Re: [Talk-GB] StyleSheet for Outdoors Rendering
One more thing. Does anyone have a way of generating a map key from a carto style? Otherwise I might have to write something. Cheers Graham On 2 Apr 2017 17:21, "Graham Jones" <grahamjones...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you all for your suggestions. > It is all coming back to me slowly now > > I decided to have a go at a large scale monochrome outdoor map. Two > reasons for this: > >1. I want to use it as a background to show the route of a race, so I >can show the route as a coloured overlay and it will show up nicely. >2. I am colourblind and struggle if he difference between features is >colour, so I want the difference to be line weight or pattern instead - I >can imagine using this for a printed outdoor map for me to use. > > Have based it on Greg's work (because it is easier to start out simple so > I understand what I am doing, and he has got the OS projection working > nicely), adding in features as I realise I need them, plagiarising Andy's > code when necessary (I will update the credits in the README) > > It is stored here if anyone is interested: > https://github.com/jones139/gb-leisure-carto (mine are the style files > with the '-mono' suffix - it is now so different to Greg's that I should > maybe change its name, unless Greg would like a mono map too?) > > you can see what it looks like here: > https://github.com/jones139/gb-leisure-carto/blob/master/ > gb-leisure-mono.png > (this gives a scale of about 1:12500 when printed on A4. > > The style currently does the area I was interested in ok (although I am > minded to make walls and hedges use a pattern rather than a simple line), > but I am sure there are important features missing when I look at a > different area, so it is a long way of finished. > > Thanks again for your help. > > Graham. > ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] StyleSheet for Outdoors Rendering
Thank you all for your suggestions. It is all coming back to me slowly now I decided to have a go at a large scale monochrome outdoor map. Two reasons for this: 1. I want to use it as a background to show the route of a race, so I can show the route as a coloured overlay and it will show up nicely. 2. I am colourblind and struggle if he difference between features is colour, so I want the difference to be line weight or pattern instead - I can imagine using this for a printed outdoor map for me to use. Have based it on Greg's work (because it is easier to start out simple so I understand what I am doing, and he has got the OS projection working nicely), adding in features as I realise I need them, plagiarising Andy's code when necessary (I will update the credits in the README) It is stored here if anyone is interested: https://github.com/jones139/gb-leisure-carto (mine are the style files with the '-mono' suffix - it is now so different to Greg's that I should maybe change its name, unless Greg would like a mono map too?) you can see what it looks like here: https://github.com/jones139/gb-leisure-carto/blob/master/gb-leisure-mono.png (this gives a scale of about 1:12500 when printed on A4. The style currently does the area I was interested in ok (although I am minded to make walls and hedges use a pattern rather than a simple line), but I am sure there are important features missing when I look at a different area, so it is a long way of finished. Thanks again for your help. Graham. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] StyleSheet for Outdoors Rendering
Hi, I haven't done much with OSM for a few years, so I think I will be behind the times, so wondered if someone could point me in the right direction please? I want to produce some large (A3 sized at least) printable maps for outdoors use. It is actually to show the route of a cross country race, so I want to show fences, gates stiles, embankments, steps, as well as land cover and contour lines / hill shading (but not distractions like admin boundaries) Is there a published carto style available that will show these sort of things available that I could use as a basis for this, rather than start from scratch? (maybe free-map.org.uk, but I'm not sure if that shows field boundaries etc?) Last time I did this sort of thing I used a simple python script called generate_image.py - is that still the best thing to use or has something else taken its place? Thanks! Graham. -- Graham Jones <http://google.com/+GrahamJones> Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [OSM-talk] Tile Server manual build 15.10 troubleshooting
You will find generate_tiles.py etc. in the subversion folder referenced here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OnDemandTileServer#Mapnik the instructions in that wiki page are: svn co http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/rendering/mapnik I don't think subversion is installed by default on ubuntu so you will probably have to do 'sudo apt-get install subversion' for 'svn' to work. On 3 January 2016 at 23:27, Graham Jones <grahamjones...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm a bit out of practice - haven't done much OSM stuff lately, but when > you download the OSM mapnik things (to make the mapnik style file), it > comes with a program called generate_tiles.py. You give it the bounding > box of the area you are interested in, and the mapnik style file, and it > creates the set of tiles - you can put these in a location where your web > server can get to them and they will be served by apache. > > I drew a picture of how it all fitted together in a presentation a while > ago, because it is quite complicated as you have discovered! > http://www.slideshare.net/jones139/rendering-openstreetmap-data-using-mapnik > > I started a wiki page to describe the different methods of making tiles > once http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Creating_your_own_tiles > > To get going I'd recommend just having a go with the generate_image.py and > generate_tiles.py scripts to get something if you are not too interested in > updating everything in real time etc. > > One thing to bear in mind though is that the method of creating the mapnik > style file has changed since I used it - the default style is now once > called 'carto', but once you have made the xml style file, > generate_tiles.py and generate_image.py will work with it. > > I hope that helps. I'm afraid it is rather late in the uk so I have to > go to bed, but if you need anything else drop me a line and I'll reply > tomorrow. > > Regards > > > Graham. > > On 3 January 2016 at 23:14, Skyler F <electricity...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> How do you use generate_tiles.py, maybe that would work better. All I >> want to do is be able to request tiles in the Colorado area from an >> application that needs tiles. >> >> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Graham Jones <grahamjones...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I'm afraid I am out of my depth now - I never used renderd - I just >>> generated a set of tiles manually using generate_tiles.py once I had got >>> the database and mapnik working - hopefully one of the folks that are more >>> familiar with renderd will be able to help with that bit. >>> Sorry! >>> >>> Graham. >>> >>> On 3 January 2016 at 23:02, Skyler F <electricity...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I am getting pretty frustrated. I have been working all day on this, >>>> and just can't get it to work. >>>> >>>> So I type service apache2 reload, and I get Job for apache2.service >>>> invalid?! Apache was working fine earlier but now, It won't even open up >>>> the apache test page when I type localhost on my system. >>>> >>>> When I run sudo -u kd0whb renderd -f -c /usr/local/etc/renderd.conf >>>> I get a bunch of syntax errors: >>>> >>>> renderd[5845]: Rendering daemon started >>>> renderd[5845]: Initiating reqyest_queue >>>> iniparser: syntax error in /usr/local/etc/renderd.conf (7): >>>> -> ;[renderd01] >>>> iniparser: syntax error in /usr/local/etc/renderd.conf (14): >>>> -> ;[renderd02] >>>> iniparser: syntax error in /usr/local/etc/renderd.conf (33): >>>> -> ;** config options used by mod_tile, but not renderd ** >>>> iniparser: syntax error in /usr/local/etc/renderd.conf (45): >>>> -> ;[style2] >>>> iniparser: syntax error in /usr/local/etc/renderd.conf (52): >>>> -> ;** config options used by mod_tile, but not renderd ** >>>> >>>> Isn't this symbol a comment " ; " ? >>>> Why is it telling me syntax errors for the commented out lines? >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Skyler F <electricity...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Well here is the error log: >>>>> >>>>> [Sun Jan 03 10:17:11.032835 2016] [mpm_event:notice] [pid 17637:tid >>>>> 140426070529920] AH00489: Apache/2.4.12 (Ubuntu) configured -- resuming >>>>> normal operations >>>>> [Sun Jan 03 10:17:11.032907 2016] [core:notice] [pid 17637:tid >>>>> 140426070529920] AH0009
Re: [OSM-talk] Tile Server manual build 15.10 troubleshooting
I'm a bit out of practice - haven't done much OSM stuff lately, but when you download the OSM mapnik things (to make the mapnik style file), it comes with a program called generate_tiles.py. You give it the bounding box of the area you are interested in, and the mapnik style file, and it creates the set of tiles - you can put these in a location where your web server can get to them and they will be served by apache. I drew a picture of how it all fitted together in a presentation a while ago, because it is quite complicated as you have discovered! http://www.slideshare.net/jones139/rendering-openstreetmap-data-using-mapnik I started a wiki page to describe the different methods of making tiles once http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Creating_your_own_tiles To get going I'd recommend just having a go with the generate_image.py and generate_tiles.py scripts to get something if you are not too interested in updating everything in real time etc. One thing to bear in mind though is that the method of creating the mapnik style file has changed since I used it - the default style is now once called 'carto', but once you have made the xml style file, generate_tiles.py and generate_image.py will work with it. I hope that helps. I'm afraid it is rather late in the uk so I have to go to bed, but if you need anything else drop me a line and I'll reply tomorrow. Regards Graham. On 3 January 2016 at 23:14, Skyler F <electricity...@gmail.com> wrote: > How do you use generate_tiles.py, maybe that would work better. All I want > to do is be able to request tiles in the Colorado area from an application > that needs tiles. > > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Graham Jones <grahamjones...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I'm afraid I am out of my depth now - I never used renderd - I just >> generated a set of tiles manually using generate_tiles.py once I had got >> the database and mapnik working - hopefully one of the folks that are more >> familiar with renderd will be able to help with that bit. >> Sorry! >> >> Graham. >> >> On 3 January 2016 at 23:02, Skyler F <electricity...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I am getting pretty frustrated. I have been working all day on this, and >>> just can't get it to work. >>> >>> So I type service apache2 reload, and I get Job for apache2.service >>> invalid?! Apache was working fine earlier but now, It won't even open up >>> the apache test page when I type localhost on my system. >>> >>> When I run sudo -u kd0whb renderd -f -c /usr/local/etc/renderd.conf >>> I get a bunch of syntax errors: >>> >>> renderd[5845]: Rendering daemon started >>> renderd[5845]: Initiating reqyest_queue >>> iniparser: syntax error in /usr/local/etc/renderd.conf (7): >>> -> ;[renderd01] >>> iniparser: syntax error in /usr/local/etc/renderd.conf (14): >>> -> ;[renderd02] >>> iniparser: syntax error in /usr/local/etc/renderd.conf (33): >>> -> ;** config options used by mod_tile, but not renderd ** >>> iniparser: syntax error in /usr/local/etc/renderd.conf (45): >>> -> ;[style2] >>> iniparser: syntax error in /usr/local/etc/renderd.conf (52): >>> -> ;** config options used by mod_tile, but not renderd ** >>> >>> Isn't this symbol a comment " ; " ? >>> Why is it telling me syntax errors for the commented out lines? >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Skyler F <electricity...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Well here is the error log: >>>> >>>> [Sun Jan 03 10:17:11.032835 2016] [mpm_event:notice] [pid 17637:tid >>>> 140426070529920] AH00489: Apache/2.4.12 (Ubuntu) configured -- resuming >>>> normal operations >>>> [Sun Jan 03 10:17:11.032907 2016] [core:notice] [pid 17637:tid >>>> 140426070529920] AH00094: Command line: '/usr/sbin/apache2' >>>> [Sun Jan 03 10:17:16.002678 2016] [mpm_event:notice] [pid 17637:tid >>>> 140426070529920] AH00493: SIGUSR1 received. Doing graceful restart >>>> AH00558: apache2: Could not reliably determine the server's fully >>>> qualified domain name, using 127.0.1.1. Set the 'ServerName' directive >>>> globally to suppress this message >>>> [Sun Jan 03 10:17:16.005685 2016] [mpm_event:notice] [pid 17637:tid >>>> 140426070529920] AH00489: Apache/2.4.12 (Ubuntu) configured -- resuming >>>> normal operations >>>> [Sun Jan 03 10:17:16.005693 2016] [core:notice] [pid 17637:tid >>>> 140426070529920] AH00094: Command line: '/usr/sbin/apache2' >>>> [Sun Jan 03 10:17:33.559173 2016] [mpm_
Re: [OSM-talk] Tile Server manual build 15.10 troubleshooting
if you type "sudo apt-cache search libtiff" it lists all the packages that are available with 'libtiff' in the title. On my system it lists libtiff5-dev, so I would suggest installing that. Regards Graham. On 3 January 2016 at 16:38, Skyler F <electricity...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am attempting a manual build of a tile server on Ubuntu 15.10. I just > did a fresh install of Ubuntu, and will post the results as I go along from > this link: > > https://switch2osm.org/serving-tiles/manually-building-a-tile-server-14-04/ > > So, here is step 1: > >> sudo apt-get install libboost-all-dev subversion git-core tar unzip wget >> bzip2 build-essential autoconf libtool libxml2-dev libgeos-dev libgeos++-dev >> libpq-dev libbz2-dev libproj-dev munin-node munin libprotobuf-c0-dev >> protobuf-c-compiler libfreetype6-dev libpng12-dev libtiff4-dev libicu-dev >> libgdal-dev libcairo-dev libcairomm-1.0-dev apache2 apache2-dev libagg-dev >> liblua5.2-dev ttf-unifont lua5.1 liblua5.1-dev libgeotiff-epsg node-carto >> >> > Here is the Result: > > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Note, selecting 'libprotobuf-c-dev' instead of 'libprotobuf-c0-dev' > Note, selecting 'libcairo2-dev' instead of 'libcairo-dev' > Note, selecting 'liblua5.1-0-dev' instead of 'liblua5.1-dev' > Package libtiff4-dev is not available, but is referred to by another > package. > This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or > is only available from another source > However the following packages replace it: > libtiff5-dev:i386 libtiff5-dev > > E: Package 'libtiff4-dev' has no installation candidate > > I don't want to mess this up on my fresh Ubuntu so I'll wait at every step > until there is a solution. > What should I try, Should I install the replacement package instead? > > Thanks, > Skyler > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > -- Graham Jones <http://google.com/+GrahamJones> Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [Talk-GB] New St station platform alignments
On 25 September 2015 at 22:41,wrote: > I can't remember ... has the track layout been changed yet? I know there > were some plans to realign, but the core structure hasn't changed since > first constructed? > I'm pretty sure there have been no changes to the tracks or major building structures at station platform level - I didn't see any evidence of heavy work like that on my travels anyway. Graham. ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands
Re: [Talk-GB] [Talk-gb-westmidlands] New St station platform alignments
On 25 September 2015 at 22:41,wrote: > I can't remember ... has the track layout been changed yet? I know there > were some plans to realign, but the core structure hasn't changed since > first constructed? > I'm pretty sure there have been no changes to the tracks or major building structures at station platform level - I didn't see any evidence of heavy work like that on my travels anyway. Graham. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] What was the outcome of the discussion about C class roads with ref tags?
