Protecting your emails.
Dear Fellow Australians, Perhaps people who want to protect their emails could do what Channel Nine do and add a "Disclaimer" as a footnote to their transmissions. He is the wording of theirs: "Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the addressee by return email. This email transmission is the property of Nine Network Australia Property Limited and any information it contains is legally protected. This footnote also confirms the email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses." I think that is pretty fair warning and others can take a leaf out of their book. Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
Re: From Crikey - Hoser/Hulls/Jail/Hulls in contempt
Dear Allan,
You used the word "goy" which means "Yiddish
name for a Gentile" where "Yiddish" means "A language spoken
by Jews of E. Europe and N. America, based on a Hebraicised Middle German, with
an admixture of French and English" and "Gentile" is "not a
jew; heathen ; pagan; applied by the Mormons to all those who are
not of their faith".
Somebody is confused. I believe the Barons were acting
for themselves and all Englishmen and women when they opposed the tyranny of
King John. The document used to guarantee rights was meant to last
"for ever" and truly occupies the place in history as the most
important charter of liberty.
Would-be tyrants want the Magna Carta scrapped and Australian
judges now declare Magna Carta to be "obsolete" - which is the
greatest act of treachery in this or any other century.
If you want your freedom, you are going to have to fight
yourself - without the aid of the Barons-of-old.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
-----Original Message-From:
Gopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Tuesday, 5 June 2001 5:47Subject: Re: From Crikey -
Hoser/Hulls/Jail/Hulls in contemptJohn,The Magna Carta was not written for the GOY (human
beings), I don't consider that we humans are slaves, the Elite deem all goy
to be.. In 1215 it was the Barons, the wealthy, who put the strangle
hold on King John. (have you ever seen the wealthy do anything to lift the
lot of the poor, if the poor benefit along the way then that is
coincidental.Allan At 10:27 AM 04/06/2001 +1000,
you wrote:
Dear Raymond,Not
entitled to Trial by Jury in Victoria???I don't believe
that. Do you believe that?Don't surrender your
Rights.You are a FREEMAN, as it says in Magna Carta - or do you
consider yourself aSLAVE?John.-Original
Message-From: Raymond Hoser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Monday, 4 June 2001
8:51Subject: Re: From Crikey - Hoser/Hulls/Jail/Hulls in
contempt>No I'm not - not here in
Vic.>-->___>>Raymond
Hoser - Australia's leading corruption>author is now facing jail
for telling the truth - go to:>http://www.smuggled.com/VGS1.htm>for
details.>Please publicise this matter as widely as
possible.>___>>Raymond
Hoser(AAC)>PO Box 599>Doncaster>Victoria
3108>Australia>Phone: (Within Australia) 0412
777211>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.raymondhoser.com>
Re: From Crikey - Hoser/Hulls/Jail/Hulls in contempt
Dear Raymond, Not entitled to Trial by Jury in Victoria??? I don't believe that. Do you believe that? Don't surrender your Rights. You are a FREEMAN, as it says in Magna Carta - or do you consider yourself a SLAVE? John. -Original Message- From: Raymond Hoser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, 4 June 2001 8:51 Subject: Re: From Crikey - Hoser/Hulls/Jail/Hulls in contempt >No I'm not - not here in Vic. >-- >___ > >Raymond Hoser - Australia's leading corruption >author is now facing jail for telling the truth - go to: >http://www.smuggled.com/VGS1.htm >for details. >Please publicise this matter as widely as possible. >___ > >Raymond Hoser(AAC) >PO Box 599 >Doncaster >Victoria 3108 >Australia >Phone: (Within Australia) 0412 777211 >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.raymondhoser.com > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
Fw: Freedom! Canada
-Original Message- From: DataMorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sunday, 3 June 2001 0:30 Subject: Freedom! Canada >Hello My Fellow Freedom Champion, > >I would like everyone to know that my book "Freedom! Canada" has now been >printed. Please pass this message on to your contact list. You can order >copies of the book "Freedom! Canada" for $10. each from; > >Jim Townsend >PO Box 63093, 2604 Kensington Road NW >Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4S5 > >You can also view the book on line at >http://members.home.net/datamorf/alberta.htm and I encourage you to pass the >link on to every Canadian you know. This information is of importance to all >of us. > >I posted the book on a web page with a talking parrot to read the text. If >you have a sound card, you can sit back, relax and listen to the web page >being read to you by a text to speech avatar. > >The book provides a synopsis of Canadian History. It explains how we as >Canadians have been sold out time and again by representatives of the >'Crown', a foreign power from Britain, and how this has lead up to the >Fraudulent Income Tax Scheme now being perpetrated on the Canadian people by >this illegitimate foreign power who use our own 'Star Chamber Court System' >to enrich their Treasury. > >I have tried to keep the book concise and easy to read for those with not >much time on their hands. I hope after reading my book, you will write your >MLA and MP for some answers to their abuses of our 'Constitution' and our >Freedoms. If you are heading into court with Revenue Canada, please read a >copy of the book. It might help you to also have it handy with you as a >reference. > >'In Toto', we can make a difference. But it will take our collective >efforts. Hopefully this will help. Take care and God Bless. > >Cheers, Jim > > > >http://members.home.net/datamorf >Townsend, Jim >403 228 - 2798 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
Re: Making the changes needed.
Dear Joe, A fellow named Thomas Jefferson said, "I believe trial by jury to be the ONLY anchor yet imagined by man which can hold a government to the principles of its constitution.". Please note the word "ONLY" (upper case added by me for emphasis). John. -Original Message-From: succeed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Wednesday, 30 May 2001 17:44Subject: Re: Making the changes needed. Dear John, No, I don't take any medication. But I get annoyed when people mislead others on any issue, in particular on such important issues. There are two ways of dealing with the problem, not including open revolution, so why keep emphasise that there is ONLY one way? This can only mislead people and cause some to close their mind to the truth, and I am sure that this is not your intention. Joe Bryant
Re: Making the changes needed.
Dear Joe,
Have you run out of Valium?
John.
-Original Message-From:
succeed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Cc:
John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Monday, 28 May 2001 20:13Subject: Making the changes
needed.
Greetings Sharree,
John Wilson copied his reply to you - on to
me.
Juries are one way not the only way.
John is keen on the jury approach and doing a lot of damage
demanding that it is the only way. Reality is that the more
people that are doing something, then bigger the numbers of people will
become informed.
Juries could do the job but for two major problems.
1. the courts deny the right to trial by jury on
most matters. 2. the people are so dumbed down that most
have no ability to serve as a juror, most don't know right from wrong. These
problems are as difficult to overcome as changing the whole system of
government. Why repair a worn-out tyre when it should be replaced with
a new one?
The problem, if a country has one and most do, is found in
the rules that limit government, the Constitution. Either it
is an effective constitution or it is defective. Most sound
great but in reality are an open door to power hungry politicians doing the
bidding of the money power.
A good Constitution sets proper, reasonable and
enforceable limits on government and a means whereby the people can, readily
and without personal expense enforce the rules.
If you are not getting justice then look to your
Constitution for its inadequacy.
Australia is in just as big a mess as anywhere, all a
result of the money power as it everywhere else.
Recently we declared an Australian Declaration of Right
2001, attached for your information. We are working on a Draft Fresh
Constitution which is all but complete. Only available by in hard copy
by post Kit $20A postal order. The big problem is getting the
population to know what we are doing that alone understand it.
We have step by step plans to overcome this problem, not
for publication.
Unfortunately our biggest enemy is people like John Wilson
who constantly tell people that so-in-so is the ONLY way, this attitude is
epidemic in the 'freedom' movement in Australia.
Every thing you do will have an effect, in the end it will
be an informed public that will bring the changes needed.
But people rely on leadership and ideas so if you have some ideas go
for it, but heed the above before deciding which way will have the greatest
effect.
Through history the people have never done anything, it
has always been the few, when the time is right (informed people) the few
get a result with the weight of the people.
I know you have a bill of rights, so did soviet
Russia. There is only one way to guarantee people liberty and justice
and that is by placing clear limits on government. A bill of rights
limits the people. Limited Government and the means whereby the people
can readily enforce the limits without personal costs is, to use Johns words
the ONLY way. But there is much informing of the general public to be
done in the mean time, information about the power of juries and a host of
other issues.
I often quote from your Declaration of
Independence, to which I would take the liberty of
adding three word, highlighted in blue:--
"We
hold these truths to be self-evident,
that all men are
created equal under the law, that they are
endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these
are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights,
governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the
consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes
destructive of these ends, it is the
right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new
government.
Check out the following web sites. www.alt3.net www.ja.olm.net/succeed www.killgst.com
Regards Joe Bryant.
The Right to Trial by Jury.
Dear Fellow Australians, Today, I have have filed an application for Special Leave to Appeal (File No: S 110 of 2001) against the Judges of the New South Wales Supreme Court continuing to deny me, an ordinary citizen, the right to trial by jury to determine my action against the Crown for being denied the right to trial by jury when the Chief Judge at Common Law, James Wood, single-handedly tried, convicted and sentenced me to jail for 2 years without parole, on 9th November 1999. The action against the Crown is intended to have a jury decide whether Australians have the right to trial by jury. Judges maintain that we do not and that Magna Carta is obsolete. Let the people decide? Not if the judges can stop it. Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
Re: J.A.I.L. In Australia?
Dear Ron, I appreciate your email. The USA Constitution is probably the best known in the world. However, the Australian Constitution is the best in the world because our ancestors took yours and dissected it. Then they combined all the best features of English Common Law and formulated our Constitution. Ours has the advantage of being based on being "under the Crown" and the Crown is bound to the Coronation Oath - which, in turn, commits the Queen/King the Holy Bible and to "execute Law and Justice with Mercy in all her (his) Judgments". The "Law" means English Common Law of magna Carta, Bill of Rights, Petition of Rights, Habeas Corpus, etc.. The Queen, at the Coronation, accepts the Holy Bible as "royal Law", ie: that all Law adheres to the 2 Commandments of "love God" and "love your neighbour". King Alfred in 891 A.D. decreed that all English Law conform to the Commandments. Therefore, anyone (including judges) swearing the Oath of Allegiance "to be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty", is bound by in the same way. Perhaps that is a long-winded way of saying that Australian heritage is the same as the American experience - with the execept that the Americans broke away, by way of the War of Independence, and hurriedly had to put together their own Bill of Rights in order to maintain the protections they enjoyed "under the Crown". Our problem is that Judicial Corruption has become endemic with the Banks in absolute control of our Parliaments and Courts. All we have to do is fight our enemies with what we already have, ie: English Common Law. This requires persistence because, eventually, Truth and Justice will re-emerge. The concept of J.A.I.L. is excellent and should be pursued throughout the world. In America, you have a head-start because I get the feeling that Judicial Honesty is more immediately achievable. Perhaps it is your greater love of country and more willingness to fight to protect it and your children. Americans are in the vanguard. God give you strength. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. -Original Message-From: Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Sunday, 27 May 2001 18:00Subject: J.A.I.L. In Australia? Dear Mr. Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have pursued your website and find the information not only interesting, but not so different from the situation that we have here in the United States. The difficulty I am having is that people tend to think that "that's a foreign country, and does not affect here." While the JAIL4Judges objective pertains with the U.S. judges being held to the standards of United States Constitution, we are more and more receiving mail from foreign countries asking about how J.A.I.L. may be of help with their country. Sorry to have to say, but reasonably expected, I have no knowledge of the "Constitutions" of any country outside the U.S. However, I am getting the distinct feeling that many foreigners are not only watching what we are doing here, but are considering how J.A.I.L. may be adapted to their respective countries. This is good thinking, but requires the self-imagination and leadership of the right person to strike out and run with it "foreign." In writing this initiative, I never once gave a thought of this as adaptable to foreign interests, as my "world" is the United States. My eyes, mind and spirit are evermore being awakened as to my shortsightedness. Where does one begin? How can one do something about a country in which he knows nothing about? I will let you enlighten me on that point. All I can say is that it appears that J.A.I.L. (in whatever form it may arise) is the need of the world. But I feel so very helpless. Are you the man for Australia? Instruct me, please. Ronald Branson [EMAIL PROTECTED] PS - I note that you requested to be on our mailings over a month ago. By responding to this email, I am concurrently blindly c.c.'ing many others who may be in touch with you on this. God bless you Mr. Wilson. Let me know your thoughts. - Original Message - From: John Wilson To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 6:21 PM Subject: Spreading the word about Judges Dear Sirs, I am having a battle with Australian Judges over the right to Trial by Jury. Is it possible to send my bulletins to someone in your organization for perusal and possible relaying to your mailing list? John Wilson. http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au
Fw: Corruption author to be jailed - see below:
-Original Message- From: Raymond Hoser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: AA Media Release For Immediate Publication <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sunday, 27 May 2001 10:00 Subject: Corruption author to be jailed - see below: >ROB HULLS IS NOW TRYING TO JAIL LEADING CORRUPTION AUTHOR >FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - MAY 27 2001 >PLEASE CONTACT ALL YOUR LOCAL MEDIA AND ENSURE THAT THIS IS WIDELY >REPORTED -THANKS >In an Australian first and in a step reminiscent of Stalinist Russia, >Victoria's Attorney General Rob Hulls has instructed his government to >initiate proceedings against Australia's leading corruption author >Raymond Hoser with a view to having him imprisoned. >Hulls has just issued writs against Hoser and his publishing company >Kotabi over their 2 year-old books Victoria Police Corruption 1 and 2, >(which between them total 1,536 pages). >These books were best-sellers before Hulls ordered them off the >bookshelves last year in all Australian states (a year after >publication). >Now two years after publication and with total sales over 10,000 copies, >Hulls has again instructed his lawyers to sue Hoser and his publisher >for "contempt". >The charge of "contempt" alleges that Hoser and publisher have >"scandalized" the Victorian courts. >The same allegation was pursued unsuccessfully against Hoser in a >related defamation action in April 2001, when Justice Bill Gillard ruled >the application as improper and awarded costs in Hoser's favor. >Several months later, Hoser signed off on an agreement not to pursue >these costs on the basis that all actions against him would be dropped. >Now, six months later, Hulls has broken the agreement and initiated >fresh legal action against Hoser and his publisher. >If the case is successful, Hoser will once again be jailed for doing >nothing more than telling the truth. >The same thing happened to Hoser in 1997 when he was improperly >convicted of perjury. >In relation to that matter, the main prosecution witness John Connell >later admitted that he'd deliberately lied to have Hoser jailed. >Hoser has yet to receive compensation for the four months he spent >behind bars. >The new Hulls writ cites various statements in Hoser's books about >Magistrates and judges as potentially scandalizing the courts. >Hoser notes that the statements referred to have long been on the public >record, and in the main are derived from the government's own official >transcripts. >Furthermore, late last year the Hulls side conceded that the relevant >sections of the books (as cited in this latest writ) were totally true >and correct. >Hoser's lawyer Alex Tees also notes that an important part of the >British legal system is that the courts should be open to public >scrutiny and comment. >This same view was upheld in an unsuccessful contempt action against >Trevor Torney (known as Torney ex parte) in the High Court last year and >other similar cases. >However in a compete repudiation of the Westminster tradition, Hulls is >now seeking to gag all public debate in relation to the courts. >This latest attempt at censorship comes in the immediate wake of the >resignation of Hulls' personal friend and colleague, County Court Judge >Robert Kent, who was recently convicted of tax charges. >Hoser notes that the delays on Hulls' part in terminating Kent's >employment by the court, "scandalized" the court far more than all that >appears in Hoser's books. (Kent ended up resigning on 24 May following a >series of newspaper editorials calling on him to do so). >Perhaps Hulls himself should be charged with scandalizing the court. >The first round in the battle is at the Melbourne Supreme Court this >Wednesday (30 May 2001), when Hulls' taxpayer funded legal team will be >applying to the court to have Hoser fined and jailed and to effectively >close-down Kotabi Publishing, who up until now have been regarded as one >of Australia's leading independent publishers. >Hoser and his publisher note that this latest case is yet another >attempt to unlawfully ban a pair of important corruption books - all the >more significant as large chunks of information from within the books >have since been re-reported in the mainstream papers as well as other >books including Underbelly 4 by Silvester and Rule and No Justice by >Bowles. >The irony is that here in Victoria, Bank Robbers and drug pushers are >allowed to roam free, while the government is plying it's vast resources >into having a man jailed for doing nothing more than documenting the >truth. >All media are urged to attend and report on this important free speech >case next Wednesday. >Copies of the writs (as issued) will be posted at: >http://www.smuggled.com/VGS2.htm >by end of today's date. >Further inquiries: please phone: >Kotabi Publishing: 03 9857-4491 >Kotabi's lawyers: >Duker and Associates, >Alex Tees: >Mobile: 0409-813-622 >Raymond Hoser: >0412-777211 >For details of the earlier actions by Rob Hulls and the Victorian >Government Solicitor (and relevant
Re: the basis for it all
Dear Sheree, Thank you for the email. J.A.I.L. is an important venture but to think that new laws are necessary is wrong and playing right into the hands of the enemy because, by people accepting that premise, means that what the banks and judges are doing is legal --- it is not. The laws are there to hammer these criminals - they will pretend they are not, but that is their game of deceit. Educate the public? Sure! Twelve at a time. Refusing Discovery is just as much a crime as the Fraud and Corrupt, in the first place. Juries are our ONLY means of achieving Truth and Justice - as well as enforcing our existing Laws. Those Juries must be FULLY INFORMED (Please look at http://www.FIJA.org ) The Conspiracy to Defraud and Subjugate is very much a reality. It is so well entrenched, that even the public are unaware that there could be any other alternative administration. It is so well entrenched, that the public are frightened of change. A few years ago, radio talk-back personality told me, on air, "Don't bother to fight. The bad guys have already won." (Brian Wilshire on station 2GB, Sydney). But the fighting is not over until the last Patriot is dead. Yes, educate the public - but the media are on the side of the enemy. Having rallies and protests are exercises in futility. Educate the public, in the Courts, 12 at a time. Those 12 must be fully informed jurors. That is the only way to inform, while bringing about Redress and Remedy. Don't be conned into wasting energies on political campaigns to influence the masses - they will end up by having committees and leaving the responsibility someone else - and that "someone else" becomes someone else, again. Better that ten, or a hundred, or a thousand individuals take their individual case to a Jury for an individual resolution which will have the authority of the Court to enforce Right. (Sorry, Sheree, for the "soap box"). Yours sincerely, John Wilson. -Original Message- From: Sherree Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, 28 May 2001 4:35 Subject: the basis for it all >Sir, > >I am a J.A.I.L. member from Florida. >Over the past months I have been researching the banking codes, such as >title 12 and title 50. >The Judges, and banks are denying public access to these, and are >violating their own laws. >The corruption is world wide, power and money, it is all part of the big >picture for world takeover by >a select group. >Please give me your comments, as I take the time to read your book on >line, and explore your site. >Also, we must find a way to educate the general populace, we need >education, but how do we reach the people...they are shutting us up, >with imprisonment if we persist. > > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
Re: THE ARCHBISHOP
Good on you, Phillip, Get stuck into the Archbishop - and while you're about it, put Queen Elizabeth 11 in her place, too. Having a clergyman renege on the responsibilities and duty of the Office of the Executive of our Government is rubbing salt into the wound. The Coronation Oath and the Oath of Allegiance are apparently meaningless to these people. Might well you say "God Save the Queen" because the Archbishop doesn't seem inclined to do so. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, 23 May 2001 8:39 Subject: THE ARCHBISHOP >Would you please note that correspondence to the Australian Monarchist League should be addressed us at: P O Box 1068, Double Bay NSW 1360. > >I have come under a great deal of criticism for daring to oppose the nomination of and acceptance by Archbishop Peter Hollingworth for the highest office under The Crown of Governor-General. > >If I, as National Chairman of the Australian Monarchist League, must be muted on these issues, then what worth is our democracy. > >I believe that there is no transgression in justified criticism, even against members of the Royal Family. Rather, the fault is in slavishly paying obeisance. > >For the edification of those interested I append below a copy of a letter I had written to the Archbishop. I have had no reply, not do I anticipate one. > >With regards, > >Philip Benwell >National Chairman >Australian Monarchist League > >The Most Rev'd Peter Hollingworth AO OBE >Archbishop of Brisbane >Etc. > >Your Grace, > >We must admit to concerns over Your Grace's open dalliance with support for a republic which we believe could well taint you for the high office to which you are to be installed. We would like to clarify matters for you are to be our Governor-General and we are to be your People. > >We note that at the Constitutional Convention you did not simply observe and comment on matters pertaining to the Christian nature of our Constitution, but was actually a very active participant, presenting reports from working groups and seconding motions and you are even reported as having said that the Australian People "would be fools" not to vote for a republic. > >We remain disturbed at your inference at the Convention that the term 'God' in the Preamble is meant in a generic sense whereas the actual wording is 'Almighty God'. > >Whilst it is true that you abstained from voting on the final day of the Convention, we note that you consistently voted along with the republicans in favour of the 'Turnbull' Model in rounds one to four on the 12th February 1998. > >The final motion on that day was "That, if Australia is to become a republic, this Convention recommends that the model adopted be the Bi-Partisan Appointment of a President Model" to which you voted in favour. > >It was only on the vote on the following day, the 13th February 1998 for the motion: "That this Convention supports in Principle, Australia becoming a republic" that you abstained. You have since been reported as saying that this was because you felt the model proposed to be unstable. If this was so, why then did you not vote against it? > >We are disappointed that our calls for prayers for The Queen on special occasions, the last being for Her Majesty's 75th birthday, have never been acknowledged by you or your staff. We have also over time received numerous concerns from monarchists that their communications to you have been ignored. > >It would be to the benefit of us all if these concerns could be clarified. Notwithstanding this, we wish to assure you that as Governor-General you will have our complete loyalty. > > >Philip Benwell > > > > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
Fw: H.M. the Queen Letter to
-Original Message- From: Kenneth Costello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, 21 May 2001 19:52 Subject: Fw: H.M. the Queen Letter to >Hello John > >Wondered if you had received this. > >Ken Costello > > >- Original Message - >From: Ron Clifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 10:01 PM >Subject: H.M. the Queen Letter to > > >> Hello Ken, >> Strange how things work !! I was conversing with you yesterday and >> after that I received this from another fellow in Alberta, Canada. The >> website address's I previously mentioned are DetaxCanada.org and >> Patriotsonguard.orgWith patriots we are presently delivering Flyers >> in the city of Calgary to eliminate the Flouride in the water system. >> This program really works. In Canada I believe we can be recognized for >> the stepping down of a City Police chief, 4 court judges, Police being >> transferred to other locations, even a Banker moving to another town. >> We have to use our own Media to deliver the Truth !!! >> Blessings, >> : Calvin-Ronald: Clifford >> (Ron) >> P.S. >> I belive that what you sent me yesterday will be posted on >> Patriotsonguard.org in a few days. Here Fred has a counter on his >> website and he can track the # of hits he gets and where they come >> from. He tells me that the RCMP and Ottawa, (the Federal Gov't) are in >> there 4-5 times a day. You should write Fred a note. >> Ron >> >> Sir Robin Janvrin, KCVO, CB >> Principal Private Secretary to Her Majesty The >> Queen >> Buckingham Palace >> London >> >> 23 March 2001 >> >> >> You were kind enough to invite a letter of >> amplification to accompany >> our petition to Her Majesty. Thank you. >> >> The Treaty of Nice raises issues of major >> constitutional importance. It >> directly threatens our rights and freedoms, and >> undermines oaths of >> loyalty to the Crown. Such fundamental matters >> cannot be considered >> merely the stuff of day-to-day politics. They >> directly concern the >> Crown, the constitution and every British subject, >> including generations >> yet unborn. >> >> We find ourselves living in exceptional times, >> which call for >> exceptional measures. Hence our petition to Her >> Majesty, which >> exercises rights unused for over 300 years - >> clause 61 of Magna Carta, >> which were reinforced by article 5 of the Bill of >> Rights. >> >> As you know, the wording of clause 61 says: >> ...and, laying the >> transgression before us, petition to have that >> transgression redressed >> without delay...And we shall procure nothing from >> anyone, directly or >> indirectly, whereby any part of these concessions >> and liberties might be >> revoked or diminished; and if any such things has >> been procured, let it >> be void and null. >> >> We have petitioned Her Majesty to withhold the >> Royal Assent from any >> Bill seeking to ratify the Treaty of Nice because >> there is clear >> evidence (which we shall address in a moment) that >> it is in direct >> conflict with the Constitution of the United >> Kingdom. It conflicts with >> Magna Carta, with the Declaration and Bill of >> Rights and, above all, >> with Her Majestys Coronation Oath and the Oaths of >> Office of Her >> Majestys ministers. Every one of these >> protections stand to this day, >> which is why they are now being invoked by our >> petition. >> >> Ultimately, our supreme protection is Her Majestys >> obligations under >> the Coronation Oath. The Queen has solemnly >> promised to govern the >> peoples of the United Kingdom according to the >> Statutes in Parliament
Re: (((mayday-announce))) Trial by Jury denied = Justice denied.
Dear Wolter,
Gaudron J (+ Callinan J) dismissed my application for leave to
appeal against Hidden J's denial of trial by jury.
Toohey J (+ Kirby & Dawsson JJ) dismissed my application
for leave to appeal against Supreme Court of NSW's Master Greenwood's ruling
that a variable rate of interest "is indeed certain".
John.
-Original Message-From:
Wolter Joosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Cyberjustice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Friday, 18 May 2001 22:03Subject: Re: (((mayday-announce)))
Trial by Jury denied = Justice denied.
Allow me to quote the High court of
Australia:
“If the courts of common law do
not uphold the rights of the individuals
by granting effective remedies, they
invite anarchy, for nothing breeds
social disorder as quickly as the sense
of injustice which is apt to be
generated by the unlawful invasion of a
person’s rights, particular when
the invader is a government
official”
(Gaudron,
Toohey JJ, Plenty v Dillon &Ors HCA\91)
Kindest
regards,
Wolter
Joosse
----- Original Message -
From:
John
Wilson
To: Cyberjustice
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 8:05
AM
Subject: Re: (((mayday-announce)))
Trial by Jury denied = Justice denied.
Dear John,
I am not using barristers or solicitors. The one
time I did, they not only failed to represent me they supported the
judge's contention that Magna Carta was "obsolete". I sacked
them on leaving the court. They are incompetent and
cowardly.
Trial by Jury is guarantied by many charters and
statutes. Under the imperial Acts Application Act, anyone (eg:
judges) who offends against an Imperial enactment is liable to 5 years
imprisonment - and the trial must be by jury. 5 years for each
offence against all of those Imperial enactments amounts to a long, long
time in jail.
That is the Law and that is Justice.
The judges have nowhere to hide.
Trial by Jury is the single most important issue in
history because, without it, there is tyranny and tyranny leads to
war.
So, it doesn't matter which court a
"freeman" is faced with, the right to trial by jury is
his.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
-Original
Message-From: Cyberjustice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Tuesday, 15 May 2001 18:06Subject: Re:
(((mayday-announce))) Trial by Jury denied = Justice
denied.
Hi we are suing a barrister and lawyer
in the Victorian County Court and currently have a Jury. They the
lawyers we are suing are fighting tooth and nail to have the matter
struck out and or have the jury removed.
Check out www.cyberjustice.com.au
Regards
John Tuczynski
- Original Message -
From:
John Wilson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001
8:23 AM
Subject:
(((mayday-announce))) Trial by Jury denied = Justice
denied.
Dear M1,
Without Trial by Jury, no
individual or group will achieve anything.
A Court consists of a Judge and
a Jury - and, if a Judge is employed by any party in the
proceedings, the Jury are sole judges of every "part and
parcel" of the case.
On Thursday 19th July, 2001 at
the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Queen's Square, Sydney,
NSW, Australia, a single Judge will hear a Notice of Motion to
deny Trial by Jury in the matter of John Wilson -v- St. George
Bank Limited & State of New South Wales.
The issues in the case are Bank
Fraud (contracts involving variable interest rates are void,
under Common Law, because of uncertainty + banks create money
"out of thin air") and Judicial Corruption (Judges
from the Supreme Court to the High Court conceal Bank
Fraud). Therefore, the conspiracy between Banks and Judges
i
JUDICIAL TREASON.
Dear Fellow Australians, In a DEMOCRACY, the People Rule - from the Greek "demos" (people) and "kratos" (rule). In a DEMOCRACY, SOVEREIGNTY - Supreme Authority - lies with the People. In a DEMOCRACY, there is GOVERNMENT by the People, of the People and for the People. In a DEMOCRACY, there are 4 ARMS OF GOVERNMENT - the Executive, House of Representatives, Senate and the Courts. In a DEMOCRACY, a COURT is constituted by a JUDGE and JURY guaranteeing Trial by Jury - Trial by the People. HOWEVER, in Australia Judges have assumed the Power of dispensing with the Laws and Rights of the People - in particular, Trial by Jury. Thereby, on their own initiative, undermining Democracy by taking away the Right of the People to NULLIFY BAD LAWS which have been passed by the other 3 Arms of Government. Without Juries, Judges have ABSOLUTE POWER in the COURTS. Thomas Jefferson said, "The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body - working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noisless step like a thief over the field of jurisdoction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will beccome as venal and oppressive as the government from wich we separated.". It was the overwhelming WILL of the PEOPLE, at a National Referendum in 1988, not to exclude Trial by Jury from Contempt of Court and Courts Martial which would have altered Section 80 of the Australian Constitution. And yet Judges deny Trial by Jury for Contempt of Court - thereby granting themselves absolute power to conceal their own incompetence, corruption and treachery. Judges also deny Trial by Jury where there are issues of BANK FRAUD and JUDICIAL CORRUPTION. To witness JUDICIAL TREASON in action, please attend the Supreme Court of New South Wales on Thursday 19th July 2001 where Judges are denying Trial by Jury for just such Bank Fraud and Judicial Corruption in John Wilson -v- St. George Bank Ltd & State of New South Wales and in John Wilson -v- State of New South Wales where the issues are Unlawful and Malicious Prosecution and the Validity of Taxation Laws. Without Trial by Jury to NULLIFY, the Executive (the Queen having abdicated the role which she swore to honour in the Coronation Oath) offers no avenue to redress and remedy wrongs, while the House of Representatives and the Senate (being controlled by Banks, Multinational Corporations and Vested Interest Groups) make laws contrary to "the Peace, Order and Good Government of the People". Trial by Jury - 19th July, 2001 - Supreme Court, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
Fw: Plan On Being In New York This Sat. 19th.
-Original Message-From: jail4judges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: www.jail4judges.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Friday, 18 May 2001 6:26Subject: Plan On Being In New York This Sat. 19th. Final Notice You've only got two days left! Plan to be in New York Flash - Flash - Flash Since the prior publication of the below flyer, Attorney Gary Zerman, J.A.I.L.'s Right-hand man, is currently, at this moment, on his way flying to New York, and will be on the radio waves tomorrow promoting this event. (If you have a radio program and would like to have Gary on your program [preferably tomorrow], call Gage at (518) 282-9818, or Loeber at (518) 872-2154. He will be in the New York area for one week.) He will also be the surprise guest speaker at the event this Saturday. Everyone in and about the east coast area, do all within you power to be present and to meet Gary Zerman. All the details you need to make any contacts are on the below flyer. - Ron Branson 1st Annual New York Lock-Up Organizing Meeting of NY-JAIL4Judges May 19, 2001 9A.M. - 5P.M. Registration and Coffee at 8a.m. Rotterdam Motor Inn 2788 Hamburg St. Schenectady, NY 12303 (518) 355- or (888) 371-3316 From NYS Twy Exit 25, take Rt 7 west 1/2 mile, then Rt 146 north 1 mile. J.A.I.L. Judicial Accountability & Integrity Legislation To finalize proposed legislation To organize a J.A.I.L. group for New York State To elect officers and form committees To create a NY-JAIL Policy/By-Laws To set goals for next meeting "...when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and provide new guards for their future security..." Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776 Are you fed up with Judicial Tyranny? Want to do something about it? Check out... www.jail4judges.org Join us on Saturday, May 19th. It may be the opportunity of a lifetime. $20 Donation covers the cost of the meeting room, morning coffee & buffet lunch. SEND RESERVATIONS TO NY-JAIL4Judges - P.O. Box 193 - Knox, NY 12107 Bill Gage (518) 282-9818 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ron Loeber (518) 872-2154 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Room Reservations (518) 355- or (888) 371-3316
Re: Appeal in Supreme Court
Dear Masood, You will not receive justice from judges. Please look at the attachment in which I outline the need for trial by jury. Please use any of it in your affidavits to support a Notice of Motion to Requisition Trial by Jury. In the High Court there is provision for a Jury - the Jury Box is there in Canberra. Apply under section 77B of the Judiciary Act 1903 which says that "The High Court may, in any suit in which the ends of justice appear to render it expedient to do so, direct the trial with a jury of the suit or of an issue of fact, and may for the pupose make all such orders, issue all such writs and cause all such proceedings to be had and taken as the Court thinks necessary, and upon the finding of the jury the Court may give such decisions and pronounce such judgment as the case requires." Also say, in the Affidavit that under section 3 of the Supreme Court Procedure Act 1900 guarantees you Trial by Jury "in any action" if there is no "consent by both parties" to have the matter heard "by a judge without a jury". Halsbury's Laws of Australia says that this consent must "be clear and unequivocal" or else the Court has no jurisdiction. A case in Queensland's Court of Appeal, handed down 15 May 2001, that ordered to "set aside the verdict and judgment in favour of the defendant; .. that there be a new trial of the action; ... that the defendant pay the plaintiff's costs of the first trial" because the judge dispensed with the jury saying "the trial judge's ruling took away the right of the applicants to have the decision made by a jury". Merrin & Anor v Cairns Port Authority (2001) QCA 178. Regards, John. -Original Message- From: Masood Falamaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, 16 May 2001 19:53 Subject: Appeal in Supreme Court >Dr John Wilson > >Thank you for the time that you put to consider this case. > >As you are aware I had an appeal before a panel of 3 judges. My appeal was >dismissed, and leave to appeal was refused. > >I have already filed an application for special leave to Appeal in the High >court. > >My question is that if I try to put an appeal in the Supreme Court that the >judgment of the above panel of 3 judges to be reviewed by others what >procedure is to be followed. The fact is that JA Handley prepared the >minutes of judgment and it appears that he made serious mistakes in his >judgment. Unfortunately the other two judges agreed with him. > >Looking forward to hearing from you ASAP. > >Regards > >Masood >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
Fw: ** Before The U.S. Sup. Ct. (PT. II - The Speach)
-Original Message-From: jail4judges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: www.jail4judges.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Wednesday, 16 May 2001 17:51Subject: ** Before The U.S. Sup. Ct. (PT. II - The Speach) J.A.I.L. News JournalLos Angeles, California May 15, 2001 Before The U.S. Supreme Court (PT. II - The Speech) JAIL4Judges participated in a major demonstration in Washington, D.C. on May 6th in front of the United States Supreme Court. Below is the speech given by military Captain Dennis M. Hatcher, now JAILer-In-Chief of Georgia, and since promoted to serve as our Associate J.A.I.L. Commander-In-Chief. JUSTICE RALLY SPEECH Washington DC May 6, 2001 Dennis M. Hatcher representing JAIL4Judges Good afternoon, Ladies and Gentlemen. I thank all of you for coming here today for this important rally for the cause of justice. My name is Dennis Hatcher, and I represent an organization called JAIL 4 Judges. I am here today at the behest of the founder of JAIL, Ron Branson, who is in Los Angeles and could not be with us. But be assured his spirit is among you, whispering the message of change in your ears. I am the JAIL4Judges Chairman for the State of Georgia, where it is often heard, "When it comes to justice, the "yoke's" on us... y'all". What is JAIL4Judges? For many of you, this is the first time you have heard the name, but I assure you, we've been around for a few years. JAIL stands for "Judicial Accountability and Integrity Legislation" and as it's name implies it demands that the corrupt and inept judges in this country be held accountable for their misdeeds. Very simply, it means that the People of this nation are demanding the same standards of accountability from the judiciary as the judiciary demands of us. It means that We the People are taking back the power and authority that we have granted them for far too long. It means we will wield the sword of justice on those who have for so long used that sword to defend abuse and corruption. (Some shouts of "yes, yes!") Everyday, in nearly every city, in every state, across this nation good and innocent citizens feel the sting, feel the agony of the lash called "Justice." If any one of you here today decided to go out and play with the life of the person next to you; if you had black uniformed thugs behind you as you took your neighbor's life savings and through the use of extortion told them they must continue to pay you their hard-earned money; and just to show that person you meant business you tied his or her hands, threw them in to a freezing room with no water, toilet, bed or food, subjected them to unspeakable humiliations; if you told them they could not speak to you let alone protest what you were doing to them; and then, when you were through toying with them, you tell them that the real reason you are doing this is for their own good, or even more importantly for the good of society, how long would you get away with it? Well, I tell you now, if you just happen to be a judge in the United States, you will always get away with it! (Shouts of support, "Yes, yes!" and "That's right!"). Now, some of you might be thinking to yourselves, "No, judges can't do that, because if they did, there are methods of punishing them." For those of you who think that organizations such as the State Bar for attorneys and Judicial Qualification Commissions for judges are there for you, you are sadly mistaken. The truth is these institutions of American jurisprudence are instruments not of self discipline, but rather, no discipline! These organizations send the message that what the judiciary does to us, the People of this nation, is OK. Of the thousands of complaints received each year by the State Bars and Judicial Commissions, less than 3% result in disciplinary action. And of that tiny percentage, how many result in anything more than a letter of caution? Less than one half of one percent! What does this tell us about the state bars' and judicial commissions' opinion of We the People? That 97% of us are wrong! That when 97% of us smell a stinking diaper, that we are not smart enough to know what it is! (Laughter and applause from the crowd) Two weeks ago, this (Pointing to the building) Supreme Court upheld the right of police to handcuff and arrest citizens for minor traffic violations. This means you will have your life turned inside out because you forgot to signal a lane change, or forgot to buckle your seat belt, or, God forbid, you forgot to turn your headlights on during a rainstorm. What on earth were our justices thinking? What was on the minds of these bastions of logic? Someone needs to tell all of us why these (Still pointing at the Supreme Court building) protectors of rights didn't say, "No way will we allow the police to r
Re: Before The U.S. Sup. Ct. (PT. I - The Event).
. -Original Message-From: jail4judges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: www.jail4judges.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Wednesday, 16 May 2001 17:00Subject: Before The U.S. Sup. Ct. (PT. I - The Event). J.A.I.L. News JournalLos Angeles, California May 15, 2001 Before The U.S. Supreme Court (PT. I - The Event) JAIL4Judges participated in a major demonstration in Washington, D.C. on May 6th in front of the United States Supreme Court. Below is the report on this event as given by military Captain Dennis M. Hatcher, now JAILer-In-Chief of Georgia, and since promoted to serve as our Associate J.A.I.L. Commander-In-Chief. In the interest of brevity, we have pared down the report using ellipsis, and in the interest of readability, have supplied connecting words. You will find this report very inspiring and motivating to get involved in freedom for your country. Sunday May 6 We arrived at the Supreme Court Building at approximately 9:30 am. I introduced myself to the people who were already setting up the posters and podium. One dedicated group had brought a utility van completely outfitted for the maintenance and assembly of demonstration equipment. At precisely 9:45am, President Bush and his motorcade drove past approximately 15-20 feet away from our demonstration site. If he looked our way, he saw people assembling signs and meeting each other. At around ...1:00 p.m. ...demonstrators were gathering in large numbers and starting to march at random along 2nd Street, the road that separates the Supreme Court Building from the Capitol Building. At this time, I took partial control of the marchers and using a bullhorn, began to shout slogans and messages to all who would hear. Within a very short time, the chant "JAIL for Judges" became the rallying cry. I pointed the bullhorn at the Capitol Building and implored visitors and tourists to join our demonstration. Instantly, crowds of people were drawn to the street, and many crossed over and picked up a sign. Several foreign tourists asked me about our demonstration. They seemed very impressed about what we were doing. I personally made the acquaintance of one Russian and one Nicaraguan, and there were many others. A Japanese reporter took a J4J card and asked if she and her crew could film us. Naturally, I said yes. As the chanting became more aggressive, more D.C. policemen arrived and positioned themselves on the steps of the court house. I counted ten policemen in the front, but more were probably guarding the sides and rear of the building. Later, there would be threats of arrest from these policemen and verbal confrontations about our J4J T-shirts. All during this one hour period prior to the speeches, tour buses and bands of foot tourists paraded by us, taking thousands of photos. At least one high school tour group received a lecture from their teachers on the right to demonstrate, and several students asked me about our cause. I simply told them that if we do not act now, then they will inherit our failures. At 2:00pm, rally organizer David Grossack addressed the crowd of approximately 115 demonstrators. He made several comments in addition to a general introduction. One of David's most important points was the mention that he and his group are fighting corruption in the courts by taking up the causes of those who have been bankrupted by attorneys and then left to finish their cases without representation when the money ran out. He got a good reception from the crowd. He then introduced me as the first speechmaker and plugged J4J as one of the fastest growing anti-immunity organizations in the nation. I had a distinct advantage by being the first to speak as I had the attention of the crowd. ... I presented my prepared speech (See Part II for the full speech) After the speech, I was complimented on it's content and I and the other JAILers began to pass out J4J cards in large quantities. ... At this point, at approximately 3:00 p.m., I attempted to sit on the steps of the court house, as I was weary of my crutches (I had to have surgery on my leg) and was greatly fatigued in my legs. I gently lowered myself onto the bottom step. I was there approximately 15 seconds when one of the police guards walked up behind me and told me I could not sit there, and that I would be arrested if I did not get up. Indignantly, I as
Annexation of the Australian Nation to a Referendum.
Dear David, The media are not telling the people of the annexation - which, of course, is part of the "mushroom" philosophy. To have its full impact, your campaign needs a national referendum. There is a national election in the air - an ideal time to put the question of choice between the present system and what the Principality of Caledonia offers. John Wilson.
Re: The Modern Day Thought Police
. -Original Message-From: jail4judges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: www.jail4judges.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Tuesday, 15 May 2001 19:09Subject: The Modern Day Thought Police J.A.I.L. News JournalLos Angeles, California May 15, 2001 For a beautiful navy blue T-shirt with "J.A.I.L." on the back and www.jail4judges.org large and visible over the pocket, imprinted in a bright yellow-gold lettering, send your check payable to J.A.I.L. for $11.95 plus $4 S&H. (Discounts on volume quantities.) Wear them to your next courthouse function and watch the reaction. The Thought Police The Associated PressMay 11, 2001OLDSMAR -- A boy was taken from his elementary school in handcuffs afterhis classmates turned him in for drawing pictures of weapons. ... ``There were some drawings that were confiscated by the teacher,'' OldsmarElementary School Principal David Schmitt said. ``The children were in nodanger at all. It involved no real weapons.''Still, Schmitt refused to discuss details of the boy's case.``All I can tell you is it was a threat . . . against students,'' he said.``Nobody in particular, but students in general.``We just need to get it through kids' heads that there are certain thingsyou don't say and there are certain things you don't draw,'' he said.The boy was handcuffed by school police for his safety, according toPinellas County School District spokesman Ron Stone.``That's normal procedure in a situation like this,'' Stone said. ``Theprimary concern was to make sure we get appropriate services for thechild.''Making threats is not unusual for students in elementary and middleschools, said Nancy Zambito, a director of school operations for the schooldistrict.Depending on the severity of the threat, Zambito said, the outcome for thestudent can be a number of things.Those possibilities range from disciplinary action by the school _ likesuspension or expulsion _ to being arrested, or taken to a hospital underFlorida's Baker Act, which allows for the involuntary commitment of peoplewho threaten or try to hurt themselves or others.``It's nothing unusual and we address them all seriously because, ofcourse, we don't know,'' Zambito said. ``And in most cases, our prime goalis to let those students know what is appropriate to say and what is not,and how to be angry and cute and funny without alarming people.'' Copyright © 2001, South Florida Sun-Sentinel Have we now become to sensitive that one can no longer draw a picture of a knife or a gun without turned in and hand-cuffed? Are we not only one step away from being arrested for exercising our thought processes? All in the name of "art," what is being promoted at taxpayer expense? An upside down broken cross floating in a bottle of urine! One man urinating in the mouth of another man, etc., etc. This is called expression of thought, but drawing on a sheet of paper an outline of a knife or gun is not, and you can be hand-cuffed and carted off. I can see it now, "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the law says no person can carry a piece of paper with a drawing of a gun, and the defendant was obviously in possession of such a drawing. The law clearly states such should be condemned. What say you?" Did not even Christ say, let him that hath no sword, sell his cloak and buy a sword? Oh, no, not even a drawing of a sword, but a real sword. Horrors. -Ron Branson- J.A.I.L. is an acronym for Judicial Accountability Initiative LawJAIL's very informative website is found at www.jail4judges.orgJAIL proposes a unique new addition to our form of government.JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!JAIL's is spreading across America like a fast moving wildfire!JAIL is making inroads into Congress for federal accountability!JAIL may be supported at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA 91603To subscribe or be removed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-Groups may sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join Open forum to make your voice heard [EMAIL PROTECTED] "..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams "There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who isstriking at the root." -- Henry David Thoreau <><
Re: (((mayday-announce))) Trial by Jury denied = Justice denied.
Dear John,
I am not using barristers or solicitors. The one time I
did, they not only failed to represent me they supported the judge's contention
that Magna Carta was "obsolete". I sacked them on leaving the court.
They are incompetent and cowardly.
Trial by Jury is guarantied by many charters and
statutes. Under the imperial Acts Application Act, anyone (eg: judges) who
offends against an Imperial enactment is liable to 5 years imprisonment - and
the trial must be by jury. 5 years for each offence against all of those
Imperial enactments amounts to a long, long time in jail.
That is the Law and that is Justice.
The judges have nowhere to hide.
Trial by Jury is the single most important issue in history
because, without it, there is tyranny and tyranny leads to war.
So, it doesn't matter which court a "freeman" is
faced with, the right to trial by jury is his.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
-Original Message-From:
Cyberjustice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Tuesday, 15 May 2001 18:06Subject: Re: (((mayday-announce)))
Trial by Jury denied = Justice denied.
Hi we are suing a barrister and lawyer in the
Victorian County Court and currently have a Jury. They the lawyers we are
suing are fighting tooth and nail to have the matter struck out and or have
the jury removed.
Check out www.cyberjustice.com.au
Regards
John Tuczynski
- Original Message -----
From:
John
Wilson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 8:23
AM
Subject: (((mayday-announce)))
Trial by Jury denied = Justice denied.
Dear M1,
Without Trial by Jury, no individual or
group will achieve anything.
A Court consists of a Judge and a Jury -
and, if a Judge is employed by any party in the proceedings, the Jury
are sole judges of every "part and parcel" of the
case.
On Thursday 19th July, 2001 at the
Supreme Court of New South Wales, Queen's Square, Sydney, NSW,
Australia, a single Judge will hear a Notice of Motion to deny Trial by
Jury in the matter of John Wilson -v- St. George Bank Limited &
State of New South Wales.
The issues in the case are Bank Fraud
(contracts involving variable interest rates are void, under Common Law,
because of uncertainty + banks create money "out of thin air")
and Judicial Corruption (Judges from the Supreme Court to the High Court
conceal Bank Fraud). Therefore, the conspiracy between Banks and
Judges is proven.
That is why Judges, unlawfully and
maliciously, deny Trial by Jury.
Absolutely any cause, including
Globalization, can only be determined by the People in the form of
Juries in Courts.
However, Judges deny Trial by
Jury.
Thursday, 19th July, 2001
9:30 am in Macquarie Street, Sydney at Queen's
Square.
What is M1's position? Will M1
defend the Right of Trial by Jury?
Yours sincerely,
John
Wilson.
Re: Trial by Jury denied = Justice denied.
Dear Ilya, Common Law is not voided. Variable interest rate loan contracts are illegal under Common Law. The banks are knowingly deceiving their customers. The judges are knowingly concealing the fraud committed by the banks. If you want, you can look at my website of http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au The media have intentionally kept the information from the public. This is conspiracy taken to its ultimate level. All that is needed to smash the corruption is a jury. That is why judges unlawfully and maliciously deny the right to trial by jury. If you are near Sydney on Saturday 19th May at 2:30 pm. have a look in at the Sydney Town Hall Square when there will be an "Australian Declaration of Right 2001". Yours sincerely, John Wilson. -Original Message- From: Ilya Dinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, 15 May 2001 15:34 Subject: Trial by Jury denied = Justice denied. >Hi >I am a passionate bank hater. Thanks for your email. > >I was wondering if you could plz give me more info re. >the issues of this court hearing.Eg, how could Common >Law be voided in relation to Variable Interest rate >Contracts, even if Bank Fraud was proven in court? >Thanks so much in advance, >Ilya >--- John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Dear M1, >> >> Without Trial by Jury, no individual or group will >> achieve anything. >> >> A Court consists of a Judge and a Jury - and, if a >> Judge is employed by any party in the proceedings, >> the Jury are sole judges of every "part and parcel" >> of the case. >> >> On Thursday 19th July, 2001 at the Supreme Court of >> New South Wales, Queen's Square, Sydney, NSW, >> Australia, a single Judge will hear a Notice of >> Motion to deny Trial by Jury in the matter of John >> Wilson -v- St. George Bank Limited & State of New >> South Wales. >> >> The issues in the case are Bank Fraud (contracts >> involving variable interest rates are void, under >> Common Law, because of uncertainty + banks create >> money "out of thin air") and Judicial Corruption >> (Judges from the Supreme Court to the High Court >> conceal Bank Fraud). Therefore, the conspiracy >> between Banks and Judges is proven. >> >> That is why Judges, unlawfully and maliciously, deny >> Trial by Jury. >> >> Absolutely any cause, including Globalization, can >> only be determined by the People in the form of >> Juries in Courts. >> >> However, Judges deny Trial by Jury. >> >> Thursday, 19th July, 2001 9:30 am in Macquarie >> Street, Sydney at Queen's Square. >> >> What is M1's position? Will M1 defend the Right of >> Trial by Jury? >> >> Yours sincerely, >> >> John Wilson. >> > > >__ >Do You Yahoo!? >Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices >http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
Billions for Bankers
Dear Fellow Australians, An extremely good website from Canada explains the banking debacle. It is http://www.somagardens.com/billions/b-cov-f.htm John Wilson.
Re: ** Court Overthrows Our Constitutional Republic
. -Original Message-From: jail4judges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: www.jail4judges.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Sunday, 13 May 2001 15:45Subject: ** Court Overthrows Our Constitutional Republic J.A.I.L. News JournalLos Angeles, California May 12, 2001 For a beautiful navy blue T-shirt with "J.A.I.L." on the back and www.jail4judges.org large and visible over the pocket, imprinted in a bright yellow-gold lettering, send your check payable to J.A.I.L. for $11.95 plus $4 S&H. (Discounts on volume quantities.) Wear them to your next courthouse function and watch the reaction. California High Court "Overthrows" Our Constitutional Republic HIGH COURT REJECTS 'JURY NULLIFICATION'By Peter BlumbergDaily Journal Staff Writer May 08, 2001 SAN FRANCISCO - For the first time, the California Supreme Court on Monday affirmed the duty of trial judges to replace jurors who refuse to apply the law in criminal cases. In the case of a juror who told a trial judge he could not in good conscience vote to convict an 18-year-old of committing statutory rape with his 16-year-old girlfriend, the high court unanimously ruled that the juror violated his oath to uphold the law and was properly removed from deliberations. People v. Williams, S066106 Although it has long been recognized that a jury effectively has the ability to disregard, or nullify, the law, Monday's opinion marked the first time the Supreme Court has directly confronted whether trial judges may remove jurors who disclose during deliberations that they will not apply the law as instructed by the court. "Jury nullification is contrary to our notion of justice for all and permits both the prosecution's case and the defendant's fate to depend upon the whims of a particular jury, rather than upon the equal application of settled rules of law," Chief Justice Ronald George wrote. "A nullifying jury is essentially a lawless jury." But in a companion case also decided Monday, the justices warned trial judges not to be too quick to replace a juror who disagrees with his peers on the evidence, even if the other jurors complain that he's not participating in deliberations. In People v. Cleveland, S078537, the court unanimously agreed the trial judge in a robbery case should not have removed a juror who was the lone holdout for acquittal without stronger evidence of his refusal to deliberate. Monday's decision overturned the defendant's conviction. Taken together, the two rulings made clear that jurors cannot be removed simply for disagreeing over the evidence but that they must be removed when they are unwilling to follow the law. Lawyers said they were not surprised by the outcome in Williams because judges have long denounced jury nullification, which was imported into American jurisprudence from English law as a means of protesting unjust laws. Today, debate over jury nullification occasionally crops up in the context of jurors refusing to impose a life sentence under the 1994 "three strikes" law on a defendant found guilty of a minor third felony offense. Prosecutors say Monday's opinion should end any debate over the legality of nullification. "We view it as an appropriate, unequivocal statement by the courtthat the rule of law will prevail, that jurors must take the law as given by the trial judge even if they disagree with it," said Deputy Attorney General Karl Mayer. California law has consistently condemned any instruction inviting jurors to reject a guilty verdict if applying the law would lead to an unjust result. In 1998, the Judicial Council adopted a jury instruction that requires jurors to notify a trial judge if any jury member expresses an intention to disregard the law.Mayer acknowledged that Monday's opinion won't stop individual jurors from reaching conclusions based on their own notion of right and wrong, but it does put lawyers and judges on notice that open defiance of the law will not be tolerated. "The jurors take an oath before they consider a case," he said. "If they engage in nullification, the are effectively violating the oath." Emeryville jury consultant Howard Varinsky, who specializes in high-profile criminal cases, said he would never expect an appellate court to approve of jurors disregarding the law. He said good defense attorneys know not even to use the term "jury nullification.""When we're trying to get a jury to nullify, we do it by appealing to thei
Re: Upcoming Seminar in Cranbrook, B.C. Please pass on
. -Original Message-From: Donald Neuls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Donald-Lorne: Neuls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Sunday, 13 May 2001 3:10Subject: Fw: Upcoming Seminar in Cranbrook, B.C. Please pass on - Original Message - From: Ron Clifford Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 7:39 AM Subject: Upcoming Seminar in Cranbrook, B.C. Please pass on Common Law Seminar and Workshop You are invited to a Seminar in Cranbrook, B.C. Date: May 26th. Time: 9:00 A.M thru 6:00 P:M This is your opportunity to meet and hear two of the most well known educators of Common Law in Canada today Learn about How our Rights and Freedoms are slowly being taken away from us, Why and Who is behind it all. How we can stop paying income taxes we are not subject to, and Most important is What we must do to keep Canada ours. Eldon Warman will teach the meaning and origins of Common Law from the beginnings, to the Magna Carta, and up to the present day. Eldon is a walking encyclopedia of information, and guarantees to startle you with facts that are not taught in our schools or media. Fred Kyburz will explain a very effective program he developed over the past ten years. This Program is a very simple method that makes government officers and bureaucrats obey the Law. Fred will explain what is currently happening, and what we must do to stop the ever increasing Tyranny in Canada. This seminar is well worth your time. If you are determined to keep the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Magna Carta come and learn from Eldon and Fred. For the location of this event please email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or call : 403-931-4058 Deposit required to hold your attendance , or pay in advance. Cost of Seminar if paid in advance: $50.00 for registrant or $75.00 for registrant and spouse at the door: $ 60.00 for registrant or $ 85.00 for registrant and spouse attendance by pre-reservation only ( cutoff : 10:00 P.M. Friday May 25th. ) Send payment to : Ron Clifford c/o The Canadian Highlander Suite 188, 132 Shawville Blvd. Calgary, Alberta T2Y 2Z7 Ceud Mile Failte - ( 1000 Welcomes )
Re: Anna Bergstrom et al
Dear Colin, I am certainly willing to contact Mr. Geoffrey Robertson - the "Catch 22" of Judges vetoing actions against themselves would probably attract such a person. What are his contact details? John. -Original Message- From: Colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, 11 May 2001 18:17 Subject: Re: Anna Bergstrom et al >Jjohn i tried http://www.google.com/ (this is a good engine) > >put in Geoffery Robertson lawyer > >AND > >http://www.google.com/search?q=Geoffery+Robertson+lawyer&btnG=Google+Search > > >regards > > Col > > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
Re: Anna Bergstrom et al
Dear Rob, Thank you for the email. I am certainly willing to seek assistance to break the barricade the judges have set up to frustrate justice. Redress and remedy (promised in the Bill of Rights 1688) can only come through a jury because of the Mafia of Judges who are as ruthless and malicious as the worst criminals and traitors. I have already approached Noam Chomsky who wrote back expressing sympathy but no surprise at the conduct of the Australian Judiciary and that he would add my case to his file on Australia. He suggested Civil Liberty groups - but they are run by lawyers who maintain that judges are right even if they are wrong. This is the wall and there is no way around it. Either we break through it to get issues of freedom to tribunals of the people to decide and order the appropriate action, or the wall will encircle us with armed guards snuffing out any resistance. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. -Original Message- From: Robert Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, 10 May 2001 10:23 Subject: Anna Bergstrom et al > Dear Mr Wilson >Have been following your problem via the neither page, and am now writing >with a suggestion which may help. I have recently read "The Justice Game" >by Geoffery Robertson, which if you havent read it will well be in your >interest to study. Further to that I am quite sure that Robertson's >philosophy would let him help you, and certainly the lady imprisonned up >North. I am not sure how Robertson, who is a Q.C. can be contacted, but >his publishers are Vintage, Random House, 20 Vauxhall Bridge Road, London >SWIV 2SA. I will have a play around through some browsers I use, and will >let you know if I can get an email address for him. Best Regards, Rob Rae > > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
Re: Judicial Corruption, Bank Fraud & Trial by Jury.
Dear Brian,
I appreciate the
gesture.
My next court expense is to file in the High Court for leave
to appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision (7th May) to dismiss my
application for leave to appeal against Justice Sully's ruling that he, without
a jury, would hear the Crown's Notice of Motion to dismiss my case for unlawful
imprisonment - thereby preventing it getting to a jury for a jury to
decide if Australians have the Right to Trial by Jury.
John.
-Original Message-From:
Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Thursday, 10 May 2001 8:24Subject: Re: Judicial Corruption,
Bank Fraud & Trial by Jury.
Hi John
Good to hear from you.
This is news to me. It's the first time I have
heard the post office question my stamp, which I acquired from them some
time ago.
I am cutting your sixth tape as I write. I will
send it today.
This will I believe complete your order of sis
tapes.
Let me know if you receive them all
OK.
John I know you have had a number of very large
expenses lately, so I would like to take the opportunity to help you is some
small way.
These first six tapes will therefore be free of
charge.
Kind regards
Brian
- Original Message -
From:
John
Wilson
To: Brian
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 1:58
PM
Subject: Re: Judicial Corruption,
Bank Fraud & Trial by Jury.
Dear Brian,
Thanks for the replacement video.
You had the Post office confused with your stamp (is
it called "franking") but I was happy to pay on picking it up.
They said they had never seen such a thing and the nearest to it was for
the recipent to apply for a licence.
John.
-Original
Message-----From: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Monday, 7 May 2001 11:45Subject: Re: Judicial
Corruption, Bank Fraud & Trial by Jury.
Dear John
Thanks for the message
John.
I have sent you some more videos. More
in the mail today.
When I have snt you number six, as per
your order, I will send you an invoice for the $100.00 as
quoted.
Regards
Brian
- Original Message -
From:
John Wilson
To: Neither Public List
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001
4:26 PM
Subject: Judicial
Corruption, Bank Fraud & Trial by Jury.
Dear Fellow
Australians,
This morning in the Supreme
Court of New South Wales was another evasion of trial by
jury.
Justice David Kirby (brother of
High Court's Justice Michael Kirby) was given the usual
hammering about the necessity of trial by jury because, amongst
many arguments, (a) s.3 of the 1900 Supreme Court Procedure Act
says that only by "consent of both parties" can there
be a judge without a jury, (b) pleadings of the Crown can only
be tried by a jury, (c) no parliament can make a law to take
away the rights of the people, (d) if a judge denies trial by
jury then that is an offence punishable by 5 years
imprisonment, etc., etc.
I will get the transcript on the
email as soon as it is to hand.
Justice Kirby ended by saying
"I'm not denying you trial by jury. Take it up on the
day."
He set 19 July 2001 as the day
for a "one-day" hearing of my case against the St.
George Bank & the Crown where Justice Carolyn Simpson, on 4
August 1991, heard and, on 30 November 1991*, awarded a Writ of
Possession without a jury against my constant insistance that
she had no jurisdiction. The Writ was exercised by the
bank on 11 January 2001. We have since got the house back after
getting $431,000 to the bank. Which, when added to the $230,000
+ paid to the bank in the last 4 years, amounts to over $661,000
the St. George Bank acquired for them creating $380,000
"out of
Trial by Jury at Risk.
BANK FRAUD, JUDICIAL CORRUPTION & TRIAL BY JURY Banks and Judges fear Trial by Jury, ie: Trial by the People. The question is: Do the People fear the Banks and the Judges? Be at the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Queen's Square, Sydney at 9:30 am on Thursday, 19th July, 2001 when the Banks, Judges and their lawyers will try to dispense with Trial by Jury to dismiss the case of John Wilson -v- St. George Bank Limited & State of New South Wales (ie: the Crown) - File No: 20714/00. The matter is about Bank Fraud, where banks issue fraudulent contracts (ie: loan contracts that are invalid because variable interest rates render them void for uncertainty) and create their own money "out of thin air". It is also about Judicial Corruption, where judges conceal those crimes while conducting proceedings without a Jury, which is unlawful and malicious. Without Trial by Jury, the Banks, through "evil counsellors, judges and ministers" (ala Bill of Rights 1688), will continue to defraud and enslave the People of Australia. Trial by Jury, granted by Magna Carta and entrenched by countless statutes, is the "Palladium (safeguard) of Freedom" and, as Thomas Jefferson said, "the only anchor yet imagined by man which can hold a government to the principles of its constitution". Whats sort of country do you want? - Written by J. Wilson, http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au
Re: The bank in Tony Rigg's house.
G'day Ron,
Please tell whoever you know, in Sydney and surrounds, to turn
up at the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Queen's Square, Sydney on Thursday
19th July to support TRIAL BY JURY, which the banks and judges are moving
against in order to protect their own corruption and treachery.
The case is John Wilson -v- St. George Bank Limited &
State of New South Wales (No: 20714/00).
The conspiracy between the banks and the judiciary to defraud
and oppress are the grounds of my case.
The banks and the judges fear Trial by Jury.
The question is: Do the people fear the banks and the
judges?
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
-Original Message-From:
Ron Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Tuesday, 8 May 2001 17:51Subject: Re: The bank in Tony Rigg's
house.
Dear John
Thanks for all the news, sorry to hear of your financial
costs.
If Ihave a win on my case, I will do what I
can.
Ron
- Original Message -----
From:
John
Wilson
To: Ray
Platt
Sent: Tuesday, 8 May 2001 10:07
AM
Subject: The bank in Tony Rigg's
house.
Dear Ray,
I am only now reading the April
Strategy.
The story on Tony Rigg and how the CBA
were leasing out his house is quite believable.
When I took back my place from the St.
George Bank I had difficulty in re-establishing the phone number.
I phone Telstra to be told that the line was a silent number in the name
of R. Lawless who is the legal officer for the St. George
Bank.
Also, two weeks before settlement, the
bank sent in Grace Bros removalists to take away all our furniture and
possessions and put into storage a few suburbs away. For this the
bank charged me $12,000 and I have just given Grace Bros a further
$8,500 to have it brought back, ie: an extra burden of $21,500 on
top of the paying out figure to St. George. A nice little touch of
viciousness, wouldn't you say?
I have already sent out an email detailing the
$431,000 paid to St. George in settlement for their creating the money
"lent" to me which, when added to the money I had paid them
since September of 1995, brings their profit to in excess of $650,000
for creating money "out of thin air". Fraud of
unimaginable proportions, when one considers the banks do it to
everyone.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
The bank in Tony Rigg's house.
Dear Ray, I am only now reading the April Strategy. The story on Tony Rigg and how the CBA were leasing out his house is quite believable. When I took back my place from the St. George Bank I had difficulty in re-establishing the phone number. I phone Telstra to be told that the line was a silent number in the name of R. Lawless who is the legal officer for the St. George Bank. Also, two weeks before settlement, the bank sent in Grace Bros removalists to take away all our furniture and possessions and put into storage a few suburbs away. For this the bank charged me $12,000 and I have just given Grace Bros a further $8,500 to have it brought back, ie: an extra burden of $21,500 on top of the paying out figure to St. George. A nice little touch of viciousness, wouldn't you say? I have already sent out an email detailing the $431,000 paid to St. George in settlement for their creating the money "lent" to me which, when added to the money I had paid them since September of 1995, brings their profit to in excess of $650,000 for creating money "out of thin air". Fraud of unimaginable proportions, when one considers the banks do it to everyone. Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
Re: Human Rights
Dear John/Ed, "Dirty tricks"? I realy don't know if the "gremlins" are intercepting at the transmission or the receiving ends of emails. I must tell you about a funny incident at the Supreme Court, yesterday. A friend and I were about to get on an almost full lift but a short woman stopped me from entering by putting her hand out towards me and saying, "No." While doing this she turned to a Sheriff, who was standing next to her, and said, "Do you know who that is?". Before the doors could close, I said, "Yes, I'm the one who doesn't like corrupt judges.". You win some, you lose some. The important thing is to hang in there. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. -Original Message- From: John Hurley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, 7 May 2001 18:25 Subject: Re: Human Rights >Dear John ! > My Smartchat server appears to be blocking the Human >Rights email that you have listed. Am trying to send this reply to you in >an attempt to get the server working again. > Ed Hurley >-Original Message- >From: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Sunday, 6 May 2001 8:48 >Subject: Re: Human Rights > > > > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
Court of Appeal denies Trial by Jury - again.
Dear Fellow Australians, In the Court of Appeal, this morning, applying for Leave to Appeal against Justice Brian Sully's ruling that a Notice of Motion to dismiss my case against the Crown for Unlawful Imprisonment can be determined without a jury, Justices Kenneth Handley and Roderick Meagher said Sully was right in law and dismissed my application. Firstly, I asked both Handley and Meagher to disqualify themselves because their involvement in the case already. Handley had made a judgment in support of Justice Peter Hidden's ruling that Magna Carta was "obsolete" and there was no right to trial by jury (see attachment) and Meagher had been outvoted by Heydon and Sheller, JAs, when the Court of Appeal released me from jail in Feb 2000 (see attachment) - ie: Meagher wanted to keep me in jail for the full 2 years "without parole". Heydon and Sheller also would not overturn the conviction - thereby supporting Chief Judge at Common Law James Wood who conducted proceedings without a jury to imprison me. This issue of Trial by Jury is the most important single issue in the fight for Freedom and Democracy - as it has always been through out history. Don't forget the 19th July when a judge - without a jury - in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Queen's Square, Sydney will hear a Notice of Motion to dismiss my case against the St. George Bank & the Crown. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. HANDLEY C of A 24-8-98..doc MEAGHER C of A 29-2-00.doc
Re: Human Rights
. -Original Message- From: Colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Mr Mo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Greg Tudehope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Jim Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; katrina hatton <[EMAIL PROTECTED], don cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], ThePremier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tanya Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Alex Amankwah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; richardgarnaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Carmel Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tony Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; judy mastwyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Janet Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mabel Gargan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Diane Gundersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Graham Keir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Selwyn Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Martin Essenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Pamela Valenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Ray Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, 7 May 2001 9:08 Subject: Human Rights >Peter Gargan >12A >Traders Lane >117 >Anderson St >Cairns. >Ph 40321272 >The Editor >Cairns Post . > >Dear Sir, > >On the 17th April 2001, Anita Bernstrom was ordered imprisoned for >three months for refusing to submit to a judgment of the Planning and >Environment Court. She is in Stuart Creek in Townsville. > >One would not think that to disobey a judge was a terrible crime >sufficient to take a mother away from her 10 year old son, and put her >beyond help. The judge ordered that even if she paid the fine, she had >to stay there. > >Anita Bernstrom applied to Supreme Court in Townsville for her freedom >under the habeas corpus but because another judge in Brisbane once >again sitting alone had decided in a case where a citizens freedom was >not at stake, that the reason why she said she should be released did >not apply to her, The Court refused her habeas corpus. > >Anita Bernstrom believes the Planning and Environment Court has >trespassed upon her land, and she is imprisoned even though the Cairns >City Council is quite happy to allow her to use her land as she is. >She is convinced that the neighbour who prosecuted her, is simply >wanting to buy her land. > > She does not believe a man can, without taking the advice of 12 people >as a jury, lock a mother away from her son, to enforce his will. She >believes this is a trespass to her person and is absolutely determined >not to eat anything until this question is satisfied in her mind. > >She is a very determined woman. She is now refusing to eat, and she is >resisting all efforts to persuade her to do so. She asked me to write to >you and tell you why. > >She is not eating any food because she does not believe any man should >be allowed to trespass on her property at Freshwater and order Police >to trespass on her body, unless a committee of 12 totally impartial >persons from the community have decided that her ownership of the land >and her body is not sufficient to protect her. She wants a jury to >decide if that belief is a crime worthy of jail. &
Judicial Corruption, Bank Fraud & Trial by Jury.
Dear Fellow Australians, This morning in the Supreme Court of New South Wales was another evasion of trial by jury. Justice David Kirby (brother of High Court's Justice Michael Kirby) was given the usual hammering about the necessity of trial by jury because, amongst many arguments, (a) s.3 of the 1900 Supreme Court Procedure Act says that only by "consent of both parties" can there be a judge without a jury, (b) pleadings of the Crown can only be tried by a jury, (c) no parliament can make a law to take away the rights of the people, (d) if a judge denies trial by jury then that is an offence punishable by 5 years imprisonment, etc., etc. I will get the transcript on the email as soon as it is to hand. Justice Kirby ended by saying "I'm not denying you trial by jury. Take it up on the day." He set 19 July 2001 as the day for a "one-day" hearing of my case against the St. George Bank & the Crown where Justice Carolyn Simpson, on 4 August 1991, heard and, on 30 November 1991*, awarded a Writ of Possession without a jury against my constant insistance that she had no jurisdiction. The Writ was exercised by the bank on 11 January 2001. We have since got the house back after getting $431,000 to the bank. Which, when added to the $230,000 + paid to the bank in the last 4 years, amounts to over $661,000 the St. George Bank acquired for them creating $380,000 "out of thin air". The judges are concealing my evidence of the Reserve Bank of Australia's own figures that Australian banks create for themselves over $20 billion every year. It really is the greatest swindle in the history of mankind, when one realizes that the banks are doing this all over the world. The judiciary are co-conspirators because of their hyjacking the courts to protect these master criminals. So, does anyone want to come to the Supreme Court at Queen's Square, Sydney on Thursday 19 July to see for themselves what sheer and total corruption is? That's when all this will come to a head. It's confrontation time. The rights of the people -v- the power of the banks. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. * This is after, on 9 November 1999, Chief Judge at Common Law James Wood tried, convicted and sentenced me to "2 years imprisonment without parole" without a jury. A Court of Appeal released me after 3 months and 3 weeks but refused to overturn the conviction. Now I am suing the Crown for unlawful imprisonment - and, again, the judges are denying me trial by jury. That is in the Court of Appeal on this coming Monday, 7 May. JW.
Re: Brian Fyffe
Dear Ladies, I am sending this communication to my address list. If this doesn't wake Australians out of their brain-dead state - nothing will. John Wilson. -Original Message-From: One Voice - One People, Human Rights Defenders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Val Kerrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Veronica Hoskisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Dave Fredricks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Ian McLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Jim Jardine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Jim Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Kerry Spencer-Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Peter Rettke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Ray and Sonya Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Rex Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Monday, 30 April 2001 8:05Subject: Brian Fyffe Dear Friends As earlier advised Erica and myself went to Melbourne to visit Brian Fyffe in prison. Before leaving I rang the prison and asked about there procedure. I sent a fax to the governor of the prison requesting professional visit rights as a human rights organisation. When we arrived at the prison, we were refused any visiting rights. I then contacted a Victorian member of Parliament and was referred to the Minister for Corrective Services. His adviser contacted the office of the Commissioner for Corrective Services. We also met with Brian Fyffe's daughter, Judy Mastwyk and various people who tried to help us. After spending one day trying to assert our rights as an human rights organisation to visit Brian Fyffe, the officers of these department became very agitated and would have - on the end of the day - just bent so far to allow us a social visit. We declined because this would have defeated the purpose. At the moment we are drafting a letter to the UN and their Human Rights Committee about this situation. Nevertheless people in Australia need to ask them selves whether they want protection of human rights and therefore would be willing to fight for them. At the moment there are no rights they are able to claim regardless what the many pages of paper of acts of the law and covenants may say. Best regards Brigitte Straulino.
Re: AUSTRALIAN MONARCHIST LEAGUE STATEMENT RE: NEXT GOVERNOR GENERAL
Dear Philip, The Most Reverend Peter Hollingsworth will swear an Oath of Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabetn the Second who has sworn to govern Australia. If the Most Reverend Peter Hollingsworth has committed an act of Sedition, then he should be charged with that offence under the Commonwealth Crimes Act 1914 - which, I would imagine, would make him ineligible to take up the Office of Governor-General of Australia. Do you have documented proof of his offence? If so, you should not conceal it. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, 23 April 2001 8:04 Subject: AUSTRALIAN MONARCHIST LEAGUE STATEMENT RE: NEXT GOVERNOR GENERAL > > >STATEMENT BY PHILIP BENWELL MBE >NATIONAL CHAIRMAN OF >THE AUSTRALIAN MONARCHIST LEAGUE >ON THE APPOINTMENT OF THE REVEREND PETER HOLLINGWORTH AS AUSTRALIA'S >NEXT GOVERNOR GENERAL > > > >"The appointment of the Most Reverend Peter Hollingworth AO OBE as our next Governor General is, of course, disappointing but the fact that the Archbishop, who has declared himself dedicated to the removal of The Crown, to hypocritically accept the highest appointment in the land to represent it is reprehensible to say the least and will be a very poor substitute for Sir William Deane who has conducted himself in the post with utter and complete impartiality". > > > >Philip Benwell >Australian Monarchist League >Phone: 02 9327 4582 >Mobile: 0419 417 097 > > > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
Re: Charging for emails
Dear Gopher, The answer to this, and other pieces of bad legislation, is to have a jury judge it and nullify it. John Wilson. -Original Message-From: Gopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Recipient list suppressed Date: Monday, 23 April 2001 6:17Subject: Charging for emailsHi everyone This is NOT a joke, so please spend a few minutes to read it carefully. 'Australian Government Bill to Charge for Each EMAIL you send' Following is an email that, is concerning for us all. Below is the url for Senator Richard Alston the Minister responsible. Please send an email to him voicing your strong opposition http://www.richardalston.dcita.gov.au/contact.html Below is the text of the email . Please read the following carefully if you intend to stay online, and continue using E-mail. The last few months have revealed an alarming trend in the Government of Australia attempting to quietly push through legislation that will affect our use of the Internet. Under proposed legislation, the Australian Postal Service will be attempting to bill E-mail users out of "alternative postage fees." Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent surcharge on every E-mail delivered, by billing Internet Service Providers at source. The consumer would then be billed in turn by the ISP. Canberra lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent this legislation from becoming law. The Australian Postal Service is claiming that lost revenue, due to the proliferation of E-mail, is costing nearly $230,000,000 in revenue per year. You may have noticed their recent ad campaign: "There is nothing like a letter." Since the average person received about 10 pieces of E-mail per day in 1998, the cost of the typical individual would be an additional 50 cents a day or over $180 per year-above and beyond their regular Internet costs. Note that this would be money paid directly to the Australian Postal Service for a service they do not even provide. The whole point of the Internet is democracy and noninterference. You are already paying an exorbitant price for ordinary mail because of bad efficiency. It currently takes up to 6 days for a letter to be delivered anywhere in Australia or longer. If the Australian Postal Service is allowed to interfere with E-mail, it will mark the end of the "free" Internet in Australia Our Canberra representative, Tony Schnell (r) has even suggested a "$20- $40 per month surcharge on all Internet service" above and beyond the governments proposed E-mail charges Note that most of the major newspapers have ignored the Story, the only exception being the Sun herald which called the idea of E-mail surcharge "a useful concept who's time has come" (March 6th, 1999 Editorial). Do not sit by and watch your freedom erode away! Send this to E-mail to EVERYONE on your list, and tell your friends and relatives to write to their Canberra or local politician representative and say "NO" to Bill 602P. It will only take a few moments of your time and could very well be instrumental in killing a bill we do not want. Please forward this today.
Thomas Jefferson on the Judiciary 1821.
Dear Fellow Australians, The website of www.jail4judges.org sends out newsletters by email to those who subscribe. The April 12, 2001 edition has a quote from Thomas Jefferson which seems timeless. It is: "The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body - working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, untilall shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated." Thomas Jefferson 1821. The Australian judiciary have declared Magna Carta to be "obsolete" while State Parliaments have passed legislation giving judges the power to deny trial by jury. Both acts are legally wrong. Both acts are oppressive and sinister. Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
Re: ABC copies Hoser - again!!!! - Suing ABC
Dear Raymond, People acting for themselves in court take money away from lawyers - therefore, judges (acting alone) persecute anyone who defies the system. Therefore, eliminate judges by suing the Crown as one of the Defendants and insist on your inalienable right to a jury trial. Firstly, learn what a jury actually is and does - ie: 12 men and women who are "honest and true" and who determine the facts, find out what the law is, judge the justice of the law, decide if the law is being appropriately applied, determine the moral intentions of the parties, and vote wholly and solely according to their conscience. Lawyers and judges will deny this - but they are corrupt. Stand your ground. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. -Original Message- From: Raymond Hoser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, 13 April 2001 10:24 Subject: Re: ABC copies Hoser - again - Suing ABC >1/ I can't even affor the lodgement fee and 2/ I need someone to >prosecute for me - because you well know that courts automatically find >against people who represent themselves here in Victoria. >Still need the money >-- >Raymond Hoser (AAC) >PO Box 599 >Doncaster >Victoria 3108 >Australia >Phone: (Within Australia) 0412 777211 >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.raymondhoser.com > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
Re: ANNOUNCEMENT - Australia Celebrates the 75th Birthday of The Queen
Dear Philip, Celebrations and the like are pleasant trivia. But what about the real role of the Crown? Attached is a letter I wrote to the new Governor of New South Wales (the Queen's Representative), Professor Marie Roslyn Bashir.. There has been no reply - not even an acknowledgement. I phoned the Macquarie Street Office of the Governor last week and received a very cold response from a lady to whom I was passed by the lass who answered the phone. Do we have an "honest and true" allegiant to the Queen, or a Government stooge who rubber-stamps whatever Bills are put in front of her? Yours sincerely, John Wilson. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Saturday, 7 April 2001 9:38 Subject: RE: ANNOUNCEMENT - Australia Celebrates the 75th Birthday of The Queen >Australia Post is issuing a special Stamp to celebrate Her Majesty's 75th birthday. > >Four million stamps will be produced with a side panel on which details of the Birthday will be highlighted and will be available for sale commencing the 12th April 2001, . Posters and storyboards advertising the Stamp will be sent to all Posts Offices throughout the Country. > >Monarchists throughout Australia are urged to order these stamps from their local Post Offices > >The Governor General and most State Governors will hold or attend functions in honour of Her Majesty's 75th birthday. > >We have been advised that the Australian Defence Forces will hold a 21 Gun Royal Salute on the lawn of Parliament House, Canberra in honour of Her Majesty's birthday. > >The Australian Monarchist League has organized for bells to ring throughout the land and for Prayers to be incorporated into Services. > >In Sydney a Special Service of Morning Prayer will be held on Sunday the 22nd April 2001 at 10.30 a.m. at St Andrew's Cathedral which Her Excellency The Governor and Sir Nicholas Shehadie will attend. > >In the evening of Saturday the 21st April 2001, the Australian Monarchist League will hold a Reception at the residence of its National Chairman Philip Benwell MBE at 28 Darling Point Road Darling Point to celebrate the 75th birthday of Her Majesty The Queen. > >Distinguished guests will include Monarchist League Patrons The Earl and Countess of Dunmore and Lady Fairfax AM OBE. > >PLEASE NOTE CHANGE OF CONTACT DETAILS >The Australian Monarchist League >P O Box 1068, Double Bay NSW 1360 >Phone: 02 9327 4582 >Fax:02 9328 6274 >Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >The National Chairman of the Australian Monarchist League, Philip Benwell can also be contacted on mobile: 0419 417 097 > > Bashir.doc
Japanese gift to banks
This morning, on the TV news it was said that the Japanese Government were proposing to give to the banks some $US200+billion to pay for the banks' bad "debts". Has nobody seen the Money Masters video? THE BANKS CREATE MONEY OUT OF THIN AIR. IT'S FRAUD - THE GREATEST SWINDLE IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND. This tape is obtained through their website of http://www.themoneymasters.com Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
Re: bank cheques
Dear Graham, The "clearance" of cheques goes back to the time when cheques were physically taken to a meeting place of all banks where they were exchanged and taken to their respective banks of origin to be entered into their ledgers and "cleared". Nowadays, with electronics, deposits and withdrawals can be "cleared" in micro-seconds. The story why banks take 3 or 5 days to "clear" a cheque is that the banks have that money still on their ledgers which they use on the "overnight and short-term money market". I believe that no longer has any validity because banks create their own money and there is no real accounting done, any more. There are no real audits of banks. the whole system is one great fraud. Banks delaying "clearance" of cheques is just another act of bastardry to inconvenience people and provide an excuse for charging more interest on overdrafts and cause embarassment to the recipient of the cheque. Governments will not audit banks because the governments have become corrupted by the banks. If you want to pursue it, go to court, demand a jury and demand discovery of the banks' accounting. At the moment, the court have become corrupted by the banks and the judges do what the banks tell them, ie: no juries and no discovery. But still, go to court and make your demands .who knows, there might be an honest judge out there, somewhere. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. -Original Message-From: graham carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Wednesday, 28 March 2001 20:03Subject: Re: bank cheques Hi John, Could you please advise me on the legality of banks with-holding payment of a bank-cheque for a period of 3 working days, I have always been of the understanding that bank-cheques were as good as cash, my bank has come up with all sorts of excuses for not allowing instant access to a bank-cheque made out to me and deposited into my account. Regards, Graham
Jury Nullifies Fishing Laws
Dear FIJA (Fully Informed Jury Association), It has just been reported on page 6 of "The Australian", a national newspaper, that a jury in the Cairns District Court, in the state of Queensland, on January 28, 2001 acquitted two Australian Aborigines "of armed robery charges after they approached a commercial vessel, the Lisa Jane, in 1998 and confiscated its catch of coral trout.". This arises out of a dispute over fishing rights in "the waters that divide Queensland from Papua New Guinea". The Queensland government laws allow commercial fishing in that area. However, On March 16, the Mer community - home of Eddie Mabo and Australia's first native title claim - approved a unanimous resolution to ban all commercial fishing vessels from operating "in the perimeters of our economic maritime boundaries" ". On the television news, this morning, a spokesman for the Queensland government warned that police would be sent to the area if the Mer community enforce their ultimatum that all commercial fishermen should get out of the area within seven days. - John Wilson.
Re: People and groups associating
Dear Samuel, I have been down the political party track with the Confederate Action Party, the One Nation Party and the Liberal Party, in that order. The main characteristic of political parties is that of manipulationeveryone trying to exert their opinions over everyone else. If an up-and-coming group or party look like they may be a threat to the banks or the Lib/Lab coalition, they are sabotaged and destroyed. Politics is a game dominated by cheats. "God Save the Queen" says "Confound their politics. Frustrate their knavish tricks." You will not succeed at that game. We have a system called "Justice" and we have Courts to administer it. At the moment, there are also cheats sabotaging the Courts. But we have Law (real Law, that is - not the invalid stuff which "evil counsellors, judges and ministers" practice) to "hold a government to the principles of its constitution" (Thom. Jefferson). If you really want to re-establish freedom and defeat the enemies of our country, then go to Court and seek "Relief" by way of tribunals of the people , ie: Fully Informed Juries. Best wishes, John Wilson. -Original Message- From: Samuel Broad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, 27 March 2001 8:38 Subject: People and groups associating >> > Hello John Wilson, >> > I am trying to launch a new political party and >> > the No Tax on Income concept. >> > Community Party Constitution was put together, so >> > Party can function like a Independent Politician, >> > but elected independent politicians cannot join >> > any party. >> > >> > To have Government by the people for the people >> > the Community Party will introduce Citizens >> > Initiated referenda. The member's will control the >> > party. Candidates having no need to work up >> > through the ranks as they will simply nominate, be >> > endorsed by the Party, then selected by the >> > people, not by the Party. >> > >> > By associating with other like minded people or >> > group/s each group effectively may expand their >> > support base because more people become involved. >> > >> > If members of each group decided to communicate >> > with friends and those friends then contact their >> > friends and so on we can have a reduced cost to >> > get the word out and so increase the support base. >> > >> > Do away with the mentality of having to keep away >> > and not to be seen to be talking to any other >> > group of people leaves the people with no >> > solidarity. >> > >> > What we should be doing is talking to these groups >> > and if the issues are much the same then >> > associate. >> > >> > For change to occur, we need at least 9,000,000 >> > people and 148 House of Reps and 40 Senators, on a >> > national basis. >> > Where the Liberal and Labor Parties get in is when >> > the people mark their preference vote. If people >> > were to leave the Liberal and Labor Parties last >> > on the ballot paper, and mark their second and >> > third preference vote to some other small party, >> > would be a sure way to vote the Liberal and Labor >> > Parties out. >> > >> > There are three files on my web site I am asking >> > to look at and they are; >> > >> > http://www.geocities.com/samfre.geo (main web >> > site) >> > http://www.geocities.com/samfre.geo/launch.html >> > http://www.geocities.com/samfre.geo/debitpol.html >http://www.geocities.com/samfre.geo/austnotwto.html >> > >> > Please reply, >> > Signed: Mr S.F.Broad of 9 Waitara Ave, >> > Keysborough. >> > 3173. Phone: 03 97985149. >> > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >__ >Do You Yahoo!? >Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. >http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
The Money Masters.
Dear Brian, I have just finished watching "The Money Masters" video tape you sent me. It is the most important and informative video ever made. At the end, a website is given which, on bringing it up, only has had 28,000 hits, to date. The site is http://www.themoneymasters.com Everyone in the world should/must see the video and the website is the way of getting it. The only fault I have with it is that, in its conclusions, it doesn't tell how the people can force their governments to outlaw the "Fractional Reserve Banking" scam, which is a vague way of saying that banks create money for themselves "out of thin air". There is only one real way to defeat bank fraud and that is through FULLY INFORMED JURIESand only then will corrective legislation result. Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
Re: Real Reason for Plunging Australian Dollar
. -Original Message-From: Tony Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Undisclosed-Recipient:; Date: Thursday, 22 March 2001 5:29Subject: Real Reason for Plunging Australian Dollar ‘Damned’ if do or not FROM: The Fraser Coast Chronicle - Maryborough Queensland - Monday, March 19, 2001. Canberra. - Uncertainty over Shell’s $10 billion takeover bid for Woodside shouldn’t be a major factor weighing down the Australian dollar, Prime Minister John Howard said. The Aussie hit a string of record lows last week after plunging below the US 50-cent barrier for the first time and economists warned it could slide below 49 cents this week after hitting 49.06 cents early on Friday. Bankers Rothschild and HSBC said political uncertainty was one factor dragging down the Aussie, including the lack orf a government decision on Royal Dutch/Shell’s $10 billion bid for Woodside Petroleum. The government was damned it it did and damned if it didn’t,Mr Howard said. The Fraser Coast Chronicle - Maryborough Queensland - Monday, March 19, 2001. COMMENT This is the big boys' version of STAND AND DELIVER, BUDDY - THIS IS A STICK UP, REACH FOR THE SKY, HAND OVER YOUR WALLET etc. The only political uncertainty is whether the world financiers will force our dollar to 10 cents US if we do not hand our oilfields over to them for next to nothing. SOLUTION We are not helpless but the action needed, if taken, would fit John Howard with the same honours and awards accorded to Abe Lincoln, John F Kennedy and Harold Holt - for the same reasons. He would be dead within days. If Australia spent a billion dollars sending copies of the Money Masters video to every major and minor political party in every one of the 180 countries that are in debt to the world financiers WAKING them to just how they were fleeced by the FRACTIONAL RESERVE BANKING system, their own RESERVE BANKS and FOREIGN OWNED PRIVATE BANKS then the stranglehold on every country would be broken forever. Every nation is in debt. HOW COME? There must be a lender who is in credit and he must reside on earth OR do we borrow from the moon? Search the internet for MONEY MASTERS - the video. AND Send this message to the far corners of the earth. We can save our oilfields IF you co-operate and send this message on to hundreds of browsers.
BHP leaves the sinking ship.
THE END OF THE LINE: BHP, Australia's biggest company and the backbone to Australian industry, announced yesterday it would be "merging" with the British based company, Billiton. What more proof does the Australian public need to convince them that they are losing their country at the hands of the banks? Do they really think that it is anything but part of the banks' "Drive for World Control" (to use Jeremy Lee's words). The shareholders of BHP only want to save themselves - that's why they want the "merger". Australia's Prime Minister, the Rt Hon. John Winston Howard, says "This is a great resource opportunity for Australia.". What else would the banks' stooge say? Equity? EQUITY? Australians' ownership of Australian assets? Who owns Australia? NOT AUSTRALIANS! We must be the most stupid people in the world. Swimming? Football? Cricket? Stuff them all. What about REALITY? What about smashing the banks and regaining our country? The banks have engineered all this by FRAUD with variable interest rates and money creation. The banks have corrupted our parliaments and courts to write their own laws and wipe out ours. Talk about DREAMTIME? Talk about a DRUNKEN STUPOR? Talk about HEADS IN THE SAND? Talk about COWARDICE? Any self-respecting people would be storming the parliaments and charging the politicians and judges with TREACHERY. Our Bill of Rights says "That jurors ought to be duly impanelled". Never has there been a more urgent situation demanding the implementation of OUR RIGHTS set out in Magna Carta. BHP deserting the sinking ship is proof-positive of where we are. NO EQUITY and NO SOVEREIGNTY. Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
Bankrupt Australia - Update.
The figures from the Reserve Bank of Australia of $379 billion for the Net Foreign Liabilities being 57.8% of our Gross Domestic Product were not when the dollar was worth 51.1 US cents (9th march) but on the 2nd of March when the dollar was higher. Therefore, bankruptcy is closer than thought. If anyone knows what the dollar was worth on the 2nd of March, one can update the first guess at the point of bankruptcy of 25 US cents...maybe 30 US cents?. That's what happens when the country is run by the banks. It's all FRAUD - planned and executed with variable interest rate loans and money creation - so that the rich get rich and the poor get poorer. The reality is that we are a bountiful land with more than enough to go around. There should be no poverty in Australia. For that fact, there should be no slavery in Australia. But that's what happens when the country is run by the banks with governments and courts doing their bidding. The people cannot win back their country with guns and bombs because the banks are too powerful. We can only win back what is rightfully ours in Court with judges pushed to one side and the issues are tried by our peers - which, naturally, means TRIAL BY JURY. The fight is between the BANKS and the PEOPLE. Call it a WAR, if you like - but the Banks represent TYRANNY and the People represent DEMOCRACY. It's there for the winning. Who is going to take it on? Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
When is Australia bankrupt?
Dear Fellow Australians, If, as of a few days ago, when the Aussie dollar was 51.1 US cents, the Net Foreign Liabilities were 57.8% of the Gross Domestic Product. When is Australia bankrupt, simply by the Aussie dollar dropping? I work it out to be when the Aussie dollar drops to 25 US cents. Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
Ever heard of a COPT?
Yesterday, a young man was handing out leaflets as part of a protest about human rights. The movement has a web site of www.copts.com
Australian Judges Reject Trial by Jury
Dear Fellow Australians, Australian Judges continue to deny the right to Trial by Jury. In the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Sydney, Justice Hulme refused to disqualify himself and proceded to judge a Notice of Motion in spite of all my arguing where my main thrust was that the law (section 3 of the Supreme Court Procedure Act 1900) laid down that "consent of both parties" is required for there to be "a Judge without a Jury". Attached are the Transcript and Judgment of 26 th February along with the Affidavit containing my argument. Justice Hulme's promotion of his, Justice Simpson's and any other Judge's authority to judge in matters from which the law excludes them, is bewildering. It's the Star Chamber, all over again. Lord Edward Coke - oh, how we need you now!!! Yours sincerely, John Wilson. Transcript SC 26 February 2001.rtf Judgment - Hulme 26 February 2001.rtf Affidavit on right to trial by jury.doc
Re: WorldNetDaily Inside the all-powerful Federal Reserve.htm
Title: WorldNetDaily: Inside the all-powerful Federal Reserve Dear Peter, Well worth sending on. John -Original Message-From: Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: john wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Sunday, 11 March 2001 19:54Subject: WorldNetDaily Inside the all-powerful Federal Reserve.htm SUNDAYMARCH 112001 Page 1 News Page 2 News Commentary Cartoons Letters TalkNetDaily Sports Weather TV Guide Movies Travel Business Stocks ShopNetDaily SUNDAY Q&AInside the all-powerful Federal ReserveGeoff Metcalf interviews veteran journalist Anne Williamson Editor's note: Anne Williamson, a veteran researcher and journalist who has written for the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times, has authored a definitive and eye-opening analysis of the nation's banking system for WorldNet Magazine, WorldNetDaily's offline companion. Williamson, who has testified before Congress as an expert on international banking issues, brought years of expertise to her comprehensive, 11,000-word investigative report, covering the Federal Reserve, how the Fed manipulates elections and markets, who's behind the Fed, and more. WorldNetDaily writer and talk-show host Geoff Metcalf recently interviewed Williamson about her article and the true nature and impact of the Federal Reserve. Subscribe to WorldNet Magazine and receive Williamson's groundbreaking exposé. Metcalf's daily streaming radio show can be heard on TalkNetDaily weekdays from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. Eastern time. By Geoff Metcalf© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com Question: This is a complex issue, which is why I have been encouraging people to read your piece in WorldNet Magazine. Can you start us out with a basic "The Fed 101"? Answer: OK. Eustace Mullins has a wonderful line in which he says the Federal Reserve System is not federal; there are no reserves; and, he says, "It is not a system, but a criminal syndicate." That is one of the more vituperous summations of the institution. And it's not unfair because there is a lot of truth in it. Q: It's a cool scam! A: Oh, it's the ultimate scam. This was a brilliant, brilliant swindle. That it has been so long-lived is remarkable, as are the results of what they have achieved with it. In the article, I try to walk the reader through the most basic elements of money and banking and then finance and currencies generally. But the real point that I hope readers will take with them is an understanding that this institution has cheated all of us of our citizenship. Q: Why? A: Because the Fed gives the government the power of creating unlimited debt. Q: For those people who listen to my program on the Internet, I do a four-minute commentary at the top of each hour. This week I kind of cheated, and, to promote your visit, I have been reading from Congressm
Australia's forein debt
Dear Fellow Australians, The Australian dollar is a 0.51 of the American dollar. The figures from the reserve Bank of Australia, at 11:30am 3rd March 2001 are: Net Foreign Liabilities as a percentage of G.D.P. = 57.8% Net Foreign Liabilities as a dollar sum = $379 billion. Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
High Court ruling on Independent & Impartial Tribunals.
Dear Wolter, I have taken a quick look at Ebner v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy - HCA 63 (7 December 2000) and the 4th paragraph says: "The rule of necessity gives expression to the principle that the rules of natural justice cannot be invoked to frustrate the intended operation of a statute which sets up a tribunal and requires it to perform the statutory functions entrusted to it. Or, to put the matter another way, the statutory requirement that the tribunal perform the functions assigned to it must prevail over and displace the application of the rules of natural justice. Those rules may be excluded by statute. Twist v Randwick Municipal Council (10); Salemi v MacKellar (No 2) (11); FAI Insurances Ltd v Winnecke (12)". Paragraph 54 says: "Having regard to the current state of the common law in Australia on the subject of disqualification for apprehended bias, we do not the submissions that there is a separate and free-standing rule of automatice disqualification which applies where a judge has a direct pecuniary interest, however small, in the outcome of the case over which the judge is presiding, etc" Wolter, please have a good read. It smells a bit, to me. Yours sincereley, John Wilson.
Re: Question
Dear Mark,
I couldn't find anything about Joe Bryant being the
interim Prime Minister of Caledonia.
However, the concept is quite
brilliant. It is obviously a very effective means of drawing attention to
the extreme state of corruption of our nation. Such a ploy can serve a
very useful purpose. By building a farcical entity, such as the
Principality of Caledonia, it must help to awaken the poor, stupid and dumb
Australians to reality.
It is serious farce and, because people like yours
truly are trying to fight for Justice and getting stonewalled, the construction
of Caledonia will probably succeed.
However, well-intentioned schemes, such as
CAP, One Nation, etc., can be sabotaged. This is what James Renton and his
supporters must be aware of, ie: when Caledonia looks like it might be
getting somewhere, the Banks (through their existing politicians and judges)
will send in people to bring them down.
One ploy, which the Banks use to undermine their
opposition, James Renton appears to have countered. The Banks use
the media to ridicule those involved. In the Principality of Caledonia,
they are already laughing. It's a very clever application of
theatre.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
-Original Message-From:
Reclaim Australia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Monday, 5 March 2001 20:47Subject: RE:
Question
John
Did
you know that Joe Bryant is the interim Prime Minister of The Principality
of Caledonia, and that Caledonia is the only true authority in Australia as
it has annexed all the crown land and property of Australia including the
flag have a look at the web page www.principalityofcaledonia.cc
Mark
-Original
Message-From: John
Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, 5 March 2001 5:58
PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Re: Question
Dear
Deborah,
Suing
individuals like bank managers for minor offences is allowed by the banks
and judges huff and puff and pretend they are doing right.
However, the issues I have raised (Contract Fraud and Money Creation)
are major offences which will bring the banks down from their position of
dominance to one of servitude. This the banks will not allow and the
judges do as they are told.
The
Constitutional Problem is one that will not go away. While people are
starting to use it, the judges again are doing what they are told and
rejecting the arguments. Nobody is yet winning on those grounds - and
will not - until the judges are pushed aside and juries come into their
own. This is what should have been and should always be --- and there
we have the battle lines drawn.
It is a question
of sovereignty, ie: who rules who. Are the people sovereign or
slaves?
The fight can
only take place in the Courts because the enemy have all the
guns.
If the people
are prevented from securing justice in the Courts, then there will be, as
Henry Lawson described, "blood on the wattle" and the whole nation
of Australia will be destroyed.
As for the
Principality of Caledonia - I would rather see the people rally to the Flag
of the Union Jack and the Southern Cross. But, if the Principality of
Caledonia serves the cause of Right and Justice to defeat what exists at the
moment, then go for it.
Joe Bryant is also doing his best with
the Alternative Three campaign. His target is a strengthened Australia
on the same foundations which we supposedly already have. This is a
better ideal and, if given a chance, would gain better acceptance than a
Lilliputian project.
Yours
sincerely,
John
Wilson.
-Original
Message-From: Deborah Humphries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: 'John Wilson' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Monday, 5 March 2001
9:46Subject: RE:
Question
Hello
John,
Its a sick world we
live in John. But I believe that what goes around, comes around.
Their time will
come.
I know of
someone on the sunshine coast who won his case but he took the
manager and not the
bank to court. He was awarded a huge damages claim.
Did you sue the
bank or the bank manager John?
What do you think
of everyone becoming citizens of the Principality of
Caledonia?
It seems to be a
legal loop hole everyone is using.
We are in a
situation where the tax department if after us and we don't have the money
to
pay them. What
would you advise?
Sorry things didn't
go as they should. But what can you expect in a country ruled by
corrupt
Re: Question
Dear Deborah,
Suing individuals like bank managers for minor offences is
allowed by the banks and judges huff and puff and pretend they are doing
right. However, the issues I have raised (Contract Fraud and Money
Creation) are major offences which will bring the banks down from their position
of dominance to one of servitude. This the banks will not allow and the
judges do as they are told.
The Constitutional Problem is one that will not go away.
While people are starting to use it, the judges again are doing what they
are told and rejecting the arguments. Nobody is yet winning on those
grounds - and will not - until the judges are pushed aside and juries come into
their own. This is what should have been and should always be --- and
there we have the battle lines drawn.
It is a question of sovereignty, ie: who rules who. Are
the people sovereign or slaves?
The fight can only take place in the Courts because the enemy
have all the guns.
If the people are prevented from securing justice in the
Courts, then there will be, as Henry Lawson described, "blood on the
wattle" and the whole nation of Australia will be destroyed.
As for the Principality of Caledonia - I would rather see the
people rally to the Flag of the Union Jack and the Southern Cross. But, if
the Principality of Caledonia serves the cause of Right and Justice to defeat
what exists at the moment, then go for it.
Joe Bryant is also doing his best with the
Alternative Three campaign. His target is a strengthened Australia on the
same foundations which we supposedly already have. This is a better ideal
and, if given a chance, would gain better acceptance than a Lilliputian
project.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
-Original Message-From:
Deborah Humphries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: 'John
Wilson' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Monday, 5 March 2001 9:46Subject: RE:
Question
Hello John,
Its a sick world we live in John. But I believe
that what goes around, comes around.
Their time will come.
I know of someone on the sunshine coast who
won his case but he took the
manager and not the bank to court. He was
awarded a huge damages claim.
Did you sue the bank or the bank manager
John?
What do you think of everyone becoming citizens of
the Principality of Caledonia?
It
seems to be a legal loop hole everyone is using.
We are
in a situation where the tax department if after us and we don't have the
money to
pay them. What would you
advise?
Sorry things didn't go as they should. But what can
you expect in a country ruled by corrupt
politicians. They have sold us
out.
Take good care now,
Deb
-----Original Message- From: John Wilson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, 5 March 2001 7:08
amTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
Question
Dear Deborah,
If you are asking about November 9th 1999 , Chief
Judge at Common Law Wood conducted a trial without a jury (against my
constant protests), convicted me and sentenced me to two years
imprisonment without parole. After three months and three weeks,
the Court of Appeal (by a vote of 2 judges to 1) released me but would
not overturn the conviction. It's all on my website of http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au
Without the right to Trial by Jury, we have no rights,
at all, because everything (including freedom) is ultimately decided in
Court.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
-Original
Message-From: Deborah Humphries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Saturday, 3 March 2001 14:22Subject:
Question
Hi, just
wondered how your court case went on Novemebr
9th?
Take
care,
Deb
Re: Question
Dear Deborah, If you are asking about November 9th 1999 , Chief Judge at Common Law Wood conducted a trial without a jury (against my constant protests), convicted me and sentenced me to two years imprisonment without parole. After three months and three weeks, the Court of Appeal (by a vote of 2 judges to 1) released me but would not overturn the conviction. It's all on my website of http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au Without the right to Trial by Jury, we have no rights, at all, because everything (including freedom) is ultimately decided in Court. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. -Original Message-From: Deborah Humphries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Saturday, 3 March 2001 14:22Subject: Question Hi, just wondered how your court case went on Novemebr 9th? Take care, Deb
Jail for e-mailers & Australian Waco.
Dear Fellow Australians, Two interesting stories in yesterday's Telegraph:- 1. The Australian Federal Attorney General announced that, as of 4th March 2001, people who retransmit material sent to them without the permission of the person who sent it to them, will suffer imprisonment for a maximum of 5 (five) years or fines of $60,000 (sixty thousand dollars). What a perfect plan for entrapment! 2. An Australian recluse, by the name of Jimmy Hallinan, refused to go to Court over traffic fines. He warned two policemen off his mountain property when they went there to arrest him. The police flew in a squad of 90 (ninety) heavily armed police, smoked him out of his hut with tear gas bombs and shot him dead. The shot was between the eyes. There will be a Coronial Enquiry into the incident with a Jury. I hope the Jury is a Fully Informed Jury who exercise their rights to investigate fully, call for any evidence, judge the Justice of the Law, decide (if the law is just) if the Law was appropriately applied, judge the moral intentions of the parties, and vote according to their consciences - or will they allow themselves to be misled, gagged and manipulated by counsellors and judges? Yours sincerely, John Wilson. PS: Absolutely anyone has permission to relay this e-mail to anyone
Re: Judges overrule Natural Justice AGAIN.
Dear Alan,
About 20 years ago I used to have a car number plate saying
"WOTNIF" - which was what my children used to say. I no longer
have that plate so you can use it, if you like.
John Wilson.
-Original Message-From:
Alan Gourley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Friday, 2 March 2001 6:35Subject: Re: Judges overrule Natural
Justice AGAIN.Dear John - Sorry - "IF Onleys"
do not carry a lot of weight in the real world, if you understood what other
people are doing and have done you would be using your time and money to
expose the takeover and not paying them for your distress. You could start
with < www.ozemail.com.au/~agourley > best wishes to your
efforts.
John Wilson wrote:
Dear
Alan, No disrespect intended BUT-
what have all you whingers done? Sitting back
in your lounge chairs pontificating! Talking
about revamping government! Talking about
making new laws or new political parties! Talking, talking, talking --doing bugger all and
achieving bugger all. You run away and hide
like frightened women -- but that's an insult to fightened
women. The traitors laugh at pathetic, gutless
wimps. I'm no hero. I'm just doing what
has to be done which is face the scum in Court --where all you
blow-hards should be. If there were a thousand
even a hundred Australians who would simply state their claim
to truth and justice IN COURTand expose and prove
the treachery of the judges, then there would be a chance of
victory. Until then (as Jeremy Lee once said,
ie: another whinger) "the enemy won't even look up from their cup
of tea". All the jaw flapping is
done. Get off your backside. Yours respectfully, John
Wilson.
-Original
Message- From: Alan Gourley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, 28
February 2001 10:58 Subject: Re: Judges overrule Natural Justice
AGAIN. Dear John - How long do you have to
keep hitting your head against this concrete wall before you admit
what I have been trying to tell you. You have proven it over
and over but still you persist in paying the enemy to stomp on your
face. I only hope that you will now face reality- Alan G.
John Wilson wrote:
Dear Fellow Australians, In the Supreme Court of New South
Wales, Sydney Registry, Justice Hulme dispensed with
Natural Justice (ie: no-one can judge in his own cause) ruled
that a Judge (including himself) can determine what jurisdiction
they have - such as whether they have the power to deny Trial by
Jury in contravention to s.3 of the 1900 Supreme Court Procedure
Act (which says that only by consent of both parties can there
by a Judge without a Jury). Judges believe they have the power
to dispense with our laws and our rights. This was the reason
for bringing in the Bill of Rights 1688. History repeating
itself, indeed. The Bill of Rights says those "counsellors, judges
and ministers" were "evil" and, by golly,
that's what we've got today. Power
corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Yours sincerely,John
Wilson.
Re: High Treason Laws Against Establishing a Foreign Power in England.htm
Title: High Treason: Laws Against Establishing a Foreign Power in England Dear Peter, Thank you for sending the article on HIGH TREASON. I will send it out on my address list. John Wilson. -Original Message-From: Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Thursday, 1 March 2001 14:25Subject: High Treason Laws Against Establishing a Foreign Power in England.htm According to the old laws of England, which are still in force, many current British politicians qualify for hanging and their laws are null and void HIGH TREASON The Complete Text of Capt. K. R. McKilliam, M.A. The British Nation is bedevilled today by alien organisations that have established themselves within our Christian Nation and aim to take us over, to destroy our Christian culture and force us to follow their preconceived designs. Unfortunately they have infiltrated themselves into our educational and religious systems and have educated many adepts among our people who unknowingly carry out their will. Many of them have been advanced to high places. "Gentile Home Secretary Roy Jenkins gets his latest set of instructions from Lord Fisher and Maurice Orbach." Published with this caption in Let My People Go! c. 1976 LAWS AGAINST ESTABLISHING A FOREIGN POWER IN ENGLAND In 1353 Edward III by his statute of Praemunire forbade appeals being made to foreign courts. Richard II who came to the throne in 1377 issued a Statute of Praemunire (16 Richard II II C5) which stated that anyone who procures from Rome or any other place any thing which touches the King, against him or his Crown or realm and all those aiding and abetting them shall be out of the King's protection. Their goods and land would be forfeited and they would be made to answer to the King and his council and a process of Praemunire Facias made against them. The learned constitutional lawyer, Blackstone, in Book 4, C8, states that Praemunire is "introducing a foreign power into the land and creating an Imperium in Imperio by paying obedience to other processes which constitutionally belong to the King alone." But although this is a general protection of the King, the constitutional lawyer Littleton states that Praemunire Facias also extends to the King's loyal subjects and this particular protection is of two sorts, firstly it gives the subject immunity or freedom from action or suite and secondly to protect the safety of the subject and his goods, lands and possessions from violence, unlawful molestation and wrong. This the subject gains by right and by law. Subjects are protected by the King, by the law and by the King's writ. ‘Praemunire doth fortify Jurisdictionem Jurium Coronae Suae of the Kingly laws of the Crown against foreign jurisdiction and against the usurpers upon them as by divers acts of parliament appears A man who by judgement given against him upon writ of Praemunire Facias etc. is out of the King's protection. For such of these crimes for which any shall have this judgement, to be hanged by the neck until he be dead and shall forfeit all his lands and chattels.’ HIGH TREASON Treason is the act of betraying; betrayal of a trust undertaken by or reposed in anyone; a breach of faith, treachery. High Treason or Treason Proper is the violation of a subject of his allegiance to his sovereign or to the state, levying war on the King's dominions, adhering to the King's enemies in his dominions, or aiding them in or out of the realm. In 1795 the offence was extended to include the contemplated use of force to make the King change his counsels. MISPRISION OF TREASON Misprision of Treason is an offence or misdemeanor akin to treason or felony. It is the neglect of duty by a public official who conceals a knowledge of treasonable actions or designs. At an assize it may warrant the same penalty as High Treason. A subject of the Crown is also bound to inf
Re: Judges overrule Natural Justice AGAIN.
Dear Alan, No disrespect intended BUT- what have all you whingers done? Sitting back in your lounge chairs pontificating! Talking about revamping government! Talking about making new laws or new political parties! Talking, talking, talking --doing bugger all and achieving bugger all. You run away and hide like frightened women -- but that's an insult to fightened women. The traitors laugh at pathetic, gutless wimps. I'm no hero. I'm just doing what has to be done which is face the scum in Court --where all you blow-hards should be. If there were a thousand even a hundred Australians who would simply state their claim to truth and justice IN COURT and expose and prove the treachery of the judges, then there would be a chance of victory. Until then (as Jeremy Lee once said, ie: another whinger) "the enemy won't even look up from their cup of tea". All the jaw flapping is done. Get off your backside. Yours respectfully, John Wilson. -Original Message-From: Alan Gourley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Wednesday, 28 February 2001 10:58Subject: Re: Judges overrule Natural Justice AGAIN.Dear John - How long do you have to keep hitting your head against this concrete wall before you admit what I have been trying to tell you. You have proven it over and over but still you persist in paying the enemy to stomp on your face. I only hope that you will now face reality- Alan G. John Wilson wrote: Dear Fellow Australians, In the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Sydney Registry, Justice Hulme dispensed with Natural Justice (ie: no-one can judge in his own cause) ruled that a Judge (including himself) can determine what jurisdiction they have - such as whether they have the power to deny Trial by Jury in contravention to s.3 of the 1900 Supreme Court Procedure Act (which says that only by consent of both parties can there by a Judge without a Jury). Judges believe they have the power to dispense with our laws and our rights. This was the reason for bringing in the Bill of Rights 1688. History repeating itself, indeed. The Bill of Rights says those "counsellors, judges and ministers" were "evil" and, by golly, that's what we've got today. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Yours sincerely,John Wilson.
The $0.95 Banana.
Dear Fellow Australians, This morning, on the way to work, I popped into the local Coles Supermarket to buy some milk. I also fancied a banana. It was amongst many other bananas and showed some black spots which, I believe, indicates that it is ripening and ready to eat. The check-out register said it was 270 grams (9.5 ounces) and costs $0.94 - which, because Australia does not have a coin below 5 cents, was "rounded up" to $0.95. INFLATION: If Australian Banks creating, for themselves and "out of thin air", between $20 billion and $30 billion every year and introducing it into circulation by way of loans, is it any wonder that we have inflation of these proportions? Is it any wonder that vast numbers of Australians are below the "poverty line"? The CREATION OF MONEY by the Banks is monumental FRAUD which Australians Judges protect to the extent of denying Australian citizens the RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY when they try to challenge the Banks' criminality. BANK FRAUD cannot exist without CORRUPT JUDGES. Australia Judges believe they are above the Law by virtue of their self-created "DOCTRINE OF IMMUNITY", which is totally "unlawful and malicious". Australian Judges believe they can dispense with our LAWS and our RIGHTS. The MEDIA refuse to expose the FRAUD and CORRUPTION - which makes them as guilty as the perpetrators. CONSPIRACY? YOU BET Yours sincerely, John Wilson http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au
The Options.
Dear Wolter, I have been sent your "The Argument is Untenable But There is a Solution" document on our Constitutional Crisis - and compliment you for it. You suggest 2 options: (1) remain a self-governing Dominion or (2) secede from the United Kingdom. I opt for (1) because we need our English heritage, desperately. We need all the history, sacrifices and achievments of our ancestors. We need the wisdom, law and culture which developed over the centuries. Otherwise, our apathy will destroy us. Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
THE EVIL OF AUSTRALIAN JUDGES IS NOW BEYOND ANY DOUBT.
Dear Fellow Australians, Proof that Australian Judges are totally corrupt is now beyond any doubt. Yesterday (the 26th of February, 2001), in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Sydney, Justice Hulme overruled the entirety of the evidence contained in the Affidavit which is attached to this email and filed in the case of John Wilson v St. George Bank Limited & State of New South Wales. Justice Hulme maintained the position of numerous other Judges in Australian Courts to conceal the Judicial Corruption which is protecting the Banks in their fraudulent practices. Also Attached to this email is a leaflet which very briefly tells of the Banks' criminality. The criminality is so severe that the "elite" will not allow the facts to go to a Jury. They employ every illegal procedure to keep it that way because, when Truth and Justice take over, there will be a massive redistribution of wealth back to the People from whom it was stolen. I filed this case on December 28, 2000 on the Grounds that the Judge (Justice Carolyn Simpson), who granted the Writ of Possession to the St. George Bank Limited, had denied my right to a Jury and she had no jurisdiction to deal with the case. I also asserted that she had concealed Bank Fraud. I asked the Duty Judge for an early hearing of a Notice of Motion to Stay an Order of Eviction. The Judge was Justice Hulme who said "my understanding of the law is that neither the judge or the state is liable in tort for anything which a judge does.". The Queen is not above the Law - and yet, Judges believe they are above the law. They believe they can dispense with our Rights and our Laws and can be as malicious as they please. They have invented what they call a "Doctrine of Immunity". Only a fool would believe they are above the Law. Australian Judges are fools. But the Australian People are greater fools for not protecting their Rights and allowing this unholy alliance between the Banks and the Judges to oppress and dispossess themselves and their children. The Conspiracy between the Banks and the Judges can only be smashed in the Courts - and only by Juries who are Fully Informed of their Rights, Responsibilities and Duty. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. Affidavit on right to trial by jury.doc CONSPIRACY.doc
Judges overrule Natural Justice AGAIN.
Dear Fellow Australians, In the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Sydney Registry, Justice Hulme dispensed with Natural Justice (ie: no-one can judge in his own cause) ruled that a Judge (including himself) can determine what jurisdiction they have - such as whether they have the power to deny Trial by Jury in contravention to s.3 of the 1900 Supreme Court Procedure Act (which says that only by consent of both parties can there by a Judge without a Jury). Judges believe they have the power to dispense with our laws and our rights. This was the reason for bringing in the Bill of Rights 1688. History repeating itself, indeed. The Bill of Rights says those "counsellors, judges and ministers" were "evil" and, by golly, that's what we've got today. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
Re: Human Rights in South Australia.
Dear Brigitte,
Brian seems to be a fellow of determination.
As long as he has Faith, then I am sure he will weather the
storm.
I am in Court again, this morning, to
try again for Trial by Jury - this time for my case against the Crown for
Justice Carolyn Simpson awarding a Writ of Possession without Jurisdiction
(ie: without Trial by Jury).
John.
-Original Message-From:
Brigitte Straulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
'John Wilson' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Sunday, 25 February 2001 22:44Subject: RE: Human Rights in
South Australia.
Dear
John
Thanks
for this. I have approached some one I know here in Sydney who I trust to
help Brian Fyffe, however I do not know yet if he is free etc. I let you
know as soon as I know. I am really worried about Brian. We need to get him
out of this jail…..
How
are things with you and your home?
Best
regards
Brigitte
-Original
Message-From: John
Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 23 February 2001
14:06To: Brigitte
StraulinoSubject: Human
Rights in South Australia.
Dear Ladies,
I
saw a bit on TV this morning, the Today Show at 8:17 am.
They had a piece on Human Rights with
regard to refugee detainees at Woomera.
The lawyer fronting them was a Jeremy
Moore. He is using the UN Covenant on Political & Civil
Rights.
Might be worth talking to
him???
John.
Re: buying back the farm
Dear George, I have yet to be convinced that these so-called People's Banks are any different to the existing corporations. Don't they also charge variable interest rates and don't they create their own money? Aren't they the same pack of swindlers in sheep's clothing? John Wilson. -Original Message- From: George. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, 22 February 2001 13:23 Subject: buying back the farm >John, > >Just happened to catch this on Lateline the other night and thought you >might be interested > >http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/s249350.htm > >George Newnham >Cairns, Queensland > > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
Warning email
Dear Dr. E. Elliott/Maud Barlow, Thank you for the warning on Globalization. As long as we retain the Jury System and it is a Fully Informed Jury System, the People can nullify anything thrown at us. Of course, it would be better to defeat the skullduggery in the first place - but do you really think that will happen? Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
CONSPIRACY: BANKS + JUDGES
CONSPIRACY: BANKS + JUDGES Australian Banks commit the crimes of fraud and Australian Judges conceal those crimes. 1. CONTRACT FRAUD: Under Common Law, variable interest rates render a contract void for uncertainty. Obtaining money by fraud is stealing. 2. CREATION OF MONEY: Figures from the journal of the Reserve Bank of Australia document that Australian Banks create, for themselves and "out of thin air", an average of $20 billion each year. By lending this "money" and charging interest, the Banks collect an ill-gotten wealth beyond imagination. If the borrowers default on payments, the Banks foreclose on their victims. JUDGES conceal these crimes in the Supreme Court, the federal Court and the High Court with lies (eg: declaring "the rate itself is indeed certain"), refusing Discovery and denying Trial by Jury. For Transcripts and Judgments, please go to the Website of http://rightsandwrong.com.au - Written by J. Wilson, PO Box 4520, North Rocks, NSW, 2151, Australia,
Re: Alan Keam, Human Rights Defender - Member of OVOP arrested Sunday night at 7 p.m!
. -Original Message-From: One Voice - One People, Human Rights Defenders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Judy Mastwyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Christine Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Colin Hubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Heather Behrendorff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; John Stubberfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Maria & Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Martin Essenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wolter Joosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Monday, 19 February 2001 7:39Subject: Alan Keam, Human Rights Defender - Member of OVOP arrested Sunday night at 7 p.m! Urgent Attention Please! To all elected Representatives of the People Dear Sir Madam South Australia: Alan Keam, a member of ONE VOICE – ONE PEOPLE Human Rights Defenders (OVOP) has been arrested. Armed Australian Government officials turned up at his home last night, Sunday 17/02/01 at 7p.m arrested him and put him in jail. This is now the third member of OVOP who has been jailed unlawfully. John Wilson is still fighting for compensation for wrongful imprisonment and Brian Fyffe has now been kept already more than 4 months in jail without a trial. What are their crimes? Alan Keam, like many educated Australian people, has researched the legal history of the Australian Constitution and raised questions about the validity of the Australian Constitution. OVOP has been provided with information that the UN has been presented with a report “Australia: the Concealed Colony” requesting the UN to determine the legal status of Australia. The issue of this report is also whether the Australian Constitution is valid. Alan Keam asked the Local Government Authorities to produce their head of power to make sure that he paid rates to a legitimate authority. The Authorities refused to produce such documents. The matter went to court and Alan Keam demanded an impartial independent trial and for that reason requested the court to provide him with a head of power. Alan Kean assured the court that he would do all things requested as soon as he has received the documentation. The court refused to comply with his request and the Registrar of the Court told Alan Keam in a letter that he does not want to have anything to do with him. For some while now Alan Keam received threatening phone call from a person claiming to be a sheriff. Last night at 7p.m Alan Keam was arrested under allegations of contempt of court. Alan Keam is not in contempt of court! He is very concerned about the violations of human rights in Australia. His crime seems to be that he asked to be provided with documentation from government authorities, which show that they have the authority they claimed to have under an Australian Constitution. OVOP are alarmed because of another issue: “The 1988 Referendum” which defeated the existence of the Local Government by the Australian people. Please find attached OVOP’s letter to, the Hon Daryl Williams, Attorney General asking for advice. Will the Australian Government start a “witch hunt” and jail all the people who ask questions about the validity of the Australian Constitution and the Referendum in question? Will people be just whisked away at nighttime like in previous Nazi Germany and Russian KGB style? Do you believe that the Australian Government has the right to refuse to answer question of concerned citizens? Why have the authorities refused to provide the information requested by Adam Keam, an Australian Citizen? What actions are you going to take as an elected representative of the Australian people? You are responsible for the Government’s abuse of the so-called due process to shut people up and for the violations of human rights in Australia? Yours faithfully Brigitte Straulino President ONE VOICE – ONE PEOPLE, Human Rights Defenders
Muslims don't charge interest.
Dear Fellow Australians, A show on SBS television aroused my curiosity about how Muslims might lend money because, apparently, trade is fundamental to their culture. I phoned the Muslim Community Co-Operative (Australia) Ltd and was sent some literature on the Muslim Community Credit Union Ltd. Their booklet says "Transactions involving interest are completely excluded.". This ties in with a search of the Holy Quran on Yahoo for the word "usury" which says that "God hath permitted trade and forbidden usury" and those "who repeat (The Offence) are companions of the Fire: They will abide therein (for ever)" etc. A book entitled "Lightning Over the Treasury Building" (author escapes me), Chapter II, says "For centuries, in England, the christians were taught, and believed, that it was contrary to Christian ethics to loan money at usury, or interest. During those centuries the Church and the State saw eye to eye, for they were practically one and the same. It was, therefore, not only un-Christian, but illegal to loan money at interest. The laws of King Alfred, in the Tenth Century, provided that the effects and lands of those who loaned money upon interest should be forfeited to the crown and the lender should not be buried in consecrated ground." etc. We, dumb Christians, seem to have "lost the plot" and let the banks become our masters, financially, politically, socially and morally. Those banks think we are so completely stupid that they, not only impose usury on us, but create the money they lend us "out of thin air" and reap returns which we cannot begin to calculate. If this were a Harold Robbins' novel, it would be ridiculed as unbelievable nonsense - a fantasy to end all fantasies. Will we Christians ever wake up? Yours sincerely, John Wilson..
Re: Treaty to be stoped URGENT
Dear Joe, I can't quite imagine you in your "early nighties". John. -Original Message- From: succeed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, 13 February 2001 13:35 Subject: Re: Treaty to be stoped URGENT >John I am not running away. You are fighting on the wrong front but best of >luck you will need it. I went down the path you are taking in the early >nighties when you were asleep like most other Australians, I learn from my >experiences. Joe Bryant > > > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
Re: Treaty to be stoped URGENT
Dear Joe, "Getting the juries is the problem." You are quite right. Judges have been refusing to let me have juries for 4 years in all my court cases, including their imprisoning me without one. We have the right to trial by jury "enshrined" in our present laws - what difference will another "Constitution" make? The COURTS ARE THE BATTLEGROUND where we must fight NOW. To put off the fight, with some excuse of making more laws, is exactly what the "evil counsellors, judges and ministers" want. They don't want a fight - and those who chicken out obviously don't want it, either. I have recently seen a video called "My Fair Lady" which has in it a song called "Words! Words! Words!". Bob Doring put out an email entitled "Fools. Traitors and Cowards", which was a report to General Macarthur in the Second World War describing the Australian population. Isn't it equally true today? Inverell wil be another repetition of those old women talking and talkingand wanting someone else to do the work for them. "Let's form another political party!". Wonderful!. Not really. Pathetic and useless - is more like it! To be a patriot, one doesn't need guns when we have juries. People bleat about being disarmed - but being denied juries is infinitely more serious. When are Australians going to fight back? Are they going to keep on saying, "Let's have some more laws." and "Let's have a new political party."? The Americans coined the phrase "Fully Informed Juries" but all they are insisting upon is what English Common Law has always had but has been kept from us. You can't win by running away. Yours sincerely, John Wilson -Original Message- From: succeed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, 12 February 2001 12:12 Subject: Re: Treaty to be stoped URGENT >Greetings John, > >Getting the juries is the problem! This will only happen with a fresh >Constitution it will not happen by confronting the courts. > > >Check out the new site I am building at www.alt3.net I would appreciate any >constructive criticism. Regards Joe Bryant > > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
Re: Treaty to be stoped URGENT
Dear Joe, Thank goodness we have juries to nullify anything done by the government against us. John. -Original Message- From: succeed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: succeed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, 9 February 2001 12:41 Subject: Treaty to be stoped URGENT >Greetings, > >My thanks to Merv Turner for a timely reminder, I have included my >submission for your information. Regards Joe Bryant > >The message Merv passed on was: > >Dear Friend and co-worker, > The following came in the mail, and you may like to take some action >on it.. > >Statute of International Criminal Code >TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN THAT IS ALL OF AUSTRALIA > >On the news report No. 261 issued by Neil Baird, 23/01/01, is the following >interesting information. On 13 Feb next, a Joing Standing Committee will >meet to consider whether Australia should accept the Statute of an >International Criminal Court. Adoption of this Treaty will over ride the >power of Australia's own courts on issues considered of interest to the >"International Community". > >The lack of publicity given to this proposal means to date there have only >been 23 submissions, most from UN affiliated organisations or lawyers who >have a personal axe to grind.. As the writer points out, with a miniscule >input from the general public the committee could recommend to the >Government as there are so few onjections to the Treatry it should be >ratified. > >It is crucial that we ACT NOW by making it clear what the committee should >decide. Submissions should be directed to: >The Inquiry Secretary >Mr. Bob Morris >Joint Standing Committee on Treaties >Dept of House of Representatives >Parliament House >Canberra ACT 2600 > >FAX (02) 6277 4827 EMAIL www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/jsct/icc > or phone Mr. Morris on (02) 6277 2135 > >The submission may be kept simple. This is what I have faxed to him: > >Re - Joint Standing Committii on Treaties >Dear Sir, > As a private citizen, I wish to indicate my objection to the >consideration of any overseas proposal that will be binding on the citizens >of Australia.Our elected representatives are responsible for internal >issues that effect their electors. But, any issue that ties us to >international agreements should be first agreed to, or rejected by, all >citizens per medium of a referendum. > An International Criminal Court should not over ride the authority >of own institutions. Nor should the citizens of this country be bound to >decisions made by any external authority, whose recognition of our common >law rights are suspect. I urge the Committee to reject this proposal. > Yours sincerely > >My submission follows, >The Inquiry Secretary >Mr. Bob Morris >Joint Standing Committee on Treaties >Dept of House of Representatives >Parliament House >Canberra ACT 2600 > >FAX (02) 6277 4827 > >9th February 2001 > >Joint Standing Committee on Treaties >Dear Sir, > > > Statute of International Criminal Code > > > SUBMISSION > >My submission is: > >Australia should not be party to the Statute of International Criminal Code. > >Because: > >1. It overrides Australian sovereignty: > >Australia (government) rejected appeals to the Privy Council in order to end >jurisdiction by "foreign" authorities. It is therefore hypocritical and a >reversal of existing policy of independent sovereignty. > >It is not in the best interests of the Australian people to transfer >sovereignty to an alien foreign power. > >The parliament does not have the peoples' authority for such a transfer of >juridical sovereignty. > >To transfer sovereignty to a foreign power could only be lawful following a >referendum of the population. > >2. Should Australia become a party to this Code: > >it would place all Australians under the control of a foreign alien power >without their individual knowledge or authority, and > >it would place all Australians under an authority over which they could not >possible have proper democratic influence, and > >it would place all Australians under an authority that will be concerned >more about the interests of more powerful nations that it would be about >Australians, and > >Australians would have no reasonable or democratic control over future >developments of the Code. > >3. Should Australia become party to this Code: > >all persons involved in the support of such involvement will have committed >an act of treachery against the Australian people for which they will be >held fully accountable. > > >Submission by, > >Joseph Richard Bryant, >Natural citizen elector. >418 Roper Road, >St Marys NSW 2670 > > > > > > > > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe
The Crown Solicitor's Request
Dear Fellow Australians,
I have filed an action (30/11/2000) in the
Supreme Court against the Crown because the Crown is vicariously liable for what
Public Servants, such as Judicial Officers, do.I am accusing the Registrar of
the District Court, under section 138 of the Crimes Act ("penal servitude
for seven years"), which is that he "unlawfully and maliciously"
rejected a Cross-Claim I had filed against the Crown, in a case the Deputy
Commissioner of Taxation filed against me.
Of course, I want trial by jury but the Crown
Solicitor doesn't.
Today I received a letter from the Crown
Solicitor enclosing a prepared "Notice of Discontinuance of Proceedings -
Filed for the Plaintiff (me)". It is signed by the Crown Solicitor
(I.V. Knight) and a Solicitor for the Crown Solicitor (G. Mahony). AND
THEY WANT ME TO SIGN IT where the document says "The plaintiff discontinues
these proceedings".
If it wasn't so pathetic, it would be
funny.
Attached is a copy of an Affidavit I filed in
this matter which gets down to basics of what is a Court; what is Justice;
what is a Law/what is not a Law. This has been put together drawing upon my own
research and material sent by email from other Patriots - for which I thank
them.
Yours sincerely,
John
Wilson.
Affidavit on right to trial by jury.doc
The Trial of William Penn (1670)
Dear Fellow Australians, By conducting a search the transcript of William Penn's trial in 1670 is available to all. This is a landmark case when the jury nullified a bad law and rejected the dictate of an oppressive government. This is essential reading for any patriot. For more information, search for "The Trial of William Penn (1670)" on Yahoo through Yahoo UK & Ireland. Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
Promo for Forum.
Dear Robert, A bit wishy-washy. What "common goal"? How about some urgency and and calling "a spade a spade". Australia is being stolen and the banks are the thieves. Democracy is a fiction and the banks are the tyrants. To use your own words, "Australians aren't hurt enough yet." That's because they are either brain-dead or "fools, traitors and cowards". Isn't Inverell more than a "talk shop" where self-centred morons have a bit of a whinge and leave thinking they have "done their bit"? Inverell must be a "call to arms" to fight for our country and for the future of our children. Why Inverell? Because there ain't nothing else! Otherwise, Inverell will become known for its chickens more than its gemstones. John Wilson.
U.S. DECISION SMASHES THE BANKS ON CREATION OF MONEY
Dear Fellow Australians, Attached is the most important court case you will ever read. It is the "Credit River Decision" of 1968 which declared that banks are committing fraud by creating money "out of thin air". Australian banks do this to the order of some 20 billion dollars each year, according to the Reserve Bank of Australia's own journals. Please read the attached account of this landmark ruling and send it on, via the email network, as far and as widely as possible. Every man and woman must learn the astonishing truth about what the banks are doing AND that they have been beated. But, information is useless unless it is known and acted upon. Nothing - absolutely nothing - is more important than smashing the banks and reverting them to the only status they deserve which is that of a servant. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. CREDIT RIVER DECISION.doc
Re: The Stirrer Special
Dear Dennis, I am communicating with Brian's daughter, Judy Mastwyk. Only by a Fully Informed Jury can Brian, or any patriot, receive Justice. The legal definition of Justice is : " a moral ideal that the law seeks to uphold in the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs". It is time for other patriots to defy bad laws and demand trial by jury because, as Thomas Jefferson said, "I believe trial by jury is the only anchor yet imagined by man which can hold a government to the principles of its constitution". If we don't restore and use our right to trial by jury, then our country and our freedom is gone. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. -Original Message- From: Dennis Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, 22 January 2001 13:41 Subject: The Stirrer Special >Hello John, I don't know if you have seen this so I am forwarding it to >you.We do seem to be between a rock and a hard place don't we. >Regards, >Dennis Fraser > >Subject: > Fw: STIRRER SPECIAL >Date: > Sun, 21 Jan 2001 22:25:01 +1000 > From: > "cap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > "Tony Grieve and associates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Correct Australian Parliaments Association" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > >-Original Message- >From: A.Esson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Alan Gourley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Tuesday, 16 January 2001 5:55 PM >Subject: STIRRER SPECIAL > >I would like you to send this on to all the people you know. If this is >what Australia has come to I shudder to think what >will occur in the next few years. > >I am also sending this to all my subscribers who do not have a computer. > >Thank you Alan > > " THE STIRRER " > > > > SPECIAL EDITION > >THE STORY OF BRIAN FYFFE > > AS TOLD BY BRIAN FYFFE > >On the 22nd December 1982 a D8H bulldozer l was operating at Deddick in >North eastern Victoria fractured a front >hydraulic hose, caught alight and was badly damaged by fire. The machine >was a 1973 "30,000 series model". Twelve >months ago William Adams, the Victorian agent for Caterpillar Tractors >sent out a recall notice on all D8 Bulldozers >dating back to 1958, stating that the machines were faulty in the front >hydraulic rams and were likely to blow, causing >fire and/or serious injury or death to the operator. > >I had recently spent over $60,000 on this D8H. As it was nearly paid for >at the time l had to refinance with C.A.G.A. >finance company in order to pay for the rebuild work to be done. I had >it insured with the "State Insurance Company" at >the time of the fire. The State Insurance Company would not settle the >claim. They refused to pay for the damage >sustained by the machine and then offered me an ex State Electricity >Company D8H dozer as a replacement. As they >refused to give me any "warranty" on this dozer l refused the offer and >told them to rebuild my own machine. This they >refused to do. I eventually went to court, Fyffe v. State Insurance >Commissioner. Mr. Peter J. Galbally appeared for me >before Justice James Gobbo, the now Governor of Victoria. I won my claim >against the State and was awarded the >$130,000 the machine was insured for and also $107,000 in interest. It >was not till December 1985 that this case was >heard, three years after the fire. Even though l had won my case the >State Insurance Company would not settle and >had to be served with a Warrant of Distress. They then settled in >January 1986. During the 3 years l was without this >machine untold damage was done to my business. I had bought a new D8K >Bulldozer in 1980 and without the 2 >machines could not operate properly or have the turnover to pay for the >new machine. Because of this situation William >Adams, the caterpillar dealer who had financed the new D8K repossessed >it in 1984. This left me in a situation where l >had neither machine but repayments on them both still to be met. > >As we also ran a dairying enterprise l employed the services of a share >farmer in 1982 who bought our herd of dairy >cows. The 1982-1983 season was one of the worst droughts in Victorian >history. The year of the Ash Wednesday bush >fires. Even our creek, which never in living memory was known to stop >flowing, dried up. So, after a year of this the share >farmer decided to move on, taking the herd of cows with him. Things went >from bad to worse. In 1986 we managed to >get another herd together and resumed milking again. All of the time >when
Letter to a Bank Manager
Dear Fellow Australians, Attached is a (one-page) letter I have just faxed to my bank manager explaining that, as more Australians begin to realize how criminal and treacherous the banks are, employees of the branches will experience more displeasure from customers. I don't believe they understand what they are a part of. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. Letter to a Bank Manager.doc
Increased security at the Supreme Court.
Dear Fellow Australians, The NSW Supreme Court shares to Law Courts Building at Queen's Square in Sydney with the Federal and High Courts of Australia. Up until today I have simply walked off the street and in through one of the 4 entrances into the foyer and caught the lifts in the multi-storied building. Today and for the first time, in that foyer, I had to pass through a metal-detecter manned by 4 sheriffs. It was a makeshift set-up and they missed the miniscule folding knife attached to my key-ring. There must now be a perceived risk felt by staff of the building. How sad! Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
Re: New Computer Virus Alert!
-Original Message-From: normanjohnb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Tuesday, 16 January 2001 8:55Subject: Fw: New Computer Virus Alert! Just in from a good contact and YES IMPORTANT, please announce asap (I'd be surprised if this cross posts but apologies if I have) - Original Message - Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 10:09 AM Subject: Fw: New Computer Virus Alert! New Virus...A Virtual card for You Subject: A new virus has just been discovered that has been classified by Microsoft ( www.microsoft.com ) and byMcAfee (www.mcafee.com ) as the most destructive ever! This virus was discovered yesterday afternoon by McAfee and no vaccine has yet been developed. This virus simply destroys Sector Zero from the hard disk, where vital information for its functioning are stored. This virus acts in the following manner: It sends itself automatically to all contacts on your list with the title "A Virtual Card for You". As soon as the supposed virtual card is opened, the computer freezes so that the user has to reboot. When the ctrl+alt+del keys or the reset button are pressed, the virus destroys Sector Zero, thus permanently destroying the hard disk. So don't open any mails with subject "A Virtual Card for You". As soon as you get the mail, delete it. Please pass on this mail to all your friends. -- Norman John --
Re: Bank fraud
Dear Len, That's a good plan. I am presented suing the Crown on the same basis. The judges know that it must be a jury trial and are breaking all the laws to prevent a jury by the other side filing a Notice of Motion to dismiss the case and the judges (although they must not deal with it, themselves) plan to judge the Notice of Motion and strike out the Claim. It's totally illegal - but judges are criminals and traitors, as you know. Sully J ruled on 15/12/00 that a judge (he, in particular) can determine a Notice of Motion by the Crown Solicitor to dismiss my Claim of Unlawful Imprisonment - and that I am appealing against to the Court of Appeal with an Application for Leave to Appeal to go before judges on 26/03/01. This I expect will go in favour of Sully J and then it's off to the High Court, etc, etc. Judicial Corruption is TOTAL. The only way to smash it is for many Australians to sue the banks (or bank officers) and demand jury trials - over and over and over until the system is broken. Yours sincerely, John. -Original Message- From: Bill Sweetwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: JohnWilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, 16 January 2001 7:23 Subject: Bank fraud >Dear John, > >G'day. A thought that has been running through my mind >for some time is that perhaps we should arrange for a >person to sue a bank loans officer in a civil suit, >with a jury, in order to show the fraud and raise the >Nurnberg principles whereby it is insufficient to hide >behind the claim that ..."one was only doing what one >was told by one's superiors." > >Food for further thought? > >Cheers, > >Len Clampett > >___ __ >http://au.classifieds.yahoo.com/au/car/ - Yahoo! Cars >- Buy, sell or finance a car.. > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
Australian Judges on "Trial by Jury".
Dear Fellow Australians, Today I received the transcript of 28th December, 2000 in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in matter No 20714/00 of John Wilson -v- St. George bank Limited & State of New South Wales. The Judge was Justice Hulme. Here is an extract from that transcript: HIS HONOUR: I'm not quite sure where you got hi idea of this inalienable right to trial by jury from but if it exists - sorry, but your claim is quite inconsistent with the terms of the Supreme Court Act. WILSON: Well the Supreme Court Act is null and void if it denies a right to trial by jury. HIS HONOUR: Well I don't know what the - where you get that idea from. WILSON: From history, from Magna Carta, from the Petition of Right, from the Bill of Rights. Many, many pieces of legislation entrenched the right to trial by jury and even -- HIS HONOUR: Well that's not my understanding of the law. My understanding is that parliament can change that -- WILSON: No it cannot. That's the point of the word inalienable. It cannot be dispensed with, you go back to the actual Bill of Rights where it refers to evil counsellors and judges who have assumed the power of dispensing with our laws and our rights. Do you know that section? HIS HONOUR: You will have to find some judge other than me or to takes me to the relevant bits of the law that demonstrat that what parliament said in the Supreme Court Act it did not have power to say. When I have the whole transcript scanned, I will put it to air. In the meantime, I would have thought that no government can make laws which take away people's rights. They do not have the authority to do so because their authority comes from the people, ie: at least, in a democracy. I would appreciate input to list the limits of parliament in this regard. Please give chapter and verse. Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
Re: Mail delivery failure
Dear Mailer & Neither, The email address for the Magna Carta Society is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and not [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Wilson. -Original Message- From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, 15 January 2001 14:27 Subject: Mail delivery failure >This message was created automatically by mail delivery >software. A message that you sent could not be delivered >to all of its recipients. > >The following message, addressed to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', >failed because it has not been collected after 30 days > >Here is a copy of the first part of the message, including >all headers. > > START OF RETURNED MESSAGE >Received: from punt-1.mail.demon.net by mailstore > for [EMAIL PROTECTED] id 976844793:10:20090:0; > Fri, 15 Dec 2000 01:46:33 GMT >Received: from acay.com.au ([203.7.132.2]) by punt-1.mail.demon.net > id aa1020046; 15 Dec 2000 1:46 GMT >Received: from default (acay0071334.acay.com.au [203.7.133.4]) > by acay.com.au (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id eBEEliW06778; > Fri, 15 Dec 2000 01:47:44 +1100 (EST) >Message-ID: <000a01c06639$09b99460$048507cb@default> >From: "John Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Neither Public List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Judicial Malice takes many forms. >Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 12:47:42 +1100 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="=_NextPart_000_0007_01C06695.3D2A0C60" >X-Priority: 3 >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 > >This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > >--=_NextPart_000_0007_01C06695.3D2A0C60 >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >Last Tuesday in the Supreme Court of NSW, Justice Brian Murray said the = >next time in court would be Friday 15th December, 2000 at 10am. His = >Chambers confirmed the date and time is a fax on the Wednesday. > >This morning, being Friday 15th December, I left my car at Parramatta = >and caught the 8:25 train to Town Hall and went down to platform 5 = >where, fortunately, there was a train (with its doors open) going to = >Bondi Junction. I got off at Martin Place and got to the Law Courts = >Building by 9:08am to find my case was on the notice board for 9:00am. > >I caught the lift to the 10th floor and hurriedly walked to Court 10E = >where everyone was waiting - including the solicitor for the Crown. = >Therefore, everyone was informed of the 9:00am listing, except me. > >It's called deception. When I don't show, the orders go in favour of = >the Crown. > >I protested that it was another example of MALICE and that the legal = >definition of MALICE is "a premeditated design to do evil". = >What better description for the Judiciary than that? > >Transcripts on the way. > > >Yours sincerely, > >John Wilson. > > > >--=_NextPart_000_0007_01C06695.3D2A0C60 >Content-Type: text/html; > charset="iso-8859-1" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > > >http-equiv=3DContent-Type> > > > MESSAGE TRUNCATED > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
Re: Re: virus warning
. -Original Message- From: Yvette Diane Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jeanette Wilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Bambi Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Alex Trost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Dresden Riding Pony Stud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Warren Sharples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Brenda Robilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Leigh Ridgway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Leigh Ridgway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Jemma & Dave Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Paul Moulden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Phil Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Micheal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Kim Latter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Serena Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Micheal Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; John Haylen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Lisa Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; David Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Jean Goldfinch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Peter Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Heather Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Peter Cochran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Terry & Pat Cobby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mike Christians <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Susan Cheeseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Jim Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; John Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Kenny . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Saturday, 13 January 2001 20:59 Subject: Fw: Re: virus warning > >Conquest Park Performance Horses. >N.S.W. > >- Original Message - >From: "Alexandra Trost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Fred Trost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Karen Mocatta" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jacqueline Trost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >"Dawn Merza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Yvette Wilson" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2001 3:59 PM >Subject: Fw: Re: virus warning > > >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Justine PEARSALL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ; >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2001 9:56 AM >> Subject: Fwd: Re: virus warning >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >>Subject: Re: virus warning >> > >Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 09:59:33 - >> > > >> > > >> > >> > Please read and take note. >> > > >> > >> > Read immediately and pass on to everyone you know >> > >> > >> > >> > Someone is sending out a very cute screensaver of the Budweiser >> Frogs. >> > >> > >> > >> > If you download it, you will lose everything! Your hard drive will >> > >>crash >> > >> > and >> > >> > someone from the Internet will get your screen name and password! >> > >> > >> > >> > DO NOT DOWNLOAD IT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES! >> > >> > >> > >> > It just went into circulation yesterday. Please distribute this >> > >>message. >> > >> > This >> > >> > is a new, very malicious virus and not many people know about it. >> This >> > >> > information was announced yesterday morning from Microsoft. >> > >> > >> > >> > Please share it with everyone that might access the Internet. >> > >> > >> > >> > Once again, Pass This Along To EVERYONE in your address book so >that >> > >> > this may be stopped. AOL has said that this is a very dangerous >virus >> > >>and >> > >> > that there is NO remedy for it at this time. >> > >> > >> > >> > This is VERY important. If you receive a screen saver from a friend >> or >> > >> > anyone >> > >> > you may not know with the Budweiser Frogs in it, DO NOT DOWNLOAD IT >> OR >> > >>OPEN >> > >> > THE FILE! >> > >> > >> > >> > Press the forward button on your email program and send this notice >> to >> > >> > EVERYONE you know. >> > > >> > >> > >_ >> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at >http://www.hotmail.com. >> > >> >> > > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
Re: No honest judges in Australia.
Dear Kevin, In each State of Australia we have a "Judicial Commision" which is a panel of senior judges who hear complaints against judges in all courts, ie: judges judging themselves. In the courts we have a system of appeals to higher courts, ie: judges judging themselves. We have no truly independent body of ordinary citizens to oversee the judges. We have the Parliaments (which are comprised of mostly lawyers) and State Governors representing the Queen of England whose Privy Council deny having any jurisdiction in Australia. The Governors (including the Governor-General) are ex-judges. We have a Law Reform Commission with a few non-lawyers to make up the numbers but. otherwise, are lawyers. In 1988 we had a Federal Referendum when the both Houses of the Commonwealth Government wanted to change section 80 of the Australia Constitution, which guaranteed trial by jury, to exclude contempt of court and courts martial - but the rejection by the people to that proposal was emphatic in all States. However, judges disregard that "Will of the People" and deny trial by jury in all cases of contempt of court and I don't know about courts martial. Is there something in our laws to protect us against corrupt judges? Yes, and many times over - but the 'judges have assumed a power of dispensing with our laws and our liberties' (ala Bill of Rights 1688). I have listed some of our protective laws and charters in my website of http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au and I'm sure Canada and Australia have the same heritage of English Common Law. However, it seems the ploy of distracting the people with sport is highly effective and the media will not inform anyone of matters of substance which might awaken them to their fate. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. -Original Message-From: The McElheran's <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Saturday, 13 January 2001 1:24Subject: Re: No honest judges in Australia. Does the Judicial System have a Judicial Counsel? (rules for judges?) Canada does, and if you know them your able to empower the judge to sit independant of state pressure. Pipe dream?? If your system is the same as ours, there should be something. Kevin - Original Message - From: John Wilson To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 8:04 PM Subject: No honest judges in Australia. Dear Kevin, How fortunate you are to have some honest judges in Canada. Here, in Australia, Judicial Corruption is total. To protect themselves, they choose which cases have trial by jury. So, naturally, anything that threatens the banks or themselves is denied a jury. If you want confirmation, please view my website of http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au From the land of sunshine and treachery, John Wilson.
The Future of Australia - "It's what we make it."
Dear Fellow Australians, The television commercial promoting this year's Centenary of Federation ends with the line, when asking the question of the future of our country, "IT'S WHAT WE MAKE IT." Are we prepared to allow Banks to steal our country from us, with their fraudulent contracts and their creating their own money? Are we prepared to allow Judges to lie, conceal that fraud, pervert the Course of Justice, and take away our rights? Are we the "FOOLS, TRAITORS AND COWARDS" (as described in that Intelligence Report to General Macarthur in the Second World War) who were willing to surrender Australia above the "Brisbane Line" to the Japanese? Are we a disunited, apathetic, gutless, amoral and selfish people who would rather be slaves than stand against INJUSTICE and TREACHERY? Are the words of "LEST WE FORGET" meaningless? In 1775 an American, Patrick Henry, said, "They tell us, Sir, that we are weak - unable to cope with so formidable an adversary...Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs, and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies have bound us hand and foot?Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased as the price of chains and slavery?" Banks and Judges make up a "formidable enemy". Our Courts have been taken from us - but they are the only bloodless path to reclaim our country and our future. I urge you to take up the pen because the enemy have the swords. I urge you to use the greatest weapon, which is TRUTH, and fight in those Courts for JUSTICE. The simplicity is that "variable means uncertain" and "variable interest rates render a contract void for uncertainty under Common Law". Put these words to JURIES across the nation. Put these words in a thousand Statements of Claim and demand RESTITUTION of the money stolen by the Banks, with their fraudulent contracts, and REDRESS the terrible wrongs caused by the Banks to families. May this be the key to unlock the chains and to restore the country to the people. By defeating the Banks in this way, we can also purge our Courts of the malignancy of CORRUPT JUDGES. WHO WILL DARE? Yours sincerely, John Wilson, http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au
St. George Bank performs the eviction.
Dear Fellow Australians, Yesterday, at 12 noon, the Sheriff enacted the court order from Justice Carolyn Simpson of the Supreme Court of NSW to evict my family and me from our home. All the locks were changed and a security guard placed on site and around the clock. The first guard arrived at 3 pm and he was being relieved at 1 am. A last minute and fourth attempt to stay the order was made. The first 2 before Justice Hulme. The 3rd to Registrar Durkin. And, yesterday, to Justice Brian Sully - who is the same judge who overruled any right to trial by jury in 1999 (including UN International Covenant on Political & Civil Rights, and all the statutes and charters and the Australian Constitution) to send me to Chief judge at Common Law James Wood and his "kangaroo court" to imprison me. The same judge who, on 15/12/00 overruled Natural Justice to say judges can judge in their own cause - to which I am currently appealing to the Court of Appeal. Justice Brian Sully seems to be one of the mafia's hatchetmen. The usual form is that, no matter what evidence one puts in sworn affidavits, the judges read it then totally ignore it and proceed with what they wanted to do in the first place. They have no compunction in overruling any and every law. They regard themselves as above the law and "immune from suit", ie: they believe they are unaccountable and untouchable. As is said on the Attorney General's own video, shown to people going in for jury service : "NO JURIES, NO JUSTICE". When are Australians going to wake to the fact that they have no rights because, without trial by jury, we are defenceless. Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
Creation of Money by the Banks.
Dear fellow Australians, The 1968 Minnesota Judgment by a Judge and Jury against a bank for creating money "out of thin air" is compulsory knowledge which all Australians must gain if we are to defeat the tyrant. Here is a quote from the Judge's "Additional Memorandum": "The issuance of a paper money without backing by the Banks is the same as if a grain warehouseman were to issue Warehouse Receipts for grain that he did not have. There must be a full representative consideration behind the paper or it is void as premised in fraud. No rights can be acquired by fraud. The law does not sanction an intentional wrong to the Citizen either in War or in Peace. - Martin V. Mahoney" Apparently Judge Mahoney was poisoned 6 months after handling down his ruling. Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
Freemasons & Jack the Ripper.
Dear Fellow Australians, A few nights ago, I saw a fascinating 1978 movie on Foxtel called "MURDER BY DECREE" with Christopher Plummer, James Mason, John Geilgud, Anthony Quayle, etc. A high quality production with the main character being Sherlock Holmes. The last 20 minutes was riveting where Sherlock Holmes confronted the Prime Minister and senior Cabinet Ministers and unravelled the mystery of Jack the Ripper as being a Freemans' plot to cover up the illegitimate birth of a Catholic child to the heir to the British throne -apparently a story which still exists today. Who are these "Freemasons"? Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
Judges are in Contempt of Court & Pervert the Course of Justice.
Dear Fellow Australians, The eviction on Thursday is still anticipated because the re-financing has not materialized. I have updated the Press Release to include mention of the penalty the corrupt Judges face when they are brought before a Jury for being in Contempt of Court and Perverting the Course of Justice. Please pass it on because it really is important in the battle we now have for Freedom and Democracy. Yours sincerely, John Wilson.
Re: EVICTION
Dear Peter, Thank you for your support. I know Joe's story. He and I exchange emails and he has turned up a few times at my Court hearings. My throwing yellow paint at a Judge was a symbolic gesture intended to secure Trial by Jury, which the Judges fear most and continue to deny. The banks are Judges are conspirators and only by Fully Informed Juries can they be defeated. The evidence of bank fraud is laid out in my website for anyone prepared to go to Court and put it to a Jury. I wish people would do it. As long as they cringe in fear, the bullies will prevail. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. -Original Message-From: Peter H Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Saturday, 6 January 2001 10:30Subject: Re: EVICTION G'Day John, I admire you greatly. You are doing something that I cannot do I have neither the patience nor the temperament. Personally, I would kill the bastard who came on my land to repossess anything of mine. I would kill the bastard who would dare to make my day take a bad turn. Likewise the authority who sought to make my life hell, would find their own hell immediately and at once!! "I am prepared to die to regain a peaceful, quiet, [Christian]-lawful, democratic, free life!" Is the other guy prepared to die for his belief?? Do you remember the [true] story of EFFIE? New South Welshman Joe Bryant was dispossessed of his yard by the Commonwealth Bank. His yard became occupied by Bank tough guys. One evening, Joe delivered a pantechnicon which gained admittance - more assets for the Bank? During the night the pantechnicon disgorged tougher guys fully armed with 'behaviour modifiers'. These tougher guys were of an academic persuasion . . . so good were their teaching skills that the former tough guys got the message, rather quickly ... and remembered it! Joe retook possession of his yard. The score: Bank nil, Joe Bryant, one. I will send you the [true] story of the man from Mt Larcom - this is a popular demonstration of one man's belief overcoming the evil of today's thoughtless authoritarianism. In the meanwhile ..Keep your powder dry .. and your gun handy,Regards, Peter H Davies
Re: Urgent Attention: John Wilson to be evicted!!!
Dear Ladies,
People power is necessary to overturn the banks and
judges.
People in the streets of Australia are brain-dead - which is a
polite way of saying they are "fools, traitors and cowards", as we
were described by that American Intelligence report to General Macarthur back in
WWII.
Only the people directly involved in the fight were
different.
We should focus on the people directly involved in these
issues of rights - ie: the public servants working in the departments performing
the acts of treachery. Inform them of the wrong they are
doing.
This, I believe, is the attack which should be mounted if we
are to win.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
-Original Message-From:
Brigitte Straulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
'John Wilson' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Friday, 5 January 2001 23:05Subject: RE: Urgent Attention:
John Wilson to be evicted!!!
Dear John
Please let us know what the situation is. There is
not much more we can do. Until we have the back-up by people it is very hard
to be taken serious by government and any other institution. That applies
equally to the UN. Only people power will make the UN move or expose them.
When will people understand that in Australia???
How is your family holding up?
Brigitte
-Original Message-From: John Wilson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 5 January 2001
08:49To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
Urgent Attention: John Wilson to be evicted!!!
Dear Ladies,
I don't understand, either.
John
-Original
Message-From: Brigitte Straulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
'succeed' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Cc:
John Wilson (E-mail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Thursday, 4 January 2001 9:00Subject: RE: Urgent
Attention: John Wilson to be evicted!!!
Dear Joe
Thanks for your fast reply. I don't
understand what you mean. Could you please explain? We would like to
help John as much as possible.
Brigitte
-Original Message-From: succeed
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 3 January
2001 10:28To: One Voice - One People, Human Rights
DefendersSubject: Re: Urgent Attention: John Wilson
to be evicted!!!
Greetings,
Experience tells me that John has one avenue
open to him and that is to reliance. Only he or his wife
can do this. I have offered to assist if possible, if required
with this attempt I await some positive response from
John. Regards Joe
Bryant.
Judges in Contempt of Court.
Dear Fellow Australians, A COURT is a place where JUSTICE IS ADMINISTERED. JUSTICE is "a moral ideal that the law seeks to uphold in the protection of rights and punishment of wrongs." Judges do not "uphold the protection of rights" but deny rights such as Trial by Jury, Natural Justice and Discovery. Judges do not "punish. . wrongs" but conceal fraud committed by banks and their own corruption. Judges violate their Oaths of Allegiance and Office and are, themselves, the "evil doers". To be guilty of CONTEMPT OF COURT is to interfer with the administration of Justice. Judges PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE. Their crimes against the people are many. My website of http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au is a record. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. QUESTIONS TO A JUDGE.doc Press Release Eviction.doc
EVICTION
Dear Fellow Australians, Last Wednesday evening 2 men from the Office of the Sheriff served me with a NOTICE TO VACATE my home before 12 noon on Thursday 11th January 2000. The next day I filed an action against the St. George Bank and the Crown. The earliest the filing clerk could give me for a hearing of a NOTICE OF MOTION to STAY THE ORDER was March and she advised me to take the NOTICE to the Duty Judge in Court 1A if I wanted a date before 11th January, The Duty Judge (Hulme) deferred deciding whether to give me that earlier date from noon to 4:45pm (of course, breaking for lunch - most probably telephoning other Judges). Then he refused saying he could see no reason for an earlier date. The day after that, I filed another Affidavit in support of the Notice. His reaction to that material, ie: Reserve bank figures showing banks create their own money and the 1968 Minnesota ruling against such practices. He read intently while rubbinbg his hand across his mouth. He adjourned the matter and left the Court. He came back and smiling denied an earlier date with no explanation. Transcripts will be on the email when they are received. Attached is a PRESS RELEASE which I have just formulated - basically asking whether the Sheriff and the Police will do what a corrupt system tells them to do. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. Press Release Eviction.doc
Appeal against Sully Judgment on Jurisdiction
Dear Fellow Australians, This morning, I filed an Application for Leave to Appeal in the Court of Appeal ($605-00) - as I told Kiby J on Friday 14/12/00 when I said: " While ever Judges conceal bank fraud, and by that I mean variable interest rate loans, and the fact that banks create their own money; while every judge continues to deny people their rights which would enable them to defend themselves against fraud and corruption; banks will just sit back and laugh at their victims. A court is a place where justice is supposed to be administered. In these courts justice is not being administered. These courts have become corrupt.". In the "White Folder" (as part of the application) I wrote a "Summary of the Claimant's Argument" and it is attached to this email. Also attached is a poem adapted by Joe Bryant from that of Douglas Walker entitled "The Ghost from Flanders Field". Well done, Joe! Yours sincerely, John Wilson. Claimant's Argument.doc THE GHOST FROM FLANDERS FIELD adapted..doc
Supreme Court Transcripts
Dear Fellow Australians, Attached are the transcripts from the 12th & 15th of December, 2000. The one for the 15th is an accurate record of what was said. But the one for the 12th had been altered - vital passages had been edited out such as 1. Justice Brian Sully said, "This is my Court." - to which I responded, "No, it is not.". I wanted to argue the question of whose Courts these are, but Justice Sully overtalked me and did not mention the pint again. 2. On page 10, line 31, where the transcript says "(Read)" I actually read out section 3 of the Supreme Court Act (1900) by saying "(1) In any action by consent of both parties the whole or any one or more of the issues of fact in question may be tried, or the amount of any damages or compensation may be assessed by a Judge without a jurt.". 3. Further down that page, on line 48, where the transcript says "(Read)" I actually read out section 30 of the Interpretation Act (1987) by saying "(1) The amendment or repeal of an Act or statutory rule does not:..(c) affect any right, privilege, obligation or liability acquired, accrued or incurred under the Act or statutory rule.". When I presented Justice Sully with a copy of my leaflet, "Judges Judging Themselves", he read it qietly and put it to one side - as he did with the leaflet, "The Judges -v- Democracy". Both these pieces of information were ignored by the Judge.He also read and ignored other material, such as the transcript and judgment of 6 Sept 1999 when he denied me trial by jury and discarded the UN International Covennat on Civil and Political Rights. What clearer proof of Judicial Wrong can there be?? Yours sincerely, John Wilson. SC - 12 DEC 2000 - T.rtf SC - 15 DEC 2000 -T.rtf THE JUDGES.doc Judges judging themselves.doc
Re: Banks and Farmers.
Dear Ron,
There are probably 3 courses:
1. give up and give in;
2. don't give up but nag and persevere by going to
court
3. coup d'etat
1 is unconscionable
3 is impossible
therefore, 2 is all there is
John
-Original Message-From:
Ron Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Friday, 15 December 2000 9:29Subject: Re: Banks and
Farmers.
No One John as they wont let anyone win just on a
decision.
Ron
- Original Message -
From:
John
Wilson
To: Ron Owen
Cc: Jeremy
Lee
Sent: Friday, 15 December 2000
11:25 AM
Subject: Re: Banks and
Farmers.
Dear Ron,
Who is going to sue the Crown (being vicariously
liable) for that wrong done by those ministers?.Of course, with a
jury to judge the whole and every part of the case.
John.
-Original
Message-From: Ron Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Thursday, 14 December 2000 11:19Subject: Re: Banks
and Farmers.
Dear John
I think It is illegal for the banks to create
credit or as the way they apply it DEBIT on customers.
As under sub section 51 of the Consititution,
placitum 4 borrowing money on the public credit of the
Commonwealth. Establishes that only the government can
borrow on the public credit of the Commonwealth. It cannot delagate
this power to the banks or anyone else, this provision is not one of
those where it states until the parliament provides otherwise. I any
fair court, which you won't ever find they are stuffed.
Ron
- Original Message -
From:
John Wilson
To: Jeremy Lee
Sent: Thursday, 14 December
2000 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: Banks and
Farmers.
Dear Jeremy,
"Under the bank charters granted by the
federal Government" --- THIS IS WHAT THE PEOPLE MUST
SEE.
Where are these bank charters and how
do we get them?
Once we get these bank charters, the
proof of the CONSPIRACY is there, in black and white
---WOW!!
Yours sincerely,
John.
-Original
Message-From: Jeremy Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Wednesday, 13 December 2000 11:06Subject: Re:
Banks and Farmers.
Dear John, The banks
are licenced to create credit under the bank charters
granted by the Federal Government. We may not like it,
but it is not illegal - Sincerely, Jeremy
Lee
-Original
Message-From: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
Jeremy Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Monday, December 11, 2000 11:31 AMSubject:
Re: Banks and Farmers.
Dear
Jeremy,
What government licence for the banks
to create the nation's money?
What legislation?
This money they create for the nation
--- who owns it? Do the banks give it to the government
or keep it?
Regards,
John Wilson.
-Original
Message-From: Jeremy Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Monday, 11 December 2000 0:23Subject:
Re: Banks and Farmers.
Dear John -
Yes, I understand the question of
credit-creation. In 1992 I made a professional
two-and-a-half hour video "The Money Game"
which
