Re: Remote FoxPro Work???
Hey Kurt - you and I met once or twice in NYC. I'm fully retired now, living in MA & still lurking on the list. Haven't programmed in years. Good luck & hang in there. -Lew On Tue, Jul 2, 2019, 5:56 PM Kurt at VR-FX wrote: > Yeah - I know - these days - that's a pretty crazy request. > > I know some of you have followed me a bit - and know I lost my job in > Nov 2017 - where I was working down on Wall Street. Then, moved to Cali > to look for a job - could NOT find work in San Francisco. Even applied > to UCLA for a programming job - did 2 rounds of interviews - and the > people there saying they were impressed with me - during both > interviews. Only to NOT get the job. Then, finally, getting a "job" down > here in San Diego. Actually getting to do 3D Design work for clients, as > well as running 3D Printing jobs. But, sadly - its SUCKING! Its not a > regular job - not salaried - not even part time pay. Its contractor pay > - per job - and it does NOT pay well enough. Been here for over 9 weeks > now - and its again put me in a BAD financial situation... > > So - as a total "shot in the dark" - I figured I would post here again > and see if there is any possible remote FoxPro work. > > And, I know - almost no companies these days are still working w/VFP. > And, sure, I know it would be better to work in some other newer more > modern tech. - but, I don't have any of those tools in my tool belt. So > - all I really have is VFP & MS SQL. > > Anyway - just figured I would take a stab and post here... > > Regards -Kurt > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAFuU78ck83ahMvV9cXE9K3=hh30wo8pkp4jnmycx8sg-79d...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
Me too. -Lew Schwartz On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Laurie Alvey wrote: > Built my own. Couldn't afford the commercial ones and no client was willing > to pay. > > Laurie > > On 4 November 2016 at 14:29, Ted Roche wrote: > > > I've been an advocate for frameworks since I read the original > > Codebook book, sitting in a parking lot in Cambridge (our fair city), > > Massachusetts. > > > > Imagine starting an application and not having to worry about how to > > get the menu working (Help, About, Copy/Cut/Paste, Print settings) and > > getting basic dialogs for things like managing reports, managing state > > between multiple non-modal forms, a rational (usually!) set of > > strategies for data handling, locking, conflict resolution, primary > > key generation, relational integrity, grids on tabbed pageframes, etc. > > > > I think frameworks are a great tool for fast startups, well-documented > > base classes, and handy utilities. Please feel free to disagree. > > > > In the 90's I was the manager for a group of developers and we worked > > as "experts" with clients with pre-existing apps, or designed and > > developed apps on our own. As such we got a lot of exposure to most of > > the frameworks. Drew Speedie (RIP!) started MaxFrame, now > > "Professional" while working as tech editor on Hacker's Guide, and I > > was an early and eager beta-tester, also shipping one of the first > > client-server MaxFrame apps. We worked with Visual Extend and with > > Mere Mortals and others. Sadly, I never got to work with FoxExpress, > > although I have the greatest of respect for Mike and Toni's knowledge > > and skills. > > > > So, what framework(s) do you work with, and why (or why not)? > > > > __ Built my own > > > > __ Whatever the client runs > > > > __ Codebook > > > > __ COMCodebook > > > > __ MaxFrame Professional > > > > __ Visual Express > > > > __ Visual Extend > > > > __ Mere Mortals > > > > __ VFP Foundation Classes > > > > __ Visual ProMatrix > > > > __ Mere Mortals > > > > __ Other (please specify) > > > > __ All of the Above > > > > -- > > Ted Roche > > Ted Roche & Associates, LLC > > http://www.tedroche.com > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78eS7vpns21Yzq=8ysisbshy5au0virhkq8qnk0odzx...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Python?
Basically doing this for myself. I teach/lecture on photography & art from time to time, so I wrote a desktop app in VFP that helped me with my presentations. The platform was just my laptop which one way or another would share a screen or be projected for use in class. It was windowed so each photog could have his/her own realizable window, side by side with any number of other windows. It could add images to any window on the fly from a central repository & move images from one window to another also on the fly. The Fox remembered the windows, where they were & which image went in which window. It was important to have multiple windows (not tabbed like a browser). Working with multiple browsers and/or tabbed view seemed too kludgey, not that I know how to do that anyway. -Lew Schwartz On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Dave Crozier wrote: > ..and I forgot to add multi language, so only one IDE to learn for > Python, PHP, Perl, Tcl, Ruby, HTML, CSS, Javascript etc. > > Dave > > -Original Message- > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier > Sent: 06 November 2015 15:12 > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: RE: [NF] Python? > > Personally I like Komodo as an IDE, it's the nearest I have come to a full > VFP like development system with everything you need in one program. > lite version is free and multi-platform. > > Dave > > -Original Message- > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke > Sent: 06 November 2015 15:09 > To: profox@leafe.com; profoxt...@leafe.com > Subject: Re: [NF] Python? > > On Fri, 6 Nov 2015, at 02:38 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > > I've been avoiding this for years, but I'd like to pick up a modern > > language. > > For fun or profit? What sort of applications do you see yourself > developing? > > Your IDE will probably be an excellent general-purpose text editor of some > description maybe with Python syntax highlighting plugin and some command > prompt windows. > > -- > Alan Bourke > alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78cyp61nvdh3mnmmmjb1gk_wot4lx-squj9vcj_vrj3...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Python?
I've been avoiding this for years, but I'd like to pick up a modern language. Given my background in the Fox and this group, it looks to me that Python is the way to go. Question is: where do I start? I'll still be pc/Windows 10 only. I'll need the lang, ide & tutorials. -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78eWgQ7NQTR+dbcHwfPHqT_Pe=srbzcvdow-idntjtq...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FPD 2.6 test for a drive without crashing
The earlier idea on this thread of trapping the error with an on error
routine and/or a more robust analysis where the fopen() error number is
captured might work. I haven't written code like this for years, but I
don't remember network drives being a problem. I never worked with NAS
drives, however.
-Lew Schwartz
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:38 PM, John R. Sowden wrote:
> Thank you for the fopen idea. I am not using share and I don't know if
> the drive is mapped or UNC. After playing around with fopen though, I
> discovered that the error is an OS/network error. What I wanted to do was,
> if the network drive failed, then fp would default to the local drive,
> whether the environment variable said the net was working or not. That
> worked, but I must answer the OS/network error message with 'Ignore'. That
> is not very secure.
>
> needs more thinking ...
>
> john
>
>
> On 10/24/2015 06:19 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote:
>
>> I think I used to use fopen("Drive:\nul") > 0
>>
>>
>> -Lew Schwartz
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 6:28 PM, John R. Sowden <
>> jsow...@americansentry.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Is there is way in FPD 2.6 to test to see if a drive is working without
>>> having the program crash. I have a network where I test for a remote
>>> drive
>>> (peer to peer net) before attempting to connect to it. I set a variable
>>> (above is done in the autoexec.bat) re: the sytatus of the remove node
>>> being on line. If there is a change in the drive, such as a reboot of
>>> the
>>> remote computer, the environment variable does not change, but the drive
>>> is
>>> no longer accessible. When I am in fpd, I want to confirm the drive is
>>> available before using it so it doesn't crash. I checked the sys()
>>> functions, but none seem to meet the concern.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78eBLPy3DiYS8PcNe4jqdRjjZ4UCVFrmmHRLt=6ubuw...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FPD 2.6 test for a drive without crashing
I think I used to use fopen("Drive:\nul") > 0
-Lew Schwartz
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 6:28 PM, John R. Sowden
wrote:
> Is there is way in FPD 2.6 to test to see if a drive is working without
> having the program crash. I have a network where I test for a remote drive
> (peer to peer net) before attempting to connect to it. I set a variable
> (above is done in the autoexec.bat) re: the sytatus of the remove node
> being on line. If there is a change in the drive, such as a reboot of the
> remote computer, the environment variable does not change, but the drive is
> no longer accessible. When I am in fpd, I want to confirm the drive is
> available before using it so it doesn't crash. I checked the sys()
> functions, but none seem to meet the concern.
>
> John
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78cu38-yj47kfvor1ryltbhjtmdowxks9gsjdd3nc1g...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Jerry: I've resubscribed. Can anyone see this?
Thanks, Jerry. I see that you replied to the list and to my personal email, so I don't know which I'm actually seeing. Can I impose on you to reply again, but only to the list? I'm going to cover my end by NOT using your personal email. Thanks! -Lew Schwartz On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Jerry Wolper wrote: > > Or can I see it? > > We can. Can you? > > -Jerry > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78fiesvpb24fkj0krsd67b-4uzu2qdnvvyyogzfupc5...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
I've resubscribed. Can anyone see this?
Or can I see it? -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78dqqsvbczehpxxxnbt8okopuhjq05wqnis-s_rnmrl...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Anyone see this?
or am I behind the too many bounces/gmail wall? -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78elky1slnxswmanmjow2wqt9qtdtkohoknceq0cpic...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Dell headache ... what should I do?
I recently bought a Dell XPS 15 ... super light. I need something I can lug around without crippling my arthritic back any more than it already is. The key method for insuring light weight is no removable components the case is sealed, there's no way to swap out the hd, change memory, battery etc That machine went doa, and after a reasonable back and forth, Dell replaced it, but there are now two sticky issues: 1. Big problem they want the dead machine back. It has all my banking, cc, password info on it. Further, since it died of power supply failure, it's absolutely certain that all that info is intact. 2. They refuse to restart the warranty. After being without a machine for two months and struggling with a failing pia before that, the warranty for the replacement machine is reduced by the 6 mos that I had the bad machine. -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78fVj38Uz7CwkuFq=pmdq67cuw-mash4uslbaodccpe...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Too many bounces, from me???
I've got it, too. -Lew Schwartz On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Laurie Alvey wrote: > I'm on Gmail and I haven't had that message (yet). > Laurie > > On 7 October 2014 13:48, Frank Cazabon wrote: > > > On 07/10/2014 08:32 AM, Man-wai Chang wrote: > > > >> Am I the only one getting this? > >> > >> > >> > > I got it yesterday too. Maybe something to do with gmail accounts? > > > > -- > > > > Frank. > > > > Frank Cazabon > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78cT1vTnDF1L-fXpS4oKGA+iOMs=ony+sex1meyh+a+...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Can't _assign/_access native property
NP. I haven't written code for years and I had a difficult install on a new, no dvd reading laptop. I thought I screwed it up somehow. -Lew Schwartz On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Ken Dibble wrote: > > I wonder if Ken can confirm whether or not he can see the Form's native >> properties and methods in the Edit Property/Method editor window >> irrespective of whether or not _access/_assign methods can be added >> manually (ie without the benefit of the check boxes that appear when one >> edits a class). >> > > Ah! Now I see what you're saying. > > You're right. VFP 9, SP1. With an .scx form open in the editing window, > using Form>Edit Property/Method... from the menu only shows custom > properties and methods. With a .vcx form class open in the editing window, > using Class>Edit Property/Method... shows both native and custom PEMs. > > That's normal behavior, at least it always has been for me. > > I'm sorry that I didn't understand what you were saying before. > > Ken Dibble > www.stic-cil.org > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78ct-4uJ2NVDS4D901Kuz--5eXnC_=-vyqm4rre99gf...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Disappearing Print Jobs
I had this many years ago on a VFP6/early windows systems. I don't think I ever chased down the cause, but some combination of explicitly setting the printer off and/or sending a cr after the print job seemed to do the trick. Another issue might be a page length setting persisting from a different job. How do you prevent multiple printers from accessing the printer at the same time? -Lew Schwartz On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Frank Cazabon wrote: > On 12/09/2014 03:45 PM, Koen Piller wrote: > >> Set a catch .. End catch to catch your Errorlog in printagreement and also >> in your printlabel procedures >> Koen >> >> >> > Thanks Koen, > > I already have an error handler (the application's) in place but I'll add > a TRY CATCH around just this bit of code and see if it catches something > the global error handler isn't. > > -- > > Frank. > > Frank Cazabon > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78dzoyutkhuhculhb7lf0ufrkwgpnvvsu-_owlm35fe...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Can't _assign/_access native property
Right. Now click on the "Form" option on the main menu and choose "Edit Property/Method." What do you see in the "Edit Property/Method" editor? -Lew Schwartz On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:54 AM, AndyHC wrote: > I just tried this (VFP9 Win7 64bit): > CREATE FORM tst > * shows: New Property; New Method; Edit Property/Method;Member Data > Editor... > * is empty (i.e. custom pem's only) > * Right-click on the form and select Properties shows all the default > properties for 'Form1' > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78d2h-mwijkja8dh1mqg9qs9ouqk3m0o_qrmtoz6sfg...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Change VFP opening behavior in blahblah\user\documents\Visual Foxpro Documents
Thanks, Tracy. I just don't remember a lot of this stuff. -Lew Schwartz On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote: > On September 7, 2014 8:01:42 PM EDT, Lew Schwartz > wrote: > > Whatever. > > > > Any way to change this obnoxious behavior in W8? > > > > > > -Lew Schwartz > > > > > > I'm not sure I'm understanding which behavior you are talking about. > > If you mean where VFP defaults where programs or files are saved, that is > caused by the "Start in" property of the default shortcut Windows uses to > start VFP. > > Most of my projects have a specific icon I launch with a custom config.fpw > that starts a prg to setup the environment for that project. > > -- > Tracy > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78fcvrm6z+c4rlrqehzax1y+exdwb8u5h_sxkdiyzy2...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Change VFP opening behavior in blahblah\user\documents\Visual Foxpro Documents
Whatever. Any way to change this obnoxious behavior in W8? -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78dv6+beec+p69vox3j6pawgbkl6cyygkv1lefrc5vt...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Can't _assign/_access native property
I wonder if Ken can confirm whether or not he can see the Form's native properties and methods in the Edit Property/Method editor window irrespective of whether or not _access/_assign methods can be added manually (ie without the benefit of the check boxes that appear when one edits a class). TIA, Ken -Lew Schwartz On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > It's as though a view custom properties/methods only filter was in effect. > > > -Lew Schwartz > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > >> Well, I shut down the fox and deleted every foxuser.* on the computer. I >> restarted foxpro and opened a form in the ide. Went over to form -> Edit >> Property/Method and the only property/method that comes up is a >> property I added myself. >> >> >> -Lew Schwartz >> >> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Ken Dibble wrote: >> >>> >>> I've never been so lazy before so I never checked to see if you could >>>> add >>>> _access/_assign methods to a scx. It seems you can't (anyone at all >>>> please >>>> confirm). >>>> >>> >>> Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but yes, you can add _assign methods >>> to .scx forms, including for default form properties. Works fine. >>> >>> Try deleting your foxuser file; that causes a multitude of botched IDE >>> issues. >>> >>> Ken Dibble >>> www.stic-cil.org >>> >>> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78cjm_D+yKL=ratodbftf0ukt-kcsrscq_p15vpp6v5...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Can't _assign/_access native property
It's as though a view custom properties/methods only filter was in effect. -Lew Schwartz On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > Well, I shut down the fox and deleted every foxuser.* on the computer. I > restarted foxpro and opened a form in the ide. Went over to form -> Edit > Property/Method and the only property/method that comes up is a > property I added myself. > > > -Lew Schwartz > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Ken Dibble wrote: > >> >> I've never been so lazy before so I never checked to see if you could add >>> _access/_assign methods to a scx. It seems you can't (anyone at all >>> please >>> confirm). >>> >> >> Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but yes, you can add _assign methods >> to .scx forms, including for default form properties. Works fine. >> >> Try deleting your foxuser file; that causes a multitude of botched IDE >> issues. >> >> Ken Dibble >> www.stic-cil.org >> >> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78fgz45krrmpd08edyzsryifdbbh0t-xm4zjk278q7y...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Can't _assign/_access native property
Well, I shut down the fox and deleted every foxuser.* on the computer. I restarted foxpro and opened a form in the ide. Went over to form -> Edit Property/Method and the only property/method that comes up is a property I added myself. -Lew Schwartz On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Ken Dibble wrote: > > I've never been so lazy before so I never checked to see if you could add >> _access/_assign methods to a scx. It seems you can't (anyone at all please >> confirm). >> > > Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but yes, you can add _assign methods > to .scx forms, including for default form properties. Works fine. > > Try deleting your foxuser file; that causes a multitude of botched IDE > issues. > > Ken Dibble > www.stic-cil.org > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78eud1xr4nuuyjwvj1y7nds2zwrv81kq+pqyjw+ws1y...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Can't _assign/_access native property
Thanks, I think I found it. Instead of going the - as I thought - more arduous route of creating classes for my forms, I was using scx's and creating runtime objects via Do Form Name linked. I've never been so lazy before so I never checked to see if you could add _access/_assign methods to a scx. It seems you can't (anyone at all please confirm). I just gave Save as Class a shot and bingo! everything is there to be messed around with, but only with class based definitions, not Form/scx's. Live and learn. -Lew Schwartz On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote: > On September 6, 2014 11:23:31 PM EDT, Lew Schwartz > wrote: > > This isn't about the property sheet, Kent. We talking 1) bring up any > > form > > to be edited in a project 2) click on the form to be sure it's the > > actively > > edited control 3) From the main vfp menu, choose the "Form" pad, and, > > from > > the resulting drop down, select "Edit Property/Method." You should > > get a > > list of all the native properties and methods PLUS those you've > > added. Has > > nothing to do with the property sheet. > > Thanks anyway. > > > > > > -Lew Schwartz > > > > > > If memory serves, you just need to create a top_assign method. > > -- > Tracy > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78dyxz37zfpvkheahvceeb6t498qqk547bdwzcbacod...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Can't _assign/_access native property
This isn't about the property sheet, Kent. We talking 1) bring up any form to be edited in a project 2) click on the form to be sure it's the actively edited control 3) From the main vfp menu, choose the "Form" pad, and, from the resulting drop down, select "Edit Property/Method." You should get a list of all the native properties and methods PLUS those you've added. Has nothing to do with the property sheet. Thanks anyway. -Lew Schwartz On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Kent Belan wrote: > Right click on the ALL tab in the properties sheet and uncheck NON DEFAULT > PROPERTIES ONLY > > > > -Original Message- > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Lew Schwartz > Sent: Saturday, September 6, 2014 10:09 PM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: Can't _assign/_access native property > > Ok, I found msxml 4.0 & installed it. Now the member data editor is > working, > BUT the Edit property/method just shows my custom work, no way to get to > the > native props & methods. What's up with this? I'm in Windows 8.1 > > > -Lew Schwartz > > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > > > I need to add a top_assign or top_access method to a form, but when I > > pull down the Edit property/method item from the Form menu I only see > > the custom methods & properties that I added myself. I haven't written > > any code for a while and I do have a botched install of the MemberData > > Editor (Class definition MSXML2.DOMDOCUMENT. 4.0 is not found) ... but > > is there a way out of this mess? > > > > > > -Lew Schwartz > > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78f-tqNA-Y7NpzSotnG+=x89pz+j1qmho_gsi_kfysy...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Can't _assign/_access native property
Ok, I found msxml 4.0 & installed it. Now the member data editor is working, BUT the Edit property/method just shows my custom work, no way to get to the native props & methods. What's up with this? I'm in Windows 8.1 -Lew Schwartz On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > I need to add a top_assign or top_access method to a form, but when I pull > down the Edit property/method item from the Form menu I only see the custom > methods & properties that I added myself. I haven't written any code for a > while and I do have a botched install of the MemberData Editor (Class > definition MSXML2.DOMDOCUMENT. 4.0 is not found) ... but is there a way out > of this mess? > > > -Lew Schwartz > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78dfkjosl8kto5a6jansobjyivt0qfwupurzlo6-p6t...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Can't _assign/_access native property
I need to add a top_assign or top_access method to a form, but when I pull down the Edit property/method item from the Form menu I only see the custom methods & properties that I added myself. I haven't written any code for a while and I do have a botched install of the MemberData Editor (Class definition MSXML2.DOMDOCUMENT. 4.0 is not found) ... but is there a way out of this mess? -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78ee9azzz3vu9j0va6acoxxft7nr5_kguh96abcqs8z...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: if endif issue
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Allen wrote: > Replace slotdt with coord.slot1.localtoutc(slotdt),; > Gatedt with coord.slot1.localtoutc(gatedt),; > Flno with coord.slot1.formflt(Flno) > && rundt with coord.slot1.localtoutc(fltdt),; > If empty(schdt) > Replace schdt with slotdt > Endif > Try Replace slotdt with coord.slot1.localtoutc(slotdt),; Gatedt with coord.slot1.localtoutc(gatedt),; Flno with coord.slot1.formflt(Flno) && rundt with coord.slot1.localtoutc(fltdt) The semi after fltdt), causes the Fox to think that the following line (if empty( ...) is a continuation of the comment and not part of your code. -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78cdK6S-r38jgFnT=Ypckuurh=-tps+ucbykdfwz6h0...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Shift + click()
Looks good. I guess you can use this in place of click() and rightclick() ... yes? -Lew Schwartz On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Tracy Pearson wrote: > On September 2, 2014 11:40:34 PM EDT, Lew Schwartz > wrote: > > That seems to have gone the same way as my memory. > > > > > > -Lew Schwartz > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Paul McNett > > wrote: > > > > > On 9/2/14, 8:07 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > > > > > >> I've forgotten how to detect whether or not the user is pressing > > the shift > > >> key when he clicks() a control. Any reminder oriented folks out > > there? > > >> > > > > > > Times like this is when I like to grep my source control > > repository... > > > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > Lew, > > I capture it in the MouseDown event. > > -- > Tracy > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78d5KfLg9kSf=5gvdf3qe4cdzw2uopjkbgpdnh8yehv...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Shift + click()
That seems to have gone the same way as my memory. -Lew Schwartz On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Paul McNett wrote: > On 9/2/14, 8:07 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > >> I've forgotten how to detect whether or not the user is pressing the shift >> key when he clicks() a control. Any reminder oriented folks out there? >> > > Times like this is when I like to grep my source control repository... > > Paul > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78cCJATdXvwzg=x+ywkfzxmgkhdpc2yfy0xsdh_szt4...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Shift + click()
I've forgotten how to detect whether or not the user is pressing the shift key when he clicks() a control. Any reminder oriented folks out there? -Lew --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78dR0b6R3vZLWVsxqXS0sV+HYtxODqj=OnoM=4wiz7_...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
My Passport Repair ???
My 2T Passport Ultra was dropped about 2.5 ft from tabletop to the floor. Now it not only won't spin up, but if I try a few times, the machine I'm mounting it on hangs. I've written an email to WD, but there's no response. Trash it? Other ideas? -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78dhdQLrexoPcfY4yA3=w-k3u2t+b8xoas7q7jeu-8z...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Strange Character in Folder Name
(1252-3)/x^3 = ?? -Lew Schwartz On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Gérard Lochon wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: >> >> I'm writing an app for w8.1 and, somehow or other adir() reports a folder >>> name beginning with chr(138). This seems to be causing explorer to become >>> blind to it, so I can't find the folder to fix it. >>> Any ideas? >>> >> > 1252 > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78dnpswg2s_sequpvbv8+zeor6ozoyvur1adw2turq3...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Strange Character in Folder Name
My bad. I was thrown off by the appearance of the folder name in my dbf. What font should I use in my browser to get European characters to appear normal instead of having black rectangles in them? -Lew Schwartz On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > I'm writing an app for w8.1 and, somehow or other adir() reports a folder > name beginning with chr(138). This seems to be causing explorer to become > blind to it, so I can't find the folder to fix it. > Any ideas? > > > -Lew Schwartz > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78crt+ij-be-_2utxqyu6k4w8d8w63hsyel2x0sbna3...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Strange Character in Folder Name
I'm writing an app for w8.1 and, somehow or other adir() reports a folder name beginning with chr(138). This seems to be causing explorer to become blind to it, so I can't find the folder to fix it. Any ideas? -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78d63synt4hrbwngpvl9xbmc2qsbtz4hzqtny_5otmm...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Column Width in an Age of Varchar
The docs say set ansi applied to sql only, but I'm using many of the old
dbf functions.
-Lew Schwartz
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> Depends on whether you have Set Ansi ON or OFF
>
> CLEAR
> CREATE CURSOR Dummy (name c(10))
> INSERT INTO Dummy VALUES ("Tommy")
> SET ANSI OFF
> SELECT * FROM Dummy WHERE name="Tom" INTO CURSOR result
> ?"With ANSI",SET("Ansi"),_tally && shows 1
> SET ANSI ON
> SELECT * FROM Dummy WHERE name="Tom" INTO CURSOR result
> ?"With ANSI",SET("Ansi"),_tally && shows 0
>
> Dave
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Lew Schwartz
> Sent: 30 June 2014 16:52
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Column Width in an Age of Varchar
>
> Is the accepted wisdom for locates, seeks, replaces, ect... now
>
> padr(cExpression, fsize(cFieldName))
>
> as opposed to using len() above, as I think many of us did previously
>
> ??
>
>
> -Lew Schwartz
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78fNoWdgQAz+bF=pzqtyj1v5tzk_bym6mm+s0mtsr3a...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Column Width in an Age of Varchar
Is the accepted wisdom for locates, seeks, replaces, ect... now padr(cExpression, fsize(cFieldName)) as opposed to using len() above, as I think many of us did previously ?? -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78ftprpjso3qj8sx9cuxanu_6x_l1cb6tmxopgh1kpg...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Chrome weird in W8.1
The google doc that Alan sent me to explains that chrome won't work in W8 mode with my machine. I managed to get it out of W8 mode. Now things are fine. On Jun 7, 2014 10:52 PM, "Dan Covill" wrote: > Lew, > When I have that kind of problem with a browser, I download and install a > new copy. Just had to do that when the new FireFox 29.0 got stuck in > full-screen mode. > Dan > > > Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 21:12:39 -0400 > > Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome weird in W8.1 > > From: lew1...@gmail.com > > To: profoxt...@leafe.com > > > > I guess that's it, but mine crashed so badly that it's stuck in this > > incompatible mode. > > > > -Lew Schwartz > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78d_aoe9b_cs0ktpt77il4tx13wzf_iqxna9zk0hn80...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Chrome weird in W8.1
I guess that's it, but mine crashed so badly that it's stuck in this incompatible mode. -Lew Schwartz On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Alan Bourke wrote: > Does this help > > https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/2762879?hl=en > > > On Sat, Jun 7, 2014, at 06:43 AM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > > I bit the bullet and I'm now in the process of xferring my work to my new > > 8.1 laptop. Things are ok (not great), but Chrome isn't playing well. It > > grabs the entire screen and then only draws the upper left hand corner of > > what I'd expect to see ... but even that is pretty much doa. > > > > Any ideas? > > > > -Lew Schwartz > > > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > > multipart/alternative > > text/plain (text body -- kept) > > text/html > > --- > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78dU_ESLXAMyPf8uCQ3k+MSb4uqe=fomcuw6_ehzsdq...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Chrome weird in W8.1
I bit the bullet and I'm now in the process of xferring my work to my new 8.1 laptop. Things are ok (not great), but Chrome isn't playing well. It grabs the entire screen and then only draws the upper left hand corner of what I'd expect to see ... but even that is pretty much doa. Any ideas? -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78fvRxG_mDBHC=+ZHDO+xziE5CUNLPiN=hee4jh_sro...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP drag drop & browsers
None of there references involve drag/drop from the internet in a browser onto a fox control. -Lew Schwartz On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Dave Crozier wrote: > It works, but make sure you open the VFP development system in NON ADMIN > mode or the Drag/drop will NOT work for testing. > > Dave > > -Original Message- > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Lew Schwartz > Sent: 25 May 2014 19:41 > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: VFP drag drop & browsers > > Is it possible to drag an image file that's being displayed in a browser > into VFP 9 in any way? > -Lew Schwartz > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78e+S=s4r8_j+zzvnyvrdfw7u5gg2warcquhpbusppn...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP9 + W8.1 + touch screen
So fox interprets these as click & double click events? -Lew Schwartz On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote: > On May 25, 2014 2:31:45 PM EDT, Lew Schwartz wrote: > >What touchy capabilities does VFP 9 have on a touch enabled W8.1 > >machine? > >Is the touch like a mouse click or what> > > > >-Lew Schwartz > > > > > > Like a mouse click. Long press is a double click. > -- > Tracy > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78e5ymN6+XyE=PC=FXkAeBjghWbqK02kq=ox-y31aug...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] New lap top configuration.
You do that for boot speed... yes? I take it that W8 still can't create an instant on image of itself on the ssd? What's the point of not putting anything else on the ssd? There's no access time, is there? I know nothing about working with an ssd. -Lew Schwartz On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Kurt @ VR-FX wrote: > FYI - my main PC has that! > > I - and many others - will install the OS on the SSD - but, leave the data > going to the regular HD. I also install my main 3D CG SW on the SSD - since > the SW is BIG and a PIG w/resources. But, I try to install almost NOTHING > Else on the SSD. I even forced the My Doc's & stuff to the regular HD... > > -K- > > > > On 5/25/2014 2:34 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > >> Looking over new laptops, I see that a lot have hd + solid state drive >> combos. What in particular are people doing with the ss with these specs? >> >> -Lew Schwartz >> >> >> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- >> multipart/alternative >>text/plain (text body -- kept) >>text/html >> --- >> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78eVQ7jf-iE2kbjUgpuvppOJbq1Mystp=esp-mzirsh...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
VFP drag drop & browsers
Is it possible to drag an image file that's being displayed in a browser into VFP 9 in any way? -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78c43aM8M5003Pj1hfUchOhcvPBki=mNPW=w=a6mm2r...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] New lap top configuration.
Looking over new laptops, I see that a lot have hd + solid state drive combos. What in particular are people doing with the ss with these specs? -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78dpc4524fvnzrykho3qydomp3jdmgnsupe9rxczvhh...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
VFP9 + W8.1 + touch screen
What touchy capabilities does VFP 9 have on a touch enabled W8.1 machine? Is the touch like a mouse click or what> -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78dbX+fgUhFjzMtVLzrSgHR4g1uh04NhXG=fx3prywn...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File exists function in win api
File makes use of vfp's set path and can return puzzling results. -Lew Schwartz On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:51 PM, < mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote: > What's wrong with just using IF FILE(lcFile) ... > > ?? > > > > On 2014-05-21 12:01, Dave Crozier wrote: > >> DECLARE INTEGER FindClose IN kernel32 INTEGER hFindFile >> DECLARE INTEGER FindFirstFile IN kernel32 STRING lpFileName, STRING >> @lpFindFileData >> DECLARE INTEGER FindNextFile IN kernel32 INTEGER hFindFile, STRING >> @lpFindFileData >> >> Dave >> >> -Original Message- >> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Lew Schwartz >> Sent: 21 May 2014 16:54 >> To: ProFox Email List >> Subject: File exists function in win api >> >> I've forgotten the name of this function. Is it still there in W 7 & 8? >> Thanks. >> >> -Lew Schwartz >> >> >> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative >> text/plain (text body -- kept) >> text/html >> --- >> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78fqxpfjvn-bz+i5fjt0fz2kn6v1sgqpajjzamxs0qa...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File exists function in win api
Those are it. I'm ok now, thanks. -Lew Schwartz On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Dave Crozier wrote: > http://www.tek-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=5763 > > Example of the functions I posted. Is this what you mean? > > Dave > > -Original Message- > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Lew Schwartz > Sent: 21 May 2014 16:54 > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: File exists function in win api > > I've forgotten the name of this function. Is it still there in W 7 & 8? > Thanks. > > -Lew Schwartz > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78csiEC3NBnq3+prVRndxnvejgQGsfSDB150FKm=h5f...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
File exists function in win api
I've forgotten the name of this function. Is it still there in W 7 & 8? Thanks. -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78dv_mjjhr+lmjo-goh_dgfjb8_qatn9-wcr_e-z6k6...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: How to quit/cancel from a main form
This works, but seems like overkill: WITH _screen nFormCount = .FormCount FOR nForm = nFormCount TO 1 STEP -1 IF .Forms[nForm] # thisform .Forms[nForm].Release() ENDIF NEXT endwith thisform.Release() -Lew Schwartz On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > This works, but seems like overkill: > WITH _screen > nFormCount = .FormCount > FOR nForm = nFormCount TO 1 STEP -1 > IF .Forms[nForm] # thisform > .Forms[nForm].Release() > ENDIF > NEXT > endwith > thisform.Release() > > -Lew Schwartz > > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > >> It isn't clear events ... I'm still in dev mode in the ide, so there's no >> read events to be cleared. Quit is a pia since everything needs t be set up >> again. >> >> Kurt: This is a personal project. I'm getting some gigs lecturing on >> photography and I need a way to manage/display my photo collection. >> >> -Lew Schwartz >> >> >> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Kurt @ VR-FX wrote: >> >>> So - U R back 2 doing more VFP work these days I C! >>> >>> -K- >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> > On May 13, 2014, at 9:56 AM, Lew Schwartz wrote: >>> > >>> > Forgot how to do this: I've got a main form with a quit button for the >>> > entire app. When I "clear all" I get cannot clear object in use etc >>> ... So >>> > I'm pretty sure there's a way to do this, but I don't remember what >>> it is. >>> > Any help? >>> > >>> > -Lew Schwartz >>> > >>> > >>> > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- >>> > multipart/alternative >>> > text/plain (text body -- kept) >>> > text/html >>> > --- >>> > >>> > ___ >>> > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com >>> > Subscription Maintenance: >>> http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox >>> > OT-free version of this list: >>> http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech >>> > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox >>> > This message: >>> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78cVU1mNLaCWMWK7Owjio=qrjhkttdylaen8+74k6zq...@mail.gmail.com >>> > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions >>> of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This >>> statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to >>> see the obvious. >>> > >>> > Report [OT] Abuse: >>> http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/CAFuU78cVU1mNLaCWMWK7Owjio=qrjhkttdylaen8+74k6zq...@mail.gmail.com >>> >> >> > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78duajyDWEqR-3nwE8nMq0e1r0L=yztvwkpwwd_ic8y...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: How to quit/cancel from a main form
WITH _screen nFormCount = .FormCount FOR nForm = nFormCount TO 1 STEP -1 IF .Forms[nForm] # thisform .Forms[nForm].Release() ENDIF NEXT endwith thisform.Release() -Lew Schwartz On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > days like today, i prefer a sledge hammer > > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Ted Roche wrote: > > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Alan Bourke > >wrote: > > > > > Or the nuclear option: QUIT > > > > > > > > That's just tactical nuke. Ctrl-Alt-Delete or just hitting the power > button > > or ripping the cord out of the wall (unless you have a laptop, of course) > > is far more nuk-u-lar. > > > > Actually supported a client who had a report she used to end this way -- > > with the power switch. Former techie had done it once - once! - in front > of > > her while debugging a problem, and she cargo-culted the solution. > Needless > > to say, her machine was full of uncleaned temp files and corrupt data. > > > > -- > > Ted Roche > > Ted Roche & Associates, LLC > > http://www.tedroche.com > > > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > > multipart/alternative > > text/plain (text body -- kept) > > text/html > > --- > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78ed2-bFLP13twpV4=iudbtjozldbnxojhwukdhuul6...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
How to quit/cancel from a main form
Forgot how to do this: I've got a main form with a quit button for the entire app. When I "clear all" I get cannot clear object in use etc ... So I'm pretty sure there's a way to do this, but I don't remember what it is. Any help? -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78cVU1mNLaCWMWK7Owjio=qrjhkttdylaen8+74k6zq...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Prevent multiple selections in listbox
Sounds right just didn't see it. Begins with "m," right? On May 9, 2014 2:22 PM, "Dave Thayer" wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > > Is there a simple way to prevent multiple selections in a listbox (ie > > nothing happens if the shift or ctrl keys are held down). > > myListBox.MultiSelect = .F. perhaps? > > Dave Thayer > Denver, CO > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78dfeojo7rempwzww8cgqxoeu4eiroausjjqimlvoq_...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Prevent multiple selections in listbox
Is there a simple way to prevent multiple selections in a listbox (ie nothing happens if the shift or ctrl keys are held down). -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78fk3qmvajm9qxdoejcxaowfxz6qxcekvqqsvbmidub...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
PEMEditor install: cThorDispatcher not found
cThorDispatcher not found What am I missing? -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78d3liq87vfso7d89fopr2qofvdadwwxfpwbxuzxdgp...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Embarrassing Question: Capitalization, etc ...
Guess I date from pre-Thor. My age makes me more like Ra or Osis. What's Thor? -Lew Schwartz On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Frank Cazabon wrote: > On 19/04/2014 04:26 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > >> Yes! That's it! How do I make it work? >> > > I used it a while back but don't remember for sure. Off the top of my head > I think you just do pemeditor in your startup and then you'll get the new > options on your menu. It's also part of Thor. > > This might help: > > http://jordanmachine.com/PEM_Editor_Videos.html > > -- > > Frank. > > Frank Cazabon > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78e2xv6htwamw5m165e04sev-s3vghjj7rq37sanw9a...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Embarrassing Question: Capitalization, etc ...
Yes! That's it! How do I make it work? I seem to remember that it just became part of my VFP setup & practice after a while. On Apr 19, 2014 1:05 PM, "Lew Schwartz" wrote: > I've forgotten how to specify the capitalization I want to use in my > custom method and property names, eg nFormCount instead of nformcount. > There's a famous add-in out there that does this, isn't there? Is it still > available? Thanks to its author in advance, whose name - even more > embarrassing - I've also forgotten. > -Lew > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78c+aomjq9lnsdjhjfeav39dr7jw9ui6q3jq5hu04ni...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Embarrassing Question: Capitalization, etc ...
I've forgotten how to specify the capitalization I want to use in my custom method and property names, eg nFormCount instead of nformcount. There's a famous add-in out there that does this, isn't there? Is it still available? Thanks to its author in advance, whose name - even more embarrassing - I've also forgotten. -Lew --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78ekz06yccecyrqwhgwtdcxvyo3ar8dycwmbxkdomkv...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Obj reference to most recently added control
Yes, .addObject(). I actually used that in my code, but wrote "create..." in my email. The duhs abound. -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78ff2tfrs6_moqqyyswcc+dptg42lx_4o_moztgz5km...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Obj reference to most recently added control
It's gotta be this.CreateObject(), I think. Otherwise it won't be a control owned by the form. I dpn't think this.CreateObject() returns anything. -Lew Schwartz On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Allen wrote: > If there are many can you use createobject? Then you have your reference > Al > > -Original Message- > > Guess I should have added that there will be many image controls on this > form. I need a way to work with the most recently added one individually. > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78cyple_1huqde98vfsma8pujy3onhvruie8ucaa6jn...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Obj reference to most recently added control
Guess I should have added that there will be many image controls on this
form. I need a way to work with the most recently added one individually.
-Lew Schwartz
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Man-wai Chang wrote:
> with thisform.path.to.Blah
> .Picture = "c:\foobar.jpg"
> endwith
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Lew Schwartz wrote:
> > Ok, I haven't written a program for 5 years, so please excuse the rust &
> > don't all jump at once.
> >
> > I'm calling this.AddObject("Blah","Image") on a form and now I've got to
> > populate the properties of the new image object. How do I get a reference
> > to it so I can do stuff like:
> >
> > oLastImageObject.Picture = "c:\foobar.jpg"
> >
> > ?
> >
> > -Lew The dunce
> >
> >
> > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> > multipart/alternative
> > text/plain (text body -- kept)
> > text/html
> > ---
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78dJYh5SYD_aMKEBdGTYNNXiMTq=dg5gpkgch7kf_q7...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Obj reference to most recently added control
Ok, I haven't written a program for 5 years, so please excuse the rust &
don't all jump at once.
I'm calling this.AddObject("Blah","Image") on a form and now I've got to
populate the properties of the new image object. How do I get a reference
to it so I can do stuff like:
oLastImageObject.Picture = "c:\foobar.jpg"
?
-Lew The dunce
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78cDQyFPqMOVPnu_eiX1kw6S+ozeptp5kbGbjyn=jj7...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
VFP9 + Win 8.1
Do these 2 play nice? --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78d5c8XoF9oLupurTZfGuniA5a3zQPMj+baWR6QPV=g...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP executables crash!
Isn't there also a c rtl .dll that needs to be contemporary with the vfp
install and not more recent?
On Mar 19, 2014 12:24 PM, "Tracy Pearson" wrote:
> Tracy Pearson wrote on 2014-03-19:
> > I would check for version mismatches of the runtimes.
> > I use this script with on our client machines when they experience the
> same.
> >
> > @echo off echo dim fso>vfpgetver.vbs echo set
> > fso=createobject("scripting.filesystemobject")>>vfpgetver.vbs echo
> > wscript.echo wscript.arguments(0) ^&" - " ^&
> > fso.getfileversion(wscript.arguments(0))>>vfpgetver.vbs for /F
> > "delims=," %%i in ('dir %%systemdrive%%\vfp9*.dll /a/s/b') do cscript
> > /nologo vfpgetver.vbs "%%i" erase vfpgetver.vbs echo. pause
> >
>
>
> I should have explained how to run it.
>
> Copy it to a versions.cmd file in notepad, then dbl-click it. It opens a
> CMD
> window and runs locating all VFP9*.DLL files and gives the full path and
> version of that DLL.
>
> VFP will find the VFP9RENU.DLL in the path before looking at the location
> where the VFP9R.DLL is located.
>
> Tracy Pearson
> PowerChurch Software
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78f01vrgbgfdo5kklfdy_eqbcjz7tbm65udaz2wexxe...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Parasites
You seem to agree with the statement, not oppose it. It's argument is that the true parasites are the ruling class, not the unemployed & dependent. Otoh, maybe I don't understand either. On Jan 5, 2014 6:56 AM, "Ricardo Aráoz" wrote: > > """ People who dismiss the unemployed > and dependent as "parasites" fail to > understand economics and parasitism. > A successful parasite is one that is not > recognized by it's host, one that can > make it's host work for it without > appearing as a burden. Such is the > ruling class in a capitalist society.""" > -- Jason Read > > On the other hand it might be argued that "the unemployed and dependent" are unsuccessful parasites. Usually the fascist argument is that government should not meddle in private affairs, but in that same sentence they are asking for government protection against immigration, outsourcing, etc. Basically what fascists want is protection for themselves and fuck everybody else. > > P.S.: I am using the word "fascist" in the same way fascists call anything to their left "communist". The name calling game may be played by all sides. > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78dptEbtkJ9uAguki37_0uJrA1=o8S_VO1ZxzXb=xh1...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Time to upgrade... Is TP-Link for real?
My cable company tells me they're delivering faster than my old Linksys can broadcast & recommends an upgrade (there are 6 - 7 devices on the wi-fi at any given time). The TP-Link stuff looks great: capabilities and price. Any comments? --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78egoffx46hboe3coqc83pnuccjmxsbwzmpuhq8hsfj...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Malware protection vs cost
In my case, none of the alternative methods worked. Of course, this may not have been their fault, but it did seem sleazy at the time. On Nov 21, 2013 9:37 AM, "Dave Crozier" wrote: > Lew, > Haven't had any problems at all with it here. When it does ask if you want > the full blown version then just say no. I must say that on a couple of > occasions it has been useful just to identify malware and then to use > alternative methods to get rid of it. Also I still like MalwareBytes above > all and even bought the paid for version for real time scanning. > > Dave > > -Original Message- > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Lew Schwartz > Sent: 21 November 2013 14:24 > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: RE: [NF] Malware protection vs cost > > I got roped in when it found a problem, but wanted $$ to remove it. > Somewhat mal-ish itself. > On Nov 21, 2013 9:14 AM, "Dave Crozier" wrote: > > > Superantispyware > > > > It's free for the stantard version > > > > -Original Message- > > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Lew Schwartz > > Sent: 21 November 2013 14:13 > > To: ProFox Email List > > Subject: [NF] Malware protection vs cost > > > > I've been using Spyhunter, but at $40/year, it's too much, imo. > > Recommendations? Suggestions? > > > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative > > text/plain (text body -- kept) > > text/html > > --- > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78cNqt82D7KRm_XwesM2zpqp1qSH=igbobbiickg8t+...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Malware protection vs cost
I've been using Spyhunter, but at $40/year, it's too much, imo. Recommendations? Suggestions? --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78fgywnr9f9yrcrhhk4x1lu5wruzkgkb4nu-xqat4tx...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Malware protection vs cost
I got roped in when it found a problem, but wanted $$ to remove it. Somewhat mal-ish itself. On Nov 21, 2013 9:14 AM, "Dave Crozier" wrote: > Superantispyware > > It's free for the stantard version > > -Original Message- > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Lew Schwartz > Sent: 21 November 2013 14:13 > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: [NF] Malware protection vs cost > > I've been using Spyhunter, but at $40/year, it's too much, imo. > Recommendations? Suggestions? > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78d3vk18cv2f5phwteue2vaos-umg6xqgk7cx2zeyzr...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Appending from a Cursor
Have to match? You can include constants, variables and data from other cursors to make the columns match up. It's a code issue, not data. -Lew Schwartz On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > At 06:45 2013-08-25, Lew Schwartz wrote: > >> I don't think that will work all the time. A cursor may be a sql filtered, >> behind the scenes view of a dbf. If you append from the actual dbf, you'll >> lose the filter. The problem is mixing the legacy dml with sql; they don't >> think of data in exactly the same way. >> > > Thank you for the warning, but it is not applicable in my case as I > created the cursor with create cursor. > > > I believe, but don't have time to verify or remember, that a pure sql >> statement will work. Something like: >> >> insert into targettable (field list); >> select (sourcefield list) from sourcecursor >> > > Yes, it will work, but unfortunately, the two lists have to match. > Using append, you do not even need a list. > > > [snip] > > Sincerely, > > Gene Wirchenko > > > __**_ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/**listinfo/profox<http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox> > OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/** > listinfo/profoxtech <http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech> > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/**search/profox<http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox> > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/**byMID/profox/<http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/> > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of > the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the > obvious. > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78c0jdzauqmxfi8gy3pbusraumgeamozffrm-1rocav...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Appending from a Cursor
I don't think that will work all the time. A cursor may be a sql filtered,
behind the scenes view of a dbf. If you append from the actual dbf, you'll
lose the filter. The problem is mixing the legacy dml with sql; they don't
think of data in exactly the same way.
I believe, but don't have time to verify or remember, that a pure sql
statement will work. Something like:
insert into targettable (field list);
select (sourcefield list) from sourcecursor
-Lew Schwartz
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> At 15:29 2013-08-19, "Michael Oke, II" wrote:
>
>> To append directly from a cursor use: append from dbf('cCursorName')
>>
>
> Thank you. That did it.
>
> [snip]
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Gene Wirchenko
>
>
>
> __**_
> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/**listinfo/profox<http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox>
> OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/**
> listinfo/profoxtech <http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech>
> Searchable Archive:
> http://leafe.com/archives/**search/profox<http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox>
> This message:
> http://leafe.com/archives/**byMID/profox/<http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/>
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of
> the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the
> obvious.
>
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78ceT2_b4B5Ky6HvN=ocwtm9ldnh7ga8avkjyfwhf3-...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bloody Mary Breakthrough!!!!
My test for thickness is precisely that: horseradish does not settle out. -Lew Schwartz On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Stephen Russell wrote: > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > > > It does seem that many tomato juices are made from tomato paste plus > water. > > The problem with turning this into a dyi juice is that they all contain > > seasonings that anticipate someone's idea of spaghetti sauce. OTOH, there > > are cocktail sauces out there that suggest using them as the basis of a > > Bloody Mary. I haven't tried any, however. The main problem is that the > > horse radish doesn't stay tip top fresh once it's in the Bloody Mary mix. > > > > For those on this list who are disparaging the thickness of the juice, > it's > > important because some of the ingredients won't go into suspension if the > > mix is too watery.--- > > > > > Our rub is a mix of onion, garlic, mustard, paprika, and other powdered > spices. It brings a second layer of body to the drink as well as some heat > in a spicy paprika that we like in small quantity. Instead of soy through > Worcestershire we use a med sweet soy which is very thick. > > We don't use horseradish at all because it just drops to the bottom. > > > > -- > Stephen Russell > Sr. Analyst > Ring Container Technology > Oakland TN > > 901.246-0159 cell > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78fb0w76ZAsnw0dg6FayGVS0TXT-Wfn366KvFk17a=3...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bloody Mary Breakthrough!!!!
It does seem that many tomato juices are made from tomato paste plus water. The problem with turning this into a dyi juice is that they all contain seasonings that anticipate someone's idea of spaghetti sauce. OTOH, there are cocktail sauces out there that suggest using them as the basis of a Bloody Mary. I haven't tried any, however. The main problem is that the horse radish doesn't stay tip top fresh once it's in the Bloody Mary mix. For those on this list who are disparaging the thickness of the juice, it's important because some of the ingredients won't go into suspension if the mix is too watery. -Lew Schwartz On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Stephen Russell wrote: > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > > > Man, you guys are tough. Thicker tomato juice is nothing to sneeze at. > > --- > > > > In smaller barbecue contests there is a good chance to find a Bloody Mary > ancillary contest. > > We cheat by adding a tiny tomato paste as well as our rub to all cocktails > we submit. We have never won but we have a great time practicing every > time we fire up the cooker. > > > -- > Stephen Russell > Sr. Analyst > Ring Container Technology > Oakland TN > > 901.246-0159 cell > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78dBkgo_DCQMdUrZ939Fe82RL_OQ2x==fccr81fonmc...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bloody Mary Breakthrough!!!!
Man, you guys are tough. Thicker tomato juice is nothing to sneeze at. -Lew Schwartz On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Pete Theisen wrote: > On 08/01/2013 09:43 PM, Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox) wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: >> >> Oh, reason not the mead. Doesn't anyone care about the bloody Bloody >>> Mary? >>> >> >> >> Yes -- waiting for the tease to be finished and the recipe to be >> proffered. >> >> Ken >> > > Oh, heck - he hasn't got a breakthrough, or even a tease. It is just using > thicker tomato juice with your otherwise regular recipe. > -- > Regards, > > Pete > http://pete-theisen.com/ > http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ > > > __**_ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/**listinfo/profox<http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox> > OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/** > listinfo/profoxtech <http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech> > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/**search/profox<http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox> > This message: http://leafe.com/archives/**byMID/profox/51FB11D5.8030400@** > verizon.net<http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/51fb11d5.8030...@verizon.net> > > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of > the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the > obvious. > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78fF6sk=nyn-extgu0g2zw45w9ffyqtq2vo6gxae-h1...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bloody Mary Breakthrough!!!!
Oh, reason not the mead. Doesn't anyone care about the bloody Bloody Mary? -Lew Schwartz On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Paul Hill > wrote: > > > On 30 July 2013 15:09, Michael Madigan wrote: > > > I had that last year. A yellow Brandywine had ZERO flowers. > > > > You need flowers for the bees to do their stuff. > > > > > I'm finding out that we have no bees around here and pollinating the > > flowers needs to be done manually to help things along. > > > > No bees? Maybe you need to encourage them? You can buy a 'house' for > > Bumble bees. > > They don't live in large numbers and are pretty docile. > > > > --- > > > > Positive outcome is honey. > > Too much honey and you learn to make mead. > > > -- > Stephen Russell > Sr. Analyst > Ring Container Technology > Oakland TN > > 901.246-0159 cell > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78f1s+zuonhkjvdfsuet5mpu6uwclkcqqxeqeexrc+v...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bloody Mary Breakthrough!!!!
Tomato juice is made from puree, true, but most puree's have additional seasonings that interfere with the cocktail saucy taste I strive for in my Bloody Mary's. Yes, cocktail sauce should be a good beginning, but where to get the good stuff in bulk? -Lew Schwartz On Jul 29, 2013 2:48 PM, "Paul Hill" wrote: > On 29 July 2013 17:42, Lew Schwartz wrote: > > I'm sharing a recent discovery from my quest for the ultimate Bloody > Mary. > > The hardest part is to find a tomato juice that's really thick (but not > > quite cocktail sauce). It turns out that most of the too watery brands > will > > separate if you let the can or jar stand overnight, and you can siphon > off > > a few, 3-4 oz of the mostly water, muddy, red fluid on top with a turkey > > baster. What remains is the beginning of a great drink. > > Haven't had a Bloody Mary for years.. > What about Passata? That's pretty thick. > > My garden tomatoes this year are a bit of a failure this year. I > bought a variety of funky tomato seeds (yellow, deep red/brown, long > ones etc) and I have about 5 plants with no flowers and a single plant > with a few small green toms. > > Last year I grew a 6 foot tall monster with 100s of cherry toms. > > The cucumbers & french beans are growing well though! > > -- > Paul > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78es5WhgWwLdfRFCTjpJnqop5Ry0m2pmnPh=k9vftcx...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Bloody Mary Breakthrough!!!!
I'm sharing a recent discovery from my quest for the ultimate Bloody Mary. The hardest part is to find a tomato juice that's really thick (but not quite cocktail sauce). It turns out that most of the too watery brands will separate if you let the can or jar stand overnight, and you can siphon off a few, 3-4 oz of the mostly water, muddy, red fluid on top with a turkey baster. What remains is the beginning of a great drink. -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78ciTPqnS-3w9D-V0_LbOvDgbh8v5xv6ApOFi66Op0g=a...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Delaying loading a form with lots of remote views
Can't you check all your necessary connections as a separate routine? -Lew Schwartz On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Peter Cushing wrote: > Chris Davis wrote: > >> Hi All >> >> I have a form with lots of remote views and despite being set to no data >> on load the form still has a delay when loading, is their anyway to avoid >> this? I presume the connection is being checked? >> >> >> >> > Are you using the data environment? > > Peter > > --**--** > > > > Rajan Imports has changed - we are now Whispering Smith Ltd. For more > information see our website at www.whisperingsmith.com > > > Please update your address book with my new email address: > pcush...@whisperingsmith.com > > . > > This communication is intended for the person or organisation to whom it > is addressed. The contents are confidential and may be protected in law. > Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If > you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by > telephone or email. > > www.whisperingsmith.com > > Whispering Smith Ltd > Head Office:61 Great Ducie Street, Manchester M3 1RR. Tel:0161 831 3700 > Fax:0161 831 3715 > London Office:17-19 Foley Street, London W1W 6DW Tel:0207 299 7960 > > > > __**_ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/**listinfo/profox<http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox> > OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/** > listinfo/profoxtech <http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech> > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/**search/profox<http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox> > This message: http://leafe.com/archives/**byMID/profox/51E905D3.1000306@** > whisperingsmith.com<http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/51e905d3.1000...@whisperingsmith.com> > > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of > the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the > obvious. > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78cHQ1bnmVUnBFVnoZJOuB4QaF4==2=n2xzp-wmsknk...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Why can't I ALTER TABLE on a cursor?
Doesn't ALTER TABLE expect the table not to be open already? What happens
if you
USE in crap
before the ALTER TABLE statement?
-Lew Schwartz
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Mike Copeland wrote:
> Before they added "readwrite" to cursors, you could create a cursor and
> then reopen it using the DBF() workaround to get a cursor that was
> editable. Before that, cursors, especially the ones created with "select *
> from crap into cursor morecrap" were uneditable.
>
> At least that's how I remember it and it makes me happy, so that's my
> story.
>
> Mike Copeland
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: Why can't I ALTER TABLE on a cursor?
> From: Kurt @ VR-FX
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Date: 7/10/2013 5:41 PM
>
>> Yeah - that sounds about right - not sure why one would use this DBF()
>> thingy in the Alter...
>>
>> -K-
>>
>>
>> On 7/10/2013 6:25 PM, Thierry Nivelet wrote:
>>
>>> Alter table crap ... ?
>>>
>>> Thierry Nivelet
>>> http://foxincloud.com/
>>> Give your VFP app a second life in the cloud
>>>
>>> Le 11 juil. 2013 à 00:13, "MB Software Solutions, LLC" <
>>> mbsoftwaresolutions@**mbsoftwaresolutions.com>
>>> a écrit :
>>>
>>> VFP9SP2
>>>>
>>>> My task is to import a text file which has 2 date fields that are in
>>>> MMDD format. So I import them as C(8) and then convert them
>>>> afterwards. I thought I could do this:
>>>>
>>>> CREATE CURSOR crap (provnum c(9), datepaid c(8), lastdos c(8), reimbamt
>>>> n(15,2), bonusamt n(15,2), datepaid2 d, lastdos2 d, filename v(200), tstamp
>>>> t)
>>>> APPEND FROM ? type DELIMITED && I use the File dialogue to pick my
>>>> import file
>>>>
>>>> REPLACE datepaid2 WITH CTOD(LEFT(datepaid,2)+"/"+**
>>>> SUBSTR(datepaid,3,2)+"/"+**RIGHT(datepaid,4)), lastdos2 WITH
>>>> CTOD(LEFT(lastdos,2)+"/"+**SUBSTR(lastdos,3,2)+"/"+RIGHT(**lastdos,4)),
>>>> filename WITH "crap", tstamp WITH DATETIME() ALL IN crap
>>>> ALTER table DBF("crap") drop COLUMN datepaid drop COLUMN lastdos
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ...but it gives me a "File is in use" error. I could have swore I did
>>>> this before successfully. What am I doing wrong?
>>>>
>>>> tia,
>>>> --Mike
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mike Babcock, MCP
>>>> MB Software Solutions, LLC
>>>> President, Chief Software Architect
>>>> http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
>>>> http://fabmate.com
>>>> http://twitter.com/mbabcock16
>>>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78e0xr+lrci2vaqvsamt6nbtudm8dcdx7is+txsgett...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Wireless routers LinkSys vs NetGear
The NAS is "practice" for getting this stuff off-site altogether. I have nightmares about losing all the work and time I've put into my photographic work. I currently have a 2 stage, nightly backup. One copy to a portable drive that I take with me on vacations and a second to the NAS. -Lew Schwartz On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Ted Roche wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > > > So, just got back from a vacation deep enough into the woods of Cape Cod > to > > be beyond paved roads. > > > It's good to hear there's still some of that on the Cape. I spent my > summers down in Plymouth and day-tripping up and down the cape. Great > memories. > > Is it time for me to upgrade? Does it matter? > > > Well, does it matter to you? > > We upgraded to N a while ago and appreciate the extra speed. However, there > was some hassle in getting everything to work with the new machines (you'll > likely want to change your WPA2 encryption codes) and you may find that > some devices are old enough that they only use the slower protocols. > Running a wireless access point with both the old and new protocols can > slow down some communications. Generally, it's better to upgrade or replace > the oldest stuff to get the best boost from the speed increase. > > Speed is an issue for me > > since I backup my photographic work to my NAS drive each night. > > > > If you have a routine task that moves a LOT of data from one place another > on the network, do yourself a favor and use the wired network for that > portion. 100 Mbit or gigabit wired is literally orders of magnitude faster > than wireless and gets the job done a lot quicker. We have a wired network > of immobile resources: printers, scanners, development servers and cable > run into some of the rooms, and we try to reserve the wireless traffic for > the mobile laptops and tablets. > > -- > Ted Roche > Ted Roche & Associates, LLC > http://www.tedroche.com > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78czdghjkahb1qmipastzzfufdfcdgy4motawh18vyj...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Wireless routers LinkSys vs NetGear
Is there an eta for the new technology? -Lew Schwartz On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Mike Copeland wrote: > Also, not to play the "just wait, something BIG is coming!" but just > wait! Something BIG is coming! > > There is a new WIFI standard (802.11ac) that is 3x faster (at 1.75 > gigabits per second) than the current fastest WIFI protocols. Of course, > you'll have to have compatible hardware on both ends, and it will be sold > at a premium for a while, plus the initial hardware won't be multi-protocol > capable so you might spend enough to get your computer to connect, but not > your pad or smartphone... (There are 26 different WIFI protocol revisions > already!) > > In my opinion, N is the best overall combo of speed/price/availability, > for now. And to get better throughput from all over the house, consider > multiple WAPs to overcome barriers like electrical wiring and walls. You > might also have some 'other' wireless hardware, like older model cordless > telephones, that are creating interference and hurting your throughput on > your existing wireless system. To find out, just pull the batteries out of > the wireless devices (if possible) and see if your throughput spikes up. > > Mike Copeland > > > Original Message > Subject: Re: [NF] Wireless routers LinkSys vs NetGear > From: Michael Oke, II > To: profoxt...@leafe.com > Date: 7/3/2013 1:20 PM > >> Look at what frequency your wireless router operates at versus what you >> had access to at the cottage. If your existing equipment is using 'b', it >> might be time to upgrade, at least if throughput is less than adequate. >> Keep in mind that, if you are pushing data to the cloud or web, your >> Internet connection will be a choke point as well. >> >> >> >> Michael Oke, II >> oke...@gmail.com >> 661-349-6221 >> >> On Jul 3, 2013, at 9:44 AM, Lew Schwartz wrote: >> >> So, just got back from a vacation deep enough into the woods of Cape Cod >>> to >>> be beyond paved roads. The cottage advertised internet access and I >>> expected something adequate and slow. Instead, I found that the >>> antennaless >>> NetGear router in the basement was pushing out 72 Mbps, way faster than >>> the >>> LinkSys I have here in the house. >>> >>> Is it time for me to upgrade? Does it matter? Speed is an issue for me >>> since I backup my photographic work to my NAS drive each night. >>> >>> -Lew Schwartz >>> >>> >>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- >>> multipart/alternative >>> text/plain (text body -- kept) >>> text/html >>> --- >>> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78fqkcufjebl0+akkp9teju4kmqtomahmfguzz7nx5f...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Wireless routers LinkSys vs NetGear
That's what I thought. I was surprised to see my old Dell Vostro pick up at 72 Mbps when I had assumed that everything on home networks communicated at the 54 Mbps of my LinkSys. -Lew Schwartz On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Michael Oke, II wrote: > The theoretical speed of the router but your hardware would have to match. > Obviously yours does in order to see that reading. > > > > Michael Oke, II > oke...@gmail.com > 661-349-6221 > > On Jul 3, 2013, at 11:31 AM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Michael Oke, II > wrote: > > > >> Keep in mind that, if you are pushing data to the cloud or web, your > >> Internet connection will be a choke point as well. > > > > > > I know the total throughput is the result of a couple of things taken in > > aggregate, but I thought the Mbps rating was exclusively a function of > thee > > wireless router. Correct me if I'm wrong. > > > > -Lew Schwartz > > > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > > multipart/alternative > > text/plain (text body -- kept) > > text/html > > --- > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78e_=pchq9fdbuhxyks4gby1qlrgx4pxcrlokm-ltw4...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Wireless routers LinkSys vs NetGear
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Michael Oke, II wrote: > Keep in mind that, if you are pushing data to the cloud or web, your > Internet connection will be a choke point as well. I know the total throughput is the result of a couple of things taken in aggregate, but I thought the Mbps rating was exclusively a function of thee wireless router. Correct me if I'm wrong. -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78dgudpbtoyg+zduq7rajzkzhmzshqfolxdkkq6k0ax...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Google is Your Lover!
Probably some moisture got into where it didn't belong. -Lew Schwartz On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > A friend bought me a hp laptop last week that had quit working. > Said he saw on youtube that he could put it in a oven and that would fix > it. > > I couldn't get it working, and I wasn't going to put something in a oven > that I had no money to replace, so I gave it back to him. > > He placed it in a over for 9 minutes and that fixed it. > > Only thing I can figure is a cold solder joint, and the oven warmed all of > the solder joints which reflowed the solder > > -Original Message- > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Johnson > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 10:12 PM > To: profox@leafe.com > Subject: Re: [NF] Google is Your Lover! > > Man-wai: It was just like I said. I put my right palm on the enter key > and > held down hard and the computer booted up. The computer is dead and it > probably has something to do with the mother board in that area. My > only task was to get the data and I did. Now that I got the data I am > sure the computer is mine and I can figure it out. > > I know... I still owe you guys the Google Calendar stuff. It's coming. > Honest! Been busy palming my customers' computers. > > > Jeff > > --- > > Jeff Johnson > j...@san-dc.com > (623) 582-0323 > > www.san-dc.com > www.arelationshipmanager.com > > On 06/26/2013 11:55 AM, Man-wai Chang wrote: > > So what exactly was wrong? Did you figure it out? > > > > If you could not, then nothing could be learnt... :) > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > > >> This is truly one for the record! A good friend gave me a dead HP > TX1000. > >> Turn it on - a few spins of the drive and that's it. I checked out > all > of > >> the fixes like turning it off and turn it on holding down two keys, etc. > >> etc. etc. Then I read one that said, "This may sound really dumb but it > >> worked for me. Press your right palm down as hard as you can in the > Enter > >> key area - not so hard as to break it - but firm and turn on the > computer." > >> I did that and the computer came up and I am copying the data to an > >> external drive. > >> > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78exwhmwbaj7ny-_jzjg+jcr5wgdfkd8ljnkldxo4bj...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Wireless routers LinkSys vs NetGear
So, just got back from a vacation deep enough into the woods of Cape Cod to be beyond paved roads. The cottage advertised internet access and I expected something adequate and slow. Instead, I found that the antennaless NetGear router in the basement was pushing out 72 Mbps, way faster than the LinkSys I have here in the house. Is it time for me to upgrade? Does it matter? Speed is an issue for me since I backup my photographic work to my NAS drive each night. -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78e_e5fjguycg5wkbd+bqsi9t2xsyibc3guvbbd8q1u...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Setting Active Page Tab
I was kind of backing into an idea that worked very well for me. I build all my pages and forms on containers, nothing else directly on the form or page itself. This made it very easy for me to take a tabbed page & throw it onto an independent form for users to look at when the need to page over to another routine. -Lew Schwartz On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Dan Covill wrote: > On 07/02/13 11:26 AM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > >> >> HOWEVER, I do not design my forms in such a way that that is >> likely to be an issue. The validation that the user would fall afoul of >> is *just for that control*. I often have form labels stating the valid >> input values where they are not obvious, and my error messages are the >> same way. >> >> > Good point, Gene. Where I have a validation routine that will be used for > multiple controls, e.g., testing that a value is within limits, that > routine is a method of a business object, and the code in the Valid method > calls it with parameters: > Result = oBox.ValidLength() > or Result = oBox.ValidWidth() > > That way, if the rules change you don't do it in the form. > > Dan > > > > > > __**_ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/**listinfo/profox<http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox> > OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/** > listinfo/profoxtech <http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech> > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/**search/profox<http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox> > This message: http://leafe.com/archives/**byMID/profox/51D321A7.4080005@** > san.rr.com<http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/51d321a7.4080...@san.rr.com> > > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of > the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the > obvious. > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78cdd-X0TOcg6Rmo7jWnLObyfkm=th7ay8pz23vdp+w...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: help with weird error message
What are you doing or trying to do when the error appears? -Lew Schwartz On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:13 PM, roger wrote: > I get this error message but I cannot find any dll with the required name > can anyone shed light on this? > > api-ms-win-core-interlocked-|1-1-1.dll > > there is a dll with almost the same name but making a copy and renaming it > does not work either. > > Thanks in advance > > Roger > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78emsh4cton5tzyqzd6nbyu921o09apgn7+czrtn92y...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Setting Active Page Tab
What if the user has to read something on another page in order to correct the error? -Lew Schwartz On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > Dear Vixens and Reynards: > > I have control-level validation for my data entry controls. In order > to be really sure, I am now checking them all when the user clicks on OK. > (If I am dealing with a row that has been adjusted to a wrong value > outside of the system, I want to catch the error.) > > The complication is that I have a few forms that have tabs. I check > the control's value. If there is an error, an error messagebox will be > thrown, then I do .setfocus() for the tab that the control is in followed > by .setfocus() for the input control. > > Is this the correct or best way to do it? > > Are there any gotchas? > > Sincerely, > > Gene Wirchenko > > > __**_ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/**listinfo/profox<http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox> > OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/** > listinfo/profoxtech <http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech> > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/**search/profox<http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox> > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/**byMID/profox/<http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/> > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of > the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the > obvious. > > Report [OT] Abuse: http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/** > 20130701205105.19DA218083@**mail.leafe.com<http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/20130701205105.19da218...@mail.leafe.com> > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78c+0zF=rsdrunax6z6uayjitpviyusrqniadzvllpt...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Browser redirect virus (quibids.com)
How did you find the name of the file? I'm still clueless . -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78c59U8SuuZdM_wBpd2=pgewwanno+akstilghc_cet...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Browser redirect virus (quibids.com)
This seems to explain it: http://www.2-viruses.com/how-to-fix-google-results-hijacker-google-redirect-virus-problem I had to go to an uninfected machine to find it. -Lew Schwartz On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Alan Bourke wrote: > Try a boot rescue CD > > On Tue, May 28, 2013, at 05:27 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > > Centers on quibids.com, but throws up a few other sites randomly. So far > > chrome and firefox are infected. None of the removal schemes on line seem > > to work (eg: I can't find quibids.com anywhere n the machine or > > registry). > > > > -Lew Schwartz > > > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > > multipart/alternative > > text/plain (text body -- kept) > > text/html > > --- > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78c01NmXgCMvP1mLQD+PEWUfq3-Vzctu02=tzt2argo...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Browser redirect virus (quibids.com)
They're pretty sleazy, apparently. I don't think they are the actual source of the virus. They are probably paying the virus maker to redirect there. -Lew Schwartz On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox) < foxh...@information-architecture.com> wrote: > Gee, QuiBids advertises a lot on TV. I assume it is sleazy, but not sleazy > in *this* way. > > Ken > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > > > Centers on quibids.com, but throws up a few other sites randomly. So far > > chrome and firefox are infected. None of the removal schemes on line seem > > to work (eg: I can't find quibids.com anywhere n the machine or > registry). > > > > -Lew Schwartz > > > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > > multipart/alternative > > text/plain (text body -- kept) > > text/html > > --- > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78cRmXmxtWn78r5UJ-5-mXZfPw2gsr=e6ipva8pozya...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Browser redirect virus (quibids.com)
Centers on quibids.com, but throws up a few other sites randomly. So far chrome and firefox are infected. None of the removal schemes on line seem to work (eg: I can't find quibids.com anywhere n the machine or registry). -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78d=p-qBAO=UHmgLZ55sZcNdYerKZv_wpG45GJk5E_G=w...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Docking station or just plain stupid?
So they don't need the rpm's. But how do they manage to bite off larger chunks of data to take advantage of the greater xfer rate? -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78cmdjnp6twzt+afluahmqlvtspyygx4y5zbg0kq_jy...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Docking station or just plain stupid?
Ok, ok. I guess the answer is "just plain stupid." It's been so long since I've had to buy or install and new hd, that I didn't realize that SATA was a totally different interface. I was thinking: Oh, yeh S + ATA means super ata, but and don't trouble to point out that, had I even looked at the hd in my laptop, I would have thought twice about my erroneous conclusion. But what's the big deal with 3.5 SATA? They require a new pin interface in your desktop, and the ata's still seem to offer higher spindle speeds and capacity. -Lew Schwartz On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Adam Buckland wrote: > The connections for 3 and 2" SATA are the sameŠ > > I have a > > http://www.amazon.com/Integral-Drive-Docking-station-drives/dp/B003OA5292/r > ef=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1369564138&sr=8-1&keywords=Integral+%28SATA%29+HDD+Co > py+Station > > Which is good for copying backup disks for my SBS server and for general > swapping of disksŠ > > > Adam. > > > On 25/05/2013 17:03, "Lew Schwartz" wrote: > > I bought one of these: > > http://www.nextwarehouse.com/item/?617328_p3g > > got a good price, and, like a dope, let it sit on my shelf until I actually > needed it. Works fine w/2.5 mini drives, but damned if I can even see how > it would ever work with a 3.5. There aren't any additional connector pins > inside for a 3.5, not power, nothing. > > Anyone know anything about them? > > > > -Lew Schwartz > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78cWROt3p7fKd=2uoipAFpE1Bh_9qBV7bD5gnysmio=l...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Docking station or just plain stupid?
Yes, but if you look into the drive slot on top, you'd see there isn't a corresponding 12v out receptacle to feed into the power plug of the 3.5 (nor are there data pins, either). -Lew Schwartz On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote: > Lew Schwartz wrote: > > >Once you stick the 3.5 in, there's no room for an additional cable. > > > >-Lew Schwartz > >On May 25, 2013 12:33 PM, "Tracy Pearson" > >wrote: > > > >> Lew Schwartz wrote: > >> > >> >I bought one of these: > >> > > >> >http://www.nextwarehouse.com/item/?617328_p3g > >> > > >> >got a good price, and, like a dope, let it sit on my shelf until I > >> >actually > >> >needed it. Works fine w/2.5 mini drives, but damned if I can even > >see > >> >how > >> >it would ever work with a 3.5. There aren't any additional connector > >> >pins > >> >inside for a 3.5, not power, nothing. > >> > > >> >Anyone know anything about them? > >> > > > I looked the up manufacturer part number and found the product on newegg. > It comes with a power adapter and has a port on the back next to the USB > port. > -- > Tracy > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78czio6YjXEQi_bnAjYkL+=hz5fwtmtcjevmyn7hjkr...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Docking station or just plain stupid?
Once you stick the 3.5 in, there's no room for an additional cable. -Lew Schwartz On May 25, 2013 12:33 PM, "Tracy Pearson" wrote: > Lew Schwartz wrote: > > >I bought one of these: > > > >http://www.nextwarehouse.com/item/?617328_p3g > > > >got a good price, and, like a dope, let it sit on my shelf until I > >actually > >needed it. Works fine w/2.5 mini drives, but damned if I can even see > >how > >it would ever work with a 3.5. There aren't any additional connector > >pins > >inside for a 3.5, not power, nothing. > > > >Anyone know anything about them? > > > > > > > >-Lew Schwartz > > > > That description suggest it should have a12 volt power supply, though it > didn't say it right out. Do you have a spare power brick laying around? > -- > Tracy > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78dxmr9aQDHQ5T5RWs1nYy=4tuzrXPyS-zekTQv=dsm...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Docking station or just plain stupid?
The photo on the link plainly shows a 3.5" drive inserted. -Lew Schwartz On May 25, 2013 12:27 PM, "Virgil Bierschwale" wrote: > I'm fixing to buy one of these or something similar. > > http://www.cyberguys.com/product-details/?productid=65039 > > Your's does not appear to have both drive capabilities whereas this one > does, I think > > > -Original Message- > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Lew Schwartz > Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 11:04 AM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: [NF] Docking station or just plain stupid? > > I bought one of these: > > http://www.nextwarehouse.com/item/?617328_p3g > > got a good price, and, like a dope, let it sit on my shelf until I actually > needed it. Works fine w/2.5 mini drives, but damned if I can even see how > it > would ever work with a 3.5. There aren't any additional connector pins > inside for a 3.5, not power, nothing. > > Anyone know anything about them? > > > > -Lew Schwartz > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78cmq4d8uvt_5+jyzam9fmtbtpotek2pq07mbjtxw7j...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Docking station or just plain stupid?
I bought one of these: http://www.nextwarehouse.com/item/?617328_p3g got a good price, and, like a dope, let it sit on my shelf until I actually needed it. Works fine w/2.5 mini drives, but damned if I can even see how it would ever work with a 3.5. There aren't any additional connector pins inside for a 3.5, not power, nothing. Anyone know anything about them? -Lew Schwartz --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78f5o+deghsfw_8syc+cyvy-goejgnnnbcfi6_xayie...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VP6: Program too large
Try erasing all the fxp's. Sometimes they contain a lot of trash and wind up getting pulled into the compliand. -Lew Schwartz On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Kevin Cully wrote: > There is something the Ed wrote in the ProFox downloads section that helps > set memory allocations. > > I don't think it has anything to do with the size of the PRG, but has > something to do with the running of the Foxpro program and the allocated > memory for the program. > > Just a foggy guess. > > -Kevin > > > On 04/26/2013 01:54 PM, Desmond Lloyd wrote: > >> Perhaps a challenge... >> >> Have an old 4000 line program written in VFP6. Have just spent about an >> hour cleaning up some spaces, removing tabs etc. Even used Ultra Edit to >> cleanup some of it. Got part way through and when I went to compile I am >> now getting a "Program to large error". >> >> There have been no additions to the file text wise, so I am at a complete >> loss! >> >> Any ideas/Suggestions? >> >> Regards, >> Desmond >> >> >> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- >> multipart/alternative >>text/plain (text body -- kept) >>text/html >> --- >> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78dEbBb083NnaXAxe9J67-LrZbwD45yPLjHQZbFJZuY6=a...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
lianja
Is this the real deal? lainja.com -Lew Schwartz > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78cc3s_2iKy3z2x1aBu8PJXs8Zohih19Pt6=ro71b0x...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Why am I getting a value returned on this query?
Sounds like a good idea Vince. I'd go with it. -Lew Schwartz On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox) < foxh...@information-architecture.com> wrote: > The magic "Send" button clarifies all! (I need an "UnSend" button many > times...) > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Vincent Teachout >wrote: > > > DOH! PEBCAK error. Error: I.D.10-T > > > > Sometimes you have to put your code in front of your disbelieving peers > > before you are able to clearly see your stupidity. > > > > Gee, maybe if I want to know what the highest CFIELD1 is, I should be > > using WHERE CFIELD1 instead of WHERE CLAIMNO. > > > > > > > > > > Vincent Teachout wrote: > > > >> I'm having a problem caused by what I think is a false result. > >> > >> I have cfield1 that has values up to "201200478" > >> > >> When I run the following query: > >> > >> SELECT MAX(cField1) as TopVal FROM claims WHERE claimno like '2013%' > >> > >> I expect to get a null result, as no cfield1 starts with '2013'. > >> > > > > > > __**_ > > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > > Subscription Maintenance: > http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/**listinfo/profox< > http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox> > > OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/** > > listinfo/profoxtech <http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech> > > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/**search/profox< > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox> > > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/**byMID/profox/5170623A.1070800@** > > taconic.net< > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5170623a.1070...@taconic.net> > > > > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of > > the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the > > obvious. > > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78fuxjbiz9uxs9eup3x3xggzn-3btyaukueptdjhsb7...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Error running second instance of EXE
You may have to introduce code that steps through the form to find out what it's doing just prior to the error. Another try is to fake NOFILTER by going with select into along a different path. Are the workstations working from their local disks or is a network path the default? -Lew Schwartz On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, John J. Mihaljevic < john.mihalje...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm working on a system (VFP 6.0) that works just fine for one user. But > when a second user is in the system and tries to run a form that the first > user is on, they were getting the following message: > > Error loading file - record number 23. Form1 members>. Loading form or the data environment : File access is > denied > > I looked at the environment for the form and saw that a few tables were > being opened with Exclusive=.t. I changed that to .f. (as they didn't need > exclusive access anyway) and that error went away. > > But now, they're getting a more simple error: > > File access is denied. > > I see that two cursors are being created in the Load event of the form. And > since this is VFP 6.0, they're not read-write (I don't believe cursors > could > be read-write back in 6.0). Could that be the problem I'm having? If so, is > there any way to work around this? > > Thanks very much, > > John > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78dHHuY0pntsWoNXA22dsqWAdP66vHP15d1+6=0qqcg...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Anyone know audio processing lingo?
Nah. I'm a descriptive, not prescriptive linguist. We went and broke it ourselves. -Lew Schwartz On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote: > And - did you ever get a chance to Study Broken-English??? > > Or - maybe it Broke after you were done with your Studies... > > :-) > -K- > > > -Original Message- > From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Lew > Schwartz > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 12:33 PM > > I've studied all flavors starting with Old English; my specialty was Middle > English. The distinctions between British, American and Canadian are new > developments in my world. > > -Lew Schwartz > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Ted Roche wrote: > > > British English, American English, or Canadian English, eh? > > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Allen > wrote: > > > > > English or American English ? lol > > > Al > > > > > > -- > > Ted Roche > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFuU78cyDRW=2tbs_tm4qnzk2ycz+efbjinq6yvrosaoon+...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Anyone know audio processing lingo?
I've studied all flavors starting with Old English; my specialty was Middle English. The distinctions between British, American and Canadian are new developments in my world. -Lew Schwartz On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Ted Roche wrote: > British English, American English, or Canadian English, eh? > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Allen wrote: > > > English or American English ? lol > > Al > > > -- > Ted Roche > Ted Roche & Associates, LLC > http://www.tedroche.com > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78d5qj5zeiibz_dujxp9zm1pep9ts_ru08jpdspgmgb...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