I don't know where the discussion got to, but thought I should point out that at least one road in North Yorkshire is a C road that is signposted as such. The road here does have signs with the C designation. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/54.5696/-1.0016 I don't think I added it so at least one other person must agree! Cheers Graham from my Phone (hence dodgy spelling!) On 4 May 2015 01:20, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote: Hi I seem to remember there was general consensus that C class roads shouldn't have their reference number in the ref tag as they aren't really for public use, such as on signs or maps, but the official use of local councils etc. It was suggested, therefore, to swap them to a tag like off_ref, or some such similar. Was this agreed upon? If there is consensus I personally think this would be a valid use of a mass edit due to the large number http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/98Y Does anyone have experience of doing such a auto edit? Cheers Dave F. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [OSM-talk] Tablet, OpenStreetMap, navigator
Yes, I use osmand for android too. Hartlepool, UK (from my phone) ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-GB] newbie questions about building outlines
If vector map district outlines are good enough for your application you could use it to render maps without importing it into osm - just merge the osm and vector map district data when you render it into images. Graham Hartlepool, UK (from my phone) On 29 Apr 2014 15:42, Brian Norman br...@earthware.co.uk wrote: Hi Everyone As a newbie contributor I was hoping to get some advice and wisdom before making a mess of things ;-). At the moment I am working on a commercial project that needs to show building outlines for inner London. I have done some simple analysis to try and identify the gaps in the London coverage and am looking at possible options for filling in the gaps. This is where I have a few questions: 1) Does anyone know if there has been a deliberate reason to not fill in the gaps with the generalized buildings from OS vectormap district? I can think of many reasons this might have been decided by the community but noticed that this has been done in other UK cities 2) We are working with our client to investigate the costs of adding the missing buildings to OSM by tracing the Bing imagery. My analysis shows there are at least 100,156 buildings present in the OS vector district data that don't overlap a building in the OSM data within the area we are considering but this is a very low estimate. Does anyone have any rough guide for a per building time to estimate the effort involved? 3) Is anyone aware of an company that are experienced in creating large volumes of OSM data from tracing aerial imagery? 4) Does anyone have any other recommended approaches? Thanks for any responses and please forgive my general ignorance Thanks Brian ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [OSM-talk] OSM for Developers Presentation
Kate, I put together a little explanation of the rendering side of OSM a few years ago: http://www.slideshare.net/jones139/rendering-openstreetmap-data-using-mapnik . It might be out of date now though! Graham. On 21 February 2014 18:38, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.ukwrote: Hello Kate, I gave this talk at a British Computer Society meeting last year: http://www.free-map.org.uk/~nick/OSM_0313.odp Not hugely in-depth but might be of some use. Nick -Kate Chapman k...@maploser.com wrote: - To: osm talk@openstreetmap.org From: Kate Chapman k...@maploser.com Date: 21/02/2014 08:00AM Subject: [OSM-talk] OSM for Developers Presentation Hi All, I'm giving a talk this weekend at the Jakarta Python meet-up. I was wondering if anyone has a good Intro to OSM for Developers talk. I'm putting one together myself, but I'm looking to see what things others cover. Basically I want to give an overview of resources for developers, this isn't really a workshop just a 20 minute presentation. Thanks, -Kate ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Power generation refinement approved
Reading JOSM's defaultpresets.xml I found a comment about mixed-up voltage values in the preset. Could someone please tell me the major voltages in use. If someone knows the voltages in use for railways/busses I am interested, too I think it varies by country, but I am pretty sure that in the UK the newer parts of the national grid run at 400kV and the older sections at 275kV. The smaller overhead lines that you see on wooden poles are about 11kV. I think overhead lines for railways are ~30kV. Graham. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[Talk-GB] Article in the I Newspaper
Hi All, There was quite a nice article on map making and OSM in the I this morning in case you haven't seen it: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/features/are-mapbox-and-openstreetmaps-personalised-maps-the-future-of-cartography-8675498.html Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Marking landuse and field boundaries
Middlesbrough has a lot more land use are surrounding it. But it's been done by as large areas of farmland to quickly fill in the blank canvas, and I'm not sure it has much ground-knowledge at all. I think I started that (or at least the bit to the West of Hartlepool). It is pretty accurate - it is a large area of farmland. Always opportunities to add more detail though - when is a clump of trees part of the farm, and when is it a natural=wood? The biggest problem is deciding how to deal with edges of the areas - it is neatest to share nodes, but it is a right pain to edit thenm once they are joined together, so I think I kept a lot of them as separate nodes placed very close together, but it does look as though there are noticable gaps now. I'll add some field boundaries when I get bored GJ -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Marking landuse and field boundaries
I guess it depends on what you think is 'difficult' - to actually survey them means a lot of walking, so I tend to only add the ones that I can remember when I get home, and get the routes from Bing. I have just had another look and for dry stone walls, it is quite easy to distinguish some in Bing images, which lends itself to armchair mapping, but it depends on the direction of the sun - I feel I need the shadow to be confident that it is a wall I am looking at and not a track. But a reasonable guess that there is a feature there is probably more use than a sheet full of nothingness...so I have just spent 20 mins with bing imagery adding walls to a hillside that I know has lots of walls on it, and I had started adding quite a few from my last visit ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=54.74429lon=-2.09388zoom=16layers=M). The suspicious gaps are where I can not tell/remember if there is a fence to replace the apparently disappeared wall Wire fences of course are much harder to spot I'll look for the errors next time I am there and correct them... Graham. On 1 January 2013 11:15, Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com wrote: My main motivation for getting involved with OSM was to get a better walking map on my garmin. To this extent I have been adding lots of barriers in the southern part of the Peak District. So it is being done. Whilst it is time consuming I wouldn't say it is difficult. I do survey with a GPS and camera as much as possible, mainly on foot. It can be difficult to determine the type of barrier from satellite imagery so having pictures to refer to makes it easier. JOSM supports photo mapping really well. You do need to check GPS tracks against the imagery and be prepared to adjust the imagery offset. I wouldn't get overly concerned about the accuracy of the position of the barrier. A fairly good job can be done with the existing tools available and people can always adjust as these improve. I must admit I don't map land use if it is farmland. To me if it isn't mapped it is farmland. It would seem a reasonable default. Please give barrier mapping a go as we are out there. Dudley Sent from my iPad On 31 Dec 2012, at 22:00, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to see field boundaries and land uses in OSM, for the same reason as you. I think the main reason that there are not many in there, is that they are very difficult to survey. I have just added them from memory when I have been able to remember enough - it is more realistic to add them now that we have high resolution Bing imagery for countryside areas, but it is a lot of work, even from an armchair. Graham. On 31 December 2012 21:17, Steven Horner ste...@stevenhorner.com wrote: Personally I would love to see fields (landuse) and the walls/fences that make this up marked on OSM but as per the Wiki this is a complicated area: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Land_use_and_areas_of_natural_land I mapped a small area with landuse and some fences months ago but refrained from doing anymore because not many others appear to be doing it. You can see what I did here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=54.72508907318115lon=-1.7569917440414429zoom=17 Some of this I need to fix, it was my early days of OSM editing. I would love to use OSM one day as a replacement for Explorer (25K) maps but until things like walls/fences are shown it would be hard to do. My idea was to use the OSM to produce some walking guides in printed or static form but they would need this data added for those areas. I know everyones view is different but do others on here use the landuse and barrier=fence tags in the same way or does it make it look too complicated. Steven ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Marking landuse and field boundaries
Thanks Steven, I am pretty sure that any reference to Google maps/imagery is not allowed (it would be worth searching through the mail archives for last time it was discussed). You are right though about the age of the Bing imagery - I noticed that the cement works is still there in the photos. I think I tagged it as 'Former' and used landuse=brownfield, which was the best I could think of for what is there now. Just proves the benefit of real surveys rather than just tracing from the photos! Graham. On 1 January 2013 14:44, Steven Horner ste...@stevenhorner.com wrote: Good job there Graham. I know most of the area around there quite well. The Bing imagery is old, it still shows the cement works which was demolished in 2005 I think. Compare it to Google and you can see it is there no more. Although you can't use Google Satellite view to trace there is surely no harm in looking at it in another window to help identify if something is a wall or a fence then jumping back to Bing imagery to fill in, maybe that isn't allowed but you aren't drawing it from Google maps. You can see several of the bits you missed because you were unsure are clearly walls. Something I have been considering doing on walks is a timelapse using my GoPro, setting it to take pictures every few seconds which would aid in identifying later. The battery doesn't last long so it could only be used for an hour or so but I will give that a go next time. It has a wide POV so captures quite a lot. On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.comwrote: I guess it depends on what you think is 'difficult' - to actually survey them means a lot of walking, so I tend to only add the ones that I can remember when I get home, and get the routes from Bing. I have just had another look and for dry stone walls, it is quite easy to distinguish some in Bing images, which lends itself to armchair mapping, but it depends on the direction of the sun - I feel I need the shadow to be confident that it is a wall I am looking at and not a track. But a reasonable guess that there is a feature there is probably more use than a sheet full of nothingness...so I have just spent 20 mins with bing imagery adding walls to a hillside that I know has lots of walls on it, and I had started adding quite a few from my last visit ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=54.74429lon=-2.09388zoom=16layers=M). The suspicious gaps are where I can not tell/remember if there is a fence to replace the apparently disappeared wall Wire fences of course are much harder to spot I'll look for the errors next time I am there and correct them... Graham. On 1 January 2013 11:15, Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com wrote: My main motivation for getting involved with OSM was to get a better walking map on my garmin. To this extent I have been adding lots of barriers in the southern part of the Peak District. So it is being done. Whilst it is time consuming I wouldn't say it is difficult. I do survey with a GPS and camera as much as possible, mainly on foot. It can be difficult to determine the type of barrier from satellite imagery so having pictures to refer to makes it easier. JOSM supports photo mapping really well. You do need to check GPS tracks against the imagery and be prepared to adjust the imagery offset. I wouldn't get overly concerned about the accuracy of the position of the barrier. A fairly good job can be done with the existing tools available and people can always adjust as these improve. I must admit I don't map land use if it is farmland. To me if it isn't mapped it is farmland. It would seem a reasonable default. Please give barrier mapping a go as we are out there. Dudley Sent from my iPad On 31 Dec 2012, at 22:00, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to see field boundaries and land uses in OSM, for the same reason as you. I think the main reason that there are not many in there, is that they are very difficult to survey. I have just added them from memory when I have been able to remember enough - it is more realistic to add them now that we have high resolution Bing imagery for countryside areas, but it is a lot of work, even from an armchair. Graham. On 31 December 2012 21:17, Steven Horner ste...@stevenhorner.comwrote: Personally I would love to see fields (landuse) and the walls/fences that make this up marked on OSM but as per the Wiki this is a complicated area: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Land_use_and_areas_of_natural_land I mapped a small area with landuse and some fences months ago but refrained from doing anymore because not many others appear to be doing it. You can see what I did here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=54.72508907318115lon=-1.7569917440414429zoom=17 Some of this I need to fix, it was my early days of OSM editing. I would love to use OSM one day as a replacement
Re: [Talk-GB] Marking landuse and field boundaries
While I agree that high data density is an issue, I can't see why this is a strong argument for not tagging land use in rural areas, as even if we do draw big polygons to distinguish farmed land from woodland from moors from scree slopes etc, these areas are so big that it doesn't make rural data that much more complicated, and it will still be much much simpler than a major city centre. Unless of course we are talking about drawing a polygon for each individual field, which would seem excessive - I am just thinking of a polygon for the general area. Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Byway between Muston and Belvoir (was Guidance for adding PRoW to OSM)
I have had similar issues, but without the abusive farmer in your part of the world? (Weardale). My old OS map said the Weardale w Way went through this field, and there was a waymark at the junction with the road, but once in the (very large!) field, there was no obvious way out - just rusty gates and barbed wire - I think the route was changed, but they didn't take down all the old waymarks, which left a lot of paths to nowhere. Can't remember how I mapped that in the end Graham. I had walked across his field according to the map which was a couple of years old and got to the end of the field to find a padlocked gate. I returned back to the sign and it was pointing in a different direction (straight ahead) and also had 3 way markers all pointing straight ahead. I presumed the route had been changed so followed the arrow after a about 50 yards I heard various abuse from over the wall. The farmer was angry that we weren't following the map and could we read one. We explained (or tried to) but he said the gate was someone elses and that was the only way we could go. There were no visible paths on the ground in any direction. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Byway between Muston and Belvoir (was Guidance for adding PRoW to OSM)
Even smaller - I am pretty sure the problem I had was just to the North of Stanhope You are right, there are plenty of opportunities to add footpaths to Weardale. I concentrated on the Weardale Way (which you can see on Lonvia's Hiking Map if you are interested ( http://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/en/?zoom=11lat=54.72073lon=-1.8885)). When we met a branching footpath I tried to record a short stub to show it is there, but we have not followed most of them.There is also a marked 'Mineral Valley's Walk' through the area that we will probably try to follow during 2013but there are huge numbers of 'normal' public footpaths too.my challenge is trying to incorporate these into a nice walk, as we don't tend to go 'mapping' - we go for a walk, and I take my GPX receiver with me! Cheers Graham. On 31 December 2012 16:20, Steven Horner ste...@stevenhorner.com wrote: It's a small world, the incident I described was also in Weardale near Thimbleby Hill South of Stanhope. I didn't use OSM then and checking OSM the path is not marked. A path on the opposite side of the wall where the farmer was stood is marked which is incorrect and will lead to someone else being shouted at unless I fix it. There is a massive job to add all of the paths in Weardale to OSM. I will gradually add them as I am out walking. I have GPX tracks of many previous walks and good records. Steven On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.comwrote: I have had similar issues, but without the abusive farmer in your part of the world? (Weardale). My old OS map said the Weardale w Way went through this field, and there was a waymark at the junction with the road, but once in the (very large!) field, there was no obvious way out - just rusty gates and barbed wire - I think the route was changed, but they didn't take down all the old waymarks, which left a lot of paths to nowhere. Can't remember how I mapped that in the end Graham. I had walked across his field according to the map which was a couple of years old and got to the end of the field to find a padlocked gate. I returned back to the sign and it was pointing in a different direction (straight ahead) and also had 3 way markers all pointing straight ahead. I presumed the route had been changed so followed the arrow after a about 50 yards I heard various abuse from over the wall. The farmer was angry that we weren't following the map and could we read one. We explained (or tried to) but he said the gate was someone elses and that was the only way we could go. There were no visible paths on the ground in any direction. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. -- www.stevenhorner.com http://www.stevenhorner.com @stevenhorner http://twitter.com/stevenhorner 0191 645 2265 stevenhorner -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Byway between Muston and Belvoir (was Guidance for adding PRoW to OSM)
Fair point - I'm not really sure what I would tag it as though! Frosterley and Stanhopehttp://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/en/?zoom=12lat=54.74591lon=-2.0121 are fairly major places with pubs - not sure about wifi though. Graham. On 31 December 2012 18:56, Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com wrote: I tried searching on Weardale but there doesn't appear to be a POI marking the Dale! For those that know this area where would make a good base for walking and also have a Pub with wifi for updating OSM in the evening? Thanks Dudley Sent from my iPad On 31 Dec 2012, at 16:47, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote: Even smaller - I am pretty sure the problem I had was just to the North of Stanhope You are right, there are plenty of opportunities to add footpaths to Weardale. I concentrated on the Weardale Way (which you can see on Lonvia's Hiking Map if you are interested ( http://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/en/?zoom=11lat=54.72073lon=-1.8885)). When we met a branching footpath I tried to record a short stub to show it is there, but we have not followed most of them.There is also a marked 'Mineral Valley's Walk' through the area that we will probably try to follow during 2013but there are huge numbers of 'normal' public footpaths too.my challenge is trying to incorporate these into a nice walk, as we don't tend to go 'mapping' - we go for a walk, and I take my GPX receiver with me! Cheers Graham. On 31 December 2012 16:20, Steven Horner ste...@stevenhorner.com wrote: It's a small world, the incident I described was also in Weardale near Thimbleby Hill South of Stanhope. I didn't use OSM then and checking OSM the path is not marked. A path on the opposite side of the wall where the farmer was stood is marked which is incorrect and will lead to someone else being shouted at unless I fix it. There is a massive job to add all of the paths in Weardale to OSM. I will gradually add them as I am out walking. I have GPX tracks of many previous walks and good records. Steven On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.comwrote: I have had similar issues, but without the abusive farmer in your part of the world? (Weardale). My old OS map said the Weardale w Way went through this field, and there was a waymark at the junction with the road, but once in the (very large!) field, there was no obvious way out - just rusty gates and barbed wire - I think the route was changed, but they didn't take down all the old waymarks, which left a lot of paths to nowhere. Can't remember how I mapped that in the end Graham. I had walked across his field according to the map which was a couple of years old and got to the end of the field to find a padlocked gate. I returned back to the sign and it was pointing in a different direction (straight ahead) and also had 3 way markers all pointing straight ahead. I presumed the route had been changed so followed the arrow after a about 50 yards I heard various abuse from over the wall. The farmer was angry that we weren't following the map and could we read one. We explained (or tried to) but he said the gate was someone elses and that was the only way we could go. There were no visible paths on the ground in any direction. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. -- www.stevenhorner.com http://www.stevenhorner.com @stevenhorner http://twitter.com/stevenhorner 0191 645 2265 stevenhorner -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Marking landuse and field boundaries
I would like to see field boundaries and land uses in OSM, for the same reason as you. I think the main reason that there are not many in there, is that they are very difficult to survey. I have just added them from memory when I have been able to remember enough - it is more realistic to add them now that we have high resolution Bing imagery for countryside areas, but it is a lot of work, even from an armchair. Graham. On 31 December 2012 21:17, Steven Horner ste...@stevenhorner.com wrote: Personally I would love to see fields (landuse) and the walls/fences that make this up marked on OSM but as per the Wiki this is a complicated area: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Land_use_and_areas_of_natural_land I mapped a small area with landuse and some fences months ago but refrained from doing anymore because not many others appear to be doing it. You can see what I did here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=54.72508907318115lon=-1.7569917440414429zoom=17 Some of this I need to fix, it was my early days of OSM editing. I would love to use OSM one day as a replacement for Explorer (25K) maps but until things like walls/fences are shown it would be hard to do. My idea was to use the OSM to produce some walking guides in printed or static form but they would need this data added for those areas. I know everyones view is different but do others on here use the landuse and barrier=fence tags in the same way or does it make it look too complicated. Steven ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Yorkshire Dales or Forest of Bowland - unmapped areas?
I'd recommend a bit further North - Weardale is one of my favourites at the moment (around Stanhope or Froserley). I'm pretty sure you can get a bus from Darlington or Bishop Auckland. There is still plenty to do - the Weardale Way is complete, but there are loads of footpaths branching off it that are just stubs, and a marked Mineral Valleys Walk which needs following. A nice mixture of scenery and industrial archaeology if you like that sort of thing! Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [OSM-talk] mapbook v0.02
Hi Stefan, Unfortunately I got distracted and it has not got any further than a prototype. The idea is that there is a web front end to allow you to select the map you would like to be produced (map style, paper size, contours, hill shading etc), and any number of renderer computers will look at it to see if there is a request for them. It will then render the map and up load it to the web server. It is quite similar to maposmatic, but the idea is that there are more facilities to customise the map. I gave up on using fancy libraries like codeigniter/bonfire because it was taking too long to learn, so it is a very simple home made php based web front end. The daemon that runs on the renderer computers is written in python and does the data handling (things like creating contours and hill shading). The code is at https://github.com/jones139/disrend. If there is interest in developing this, I could move it up my list of things to do. Regards Graham. On 6 November 2012 18:46, Stefan Keller sfkel...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Graham I'm curious: Is it ready now? 2012/3/10 Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com: Excellent - thanks Paul. I have nearly finished a web service that will allow users to select an area and generate a book using your programWill be a week or two before it is ready though Graham. On 10 March 2012 05:03, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: I have completed an overhaul to my mapbook program, making it easier to extend and adding new features. This program, available at https://github.com/pnorman/mapbook, will create a PDF with a title page, an index map showing the coverage of the book and what page covers what area, then individual map pages, each page having arrows indicating which page is in which direction. It also includes an attribution page. An example for Vancouver, BC is available at http://pnorman.dev.openstreetmap.org/mapbook/vancouver.pdf Mapbook will work with any mapnik .xml style and can generate high-resolution maps that print well Requirements: Python 2.7 Mapnik2 Cairo Most osm mapnik styles will also require a postgis database created with osm2pgsql -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Survey for people with color vision deficiencies about the street classes in OSM's Mapnik style
Hi Johannes, Thank you for doing this - I look forward to seeing the results. Colour vision is one of my interests, as I have a lot of trouble with distinguishing colours, and I have been meaning to make a service to filter map tiles through a colour vision simulation...but I have never got around to it - have been carrying the research papers up and down the country for the last 6 months, but haven't done anything with them I did produce a FM-100 simulation in java a while back, but yours is much better! I don't know if I missed this subtlety in your examples because of my colour vision problems, but I would have been more inclined to vary the thickness of the casing around the road - it is quite a good indicator of its 'importance', and you can make roads look different without using up more colours - you could stick to nice bold colours (pastel colours are nasty - all look the same!). It is clear from your tests that you have realised that thicker is much easier than thin, but of course the map does not look so nice that way. Regards Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-GB] Find My Nearest Cash Machine
Seem Graham beat me to publishing a map of the ATMs: http://www.itoworld.com/map/230 But yours looks nicer, and doesn't have odd references to breweries mixed in with ATMs! When I looked at doing this I struggled with banks - how do we know if they have ATMs or not? Some have them tagged explicitly as separate nodes, but not sure what to assume if there is only an 'amenity=bank'. Cheers Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMapWidget
Hi, I have tested it on my desktop computer now, and it is looking very good (I haven't had chance to look at the android problems yet). The ability to move the start point for directions is really useful. I wonder if it could use a little 'help' button that would pop up a dialog with a bit more information for the end user? The dialog could also include a 'please help improve this map' link to the OSM wiki? Thanks Graham. On 11 August 2012 18:25, Aleksandra Milanovic sandraa.milano...@gmail.comwrote: Hi guys, can you give me an opinion on the latest changes I've made on my GSoC project (http://sandra-milanovic.github.com/OpenStreetMapWidget/) ? Additional options are in the right click (longpress for mobile) menu. If you have some difficulties, please share them with me. Thanks, Sandra On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Claudius claudiu...@gmx.de wrote: Am 19.06.2012 09:06, Matthias Meisser: Great idea Sandra, at FF13 there seem to be a little bug, that you can't pan the map, when you try to grab them in the upper area of the map (where the buttons are on the right), as the browser trys to select the buttons. Reason for that is the width: 80%; statement in the #toolbar CSS markup. No idea why you actually need to define the toolbar width. Scales well without, but I haven't tested cross-browser. Claudius ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMapWidget
I am having the same trouble with android. Earlier versions worked though so I am sure it can be fixed. Graham On 12 Aug 2012 16:57, Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Aleksandra, 2012/8/12 Aleksandra Milanovic sandraa.milano...@gmail.com: @Pavel: the idea was to make an extensively simple app for giving your location via SMS and email. The advance features are hidden because I didn't want to fill up the space with additional buttons. The buttons are slightly bigger, because it was more difficult to press them on most of the touch phones. Thank you for the suggestions. I take them as a serious insight, especially from the aspect of small screen smartphones. I'll see what I can do to improve the UI elements. thank you very much for the nice tool. For me it works absolutely perfect on a desktop. No complains about the right mouse-button. ;-) On my Android smartphone it doesn't work at all. :-( ... but I don't know, that I would like to have it on the smartphone. On the desktop it is a phantastic tool. Once more thank you. ;-) Manfred ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-GB] Google Maps using Sustrans Cycling data
For example in my area (Newcastle/Gateshead) I've worked to get good surveys and mapping of the NCN72, but the NCN14 on the south side of the river is very patchy and isn't mapped at all for large stretches. Sounds like I had better go for a bike ride Up North then. I thought it NCN14 was complete all the way to Newcastle, so I will ride it one weekend once summer arrives.. Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMapWidget
Hi Sandra, It is looking good! The location detection works well on my Android Phone, but the 'send by SMS' does not work. The email link option works fine. I have raised an issue on your Github repository ( https://github.com/Sandra-Milanovic/OpenStreetMapWidget/issues ). The other thing that I would find useful is the ability to select which map tile background to use - could this be selectable too? Again I raised an issue for you. Regards Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-GB] Permissive paths and uncrecorded rights of way
Hi, If there is a path on the ground but nothing to say it is a public footpath etc, I just tag it as highway=path with no designation. Graham On 26 Apr 2012 16:29, cotswolds mapper osmcotswo...@gmail.com wrote: [New here (to OSM, not to mapping), so I'm not sure if I'm making this point in the right way or the right place. It's effectively a comment on the UK wiki changes, but I can't see how to reply to that thread.] It's been bothering me for a while that there is a gap in tagging guidelines relating to well-used (and possibly long-standing) paths that are not official rights of way. Certainly a newcomer reading the guidelines could get the impression that everything is one of RoW, permissive path or unknown, and I don't think that is true. Two examples from the area I'm working in (Cotswolds between Stroud/Cirencester/Birdlip). 1) There is a path through a wood I have been using on and off for nearly twenty years. It's clearly well used, mainly by dog walkers. There are no signs indicating the wood is private, and they are using it as of right. If someone tried to close it, I'm pretty sure it could be proved that a right of way exists. 2) In several villages (e.g. Eastcombe) I have found public 'ways' which are not official RoWs: On OS 1:25k maps (both historic and modern) they are shown as white roads. They feel like public rather than private land, with dry stone walls on both sides, and no stiles or gates or restrictions. 'Proper' rights of way branch off them. They are maintained at public expense (parish council workman cuts the grass twice a year, and sometimes there's a tarmac strip), and are well used (because the roads are narrow with no pavement). I would expect them to be ORPAs, but mostly they are not, and I have found too many for it to be an OS transcription error. In both cases, 'permissive' is completely inappropriate because people have used these ways as of right for many years, but they are not status unknown. More generally, I have read that there are thousands of miles of 'lost/unrecorded' RoW in... (England? UK? ... can't remember), and OSM mappers should be finding some of these. While all sorts of tags are possible for the experienced, the novice is likely to restrict themselves to wiki options. At the moment, the wiki reads to me as if 'permissive' is the fall through option once you have established that a way is not a RoW. IMO mappers should be discouraged from thinking like that and only record a way as 'permissive' if there is clear evidence that it is not used as of right. (And also be open to the idea that permissive signs may be wrong, but that's for another thread...) I think there then needs to be a tag (or two) for other ways that are not RoW, but not clearly permissive. For my first example, maybe 'traditional' or 'informal' would do. For my second example, which seems to me an obvious example of something falling through the crack between the council road's department and RoW department, I would be inclined to use 'de facto RoW', because it's hard to imagine anyone disputing the use, but there would need to be a high standard of evidence on the ground to use that term. Rob ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[OSM-talk] GSoC Projects Announcement
Hi All, [sorry for posting to both dev and talk, but I thought that this may be of wider interest] I am very pleased to announce that the projects selected for this year's Google Summer of Code have been announced. This year OSM received a record 28 good proposal applications for the 6 student places that we were given. This meant that we had some very difficult decisions to make and some students who made very good proposals had to be turned down. Although this will obviously be disappointing for those whose projects have not been selected, I hope that they will be able to contribute to the project in their spare time. I would like to thank all the community members who have helped to review the proposals and choose the 6 projects to be part of this year's programme with OSM - their reviewing of the proposals was essential to helping us make the right choices. The selected OSM projects are: - Anomaly Detection Engine (Velkei Adam Istvan) [Mentored by Derick Rethans] - Improved Support for non-Latin Languates in mapnik (Hermann Krauss) [Mentored by Dane Springmayer] - Improvements to Vespucci (Jan Schejbal) [Mentored by Marcus Wolschon] - OSM Widget Creator ( Aleksandra Milanovic) [Mentored by Kate Chapman] - Tile Data Service (Michael Daines) [Mentored by Darafei Praliaskouski (Komzpa)] - Video Based Speed Limit and Road Sign Detector plugin for JSOM (Nikhil Upadhye) [Mentored By Kai Krueger] We will be asking the students to set up pages on the OSM wiki, and post regular updates to the osm-dev mailing list so you will be able to see how they are getting on. I would like to wish he students and their mentors good look with their projects! Regards Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Android Phonegap App
Hi. I have never used phonegap, but one of the 2010 google summer of code projects did, so you may be able to pick up something from that (search the wiki for gsoc). Another looked at a javascript editor, and that used oauth authentication, so it would be worth a loom too. Graham from my phone On 16 Apr 2012 13:48, David Serenity debuk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I am new to osm and phonegap development. I have not found much documentation on making calls to OSM api from an android phonegap app. I am especially interested in creating changesets and uploading map data (form entries and coordinates) to OSM. i tried ajax calls to the api and have run into same origin policy restrictions and the url ( * http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/create*) is not found. i have used the code below: function loadIt() { var xmlData = 'osmchangesettag k=created_by v=EasyMappr /tag k=comment v=Ah please do it //changeset/osm'; var url = http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/create;; $.ajax({ type:PUT, username: debuk...@gmail.com, password: lettersforme, url: url, data: xmlData, error: function(xhr, textStatus, errorThrown) { if (xhr.status === 0) { alert('Not connect.\n Verify Network.' + textStatus); } else if (xhr.status == 404) { alert('Requested page not found. [404]'); } else if (xhr.status == 500) { alert('Internal Server Error [500].'); } else if (textStatus === 'parsererror') { alert('Requested JSON parse failed.'); } else if (textStatus === 'timeout') { alert('Time out error.'); } else if (textStatus === 'abort') { alert('Ajax request aborted.'); } else { alert('Uncaught Error.\n' + xhr.responseText); } }, success : function(result) { alert(Its done + result); } }); } If anyone can provide any ideas or code, please share? Regards, David ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Traffic simulation Modeling using OSM data
Hi, This sounds like a really interesting idea - it is something I have always had the idea of doing, but have never got around to it - I would like to re-create the effect of someone touching their brakes on a busy road, leading to someone doing an emergency stop 2km further back. The OpenStreetMap part of the proposal is however quite minor - it is only really providing you with the network - the 'interesting' part of the proposal is the simulation. Therefore by all means submit the idea to OSM and we will consider it along side the other proposals, but it might be worth seeing if there is a numerical simulation project that has been accepted to GSoC that you could apply to as well, in case it is not accepted as part of OSM? Regards Graham. On 3 April 2012 11:38, sourav dutta mailsouravdu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Sorry for mailing in so late, i came to know about Gsoc few days ago. I am Undergraduate doing my Btech-Hons for IIIT - Hyderabad. I have worked in OCR, Vision,(Sfm) ,Image Processing,Information retrieval. OSM data have been used for path finding...with A star algo etc.but it is never used for simulation of traffic. Traffic monitoring and simulation has been worked on for some time now. There are very elaborate systems like MITSIM which gather data from various sources and design a traffic model. But the problem is it is very difficult to implement them. The information about the streets, traffic data, satellite data etc. is difficult to gather. My idea is to design a traffic simulation using OSM data. as the OSM data is readily available and is available in many formats. To model the traffic probabilistic or network flow models are popular. But to get a more accurate simulation want to use multiple vehicles as bots interacting with each other. A basic overview of my idea ... 1) first we need the area where want the simulation to run. This would be done by defining a rectangular region in the map. This data can be stored in posgreSQL which will make it easier to use the data. 2) Next we define for all the bots - source and destination and this find the appropriate path(A star) to go. 3) At the heart of the simulation we need to have a engine which would handle the collision etc. and directs the bots etc. I have tried a few physics engine but their performance degrades steeply decreases with the increase of number of objects. 4) So I want to use my own engine with only few rules for collision etc. The brute for implementation would require to check each bot with other bot ( the same thing which makes other engines slow O(n^2) ). But i plan to use a implementation of KD-tree, ANN(Approximate nearest neighbour) Open source implementation of the same exists and works pretty well. This would allow the matching to be done in O(nlogn). ANN implementation (http://www.cs.umd.edu/~mount/ANN/) 5) To manage the interaction of the bots the memory requirements skyrockets as the number of bots increases. ie why i wish to treat them as Multi-Agent-System There are nice implementations of distributed multi-agent framework which use shared memory to manage the agents( bots in our case). 6) congestions , bottlenecks and collisions can thus be detected. In the streets. 7) Future Works - Once this frameworks is complete data from other sources like the traffic lights flyovers etc.. can be incorporated in the existing system. -- Sourav Dutta CSE,UG3 IIIT H ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] GSoC Update
Hi All, [apologies for cross posting - all future mails from me about this year's GSoC will be on the dev list, but I'm not sure if everyone relevant subscribes to the dev list, so sent this to talk too]. We are starting to get some proposals for Google Summer of Code projects posted by students now. It would be great if anyone else who is willing to help with mentoring would would sign up as soon as possible and help us with the selection of the projects. If we start reviewing the proposals now we have the chance to ask the students to clarify issues with their proposals or suggest improvements, before the deadline for changing proposals in about a week. If you would like to help, please sign up on the Google Summer of Code web site http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2012, and drop myself and Ian Dees an email so we know who you are, as sometimes we get requests from people we have never heard of. I would also be grateful if anyone who has been involved with mentoring previously would sign up, even if you do not have time to do it this year, to provide your insights on the proposals given your previous experience. Thanks Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] GSOC-2012 Application
Hi Nikhil, Thank you for your interest in OSM. I am glad you are familiarising yourself with OSM before applying for GSoC. Are there any particular things you would like guidance on? There is a template on the Google GSoC application page showing the things we would like to see in your project proposal, and I have also linked a 'processes' page from our project ideas page to you can see how GSoC works - basically you do not need to find yourself a mentor - we match mentors to projects as part of the application review process. Regards Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] GSoC 2012 - Regarding CycleStreets Projects
Pryanka, If you have not heard from the author of cyclestreets, it would be worth looking at other OSM routers which are open source. Search our wiki for routers or routing. You should find things like gosmore and osrm. You coold experiment with them to see how they do with cycling or walking routing. There was a gsoc project a couple of years ago to calculate the 'hilliness' of routes - you could look at including that into the routing algorithm too? You will have to remember that some people will want to go over hills and others avoid them. The surface of tracks could also be a good parameter for cycle routing if existing routers so not use this. Just a few thoughts so you can work up a gsoc proposal if cyclestreets does not get back to you, or if you would prefer to work on a different route calculator. Graham from my phone On 23 Mar 2012 06:17, Priyanka priyanka.mengh...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Graham :-) If the mentors of the Cyle Streets projects are reading this, please let me know. I would be delighted to discuss the 'Less Wiggly Routes' project with you. :-) Thanks Regards, Priyanka On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Pryanka, I h... ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] About the GSOC Project - OSM Application for Android -Need Some Help
Hi You can pick whichever application you want as the basis of your project proposal. I put some notes in one of the Android project ideas saying what I think should be included in the proposal. It would be worth bearing those in mind as you prepare your proposal. Please submit a draft early so we have chance to review it and ask questions before the deadline. Thanks! Graham Regards Graham from my phone On 23 Mar 2012 15:55, Andun Sameera andun...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I have found that you have given a new potential android application which can be used as our source of project. That is https://github.com/CUTR-at-USF/OpenTripPlanner-for-Android/wiki. The first major application you have given for this project was https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.cyclestreets. I have cloned the git repository of both of these projects and analyze the both projects. According to my understanding the OpenTripPlanner for Android is look professional than the Cycle street map. Please correct me if I am wrong. So what do you prefer as the best application? Also the project I have done in my uni (Travel Ceylon - Trip Planner for Sri Lanka - http://insightforfuture.blogspot.com/2012/01/travel-ceylon-travel-palnner-for-sri.html ) looks similar to the OpenTripPlanner for Android. So I have some new features which can strength that more and more. Also when I run the OpenTripPlanner for Android app a error raises at the LogCat saying, 03-23 21:12:40.535: E/OTP(358): No route to display! What will be the problem ? Please help me to proceed further. Thank You Andun Sameera undergraduate Department of Computer Science and Engineering University Of Moratuwa Sri Lanka ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] About the GSOC Project - OSM Application for Android -Need Some Help
If the application does not have its own mailing list or issue tracker, you can try here, but for specific questions about the program, it would be best to try to get in touch with the developers of the program. Graham from my phone On 23 Mar 2012 16:15, Andun Sameera andun...@gmail.com wrote: Thank You Very Much Sir I will do as you said Sir, Also where can I talk about those technical questions raised related to those application sir? Things like errors,faults in the application. Thank You Andun Sameera Undergraduate Department of Computer Science and Engineering University Of... On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote: Hi You can pick ... ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] GSoC 2012 Application
Hi. Sounds like an interesting idea. You do not need to find a mentor. You just need to prepare a prokect proposal and submit it on the google GSoC site. Very good to discuss it here too though! We match potential mentors to projects as part of the selection process. Hope that helps. Graham from my phone On 23 Mar 2012 16:44, Ishan Agrawal ishan.agrawa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I had some ideas regarding this project. I am not sure who to and how to approach for mentorship on this project. Games based on OSM data I wanted to work on a game idea that I have thought of which I call infectious. It focuses on real time movement of a person in a city. There are two groups (for eg. disease and cure) and every person belongs to either group. Whenever two people from different groups come in close proximity they can convert the other guy into their own group. The person who converts the most people wins or the whole group could win also. So essentially the spread happens like a contact based virus would spread in a community. Singapore is a great place to start this game too, since Singapore has the highest smartphone density in the world, its small enough to run country wide campaign in the game and 3G works even in underground trains, and people usually play these games during daily commutes. I am really excited to build this game using OSM data. I can build this on OSMAnd using live tracking and Map viewing features of the app. I would really like to discuss this further. Regards, Ishan Agrawal On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Ishan Agrawal ishan.agrawa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, ... ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] GSoC 2012 - Application
Hi Shivansh, If you look at the OSM wiki and search for SVN, you will find the links to the SVN and GIT repositories for the main OSM code ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/SVN ). It sounds as though your thoughts on what the 'widgets' project idea is about are slightly different to what I thought the proposer was thinking of. I think you are thinking of an interactive map where the user can interact with map elements to see more information? In which case I would recommend looking up kothicjs, which is a client side map renderer. I am sure that code could be extended to add this sort of functionality? It also sounds like a good idea to me - I know a few people are using kothicjs now. I thought that the 'widget' idea was more about making it easy for non-techical users to add maps to blogs etc. In that case you do not really need the main OSM code - you will need to use a map display javascript library (openlayers.org or leaflet.cloudmade.com), and get that to interact with the blog software etc. I think either of these would make good GSoC project proposals. Regards Graham. On 22 March 2012 06:43, Shivansh Srivastava shivansh.b...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Graham, Thank you for your reply insights. I have already made my account, was browsing through the Wiki. Could you give me a link to the svn, so that I can familiarize myself with the working of the code. I have various jQuery (Javascripts) + CSS based ideas in mind. 1. Interactive jQuery Dialog box - the widget can be loaded it would give a brief description about the place. 2. MouseOver Effect - When mouseover some geographical unit, that part/area will cjane country, when viewed from a large distance. 3. jQuery Tooltip - a descriptive message which passes html element as a parameter onmouseover. 4. Any other such UI which comes to mind from anyone in the community? Could you please send me the link to the git/repo which I need to fork out, to get familiar with the project. Also, I couldnt find the desired repo on -https://github.com/cyclestreets - for the routing panel. If I am missing out on any link, please direct me to it. Cheers, On 19 March 2012 12:51, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Thank you for your interest in applying for GSoC with Openstreetmap. I am sure the person that raised that project idea will reply with some more information, but here are a few thougts from me. - It is important to understand the fundamentals of what OSM is, so please start by creating an account and making some improvements to the map in your local area. - It would also be good to look at the data structure so that you appreciate that OSM is really a database of geographic information which can be turned into map images. Details of the xml file format can be found on our wiki - Provision of map tile images is a secondary service, and a number of companies provide map tiles based on OSM data. - I would be very keen on any 'end user' applications like this one having clear links to a 'how to improve this map' page to help encourage contributions, not just use the data. - In terms of your specific questions on the project idea, the idea listed quite a few features that could be made available - I would search for these things on the osm wiki to see what is available at the moment, which you could integrate into widgets. - I am not familiar with widgets for blogs etc, but as you say, I think they are javascript programmes which interact with both the host environment (wiki, blog etc) and the osm based service. I think it should be possible to make it a stand alone system where you can say 'copy this code into your website'? From your mail I think you know more than me about this bit though! Hope that helps. Please feel free to ask more questions as you develop your proposal. Regards Graham from my phone On 19 Mar 2012 03:18, Shivansh Srivastava shivansh.b...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am Shivansh, pursuing Engineering at BITS Pilani, currently in my 3rd year. I am well versed in Web Technologies, that include HTML5, JavaScripts (jQuery), CSS; with PHP MySQL and App Development for Windows Phone 7. I have worked in my college on several websites with the same knowledge. I had also given a talk at the 3rd WikiConference held at Mumbai on Improving Wiki UI using AJAX jQuery presented 4 ideas/projects with the Wiki community. I am interested in pursuing the *OSM Widget Creator* listed on the Ideas page. I have a few queries regarding the same- 1. Most of it can be done through javascript (more effectively through jQuery). But since I am new to OSM, I want to know how would I work on it? Would it be in a similar way as MediaWiki, by downloading the software developing, or working on my user common.js? 2. Could I also be enlightened on the kinds of widget expected to be developed? I would like to take the opportunity to learn as much
Re: [OSM-talk] GSoC 2012 - Regarding CycleStreets Projects
Hi Please just use this list so that others can share opinions on the project too. So feel free to ask your questions here. Thanks Graham from my phone On 21 Mar 2012 07:18, Priyanka priyanka.mengh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am a prospective GSoC 2012 applicant, and I am interested in applying for the CycleStreets projects. However, on the idea page, I do not find any link to contact the mentor(s) for this project. Am I missing something? I would be grateful if the information could be shared. -- Thanks Regards Priyanka M ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] About GSOC 2012
Hi, Thank you for your interest in applying for GSoC with Openstreetmap. This list will be fine to ask questions. Here are a few suggestions to get you started: - It is important to understand the fundamentals of what OSM is, so if you have not done so before, please start by creating an account and making some improvements to the map in your local area. - It would also be good to look at the OSM data structure. Details of the xml file format can be found on our wiki. - The next stage is for you to develop a project proposal - our ideas pagehttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GSoC_Project_Ideas_2012 lists quite a few ideas, but these need some development to turn them into a successful project proposal - you should be able to see our application template on the Google GSoC web site. Hope that helps. Please feel free to ask more questions as you develop your proposal. Regards Graham On 21 March 2012 15:39, Andun Sameera andun...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I am a undergrad of University of Moratuwa Sri Lanka. I read your descriptions of the GSOC ideas. I did several project which use maps and manipulates maps. So I am really interested in doing a project with you for this years GSOC. So can I discuss relevant thing in this mailing list? Can You Please provide me more details? Thank You ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] GSoC Application Process
Hi All, Based on a couple of emails I have seen lately, I think I have communicated the Google-Summer-of-Code (GSoC) process poorly, sorry!. To clarify, this is how it works: - OSM has now been accepted as a mentoring organisation for GSoC - Ian Dees and I are acting as administrators for OSM. - Potential students review our project ideas pagehttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GSoC_Project_Ideas_2012and ask questions on the mailing lists for guidance etc. It is really good if the person who proposed the project replies, but Ian or I step in if a quick reply is not forthcoming.I like to see the discussion of potential projects being open to the community in general to give others the chance to express opinions on the value of the proposal, potential pitfalls etc. - Students apply via the Google GSoC site (http://code.google.com/soc/), not to OSM or to a potential mentor. - In parallel with student applications OSM community members volunteer to act as mentors, and apply via the Google GSoC site ( http://code.google.com/soc/). Please drop myself and Ian an email too, in case we do not recognise you. - The people who have volunteered to act as OSM mentors identify which projects they would be willing to mentor. - The OSM mentors review and rank all of the proposals and decide which ones to accept, given the available mentors, the number of student places allocated to us by Google, and the quality of applications. We enter the ranking into the GSoC web site so Google can see it. [Note that we will discuss the applications off-list, because to me it is a bit like reviewing job applications - not the sort of thing you shout across the office]. - The administrators (Ian and I) match the students to the mentors. - Google announces the successful applicants based on the ranking we have entered. - I will provide feedback to unsuccessful applicants on why their proposals were not accepted. - Then the real work begins! I hope that helps. The student application period starts in a few days, so it would be really good if we could sign up potential mentors as soon as possible so that we can start to review the applications as they arrive, so if you are interested in acting as a mentor and would like any more information, please contact Ian and I. Regards Graham -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] GSOC2012 Video Based Speed Limit Detector
Hi Emanuela, Thank you for your interest in applying for GSoC with Openstreetmap. This list will be fine to ask questions - the person who proposed the project idea should reply here. Here are a few suggestions to get you started: - It is important to understand the fundamentals of what OSM is, so if you have not done so before, please start by creating an account and making some improvements to the map in your local area. - It would also be good to look at the OSM data structure. Details of the xml file format can be found on our wiki. Not directly relevant to the particular project idea that you are thinking of, but we are asking all applicants to show an understanding of the basics of how OSM works this year, irrespective of their particular project proposal, as you will see on our application template. - I think the project idea is about developing a plugin for the JOSM editor? If so it would be good to have a look at that and learn to use it, then have a look at the code and some example plugins to see how they work - you should find lots of information on the OSM wiki. Hope that helps. Please feel free to ask more questions as you develop your proposal. I would ask the person who proposed the idea to reply here with a bit more information please, as this is not something I know anything about! Regards Graham -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] GSoC 2012 - Application
Hi, Thank you for your interest in applying for GSoC with Openstreetmap. I am sure the person that raised that project idea will reply with some more information, but here are a few thougts from me. - It is important to understand the fundamentals of what OSM is, so please start by creating an account and making some improvements to the map in your local area. - It would also be good to look at the data structure so that you appreciate that OSM is really a database of geographic information which can be turned into map images. Details of the xml file format can be found on our wiki - Provision of map tile images is a secondary service, and a number of companies provide map tiles based on OSM data. - I would be very keen on any 'end user' applications like this one having clear links to a 'how to improve this map' page to help encourage contributions, not just use the data. - In terms of your specific questions on the project idea, the idea listed quite a few features that could be made available - I would search for these things on the osm wiki to see what is available at the moment, which you could integrate into widgets. - I am not familiar with widgets for blogs etc, but as you say, I think they are javascript programmes which interact with both the host environment (wiki, blog etc) and the osm based service. I think it should be possible to make it a stand alone system where you can say 'copy this code into your website'? From your mail I think you know more than me about this bit though! Hope that helps. Please feel free to ask more questions as you develop your proposal. Regards Graham from my phone On 19 Mar 2012 03:18, Shivansh Srivastava shivansh.b...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am Shivansh, pursuing Engineering at BITS Pilani, currently in my 3rd year. I am well versed in Web Technologies, that include HTML5, JavaScripts (jQuery), CSS; with PHP MySQL and App Development for Windows Phone 7. I have worked in my college on several websites with the same knowledge. I had also given a talk at the 3rd WikiConference held at Mumbai on Improving Wiki UI using AJAX jQuery presented 4 ideas/projects with the Wiki community. I am interested in pursuing the *OSM Widget Creator* listed on the Ideas page. I have a few queries regarding the same- 1. Most of it can be done through javascript (more effectively through jQuery). But since I am new to OSM, I want to know how would I work on it? Would it be in a similar way as MediaWiki, by downloading the software developing, or working on my user common.js? 2. Could I also be enlightened on the kinds of widget expected to be developed? I would like to take the opportunity to learn as much as I can working on the ideas contribute during the summer. With Regards, -- Shivansh Srivastava | +91-955-243-5407 | http://in.linkedin.com/pub/shivansh-srivastava/17/a50/b18mr.shivansh.srivast...@gmail.com mr.shivansh.srivast...@gmail.comSecretary, BITS Alumni Affairs Division | Web Expert, Newsletter, BITSAA International 3rd Year Undergraduate | B.E. (Hons.) - Electronics Instrumentation BITS-Pilani. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Google Summer of Code
Hi All, I am pleased to announce that OSM has been accepted to participate in this year's Google Summer of Code programme ( http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/org/google/gsoc2012/osm). Thanks to all of you who have contributed to our ideas page ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GSoC_Project_Ideas_2012), which supported the application. Over the next few weeks we can expect potential students to review the ideas page and contact us to seek clarification on ideas or guidance on how to develop them. Ian Dees has set a good example in responding to such requests positively, and with a steer that a good start is to learn a bit about mapping. I would be grateful if you would again review the ideas list and provide any clarifications that may help students in producing a project proposal from them. I would also like to hear from anyone that would be prepared to act as a mentor on this year's programme. I will do a bit more work on a wiki page that I have started on the process I propose to follow for this year's GSoC ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Processes), and send another update email so you know what we will be doing. Thanks again for your support. Regards Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-GB] New VectorMapDistrict comparison maps on ITO Map
Peter, This is very good, thank you - It is a nice easy check to see whether there are areas that need more attention. One thing that I would find useful would be an 'Edit' button that would open the same view in Potlatch2 to help correct little issues easily (like some of those roads with odd kinks in because I had moved a node accidentally etc.). Graham. On 13 March 2012 20:21, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote: I am pleased to be able announce that ITO Map now has a bunch of new map views comparing data in OSM with VectorMapDistrict. There are 7 new maps: two comparing roads in OSM with those in VMD (one highlighting omissions in VMD and the other from OSM), and also maps comparing railways, electricity, water, woodland and building data in the two map bases. The version of VMD we are using is probably not the most recent and we are also aware of some odd times on zoom 8. We will ensure that we using the latest VMD within the next few days and will be taking a look at the problems with zoom 8. In the mean time I hope it is useful. http://www.itoworld.com/map/group/21 These maps use our new ITO Map interface with a place search and sharing options which we rolled out last week. Regards, Peter Miller ITO World Ltd ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [OSM-talk] mapbook v0.02
Excellent - thanks Paul. I have nearly finished a web service that will allow users to select an area and generate a book using your programWill be a week or two before it is ready though Graham. On 10 March 2012 05:03, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: I have completed an overhaul to my mapbook program, making it easier to extend and adding new features. This program, available at https://github.com/pnorman/mapbook, will create a PDF with a title page, an index map showing the coverage of the book and what page covers what area, then individual map pages, each page having arrows indicating which page is in which direction. It also includes an attribution page. An example for Vancouver, BC is available at http://pnorman.dev.openstreetmap.org/mapbook/vancouver.pdf Mapbook will work with any mapnik .xml style and can generate high-resolution maps that print well Requirements: Python 2.7 Mapnik2 Cairo Most osm mapnik styles will also require a postgis database created with osm2pgsql -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Google Summer of Code
Hi All, Thank you to those who have suggested ideas for GSoC projects on the ideas wiki page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GSoC_Project_Ideas_2012. I would encourage everyone to have a look at the ideas and comment on them so that we can develop them to make it easier for potential students to understand what is involved, and add any other suggestions too - maybe use the discussion wiki page if the comment is more than a simple one line one, or discuss it on this, or the dev mailing list if more significant? There are a couple that are to do with HTML renderers. We actually had a previous GSoC project that made a lot of good progress on this a couple of years ago (https://github.com/mdaines/simple-map-editor). This is one that I feel bad about because I have not taken it on after GSoC (I always intended to incorporate it into one of my 'speciality' maps of historic features etc...), but I think it has all of the basics of a simple editor there (including Oauth authentication), so there is scope to have a nice project to develop the user interface to turn it into a finished product. It would be good to expand on the proposals there to clarify that this is to build on an existing project, not start from scratch, and to help identify the scope of the project (ie is it going to allow editing of geometry or just adding nodes and editing tags on other features?). The ideas list is taking shape nicely, so I have submitted a draft application on behalf of OSM, which points to the ideas page, but there is still time to work on the ideas before the Google (and if we are successful, potential students) start to look at it. Please let me know if you are interested in acting as a mentor, and in helping to choose which student applications are successful if OSM is selected to participate this year - I can provide more details of what is involved. Regards Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Google Summer of Code
Hi All, OSM has taken part in the Google Summer of Codehttp://code.google.com/soc/programme for the last few years, and we are thinking of applying to take part again this year. The programme is to encourage university students to participate in open source projects. They receive a payment from Google to allow them to work on computer coding projects over the summer break rather than taking other work. OSM receives a small contribution for its participation too. To take part OSM has to provide a list of 'project ideas' for challenging, but achievable projects, then offer a mentor to help the successful students achieve their project goals. We have started an ideas page at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GSoC_Project_Ideas_2012. Please will you have a look, and add any project ideas you can come up with to the list? Also, if you would be willing to act as a mentor, please make a note on that page too. We need to complete the project ideas list this week, so please put down anything you can think of eary. If you would like any more information, please let me know. Thanks Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Google Summer of Code
In my opinion, it would be very much desirable to actually have individual students who *are* *already* *active* in OSM suggest a project that they would like - and feel capable - to do, and then use these ideas in our application. Or, if that is not possible, at the very least have someone who has a very concrete idea of what needs doing and who says this is what needs doing, and I am willing to mentor it. GSoC is not a wishing well. If people are dropping their someone should really do X ideas on the wiki page and not even willing or able to mentor it then that is, in my eyes, asking for trouble... Thanks Frederik - very good points. It would be really good for students that are involved with OSM to propose projects. Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Printed map books
Hi Paul, This is very good. I had to convert the print 'x'.format() statements into the ' %d ' % (xxx) format to get it to run on my computer (not sure if that is a python version issue), but it is producing nice clear paginated output. Thanks Graham. On 22 February 2012 03:38, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: I’ve thrown something together in python. It uses mapnik for rendering the maps and cairo for page layout. It’s on github at https://github.com/pnorman/mapbook but it’s very much in a development stage. I intend to add **- **Arrows at the edges, indicating what page to go if you want to look in that direction **- **An index page at the front **- **The ability to skip maps ** ** *From:* Graham Jones [mailto:grahamjones...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Sunday, February 19, 2012 2:50 AM *To:* Paul Norman *Cc:* Steve Bennett; talk@openstreetmap.org *Subject:* Re: RE: [OSM-talk] Printed map books ** ** My townguide python script does that - it uses a library to put the mapnik generated images onto pdf pages along with other text. from my phone On 19 Feb 2012 09:37, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: Pdfatlas appears to use a custom rendering language, and I’d rather avoid that. It also hasn’t been updated in 5 years. What I’m considering writing is a set of python scripts that build the map with mapnik and then piece the pages together. Do you think inkscape is the easiest way to build the PDFs from the command line? *From:* Graham Jones [mailto:grahamjones...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Sunday, February 19, 2012 1:08 AM *To:* Steve Bennett *Cc:* Paul Norman; talk@openstreetmap.org *Subject:* Re: [OSM-talk] Printed map books Hi, The two 'townguide' ones are mine, but the demonstration web service at townguide.webhop.n... -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Printed map books
Great! I will have a go with it when I get back home. Graham from my phone On 22 Feb 2012 03:38, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: I’ve thrown something together in python. It uses mapnik for rendering the maps and cairo for page layout. It’s on github at https://github.com/pnorman/mapbook but it’s very much in a development stage. I intend to add **- **Arrows at the edges, indicating what page to go if you want to look in that direction **- **An index page at the front **- **The ability to skip maps ** ** *From:* Graham Jones [mailto:grahamjones...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Sunday, February 19, 2012 2:50 AM *To:* Paul Norman *Cc:* Steve Bennett; talk@openstreetmap.org *Subject:* Re: RE: [OSM-talk] Printed map books My townguide python script does that - it uses a library to put the mapnik generated images ont... ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Printed map books
Hi, The two 'townguide' ones are mine, but the demonstration web service at townguide.webhop.net is not working, sorry (had a little disk crash a year ago, and never quite got around to putting it back together...) Getting a nice printable booklet working has been on my todo list for ages - there is a rough implementation of it in the townguide code, but that is really a proof of concept rather than a finished work.I must admit to not developing townguide recently, but if there is demand for this, I will have a go at getting a booklet implementation workingyou will have to give me a few weeks though, but the code is all open source, so if you would like to work on it, I can explain how it works. I think there is another option called pdfatlas - This is aiming to do something similar, but I failed to get it working when I tried - can't remember why though - worth searching on the OSM wiki for it. Regards Graham. On 19 February 2012 08:55, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Paul, I asked about this a while ago on the thread Generating a street directory from OSM? and got some good answers. Some relevant links that came up: http://code.google.com/p/townguide http://www.townguide.webhop.net/ http://www.maposmatic.org Steve On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: In my car I still use a printed map book, which I'd like to replace with one using OSM data and was wondering if anyone had any suggestions. The features I consider requirements are - Tiled pages with an index map at the front of the book - Arrows on each page indicating the number of the adjacent pages I'd also like - A street index at the back, indicating the street, city, map page and map grid I've looked at the wiki, but all of the programs I saw used osmarender ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Printed map books
My townguide python script does that - it uses a library to put the mapnik generated images onto pdf pages along with other text. from my phone On 19 Feb 2012 09:37, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: Pdfatlas appears to use a custom rendering language, and I’d rather avoid that. It also hasn’t been updated in 5 years. ** ** What I’m considering writing is a set of python scripts that build the map with mapnik and then piece the pages together. Do you think inkscape is the easiest way to build the PDFs from the command line? ** ** ** ** *From:* Graham Jones [mailto:grahamjones...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Sunday, February 19, 2012 1:08 AM *To:* Steve Bennett *Cc:* Paul Norman; talk@openstreetmap.org *Subject:* Re: [OSM-talk] Printed map books Hi, The two 'townguide' ones are mine, but the demonstration web service at townguide.webhop.n... ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-GB] United Kingdom Tagging Guidelines on the OSM wiki: due for an update?
If we treat path and footway as synonims, that would be ok. The only thing is that I (maybe incorrectly) treat footway as having an implied access permission (things like little paved walkways in towns) - a bit like highway=unclassified. On the other hand I treat highway=path as just being a statement of fact - 'there is a path here', so it needs some access tags adding to it. In my mind highway = footway is about the same as highway=path; foot=yes (or maybe designation=public_footpath, but that is more specific). We should clarify this if we are going to treat them the same or adopt one over the other. Graham. from my phone On 18 Feb 2012 08:28, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote: Possibly relevant here: Freemap's database has a rural bias, as it covers only certain counties: specifically W Sussex, Surrey, Hampshire, Wiltshire and Somerset in the south; Cheshire, Derbyshire, Lancashire and Cumbria in the north; and all of Wales. The dominance of footway still holds: footway (all) 81766 path (all) 14904 footway + designation 11711 path + designation 2042 footway + foot=permissive 3699 path + foot=permissive 1619 However I'd agree that what would really be interesting is the trend. The main thing that comes out of this data is how many footways OR paths lack either a designation tag or a foot=permissive. I suspect that many of these are rights of way or permissive paths. Since we really want to let people know where they can definitely walk, I think this is a more important issue to fix than footway vs path! Nick -Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com grahamjones...@gmail.comwrote: - To: Andrew Chadwick a.t.chadw...@gmail.com a.t.chadw...@gmail.com From: Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com grahamjones...@gmail.com Date: 17/02/2012 07:43PM Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] United Kingdom Tagging Guidelines on the OSM wiki: due for an update? On 17 February 2012 17:35, Andrew Chadwick a.t.chadw...@gmail.com wrote: I'd still ... ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org... ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] United Kingdom Tagging Guidelines on the OSM wiki: due for an update?
Hi You are dead right - I was talking about paths as in narrow strips of ground for walking on. I would tag a public footpath as highway=whatever is appropriate: unclassified|residential|service|track|path, designation=public_footpath. Graham. On 18 February 2012 10:48, Derick Rethans o...@derickrethans.nl wrote: Hi, On Sat, 18 Feb 2012, Graham Jones wrote: On the other hand I treat highway=path as just being a statement of fact - 'there is a path here', so it needs some access tags adding to it. In my mind highway = footway is about the same as highway=path; foot=yes (or maybe designation=public_footpath, but that is more specific). During the Weybridge mapping party, I'd encountered some residential roads (highway=residential) or service roads (highway=service) that were also public footpaths, so I've mapped those as: highway=residential designation=public_footpath http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/150222454 Marking those roads as highway=footway or highway=path makes no sense (to me). cheers, Derick -- http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php twitter: @derickr and @xdebug -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [OSM-talk] osm2pgsql hstore (was: Wind turbines no longer rendered on mapnik layer)
Thanks - I will give it another try - I have got a computer running Ubuntu 11.10, which has Postgres 9.1.2. I will create a second database with an hstore and see how it compares. Graham. On 17 February 2012 11:36, Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de wrote: Komяpa writes: - is a database generated by osm2pgsql with an hstore expected to perform similarly to one without? It performs at the same speed for me. Of course you're not supposed to use hstore for every tag, but just for those on highest zoom levels, where spatial indexes are used mostly, not indexes for other columns. if you are using Postgres 9.1 you are advised to update to 9.1.2. There was a bug introduced that prevented index usage. For example testing for a tag like SELECT * from table WHERE hstore ? tag did not use an index and could make a query horribly slow. We experienced this on Toolserver. Stephan -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-GB] United Kingdom Tagging Guidelines on the OSM wiki: due for an update?
On 17 February 2012 15:43, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.ukwrote: From my understanding, a minimum of ONE to TWO tags are needed: a) a highway tag. This represents the physical properties of the way, e.g. service, track, path (or footway - see below) b) if applicable, a designation tag. This represents the RoW status. I agree - I will normally tag a public footpath as highway = path | track, designation = public_footpath. I may include a surface=gravel | paved if it is not a mud path. I too only use highway=footway for urban footpaths, but you see plenty of them in the country and I don't usually bother changing them. I think there is an issue of rendering on the main mapnik stylesheet - If I remember correctly highway=path renders differently to highway=footway. I was going to look for a nice example of a mixture in the North Yorkshire Moors or Weardale, but it looks like someone has changed them to highway=path, so can't find any just now! Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] United Kingdom Tagging Guidelines on the OSM wiki: due for an update?
On 17 February 2012 17:35, Andrew Chadwick a.t.chadw...@gmail.com wrote: I'd still love to see some areas with big outbreaks of highway=path+designation-only, or highway=path+access-tags-only as representations of public paths. Must throw down some overpass-api quadrats around the country to see what people are doing in various areas, before we completely throw highway=path to the Germans. Statistically, would highway=path + designation=public_footpath vs. highway=footway + designation=public_footpath be a worthwhile comparison? Should get around the legacy issue with h=footway. I have just had a play with my shiny new British Isles database import with a hstore, so that I can get to the 'designation' tag. The following queries are looking at highway = footway v's highway=path, with or without some sort of designation (ie designation or foot not null). osm_gb_hs=# --total with a designation osm_gb_hs=# select highway, count(way) as count,cast(sum(st_length2d(way)/1000.) as int) as totLen from planet_osm_line where (highway='footway' or highway='path') and (((tags-'designation') is not null) or (foot is not null)) group by highway order by highway, totLen desc; highway | count | totlen -++ footway | 124970 | 66566 path| 27154 | 17313 (2 rows) osm_gb_hs=# osm_gb_hs=# --total without a designation osm_gb_hs=# select highway, count(way) as count,cast(sum(st_length2d(way)/1000.) as int) as totLen from planet_osm_line where (highway='footway' or highway='path') and (((tags-'designation') is null) and (foot is null)) group by highway order by highway, totLen desc; highway | count | totlen -++ footway | 224678 | 59942 path| 28628 | 14235 (2 rows) You can see that there are many more highway=footway rather than highway=path in the british isles. I think the totlen column is the total length in km, but my postgis is not very good so this could be wrong. Basically this says that there are 224k footways without a designation of some sort, and 125k with a designation. Similarly, there are 28k paths without a designation and 27k with a designation. [there are also over 20k highway=bridleway, which is an odd one]. Is this the sort of query you were thinking of? Of course I can produce huge lists of all the combinations of designations and foot values, but not that sure how useful that is, or how to present it. This is for the whole uk, so includes urban areas, which could account for the very large proportion of footways over paths. I wonder if there are relations for the national parks so I could run a few queries for those areas? Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] United Kingdom Tagging Guidelines on the OSM wiki: due for an update?
I think I have worked out how to do the query using national park relations, and get the following results for a small sample: National Park | Footway (no des) | Footway (des) | path (no des) | path (des) | New Forest (way ID 129493402) | 153| 213 |98 | 493 | North York Moors (rel 409150) | 294| 440 | 100 | 103 | Lake District (rel 287917)| 952| 1572 | 245 | 187 | So, I think you are right that highway=footway is more used, even in rural areas (except for the New Forest in the sample above). A more interesting comparison may be which are being created though, because highway=footway may be legacy stuff - I certainly used to use it, but stopped after a while and switched to highway=path. Hope that helps. Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[OSM-talk] osm2pgsql hstore (was: Wind turbines no longer rendered on mapnik layer)
On 16 February 2012 16:25, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Hi, On 02/16/2012 03:05 PM, Kay Drangmeister wrote: Isn't there a hstore in the rendering-db? No. This reminded me of a question I have been meaning to ask for quite a while - is a database generated by osm2pgsql with an hstore expected to perform similarly to one without? The only time I tried to use hstore, the performance of the whole database was dreadful (at least a factor of 5 slower, but I didn't do any proper benchmarking - I just gave up and re-created it without hstore and the problem went away).It may have been that something went wrong with the import that I did not notice, and it was not an hstore issue. Using hstore would be really good given the fashion for generating new keys with colons in them, but not with that reduction in performance, so I keep having to re-import my database to add new keys. grumble Why create a key generator:power_source rather than just use power_source. power_source is much more generic so you could re-cycle it for things like district heating, but generator:power_source is only ever going to be used for generating stations, and needs a new column in the database. /grumble. I think I just prefer more generic, re-usable keys rather than trying to invent a new one for each situation Regards Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] osm2pgsql hstore (was: Wind turbines no longer rendered on mapnik layer)
On 16 February 2012 18:51, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: On 02/16/2012 07:25 PM, Graham Jones wrote: This reminded me of a question I have been meaning to ask for quite a while - is a database generated by osm2pgsql with an hstore expected to perform similarly to one without? I never ran one with hstore when I think of what this must mean for the database engine, and storage space, then I shudder and would not be surprised by the factor 5 you mentioned. Thanks - I don't feel so bad about giving up so easily now! If you want to add a new key but avoid re-importing the full database, you can add the key to osm2pgsql's style file, somehow generate an .osm file that contains only the objects that have this tag, wrap this .osm file into a osmChangemodify.../**modify/osmChange instead of osm.../osm and throw it at osm2pgsql in append mode. That's a neat idea - will try that next time, thanks. People like keys that are understandable without context. Contrast this with a tag width=2 - where you have no chance in knowing what it means without looking at the whole thing. Yes - I think it is just a style difference - I am quite happy to interpret it from context for the sake of having a smaller number of unique keys to think about. Cheers Graham -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-GB] Backwards Areas
Ah. That would account for why I can not explain the effect from my edits - thanks! I just assumed it was my fault because of the timing, and at high zoom the first unaffected tile was next to the area I edited. Cheers Graham from my phone On 15 Feb 2012 09:03, Peter Reed peter.r...@aligre.co.uk wrote: Graham, ** ** I don’t think this is anything to do with your edit. ** ** About the same time as you edited Finchale, somebody accidentally added “building=yes” to the admin-area relation for North-East England, so the whole region turned into a building. ** ** It was fixed fairly quickly, and I think it has all been re-rendered on mapnik now. ** ** Pete Hi All, I had a mishap today when I added a closed area way around the Finchale ... * http://maps3.org.uk/images/OSM_colour_fill.png showing one of the* affected tiles that was left in my browser cache after I corrected it. The reason I am su... ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Backwards Areas
Thanks - I thought there was some sort of anticlockwise rule, but I had never noticed it make any difference. GJ from my phone On 15 Feb 2012 10:38, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 February 2012 19:34, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote: but I made the way run... Just for clarity, there's no difference between clockwise and anticlockwise polygons in OSM. Either direction works fine. There are, of course, one or two exceptions, the principle one being coastlines where you might be able to describe a whole island with just one way. But for buildings, gardens, ruins etc, there's no difference. Cheers, Andy ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Backwards Areas
Try again without the image attached... On 14 February 2012 19:28, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I had a mishap today when I added a closed area way around the Finchale Priory ruins in County Durham ( http://maps3.org.uk/EH_NTMap/client/brewmap.html?lon=-1.5409719944000244lat=54.81767586923475z=16). I tagged the closed way with historic=abbey, ruins=yes, barrier=fence (because there is a fence around the outside), but I made the way run clockwise rather than anticlockwise. This seemed to start flooding County Durham with a funny grey-purple colour (I am colour blind, sorry!) - image here http://maps3.org.uk/images/OSM_colour_fill.png showing one of the affected tiles that was left in my browser cache after I corrected it. The reason I am surprised at this effect is that now that I have reversed the way, things have returned to normal, but the inside of the way is not shaded (certainly not with the dark colour on the attached image). I am quite surprised by this - does anyone know what happened? Cheers Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [OSM-talk] Contact And Remap Campaign
Hi Mike, Thank you for the considered reply. Yes, it looks like 'orphan works' was the term I was thinking of. Thanks you for the links. I think the reason that I do not agree that re-mapping is the better option, is that I have no real interest in preserving my personal copyright or changing the licence - when I started contributing to this project I did not read the legal stuff enough to realise that I retained personal copyright of the data I contributed and thought that I was contributing to some sort of collective ownership project. I remember thinking that the attribution part of the licence was a nice idea because it is polite to say where you got the data from, nothing more than that. For this reason, putting effort into addressing the consequences of a licence change will never feel worthwhile to me, because I see no benefit in it. I understand that many people do think it is a good idea though, and respect that view. If I sounded disrespectful of people's copyright, then I apologise - I do not think that what I suggested is disrespectful, just a pragmatic interpretation that is unlikely to offend many, and for which there is a straightforward response to anyone that does not like what has been done to their data. Anyway for fear of this getting into the usual bad tempered 'debate' about licence issues, this is my last word on the subject! Cheers Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Contact And Remap Campaign
On 7 February 2012 05:34, Simone Cortesi sim...@cortesi.com wrote: Our default action should be: if somebody doesn't answer, then relicence I completely agree - we should assume that no response is equivalent to consent - if they complain about this action we can delete their data when they show enough interest to actually decline the licence/terms. Qui tacet consentire. Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-GB] Example of OSM National Turst property map?
Looks useful - could you add Cadw and Historic Scotland to the highlighted operators? (EG http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/117407496 ) Done! http://maps3.org.uk/EH_NTMap Now does CADW, Historic Scotland and Scottish Heritage. I ran out of coloured dots though, so will need some non-copyright infringing icons to use Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Example of OSM National Turst property map?
Not quite what you asked for, but your question persuaded me to do something that I have intended to do for ages, which is to map where the National Trust / English Heritage properties are on the map, so you can have a look at how they have been mapped You can see a very quick go at it here: http://maps3.org.uk/EH_NTMap. (if you click on one of the coloured markers, there is a link to the OSM object in the popup). I know it is not National Trust, but I am quite pleased with Dover Castle ( http://maps3.org.uk/EH_NTMap/client/brewmap.html?lon=1.322876214981079lat=51.12747179411275z=16), even if I forgot to add the 'operator' tag to make it appear on my new map... I think there is a lot of scope for micro-mapping these sort of places, but we could do with a specific rendering - castles especially need rendering for embankments and ditches to give an impression of the topography, country houses need flower beds etc. I did start a style to render Dover Castle like that...will see if I can find an example for you, but I think it is a long way off being something you would use to show off!. Regards Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [OSM-talk] Critical Mass for license change-over
Mike, Thank you for the detailed report and request for comments. This is my view on where we are. I think clarity on what will be deleted is very important, because without that it is hard to make a judgement on the cost-benefit of going ahead with the licence change. I will probably need a reminder about the positive side of the balance, because as I see it at the moment, it is mostly negative. We should not assume that contributors' acceptance of the new licence means that they are particularly in favour of it - they may have just accepted because it was easier than getting involved in the argument, and did not see it as doing any harm. From a personal point of view I fall into that category - I have no interest in changing the licence, but am not against it per-se, so accepted. Because I see negligible benefit in changing the licence, I find it very hard to justify data loss by progressing with it. Some of the numbers in the links you provided look very low to me, but I may have been interpreting them wrong. I also think it is a huge distraction of effort and resources - people have written tools (like those you refer to) to look at the possible effect of the change, and lots of people are putting effort into 're-mapping' areas. I feel there would be more constructive things to do. Given these issues, I wish I had thought about the consequences a lot more before I voted in favour of starting the process! But if we assume that there will not be a huge cry to abandon the change, as there seem to be a lot of people who are genuinely in favour of it, then I would like to see clarity on what will be deleted. My main issue with it is the assumption that is currently being made that people who do not respond to requests to accept or decline the new licence are treated as decliners. I have tried to contact some people in my are who made a few edits and disappeared, but they have not responded. I think it is overly pessimistic to treat these as decliners - we should assume they accept unless they complain and make a definitive statement that they decline.This is especially important for people who may have deceased - I would not like to think that if my near miss cycling accident had turned out worse, that my contributions would be deleted - that does not seem right to me. Without clarity on what the criteria for deleting information will be, I do not think I can make a judgement on whether we have reached a 'critical-mass'. Sorry for the rambling reply. To summarise my views: - We should not assume that everyone that has accepted the licence is particularly in favour of it - they may be pretty much neutral on it. - We should not treat non-responders as decliners, as this is overly pessimistic, and in my judgement is unlikely to be what the non-responders would want. - I will make a judgement on whether we have reached the 'critical mass' once we have clarity on what Thank you again for asking for feedback, and sorry I did not give you a straight answer. Regards Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] How I got here - was Geocaching.com moved to OSM (partly)
Hi Rob, On 21 January 2012 14:30, Rob Warren war...@muninn-project.org wrote: I've been working on an ontology for graves and cemetery for use with linked open data [1]. Would there be any interest in setting up an LOD gateway for grave data on the OSM? best, rhw [1] http://rdf.muninn-project.org/**ontologies/graves.htmlhttp://rdf.muninn-project.org/ontologies/graves.html As no-one else has responded, I will have to show my ignorance and admit that I do not know what you mean. There are often responses on these lists that 'we' do not want data type 'X' in the main OSM database - it should be in a separate one. So, if you are proposing to set up a separate database and show how it could be lined to OSM, that would be really good. I am afraid I could not work out what the ontology meant - is it a database schema, or a template for how to describe graves in XML? There has been quite a bit of discussion about mapping historical things here recently and I wonder if this could be incorporated into some sort of general 'historicOSM' database? Sorry for being dense! Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] geojson
On 21 January 2012 08:47, Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org wrote: can i h ave the code of the free-map.org.uk? so i can learn how it work still seeking a way to make POI using GeoJSON Frans, I think Nick's Fremap Code is here: http://www.free-map.org.uk/svn/freemap/fmap2012/ws/ (linked from his blog entry http://www.free-map.org.uk/wordpress/?p=221). This would be well worth looking at, because it is a better solution than the one I used for BrewMap, which has all of the data in a single file, so would not work well if there is a lot of data. I have started on a geoJSON version of the brewmap server code in the TiledData branch of brewmap https://github.com/jones139/BrewMap. It does not work properly yet, but you can see the postgresql queries that return geoJSON. I intend to have a look at Nick's code and use a similar model for brewmap. Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] geojson
Hi Frans, The BrewMap code is fine for small amounts of data - but it will not scale to large datasets, so it is worth keeping that in mind when you think of other projects to base on it - I think the approach Nick has taken will scale better, so it is still worth looking at. Regards Graham. On 21 January 2012 09:26, Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org wrote: GRaham, your BrewMap run well :0 now student working on it ;) brewmap.osmosa.net run here, we try to move the datasource from openstreetmap.org to osmosa.net and you will see the apps based on Brwemap shortly,, thx for sharing it On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote: On 21 January 2012 08:47, Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org wrote: can i h ave the code of the free-map.org.uk? so i can learn how it work still seeking a way to make POI using GeoJSON Frans, I think Nick's Fremap Code is here: http://www.free-map.org.uk/svn/freemap/fmap2012/ws/ (linked from his blog entry). This would be well worth looking at, because it is a better solution than the one I used for BrewMap, which has all of the data in a single file, so would not work well if there is a lot of data. I have started on a geoJSON version of the brewmap server code in the TiledData branch of brewmap. It does not work properly yet, but you can see the postgresql queries that return geoJSON. I intend to have a look at Nick's code and use a similar model for brewmap. Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] geojson
Hi Frans, I haven't checked Nick's code, but I think that it works by the client requesting data for the specific area that is being displayed on the map. The BrewMap code just uses a single data file to cover the entire area (in this case the uk), so even if you zoom in very close, it still uses data for the whole uk. This is fine if you only have a few hundred data points, but will become very slow if you have tens of thousands. Now for low zoom levels (large displayed areas) this amounts to the same thing, so there would be no benefit, unless you do some filtering on the server side to simplify the data (eg group POIs if they are going to be plotted on top of each other). I have not done this yet, but Nick, and the folks working on KothicJS are likely to have thought about it and may have solutions, which is why I think it is worth investigating how they do it. Whether it is worth putting effort into simplifying the data on the server depends on how much data you are dealing with. Regards Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] confuse with OSM API
Hi Frans, I have drawn a simplified version of the Components of OSM picture ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Develop) - you can see it here: http://maps3.org.uk/doc/OSM_Data_Flows.pdf http://maps3.org.uk/doc. What I am trying to show is that the editors talk to the main OSM API database. The planet file you used to populate your own database to make your tileserver is essentially a copy of the data in the API database. The editors can also display tiles, but they do that just like any other web browser would - they are just using them as background images. Therefore unless you want to have your own private data, that is not in OSM, you should just edit normally and use osmosis and osm2pgsql to keep your local database up to date with any edits, then use your local database to generate tiles. Hope that helps a bit. Graham. On 21 January 2012 09:20, Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org wrote: hi all i am in discussion with OSMAnd, related to implement OSMAnd in non OSM.org domain, like our domain osmosa.net and it need Tile, so OSMAnd communicate with Tile. and we know there is OSM API, which used by JOSM. and we know JOSM also talking with tile, we can see the tile in JOSM so... i am confuse, how many API inside OSM, that we can use. i tought only from OSM API.. but it isnt F ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Request for Romano-British features
Mick, On 15 January 2012 00:54, mick bare...@tpg.com.au wrote: One example of my long-term goals (I'll leave them to my Grandchildren ;) ) is to be able to take say an layer containing prehistoric monumental and settlement features and look at the extent to which the Romans developments respected these. In the fullness of time and with plenty of support, I'd like to see layers to cover all periods of history covered. Me too, but I would not expect the main OSM page to do this - we will have to have a separate 'OSM-history' map I think. This requires a renderer / display set up that allows the use to select what features you want and filter out those you don't. What I can see of OSM the editing tools are quite good, though they could/should be enhanced if my goals reach 'critical mass'. The rendrering engine will require significant enhancement to support selectable layers unless I have missed something. I will make a mock up rendering tonight to see if it is the sort of thing you are thinking of - I was just thinking of adding a layer switcher to my existing history map (http://maps3.org.uk/tiles/historic.html) to allow you to select prehistoric/roman/modern features etc. Nag me if I don't get back to you 'cos it will mean I got distracted by something else! Cheers Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Request for Romano-British features
This requires a renderer / display set up that allows the use to select what features you want and filter out those you don't. The rendrering engine will require significant enhancement to support selectable layers unless I have missed something. Hi Mick, Is this the sort of thing you had in mind ( http://maps3.org.uk/tiles/historic_layers.html)? It has a VERY crude filtering of prehistoric / Roman / medieval and 'modern' historic features, and an even rougher rendering of those features. (to do it properly we will need either civlization/period tags, or start/end dates, and spend a lot more time on the presentation than I have!). But, there is a layer switcher on the right hand side of the map where you can select a base map (I used the standard OSM rendering and cycle map, because I thought that if we do it for real, we would want a topographic base layer more than a motorway network?) Each layer is rendered a bit differently so you can see them change when you switch them on and off. Note that I have not rendered much of the map - it will get very slow as you zoom in, because it will start to render the map on demand, and my database seems a bit slow for some reason There are obviously lots of improvements - at the very least a link to an editor like we have on the brewmap http://brewmap.maps3.org.uk, so you can correct things that are tagged incorrectly, then different icons for different types of features within the layers (they are all the same at the moment). There is a 'how it works' section at the bottom of the maphttp://maps3.org.uk/tiles/historic_layers.htmlif you are curious about how I have done it. Hope that helps. Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[Talk-GB] How to get a Relation History?
Hi, I am trying to find the history of the relation covering the Weardale Way ( 86561 ). I can view the relation itself ok at http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/86561, but when I try to view the history of it with http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/86561/history, I always get a 'sorry...took too long to retrieve' error. Does anyone know an alternative way of finding out who edited it before me? Alternatively, I'll ask the question here in case the other user reads this list During the Summer I had a go at mapping the Weardale Way from Killhope eastwards. We found it very poorly signposted and there seem to be quite a few branches off it according to the signs (I suspect that the 'official' route may have changed, but there are some old signs still in place on the ground). Since then someone has had a good go at finishing it off, and it looks like it is complete all the way to the coast now ( http://hiking.lonvia.de/relation/86561?zoom=11lat=54.7635lon=-1.93298route=1hill=1.56). We were out near Wolsingham yesterday ( http://hiking.lonvia.de/relation/86561?zoom=13lat=54.72406lon=-1.905route=1hill=1.56) and I found another 'Weardale Way' public footpath sign, that seems to form a spur off to the West of Wolsingham...but I didn't see any other signs, so it looks like a path to nowhere. I am minded to believe that the sign I saw with 'Weardale Way' written on it was a mistake and it should have been a plain 'public footpath' sign, but I do not know how to check this. I wondered if whoever had completed the Weardale Way had another source of information about the route that we can use in OSM to check it. If we can confirm that the sign is incorrect, I will remove the extra spur path from the route. On a related subject, there are a lot of signs for a 'Mineral Valleys Walk' in that area that take you past a lot of old industrial artefacts - I'll have a go at mapping that in the Spring if anyone would like to help. Thanks Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] How to get a Relation History?
There's a great OSM Deep History services at http://osm.mapki.com/history/ http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=86561 Thanks Andy - I had forgotten about that. Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] How to get a Relation History?
On 15 January 2012 10:27, David Dixon da...@ddixon.force9.co.uk wrote: I'm not the user who recently finished off the Weardale Way (and I don't know whether that was done from survey) but surveying the Way has been one of my projects. The route between Frosterley and Wolsingham used to be a low level route running close to the railway (the way you've just walked), but was subsequently changed to a more interesting higher level route (the one that's part of the complete OSM relation). The signs you saw have almost certainly been superseded, but perhaps could be mapped as a separate Old Weardale Way or alternative route relation? A change of route would be consistent with what I have seen on the ground - if I have followed the old route in places, it could account for why it is so badly signed! I think having a 'Weardale Way Alternate Route' relation is probably the best approach, otherwise you get a bit of a mess with all the little bits of route that do not appear to go anywhere. I will email the others who have contributed to the route to see what they know about the alternative bits. Cheers Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [OSM-talk] Request for Romano-British features
Hi Mick, On 14 January 2012 05:28, mick bare...@tpg.com.au wrote: My goal was to create a 'Bastard Son of OSM' as a means to share my work with those people of similar interest but, as OSM has no ability to offer user selected layers I'm looking at other options. Please let us know which option you settle on - I would be interested to see how that works. I think I misunderstood your original question. I see now that you were proposing to set up a completely different system, based on the OSM software. You could easily use the existing OSM software to produce different map layers for display based on start/end date / civilization / period etc. for display to users (as long as you tag the features in the map with these!). Do you mean editor support for 'layers' to make it easy to edit only features with a specific start/end date / civlization etc.?The JOSM editor allows you to filter data ( http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Dialog/Filter), which could give you a similar effect (e.g. only display data tagged as civilization=roman etc.). I am not sure if you can do that in Potlatch though. Therefore I think you could achieve what you want with existing OSM software. Maybe a bit of customisation to make editing easier or to allow filtering on date ranges. Regards Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Integration and POI and specific project
Hi, You can plot POIs stored in a separate file or database using Openlayers: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Openlayers_POI_layer_example. Or I have an equivalent that uses the Leaflet library instead ( http://brewmap.maps3.org.uk/client/brewmap.html - source at https://github.com/jones139/BrewMap). The best way to provide the data will depend on how much data you have to display - the two examples above are for very modest amounts of data - as you get more and more you will need a way of providing just the data for the area of map being displayed. Regards Graham. On 4 January 2012 21:07, Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org wrote: hi all i am working for a website called strainstory.com, a web to collect indonesian endangered species, which growing rapidly in indonesia. and wanna to map the species, biotope, and put as POI in the OSM, which right now we use osmosa.net (idea still). any idea for integration tips? where should i put the information (right now in strainstory database), and how to show in openlayers? tips welcome F ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Request for Romano-British features
On 2 January 2012 09:49, Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote: ** I've been using historic=roman_road but will be switching to historic=road, culture=roman as per an excellent tagging schema proposed by Francesco de Virgilio at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Fradeve11/prove2 , as this will enable a pan-European approach. I hadn't seen that proposal - I agree it would be good to have a world-wide scheme, but I am concerned that we could potentially end up with different tagging schemes here...and I know how unpopular it would be to 'correct' them electronically in the future As far as I can tell there is: 1. The proposed culture= (no wiki page for it yet other than http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Fradeve11/prove2 2. historic:civilization= - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic:civilization I started a wiki page to record how British historical sites are tagged ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Historic_Britain) - It would be good to update that with the proposal - the main thing that is missing from it is a list of 'cultures' or 'civilizations' that we can all use. Neither culture nor historic:civilization are that well used, but there are more historic:civilization entries (see http://taginfo.osm.org). What I intend to do with my map is to have different layers for different cultures/civilizations so that you can see all roman features, or all cold war relics etc. Regards Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Request for Romano-British features
On 2 January 2012 11:58, Joseph Reeves iknowjos...@gmail.com wrote: the main thing that is missing from it is a list of 'cultures' or 'civilizations' that we can all use. In the UK at least there's a defined and well used list of periods provided by the Archaeology Data Service: http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/Imagebank/period.jsf That list has an elegant simplicity about it. Richard Light added a link to the wiki page to a classification system used by English Heritage ( http://light.demon.co.uk/eh-periods.rdf). Unfortunately it is in quite a complicated format, and I have not had chance to sit down and decode it into a simple proposal for tagging - do you know how this compares to your list? Also please note that the above list is for the UK only. On the continent, for example, different things happened and happened at different times. It probably wouldn't be possible to get a coherent tagging scheme across Europe that made any sense; there's simply not a consistent European past that could be represented in such a way. I agree - the historic:civilizationhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic:civilizationpage has recommendations for different regions, so we would just need to add a suitable UK (or British Isles?), scheme to it. My concern was more about using 'culture' rather than 'civilization' and 'period' as that would seem to be a competing tagging system, rather than just a regional variation on a general scheme. Regards Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Request for Romano-British features
On 2 January 2012 15:47, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote: Historic mapping wiki page has yet to be created, but start_date and end_date would seem to replace the need for Key:historic:period if accurate data is available. I think the issue is availability of accurate data - I am pretty confident that I can look at a building and think it is Tudor, or a fortress and guess that it is Nepoleonic, but guessing the date seem somehow harder to me. I would like the tagging to be accessible to non-history buffs, so more qualitative categories would seem easier than trying to be too precise. By all means include start_date if it is known though! Having been watching a program recently on the development of various industrial areas of the UK, it would seem that there is substantial data available to provide historic maps. Development and decline of the railway system for example is something I've been gathering historic maps that provides considerable accurate timelines. I like this sort of thing too, which is why we will need more categories than currently proposed 'modern' is too wide given all the changes in the 20th Century. The only question that still has not been addressed is one that covers a lot of parallel data. SHOULD it be uploaded to the main database, or should we have a working method for linking secondary databases into the rendering process. Which to my mind still provides the most logical way forward. But at what point does an historic element get degraded to the secondary storage area? Or more important ... what classifies historic data as being 'main stream'? My view is that if it is something that is still there on the ground (e.g. the ruins of an old tin mine), then it should go in the main database. If there is nothing physically to see, it belongs in a specialist historic map. I haven't thought about how to make this separate map though Regards Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-GB] Waterways Map (was invisible)
Hi Will, I have put what I had previously back on line at http://www.maps.webhop.net/canals. The data is quite out of date (maybe 10 months) - I realised that I am lacking the 'boat=' tag from my database so can not re-render it tonight - I will re-generate it over the next couple of days. I did not think anyone was using this because there is an alternative at http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/ito_map/main?view=24. This one could be developed into more of a 'user' map rather than a 'mapper' tool though - if you are interested in developing the cartography that would be great - it could do with icons for locks, moorings, water, fuel etc. I will move this to my 'maps3.org.uk' site (which is more responsive) from an end user point of view once I have sorted out the database so I can render the tiles on demand. Regards Graham. On 1 January 2012 17:55, Will Abson will.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Graham, I came across your waterways map a little while ago, and thought it was a great visualisation tool. I'm just now trying to take a fresh look at some of the waterways data for the UK that's held within OSM, but I see that your map is sadly no longer accessible (I get a 404). If you'd be interested in making it available again then I could perhaps provide some assistance as I have a small Linode server that's currently not doing too much, but I would need your help to explain how you put the map together. It would be great to get the waterways map (or something similar) back online again, so please let me know if I can help. Cheers, Will. On 2 February 2011 21:02, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Folks, Thanks to Chris for reminding me, I have updated my canals / waterways map - it should now be up to date as of the early hours of this morning (http://maps.webhop.net/canals). It looks like good progress from the last update - much more like a network now, but there are still some gaps! The things I noticed from my part of the country is that the River Tyne is not rendered - must not have a 'boat=yes' tag - does anyone know how far up the river you can get a boat to add this? Conversely I am not convinced that the river Wear upstream of Durham is navigable - I thought it got pretty shallow at Shincliffe? Also there is the problem of a Weir, so maybe there are only bits of it downstream that are navigable too? This is still running on the computer in my living room so will seem slow because of my internet connection, but I am working on getting minutely updating working on a little virtual server, which will seem better from the outside world - I will be looking for suggestions for other visualisations to include once I have got that working (adding more is very easy once it is working), so please think of anything else you would like to see. Graham. On 19 January 2011 21:28, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you all for your comments. Dealing with 'disused' was nice and easy - I have deleted disused locks altogether and changed disused canals to a fainter, dotted line (see just north of Carnforth near Lancaster). I am not sure I have ever seen a 'disused' canal - does this mean a ditch, or just an overgrown, impassable canal? I have also prevented locks being shown until you zoom in to zoom level 10. Updated version now rendering at http://maps.webhop.net/canals, using the mapnik style http://maps.webhop.net/canals/canal2.xml.. Adding navigable rivers is a good idea, but will take more doing because my database does not include the 'boat=' tag - I will have to re-import the whole uk, which takes a few hours... Are there any other waterway specific tags that should be included? What points of interest should a waterways map highlight - I only have locks at the moment, because I remember these being the interesting part of canal boating, but I can add other things - especially if anyone would like to draw an icon for it - otherwise we will end up with another one of my dodgy drawings! Graham. On 19 January 2011 19:24, Chris Moss mosch...@googlemail.com wrote: Thanks Graham and Malcolm, Certainly I can see for the first time where the gaps are in the waterway coverage and it encourages me to explore mapnik and see how everything works. Chris ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-legal-talk] License Change View on OSM Inspector
Is the process for deciding whether or not to delete a node set in stone? I am fairly sure that I have moved the majority of those nodes from where they were originally (I am fairly sure because there was originally only 1 path on OSM going up the hill when there are 2 different paths on the ground), so surely if I moved them from their original position they can't be deleted just because the specific node id in the database was originated by someone else?? that's crazy - what's the logic behind that decision - shouldn't the check ensure that they are at least in the same place as the originator positioned them? Otherwise I can see a lot of senseless destruction and that makes me really quite sad. I agree, it sounds mad, and I find it hard to believe that 'we' would do this. Surely we need to apply a bit of pragmatism to this and think about 'reasonableness'? I can see that it is reasonable to delete the contributions from someone who has explicitly said that they do not agree to the new terms - that is a shame, but it is their choice. From the discussion on this list (and I have not looked into it properly - I gave up on thinking about licences when the 'debate' all got out of hand earlier in the year), it sounds as though if someone who has neither accepted nor declined the terms has touched an object, that object will be deleted - is this really the intention of those looking after this licence change? I see there are three potential reasons for someone neither accepting nor declining the terms: - They really do not agree with them, but for some reason that I can not think of they decide not to click the 'decline' button - These are an awkward case, but it is up to them to make their intentions clear. - They left the project having made their contribution and are now not contactable (changed email address etc.), or so un-interested that they do not respond. - They could be really keen OSM contributors who have since died, so are not answering their emails. In my opinion, it would be reasonable to assume that the last two have the best interests of the project at heart and do not want to have their contributions deleted, so they should be retained. If at some point they contact us to say that they object to their contributions being in the database, then yes, delete them, but leave them there until they do. A pragmatic approach along these lines would seem quite reasonable to me, and would save a lot of un-necessary re-work - deleting contributions of people that we can not make contact with just seems excessive, and is probably not what the non-contactable contributors wanted anyway. Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-legal-talk] License Change View on OSM Inspector
On 13 December 2011 21:25, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote: The intentions don't matter here, its to be able to defend the new licensing / copyright in court you need to show all the content has come from people who have accepted the new license. It will only come to court if someone sues, and in the context of this re-licensing discussion, the only person who would do that is someone who has not accepted the new terms, and objects to their data being retained. My view is that a reasonable approach would be to assume that non-contactable mappers actually want their data to be used, but if they complain and say that this is not the case, delete it thenso it would never go to court. But I think it is a defensible position anyway - xxx complained that we retained his data, so we have done what he wanted and deleted it Anyway, that is enough of legal stuff for me, but wanted to share what I think is a reasonable alternative approach to dealing with this issue, rather than re-mapping things that people may not actually want deleting in the first place. Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-GB] OS VectorMap water feature import
If not, I have got them on dvd if anyone would like them - probably quicker for me to post them than upload to a server - I prefer handling the new bigger files because it keeps the style files for rendering simpler. Graham from my phone On 13 Dec 2011 08:51, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote: Is the version from os.openstreetmap the original? http://os.openstreetmap.org/data/ Cheers Andy -Original Message- From: Borbus [mailto:bor...@gmail.com] Sent: 12 December 2011 22:... ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] OS VectorMap water feature import
On 11 December 2011 18:46, Tim François sk1pp...@yahoo.co.uk The entire process took a long, long time (we're talking many hours), as the OS data is all fragmented and needs joining up. This is one where it is certainly possible to import the data, but to do it manually is going to be a huge amount of effort, and I wonder if it is really worth the effort? I see the main benefit of OSM in providing 'added value' geographic data that is not available in other freely available sources. Last time I made a map of an outdoor area, I found that the OS Vector Map District (VMD) water features added a lot to it, because the OSM data was pretty plain. In the end I actually made the map from a mixture of OSM and VMD Data, with SRTM generated contours. I certainly used OSM footpaths and route relations (because they are not in any of the other data sets) - as I wanted to highlight a walking route. I used VMD waterways because they were far more complete than OSM. I think that for the area I was working on (Weardale) I used VMD roads too, because there are still a lot missing from OSM. Where I struggled was in woodland areas - you get a lot more if you use VMD, but I also know that quite a lot have been felled, which can be changed in OSM, but not VMD, so this was a difficult choice. (You can see the output herehttps://github.com/jones139/Mapnik-OSM-Styles/raw/master/weardale_way/image_vmd_fc.png (but there is something wrong with the grid on the version on that server, sorry!and the rendering style is not as pretty as the main OSM one). I wonder if a more productive use of our efforts would be in developing tools to make it easier to make such merged data maps and highlight the 'value added' bits from OSM that make it stand out from a Land Ranger map? [Things like showing all the industrial archeology, real ale pubs etc.]. I am working (very slowly) on a tool that will pull together the required data to produce these sort of things and render it at high resolution for printing.It is not at the sort of state that I would publish it and recommend that someone just tries it (no nice front end), but it is getting there and I can make maps from it when I want to. I would be happy to put more effort into it if there was interest (or anyone interested in helping!). One final thing is that if we do say that we will not import the VMD data into OSM, this means that it will not appear on the main OSM web site map. We could show off what is possible though by making a 'osm-uk' site with a web map that combines the various data sources in a web map? Regards Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [OSM-talk] GNIS quality improvement, was: USGS Topo maps
On 28 November 2011 19:10, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote: That makes sense, but how do you deal with logging the modifier of the data - is this a webapp, and do people log in with OAuth? If you decide to develop this as a web application, it might be worth looking at the outcome of one of last year's Google Summer of Code projects, where Michael Daines was working on a simple map editor based on javascript (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Map_Editor - source code at https://github.com/mdaines/simple-map-editor). He got it working with OAuth so it could be a good basis for your application if you produce a custom user interface for it. Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] OSM based project - PrishtinaBuses.info
Hi, It looks very good, well done! I'll have a look at your code to see how it works. Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-GB] Drinking Map of UK
On 27 November 2011 12:07, Craig Loftus craigloftus+...@googlemail.com wrote: There has been a little discussion on the talk page about this. I think Andy is mainly interested in specialist shops (shop=alcohol) and noting whether they sell real ale, either draught or bottled. As a first punt I suggested overloading real_ale (real_beer), with 'draught' and 'bottled' values. Did we agree on these tags? Nobody disagreed. There haven't been any other suggestions, or the objections I expected to the use of real_beer. Go on then, I'll disagree - why do we need a new key called real_beer (currently 1 use in the database) when there is an existing key called real_ale with 878 entries in the database. It could be that I am not a beer-buff and don't appreciate the distinction, but they are synonymous to my simple mind, so I would have just gone with real_ale, which is a more common term as far as I am aware. ducks waiting for abuse from fans of real beer! I am happy to try out our current rendering system with pubs, but I think it will feel a bit sluggish (lots more data than for breweries etc.) - working on a better system now... But I will need a bribe - Icons. If someone provides a set of icons for un-real and real ale (beer) pubs, off-licences etc, I will put them on a map for you! PNG images at say 32x32 pixels will be fine. Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Drinking Map of UK
It is only splitting hairs if your beer horizon extends no further than the channel. Where I was coming from is that I think that 'real-stuff=yes' is useful as it distinguishes the supplier of 'craft' products from 'industrial' ones. The problem is that there are lots of different types of stuff - ale, beer, cider, perry - I am sure there are lots more. Having a separate key for each one seems a bit over the top, because at one level a user may just want to know if a place just sells Carlsberg and John Smiths, or something more interesting. Those with more advanced pallets than I may well then be interested if it the interesting thing is ale, beer, fancy Belgian lager things, German wheat beer, hand crushed apple cider etc. etc. Therefore I would prefer to see a more generic type of 'real-stuff' key used which can be 'yes' or 'ale|beer|.', depending on how keen the mapper is feeling. We could then show every outlet with 'real-stuff'!=null on the map and link to its web site. We could also have different icons for different values of 'real-stuff'. An equivalent of tagQueries could identify where philistines have said real-stuff=yes, so a connoisseur can add the extra detail if required. I thought that 'real ale' had become quite a generic term so could have been used as a synonym for 'real-stuff', but it would be interesting to know what the Germans and Belgians would call their posh beers to see if real-ale is too English - or is that where the proposal for 'real-beer' came from? Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Drinking Map of UK
On 25 November 2011 10:02, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote: The page is working for me again. Yes, “Former Brewery” is the former Ridley’s site. Bishop Nick launched their first beer at The Compasses, Littley Green (next village over) recently; their old brewery tap. Not sure what the site used for now, but am about to change “name” to “description” as it has never been called “Former Brewery”. ** ** Ed Maybe 'Former' in the name is a bit of a giveaway and I should filter those out of the tagQueries listI suppose the question is are there any 'Former Mansfield Brewery' etc., now brewing something else? For the non-beer lover's out there, you may notice that Craig has implemented layer switching, so you can click on the map key on BrewMaphttp://brewmap.maps3.org.ukto switch layers on and off, so you can just look at for instance wineries if you prefer. I am quite surprised how many wineries there are in the UK Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Drinking Map of UK
I notice the South/ South West is looking a bit empty, so I started a list of places I know but need investigating further before marking on the map (some I could do as single node as a very rough placement - but should be able to get better trace / identify stuff using Bing Aerials). Thanks to user m902 for mapping some that were on my list. Thanks - I saw 'm902' had been busy! In case some of you wonder what has happened to vineyards, I have removed things that are just tagged as 'landuse=vineyard' from the map (on the ground that that means a field full of plants, and as Craig said if we do that for wine, we should show hopp fields for beer). I am now showing only craft/industry = winery instead. But because lots of vineyards are wineries too, I have added them to the tagQueries page. Regards Graham. On 23 November 2011 23:05, Robert Norris rw_nor...@hotmail.com wrote: -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Drinking Map of UK
On 22 November 2011 09:02, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote: Is there a way to flag false positives? Well, I don't have one at the moment. I was thinking of trying to refine them out of the tagQueries list by trapping landuse=retail etc., but you are right that this will not work for everything. It is a bit of an abuse of the tag, but makes sense to me, so how about brewery=no? Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Drinking Map of UK
On 22 November 2011 20:46, Craig Loftus craigloftus+...@googlemail.comwrote: It is a bit of an abuse of the tag, but makes sense to me, so how about brewery=no? I think this is backwards. There is nothing wrong with naming something a brewery but it not being one. The marker should be applied to the tagQuery list, similar to Keepright. You could then write more exclusion rules if a pattern emerges from the entries being marked. You are right a separate exclusions list just for this map would be the most 'correct' thing to do to save putting spurious tags in the OSM database. I was being lazy though - a check for brewery!='no' tag is trivial to implement, whereas a way of allowing users to add items to an exclusions list takes a bit more doing (at least if we want a bit of security like user authentication). I do have a nearly finished codeigniter/bonfire application that could run on my server that does user authentication and I could add a module to that to manage an exclusions list, but I have never quite got around to finishing it. Could just do it manually for now I suppose? Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb