Re: deleteById without solrj?
Also note that the XML that an be POSTed to /solr/update can also be sent as a content stream on the URL for a plain GET request: /solr/update?stream.body=deleteid.../id/deletecommit=true Erik On Dec 3, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Tom Hill wrote: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#A.22delete.22_by_ID_and_by_Query On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Joel Nylund jnyl...@yahoo.com wrote: Is there a url based approach to delete a document? thanks Joel
Debian Lenny + Apache Tomcat 5.5 + Solr 1.4
Hi All, We've deployed 4 instances of Solr on a debian server. It is taking only 1.5 GB of RAM on local ubuntu machine but it is taking 2.0 GB plus on Debian Lenny server. Any ideas/pointers will help. Regards Rajan
Re: Issues with alphanumeric search terms
I have added filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory catenateAll=1 / to both index and query but still getting same behaviour. Is there any other that i am missing? Did you re-start tomcat and re-index? Why not use StandardTokenizerFactory?
Re: creating Lucene document from an external XML file.
Hello.., You have mentioned I can make use of UpdateProcessor API. May I know when the flow of execution enters that UpdateRequestProcessor class.? To be brief , it would be perfect for my case if its after analysis but exactly before its being added to the index. Thanks alot. On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote: : // one possibility to think about is that instead of modifying the documents : before sending them to Solr, you could write an UpdateProcessor tha runs : direclty in Solr and gets access to those Documents after Solr has already : parsed that XML (or even if the documents come from someplace else, like : DIH, or a CSV file) and then make your changes. // : I have not decided to modify documents, instead I go for : modifying them at run time. (modifying Java object's variables that : contains information extracted from the document-file). : my question is : Is there any part of the api which take document file : path as input , returns java object and gives us a way to modify : inbetween before sending the same object for indexing (to the : IndexWriter - lucene api). Yes ... as i mentioned the UpdateProcessor API is where you have access to the Documents as Lucene objects inside of Solr before they are indexed. -Hoss
Re: Issues with alphanumeric search terms
as Ahmet says, you need to re-index. Nothing about WordDelmiterFilterFactory alters case as far as I can tell from http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory Are you applying this in addition to the LowerCaseTokenizerFactory? In which case it's too late. The numbers have already been stripped... Please get a copy of Luke and examine your index to see what actually gets indexed, it'll give you a *much* better idea of what the various analyzers actually put in your index. Best Erick On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 6:57 AM, AHMET ARSLAN iori...@yahoo.com wrote: I have added filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory catenateAll=1 / to both index and query but still getting same behaviour. Is there any other that i am missing? Did you re-start tomcat and re-index? Why not use StandardTokenizerFactory?
how to get list of unique terms for a field
Hi, lets say I have a field called countryName, is there a way to get a list of all the countries for this field? Trying to figure out a nice way to keep my categories and the solr results in sync, would be nice to get these from solr instead of the database. thanks Joel
Re: how to get list of unique terms for a field
On Dec 4, 2009, at 8:59 AM, Joel Nylund wrote: lets say I have a field called countryName, is there a way to get a list of all the countries for this field? Trying to figure out a nice way to keep my categories and the solr results in sync, would be nice to get these from solr instead of the database. A couple of ways, depending on what you want: 1) faceting, as part of the search results, filtered within constraints (q/fq's): facet=onfacet.field=countryName 2) TermsComponent: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent Erik
Re: Debian Lenny + Apache Tomcat 5.5 + Solr 1.4
Are you explicitly setting the heap sizes? If not, the JVM is deciding for itself based on what the box looks like (ram, cpus, OS, etc). Are they both the same architecture (32 bit or 64 bit?) -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com p.s. in general cross-posting to both solr-user and solr-dev is discouraged. On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:27 AM, rajan chandi chandi.ra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, We've deployed 4 instances of Solr on a debian server. It is taking only 1.5 GB of RAM on local ubuntu machine but it is taking 2.0 GB plus on Debian Lenny server. Any ideas/pointers will help. Regards Rajan
Re: dismax query syntax to replace standard query
Thanks. When I do it that way it gives me following query.
params={indent=onstart=0q=risk+testqt=dismaxfq=statusName:(Male+OR+Female)+name:Joehl=onrows=10version=2.2}
hits=63 status=0 QTime=54
I typed in 'Risk test' (no quote in the text) in the text field in UI. I
want search to do AND between statusName and name attributes (all
attributes in fq param).
Following is my dismax configuration in solrconfig.xml
requestHandler name=dismax class=solr.SearchHandler
lst name=defaults
str name=defTypedismax/str
str name=echoParamsexplicit/str
float name=tie0.01/float
str name=qf
title^2 description
/str
str name=pf
title description
/str
str name=mm
2lt;-1 5lt;-2 6lt;90%
/str
int name=ps100/int
str name=q.alt*:*/str
str name=hl.fltitle description/str
str name=f.name.hl.fragsize10/str
str name=f.name.hl.alternateFieldtitle/str
str name=f.text.hl.fragmenterregex/str
/lst
/requestHandler
And schema.xml has
defaultSearchFieldtitle/defaultSearchField
solrQueryParser defaultOperator=OR/ -- when I change this to AND it does
AND all params in fq and also does ANDing between words in the text field
e.g. risk+test and doesn't return me results.
basically I want to do ORing between words in q list and ANDing between
params in fq list.
