Reply reminder

2003-02-16 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello,

Occasionally I need to reply to a message but can't do it at that
particular moment so would like to be able to mark it in an obvious
way so that I don't miss it later. I have mark message read as soon as
it is opened set. I would like to be able to easily (ie with one or
two keystrokes) set a message as needing to be replied to so that it
reminds me, either by colour or a pop up box.

I've looked at specials/remind later but can that sort of thing be
done in any easier way rather than going through all the dialogue
boxes or is there any other easy way? I'm probably missing the obvious
here :-)

-- 
Best regards,
Richard  

| Using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/6  SpamPal
| Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3
| and using the best browser: Opera7



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Reply reminder

2003-02-16 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Richard Wakeford [RW] wrote:'

RW Occasionally I need to reply to a message but can't do it at that
RW particular moment so would like to be able to mark it in an obvious
RW way so that I don't miss it later. I have mark message read as soon as
RW it is opened set. I would like to be able to easily (ie with one or
RW two keystrokes) set a message as needing to be replied to so that it
RW reminds me, either by colour or a pop up box.

You could use the message flagging for this.

You could drag and drop the message to a folder that is designated
for messages to be replied to.

You could create a manual filter that applies a special colour group
to the message. If you see a message with that particular colour
group, you know that the message needs to be replied to.

Finally, you can create a reply to the message and then save it as a
draft to your Outbox. It will not be sent while in the draft state.

RW I've looked at specials/remind later but can that sort of thing be
RW done in any easier way rather than going through all the dialogue
RW boxes or is there any other easy way? I'm probably missing the
RW obvious here :-)

This feature is currently in beta and should therefore be discussed
only on the beta list. This is in order to prevent confusion.

- --
  -=] allie_M [=-  {List Moderator}
   -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: My Public Keys - http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html

iD8DBQE+T4EnV8nrYCsHF+IRAqk4AJ4+8zay5kncrBP1p90RegZbsvRtTACePq5e
VUl966jYw5+pjOG4v8sK8oM=
=l15Q
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Reply reminder

2003-02-16 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Richard,

 Occasionally I need to reply to a message but can't do it at that
 particular moment so would like to be able to mark it in an obvious
 way so that I don't miss it later. I have mark message read as soon as
 it is opened set. I would like to be able to easily (ie with one or
 two keystrokes) set a message as needing to be replied to so that it
 reminds me, either by colour or a pop up box.

Use a Colour Group or just copy the message to a Pending_Reply folder.

In regards to specials/remind later is a feature in the 1.63 Beta
and should be discussed in TBBeta.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Reply reminder

2003-02-16 Thread Deborah W
On Sunday, February 16, 2003, 12:01:43 PM, Richard Wakeford wrote:

RW I've looked at specials/remind later but can that sort of thing be
RW done in any easier way rather than going through all the dialogue
RW boxes or is there any other easy way? I'm probably missing the
RW obvious here :-)

You could create a keyboard shortcut to perform whatever function you
choose - eg marking it with a specific colour. You'll find it at
View-Edit Shortcuts, or by pressing Alt-F12.

-- 
Deborah



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Reply reminder

2003-02-16 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Allie,

On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 at 07:16:35[GMT -0500](which was 12:16 where I
live) you wrote:

 You could use the message flagging for this.

 You could drag and drop the message to a folder that is designated
 for messages to be replied to.

The trouble with that is that it is already in its own designated
folder which would mean yet another filter to get it back to its
folder once replied to.

 You could create a manual filter that applies a special colour group
 to the message. If you see a message with that particular colour
 group, you know that the message needs to be replied to.

Now that's more like it but, even though I've not tried it, would it
over ride the colour of the group it's already in?

 Finally, you can create a reply to the message and then save it as a
 draft to your Outbox. It will not be sent while in the draft state.

