Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-23 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message 4d643c95.2040...@firshman.co.uk, Tony Firshman 
t...@firshman.co.uk writes



Malcolm Cadman wrote, on 21/Feb/11 21:34 | Feb21:



Hi Dave,

Is it an Mplane that was used in the AT cased version of a QL?

Any backplane is possible.


At the London QL Group we are repairing an AT QL system for a QL User.

The back plane seems to allow connections to work themselves loose, over
time, or with any sudden movements.

If you can add it a simple locking system for cards to the plane, then
that would be a useful enhancement.

That won't be Mplane. Mplane is a wide thin card, and both the large 
items (motherboard and expansion card) are screw fixed.  Only an item 
like qubide will sit unfixed by default, but it is possible also to fix 
that with suitable posts.


I think you probably have a Qplane, with all the extensions vertically 
from the motherboard.


Have a look at:

http://tfs.firshman.co.uk/ql/mplane.htm

Tony


Hi Tony,

Yes, definitely not an Mplane, having looked at the photo on your web 
site ...so most likely a Qplane.


--
Malcolm Cadman
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-22 Thread Phill Harvey-Smith

On the subject of backplanes..

I have one of these :

http://www.rwapadventures.com/images/q+4-interface.jpg

But alas don't have the little interface board that connects it to the 
QL, does anyone have one that can take a couple of high quality piccies 
of it, or beter still have a schematic ?


Cheers.

Phill.


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-22 Thread Petri Pellinen
Hi Tobias,

thanks for your thoughts on this. And your guess on Pennell's solution
is correct :) Very interesting piece of information about driver
shadowing. Obvious, once you think about it but I hadn't thought
about it :)


Cheers,
Petri


On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Tobias Fröschle
tobias.froesc...@t-online.de wrote:
 Well, I don't have the Pennel book, so don't know his recipe - But would
 expect he recommends scanning the potential expansion port ROM start
 candidates for a valid ROM header and mimicking the correct initialisation
 sequence (i.e calling initialisation routine at x+6 and linking in Basic
 procedures at x+4.
 So what could go wrong: Waste of memory - All drivers need to allocate at
 least a 40+ bytes driver linkage block plus any additional scratchpad memory
 they need. So if you initialize a driver twice, memory of the first is
 potentially lost. (The driver as such won't be called twice, because drivers
 may very well shadow each other, only the first one that tells the system
 it has recognized its device name will actualy be called (This is one of the
 mechanisms used by the PE to 'hide' the original con_ driver)
 Waste of CPU: Drivers linking in a polling or scheduler loop might very well
 do that twice, same for an external interrupt routine.
 Polling or scheduler loops just waste CPU. External interrupt routines
 hooked in twice shouldn't hurt (but probably wasting CPU as well), as an
 interrupt routine should really clear the interrupt source befor it returns.
 BTW all of the link traps have no failure exit - they will just link in
 whatever routine they're asked for.
 Same goes with SuperBASIC extensions - just a waste of memory - the last one
 hides the others.
 This would be one typical usage of a thing: When a driver is initialized, it
 could check for existance of its correspondent thing and gracefully exits
 without further initialisation if it's already there.
 ___
 QL-Users Mailing List
 http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-22 Thread David Tubbs

At 09:48 22/02/2011 +, you wrote:

On the subject of backplanes..

I have one of these :

http://www.rwapadventures.com/images/q+4-interface.jpg

But alas don't have the little interface board that connects it to the QL, 
does anyone have one that can take a couple of high quality piccies of it, 
or beter still have a schematic ?


Cheers.

Phill.


Surely you you just plug it into the QL, mem'expansion or just ribbon cable.


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-22 Thread Phill Harvey-Smith

David Tubbs wrote:

At 09:48 22/02/2011 +, you wrote:

On the subject of backplanes..

I have one of these :

http://www.rwapadventures.com/images/q+4-interface.jpg

But alas don't have the little interface board that connects it to the 
QL, does anyone have one that can take a couple of high quality 
piccies of it, or beter still have a schematic ?


Surely you you just plug it into the QL, mem'expansion or just ribbon 
cable.


Well yes but perhaps I didn't make it clear, I don't have the small card 
 pictured on the left of that picture, just the big metal 4 slot 
backplane and that deffo won't plug directly into the QL the cable's 
not long enough...


Cheers.

Phill.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-22 Thread Lee Privett
There is also documentation on backplane power adapter (I think) on Dilwyns web 
here http://www.dilwyn.me.uk/docs/manuals/qplane.zip from here 
http://www.dilwyn.me.uk/docs/manuals/index.html#qlmanual
 
Lee 
- Back to the QL-
  - Original Message - 
  From: David Tubbs 
  To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 4:02 PM
  Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...