Any pointers would be appreciated.
Thanks,
isugar wrote:
I believe you need to use the fq parameter with dismax (not to be confused
with qf) to add a filter query in addition to the q parameter.
So your text search value goes in q parameter (which searches on the
fields
you configure) and the rest of the query goes in the fq.
Would that work?
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:28 PM, javaxmlsoapdev vika...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have configured dismax handler to search against both title
description fields now I have some other attributes on the page e.g.
status, name etc. On the search page I have three fields for user to
input search values
1)Free text search field (which searchs against both title
description)
2)Status (multi select dropdown)
3)name(single select dropdown)
I want to form query like textField1:value AND status:(Male OR Female)
AND
name:abc. I know first (textField1:value searchs against both title
description as that's how I have configured dixmax in the
configuration)
but not sure how I can AND other attributes (in my case status
name)
note; standadquery looks like following (w/o using dixmax handler)
title:testdescription:testname:JoestatusName:(Male OR Female)
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/dismax-query-syntax-to-replace-standard-query-tp26631725p26631725.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/dismax-query-syntax-to-replace-standard-query-tp26631725p26635928.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: latency in solr response is observed after index is updated
Hi Kay Kay , We have commented out auto commit frequency in solrconfig.xml below is the cache configuration:- filterCache class=solr.LRUCache size=512 initialSize=512 autowarmCount=256/ !-- queryResultCache caches results of searches - ordered lists of document ids (DocList) based on a query, a sort, and the range of documents requested. -- queryResultCache class=solr.LRUCache size=512 initialSize=512 autowarmCount=256/ !-- documentCache caches Lucene Document objects (the stored fields for each document). Since Lucene internal document ids are transient, this cache will not be autowarmed. -- documentCache class=solr.LRUCache size=512 initialSize=512 autowarmCount=0/ will further requests after index is updated wait for auto warming to complete ? Thanks, Bharath Kay Kay wrote: What would be the average doc size. What is the autoCommit frequency set in solrconfig.xml . Another place to look at is the field cache size and the nature of warmup queries run after a new searcher is created ( happens due to a commit ). Bharath Venkatesh wrote: Hi Kalidoss, I am not aware of using solr-config for committing the document . but I have mentioned below how we update and commit documents: curl http://solr_url/update --data-binary @feeds.xml -H 'Content-type:text/xml; charset=utf-8' curl http://solr_url/update --data-binary 'commit/' -H 'Content-type:text/xml; charset=utf-8' where feeds.xml contains the document in xml format we have master and slave replication for solr server. updates happens in master , snappuller and snapinstaller is run on slaves periodically queries don't happen at master , only happens at slaves is there any thing which can be said from above information ? Thanks, Bharath -Original Message- From: kalidoss [mailto:kalidoss.muthuramalin...@sifycorp.com] Sent: Tue 12/1/2009 2:38 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: latency in solr response is observed after index is updated r u using solr-config for committing the document? bharath venkatesh wrote: Hi, We are observing latency (some times huge latency upto 10-20 secs) in solr response after index is updated . whats the reason of this latency and how can it be minimized ? Note: our index size is pretty large. any help would be appreciated as we largely affected by it Thanks in advance. Bharath This message is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete this e-mail and all attachments from your system.
edismax using bigrams instead of phrases?
I've started trying edismax, and have noticed that my relevancy ranking is
messed up with edismax because, according to the debug output, it's using
bigrams instead of phrases and inexplicably ignoring a couple of the pf
fields. While the hit count isn't changing, this kills my ability to boost
exact title matches (or, I would guess, exact-anything-else matches, too).
debugQuery output can be seen at:
http://paste.lisp.org/display/91582
That's the exact same query except for the defType.
Note that instead of looking in the 'pf' fields for the search string gone
with the wind, it's looking individually for gone with, with the, and
the wind.
edismax is also completely ignoring the title_a and title_ab fields, which
are defined as exactmatcher as follows.
!-- Full string, stripped of \W and lowercased, for exact and left-anchored
matching --
fieldType name=exactmatcher class=solr.TextField omitNorms=true
analyzer
tokenizer class=solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory/
filter class=schema.UnicodeNormalizationFilterFactory
version=icu4j composed=false remove_diacritics=true
remove_modifiers=true fold=true/
filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/
filter class=solr.TrimFilterFactory/
filter class=solr.PatternReplaceFilterFactory
pattern=[^\p{L}\p{N}] replacement= replace=all
/
/analyzer
/fieldType
Any help on this would be much appreciated.
--
Bill Dueber
Library Systems Programmer
University of Michigan Library
Re: how to get list of unique terms for a field
Here's a pretty simple perl script. Call it as scriptname facetindex (or
scriptname facetindex maxnum)
#
#!/usr/local/bin/perl
use strict;
use JSON::XS;
use LWP::Simple;
### CHANGE THIS TO YOUR URL!! ###
my $select = 'http://solr-vufind:8026/solr/biblio/select';
# Get facet and (optional) maxnum from the command line
my ($facet, $num) = @ARGV;
$num ||= -1; # all values
my $url =
$select?q=*:*rows=0facet=truefacet.limit=$numfacet.field=$facetwt=json
json.nl=arrarr;
my $json = decode_json(get($url));
foreach my $a (@{$json-{facet_counts}{facet_fields}{$facet}}) {
print $a-[0], \n;
}
RE: search on tomcat server
I went through all the links on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/#Search_and_Indexing And still have no clue as how to proceed. 1. do I have to do some implementation in order to get solr to search doc. on tomcat server? 2. if I have files, such as .doc, docx, .pdf, .jsp, .html, etc under window xp, c:/tomcat/webapps/test1, /webapps/test2, What should I do to make solr search those directories 3. since I am using tomcat, instead of jetty, is there any demo that shows the solr searching features, and real searching result? Thanks, Jill -Original Message- From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar [mailto:shalinman...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 10:40 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: search on tomcat server On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Jill Han jill@alverno.edu wrote: I got solr running on the tomcat server, http://localhost:8080/solr/admin/ After I enter a search word, such as, solr, then hit Search button, it will go to http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=solrversion=2.2start=0rows=10in dent=onhttp://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=solrversion=2.2start=0rows=10in%0Adent=on and display ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ? - http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=solrversion=2.2start=0rows=10i ndent=onhttp://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=solrversion=2.2start=0rows=10i%0Andent=on response - http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=solrversion=2.2start=0rows=10i ndent=onhttp://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=solrversion=2.2start=0rows=10i%0Andent=on lst name=responseHeader int name=status0/int int name=QTime0/int - http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=solrversion=2.2start=0rows=10i ndent=onhttp://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=solrversion=2.2start=0rows=10i%0Andent=on lst name=params str name=rows10/str str name=start0/str str name=indenton/str str name=qsolr/str str name=version2.2/str /lst /lst result name=response numFound=0 start=0 / /response My question is what is the next step to search files on tomcat server? Looks like you have not added any documents to Solr. See the Indexing Documents section at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/#Search_and_Indexing -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: edismax using bigrams instead of phrases?
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Bill Dueber b...@dueber.com wrote: I've started trying edismax, and have noticed that my relevancy ranking is messed up with edismax because, according to the debug output, it's using bigrams instead of phrases and inexplicably ignoring a couple of the pf fields. While the hit count isn't changing, this kills my ability to boost exact title matches (or, I would guess, exact-anything-else matches, too). It's a feature in general - the problem with putting all the terms in a single phrase query is that you get no boosting at all if all of the terms don't appear. But since it may be useful as an option, perhaps we should add the single-phrase option to extended dismax as well. edismax is also completely ignoring the title_a and title_ab fields, which are defined as exactmatcher as follows. I believe this is because extended dismax only adds phrases for boosting... hence if a field type outputs a single token, it's considered redundant with the main query. This is an optimization to speed up queries (esp single-word queries). Perhaps one way to fix this would be to check if the pf is in the qf list before removing single term phrases? -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: edismax using bigrams instead of phrases?
I see that edismax already defines pf (bigrams) and pf3 (trigrams) -- how would folks think about just calling them pf / pf1 (aliases for each other?), pf2, and pf3? The pf would then behave exactly as it does in dismax. And it sounds like the solution to my single-token fields is to just move them into the query itself. Thanks! On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote: On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Bill Dueber b...@dueber.com wrote: I've started trying edismax, and have noticed that my relevancy ranking is messed up with edismax because, according to the debug output, it's using bigrams instead of phrases and inexplicably ignoring a couple of the pf fields. While the hit count isn't changing, this kills my ability to boost exact title matches (or, I would guess, exact-anything-else matches, too). It's a feature in general - the problem with putting all the terms in a single phrase query is that you get no boosting at all if all of the terms don't appear. But since it may be useful as an option, perhaps we should add the single-phrase option to extended dismax as well. edismax is also completely ignoring the title_a and title_ab fields, which are defined as exactmatcher as follows. I believe this is because extended dismax only adds phrases for boosting... hence if a field type outputs a single token, it's considered redundant with the main query. This is an optimization to speed up queries (esp single-word queries). Perhaps one way to fix this would be to check if the pf is in the qf list before removing single term phrases? -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com -- Bill Dueber Library Systems Programmer University of Michigan Library
Re: question about schemas
Lance Norskog-2 wrote: But, in general, this is a shopping cart database and Solr/Lucene may not be the best fit for this problem. True, every tool has strengths and weaknesses. Given how powerful Solr appears to be, I would be surprised if I was not able to handle this use case. Lance Norskog-2 wrote: You can make a separate facet field which contains a range of buckets: 10, 20, 50, or 100 means that the field has a value 0-10, 11-20, 21-50, or 51-100. You could use a separate filter query with values for these buckets. Filter queries are very fast in Solr 1.4 and this would limit your range query execution to documents which match the buckets. Thank you for this suggestion. I will look into this. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/question-about-schemas-tp26600956p26636155.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: High add/delete rate and index fragmentation
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote: #2: The standard architecture is with a master that only does indexing and one or more slaves that only handle queries. The slaves poll the master for index updates regularly. Java 1.4 has a built-in system for this. How do you achieve durability with the standard architecture? For one of our use cases (which does not have much churn), we are considering this architecture, but I don't want an update to be lost if the master goes down before slaves update. What I was thinking initially is that this could be achieved having a master per datacenter, which would synchronously update other masters through a RequestHandler. So I could guarantee this durability, but of course this architecture would have issues of its own. like when there is a network partitioning, how you could handle master no longer being in sync. Is there some work being done to address this use case? An alternate architecture has multiple servers which do both indexing and queries in the same index. This provides the shortest pipeline time from recieving the data to making it available for search. For our use case where there is a high add/delete rate, I was thinking of using this architecture, as I noticed that records become available right away. But in this case we have the concern about how well it performs when adding/deleting. I did an initial test adding many thousands of elements and did not see any degradation, that's why I asked about its performance when deleting records (since it only marks for deletion and we have some control over the automatic segment mergin, I guess this is not much of a problem). Rodrigo On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Jason Rutherglen jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote: Rodrigo, It sounds like you're asking about near realtime search support, I'm not sure. So here's few ideas. #1 How often do you need to be able to search on the latest updates (as opposed to updates from lets say, 10 minutes ago)? To topic #2, Solr provides master slave replication. The optimize would happen on the master and the new index files replicated to the slave(s). #3 is a mixed bag at this point, and there is no official solution, yet. Shell scripts, and a load balancer could kind of work. Check out SOLR-1277 or SOLR-1395 for progress along these lines. Jason On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Rodrigo De Castro rodr...@sacaluta.com wrote: We are considering Solr to store events which will be added and deleted from the index in a very fast rate. Solr will be used, in this case, to find the right event we need to process (since they may have several attributes and we may search the best match based on the query attributes). Our understanding is that the common use cases are those wherein the read rate is much higher than writes, and deletes are not as frequent, so we are not sure Solr handles our use case very well or if it is the right fit. Given that, I have a few questions: 1 - How does Solr/Lucene degrade with the fragmentation? That would probably determine the rate at which we would need to optimize the index. I presume that it depends on the rate of insertions and deletions, but would you have any benchmark on this degradation? Or, in general, how has been your experience with this use case? 2 - Optimizing seems to be a very expensive process. While optimizing the index, how much does search performance degrade? In this case, having a huge degradation would not allow us to optimize unless we switch to another copy of the index while optimize is running. 3 - In terms of high availability, what has been your experience detecting failure of master and having a slave taking over? Thanks, Rodrigo -- Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com
Solr 1.4: StringIndexOutOfBoundsException in SpellCheckComponent with HTMLStripCharFilterFactory
I am running a search in Solr 1.4 and I am getting the StringIndexOutOfBoundsException pasted below. The spell check field uses HTMLStripCharFilterFactory. However, the search works fine if I do not use the HTMLStripCharFilterFactory. If I set a breakpoint at SpellCheckComponent.java: 248, the value of the variable best is as shown in the screenshot: http://yfrog.com/j5solrdebuginspectp At the end of first iteration, offset = 5 - (24 - 0) = -19 This causes the index out of bounds exception. The spell check field is defined as: fieldType name=text_spell class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/ tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.StandardFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt enablePositionIncrements=true/ filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=true/ filter class=solr.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType Stack Trace: = String index out of range: -19 java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: -19 at java.lang.AbstractStringBuilder.replace(Unknown Source) at java.lang.StringBuilder.replace(Unknown Source) at org.apache.solr.handler.component.SpellCheckComponent.toNamedList(SpellCheckComponent.java:248) at org.apache.solr.handler.component.SpellCheckComponent.process(SpellCheckComponent.java:143) at org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(SearchHandler.java:195) at org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:131) at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1316) at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.execute(SolrDispatchFilter.java:338) at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:241) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1089) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:365) at org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:216) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:181) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:712) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:405) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:211) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerCollection.handle(HandlerCollection.java:114) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:139) at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:285) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:502) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete(HttpConnection.java:821) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:513) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:208) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:378) at org.mortbay.jetty.bio.SocketConnector$Connection.run(SocketConnector.java:226) at org.mortbay.thread.BoundedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(BoundedThreadPool.java:442)
Re: question about schemas (and SOLR-1131?)
Could this be solved with a multi-valued custom field type (including a custom comparator)? The OP's situation deals with multi-valuing products for each customer. If products contain strictly numeric fields then it seems like a custom field implementation (or extension of BinaryField?) *should* be easy - only the comparator part needs work. I'm not clear on how the existing query parsers would handle this though, so there's probably some work there too. SOLR-1131 seems like a more general solution that supports analysis that numeric fields don't need. gdeconto wrote: I saw an interesting thread in the solr-dev forum about multiple fields per fieldtype (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131) from the sounds of it, it might be of interest and/or use in these types of problems; for your example, you might be able to define a fieldtype that houses the product data. note that I only skimmed the thread. hopefully, I'll get get some time to look at it more closely -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/question-about-schemas-tp26600956p26636170.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: HTML Stripping slower in Solr 1.4?
Thanks Koji for logging the ticket. I noticed its priority is set to minor. Is there any work around? I feel like I am being half as productive as every iteration is taking twice as much time. Thanks Robin On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote: Robin, Thank you for reporting this. Performance degradation of HTML Stripper could be in 1.4. I opened a ticket in Lucene: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2098 Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Grouping
Is there a way to make a group by or distinct query? -- Bruno Morelli Vargas Mail: brun...@gmail.com Msn: brun...@hotmail.com Icq: 165055101 Skype: morellibmv
Re: creating Lucene document from an external XML file.
I think you'd have to dig into Solr (Lucene actually) to inject yourself after Analysis. The UpdateRequestProcessor, as the name implies, it at the request level, so pretty high up/early on. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch - Original Message From: Phanindra Reva reva.phanin...@gmail.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Fri, December 4, 2009 7:48:46 AM Subject: Re: creating Lucene document from an external XML file. Hello.., You have mentioned I can make use of UpdateProcessor API. May I know when the flow of execution enters that UpdateRequestProcessor class.? To be brief , it would be perfect for my case if its after analysis but exactly before its being added to the index. Thanks alot. On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : // one possibility to think about is that instead of modifying the documents : before sending them to Solr, you could write an UpdateProcessor tha runs : direclty in Solr and gets access to those Documents after Solr has already : parsed that XML (or even if the documents come from someplace else, like : DIH, or a CSV file) and then make your changes. // :I have not decided to modify documents, instead I go for : modifying them at run time. (modifying Java object's variables that : contains information extracted from the document-file). : my question is : Is there any part of the api which take document file : path as input , returns java object and gives us a way to modify : inbetween before sending the same object for indexing (to the : IndexWriter - lucene api). Yes ... as i mentioned the UpdateProcessor API is where you have access to the Documents as Lucene objects inside of Solr before they are indexed. -Hoss
Re: Grouping
Not out of the box. You could group by using SOLR-236 perhaps? Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch - Original Message From: Bruno brun...@gmail.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Fri, December 4, 2009 1:08:59 PM Subject: Grouping Is there a way to make a group by or distinct query? -- Bruno Morelli Vargas Mail: brun...@gmail.com Msn: brun...@hotmail.com Icq: 165055101 Skype: morellibmv
Re: High add/delete rate and index fragmentation
Hello, You are right that we would need near realtime support. The problem is not so much about new records becoming available, but guaranteeing that deleted records will not be returned. For this reason, our plan would be to update and search a master index, provided that: (1) search while updating records is ok, It is in general, though I haven't fully tested NRT under high load. (2) performance is not degraded substantially due to fragmentation, You can control that somewhat via mergeFactor. (3) optimization does not impact search, It will - disk IO, OS cache, and such will be affected, and that will affect search. and (4) we ensure durability - if a node goes down, an update was replicated to another node who can take over. Maybe just index to 1 masters? For example, another non-search tool I'm using (Voldemort) has the notion of required writes, which represents how many copies of data should be written at insert/add time. It seems that 1 and 2 are not so much of a problem, 3 would need to be tested. I would like know more about how 4 has been addressed, so we don't lose updates if a master goes down between updates and index replication. Lucene buffers documents while indexing, to avoid constant disk writes. HDD itself does some of that, too. So I think you can always lose some data is whatever is in the buffers doesn't get flushed when somebody trips over the power cord in the data center. Otis #3 is a mixed bag at this point, and there is no official solution, yet. Shell scripts, and a load balancer could kind of work. Check out SOLR-1277 or SOLR-1395 for progress along these lines. Thanks for the links. Rodrigo On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Rodrigo De Castro wrote: We are considering Solr to store events which will be added and deleted from the index in a very fast rate. Solr will be used, in this case, to find the right event we need to process (since they may have several attributes and we may search the best match based on the query attributes). Our understanding is that the common use cases are those wherein the read rate is much higher than writes, and deletes are not as frequent, so we are not sure Solr handles our use case very well or if it is the right fit. Given that, I have a few questions: 1 - How does Solr/Lucene degrade with the fragmentation? That would probably determine the rate at which we would need to optimize the index. I presume that it depends on the rate of insertions and deletions, but would you have any benchmark on this degradation? Or, in general, how has been your experience with this use case? 2 - Optimizing seems to be a very expensive process. While optimizing the index, how much does search performance degrade? In this case, having a huge degradation would not allow us to optimize unless we switch to another copy of the index while optimize is running. 3 - In terms of high availability, what has been your experience detecting failure of master and having a slave taking over? Thanks, Rodrigo
how to do auto-suggest case-insensitive match and return original case field values
Hi everyone, New to forum and to Solr, doing my first major project with it and enjoying it so far, great software. In my web application I want to set up auto-suggest as you type functionality which will search case-insensitively yet return the original case terms. It doesn't seem like TermsComponent can do this as it can only return the lowercase indexed terms your are searching against, not the original case terms. There was one post on this forum http://old.nabble.com/Auto-suggest..-how-to-do-mixed-case-td2410.html#a24143981 http://old.nabble.com/Auto-suggest..-how-to-do-mixed-case-td2410.html#a24143981 where someone asked the same question, and what someone said is to There is no way to do this right now using TermsComponent. You can index lower case terms and store the mixed case terms. Then you can use a prefix query which will return documents (and hence stored field values). So this got me started, I set out to use Solr Query instead of TermsComponent to try to do this. I did the following as mentioned: fieldType name=test class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer tokenizer class=solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType fieldType name=test_lc class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer tokenizer class=solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType field name=test type=test indexed=false stored=true multiValued=true / field name=test_lc type=test_lc indexed=true stored=false multiValued=true / And used copyField to populate the test_lc field: copyField source=test dest=test_lc/ This is the easy part (the forum user didn't explain the hard part!) It is very hard to get the same information that TermsComponent returns using the regular Solr Query functionality! For example: http://localhost:8983/solr/terms?terms.fl=test_lcterms.prefix=aterms.sort=countterms.limit=5omitHeader=true int name=a-kinase anchor protein 1315/int int name=accn56/int int name=actin-binding3/int int name=activator1/int int name=agie-bp11/int which provides useful sorting by and returning of term frequency counts in your index. How does one get this same information with regular Solr Query? I set up the following prefix query, searching by the indexed lowercased field and returning the other: http://localhost:8983/solr/select?fl=testq=test_lc%3Aa*sort=score+descrows=5omitHeader=true doc arr name=test str3D-structure/str stracetylation/str stralternative promoter usage/str strHLC-7/str /arr /doc doc arr name=test stralternative splicing/str strcomplete proteome/str strDNA-binding/str strRACK1/str /arr /doc doc arr name=test stracetylation/str strAIG21/str strWD repeat/str strGNB2L1/str /arr /doc doc /arr arr name=test str3D-structure/str strapoptosis/str strcathepsin G-like 1/str strATSGL1/str strCTLA-1/str /arr /doc doc arr name=test strautoantigen Ge-1/str strautoantigen RCD-8/str strHERV-H LTR-associating protein 3/str strHHLA3/str /arr /doc I can see how to process this in my front-end app to extract the original terms starting with the prefix letter(s) used in the query, but there are still some major problems when compared to TermsComponent: - How do I make sure my auto-suggest list is at least a certain number of terms long? Using rows of course doesn't work like terms.limit, because between returned docs there can be the same term and these will get collapsed. - How do I get term frequency counts like TermsComponent does? I looked at faceting but I don't understand how to get the TermsComponent behavior using it. Sorry for the long message, just wanted to fully explain, thanks for any help! leandro -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/how-to-do-auto-suggest-case-insensitive-match-and-return-original-case-field-values-tp26636365p26636365.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: search on tomcat server
Have you gone through the solr tomcat wiki? http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat I found this very helpful when I did our solr installation on tomcat. - Bill -- From: Jill Han jill@alverno.edu Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 8:54 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: search on tomcat server I went through all the links on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/#Search_and_Indexing And still have no clue as how to proceed. 1. do I have to do some implementation in order to get solr to search doc. on tomcat server? 2. if I have files, such as .doc, docx, .pdf, .jsp, .html, etc under window xp, c:/tomcat/webapps/test1, /webapps/test2, What should I do to make solr search those directories 3. since I am using tomcat, instead of jetty, is there any demo that shows the solr searching features, and real searching result? Thanks, Jill -Original Message- From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar [mailto:shalinman...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 10:40 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: search on tomcat server On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Jill Han jill@alverno.edu wrote: I got solr running on the tomcat server, http://localhost:8080/solr/admin/ After I enter a search word, such as, solr, then hit Search button, it will go to http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=solrversion=2.2start=0rows=10in dent=onhttp://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=solrversion=2.2start=0rows=10in%0Adent=on and display ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ? - http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=solrversion=2.2start=0rows=10i ndent=onhttp://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=solrversion=2.2start=0rows=10i%0Andent=on response - http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=solrversion=2.2start=0rows=10i ndent=onhttp://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=solrversion=2.2start=0rows=10i%0Andent=on lst name=responseHeader int name=status0/int int name=QTime0/int - http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=solrversion=2.2start=0rows=10i ndent=onhttp://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=solrversion=2.2start=0rows=10i%0Andent=on lst name=params str name=rows10/str str name=start0/str str name=indenton/str str name=qsolr/str str name=version2.2/str /lst /lst result name=response numFound=0 start=0 / /response My question is what is the next step to search files on tomcat server? Looks like you have not added any documents to Solr. See the Indexing Documents section at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/#Search_and_Indexing -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Dumping solr requests for indexing
Is there any way to dump all incoming requests to Solr into a file? My customer is seeing a strange problem of disappearing docs from index and I'd like to ask them to capture all incoming requests. Thanks. -kuro
Re: Dumping solr requests for indexing
The solr log, as well as the servlet container log should have them all. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch - Original Message From: Teruhiko Kurosaka k...@basistech.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Fri, December 4, 2009 2:23:17 PM Subject: Dumping solr requests for indexing Is there any way to dump all incoming requests to Solr into a file? My customer is seeing a strange problem of disappearing docs from index and I'd like to ask them to capture all incoming requests. Thanks. -kuro
Best way to handle bitfields in solr...
Folks: In my db I currently have fields that represent bitmasks. Thus, for example, a value of the mask of 48 might represent an undergraduate (value = 16) and graduate (value = 32). Currently, the corresponding field in solr is a multi-valued string field called EdLevel which will have valueUndergraduate/value and valueGraduate/value as its two values (for this example). I do the conversion from the int into the list of values as I do the indexing. Ideally, I'd like solr to have bitwise operations so that I could store the int value, and then simply search by using bit operations. However, given that this is not possible, and that there have been recent threads speaking to performance issues with multi-valued fields, is there something better I could do? TIA, - Bill
Re: Best way to handle bitfields in solr...
Would http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#fieldvalue help? Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch - Original Message From: William Pierce evalsi...@hotmail.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Fri, December 4, 2009 2:43:25 PM Subject: Best way to handle bitfields in solr... Folks: In my db I currently have fields that represent bitmasks. Thus, for example, a value of the mask of 48 might represent an undergraduate (value = 16) and graduate (value = 32). Currently, the corresponding field in solr is a multi-valued string field called EdLevel which will have Undergraduate and Graduate as its two values (for this example). I do the conversion from the int into the list of values as I do the indexing. Ideally, I'd like solr to have bitwise operations so that I could store the int value, and then simply search by using bit operations. However, given that this is not possible, and that there have been recent threads speaking to performance issues with multi-valued fields, is there something better I could do? TIA, - Bill
RE: Dumping solr requests for indexing
Log only tells high-level descriptions of what were done. I'd like to capture the exact XML requests with data, so that I could re-feed it to Solr to reproduce the issue my customer is encountering. -kuro -Original Message- From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 11:41 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Dumping solr requests for indexing The solr log, as well as the servlet container log should have them all. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch - Original Message From: Teruhiko Kurosaka k...@basistech.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Fri, December 4, 2009 2:23:17 PM Subject: Dumping solr requests for indexing Is there any way to dump all incoming requests to Solr into a file? My customer is seeing a strange problem of disappearing docs from index and I'd like to ask them to capture all incoming requests. Thanks. -kuro
Question: Write to Solr but not via http, and still store date_format
Hi Solr team, Has anyone been able to write to Solr, keeping things like 'date_format', but indexing directly, rather than via http? I've been indexing using Lucene Java, and this works well and is very fast, except that any data indexed this way doesn't store date_format et al information (date.format resuts always return 0). I like indexing directly into Lucene, rather than via http requests, as it is much faster, particularly at very high input rates. Anyone encountered this and managed to solve it? Many thanks, peter _ Got more than one Hotmail account? Save time by linking them together http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/186394591/direct/01/
Re: Question: Write to Solr but not via http, and still store date_format
Are you looking for http://wiki.apache.org/solr/EmbeddedSolr ? Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch - Original Message From: Peter 4U pete...@hotmail.com To: Solr solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Fri, December 4, 2009 3:09:19 PM Subject: Question: Write to Solr but not via http, and still store date_format Hi Solr team, Has anyone been able to write to Solr, keeping things like 'date_format', but indexing directly, rather than via http? I've been indexing using Lucene Java, and this works well and is very fast, except that any data indexed this way doesn't store date_format et al information (date.format resuts always return 0). I like indexing directly into Lucene, rather than via http requests, as it is much faster, particularly at very high input rates. Anyone encountered this and managed to solve it? Many thanks, peter _ Got more than one Hotmail account? Save time by linking them together http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/186394591/direct/01/
Answer: RE: Question: Write to Solr but not via http, and still store date_format
Oops, of course the answer was staring me in the face! -- Use the EmbeddedSolrServer, rather than the CommonsHttpSolrServer. Live and learn. Live. and learn. Thanks, Peter From: pete...@hotmail.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Question: Write to Solr but not via http, and still store date_format Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 20:09:19 + Hi Solr team, Has anyone been able to write to Solr, keeping things like 'date_format', but indexing directly, rather than via http? I've been indexing using Lucene Java, and this works well and is very fast, except that any data indexed this way doesn't store date_format et al information (date.format resuts always return 0). I like indexing directly into Lucene, rather than via http requests, as it is much faster, particularly at very high input rates. Anyone encountered this and managed to solve it? Many thanks, peter _ Got more than one Hotmail account? Save time by linking them together http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/186394591/direct/01/ _ Got more than one Hotmail account? Save time by linking them together http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/186394591/direct/01/
Re: Dumping solr requests for indexing
Aha! Sounds like a job for a simple, custom UpdateRequestProcessor. Actually, I think URP doesn't get access to the actual XML, but what it has access may be enough for you: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateRequestProcessor Alternatively, unpack the war, add a custom logging servlet filter, chain it in web.xml and that might do the trick. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch - Original Message From: Teruhiko Kurosaka k...@basistech.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Fri, December 4, 2009 3:05:57 PM Subject: RE: Dumping solr requests for indexing Log only tells high-level descriptions of what were done. I'd like to capture the exact XML requests with data, so that I could re-feed it to Solr to reproduce the issue my customer is encountering. -kuro -Original Message- From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 11:41 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Dumping solr requests for indexing The solr log, as well as the servlet container log should have them all. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch - Original Message From: Teruhiko Kurosaka To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Fri, December 4, 2009 2:23:17 PM Subject: Dumping solr requests for indexing Is there any way to dump all incoming requests to Solr into a file? My customer is seeing a strange problem of disappearing docs from index and I'd like to ask them to capture all incoming requests. Thanks. -kuro
how to set multiple fq while building a query in solrj
how do I create a query string witih multiple fq params using solrj SolrQuery API. e.g. I want to build a query as follow http://servername:port/solr/issues/select/?q=testingfq=statusName:(Female OR Male)fq=name=Joe I am using solrj client APIs to build query and using SolrQuery as follow solrQuery.setParam(fq statusString); solrQuery.setParam(fq, nameString); It only sets last fq (fq=nameString)in the string.. If I swich abover setParam order it sets fq=statusString. How do I set muliple fq params in SolrQuery object. Thanks, -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/how-to-set-multiple-fq-while-building-a-query-in-solrj-tp26638650p26638650.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: how is score computed with hsin functionquery?
Thanks Lance, I appreciate your response. I know what a DIH is and have already written custom transformers. I just misunderstood your response to my message (I wasnt aware that we could use JS to create transformers). Anyhow, my intent is to change the tool (create a variation of hsin to support degrees) rather than change the data (which introduces other issues, such as having to support most systems in degrees and this one system in radians) any ideas/advice in that regard? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/how-is-score-computed-with-hsin-functionquery--tp26504265p26638720.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: HTML Stripping slower in Solr 1.4?
Is BaseCharFilter required for the html strip filter? -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote: Robin, Thank you for reporting this. Performance degradation of HTML Stripper could be in 1.4. I opened a ticket in Lucene: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2098 Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Query time boosting with dismax
Hi, Is it possible to weigh specific query terms with a Dismax query parser? Is it possible to write queries of the sort ... field1:(term1)^2.0 + (term2^3.0) with dismax? Thanks, Girish Redekar http://girishredekar.net
Re: Debian Lenny + Apache Tomcat 5.5 + Solr 1.4
We are using 64 bit VM with 64 bit JDK on it. It is 2.00 GB RAM Zen instance. We're setting up max JVM heap size of 1800 MB max. - Rajan On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote: Are you explicitly setting the heap sizes? If not, the JVM is deciding for itself based on what the box looks like (ram, cpus, OS, etc). Are they both the same architecture (32 bit or 64 bit?) -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com p.s. in general cross-posting to both solr-user and solr-dev is discouraged. On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:27 AM, rajan chandi chandi.ra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, We've deployed 4 instances of Solr on a debian server. It is taking only 1.5 GB of RAM on local ubuntu machine but it is taking 2.0 GB plus on Debian Lenny server. Any ideas/pointers will help. Regards Rajan
Re: Debian Lenny + Apache Tomcat 5.5 + Solr 1.4
My local ubuntu 9.04 64 bit taking 1.5 GB is not a VM and Debian Lenny 64 bit taking 2 GB is a Xen Instance. - Rajan On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:51 AM, rajan chandi chandi.ra...@gmail.comwrote: We are using 64 bit VM with 64 bit JDK on it. It is 2.00 GB RAM Zen instance. We're setting up max JVM heap size of 1800 MB max. - Rajan On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote: Are you explicitly setting the heap sizes? If not, the JVM is deciding for itself based on what the box looks like (ram, cpus, OS, etc). Are they both the same architecture (32 bit or 64 bit?) -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com p.s. in general cross-posting to both solr-user and solr-dev is discouraged. On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:27 AM, rajan chandi chandi.ra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, We've deployed 4 instances of Solr on a debian server. It is taking only 1.5 GB of RAM on local ubuntu machine but it is taking 2.0 GB plus on Debian Lenny server. Any ideas/pointers will help. Regards Rajan
Re: Debian Lenny + Apache Tomcat 5.5 + Solr 1.4
Local Solr doesn't look like 64 bit. ra...@rajan-desktop:~$ uname -a Linux rajan-desktop 2.6.28-16-server #55-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 20 20:50:00 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux But the Xen Solr server does ra...@rajan-desktop:~$ uname -a Linux rajan-desktop 2.6.28-16-server #55-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 20 20:50:00 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux May be that is the reason why Server is taking more RAM. Thanks all for your responses. Regards Rajan On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:06 AM, rajan chandi chandi.ra...@gmail.comwrote: My local ubuntu 9.04 64 bit taking 1.5 GB is not a VM and Debian Lenny 64 bit taking 2 GB is a Xen Instance. - Rajan On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:51 AM, rajan chandi chandi.ra...@gmail.comwrote: We are using 64 bit VM with 64 bit JDK on it. It is 2.00 GB RAM Zen instance. We're setting up max JVM heap size of 1800 MB max. - Rajan On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote: Are you explicitly setting the heap sizes? If not, the JVM is deciding for itself based on what the box looks like (ram, cpus, OS, etc). Are they both the same architecture (32 bit or 64 bit?) -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com p.s. in general cross-posting to both solr-user and solr-dev is discouraged. On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:27 AM, rajan chandi chandi.ra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, We've deployed 4 instances of Solr on a debian server. It is taking only 1.5 GB of RAM on local ubuntu machine but it is taking 2.0 GB plus on Debian Lenny server. Any ideas/pointers will help. Regards Rajan
Re: Query time boosting with dismax
Terms no, but fields (with terms) and phrases, yes. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch - Original Message From: Girish Redekar girish.rede...@aplopio.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Fri, December 4, 2009 11:42:16 PM Subject: Query time boosting with dismax Hi, Is it possible to weigh specific query terms with a Dismax query parser? Is it possible to write queries of the sort ... field1:(term1)^2.0 + (term2^3.0) with dismax? Thanks, Girish Redekar http://girishredekar.net