That's the problem, I won't be replying until later, sometimes much
later if I completely forget about the message which is what caused
the problem in the first place :-)

-- 
Best regards,
Richard

| Using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/6  SpamPal
| Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3
| and using the best browser: Opera7



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Reply reminder

2003-02-16 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Miguel,

On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 at 13:26:07[GMT +0100](which was 12:26 where I
live) you wrote:

 Use a Colour Group or just copy the message to a Pending_Reply folder.

Do I actually have to select the colour group with the dialoge box or
can I assign a key stroke to it somehow?

 In regards to specials/remind later is a feature in the 1.63 Beta
 and should be discussed in TBBeta.

Yes, I thought about that but thought the question as a whole was
better for the general forum. Wrong again :-)

-- 
Best regards,
Richard

| Using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/6  SpamPal
| Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3
| and using the best browser: Opera7



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Reply reminder

2003-02-16 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Richard Wakeford [RW] wrote:'

RW The trouble with that is that it is already in its own designated
RW folder which would mean yet another filter to get it back to its
RW folder once replied to.

You could create replied filters for this folder. It's not as
difficult as it would seem. Just copy the Inbox filters to the
replied filter group and change the source folder name to that of
your 'for replies' folder.

In this way, once a reply is sent, the message is automagically
moved back to its correct folder.

RW Now that's more like it but, even though I've not tried it, would it
RW over ride the colour of the group it's already in?

Yes. A message cannot be labelled with more than one colour group at
a time.

 Finally, you can create a reply to the message and then save it as a
 draft to your Outbox. It will not be sent while in the draft state.

RW That's the problem, I won't be replying until later, sometimes much
RW later if I completely forget about the message which is what caused
RW the problem in the first place :-)

Regularly checking your Outbox to see what drafts are there would be
like looking out for messages labelled with particular colours,
wouldn't it?

Unless, you're looking for a way for the program to actually reach
out to you by popping up a reminder message, but that feature is in
beta. We could discuss it on the beta list.

- --
  -=] allie_M [=-  {List Moderator}
   -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: My Public Keys - http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html

iD8DBQE+T4hfV8nrYCsHF+IRAkUHAKDZ2mjZQsvQnuS5gIIHPECN+JAiWwCfTcO2
CQ4zReYx8Qd/513sd3dxrAM=
=a6Fd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Reply reminder

2003-02-16 Thread Deborah W
On Sunday, February 16, 2003, 12:39:44 PM, Richard Wakeford wrote:

 Use a Colour Group or just copy the message to a Pending_Reply
 folder.

RW Do I actually have to select the colour group with the dialoge box
RW or can I assign a key stroke to it somehow?

You can assign a keystroke by clicking on Alt-F12, then choosing the
colour group you want to use,  the keystroke you want to use for it.
Very simple :-)

-- 
Deborah



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Reply reminder

2003-02-16 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Richard,

 Use a Colour Group or just copy the message to a Pending_Reply folder.

 Do I actually have to select the colour group with the dialoge box or
 can I assign a key stroke to it somehow?

You can assign a keystroke.

If you care to see what I do to not forget any replies, you can look
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] dated 25 oct 2002 and
with Subject: Re: Displaying new status in account tree pane and
folder summary pane in the list archives.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Educational Version Headers

2003-02-16 Thread Kim
Hi all, :)

This is my first posting to the TBUDL list. I just started trying out
The Bat! a couple of days ago. So far I'm impressed.

If I choose to purchase The Bat, I qualify for the educational
discount (I am an elementary school teacher and have already written
to The Bat support to make sure that I qualify). I did a little
reading through the TBUDL archives yesterday, and saw that the
educational version is notated in the header of each e-mail sent.
One person mentioned that the header for that version gave out too
much information. Exactly what info is in the educational header that
isn't in the standard version of The Bat? I'm currently using the
evaluation version of The Bat, so I won't be able to check that out
until after I purchase one version or the other.

One other observance that I made is in the amount of information in
the headers of the evaluation version of The Bat vs. that of my
current e-mail client, Becky. There appears to be a *lot* more info
revealed in The Bat headers (evaluation) version that in that of
Becky. Does this change in the regular version of The Bat, or is this
the norm?

Thanks for your help.

-- 
Best regards,
Kim  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Editor - Viewing Font

2003-02-16 Thread Kim
Hi All,

Does anyone know if the next version of The Bat will allow for the
viewing of variable-width fonts in the Editor of The Bat? I am
currently trying out the evaluation version, and I was happy to see
that I was able to choose my favorite font (Verdana) for reading mail,
but I noticed that the font choice in the editor is limited to just
fixed-width fonts. I have a bit of difficulty with my eyes (I see
things ok, but because of a medical condition I have, things that are
uncomfortable to read soon lead to a migraine). I'd like to be able to
choose a font that is easy on the eyes. I have yet to find a
fixed-width font that fits the bill for me, so to speak. I'm using
Lucida Console in the editor at the moment, which is the closest I can
get to fit my needs. Does anyone know if the use of variable width
fonts will be available in the editor for viewing in the next version
of The Bat? Thanks.

-- 
Best regards,
Kim  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Educational Version Headers

2003-02-16 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Kim,

on Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:45:52 -0500GMT (16.02.03, 18:45 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

K This is my first posting to the TBUDL list.

Welcome to TBUDL then. :-)

K I just started trying out The Bat! a couple of days ago. So far I'm
K impressed.

I believe that. Everyone is. *S*

K I did a little reading through the TBUDL archives yesterday, and saw
K that the educational version is notated in the header of each
K e-mail sent. One person mentioned that the header for that version
K gave out too much information. Exactly what info is in the
K educational header that isn't in the standard version of The Bat?

There are three version lines: educational, personal, professional. If
you believe it is too much information that you're in the educational
sector, there are tools to cut this off. But there is nothing more
hidden in the headers.

K I'm currently using the evaluation version of The Bat, so I won't be
K able to check that out until after I purchase one version or the
K other.

No. Your version is fully functionable. Press ctrl+shift+K on any
message and all headers will be displayed.

K One other observance that I made is in the amount of information in
K the headers of the evaluation version of The Bat vs. that of my
K current e-mail client, Becky. There appears to be a *lot* more info
K revealed in The Bat headers (evaluation) version that in that of
K Becky. Does this change in the regular version of The Bat, or is this
K the norm?

I don't know about Becky's headers, but there is no difference in
behavior between your evaluation copy and a registered one.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

Documentation is like sex: when it is good, it is very, very good;
and when it is bad, it is better than nothing.
 (Dick Brandon)

Winamp currently playing: ±çµúµX - ¦Ç©h®Q  
  



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Reply reminder

2003-02-16 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Deborah,

On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 at 12:27:38[GMT +](which was 12:27 where I
live) you wrote:

 You could create a keyboard shortcut to perform whatever function you
 choose - eg marking it with a specific colour. You'll find it at
 View-Edit Shortcuts, or by pressing Alt-F12.

Gosh it's that easy. thanks.

-- 
Best regards,
Richard

| Using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/6  SpamPal
| Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3
| and using the best browser: Opera7



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Educational Version Headers

2003-02-16 Thread Kim
Hi Peter,

Sunday, February 16, 2003, 1:02:16 PM, you wrote:

 Hi Kim,

 Welcome to TBUDL then. :-)

Thanks!  :)

 There are three version lines: educational, personal, professional. If
 you believe it is too much information that you're in the educational
 sector, there are tools to cut this off. But there is nothing more
 hidden in the headers.

Great to know. My worry was that it would show the name of the school
where I teach, or something along those lines, and for safety
purposes, I don't wish that to be in the headers. Thank goodness that
isn't the case anyway. To be honest, although I qualify for the
educational version, I'm thinking about spending the extra $10 and
getting the standard version of The Bat instead. I think it's the
educational label in the header that's persuading me in that
direction.

 No. Your version is fully functionable. Press ctrl+shift+K on any
 message and all headers will be displayed.

I did a check on the headers of a couple of random messages. Thanks.
:)

 I don't know about Becky's headers, but there is no difference in
 behavior between your evaluation copy and a registered one.

It's nice to know that this version is fully functionable, and What
you see is what you get, so to speak. It makes evaluating The Bat so
much easier and straightforward!

Thanks for your help, Peter. :)

-- 
Best regards,
Kim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Reply reminder

2003-02-16 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Allie,

On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 at 07:47:26[GMT -0500](which was 12:47 where I
live) you wrote:

  You could create replied filters for this folder. It's not as
 difficult as it would seem. Just copy the Inbox filters to the
 replied filter group and change the source folder name to that of
 your 'for replies' folder.

 In this way, once a reply is sent, the message is automagically
 moved back to its correct folder.

I've finally assigned a keystroke that marks the message that needs
replying to in underlined red, very eye catching!

 Regularly checking your Outbox to see what drafts are there would be
 like looking out for messages labelled with particular colours,
 wouldn't it?

Ah, but I want to be reminded that I have _yet_ to write a reply, not
that I have one to edit in the outbox.

 Unless, you're looking for a way for the program to actually reach
 out to you by popping up a reminder message, but that feature is in
 beta. We could discuss it on the beta list.

Yes, I'd like to learn the intricacies of that. I've had a look so
will move to Beta.

-- 
Best regards,
Richard

| Using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/6  SpamPal
| Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3
| and using the best browser: Opera7



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Reply reminder

2003-02-16 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Miguel,

On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 at 16:03:01[GMT +0100](which was 15:03 where I
live) you wrote:

 You can assign a keystroke.

 If you care to see what I do to not forget any replies, you can look
 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] dated 25 oct 2002 and
 with Subject: Re: Displaying new status in account tree pane and
 folder summary pane in the list archives.

I remember reading that thread and thinking how interesting it was but
not what I needed and it still isn't! I only have spasmodic messages
from different people at different times that I need reminding of so I
can't use any hard and fast rules. I have assigned a keystroke and
will try that but I am taking a discussion into Beta of the Reminders
utility.

-- 
Best regards,
Richard

| Using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/6  SpamPal
| Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3
| and using the best browser: Opera7



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Default E-Mail Client Problem

2003-02-16 Thread Kim
Hi all,

I've come across a problem that really has me stumped.

Friday night I installed The Bat. I chose NOT to set it as my default
e-mail client, as Becky is my default e-mail client, and I wasn't sure
if I'd like The Bat or not. Although I do like the program, I've come
across a problem, which is *very* reproducible.

The first few times I started The Bat, it asked me if I wanted to make
it my default e-mail client. Each time I chose No. Sometime
yesterday, The Bat stopped requesting that at start up. I hadn't
changed any settings. In fact, the check box for that setting was
still marked in preferences. The problem occurred today when I clicked
a mailto:; link in Opera (I use Opera, although IE6 is set as my
default browser). Once clicking the mailto link, there was a delay,
and then IE6 started. No kidding -- 64 IE windows appeared. IE has
been known to do some flaky things, but I have NEVER seen this
behavior in IE, ever (and I began using IE back when IE 2 was out).
Fortunately, a feature of Windows XP is to group all IE windows in one
section on the toolbar, once enough of them have opened. Because of
this, I was able to right click on the one and choose close group.
This closed all the IE windows that were open (I watched the number of
IE windows count down on the toolbar).

I then went back into Opera to see what the heck was listed as my
default e-mail client. Before I had installed The Bat, it had said
Becky. Now, it showed as *blank*. Nothing was written in the box at
all. I chose to go to the setting below which specifically allows me
to chose the location of the e-mail client I wish to chose. For now, I
chose Becky (since I am still evaluating The Bat).

I then went into IE6 and checked my settings there. Although IE listed
my default e-mail client as Becky, when I clicked on a mailto: link, I
got a message that there was a problem finding my default e-mail
client, and that it needed reinstalled. I'm sorry I don't have the
exact wording of the error message, because as soon as I closed the
error box, I was again faced with a multitude of IE windows (this time
it was 65). I right-clicked on the IE group on the toolbar as before,
and chose close group. I then restarted IE and went to the programs
tab and changed the default e-mail client to The Bat, clicked 'Apply',
then went back and changed it to Becky, clicking 'Apply' again. The
next time I tried clicking a mailto: link it brought up Becky.

Happy ending? Not quite. The next time I started The Bat, although it
still didn't ask me if I wanted to make it my default e-mail client,
it apparently did something...because the next time I tried to click a
mailto: link in IE, I again received the problem locating default
e-mail client message, and was faced with 64 more IE windows.

The only work-around that I've been able to find is to remove the
check from Check that The Bat is the default mail client at startup
from The Bat preferences. When I do this, all behaves normally. Also,
Becky 2 again appears in the Use default e-mail client on computer
box in Opera, when I remove the default check from The Bat
preferences. This is a very reproducible problem, as I tested it out
multiple times, each time with the same result.

Is this a known problem? I love The Bat thusfar, but this glitch
really bothers me. Any info on this one? Is there a work-around or
fix? Thanks.

-- 
Best regards,
Kim



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Default E-Mail Client Problem

2003-02-16 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Kim!

On Sunday, February 16, 2003, 7:04 PM, you wrote, in part:

K ... The only work-around that I've been able to find is to remove the
K check from Check that The Bat is the default mail client at startup
K from The Bat preferences. When I do this, all behaves normally. ...

You sound like someone who knows a lot more about computers and
computer programs than I do. However, it's a slow night on tbudl, and
until an expert spots your message, I thought I'd put in my two
cents worth. :)

First, welcome to tbudl! I've been using The Bat! for about 4 months
now--I'm a retired elementary school teacher--and I think you are
going to like it and eventually choose it as your default e-mail
client program.

Second, I have a feeling this is more of a problem with XP than with
The Bat!

I have been using XP since December, and a bossier operating system I
have never encountered! (I say from my limited experience that
includes only DOS 2.6 and Windows 95B before coming to Windows XP Home
Edition.)

It makes folders for me and puts things in them without my asking, and
also subfolders. It changes the paths of things without warning me.
That little dog takes forever to hunt out a file, and sometimes it
will deny that it exists--when I put the file there myself, and by
going to Windows Explorer can locate it.

Well--this list is not meant for me to wail over XP, it's for solving
problems with using The Bat! I know one thing--XP does not like to
have similar applications in its bosom. When I put the software for my
new Canon G2 camera in the machine, XP immediately decided that should
all be in my HP scanner folder--and I specifically told it to put the
Canon software in a Canon folder in Program Files. Go figure.

So--if you saved your Becky installation files: what about checking
whether XP just doesn't like having two e-mail clients available?
Uninstall Becky. Pick The Bat! as your default. See if you still have
the IE6 vs. Opera problem then.

I'm not a scientist, so there may be some faulty reasoning here.
Anyway, it's my 2 cents worth on a slow, icy night, and my way of
welcoming a fellow teacher to tbudl.  :)

K ... Also, Becky 2 again appears in the Use default e-mail client
K on computer box in Opera, when I remove the default check from The
K Bat preferences. This is a very reproducible problem, as I tested
K it out multiple times, each time with the same result. ...

I understand.

K ... Is this a known problem? ...

Others who have been with The Bat! longer than I will soon be telling
you the answer to this. :)

K I love The Bat thusfar, ...

Me too! :)

K ... but this glitch really bothers me. Any info on this one? Is
K there a work-around or fix? Thanks.

I hope there will be, whether it turns out to be an XP glitch or a TB!
glitch, or the interaction between the two. Anyway, I promise you that
there are some great and knowledgeable people on this list, and they
will soon be helping you. :)

-- 
Best regards,
Mary

The Bat! 1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Importing messages

2003-02-16 Thread Bill Kraski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello tbudlers,

PocoMail  has  a compatible mail format for importing and I successfully
imported  my  Inbox  into  the Inbox for one of my accounts in The Bat!.
However, I have multiple subfolders in Poco that I'd like to import into
like  folders  in The Bat!. What I've seen in the help file is not clear
as  to  whether  this is possible  how to do it. So, is this possible 
how?

TIA

- --
Best regards,
 Bill Kraskimailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPlBH5V+k60BsXnM1EQKixwCeKOPQqs7haxONG3dokeiOoOqsF+IAn3dy
5j7c4kHMjnibTjVtXfFHtwkx
=ClDD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[3]: Default E-Mail Client Problem

2003-02-16 Thread Mike Alexander
Hi Kim,

Monday, February 17, 2003, 3:04:08 AM, you wrote:


K I hesitate to uninstall Becky, as I have two years of old e-mail on it
K (that I transferred from my old computer), although as a temporary
K test so to speak, I suppose it couldn't hurt. I do have the original
K installation files (I archive everything to CD).

The best thing for you to do if you're having problems like that is,
rather than uninstall Becky, just make TB the default. That's what I
did (I'd been using Outlook Express).  Then I just used TB instead of
OE. When I decided that I'd definitely purchase (didn't take long g)
I archived all the mails I wanted to keep, and just don't bother to
use OE.  When I change to XP (I'm using 2000 at the moment) I will try
and make sure OE doesn't get installed at all. Shouldn't be a problem
as I'm installing the Pro version.

Incidentally, with regards to the problem you mentioned - Windows
assumes you'll be using the MS products. When you more than one
competing mail client, it seems to roll back to the IE/OE clients
when there is a clash. No doubt this is due to a registry entry
somewhere. I've seen similar problems a number of times, but usually
only one copy of IE/OE gets launched.  ;-)

-- 
Best regards,
 Mike   




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Change ISP TB email accounts, Lost Templates

2003-02-16 Thread Greg Strong
IIRC there is a file that you can delete and TB will re-index all the
messages in base.  What is the name of the file?

Just so you understand why I ask the question.  I have TB installed on a
multi-boot system with both TB installation accessing the same message
database on the extended drive.  I have also recently just changed ISP
which required changing my email accounts.  Due to the change my regular
and mail list accounts have changed.  What I did was in the first
instance named as follows

Old ISP:
  New name   Old name
     
  Regular (Old)  Regular
  Mail List (Old)Mail List

New ISP:

Regular
Mail List


After receiving messages in the bootable partition I regularly use. I
have now made the above changes in the other bootable partition.  Now it
appears I've lost some threaded messages.  Is this just an indexing
problem, or have I truly lost some threads?

I've also noticed that all my templates are gone, so something else is
happening as well.  Is this a case of un-install with a re-install.  TIA!

-- 
Regards,
Greg Strong




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Default E-Mail Client Problem

2003-02-16 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Kim [K] wrote:'

 Although I do like the program, I've come across a problem, which is
 *very* reproducible.

 [...]The problem occurred today when I clicked a mailto:; link in
 Opera (I use Opera, although IE6 is set as my default browser). Once
 clicking the mailto link, there was a delay, and then IE6 started. No
 kidding -- 64 IE windows appeared. [...]

  This happened to me as well but in a different setting. It occurred
  when I *did* want TB! to be my default client.

  The work around was to make another client my default and then make
  TB! the default again. So I went into the Internet Explorer options,
  and under the 'Program' tab, select OE as the default, hit OK, then
  re-select TB! and hit OK again.

 The only work-around that I've been able to find is to remove the
 check from Check that The Bat is the default mail client at startup
 from The Bat preferences.

  Seems OK to me. I thought you'd have done that from the very start to
  avoid the query popping up each time you started TB!. :)

  It's a glitch that has been experienced by others, including Win2k
  users. We're not sure what causes it but it's nothing to worry too
  much about. :)

  I've been running TB! on XP Pro here for over a year and things are
  just fine. No problems at all.

- --
  -=] allie_M [=-  {List Moderator}
   -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: My Public Keys - http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html

iD8DBQE+UGp2V8nrYCsHF+IRAsk2AKDBeXROuHiCbqXGCI9RMSaTXhWssgCdHal4
40xEIbuu/lF5pq5GmHwmSYQ=
=4PRM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Change ISP TB email accounts, Lost Templates

2003-02-16 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Greg Strong [GS] wrote:'

GS IIRC there is a file that you can delete and TB will re-index all the
GS messages in base.  What is the name of the file?

Each folder has a messages.tbi file. This is the index file for each
message base within each folder and not each account.

GS Just so you understand why I ask the question.  I have TB installed
GS on a multi-boot system with both TB installation accessing the same
GS message database on the extended drive.

OK.

GS I have also recently just changed ISP which required changing my
GS email accounts. Due to the change my regular and mail list accounts
GS have changed. What I did was in the first instance named as follows

[...]

GS After receiving messages in the bootable partition I regularly use.
GS I have now made the above changes in the other bootable partition.

Oops. I'd not have done it that way. I'd have made the change in one
installation, then when finished, export the registry settings of
the changed installation (HKCU/Software/rit), boot to the other
installation, import the registry key and then start the other
installation.

When you made the change on one TB! installation and then start up
the other TB! installation with the old registry settings, confusion
likely set in and changes were made to correct the confusion.

GS Now it appears I've lost some threaded messages.  Is this just an
GS indexing problem, or have I truly lost some threads?

You've probably lost them. I doubt there's an indexing problem.

GS I've also noticed that all my templates are gone, so something else is
GS happening as well.  Is this a case of un-install with a re-install.  TIA!

Uninstalling and reinstalling will likely not help. I hope you have
a backup. I'd restore one installation to full working order and
then do what I described above, i.e., export the registry settings
and import it for the other installation.

- --
  -=] allie_M [=-  {List Moderator}
   -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: My Public Keys - http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html

iD8DBQE+UG/PV8nrYCsHF+IRAoT4AKD7ZQN0NuloY8sNH2eWSeu8XcpRPACg22Vl
LQ1nFNfk93FcoPUHOPgqBrc=
=DM+Q
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Default E-Mail Client Problem

2003-02-16 Thread Kim
Hi Allie,

Sunday, February 16, 2003, 11:52:04 PM, you wrote:

   This happened to me as well but in a different setting. It occurred
   when I *did* want TB! to be my default client.

Ouch. At least I know I'm not alone.

   The work around was to make another client my default and then make
   TB! the default again. So I went into the Internet Explorer options,
   and under the 'Program' tab, select OE as the default, hit OK, then
   re-select TB! and hit OK again.

That's exactly what I did too -- but in my case it was between The Bat
and Becky. It's the only thing that seemed to reset the functionality
of the mailto: link (and kill the 'glitch'), so long as I removed the
check from the default mail setting in The Bat as well. If I didn't do
that, then the problem occurred the next time I ran The Bat, and then
tried clicking on a mailto: link in IE again.

   Seems OK to me. I thought you'd have done that from the very start to
   avoid the query popping up each time you started TB!. :)

You're right. That's exactly what I should have done. I'm still not
sure why the query disappeared on its own.

   It's a glitch that has been experienced by others, including Win2k
   users. We're not sure what causes it but it's nothing to worry too
   much about. :)

I'm glad that it's not just me. However the more I use The Bat, the
more I like it, so I think it will become my permanent e-mail client
soon. For now, I set it as the default.

   I've been running TB! on XP Pro here for over a year and things are
   just fine. No problems at all.

Thanks for the info. I did wonder about this a little, since I had
relatively few problems with my e-mail client in XP. I was hoping The
Bat would work well with XP in the long run, and if your situation is
any indication of that, I must say I'm relieved. I've also read a lot
of positive things about The Bat elsewhere, which really helps.  :)

Now it's just a matter of deciding between the educational version and
the personal version of The Bat.  :)

Thanks for your help!

-- 
Best regards,
Kim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[4]: Default E-Mail Client Problem

2003-02-16 Thread Kim
Hi Mike,

Sunday, February 16, 2003, 10:40:20 PM, you wrote:

 The best thing for you to do if you're having problems like that is,
 rather than uninstall Becky, just make TB the default. That's what I
 did (I'd been using Outlook Express).  Then I just used TB instead of
 OE. When I decided that I'd definitely purchase (didn't take long g)
 I archived all the mails I wanted to keep, and just don't bother to
 use OE.  When I change to XP (I'm using 2000 at the moment) I will try
 and make sure OE doesn't get installed at all. Shouldn't be a problem
 as I'm installing the Pro version.

That's exactly what I did, and it's working great so far. Once I
register The Bat, I'll get rid of the evaluation box each time I click
on a mailto: link (since Becky is no longer configured as my default
e-mail client). I don't think it's going to take me too long to decide
either.

Thanks for your help.  :)

-- 
Best regards,
Kim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Editor - Viewing Font

2003-02-16 Thread Robert Golovniov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Hello Kim,

Sunday, February 16, 2003, 7:50:57 PM, you wrote:

K Does anyone know if the next version of The Bat will allow for the
K viewing of variable-width fonts in the Editor of The Bat?

If I am not mistaken, this option is already included in the latest
beta versions of The Bat! But this subject, as far as I understand,
has to be taken over to the beta list.

- -- 
 -=Robert  Beata Golovniov | Lviv, Ukraine=-
~~
PGP key: 633F6D07 (1A1C 29F1 2A0C 4C4E 0BDA  C8EE 5A1D 9F03 633F 6D07)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=PGP%20KeyBody=Embedded%20key
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=GPG%20KeyBody=Attached%20key
~~
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: PGP-signed for authentication.

iD8DBQE+UIMpWh2fA2M/bQcRAzc9AJ9ejF8hRW8DuaNXIV9NtaU2jgNVYgCg082z
/F974RhSPfwSKgvVeQG2eD0=
=pM9f
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Default E-Mail Client Problem

2003-02-16 Thread Geoff Lane
On 17 February 2003, 02:08, Mary Bull wrote:

 That little dog takes forever to hunt out a file, and sometimes it
 will deny that it exists--when I put the file there myself, and by
 going to Windows Explorer can locate it.
~~~

Now, I've suffered that one and had to suffer a rather humiliating
call to the computer manufacturers to resolve it. By the time that I
discovered the issues, both my wife and I had spent several hours
redoing work because Windows XP failed to find files that we knew we'd
created. In my case, there were two issues:

1. The files that I sought were within the Program Files tree.
   Windows XP now considers Program Files and all it contains to be
   system folders and doesn't search there by default. To include
   these folders, in the Search Companion expand Search Options, then
   Advanced Options, and select System Folders.
   
2. An Index Server index had become corrupted. To rebuild a corrupted
   index, go to Administrative Tools - Computer Management (which you
   can access by right-clicking My Computer in the Start Menu and
   choosing Manage). Now Expand Services and Applications, then
   Indexing Service, then System. Now click Directories. Right click
   the entry for the Directory that you know contains your file and
   choose All Tasks - Rescan (Full).

Returning to the original poster's query: I had something similar
when I first started with TB (at 1.53d). In my case, it was because
the Registry had no entry for TB, which occurred because I didn't have
sufficient permissions when I first installed TB. If you search the
archives for this list, you should find my cries of woe and the very
informed resolution. However, to put it in a nutshell, I needed to log
on as an administrator and then reinstall TB, after which all went
well.

HTH,

-- 
Geoff Lane
Cornwall, UK
--
Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Tagline theft ... the sincerest form of flattery



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html