  At 09:48 22/02/2011 +, you wrote:
  On the subject of backplanes..
  
  I have one of these :
  
  http://www.rwapadventures.com/images/q+4-interface.jpg
  
  But alas don't have the little interface board that connects it to the QL, 
  does anyone have one that can take a couple of high quality piccies of it, 
  or beter still have a schematic ?
  
  Cheers.
  
  Phill.

  Surely you you just plug it into the QL, mem'expansion or just ribbon cable.


  ___
  QL-Users Mailing List
  http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-22 Thread Dave Park
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Phill Harvey-Smith 
a...@aurigae.demon.co.uk wrote:

 David Tubbs wrote:

 At 09:48 22/02/2011 +, you wrote:

 On the subject of backplanes..

 I have one of these :

 http://www.rwapadventures.com/images/q+4-interface.jpg

 But alas don't have the little interface board that connects it to the
 QL, does anyone have one that can take a couple of high quality piccies of
 it, or beter still have a schematic ?


 Surely you you just plug it into the QL, mem'expansion or just ribbon
 cable.


 Well yes but perhaps I didn't make it clear, I don't have the small card
  pictured on the left of that picture, just the big metal 4 slot
 backplane and that deffo won't plug directly into the QL the cable's not
 long enough...


The card pictured is not a memory card, but instead looks like the buffer
card that  came with those backplanes. I'm sure the backplane would work
without it, but you might have problems if you use more than the first two
slots.

Rich Mellor may be able to tell you more.

Dave
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-22 Thread Tony Firshman

Phill Harvey-Smith wrote, on 22/Feb/11 16:18 | Feb22:

David Tubbs wrote:

At 09:48 22/02/2011 +, you wrote:

On the subject of backplanes..

I have one of these :

http://www.rwapadventures.com/images/q+4-interface.jpg

But alas don't have the little interface board that connects it to
the QL, does anyone have one that can take a couple of high quality
piccies of it, or beter still have a schematic ?


Surely you you just plug it into the QL, mem'expansion or just ribbon
cable.


Well yes but perhaps I didn't make it clear, I don't have the small card
pictured on the left of that picture, just the big metal 4 slot
backplane and that deffo won't plug directly into the QL the cable's
not long enough...

... but I wouldn't bother even trying.
This Quad device is about the worst electrically if I remember 
correctly. It was also pretty bad mechanically.


I don't think they realised how noisy the QL bus was when extended.

Tony
--
QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:257/67) +44(0)1442-828255
   t...@firshman.co.uk http://firshman.co.uk
Voice: +44(0)1442-828254 Fax: +44(0)1442-828255 Skype: tonyfirshman
TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-22 Thread Tony Firshman

Lee Privett wrote, on 22/Feb/11 16:22 | Feb22:

There is also documentation on backplane power adapter (I think) on Dilwyns web 
here http://www.dilwyn.me.uk/docs/manuals/qplane.zip from here 
http://www.dilwyn.me.uk/docs/manuals/index.html#qlmanual


This is not a Qplane but a CST Q+4.

Tony

--
QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:257/67) +44(0)1442-828255
   t...@firshman.co.uk http://firshman.co.uk
Voice: +44(0)1442-828254 Fax: +44(0)1442-828255 Skype: tonyfirshman
TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-22 Thread Malcolm Lear



On 22/02/2011 16:26, Tony Firshman wrote:

Phill Harvey-Smith wrote, on 22/Feb/11 16:18 | Feb22:

David Tubbs wrote:

At 09:48 22/02/2011 +, you wrote:

On the subject of backplanes..

I have one of these :

http://www.rwapadventures.com/images/q+4-interface.jpg

But alas don't have the little interface board that connects it to
the QL, does anyone have one that can take a couple of high quality
piccies of it, or beter still have a schematic ?


Surely you you just plug it into the QL, mem'expansion or just ribbon
cable.


Well yes but perhaps I didn't make it clear, I don't have the small card
pictured on the left of that picture, just the big metal 4 slot
backplane and that deffo won't plug directly into the QL the cable's
not long enough...

... but I wouldn't bother even trying.
This Quad device is about the worst electrically if I remember 
correctly. It was also pretty bad mechanically.


I don't think they realised how noisy the QL bus was when extended.

I'm not sure that's a problem. We had a lab full of QL's here at Essex 
University each fitted with an adapter bringing ribbon cable out to a 
full width 3U rack. The racks had memory, floppy, parallel, serial, and 
IO cards. All worked without any problems. However the card at the QL 
end had full data and address buffers. I've just checked and the ribbon 
cable was about a foot long plus of course the length of the rack (18 
inches).


Malcolm

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-22 Thread David Tubbs

At 10:25 22/02/2011 -0600, you wrote:


The card pictured is not a memory card, but instead looks like the buffer
card that  came with those backplanes. I'm sure the backplane would work
without it, but you might have problems if you use more than the first two
slots.

Rich Mellor may be able to tell you more.

Dave
___


One hell of alot of buffer, a mem expansion would bridge the gap.

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-22 Thread Dave Park
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Malcolm Lear malc...@essex.ac.uk wrote:



 On 22/02/2011 16:26, Tony Firshman wrote:

 Phill Harvey-Smith wrote, on 22/Feb/11 16:18 | Feb22:

 David Tubbs wrote:

 At 09:48 22/02/2011 +, you wrote:

 On the subject of backplanes..

 I have one of these :

 http://www.rwapadventures.com/images/q+4-interface.jpg

 But alas don't have the little interface board that connects it to
 the QL, does anyone have one that can take a couple of high quality
 piccies of it, or beter still have a schematic ?


 Surely you you just plug it into the QL, mem'expansion or just ribbon
 cable.


 Well yes but perhaps I didn't make it clear, I don't have the small card
 pictured on the left of that picture, just the big metal 4 slot
 backplane and that deffo won't plug directly into the QL the cable's
 not long enough...

 ... but I wouldn't bother even trying.
 This Quad device is about the worst electrically if I remember correctly.
 It was also pretty bad mechanically.

 I don't think they realised how noisy the QL bus was when extended.

  I'm not sure that's a problem. We had a lab full of QL's here at Essex
 University each fitted with an adapter bringing ribbon cable out to a full
 width 3U rack. The racks had memory, floppy, parallel, serial, and IO cards.
 All worked without any problems. However the card at the QL end had full
 data and address buffers. I've just checked and the ribbon cable was about a
 foot long plus of course the length of the rack (18 inches).


I've done a rough schematic for a 1 to 3 backplane with a 24 pin ATX
connector with power control. This will work in any ATX case with an ATX2.X
PSU - which would open up case options considerably. It does not contain a
ROM socket like the Mplane, because it places two cards on the front side of
the QL, not the rear side covering the ROM port.

I will have a prototype made for testing in a couple of months, and will
then share the photographs, schematic and PCB gerbers with the list.

*If anyone wants a backplane, they can have a new TF Services MPlane for
around £50/€60** including shipping** to the EU. As there will be a limited
number before the ~50 PCBs are used up, if people would like to be on the
waiting list they should email me. Please say in the email how many you
would like reserved for you. These will likely be ready to ship in 6-8
weeks.*
*
*
Dave
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-22 Thread Ralf Reköndt

Tony Firshman wrote:


This Quad device is about the worst electrically if I remember
correctly. It was also pretty bad mechanically.

I don't think they realised how noisy the QL bus was when extended.


Seemed, I once had a QL with a very stable bus (english bare PCB one with JS 
before). I put it into a little PC case and just had a backplane connected 
via a ribbon cable to the QL's bus. Nothing else. No buffering. No extra 
power supply.


And that worked with a full blown SQB with mouse port, a QEPIII and a QFlash 
EPROM-card on its connectors simultanously without any problems.


Cheers...Ralf 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-22 Thread Tony Firshman

Ralf Reköndt wrote, on 22/Feb/11 17:47 | Feb22:

Tony Firshman wrote:


This Quad device is about the worst electrically if I remember
correctly. It was also pretty bad mechanically.

I don't think they realised how noisy the QL bus was when extended.


Seemed, I once had a QL with a very stable bus (english bare PCB one
with JS before). I put it into a little PC case and just had a backplane
connected via a ribbon cable to the QL's bus. Nothing else. No
buffering. No extra power supply.

And that worked with a full blown SQB with mouse port, a QEPIII and a
QFlash EPROM-card on its connectors simultanously without any problems.

Yes but with a std speed QL.  I meant to say there would be issues with 
GC and SGC.


Tony
--
QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:257/67) +44(0)1442-828255
   t...@firshman.co.uk http://firshman.co.uk
Voice: +44(0)1442-828254 Fax: +44(0)1442-828255 Skype: tonyfirshman
TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-22 Thread Malcolm Lear



On 22/02/2011 17:53, Tony Firshman wrote:

Malcolm Lear wrote, on 22/Feb/11 16:45 | Feb22:



On 22/02/2011 16:26, Tony Firshman wrote:

Phill Harvey-Smith wrote, on 22/Feb/11 16:18 | Feb22:

David Tubbs wrote:

At 09:48 22/02/2011 +, you wrote:

On the subject of backplanes..

