Re[2]: TB Is Crawling
I tried compressing all mailboxes to see if that would help, but I'm afraid that it does not. :( Any other suggestions? At this point, I'm going to have to move them to a different e-mail client if I can't find a fix. Michael T. Ashby Thursday, June 13, 2002, 8:52:10 AM, you wrote: snip MDP Are these outbox folders configured to Compress on exit? I'll bet MDP they are uncompressed and occupy many megabytes, all of which are MDP traversed, one deleted (sent) message at a time, every time a new MDP outbound message is saved to it. MDP That's my guess. Compress the outbox folders and see what happens. MDP - -- MDP Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator MDP TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 MDP ' /snip Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
TB Is Crawling
I posted to the list at the end of last week, but didn't have any success finding solution. I have a little bit more information, so I thought I'd take another run at the list and see if anyone has any suggestions. :) We have several employees all running TB 1.60q on Windows98 boxes. Most everyone has had no problems with TB, but I have two workstations that are giving me fits. Specifically, when an e-mail is deferred to the Outbox, there is a delay of 15 - 30 seconds before the program responds and continues. In other words, when a user clicks the Put the letter in the Outbox button, there is a long delay, where the program does absolutely nothing and will not respond before the e-mail is placed in the Outbox. Keep in mind, that the e-mail is NOT being sent immediately, so (to my knowledge), there is no interaction with the POP3 server that is being used to send the mail. Since the mailboxes are stored on the server, I have added the exact same accounts to other workstations and have not experienced any delays whatsoever. This leads me to believe that the error is localized to the workstation and not to any server issues. I have un-installed TB, rebooted and re-installed TB only to have the same delays continue. Does anyone have any suggestions of how or why this is happening? Unfortunately, both users receive a good bit of e-mail, so throughout the day, these delays are driving them nuts. Thanks in advance! Michael T. Ashby Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Slow Sending
I'm finding that it's taking quite awhile for an e-mail to send. I click the send button and it takes approximately 15 seconds for the e-mail to send. During that time TB is locked up and I'm unable to do anything else within the program. Anyone else run into this problem? Any suggestions on what I could tweak to have the e-mail not hang like that? Michael T. Ashby Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: Slow Sending
I'm using version 1.60m Michael T. Ashby Friday, June 7, 2002, 10:44:34 AM, you wrote: JA On Friday, June 07, 2002, Weaven, ChristopherX wrote... What version of The Bat! are you using? JA No offence... but is there any chance you could change the outlook JA settings to actually put in the quotes for the emails you're replying JA to... I keep getting confused, and thing somebody is double posting on JA the behalf of somebody else ;) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[4]: Slow Sending
Britt, Thanks, will do! Michael T. Ashby Friday, June 7, 2002, 10:50:11 AM, you wrote: BM Dear Michael, BM Friday, June 7, 2002 at 5:47:58 PM you wrote: MTA I'm using version 1.60m BM Try upgrading to the latest version. There has been many problems with BM version m. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[5]: Slow Sending
Ok, I tried installing the latest version. Performed a reboot of the machine as well, just to be sure and the problem is not fixed. So, when I send an e-mail it's still taking 15 - 30 seconds for the message to go away and TB is hung while this process is happening. Any other suggestions? Michael T. Ashby Friday, June 7, 2002, 10:54:36 AM, you wrote: MTA Britt, MTA Thanks, will do! MTA Michael T. Ashby MTA MTA Friday, June 7, 2002, 10:50:11 AM, you wrote: BM Dear Michael, BM Friday, June 7, 2002 at 5:47:58 PM you wrote: MTA I'm using version 1.60m BM Try upgrading to the latest version. There has been many problems with BM version m. MTA MTA Current Ver: 1.60q MTA FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com MTA Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MTA Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com MTA Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MTA TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MTA Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: Slow Sending
Well, it's not that the e-mail is taking long to be handled by the POP server, it's more that TB is just hanging there while it happens. It used to be that the e-mail would just go to the outbox and the connection manager would deliver the mail, while I could read other mail, etc. The problem is that TB just hangs there doing nothing until the e-mail is sent. Even just sending it to the outbox and not sending it immediately has the same effect. Michael T. Ashby Friday, June 7, 2002, 11:23:39 AM, you wrote: JR Hello Michael. JR At 11:30 AM on Friday, June 07, 2002 you wrote the following JR about [Slow Sending]: Michael I'm finding that it's taking quite awhile for an Michael e-mail to send. I click the send button and it Michael takes approximately 15 seconds for the e-mail to Michael send. [...] JR Could also be your ISP server in which case there's not a JR whole helluva lot you can do about it. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: Best Practices: Attachment Filters
I guess I mis-spoke a bit. What I meant to ask is that if it were possible to have the filter simply delete the e-mail from the server, not just strip the attachments. Secondly, I know that I won't open attachments, but I can't say the same for my co-workers. :-) I just want to be extra careful if possible. So, if an e-mail has an attachment with foo extensions, then I'd prefer TB not even download the message. Here's the environment: - Anti-Virus is installed and updated nightly. - There is no e-mail server other than the POP3 server that is part of a shared domain server. In other words, I don't have access to configure sendmail, etc. Michael T. Ashby Tuesday, May 14, 2002, 11:28:39 AM, you wrote: JA On Tuesday, May 14, 2002, Michael T. Ashby wrote... My questions are: 1. Can this be done? JA Stripping attachments is a pain, and I'm not sure TB! can do it. JA Although if you have access to the mail server, and it is running JA procmail, you could force it to mangle the extension, so it forces you JA to save the file before you can open it... this will guarantee that JA your virus scanner (if installed) will read the file. 2. If so, what recommended extensions should be excluded? JA TB! isn't at risk from a lot of auto-executing code viruses such as JA Nimda, Melissa, Klez etc as it doesn't support a lot of the HTML code JA that forces it to run. If you're worried about attachments, just don't JA open it. You should know if it's a trusted source. Also bug your mail JA server admin see if they can get a good virus scanner installed on JA there to check incoming mail. If it is a Unix type server, they may JA want to look for a program called MailScanner (GPL'd) which can be JA used with a majority of the common server virus scanners (I personally JA advise Sophos). If all that still makes you worried... install the JA latest scanner on your desktop as well, and get it to check for JA updates daily. Current Ver: 1.60k FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: Bat better than SpamKiller. Now
Marck, For those of us that are newbies, what does this filter do exactly? Michael Ashby Monday, May 6, 2002, 10:12:39 AM, you wrote: MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP Hash: SHA1 MDP Hi John, MDP @06 May 2002, 14:46:03 +0100 John Galvin wrote in MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MDP Personally, I download the spam and forward it to SpamCop. ... I get a html email. I need to forward on the html code to keep spamcop happy. Is there any macro available, that will include the html code of the email automatically? MDP I focus any spam anywhere and press Ctrl-Alt-S. ByeBye Spam! (I copy MDP this filter to all accounts). MDP BeginFilter MDP Name: Submit Spam MDP Active: 1 MDP Source: \\Marck\Inbox MDP Target: \\Anti-Spam\Trash MDP CopyFolder: none MDP MainSet: 40. MDP Actions: faMarkRead,faNewMsg,faExport,faoExportOver,faoExportKludges,faoHotKey,faoSaveUnix MDP AddGroups: MDP DelGroups: MDP ForwardTemplate: MDP ConfirmTemplate: MDP ReplyTemplate: MDP FwdAddr: MDP RedirectAddr: MDP NewAddr: submit.(your submission address)@spam.spamcop.net MDP NewTemplate: %ACCOUNT\3D\22marck\22\0D\0A%put\3D\27C:\5Ctemp\5Cexport.txt\27\0D\0A MDP ExtCmd: MDP ExtFile: C:\temp\export.txt MDP ExtractDir: MDP ColourGroup: default MDP AddAddrItems: afiFrom, MDP DelAddrItems: afiFrom, MDP HotKey: 49235 MDP IsOfColour: default MDP SizeBigger: 0 MDP SizeSmaller: 0 MDP AgeOlder: 0 MDP AgeNewer: 0 MDP InAddrPos: 0 MDP OutAddrPos: 0 MDP InAddrGroups: MDP NoAddrGroups: MDP KillFile: MDP KillMethod: 0 MDP SaveTemplate: MDP SndFile: MDP SysSound: 0 MDP SoundTime: 0:00-0:00 MDP AllowTime: 0:00-0:00 MDP EndFilter MDP - -- MDP Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator MDP SB! v1.60d/iKey1000-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 MDP ยท MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- MDP iD8DBQE81p1oOeQkq5KdzaARAuUZAKCWYGJVTas1cq78o2o8MWfrg8Ee5QCg1pFF MDP p63Lya0e7/HSy4kf4QKZUgw= MDP =7/X/ MDP -END PGP SIGNATURE- MDP MDP Current Ver: 1.60i MDP FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com MDP Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MDP Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com MDP Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MDP TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MDP Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: All this effort for what?? Batted-out!!
Julius, I know how you feel about the mailing list. I too kinda felt that way when I first signed up, but I don't think it's as bad as you may think. The Bat! is EXTREMELY powerful and allows for a LOT of tweaks and edits to customize almost every nuance to your personal preferences. I joined this list because I was thinking it would help me learn about the product faster, but if anything I found that most of the posts here are WAY over my head. :) Most of the threads here are not the typical fare that the average user would address. The average user isn't going to know, much less care, about the merit so PGP vs. sMime. So, take most of the posts with a grain of salt, because many posts here are dealing with beta, or just released versions and features that most users are not going to use. Personally, I've found TB to be extremely reliable and it does everything I need. Additionally, as I poke around the program I continually find more and more features that just blow my socks off. For example, I just figured out how to use Quick Templates and like a kid in a candy store! :P So, although you may see a lot of issues addressed here, don't take them to heart. You're looking at posts that have a high geek quotient and are far above the average e-mail fare. In my book, there is no more secure and reliable e-mail client out there. Michael T. Ashby Consultant The Ashby Group http://www.ashbygroup.net mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 8:37:31 AM, you wrote: MS At Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 2:36:13 PM, Julius wrote: Hi there, List members , I signed-on and purchased my entry to the bat! about 2 weeks ago. I was expecting a reasonable new alternative to OE. MS And it is definately that. But all I see is about 200 e-mail exchanges per day!! about PROBLEMS with TB and hopes for better versions etc. MS It is a high-volume mail list - whether this is because a series of MS new releases have just come out or not would be conjecture on my part, MS as I've been on the list less than a week. However, I've been on MS other mailing lists for Eudora that are fairly high-volume all the MS time. MS That being said, I've been using TheBat for over a year, and am more MS than satisfied with it, having gone thru OE, Eudora, Calypso, MS Incredimail, and others. How can we/you spend all our time nit-picking the program of our choice every time we sign-on to the net?? Easier for me to go back to OE and not have to read 200 questions/ day about TB. AND WE PAID FOR TB!! While OE and NS are free. MS And they are worth every cent you paid. :) Isn't there something wrong here guys??? Listen, I paid my money for the bat! but can't believe the research work (hundreds of daily messages) I have to participate in to use it. This is not a useful tool it is a JOB which I don't need right now. And I don't see any ending to it... just generates more and more questions on the site. MS Well, you don't *have* to read it all, or read it at all, for that MS matter. Unsubscribe, or read only the threads that interest you. MS A tip - this is one list where view by thread works well. A lot of MS them are hopeless in this mode. Can we end this and get a decent product out of the bat! ? I think we should address our problems/questions/requests to the authors, in Russia or Belarus, and stop trying to outguess them and provide ideas that have to be tested every time, regardless of comments from moderators with credentials. Let's make this work!! Ideas?? MS I don't know about that. This seems one of the more useful mailing MS lists I've been on. THe authors of TheBat have more productive things MS to do (V2.0) and let the users help those that want help. Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pricing
I e-mailed RIT Labs about a site licence, but I haven't head back, so I thought I'd throw it out to the mailing list in case there are resellers here that could help me. I'm looking at purchasing a site licence for 15 users. Michael T. Ashby Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M$ Exchange Replacement
I was at a client's site yesterday and we were discussing the costs and merits of upgrading their servers. After already receiving the green light to proceed an idea hit me. 90% of the upgrade was due to Exchange (long story), so why not just use The Bat! instead? I told the client to wait a day or so until I thought about it some more. Here's the layout: The client has about 15 workstations/users all using exchange. None of them use the PIM features. They simply use it for e-mail. So, TB seems perfect. Here's my question: What would be the best configuration for the install? I would like all the mailboxes to be stored on the server for backup purposes and I'd like some employees to be able to share a mailbox (tech support, that sort of thing). They are using TrendMicro's OfficeScan for virus protection (although I don't think there's a plugin yet for that) Anyway, what would be your recommendation on how best to configure this install? Michael T. Ashby Consultant The Ashby Group http://www.ashbygroup.net mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Winamp Is Currently Playing: Nothing Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: M$ Exchange Replacement
I'm familiar with Pegasus, but I really like TB and would like to use it as part of the solutions. Thank you for the suggestion though. Michael T. Ashby Consultant The Ashby Group http://www.ashbygroup.net mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, April 18, 2002, 7:21:10 AM, you wrote: S On Thursday, April 18, 2002, at 3:09:19 PM, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to Shahar about: S M$ Exchange Replacement Here's my question: What would be the best configuration for the install? I would like all the mailboxes to be stored on the server for backup purposes and I'd like some employees to be able to share a mailbox (tech support, that sort of thing). S Michael, S That's remind me something. S About 4-5 years ago, one of our customers came and ask for a low cost email S system. S We gave him this solution: S Pegasus mail and Mercury. S I don't remember the exact configuration but what I do remember is S that this customer had about 400 computers in one LAN. S If you need more info about this solution I can make some phone calls S and try to have it. S Thank you for writing. S S Current Ver: 1.60c S FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com S Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] S Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com S Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] S TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: M$ Exchange Replacement
Point taken Clive. I turned to the list because I figured there were others that had gone through something similar and could offer some insight. This list has proved very helpful in the past and is a fantastic resource. Sorry if the post was inappropriate. Michael T. Ashby Consultant The Ashby Group http://www.ashbygroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === Thursday, April 18, 2002, 7:32:58 AM, you wrote: CT 18 April 2002, 13:09, you wrote: Here's my question: What would be the best configuration for the install? I would like all the mailboxes to be stored on the server for backup purposes and I'd like some employees to be able to share a mailbox (tech support, that sort of thing). They are using TrendMicro's OfficeScan for virus protection (although I don't think there's a plugin yet for that) Anyway, what would be your recommendation on how best to configure this install? CT And how much of your fee are you prepared to share for this CT information, Michael? ;-) Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: M$ Exchange Replacement
Thanks to everyone for your feedback. It's been very helpful. I'm actually shying away from having a mail server on the server. Everything that they do is POP3 based and they don't have the typical corporate mentality regarding e-mail. I'm thinking that simpler is better, having been the Exchange route with them already. Prior to saying we could do this, I had spoken with the person that had first turned me on to TB and his firm is setup in the same manner. With the mailboxes stored on the server, then more than one person can access the mailbox at a time and everything is backed up nightly - to me it sounds like an ideal setup for this client. Unless someone thinks this is foolish. :) Michael T. Ashby Consultant The Ashby Group http://www.ashbygroup.net mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, April 18, 2002, 12:39:45 PM, you wrote: PP Hello Miguel, PP On Thursday, April 18, 2002 at 3:34:34 PM you wrote in PP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part): I'm familiar with Pegasus, but I really like TB and would like to use it as part of the solutions. Thank you for the suggestion though. MAU You don't need Pegasus. You can have a very nice setup with Mercury/32 MAU as a server (it's free, BTW) and The Bat! as e-mail clients. This is MAU what I use. PP And this is what I'd suggest too ... not Mercury in any case, I don't know PP this software so I can't recommend it, but a 'real' Mail-Server plus TB!. PP Server capabilities of TB! are limited in some matters so I wouldn't rely PP on them, but there're cheaper and better SMTP/POP3-servers out there than PP MS-Exchange :-) PP Mercury (as we've read), MDaemon, ArGoSoft ... and for sure several other PP Windows Mail-Servers. PP I've just entered PP Windows Mail-Server PP into Google and had more than enough hit. PP Tucows is another idea ... maybe you want start here PP http://thenewsmonsters.tucows.com/mailserver95.html PP having a look if there's something that fits your needs. PP TB! should be work with every SMTP POP3 enabled server software, so this PP will not matter. PP P.S.: I assume a fast and stable Linux box is out of discussion for server? PP *GGG* Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I need a 'snapshot'
If you are on a Windows machine, you can hit the Print Screen button
and a snapshot is made of your desktop. If you only need a window,
then hold down the Alt key.
What this does is create a .bmp and store it on your clipboard. You
can then paste it into any graphics or word processing program and use
it as needed.
Hope that helps!
Michael T. Ashby
Consultant
The Ashby Group
http://www.ashbygroup.net
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, April 18, 2002, 1:45:39 PM, you wrote:
G Howdy Ladies and Gents,
G I have been using the 'View Threads by Reference' option for all the various
G newslists to which I belong. This works great until someone uses the
G 'Reply To' function to start a new message subject (something that is
G never condoned on this list). One particular list, with traffic about
G the same as this list, presents quite a few instances of this
G undesirable behavior.
G I have written a few messages to the list, requesting that people not
G use the 'Reply To' when they start new message subjects. To many,
G my request does not make sense, as their software views 'By Subject'.
G I would like to be able to get a 'snapshot' of the message tree that
G shows the structure looks like when someone uses the 'Reply To' in an
G inappropriate manner. I would probably want to store it as a .jpg
G file on my web site and then provide the link to the list so that they
G could view the graphic. Does anyone know how I can get a 'picture' of
G the message tree?
G Perhaps I can gain some converts to TB! by showing how useful this
G 'View Threads by Reference' can really be.
G AtDhVaAnNkCsE
G With a tip of the hat,
G GJim c):{-
Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: M$ Exchange Replacement
I understand that there is a server involved with POP3 e-mail, but that server is located off site in a server farm. I just don't see a reason to add ANOTHER server just to collect it. They aren't using the PIM features of Outlook and TB is one of the most robust e-mail client's I've found, so it seems like the perfect solution for this client. Michael T. Ashby Consultant The Ashby Group http://www.ashbygroup.net mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, April 18, 2002, 2:13:32 PM, you wrote: PP Hello Michael, PP On Thursday, April 18, 2002 at 8:25:07 PM you wrote in PP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part): MTA I'm actually shying away from having a mail server on the server. MTA Everything that they do is POP3 based PP I'm sorry to tell you: even this is a server :-) PP MS-Exchange offering to fetch the mail not only via LookOut but via POP3 PP too is nothing else but: a mail server :-) Not an 'MTA' as 'Mail Transfer PP Agent', this would the SMTP-capabilities of Exchange offer, but it _is_ a PP server :-) PP So if your customer can abandon the PIM functionality every cheaper mail PP server for Windows will do it. PP 1.) it will be cheaper; let the money flow to Moldavia for a mile stone of PP mail client *g* PP 2.) Let the system not always run on the corner to it's ruin by starting PP Exchange if this can be avoided :-) MTA Unless someone thinks this is foolish. :) PP As I've already said: this might work, but I've heard it _sometimes_ ain't PP the most stable solution running TB! in Non-TCP-server-mode. Mail loss was PP sight ... Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eudora Import
I recently migrated from Eudora to TB! and I'm very happy, but I've found another oddball quirk that I'm hoping the collective here can help me with. All of my sent items have imported with HTML tags in the body of the document. TB! doesn't render the e-mail as html, so it shows the tags. I don't use HTML for e-mail. Everything that I sent was in plain text, so I don't know why TB! decided to add the tags. Anyone have any suggestions on how to remove them from my 20,000+ sent e-mails? :-) Michael T. Ashby Consultant The Ashby Group http://www.ashbygroup.net mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: Eudora Import
I don't recall having anything like that, but that's kinda what I figured. Sounds like I'm SOL. Oh well... Michael T. Ashby Consultant The Ashby Group http://www.ashbygroup.net mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, March 21, 2002, 12:24:49 PM, you wrote: NA Hello Michael T. Ashby, NA On Thursday, March 21 2002 at 08:08 AM PDT, you wrote: All of my sent items have imported with HTML tags in the body of the document. TB! doesn't render the e-mail as html, so it shows the tags. I don't use HTML for e-mail. Everything that I sent was in plain text, so I don't know why TB! decided to add the tags. NA I think the problem was that Eudora used Rich Text Format without you being NA aware of it... or something along those lines. You may have had an underline NA in your signature, or something bolded or italicised. Can you recall anything NA like that? Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: Newbie: Can I Flter Imported Sent Mail?
Raj, I tried that as well, and that worked for some messages, but unfortunately, it won't work for most. The reason is that under the From header, all I see is my name, not the e-mail address. Since my name is the same for all accounts, there's no way to differentiate between the various accounts. The only work around I see, is to open each message. Only then can I see the actual e-mail address the account was sent from. But, I'm open to any more suggestions! :-) Michael T. Ashby Consultant The Ashby Group http://www.ashbygroup.net mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Friday, March 15, 2002, 8:36:18 AM, you wrote: R Michael, R On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, at 18:06:42 [GMT -0600] (which was 5:36 AM where I live) you R wrote: MTA The end result would be that all items sent MTA from the ashbygroup.com account would be left the in sent folder of MTA ashbygroup.com and all the e-mail sent from the npug.org account would MTA reside in the npug.org sent items account. R Do you really need a filter for this ?? I am assuming that this is only for the R imported messages. R I would suggest that you select all the messages and then move it (Drag) it R to the desired folder. R To quickly select the messages, select one message and then while holding R 'Alt' click on the from address ([EMAIL PROTECTED] - in yourcase) and just move R them. To see the rest of the messages press 'esc' R TGIF, Have a great weekend! -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[4]: Newbie: Can I Flter Imported Sent Mail?
Raj, Bingo! That did the trick. Thank you so much for all your help and for everyone else in the list. Have I mentioned that I LOVE the bat? :-) Thanks again, Michael T. Ashby Consultant The Ashby Group http://www.ashbygroup.net mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Friday, March 15, 2002, 9:49:19 AM, you wrote: R Michael, R On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, at 09:34:28 [GMT -0600] (which was 9:04 PM where I live) you R wrote: MTA The only work around I see, is to open each message. Only then can I MTA see the actual e-mail address the account was sent from. But, I'm open MTA to any more suggestions! :-) R What about a filter which will check for the e-mail address in kludges (headers) R TGIF, Have a great weekend! -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Newbie: Can I Flter Imported Sent Mail?
Hello all! I'm new to The Bat! and I'm really falling in love. I've migrated from Eudora and I have a question I can't seem to find an answer to. So, I thought I'd toss it out to you guys and see if you can steer me in the right direction. Eudora handles all accounts with the same inbox and sent folders. I have four accounts in The Bat! and I'd like to sort all the sent items I have to the appropriate account. I've tried various filters, but they all seem to apply to after you've received, or read the e-mail, etc. For example, I have all of my sent e-mails in the sent folder of my [EMAIL PROTECTED] account. What I'd like to do is filter all e-mail I sent from my [EMAIL PROTECTED] account (which has been imported from Eudora into the ashbygroup.com account) into the appropriate sent folder. The end result would be that all items sent from the ashbygroup.com account would be left the in sent folder of ashbygroup.com and all the e-mail sent from the npug.org account would reside in the npug.org sent items account. Everything works fine for new mail, this only applies to the sent items I imported from Eudora. Thanks in advance! Michael T. Ashby Consultant The Ashby Group http://www.ashbygroup.net mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: Newbie: Can I Flter Imported Sent Mail?
Ottar, Thanks for the step-by-step guidelines. I did that, but for some reason it didn't work. No e-mails were selected and moved. I tried various combinations, but for some reason it's not liking it. Michael T. Ashby Consultant The Ashby Group http://www.ashbygroup.net mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === Thursday, March 14, 2002, 11:21:31 PM, you wrote: OG Hello Michael, OG Friday, March 15, 2002, 1:06:42 AM, you wrote to TBUDL: MTA What I'd like to do is filter all e-mail I sent from my MTA [EMAIL PROTECTED] account (which has been imported from Eudora MTA into the ashbygroup.com account) into the appropriate sent folder OG I think this should work: OG Create a Read messages mail filter in your ashbygroup.com account. OG Select the Sent folder as the source folder OG Select the Sent folder of the npug account for the Move messages to - OG box OG Enter [EMAIL PROTECTED] as filtering string with location Sender OG Tick the box Manual only OG Close the filter dialogue OG Right click the sent folder of ashbygroup.com OG Select Refilter messages OG Tick the boxes Read message filter and Manual filters OG OK -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
