your address book, please. * Please respect my privacy. Do not forward my address to anyone else or include me in emails sent to multiple recipients. Use BCC. I've got a Search box on my form that will let the user search the active table based upon whatever the current sort order is (the currently active index tag). For example, my Customers table. I want them to be able to enter either a Customer Number or a Customer Name, and have it search the table based upon whichever index tag is currently selected. If they enter a digit (for example, 9), I need to know if it should be treated as a digit (for example, Customer Number 9) or a character (for example, 9 Industries) depending on what the currently active index order is. Using vartype() for the fields Name or Number wouldn't be good enough because the current index tag may be comprised of more than one field that aren't all numeric or all character. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Determining the type of active index
John Check out KEY() and SYS(14) John J. Mihaljevic wrote: Hi all, I've got a Search box on my form that will let the user search the active table based upon whatever the current sort order is (the currently active index tag). For example, my Customers table. I want them to be able to enter either a Customer Number or a Customer Name, and have it search the table based upon whichever index tag is currently selected. If they enter a digit (for example, 9), I need to know if it should be treated as a digit (for example, Customer Number 9) or a character (for example, 9 Industries) depending on what the currently active index order is. Using vartype() for the fields Name or Number wouldn't be good enough because the current index tag may be comprised of more than one field that aren't all numeric or all character. Thanks much, John The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but lack of will. - Vince Lombardi * All mail scanned by Norton AntiVirus. No AV software on your computer? Remove me from your address book, please. * Please respect my privacy. Do not forward my address to anyone else or include me in emails sent to multiple recipients. Use BCC. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] IE7 and MS Virtual Earth Mapping conflict with FireFox
I didn't make too many changes, just rearranged the form a bit. See http://www.wjarnold.com/downloads/map_test_1.gif I did add parms to pass it one or two addresses (to map a location or a route). Bill -- if you get this working consistently, and have time to implement this into my app, let me know. We can discuss rates/fees at that time. I'd like to incorporate this into FabMate if possible. Mike, I'll gladly share whatever I come up with code-wise (which is mostly minor changes to Dave's work), but if it needs to be custom-fitted or you'd like a hand with it, no problem. Yeah, let's see if we can get it working right first. I do have this customer who really likes and needs it, so it is in progress. Same offer for whomever is able to consistently get this working. I'd like for my clients to be able to plug in a To/From address like in maps.google.com and get driving directions, along with the ability to save the file locally for later recollection on demand. There are some gotchas with this stuff: - the addresses passed to it must be well formed. For this I use my own CASS engine, which works but isn't ready for prime-time yet. If you already have properly formatted addresses, no problem. - the driving instructions are returned in a pop-up window, so I need a way to get the (text) contents of that window into a string that can then be worked with. This might be easy or very difficult - can't tell yet. This is a really nice feature for products that can use it. Let's hope the remaining problems can be solved! Bill Thanks! --Mike -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] -- Iraq articles
On Tuesday, January 16, 2007 1:52 PM Michael Madigan wrote: Yes we are, or more specificly, the world oil supply is. That keeps oil prices lower than it would otherwise be. Very little oil is being produced from Iraq according to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_reserves (I also included the text about Iran for comparison) Iran Iran has the world's second largest reserves of conventional crude oil at 133 gigabarrels, according to the CIA World Factbook, although it should be noted that both Canada and Venezuela have larger reserves if Non-conventional oil is included. Iran is the second largest oil holder globally with approximately 10% of the world's oil. Iran averages about 1.5 gigabarrels per year, which is a significant decline from the 6 gigabarrels per year it produced when the Shah of Iran was in power. The United States prohibits imports of oil from Iran, which limits its exposure to an Iranian oil cutoff, but does not reduce the likelihood that an interruption of Iranian oil would cause a spike in world oil prices. American pressure on Iran to renounce Iran's nuclear program makes the possibility of military confrontation quite high, and the political risks of Iranian oil far outweigh any geological ones. Iraq Iraq has the fourth largest reserves of conventional oil in the world at 112 gigabarrels. Despite its vast oil reserves and low costs, production has not recovered since the US-led 2003 invasion of Iraq. Constant looting, insurgent attacks, and sabotage in the oil fields has limited production to around 0.5 gigabarrels per year at best. Political risk is thus the main constraint on Iraqi oil production and likely to remain so in the near future. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] -- Iraq articles
Well, who do you believe? http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/28/093442.php Iraq's oil production hit a post war high of 2.5 million barrels per day starting this summer and production is near capacity, according to Iraq's Oil Minister Hussain al-Shahristani. Based on current prices oil revenues are likely to total more than $41 billion this year, which reflects both an increase in price and in production. Every month this year has shown an increase in production over the same month in 2005 with an estimated increase in overall production of at least 17%. If production continues to increase, it's likely that the Iraqi oil fields will be up to full production at pre-war capacity by the end of 2007, and the Oil Ministry has set a very conservative target of 4 million barrels per day by 2010. This leaves the government with an awful lot of money and they're scrabbling around to find ways to spend it effectively. --- David Crooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday, January 16, 2007 1:52 PM Michael Madigan wrote: Yes we are, or more specificly, the world oil supply is. That keeps oil prices lower than it would otherwise be. Very little oil is being produced from Iraq according to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_reserves (I also included the text about Iran for comparison) Iran Iran has the world's second largest reserves of conventional crude oil at 133 gigabarrels, according to the CIA World Factbook, although it should be noted that both Canada and Venezuela have larger reserves if Non-conventional oil is included. Iran is the second largest oil holder globally with approximately 10% of the world's oil. Iran averages about 1.5 gigabarrels per year, which is a significant decline from the 6 gigabarrels per year it produced when the Shah of Iran was in power. The United States prohibits imports of oil from Iran, which limits its exposure to an Iranian oil cutoff, but does not reduce the likelihood that an interruption of Iranian oil would cause a spike in world oil prices. American pressure on Iran to renounce Iran's nuclear program makes the possibility of military confrontation quite high, and the political risks of Iranian oil far outweigh any geological ones. Iraq Iraq has the fourth largest reserves of conventional oil in the world at 112 gigabarrels. Despite its vast oil reserves and low costs, production has not recovered since the US-led 2003 invasion of Iraq. Constant looting, insurgent attacks, and sabotage in the oil fields has limited production to around 0.5 gigabarrels per year at best. Political risk is thus the main constraint on Iraqi oil production and likely to remain so in the near future. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. Saddam - Hung for the Holidays http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
C00000005 exception
Over and over using VFP 9 It usually happens after I run a query on a free table and attempt to close the SQL code - results a crash with this error. Just checked my VFP error log - 59 recorded events all with the same exception. I also have VFP8 loaded on this machine and haven't seen this happen once. Any suggestions? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] -- Iraq articles
On Tuesday, January 16, 2007 3:43 PM Michael Madigan wrote: Well, who do you believe? I don't believe any of them. Now, if Chloe from 24 could get me the information fast I would believe that because I do not have a lot of time right now!!! Jack Bauer voice :-) David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: C00000005 exception
Hi Jeff, Do you happen to have the CTP of service pack 2 of VFP 9 installed? That might cause such a crash. -- Christof ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: C00000005 exception
Yep, but it happen both before and after I installed it. - Original Message - From: Christof Wollenhaupt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: profox@leafe.com Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:13:29 +0100 Subject: RE: C0005 exception Hi Jeff, Do you happen to have the CTP of service pack 2 of VFP 9 installed? That might cause such a crash. -- Christof [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] -- Iraq articles
Pete Theisen wrote: On Tuesday 16 January 2007 12:11 pm, Kristyne McDaniel wrote: Hi Kristyne! Oil, democracy, security, etc., etc. Most immediately about oil, if you aren't one of the ones killed. You let that oil supply dry up and we are all in deep stuff for a LONG time. I still have some WW II gas ration stamps somewhere, and MY career was on hold for years in the '70s all because of the stinkin' Arabs and what they want for their oil. We have to put the sensible ones in charge over there and keep them in charge. I'll never understand your.philosophy(?). I thought you repubs where all about the almighty market, and the laws of the FREE market. And now you complain because the Arabs, by the same laws (they control the supply and you cannot stop your demand), state they want more dollars for their oil. Soon enough you'll be saying the state must strictly regulate the market, and next thing you'll be citing Lenin or Marx (me, I prefer Bakunin). Forget developing a domestic supply or alternatives, killing kids and Arabs is cheaper so that is what our leaders will do, D or R. Once the Arab oil is ALL gone, then the lefty solutions will look better. I don't favor this, understand, I am just realistic enough to know that this is how it will be. So why are you surprised they want to blow 3000 of you and a couple of towers away? Why do you want to send our troops to fight for people you respect so little? I am tired of people I know going to Iraq. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Releasing Multiple Windows - But Not All
I solved the problem. The code below works fine except for the active form. In the form frmtimer which launches this procedure, I inserted a THISFORM.Activate before calling this procedure. Since this becomes the active form and I don't want it released, everything works the way I want it to. Jeff Jeff Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 623-582-0323 Fax 623-869-0675 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Johnson Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 10:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Releasing Multiple Windows - But Not All I am trying to close all windows except two and am not having much luck. The following code releases all of the windows except the two I want to leave open and the _screen.activeform. I even tried releasing the _screen.activeform first, but it still leaves it open. I also tried ACTIVATE SCREEN and _SCREEN.Show(). Likewise, I tried frmtimer.activate making it the active form. I can't seem to make the active form release. LnForms = _SCREEN.FormCount DO WHILE lnForms 0 IF !(UPPER(_SCREEN.Forms(lnForms).name) $ 'CAPPTOOLBARBASE~FRMTIMER') llSuccess = _SCREEN.Forms(lnForms).QueryUnload() IF llSuccess _SCREEN.Forms(lnForms).Release() ENDIF ENDIF lnForms = lnForms - 1 ENDDO Any ideas? Jeff Jeff Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 623-582-0323 Fax 623-869-0675 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.16.12/630 - Release Date: 1/15/2007 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/signed text/plain (text body -- kept) application/x-pkcs7-signature --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: C00000005 exception
Can't a corrupted Foxuser file do this or is my memory faulty? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Over and over using VFP 9 It usually happens after I run a query on a free table and attempt to close the SQL code - results a crash with this error. Just checked my VFP error log - 59 recorded events all with the same exception. I also have VFP8 loaded on this machine and haven't seen this happen once. Any suggestions? [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] The Long Drop
Michael Madigan wrote: I don't understand why you wouldn't just shoot him in the head. Has to be less painful and more precise. Well that's what Stalin did. He shot them in the neck. Go figure, so you're a friggin commie Stalinist. --- Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Everybody! Got it right with Saddie but blew it for his brother? http://thespincycle.blogspot.com/2005_11_01_thespincycle_archive.html By the 1860's the principles of the Enlightenment had long informed the basis of civil society and a string of dreadful executions had stained practice of English justice. The hangman of the day (who by convention is not named) introduced a new method which promised an instant and humane death for those who were sentenced to the Extreme Sanction. The mechanics of this method were outlined in the Schedule of Hangman's Weights and Measures, a copy of which is not reproduced here for fear that the foolish may take advantage of it. Rest assured that a copy is in the possession of your diligent correspondent. The fiendish secret of the long drop method was the calculation, by exact formula, of the weight of the condemned against the depth of the drop he or she had to fall to bring around 1000 pounds of force against the cervical spine, the idea being that this would cause the odontoid process to breach the relevant section of the spinal cord producing a clean and quick death. Paralysis and unconsciousness was instant and, after one hour on the rope, the miscreant would assuredly be dead. (End of quote) So today in the news one of the condemned convicts was decapitated. Too long a drop for his body weight? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: C00000005 exception
It usually happens when I'm working on a file on the network and rarely happens when I'm working on a file on my local drive but I will look for a corrupted Foxuser file - Original Message - From: Chet Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: profox@leafe.com Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:03:29 -0800 Subject: Re: C0005 exception Can't a corrupted Foxuser file do this or is my memory faulty? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Over and over using VFP 9 It usually happens after I run a query on a free table and attempt to close the SQL code - results a crash with this error. Just checked my VFP error log - 59 recorded events all with the same exception. I also have VFP8 loaded on this machine and haven't seen this happen once. Any suggestions? [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxPro on Vista
Dave Crozier wrote: To All, especially Adam for the Spot, Sorry to mislead you all I Finger burped there and the post should have read should have read 1Gb (one) not 2Bg - whatever a Bg is!! Ooops! I thought it was a very happy computer, you know, with all that grinning. You see, not only are the eyes going now...but also the fingers...the end is surely soon in sight! Dave Crozier ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] -- Iraq articles
I just think there should be sound effects to the video where Saddam's brother's head pops off during his hanging. Like maybe use the sound of a champagne cork popping. --- David Crooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday, January 16, 2007 3:43 PM Michael Madigan wrote: Well, who do you believe? I don't believe any of them. Now, if Chloe from 24 could get me the information fast I would believe that because I do not have a lot of time right now!!! Jack Bauer voice :-) David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] The Long Drop
You write code with that illogical brain? --- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: I don't understand why you wouldn't just shoot him in the head. Has to be less painful and more precise. Well that's what Stalin did. He shot them in the neck. Go figure, so you're a friggin commie Stalinist. --- Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Everybody! Got it right with Saddie but blew it for his brother? http://thespincycle.blogspot.com/2005_11_01_thespincycle_archive.html By the 1860's the principles of the Enlightenment had long informed the basis of civil society and a string of dreadful executions had stained practice of English justice. The hangman of the day (who by convention is not named) introduced a new method which promised an instant and humane death for those who were sentenced to the Extreme Sanction. The mechanics of this method were outlined in the Schedule of Hangman's Weights and Measures, a copy of which is not reproduced here for fear that the foolish may take advantage of it. Rest assured that a copy is in the possession of your diligent correspondent. The fiendish secret of the long drop method was the calculation, by exact formula, of the weight of the condemned against the depth of the drop he or she had to fall to bring around 1000 pounds of force against the cervical spine, the idea being that this would cause the odontoid process to breach the relevant section of the spinal cord producing a clean and quick death. Paralysis and unconsciousness was instant and, after one hour on the rope, the miscreant would assuredly be dead. (End of quote) So today in the news one of the condemned convicts was decapitated. Too long a drop for his body weight? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] IE7 and MS Virtual Earth Mapping conflict with FireFox
Bill Arnold wrote: There are some gotchas with this stuff: - the addresses passed to it must be well formed. For this I use my own CASS engine, which works but isn't ready for prime-time yet. If you already have properly formatted addresses, no problem. I'm thinking the onus is on the user to make sure s/he inputs the correct format. If not, an electric shock via the wire affixed from the PC to his/her chair. g - the driving instructions are returned in a pop-up window, so I need a way to get the (text) contents of that window into a string that can then be worked with. This might be easy or very difficult - can't tell yet. Can you scrape it with Rick Strahl's wwIPStuff controls? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: C00000005 exception
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Over and over using VFP 9 It usually happens after I run a query on a free table and attempt to close the SQL code - results a crash with this error. Just checked my VFP error log - 59 recorded events all with the same exception. I also have VFP8 loaded on this machine and haven't seen this happen once. Any suggestions? Just a quick one: given what someone commented recently about no longer getting C00.005s after implementing Ed Leafe's SetMemory.prg code (see http://leafe.com/dls/vfp), I'd start with that! -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] -- Iraq articles
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 1:29 pm, Kristyne McDaniel wrote: Hi Kristyne! They have to try. It is interesting that even the doves have not as of yesterday introduced a motion to cut funding, as McCain pointed out. Pete, Oil, democracy, security, etc., etc. Most immediately about oil, if you aren't one of the ones killed. You let that oil supply dry up and we are all in deep stuff for a LONG time. What oil? We aren't getting any oil to speak of from Iraq. Kristyne McDaniel http://www.mcstyles.com http://www.shamrocktrails.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: C00000005 exception
Chet Gardiner wrote: Can't a corrupted Foxuser file do this or is my memory faulty? Don't know about the Foxuser suggestion but I would have thought that faulty memory could well be a problem ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Over and over using VFP 9 It usually happens after I run a query on a free table and attempt to close the SQL code - results a crash with this error. Just checked my VFP error log - 59 recorded events all with the same exception. I also have VFP8 loaded on this machine and haven't seen this happen once. Any suggestions? [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] -- Iraq articles
That's because they're full of crap, Cindy Sheehan will now become their problem. --- Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 16 January 2007 1:29 pm, Kristyne McDaniel wrote: Hi Kristyne! They have to try. It is interesting that even the doves have not as of yesterday introduced a motion to cut funding, as McCain pointed out. Pete, Oil, democracy, security, etc., etc. Most immediately about oil, if you aren't one of the ones killed. You let that oil supply dry up and we are all in deep stuff for a LONG time. What oil? We aren't getting any oil to speak of from Iraq. Kristyne McDaniel http://www.mcstyles.com http://www.shamrocktrails.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] -- Iraq articles
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 5:59 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: We have to put the sensible ones in charge over there and keep them in charge. I'll never understand your.philosophy(?). I thought you repubs Hi Ricardo! Rs are not easily categorized, and I am not typical of them anyway. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] The Long Drop
Michael Madigan wrote: You write code with that illogical brain? Shush! you commie. We have you tagged. --- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: I don't understand why you wouldn't just shoot him in the head. Has to be less painful and more precise. Well that's what Stalin did. He shot them in the neck. Go figure, so you're a friggin commie Stalinist. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] -- Iraq articles
Pete Theisen wrote: On Tuesday 16 January 2007 5:59 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: We have to put the sensible ones in charge over there and keep them in charge. I'll never understand your.philosophy(?). I thought you repubs Hi Ricardo! Rs are not easily categorized, and I am not typical of them anyway. Hahaha! So you're a socialist Repub ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] -- Iraq articles
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 7:44 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: Pete Theisen wrote: On Tuesday 16 January 2007 5:59 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: We have to put the sensible ones in charge over there and keep them in charge. I'll never understand your.philosophy(?). I thought you repubs Hi Ricardo! Rs are not easily categorized, and I am not typical of them anyway. Hahaha! So you're a socialist Repub Hi Ricardo! If I were to make such a leap of logic the demagogueic furies would be all over me, oh, wait, they kind of are. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Easy way to count total lines of code in complete project?
Is there an easy way to determine the total number of lines of code in an app/project? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: FoxPro on Vista
Adam Buckland wrote: Sorry spec has just gone up to a quad core which is min spec for Vista SP1 Didn't you see the revised spec at the bottom of the EULA? I think that you need a bigger video card as a tune up point. Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.12/631 - Release Date: 1/16/2007 8:25 AM ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: C00000005 exception
That or what kind of network? Novell? Paul Newton wrote: Chet Gardiner wrote: Can't a corrupted Foxuser file do this or is my memory faulty? Don't know about the Foxuser suggestion but I would have thought that faulty memory could well be a problem ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Over and over using VFP 9 It usually happens after I run a query on a free table and attempt to close the SQL code - results a crash with this error. Just checked my VFP error log - 59 recorded events all with the same exception. I also have VFP8 loaded on this machine and haven't seen this happen once. Any suggestions? [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Easy way to count total lines of code in complete project?
MB Software Solutions wrote: Is there an easy way to determine the total number of lines of code in an app/project? There use to be a great documentation program for VFP code. I can't remember the name of it but it would rip through all your classes, and forms doing what your looking for as well as a lot more. Sorry I can't remember it's name. Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.12/631 - Release Date: 1/16/2007 8:25 AM ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Microsoft Caught out - Naughty, Naughty!
Dave Crozier wrote: ...Microsoft used undocumented APIs that allowed its developers to write programs that worked better with Windows than competitors', according to the latest testimony in the Iowa antitrust action against the company .Alepin had earlier claimed that Microsoft ran special demonstration programs whose sole purpose was to crash rival products and alleged that the company had subverted developers who used Microsoft's version of Java 'thinking they were developing multi-platform applications, but were actually developing Windows-specific applications'.. http://tinyurl.com/yj7oxy Hey John Harvey, remember when we wanted to do this at a programing event for the MPCUG? Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.12/631 - Release Date: 1/16/2007 8:25 AM ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] -- Iraq articles
Michael Madigan wrote: Yes we are, or more specificly, the world oil supply is. That keeps oil prices lower than it would otherwise be. Your kidding right? http://tinyurl.com/y5t4g9 April last year but the plight is still present. Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.12/631 - Release Date: 1/16/2007 8:25 AM ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