I have one of these :

http://www.rwapadventures.com/images/q+4-interface.jpg

But alas don't have the little interface board that connects it to
the QL, does anyone have one that can take a couple of high quality
piccies of it, or beter still have a schematic ?


Surely you you just plug it into the QL, mem'expansion or just ribbon
cable.


Well yes but perhaps I didn't make it clear, I don't have the small 
card

pictured on the left of that picture, just the big metal 4 slot
backplane and that deffo won't plug directly into the QL the 
cable's

not long enough...

... but I wouldn't bother even trying.
This Quad device is about the worst electrically if I remember
correctly. It was also pretty bad mechanically.

I don't think they realised how noisy the QL bus was when extended.


I'm not sure that's a problem. We had a lab full of QL's here at Essex
University each fitted with an adapter bringing ribbon cable out to a
full width 3U rack. The racks had memory, floppy, parallel, serial, and
IO cards. All worked without any problems. However the card at the QL
end had full data and address buffers. I've just checked and the ribbon
cable was about a foot long plus of course the length of the rack (18
inches).


... but what expansion card? I am talking really Gold Card and SGC.

Tony

Standard QL's.

Malcolm

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-22 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message 
AANLkTikeM=gpfa9smf8zwjh3_kcfhaxgstw6o6jjo...@mail.gmail.com, Dave 
Park plasticu...@gmail.com writes



Hi all,

After a bit of back and forth, it looks like I will be assembling the
remaining stock of Tony Firshman's Mplane. If it happens, they will be
available in about 2-3 months. For those that don't remember, the MPlane
offers 3 expansion ports and has a 4-pin power connector to take power from
a standard AT power supply. It also has a ROM port. This design is great for
fitting in smaller cases because it folds back on the QL in a very slimline
way.

However, AT cases and power supplies are not the easiest to find, and don't
have the best form factors any more. There are some interesting slimline and
lightweight ATX cases available.

I have been asked if it would be possible to do an ATX version or adaptor
for this type of backplane. This came up in 2002-3 too, so the need must be
even stronger now.

My thinking is that many might like this within the QL community, and it
would certainly be useful in many other applications so we can have our
parts subsidised by wider sales - as with the battery adaptor PCB.

Is there much interest in this?

Dave


Hi Dave,

Is it an Mplane that was used in the AT cased version of a QL?

At the London QL Group we are repairing an AT QL system for a QL User.

The back plane seems to allow connections to work themselves loose, over 
time, or with any sudden movements.


If you can add it a simple locking system for cards to the plane, then 
that would be a useful enhancement.


--
Malcolm Cadman
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-21 Thread Dave Park
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Lee Privett lee.priv...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dave, it my help those like me with less knowledge of such things to know
 exactly what QL'ers could make use of a back plane for, plugging in
 additional peripherals such as floppy drive adapter are already realised
 with through connections on the memory unit.


A backplane allows you to place each card in its own slot. It multiplies the
QL's expansion port into three, four or more ports. This means cards don't
need to use through-connectors.  It also allows them to be powered by an
external power supply, if you have so many cards that they strain the QL
power supply. This is especially helpful if you have a Gold Card, SGC or
Aurora... Imagine a Gold Card in a slot, a QubIDE in one slot, and still
having a slot free. Backplanes are usually used if you remove your QL
circuit board from the original case and put it in a regular PC case.

There are different formats of backplane that allow you to place your QL in
a different case - usually an older AT computer case with an AT power
supply. AT power supplies have a ON/OFF switch to operate the PSU directly.

ATX power supplies are more complicated. They are switched on an off
electronically by a control signal from the computer's circuit board -
circuitry QLs and most pre-1995 computers do not have. The switch is
connected to the computer, and is a momentary switch. It tells the computer
that a power toggle was requested, and the computer PCCB can refer to its
internal settings to decide what to do. This allows the computer to shut
itself down, and to define whether the computer should stay off or turn on
after a power failure.

There are no QL backplanes which work with ATX power supplies, because they
lack that power control circuitry.

There is a good description of ATX power and control here:

http://pinouts.ru/Power/atx_v2_pinout.shtml

Taking power from pin 9 (5VSB) we can operate a bistable flip-flop which is
operated by a momentary switch, and feeds the flip-flop's output to pin 16
(/PS_ON).

In plain English, a bistable flip-flip is a circuit that, when triggered,
changes state then stays in that state until triggered again. So each time
you press the switch, the output changes from 1 to 0 or from 0 to 1. Feeding
this back to the control circuit of the power supply allows the power supply
to turn on and off all the other power outputs as required.

The circuit to control this is so trivial, it should really be used in all
new designs where a PSU may be needed.

Dave
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-21 Thread Dave Park
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Adrian Ives adr...@acanthis.co.uk wrote:

 Yes, the ATX connector (or better) is a must. You probably want to look
 into
 an adapter lead that also bridges the Power Good signal, otherwise you
 won't
 get the PSU to switch on. This is what I had to do with my QPlanes in ATX
 cases.


Hehe, this. When you solved that problem, what did you bridge it to? I just
shunted it through a resistor to ground in my prototype, as the PSUs I
tested only provided 5V at 10-20mA.

And, have a good insulating backing plate, because there's nothing worse
than 40 amps of 12V shorting onto something metal in the case, or worse, to
something on a PCB...

Dave
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-21 Thread Daniele Terdina

 A backplane allows you to place each card in its own slot. It multiplies the
 QL's expansion port into three, four or more ports. This means cards don't
 
Didn't Sinclair ROMs have a bug preventing usage of all expansion slots except 
for the first one?
 
Daniele   
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-21 Thread Dave Park
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:40 PM, JJ Ruiz jjruiz_r...@yahoo.es wrote:

 I would get one to connect an Aurora and a Gold Card, powering them through
 the backplane.

 The 9V line, will carry 9V? or 5V? or it will be selectable? or it will be
 selectable by each expansion connector?


ATX v2 PSUs supply +5V and +/i12V. It is perfectly possible to supply +9V
from a +12V line using a 7809... Depending on the current requirement, this
could supply up to 2 amps, but would generate a fair amount of heat. For
smaller values like 500mA it wouldn't generate much or need a heatsink.

Is the 9V for serial? Or to feed 5V cards that have a 7805 regulator?

Dave
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-21 Thread Tony Firshman

Dave Park wrote, on 21/Feb/11 19:04 | Feb21:

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Adrian Ivesadr...@acanthis.co.uk  wrote:


Yes, the ATX connector (or better) is a must. You probably want to look
into
an adapter lead that also bridges the Power Good signal, otherwise you
won't
get the PSU to switch on. This is what I had to do with my QPlanes in ATX
cases.



Hehe, this. When you solved that problem, what did you bridge it to? I just
shunted it through a resistor to ground in my prototype, as the PSUs I
tested only provided 5V at 10-20mA.

Yes - that is what I do, and a ground is right next door!


And, have a good insulating backing plate, because there's nothing worse
than 40 amps of 12V shorting onto something metal in the case, or worse, to
something on a PCB...



Oh yes there is - a wet tongue (8-)#

Tony

--
QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:257/67) +44(0)1442-828255
   t...@firshman.co.uk http://firshman.co.uk
Voice: +44(0)1442-828254 Fax: +44(0)1442-828255 Skype: tonyfirshman
TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-21 Thread Tony Firshman

Dave Park wrote, on 21/Feb/11 19:45 | Feb21:

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:40 PM, JJ Ruizjjruiz_r...@yahoo.es  wrote:


I would get one to connect an Aurora and a Gold Card, powering them through
the backplane.

The 9V line, will carry 9V? or 5V? or it will be selectable? or it will be
selectable by each expansion connector?



ATX v2 PSUs supply +5V and +/i12V. It is perfectly possible to supply +9V
from a +12V line using a 7809... Depending on the current requirement, this
could supply up to 2 amps, but would generate a fair amount of heat. For
smaller values like 500mA it wouldn't generate much or need a heatsink.

Is the 9V for serial? Or to feed 5V cards that have a 7805 regulator?

The latter.
I simply solder a two pin plug across the outer pins of the expansion 
card 7805 and us an HD style jumper - and a BIG label saying Check 
9v!.  Mind you it is amazing how long an SGC will survive (8-)#  It 
took a little while to recover, but has worked fine ever since.


BTW SGC has an external connector for 5V power. I have solder jumpered 
*all* of mine.  The through contact when not used was very dodgy indeed, 
especially once the socket had been used.


The best and most stable solution with the QL motherboard is to jumper 
all cards, and to connect the 5V to the 9V rail on the QL motherboard.


Tony


--
QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:257/67) +44(0)1442-828255
   t...@firshman.co.uk http://firshman.co.uk
Voice: +44(0)1442-828254 Fax: +44(0)1442-828255 Skype: tonyfirshman
TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-21 Thread Tony Firshman

Dave Park wrote, on 21/Feb/11 19:41 | Feb21:

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Daniele Terdinadanieleterd...@hotmail.com

wrote:





A backplane allows you to place each card in its own slot. It multiplies

the

QL's expansion port into three, four or more ports. This means cards

don't

Didn't Sinclair ROMs have a bug preventing usage of all expansion slots
except for the first one?



I do recall using a QubIDE and SuperQBoard on a JM ROM QL without problems,
but I think there are specific reasons for that.

Maybe someone with more knowledge than myself can reply?


I also don't recall such a problem.

The JM did have a bug where Basic loaded RESPR extensions were not 
recognised in the 'boot' program, which is why boots in my commercial 
programs had simply LRUN driveboot1.


Tony
--
QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:257/67) +44(0)1442-828255
   t...@firshman.co.uk http://firshman.co.uk
Voice: +44(0)1442-828254 Fax: +44(0)1442-828255 Skype: tonyfirshman
TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-21 Thread Petri Pellinen
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Daniele Terdina
danieleterd...@hotmail.com wrote:
 Didn't Sinclair ROMs have a bug preventing usage of all expansion slots 
 except for the first one?

Being a re-newbie I also have (I hope!) a few related questions : This
might be a FAQ so apologies in advance if this subject has been beaten
to a painful death many times before

Is the section Peripheral ROM problem in chapter 9 of The Sinclair
QDOS Companion still relevant? Andrew Pennell outlines a procedure to
work around the early QDOS bug where only the first peripheral routine
is discovered. Should this workaround still be applied to make sure
all peripheral drivers get initialized properly? Does the workaround
actually *break* things with newer QDOS versions and more recent
peripherals?

Cheers,
Petri
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-21 Thread Tobias Fröschle

Am 21.02.2011 21:47, schrieb Petri Pellinen:

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Daniele Terdina
danieleterd...@hotmail.com  wrote:

Didn't Sinclair ROMs have a bug preventing usage of all expansion slots except 
for the first one?

Being a re-newbie I also have (I hope!) a few related questions : This
might be a FAQ so apologies in advance if this subject has been beaten
to a painful death many times before

Is the section Peripheral ROM problem in chapter 9 of The Sinclair
QDOS Companion still relevant? Andrew Pennell outlines a procedure to
work around the early QDOS bug where only the first peripheral routine
is discovered. Should this workaround still be applied to make sure
all peripheral drivers get initialized properly? Does the workaround
actually *break* things with newer QDOS versions and more recent
peripherals?


Quite an interesting question, just a wild guess on it:
Well, I don't have the Pennel book, so don't know his recipe - But would 
expect he recommends scanning the potential expansion port ROM start 
candidates for a valid ROM header and mimicking the correct 
initialisation sequence (i.e calling initialisation routine at x+6 and 
linking in Basic procedures at x+4.
So what could go wrong: Waste of memory - All drivers need to allocate 
at least a 40+ bytes driver linkage block plus any additional scratchpad 
memory they need. So if you initialize a driver twice, memory of the 
first is potentially lost. (The driver as such won't be called twice, 
because drivers may very well shadow each other, only the first one 
that tells the system it has recognized its device name will actualy be 
called (This is one of the mechanisms used by the PE to 'hide' the 
original con_ driver)
Waste of CPU: Drivers linking in a polling or scheduler loop might very 
well do that twice, same for an external interrupt routine.
Polling or scheduler loops just waste CPU. External interrupt routines 
hooked in twice shouldn't hurt (but probably wasting CPU as well), as an 
interrupt routine should really clear the interrupt source befor it 
returns. BTW all of the link traps have no failure exit - they will just 
link in whatever routine they're asked for.
Same goes with SuperBASIC extensions - just a waste of memory - the last 
one hides the others.
This would be one typical usage of a thing: When a driver is 
initialized, it could check for existance of its correspondent thing and 
gracefully exits without further initialisation if it's already there.

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-21 Thread David Tubbs

At 19:33 21/02/2011 +, you wrote:
Only in the JM and previous rom versions. From JS onwards I believe it 
works as it's supposed to.


Certainly Minerva and MG tested each 16k ROM slot when I made my 256k EPROM 
expansion card


Incidently I mapped the floppy drive code in that slot freom 64k upwards.

I jave done many odd things in the hardware field that folk may be 
interested in. But when two people here asked for pics I find myself 
dismayed at their responses. One came back instantly with Oh no it isnt., 
the other to four emails gave no substantive reply save one to explain why 
it doesn't work. They both come across as experts and I was just an 
shamateur bodger.


I did tread , I think, a an unusual trail through computing and have for 
some time have been thinking of writing it up with illustrations (crippling 
limitation of this board.)


Not to forget the backplanes.
My own solution was not planar, more like a crooked spine., in effect a 2 
or 3 way expansion.




___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-21 Thread Dave Park


On Feb 21, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Tony Firshman t...@firshman.co.uk wrote:

 Dave Park wrote, on 21/Feb/11 19:04 | Feb21:
 On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Adrian Ivesadr...@acanthis.co.uk  wrote:
 
 Yes, the ATX connector (or better) is a must. You probably want to look
 into
 an adapter lead that also bridges the Power Good signal, otherwise you
 won't
 get the PSU to switch on. This is what I had to do with my QPlanes in ATX
 cases.
 
 
 Hehe, this. When you solved that problem, what did you bridge it to? I just
 shunted it through a resistor to ground in my prototype, as the PSUs I
 tested only provided 5V at 10-20mA.
 Yes - that is what I do, and a ground is right next door!
 
 And, have a good insulating backing plate, because there's nothing worse
 than 40 amps of 12V shorting onto something metal in the case, or worse, to
 something on a PCB...
 
 
 Oh yes there is - a wet tongue.  

Oh really? Wet tongued heal. Fried QLs do not self-repair. ;)

Dave
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-21 Thread Phill Harvey-Smith

On 22/02/2011 00:12, Dave Park wrote:

On Feb 21, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Tony Firshmant...@firshman.co.uk  wrote:

And, have a good insulating backing plate, because there's nothing worse
than 40 amps of 12V shorting onto something metal in the case, or worse, to
something on a PCB...


Oh yes there is - a wet tongue.


Oh really? Wet tongued heal. Fried QLs do not self-repair. ;)


Though prolly not if they've had 40A @ 12V (480W) through them...

Mind TBH, if I where powering QL+addons from an ATX I'd prolly put 
apropreatly rated fuses in the cables between PSU and computer, after 
all the sorts of currents that an AT/ATX PSU can supply could under 
fault conditions cause the QL board to catch fire without ever over 
strainging the PSU..


Common misconception: fuses are there to prevent shocks, they're not 
they're there to melt/blow and break the circuit before it can become 
damaged / catch fire.


Cheers.

Phill.

--
Phill Harvey-Smith, Programmer, Hardware hacker, and general eccentric !

You can twist perceptions, but reality won't budge -- Rush.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-21 Thread Dave Park


On Feb 21, 2011, at 6:27 PM, Phill Harvey-Smith a...@aurigae.demon.co.uk 
wrote:

 On 22/02/2011 00:12, Dave Park wrote:
 On Feb 21, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Tony Firshmant...@firshman.co.uk  wrote:
 And, have a good insulating backing plate, because there's nothing worse
 than 40 amps of 12V shorting onto something metal in the case, or worse, to
 something on a PCB...
 
 Oh yes there is - a wet tongue.
 
 Oh really? Wet tongued heal. Fried QLs do not self-repair. ;)
 
 Though prolly not if they've had 40A @ 12V (480W) through them...
 
 Mind TBH, if I where powering QL+addons from an ATX I'd prolly put 
 apropreatly rated fuses in the cables between PSU and computer, after all the 
 sorts of currents that an AT/ATX PSU can supply could under fault conditions 
 cause the QL board to catch fire without ever over strainging the PSU..
 
 Common misconception: fuses are there to prevent shocks, they're not they're 
 there to melt/blow and break the circuit before it can become damaged / catch 
 fire.

Indeed. It is always best to ensure a weak point in the circuit is one you can 
replace for less than 50p. 

Dave. 
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-21 Thread Lee Privett
All this talk is making hunger for an SGC not having seen or used before, are 
there really none out there or not ever being made?
 
Lee 
- Back to the QL-
   On 22/02/2011 00:12, Dave Park wrote:
   On Feb 21, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Tony Firshmant...@firshman.co.uk  wrote:
   And, have a good insulating backing plate, because there's nothing worse
   than 40 amps of 12V shorting onto something metal in the case, or worse, 
to
   something on a PCB...
   
   Oh yes there is - a wet tongue.
   
   Oh really? Wet tongued heal. Fried QLs do not self-repair. ;)
   
   Though prolly not if they've had 40A @ 12V (480W) through them...
   
   Mind TBH, if I where powering QL+addons from an ATX I'd prolly put 
apropreatly rated fuses in the cables between PSU and computer, after all the 
sorts of currents that an AT/ATX PSU can supply could under fault conditions 
cause the QL board to catch fire without ever over strainging the PSU..
   
   Common misconception: fuses are there to prevent shocks, they're not 
they're there to melt/blow and break the circuit before it can become damaged / 
catch fire.

  QL-Users Mailing List
  http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-16 Thread Petri Pellinen
I would be interested in buying one. The DIN connectors seem to be
rather expensive so I'm a bit concerned about the price. A kit instead
of a finished assembly would also be nice. Four slots would probably
be optimal for my use. Can't answer your other questions since I have
never used one before :)

/Petri

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Plastic plasticu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi all,

 I have been asked off-list if I could make some backplanes. I have a stack
 of the connectors already, so, if there was demand, I could do this quite
 easily.

 The questions are:

 Is there any demand for this?
 Is there any deficiency or design issue with previous ones that needs
 correcting? (clearances? support? clean power?)
 How are they normally used/oriented? How could they be improved?
 How many expansion ports does your backplane have, how many do you use, and
 how many do you wish you had?

 Maybe people could send me photos off-list of their backplane set-ups so I
 can see what people are doing!

 Dave
 ___
 QL-Users Mailing List
 http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-16 Thread Rich Mellor

On 16/02/2011 15:46, Petri Pellinen wrote:

I would be interested in buying one. The DIN connectors seem to be
rather expensive so I'm a bit concerned about the price. A kit instead
of a finished assembly would also be nice. Four slots would probably
be optimal for my use. Can't answer your other questions since I have
never used one before :)

/Petri

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Plasticplasticu...@gmail.com  wrote:

Hi all,

I have been asked off-list if I could make some backplanes. I have a stack
of the connectors already, so, if there was demand, I could do this quite
easily.

The questions are:

Is there any demand for this?
Is there any deficiency or design issue with previous ones that needs
correcting? (clearances? support? clean power?)
How are they normally used/oriented? How could they be improved?
How many expansion ports does your backplane have, how many do you use, and
how many do you wish you had?

Maybe people could send me photos off-list of their backplane set-ups so I
can see what people are doing!

Dave
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm



I have several backplanes available if anyone needs one:

a) A Jurgen Falkenberg 2 slot unbuffered / unpowered backplane
b) An unknown unbuffered / unpowered backplane which has a nice blue PCB 
- oddly it has 2 female connectors and 2 male connectors (any ideas - 
anyone.)

c) A QPlane - powered buffered backplane, with 3 slots
d) A Jurgen Falkenberg QL-Bus - see 
http://www.rwapadventures.com/ql_wiki/index.php?title=QL-Bus


--
Rich Mellor
RWAP Services

http://www.rwapsoftware.co.uk
http://www.rwapservices.co.uk

-- Try out our new site: http://sellmyretro.com


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-16 Thread Plastic
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Rich Mellor r...@rwapservices.co.ukwrote:

 I have several backplanes available if anyone needs one:


 a) A Jurgen Falkenberg 2 slot unbuffered / unpowered backplane
 b) An unknown unbuffered / unpowered backplane which has a nice blue PCB -
 oddly it has 2 female connectors and 2 male connectors (any ideas -
 anyone.)
 c) A QPlane - powered buffered backplane, with 3 slots
 d) A Jurgen Falkenberg QL-Bus - see
 http://www.rwapadventures.com/ql_wiki/index.php?title=QL-Bus


Rich, what do you make of the QPlane? I have one and am scared to use it. I
wouldn't have used a 2-layer PCB for that purpose.

I hear the Falkenburgs are decent, as is the MPlane.

Dave
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Backplanes...

2011-02-16 Thread Rich Mellor

On 16/02/2011 17:23, Plastic wrote:

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Rich Mellorr...@rwapservices.co.ukwrote:


I have several backplanes available if anyone needs one:


a) A Jurgen Falkenberg 2 slot unbuffered / unpowered backplane
b) An unknown unbuffered / unpowered backplane which has a nice blue PCB -
oddly it has 2 female connectors and 2 male connectors (any ideas -
anyone.)
c) A QPlane - powered buffered backplane, with 3 slots
d) A Jurgen Falkenberg QL-Bus - see
http://www.rwapadventures.com/ql_wiki/index.php?title=QL-Bus


Rich, what do you make of the QPlane? I have one and am scared to use it. I
wouldn't have used a 2-layer PCB for that purpose.

I hear the Falkenburgs are decent, as is the MPlane.

Dave
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


I used a QPlane for years in my Aurora / SGC based boxed QL (long since 
sold) without any problems.


My only real problem was that I managed to break a bit of the plastic 
off one of the connectors on the QPlane, so could only use 2 out of the 
three slots (just enough for Aurora + QubIDE + Super Gold Card).


--
Rich Mellor
RWAP Services

http://www.rwapsoftware.co.uk
http://www.rwapservices.co.uk

-- Try out our new site: http://sellmyretro.com


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm