[RBW] Re: Haters Gonna Hate - for the "Cult-like Fanbase"

2024-09-24 Thread Cyclofiend Jim

I'm not sure of the purpose of this post. To my eye, it shows off the worst 
aspects of the internet. The reason I continue to be a part of this group 
is to move away from stuff like that. 

I don't particularly feel that this has added any entertainment value to 
our group discussion and I feel like I need a shower after reading this 
poster's comments. 

My suggestion is that we pedal on and let stuff like this drift downstream.

Jim


On Tuesday, September 24, 2024 at 6:59:43 PM UTC-7 velomann wrote:

> Every week, BikePortland publishes a "Monday Roundup" of bike and 
> transportation items in the news, and this week the New Yorker article on 
> Grant and Rivendell was featured, and received the following response (Bold 
> print is the poster's, not mine).  For your entertainment:
>
> "The mean-spirited regresso-grouchery (regressive retro-grouchery) of 
> Grant Petersen and his supporters helped delay the wide-spread adoption 
> of widely used technologies (e.g. disc brakes, carbon forks, e-bikes) that 
> make transportation cycling* a more pleasant experience. It’s one thing 
> to prefer a certain type of bike and a different thing altogether to 
> constantly slam those who do not prefer your particular flavor of bike. For 
> example, Petersen derisively referred to disc brakes as “motorcycle parts” 
> and often described e-bikes as mopeds or motorcycles.
>
> A real world example of how Petersen’s ideology has been harmful is that 
> many local “steel is real” bike shops have historically refused to work on 
> bikes with disc brakes, internal cable routing, carbon components, or 
> e-bikes despite their popularity (and some still do).
>
> *not racing bikes but every day transportation bikes"
>
>
> I responded, of course, including a comment that I thought "Grant 
> Suppressed Disc Brakes" would make a great bumper sticker, and that I 
> thought they were exaggerating the influence Grant had/has on the bike 
> industry.
>
> the poster had more to say:
>
>
> "I think the formerly wide-spread attitude of people who think like Grant 
> Petersen delayed wide-spread adoption of disc brakes.
>
> You must be confusing Grant with someone who actually has some kind of 
> influence
>
> The guy who put ing Bridgestone bikes on the map, has a blog that 
> millions have read, has published widely-read books reviewed in the NYT, is 
> a major foil of the Bike Snob, has created an enormous cult-like fanbase, 
> and is de facto leader of a slow cycling movement has absolutely influenced 
> the bike industry — and, more importantly, has influenced cycling fans who 
> work in or own bike shops.
>
> Grant Petersen has done an awful lot of amazing things that I respect but 
> that does not mean he should get a pass for being a jerk about the bikes 
> that many of us now ride."
>
>
> Sheesh
>
>
> Mike M
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/def85399-82b0-44c4-a0dd-1aa3635b83d7n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [RBW] Rivendell children's bike

2024-09-23 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
That account has been removed from the group.  They made numerous attempts 
at posting to other threads with items for sale. 

If they contact you or any other list member directly, I would strongly 
suggest additional verification. 

- Jim / List Admin

On Saturday, September 21, 2024 at 7:44:31 AM UTC-7 Pancake wrote:

> I was contacted about this post by “Tom River” from moima...@gmail.com. 
>
> It appears to be a sketchy account with no prior posts on our list and 
> offering to sell an adult bike for my daughter. If anyone knows this person 
> and can vouch for them that’d be great, but otherwise I think others should 
> be aware of a possible scam:
>
> This is certainly not a kids bike they’re offering to seem me for $420 and 
> asking for contact “ASAP”:
> [image: image0.jpeg]
> Abe
>
> On Sep 20, 2024, at 9:53 AM, Pancake  wrote:
>
> Passionately home they make the Rosco Kid Bike! But it needs V-brakes!
>
>
> I’ve been looking for another used Woom 4 (20” tires) or 5 (24” wheels) as 
> my daughter grows up, but they’re terribly pricy new or used. 
>
> The Wooms wisely has V-brakes and hand brakes front and rear. Learning 
> hand braking is both a valuable skill and a safer, more effective way for 
> kids as young as three to ride. 
>
> The advantage of the v-brakes also allow for the easy install of a Sunlite 
> front rack - that would solve where to put a water bottle or lunch box for 
> their ride to school, tackle box for their fishing ride to the pond.
>
> There are highly adjustable reach for v-brake levers too - like on the 
> Woom getting the lever close to the hand grip makes it easy for short 
> fingers to reach the brake quickly. 
>
> As I live only 30 minutes from Walnut Creek I volunteered daughters as 
> prototype test riders! Let me spend $450 at Riv instead of Woom!
>
> Abe “the kids are too big for the Rosco Baby Bike now” in Napa 
>
> On Thursday, September 19, 2024 at 4:22:51 AM UTC-7 Ryan wrote:
>
>> Wow Patrick that's some origin storygoes a long way towards 
>> explaining your propensity for fixed gear bikes
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 18, 2024 at 7:39:24 PM UTC-5 Patrick Moore wrote:
>>
>>> You've convinced me that hand brakes aren't hard for beginning children 
>>> cyclists; I suppose if a child is old enough and coordinated enough to 
>>> backpedal to stop he or she can grab a lever.
>>>
>>> One advantage of coaster brakes is that they're generally set and 
>>> forget. As long as the chain is not hugely loose they'll work as well as 
>>> day 1 after months and even years of neglect. Calipers, OTOH: most parents 
>>> will buy Target or Costco children's bikes. I've spent much time making the 
>>> calipers or V brakes or cantilevers on inexpensive bikes work minimally 
>>> well; just did that a few weeks ago for the front brake on the bike 
>>> belonging to the 11 year old son of a friend; the brake was -- again -- 
>>> useless. The rear was not much better but at least it didn't get worse. 
>>> This after I'd done a complete brake cable and housing refit and full 
>>> adjustment 6 or 8 months ago.
>>>
>>> I guess my only real points are: coaster brakes are not harmful, and 
>>> they do have their advantages.
>>>
>>> Me, I learned to ride age 4 -- 65 years ago -- on a brakeless fixie; no 
>>> kidding. I have distinct memories of the rather intimidating blonde sisters 
>>> next door (they might have been 9 and 11) teaching me to ride a tiny, 
>>> rust-red 12"-or-so-wheel bike with solid spokes and hard rubber tires and 
>>> -- again, I have distinct memories from even so long ago for bike stuff -- 
>>> no coasting. They -- probably gleefully -- perched me on it and pushed me 
>>> off down our sloping driveway into the street. Very short driveway, very 
>>> quiet residential street. 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 4:53 PM Ted Durant  wrote:
>>>

 On Sep 18, 2024, at 3:29 PM, Patrick Moore  wrote:

 I just read Ted's post. I retract the second part, maybe -- instance is 
 not a statistic -- but not the first part of my assertion!

> … As just one of the dozens of generations of small children learning 
> to ride on coaster braked bikes (but *) I think someone was thinking 
> about 
> things far, far too hard. And there’s more! Can you imagine bike-clueless 
> parents teaching wildly uncoordinated children how to safely use caliper 
> brakes?? "Now Junior or Missy, remember that your rear brake is activated 
> by the *right* lever but that your *left* lever activates the *front* 
> brake 
> which does 80% of the braking. Got that, Junior/Missy?”
>

 As I noted, we adjusted the front brake so that it didn’t provide much 
 power, just for that reason. We did that on the balance bike, and on the 
 pedal bike we didn’t feel we needed to depower it as much because he had 
 internalized well the difference between the left brake and the right 
 brake. Woom helpfully colors the lev

[RBW] Re: Slipping on swept back handlebars

2024-09-10 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Are you sure about the clamp diameter on the swept-back bars you have? What 
is the brand? 
If the bar is chromed or even highly polished, that can create a smooth 
enough surface that slippage is a problem. 
I will point you to "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" to the 
description of the shim... 
Might just be all you need. 

Jim
On Tuesday, September 10, 2024 at 11:45:45 AM UTC-7 ethan...@gmail.com 
wrote:

> I just put some swept back handlebars on my bicycle and I am having 
> trouble with slipping. The handlebars sweep back 7 inches or so with a 26mm 
> clamp diameter. My stem is a nitto tallux and I'm switching in an old 130mm 
> Ritchey stem for more reach, but I'm still worried about the bar slipping. 
> Is there a good solution for gripping big bars that increase torque at the 
> stem clamp, especially when riding on gravel/off-road? 
>
> I might be able to tighten it more, but I'm worried that going tighter 
> will strip or deform the bolt. Do folks ever use thread-locker or some 
> adhesive for extra stick? Or do I need a 2-4 bolt faceplate stem for the 
> extra gripping strength?
>
> Let me know if you have any tips/tricks/ideas! Thanks,
>
> Ethan
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/c9c505a8-3d2b-4506-9304-6cdd8140c72fn%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Wheel-building Advice

2024-09-02 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
If you haven't heard the acronym "AASHTA", now's a good time to learn it. 

"As Always Sheldon Has The Answer" (RIP Sheldon Brown) - in this case, an 
excellent overview of how-to resides here:
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/wheelbuild.html

FWIW, I've always used double-butted spokes. DT's. 

Take your time and enjoy the process.

Jim



On Monday, September 2, 2024 at 9:26:05 AM UTC-7 aaronmer...@gmail.com 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I'm interested in building my first wheelset! I have worked on my own 
> bikes for a while and consider myself to be moderately handy, so I think it 
> would be a fun experience and challenge to learn this new skill.
>
> I want to build a relatively simple, but dependable, wheelset with 
> Velocity Cliffhangers and Deore (rim brake) hubs, for commuting and trail 
> riding. I'm a bit clueless about spokes and would love some advice.  Would 
> double butted spokes be too flimsy? any brand suggestions? 36 front and 
> rear, or 32 front and 36 rear? For context: I'm pretty slender, barely 135 
> after Thanksgiving dinner, but I don't like to pack light for bike packing 
> and I want to be able to ride these wheels fairly hard on fire roads 
> without worry.
>
> I'm having a hard time figuring out where to get these parts (mostly hubs 
> and spokes). let me know if there are any good online suppliers or East Bay 
> bike shops that are recommended for sourcing these parts.
>
> Also, if anybody knows of a good bike kitchen/coop in the East Bay let me 
> know. I'm about to move out of SF and won't have easy access the the Bike 
> Kitchen in the Mission and would rather not have to buy a truing stand.
>
> Any other advice for a first time wheel-builder would be greatly 
> appreciated!
>
> Thanks,
> -Aaron
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/6a3d2a0c-fc3d-4726-98f5-8f21be805c08n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [RBW] A Different Kind of RR

2024-08-08 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
I generally try to keep a pretty light hand on the tiller of this crazy 
cruise, and I'm genuinely conflicted as to how to handle this thread. 

On one hand, I'd like to lock it and delete the gruffer posts, 

While on the other hand, folks stood up for themselves in an appropriate 
and (so far) respectful manner. It seems like some points have been 
excessively reinforced and need no further embellishment (the first way out 
of a hole is to stop digging).. And some folks found terminology to be 
triggering, so I want to respect that also. 

One tenet I've mentioned probably too infrequently here is the idea that we 
are all going to express ourselves poorly from time to time, and if we can 
give one another the space to do that, it's for the benefit of all. 

If this thread devolves into personal invective, it'll get sliced up and 
locked. But if we can take a deep breath and step back, I'd rather get back 
to appreciating the _spirit_ of the original post. 

We'll see how that goes, yeah?

- Jim / list admin

On Thursday, August 8, 2024 at 6:40:07 PM UTC-7 Brian Campbell wrote:

> Agree with George. 
>
> While there is no ill-will intended,  as victim of wilding incident a few 
> decades ago, you are sending a message that you might not want to! 
>
> My wife's broken nose can attest to that!
>
>
>
> On Thursday, August 8, 2024 at 12:15:18 PM UTC-4 George Schick wrote:
>
>> Umm...I don't think I'd refer to it as a "wilding" if I were you. Here is 
>> the standard definition for that term:
>>
>> https://www.google.com/search?q=wilding&oq=wilding&aqs=chrome..69i57j0i512j46i10i131i433i512j0i10i131i433i512j46i10i512j0i512l2j46i512l2j0i512.3080j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
>> The Urban Dictionary is even more explicit.
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, August 8, 2024 at 10:10:59 AM UTC-5 Bicycle Belle Ding Ding! 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I did it again. I went to that crazy Wed night Grand Rapids ride. From 
>>> now on I’m calling it “wilding.” As in, “I am going wilding! See you way 
>>> past bedtime!” I think that’s a real term, I might be misappropriating it, 
>>> but it sounds fantastic and suits my purposes.
>>>
>>> I arrive at the city park a little early and watch the crowd roll up. 
>>> The wheelie crowd is right on time, careening around on rear wheels and 
>>> making everyone nervous. A wide variety of bikes are in attendance. We have 
>>> a massive turnout, 121 riders, just awesome to behold. J is leading, and he 
>>> brings this:
>>>
>>> [image: image0.jpeg][image: image1.jpeg]
>>> You can see here that cleanliness is very important to him, and that he 
>>> does mostly tame rides and so we would have nothing to fear since he 
>>> planned tonight’s route.
>>>
>>> Here is my bike, demure and innocent, having its first adventures 
>>> amongst all these GR rabble rousers.
>>> [image: image2.jpeg]
>>>
>>> It is 8:30pm. We set off and a new group makes its appearance. I call 
>>> them The Jumpers. They have full suspension bikes with names like Salsa on 
>>> them and when we go up a ramp, they ride up the stairs. They fly off ledges 
>>> and drop back into the group and scare this nurse half to death. They 
>>> launch their bikes and sashay through the air and hope everyone is 
>>> watching. The Jumpers are wilding the hardest. 
>>>
>>> I quickly realize that the middle-back is the place to be. Away from The 
>>> Kids and The Jumpers. I want to ride by J, but I also want to go home by 
>>> private vehicle, not ambulance.
>>>
>>> We block intersections and ride through red lights; drivers submit to 
>>> all of this. No honking or threatening behavior. Just tolerance for 121 
>>> bikes and riders wending through their streets. We ride through 
>>> neighborhoods (only one crash!), and then along the aptly-named Grand 
>>> River. Everyone stares at us, a massive clot of bikes, moving along the 
>>> path. We get to a pavilion where everyone chats in a haze of pot smoke and 
>>> beer drinking. I drink my usual electrolyte water; I need my wits about me. 
>>> Three men come to ogle my Platypus. They are into all the custom colored 
>>> bits. One of them is Velocity USA’s anodizer; here is the man who anodized 
>>> my rims! 
>>>  [image: image3.jpeg]
>>> It turns out, he is my bike twin. I am jealous of the blue metal flake 
>>> in his purple paint job. I didn’t think someone could out-sparkle me, but 
>>> he’s done it.
>>>
>>> [image: image4.jpeg]
>>>
>>> Isn’t it scary how much we have in common?
>>> [image: image5.jpeg]
>>>
>>> At 10pm, good and dark out, we set off. Here was the description of the 
>>> ride: “…We‘ll head back to the Monarch via a less level and less paved 
>>> route, so if you’re heading back with us, bring some tires!”
>>>
>>> WHAT COULD GO WRONG.
>>>
>>> It is the black of night. We are in the middle of nowhere. There are 
>>> animals in the woods. We are behind a factory of some kind. The parking lot 
>>> is dirt and full of pot holes. Now there is no road, no buildings. We are 
>>> in the woods, riding ove

[RBW] Caveat Emptor - Confirm your seller | Scam Prevention Reminder

2024-08-08 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
General reminder to list members
Most transactions go off without a hitch. That is due to the fact that most 
buyers and sellers are active list members and good honorable folks. 

However, there has been an upsurge in folks preying on WTT/WTB/ISO posts. 

The most common scam vector has been a direct email contact with 
well-worded pitch regarding the bicycle frame or model someone was seeking. 
They will usually provide photos. It will seem "legit enough" with the 
right descriptions and reasonable explanations. 

Before proceeding, I strongly encourage you to check to see if they are a 
group member. You can do it one of two ways (and it's easier through a 
computer than through mobile). First, go to PEOPLE and click on MEMBERS. At 
that point, you can enter their email address and search to see if they are 
members of this group. 
The other test is to simply search for their email in the "Conversations" 
section of the group. 

Here are two key points - 
- If someone is not a member of this group, they cannot see your email 
address and would be unable to contact you. 
- I suspect that there are some nefarious "members" who are able to see 
your email address and then using another identity to contact their prey. 
This allows them to disappear with your money.

If someone is not a member of this group but magically has the ability to 
contact you, it is almost certain they are attempting a scam. 

Thanks for reading!

- Jim  / List Admin



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/0a9dc8a0-395c-4fb1-b729-be97cc001843n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [RBW] Nine is fine! 1x9 drivetrains in 2024. Who else is doing it?

2024-07-26 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Hi Fred - 

There are links to contact me - the list admin - in the list information. 
Sorry you had trouble finding that info, but it hasn't changed since the 
list was moved here from the old listserv.
There are no "mods" - there is me. Been just been for the whole time. 

I emailed you earlier today when I passed your post through the moderation 
queue. I didn't hear back from you. I am guessing there may be some issue 
with your email, so I'm replying to your public post.

As I said in the email from this morning, I don't know why you got 
moderated. It might have been that you were commenting in a contentious 
thread and got caught up accidentally. The last active post from you was in 
February of this year. 

I also pointed out that i was working on a project and had been delayed in 
checking things for a few days. Sorry for that delay. 

If you have other questions about the group, please feel free to email me 
directly - cyclofi...@gmail.com

Thanks!

Jim / list admin


On Friday, July 26, 2024 at 8:03:46 PM UTC-7 fmar...@gmail.com wrote:

> I made this comment 3 days ago, and it's just showing up now. Why am I on 
> some kind of monitoring?
> Please let me know what I have done to justify this treatment, or just 
> tell me to leave if I'm not welcome here.
> Can I get the names of the Mods, please?
>
> Fred Marsh
> Mount Prospect, IL
>
> On Friday, July 26, 2024 at 11:42:04 AM UTC-5 Fred Marsh wrote:
>
>> I've been 1x9 for a long time and loving it!
>> https://i.imgur.com/yU6nbGS.jpg
>> - Fred
>> Mount Prospect Illinois Flatland
>>
>> On Wednesday, July 24, 2024 at 10:11:59 AM UTC-5 John Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> I'll take your 1x9 and raise you -1! 
>>>
>>> I've been using Microshift Acolyte on my Jones SWB and I think it's 
>>> pretty excellent (even if it is marketed as a "kid's mountain bike" group). 
>>> I'm running 12-46 Acolyte 8-speed cassette with a 32t crank up front and a 
>>> medium cage RD. I don't love the shifter, but it all works pretty 
>>> flawlessly.
>>>
>>> john (outside fontainebleau)
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, July 24, 2024 at 4:00:27 PM UTC+2 Arthur Mayfield wrote:
>>>
 My Sam is 1x9 with a smallish chainring and a mtn RD, but my Soma Buena 
 Vista is 2x9 with Ultegra drivetrain. I like having the extra range of the 
 46 and 30 tooth chainrings on the Buena Vista, but I rarely shift while 
 riding, since I’m usually either in flat areas or hilly. I could probably 
 take the front derailleur off and move the chain by hand, but the FD is 
 light, and the shifter is downtube mounted, so it’s a simple affair and 
 easily maintained.

 On Wednesday, July 24, 2024 at 8:53:20 AM UTC-4 wboe...@gmail.com 
 wrote:

> My Pugsley is 1x9 and I agree it's totally sufficient.  The problem in 
> my stable is it's an outlier, so I can't share any parts with other 
> bikes.  
> In fact, I now have 9, 10, 11 and 12 speed bikes, meaning I have to carry 
> spare chain links for all of those speeds in the shared saddlebag :)
>
> Will near Boston 
>
> On Wednesday, July 24, 2024 at 4:26:57 AM UTC-4 Nick Payne wrote:
>
>> I built a bike up a while ago using Campagnolo Ekar 1x13, but I sold 
>> it after riding it for a few months because I didn't like the way the 
>> gearing was setup on the cassette. The five smallest cogs were all a 
>> single 
>> tooth jump from each other, and then the gaps between gears got much 
>> larger 
>> towards the bottom of the gear range 
>> (10-11-12-13-14-15-17-20-23-27-32-38-44). I would have much preferred 
>> closer ratios in the middle of the gear range where I spent most time.
>>
>> I've gone back to using 11-speed 2x systems, which suit my style of 
>> riding better.
>>
>> Nick Payne
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/5d4decc7-9934-49a0-b54f-f8e799fe0bd2n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [RBW] Who needs a Restoration Project? Madden Mountain Panniers / Kangaroo Bag Panniers

2024-07-12 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
All bags have been spoken for - thanks to all who reached out. May these be 
back on the roads and trails in the near future under the guidance of their 
new stewards!

On Wednesday, July 10, 2024 at 11:10:34 PM UTC-7 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:

> Madden Bags have a project manager 
>
> On Wednesday, July 10, 2024 at 2:02:31 PM UTC-7 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:
>
>> Kangaroo Bags are spoken for. 
>> Madden Bags are available still. 
>>
>> On Wednesday, July 10, 2024 at 9:13:54 AM UTC-7 Jeremy Rossen wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> I would cover the shipping to the boston area, and give the bags some 
>>> love and finish this project!
>>>
>>> let me know,
>>> Jeremy
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:47 AM Cyclofiend Jim  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Digging through boxes in my garage and unearthed three sets of panniers 
>>>> from the late 80's/early 90's. They all have noticeable "stored nylon" 
>>>> funk 
>>>> (an "olfactory adventure"?) and all of the strap tie-down guides have 
>>>> degraded and failed. (If they had just spent the extra $'s and used a 
>>>> non-rubber part) 
>>>>
>>>> I've sprayed them all with some defunk enzymatic and hung them in the 
>>>> sun for a day or two. They aren't going to cause gagging, but they aren't 
>>>> exactly odor-free. If I were going to do the restoration, I'd put them 
>>>> into 
>>>> a nice large washing machine and run them through, then hang them in the 
>>>> sun for a bit. A little borax in the laundry, perhaps...
>>>>
>>>> However, before I did that, I'd want to pick off all the strap guide 
>>>> remnants which have degraded. They were rubber and have completely dried 
>>>> out in the (mumble-mumble) years since I bought them (Ok... bought these 
>>>> back in the 1980s...). When I started airing them out, chunks fell away 
>>>> from each one. They are toast. 
>>>>
>>>> I'd probably look for a sail bag maker or a friend who has a commercial 
>>>> sewing machine, cut some thick leather in the shape of the strap guides 
>>>> and 
>>>> sew them in place. They will probably work without the guides, but it 
>>>> would 
>>>> be a better fix.
>>>>
>>>> If you have read this far, then you know the quality of the old Madden 
>>>> Mountain Panniers and first generation Kangaroo Bags. This was seriously 
>>>> overbuilt gear. I had to resign them to landfill. 
>>>>
>>>> I have a bunch of detailed images which I took yesterday.
>>>>
>>>> If this sounds like something you are interested in, take a look at the 
>>>> images. The Madden Mountain pannier sets snap together when off the bike. 
>>>> The Kangaroo Bags have nicely overlapping top covers. and a cinchable top 
>>>> to the compartment. All zippers and snaps seem to be in great shape. 
>>>>
>>>> https://photos.app.goo.gl/jKrRmJA5cQxMThF99
>>>>
>>>> I used these a few times, but they never got the miles they deserved. 
>>>> If you want to take this on, I really just want to cover shipping to your 
>>>> location. As I said, I just don't want to toss them into landfill. They 
>>>> are 
>>>> in good shape, except for the funk and the failed strap guides. 
>>>>
>>>> So, if you want to take on stewardship of this project, message me 
>>>> directly. Pickup available if you are in the general SF Bay Area. 
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for considering this!
>>>>
>>>> Jim
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/e295cc27-aef6-4fab-bd04-b58a47ddf37bn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/e295cc27-aef6-4fab-bd04-b58a47ddf37bn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/9e4a11d1-b934-41a5-81a1-a1defa06e160n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Size 45 Clem Smith JR sizing?!

2024-07-11 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Your total height is only part of the equation, mate.

Here's a good place to start for finding the right sized Riv - 
https://www.rivbike.com/pages/pubic-bone-height-how-to-measure-your-pbh



On Thursday, July 11, 2024 at 8:47:42 AM UTC-7 s...@secondwindow.co.uk 
wrote:

> Can somebody tell me if a size 45 Rivendell Clem Smith JR would fit me?
>
> I am 173cm tall
>
> Thanks and please help!
>
> [image: r/Rivendell_Bicycles - Size 45 Clem Smith JR sizing?!]
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/bc375404-f0ec-4b1b-befa-76c8d1f30459n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [RBW] Who needs a Restoration Project? Madden Mountain Panniers / Kangaroo Bag Panniers

2024-07-10 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Madden Bags have a project manager 

On Wednesday, July 10, 2024 at 2:02:31 PM UTC-7 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:

> Kangaroo Bags are spoken for. 
> Madden Bags are available still. 
>
> On Wednesday, July 10, 2024 at 9:13:54 AM UTC-7 Jeremy Rossen wrote:
>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> I would cover the shipping to the boston area, and give the bags some 
>> love and finish this project!
>>
>> let me know,
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:47 AM Cyclofiend Jim  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Digging through boxes in my garage and unearthed three sets of panniers 
>>> from the late 80's/early 90's. They all have noticeable "stored nylon" funk 
>>> (an "olfactory adventure"?) and all of the strap tie-down guides have 
>>> degraded and failed. (If they had just spent the extra $'s and used a 
>>> non-rubber part) 
>>>
>>> I've sprayed them all with some defunk enzymatic and hung them in the 
>>> sun for a day or two. They aren't going to cause gagging, but they aren't 
>>> exactly odor-free. If I were going to do the restoration, I'd put them into 
>>> a nice large washing machine and run them through, then hang them in the 
>>> sun for a bit. A little borax in the laundry, perhaps...
>>>
>>> However, before I did that, I'd want to pick off all the strap guide 
>>> remnants which have degraded. They were rubber and have completely dried 
>>> out in the (mumble-mumble) years since I bought them (Ok... bought these 
>>> back in the 1980s...). When I started airing them out, chunks fell away 
>>> from each one. They are toast. 
>>>
>>> I'd probably look for a sail bag maker or a friend who has a commercial 
>>> sewing machine, cut some thick leather in the shape of the strap guides and 
>>> sew them in place. They will probably work without the guides, but it would 
>>> be a better fix.
>>>
>>> If you have read this far, then you know the quality of the old Madden 
>>> Mountain Panniers and first generation Kangaroo Bags. This was seriously 
>>> overbuilt gear. I had to resign them to landfill. 
>>>
>>> I have a bunch of detailed images which I took yesterday.
>>>
>>> If this sounds like something you are interested in, take a look at the 
>>> images. The Madden Mountain pannier sets snap together when off the bike. 
>>> The Kangaroo Bags have nicely overlapping top covers. and a cinchable top 
>>> to the compartment. All zippers and snaps seem to be in great shape. 
>>>
>>> https://photos.app.goo.gl/jKrRmJA5cQxMThF99
>>>
>>> I used these a few times, but they never got the miles they deserved. If 
>>> you want to take this on, I really just want to cover shipping to your 
>>> location. As I said, I just don't want to toss them into landfill. They are 
>>> in good shape, except for the funk and the failed strap guides. 
>>>
>>> So, if you want to take on stewardship of this project, message me 
>>> directly. Pickup available if you are in the general SF Bay Area. 
>>>
>>> Thanks for considering this!
>>>
>>> Jim
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/e295cc27-aef6-4fab-bd04-b58a47ddf37bn%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/e295cc27-aef6-4fab-bd04-b58a47ddf37bn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/7f9cae29-55ae-4698-b8fb-0300bffc5469n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [RBW] Who needs a Restoration Project? Madden Mountain Panniers / Kangaroo Bag Panniers

2024-07-10 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Kangaroo Bags are spoken for. 
Madden Bags are available still. 

On Wednesday, July 10, 2024 at 9:13:54 AM UTC-7 Jeremy Rossen wrote:

> Hi Jim,
>
> I would cover the shipping to the boston area, and give the bags some love 
> and finish this project!
>
> let me know,
> Jeremy
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:47 AM Cyclofiend Jim  
> wrote:
>
>> Digging through boxes in my garage and unearthed three sets of panniers 
>> from the late 80's/early 90's. They all have noticeable "stored nylon" funk 
>> (an "olfactory adventure"?) and all of the strap tie-down guides have 
>> degraded and failed. (If they had just spent the extra $'s and used a 
>> non-rubber part) 
>>
>> I've sprayed them all with some defunk enzymatic and hung them in the sun 
>> for a day or two. They aren't going to cause gagging, but they aren't 
>> exactly odor-free. If I were going to do the restoration, I'd put them into 
>> a nice large washing machine and run them through, then hang them in the 
>> sun for a bit. A little borax in the laundry, perhaps...
>>
>> However, before I did that, I'd want to pick off all the strap guide 
>> remnants which have degraded. They were rubber and have completely dried 
>> out in the (mumble-mumble) years since I bought them (Ok... bought these 
>> back in the 1980s...). When I started airing them out, chunks fell away 
>> from each one. They are toast. 
>>
>> I'd probably look for a sail bag maker or a friend who has a commercial 
>> sewing machine, cut some thick leather in the shape of the strap guides and 
>> sew them in place. They will probably work without the guides, but it would 
>> be a better fix.
>>
>> If you have read this far, then you know the quality of the old Madden 
>> Mountain Panniers and first generation Kangaroo Bags. This was seriously 
>> overbuilt gear. I had to resign them to landfill. 
>>
>> I have a bunch of detailed images which I took yesterday.
>>
>> If this sounds like something you are interested in, take a look at the 
>> images. The Madden Mountain pannier sets snap together when off the bike. 
>> The Kangaroo Bags have nicely overlapping top covers. and a cinchable top 
>> to the compartment. All zippers and snaps seem to be in great shape. 
>>
>> https://photos.app.goo.gl/jKrRmJA5cQxMThF99
>>
>> I used these a few times, but they never got the miles they deserved. If 
>> you want to take this on, I really just want to cover shipping to your 
>> location. As I said, I just don't want to toss them into landfill. They are 
>> in good shape, except for the funk and the failed strap guides. 
>>
>> So, if you want to take on stewardship of this project, message me 
>> directly. Pickup available if you are in the general SF Bay Area. 
>>
>> Thanks for considering this!
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/e295cc27-aef6-4fab-bd04-b58a47ddf37bn%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/e295cc27-aef6-4fab-bd04-b58a47ddf37bn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/f3e8fb87-9cea-4622-83f8-70a3b12fda7an%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Who needs a Restoration Project? Madden Mountain Panniers / Kangaroo Bag Panniers

2024-07-10 Thread Cyclofiend Jim

Note: that should have been "...I'd _hate_ to resign them to a landfill..."


On Wednesday, July 10, 2024 at 8:47:29 AM UTC-7 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:

> Digging through boxes in my garage and unearthed three sets of panniers 
> from the late 80's/early 90's. They all have noticeable "stored nylon" funk 
> (an "olfactory adventure"?) and all of the strap tie-down guides have 
> degraded and failed. (If they had just spent the extra $'s and used a 
> non-rubber part) 
>
> I've sprayed them all with some defunk enzymatic and hung them in the sun 
> for a day or two. They aren't going to cause gagging, but they aren't 
> exactly odor-free. If I were going to do the restoration, I'd put them into 
> a nice large washing machine and run them through, then hang them in the 
> sun for a bit. A little borax in the laundry, perhaps...
>
> However, before I did that, I'd want to pick off all the strap guide 
> remnants which have degraded. They were rubber and have completely dried 
> out in the (mumble-mumble) years since I bought them (Ok... bought these 
> back in the 1980s...). When I started airing them out, chunks fell away 
> from each one. They are toast. 
>
> I'd probably look for a sail bag maker or a friend who has a commercial 
> sewing machine, cut some thick leather in the shape of the strap guides and 
> sew them in place. They will probably work without the guides, but it would 
> be a better fix.
>
> If you have read this far, then you know the quality of the old Madden 
> Mountain Panniers and first generation Kangaroo Bags. This was seriously 
> overbuilt gear. I had to resign them to landfill. 
>
> I have a bunch of detailed images which I took yesterday.
>
> If this sounds like something you are interested in, take a look at the 
> images. The Madden Mountain pannier sets snap together when off the bike. 
> The Kangaroo Bags have nicely overlapping top covers. and a cinchable top 
> to the compartment. All zippers and snaps seem to be in great shape. 
>
> https://photos.app.goo.gl/jKrRmJA5cQxMThF99
>
> I used these a few times, but they never got the miles they deserved. If 
> you want to take this on, I really just want to cover shipping to your 
> location. As I said, I just don't want to toss them into landfill. They are 
> in good shape, except for the funk and the failed strap guides. 
>
> So, if you want to take on stewardship of this project, message me 
> directly. Pickup available if you are in the general SF Bay Area. 
>
> Thanks for considering this!
>
> Jim
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/3687488c-cfb1-4283-92a8-cc57cccf3c0dn%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Who needs a Restoration Project? Madden Mountain Panniers / Kangaroo Bag Panniers

2024-07-10 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Digging through boxes in my garage and unearthed three sets of panniers 
from the late 80's/early 90's. They all have noticeable "stored nylon" funk 
(an "olfactory adventure"?) and all of the strap tie-down guides have 
degraded and failed. (If they had just spent the extra $'s and used a 
non-rubber part) 

I've sprayed them all with some defunk enzymatic and hung them in the sun 
for a day or two. They aren't going to cause gagging, but they aren't 
exactly odor-free. If I were going to do the restoration, I'd put them into 
a nice large washing machine and run them through, then hang them in the 
sun for a bit. A little borax in the laundry, perhaps...

However, before I did that, I'd want to pick off all the strap guide 
remnants which have degraded. They were rubber and have completely dried 
out in the (mumble-mumble) years since I bought them (Ok... bought these 
back in the 1980s...). When I started airing them out, chunks fell away 
from each one. They are toast. 

I'd probably look for a sail bag maker or a friend who has a commercial 
sewing machine, cut some thick leather in the shape of the strap guides and 
sew them in place. They will probably work without the guides, but it would 
be a better fix.

If you have read this far, then you know the quality of the old Madden 
Mountain Panniers and first generation Kangaroo Bags. This was seriously 
overbuilt gear. I had to resign them to landfill. 

I have a bunch of detailed images which I took yesterday.

If this sounds like something you are interested in, take a look at the 
images. The Madden Mountain pannier sets snap together when off the bike. 
The Kangaroo Bags have nicely overlapping top covers. and a cinchable top 
to the compartment. All zippers and snaps seem to be in great shape. 

https://photos.app.goo.gl/jKrRmJA5cQxMThF99

I used these a few times, but they never got the miles they deserved. If 
you want to take this on, I really just want to cover shipping to your 
location. As I said, I just don't want to toss them into landfill. They are 
in good shape, except for the funk and the failed strap guides. 

So, if you want to take on stewardship of this project, message me 
directly. Pickup available if you are in the general SF Bay Area. 

Thanks for considering this!

Jim

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/e295cc27-aef6-4fab-bd04-b58a47ddf37bn%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Rivendell Prototype mountain bike for sale

2024-07-07 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
George - read through the description of it in RR3 (page 37) and they talk 
about the taller head tube.
https://notfine.com/rivreader/RR03.pdf

J


On Saturday, July 6, 2024 at 8:12:40 AM UTC-7 George Schick wrote:

> I'm puzzled by the posted frame size for this bike.  For a bike with a 19" 
> seat tube I would expect to see a much shorter head tube.  Unless it just 
> has a top tube with a lot of slope.  It's hard to tell from that photo 
> because the picture was take with the bike on a downward slant.
>
>
> On Thursday, July 4, 2024 at 6:10:17 PM UTC-5 David Blessing wrote:
>
>> I am offering for sale, my Rivendell, prototype mountain bike. I do not 
>> know a lot of history about this frame. I believe that it was one of only a 
>> few prototypes of a mountain bike format made by Rivendell. I have owned 
>> this bike for many years and have never run into anyone else who owns one.  
>> I am not sure when it was made, although some posts I have looked at 
>> suggest that Rivendell was planning a mountain bike somewhere around 1995. 
>> I purchased this frame from a BOB, built it up and rode it once before 
>> hanging it in my office shop along side of my Atlantis and my Rambouillet, 
>> both of which are also for sale.  I am approaching 71 years of age, and it 
>> is time to clean out the stable.
>>
>>
>> This bicycle has a frame that is 49cm from center to the top of the seat 
>> tube or 19”. I’m not up on mountain bike sizing, but I am 5’9” and I think 
>> it fits me fine. This Bicycle has White Industries hubs attached to 26 inch 
>> Velocity Aeroheat AT  rims, a Shimano Deore Mega 9 front derailleur, and 
>> Shimano Deore rear derailleur, cool unidentified handlebar, and Nitto 
>> Technomic stem. It also has Dura Ace brake levers and Suntour XC Pro 
>> cantilever  brakes. The rack pictured goes with the bike. Stamped into the 
>> bottom bracket is the serial number K96087. The saddle and pedals are not 
>> included and  I will probably keep the Baggins bag. I am not sure if  the 
>> seat post is a Nitto or not. The crank is a Suntour XC Pro triple, 
>> 42x32x20.  Shifters are Silver Bar ends. This bicycle is beautiful, but not 
>> new.  It has some nicks and scrapes especially around the chain area.  Some 
>> can be touched up, a couple would only be repairable with a repaint.  I 
>> have included a picture of the worst.  I call them beausage. 
>>
>>
>> This bicycle will be packed by my wonderful friends at the Bike Shed in 
>> Kearney, Nebraska and shipped via bike flights. I will be happy to subtract 
>> $200 from my price if you would like to road trip it to my home or near my 
>> home near Elwood, Nebraska to pick it up.
>>
>>
>> Price:  $1850.00 shipped to you in the CONUS.  
>>
>>
>> Should you be interested, I will be happy to supply you with further 
>> pictures of your choosing.[image: IMG_2403.jpeg]
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/43013ef9-6838-401e-8003-1621c81a1e7fn%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Rivendell Prototype mountain bike for sale

2024-07-05 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
A... of course. 
The Mountain was "pre" Joe/Curt builds. 

Thanks for sharing that. 

On Friday, July 5, 2024 at 9:26:11 AM UTC-7 Father of Sam wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> Weird that this is my first time ever responding or posting anything to 
> this group in 15 years, but I thought it might be helpful to drop this here:
>
> https://waterfordbikes.com/w/support/serial-numbers/
>
> The letter corresponds to the month of the year (skipping 'I'), so this 
> beautiful bike was the 87th frame built at Waterford in October of '96.  
> What an absolute treasure!
>
> -Peter
> NorCal
> On Friday, July 5, 2024 at 7:36:01 AM UTC-7 Ted Durant wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, July 4, 2024 at 6:10:17 PM UTC-5 David Blessing wrote:
>>
>> Stamped into the bottom bracket is the serial number K96087. 
>>
>>
>> It was built in Waterford in 1996. The "K" indicates which builder at 
>> Waterford wielded the torch. 
>>
>> Ted Durant
>> Milwaukee WI USA 
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/80b6d1f9-5fe0-4db7-8aa6-cf0377f647bfn%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Rivendell Prototype mountain bike for sale

2024-07-04 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
My, my, my that is a piece of RBW history right there...

My guess would be a 1996 build. I think the "K" meant a "Kurt" build. (Curt 
Goodrich) But I'm not sure. (J or JS would have been for Joe Starck)

RR#3 talks about the Mountain model (Mountain/Expedition was another name 
for it) - there were _very_ few ever built.

https://notfine.com/rivreader/RR03.pdf
(page 37)


On Thursday, July 4, 2024 at 4:10:17 PM UTC-7 David Blessing wrote:

> I am offering for sale, my Rivendell, prototype mountain bike. I do not 
> know a lot of history about this frame. I believe that it was one of only a 
> few prototypes of a mountain bike format made by Rivendell. I have owned 
> this bike for many years and have never run into anyone else who owns one.  
> I am not sure when it was made, although some posts I have looked at 
> suggest that Rivendell was planning a mountain bike somewhere around 1995. 
> I purchased this frame from a BOB, built it up and rode it once before 
> hanging it in my office shop along side of my Atlantis and my Rambouillet, 
> both of which are also for sale.  I am approaching 71 years of age, and it 
> is time to clean out the stable.
>
>
> This bicycle has a frame that is 49cm from center to the top of the seat 
> tube or 19”. I’m not up on mountain bike sizing, but I am 5’9” and I think 
> it fits me fine. This Bicycle has White Industries hubs attached to 26 inch 
> Velocity Aeroheat AT  rims, a Shimano Deore Mega 9 front derailleur, and 
> Shimano Deore rear derailleur, cool unidentified handlebar, and Nitto 
> Technomic stem. It also has Dura Ace brake levers and Suntour XC Pro 
> cantilever  brakes. The rack pictured goes with the bike. Stamped into the 
> bottom bracket is the serial number K96087. The saddle and pedals are not 
> included and  I will probably keep the Baggins bag. I am not sure if  the 
> seat post is a Nitto or not. The crank is a Suntour XC Pro triple, 
> 42x32x20.  Shifters are Silver Bar ends. This bicycle is beautiful, but not 
> new.  It has some nicks and scrapes especially around the chain area.  Some 
> can be touched up, a couple would only be repairable with a repaint.  I 
> have included a picture of the worst.  I call them beausage. 
>
>
> This bicycle will be packed by my wonderful friends at the Bike Shed in 
> Kearney, Nebraska and shipped via bike flights. I will be happy to subtract 
> $200 from my price if you would like to road trip it to my home or near my 
> home near Elwood, Nebraska to pick it up.
>
>
> Price:  $1850.00 shipped to you in the CONUS.  
>
>
> Should you be interested, I will be happy to supply you with further 
> pictures of your choosing.[image: IMG_2403.jpeg]
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/6bbf192d-a52c-4ba4-942a-474e87eeb401n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] A general message about Scams, Scammers and recent techniques

2024-07-01 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Hey all - 

As I'm sure you are aware, we have had some instances of non-group members 
emailing members who have posted "wanting to buy" or "want to trade" 
listings. These emails often have very good descriptions and contain very 
believable photos.

They have largely been scam attempts. Other group members have recognized 
images that were theirs or belonged to riding partners. These are 
believable attempts and through the excitement of saving a few bucks or 
getting a model which is currently unavailable, it would be very easy to 
fall for the scam. And we do not fall for scams because we are stupid. We 
fall for scams because we are human. 

This is reason I have tightened the bottleneck for new members posting "For 
Sale" items. If you haven't been an active member in any discussion, and 
your first post is a "For Sale" listing, it will not be passed through. (I 
had changed the group description to reflect that a number of weeks back. 
And if you are a new member who wants to post some items for sale, I'm 
happy to be convinced that you are completely legit. Reach out and let's 
talk).

At this point, I am advising anyone who is approached via email to:
- Search the other person's email in the group archives, to see if they 
have a track record of posting. If they have no posts, it's likely a scam.
- Search their email in the group member section, to see if they are 
actually a member. If they are not a member, it's likely a scam. 

If you do choose to proceed with any transaction, you do so at entirely 
your risk. Due diligence and paying with a protected method are always good 
practice. 

And, yes, I do realize that there are a number of folks who have lurked on 
this list for a number of years and may not have ever posted. So, the above 
method is not foolproof. The vast majority of folks in this group are solid 
citizens who act in good faith. I don't want to lose site of that. 

Thanks for your contributions to this group. 

Jim / List Admin


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/8441a22b-87f4-43ae-a54a-a118823c5a2en%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Tenere32 tenere...@gmail.com???

2024-07-01 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Weirdly... (and I'm looking at you, google groups!) if you type just 
"tenere" into the search, it returns only this thread. But if you add the 
number 746 to the name, another post shows up. 

On Monday, July 1, 2024 at 2:49:44 PM UTC-7 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:

> And there was a post back on June 15th when I removed them from the group. 
>
> J
>
> On Monday, July 1, 2024 at 2:46:55 PM UTC-7 Bill Lindsay wrote:
>
>> That does not ring a bell and if you type "tenere" into the search 
>> window, only your post comes up.  So that's suspicious.  Do not send them 
>> money until you lay out a transfer plan that protects you.  There are 
>> several ways to do that, but it that person is a scammer, they won't agree 
>> to any of them.  
>>
>> Bill Lindsay
>> El Cerrito, CA
>>
>> On Monday, July 1, 2024 at 2:40:41 PM UTC-7 michae...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Made a post (that was since deleted?) looking for a clem size 52. Got a 
>>> few messages from different folks before my post got taken down but 
>>> tenere had a clem in the size I was looking for, photos, etc... but wanted 
>>> to check in here to see if anyone knew them? 
>>>
>>> email address tene...@gmail.com
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/dc400dad-ee6a-4a75-8d35-f4e0b53e66aen%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Tenere32 tenere...@gmail.com???

2024-07-01 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
And there was a post back on June 15th when I removed them from the group. 

J

On Monday, July 1, 2024 at 2:46:55 PM UTC-7 Bill Lindsay wrote:

> That does not ring a bell and if you type "tenere" into the search window, 
> only your post comes up.  So that's suspicious.  Do not send them money 
> until you lay out a transfer plan that protects you.  There are several 
> ways to do that, but it that person is a scammer, they won't agree to any 
> of them.  
>
> Bill Lindsay
> El Cerrito, CA
>
> On Monday, July 1, 2024 at 2:40:41 PM UTC-7 michae...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Made a post (that was since deleted?) looking for a clem size 52. Got a 
>> few messages from different folks before my post got taken down but 
>> tenere had a clem in the size I was looking for, photos, etc... but wanted 
>> to check in here to see if anyone knew them? 
>>
>> email address tene...@gmail.com
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/de7f9fad-6d5b-4161-bcf4-d85c252e06e7n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Tenere32 tenere...@gmail.com???

2024-07-01 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Sorry Michael - I may have nicked that post accidentally. We had a few 
weird ones pop up over the weekend. 

To be very clear, I would not in any way trust them to be a legit source. 

They are not a group member, so I suspect it's similar to the issues we had 
with another random gmail account. 

If someone sends you photos of an item but have no history of interacting 
within this group, I personally would give it a hard pass. There are many, 
many scammers floating around who can easily scrape appropriate images off 
the web. 

- Jim / list admin



On Monday, July 1, 2024 at 2:40:41 PM UTC-7 michae...@gmail.com wrote:

> Made a post (that was since deleted?) looking for a clem size 52. Got a 
> few messages from different folks before my post got taken down but 
> tenere had a clem in the size I was looking for, photos, etc... but wanted 
> to check in here to see if anyone knew them? 
>
> email address tene...@gmail.com
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/6b994923-9ab1-4500-a613-9de193e3dab2n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Where can I read try out a ton of different Rivendell models?

2024-06-30 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
What kind of bikes have you been riding previously? 
The reason I ask is that at 86CM PBH, you are probably "between" the 54 and 
57. 
If you walked into most shops, they would probably to put you on the 
smaller bike for all the reasons we fear most shops.
If you showed up in Walnut Creek and anyone at the RBWHQ&L got chatting 
with you, they'd likely encourage you to try the larger size. 

Also, if you are going for upright bars, that might change the equation a 
bit. 
If you are 5'11" with a true 86CM PBH, then you probably are a little 
longer in the upper body 

You might call them in Walnut Creek and be honest about your budget 
restrictions and the fact you might not be buying it right away. They fit 
folks well. 

J

On Sunday, June 30, 2024 at 2:04:48 PM UTC-7 anthony...@gmail.com wrote:

> I should’ve stated in the original post, my bad. I’m thinking that a 54 cm 
> Roadini would be a good fit since I’m 5’11 and have a PBH of 86 cm. Please 
> let me know if I’m wrong though!
>
> On Sunday, June 30, 2024 at 8:32:27 AM UTC-4 mathiass...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Regarding the test rides: you should state your desired frame size and/or 
>> your PBH. 
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, June 29, 2024 at 3:25:21 PM UTC-4 Bill Lindsay wrote:
>>
>>> Finding a local Rivendell owner is a good idea, and you should 
>>> definitely try to pursue that.  In 2024 it can be tricky to execute a 
>>> Rivendell Acquisition Plan a year in advance.  If it's a year down the road 
>>> because you are saving up the money then my advice is to plan on being 
>>> patient twice.  Be patient now while you are saving up the money and trying 
>>> to arrange your informal test ride stuff.  The second round of being 
>>> patient will hinge on what is actually available for you to buy in the 
>>> summer of 2025.  If you have your heart set on one particular thing, and 
>>> that thing isn't available, then you'll have to react to that situation.  
>>>
>>> Big picture, if it's possible, I think it's a good idea in 2024 to be 
>>> ready to react when the perfect bike presents itself to you. If a bike you 
>>> want to own is available, buy it, because it may not be available to you 
>>> later.  That's easier said than done, particularly if your tastes are 
>>> fluid.  
>>>
>>> Bill Lindsay
>>> El Cerrito, CA
>>>
>>> On Saturday, June 29, 2024 at 9:36:53 AM UTC-7 anthony...@gmail.com 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi, I'm interested in getting a Rivendell in a year or so, but I wanted 
 to try some out in the meantime. Does anyone know of any places that have 
 readily available rivs (preferably Roadinis)? Where did you guys try them 
 out before purchasing? 

 I'm from Florida and the riv dealer near me doesn't have any complete 
 bikes. If anyone is in the Tampa or Miami area and is generous enough to 
 let me have a test-ride, that would be great! Thanks in advance!
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/81491a26-5459-4a5a-a8c9-982799cb33d4n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: FS: Rivendell Roadeo 59

2024-06-22 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Please clarify your asking price for this bike. 

Thanks!

Jim

On Saturday, June 22, 2024 at 11:26:25 AM UTC-7 Jonathan D. wrote:

> I am trying to thin out the number of bikes. I'm going to keep the Ram and 
> sell the Roadeo. This is an amazing bike. 
>
> Selling a great condition Rivendell Roadeo 59 cm. Bike is in great shape 
> and comes with Shimano Ultegra 10 speed, Tektro brakes, Thompson seat post, 
> Nitto Stem and Bar. I plan to keep the seat and pedals but might have 
> alternatives if you are interested.  Frame new starts at $2800. Seat is at 
> 75 mm. I have different stems I can include.  I have several wheel options 
> as including some Chris King Velocity rim wheels, and the A23 rims. 
>
>
> https://www.icloud.com/sharedalbum/#B0Z5ejO17r8P43
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/22715aa9-b5c0-4eb0-a86b-bf65b38c01edn%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Scammer alert: tenere...@gmail.com

2024-06-15 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
They joined two days ago and were still moderated. 

They have been removed from the group. 

Thanks for the heads-up.

Jim

On Saturday, June 15, 2024 at 1:24:48 PM UTC-7 jamin orrall wrote:

> Just replied to R Olson's post about some items for sale, in addition to 
> his response  I immediately received an email asking me what Items I would 
> like to buy from an unrelated email (tene...@gmail.com).  Just a warning 
> they are watching the forum.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/04b36418-f388-42fb-8e22-4950480298d5n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Recommend me a ride in Marin or nearby?

2024-06-12 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Two quick options:

Railroad Grade on Mt Tamalpais is all climbing, but it's a polite grade and 
the views are quite nice. 
It is south facing so can get pretty warm if the temps come up. But there 
are places to stop and recover. 

China Camp State Park can be a bit mountain-bikey at time, but the trails 
are polished and well tended. If you start at the campground end, it's a 
steady climb for a bit, but then a nice long-ish level descent out to 
Buckeye Point and back on the lower trails. Just technical enough to keep 
you alert. Multi-use singletrack. There is a use fee. 

Jim

On Sunday, June 9, 2024 at 11:15:01 PM UTC-7 Lucky wrote:

> Greetings all,
>
> My son wants me to take him riding in Marin or the bay somewhere for a 
> day. He’s newly experimenting with riding a semi-loaded bikepacking rig in 
> anticipation of attempting a solo three day trip at the end of summer. He 
> is 15 (almost 16) and will be riding on a loaner VO Piolet. I will be 
> riding my older Atlantis set up with Super Yummy gravel tires. Any 
> recommendations of a pretty ride that’s not just all climbing or too 
> sketchy? My fitness level isn’t what his is. 
> You can reply directly if you choose.
>
> Thanks, Liz in Sac

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/29a7d9bc-ff3d-4f06-810f-81079c4cfe27n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] WTB SCAMMER ALERT - gran09...@gmail.com

2024-06-06 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Just a heads-up that if someone reaches out to you from the account - 
gran09...@gmail.com, they are not an active list member. 

They have directly contacted a couple of group members who posted a WTB 
request and exhibited fairly hinky behavior regarding location, etc. 

I have the group settings to restrict contact information to only group 
members, so they either have a "listening post" email account so they can 
harvest contact info, or folks are sharing their contact info in the body 
of the post. 

The body of your post is publicly viewable. 

If you are logged in and viewing the list, you should be able to search for 
the email of anyone who contacts you. If someone tries to sell you 
something of reasonable value but they have no footprint in this group, 
that should be a huge red flag. 

Jim / list admin

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/8512c161-9892-4f24-9a57-72cd28a33c83n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: FS - MUSA shorts, knickers, BrandV Grabsack, Timbuk2 messenger bag - PRICE DROP

2024-06-04 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
BrandV Bag is SOLD!

On Sunday, June 2, 2024 at 1:52:53 PM UTC-7 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:

> Knickers are SOLD!
>
> On Sunday, June 2, 2024 at 9:37:11 AM UTC-7 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:
>
>> Prices still include shipping to lower 48
>>
>> MUSA Knickers - original style grey - Size Large
>> 20" (ish) inseam. Gusseted crotch design. Elastic waist belt.
>> Definite saddle wear and some weird stain from when I leaned against some 
>> greasy bits in the shed. Reflectors on back of legs have seen better days 
>> and are definitely worn off in places. Worn. Used. But still have some 
>> miles left in them. Was $35 - now $25
>>
>> Brand V "Grabsack" style bag - OSFA
>> Shoulder bag under the original "Brand V" tag with wooden flap locks. 
>> Very similar to the current Grabsack style back with a main dump area and 
>> nylon divider to separate stuff in the back. I used this lightly for a 
>> while, but it's been flat in the closet for a few years now. Heavy duck 
>> cotton which shows a little sheen here and there. There are probably a few 
>> stains I didn't notice, but it's in pretty dang good shape. Was $65 - now 
>> $45
>>
>> Timbuk2 Messenger bag - Laptop/roller luggage compatible. 
>> This was the last messenger bag I ever bought and while I did slap a 
>> "Just Ride" fabric sticker on it, I didn't really use this one in anger. 
>> It's got some hours on it, but not worn or torn. I just hate to not be 
>> using this, but I've got two others which I reach for (and a small third 
>> one as well), so this doesn't get used. It has a padded laptop section, and 
>> a slot for stacking on a rollaway luggage handle. Heavy duty nylon. 
>> Rubberized base. Large clips.
>> Lots of nooks and crannies to zipper in things. Was $85 - now $65
>>
>>
>> Prices include USPS shipping within the contiguous 48 states. No fee 
>> paypal or venmo, or mail me a check. 
>>
>> I'm attaching a single image of each, but there are many more full size 
>> images in the link below. 
>>
>> Full gallery of images yonder - 
>> https://photos.app.goo.gl/NiH3m5PvLPJQoJHW8
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 22, 2024 at 6:01:58 PM UTC-7 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:
>>
>>> Shorts are SOLD! 
>>> No more calls on the shorts - we have a winner!
>>>
>>> J
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/05581604-f5f3-44b9-9e1d-f4dc5341c2b3n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: FS - MUSA shorts, knickers, BrandV Grabsack, Timbuk2 messenger bag - PRICE DROP

2024-06-02 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Knickers are SOLD!

On Sunday, June 2, 2024 at 9:37:11 AM UTC-7 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:

> Prices still include shipping to lower 48
>
> MUSA Knickers - original style grey - Size Large
> 20" (ish) inseam. Gusseted crotch design. Elastic waist belt.
> Definite saddle wear and some weird stain from when I leaned against some 
> greasy bits in the shed. Reflectors on back of legs have seen better days 
> and are definitely worn off in places. Worn. Used. But still have some 
> miles left in them. Was $35 - now $25
>
> Brand V "Grabsack" style bag - OSFA
> Shoulder bag under the original "Brand V" tag with wooden flap locks. Very 
> similar to the current Grabsack style back with a main dump area and nylon 
> divider to separate stuff in the back. I used this lightly for a while, but 
> it's been flat in the closet for a few years now. Heavy duck cotton which 
> shows a little sheen here and there. There are probably a few stains I 
> didn't notice, but it's in pretty dang good shape. Was $65 - now $45
>
> Timbuk2 Messenger bag - Laptop/roller luggage compatible. 
> This was the last messenger bag I ever bought and while I did slap a "Just 
> Ride" fabric sticker on it, I didn't really use this one in anger. It's got 
> some hours on it, but not worn or torn. I just hate to not be using this, 
> but I've got two others which I reach for (and a small third one as well), 
> so this doesn't get used. It has a padded laptop section, and a slot for 
> stacking on a rollaway luggage handle. Heavy duty nylon. Rubberized base. 
> Large clips.
> Lots of nooks and crannies to zipper in things. Was $85 - now $65
>
>
> Prices include USPS shipping within the contiguous 48 states. No fee 
> paypal or venmo, or mail me a check. 
>
> I'm attaching a single image of each, but there are many more full size 
> images in the link below. 
>
> Full gallery of images yonder - 
> https://photos.app.goo.gl/NiH3m5PvLPJQoJHW8
>
> On Wednesday, May 22, 2024 at 6:01:58 PM UTC-7 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:
>
>> Shorts are SOLD! 
>> No more calls on the shorts - we have a winner!
>>
>> J
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/0ab00dfd-5b52-443b-b75a-0bb4c22726f8n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: FS - MUSA shorts, knickers, BrandV Grabsack, Timbuk2 messenger bag - PRICE DROP

2024-06-02 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Prices still include shipping to lower 48

MUSA Knickers - original style grey - Size Large
20" (ish) inseam. Gusseted crotch design. Elastic waist belt.
Definite saddle wear and some weird stain from when I leaned against some 
greasy bits in the shed. Reflectors on back of legs have seen better days 
and are definitely worn off in places. Worn. Used. But still have some 
miles left in them. Was $35 - now $25

Brand V "Grabsack" style bag - OSFA
Shoulder bag under the original "Brand V" tag with wooden flap locks. Very 
similar to the current Grabsack style back with a main dump area and nylon 
divider to separate stuff in the back. I used this lightly for a while, but 
it's been flat in the closet for a few years now. Heavy duck cotton which 
shows a little sheen here and there. There are probably a few stains I 
didn't notice, but it's in pretty dang good shape. Was $65 - now $45

Timbuk2 Messenger bag - Laptop/roller luggage compatible. 
This was the last messenger bag I ever bought and while I did slap a "Just 
Ride" fabric sticker on it, I didn't really use this one in anger. It's got 
some hours on it, but not worn or torn. I just hate to not be using this, 
but I've got two others which I reach for (and a small third one as well), 
so this doesn't get used. It has a padded laptop section, and a slot for 
stacking on a rollaway luggage handle. Heavy duty nylon. Rubberized base. 
Large clips.
Lots of nooks and crannies to zipper in things. Was $85 - now $65

Prices include USPS shipping within the contiguous 48 states. No fee paypal 
or venmo, or mail me a check. 

I'm attaching a single image of each, but there are many more full size 
images in the link below. 

Full gallery of images yonder - 
https://photos.app.goo.gl/NiH3m5PvLPJQoJHW8

On Wednesday, May 22, 2024 at 6:01:58 PM UTC-7 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:

> Shorts are SOLD! 
> No more calls on the shorts - we have a winner!
>
> J

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/c705c328-97aa-4a21-8d17-d17a251398a3n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [RBW] Touch-up paint

2024-06-02 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
The original orange Rambouillet was a two pass paint job using House Of 
Kolor paints. That specific method of paint application is not used any 
longer.  

I had documented that a while back here - 
http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/color.html

Jim

On Sunday, June 2, 2024 at 5:54:41 AM UTC-7 Bill Lindsay wrote:

> John
>
> No, I don't think anything particular about the Nation of Japan directly 
> influenced the shade of orange of the orange Rambouillet.  Rambouillets got 
> that paint job because they got that paint job.  Orange Hillbornes got 
> their different paint job because that's the paint job they got.  
>
> Bill Lindsay
> El Cerrito, CA
>
> On Saturday, June 1, 2024 at 2:45:15 PM UTC-7 John Hawrylak, Woodstown NJ 
> wrote:
>
>> Bill
>>
>> Would the Rambouillets being built in Japan have anything to do with the 
>> shade of orange???   The Waterford colors seem to be the colors they used 
>> for the Rivendell models they made.  
>>
>> John Hawrylak
>> Woodstown NJ
>>
>> On Friday, May 31, 2024 at 4:54:44 PM UTC-4 Bill Lindsay wrote:
>>
>>> Orange Sam Hillbornes and Orange Rambouillets are both "sparkly metallic 
>>> Orange" in color FAMILY.  They are not identical.  The multi-coated 
>>> treatment of the Orange Rambouillets have been described as a "thousand 
>>> dollar paint job".  Whether a scratch on an Orange Rambouillet could be 
>>> made slightly less ugly with the $50 Hilborne Orange touchup from 
>>> Waterford, that's up to the beholder.  
>>>
>>> Bill Lindsay
>>> El Cerrito, CA 
>>>
>>> On Friday, May 31, 2024 at 1:35:04 PM UTC-7 maxcr wrote:
>>>
 Does anyone know if the Sam Hilborne Orange is the same as Rambouillet 
 orange?
 Max 

 On Friday, May 10, 2024 at 10:21:02 PM UTC-4 Roy Summer wrote:

> Sometimes you can find nail polish that will match or come very close. 
> Clear polish will help prevent rust if you can’t find a color match.
>
> On Friday, May 10, 2024 at 9:31:18 PM UTC-4 gds...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I need Pea Sage Green. Got a "beusage" spot on my Romulus.
>>
>> On Fri, May 10, 2024, 4:49 PM Zac  wrote:
>>
>>> FWIW, I was checking the Gunnar/Waterford site to see if they had my 
>>> paint color (I ordered a bottle when I first heard they were shutting 
>>> down, 
>>> but it broke during a move) and noticed they added some Riv colors:
>>>
>>> Rivendell Atlantis Green
>>> Rivendell Cream
>>> Rivendell Head Tube Ivory
>>> Rivendell Homer Hilsen Blue
>>> Rivendell Jay's Green
>>> Rivendell Light Blue Met
>>> Rivendell Light Green
>>> Rivendell Pearly Arctic Blue
>>> Rivendell Roadeo R
>>> Rivendell Roadeo White
>>> Rivendell Sage
>>> Rivendell Sam Hilborne Orange
>>>
>>> I think the touch-up paint is now shipped in plastic bottles instead 
>>> of glass like I received.
>>> https://waterfordbikes.com/fv/store/Touch-up-one-step-p579850196
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>> send an email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/c4e0d5ad-42b1-4ec8-81a2-123aee64d8a8n%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> 
>>> .
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/65e3b874-d7dc-469d-8348-6e0bdfa0n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [RBW] Re: Are bikes becoming too complicated?

2024-05-24 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
I always appreciated solid designs, but definitively stepped off the train 
in the late 90's. 
I'd been reading GP's writings and spent a lot of time on Sheldon's site. 
Slowly realizing that simple and dependable beat flashy and light every day 
of the week. 
I was riding a ton through a California El Nino winter, and the combination 
of muddy trails and mileage had me grinding up drivetrains about every 
month. Most of my disposable income was going to chains, chainrings, and 
cassettes. All those shift-assisting bits and narrow/short teeth just 
evaporated in those conditions. The only reason I switched to XTR cranks 
was that the (ridiculously expensive) chainrings were about 3x thicker than 
everything else. But --- ooof! -- when those had to be replaced. ugh. 
Then I came into possession of an MB1, took off all the shifty bits and 
bought a BMX sprocket and a Surly tensioner. Those long, thick teeth on the 
back wheel refused to grind down, and the chunky chainring worked fine no 
matter how much grit got ground into it. 
The penny dropped, and I embraced the simple drivetrain lifestyle. 

Jim

On Friday, May 24, 2024 at 10:17:33 AM UTC-7 Mathias Steiner wrote:

> please please please let it be an April-Fool's joke
>
>
> On Friday, May 24, 2024 at 1:09:04 PM UTC-4 Patrick Moore wrote:
>
>> SaaS -- Shifting-as-a-Service, and "your personal power assistant." I 
>> love it.
>>
>> On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 10:41 AM Robert Calton  wrote:
>>
>>> To add an amusing, cynical thought: can you imagine 
>>> Shifting-as-a-Service? New fully integrated wireless 5G groupsets charge 
>>> you $10/month for 1,000 shifts and then you're stuck with a fixie. Or pony 
>>> up $40/month for unlimited shifts and get your shifting analytics pushed to 
>>> the latest Shimano E-Tube app 
>>> . 
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/f2f6347f-425d-4049-8681-011606a33895n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: FS - MUSA shorts, knickers, BrandV Grabsack, Timbuk2 messenger bag

2024-05-22 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Shorts are SOLD! 
No more calls on the shorts - we have a winner!

J

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/9c6a6c65-4e61-49ff-bd73-f3a892057e0dn%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] FS - MUSA shorts, knickers, BrandV Grabsack, Timbuk2 messenger bag

2024-05-22 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Hey there - 

I'd stashed these last fall to list to all's y'all's and then promptly 
forgot to do so. All sold "as-is" but happy to answer questions if you have 
them. 

MUSA Shorts - original style grey - Size Large
8" inseam. Gusseted crotch design. Elastic waist belt.
Very light use - $40

MUSA Knickers - original style grey - Size Large
20" (ish) inseam. Gusseted crotch design. Elastic waist belt.
Definite saddle wear and some weird stain from when I leaned against some 
greasy bits in the shed. Reflectors on back of legs have seen better days 
and are definitely worn off in places. Worn. Used. But still have some 
miles left in them. $35. 

Brand V "Grabsack" style bag - OSFA
Shoulder bag under the original "Brand V" tag with wooden flap locks. Very 
similar to the current Grabsack style back with a main dump area and nylon 
divider to separate stuff in the back. I used this lightly for a while, but 
it's been flat in the closet for a few years now. Heavy duck cotton which 
shows a little sheen here and there. There are probably a few stains I 
didn't notice, but it's in pretty dang good shape. $65

Timbuk2 Messenger bag - Laptop/roller luggage compatible. 
This was the last messenger bag I ever bought and while I did slap a "Just 
Ride" fabric sticker on it, I didn't really use this one in anger. It's got 
some hours on it, but not worn or torn. I just hate to not be using this, 
but I've got two others which I reach for (and a small third one as well), 
so this doesn't get used. It has a padded laptop section, and a slot for 
stacking on a rollaway luggage handle. Heavy duty nylon. Rubberized base. 
Large clips.
Lots of nooks and crannies to zipper in things. $85

Prices include USPS shipping within the contiguous 48 states. No fee paypal 
or venmo, or mail me a check. 

I'm attaching a single image of each, but there are many more full size 
images in the link below. 

Full gallery of images yonder - 
https://photos.app.goo.gl/NiH3m5PvLPJQoJHW8

Jim

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/c3d1ef6c-bd22-4ef0-8ae9-b74fab8bdc70n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Sam Hillbornes Go Live Tomorrow

2024-05-14 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
I have to say that I haven't looked at a bike and felt a strong impulse to 
buy in a long time. 

But both of those colors tripped the switch for me. Unique and yet wholly 
Riv. Very fine choices. There are going to be some lucky owners looking 
back on this day and smiling.

Found myself looking at them, thinking "y'know, I don't really have a 
swept back bar setup"

Temptingtempting

J

On Tuesday, May 14, 2024 at 6:09:21 AM UTC-7 Doug H. wrote:

> I like the colors coming this go-round. The Sam seems like the perfect 
> all-rounder and I would get one had I not just bought a Roadini. Who's 
> planning to get a Sam Hillborne?
> Doug
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/e02d7739-4104-45ac-985c-1124daf7cef2n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Rivendell Rambouillet Randonneuring Road Bicycle "pointy lugs" Toyo? Waterford?

2024-05-13 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Just saw the actual post - the bottom bracket detail would confirm that 
this was the original factory paint. 

>From another resource: 
Base Coat = HOK Nova Orange Shimrin #BC08
Kandy Clear Coat=HOK Spanish Gold #UK14


Jim
On Monday, May 13, 2024 at 12:53:25 PM UTC-7 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:

> Back in the day, I compiled a fair amount of Rambouillet info yonder - 
> http://cyclofiend.com/rbw/rambouillet/
>
> But, yeah. Toyo. It's possible there was proto-model built stateside, but 
> I cannot recall that being the case. 
>
> In the open shade, that has a bit more of a "current" look to the orange 
> than original. I'd want to verify that it wasn't a repaint. The original 
> orange was a complex paint job. 
> If it had actual sunlight falling on the image, it would be easier to 
> confirm. 
>
> Jim
>
>
> On Thursday, May 9, 2024 at 3:28:27 PM UTC-7 jerry...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> No mine, and no affiliation...
>> $1,6999
>>
>> https://www.ebay.com/itm/305557298256?itmmeta=01HXFQAW6P602XRR9J2PG63GAH&hash=item4724a25c50:g:mhsAAOSwQPJmPTYG
>> [image: 00ram.jpg]
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/7415597a-d0d8-4490-8d71-d00bb1d83617n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Rivendell Rambouillet Randonneuring Road Bicycle "pointy lugs" Toyo? Waterford?

2024-05-13 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Back in the day, I compiled a fair amount of Rambouillet info yonder - 
http://cyclofiend.com/rbw/rambouillet/

But, yeah. Toyo. It's possible there was proto-model built stateside, but I 
cannot recall that being the case. 

In the open shade, that has a bit more of a "current" look to the orange 
than original. I'd want to verify that it wasn't a repaint. The original 
orange was a complex paint job. 
If it had actual sunlight falling on the image, it would be easier to 
confirm. 

Jim


On Thursday, May 9, 2024 at 3:28:27 PM UTC-7 jerry...@gmail.com wrote:

> No mine, and no affiliation...
> $1,6999
>
> https://www.ebay.com/itm/305557298256?itmmeta=01HXFQAW6P602XRR9J2PG63GAH&hash=item4724a25c50:g:mhsAAOSwQPJmPTYG
> [image: 00ram.jpg]
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/fc4dd3a0-26f0-4a42-a152-5e9003da5436n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: List Admin Message: Kerfuffle of the week and what to do about scammy folks

2024-05-07 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
I would say a good rule of thumb:
- An offer which begins as a DM
- The offer comes from someone who has no posts in the group
= "Run Away!"

On Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 12:56:20 PM UTC-7 Hoch in ut wrote:

> Would it be possible to list the names of the scammers somewhere? Just for 
> those initiated contact by a private message prior to the ban. 
> On Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 1:46:25 PM UTC-6 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:
>
>> Hey all - 
>>
>> I just removed another person who listed an item and appears to have been 
>> harvesting internet images and presenting them as their own. That's not OK. 
>>
>> This has happened pretty infrequently on this group, and it always a 
>> minor PITA to deal with. 
>>
>> All of which has me wanting to tighten down the listing of for sale items 
>> for new members. These problems always stem from some "enterprising" 
>> individual who joins the group and tries to post a for sale item 
>> immediately. I can count on one hand the times that some "known" group 
>> member acted inappropriately in a transaction.
>>
>> The way in which we've avoided this in the past is by asking folks to 
>> engage on the list first, and use it as a way to rehome items second. I'm 
>> going to be a lot more rigid about that now. 
>>
>> I'll update the list info to reflect this in stronger language, but if 
>> your first post is a For Sale item, I won't be passing it through the 
>> queue. If you would like to offer items to other members, please engage 
>> with the community for a while (purposefully vague...) and demonstrate that 
>> you aren't simply here to cash in. 
>>
>> So - deep breath everyone. 
>>
>> Thanks to those who shared more than just conjecture. That clarified the 
>> issue in this case. That's important data. 
>>
>> As for potential or new members who just want to sell gear and not be 
>> part of this community - there's ebay or other marketplaces which protect 
>> you and the buyer, as well as more transactionally focused groups. Please 
>> use those. 
>>
>> Other than that, we're coming into riding season. Go get some miles in.
>>
>> Jim / List-admin
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/1b014c1a-d638-4eac-b835-58f1cf980acen%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: List Admin Message: Kerfuffle of the week and what to do about scammy folks

2024-05-07 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
I would say if anyone DM'd you and they are not members of this group, that 
would be suspect. 

J

On Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 12:56:20 PM UTC-7 Hoch in ut wrote:

> Would it be possible to list the names of the scammers somewhere? Just for 
> those initiated contact by a private message prior to the ban. 
> On Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 1:46:25 PM UTC-6 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:
>
>> Hey all - 
>>
>> I just removed another person who listed an item and appears to have been 
>> harvesting internet images and presenting them as their own. That's not OK. 
>>
>> This has happened pretty infrequently on this group, and it always a 
>> minor PITA to deal with. 
>>
>> All of which has me wanting to tighten down the listing of for sale items 
>> for new members. These problems always stem from some "enterprising" 
>> individual who joins the group and tries to post a for sale item 
>> immediately. I can count on one hand the times that some "known" group 
>> member acted inappropriately in a transaction.
>>
>> The way in which we've avoided this in the past is by asking folks to 
>> engage on the list first, and use it as a way to rehome items second. I'm 
>> going to be a lot more rigid about that now. 
>>
>> I'll update the list info to reflect this in stronger language, but if 
>> your first post is a For Sale item, I won't be passing it through the 
>> queue. If you would like to offer items to other members, please engage 
>> with the community for a while (purposefully vague...) and demonstrate that 
>> you aren't simply here to cash in. 
>>
>> So - deep breath everyone. 
>>
>> Thanks to those who shared more than just conjecture. That clarified the 
>> issue in this case. That's important data. 
>>
>> As for potential or new members who just want to sell gear and not be 
>> part of this community - there's ebay or other marketplaces which protect 
>> you and the buyer, as well as more transactionally focused groups. Please 
>> use those. 
>>
>> Other than that, we're coming into riding season. Go get some miles in.
>>
>> Jim / List-admin
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/8904c741-94f9-4bd1-9c35-d6830d4cd30fn%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] List Admin Message: Kerfuffle of the week and what to do about scammy folks

2024-05-07 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Hey all - 

I just removed another person who listed an item and appears to have been 
harvesting internet images and presenting them as their own. That's not OK. 

This has happened pretty infrequently on this group, and it always a minor 
PITA to deal with. 

All of which has me wanting to tighten down the listing of for sale items 
for new members. These problems always stem from some "enterprising" 
individual who joins the group and tries to post a for sale item 
immediately. I can count on one hand the times that some "known" group 
member acted inappropriately in a transaction.

The way in which we've avoided this in the past is by asking folks to 
engage on the list first, and use it as a way to rehome items second. I'm 
going to be a lot more rigid about that now. 

I'll update the list info to reflect this in stronger language, but if your 
first post is a For Sale item, I won't be passing it through the queue. If 
you would like to offer items to other members, please engage with the 
community for a while (purposefully vague...) and demonstrate that you 
aren't simply here to cash in. 

So - deep breath everyone. 

Thanks to those who shared more than just conjecture. That clarified the 
issue in this case. That's important data. 

As for potential or new members who just want to sell gear and not be part 
of this community - there's ebay or other marketplaces which protect you 
and the buyer, as well as more transactionally focused groups. Please use 
those. 

Other than that, we're coming into riding season. Go get some miles in.

Jim / List-admin

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/e9843baa-ec8e-42d4-a95e-bbea16249823n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Kerfuffle of the week - Scam posts and what to do...

2024-05-07 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Hey all - 

I just removed another person who listed an item and appears to have been 
harvesting internet images and presenting them as their own. That's not OK. 

This has happened pretty infrequently on this group, and it always a minor 
PITA to deal with. 

All of which has me wanting to tighten down the listing of for sale items 
for new members. These problems always stem from some "enterprising" 
individual who joins the group and tries to post a for sale item 
immediately. I can count on one han d the times that some "known" group 
member acted inappropriately in a transaction.

The way in which we've avoided this in the past is by asking folks to 
engage on the list first, and use it as a way to rehome items second. I'm 
going to be a lot more rigid about that now. 

I'll update the list info to reflect this in stronger language, but if your 
first post is a For Sale item, I won't be passing it through the queue. If 
you would like to offer items to other members, please engage with the 
community for a while (purposefully vague...) and demonstrate that you 
aren't hear just to cash in. 

So - deep breath everyone. 

Thanks to those who shared more than just conjecture. That clarified the 
issue in this case. 

As for potential or new members who just want to sell gear and not be part 
of this community - there's ebay or other marketplaces which protect you 
and the buyer, as well as more transactionally focused groups. Please use 
those. 

Other than that, we're coming into riding season. Go get some miles in.

Jim / List-admin


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/c4af7690-25b9-4c17-a1da-51fb605c8724n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Caution: "Cuddle Bears"

2024-05-07 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
If you saw my post on the recent (now-locked) Hilsen-for-sale thread, it's 
clear that "Caveat Emptor" is an approach I endorse. 
That has never _not_ been the case in this group and on the internet. 

However, assuming ill-will just because someone didn't want to reveal their 
exact location feels a bit judgmental. 

Bear in mind that new members are moderated, and it could be a day or so 
until a response is released from the queue. In this case, it took a few 
hours before I saw and did so, and there were all manner of insinuations 
fairly quickly. 

Hence my encouragement to dial things back a bit. 

The folks replied to my direct email query in a timely manner and with a 
fair amount of detail. I would probably converse with them a bit more 
before sending off a check in that amount, certainly. But unless you had a 
specific interaction with them that is cause for general concern, I'm not 
seeing a reason to engage. 

Anything that's for sale on this list - from the lowliest worn-out cycling 
cap to a full new bike build - should be confirmed before you send any 
funds. 

And as I feel like I've written more than a few times times in the past 
couple days - if you are having questionable interactions or 
communications, feel free to loop me in. 

Jim



On Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 11:50:46 AM UTC-7 weste...@gmail.com wrote:

> Jim, 
>
> On Cuddle Bears' FS post thread they decline to reveal their location, say 
> they won't reveal their name, and don't address their use of someone else's 
> photos in their FS thread.  That thread also marks the first post by Cuddle 
> Bears (perhaps they are a regular poster under another name, but that in 
> and of itself is more than a bit peculiar...) -- those are all red flags 
> for me.  I think Max has a point -- Caveat Emptor. Be warned. FWIW, I'd not 
> trust Cuddle Bears given the history of scammers -- this is a community -- 
> new identities shrouded making an FS post shrouded in secrecy are not ideal 
> ways to be a good member of the community. 
>
> Regards, 
>
> Julian Westerhout 
>
> On Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 10:40:20 AM UTC-5 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:
>
>> Max - 
>> I realize you have been in this group for a while, but unless you have 
>> something concrete to offer, I'd ask that you refrain from posting 
>> commentary like this. It's exceedingly vague. If you are an injured party 
>> in a specific transaction, that's different. But it did not seem that way 
>> from this post. 
>>
>> If I understand the issue - a seller repurposed a photograph of a pair of 
>> handlebars. That seems to be the one issue at this point. 
>>
>> As I said in a separate thread - if you have specific _experience_ with a 
>> seller, you are welcome to email the admin - that would be me - with 
>> information.
>>
>> Most of the recent scam attempts - and there are very few here - are via 
>> a DM from someone who has not taken the time to post anything. In this 
>> case, while I certainly encourage caution on any transaction, let's dial 
>> things back a notch, OK?
>>
>> Jim / list admin
>>
>> On Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 5:04:46 AM UTC-7 Max S wrote:
>>
>>> Cuddle Bears is / are selling a Susie bike for a very good asking price, 
>>> almost too good to be true. User has no prior posts, a few other details 
>>> don't check out. Use caution. 
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/35992895-6d65-469b-b401-fd70e0b081d5n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Caution: "Cuddle Bears"

2024-05-07 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
If you are worried that the poster does not have possession of a specific 
item, it's pretty simple to ask for verification with an updated image. 


On Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 8:40:20 AM UTC-7 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:

> Max - 
> I realize you have been in this group for a while, but unless you have 
> something concrete to offer, I'd ask that you refrain from posting 
> commentary like this. It's exceedingly vague. If you are an injured party 
> in a specific transaction, that's different. But it did not seem that way 
> from this post. 
>
> If I understand the issue - a seller repurposed a photograph of a pair of 
> handlebars. That seems to be the one issue at this point. 
>
> As I said in a separate thread - if you have specific _experience_ with a 
> seller, you are welcome to email the admin - that would be me - with 
> information.
>
> Most of the recent scam attempts - and there are very few here - are via a 
> DM from someone who has not taken the time to post anything. In this case, 
> while I certainly encourage caution on any transaction, let's dial things 
> back a notch, OK?
>
> Jim / list admin
>
> On Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 5:04:46 AM UTC-7 Max S wrote:
>
>> Cuddle Bears is / are selling a Susie bike for a very good asking price, 
>> almost too good to be true. User has no prior posts, a few other details 
>> don't check out. Use caution. 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/0f0b65bd-beaf-4b18-9a0e-c8f50f14270bn%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Caution: "Cuddle Bears"

2024-05-07 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Max - 
I realize you have been in this group for a while, but unless you have 
something concrete to offer, I'd ask that you refrain from posting 
commentary like this. It's exceedingly vague. If you are an injured party 
in a specific transaction, that's different. But it did not seem that way 
from this post. 

If I understand the issue - a seller repurposed a photograph of a pair of 
handlebars. That seems to be the one issue at this point. 

As I said in a separate thread - if you have specific _experience_ with a 
seller, you are welcome to email the admin - that would be me - with 
information.

Most of the recent scam attempts - and there are very few here - are via a 
DM from someone who has not taken the time to post anything. In this case, 
while I certainly encourage caution on any transaction, let's dial things 
back a notch, OK?

Jim / list admin

On Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 5:04:46 AM UTC-7 Max S wrote:

> Cuddle Bears is / are selling a Susie bike for a very good asking price, 
> almost too good to be true. User has no prior posts, a few other details 
> don't check out. Use caution. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/80a0a017-fad0-4b9f-8d5d-f3a41c204310n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Another Brevet Report: The Antelope Island 300k

2024-05-06 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
What a brilliant adventure. Thank you for sharing the details and the 
images. 

Jim

On Sunday, May 5, 2024 at 8:17:58 PM UTC-7 Brady Smith wrote:

> A few weeks ago I wrote about my first brevet of the season, in which good 
> training and great conditions produced a 200k for the ages, at least for 
> me. 
>
> Yesterday's ride was a challenge of a different sort. 
>
> The real Antelope Island 300k sets off this coming Saturday. I decided to 
> pre-ride the course because I'll be in Washington DC with 80 8th graders 
> this coming weekend, an endurance test, to be sure, but of a somewhat 
> different kind. 
>
> We've had beautiful weather this week in the Salt Lake Valley, but it's 
> been, quite literally, the calm before the storm. As I did some final 
> planning on Friday, I started noticing winter weather advisories for the 
> Wasatch mountains Sunday into Monday. At first I didn't make much of it, 
> since I was planning on riding on Saturday, and since winter weather can 
> happen all the way through May in this part of the country. But then I 
> remembered what always happens when big storms roll through the valley--big 
> winds come along with them. 
>
> I noticed almost as soon as I started up Emigration Canyon alongside our 
> RBA, who graciously volunteered to accompany me for the first twenty miles 
> or so of the ride--a gusty, noticeable breeze from the east, the opposite 
> direction that winds usually blow in these parts. It calmed a bit as we got 
> to the middle of the canyon--a 7 mile climb or so--and then disappeared as 
> we made our way up towards Big Mountain Pass, a 7400 foot summit that marks 
> the end of the first big ascent on the route. 
>
> Ken, our RBA, had wondered aloud about continuing on, but decided against 
> it due to family obligations. He did not miss the fast descent that usually 
> greets riders on the east side of Big Mountain Pass, because, as we had 
> suspected, it had not yet been cleared by the UDOT, probably because, like 
> us, they could read the forecast, and saw that a foot or two of snow was 
> due to fall over the mountains in the coming days. It was not completely 
> covered in snow, but there were five or six significant snowdrifts impeding 
> progress down the mountain. A ten minute descent turned into thirty minutes 
> of intermittent riding and hiking. 
>
> It didn't seem to be a particularly big deal at that point, and the next 
> 35 miles or so were nothing short of serene. From the base of Big Mountain 
> one continues past East Canyon reservoir and along the vast expanse of the 
> Morgan Valley, a 30 mile downhill section, at which point the 20 mile, 3400 
> foot ascent that greets riders at the start of this route seems to be 
> redeemed. I blew through this section, finding myself in Mountain Green 
> well before lunch, and then up and over Trapper's Loop Road, the second big 
> climb of the route, in fairly swift time. 
>
> After meandering through the upper Ogden Valley, I came across, around 
> mile 80, what I hoped was the last big test of this ride--the North Ogden 
> Divide. You can see it clearly as you approach the backside of the Wasatch 
> Mountains, a tiny line etched precariously in the mountainside, only 2 
> miles long from where the climb really starts to the top of the mountain, 
> but a 2 miles that proceeds upwards at a steady 10%. It's also narrow, and 
> presaged by a sign saying something to the effect of "Steep grades and 
> sharp curves. Not Recommended for Cyclists." (As if in penance, there is a 
> "Share the Road" sign immediately after, but based on the angry shouts of 
> one pickup driver heading down the mountain opposite, not one motorists pay 
> much attention to.) 
>
> I shifted immediately into my 30-32 low gear and started upwards, one eye 
> on the road ahead, another in my mirror, making sure that the occasional 
> vehicle coming up behind me looked like it was going to give me adequate 
> space. It's fair to say that this was the hardest climb I've ever 
> completed, at least when accounting for the fact that I'd already done 80 
> miles and 6000 feet of elevation at this point in the ride. It was 
> borderline nauseating making my way up the mountainside, the stress of the 
> ascent only partially atoned for by the stunning views of the valley off to 
> the south. When there was space I occasionally started zig-zagging up the 
> mountain, trying to relieve some of the strain on my legs and lungs, then 
> getting over when traffic appeared in my mirror behind me. At long last, I 
> made it to the top. 
>
> The descent was exhilarating. The speed limit is 30 mph, but I had to lean 
> on my brakes to stay at 35mph, and the cars lined up behind me seem to have 
> no problem waiting to pass until we got to the bottom. In my head, the 
> worst of it was over. I'd done almost 7000 feet of climbing in 80 miles. 
> After 8 hours in the mountains, I was back in the Salt Lake Valley, with a 
> flat 100 miles or so

Re: [RBW] Re: Scam alert? I'm so confused. Blue Homer in LA? ND?

2024-05-04 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Follow up - 

I just reread the posts in this thread - I'm still confused (and don't 
really want to know all the details)but just to be clear.

First
- There was an old post on FB (unrelated to this group at all)
- It's been there a while.
- It seems scammy.

Also
- Someone DM'd a group member (As I've mentioned before, this is possible 
even if the DM'ing member is moderated) saying a similar bike is for sale.
- That went scammy quickly.
- Others had experience with that individual which felt scammy.
- No one reported it to me.
- I've now removed _that_ individual who was on this list. 

Then
- there was a tangent about an older scammer (immediately removed from this 
group back when it happened, after someone brought it to my attention). 

Review:
- If someone solicits you via DM for a transaction and they have no 
presence on this list, I would err on the side of caution. There are plenty 
of solid group citizens here and very few scammers. But that does not mean 
you should simply trust someone who has contacted you. Verify. Ask for 
specifics. Engage in safe online transaction practices.
- And if someone is acting hinky, let the admin know... 

OK.  Enjoy your weekend!

Jim





On Friday, May 3, 2024 at 3:18:52 PM UTC-7 Jay wrote:

> I feel for those of you who have been scammed.  Hopefully, karma plays out 
> for them, and perhaps you'll have a 'win' in the near future that makes up 
> for it.
>
> I'm almost to the point of quoting any online used buy/sell activity.
>
> I've bought/sold bike stuff, and a few other categories of items, on 
> kijiji for 10-15 years.  Pre-covid, didn't do too bad.  Most items would go 
> in 1-2 weeks, a lot of views, responses were generally positive even if a 
> sale didn't occur.  Most who did respond, got back to you even if they 
> decided to pass on the item.  Likewise, I would message on things I was 
> interested in, and most sellers were respectful and good to deal with. 
>  During covid, selling was a piece of cake.  Now, sigh, about 90% of the 
> interactions I've had are with pinheads.  People who in one minute seem so 
> interested "I can be there today between 3-4pm", and when you say you're 
> working, how about after dinner, you never here another word from them 
> (this has happened with 8 out of the last 10 interactions).  I've had items 
> listed for months with no activity.  I may donate a bunch of things to a 
> bike collective or not-for-profit and hopefully the old parts (mainly 
> saddles and stems) will go to a good home.  I'm a really positive person, 
> but it's hard to be positive with a lot the online activity these days (and 
> these are not scammers, just, pinheads!).
>
> Buy/Sell looks great on this site.  I'm in Canada though so that's a bit 
> of a challenge (though I do use cross border pick up site, and it works 
> fine, both directions), plus I'm at my budget for spending on bike things, 
> for now, and I have most of what I want.
>
> On Friday, May 3, 2024 at 11:07:48 AM UTC-4 krhe...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> @Roberta and Eric -
>> Let me clarify how I was scammed. I posted here last July wanting to buy 
>> Blue Lug's
>> *REW10 WORKS* hex brass valve caps here in the states to save myself some 
>> monies in overseas shipping costs. 
>>
>> Anita Batya saw my post and claimed that she had a pair. Anita told me 
>> that she lived in Seattle, of which is relatively close to me (This was a 
>> lie. She lived in Pennsylvania after doing some online homework after the 
>> fact). If I wanted them, she requested me to make a payment through a third 
>> party email address of which she claimed it was her bookkeeper. Anita told 
>> me that she was waiting for an answer from Paypal for a refund. I sent 
>> her money (I forgot what amount it was $50.00~?) several times. This kept 
>> going in circles over and over again. By then, I felt that there was 
>> something mighty strange and peculiar going on. I caught on that I was 
>> being scammed. I did not respond back to her. This was my first time being 
>> scammed over something that I really wanted. My apologies for there might 
>> be some holes left out from my recollection of my interaction with Anita. 
>>
>> Later down the road, there was other members herein and over on the IBOB 
>> group being scammed by Anita. Skip Montanaro, the administrator accepted 
>> Anita 
>> Batya's membership. When I told Skip that she was/is a scammer, he quickly 
>> took action and denied her membership.
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/g/internet-bob/c/5FXmDXVSG6c/m/yGCjPQ3KBAAJ
>> https://groups.google.com/g/rbw-owners-bunch/c/WRzS3bBRKcc
>>
>> Kim Hetzel. 
>>
>> On Friday, May 3, 2024 at 7:24:11 AM UTC-7 drewfi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> The "Jeff" in question reached out to me in response to a WTB post. I 
>>> asked what his "Friend" was selling and he said a 60cm Homer, which I 
>>> thought was strange considering my post specifically said 54/55/56cm. 
>>>
>>> A quick check to see that he'd never posted i

[RBW] Re: Scam alert? I'm so confused. Blue Homer in LA? ND?

2024-05-04 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
ADMIN HAT ON ///

Ok. I want to be very, very clear about this. 

I've definitely removed and suspended individuals from this group when they 
behaved inappropriately or they were clearly scams.

But there is really no way for me - or any other member of this group - to 
police some other group on Facebook.

If you have a problem with a seller on Facebook, it would be much more 
direct to take up with FB or the admin of that group. This is not the place 
for that. 

One of the reasons I limit posting for newer members is to try to filter 
out those who are clearly trying to scam folks. 

But I do not in any way want any member of this group to assume that some 
faceless person on the internet has been vetted for transactions. That 
responsibility lies with the buyer. Any member of this group can search 
other members to see how active they have been over the years. 

Caveat emptor. 

Let's have no confusion on that point. 

I felt it was inappropriate to drag content from a private transaction on 
separate on FB into this group, so I've locked this thread. 

// ADMIN HAT OFF

Thanks!

Jim 

On Thursday, May 2, 2024 at 8:48:01 PM UTC-7 brenton...@gmail.com wrote:

> Hi. I've been searching for a blue homer in 54.5 for my wife and in my ISO 
> post I was linked to this facebook listing:
>
> " @Brenton -
> If you go FACEBOOK Rivendell Bicycle BUY/SELL/TRADE, there is a blue Homer 
> under the owner's name of 
> *Payton Beargrr* 
> 
>  
>
> Very near mint condition A. Homer Hilsen, 54.5cm with 650b wheels. Unsure 
> of year but it's likely 4 or less years old. Taiwanese made frame. I am not 
> the original owner but this appears to be a Rivendell build. 
> -Nitto handlebars, stem, and seat post
> -Brooks saddle
> -Paul racer brakes, Paul canti levers
> -Paul thumbie mounts with Microshift shifters
> -Riv Silver double crankset
> -IRD front derailleur
> -Shimano Alivio rear derailleur
> -MKS Grip Monarch pedals
> -mismatched Shimano hubs, no name rims
> -Soma Cazadero 650 x 42b
> -Sackville bag
> The only imperfections are the two small paint chips on the top tube, 
> noted in the pictures. 
> $2500 + shipping. 
> Let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Kim Hetzel."
>
> Other people seem to also be looking at this bike. Robert Carlton said 
> owner confirmed it's a 58. The facebook post has some comments and the 
> owner says the bike is in *Fargo ND.*
>
> I've been texting with someone (who says the bike is in *LA*) and he 
> wants a $400 deposit to sell it to me for $1300 (complete bike, insane 
> price). The whole thing is odd. They can't send me a pic with measure tape 
> to prove a claim of *69cm standover*. It sure doesn't look like a 54.5 
> based on every other Riv stack I've seen and studied. Our messages have 
> been super cryptic. 
>
> I just *HOPE* anyone else looking for a blue homer in 58 or 54.5 doesn't 
> fall for a scam. Posting here amongst people I trust, admire, and have 
> become friends with. My Roadini frame and dozens of parts on both my Rivs 
> have been purchased from this group. I don't want to stir up any drama if 
> this is in fact a legit sale, but the listing is from Jan 2023, 16 months 
> old, this bike at any price under $2000 should be long gone on it's way to 
> a new owner. PS. I'm not sending a deposit.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/3c956f7b-b78e-40a8-a406-4dd747c83419n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: 3rd parties for bike sales

2024-03-09 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
With any platform, it's beneficial to understand what protections are 
offered. There are resources through the FB help site - 
https://www.facebook.com/help/228307904608701

I wouldn't buy anything significant from anyone without a clear return 
policy agreement. 
Other than that, all caveats apply. 




On Friday, March 8, 2024 at 4:26:52 PM UTC-8 James wrote:

> Has anyone here experimented with 3rd party websites for "large" purchases 
> from strangers?  I'm looking to buy a bike from someone on FB marketplace 
> and it's not a local sale.  So in essence I'm sending over $1,000 to a 
> stranger on their word.  What have ya'll done, if anything, to make sure 
> you aren't getting scammed (asides from getting a sense of their character 
> over the phone)?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/85b08036-d210-481e-a8c7-0a3549eb2cd6n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Building a Quickbeam and wondering...

2024-03-08 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Mine's still more or less as shown here - 
http://www.cyclofiend.com/ssg/2007/ssg017r3-cyclofiend0107.html

I came back one tooth on the fixed, so it's running at 15T with the stock 
40 Sugino up front. That's kinda where it lives 95% of the time. 
But the 32T is there, as well as the 18T freewheel.

The "single speed crankset" was just a Sugino triple with a guard. You 
could get the Silver and swap up the inner ring.
https://www.rivbike.com/products/crank-silver-double-42-28-with-guard

One of the reasons that remains my favorite bike is the ultimate 
adaptability. You can come up with all manner of ways to set it up and it 
will let you do so. 

J

On Tuesday, March 5, 2024 at 12:21:08 PM UTC-8 David wrote:

> What are your drivetrain specs? Cranks, chainrings, etc.  Simpleones, too, 
> if that's what you're riding. It appears Riv doesn't offer the classic 
> single speed crankset anymore.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/7667133a-e50d-4bb6-bbb4-f156daf825d8n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] List Admin-y Things

2024-03-04 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Hey there - 

I just found a few list-de-moderation requests in my spam folder. It looks 
like something was triggering the filters...

Anyway - I've unmoderated most of you who requested in the past few weeks, 
so you should be good to go for future interactions. 

A few of you who asked to be unmoderated didn't actually show up as 
members. This is usually caused by using a different email account to joint 
the group. A couple others were just trying to post long, general 
bike-stuff-for-sale lists that were not particularly Riv-adjacent or 
focused. 

To all of you who are now onboard, a hearty Welcome!

Spring is coming, so hang in there through the rains (and blizzards) we are 
experiencing and get riding!  Looking forward to more ride photos and tales.

Jim / List Admin

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/e7492e56-35b1-4cc3-91d9-6f3a8b5f2c82n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Favorite Bay Area S24Os?

2024-01-21 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Angel Island is an oft-overlooked destination. 
SP Taylor State Park (though in a valley and tends to be a bit damp)
China Camp State Park


On Sunday, January 21, 2024 at 10:31:42 AM UTC-8 jesse.b...@gmail.com wrote:

> Hello! I am hoping to do a lot more quick overnight trips this year and 
> was wondering if people had favorite rides and camp spots in the bay area? 
> I have a few Marin sites on my list (Pantoll, Hawk).
>
> I live in SF, but not opposed to taking bart as part of the trip.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/6fe86f81-c940-4930-bb3b-4295b400bd6bn%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [RBW] OK to post non Rivendell bikes for sale here?

2024-01-21 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Thanks to those who already responded, but putting on my admin cap:

>2019 Ibis Mojo 3

This would be solidly outside of the selling guidelines for this group. 
Plenty of other places to find an excited buyer for that. 

- J

On Tuesday, January 16, 2024 at 3:05:43 PM UTC-8 rmro...@gmail.com wrote:

> 2019 Ibis Mojo 3, size large. Fits more like a medium. I am 5’10”. Riv 
> content? My Gus has taken it’s place.
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 16, 2024, at 4:38 PM, Steve  wrote:
>
> You've piqued my curiosity - what's the bike?
>
> Steve
>
> On Tuesday, January 16, 2024 at 12:57:17 PM UTC-5 Patrick Moore wrote:
>
>> The moderator and others can correct me, but I think that if the bike in 
>> question is relatively aligned with Rivendell tastes and might appeal to 
>> list members -- if it's generally Rivendellian in taste -- it will be fine. 
>> I would not post a FS for a modern CF road bike or downhill mountain bike 
>> here.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:41 AM Richard Rose  wrote:
>>
>>> I am still new here & do not want to violate an rules. But, I do have a 
>>> bicycle that I would like to sell and thought others here might be 
>>> interested. I will not post here until I hear if it is acceptable. Thanks! 
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/f8769fc7-af87-459d-b2b6-35b43d5e61cdn%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> 
>>> .
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Patrick Moore
>> Alburquerque, Nuevo Mexico, Etats Unis d'Amerique, Orbis Terrarum
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Executive resumes, LinkedIn profiles, bios, letters, and other writing 
>> services
>>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> *When thou didst not, savage, k**now thine own meaning,*
>>
>> *But wouldst gabble like a** thing most brutish,*
>>
>> *I endowed thy purposes w**ith words that made them known.*
>>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/ffd50edf-434f-49e3-b449-589f3defdef3n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> 
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/6c674845-cb44-4970-894c-0162ca29fecan%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Coaster Brakes for a Beachy Clem Build

2023-12-19 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
On Monday, December 18, 2023 at 10:15:35 AM UTC-8 Bill Lindsay wrote:

The show stoppers that I would fear are:

1. A coaster brake requires a no-tensioner way to take up chain slack.  On 
normal cruisers, that's done with horizontal dropouts.  The Clem has 
vertical dropouts.  


Fixing chain slack on vertical dropouts is easily addressed with a chain 
tensioner. 
https://surlybikes.com/parts/singleator

Or if you want a purpose-built wheel, check out the White ENO hub - 
https://www.whiteind.com/product/eno-flip-flop/

If you go the hub route, you would have to leave the handbrakes in 
place 

J

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/0f4c0755-a47d-47c5-9511-1a2607ea739bn%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Coaster Brakes for a Beachy Clem Build

2023-12-19 Thread Cyclofiend Jim


On Monday, December 18, 2023 at 10:15:35 AM UTC-8 Bill Lindsay wrote:

The show stoppers that I would fear are:

1. A coaster brake requires a no-tensioner way to take up chain slack.  On 
normal cruisers, that's done with horizontal dropouts.  The Clem has 
vertical dropouts.  


Fixing chain slack on vertical dropouts is easily addressed with a chain 
tensioner. 
https://surlybikes.com/parts/singleator

Or if you want a purpose-built wheel, check out the White ENO hub - 
https://www.whiteind.com/product/eno-flip-flop/

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/e4162bcb-05f3-4fc9-a2c7-a73dad659e33n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: FS: 60 cm Quickbeam

2023-12-08 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Ha! It's kind of disconcerting to see a Quickbeam with front and rear 
derailers. 
Front/Rear were the Suzue hubs?

Jim

On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 10:40:18 AM UTC-8 joe kelly wrote:

> On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 1:35:18 PM UTC-5 joe kelly wrote:
>
>>
>> Stuff I forgot to mention; it’s orange, I don’t want to ship it but would 
>> be willing to drive to meet up, I’m in Columbus Ohio, it has set for a few 
>> years now since cycling faded away and golf took over as favorite hobby. 
>> Has jack brown green tires, front one is flat needs a new tube probably, it 
>> won’t pump up. Has a brass bell. 
>> I loved assembling and riding this bike but I just haven’t touched it in 
>> a few years. Just writing this for sale post brought back so many nice 
>> memories. Maybe it can make nice memories for the next owner too. Hope so 
>> anyway.
>> Thanks
>> Joe
>> On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 1:28:00 PM UTC-5 joe kelly wrote:
>>
>>> Hello
>>> I have decided to sell my 60 cm quickbeam. I bought it used and 
>>> customized it with lots of stuff from Rivendell. I had a wheelset made that 
>>> is a 5sp 120 rear hub and a dyno front hub I got from Rivendell with 
>>> velocity twin hollow wheels. It has lightsfront and rear, a sackville 
>>> small, fenders, campee front rack with wall basket and net. Nitto stem with 
>>> albatross bars, nitto post with broooks b17 and randi jo cover. Sugino 
>>> crank with mkx pedals. Original wheelset included too. Bar end shifters and 
>>> cheapy derailers.
>>> $1750 obo
>>> Thanks
>>> Joe
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/5c100b81-8b81-4289-a8c1-d496989ba3d7n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] "Trust, but Verify"

2023-11-23 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Putting on the admin cap this morning:

I had a couple of members reach out to me regarding some interactions 
following a "WTB/WTT" posting.

They were contacted directly by a "member" who had just what they wanted. 
Luckily, both of the original posters did a bit of due diligence and 
realized that the images had been pulled from other forums, and the person 
who contacted them had some fairly sketchy responses. Both individuals 
wisely stepped away from the transaction. 

This is a reminder that it's up to you to verify the validity of anyone 
with whom you are dealing. One quick way to do so is by searching 
conversations in this group under the person's email address. In this case 
the "member" who exhibited hinky behavior had been in this group for all of 
6 days. They had not contributed to any conversations and were still 
moderated. 

Bear in mind that a moderated/unknown member can still contact you 
directly. That's what this individual did in these cases. 

As a reminder, if you are engaging in transactions, the onus is upon you to 
confirm identity and validity of the person and conditions. Ask questions. 
Require an image with today's newspaper or some other verifiable, unique 
aspect. Search them in the group. 
In other words, "Trust, but verify."

Thankful, as always, for all of you in this group.

admin mode OFF

Jim

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/9af2d699-eb17-43e5-b329-78396bfcdb3en%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [RBW] Re: FS: QuickBeam 58 cm

2023-08-27 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
The flat tabs ("Frenchie tabs"? hmmm h'ain't heard that one before) 
were on the orange model for sure - you can see them on mine - 
http://www.cyclofiend.com/ssg/2006/ssg017r2-cyclofiend1006.html

IIRC, the first green runs did not have them. I've definitely seen a few 
that did not sport them.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/philipwilliamson/261885177/in/photostream/

On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 8:32:07 AM UTC-7 robert.har...@gmail.com 
wrote:

> I agree with this sentiment. My 58cm QB is my “core” bike. Hills, long 
> rides, errands — it does most of what I want from a bike and does it very 
> well. Keeping this one is a good idea…
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 27, 2023, at 11:27 AM, Benjamin L. Kelley  
> wrote:
>
> 
>
> Honestly, if I was somehow forced to winnow down to one bike, it would be 
> my qb hands down no 2nd thoughts.
> It's a pretty great do about everything except race or full on mtb frame.
>
> Jason, glad you decided to keep it. It's also a great build.
>
> --ben in Kansas City
>
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 7:28 AM Bill Lindsay  wrote:
>
>> APPROVE people keeping their bikes and using them.  
>>
>> BL in EC
>>
>> On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:52:50 PM UTC-7 jasonz...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> And as it is Friday and I took an awesome joyride around the new area, I 
>>> am calling it quits on calling it quits for this bike.  I can say it is now 
>>> sold, as you all sold me on keeping it.  My plan is to keep riding it more 
>>> now that I'm more confident with the climbs in the immediate area and 
>>> if/when I put on the pass n stow rack and start using it for camping, I'm 
>>> hoping to either: change the front chainring to 40t vs 48 and/or find a 
>>> 16/19 DOS for the rear.  That should give me all that I need for the 
>>> terrain.  For some reason the climbing isn't as bad as I initially assumed 
>>> on the 48-18 and I'll just use the bombora when I'm pulling the baby.
>>>
>>> Im super surprised this didn't sell, glad now that I've made my mind, 
>>> but a head scratcher for sure.
>>>
>>> Glad to get to know you all more, it's always a good learning 
>>> opportunity.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Jason a proud old owner of a new old Quickbeam
>>>
>>> On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 7:03:51 PM UTC-5 Jason Zakaras wrote:
>>>
 Indeed, super clean, it was a gem when I picked it up from you Dylan!  
 I just took a small rip on it and it just glides.  While I think the Rene 
 Herse crank looks brilliant, the 48t is just too stout to have much fun 
 for 
 me now.  I'm kicking myself for getting rid of the 40/32 crank and the 
 17/19 dos... doh!

 If it doesn't sell I think I'm going to change out the chainring to 36t 
 and maybe put a 17/19 dos on it and see if I can have a smile again.  I 
 can 
 put my pull trailer adapter on the bombora and pull the lil one with that 
 too.  hm apostasy!

 On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 6:08:50 PM UTC-5 dylantho...@gmail.com 
 wrote:

> For what it's worth - this is my old frame and it's SUPER clean. Jason 
> did a great job in updating it since I sold it to him. 
>
>
> On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 2:42:48 PM UTC-7 Patrick Moore wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Jason. I looked them up on the Wolf Tooth site and as far as 
>> I can tell they are made only for mountain bike bars; are yours a road 
>> bike 
>> bar model, or did you just force them on to the bigger bar?
>>
>> About that Quickbeam: I know from experience that you can list and 
>> relist a very nice bike and come away with far less than than expected; 
>> then a month later someone will post a similar bike and get a much 
>> higher 
>> price. This happened when I sold a very nice Sam Hillborne some years 
>> ago. 
>> FWIW.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 3:36 PM Jason Zakaras  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Patrick, they are wolf tooth's silicone grips, I believe the Karv 
>>> maybe fatpaw.  I recently switched all my mtbs over to them and they 
>>> are 
>>> lovely.  Its a nice touch when you're feeling fatigued and can drop 
>>> down 
>>> into a cozy bed for yer hands.  I highly recommend them.
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/4d8c6e53-5569-44f5-b090-9fd1c655d4a5n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> 
>> .
>>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send a

[RBW] Caveat Emptor - Not just a good idea....

2023-07-20 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Caveat Emptor: the principle that the buyer alone is responsible for 
checking the quality and suitability of goods before a purchase is made.

Just to put on my Captain Obvious hat, I want to remind those of you who 
are engaging in transactions here: There is some degree of risk in any 
internet transaction. 

Do your due diligence before sending any money. 
- Do you know the individual?
- Do they have a history of contributing in this group?
- Have you searched for their name and/or email in this group? 

Just because someone figured out how to contact you does not mean they are 
trustworthy. This is a discussion group. It was never set up to provide a 
marketplace with checks against people who take advantage of good-natured 
and trusting folks. You need to take responsibility to protect yourself. 

Now, having said that, we've been remarkably trouble-free in this area, 
mostly because we have a pretty good sense of who is an active member and 
acts as part of the community. 

Be well. Trust, but verify. 

Jim / admin





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/d6682578-9efb-487e-be03-9f5c23fafd7dn%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [RBW] Re: Wanted post worries

2023-07-20 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
I have removed a couple of "members" who joined in the last month or so and 
seem to be here only to solicit direct transactions. 

Jim

On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 11:08:48 PM UTC-7 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:

> Just as a reminder, this is a publicly viewable list. 
>
> The contact settings allow members of the group to contact another member. 
> Potentially, someone could join just to do so. That would mean that they 
> likely have not ever posted to the group, as their postings would be 
> moderated until they reach out to me directly. 
>
> If the person shows no history of activity in the group, I'd strongly 
> encourage you to confirm they are legitimate. You can easily search by 
> member name or email. 
>
> JIm / admin
> On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 10:52:53 PM UTC-7 melissa...@gmail.com 
> wrote:
>
>> Bummer. This post came a few days too late. Anita made off with 37 of my 
>> hard-earned dollars and no cork grips in sight :'(
>>
>> On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 11:16:20 AM UTC-4 Josh C wrote:
>>
>>> Can you even tell if someone posts often, other than just being familiar 
>>> with their name? I've been on here for a couple of years but also don't 
>>> really post much. I find that most questions I might have are often 
>>> answered by a quick search and review of old threads. There is a wealth of 
>>> knowledge on this group. It's hard to know if someone is trying to scam 
>>> you. I guess using PayPal or some form of protected payment is the way to 
>>> go. 
>>>
>>> On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 11:00:09 AM UTC-4 jrst...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> I better post more often as I like selling on this list and giving good 
>>>> deals. It seems scams are all around us. 
>>>>
>>>> On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 9:30:31 AM UTC-4 krhe...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ted Wood,
>>>>>
>>>>> I got caught up in a spider web with Anita Batya most recently for 
>>>>> those *REW10 WORKS* hex brass valve caps . I was taken for a real 
>>>>> agitating tail spin with her. Still waiting for an answer from Paypal for 
>>>>> a 
>>>>> refund to finalize my interests with her. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Kim Hetzel
>>>>> Yelm, WA. 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 4:38:13 AM UTC-7 ted.l...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Always check the members list at https://groups.google.come before 
>>>>>> replying to wanted post DMs. I was recently scammed out of a *whopping* 
>>>>>> $17 
>>>>>> by not following my own advice. Watch for Anita as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 2:07 PM larson@gmail.com <
>>>>>> larson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I had similar responses to my post. Eduardo wanted to sell me an 
>>>>>>> Atlantis MIT frameset for $600.
>>>>>>> Randy in WI
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 12:58:44 PM UTC-5 Josh C wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's good to be careful. It's a weird world these days. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 12:50:16 PM UTC-4 Lucky wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Greetings all, 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I posted a want ad yesterday for an Albastache bar and got a 
>>>>>>>>> couple responses from people I’ve never seen here before. I do know 
>>>>>>>>> there 
>>>>>>>>> are lurkers on the list so if Denise and Eduardo Garcia are members 
>>>>>>>>> here 
>>>>>>>>> please follow up with more info. 
>>>>>>>>> It’s a shame we have to worry about scammers all the time now and 
>>>>>>>>> my apologies if I am wrong. 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Liz in Sacramento 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>> send an email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/52f64998-5ffc-42ca-bc50-550556fd3a0an%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/52f64998-5ffc-42ca-bc50-550556fd3a0an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Ted Wood < ted.l...@gmail.com >
>>>>>>
>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/6714f8de-542d-4a58-abfe-8c7de5004defn%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [RBW] Re: Wanted post worries

2023-07-20 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Just as a reminder, this is a publicly viewable list. 

The contact settings allow members of the group to contact another member. 
Potentially, someone could join just to do so. That would mean that they 
likely have not ever posted to the group, as their postings would be 
moderated until they reach out to me directly. 

If the person shows no history of activity in the group, I'd strongly 
encourage you to confirm they are legitimate. You can easily search by 
member name or email. 

JIm / admin
On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 10:52:53 PM UTC-7 melissa...@gmail.com wrote:

> Bummer. This post came a few days too late. Anita made off with 37 of my 
> hard-earned dollars and no cork grips in sight :'(
>
> On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 11:16:20 AM UTC-4 Josh C wrote:
>
>> Can you even tell if someone posts often, other than just being familiar 
>> with their name? I've been on here for a couple of years but also don't 
>> really post much. I find that most questions I might have are often 
>> answered by a quick search and review of old threads. There is a wealth of 
>> knowledge on this group. It's hard to know if someone is trying to scam 
>> you. I guess using PayPal or some form of protected payment is the way to 
>> go. 
>>
>> On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 11:00:09 AM UTC-4 jrst...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> I better post more often as I like selling on this list and giving good 
>>> deals. It seems scams are all around us. 
>>>
>>> On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 9:30:31 AM UTC-4 krhe...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
 Ted Wood,

 I got caught up in a spider web with Anita Batya most recently for 
 those *REW10 WORKS* hex brass valve caps . I was taken for a real 
 agitating tail spin with her. Still waiting for an answer from Paypal for 
 a 
 refund to finalize my interests with her. 

 Kim Hetzel
 Yelm, WA. 



 On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 4:38:13 AM UTC-7 ted.l...@gmail.com wrote:

> Always check the members list at https://groups.google.come before 
> replying to wanted post DMs. I was recently scammed out of a *whopping* 
> $17 
> by not following my own advice. Watch for Anita as well.
>
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 2:07 PM larson@gmail.com <
> larson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I had similar responses to my post. Eduardo wanted to sell me an 
>> Atlantis MIT frameset for $600.
>> Randy in WI
>>
>> On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 12:58:44 PM UTC-5 Josh C wrote:
>>
>>> It's good to be careful. It's a weird world these days. 
>>>
>>> On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 12:50:16 PM UTC-4 Lucky wrote:
>>>
 Greetings all, 

 I posted a want ad yesterday for an Albastache bar and got a couple 
 responses from people I’ve never seen here before. I do know there are 
 lurkers on the list so if Denise and Eduardo Garcia are members here 
 please 
 follow up with more info. 
 It’s a shame we have to worry about scammers all the time now and 
 my apologies if I am wrong. 

 Liz in Sacramento 
>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>> send an email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/52f64998-5ffc-42ca-bc50-550556fd3a0an%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> 
>> .
>>
> -- 
> Ted Wood < ted.l...@gmail.com >
>


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/2da80d6c-eb20-4bf1-bb0e-01d65b44bce1n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: [SFRandon] OT - recovered Rivendell Atlantis

2023-06-22 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Ha... you beat me to it. 
Thanks Eric.



On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 8:22:46 AM UTC-7 campyo...@me.com wrote:

> Forwarding from another email list … 
>
> --Eric Norris
> campyo...@me.com
> Insta: @CampyOnlyGuy
> YouTube: YouTube.com/CampyOnlyGuy 
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From: *Eric Larsen 
> *Subject: **[SFRandon] OT - recovered Rivendell Atlantis*
> *Date: *June 22, 2023 at 7:36:25 AM PDT
> *To: *San Francisco Randonneurs 
> *Reply-To: *ciren...@gmail.com
>
> If you know anyone who had a Rivendell Atlantis stolen from them, please 
> have them contact me off list to identify.
> Eric
>
> -- 
> -- 
> This message is from the San Francisco Randonneurs list at 
> sfra...@googlegroups.com
> Search the archives at http://groups.google.com/group/sfrandon
> For SFR's schedule and general information, visit 
> http://sfrandonneurs.org/
> To unsubscribe, email sfrandon+u...@googlegroups.com
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "San Francisco Randonneurs" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to sfrandon+u...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sfrandon/CAPyocvW3WeBX2xJVWM%3DsBMBo0wVDeqReScLTy64U3T6irONfgw%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> 
> .
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/70b1ceda-ce36-4c26-a391-0e12136f4c50n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Using Your Rivendell Vs. Being Precious: A Spectrum

2023-06-18 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
I still hold in my mind the comment that GP wrote many years ago:

"A bike with no scratches has no stories to tell..."


On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 3:15:18 PM UTC-7 Bicycle Belle Ding Ding! 
wrote:

> Did you read Grant’s Blahg? He covers a lot of ground, but most notable to 
> me was the Please Don’t Be Precious About Your Rivendell section. In sum, 
> Grant is saying it saddens him to think of people riding beater bikes 
> instead of their Rivendells to do daily, monotonous tasks - because those 
> tasks make up a lot of real life. If one “saves” their Rivendell, it will 
> not realize its potential, sit mostly unused and then pass to one’s heirs 
> who will sell it in “near mint” condition on EBay, and how sad. What was 
> the bike for?
>
> I have found myself both guilty and innocent on the matter. My #1 favorite 
> bike is my raspberry Platypus. I ride it all the time, because I bought it 
> to ride it, but I also dread any harm coming to it, and I do guard it from 
> that. I got a second Platypus that I dedicated to shopping and traveling 
> with and promised not to be precious about it. But now and then I still am 
> tempted to backslide. When traveling to the Philly Bike Expo I dithered 
> about which bike to bring. I didn’t want my raspberry Platy damaged while 
> locked up at racks and I feared it being stolen. Roberta said, “I don’t 
> think you have a choice, Leah. That’s the bike people will expect you to 
> bring.” And she was right, and I did. 
>
> Then, there is Pam. Pam is at the other far end of the spectrum. Her bike 
> is a model of beausage. Innumerable paint chips and little spots of rust 
> cover her tiny Betty frame. Her Backabike bags are full of holes and the 
> elastic closures are worn out. She locks it up and never worries about it. 
> She did not obsessively stare out the restaurant window to see if it was 
> still locked to the rack while we were at dinner (like yours truly). But 
> she loves her bike, has real affection for it. She looked at me, eyes 
> shining, and said exactly that. Ana, PurpleRiv, is another good example to 
> us. She adores her bike, but has not spared it from hard work. Her bike has 
> hauled obscene loads and taken her everywhere. I remember there was that 
> one fateful camping trip for she 1. Posed it for a photo, only to have it 
> topple and slide down the face of a boulder next to it. I believe she said 
> she sat there and wept for 2 hours over her Joe Bell paint. And who among 
> us would not do the same? 2. Same trip, another photo op, and the bike fell 
> off a cliff. 
>
> So, who truly loves their Rivendell? The one who lavishes it with care and 
> protection? Or the one who pulls it out of the garage and into all of life 
> - the mundane and the adventurous? 
>
> On one end of the spectrum we have those who will only take a Rivendell 
> out for special occasions so as not to spoil it, and on the other…well, we 
> have Pam and Ana, who will give it a good thrashing. (Oh, don’t take it 
> personally, friends, I’m being funny about both types of owners.)
>
> I find myself wanting to be precious but fighting it and succeeding *most* 
> of the time. I’m lucky that the raspberry paint hides beausage and dirt, so 
> it looks pretty new. But a dent in the top tube or a large chip in the 
> paint would really hurt my feelings. Heaven help me. 
>
> Where are you on the spectrum? What words of wisdom might you have? What 
> strategies do you employ? Do you want to change? Or are you 
> unapologetically staying put on the matter? It might be fun to hear 
> perspectives.
> Leah
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/cbfcb103-8dc1-4ef6-9d61-a2f69b736571n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Red Toyo Atlantis?

2023-05-04 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Ha! I'd forgotten about that. Gino has been been the temporary steward of a 
lot of very interesting bikes over the years... 

J


On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 at 12:42:15 PM UTC-8 Jeremy Till wrote:

> I *think* this bike was formerly owned by (former list member?) Gino 
> Zahnd, as evidenced by this photo from 2013, which I faved at the time: 
>
> https://flic.kr/p/f8fyGT
>
> Gino does reference selling it in the comments on the photo.  
>
> -Jeremy Till
> Sacramento, CA
>
> On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 9:27:02 AM UTC-8 homer...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I very curious about this bike. Honestly, I’ve just never seen a red 
>> Atlantis?
>> Does Anyone know what year this bike was made?
>>
>> Thanx folks 
>>
>>
>> https://sfbay.craigslist.org/eby/bik/d/vallejo-rivendell-atlantis-58/7578102714.html
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/0f36ca74-9ae5-4306-b822-e3197bce4331n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Atlantis Old vs New?

2023-05-04 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
The "2" was on the first Atlantii, to acknowledge that the name had been 
used in the past by Bridgestone 

I have the old Atlantis page yonder - 
http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/atlantis/index.html

There are a few scans of the pertinent flyers.

J
On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 11:47:45 AM UTC-7 MisterMo wrote:

> Is there a place to go to get Atlantis history and updates over the years? 
> ie, was there a Waterford Atlantis? Atlantis to Atlantis2 was? Did Toyo 
> produce Atlanti with both the roundy lugs and the pointy lugs?  How does 
> one tell the difference between Toyo, MIT and Wford? etc, etc. Thanks for 
> pointing me to a place with this info (or providing it here).  
>
> On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 4:22:39 PM UTC-4 Mackenzy Albright wrote:
>
>> I don't have an atlantis - but for a long time rode a crust romancuer, 
>> which was somewhat based off the old atlantis's. I thought it was the bees 
>> knees for a long time, but never felt right *for me* especially while 
>> trying to use upright bars. It felt amazing with drops however. Due to neck 
>> injuries and unable to set the bike up in it's best form decided to trade 
>> my Romanceur for a Clementine. It is a day and night difference of ride 
>> with boscos and long top tube and wheelbase. 
>>
>> My summarization would be: 
>>
>> For drop bar setup - an older atlantis would be nice. There are a more 
>> similar bikes available like the older atlantis frames. AKA large tire 
>> clearance touring bikes. Bassi Le Montreal, Crust Romancuer, etc. 
>>
>> For upright bars - the long wheelbase and top tube rivs truly shine in 
>> their comfort, performance, and handling. I don't think there are a lot of 
>> bikes out there outside of rivendell with similar wheelbase and handling 
>> characteristics. I get a bit annoyed with the constant rebuttal that 
>> "they're just over priced 80's mountain bikes" - but they took everything 
>> good about 80s mountain bikes and improved it. Longer wheelbases and top 
>> tubes. Better steering geometry. Higher head tubes. More clearance for 
>> larger tires. Lots of braze on options for racks and bags. etc. 
>>
>> On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 8:32:06 AM UTC-7 Ken Yokanovich wrote:
>>
>>> I have a 61cm Toyo-built Atlantis. I had not ridden the bike for about 3 
>>> years due to some unexpected life change circumstances and then a 
>>> repaint/rebuild. I also have a latest-generation 57cm Appaloosa that I have 
>>> owned and ridden during those 3 years for recreation, errands, and 
>>> commuting. The current generation MIT Atlantis is very similar to 
>>> Appaloosa.   I recently got the Atlantis back from a repaint, and it has 
>>> been fun to compare the two bikes. 
>>>
>>> Atlantis
>>> I have ridden this bike for recreation, commuting, and have done several 
>>> loaded tours on it. I like it a lot, I *don't LOVE* it. At least not 
>>> for recreational riding. I tend to grab something else when it's time to go 
>>> play.  (I also own Rivendell: Custom - All Rounder, Custom - Road, Frank 
>>> Jones, HubbuHubbuH, Platypus) Tire widths have ranged 35-48mm. It seems to 
>>> handle a lot better with the wider tires, particularly when descending 
>>> hills on gravel. It *IS *my go to bike for loaded touring and when I 
>>> travel. (This is a weird combination of opposing purposes that I am 
>>> constantly struggling with.) I prefer the position of drop bars and 
>>> appreciate multiple hand options for multi-day rides and long hours in the 
>>> saddle. The more "aerodynamic" position is something MUCH appreciated for 
>>> those eventual day-long headwinds. The bike does have toe overlap with the 
>>> fenders, but this has never been a big deal for me. For the most part, I 
>>> would have a hard time telling you which of my bikes did/didn't.
>>> [image: Atlantis Full.png]
>>>
>>> Appaloosa
>>> I bought the Appaloosa as the keep-handy grab-n-go bike. My confidence 
>>> in upright handlebars was bolstered by the experience of riding and touring 
>>> on the HubbuHubbuH. I like the Bosco bars way more than I expected I ever 
>>> would.  I keep the Appaloosa parked in front of the car making it an easy 
>>> choice for errands and commuting. Unexpectedly, I have found myself riding 
>>> the Appaloosa for recreation too.  The bike rides much "lighter" and 
>>> "faster" than I expected it would.  If I hadn't just got the Atlantis ready 
>>> for summer touring, I would like to try taking the Appaloosa on a 
>>> fully-loaded tour. I think the more casual ride mood that it inspires might 
>>> encourage me to cut back on ambitious daily mileage goals when touring.
>>> [image: Appaloosa.png]
>>>
>>> Summary 
>>> Both bikes provide a lot of enjoyment. If forced to choose between the 
>>> Atlantis or Appaloosa, I would select the Appaloosa. 
>>> What's next or what would I do differently?  I have thought about buying 
>>> another Appaloosa from the next batch and building it up for loaded touring 
>>> so I could reconfigure the Atlan

[RBW] Re: SF Bay Area Trail status update

2023-04-17 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Beautiful. 
The spring this year is erupting!

J


On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 11:29:23 AM UTC-7 Brendan Willard in SF wrote:

> [image: IMG_4868.JPG]
>
> On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 11:28:34 AM UTC-7 Brendan Willard in SF wrote:
>
>> [image: IMG_4870.JPG]
>>
>> On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 11:27:45 AM UTC-7 Brendan Willard in SF 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Glorious in the Headlands!
>>>
>>> [image: IMG_4874.JPG]
>>>
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/80e870f7-795b-4a0b-a959-a657ec2b7d07n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: How to determine the year my Riv was built

2023-04-17 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Looks like I was off by a year - the Bleriot run ended in 2008 - for those 
interested, there's a link to that thread on the Bleriot page I referenced
https://groups.google.com/g/rbw-owners-bunch/c/mQqL-yBsg_Y

It was kind of an odd arrangement, as it was sold through QBP, which was 
the major US wholesaler of bike equipment at the time (they may still 
be...) 
As you likely know, they were the Taiwan-built version of a a Saluki, a 
model which got folded into the 650B end of the first version of the 
Hilsen. 

I'm not sure if QBP ordered a few runs, or if they just sold through the 
original order. 

Jim / cyclofiend




On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 5:33:30 PM UTC-7 tob...@gmail.com wrote:

> Thanks for the info. If they were a single production run bike, then my 
> question is almost a moot point. 
>
> On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 4:44:24 PM UTC-7 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:
>
>> Bleriots were only produced for a few years. It may have only been one 
>> run.
>> aught-6 to aught-9 IIRC
>> http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/bleriot/index.html
>>
>> On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 4:24:08 PM UTC-7 tob...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I own a Bleriot that I purchased second hand, and was curious if there's 
>>> is a way to determine the year it's from?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/1a4f438d-2b7e-47ff-9ee9-8841d94857bbn%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: How to determine the year my Riv was built

2023-04-17 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Bleriots were only produced for a few years. It may have only been one run.
aught-6 to aught-9 IIRC
http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/bleriot/index.html

On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 4:24:08 PM UTC-7 tob...@gmail.com wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I own a Bleriot that I purchased second hand, and was curious if there's 
> is a way to determine the year it's from?
>
> Thanks!
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/0bee1fa1-4118-44f5-8636-cc95357a437fn%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] List Housekeeping: Hotmail and AOL accounts may be problematic

2023-04-17 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Was cleaning up old spam folders and turned up a few messages from members 
asking why they had been banned from the group. 

They were not people I recall banning (I do actually have a list, and it's 
relatively short - thank you all!), so I checked my admin tools to see 
their status.

None of them showed up on the roster of banned emails.

More oddly, none of them showed up on the list of members (which includes 
"banned" address profiles in addition to active moderated/unmoderated 
members). 

Since 100% of those contacting me about not being able to log in and post 
had either @hotmail or @aol accounts, I'm figuring that there's some issue 
related to that. And I can't really solve that for anyone. 

Just to be explicit - 
You must be logged into your google account to post to this group. 
You may have to figure out why google is no longer recognizing aol or 
hotmail. 

Hope that points you in the right direction!

Jim / list admin




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/882bcc0f-98df-43d4-906e-eb26914fc112n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: PSA: Watch our for scammers in the group

2023-04-17 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
In the more general sense, I have not received any feedback from active 
members that this was an issue.
It strikes me as part of the due diligence of anyone selling or buying on 
any internet-based group to confirm that someone is who they say they are.

>From the description of this particular problem, it doesn't seem like 
there's a reasonable fix. We can't guard against everyone on the internet 
scraping contact info. If someone off-list contacts you, I'd be wary. But 
that's just good internet hygiene.

Just to be clear - I do not "vet" people on this list. I ask that they take 
the time to reach out and ask to be unmoderated. That seems to self-select 
those who would just want to sell something and leave. 

Honestly, in recent I've been tightening up which FS posts I let through. 
Riv bikes and Nitto and RBW-sold items, sure. But piles of generic road 
components? Yeah...no... Or the person who was trying to sell a C'dale FS 
MTB? No...no. 

For those who have been here a while with full posting permission, I have 
no interest in policing what is getting bought and sold. it is my belief 
that the more the total number of threads skew towards buy/sell, the less 
of an asset this group becomes. I also realize that many appreciate that 
aspect of this group.

Locking this thread. 

Be well, go ride!

Jim 
/admin


On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 9:01:01 AM UTC-7 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:

> On Monday, April 10, 2023 at 5:29:03 AM UTC-7 Johnny Alien wrote:
>
> I was aware that anyone could view the forums but I (wrongly) assumed that 
> only members could post or message other members
>
>
> Specific to this comment:
> - This is a publicly viewable group
> - Non-members cannot post
> - All new members are moderated (and believe me, not all move past that 
> point...)
> - If you post contact information in your post, it will be viewable.
>
>  
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/2672a479-e39b-4096-ae50-93f5a5136a3an%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: PSA: Watch our for scammers in the group

2023-04-17 Thread Cyclofiend Jim

On Monday, April 10, 2023 at 5:29:03 AM UTC-7 Johnny Alien wrote:

I was aware that anyone could view the forums but I (wrongly) assumed that 
only members could post or message other members


Specific to this comment:
- This is a publicly viewable group
- Non-members cannot post
- All new members are moderated (and believe me, not all move past that 
point...)
- If you post contact information in your post, it will be viewable.

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/4de21b0b-3dab-4e50-ac7d-f66ff0d90a08n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: New build: 1985 Bridgestone MB-2

2023-02-13 Thread Cyclofiend Jim


On Monday, February 13, 2023 at 9:19:51 AM UTC-8 Jose wrote:
Amazing build! Did Grant P design the 1985 MB-1 and MB-2? 


No - those were more of a "legacy" design. The MB's in '85 still had the 
long wheelbase design which was the norm in those days. IIRC, the '87 was 
his first full frame design.

1985 - 
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bridgestone/1985/pages/19-bridgestone-mb-1.html
1987 (with drop bars no less)
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bridgestone/1987/pages/bridgestone-1987-13.htm
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/c6961138-661c-4bd9-83c5-e92401dd238fn%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [RBW] Re: Bombadil and Hunqapillar origins: The definitive thread

2022-12-22 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Yes. My recollection was that Bomba was coming out when it was "suggested" 
that those names were IP, so IIRC it was the last of the Tolkien names.

Grant shared the Hunkapiller mailbox story with me verbally during a visit 
to RBWHQ&L. It was the same as he later wrote in one of the Readers. 

The first Hunqapillar I ever saw came out with grey frame and orange.
I had some images over on my (goodness gracious it's still THERE?) Flickr 
feed - 
https://www.flickr.com/search/?user_id=93409214%40N00&view_all=1&text=hunqapillar

There were both TTT (Twin Top Tube) and Diagatube frames when I visited. 
IIRC, Grant said it was going to be diagatube only in production - this 
image shows an unpainted model - 
https://www.flickr.com/photos/cyclofiend/4713714578/in/photolist-8bx281-8btKnk-8btKpk-7NNCR6-cqiLDG-7NVfpo-oiwPmQ-7NVgrq-7NVfuj-7NVgwQ-7NRh2g-7NRhHe-7NRgWB
(taken mid-2010)

For completeness - here's a tall Bomba with the TTT and that gorgeous 
kidney bean red - 
https://www.flickr.com/photos/cyclofiend/4207455573/in/photolist-7pNiXt-7pSegm-7pNiYF

J


On Sunday, December 11, 2022 at 1:41:43 PM UTC-8 Jay Lonner wrote:

> This is the story that I’ve heard. And while I do love the name and woolly 
> mammoth iconography, it does feel like a missed opportunity when Oliphaunt 
> was right there. (But maybe they had already gotten a cease-and-desist from 
> the Tolkien estate at that point?)
>
> In any case, it’s great seeing the Hunqapillar get some attention — I sure 
> love mine. And I also appreciate the link to John Watson’s build on the 
> Radavist. He mentions wanting to track down an 8-speed specific White 
> Industries freehub. So here’s where I confess to some gaps in my knowledge 
> — are current generation rear hubs incompatible with 8-speed cassettes? I 
> had assumed that the freehub dimensions were constant, and that the 
> cassettes and chains just got narrower with more gears. But evidently 
> that’s not the case, presumably leading to a rear wheel with more dish? I 
> like my 3x8 setup quite well for the Hunq, and am wondering whether I need 
> to be on the lookout for spares if there’s no way to retrofit contemporary 
> components.
>
> Jay Lonner
> Bellingham, WA
>
> Sent from my Atari 400
>
> On Dec 11, 2022, at 11:52 AM, J J  wrote:
>
> Re: the mailbox — I believe Grant was on a tour and saw the name 
> “Hunkapiller” on a mailbox. Forgot where. He changed the spelling for the 
> bike.
>
>
>
> On Sunday, December 11, 2022 at 2:17:05 PM UTC-5 eric...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Ricky — The mailbox thing is new to me, interested to learn more if 
>> others have insight. 
>>
>> Laing — That is a beauty of a Bombadil and I really appreciate you have 
>> the screenshot from when you bought it. That's the kind of receipt I like. 
>> Please keep us updated on how it handles with the very wide drops and other 
>> changes. Congrats on your traverse of FL on that bike! 
>>
>> Brian — Thanks for the info! Definitely appropriate for the thread, I'd 
>> say. I'm surprised Sackville is a reference to LOTR, never would have 
>> guessed it. I think I'd heard of the rest, but only through reading about 
>> Riv over the years. And I was aware of Rivendell Mountain Works as a point 
>> of inspiration as well. 
>>
>> Thanks, Eliot! I've got two videos in the hopper. Apologies for the 
>> erratic upload schedule. I enjoy documenting my projects but I don't want 
>> to be a full-time YouTube person. 
>> On Sunday, December 11, 2022 at 12:39:36 PM UTC-5 eliot...@gmail.com 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Eric when are we going to see another YouTube video ? I really admire 
>>> your style and have even learned a few tricks from your excellent build 
>>> videos. Sorry for the tangent.
>>>
>>> On Sunday, December 11, 2022 at 8:42:59 AM UTC-8 brok...@gmail.com 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Eric, I hope this doesn't derail your thread too much, but I though I 
>>>> might try to address your Tolkien question. As I'm sure many of us here 
>>>> are, I've long been a big Tolkien nerd, but I wouldn't consider myself an 
>>>> expert... I'd say I'm pretty well-versed, though!
>>>> I know Grant has always maintained that he named Rivendell BW out of 
>>>> his appreciation for the old Rivendell Mountain Works catalogs (no doubt a 
>>>> main inspiration for the Riv Readers and model catalogs / brochures). But 
>>>> then, he also has taken quite a few liberties with the Tolkien property 
>>>> names and references. Here's a short list of all the ones I can think of, 
>>>>

[RBW] Re: Orange Ram touchup paint

2022-12-22 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Not sure on that one. 

Note that the orange Ram was a layered paint job. Very tough to actually 
"match". 

Jim

On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:14:57 PM UTC-8 cdres...@gmail.com wrote:

> Checked some older postings and cyclofriend who recommended Boyds Roadser 
> Florida Orange Pearl but appears to be out of stock. Anyone tried Boyd's 
> Orange Pearl Enamel?
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/d87a1b6a-730c-41a1-8a58-6fb02b096a50n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Bleriot Touch Up Paint?

2022-12-05 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
There was a nail enamel which worked well - back when I posted this page:
http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/color.html

- J

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 11:46:39 AM UTC-8 fmar...@gmail.com wrote:

> I remember seeing something about a Testors model paint color that matched 
> up really well with the Bleriot aqua color. I can't find it now, do any 
> Bleriot owners have any idea?
>
> Thanks,
> Fred
> Mount Prospect, IL
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/b23f737d-83af-4c65-8616-b23af79d4921n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Appaloosa Purple Prose

2022-12-05 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
If you have detailed photos of the fork, I think it would be appropriate to 
post those as well. 

Jim / list admin

On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 7:11:00 PM UTC-8 Matthew Williams wrote:

> Oh, where to begin? I owned this bike for approximately two months. Here’s 
> what happened:
>
> A few months ago, I bought this Appaloosa (identical to my current whip) 
> from the original owner and shipped the bike via BikeFlights. But when UPS 
> delivered it, I braced myself for disappointment: the box had a tire track 
> across one side, the top and sides were torn, and a large hole had been 
> haphazardly patched with several strips of clear packing tape. 
>
> I took photos as I carefully unpacked the bike. A truck had backed over 
> the bike: the seatstays, chainstays, rear rack, and fork were badly bent, 
> the front wheel was crushed, and the frame was visibly deformed and out of 
> alignment. BikeFlights reimbursed me for the shipping costs and what I paid 
> for the bike. To fulfill the claim, BikeFlights sent me a shipping label, 
> and directed me to repack and ship the crushed bike to a non-profit 
> organization.
>
> I don’t know the concatenation of circumstances, but the bike is once 
> again for sale—the frame and forks have been fixed and the front wheel has 
> been replaced. To be clear, I neither question the integrity or the 
> worksmanship of the builder who straightened the frame, nor am I accusing 
> the seller or anyone involved of malice, deception, or anything untoward. 
>
> The purpose of this note is so interested purchasers can make an informed 
> decision. If I was considering buying this bike, I’d want someone to warn 
> me. 
>
> [image: IMG_3007.jpg][image: IMG_3018.jpg][image: IMG_3014.jpg]
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/e163a58f-9ba8-41d1-88a8-3259423f5ea4n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] A Few Thoughts About FS posts

2022-10-28 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Hey there - 

Just slipping on my admin cap because I'm noticing a trend:

There has been an increase in "no-price" For Sale posts which have ended up 
in the queue. While I don't feel they are made in anything other than good 
faith, it potentially changes the nature of this group to an auction house. 
There are other websites which do that.

I've also noticed a number of Sale listing attempts (again, caught in the 
review queue as they are from newer members (or those who never posted 
before) for pretty general gear. That's much more of a grey area, as we all 
end up with extra bike stuff. But there have been a number of "swap meet" 
style posts that get pretty broad, or are even introduced with "I've 
cross-posted this into..." 

For the second condition, I'll admit more leeway for those who share images 
and ride reports and the things that make this a valuable place. 

For the first issue, moving forward if something is listed for sale without 
a clear asking price and lands in the queue, I'm going to not pass it 
through. And might ask non-moderated posters to specify a price if a 
listing is not clear. 

For reference - in this last batch of ~20 posts which landed in moderation, 
there were 6 which had no-price-gimmee-an-offer text. 

Thanks!

Jim / list admin


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/747aea73-75ff-4d8e-952c-bd8d2c41b021n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Your cyclist vs. motorist war/horror stories

2022-10-10 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Putting on the Admin Cap...

In the past I've pulled threads like this as they veered quickly and 
strongly off topic and tended to end up in Polemic-ville. 

I'd like to remind everyone, particularly newer members, of the narrower 
focus of this group. It's by design and has generally served us well for 
many years. General topics outside of Rivendell Bicycle Works are best 
covered in more general groups such as iBob, etc. 

Whether driver obliviousness or intentional maliciousness, we are unlikely 
to solve it here. 

I thank those who have shared stories and maintained a moderated tone so 
far, and I'll ask that any other member consider before posting whether 
adding to this thread is helpful. 

Thank you. 
Jim / Admin

On Sunday, October 9, 2022 at 9:41:46 AM UTC-7 eric...@gmail.com wrote:

> *First of all I'd like to note that starting this thread might not be a 
> great idea. But perhaps it would be a way for us to share some experiences, 
> vent or commiserate. *
>
> Well, I think a lot of us have been there. We've had a weird, scary, 
> too-close-for-comfort interaction with a motorist. It could be due to 
> driver inattention or downright overt aggression. It could have been your 
> fault or no fault of your own. Do you have a riding story involving a 
> motorist you'd like to share? 
>
> I live in Fredericksburg, VA, a small city built on a grid. We have an 
> historic district here, many streets are narrow with one-way traffic. There 
> are a few two-lane arteries designed to move cars. Posted speeds are 25 mph 
> (I always drive slower and leave my truck in 2nd gear). People drive like 
> maniacs on certain residential streets, sometimes reaching 50mph. I often 
> wish for more traffic calming infrastructure, crosswalks, speed tables and 
> the like. 
>
> In March 2021 I was riding my bike to the bike shop, about a 1.5 mile 
> trip. I was heading down a one-way street through a residential 
> neighborhood with street parking on the right and long, grassy, landscaped 
> park on the left. I was riding to the right side of the street. This 
> section of road has one lane and it is unusually wide. There is room for 
> someone to comfortably pass a cyclist. 
>
> Someone honked their horn at me but not in the "Hi, heads up, I'm about to 
> pass you please and thanks" sort of way but the "Get the fork off the 
> road!" kind of way. It was startling. I responded by taking the lane, which 
> is legal for cyclists in Virginia. I rode dead center in the middle of the 
> lane. I hoisted a one-finger salute and carried on riding. I rode in the 
> middle of the lane for approximately 100 feet before making a turn. 
>
> Yes, this was an escalation. And it was a bad decision. I don't think I'm 
> alone in feeling frustrated by displays of impatience and aggression from 
> drivers and feel that I have certain rights as a human person to ride 
> safely. It is sometimes difficult not to react in the moment. Motorists 
> might be not only impatient but totally deranged. Road rage is real. And 
> drivers are behind the wheel of a vehicle that is easily weaponized. With 
> just a feather of the gas pedal or a slight turn of the wheel they can 
> inflict irrevocable damage to a cyclist. 
>
> The driver responded to my salute by getting within a few feet of my back 
> wheel. When I  made a turn to carry on to the bike shop, they followed. I 
> could hear them revving their engine behind me and feathering the gas to 
> get close to my back wheel but not quite hit me. I continued to ride in the 
> middle of the road. 
>
> I heard something hit the street next to me. It was an unopened aluminum 
> can of a carbonated beverage (I didn't go back to check out whether it was 
> soda, beer or seltzer). Acknowledging the projectile I decided I had to 
> bail and get up on the sidewalk or somehow turn around to where the car 
> could not get to me. 
>
> As soon as I moved to the side to take a driveway apron up onto the 
> sidewalk the car passed me, then got right in front of me and slammed on 
> their brakes. I braked hard and managed not to do an endo onto their trunk 
> or hit their vehicle. The straddle cable hanger came loose from the front 
> brake cable. The driver sped off. I did not get their plates. 
>
> A few days later I went around the neighborhood and knocked on every door 
> with a doorbell camera that was along the path of my interaction with the 
> driver. Everyone I asked checked their footage but only one came back with 
> anything showing me or the driver. There was a clip of the driver revving 
> their engine behind me and throwing the can. You can see the can fly 
> through the air and hear it land in the street. I got a good profile shot 
> of the car (2005 Acura TL, maroon with custom window trim), but no view of 
> the tags. 
>
> This is, by far, the worst interaction I've had with a motorist. I've only 
> been riding for a few years. There are others that aren't nearly as bad but 
> still register a

[RBW] Re: I'm curious about the very early, blue Bombadil prototype

2022-09-07 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Never actually saw that bike blue bike in person.That was definitely an 
early proto. The photo was in DirtRag Mag (print version), so you know 
there was a delay for printing.

The specifics definitely changed from that. IIRC, the bike had 
fundamentally changed even before that article ran.

This has 2 sizes of the the clear coat version 
- http://www.cyclofiend.com/cc/2008/cc452-bombadilproto0208.html
A 52 and a 60 from February 2008 at RBWHQ&L - I think that was pretty close 
to the dimensions in the one you shared. It did have the single top tube, 
which was changed before production. 

This early aught-nine version (with swept-back bars, mind you...) had the 
2TT.
http://www.cyclofiend.com/cc/2009/cc626-martygierke0309.html

Gino was riding a proto in 2008 which had the 2TT
http://chicogino.blogspot.com/2008/05/rivendell-bombadil-my-two-week-fling.html

J

On Monday, September 5, 2022 at 6:22:27 PM UTC-7 Chris L wrote:

> I think the only images I've seen of the blue Bombadil prototype is from 
> an article posted on the Cyclofiend website.  
>
> Does anyone here own that bike?  Anyone know what size it was (52cm, 56cm, 
> other???)
>
> Was it the same basic geometry as the clear coated bikes?  
>
> [image: Bombadil.jpg]
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/8bd94899-05ab-466e-982b-ec2916e09107n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Price Drop - Re: FS: Timbuk2 Messenger/Commuter Bag - Blue/Black - NOW $75 Shipped to CONUS

2022-09-03 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Had two local CL folks flake on this last week, and I'd much rather sell 
this to a group member. So how's about one of them fancy retailer Labor Day 
Sale things... 
Was $95 shipped. Now $75 shipped. 

DM me. 

On Saturday, August 13, 2022 at 5:41:15 PM UTC-7 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:

> I've had this for a few years, but it has seen little use. I probably used 
> it while riding once or twice, but more as a travel/plane bag. Of all my 
> messenger bags, this one has the fewest miles on it. Was digging into the 
> closet for something else and this tumbled down off the top shelf. It 
> deserves to see some use and it is not getting it from me. 
>
> There's not really a directly comparable current model. This was a more 
> "digital nomad" design - with a briefcase handle (in addition to the 
> shoulder strap) and a slot through the back pad where you can run the 
> handle of a rollaway bag up through it. The one design flaw is that it did 
> not have a sternum strap, which meant it tended to shift when using as a 
> bike-specific bag. 
>
> Mid-bright blue and black. Customized with a "Just Ride" fabric sticker. 
> It has the nicely detailed flap with velcro adjustable corners. Mild taper 
> to the base and super-rugged scuff fabric on the base. It is a nylon 
> ballistic type cloth throughout (no waxed cotton here). Mid-divider and 
> zippered full length pocket, as well as both internal and external gadget 
> and go-go-gadget pockets. Small reflective tabs on the clip adjusters. Key 
> fob clip. Hydration bottle pocket on the exterior.
>
> Approximate size when folded down:
> 18" w x 12" h
> Can hold a pretty hefty amount of stuff. 
>
> $95 shipped to the CONUS
>
> One image attached here - if you want to see more, please follow the link 
> to this album
> https://photos.app.goo.gl/whvEM7xZ85MgS6KJA
>
> I will delete this post when this sells, so if you are reading this, I'm 
> either waiting for payment or it's yours if you email/contact me directly. 
>
> Cyclofiend 
>
> at GEEEMAIL dot Com (except you need to spell it right) 
>
> Thanks for looking -
>
> Jim
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/e3668c52-47b5-437d-bafe-dd08743995c3n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [RBW] Re: Long reach brake options for AHH

2022-07-12 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Ha. Yeah. Good point. 
Definitely SF Bay Area where things are reasonably dry and dusty.

I will say that have run that through some fairly wet brevets and did use 
those when I used the AHH for CX.
We had some muddy days - https://flic.kr/p/61iVgT


On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 12:23:48 PM UTC-7 Josiah Anderson wrote:

> I agree with Eric and others who find the 559s lacking in stopping power. 
> They're more or less good enough in dry conditions, but if it's wet, not so 
> much, and they're even worse in the snow. One of my scariest bike 
> experiences ever was on a 650b conversion of an old Trek with 559s (with 
> salmon pads), coming down a long hill with a busy intersection at the 
> bottom. It was raining, and having recently switched to the Tektros from 
> Mafac Racers, I was expecting my brakes to work, but they didn't. I went 
> through the intersection at probably 35mph, and I managed to make the turn 
> and somehow there were no cars, but it still freaked me out. The 559s don't 
> seem to be able to squeeze hard enough to create enough friction to dry off 
> wet rims in a revolution or two like most other (good) rim brakes do, so 
> they just keep skating on top of the layer of water. Same deal for ice, 
> although there are fewer brakes that do well with that.
>
> I've noticed that it seems like many of the people who like the 559s ride 
> in relatively dry places and many of us who regularly deal with wet and 
> freezing conditions find them inadequate. That's just my hypothesis on the 
> wide variety of opinions on these brakes; I know not everyone fits this 
> pattern.
>
> (Apologies if this post comes through late- I post frequently on IBOB but 
> not as much here so might not have Cyclofiend Jim's approval to post).
>
> Josiah Anderson
> Missoula, MT 
>
> Le lun. 11 juil. 2022 à 15:52, Cyclofiend Jim  a 
> écrit :
>
>> I must ride a lot slower than all's y'all's... but I've honestly never 
>> had any trouble with my brakes on my AHH. I use the original standard 
>> Shimano Lever  that shipped with it in aught-seven (probably discontinued) 
>> on a set of Noodle bars. They don't bottom out at full pressure and the 
>> wheel will skid. 
>>
>> http://www.cyclofiend.com/cc/2008/cc522-cyclofiend_jim0908.html
>>
>> - Jim
>>
>> On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 3:41:01 PM UTC-7 Patrick Moore wrote:
>>
>>> Laing: Forgive me if you've posted some before, but if not, I'd be 
>>> delighted to see photos of your Riv custom "racing bike." 53.4 X 62?? What 
>>> sort of bar? Me, I fit almost the diametrical opposite: 60 X 56 c-c for a 
>>> drop-bar bike. 
>>>
>>> To all: I've found this discussion interesting, both regarding braking 
>>> effectiveness and road bike aesthetics. I have to say that I myself would 
>>> prefer cantis or V brakes, or braze-on centerpulls instead of what appear 
>>> to me clunky very-long reach calipers on a "gofast" road bike if medium 
>>> reach calipers didn't work; and in fact, I've seen a number of custom or 
>>> high-end production road bikes from before WWII built for cantilever 
>>> brakes. I think a great many of these were on the Classics Rendezvous and 
>>> Classic Lightweights UK websites.
>>>
>>> IME, I tend to agree with those who say that almost all brakes work 
>>> decently, if not brilliantly, if properly set up, and if the levers are 
>>> appropriate to the brakes proper. I know that my otherwise wonderful 
>>> second-gen (? The tab-operated cam) Dura Ace single pivots worked badly, 
>>> even with salmons, pulled by 7410-era levers, while the single pivot (high 
>>> end DC? Superbe Pro?) 57 mm reach single pivot on the gofast pulled by the 
>>> same levers works very well indeed, for power and for modulation.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 10:34 AM lconley  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Appearance was a large consideration when I selected the Rene 
>>>> Herse braze-on centerpull brakes for my Rivendell Custom that was intended 
>>>> as a road bike. I call it a fat man's racing bike. "Racing Bike" as in no 
>>>> braze-ons for racks, no fender eyelets, no holes in the "brake" or chain 
>>>> stay bridges, - clean stays and forks but a really long wheelbase. The 
>>>> long 
>>>> chainstays are balanced by the really long main triangle (62 cm ETT x 53.4 
>>>> ST). What I did not realize was how large the Rene Herse brakes are, they 
>>>> dwarf my Mafac Competition , DiaCompe,

Re: [RBW] Re: Long reach brake options for AHH

2022-07-11 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
I must ride a lot slower than all's y'all's... but I've honestly never had 
any trouble with my brakes on my AHH. I use the original standard Shimano 
Lever  that shipped with it in aught-seven (probably discontinued) on a set 
of Noodle bars. They don't bottom out at full pressure and the wheel will 
skid. 

http://www.cyclofiend.com/cc/2008/cc522-cyclofiend_jim0908.html

- Jim

On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 3:41:01 PM UTC-7 Patrick Moore wrote:

> Laing: Forgive me if you've posted some before, but if not, I'd be 
> delighted to see photos of your Riv custom "racing bike." 53.4 X 62?? What 
> sort of bar? Me, I fit almost the diametrical opposite: 60 X 56 c-c for a 
> drop-bar bike. 
>
> To all: I've found this discussion interesting, both regarding braking 
> effectiveness and road bike aesthetics. I have to say that I myself would 
> prefer cantis or V brakes, or braze-on centerpulls instead of what appear 
> to me clunky very-long reach calipers on a "gofast" road bike if medium 
> reach calipers didn't work; and in fact, I've seen a number of custom or 
> high-end production road bikes from before WWII built for cantilever 
> brakes. I think a great many of these were on the Classics Rendezvous and 
> Classic Lightweights UK websites.
>
> IME, I tend to agree with those who say that almost all brakes work 
> decently, if not brilliantly, if properly set up, and if the levers are 
> appropriate to the brakes proper. I know that my otherwise wonderful 
> second-gen (? The tab-operated cam) Dura Ace single pivots worked badly, 
> even with salmons, pulled by 7410-era levers, while the single pivot (high 
> end DC? Superbe Pro?) 57 mm reach single pivot on the gofast pulled by the 
> same levers works very well indeed, for power and for modulation.
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 10:34 AM lconley  wrote:
>
>> Appearance was a large consideration when I selected the Rene 
>> Herse braze-on centerpull brakes for my Rivendell Custom that was intended 
>> as a road bike. I call it a fat man's racing bike. "Racing Bike" as in no 
>> braze-ons for racks, no fender eyelets, no holes in the "brake" or chain 
>> stay bridges, - clean stays and forks but a really long wheelbase. The long 
>> chainstays are balanced by the really long main triangle (62 cm ETT x 53.4 
>> ST). What I did not realize was how large the Rene Herse brakes are, they 
>> dwarf my Mafac Competition , DiaCompe, and Weinmann centerpulls. But they 
>> still have that fifties - sixties racing bike look. The centerpull 
>> braze-ons are located between the rim and the fork crown/brake bridge, so 
>> they are a stiffer mount that cantilevers/V-brakes whose braze-ons are 
>> located below the rim. Another plus for the RH centerpulls is no black or 
>> plastic parts like the long reach Tektros.
>>
>> I have never actually seen another bike with braze-on centerpulls except 
>> in pictures - some in the book *Japanese Steel*. I have considered at 
>> times having Dia-Compe braze-ons installed on my Paramount for the original 
>> Weinmann centerpull brakes.
>>
>> Laing
>>
>> On Sunday, July 10, 2022 at 7:50:05 AM UTC-4 Daniel MacPherson wrote:
>>
>>> I agree with the sentiment that road bikes look better with calipers on 
>>> them. Though I find the long-reach caliper brakes (Tektro R559) to be 
>>> rather ugly looking. Road bikes with disc brakes or v-brakes still look odd 
>>> to me. I assume they must be gravel or cyclocross bikes. Maybe Rivendell 
>>> should develop some kick-ass long reach caliper brakes. 
>>>
>>>
>>> Daniel M 
>>>
>>> Tallahassee Fl
>>>
>>> On Saturday, July 9, 2022 at 10:31:46 PM UTC-4 Joe Bernard wrote:
>>>
 Part of the Riv association with long-reach calipers (my opinion) is 
 Grant had them made back in the days when road bikes were closely 
 associated with calipers and he wanted more room for big tires. We don't 
 think anything of it now but at the time if your bike had canti posts it 
 was a tourer or mtb, you couldn't sell it to folks looking for a road 
 frame. 



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/29d1c33e-5e78-4443-85cb-e34e68078086n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [RBW] Re: Let's talk about the All Rounder

2022-03-17 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
In terms of lineage, the A/R was the refinement of the XO from the 
Bridgestone era, and begat the Atlantis. 
http://www.cyclofiend.com/Images/rbw/gen1/rivcat05_allrounder.jpg

http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/atlantis/index.html

- J


On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 1:03:32 PM UTC-7 Ryan wrote:

> What Addison said!
>
> In my mind, it's like the little black Chanel cocktail dress...a classic 
> that never really goes out of style. Think of Audrey Hepburn in *Breakfast 
> at Tiffany's.*
>
> But of course, I too appreciate Riv's current offerings. Of course I'm 
> keeping my 1997 Waterford-built AR. If I was going to buy another 
> bike...not likely, but if...a Clem step-thru would be the ticket. I don't 
> love the Boscos, and I would probably do as others have done and shed some 
> rolling weight with 36-hole Deore LX/XT hubs, Velocity rims w db spokes and 
> RH tires with the Endurance casing. And maybe a wider Brooks sprung saddle 
> for the more upright position. Black or some other really understated color.
>
> On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 1:06:20 PM UTC-5 Addison wrote:
>
>> I've raved for years about my Allrounder.  It does pretty much everything 
>> well or exceptionally well.  At least that I ask it to do.  The current 
>> iteration is attached.
>>
>> And here is an old link/write up I did on it.
>>
>>
>> https://www.addisonwilhite.com/rambler/rivendell-allrounder-jack-of-all-tradesmast-of-most
>>
>> I test rode a Hunq a few years ago and felt like my AR was the same 
>> bike.  I know the new Riv offerings are different animals but they don't 
>> speak to me the way  the AR does.  Still love and admire Riv the company of 
>> course.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Addison Wilhite, M.A. 
>>
>> Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology 
>>  
>>
>> *“Blazing the Trail to College and Career Success”*
>>
>> Portfolio and Blog 
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:42 AM Sean Steinle  wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the replies so far, wonderful stuff, this is exactly the sort 
>>> of discussion I was hoping for. Unsurprisingly, the consensus so far seems 
>>> to be what I thought from the start, a great bike, but less 'refined' than 
>>> current Rivs, in the sense that Grant is always tweaking and making things 
>>> closer to his current definitely of ideal. 
>>>
>>> Bill, great points, and thanks for the reply, what I actually meant by 
>>> point 2 was not whether Grant still feels like the All Rounder is better 
>>> than the b-stones, but whether he feels like his current bikes are much 
>>> superior to the All Rounder, in the same as he felt about the All Rounder 
>>> compared to the b-stones back when he first started Riv. I think the answer 
>>> to that is probably yes, or, like you poitned out, it'd still be an 
>>> offering from them. 
>>>
>>> On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 11:52:06 AM UTC-5 George Rosselle wrote:
>>>
 I did not own and All Rounder but did have an Atlantis from the first 
 batch. It was a beautiful bike and a pleasure to ride, but was a bit 
 harsher than I would have liked. Maybe it would ride better loaded but I 
 never rode it that way. I much prefer the ride of the Rosco Bubbe I have 
 now. I think the changes Grant has made in the bikes over time is an 
 improvement, as you would hope, not just changes for the sake of selling 
 more bikes. If you find an All Rounder that fits for a good price it might 
 be worth checking out, but there are so many similar bikes on the market 
 now that are probably better for the same price, or less, that I would 
 recommend keeping an open mind.

 George in Loganville, GA

 On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 12:19:38 PM UTC-4 Mackenzy Albright 
 wrote:

> I have not personally owned an all-rounder. But in general interest of 
> bike development and history. It seemed that the design lineage came 
> loosely from elements of the randonneur bikes (roadish geometry with 650b 
> wider tires) Grant - being a thoughtful individual, adopted the design to 
> contemporary parts availability which created the XO-1, which utilized 
> slightly wider 26" tires. With Bridgestone being less interested in 
> developing niche bikes grant started Rivendell. The All-rounder was a 
> quick 
> adaptation to a more boutique style small company version with revisions 
> as 
> Grant's perspective on bikes changed. If I recall there was also the 
> mountain bike (I cant recall the name) and a road frame? EItherway - the 
> All-rounder morphed into the Atlantis (another reference to Bridgestone 
> touring bikes)  The Atlantis, again following trends in terms of 
> wheelsize 
> and clearance became (ie fitting 29er sized tires etc) which has had it's 
> own evolution in itself. 
>
> Grant see's his bikes within his interest of market. I think the early 
> Atlantis style bikes influenced a who

[RBW] Re: Waterford vs Toyo AHH

2022-03-17 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Hey there Matt - 

I think there were few of the AHH production bikes which did _not_ have a 
kickstand plate. 
http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/hilsen/index.html

A recall seeing few photos of early (likely Waterford-built) with a round 
chainstay bridge only, but most of the ones I saw had the plate. I know 
mine does (a Toyo-built). 

I've got a few of those early AHH's photo'd during visits to the RBWHQ&L - 
https://www.flickr.com/photos/cyclofiend/7495148306/in/album-72157630407224566/

they all seem to have them. 

IIRC, the serial numbers have some designators. But, if it has 
Waterford-branded dropouts, I think that's a solid indicator. They were a 
bit more rare. The colors were lighter on some of the Waterford ones as 
well. 

Jim







On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 10:21:51 AM UTC-7 Matt Beecher wrote:

> I've been looking at that neat AHH over on Ebay and it got me wondering.  
> I saw a few comments in the past about Waterford vs Toyo AHH frames.  How 
> does one tell the difference.  Is the easiest/only option to look for 
> Waterford dropouts?  
>
> Do any of the AHH frames have a kickstand plate?  
>
> Dang, I wish that were not my size.
>
> Best regards,
> Matt in Oswego, IL
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/c41e6de1-9bfd-47cf-bbc7-ec9fdc63f8f9n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Groups.Google

2022-01-16 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
There is a FB group here - 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/rbwownersbunch

No buy/sell/trade. Emphasis on photos. 



On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 6:02:44 AM UTC-8 rickur...@gmail.com 
wrote:

>
> I am able to understand and use the group as designed, thanks all.
> My gripe is with the sheer awkwardness and HORRIBLE interface of google 
> groups. If you’ve ever used Discord or Facebook groups you’ll know what I’m 
> talking about. 
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 4:24:35 PM UTC-5 Joe Bernard wrote:
>
>> On Android: I look at the mobile website, then when I want to post I 
>> click the 3 dots top right and go to Desktop Site. This brings up the reply 
>> function. Not awesome but workable. 
>>
>> Joe Bernard
>>
>> On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 5:57:42 AM UTC-8 rickur...@gmail.com 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I love my Rivendell, and I love Rivendell owners! 
>>> But, I despise this Google group format! 
>>> I wish there was another way. I'm sure there is, I just don't know what 
>>> it is
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/0b0b2a13-2694-4359-a9d5-744c61660d7bn%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: First 10 days

2022-01-16 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Good on ya, matey! If you are smiling, you are doing it right.

Enjoy the ride!

- J

On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 12:17:41 PM UTC-8 rmro...@gmail.com wrote:

> Just 5 rides and 80 or so miles in and I am hooked. Normally there would 
> be too much snow/ice & salt on the roads in January to ride. I am having a 
> blast riding this bike, Tried it today with a partial load.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/fff46085-9ee9-4443-b4cd-083168a24652n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Question about the 1995 Waterford Road standard

2022-01-16 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Didn't realize the Mountain Bike Museum was selling frames
Road Standard dimensions are on this never-quite finished resource - 
http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/gen1/

Here's the direct link to the image
http://www.cyclofiend.com/Images/rbw/gen1/rivcat05_framespecs.jpg

I will say it sort hurts to hear a '95 described as "vintage" but there 
ya go.

Good frame - won't have quite the tire clearances we're seeing on more 
recent models, of course. Horizontal dropouts, too. 

Jim
On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 4:49:47 PM UTC-8 Adrianna T wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I saw this ad and I am very tempted: 
> https://sfbay.craigslist.org/nby/bik/d/fairfax-wow-beautiful-1995-rivendell/7429374409.html
>
> I'm going to see it next week to decide.
>
> 1. I am 5' 5 female, any ideas on whether this will fit me? 
>
> 2. This will be my first vintage bike, and I am so excited! Any other tips 
> or advice on this particular frame? 
>
> -Adrianna
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/0d2577c8-ff43-404f-935d-4790230c0226n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [RBW] Rivendell Timeline - it's happening!

2021-11-29 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Rambouillet were all Toyo-built.  
The first run (orange) had a mis-positioned rear brake bridge as has been 
documented. 
http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/rambouillet/


On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 4:08:20 PM UTC-8 iamkeith wrote:

> Regarding builders:  Joe Starck definitely built Road and All Rounder 
> frames.  I'm not so sure he built Rambouillets, unless perhaps a prototype 
> or two?   
>
> It occurs to me that the Roco Bebe kid-carrier bike is missing from your 
> list.
>
> On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 1:34:30 PM UTC-7 Fullylugged wrote:
>
>> Those are pretty collectible then!
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Nov 28, 2021, at 2:24 PM, Joe Bernard  wrote:
>>
>> As Ryan stated there are in fact a few RS-made Rivs out there. Very few. 
>>
>>
>> Joe Bernard
>>
>> On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 11:22:14 AM UTC-8 Fullylugged wrote:
>>
>>> Sachs designed the lugs used on the earliest models.  He didn’t make 
>>> them or any frames. Waterford was the earliest vendor and as others have 
>>> noted, a few other small builders have helped over the years, Nobilette 
>>> most recently. Toyo did several frame models for a period of about 5 years, 
>>> and Panasonic had one too. Panasonic and Urema did painting in Japan. 
>>>  Maxway in Taiwan has been a major supplier of late.  
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>> On Nov 28, 2021, at 10:07 AM, Eric Daume  wrote:
>>>
>>> I’ve never heard that they used Sachs as a builder. Hasn’t he always 
>>> had a long waiting list?
>>>
>>>
>>> I think they’ve used a Sachs fork crown or lugs, or maybe he used 
>>> theirs. 
>>>
>>> On Sunday, November 28, 2021, Ryan  wrote:
>>>
 Customs...I feel Riv started mixing tubesets(Reynolds/Vitus/Columbus)  
 and tweaking geometry around 1998 when they were moving away from 
 Waterford 
 and working with Match. I think customs started with Joe Starck in 1999 
 and 
 they added Curt Goodrich around 2000 or thereabouts. My 2000 Road 
 delivered 
 2001 was a Goodrich frame. With high demand they used other builders , one 
 of them being Richard Sachs. Mark Nobilette has been their sole custom  
 builder for a long time...but not sure when JS and CG stopped and 
 Nobilette 
 started. 2005 or so?

 On Saturday, November 27, 2021 at 3:13:56 PM UTC-6 Jason Fuller wrote:

> These are great tweaks, I am updating my draft paper copy as we go and 
> all this will be included in the digital version - thanks Joe, Bruce, 
> Keith, and Joel!  I'll be sure to credit the RBWOB in the footnotes of 
> this 
> thing. 
>
> I'll try to think of a way to graphically represent semi-custom, 
> prototype, and production from each other. For the builder I am thinking 
> color-coding. It'll kind of show the Waterford era, into the Toyo era, 
> back 
> to Waterford a bit more before mostly going MIT. With other builders 
> sprinkled in of course. Should be a neat effect.  It's worthwhile adding 
> the start of the official custom program, I expect, as well.  
>
> I think small at-time-of-order tweaks such as braze-ons and paint 
> choice will be outside the scope of this infographic - certainly part of 
> the beauty of Rivs is that they cannot be fully described by such means 
> :D 
>
> On Saturday, 27 November 2021 at 12:55:02 UTC-8 Joe Bernard wrote:
>
>> Disclaimer added: I'm speaking of strictly production models. The 
>> line between "production" and "custom" was always a little fuzzy in the 
>> early Waterford days; and even now my "custom Rivendell" hews tightly to 
>> Grant's ideas of what a frame should be. For my purposes in the 
>> discussion 
>> a custom is any Riv frame where you were able to change a spec at 
>> purchase 
>> time.  
>>
>> Joe Bernard
>>
>> On Saturday, November 27, 2021 at 11:58:09 AM UTC-8 Joe Bernard wrote:
>>
>>> Nice work, Jason!
>>>
>>> I believe the only difference between Road and Road Standard is the 
>>> LongLow became available, which prompted the original Road model 
>>> getting a 
>>> name added to express it as one of two road frames. 
>>>
>>> As I recall the Mystery Bike was offered and sold to 10 people, I've 
>>> only ever seen two of them. 
>>>
>>> Joe Bernard
>>>
>>> On Saturday, November 27, 2021 at 11:33:31 AM UTC-8 Jason Fuller 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 My understanding of the Mystery bike so far (all lifted from Tom 
 Allingham's Flickr):  Produced in 2012 (?) as an Appaloosa 
 exploration, 
 with the swoopy mid-stays and fabricated by Nobilette. Any idea how 
 many 
 were produced, and whether I got my production year right?  And am I 
 missing gen 1 Appaloosas, ie did they happen between '12 and '16 when 
 the 
 MIT batch rolled in?  

 On Saturday, 27 November 2021 at 11:14:05 U

Re: [RBW] Rivendell Timeline - it's happening!

2021-11-29 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
First mention of the Bomba was RR #39, Spring 2007
http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/bombadil/index.html

On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 11:10:16 AM UTC-8 Jason Fuller wrote:

> Aaah so much good insight here, and it's fun to see that others have done 
> exactly what I'm doing after all!  Marty, thanks for posting that up, I had 
> completely missed Project Buffalo, and somehow never noticed it when 
> scanning the readers despite it's full-page coverage.  I think I skimmed 
> right past it because it does not look like a typical Riv!  I'd also missed 
> your head badge poster before (I clearly need to visit more often) and I 
> WANT ONE!
>
> Can folks scrutinize the accuracy of this builder list?  I know a lot of 
> these batches have probably had additional builders doing the odd one to 
> fill in for production gaps etc.  I don't know where to draw the line, but 
> good to have more info than less! 
>
> [image: Rivlist_Nov28.JPG]  
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sunday, 28 November 2021 at 10:42:09 UTC-8 Ryan wrote:
>
>> Steven, you are right about "unofficial customs" like the snapshot of an 
>> early catalogue posted by Joe Bernard mentions where it notes a 300.00 
>> upcharge. And Nathan is right that during a peak demand period they used 
>> some US top builders for customs and RS was one of them. I think one was 
>> for sale on this group a few years ago
>>
>> On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 11:32:39 AM UTC-6 Nathan F wrote:
>>
>>> Eric,
>>>
>>> Sach's decade long waiting list is a recent invention from frame 
>>> building's explosion in popularity around the late 00s / early 10s. It 
>>> wasn't always that difficult to have him build you a bike.
>>>
>>> In the 90s I believe he designed some lugs for Rivendell, and then later 
>>> made 3 frames or so for them when they were shopping around for builders? 
>>> Not so sure on the numbers for that second part, but I know they didn't use 
>>> him much. 
>>>
>>> Nathan
>>>
>>> On Sunday, 28 November 2021 at 08:07:58 UTC-8 Eric Daume wrote:
>>>
 I’ve never heard that they used Sachs as a builder. Hasn’t he always 
 had a long waiting list?

 I think they’ve used a Sachs fork crown or lugs, or maybe he used 
 theirs. 


 On Sunday, November 28, 2021, Ryan  wrote:

> Customs...I feel Riv started mixing tubesets(Reynolds/Vitus/Columbus)  
> and tweaking geometry around 1998 when they were moving away from 
> Waterford 
> and working with Match. I think customs started with Joe Starck in 1999 
> and 
> they added Curt Goodrich around 2000 or thereabouts. My 2000 Road 
> delivered 
> 2001 was a Goodrich frame. With high demand they used other builders , 
> one 
> of them being Richard Sachs. Mark Nobilette has been their sole custom  
> builder for a long time...but not sure when JS and CG stopped and 
> Nobilette 
> started. 2005 or so?
>
> On Saturday, November 27, 2021 at 3:13:56 PM UTC-6 Jason Fuller wrote:
>
>> These are great tweaks, I am updating my draft paper copy as we go 
>> and all this will be included in the digital version - thanks Joe, 
>> Bruce, 
>> Keith, and Joel!  I'll be sure to credit the RBWOB in the footnotes of 
>> this 
>> thing. 
>>
>> I'll try to think of a way to graphically represent semi-custom, 
>> prototype, and production from each other. For the builder I am thinking 
>> color-coding. It'll kind of show the Waterford era, into the Toyo era, 
>> back 
>> to Waterford a bit more before mostly going MIT. With other builders 
>> sprinkled in of course. Should be a neat effect.  It's worthwhile adding 
>> the start of the official custom program, I expect, as well.  
>>
>> I think small at-time-of-order tweaks such as braze-ons and paint 
>> choice will be outside the scope of this infographic - certainly part of 
>> the beauty of Rivs is that they cannot be fully described by such means 
>> :D 
>>
>> On Saturday, 27 November 2021 at 12:55:02 UTC-8 Joe Bernard wrote:
>>
>>> Disclaimer added: I'm speaking of strictly production models. The 
>>> line between "production" and "custom" was always a little fuzzy in the 
>>> early Waterford days; and even now my "custom Rivendell" hews tightly 
>>> to 
>>> Grant's ideas of what a frame should be. For my purposes in the 
>>> discussion 
>>> a custom is any Riv frame where you were able to change a spec at 
>>> purchase 
>>> time.  
>>>
>>> Joe Bernard
>>>
>>> On Saturday, November 27, 2021 at 11:58:09 AM UTC-8 Joe Bernard 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Nice work, Jason!

 I believe the only difference between Road and Road Standard is the 
 LongLow became available, which prompted the original Road model 
 getting a 
 name added to express it as one of two road frames. 

 As I recall the Mystery Bike was offered a

Re: [RBW] Rivendell Timeline - it's happening!

2021-11-29 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Buffalo was the original name of the Bombadil.  

- J

On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 11:10:16 AM UTC-8 Jason Fuller wrote:

> Aaah so much good insight here, and it's fun to see that others have done 
> exactly what I'm doing after all!  Marty, thanks for posting that up, I had 
> completely missed Project Buffalo, and somehow never noticed it when 
> scanning the readers despite it's full-page coverage.  I think I skimmed 
> right past it because it does not look like a typical Riv!  I'd also missed 
> your head badge poster before (I clearly need to visit more often) and I 
> WANT ONE!
>
> Can folks scrutinize the accuracy of this builder list?  I know a lot of 
> these batches have probably had additional builders doing the odd one to 
> fill in for production gaps etc.  I don't know where to draw the line, but 
> good to have more info than less! 
>
> [image: Rivlist_Nov28.JPG]  
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sunday, 28 November 2021 at 10:42:09 UTC-8 Ryan wrote:
>
>> Steven, you are right about "unofficial customs" like the snapshot of an 
>> early catalogue posted by Joe Bernard mentions where it notes a 300.00 
>> upcharge. And Nathan is right that during a peak demand period they used 
>> some US top builders for customs and RS was one of them. I think one was 
>> for sale on this group a few years ago
>>
>> On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 11:32:39 AM UTC-6 Nathan F wrote:
>>
>>> Eric,
>>>
>>> Sach's decade long waiting list is a recent invention from frame 
>>> building's explosion in popularity around the late 00s / early 10s. It 
>>> wasn't always that difficult to have him build you a bike.
>>>
>>> In the 90s I believe he designed some lugs for Rivendell, and then later 
>>> made 3 frames or so for them when they were shopping around for builders? 
>>> Not so sure on the numbers for that second part, but I know they didn't use 
>>> him much. 
>>>
>>> Nathan
>>>
>>> On Sunday, 28 November 2021 at 08:07:58 UTC-8 Eric Daume wrote:
>>>
 I’ve never heard that they used Sachs as a builder. Hasn’t he always 
 had a long waiting list?

 I think they’ve used a Sachs fork crown or lugs, or maybe he used 
 theirs. 


 On Sunday, November 28, 2021, Ryan  wrote:

> Customs...I feel Riv started mixing tubesets(Reynolds/Vitus/Columbus)  
> and tweaking geometry around 1998 when they were moving away from 
> Waterford 
> and working with Match. I think customs started with Joe Starck in 1999 
> and 
> they added Curt Goodrich around 2000 or thereabouts. My 2000 Road 
> delivered 
> 2001 was a Goodrich frame. With high demand they used other builders , 
> one 
> of them being Richard Sachs. Mark Nobilette has been their sole custom  
> builder for a long time...but not sure when JS and CG stopped and 
> Nobilette 
> started. 2005 or so?
>
> On Saturday, November 27, 2021 at 3:13:56 PM UTC-6 Jason Fuller wrote:
>
>> These are great tweaks, I am updating my draft paper copy as we go 
>> and all this will be included in the digital version - thanks Joe, 
>> Bruce, 
>> Keith, and Joel!  I'll be sure to credit the RBWOB in the footnotes of 
>> this 
>> thing. 
>>
>> I'll try to think of a way to graphically represent semi-custom, 
>> prototype, and production from each other. For the builder I am thinking 
>> color-coding. It'll kind of show the Waterford era, into the Toyo era, 
>> back 
>> to Waterford a bit more before mostly going MIT. With other builders 
>> sprinkled in of course. Should be a neat effect.  It's worthwhile adding 
>> the start of the official custom program, I expect, as well.  
>>
>> I think small at-time-of-order tweaks such as braze-ons and paint 
>> choice will be outside the scope of this infographic - certainly part of 
>> the beauty of Rivs is that they cannot be fully described by such means 
>> :D 
>>
>> On Saturday, 27 November 2021 at 12:55:02 UTC-8 Joe Bernard wrote:
>>
>>> Disclaimer added: I'm speaking of strictly production models. The 
>>> line between "production" and "custom" was always a little fuzzy in the 
>>> early Waterford days; and even now my "custom Rivendell" hews tightly 
>>> to 
>>> Grant's ideas of what a frame should be. For my purposes in the 
>>> discussion 
>>> a custom is any Riv frame where you were able to change a spec at 
>>> purchase 
>>> time.  
>>>
>>> Joe Bernard
>>>
>>> On Saturday, November 27, 2021 at 11:58:09 AM UTC-8 Joe Bernard 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Nice work, Jason!

 I believe the only difference between Road and Road Standard is the 
 LongLow became available, which prompted the original Road model 
 getting a 
 name added to express it as one of two road frames. 

 As I recall the Mystery Bike was offered and sold to 10 people, 
 I've only ever 

[RBW] Re: More SPAM

2021-10-18 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Yeah... this is a google routing thing. 
Seth Godin has ranted about this more than a few times - but basically, the 
algorithm decides that stuff we've been getting regularly (and in most 
cases opted-in to receive) gets shuttled there. 

Just one of those tasks to be aware of. Usually telling google it isn't 
spam will work, but also adding the specific email - 
rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com - as a specific CONTACT in your google 
address book/contacts will help. 

J
On Saturday, October 16, 2021 at 12:58:03 PM UTC-7 Hugh Smitham wrote:

> I've had the same issue with gmail putting RBW Owners Bunch in my spam 
> folder. Now I'm aware. Hott here.
>
> Hugh n LA 
>
> On Saturday, October 16, 2021 at 10:04:52 AM UTC-7 ericf3 wrote:
>
>> I am not affected AFAIK as I can easily spot them -- but just checking in 
>> on e-mail I see TEN items in the SPAM folder, all from RBW group.
>>
>> Just letting others know
>>
>> EricF
>> No riding for me today in THIS monsoon
>> Vancouver
>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/04e63d0c-45b2-4b01-a995-563aa7bb6896n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Switching hosts for this forum?

2021-10-03 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Thanks for asking, Eric - at this point, it's a "known Known" and is 
unlikely to be changed, barring Google dropping the entire Groups format.

Despite drawbacks and quirks, it provides decent bandwidth with a minimum 
of management and zero out of pocket cost. I've hosted, managed and run 
Listservs, BBS's and their related offspring over the years and none of 
them are without hassle. 

The attachment size for photos into Google Groups has been 25 MB for some 
time now. Yeah... but the other option is to set up a nice photo album and 
share that link. 

I have posted before that if things are not working correctly, the one 
helpful "to-do" is to access the Settings panel and use the "Send feedback 
to Google" button. Some things have actually been addressed over the years. 

There is a "For Sale" tag (Or "Label" in Googroup parlance). Periodically I 
remind folks, but honestly, almost every list member seems to label things 
clearly enough in the subject that it's hard to be confused.
There are actually three labels - "RBW-Emphemera" - "RBW-History" and 
"transations-sell-buy-trade"
I"ve been relatively slow to implement them, as I did not want to impose 
too much structure on this group. 

I would also say that basic searchability is pretty strong - that's been 
refined a great deal over the last couple years. As with Gmail, it uses 
tools which are pretty refined. 

As one more vector, there is a Rivendell Owners Bunch On Facebook group 
which I set up a while ago, where For Sale/Trade is not allowed, and photos 
are more the coin of the realm. 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/rbwownersbunch

There's another one which I'm not an admin of called "Rivendellicious" 
which also includes Bridgestone topics and allows transactions. 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/19202914712

again, I appreciate your input - thanks!

- Jim / group admin




On Sunday, October 3, 2021 at 7:09:29 AM UTC-7 eric...@gmail.com wrote:

> Hi all -- I'm relatively new in these parts but I do love and appreciate 
> the community, information, gear swaps and laughs of the RBW Owners Bunch. 
>
> But, man, Google Groups is awful. I'm a member of a few other forums that 
> use phpBB  which is, to my mind, real nice and 
> easy to use. 
>
> Problems I see here: 
>
>- Generally difficult to keep up with rolling posts, format doesn't 
>lend to quick scanning and visual organization
>- Threads don't have pages! Infinite scroll
>- DMs get lost
>- Sharing images is a total pain
>- We don't have discussion folders for broad categories. Spitballing 
>here but we could have: General discussion, For Sale, Repairs and 
>maintenance, etc. 
>- A For Sale folder with a tagged/pinned mega thread with frames for 
>sale would be cool, supplemented by our rolling gear posts. 
>
> I believe phpbb would add some much needed functionality, editing 
> capability, sharing capability and browsing capability! I have not done *any 
> *research into the cost or what it would take to set up a new forum but 
> I'd wager that a few of us would gladly chip in to cover the costs. 
>
> Food for thought. Perhaps this has been discussed previously. But I think 
> there are better ways for us to get together. 
>
> Did I mention Google groups is awful?
>
> Okay, peace and love!
> Eric
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/19553928-ed29-45fc-b4b1-998428c30cd8n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Landmark LBS Closed

2021-10-02 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Long, slow exhale.

Holding an eagle to the east in memory of an amazing person who left us too 
soon.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/eagle.html

There was a phrase, before this list, before Rivendell was more widely 
known:
AASHTA

"As Always, Sheldon Has The Answer"

Back in the days of Usenet, when dealing with a technical cycling problem - 
heck, even building a wheel from scratch - was a 
17th-level-mason-guild-craft-mysto riddle you had to solve through elusive 
scraps of information (and certainly no online videos), there was one 
person who consistently wrote copious, logical, detailed answers to 
technical bicycle questions: Sheldon Brown. 

He set the standard in assistance, all from the back room of this shop I'd 
never visited in Newtown Mass. Back in the days of dial-up. 
Rec:Bicycles:Tech (and a dozen other sub-topics in Bicycles) was an oasis 
and generations of riders owe him a serious debt. By his own admission, the 
Harris Cyclery folks let him tinker around and play on this crazy 
experiment of internet "discussion groups" long before it was widespread. 
But we are richer for those decisions. It has a lot to do with how riders 
became aware of stuff other than "what the pros ride!", learned the history 
of the sport and bicycles in general, and it coalesced the perspective of 
many of us who realized the sublime perfection of the bicycle in its most 
basic form. It is part of the foundation of this list, to be sure.

There were so many articles, you cannot scratch the surface - it was the 
original archive.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/retroraleighs/history.html
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/tandems.html

He is the one who finally nudged me into trying a fixed-gear 
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/fixedgear.html
"Coasting is a pernicious habit"

His technical knowledge ran deep. No, deeper than that. His humor to his 
last days filled the world. One of my favorite chuckles was when he 
photographed Grant at the Bridgestone booth at the 2005 Interbike.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/lasvegas/2005/

I feel very, very lucky that I am out of retail these days. Running a high 
service, knowledge-based store is a very difficult challenge when you can 
get stuff delivered in 4 hours from a warehouse across your state. Layer on 
that the constraints of doing business the last couple years and you have a 
very tough equation to solve. It's why remembering and supporting those 
quality organizations who hang in there is so important. 

I'll admit this hit me unaware. But, it has hit me. Didn't realize they had 
shuttered. 
I guess I'll go pour one out, as the kids say. Thank you Sheldon. Thank you 
Harris. You have blazed a trail and kept it clear. Now it's our turn to 
continue.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/06/24/metro/we-had-people-with-tears-their-eyes-west-newton-bicycle-shop-closes-after-70-years/



On Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 6:44:46 AM UTC-7 George Schick wrote:

> I just happened to check into Harris Cyclery the other day to see if they 
> had a certain component in stock only to find this announcement:
> https://www.sheldonbrown.com/harris/
> Apparently they closed back in June but I had not checked the website for 
> a while and just discovered it.
>
> I've purchased many bike parts as well as one complete bike from those 
> people over the years and they were always very friendly and knowledgable. 
>  Further, that shop was central to the famous Sheldon Brown.  Fortunately, 
> it looks like the website and links to all of Sheldon's articles and advice 
> is still up and running.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/c41d1b95-2137-49b4-adf5-375098c8fbbbn%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: HUGE Rivendell archive update: Catalogs, flyers, brochures and more

2021-09-06 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Unfortunately, GoogleGroups has dropped the ability to "Pin" posts in 
group.s 

Guess they figure the search algorithm can find anything 

ahh well...

- J / admin

On Thursday, September 2, 2021 at 2:20:08 PM UTC-7 divis...@gmail.com wrote:

> Might be a good idea for a moderator to sticky this post, for future 
> reference.
>
> Peter "knowing the info is out there doesn't help, if you can't find it" 
> Adler
> Berkeley, CA/USA
>
> On Thursday, September 2, 2021 at 10:08:47 AM UTC-7 eric...@gmail.com 
> wrote:
>
>> I've spent the last several months scanning my collection of Rivendell 
>> catalogs, flyers, ads and brochures. 
>>
>> Reed, who hosts the archive of Rivendell Readers at 
>> http://notfine.com/rivreader/, kindly added all of my scans to the site. 
>> Now there is quite a trove of Rivendell ephemera. 
>>
>> He created a new link (the old one still works!): 
>> http://notfine.com/rivendell/
>>
>> Enjoy reading! All of the files are text searchable. If you have anything 
>> that we haven't included please send me a DM. 
>>
>>
>>- All 20 Rivendell catalogs
>>   -  Catalogs from 1996-2018
>>- Frame brochures
>>   - 1995 frames mailer
>>   - Atlantis and Atlantis 2
>>   - Rambouillet
>>   - Romulus
>>   - Rivendell Frame Brochure
>>   - An early frame paint chart
>>   - *I'm missing the Cheviot brochure*
>>- Flyers
>>   - Nine flyers from 2002–2009
>>   - *I'm missing Hiawatha Holidays No. 1 *
>>- Ads
>>   - An add for the reader from Vintage Bicycle Quarterly
>>   - A 2014 Cheviot ad
>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/bdb46dbf-244a-4eca-8866-06434bdf0c3bn%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [RBW] Re: FS - Rivendell Rambouillet

2021-07-09 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Two quick points - 

Please let's keep this post on topic. It is a for sale post for a specific 
bike, not a general Rambouillet thread (which I'd love to see discussed - I 
removed several posts here which deserved a separate thread topic.)

If you are interested, please contact the seller directly.

- Jim

On Friday, July 9, 2021 at 1:33:46 PM UTC-7 iamkeith wrote:

> Sure looks like a 56 or, maybe 58, to me.  Remember that the Rams were 
> proportioned to encourage people to size "up" from what they typically 
> believed they needed.  Even more so than other Rivs of the era, they had 
> proprtionally shorter top tubes and lower bottom brackets.
>
> On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 4:11:30 PM UTC-6 rcn...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> If this is a 56 I think I have to put my hat in.  Currently 
>> Rivendell-less and this would replace my '76 Witcomb USA which is nice but 
>> a bit quick handling for my taste these days.
>>
>> Ryan
>>
>> On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 12:09:56 PM UTC-7 David Hallerman wrote:
>>
>>> Reading posts kvelling over the Rambouillet delights me for a special 
>>> new reason - I’m the very lucky guy who bought the NOS 56cm Ram frameset 
>>> that Gerard Gunhouse sold here less than a fortnight ago.
>>>
>>>
>>> As someone who owned an original Waterford-built Riv Road Standard, 
>>> bought during the company’s first year, and regrets selling it a few years 
>>> ago, this new and perhaps better chance (fatter tires are better) at Riv 
>>> All-Roadism - in perfect emerald green no less! - is a source of unexpected 
>>> joy.
>>>
>>>
>>> I’ll post some photos as the build goes along. And thanks again Gunner, 
>>> you’ve been a great gentleman across the whole process of my buying your 
>>> absurdly well-packed and well-preserved backup Rambouillet. Did I mention 
>>> the bike is GREEN?
>>>
>>>
>>> Dave, who is intent on beaucoup beausage for his new Ram to counter a 
>>> core reason he sold his original Riv Road which had to do with some kind of 
>>> preservation but hey you know life is short
>>>
>>> + + + + + + + +
>>>
>>> Hudson Valley NY
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 11:13 AM Cyclofiend Jim  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> A quick scan back through the last year or so brings up some listings 
>>>> for built Rams in the $1500 range. 
>>>> Green frame would likely have been ~2007-2009 - that was the last color 
>>>> option. 
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 8:08:50 AM UTC-7 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It's weird to think of folks not knowing the Rambouillet... but, that 
>>>>> was a few years ago now.
>>>>> Here's info on it and a scan of the booklet - 
>>>>> http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/rambouillet/index.html
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 5:23:43 PM UTC-7 rtan...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Want to sell this bike.  Top tube - 20", seat tube - 22", wheelbase - 
>>>>>> 40"
>>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/219b9159-906c-4107-beb9-88aaa56d7318n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/219b9159-906c-4107-beb9-88aaa56d7318n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/229a6265-d14c-43ad-81cc-c297261133e9n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: FS - Rivendell Rambouillet

2021-07-07 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
A quick scan back through the last year or so brings up some listings for 
built Rams in the $1500 range. 
Green frame would likely have been ~2007-2009 - that was the last color 
option. 

On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 8:08:50 AM UTC-7 Cyclofiend Jim wrote:

> It's weird to think of folks not knowing the Rambouillet... but, that was 
> a few years ago now.
> Here's info on it and a scan of the booklet - 
> http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/rambouillet/index.html
>
> On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 5:23:43 PM UTC-7 rtan...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>
>> Want to sell this bike.  Top tube - 20", seat tube - 22", wheelbase - 40"
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/219b9159-906c-4107-beb9-88aaa56d7318n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: FS - Rivendell Rambouillet

2021-07-07 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
It's weird to think of folks not knowing the Rambouillet... but, that was a 
few years ago now.
Here's info on it and a scan of the booklet - 
http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/rambouillet/index.html

On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 5:23:43 PM UTC-7 rtan...@gmail.com wrote:

>
> Want to sell this bike.  Top tube - 20", seat tube - 22", wheelbase - 40"
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/25d2f91d-7bd1-4adc-bb3c-bab5f83e20cbn%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: FS - Rivendell Rambouillet

2021-07-06 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Note - this individual is selling the bicycle which belonged to her late 
husband.
She felt that this bicycle could find a proper home to a member of this 
group. 
I have contacted her to encourage her to post this with a proper price 
listing and other specifics, so there may be updates to this listing. 

Jim / List admin

On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 5:23:43 PM UTC-7 rtan...@gmail.com wrote:

>
> Want to sell this bike.  Top tube - 20", seat tube - 22", wheelbase - 40"
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/6fd36281-7aa1-4829-9690-1ad324c54895n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Cerdan Crankset

2021-07-06 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
This idea has been around a long time. If you go back into The Data Book, 
you'll see early drawings of spring-loaded cranksets. There was "BikeDrive" 
a few years ago, and there have been more throughout the decades. They have 
not caught on yet, which I don't think is a bad thing. It complicates an 
otherwise simple and direct power mechanism which works fine. 

- J



On Thursday, July 1, 2021 at 11:06:07 AM UTC-7 Doug H. wrote:

>
> https://www.designboom.com/technology/cerdan-crankset-increases-pedaling-power-06-30-2021/
> See above link:
>
> I find this design fascinating so thought I'd share it with the Group. 
> This isn't electronic shifting or carbon but good ole mechanical and metal. 
> Could this innovation become accepted in the mainstream cycling world?
> Doug
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/e2d0b60d-b98b-4caf-a452-a1fd781c13c9n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [RBW] Interesting Riv

2021-06-25 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
The "Protovelo" stickers were later - maybe '05 or so...  they were created 
to sell frames which were laying about in the warehouse. I've never seen 
those applied to bikes which weren't pretty close to production models - 
might have used a different dropout without fender/rack mounts or had 
braze-ons for cable routing in a weird place. Most I've seen had received 
quality powder coating or paint.

It does seem to have a "star" under the bottle boss, but Riv were't the 
only ones doing those types of details. 

On Thursday, June 24, 2021 at 6:13:24 AM UTC-7 Johnny Alien wrote:

>
> I always thought Rivendell marked their prototypes as Protovelo
> On Thursday, June 24, 2021 at 7:14:13 AM UTC-4 Steven Sweedler wrote:
>
>> I had a similar Road Custom that was designed around 700 x 28s w/cantis. 
>> This was before longer reach dual pivots were introduced. Steve
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 2:49 AM dub...@hotmail.com  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Team,
>>>
>>> Purchased this one on ebay and the story is that its a Prototype 
>>> Rivendell 
>>>
>>> Anyone have any ideas on it's back ground?
>>>
>>> SN M1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Adrian the Aussie
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/d48692b0-1f84-4fa9-9722-2402d56629cen%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> 
>>> .
>>>
>> -- 
>> Steven Sweedler
>> Plymouth, New Hampshire
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/823ccf92-4524-4eee-bcfb-208d93cf63f1n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Interesting Riv

2021-06-24 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
It's possible, but just doesn't look quite right. 
Clearance at the fork seems pretty narrow.
Hard to tell with the angle on the side view, but the fork bend looks a 
little high and chunky.
I think you'd want to have some clear documentation before making that 
claim. 
Are there any marks on the BB? 

The closest to that era would be  LongLow - 
http://www.cyclofiend.com/Images/rbw/gen1/rivcat05_longlow.jpg

http://www.cyclofiend.com/cc/2010/cc822-dongenovese1110.html

On Wednesday, June 23, 2021 at 11:49:48 PM UTC-7 dub_...@hotmail.com wrote:

> Hi Team,
>
> Purchased this one on ebay and the story is that its a Prototype Rivendell 
>
> Anyone have any ideas on it's back ground?
>
> SN M1
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Adrian the Aussie
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/cded2eda-73fb-48dd-bd17-6085ce4e9589n%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: H/Hilsen (Toyo) tire size

2021-06-20 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
A... just before I posted this, I realized you have a 650B (which is 
essentially a Saluki in 56). My comments below the line were for a 700C 
Hilsen. I think you'll find any reference to Saluki clearances would be 
appropriate.

There is a thread here which chats a bit about Saluki v. Hilsen
https://groups.google.com/g/rbw-owners-bunch/c/5JKIpW9dQTA

In that thread, you will find reference to a fendered Saluki with 42's. 

-- 700C comments  

I still run Jack Browns (bulky 33 1/3) on mine and there is gobs of room. 

On this page, you can see Pasela 37's and plenty of space to spare - 
http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/hilsen/index.html

Original RR article introducing the 700C Hilsen stated clearance for 40 
with fenders. (you'll find a hi-rez archived scan on that page as well).

- J

On Sunday, June 20, 2021 at 6:20:31 PM UTC-7 gpgun...@aol.com wrote:

> Greetings
> Can anyone confirm or shed light on the largest tire size one can safely 
> ride on a Toyo H/Hilsen (56 650B) with fenders. I would like to work a 
> 38-42 if possible and don't want to cut it too close for safety reasons. 
> Thanks much 
> Gunner  
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/307bdcdd-3924-4f92-b41a-95739c40573dn%40googlegroups.com.


[RBW] Re: Beginners SLR camera?

2021-05-20 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Ha... dusting off my "back in the day" file...
Worked in a photography shop just as the first Canon Sure-Shots came out - 
we sold everything from Leica through off-brand stuff. Even had a full 
darkroom department. (Kids, ask your parents...)

True manual = mechanical shutter.  

The Canon AE (which stood for Automatic Exposure) series was excellent, but 
used a larger battery and wouldn't work if it went dead. They were 
auto-exposure (AE1 let you set the shutter speed manually, and the lens set 
the aperture). Lenses were great, and the were solid units. The predecessor 
to that was the FT series, which were tanks. I had one for a while and held 
onto it for a long time just for that reason, they were the RBW's of the 
SLR world, as were the Nikon FM (manual) models. The old Nikkormats 
(precursor to Nikon) were sturdy beasts as well, though you have to make 
sure you have the right lenses for them. 

I used mostly Olympus OM-1's, as they had fully mechanical shutters and 
were small but tough. Good lenses. Low profile. Simple +/- metering in the 
viewfinder.

Minolta SRT (201?) series were bigger and bulkier, but worked really well.  
Circle/ring metering. 

Pentax K1000 was another in that same style. Basic. Solid. Used the 
"bayonet" Pentax lenses rather than the screw-on lenses of the Spotmatic 
(another good option if you can find the lenses).

If you can't find factory lenses, the Vivitar Series 1 lenses from that era 
were good. 

- J
On Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 11:11:29 AM UTC-7 Patrick Moore wrote:

> My daughter has come to like film photography during her first
> attempts using a high quality borrowed manual SLR.
>
> I'd like to get her an SLR, preferably manual, preferably with a
> flash, of decent quality but not too expensive; and I have no idea
> what "expensive" means here.
>
> She would also be happy with a point and shoot, but I think that if
> affordable that a minimally decent manual with flash would be more
> satisfying.
>
> I know many of you are photographers; what would you recommend, and
> why? Manual or automatic?
>
> I might be in the market for a decent used camera for her 20th birthday.
>
> My posted photographs are really bad, I know that, and this despite
> some care. She might be able to help me learn how to take better ones.
>
> -- 
>
> ---
> Patrick Moore
> Alburquerque, Nuevo Mexico, Etats Unis d'Amerique, Orbis Terrarum
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/ed252f62-b745-4277-9077-d51235a04f0fn%40googlegroups.com.


  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >