Re: No Images On One Site
Jim Taylor wrote: Thomas Pamin wrote: Anyone know why images don't load on this site. They used to. Safe Mode doesn't change it. https://flightsim.to/ Works for me with Seamonkey 2.54.5 Beta1 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.5 Jim That Should be 2.53.3 Bata1 in my post above - typo. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: No Images On One Site
Thomas Pamin wrote: Anyone know why images don't load on this site. They used to. Safe Mode doesn't change it. https://flightsim.to/ Works for me with Seamonkey 2.54.5 Beta1 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.5 Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem viewing commits on gitlab.com with SeaMonkey.
Jonathan Wilson wrote: If I try to view a commit on gitlab.com such as https://gitlab.com/w3dhub/a-path-beyond-sdk/-/commit/a615e4d328a3f4ab1c60c3371308b28272489ccd with SeaMonkey, I see no output. Works fine for the same commit on the Chrome-based version of Edge as well as version 81.0 of Firefox (FirefoxPortable specifically if that makes a difference). Is there something I can do (say, a useragent override) that would get the page working again or is this a site that just won't work in SeaMonkey (I have 2.53.4) anymore? I think the fix for their change is in 2.53.5. It works in my 2.53.5.beta.1.pre from Bill's site http://www.wg9s.com/comm-253 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Links
Jim Taylor wrote: Link to plane icons tx16s uses Horus ones: https://www.skyraccoon.com/ Frsky has 6 channel and 8 channel receivers with build in vario looks like both are about $39. I haven't seen either one, I have the old standalone vario (which is still made). https://alofthobbies.com/frsky-g-rx6.html https://alofthobbies.com/frsky-g-rx8.html For motor battery voltage both of them need a battery sensor (up to 5s) $2.50 I think they have receiver battery sensor built in and all have RSSI. https://alofthobbies.com/frsky-battery-voltage-sensor-fbvs-01.html Jim Obviously I screwed up here. Any way to delete this? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Links
Link to plane icons tx16s uses Horus ones: https://www.skyraccoon.com/ Frsky has 6 channel and 8 channel receivers with build in vario looks like both are about $39. I haven't seen either one, I have the old standalone vario (which is still made). https://alofthobbies.com/frsky-g-rx6.html https://alofthobbies.com/frsky-g-rx8.html For motor battery voltage both of them need a battery sensor (up to 5s) $2.50 I think they have receiver battery sensor built in and all have RSSI. https://alofthobbies.com/frsky-battery-voltage-sensor-fbvs-01.html Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Where to now??
Daniel wrote: For a couple of years now, I've been looking in on the SeaMonkey irc channel on the Moznet irc server. But now that that irc server has been closed, where should I be, please?? freenode ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM-2.53: dateformat
Hartmut Figge wrote: Hartmut Figge: With ac_add_options --disable-pulseaudio ac_add_options --enable-alsa I have sound in my 2.57. That is fine for a private build, but otherwise... hm. No I have build a 2.57 with these options # ac_add_options --disable-pulseaudio ac_add_options --enable-alsa The entry with pulseaudio is commented out and therefore not active. As expected the build failed with 0:12.71 checking MOZ_ALSA_LIBS... -lasound 0:12.72 checking for libpulse... Package libpulse was not found in the pkg-config search path. 0:12.72 Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libpulse.pc' 0:12.72 to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable 0:12.72 No package 'libpulse' found 0:12.72 configure: error: pulseaudio audio backend requires libpulse development package So I installed pulseaudio. That does not mean that I could hear sound using pulseausio, though. *g* This time the build succeeded. No sound in this build. So I removed pulseaudio and tried again. Success. With this build sound should work on Linux using alsa. But what with a system using pulseaudio? If there are Linux users using pulseaudio, it would be nice, if someone tested this build for sound. E.g. using youtube. Remember, that in 2.57 the MailNews part does not work. Only the browser should be tested. WARNING! Don't use an existing profile. Use a new one. Unpack the .tar.bz2 somewhere in $HOME, navigate to the appropriate place and start the build with ./seamonkey -no-remote -p. This opens the 2.57 into the profile manager where you can create a new profile and start it there. The -no-remote part is in case you have already another SM running. http://www.triffids.de/pub/sm/sm-2.57/ Hartmut I tried to test this for you on my openSUSE LEAP 15.0 system but your build needs glibc 2.27 and I only have 2.26 so it won't run. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Downloading mail from Yahoo.
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote: Jim Taylor wrote: Daniel wrote: Because my ISP supplied POP3 e-mail account has a very small limit (500KBytes) before I start getting charged 'over-mail-limit' fees, I set myself up a freebie Yahoo e-mail account and, I thought, I'd be able to then open my SM Mail & News screen, set up an e-mail account to download the e-mails from my Yahoo account. I think I set it up as a POP3 account and when it didn't download the e-mails from Yahoo, I figured it was probable because of some limitation that Yahoo put on the Freebie accounts. (Note: I cannot actually check this now because, about 18 mths ago, I accidentally deleted my SM Profile), however It just occurred to me ... is it possible that I was not able to download from Yahoo because I was trying to download using a POP3 account?? Might it work if I set up my SM (Yahoo) e-mail account as an IMAP account?? Or is my problem the *freebie* Yahoo e-mail account protocol?? TIA Pop3 still works with my free yahoo email account. They made a change where I had to turn off "Leave mail on server" in server settings but Seamonkey displayed a dialog telling me what to do when that happened. Jim What a strange decision. I don't see any significant difference between IMAP and "POP3 with Leave mail on server" so why are they blocking the second option? Actually it may have just been a misconfigured mail server. I just changed it back to post the exact message about what it didn't support and it is working again with "leave mail on server". ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Downloading mail from Yahoo.
Daniel wrote: Because my ISP supplied POP3 e-mail account has a very small limit (500KBytes) before I start getting charged 'over-mail-limit' fees, I set myself up a freebie Yahoo e-mail account and, I thought, I'd be able to then open my SM Mail & News screen, set up an e-mail account to download the e-mails from my Yahoo account. I think I set it up as a POP3 account and when it didn't download the e-mails from Yahoo, I figured it was probable because of some limitation that Yahoo put on the Freebie accounts. (Note: I cannot actually check this now because, about 18 mths ago, I accidentally deleted my SM Profile), however It just occurred to me ... is it possible that I was not able to download from Yahoo because I was trying to download using a POP3 account?? Might it work if I set up my SM (Yahoo) e-mail account as an IMAP account?? Or is my problem the *freebie* Yahoo e-mail account protocol?? TIA Pop3 still works with my free yahoo email account. They made a change where I had to turn off "Leave mail on server" in server settings but Seamonkey displayed a dialog telling me what to do when that happened. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sea Monkey and Windows 10
Daniel wrote: On 19/07/2016 9:16 AM, Jim Taylor wrote: Larry S. wrote: Second try: Is Sea Monkey compatible with W10? If not, what do I have to do so it will work? Will it have to be reinstalled? Should it be uninstalled before the conversion? I save up-to-date copies of the profile and ini in a separate HD, but in W10 have no idea where to find the profile so I can copy in the saved version. Help, anyone? (What is the path to the profile, and how do I find it?) In W7 I know the answer, but W10 is a mystery with a confusing UI. What happens to extensions and plug-ins? Larry S Yes it is compatible with Windows 10 (although I see Windows 10 isn't listed under System Requirements, looks like it needs updating). You shouldn't have to do anything, it should just work. I have upgraded 3 systems (1 form Win7 and 2 from Win 8.1) and installed it on one new Win 10 system and have not had any problems. Type about:profiles in the url bar and it will tell you where your profile is located. Or click Help, Troubleshooting Information and click on about:profiles under application basics. Jim Hmm! Jim, in my Win7 install, when I click on either of your about:profiles above, I get a Invalid Address The URL is not valid and cannot be loaded. What am I doing wrong?? (By-the-By, at installation, I have done a "Custom" Installation, placing my profile on my E:\ drive, although I would expect this to affect SeaMonkey, as it still works with my selected profile!!) Sorry I'm using 2.45a1 and didn't realize about:profiles wasn't in the current release. Just checked my Win. 10 machine running 2.40 and it isn't there. Not sure when it was added, looks like maybe https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1179129 added it. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sea Monkey and Windows 10
Larry S. wrote: Second try: Is Sea Monkey compatible with W10? If not, what do I have to do so it will work? Will it have to be reinstalled? Should it be uninstalled before the conversion? I save up-to-date copies of the profile and ini in a separate HD, but in W10 have no idea where to find the profile so I can copy in the saved version. Help, anyone? (What is the path to the profile, and how do I find it?) In W7 I know the answer, but W10 is a mystery with a confusing UI. What happens to extensions and plug-ins? Larry S Yes it is compatible with Windows 10 (although I see Windows 10 isn't listed under System Requirements, looks like it needs updating). You shouldn't have to do anything, it should just work. I have upgraded 3 systems (1 form Win7 and 2 from Win 8.1) and installed it on one new Win 10 system and have not had any problems. Type about:profiles in the url bar and it will tell you where your profile is located. Or click Help, Troubleshooting Information and click on about:profiles under application basics. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: (Ssgt. Brock)-(I'M HAVING TROUBLES WITH MY YAHOO MAIL WHILE USING SEAMONKEY ONLY?)
Derrell R. Brock wrote: Dear SeaMonkey Support, My name is (Ssgt. Derrell R. Brock) and I'm a retired soldier of the United States Army and a Gulf War Veteran and I need to ask a question if I may?. This is my (FIRST-TIME) writing to you with a problem you see at this time I use your (SeaMonkey) browser as my primary browser (24/7/365) and my primary email is (Yahoo) but at this time your browser will not work properly on my Yahoo mail?. Now the version that I have installed is (2.26 Beta 2) and I always check for the latest updates each time I log on. But in my Yahoo mail when I click on it the mail does come up but I cannot use the Yahoo calendar or even check my contact list and then after a little bit of time maybe10 seconds then a message shows up at the bottom of the page asking me if this is taking to long then click the other version?. So as you can see this has now been going on for well over a month now and I thought that maybe someone was working on it and it would come back but it has not so I am writing to you for (HELP!!). I have had to go back to (FireFox) and (Explorer) to use my Yahoo calendar and contact list so again please I need your (HELP!!). I shall be standing by to receive your response. Thank You Ssgt. Derrell R. Brock (U.S. Army Retired) (505)440-1860 icestati...@yahoo.com It's being worked on and may be fixed in the next 2.26 release. See bug 995706 and comment 6 has a workaround if you don't want to just use classic until the fix comes out. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=995706 Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sudden problem with Yahoo mail
no...@nonospam.org wrote: Since late yesterday, I am unable to navigate through my messages on Yahoo mail with SeaMonkey. I can get to the inbox, but when I click on a new message to open it, nothing happens. If I try to change directories, that doesn't work either. Using IE to access my account, it works OK. It looks like Yahoo has changed something again without checking for compatibility with non-IE browsers. John See bug 995706 comment 6 for a workaround. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=995706 Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: ADS :Zone.Identifier$DATA
Philip Chee wrote: On 12/12/2013 05:44, Jim Taylor wrote: chokito wrote: Why will SM 2.23 not set the ADS :Zone.Identifier$DATA stream to any downloaded file, see picture in Link-2? In SM 2.22.1 that's work fine. In FF 26.0 it works fine. Link-1: http://airdownload.adobe.com/air/win/download/3.9/AdobeAIRInstaller.exe Link-2: http://blog.case.edu/bes7/2008/04/22/props.png Regards Urs User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0 SeaMonkey/2.23 I don't know the answer, but it appears to not set it on Windows 7 also User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0 SeaMonkey/2.23 Build identifier: 20131207072643. browser.download.manager.scanWhenDone is still set to true and I don't see any recent changes to nsDownloadManager.cpp or firefox.js Bug 900514 made a change to suite downloadmanager.js in that time frame, but it looks like it was just for drag and drop.. It might have been an inadvertent breakage due to Firefox moving to a new Javascript based downloads panel. The backend code is still in toolkit. Since the old downloads code in toolkit is going to be removed I'm not sure if the Firefox devs are going to invest any effort in fixing this. Phil It looks to me like http://mxr.mozilla.org/comm-central/source/mozilla/toolkit/components/jsdownloads/src/DownloadIntegration.jsm#526 is where zone information should get written, but I have no idea how to figure out if SeaMonkey uses this. Either I'm too old or this code is too complex.or both. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: ADS :Zone.Identifier$DATA
chokito wrote: Why will SM 2.23 not set the ADS :Zone.Identifier$DATA stream to any downloaded file, see picture in Link-2? In SM 2.22.1 that's work fine. In FF 26.0 it works fine. Link-1: http://airdownload.adobe.com/air/win/download/3.9/AdobeAIRInstaller.exe Link-2: http://blog.case.edu/bes7/2008/04/22/props.png Regards Urs User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0 SeaMonkey/2.23 I don't know the answer, but it appears to not set it on Windows 7 also User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0 SeaMonkey/2.23 Build identifier: 20131207072643. browser.download.manager.scanWhenDone is still set to true and I don't see any recent changes to nsDownloadManager.cpp or firefox.js Bug 900514 made a change to suite downloadmanager.js in that time frame, but it looks like it was just for drag and drop.. Open a bug. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Funding and Bug Fixes....
Rufus wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Larry S. wrote: Daniel wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Rufus wrote: Certainly some of the most annoying ones - like the short drop downs, path following, the problems with the Profile Manager - are SM specific interface issues, right? Why do bugs like these persist so long? Hey, actual examples! So, for the fun of it, let's check... * Short drop downs. IIRC, this is a Mac-specific issue. Most SM developers don't have a Mac, and at least some, like me, don't want one (which is their personal taste, not to argue with). IIRC, there are only two SM developers who have a Mac at all, and both are known for having very little time. They do what they can, but analyzing the root causes of such bugs probably doesn't fit their time schedule. All you can do is a) analyze the bug as good as you can (e.g. by collecting all occurrences, making screen shots and attaching them to the bug) and b) try to narrow down when the issue first appeared, ideally down to the nightly builds level, so that identifying the causing change in code becomes possible. Jens, could you please check out my Comment 11 on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=812050, as I'm seeing a clipped screen on my Win7 SM 2.22b2 Spell Checker screen. Same here on Win 7 SM 2.22.1. Easily fixed by very slightly moving the screen down from the top (as previously suggested). Larry S. Or, oddly enough, UP. Just what are you moving? In the Mac version I can't drag/drop or move any part of the drop down. The short spelling check box on Windows is not a drop down. It's a modal dialog box. I don't know how it is implemented on a Mac, but on Windows it pops up on the top left of the screen with the top of the box slightly off the display area and the bottom of the box shortened. If you click on the title bar and drag it slightly (the way you move any window on Windows) it corrects itself. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Splitting hairs!! Re: Line spacing revisited
Daniel wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: I do not have a xul.mfasl in my default profile, because nglayout.debug.disable_xul_cache is set to true there. You may check your setting for this pref. No such pref in my about:config (Win7 Pro SP1 64-bit system), nothing even close. That's because it's a hidden pref, i.e. it's only visible if you manually add it. Fine, I added it, set it to true. So? About:config still has one-and-a-half-line spacing. Data Manager still has one-and-a-half-line spacing. I don't see what I've gained here. Does it require a restart? Jens, above, Hartmut tells Paul to set a pref to true, Paul says there is no such pref and the you say it's a hidden pref. Paul then adds the pref and sets it to true. Not wanting to get picky-picky (because of the work you do for us SM users) but reading between the lines here, does this imply that hidden prefs don't (necessarily) do anything, or did you just mis-type hidden rather than absent?? He didn't mistype, he used hidden preference because that's what it's called (a preference that is not visible by default). An absent preference would be one that didn't exist, either hidden or otherwise. Don't try to read between the lines. A preference must be implemented to do something. As SeaMonkey inherits code from Firefox there are some preferences that are defined (and may be used in Firefox) that are not implemented or used in SeaMonkey. Any preference (both hidden and visible) may not necessarily do anything if it has not been implemented or if it doesn't apply to the users system. So in that respect there is no difference between hidden and visible other than one is listed in about:config and the other is not until it is added to the list manually. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Incremental Update Done Locally
David E. Ross wrote: I prefer to do my updates locally after downloading the installer files. I maintain my own PC and also my wife's. Thus, I want to download once and install twice. For an incremental update of a Mozilla-based applications, I download the .partial.mar file. Then I use a DOS script to do the install. Today is the first time I tried this with my new Windows 7 PC using seamonkey-2.22-2.22.1.partial.mar. Oops! It happens that a .mar file in Windows 7 is a Microsoft Office Access Report Shortcut file, and a .partial file is an IE Partial Download file. Thus, the downloaded SeaMonkey update has an icon with a bent arrow in the lower-left corner to indicate it is a shortcut. Worse, the actual file name got changed to seamonkey-2.22-2.22.1.partial.mar.mar. Yes, the .mar extension now appears twice at the end of the file name! This doubled extension is not visible when viewing the file in a Windows Explorer window; only one .mar is seen. Also, the FTP log that I get when I download files does not show the doubled extension. I had to use a DOS window to see it. Apparently, Windows 7 added the extra .mar. This doubled extension, of course broke my script and the Mozilla updater.exe that it uses. Since updater.exe requires the .mar file to be named update.mar, I had to add the following to my DOS script: If EXIST update.mar.mar ren update.mar.mar update.mar Followup-To set to mozilla.support.seamonkey. What are you using to download the update? I do not have that problem with Windows 7 Home Premium. I can download seamonkey-2.22-2.22.1.partial.mar using either the windows 7 command line ftp program or using SeaMonkey and it is downloaded and named correctly. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: IE displays this page fine, SM refuses. Any workaround? http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/mastectomy-option-treating-breast-cancer-article-1.1513829 Content Encoding Error The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression. The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression. Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem. [Try again] Works for me in Windows 7 SeaMonkey 2.22 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 SeaMonkey/2.22 Build identifier: 20131023190953 Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.22
MCBastos wrote: I have seen no problems with the new version. However... is it just me, or is the message tree/list formatted a little different? Like, with lines slightly more separate from each other, or perhaps a different default font? I don't know exactly what it is, but the list seems a bit more airy now. It's not just you. See the 2.22 Beta 1 Mail News Display Change thread in mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey news://news.mozilla.org:119/vjadnvvpdlsqy_fpnz2dnuvz_qqdn...@mozilla.org and bug 92779 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=927779 It's a carryover from a Firefox change and is being worked on. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cannot see embedded image in a mail
Ray_Net wrote: I got a mail, where SM did not show me some images that must be visible. When i look into the message source i see a lot of images. I post you the end of the mail (after the mail text and the mail text in html format): Why is SM not working ? --Apple-Mail-16--779771413 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline; filename=image001.jpg Content-Type: image/jpeg; name=image001.jpg Content-Id: D355960177404EB9B1F04D978B9191AC@usered6807b533 /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEAYABgAAD/2wBDAAoHBwgHBgoICAgLCgoLDhgQDg0NDh0VFhEYIx8lJCIf IiEmKzcvJik0KSEiMEExNDk7Pj4+JS5ESUM8SDc9Pjv/wAALCAABAAEBAREA/8QAHwAAAQUBAQEB AQEAAAECAwQFBgcICQoL/8QAtRAAAgEDAwIEAwUFBAQAAAF9AQIDAAQRBRIhMUEGE1Fh ByJxFDKBkaEII0KxwRVS0fAkM2JyggkKFhcYGRolJicoKSo0NTY3ODk6Q0RFRkdISUpTVFVWV1hZ WmNkZWZnaGlqc3R1dnd4eXqDhIWGh4iJipKTlJWWl5iZmqKjpKWmp6ipqrKztLW2t7i5usLDxMXG x8jJytLT1NXW19jZ2uHi4+Tl5ufo6erx8vP09fb3+Pn6/9oACAEBAAA/APZq/9k= --Apple-Mail-16--779771413-- --Apple-Mail-15--779771413-- What makes you think that SeaMonkey is not working and the images should be visible? The image001.jpg which you pasted (if you pasted the whole image and if I am decoding it correctly) consists of 1 white pixel, which I doubt you could tell if it was displayed or not. I would be more concerned why I was getting email with those kinds of images. Why not ask the sender what the images are supposed to be and why they are sending them. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: geo.enable=false doesn't
NoOp wrote: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/24.0 SeaMonkey/2.21 Today when I went to http://news.yahoo.com/ I noticed that the site picked up my geo location (accurately BTW). Unfortunately this should _not_ have happened as at the time I had: 1. About:config: geo.enable=false (this should turn off geolocation) 2. Permissions: Share Location=always ask (with geolocation on, I should receive a prompt asking if I want to let the site use geolocation) So I set Permissions: Share Location=Block, cleared cache (memory disk/all), cleared with 'Clear Private Data - all except passwords), opened new browser window again tried news.yahoo.com. Again the site is showing my geolocation. I next went to http://browserspy.dk/ scrolled down clicked on Geolocation sure enough, geolocation is _enabled_. I can't locate an open bug of this type on: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=geolocation So before I open a bug report, can anyone else verify? It works correctly on my system. Windows 7 SeaMonkey 2.21 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/24.0 SeaMonkey/2.21 Build identifier: 20130916112225 When I go to http://browserspy.dk/geolocation.php with geo.enable=false it says: Geolocation supported in browser = yes (which is correct, SeaMonkey does support it) My location based on ip is correct The ip based map is correct The Geolocation Based Map is blank and when I click on Get Position I get a returned data is null error which indicates that SeaMonkey is not returning my geolocation. If I go to the same page with geo.enable=true everything is the same until I click on get position for the geobased map and then I get a popup telling me that this web site wants to know my location and asks what I want to do (Share Location, Don't share, never Share, always share, not now) So as far as I can tell it is working as intended on my system Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: optional taskbar preview-per-tab.
linda.wh...@gmail.com wrote: How do I disable the optional taskbar preview-per-tab? Change browser.taskbar.previews.enable from true to false in about:config. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Print dialog goes behind mailnews window
David Wilkinson wrote: In mailnews in SeaMonkey 2.21 on Windows XP, when I go to print a message the print dialog appears momentarily but then disappears. It is still there, but it is behind the mailnews window. I have to minimize the mailnews window or use Alt-Tab to get it back. Does anybody else see this? It doesn't happen in the browser, just mailnews. This is a known problem that is being worked on. Bug 918425 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=918425 Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bug 147474 - Move 'Helper Applications' out of Navigator (browser) category
Edmund Wong wrote: Hi, I'm soliciting some feedback on this bug[1]. Where should Helper Applications be if it isn't good to be in the Advanced category? The patch moves it from the Browser category to the Advanced category. Thanks Edmund [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147474 I don't think it should be hidden under Advanced. Either give it its own category or leave it where it is. It has been under browser for years and people know where to find it. I understand that technically it applies to mail and news and not just browser, but how many people have complained that they couldn't find it (any?)? And how many will complain when it is moved and they can't find it and think it has been removed? One of the things you hear the most complaints about is developers wasting their time on UI changes that don't need done instead of fixing real problems. No matter where you put it (other than giving it its own category) some/many people won't like it. On the other hand if you just leave it where it is I doubt anyone would complain. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.19 Email Line Spacing
Brooke Clarke wrote: Hi: The spacing between each major folder at the left and between each subject on the right is at 1.5 or 2 lines whereas in SM 2.15 it was single spaced. How to get back to single spacing? I didn't see that problem at 2.19 or 2.20, but I'm seeing it on 2.22a2. Did anybody figure out how to change it back to the way it was? -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.20 doesn't draw pages Correctly
PhillipJones wrote: SM 2.20 doesn't seem to draw web pages correctly. see this: https://www.dropbox.com/s/euc0hogvgncorpd/webpage.png That's a Screen shot of the problem in 2.20 b3 here is the actual link. http://obits.silive.com/obituaries/siadvance/obituary.aspx?page=lifestorypid=166302035#fbLoggedOut FireFox, Chrome, Opera, OmniWeb, iCab doesn't show the same problem. Oh and I have Checked the css files and change them from css to old to make sure they are not causing the problem. Many site are showing this problem. I'll report it here because anything I post on bugzilla is ignored. That page displays correctly for me on 2.20 b3 Windows 7 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:23.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/23.0 SeaMonkey/2.20Build identifier: 20130729203718 Have you tried with all addons disabled? You appear to be posting from a Mac, is that where you are having the problem? If so perhaps someone with a Mac can see if they have the same display problem. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Spell check
F Murtz wrote: Can I have spellcheck in seamonkey while using news groups?how? Yes. Turn it on with Edit-Preferences-Appearance-Spelling check boxes and settings as appropriate. There should be a spell icon on the Compose toolbar and an option on the compose window under Edit-Check Spelling. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Status on Next Version?
Daniel wrote: On a related point, for a couple of weeks or so, I've been using my Win7 SM beta, but, over the week-end, I switched back to using my Linux version, and each night I've been told there is a SM 2.18b4 available and offering to download the update, and it spins and it spins and it spins!! Is there some pref set for when the next Beta should be available?? If not, any guess why I've been getting these update available screens?? You're getting the update notices because SM 2.18b4 IS available (and has been since May 3rd). The real question is why the download spins and you don't get it, to which I don't have an answer. But you can download the full 2.18b4 from the beta download page http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.18b4 . -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Flash
Ken Rudolph wrote: I know this sounds like a broken record; but my Shockwave Flash plugin is *constantly* crashing. I'm sure by now they are thoroughly sick of the crash reports (if anybody is actually caring where ever these things go) since I send it every time flash crashes which is 10 or more times a day. Win-7, SM 2.17.1, Shockwave Flash 11.7.700.202 (which is supposed to be up to date, but it just gets worse and worse.) Is there anything I can do about this? It's getting so serious that I'm going to have to quit SeaMonkey after over 15 years with Netscape Mozilla. It may not be that people don't care, but that it's not a SeaMonkey problem and they can't do anything about it. I am running the same SeaMonkey version as you, same flash version and same OS and I have only had two SeaMonkey crashes in 2013 (and neither were caused by flash). None of the several people around me with the same configuration are having flash crashes either. The only thing that may be different is that we all have flash protected mode disabled. To disable protected mode: add ProtectedMode=0 to C:\Windows\System32\Macromed\Flash\mms.cfg If that doesn't work try with a new profile and other plugins disabled. I have java, adblock, flashblock, googletalk, silverlight, vlc and a couple of others so those shouldn't be a problem. And post a couple of the report ids from about:crashes so we can take a look at them. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey HELP(aka F1) needs help
Richard Owlett wrote: F1 rarely gives me what I'm looking for ;/ I've been forcibly retired. That could be a good thing - I've time on my hands. Where is the help system described/documented. I'd like to make an attempt at making it 'better'. IOW tell me where to go... As no one has answered here a better place to ask may be mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey . Or in the IRC channel #SeaMonkey. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Flash issues
Ed Mullen wrote: Remember the problem with Flash plugin with Seamonkey swithcing between mail and browser windows without user input? It's happening again for me. Anyone? How did you fix it the first time? I disabled Flash protected mode to fix it originally and never took it out to see if the problem had been corrected so it's still disabled and so far I have not had the problem again. You can disable Protected Mode by adding the line ProtectedMode=0 to the Flash mms.cfg file located in: (Windows 32bit) C:\Windows\System32\Macromed\Flash (Windows 64bit) C:\Windows\SysWOW64\Macromed\Flash -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Downloading E-mails from Yahoo
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Daniel wrote: On my ISP provided e-mail account, I have a fairly small byte count, enough for normal daily e-mail but not to have folks sending me photo's, etc. So I've set myself up a Yahoo e-mail account! What I now want to do is download those e-mails into an account on the Mail Newsgroup screen in SeaMonkey. I seem to remember that this was possible, back in the Moz Suite days, but looking through the SeaMonkey Extension pages, I don't see anything which seems to do this! It may be that, as I'm using Beta versions of SM, the required extension has not been updated for V 2.18, but, hopefully, if there is such an extension, with help from you guys, I'll be able to set it up correctly. Does anyone know of an extension/plug-in that will do what I want?? Start here: http://help.yahoo.com/kb/index?page=contentid=SLN3255actp=searchviewlocale=en_USsearchid=1367146737789locale=en_USy=PROD_MAIL_ML Continue here: http://help.yahoo.com/kb/index?locale=en_USy=PROD_MAIL_MLpage=contentid=SLN3217 The prompts may be slightly different in Thunderbird, but you should be able to adapt. And realize that the download feature is not available with the free email accounts. As stated in both of the links Paul provided: Please note: this feature is available only to Mail Plus subscribers. For more information on Mail Plus, please visit this webpage. ( http://mailplus.mail.yahoo.com/ ) A better option is gmail which allows both pop and imap downloads. Microsoft hotmail allows pop, not sure about imap. Seems Yahoo is the only one that doesn't allow downloading from it's free accounts. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM2.17 Composer Can Not Delete Table Rows or Cells
Brooke Clarke wrote: Hi: I'm not able to delete rows or cells of a table in Sea Monkey 2.17 Composer. Bug 85839 ( https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=858309 ) was opened for this problem and comment 4 has details of a workaround. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM2.17 Composer Can Not Delete Table Rows or Cells
Jim Taylor wrote: Brooke Clarke wrote: Hi: I'm not able to delete rows or cells of a table in Sea Monkey 2.17 Composer. Bug 85839 ( https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=858309 ) was opened for this problem and comment 4 has details of a workaround. Actually looking further it looks like core bug 857487 ( https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=857487 ) has already fixed this problem so it will probably be in the next SeaMonkey release. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Getting strange characters in emails instead of ' and
flyguy wrote: On 4/13/2013 3:27 PM, Jim Taylor wrote: flyguy wrote: Lately, my wife and I have received emails with eight characters that appear in the place of an apostrophe, nine in place of a quote mark. Here's a cut and paste, which I hope gets through: For single apostrophe I get ’t For quote I get – It doesn't seem to matter if I use Original HTML, Simple HTML, or Plain Text to view them. Changing the Encoding to UTF does reduce the number of odd characters; changing to IBM 850 changes the characters that appear. We're using SM 2.16.2, Win XP, Western ISO-889-1 encoding. Why are we getting these odd characters now, and how do we get our apostrophes and quote marks back? You don't say from whom you and your wife are receiving these emails. Is it the same person or from the same system? Does it happen if you send an email to yourself? If you turn on full headers (view-headers-all) what is the Content Type line of the bad emails? Generally what you describe happens because someone composes in Microsoft Word using smart quotes and apostrophes and then pastes that content into an email. It can also happen with database data that is exported using one character encoding and imported using a different one. I suppose it could also happen if content is created using a character encoding that isn't available on the receiving system. In any case more information is needed to speculate further. It's not from the same person, but several: recently, one was using msn.com and the other was using charter.net. For the msn.com email: Content-type: multipart/related; boundary==_NextPart_000_000D_01CE3845.7DE6CE20; type=multipart/alternative X-mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 for the charter email: Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000_001D_01CE381F.AB21BE20 x-mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 AT least those two seem to be using Live Mail - maybe that's the problem? It doesn't happen when we send emails to each other, or to ourselves. OK, its a multipart so the encoding type we need to see is in the part and not the header. Do view-message source and look for something like: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable for the section that has the bad text and past it here. I suspect there is a content type mismatch or some other problem. Here is an example of the source text with quotes sent from hotmail to my SeaMonkey This is a test =E2=80=9Ctest=E2=80=9D of quotes = =E2=80=9Cquotes=E2=80=9D. and Test of =E2=80=98apostrophe=E2=80=99s and this is how it displays in my SeaMonkey mail: This is a test “test” of quotes “quotes”. and Test of ‘apostrophe’s As you can see my SeaMonkey is displaying the special quote and apostrophe characters correctly so we need to figure out why yours isn't. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Getting strange characters in emails instead of ' and
flyguy wrote: Lately, my wife and I have received emails with eight characters that appear in the place of an apostrophe, nine in place of a quote mark. Here's a cut and paste, which I hope gets through: For single apostrophe I get ’t For quote I get – It doesn't seem to matter if I use Original HTML, Simple HTML, or Plain Text to view them. Changing the Encoding to UTF does reduce the number of odd characters; changing to IBM 850 changes the characters that appear. We're using SM 2.16.2, Win XP, Western ISO-889-1 encoding. Why are we getting these odd characters now, and how do we get our apostrophes and quote marks back? You don't say from whom you and your wife are receiving these emails. Is it the same person or from the same system? Does it happen if you send an email to yourself? If you turn on full headers (view-headers-all) what is the Content Type line of the bad emails? Generally what you describe happens because someone composes in Microsoft Word using smart quotes and apostrophes and then pastes that content into an email. It can also happen with database data that is exported using one character encoding and imported using a different one. I suppose it could also happen if content is created using a character encoding that isn't available on the receiving system. In any case more information is needed to speculate further. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Changing age of browser version checking per bug 581319
Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote:
Per bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581319:
What pref was ever established that throws the nag message Your copy
of Seamonkey is old and probably has known security flaws, but you
have disabled automated update checks. Please update to a newer
version. and where is the age setting able to be changed?
- Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP]
Looking at the patch there isn't a pref that throws the message, only
one to override it. And I don't think it exists by default so you
probably have to create it.
Bool app.updatecheck.overide true
1.36 + _shouldShowUpdateWarning: function () {
1.37 +// Look for an unconditional override pref. If set, do
what it says.
1.38 +// (true -- never show, false -- always show)
1.39 +try {
1.40 + return
!Services.prefs.getBoolPref(app.updatecheck.override);
--
Jim
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: blurry text in SeaMonkey
Joe32065 wrote: Version 2.17 of SeaMonkey on windows 7 32 bit. Some of the text is blurry, kind of out of focus, then eventually will clear up. Checked cables, all tight. Radeon 3850 that has never caused problems, took the video card out and cleaned and re-inserted. Newest drivers. Only seems to happen in SeaMonkey. Any ideas. Did you apply Windows 7 Platform Update KB2670838 (MSIE 10 Prerequisite)? If so see bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=812695 . If that is the problem there are several work arounds. Changing gfx.content.azure.enabled from true to false in about:config worked for me. Or you can turn off hardware acceleration in preferences. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: rendering
question wrote: http://www.wunderground.com/US/MI/Flint.html 10 day forecast does not Show correctly Like I am missing a Font . Problems started when Microsoft update the video card drivers . I have rolled back the Driver .. uninstalled the Nvida drivers I have tried a different video Card . ( Different Brand ) Tried my Wifes monitor ( Same Model as mine ) win7 Hard to believe it is Windows Related. Since IE Renders correctly Works for me, SeaMonkey 2.17 Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit. User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17 -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: can't remove corrupt SeaMonkey file
NormM wrote: On Saturday, March 30, 2013 3:54:58 PM UTC-4, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: NormM wrote: SeaMonkey 2.16.2, WinXP Pro SP3. I've been trying to delete (or fix)a corrupt file on my pc at: C:\Documents and Settings\NormM\Local Settings\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\vkxwuggr.default\Cache.Trash31234 I've tried most on-line recommended solutions methods but none work. Help. TIA Are you sure SeaMonkey is completely closed? Check the Windows Task Manager for running processes What happens when you try to delete it? Do you get an error message (file in use, for example)? Or does the file reappear after you delete it? If you're getting file-in-use, restart the computer (I assume SM isn't launched at bootup?) and that should clear it. FWIW, I have no filename beginning with Cache in my SM 2.16.2 profile directory SM does not run at Startup. Task Manager shows no SM processes running. When I go to the problem directory (Cache.Trash31234)and click on it the error msg sez . . . is not accessible. The file or directory is corrupted and unreadable. Then my task bar opens and sez CMD.EXE -- Corrupt File run chkdsk. I have run that process a couple times and it does not fix it. Sorry if I'm too wordy, novice on this end. Tnx! This is not a SeaMonkey problem, it is a filesystem or hardware problem. Probably either a bad spot on the disk or some file system corruption. Is it ntfs or fat32 (not that it really matters)? When you ran chkdsk what options did you use. Chkdsk will only fix problems if you give it the /f switch. Reboot in safe mode, command line only and run chkdsk /f and see if it will fix it. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Accidently saved a JP(E)G attachment incorrectly in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.16.2 mail...
Ant wrote: On 3/27/2013 4:08 AM PT, Jim Taylor typed: ... I was wondering why my saved JP(E)G image didn't show up correctly. I noticed my 3.5 MB file was actually a text file with encoded attachment: --Apple-Mail-ABD6ED3D-0515-4E05-BC44-0EC8E2F9C77B Content-Type: image/jpeg; name=photo.JPG Content-Disposition: inline; filename=photo.JPG Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 bunch of letters and numbers --Apple-Mail-ABD6ED3D-0515-4E05-BC44-0EC8E2F9C77B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit How can I get this image out? I no longer have the original e-mail anymore, but do have this saved file (e-mail + encoded image). I tried copying this file into my SM to see if SM mail could read it. Nope! Remove the header and footer and run the bunch of letters and numbers through a base 64 decoder. The result should be a jpg file. I assume I can use my 64-bit Debian stable's base64 command, but it doesn't seem to work: $ base64 -d savedfile.txt -▒ExifMM* ▒ ▒base64: invalid input Maybe I did that wrong? :( First off verify that it is actually an inline jpg and remove everything before the beginning of the jpg. The inline jpg begins with hex ff d8 ff e0 which when base64 encoded is hex 2f 39 6a 2f. C:\toolsjimdump encoded.txt | head -3 encoded.txt: 2f39 6a2f 3441 4151 536b 5a4a 5267 4142 /9j/4AAQSkZJRgAB 0010 4151 4541 7441 4330 4141 442f 3454 7732 AQEAtAC0AAD/4Tw2 C:\toolsjimdump decoded.jpg | head -3 decoded.jpg: ffd8 ffe0 0010 4a46 4946 0001 0101 00b4 .X.`..JFIF.4 0010 00b4 ffe1 3c36 4578 6966 4d4d .4...a6Exif..MM If it looks like a valid jpg try using the ignore error switch of your base64 decoder. Also realize that if you don't supply an outfile to the command it decodes to the screen. base64 -di infile.txt outfile.jpg -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Accidently saved a JP(E)G attachment incorrectly in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.16.2 mail...
Ant wrote: On 3/28/2013 5:29 AM PT, Jim Taylor typed: SNIP I don't know where to get dump and head commands for my very old, updated Windows XP Pro. SP3 machine. However, I can see the texts in mine that I left in for the decoding in its beginning: 9j/4S32RXhpZgAATU0AKggACwEPAAIGkgEQAAIKmAESAAMBAAEA AAEaAAUBogEbAAUBqgEoAAMBAAIAAAExAAIGsgEyAAIU uAITAAMBAAEAAIdpAAQBzIglAAQBAAACUgAAAxxBcHBsZQBpUGhvbmUg NFMASAEAAABIATYuMS4yADIwMTM6MDM6MjQgMjA6MzQ6MzgAABiCmgAFAQAA AfKCnQAFAQAAAfqIIgADAQACAACIJwADAQKAAACQAAAHBDAyMjGQAwAC... OK, lets start over. The text you pasted above should start with a / to be a valid base64 encoded jpg file. Assuming it really has it and you missed it when you pasted here: /9j/4S32RXhpZgAATU0AKggACwEPAAIGkgEQAAIKmAESAAMBAAEA AAEaAAUBogEbAAUBqgEoAAMBAAIAAAExAAIGsgEyAAIU uAITAAMBAAEAAIdpAAQBzIglAAQBAAACUgAAAxxBcHBsZQBpUGhvbmUg NFMASAEAAABIATYuMS4yADIwMTM6MDM6MjQgMjA6MzQ6MzgAABiCmgAFAQAA AfKCnQAFAQAAAfqIIgADAQACAACIJwADAQKAAACQAAAHBDAyMjGQAwAC base64 decodes to: ffd8 ffe1 2df6 4578 6966 4d4d 002a .X.a-vExif..MM.* 0010 0008 000b 010f 0002 0006 0020 0092 0110 0002 000a 0098 0112 0030 0003 0001 0001 011a 0005 0040 0001 00a2 011b 0005 0001 ... 0050 00aa 0128 0003 0001 0002 0131 .*.(...1 0060 0002 0006 00b2 0132 0002 .2.2 0070 0014 00b8 0213 0003 0001 0001 .8.. 0080 8769 0004 0001 00cc 8825 ...i.L.% 0090 0004 0001 0252 031c 4170 .RAp 00a0 706c 6500 6950 686f 6e65 2034 5300 ple.iPhone 4S... 00b0 0048 0001 0048 0001 362e .H...H6. 00c0 312e 3200 3230 3133 3a30 333a 3234 2032 1.2.2013:03:24 2 00d0 303a 3334 3a33 3800 0018 829a 0005 0:34:38. 00e0 0001 01f2 829d 0005 0001 .r.. 00f0 01fa 8822 0003 0001 0002 8827 .z' 0100 0003 0001 0280 9000 0007 0110 0004 3032 3231 9003 0002 00..0221... Which appears to be a valid exif formated jpg taken with an Apple iphone 4s. If you take the original text file attachment and copy it to a file named somefile.txt. Edit somefile.txt to remove all the text before the /9j/4S32R and remove everything at the end starting with --Apple-Mail-ABD6ED3D-0515-4E05-BC44-0EC8E2F9C77B. Run somefile.txt through a base64 decoder (telling it to ignore bad characters) to produce a decoded file named somefile.jpg: base64 -di somefile.txt somefile.jpg You should end up with a jpg file that can be viewed with SeaMonkey or any other program capable of viewing a jpg. If that doesn't work I have no further suggestions. I can't even decode yet. :P base64 -di infile.txt outfile.jpg $ base64 -di encoded.txt decoded.jpg base64: extra operand `encoded.txt' Try `base64 --help' for more information. SNIP -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Accidently saved a JP(E)G attachment incorrectly in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.16.2 mail...
Philip TAYLOR wrote: Ant wrote: $ base64 -di encoded.txt decoded.jpg base64: extra operand `encoded.txt' Try `base64 --help' for more information. Too many parameters. Add a redirection operator such as , as in : $ base64 -di encoded.txt decoded.jpg Philip Taylor Good catch. I was posting from my Windows machine using the base64 command from http://www.fourmilab.ch/webtools/base64/ instead of my Linux machine. I remembered that the ignore garbage switch was different (-i instead of -n) but forgot that the Linux command didn't have a output file parameter. Thanks for catching and correcting. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Accidently saved a JP(E)G attachment incorrectly in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.16.2 mail...
Ant wrote: ... I was wondering why my saved JP(E)G image didn't show up correctly. I noticed my 3.5 MB file was actually a text file with encoded attachment: --Apple-Mail-ABD6ED3D-0515-4E05-BC44-0EC8E2F9C77B Content-Type: image/jpeg; name=photo.JPG Content-Disposition: inline; filename=photo.JPG Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 bunch of letters and numbers --Apple-Mail-ABD6ED3D-0515-4E05-BC44-0EC8E2F9C77B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit How can I get this image out? I no longer have the original e-mail anymore, but do have this saved file (e-mail + encoded image). I tried copying this file into my SM to see if SM mail could read it. Nope! Thank you in advance. :) Remove the header and footer and run the bunch of letters and numbers through a base 64 decoder. The result should be a jpg file. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Editing HTML files in Sea Monkey
Ed wrote: On 3/14/2013 9:25 PM Ed Mullen submitted the following: John wrote: I edit and create pages all the time using SM for my site. However my index.htm page (http://www.cerm.info) for some reason the color for my links on the left is off. I can live with the problem, but its annoying. Only SM renders the page in its composer this way. Any ideas?? Specify ... specify. What exactly is wrong? Screenshots? I loaded your page and, at a brief glance, saw nothing wrong. Looks good to me also. Perhaps his definition of off is not no color, but not the color I choose? Read his problem again. He is not saying the page displays bad in a browser. He is saying it is bad in SeaMonkeys Composer. I don't know what is causing his problem, but I can see it. If I open the page in a browser, IE or SeaMonkey, the links on the left side are white on a blue background. If I open that page in SeaMonkey's html Composer they are blue on a blue background and difficult to see. I don't know html enough to know if the colors are being set in the external css sheet that Composer doesn't read or if there is some other problem with Composer. Interestingly if you have the page open in Composer and a browser window and follow a link in the browser window the color of that link in the Composer changes to the correct color (white 00). -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Change in 'Move Tab' behavior
Rickles wrote: According to the Add-Ons search, the closest thing is a right-click menu tool that is accessed anywhere inside the tab window of the page being viewed, to close that page. But I agree, the X on the tab name is the simplest, most direct and obvious means of closing any tab at any time. EVERY single other implementation, internal to SM or any add-on, makes it so that you have to have focus on the tab you want to close, before you can close it. I'm a firm believer in working smarter, not harder, but this flies in the face of that. I wish I had the time to become a programmer so I could write my own such tool, but it's just not possible. It would help my understanding if someone involved in the coding or review process could explain the logic of using 2 steps to take the action instead of one. Takers? This has been discussed before. The current way of having the tab close X at a fixed position on the far right of the tab bar works better for the way many people use the browser (including me) than having it on each tab the way Firefox does. And having it on the tab also takes up more room on the tab bar leaving less for tabs. For example, if I go to a page of headlines I'll open links to things I want to read in new tabs. Then I'll go to the last tab and read it. When done I will close the tab and the next one will automatically get the focus, I don't have to move the mouse cursor off the close x. I can read all the tabs and close them without any mouse movement and only a click when I'm done. I do the same thing with forums, scroll down the new posts screen and open any that interest me in new tabs and read them and close in order. Let me pose a question to you. Why would you want to close a tab that doesn't have the focus? I'm not sure I can understand why someone wouldn't close tabs when they were done with them and they still have the focus instead of coming back later to close them when they no longer had the focus. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Change in 'Move Tab' behavior
Philip TAYLOR wrote: n...@likely.com.invalid wrote: This has been discussed before. The current way of having the tab close X at a fixed position on the far right of the tab bar works better for the way many people use the browser (including me) than having it on each tab the way Firefox does. For many people. Could you adduce some statistics to support that statement ? Philip Taylor No, I know of no workflow or usability studies that actually provide statistics. My statement was based on user observation and comments in past discussions of this issue. Perhaps For some people would have been a better choice of words. But it would be really interesting to see actually statistics on what percentage of time people close a tab that does not have the focus versus closing the currently active tab. Probably the best solution is to give the user a choice thru a preference (browser.tabs.closeButton) of how they want the close button displayed, as Firefox does http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser.tabs.closeButtons . Actually SeaMonkey has that preference but I don't know if it actually supports the other options. As I prefer the way it is (default option 3) I have never tried any of the other to see if they are supported or not. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Change in 'Move Tab' behavior
Rickles wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Frankly, I prefer the current capability. It means that the tab whose page I see is the tab that will be closed. It also means that, when I select the X button on the far right, I am unlikely to select a tab adjacent to the current tab by having my cursor positioned incorrectly. So what we have now is different users wishing to choose how the tab closure should work in their own situations, but what is available in FF isn't in SM. Our choices have been limited, which is a step back. It was being worked on in SeaMonkey several years ago. Looks like it was coming along pretty good and then just kind of got set aside. Probably they got busy with bigger fires. Bug 534221 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=534221 . If it's that important to you go vote for it. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Recommendation for Freeby e-mail address
Daniel wrote: (Then I'll worry about setting up another e-mail account in SeaMonkey.) Google gmail has a 10 GB storage limit and a 25 MB attachment per email limit. I download it via POP in SeaMonkey but it can also use IMAP. I have never received an email with an attachment to my gmail account but assume it would download the same as my regular account. If nobody else responds I can test attachments if you want. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Text Rendering Issues due to Windows 7 Platform Update KB2670838
Ray_Net wrote: Jim Taylor wrote, On 28/02/2013 22:12: chicagofan wrote: Jim Taylor wrote: I have added a comment to bug 812695 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=812695 that I am seeing this problem on SeaMonkey 2.16 also after Microsoft Update pushed KB2670838 to my laptop yesterday. I have changed gfx.content.azure.enabled from true to false as a workaround to correct the problem until it is corrected. Can you explain what is happening, so I can decide if I want to install that update? It seems it's a 50/50 chance now that MS updates will break something on my system. Thanks... bj Some of the text characters have dots missing and are malformed, also some reports of images having problems too, but I didn't see that problem. It seems to be only certain sized text, for me it was mostly the text in the tab titles and the menus. I could still read them, but it was hard enough on the eyes I didn't want to keep using it. If you follow the link to the bug I posted, right under the bug description are some attachments with screen shots of the problem (they are from Foxfire, but the problem is the same on SeaMonkey). Also it looks like most of the people having the problem (including me) have ATI video cards or chipsets so you may not see the problem. Also changing gfx.content.azure.enabled from true to false in about:config corrected the problem for me and I haven't seen any ill effects from that setting so I am going to leave the Microsoft KB2670838 patch on and run with gfx.content.azure.enabled false until they get the problem fixed. my gfx.content.azure.enabled is false (and this is the default) so what ? I'm not sure what you are asking with the so what?, or why you even commented if you are not having the problem and your gfx.content.azure.enabled default is false. If you are asking why your gfx.content.azure.enabled is default false and mine and others is default true I don't know the answer. Perhaps it's because your OS is 32 bit or you have hardware acceleration turned off or your video card is blacklisted, I don't know how the default is determined and I don't care enough to go to the source and find out. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Text Rendering Issues due to Windows 7 Platform Update KB2670838
I have added a comment to bug 812695 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=812695 that I am seeing this problem on SeaMonkey 2.16 also after Microsoft Update pushed KB2670838 to my laptop yesterday. I have changed gfx.content.azure.enabled from true to false as a workaround to correct the problem until it is corrected. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Text Rendering Issues due to Windows 7 Platform Update KB2670838
chicagofan wrote: Jim Taylor wrote: I have added a comment to bug 812695 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=812695 that I am seeing this problem on SeaMonkey 2.16 also after Microsoft Update pushed KB2670838 to my laptop yesterday. I have changed gfx.content.azure.enabled from true to false as a workaround to correct the problem until it is corrected. Can you explain what is happening, so I can decide if I want to install that update? It seems it's a 50/50 chance now that MS updates will break something on my system. Thanks... bj Some of the text characters have dots missing and are malformed, also some reports of images having problems too, but I didn't see that problem. It seems to be only certain sized text, for me it was mostly the text in the tab titles and the menus. I could still read them, but it was hard enough on the eyes I didn't want to keep using it. If you follow the link to the bug I posted, right under the bug description are some attachments with screen shots of the problem (they are from Foxfire, but the problem is the same on SeaMonkey). Also it looks like most of the people having the problem (including me) have ATI video cards or chipsets so you may not see the problem. Also changing gfx.content.azure.enabled from true to false in about:config corrected the problem for me and I haven't seen any ill effects from that setting so I am going to leave the Microsoft KB2670838 patch on and run with gfx.content.azure.enabled false until they get the problem fixed. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey minimizes to system tray
jb wrote: From: dufu...@bang.vispa.com To:support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Subject: Re: Seamonkey minimizes to system tray Windows 7 (64) Seamonkey 2.15.2 When I click 'Window' 'Browser' from 'mail', the browser opens and then immediately minimizes to the system tray. Always. Is there a fix? That kind of sounds like one of the problems caused by the Flash plugins protected mode. If you have a Flash version higher than 11.3 installed you can try disabling Flash protected mode using the instructions found at http://kb.mozillazine.org/Flash#Disabling_Protected_Mode_in_Flash_11.3 to see if that corrects the problem. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bye bye seamonkey
Jim Dell wrote: Daniel wrote: question wrote: Since Seamonkey is set to Disable Java as it startup,, many of us will be moving to INTERNET EXPLOITER .. How many of you?? Seems to me, if SeaMonkey is disabling Java (because *Java* has a known problem), why would you then want to move to MSIE (which, I'm guessing, has the same problem with Java), and have to deal with MSIE's other problems (like ActiveX, .)!! My problem is not that it is disabling it, but it keeps trying to install 7u10 when 7u11 was installed yesterday. Anybody got a fix for that? Jim Mine was doing that, Windows 7 64 Bit Home Premium, with both 64 bit and 32 bit Java 7u11 installed. Every time I would click on a java object SeaMonkey would want to download 7u10. I copied the java 7u11 plugin from the java directory to the SeaMonkey plugin directory and then SeaMonkey plugin manager would show the 7u11 plugin but Java would not work. It would actually crash SeaMonkey when trying to run www.time.gov or other java pages. I tried several things that didn't work, but what finally did is I uninstalled 32 bit Java 7u11 run time (jre-7u11-windows-i586.exe), then installed 32 bit Java 7u10 run time (jre-7u10-windows-i586.exe), then reinstalled Java 7u11 (jre-7u11-windows-i586.exe) over top of it. After that SeaMonkey see the correct plugin and java is working fine. Of course there is a new exploit for 7u11 so I will probably disable it again. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: lost SeaMonkey files
jb wrote: Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 15:04:05 -0600 From: Robnom...@example.com To:support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Subject: Re: lost SeaMonkey data Message-ID:slrnkejpm5.qo2.nom...@xs8.xs4all.nl jbj...@bang.vispa.com wrote: Date:Sun, 6 Jan 2013 From:j...@bang.vispa.com To:support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Subject: Re: Lost Seamonkey data Ver: SeaMonkey 2.14.1 OS: Win 7 (64) No, I'm using an older backup. No, I didn't delete C:\Users\JB\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\SeaMonkey directory. That's where I copied the backup to! Please paste the content of the file profiles.ini in that directory. I have found three files called profiles.ini of widely differing dates. One at a time, I placed a copy into the: C:\Users\JB\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\SeaMonkeydirectory. Each time thereafter, I tried to start SeaMonkey and got the following message: *Your SeaMonkey profile cannot be loaded. It may be missing or inaccessible.* Does this indicate to you the cause of my problem? I now know the files and bookmarks from SM Mail Browser are on the hard drive because I can see them when I do an anti virus scan. My assumption then is that the data I need to restore SM is on the pc, somewhere, I just don't know how to set it up again, can you help please? regards - jb -- Here is the profile.ini and directory listings from my machine. Perhaps it will help you figure it out. Directory of C:\Users\Jim\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\SeaMonkey 07/03/2010 07:05 AMDIR . 07/03/2010 07:05 AMDIR .. 12/01/2012 06:37 AMDIR Crash Reports 07/03/2010 07:05 AMDIR Profiles 07/03/2010 07:05 AM 111 profiles.ini 1 File(s)111 bytes 4 Dir(s) 267,460,292,608 bytes free C:\Users\Jim\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\SeaMonkeycat profiles.ini [General] StartWithLastProfile=1 [Profile0] Name=default IsRelative=1 Path=Profiles/6q9fxq8s.default Directory of C:\Users\Jim\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles 07/03/2010 07:05 AMDIR . 07/03/2010 07:05 AMDIR .. 01/07/2013 02:05 PMDIR 6q9fxq8s.default 0 File(s) 0 bytes 3 Dir(s) 267,460,292,608 bytes free Directory of C:\Users\Jim\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\6q9fxq8s.default 01/07/2013 02:05 PMDIR . 01/07/2013 02:05 PMDIR .. 12/10/2012 08:38 PM 8,591 abook.mab 01/06/2013 10:56 PM 524,288 addons.sqlite 01/06/2013 10:56 PM 393,824 addons.sqlite-journal 01/06/2013 10:58 PM28,550 blocklist.xml 01/05/2013 01:41 PMDIR bookmarkbackups 06/23/2011 03:49 PM14,901 bookmarks.html 12/22/2012 12:49 PM 360,448 cert8.db 07/11/2012 05:49 AM 2,169 cert_override.txt 06/26/2011 07:30 PMDIR chatzilla 06/07/2012 06:03 AMDIR chrome 06/23/2011 04:16 PM98,304 chromeappsstore.sqlite 12/21/2012 06:56 AM 188 compatibility.ini 06/10/2011 10:51 AM 185,996 compreg.dat 01/01/2013 08:56 AM 229,376 content-prefs.sqlite 01/07/2013 02:03 PM 1,572,864 cookies.sqlite 01/01/2013 08:56 AM32,768 cookies.sqlite-shm 01/06/2013 10:56 PM 431,808 cookies.sqlite-wal 01/04/2013 06:54 PM34 directoryTree.json 01/05/2013 08:54 PM 450,560 downloads.sqlite 12/12/2012 06:24 PMDIR extensions 12/12/2012 06:24 PM 658 extensions.ini 03/18/2011 01:08 PM 807 extensions.log 06/10/2011 10:51 AM 8,169 extensions.rdf 12/12/2012 06:24 PM 458,752 extensions.sqlite 01/07/2013 10:15 AM80,896 formhistory.sqlite 10/16/2011 12:27 PM70,656 formhistory.sqlite.save 06/19/2012 06:24 AM 1,048,576 global-messages-db.sqlite 10/26/2012 06:17 AM 6,685 history.mab 12/22/2012 12:49 PM16,384 key3.db 11/30/2012 06:34 AM 2,707 localstore-safe.rdf 01/07/2013 02:05 PM63,964 localstore.rdf 11/17/2012 06:44 AMDIR Mail 07/04/2010 08:03 AM 504 mailViews.dat 12/23/2012 07:11 PM27,406 mimeTypes.rdf 08/14/2012 01:55 PMDIR minidumps 06/23/2011 08:17 PMDIR News 01/07/2013 11:13 AM60,545 panacea.dat 06/23/2011 06:12 PM 1,758 panels.rdf 01/01/2013 08:56 AM 0 parent.lock 01/01/2013 08:56 AM 4,096 permissions.sqlite 01/07/2013 02:03 PM41,943,040 places.sqlite 01/01/2013 02:12 PM98,304 places.sqlite-shm 01/07/2013 02:03 PM53,592 places.sqlite-wal 01/07/2013 11:07 AM17,946 pluginreg.dat 01/03/2013 04:45 PM36,021 prefs.js 07/24/2012 06:32 PM34,974 prefs.js.save 07/18/2012 06:10 AM31 search-metadata.json
Re: close button on tabs
JAS wrote: I know this has been addressed before but am wondering if any progress has been made toward a solution of adding a close button on tabs in SM 2.14.1 and beyond. I know you can right click and choose to close tab or if the tab is at the far right just click the close button on the right or middle click on a tab to close it but my middle click button has quite working on my mouse and hate to buy a new one. Control-w will close the focused tab. I personally much prefer the way SeaMonkey does it with the close x button on the right hand side of the tab title bar rather than the way Firefox does it with the close x button on every tab title (at least that's the way Firefox did it the last time I looked, which has been quite a while). SeaMonkey's way suits the way I use a browser better because I open links that I want to read in new tabs and then as I read them just click the x to close one and move to the next without having to move the mouse cursor all over the place. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Symantec and SeaMonkey....
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Hey Guys, So I have to say, I am quite annoyed with Symantec/Norton at the moment. Our Beta 2, which has been out for ~ a week, and I submitted the whitelist request to Norton ~12 hours before the *DAY* of our release, still is not complete. With the release cadence we have/need, the turnaround time on their whitelisting is completely unacceptable/bad. It completely hurts our ability to get meaningful data for betas, and hurts our ability to keep our release users up to date with latest stability/security updates. My proposal: * No longer wait for Symantec to indicate that the whitelisting is complete * Mention it on our known-issues page that Norton can interact badly with us on occassion * Specifically list the .dll's [by name] it thinks are viruses on our known-issues page as ok and Norton's fault * Continue to submit whitelisting requests ASAP * Continue to move forward with getting signed builds out [`may` help with this] * Continue to *try* getting a human contact at Norton to see if/when we can speed up their process or fix this misidentification, and how. The key point is this *will* be a pain point for windows users who have Norton, where the most-logical solution for those users is to *disable* their Virus Software during the duration of SeaMonkey use. And is specifically manifests in the following ways: * Quarantines 1-or-2 dll's * The dll's affect our cryptography ability, in such that them missing may/could break some https sites from functioning/cause crashes etc. (I haven't witnessed it, but I also have avoiding us ever shipping in this case) * Restoration of the dll's seems to sign/modify them slightly such that partial updates fail for these users, and end up having to download updates twice (the second download being our full 20ish MB download). I am literally treating this as a proposal for the community, we have no sane way to detect the presence of Norton and delay JUST those updates. This is not a vote, and I will take on the final call [unless the SeaMonkey Council think that they as a whole should make the final call]. So reasons for/against are appreciated, including me toos, or please no though I'd appreciate reasons for any of those mails. With *myself* as a Symantec user as well [in my case because it came pre-installed on my computer, and I decided to just register/subscribe rather than fight and try to remove/switch] it is a bad situation to have to be in, but I feel this is a decision I need community input on, rather than decided that some subset of our users will have to suffer due to a larger companies issues. I see no reason that all Windows users should be penalized with slow updates because some users choose to use a bloated and buggy antivirus program. Perhaps if it causes them enough pain they will either complain to Symantec enough that they will fix their algorithm or they will switch to another antivirus program. It's not like there aren't alternatives available particularly since Microsoft Security Essentials is free. On the corporate side, where end users have no choice about their antivirus product, I don't know if Symantec's corporate products detect the false positive or not. But even if they do I doubt that many large companies are using SeaMonkey as their standard browser and the individual users that may be running it are probably knowledgeable enough to deal with it, particularly if they are told about it in the release notes and known problems. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Getting REALLY SICK of SM not seeing Captcha boxes!
Jane Galt wrote: WaltS wls15...@removeyahoo.com wrote : On 11/12/2012 12:29 PM, Jane Galt wrote: I'm fed up with SM not seeing captcha boxes on most sites! Then I have to open Internet Explorer and do the same page all over again! WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?! An extension conflict? A preference incorrectly set? A link to a page where it doesn't show for you would be nice, otherwise it IS HARD to help. http://posting.denver.backpage.com/online/classifieds/PostAdPPI.html/den/post ing.denver.backpage.com/? u=denserverName=posting.denver.backpage.comsection=4378category=4428 superRegion=Denver I have no problem seeing the Captcha at Step 2 of that link (you don't need a login to get to step 2, you just have to put some data in the required fields at step 1). Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit SeaMonkey 2.13.2 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Firefox/16.0 SeaMonkey/2.13.2 The problem is not with SeaMonkey, it is something with your configuration or an addon. Make sure load all images is enabled and try with all addons disabled - Help-Restart with Add-ons Disabled. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Why does the LA Times home page kill my SeaMonkey?
David E. Ross wrote: On 9/25/12 11:04 AM, Bob Fleischer wrote: Actually, it doesn't kill the process, but all windows disappear and SeaMonkey apparently consumes no resources (other than the memory it is already using). Bob Windows XP SP3 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 SeaMonkey/2.12.1 I have no problem in viewing the LA Times home page at http://www.latimes.com/ or navigating through that Web site. I have seen many reports about problems with SeaMonkey 2.12.1. One thing in common to most of those problems is with the SeaMonkey that has the UA string Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 Firefox/15.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.12.1 I am beginning to suspect either a Windows 7 bug or a problem with the way SeaMonkey interfaces with Windows 7. I have no problem with that page or any of the others that have been reported and I'm on Windows 7 with that UA string: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 Firefox/15.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.12.1 I think most of the problems people are having are caused by bad plugins, extensions, or antivirus programs and not SeaMonkey or their OS. It would save a lot of time if everybody would try safe mode before assuming they have a problem with the browser. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Images lost in sent emails
user@domain.invalid wrote: I'm using SM 2.12.1 and I have an issue where if I forward and email containing embedded images to a friend of mine who is using Windows Live Mail, the email does not show up the images when he opens it. Instead, there is a blank box with a long file name. I asked him to return the defective email to me and I get it back with the blank boxes. He claims that this only occurs with forwarded emails from me - if I create a new email and insert and image it comes out fine at his end. It could very well be that I am the only one using SM that is sending to him - pretty well all other would be using OE or Winmail. Any clues anyone?? Bill Many of the forwarded messages I receive come in like that (the images come as attachemnts). They aren't coming from SeaMonkey so it's not just SeaMonkey that does it. Not sure if it will work but you can try changing your composition settings. Edit-Preferences Category Mail Newsgroups - Composition, if Quote attachemnts viewed inline in replies is not checked you can try checking that and/or changing Forward messages from As Attached to Inline. These are just suggestions, I don't know if it will fix the problem or not and I have no way to test. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Everywhere I go I get this message !
DoctorBill wrote: Your browser or your browser's settings are not supported. To get the best experience possible, please download a compatible browser. If you know your browser is up to date, you should check to ensure that javascript is enabled. Javascript IS enabled.Why this message ? Is SeaMonkey being boycotted ? I fear uploading the LATEST VERSION OF JAVASCRIPT since the last time I clicked on THAT link, my system got all messed up. Will downloading the latest version of Javascript stop those messages ? DoctorBill First off if you are getting those messages in the browser you are using to post this message it is SeaMonkey 2.7 and your browser is not up to date, the current is 2.12. And as somebody has pointed out you misunderstand the difference between java and javascript. You don't download javascript it's part of the browser and gets updated when you update the browser (which it doesn't look like you've been doing). If you post a url where you get that message we can tell you if we get it in 2.12. With many web sites adding html5 content, if you don't update SeaMonkey to get the latest html5 support strange things may happen on some pages. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Turn Off HTML5?
NoOp wrote: Anyone know how to turn *off* HTML5 completely? I find HTML5 auto loading both invasive, and a potential security threat. For example, if I land on this page with flash turned off: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SSUwSZYkQQfeature=related [A 70th Birthday Tribute To Muhammad Ali] HTML5 auto starts and begins downloading the video automatically. If I let it continue, the player then caches the download and begins playing the video. I realize that I can turn on controls and pause/start the video. I know that I can right click on an html5 video and click 'Stop download' I also know that I can turn off JavaScript completely to kill HTML5, but that of course kills all javascript. Basically I would like a button (like the flash/kill flash button on Prefbar) to enable me to turn off HTML5 *completely*, and to turn it back on should I care to. about:config only has the following html5 entries: html5.flushtimer.initialdelay html5.flushtimer.subsequentdelay html5.offmainthread and none of them turn HTML5 off. So, I rephrase: anyone know how to turn *off* HTML5 completely, without disabling javascript completely? I don't know how to turn it off completely, but changing media.autoplay.enabled to false will keep them (and flash) from autostarting. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Olympics on the Web
David E. Ross wrote: Has anyone in the U.S. been able to view NBC's live streaming broadcasts of the Olympics on the Web from http://www.nbcolympics.com/sports/index.html? No matter what sport I select, I get a page with the Olympics 2012/NBC logo on the right and a blank frame on the left. When I try to report this, NBC's Help/Contact page insists that I have the wrong CAPTCHA number. Windows XP SP3 SeaMonkey 2.11 but spoofing Firefox 14.0.1 Flash 11.3 r300(268) (FlashBlock disabled) Cookies accepted from ALL sources Images accepted from ALL sources AdBlock Plus disabled JavaScript enabled Broadband connection via Time Warner Cable (RoadRunner) No, I'm not using Advertise Firefox compatibility. Instead, my UA string is Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 I'm able to watch them. I had to go to a start here page and provide information about my digital TV service to prove that I'm entitled to get them. I had to enable setting third party cookies to get that to work (they gave me an error message telling me I had to do that). After that it worked. It worked with Flashblock but I white listed nbcolympics.com just so I wouldn't have to keep clicking on them to enable. I'm on Windows 7 Home Premium SeaMonkey 2.11 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120715 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 Flash 11.3.300.265 -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: pdf file display question
BIll Spikowski wrote: Jim Taylor wrote: Jay O'Brien wrote: I have two computers on my desktop, both running SM. One, a Windows 7 64-bit machine, when I double-click on an attached pdf file displays the pdf in Adobe reader. The other computer, XP 32-bit, displays the files as an application/pdf Object in the SM browser, not in Adobe reader. What sets this action? Thanks, Jay O'Brien That action is set in Adobe Reader. You don't say what version you have so it might not be in the same place in all versions. In my Reader X (version 10) it is Edit-Preferences-Internet and check or uncheck Display PDF in browser in right pane under Web Browser Options. I've recently begun having the same problem, all on Windows XP machines. On my home computers, PDFs open in the SM browser (my preference), but at work, after a recent SM upgrade, they began opening in my full version of Adobe Acrobat. All the machines use the same operating system and the identical version of SM Acrobat has the same preference settings as Reader; my problem is not there, as my preference is already set to display PDF in browser. It also has nothing to do with email settings for attached files; my problem is PDFs opened from web links. I've followed other advice offered in this NG but I've never figured out where the glitch is, or how to restore the behavior I prefer... The only think else I know to check is SeaMonkey's Helper Applications settings. Edit-Preferences-Browser-Helper Applications scroll right panel down to Adobe Acrobat Document and make sure it is set to your preference of either Use Adobe Reader or Use Adobe Acrobat (in SeaMonkey). If that is OK I don't know where else to look. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Default Printer for SeaMonkey
W3BNR wrote: On 7/24/2012 3:49 PM Ed submitted the following: On 7/24/2012 2:53 PM Jim Taylor submitted the following: Ed wrote: On 7/24/2012 1:32 PM Ed submitted the following: On 7/24/2012 11:08 AM Jay Garcia submitted the following: D E L E T E D In your OS printers section, click on your HP Printer and select Properties. Set it as default. Then, in any OTHER application such as Word, etc. bring up a document and print. Does it use the HP default printer? Probably so. Now start Seamonkey and print. What happens now? If it still uses the PaperPort then exit Seamonkey, locate your profile and the file prefs.js - make a copy of this file. Then right-click on prefs.js (not the copy) and choose edit. find all the lines referring to printers and remove the lines. Save - Exit - restart SM. Now what happens when you print? That did it. And it added the HP printer info back into the prefs.js file. Also looking at the pref.js file there is quite a bit of garbage(?) left over from installations of extensions that are no longer in use and were not removed when removing the extensions. I assume they can also be removed? Additional: The above worked fine until I had a page I wanted to print in pdf. I went to print - selected PDFCREATOR as a printer and printed the page. Now THAT printer has been added to about:config and when exiting SM is now in the prefs.js file along with the HP printer. PDFCREATOR is now the printer that shows up in SeaMonkey as it's default printer although the system default is the HP printer. Back to square one. How did you leave print.save_print_settings? Did you leave it false or did you change it back to the default of true? Default of true. It looks like: print_printer userstring xxx gets changed each time a new printer is added to config and does not change afterwards. As far as I can tell print_printer stores the last printer used and will become the default printer for SeaMonkey until another printer is selected from the print dialog. If you go into about:config and clear (reset) print_printer it will default to the systems default printer until you print to another printer. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Default Printer for SeaMonkey
David E. Ross wrote: On 7/24/12 3:25 AM, Ed wrote: Where is the default printer defined? I Find the printers in about:config, but cannot find any place where any is defined as 'default'. I have a number of printers (or pseudo printers) available on this system. My Windows 7 default printer is FinePrint. But SeaMonkey always comes up with PaperPort Image Printer which is a software pseudo printer. I would like SeaMonkey to use the system 'default' printer. Let's start over. In about:config, the default printer is indicated by the preference variable print_printer. Every time you actually print, this is reset to whatever printer you request. Thus, SeaMonkey remembers the last printer you used and makes that your default. SeaMonkey DOES NOT use your Windows system default printer. If you wish always to default to your Windows system default printer, do the following: 1. In your profile directory, locate the file user.js. 2. Open user.js in a text editor (e.g., Wordpad, Notepad). 3. Insert the following: user_pref(print_printer, xxx); // default back to actual printer if another printer was // selected (e.g., Acrobat Distiller) 4. On your Windows taskbar, select [Start Settings Printers and Faxes]. 5. On the Printers and Faxes window, locate your Windows system default printer. 6. Left-click ONCE on the printer, pause, and then left-click again. 7. Right-click and select Copy from the pull-down context menu. 8. Paste the result over the xxx from step #3, keeping the quote marks. 9. Close the Printers and Faxes window. 10. Save the edited user.js file. 11. Completely terminate SeaMonkey. After doing all this, every time you launch SeaMonkey you will reset its default printer to be the same as your Windows system default printer. However, you will have to remember to edit user.js if you ever change your Windows system default printer (e.g., you replace your printer). Note well: This CANNOT be accomplished via about:config. SeaMonkey will always update print_printer in prefs.js, undoing any setting you make via about:config. SeaMonkey does not change user.js, but it reads user.js to override prefs.js. This override happens only when SeaMonkey is launched. On my Windows 7 system, and probably all Windows systems, if print_printer is blank or invalid the print dialog defaults to selecting the system default printer. So clearing that pref ( or ) via user.js as David describes should always select the system default printer. Note that I have verified this by changing print_printer in about:config, but not by doing it via user.js. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: pdf file display question
Jay O'Brien wrote: I have two computers on my desktop, both running SM. One, a Windows 7 64-bit machine, when I double-click on an attached pdf file displays the pdf in Adobe reader. The other computer, XP 32-bit, displays the files as an application/pdf Object in the SM browser, not in Adobe reader. What sets this action? Thanks, Jay O'Brien That action is set in Adobe Reader. You don't say what version you have so it might not be in the same place in all versions. In my Reader X (version 10) it is Edit-Preferences-Internet and check or uncheck Display PDF in browser in right pane under Web Browser Options. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Default Printer for SeaMonkey
Ed wrote: Where is the default printer defined? I Find the printers in about:config, but cannot find any place where any is defined as 'default'. I have a number of printers (or pseudo printers) available on this system. My Windows 7 default printer is FinePrint. But SeaMonkey always comes up with PaperPort Image Printer which is a software pseudo printer. I would like SeaMonkey to use the system 'default' printer. -- Ed I believe the default behavior is to remember and use the last selected printer and settings. At least all of my systems work that way. In Firefox this behavior is controlled by the about:config preference print.save_print_settings;true. SeaMonkey has this print.save_print_settings about:config preference also, so assuming SeaMonkey honors it, changing it to false should do what you want but I haven't tried it. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Default Printer for SeaMonkey
Ed wrote: On 7/24/2012 1:32 PM Ed submitted the following: On 7/24/2012 11:08 AM Jay Garcia submitted the following: D E L E T E D In your OS printers section, click on your HP Printer and select Properties. Set it as default. Then, in any OTHER application such as Word, etc. bring up a document and print. Does it use the HP default printer? Probably so. Now start Seamonkey and print. What happens now? If it still uses the PaperPort then exit Seamonkey, locate your profile and the file prefs.js - make a copy of this file. Then right-click on prefs.js (not the copy) and choose edit. find all the lines referring to printers and remove the lines. Save - Exit - restart SM. Now what happens when you print? That did it. And it added the HP printer info back into the prefs.js file. Also looking at the pref.js file there is quite a bit of garbage(?) left over from installations of extensions that are no longer in use and were not removed when removing the extensions. I assume they can also be removed? Additional: The above worked fine until I had a page I wanted to print in pdf. I went to print - selected PDFCREATOR as a printer and printed the page. Now THAT printer has been added to about:config and when exiting SM is now in the prefs.js file along with the HP printer. PDFCREATOR is now the printer that shows up in SeaMonkey as it's default printer although the system default is the HP printer. Back to square one. How did you leave print.save_print_settings? Did you leave it false or did you change it back to the default of true? -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Gmail and Win XP
Ed Mullen wrote: Jim Taylor wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: A friend who uses me as their tech support guy wrote that she and her husband can't access Gmail on their XP systems. Okay on an Acer tablet, okay on W7 systems. I tried on my W7 systems, it's fine. Tried on an XP system and no good. I tried deleting the XP Google cookies and trying again: No go. Tried Safe Mode, no go. Any ideas? I just tested and have no problems accessing Gmail on my XP system. Can't access Gmail isn't really much of a description of the problem. What are the exact symptoms - don't get the sign in screen? Get the sign in screen and can't sign in? If so what message (password incorrect? clear stored passwords). Get signed in but don't get the mailbox. It's difficult to diagnose a problem without knowing the symptoms. --. Jim Gmail site just sits there and spins, no reply from Gmail, I gave up waiting for it to time out. This doesn't sound like a SeaMonkey problem, can they access it from IE? Is that machine using the same DNS servers as the ones that can connect? Can you connect by IP ( http://74.125.225.54/mail )? Interestingly July 9 was when the FBI was supposed to shut down the DNSChanger malware servers so if that's when it quit working I would check to make sure it isn't infected with the DNSChanger malware. --. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey-2.10 - Problem with Mail Newsgroups-accounts - (preferences ?)
Bernd Adda wrote: sorry for my english - I work with openSUSE 12.1 (Linux) and use LTE for Internet (no DSL) - Many years I used mozilla and now Seamonkey (with Mail) Till to 2.8 all is OK - but with 2.10 I have problems. If I opened Mail News-accounts, I could see all accounts But now off from 2.10 it opens only the head-accounts (or how is the name for it?) I mean up to now I got for the Name also Inbox, Templates, Drafts, Sent and Trash But new I get only the name The other I must click a second time to see them. That is also so by thunderbird Nobody can help me. Regards adda (german) If I understand your problem I think it is bug 748899. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748899 Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem doing FTP Speed Test on SM 2.10.1
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Desiree wrote: I've been doing this Test64 speed test (64MB FTP download) since I got broadband in 2001. I suddenly can't do it on the latest SM. I get a 403 Forbidden to access test on this server error instead of getting a download box. I can do it just fine on SM 2.6.1. Both are running on XP Pro. I also have no problems getting a download box on Fx 10 Enterprise or on the current Opera browser. What could be the problem on SeaMonkey 2.10.1? Thanks. Strange. File downloaded here in 17 seconds. I have no problem downloading it either. Took me 2 minutes from ftp://ftp1.optonline.net/test64 on SeaMonkey 2.10.1 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Firefox/13.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.10. Post the exact url you are using. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem doing FTP Speed Test on SM 2.10.1
Desiree wrote: Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com wrote in message news:uvkdnehqm7tlzkpsnz2dnuvz_vadn...@mozilla.org... Desiree wrote: I've been doing this Test64 speed test (64MB FTP download) since I got broadband in 2001. I suddenly can't do it on the latest SM. I get a 403 Forbidden to access test on this server error instead of getting a download box. I can do it just fine on SM 2.6.1. Both are running on XP Pro. I also have no problems getting a download box on Fx 10 Enterprise or on the current Opera browser. What could be the problem on SeaMonkey 2.10.1? Thanks. Strange. File downloaded here in 17 seconds. Hmmm...that's interesting. I get the same 403 Forbidden using both ftp://ftp1.optonline.net/test64 and ftp://ftp1.optonline.net/pub/test64. ON SM 2.6.1, if I try the ftp://ftp1.optonline.net/pub/test64, I get an alert message saying this file does not exist. That indicates SM contacted the server and got a correct response, but on SM 2.10.1 it gets the 403 Forbidden response instead. (The link with pub in it was dropped years ago I think I recall. I use the first link but the second one was mentioned in the old dslr thread (see below) and so I tried it too just now. OOL is not my ISP but the test is available on the dslreports.com OOL forum for anyone to use and Google lists other forums that give the llink to it. I found this old thread: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9646984. It suggests for that user that his anon password was messed up. Could this latest SM version be mangling the anon password? BTW, this is a clean install of SM 2.10.1. It is not installed on top of an older version. I didn't think I'd like it (that is why I have still have 2.6 on the host computer) but I really do like it! -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher My other post where I said it worked for me crossed with this one of yours so ignore where I said post the exact url you were using. We are using the same one and I am also not a OOL subscriber. I doubt that it is a problem with the anonymous password because that site does not require one and seems to accept anything (or none). And unless you have changed advanced.mailftp from its default of false in about:config SeaMonkey will send mozi...@example.com for a password which it accepts. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: hbo site problems
Ken Rudolph wrote: I seem to be unable to load http://www.hbogo.com in SeaMonkey. All I get is a spinning logo and the site never loads. I'm having no problem accessing that site using Google Chrome. For that matter, even http://www.hbo.com just shows a white screen in SM, but loads in Chrome (at least on my computer...last week I had no problems). Anybody else having this problem? Any ideas how to make it work in SM? I'm running SM 2.10 on Win-7 Ult. I did an automatic install of a new version of Shockwave Flash this morning...it's listed in Enabled plugins as File: NPSWF32_3_300_257.DLL, Version: 11.3.300.257, Shockwave Flash 11.3 r300 . Could that be a problem? It works for me on SM 2.10 Windows 7 Home Premium Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 Firefox/13.0 SeaMonkey/2.10 using that version of flash (File: NPSWF32_11_3_300_257.dll Version: 11.3.300.257 Shockwave Flash 11.3 r300). Both of those URL's are very slow to load, but they both load and run for me. You can try troubleshooting using the information from http://kb.mozillazine.org/Macromedia_flash particularly the section on Flash Player 11.3 Protected Mode - Windows. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.9
Ken Rudolph wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Snip About the Flash problems. Using YouTube I found a window called Flash Player Settings Manager. It says: ActiveX Version: Not installed...Plug-in Version: 11.3.300.257. Could it be possible that what I need is to install an ActiveX Version? If so, where can I find this? Snip The ActiveX version is for IE, it's not used for SeaMonkey or Firefox. Did you upgrade to 2.10? If so I would download the full version and reinstall. You can get it at http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ . If you really want to go back to 2.9.1 you can get it from http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.9.1 . I think I would uninstall SeaMonkey, uninstall Flash, reinstall Flash, and then reinstall SeaMonkey. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Poor performance with profile on SD card
David Wilkinson wrote: David Wilkinson wrote: I tested this card on my Windows 7 x64 desktop machine (using an external card reader) and got very similar results: --- CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/ --- * MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s] Sequential Read :18.171 MB/s Sequential Write :11.250 MB/s Random Read 512KB :17.789 MB/s Random Write 512KB : 0.356 MB/s Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 3.058 MB/s [ 746.6 IOPS] Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 0.003 MB/s [ 0.8 IOPS] Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 4.018 MB/s [ 981.0 IOPS] Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 0.003 MB/s [ 0.8 IOPS] Test : 1000 MB [I: 24.4% (7.3/29.8 GB)] (x5) Date : 2012/06/13 9:28:28 OS : Windows 7 Ultimate Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64) - So I guess it is the card... After considerable research, I bought a new card: SanDisk 32GB Extreme SDHC Memory Card (SDSDRX3-032G-A21) - 45MB/s and got dramatically better results for the 4KB writes (on my Windows 7 machine): --- CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/ --- * MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s] Sequential Read :18.063 MB/s Sequential Write :17.264 MB/s Random Read 512KB :17.653 MB/s Random Write 512KB : 1.591 MB/s Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 2.721 MB/s [ 664.2 IOPS] Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 1.194 MB/s [ 291.6 IOPS] Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 2.422 MB/s [ 591.3 IOPS] Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 0.928 MB/s [ 226.5 IOPS] Test : 1000 MB [I: 0.0% (0.0/29.7 GB)] (x5) Date : 2012/06/15 13:51:56 OS : Windows 7 Ultimate Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64) Next step: try it in my Windows 8 tablet and put my SeaMonkey profile on it. Question: if you were me, would you format it as NTFS? Or just leave well alone and hope I do not want to copy files bigger than 4GB onto it. Good question, and I don't know the answer. Theoretically if you format NTFS and retest and performance is bad you can use the SD Formatter from the SD Association ( https://www.sdcard.org/downloads/formatter_3/ ) to format it back to Fat32 for optimal performance, but I have never done it and don't know that it would get it back to the same performance it has now. It might be worth using it to format the poor performing one back to Fat32 and retest to see if it makes a difference. That might give you a hint what you want to do with the new one. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: minidumps folder -- what are these files?
Ray_Net wrote: NoOp wrote, On 14/06/2012 21:35: On 06/14/2012 09:09 AM, Ray_Net wrote: NoOp wrote, On 14/06/2012 02:35: ... You should be able to review the crash reports, if you've submitted them, in the browser. In the URL box enter: about:crashes and click on the crash report ID. Hum hum this the result when i click on about-crashes: Submitted Crash Reports No crash reports have been submitted. Hum hum: You should be able to review the crash reports, *if you've submitted them*, in the browser. ... I agree with you but: I never experienced any crash and i never see a submission ... so what's the next step to stop the growing number of files in the minidumps directory ? I am also getting many silent crash minidumps (16 yesterday and 11 so far today). All of mine are LdrShutdownProcess so may be related to bug 747683 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747683 as I have Flash 11.3.300.257 installed. I'm on Windows 7 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 Firefox/13.0 SeaMonkey/2.10. I didn't even know I was getting them until I saw this thread and went and looked so I've just started to look into the problem. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Poor performance with profile on SD card
Snip David Wilkinson wrote: Hi Jim: So I finally got around to downloading CrystalDiskMark and testing my card. These are the results: Sequential Read : 16.70 MB/s Sequential Write : 11.37 MB/s Random Read 512KB : 16.41 MB/s Random Write 512KB : 0.433 MB/s Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 2.588 MB/s Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 0.003 MB/s Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 3.456 MB/s Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 0.004 MB/s Clearly, the 4KB writes are extremely slow. It is possible that this poor performance is due to Windows 8 rather than the card itself? In any case, the poor write performance is probably the cause of the SeaMonkey slowdown. I also noticed that when I copied the profile onto the card across my network it took a very long time (which I had assumed was because I did it via wireless...). Yes, I think you have found the cause (actually I guess it's the source, the cause is still undetermined) of your performance problem. It would be interesting to test the card on Windows 7 or XP or another machine. In any case it's good to know that CrystalDiskMark runs on Windows 8. -- Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Multiple Users - Need to Reboot
David Harrington wrote: I am using Seamonkey 2.9 under Win 7 Home Premium. There are 5 accounts operating on the same machine. In any session, the first account to access Seamonkey gets full use of the program. Subsequent users are unable to access Seamonkey until the machine is rebooted. Logging out of the first account before logging in to the next doesn't change this. Nothing except a full re-boot gives anyone else access to SeaMonkey. Any ideas on how this might be corrected? I don't have that problem with my Windows 7 installation with two user accounts. In fact I don't even have to close SeaMonkey in one session in order to switch users and have the other user use it (their copy with their bookbarks, etc.). Do you get the message that SeaMonkey is already running? Does each of your users have their own (default or other) profile? And if so are they located under that users appdata? Does your APPDATA environment variable get set correctly? If you have profiles (other than the default profile) can you start another copy of SeaMonkey with the command PATH_to_Seamonkey\seamonkey.exe -P PROFILENAME -no-remote (ie: C:\Program Files (x86)\SeaMonkeyseamonkey.exe -P jim -no-remote). If you get the message that SeaMonkey is already running it indicates the second instance is trying to use the same profile, otherwise I'm not sure. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Poor performance with profile on SD card
David Wilkinson wrote: I have an Acer Iconia W500 tablet on which I have installed Windows 8 Release Preview 32-bit (and previously the Developer Preview and Consumer Preview). This machine has a 32GB SSD drive, and I have added a 32GB SD card in the internal slot, formatted as NTFS (drive D). When I put my SeaMonkey profile on this SD card, the performance is abysmal. *Everything* takes a long time, especially just loading pages in the browser. This happens both with my existing profile (copied from another machine) and a new test profile. The original default profile on the SSD C drive works fine. Has anybody else seen this? Can SeaMonkey be transferring so much data to/from the profile that disk speed is a major issue? BTW, the card is PNY 32GB Secure Digital High-Capacity (SDHC) Flash Card Model P-SDHC32G10-EFS2 R. I'm certainly no expert but suspect that disk speed may be a major issue. SeaMonkeys cache is in the profile along with cookies, history, bookmarks and all the other sqlite databases so it's going to be reading and writing it frequently. The advertized write speed for that card is 20MB/s and that is probably for sequential writes of the optimal size so you are probably not getting anything close to that. At best it will be 5 times slower than you SDD and may be considerably more than that. Also running a release preview the drivers may not be fully optimized yet. I suggest downloading CrystalDiskMark (if it will run on Windows 8) and run it on the SD card and the SDD drive and compare the random read and write speeds. You could also try moving the cache back to the SDD drive to see if that makes a difference(Preferences-Advanced-Cache-Cache Folder Location) Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: spinning cursor
sean nathan wrote: is there something going on with the mozilla.org servers that would cause m to have an incessantly spininng cursor when connected to this newsgroup? sean It's not the servers, it's a bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727414 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Blank page
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Rickles wrote: It looks like I'm gonna have to take the painful path of rebuilding my profile once again, doesn't it? I'm not looking forward to this, due to how many times I've done it in the past, and how many times I've lost something as a consequence (emails, bookmarks, passwords, etc.) That's really puzzling to me... I've been using SeaMonkey since long before they ever thought of that name, and using Thunderbird since version 0.2 -- first with Windows, then Linux since 2006 -- and I've never had to rebuild or make a profile. Am I one of the lucky ones or am I one of the regulars (who don't have to rebuild)? You're not alone, I have been using SeaMonkey since the day Netscape went away and have never had to rebuild a profile. In fact on the very first install it migrated my Netscape profile and I didn't even have to do it then. I'm running it on 5 real machines, SUSE Linux, Fedora Linux, Windows 2000, XP, and Windows 7, and a couple virtual machines. I put on updates as soon as they come out and occasionally run betas on my main laptop (installed over top and using same profile) and have never had a problem with a profile or lost anything. Just lucky? Maybe, but I like to think it's due to good system admin. :-) But like you I keep everything up to date and install very few extensions and plugins. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: seamonkey accessing windows media player
LMH wrote: When I did this, I got the following, plugin.scan.WindowsMediaPlayer;7.0 That is the only thing I could find doing several searches. I'm not sure what this is, so I would appreciate some advice before I go changing it. LMH SNIP Per http://kb.mozillazine.org/Plugin_scanning To stop the Windows Media Player plugin scan, modify the value of the preference plugin.scan.WindowsMediaPlayer from 7.0 to 19.0 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Google: Chrome is the only modern browser
MCBastos wrote: Did anybody else feel a bit offended by today's Google Doodle, the one featuring the Moog? Look at the line below the Doodle, suggesting that you upgrade to a modern browser. Thing is, the line will appear in every browser except Chrome and its derivatives (it didn't show in Iron, which is basically Chrome-minus-the-spying). Well, at least it did show up in latest-release-version Seamonkey, Firefox, Opera and IE. I don't have Safari here. I'm more concerned that although it showed up in SeaMonkey 2.9.1 it didn't work (couldn't change the controls or play it). It did work with IE 9. Maybe it's something with my configuration, can anybody else get it to play with SeaMonkey? Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Google: Chrome is the only modern browser
Jim Taylor wrote: MCBastos wrote: Did anybody else feel a bit offended by today's Google Doodle, the one featuring the Moog? Look at the line below the Doodle, suggesting that you upgrade to a modern browser. Thing is, the line will appear in every browser except Chrome and its derivatives (it didn't show in Iron, which is basically Chrome-minus-the-spying). Well, at least it did show up in latest-release-version Seamonkey, Firefox, Opera and IE. I don't have Safari here. I'm more concerned that although it showed up in SeaMonkey 2.9.1 it didn't work (couldn't change the controls or play it). It did work with IE 9. Maybe it's something with my configuration, can anybody else get it to play with SeaMonkey? Jim After some more investigating I discovered that it was Flashblock that was preventing it from working. After disabling Flashblock I was able to change settings and play the Moog Doodle. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: seamonkey accessing windows media player
David E. Ross wrote: . My primary beef with WMP is that it plays media from within a Web page instead of launching a distinct, separate process. If I switch profiles or merely close that page, whatever was playing stops. This is also a complaint I have against media playing via Flash. Usually, the media I play are streaming broadcasts of classical music. These are not 5-10 minute tracks of popular pieces; these are 30-60 minute symphonies and concertos or even 2 hour operas. I don't think that's a function of Windows Media Player, it's how you have your browser configured. Mine opens it in a separate process. I think if you have Preferences-Helper Applications for the media type set to use the Windows Media Player Firefox Plugin it plays within the page. But if you have it set to Use Windows Media Player like I do it opens WMP in a separate process. Of course the down side of that is you have to close the WMP window when it is finished because it is in its own process and doesn't close automatically when the media finishes. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Need Windows Media Player plugin for SM 2.91 that works with WIN 7 x64
Arnie Goetchius wrote: Anybody have a link for the correct plugin? When I go to a site like http://www.odyovi.com/greece/athens/free-online-greek-tv/watch-live/mega-tv and try to run it on SM 2.91 and Win7 x64, it tells me I need to install WMP 11.0. When I try to install, it fails. I have the Microsoft Windows Media Player Firefox Plugin version 1.0.0.8 installed and that video plays for me. See if these two links help. Instructions: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Windows_Media_Player Link to download: http://www.interoperabilitybridges.com/windows-media-player-firefox-plugin-download Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Need Windows Media Player plugin for SM 2.91 that works with WIN 7 x64
Arnie Goetchius wrote: Jim Taylor wrote: Arnie Goetchius wrote: Anybody have a link for the correct plugin? When I go to a site like http://www.odyovi.com/greece/athens/free-online-greek-tv/watch-live/mega-tv and try to run it on SM 2.91 and Win7 x64, it tells me I need to install WMP 11.0. When I try to install, it fails. I have the Microsoft Windows Media Player Firefox Plugin version 1.0.0.8 installed and that video plays for me. See if these two links help. Instructions: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Windows_Media_Player Link to download: http://www.interoperabilitybridges.com/windows-media-player-firefox-plugin-download Jim I was able to install it using the above link and it works for Firefox but not for SM 2.91. I'll have to read the above instructions and see if I can find a clue of why it won't work. For SeaMonkey you have to manually copy the plugin to SeaMonkeys plugin directory and restart SeaMonkey, did you do that? The Installing the New Plugin section of the instruction link tells you where to find it and where to put it. SeaMonkey 1.x, SeaMonkey 2, Minefield, or in a custom Firefox installation, you will need to copy the np-mswmp.dll file to your browser's plugins folder. [6] For example, for SeaMonkey 2, copy np-mswmp.dll to the C:\Program Files\SeaMonkey\plugins folder or, on 64-bit Windows, to the C:\Program Files (x86)\SeaMonkey\plugins folder. See the link for where to find the file. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Bug 754622] Re: [linux] Java 7u4 not working in SM 2.9.1
NoOp wrote: On 05/12/2012 10:55 AM, NoOp wrote: ... Given that it does work with SeaMonkey in Windows (XP and 7), I suspect that the linux builds may still have a paramater that blocklists Java 7. Maybe related to the older Mozilla blocklist? https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/blocked/p85 Who is affected? All Firefox users who have installed the Java plugin, JRE versions below 1.6.0_31 or between 1.7.0 and 1.7.0_2. Perhaps it doesn't recognize 1.7.0_4? I've checked /seamonkey/blocklist.xml and no java is listed there, so that's not it. I guess I'll try the old fashioned way with a symlink in ~./mozilla/plugins. Symlink doesn't work either. I've filed a bug report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754622 [Sun Java jre1.7.0_04 does not work in SeaMonkey] Please feel free to add onto that bug if you can. I have added comment 2 to the bug to show that jave 7_04 does work with SeaMonkey 2.9.1 on Windows so it's not a universal problem across all platforms. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Bug 754622] Re: [linux] Java 7u4 not working in SM 2.9.1
NoOp wrote: Snip. I have added comment 2 to the bug to show that jave 7_04 does work with SeaMonkey 2.9.1 on Windows so it's not a universal problem across all platforms. Jim This thread, and the bug report stated that: 1) the bug is linux only (Windows SM 2.9.1 versions + Java 7_4: WinXP Win7 all work fine., and 2) Platform: x86 Linux. But thanks for checking anyway :-) Sorry I missed where you said that Windows worked in comment 1. I knew you were reporting a bug on platform Linux, but hadn't seen if it had been reported to work on Windows or MAC. I'll try to read more closely in the future. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Why the full 21.7MB??
Snip Daniel wrote: Jim Taylor wrote: Daniel wrote: Jim, my download limit is greatly increased, now-a-days, but cannot see the logic in downloading a big file, just because I can. And why would the busy SeaMonkey Council volunteers produce an update file if they didn't want people to use them?? And it is a non issue if you let it do the updates as they come out. But as I have SM set-up to check each week, and, before that weekly event occurs, it is know that the update has problems, why update? And doing it like Microsoft and including cumulative updates is not the answer. That's part of the reason Microsoft SPs are huge. You complain about a 23 Meg SeaMonkey download, what do you say about a 400 Meg Microsoft download? As I've update Win7 each second Tuesday of the Month (or there-abouts), I've never had a 400MB MS d/l, but, then again, I've never d/l'ed a Win7 SP! Should I have?? With a full package being only 23 Meg. you would be further ahead taking the updates when the come out and in the rare case where a update had server problems downloading the previous full package and backing off the update. But if you don't want to install the updates as they come out and don't want to download the full package you can still download the partials and install them manually in order. You can find the instructions at https://wiki.mozilla.org/Software_Update:Manually_Installing_a_MAR_file In your case (using Windows en-us updates as an example) going from 2.8 to 2.9.1 you could have downloaded ftp://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/releases/2.9/update/win32/en-US/seamonkey-2.8-2.9.partial.mar and installed it (5910 KB) and then downloaded ftp://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/releases/2.9.1/update/win32/en-US/seamonkey-2.9-2.9.1.partial.mar and installed it (918 KB). Jim As I've yet to do the update for my Win7 version, I thank you for this information, as it means I'll be able to update the Win7 SM with-out d/l'ing the full 20-odd MB. (Bugger, I've just noticed they are the WIN32 versions..will have to go looking for the WOW64 equivalents!!) I think that is the WOW64 version. WOW64 is the subsystem that runs 32 bit applications on 64 Bit Windows. I don't think there is an official 64 bit version of SeaMonkey yet so unless you are running a contributed build (which I don't think has update capability) you are running the WIN32 version. As to Windows updates that depends on when you got it. There is a SP1 and it was a big download. Windows 7 SP1 x64-based (64-bit): 1050 MB. I use Windows auto update on my Win7 and XP and have seen huge downloads. The Dot-Net Framework updates all pushed 100 MB and when they come in with others it all add up to a pretty big download and all the XP and Vista SP's were huge. My SUSE Linux system seems to be downloading updates all the time and I don't even try to figure out how much it downloads. And I keep SeaMonkey updated on 5 systems so I'm glad I'm not on dial-up anymore. Jim Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Why the full 21.7MB??
Daniel wrote: Jim Taylor wrote: Daniel wrote: Manuel Reimer wrote: Daniel wrote: With 2.9.1 being out for a week or so, I figured it was safe to now do the update from 2.8 to 2.9.1and now I find I'm in the process of a 21MB download!!! Of course. AFAIK partial updates are only available if you go from release to release without skipping one. Why am I apparently downloading the entire version, rather than the Update version??? The partial update for 2.9.1 only matches on a 2.9 release. And will I have to do another complete download when I update my Win7 SM from 2.8 to 2.9.1 as well?? Yes. Yours Manuel Tks for your response, Manuel, but this means, if I want to stick with the updates, I am *required* to update to a version that is *known to have problems* (security and/or otherwise) before updating to the repaired version!! Am I the only one that see's the problem with this?? (Was it today or yesterday, I was reading a thread (on UseNet group??) where someone said the Windows Service Pack updates can bridge two SP's, e.g. SP1 includes files for SP1, SP2 includes SP1 and files for SP2, SP3 includes files for SP2 (but not SP1) and the additional SP3 files). *Maybe SM could do likewise* with incremental updates!) I don't know if you are the only one that sees a problem with it, but you may well be. I certainly don't see a problem with it. Even on a system that is eligible for a partial upgrade I think that if there is a problem with the upgrade server it falls back to a full download. Maybe you are one of the very few people left who has to pay for internet service by the byte, but for most of us it just isn't that big a deal. I always download the full package on at least one system anyway just to have it available in case I have to do a fresh install or back off an update. Look at it as the price you have to pay for not keeping your systems patched with the latest updates. Jim Well, I'm happy for you downloading the entire file each and ever time, Jim, If you don't have to worry about your download limit, congratulations! Yes, I was on a system where I paid for each and every byte downloaded, So I was happy when the SeaMonkey Council announced that they would be producing upgrade packs as well as the full versions. Seems they've only done it to a limited extent..pity, they are so hard-working, that they couldn't fix this problem, as well! It's unfortunate that you don't have unlimited download, but I think you are in the minority these days. And it is a non issue if you let it do the updates as they come out. And doing it like Microsoft and including cumulative updates is not the answer. That's part of the reason Microsoft SPs are huge. You complain about a 23 Meg SeaMonkey download, what do you say about a 400 Meg Microsoft download? With a full package being only 23 Meg. you would be further ahead taking the updates when the come out and in the rare case where a update had server problems downloading the previous full package and backing off the update. But if you don't want to install the updates as they come out and don't want to download the full package you can still download the partials and install them manually in order. You can find the instructions at https://wiki.mozilla.org/Software_Update:Manually_Installing_a_MAR_file In your case (using Windows en-us updates as an example) going from 2.8 to 2.9.1 you could have downloaded ftp://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/releases/2.9/update/win32/en-US/seamonkey-2.8-2.9.partial.mar and installed it (5910 KB) and then downloaded ftp://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/releases/2.9.1/update/win32/en-US/seamonkey-2.9-2.9.1.partial.mar and installed it (918 KB). Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Why the full 21.7MB??
Daniel wrote: Manuel Reimer wrote: Daniel wrote: With 2.9.1 being out for a week or so, I figured it was safe to now do the update from 2.8 to 2.9.1and now I find I'm in the process of a 21MB download!!! Of course. AFAIK partial updates are only available if you go from release to release without skipping one. Why am I apparently downloading the entire version, rather than the Update version??? The partial update for 2.9.1 only matches on a 2.9 release. And will I have to do another complete download when I update my Win7 SM from 2.8 to 2.9.1 as well?? Yes. Yours Manuel Tks for your response, Manuel, but this means, if I want to stick with the updates, I am *required* to update to a version that is *known to have problems* (security and/or otherwise) before updating to the repaired version!! Am I the only one that see's the problem with this?? (Was it today or yesterday, I was reading a thread (on UseNet group??) where someone said the Windows Service Pack updates can bridge two SP's, e.g. SP1 includes files for SP1, SP2 includes SP1 and files for SP2, SP3 includes files for SP2 (but not SP1) and the additional SP3 files). *Maybe SM could do likewise* with incremental updates!) I don't know if you are the only one that sees a problem with it, but you may well be. I certainly don't see a problem with it. Even on a system that is eligible for a partial upgrade I think that if there is a problem with the upgrade server it falls back to a full download. Maybe you are one of the very few people left who has to pay for internet service by the byte, but for most of us it just isn't that big a deal. I always download the full package on at least one system anyway just to have it available in case I have to do a fresh install or back off an update. Look at it as the price you have to pay for not keeping your systems patched with the latest updates. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: No multiple downloads with SM 2.9.1
David E. Ross wrote: On 5/2/12 8:56 AM, Philip Chee wrote: On Wed, 02 May 2012 11:49:46 -0400, hawker wrote: On 5/2/2012 1:05 AM, MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 01/05/2012 20:30, Patrick Crumhorn told the world: Since patching to SM 2.9.1 this morning, multiple downloads are broken. I used to be able (as of last night even) to go to a site and start a download of an audio file from an html link, then do another one or two at the same time, but now when I start a new download, it will not start unless I pause the download already in progress. And the paused d/l will not restart until I pause or complete or kill the other one. This is a real problem - any suggested workarounds? (Using XP Professional, btw). The DownThemAll extension. If you download lots of files, you probably will like it so much that you won't *care* if the bug is ever fixed. So is this a known and reported bug? DownThemAll has a built in accelerator which implies that the download happens though DownThemAll's server not direct. That is a privacy No download accelerator doesn't imply that the download happens though DownThemAll's server at all. What makes you think that? And anyway if it goes through an intermediate server then it would be slower not faster. Phil To rephrase hawker's question: Is this a reported bug in the Download Manager? If so, what is the bug number? So getting back to the OP's original problem/question, I am having no problems with multiple downloads on 2.9.1. I am able to download several things at the same time just like I always could. Can anybody else confirm his problem? I'm on SeaMonkey 2.9.1 Windows 7 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120429 Firefox/12.0 SeaMonkey/2.9.1 Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Ordering Email Accounts
Daniel wrote: Jim Taylor wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Daniel wrote, On 28/04/2012 13:10: Snip. I don't believe what your are saying ... this is my case completely cray. - I see: - Scarlet - Swing - Mortehan - Gmail - Local Folders - NEWSatSCARLET - news.mozilla.org mail.accountmanager.accounts value list is: account1,account2,account3,account4,account5,account6,account7 BUT ... this is not the order i see on the left pane... account1 is server1 is Scarlet account2 is server2 is Local Folders (instead of Swing) account3 is server3 is NEWSatSCARLET (instead of Mortehan) account4 is server4 is Swing (instead of Gmail) account5 is server5 is news.mozilla.org (instead of Local Folders) account6 is server6 is Mortehan (instead of NEWSatSCARLET) account7 is server7 is Gmail (instead of news.mozilla.org) Therefore the order on the screen is totally different of the list order: account1,account2,account3,account4,account5,account6,account7 If SeaMonkey is the same as Thunderbird the types of accounts are in a certain order that you can not change. Changes to mail.accountmanager.accounts will change the order of accounts within a type group, but not the order of the type groups. This is my understanding of how it works: The default account is always first, Email accounts and RSS accounts are always above the Local Folders, and Local Folders are always above Newsgroup accounts. Jim Jim, you could well be right (what do I know??), but why then, in Rays listing above, is Gmail (a mail account??) last and Swing (which he says is in place of Gmail (a mail account)) listed as server4 after a news account?? Maybe I misunderstand his post, but it looks consistent with what I said. If his order on the screen is: I see: - Scarlet - Swing - Mortehan - Gmail - Local Folders - NEWSatSCARLET - news.mozilla.org His 4 mail accounts (I'm assuming they are all mail, he didn't say) are first (in the order they are listed in mail.accountmanager.accounts), then local folders, then his news accounts in the order they are listed in mail.accountmanger. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Ordering Email Accounts
Ray_Net wrote: Daniel wrote, On 28/04/2012 13:10: Larry S. wrote: Daniel wrote: Chris Ilias wrote: On 12-04-12 5:19 PM, Frosted Flake wrote: Is there some way to set the order that email (and News) accounts are displayed by SeaMonkey? If so, how? You can install an extension that will add that functionality. It is called Folderpane Tools https://addons.mozilla.org/seamonkey/addon/folderpane-tools/. Alternatively, Flakey, if you are comfortable working in about:config, search for the property mail.accountmanager.accounts, change the order of the accounts listed under the value, re-start SM and away you go. Hmmm . . . How do I do that? Just change the numbers on the accounts, or physically rearrange them? I.e., is the name Account fixed to the account, or is the number? Thanks in advance! Larry, the sequence the accounts are in now is determined by the order of the Accountx sequence now in the mail.accountmanager.accounts pref. On my Mail Newsgroups screen, my accounts, in order, are Mail, Local Folder, Albury News server, Mozilla News server, UseNet Account1, UseNet Account2. In Prefs, the mail.accountmanager.accounts Value lists the accounts as account1, account6, account4, account7, account8, account12. So, Mail is account1, Local Folder is account6, Albury News is account4, Mozilla is account7, UseNet Account1 is Account 8 and UseNet Account2 is actually account12. The missing accountx numbers are for accounts that I did have, e.g. secnews.netscape.com, but which I no longer have. And, as you can see, I've changed the sequence of the accounts such as account6 (Local Folders) appears before account4 (Albury News). So, if you change the order of the accountx's in the mail.accountmanager.accounts pref and then re-start SM, the order of the accounts in the Mail Newsgroups page will change. To change the order, double click on the value and cut-and-paste, remembering to look after the comma's. I don't believe what your are saying ... this is my case completely cray. - I see: - Scarlet - Swing - Mortehan - Gmail - Local Folders - NEWSatSCARLET - news.mozilla.org mail.accountmanager.accounts value list is: account1,account2,account3,account4,account5,account6,account7 BUT ... this is not the order i see on the left pane... account1 is server1 is Scarlet account2 is server2 is Local Folders (instead of Swing) account3 is server3 is NEWSatSCARLET (instead of Mortehan) account4 is server4 is Swing (instead of Gmail) account5 is server5 is news.mozilla.org (instead of Local Folders) account6 is server6 is Mortehan (instead of NEWSatSCARLET) account7 is server7 is Gmail (instead of news.mozilla.org) Therefore the order on the screen is totally different of the list order: account1,account2,account3,account4,account5,account6,account7 If SeaMonkey is the same as Thunderbird the types of accounts are in a certain order that you can not change. Changes to mail.accountmanager.accounts will change the order of accounts within a type group, but not the order of the type groups. This is my understanding of how it works: The default account is always first, Email accounts and RSS accounts are always above the Local Folders, and Local Folders are always above Newsgroup accounts. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How do I enable javascript ?
DoctorBill wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: What do I do ? Have you given any thought yet to fix your munged email address that is abusing hotmail? Have you given any thought yet to fix your munged email address that is abusing hotmail? No. I am not as concerned as you are. Well you should be (unless you are in fact abuse@hotmail). Abusing a service email (even Microsoft's) is not looked on kindly by the community. And if I came to the community for help as often as you do I would not want to alienate people. But that's just my opinion. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.8 wants to install older Java runtime
flyguy wrote: Two or three days ago, SM 2.8 said my Java plugin was not compatible (it was version 16 or so from last year), so I installed ver 31. Things seem to work properly. T His morning, when I started my system (XP Professional), I got this message: Additional plugins are required to display all the media on this page. [install missing plugins] The plugin it wants to install is Java Runtime Environment 1.6 u29, however, Add/Remove programs show I have ver 31 installed. Clicking on the [install missing plugins] seems to start the process (oddly, to install ver 29!), but then fails with a message like web page missing, can not find. I reinstalled ver 31, Java.com confirms Java is working, and things seem OK now, but that is what I think happened yesterday. All this fussing began a few minutes after Flash updated itself (with my permission). Same thing occurred on my wife's computer (also XP, but Home version), though no messages to update plugins (yet). What web page are you trying to access that says you need the v29 plugin? Also check to make sure that the the v31 plugin is actually install in SeaMonkey. I know you said that add remove programs shows that Java version 6.31 is installed, but what does SeaMonkey show? Tools/Add-ons Manager/Plugins - I have two Java plugins installed, Java Deployment Toolkit 6.0.310.5 and Java(TM) Platform SE 6 U31 6.0.310.5 and I am having no problems. Without the URL that is giving the problem nobody else can see if it gives them problems too. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.8 wants to install older Java runtime
flyguy wrote: On 4/4/2012 9:27 AM, Jim Taylor wrote: flyguy wrote: Two or three days ago, SM 2.8 said my Java plugin was not compatible (it was version 16 or so from last year), so I installed ver 31. Things seem to work properly. T His morning, when I started my system (XP Professional), I got this message: Additional plugins are required to display all the media on this page. [install missing plugins] The plugin it wants to install is Java Runtime Environment 1.6 u29, however, Add/Remove programs show I have ver 31 installed. Clicking on the [install missing plugins] seems to start the process (oddly, to install ver 29!), but then fails with a message like web page missing, can not find. I reinstalled ver 31, Java.com confirms Java is working, and things seem OK now, but that is what I think happened yesterday. All this fussing began a few minutes after Flash updated itself (with my permission). Same thing occurred on my wife's computer (also XP, but Home version), though no messages to update plugins (yet). What web page are you trying to access that says you need the v29 plugin? Also check to make sure that the the v31 plugin is actually install in SeaMonkey. I know you said that add remove programs shows that Java version 6.31 is installed, but what does SeaMonkey show? Tools/Add-ons Manager/Plugins - I have two Java plugins installed, Java Deployment Toolkit 6.0.310.5 and Java(TM) Platform SE 6 U31 6.0.310.5 and I am having no problems. Without the URL that is giving the problem nobody else can see if it gives them problems too. SM did not show Java installed, even though add/remove programs did. The URL is http://rldtowercam.viewnetcam.com:5/CgiStart?page=SingleLanguage=0 It's not offering to install a plugin now that I've reinstalled ver 31, and my add-on manager now shows the plugins you have, and add/remove still shows ver 31 installed (the Java installer did say java was already installed, but would remove and reinstall if I clicked continue, which I did). The real puzzle is the SM offer to install an older version, and then having that attempt fail. Perhaps the situation could be duplicated by disabling or removing Java from a test computer. I don't know, it appears that something didn't go right with your original java installation and the SeaMonkey plugins weren't installed. Who knows what kind of confusion that could have caused. Hopefully everything is working after reinstalling Java now that the plugins showing in SeaMonkey. FWIW that page works fine for me. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
