Re: [TruthTalk] Clowning Around
In a message dated 6/6/2005 10:35:13 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Perry the Clown wrote to Blaine: PRODUCE THE PHOTOS [of perry the clown] OR RETRACT YOUR MISCHARACTERIZATION OF MY COUNTENANCE!Looks like the mormon boys are tag-teaming me. But, I must confess. I did not think anyone would find my clown picture on the internet (in fact, I forgot it was even posted), but Dave found it and posted it, so, Blaine, I guess I owe you an apology. I am a clown. You can call me a clown any time you wish.In all humility,Perry the Clown Blaine: I would like to find it too--have an address?
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
In a message dated 6/6/2005 3:28:38 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Whoa, Blaine. Is your "witness of the spirit" that subjective heartburn feelings mormons say they get? AKA, the burning in the bazoom? Do you have any biblical references that this burning feeling is a valid witness? Could it instead possibly be the fires of hell being stoked by your resident demon? Blaine: Sorry, but none of the above rings a true sound for me. It sounds like goeldygook, or whatever. At best, it is a rediculous statement, which deserves no answer, or a rediculous answer. I choose no answer, for the simple reason there is no serious answer to a rediculous question.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
IFF the object of my/your 'faith/belief' is other than our perception then, how and, in what way(s) does that matter? As I've 'read' you for some time now, I've seen you as one with the capacity to identify 'meaning'. Do you know what I mean? I shall not evade 'your' question. - Original Message - From: Dave Hansen To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 00:20 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH DAVEH: I find that interesting, Lance. May I ask how high (that may be a poor way of describing it) is your faith? IOW, on a scale of 1 to 10, where 10 is an absolute abiding faith in Jesus, and 5 is a mediocre faith, and 1 is a bare shadow of a faithwhere do you feel you fit on that scale? AndIf you would rather not answer such a personal question, please do not feel compelled to respond to this post. Orif you feel like responding, but don't want to risk the possible mocking or vicious attack of other TTerspost it off-Forum. Perhaps I did not properly consider your original question. I don't consider my faith to be placed in JS, but rather in Jesus. So, if somebody chooses to attack JS for whatever reason, I'm not too bothered. To me it would be like they are attacking Moses, or Abraham or Paul. I hadn't thought about it before, but perhaps that explains why I don't get in a huff when some detractors say bad things about JS on TT.Lance Muir wrote: Speaking for myself...maybe.A not very good movie was made (look! he's at it again..does this guy do nothing but watch movies?) entitled 'The Body'; the premise of which was...wait for it...the discovery of the bones of Jesus..Well, there you go This would be comparable to discovering a document in the handwriting of JS saying...hey..I was just funnin' y'all!! - Original Message - From: Dave Hansen To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 06, 2005 10:37 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH DAVEH: Lance, from a subjective standpoint...Do you believe Jesus is the Christ? If so, could anything be said to move you from that truth as you perceive it? (I also wonder the same about other TTer's feelings about thishoping to hear some responses.)Lance Muir wrote: If I read you correctly then, absolutely nothing could be said ever to move you from your 'subjective truth'. I thought as much. DAVEH: If I'm following you correctly on this Lance, the answer would be yes to both questions. (But I have not given it any deep thought, as I'm a bit short on time this morning.)Lance Muir wrote: Blaine says that 'God gives direction to all liberally who ask in faith'. I asked you/DH whether or not the 'subjective' bottom line was James 1. Are you herein simply offering a resounding 'yes' to that query? Would this invariably be your fallback position?-- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
How would they know if they’ve never tried? Anyway, “proof-texting” is a term THEY use to shoot down scripture quoters. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Hansen Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 9:39 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH DAVEH: Can you blame them? Seems like it may be a defensive technique. If they quote a passage, they may fear being criticized as proof-texting. ShieldsFamily wrote: DaveH, regarding your previous question, please take note of this technique of the Bible quote haters: Instead of specifically quoting a particular statement to explain their views they throw an entire chapter at you and say, "It's in there if you just can see it--find it for yourself!" Thus they think they are justified for using the Bible, but have blurred the issues by not being specific (because it really isn't "in there"!). Izzy The Bible does NOT speak for itself. On this (see my formula once again) we wholeheartedly agree. Why is it that even among the 'biblicists' who are mature there exists such minimal agreement? This ain't tennis or ping pong folks, this is the God of the Cosmos! Throwing out bible verses which simply elucidate YOUR view (not HIS) leaves people confused. That's why I referenced 2 Tim 3 (KJV whole chapter). Because men love darkness so much that they will not come to the light so that their deeds may be made manifest. On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 23:49:00 -0700 Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The Bible speaks for itself. DAVEH: Are you sure about that, Izzy??? If so, why are there so many TTers wanting to speak in its behalf? Hmm...If the The Bible speaks for itself, then why do Street Preachers feel the need to proclaim it from the street? ShieldsFamily wrote: The Bible speaks for itself. According to JSmith the Bible is not enough. Who will you serve, the God of the Bible or the God of the Book of Mormon? Izzy -- ~~~Dave Hansen[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.langlitz.com~~~If you wish to receivethings I find interesting,I maintain six email lists...JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
And the RCC adopted them as “canon” to support their heretical doctrines. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:16 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH JD reaches back into his dusty old shelf of misinformation. The Apocrypha was part of the corrupt mss The apocrypha was not part of the 1611 it was printed as a tool like the maps we have in our bibles, not interspesed as part of the text as in the Oldest & best manuscripts The apocryphal books were not in the Jewish OT either only in the RC bibles. The minister of questions chooses to mislead. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.greatsite.com/timeline-english-bible-history/ You may find this interesting. As far as "adding" to the bible -- did you know that the Apocrapha was a part of nearly all Bibles until the mid to late 1800's. The so-called "Prostestant bible" is a little over 120 yers old. Christ and or the New Testament writers quoted from most of them, themselves. Jd -Original Message- From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:10:53 -0400 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH What were the more noble Bereans of Acts 17:11 checking Paul's teaching against? Also your favorite epistle James is said to have been written by the Lord's brother only 15yrs following the ascension. Could we be missing something here JD? On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:03:19 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When did the Bible come into existence -- before or after the Revelation? There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times. But, certainly, we should not be adding to what God has said. Jd From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Myth - It is finished already And this warning is not only in Revelation, it is also in Deuteronomy and in Proverbs. On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. From: ShieldsFamily You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Probably because it’s downright funny! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Hansen Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:31 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Street preachers just quote what it says. Izzy DAVEH: Then why do some feel the need to wave underwear? ShieldsFamily wrote: DaveH, There are TT'ers who get criticized for quoting what the Bible says by those who don't quote what it says, but replacewhat it says with their own ideas of what they think it should say--that's why they don't quote and don't like those who quote. Street preachers just quote what it says. Izzy The Bible speaks for itself. DAVEH: Are you sure about that, Izzy??? If so, why are there so many TTers wanting to speak in its behalf? Hmm...If the The Bible speaks for itself, then why do Street Preachers feel the need to proclaim it from the street? -- ~~~Dave Hansen[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.langlitz.com~~~If you wish to receivethings I find interesting,I maintain six email lists...JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
It's about as funny as it would be for you and your Jet-flying son to be present at a flag burning. It's about as funny as David or Kevin, while preaching at a 'sodomite' convention, to witness the desecration of the Holy Scriptures! Iz, these would be just 'downright funny'! - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 07:46 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Probably because its downright funny! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave HansenSent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:31 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Street preachers just quote what it says. IzzyDAVEH: Then why do some feel the need to wave underwear?ShieldsFamily wrote: DaveH, There are TT'ers who get criticized for quoting what the Bible says by those who don't quote what it says, but replacewhat it says with their own ideas of what they think it should say--that's why they don't quote and don't like those who quote. Street preachers just quote what it says. Izzy The Bible speaks for itself.DAVEH: Are you sure about that, Izzy??? If so, why are there so many TTers wanting to speak in its behalf? Hmm...If the The Bible speaks for itself, then why do Street Preachers feel the need to proclaim it from the street? -- ~~~Dave Hansen[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.langlitz.com~~~If you wish to receivethings I find interesting,I maintain six email lists...JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Two issues arise: 1. Which 'heretical doctrines' arise from 'them'? 2. IFF some actually do then, are they offset by those 'heretical doctrines' arising from the 'accepted canon'. Example:The 'rapture' doctrine from 1 Thess. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 07:43 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH And the RCC adopted them as canon to support their heretical doctrines. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin DeeganSent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:16 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH JD reaches back into his dusty old shelf of misinformation. The Apocrypha was part of the corrupt mss The apocrypha was not part of the 1611 it was printed as a tool like the maps we have in our bibles, not interspesed as part of the text as in the Oldest & best manuscripts The apocryphal books were not in the Jewish OT either only in the RC bibles. The minister of questions chooses to mislead.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.greatsite.com/timeline-english-bible-history/ You may find this interesting. As far as "adding" to the bible -- did you know that the Apocrapha was a part of nearly all Bibles until the mid to late 1800's. The so-called "Prostestant bible" is a little over 120 yers old. Christ and or the New Testament writers quoted from most of them, themselves. Jd -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:10:53 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH What were the more noble Bereans of Acts 17:11 checking Paul's teaching against? Also your favorite epistle James is said to have been written by the Lord's brother only 15yrs following the ascension. Could we be missing something here JD? On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:03:19 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When did the Bible come into existence -- before or after the Revelation? There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times. But, certainly, we should not be adding to what God has said. Jd From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Myth - It is finished already And this warning is not only in Revelation, it is also in Deuteronomy and in Proverbs. On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. From: ShieldsFamily You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
[TruthTalk] Clowning Around
You jest! This is not Perry - it's a clown wearing Ruben and the other SP's John 3:16 wig. From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PRODUCE THE PHOTOS OR RETRACT YOUR MISCHARACTERIZATION OF MY COUNTENANCE! DAVEH: Can it be an AH attack if there are pictures to prove it, Perry. :-D Charles Perry Locke wrote: Third, it is an ad hominem attack to call me a clown unless you have photos of my huge red nose, frizzy read hair, whiteface, painted on smile, and painted stars over my eyes! not to mention my over-baggy striped pants, red suspenders, and huge floppy shoes! I may be funny looking, but a clown I am not! Besides, I get claustrophobic in small cars EVEN WHEN BY MYSELF, MUCH MORE SO WITH 9-10 OTHER CLOWNS IN THERE WITH ME! PRODUCE THE PHOTOS OR RETRACT YOUR MISCHARACTERIZATION OF MY COUNTENANCE! Perry Blaine wrote:Laugh, clown, laugh!! -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS. <>
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
'Proof-texting' can apply to more than the Scriptures. Michael Moore and John Kerry both employed it vis a vis GWB. How did you respond when they did it? One may accurately quote someone, often absent appropriate context, with the intent of critiquing the person they quote. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 07:39 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH How would they know if theyve never tried? Anyway, proof-texting is a term THEY use to shoot down scripture quoters. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave HansenSent: Monday, June 06, 2005 9:39 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH DAVEH: Can you blame them? Seems like it may be a defensive technique. If they quote a passage, they may fear being criticized as proof-texting.ShieldsFamily wrote: DaveH, regarding your previous question, please take note of this technique of the Bible quote haters: Instead of specifically quoting a particular statement to explain their views they throw an entire chapter at you and say, "It's in there if you just can see it--find it for yourself!" Thus they think they are justified for using the Bible, but have blurred the issues by not being specific (because it really isn't "in there"!). Izzy The Bible does NOT speak for itself. On this (see my formula once again) we wholeheartedly agree. Why is it that even among the 'biblicists' who are mature there exists such minimal agreement? This ain't tennis or ping pong folks, this is the God of the Cosmos! Throwing out bible verses which simply elucidate YOUR view (not HIS) leaves people confused. That's why I referenced 2 Tim 3 (KJV whole chapter). Because men love darkness so much that they will not come to the light so that their deeds may be made manifest. On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 23:49:00 -0700 Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The Bible speaks for itself.DAVEH: Are you sure about that, Izzy??? If so, why are there so many TTers wanting to speak in its behalf? Hmm...If the The Bible speaks for itself, then why do Street Preachers feel the need to proclaim it from the street?ShieldsFamily wrote: The Bible speaks for itself. According to JSmith the Bible is not enough. Who will you serve, the God of the Bible or the God of the Book of Mormon? Izzy -- ~~~Dave Hansen[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.langlitz.com~~~If you wish to receivethings I find interesting,I maintain six email lists...JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
1. Purgatory is one that is taken from 1 or 2 Macc - Izzy being a redeemed rc probably knows more 2. The rapture is one interpretation among others, it is not declared canon by the rcc or anyone else. Let's face it Lance - your Bishop has erred. On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:20:05 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Two issues arise: 1. Which 'heretical doctrines' arise from 'them'? 2. IFF some actually do then, are they offset by those 'heretical doctrines' arising from the 'accepted canon'. Example:The 'rapture' doctrine from 1 Thess. From: ShieldsFamily And the RCC adopted them as canon to support their heretical doctrines. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan JD reaches back into his dusty old shelf of misinformation. The Apocrypha was part of the corrupt mss The apocrypha was not part of the 1611 it was printed as a tool like the maps we have in our bibles, not interspesed as part of the text as in the Oldest & best manuscripts The apocryphal books were not in the Jewish OT either only in the RC bibles. The minister of questions chooses to mislead.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.greatsite.com/timeline-english-bible-history/ You may find this interesting. As far as "adding" to the bible -- did you know that the Apocrapha was a part of nearly all Bibles until the mid to late 1800's. The so-called "Prostestant bible" is a little over 120 yers old. Christ and or the New Testament writers quoted from most of them, themselves. Jd -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:10:53 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH What were the more noble Bereans of Acts 17:11 checking Paul's teaching against? Also your favorite epistle James is said to have been written by the Lord's brother only 15yrs following the ascension. Could we be missing something here JD? On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:03:19 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When did the Bible come into existence -- before or after the Revelation? There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times. But, certainly, we should not be adding to what God has said. Jd From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Myth - It is finished already And this warning is not only in Revelation, it is also in Deuteronomy and in Proverbs. On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. From: ShieldsFamily You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
[TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
After hearing them once who would pay any mind to what Michael Moore and John Kerry have to say? From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 'Proof-texting' can apply to more than the Scriptures. Michael Moore and John Kerry both employed it vis a vis GWB. How did you respond when they did it? One may accurately quote someone, often absent appropriate context, with the intent of critiquing the person they quote. From: ShieldsFamily How would they know if theyve never tried? Anyway, proof-texting is a term THEY use to shoot down scripture quoters. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Hansen DAVEH: Can you blame them? Seems like it may be a defensive technique. If they quote a passage, they may fear being criticized as proof-texting.ShieldsFamily wrote: DaveH, regarding your previous question, please take note of this technique of the Bible quote haters: Instead of specifically quoting a particular statement to explain their views they throw an entire chapter at you and say, "It's in there if you just can see it--find it for yourself!" Thus they think they are justified for using the Bible, but have blurred the issues by not being specific (because it really isn't "in there"!). Izzy The Bible does NOT speak for itself. On this (see my formula once again) we wholeheartedly agree. Why is it that even among the 'biblicists' who are mature there exists such minimal agreement? This ain't tennis or ping pong folks, this is the God of the Cosmos! Throwing out bible verses which simply elucidate YOUR view (not HIS) leaves people confused. That's why I referenced 2 Tim 3 (KJV whole chapter). Because men love darkness so much that they will not come to the light so that their deeds may be made manifest. On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 23:49:00 -0700 Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The Bible speaks for itself.DAVEH: Are you sure about that, Izzy??? If so, why are there so many TTers wanting to speak in its behalf? Hmm...If the The Bible speaks for itself, then why do Street Preachers feel the need to proclaim it from the street?ShieldsFamily wrote: The Bible speaks for itself. According to JSmith the Bible is not enough. Who will you serve, the God of the Bible or the God of the Book of Mormon? Izzy -- ~~~Dave Hansen[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.langlitz.com~~~If you wish to receivethings I find interesting,I maintain six email lists...JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
[TruthTalk] The cat who went to Heaven
Subject: The cat who went to Heaven A cat died and went to Heaven. God met her at Heaven's door and said "you have been a good cat all of these Years, anything you want, is yours for the asking. The cat thought for a moment, and then said "all my life I lived on a farm, And slept on hard wooden floors. I would like a soft fluffy pillow to lay On." God said,"say no more!" And instantly the cat had her soft pillow. A few days later, six mice were killed in an accident, and all went to heaven together. God met the mice at heavens door. God made them the same offer that he had made to the cat. The mice replied "we have had to run, all of our lives, we ran from cats, we ran from dogs, and even from people with brooms. If all of us could have a pair of roller skates, it would be grand!" God answered, "It is done," and the mice had their roller skates. About a week later, god decided to check on the cat, and found her curled up, on her soft, fluffy pillow.god asked,"is everything okay? Have you been happy?" The cat replied "oh, it's wonderful, I am happier now, than I have ever been in life". My pillow is soft and fluffy, and those little meals on wheels you've been sending over are delicious!"
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
To each his own; everyone has their own type of humor - it's a cultural thing Lance. Do you think it was ungodly for Elijah to mock the prophets of Baal at Mt. Carmel by telling them their god just might be sitting on the toilet? On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:17:02 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: It's about as funny as it would be for you and your Jet-flying son to be present at a flag burning. It's about as funny as David or Kevin, while preaching at a 'sodomite' convention, to witness the desecration of the Holy Scriptures! Iz, these would be just 'downright funny'! From: ShieldsFamily Probably because its downright funny! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave HansenStreet preachers just quote what it says. IzzyDAVEH: Then why do some feel the need to wave underwear?ShieldsFamily wrote: DaveH, There are TT'ers who get criticized for quoting what the Bible says by those who don't quote what it says, but replacewhat it says with their own ideas of what they think it should say--that's why they don't quote and don't like those who quote. Street preachers just quote what it says. Izzy The Bible speaks for itself.DAVEH: Are you sure about that, Izzy??? If so, why are there so many TTers wanting to speak in its behalf? Hmm...If the The Bible speaks for itself, then why do Street Preachers feel the need to proclaim it from the street? -- ~~~Dave Hansen[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.langlitz.com~~~If you wish to receivethings I find interesting,I maintain six email lists...JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
MY POINT HERE HAD TO DO WITH THE FINE ART OF 'proof-texting' not with either of these two gentlemen or, with politics, where such takes place on a daily basis. It also takes place herein (TT). - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 08:33 Subject: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH After hearing them once who would pay any mind to what Michael Moore and John Kerry have to say? From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 'Proof-texting' can apply to more than the Scriptures. Michael Moore and John Kerry both employed it vis a vis GWB. How did you respond when they did it? One may accurately quote someone, often absent appropriate context, with the intent of critiquing the person they quote. From: ShieldsFamily How would they know if theyve never tried? Anyway, proof-texting is a term THEY use to shoot down scripture quoters. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Hansen DAVEH: Can you blame them? Seems like it may be a defensive technique. If they quote a passage, they may fear being criticized as proof-texting.ShieldsFamily wrote: DaveH, regarding your previous question, please take note of this technique of the Bible quote haters: Instead of specifically quoting a particular statement to explain their views they throw an entire chapter at you and say, "It's in there if you just can see it--find it for yourself!" Thus they think they are justified for using the Bible, but have blurred the issues by not being specific (because it really isn't "in there"!). Izzy The Bible does NOT speak for itself. On this (see my formula once again) we wholeheartedly agree. Why is it that even among the 'biblicists' who are mature there exists such minimal agreement? This ain't tennis or ping pong folks, this is the God of the Cosmos! Throwing out bible verses which simply elucidate YOUR view (not HIS) leaves people confused. That's why I referenced 2 Tim 3 (KJV whole chapter). Because men love darkness so much that they will not come to the light so that their deeds may be made manifest. On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 23:49:00 -0700 Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The Bible speaks for itself.DAVEH: Are you sure about that, Izzy??? If so, why are there so many TTers wanting to speak in its behalf? Hmm...If the The Bible speaks for itself, then why do Street Preachers feel the need to proclaim it from the street?ShieldsFamily wrote: The Bible speaks for itself. According to JSmith the Bible is not enough. Who will you serve, the God of the Bible or the God of the Book of Mormon? Izzy -- ~~~Dave Hansen[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.langlitz.com~~~If you wish to receivethings I find interesting,I maintain six email lists...JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
As to #2, Judy, whether the 'rapture doctrine' serves best to illustrate my point or not, that heretical doctrines arise in greater numbers from the canon itself, THAT WAS MY POINT. It was a 'non-rcc' point. Believers do the same thing with the non-apocryphal scriptures. - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 08:26 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH 1. Purgatory is one that is taken from 1 or 2 Macc - Izzy being a redeemed rc probably knows more 2. The rapture is one interpretation among others, it is not declared canon by the rcc or anyone else. Let's face it Lance - your Bishop has erred. On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:20:05 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Two issues arise: 1. Which 'heretical doctrines' arise from 'them'? 2. IFF some actually do then, are they offset by those 'heretical doctrines' arising from the 'accepted canon'. Example:The 'rapture' doctrine from 1 Thess. From: ShieldsFamily And the RCC adopted them as canon to support their heretical doctrines. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan JD reaches back into his dusty old shelf of misinformation. The Apocrypha was part of the corrupt mss The apocrypha was not part of the 1611 it was printed as a tool like the maps we have in our bibles, not interspesed as part of the text as in the Oldest & best manuscripts The apocryphal books were not in the Jewish OT either only in the RC bibles. The minister of questions chooses to mislead.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.greatsite.com/timeline-english-bible-history/ You may find this interesting. As far as "adding" to the bible -- did you know that the Apocrapha was a part of nearly all Bibles until the mid to late 1800's. The so-called "Prostestant bible" is a little over 120 yers old. Christ and or the New Testament writers quoted from most of them, themselves. Jd -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:10:53 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH What were the more noble Bereans of Acts 17:11 checking Paul's teaching against? Also your favorite epistle James is said to have been written by the Lord's brother only 15yrs following the ascension. Could we be missing something here JD? On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:03:19 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When did the Bible come into existence -- before or after the Revelation? There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times. But, certainly, we should not be adding to what God has said. Jd From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Myth - It is finished already And this warning is not only in Revelation, it is also in Deuteronomy and in Proverbs. On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. From: ShieldsFamily You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Blaine, there were a couple of detractor questions, but here are the ones I think you will be able to answer: 1. Is the "witness of the spirit" to which you referred the "burning in the bosom" that mormons say they get as a witness? 2. Do you have any biblical references that this burning feeling (a.k.a., the "burning in the bosom") is a valid witness of the spirit? Perry From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 03:19:43 EDT In a message dated 6/6/2005 3:28:38 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Whoa, Blaine. Is your "witness of the spirit" that subjective heartburn feelings mormons say they get? AKA, the burning in the bazoom? Do you have any biblical references that this burning feeling is a valid witness? Could it instead possibly be the fires of hell being stoked by your resident demon? Blaine: Sorry, but none of the above rings a true sound for me. It sounds like goeldygook, or whatever. At best, it is a rediculous statement, which deserves no answer, or a rediculous answer. I choose no answer, for the simple reason there is no serious answer to a rediculous question. -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Clowning Around
Blaine, I have no link. Maybe Dave has it. The photo was attached to Dave's original message. If you have that just open the email and clock "download" at the bottom of hte mail page (I presume you receive TT mail via your AOL account?). Perry From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Clowning Around Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 03:02:00 EDT In a message dated 6/6/2005 10:35:13 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Perry the Clown wrote to Blaine: PRODUCE THE PHOTOS [of perry the clown] OR RETRACT YOUR MISCHARACTERIZATION OF MY COUNTENANCE! Looks like the mormon boys are tag-teaming me. But, I must confess. I did not think anyone would find my clown picture on the internet (in fact, I forgot it was even posted), but Dave found it and posted it, so, Blaine, I guess I owe you an apology. I am a clown. You can call me a clown any time you wish. In all humility, Perry the Clown Blaine: I would like to find it too--have an address? -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Clowning Around
DAVEH: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Blaine, I guess I owe you an apology. I am a clown. You can call me a clown any time you wish. In all humility, Perry the Clown Blaine: I would like to find it too--have an address? -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Jt says 'to each his own, everyone has their own type of humour - it's a cultural thing, Lance.' Therefore we may assume that profaning the 'sacred' matters not to her. So make fun of or desecrate the flag, the Scriptures or Mormon undergarments, ...all in that which one finds humorouseh? Can I get an 'Amen' from all, Mormon and non-Mormon on this point by Judy? Try burning a Koran at a Mosque when the worshippers on walking in. Tell them it's just a 'cultural thingy'. - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 08:30 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH To each his own; everyone has their own type of humor - it's a cultural thing Lance. Do you think it was ungodly for Elijah to mock the prophets of Baal at Mt. Carmel by telling them their god just might be sitting on the toilet? On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:17:02 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: It's about as funny as it would be for you and your Jet-flying son to be present at a flag burning. It's about as funny as David or Kevin, while preaching at a 'sodomite' convention, to witness the desecration of the Holy Scriptures! Iz, these would be just 'downright funny'! From: ShieldsFamily Probably because its downright funny! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave HansenStreet preachers just quote what it says. IzzyDAVEH: Then why do some feel the need to wave underwear?ShieldsFamily wrote: DaveH, There are TT'ers who get criticized for quoting what the Bible says by those who don't quote what it says, but replacewhat it says with their own ideas of what they think it should say--that's why they don't quote and don't like those who quote. Street preachers just quote what it says. Izzy The Bible speaks for itself.DAVEH: Are you sure about that, Izzy??? If so, why are there so many TTers wanting to speak in its behalf? Hmm...If the The Bible speaks for itself, then why do Street Preachers feel the need to proclaim it from the street? -- ~~~Dave Hansen[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.langlitz.com~~~If you wish to receivethings I find interesting,I maintain six email lists...JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
Re: [TruthTalk] Clowning Around
Oh, Blaine, if you took my response as serious, thinking the picture really is of me in a clown suit, then you did not catch the gist of my jest. Dave just forwarded some photo he got somehwere, most likely on the web, and posted it as though it was me. I was just playing along. But, still feel free to call me a clown whenever you like! Perry From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Clowning Around Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 03:02:00 EDT In a message dated 6/6/2005 10:35:13 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Perry the Clown wrote to Blaine: PRODUCE THE PHOTOS [of perry the clown] OR RETRACT YOUR MISCHARACTERIZATION OF MY COUNTENANCE! Looks like the mormon boys are tag-teaming me. But, I must confess. I did not think anyone would find my clown picture on the internet (in fact, I forgot it was even posted), but Dave found it and posted it, so, Blaine, I guess I owe you an apology. I am a clown. You can call me a clown any time you wish. In all humility, Perry the Clown Blaine: I would like to find it too--have an address? -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
He already answered these. James 1:5 fg/ - Original Message - From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: June 07, 2005 09:01 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > Blaine, there were a couple of detractor questions, but here are the ones I > think you will be able to answer: > > 1. Is the "witness of the spirit" to which you referred the "burning in the > bosom" that mormons say they get as a witness? > > 2. Do you have any biblical references that this burning feeling (a.k.a., > the "burning in the bosom") is a valid witness of the spirit? > > Perry > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org > >To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org > >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > >Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 03:19:43 EDT > > > > > >In a message dated 6/6/2005 3:28:38 PM Mountain Standard Time, > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > >Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >Whoa, Blaine. Is your "witness of the spirit" that subjective heartburn > >feelings mormons say they get? AKA, the burning in the bazoom? Do you have > >any biblical references that this burning feeling is a valid witness? > >Could > >it instead possibly be the fires of hell being stoked by your resident > >demon? > > > > > > > >Blaine: Sorry, but none of the above rings a true sound for me. It > >sounds > >like goeldygook, or whatever. At best, it is a rediculous statement, > >which deserves no answer, or a rediculous answer. I choose no answer, for > >the > >simple reason there is no serious answer to a rediculous question. > > > -- > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
I guess it depends upon your perspective. To me mormon underwear is not a sacred thing (but a silly thing!). Maybe it is to you. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 6:17 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH It's about as funny as it would be for you and your Jet-flying son to be present at a flag burning. It's about as funny as David or Kevin, while preaching at a 'sodomite' convention, to witness the desecration of the Holy Scriptures! Iz, these would be just 'downright funny'! - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 07:46 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Probably because it’s downright funny! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Hansen Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:31 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Street preachers just quote what it says. Izzy DAVEH: Then why do some feel the need to wave underwear? ShieldsFamily wrote: DaveH, There are TT'ers who get criticized for quoting what the Bible says by those who don't quote what it says, but replacewhat it says with their own ideas of what they think it should say--that's why they don't quote and don't like those who quote. Street preachers just quote what it says. Izzy The Bible speaks for itself. DAVEH: Are you sure about that, Izzy??? If so, why are there so many TTers wanting to speak in its behalf? Hmm...If the The Bible speaks for itself, then why do Street Preachers feel the need to proclaim it from the street? -- ~~~Dave Hansen[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.langlitz.com~~~If you wish to receivethings I find interesting,I maintain six email lists...JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Actually I am not a former RCC. My parents were RCC and my brother. It never took with me. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 6:27 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH 1. Purgatory is one that is taken from 1 or 2 Macc - Izzy being a redeemed rc probably knows more 2. The rapture is one interpretation among others, it is not declared canon by the rcc or anyone else. Let's face it Lance - your Bishop has erred. On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:20:05 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Two issues arise: 1. Which 'heretical doctrines' arise from 'them'? 2. IFF some actually do then, are they offset by those 'heretical doctrines' arising from the 'accepted canon'. Example:The 'rapture' doctrine from 1 Thess. From: ShieldsFamily And the RCC adopted them as “canon” to support their heretical doctrines. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan JD reaches back into his dusty old shelf of misinformation. The Apocrypha was part of the corrupt mss The apocrypha was not part of the 1611 it was printed as a tool like the maps we have in our bibles, not interspesed as part of the text as in the Oldest & best manuscripts The apocryphal books were not in the Jewish OT either only in the RC bibles. The minister of questions chooses to mislead. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.greatsite.com/timeline-english-bible-history/ You may find this interesting. As far as "adding" to the bible -- did you know that the Apocrapha was a part of nearly all Bibles until the mid to late 1800's. The so-called "Prostestant bible" is a little over 120 yers old. Christ and or the New Testament writers quoted from most of them, themselves. Jd -Original Message- From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:10:53 -0400 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH What were the more noble Bereans of Acts 17:11 checking Paul's teaching against? Also your favorite epistle James is said to have been written by the Lord's brother only 15yrs following the ascension. Could we be missing something here JD? On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:03:19 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When did the Bible come into existence -- before or after the Revelation? There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times. But, certainly, we should not be adding to what God has said. Jd From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Myth - It is finished already And this warning is not only in Revelation, it is also in Deuteronomy and in Proverbs. On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. From: ShieldsFamily You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Kevin Deegan wrote: Matthew Mark, Luke, bel & the Dragon? only in the Catholic counterfiets! You left out first and second Ralph.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Before you get carried away here Lance, I seem to recall that not so long ago you referred to me on this public internet list as 'one funny broad' - and as a child of God I find this term offensive; are you aware of it's origin? - if not I will enlighten you (this is from Plateau Press.com): jennifer: How/where/when/why did the word 'broad' get used to describe a woman?Doug: This term started out as US criminal slang. The original meaning was 'a prostitute' and when it entered mainstream usage it broadened (sorry for the pun, I just couldn't resist) its meaning to include so-called women of loose morals and later women of the uneducated or lower classes. So as you can see the term has never been what you might call respectful. It is first cited in 1914. In these days of 'enlightened behaviour' the term is considered apropos and is fast falling into disuse. I understand that you were 'well meaning' and am using this to show how easy it is to offend when ppl are prone to take up an offense. I don't do that because I live by Psalm 119:165 and so God's peace guards my heart and mind. jt On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:09:42 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jt says 'to each his own, everyone has their own type of humour - it's a cultural thing, Lance.' Therefore we may assume that profaning the 'sacred' matters not to her. So make fun of or desecrate the flag, the Scriptures or Mormon undergarments, ...all in that which one finds humorouseh? Can I get an 'Amen' from all, Mormon and non-Mormon on this point by Judy? Try burning a Koran at a Mosque when the worshippers on walking in. Tell them it's just a 'cultural thingy'. From: Judy Taylor To each his own; everyone has their own type of humor - it's a cultural thing Lance. Do you think it was ungodly for Elijah to mock the prophets of Baal at Mt. Carmel by telling them their god just might be sitting on the toilet? On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:17:02 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: It's about as funny as it would be for you and your Jet-flying son to be present at a flag burning. It's about as funny as David or Kevin, while preaching at a 'sodomite' convention, to witness the desecration of the Holy Scriptures! Iz, these would be just 'downright funny'! From: ShieldsFamily Probably because its downright funny! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave HansenStreet preachers just quote what it says. IzzyDAVEH: Then why do some feel the need to wave underwear?ShieldsFamily wrote: DaveH, There are TT'ers who get criticized for quoting what the Bible says by those who don't quote what it says, but replacewhat it says with their own ideas of what they think it should say--that's why they don't quote and don't like those who quote. Street preachers just quote what it says. Izzy The Bible speaks for itself.DAVEH: Are you sure about that, Izzy??? If so, why are there so many TTers wanting to speak in its behalf? Hmm...If the The Bible speaks for itself, then why do Street Preachers feel the need to proclaim it from the street? -- ~~~Dave Hansen[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.langlitz.com~~~If you wish to receivethings I find interesting,I maintain six email lists...JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Lance your comment is irrelevant to the discussion. Izzy From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 'Proof-texting' can apply to more than the Scriptures. Michael Moore and John Kerry both employed it vis a vis GWB. How did you respond when they did it? One may accurately quote someone, often absent appropriate context, with the intent of critiquing the person they quote. From: ShieldsFamily How would they know if they’ve never tried? Anyway, “proof-texting” is a term THEY use to shoot down scripture quoters. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Hansen DAVEH: Can you blame them? Seems like it may be a defensive technique. If they quote a passage, they may fear being criticized as proof-texting. ShieldsFamily wrote: DaveH, regarding your previous question, please take note of this technique of the Bible quote haters: Instead of specifically quoting a particular statement to explain their views they throw an entire chapter at you and say, "It's in there if you just can see it--find it for yourself!" Thus they think they are justified for using the Bible, but have blurred the issues by not being specific (because it really isn't "in there"!). Izzy The Bible does NOT speak for itself. On this (see my formula once again) we wholeheartedly agree. Why is it that even among the 'biblicists' who are mature there exists such minimal agreement? This ain't tennis or ping pong folks, this is the God of the Cosmos! Throwing out bible verses which simply elucidate YOUR view (not HIS) leaves people confused. That's why I referenced 2 Tim 3 (KJV whole chapter). Because men love darkness so much that they will not come to the light so that their deeds may be made manifest. On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 23:49:00 -0700 Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The Bible speaks for itself. DAVEH: Are you sure about that, Izzy??? If so, why are there so many TTers wanting to speak in its behalf? Hmm...If the The Bible speaks for itself, then why do Street Preachers feel the need to proclaim it from the street? ShieldsFamily wrote: The Bible speaks for itself. According to JSmith the Bible is not enough. Who will you serve, the God of the Bible or the God of the Book of Mormon? Izzy -- ~~~Dave Hansen[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.langlitz.com~~~If you wish to receivethings I find interesting,I maintain six email lists...JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Lance, FYI: It isn’t sacred if God doesn’t say it is sacred. Somebody thinking it is doesn’t make it so. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 7:10 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Jt says 'to each his own, everyone has their own type of humour - it's a cultural thing, Lance.' Therefore we may assume that profaning the 'sacred' matters not to her. So make fun of or desecrate the flag, the Scriptures or Mormon undergarments, ...all in that which one finds humorouseh? Can I get an 'Amen' from all, Mormon and non-Mormon on this point by Judy? Try burning a Koran at a Mosque when the worshippers on walking in. Tell them it's just a 'cultural thingy'. - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 08:30 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH To each his own; everyone has their own type of humor - it's a cultural thing Lance. Do you think it was ungodly for Elijah to mock the prophets of Baal at Mt. Carmel by telling them their god just might be sitting on the toilet? On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:17:02 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: It's about as funny as it would be for you and your Jet-flying son to be present at a flag burning. It's about as funny as David or Kevin, while preaching at a 'sodomite' convention, to witness the desecration of the Holy Scriptures! Iz, these would be just 'downright funny'! From: ShieldsFamily Probably because it’s downright funny! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Hansen Street preachers just quote what it says. Izzy DAVEH: Then why do some feel the need to wave underwear? ShieldsFamily wrote: DaveH, There are TT'ers who get criticized for quoting what the Bible says by those who don't quote what it says, but replacewhat it says with their own ideas of what they think it should say--that's why they don't quote and don't like those who quote. Street preachers just quote what it says. Izzy The Bible speaks for itself. DAVEH: Are you sure about that, Izzy??? If so, why are there so many TTers wanting to speak in its behalf? Hmm...If the The Bible speaks for itself, then why do Street Preachers feel the need to proclaim it from the street? -- ~~~Dave Hansen[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.langlitz.com~~~If you wish to receivethings I find interesting,I maintain six email lists...JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Oh sorry about that Iz, good for you. BTW has anyone seen Christine - missing her. jt On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:22:05 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Actually I am not a former RCC. My parents were RCC and my brother. It never took with me. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor 1. Purgatory is one that is taken from 1 or 2 Macc - Izzy being a redeemed rc probably knows more 2. The rapture is one interpretation among others, it is not declared canon by the rcc or anyone else. Let's face it Lance - your Bishop has erred. On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:20:05 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Two issues arise: 1. Which 'heretical doctrines' arise from 'them'? 2. IFF some actually do then, are they offset by those 'heretical doctrines' arising from the 'accepted canon'. Example:The 'rapture' doctrine from 1 Thess. From: ShieldsFamily And the RCC adopted them as “canon” to support their heretical doctrines. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan JD reaches back into his dusty old shelf of misinformation. The Apocrypha was part of the corrupt mss The apocrypha was not part of the 1611 it was printed as a tool like the maps we have in our bibles, not interspesed as part of the text as in the Oldest & best manuscripts The apocryphal books were not in the Jewish OT either only in the RC bibles. The minister of questions chooses to mislead.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.greatsite.com/timeline-english-bible-history/ You may find this interesting. As far as "adding" to the bible -- did you know that the Apocrapha was a part of nearly all Bibles until the mid to late 1800's. The so-called "Prostestant bible" is a little over 120 yers old. Christ and or the New Testament writers quoted from most of them, themselves. Jd -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:10:53 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH What were the more noble Bereans of Acts 17:11 checking Paul's teaching against? Also your favorite epistle James is said to have been written by the Lord's brother only 15yrs following the ascension. Could we be missing something here JD? On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:03:19 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When did the Bible come into existence -- before or after the Revelation? There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times. But, certainly, we should not be adding to what God has said. Jd From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Myth - It is finished already And this warning is not only in Revelation, it is also in Deuteronomy and in Proverbs. On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. From: ShieldsFamily You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Judy, I believe that Lance is the one who coined the term in 1914, so you’ll just have to forgive him. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 7:25 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Before you get carried away here Lance, I seem to recall that not so long ago you referred to me on this public internet list as 'one funny broad' - and as a child of God I find this term offensive; are you aware of it's origin? - if not I will enlighten you (this is from Plateau Press.com): jennifer: How/where/when/why did the word 'broad' get used to describe a woman? Doug: This term started out as US criminal slang. The original meaning was 'a prostitute' and when it entered mainstream usage it broadened (sorry for the pun, I just couldn't resist) its meaning to include so-called women of loose morals and later women of the uneducated or lower classes. So as you can see the term has never been what you might call respectful. It is first cited in 1914. In these days of 'enlightened behaviour' the term is considered apropos and is fast falling into disuse. I understand that you were 'well meaning' and am using this to show how easy it is to offend when ppl are prone to take up an offense. I don't do that because I live by Psalm 119:165 and so God's peace guards my heart and mind. jt On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:09:42 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jt says 'to each his own, everyone has their own type of humour - it's a cultural thing, Lance.' Therefore we may assume that profaning the 'sacred' matters not to her. So make fun of or desecrate the flag, the Scriptures or Mormon undergarments, ...all in that which one finds humorouseh? Can I get an 'Amen' from all, Mormon and non-Mormon on this point by Judy? Try burning a Koran at a Mosque when the worshippers on walking in. Tell them it's just a 'cultural thingy'. From: Judy Taylor To each his own; everyone has their own type of humor - it's a cultural thing Lance. Do you think it was ungodly for Elijah to mock the prophets of Baal at Mt. Carmel by telling them their god just might be sitting on the toilet? On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:17:02 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: It's about as funny as it would be for you and your Jet-flying son to be present at a flag burning. It's about as funny as David or Kevin, while preaching at a 'sodomite' convention, to witness the desecration of the Holy Scriptures! Iz, these would be just 'downright funny'! From: ShieldsFamily Probably because it’s downright funny! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Hansen Street preachers just quote what it says. Izzy DAVEH: Then why do some feel the need to wave underwear? ShieldsFamily wrote: DaveH, There are TT'ers who get criticized for quoting what the Bible says by those who don't quote what it says, but replacewhat it says with their own ideas of what they think it should say--that's why they don't quote and don't like those who quote. Street preachers just quote what it says. Izzy The Bible speaks for itself. DAVEH: Are you sure about that, Izzy??? If so, why are there so many TTers wanting to speak in its behalf? Hmm...If the The Bible speaks for itself, then why do Street Preachers feel the need to proclaim it from the street? -- ~~~Dave Hansen[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.langlitz.com~~~If you wish to receivethings I find interesting,I maintain six email lists...JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
RE: [TruthTalk] The World Takes Care of It's Own
Amen. Let's send Canada! Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Perry Locke Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 2:29 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The World Takes Care of It's Own People don't starve because there is not enough food in the world. People starve because despotic rulers cut off supply chains to starve the people so they will not rise up and overthrow the despots. No amount of money will fix those types of problems...but getting rid of the depots will. Perry >From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org >Subject: [TruthTalk] The World Takes Care of It's Own >Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:42:05 -0400 > >Bob Geldof Launches Live 8 Concerts >On July 13th 1985 two unique simultaneous concerts called Live Aid were >held in London and Philadelphia with a goal of easing the suffering of >millions of victims of famine in Africa. Live Aid raised over $100 >million but 20 years later poverty, disease, and famine are still major >problems for the people of Africa. 20 years ago the public contributed >resources to end suffering and now Bob Geldof is putting together new >concerts to pressure wealthy governments to come to the aid of >impoverished people. >- Top 40 / Pop Guide Bill Lamb -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
So what does Blaine have to say for himself? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:17 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Myth - It is finished already And this warning is not only in Revelation, it is also in Deuteronomy and in Proverbs. On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. From: ShieldsFamily You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blaine: Aren't you converted to Mormonism by now Izzy? :>) I'm shocked you don't know the answer. It is BOTH. Since they are the same individuals! I do, however understand why you might think otherwise. Anyone subjected to the watered-down doctrines of traditional Christianity would tend, I would think, to uphold these false niceties, even in the face of strong evidence to the contrary. Satan has a way of lulling the unwary into a sense of false security, engendered by his presentation of a few superficial truths with his fundamental falsehoods. This pairing is as old as the Garden of Eden, when Satan told Eve she would not surely die, AND that she would gain wisdom, the latter being the truth, and the former a lie. n a message dated 6/6/2005 9:23:07 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The Bible speaks for itself. According to JSmith the Bible is not enough. Who will you serve, the God of the Bible or the God of the Book of Mormon? Izzy
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Rev 2218I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are written in this book; 19and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of life and from the holy city, which are written in this book. JD, tell me what does the word “Bible” mean? And what is the last book in the Bible? Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 12:03 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH When did the Bible come into existence -- before or after the Revelation? There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times. But, certainly, we should not be adding to what God has said. Jd -Original Message- From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:17:29 -0400 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Myth - It is finished already And this warning is not only in Revelation, it is also in Deuteronomy and in Proverbs. On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. From: ShieldsFamily You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Sure makes me think it’s all about JSmith and the BoM. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:27 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH I see you have not read Charlotte's Web. It is about a spider that spun webs with English words incorporated, which in turn were assumed by Humans to refer to the pig who lived in the sty beneath the webs. These descriptive adjectives were then assumed to be the pig's character traits. No proof, no nothing, just the words, appearing in print form, were enough to convince the masses that the pig was super-normal. He became celebrated, because Charlotte the spider said he was such--IN PRINT. Just a spoof on the gullibility of human-kind. Blaine In a message dated 6/6/2005 11:02:16 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Are you so gullible that YOU believe everything that is in print? Like the Book of Mormon, Pearl of Great Price, and the D&C. E. B. White, the author of Charlotte's Web, was born in 1899. How could the story be a basis for what E. B. Stennhouse wrote in 1875??? Perry
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
In addition, "proof-texting" is the misuse of scripture. All ae suspectible to this failure. We look for verses with similar wording and assume those passages have the same meaning and context. -Original Message-From: Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:24:11 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH 'Proof-texting' can apply to more than the Scriptures. Michael Moore and John Kerry both employed it vis a vis GWB. How did you respond when they did it? One may accurately quote someone, often absent appropriate context, with the intent of critiquing the person they quote. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 07:39 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH How would they know if they?ve never tried? Anyway, ?proof-texting? is a term THEY use to shoot down scripture quoters. Izzy
FW: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Then why watch them? J From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:18 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH In the movies sometimes they don't care about what God said. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 06, 2005 13:05 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH After God said not to add to it? I think NOT. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:01 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 06, 2005 12:38 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:06 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH I Blaine: Aren't you converted to Mormonism by now Izzy? :>) I'm shocked you don't know the answer. It is BOTH. Since they are the same individuals! I do, however understand why you might think otherwise. Anyone subjected to the watered-down doctrines of traditional Christianity would tend, I would think, to uphold these false niceties, even in the face of strong evidence to the contrary. Satan has a way of lulling the unwary into a sense of false security, engendered by his presentation of a few superficial truths with his fundamental falsehoods. This pairing is as old as the Garden of Eden, when Satan told Eve she would not surely die, AND that she would gain wisdom, the latter being the truth, and the former a lie. n a message dated 6/6/2005 9:23:07 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The Bible speaks for itself. According to JSmith the Bible is not enough. Who will you serve, the God of the Bible or the God of the Book of Mormon? Izzy
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
The decision to commit to actions and wording that is objectionable to others is living proof that those who do such things no longer care about those whom they insult. JD -Original Message-From: Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:09:42 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Jt says 'to each his own, everyone has their own type of humour - it's a cultural thing, Lance.' Therefore we may assume that profaning the 'sacred' matters not to her. So make fun of or desecrate the flag, the Scriptures or Mormon undergarments, ...all in that which one finds humorouseh? Can I get an 'Amen' from all, Mormon and non-Mormon on this point by Judy? Try burning a Koran at a Mosque when the worshippers on walking in. Tell them it's just a 'cultural thingy'. - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 08:30 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH To each his own; everyone has their own type of humor - it's a cultural thing Lance. Do you think it was ungodly for Elijah to mock the prophets of Baal at Mt. Carmel by telling them their god just might be sitting on the toilet?
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
You persist in missing Lance's point. There are similar listings on the internet to this found below. No one is arguing that apocrapha is scripture. Continue with that line of debate and you are wasting time. JD Matthew 4:4 Wisdom 16:26 Matthew 4:15 1 Maccabees 5:15 Matthew 5:18 Baruch 4:1 Matthew 5:28 Sirach 9:8 Matthew 5:2ss Sirach 25:7-12 Matthew 5:4 Sirach 48:24 Matthew 6:7 Sirach 7:14 Matthew 6:9 Sirach 23:1, 4 Matthew 6:10 1 Maccabees 3:60 Matthew 6:12 Sirach 28:2 Matthew 6:13 Sirach 33:1 Matthew 6:20 Sirach 29:10s Matthew 6:23 Sirach 14:10 Matthew 6:33 Wisdom 7:11 Matthew 7:12 Tobit 4:15 Matthew 7:12 Sirach 31:15 Matthew 7:16 Sirach 27:6 Matthew 8:11 Baruch 4:37 Matthew 8:21 Tobit 4:3 Matthew 9:36 Judith 11:19 Matthew 9:38 1 Maccabees 12:17 Matthew 10:16 Sirach 13:17 Matthew 11:14 Sirach 48:10 Matthew 11:22 Judith 16:17 Matthew 11:25 Tobit 7:17 Matthew 11:25 Sirach 51:1 Matthew 11:28 Sirach 24:19 Matthew 11:28 Sirach 51:23 Matthew 11:29 Sirach 6:24s Matthew 11:29 Sirach 6:28s Matthew 11:29 Sirach 51:26s Matthew 12:4 2 Maccabees 10:3 Matthew 12:5 Sirach 40:15 Matthew 13:44 Sirach 20:30s Matthew 16:18 Wisdom 16:13 Matthew 16:22 1 Maccabees 2:21 Matthew 16:27 Sirach 35:22 Matthew 17:11 Sirach 48:10 Matthew 18:10 Tobit 12:15 Matthew 20:2 Tobit 5:15 Matthew 22:13 Wisdom 17:2 Matthew 23:38 Tobit 14:4 Matthew 24:15 1 Maccabees 1:54 Matthew 24:15 2 Maccabees 8:17 Matthew 24:16 1 Maccabees 2:28 Matthew 25:35 Tobit 4:17 Matthew 25:36 Sirach 7:32-35 Matthew 26:38 Sirach 37:2 Matthew 27:24 Daniel 13:46 Matthew 27:43 Wisdom 2:13 Matthew 27:43 Wisdom 2:18-20 -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:26:34 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH 1. Purgatory is one that is taken from 1 or 2 Macc - Izzy being a redeemed rc probably knows more 2. The rapture is one interpretation among others, it is not declared canon by the rcc or anyone else. Let's face it Lance - your Bishop has erred. On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:20:05 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Two issues arise: 1. Which 'heretical doctrines' arise from 'them'? 2. IFF some actually do then, are they offset by those 'heretical doctrines' arising from the 'accepted canon'. Example:The 'rapture' doctrine from 1 Thess.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
How did you respond when they did it? Better question. How did you respond when Jesus did it? "IT IS WRITTEN" JesusLance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 'Proof-texting' can apply to more than the Scriptures. Michael Moore and John Kerry both employed it vis a vis GWB. How did you respond when they did it? One may accurately quote someone, often absent appropriate context, with the intent of critiquing the person they quote. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 07:39 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH How would they know if theyve never tried? Anyway, proof-texting is a term THEY use to shoot down scripture quoters. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave HansenSent: Monday, June 06, 2005 9:39 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH DAVEH: Can you blame them? Seems like it may be a defensive technique. If they quote a passage, they may fear being criticized as proof-texting.ShieldsFamily wrote: DaveH, regarding your previous question, please take note of this technique of the Bible quote haters: Instead of specifically quoting a particular statement to explain their views they throw an entire chapter at you and say, "It's in there if you just can see it--find it for yourself!" Thus they think they are justified for using the Bible, but have blurred the issues by not being specific (because it really isn't "in there"!). Izzy The Bible does NOT speak for itself. On this (see my formula once again) we wholeheartedly agree. Why is it that even among the 'biblicists' who are mature there exists such minimal agreement? This ain't tennis or ping pong folks, this is the God of the Cosmos! Throwing out bible verses which simply elucidate YOUR view (not HIS) leaves people confused. That's why I referenced 2 Tim 3 (KJV whole chapter).. Because men love darkness so much that they will not come to the light so that their deeds may be made manifest. On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 23:49:00 -0700 Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The Bible speaks for itself.DAVEH: Are you sure about that, Izzy??? If so, why are there so many TTers wanting to speak in its behalf? Hmm...If the The Bible speaks for itself, then why do Street Preachers feel the need to proclaim it from the street?ShieldsFamily wrote: The Bible speaks for itself. According to JSmith the Bible is not enough. Who will you serve, the God of the Bible or the God of the Book of Mormon? Izzy -- ~~~Dave Hansen[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.langlitz.com~~~If you wish to receivethings I find interesting,I maintain six email lists...JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
The more important question IMO is "what did this word "bible" mean to the Apostle John in 98 AD. JD -Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:35:51 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Rev 2218I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are written in this book; 19and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of life and from the holy city, which are written in this book. JD, tell me what does the word ?Bible? mean? And what is the last book in the Bible? Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 12:03 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH When did the Bible come into existence -- before or after the Revelation? There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times. But, certainly, we should not be adding to what God has said. Jd -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:17:29 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Myth - It is finished already And this warning is not only in Revelation, it is also in Deuteronomy and in Proverbs. On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. From: ShieldsFamily You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy
[TruthTalk] Apocrypha
Thanks JD, I appreciate the effort. Like a good Berean - I will check them all out and compare. jt From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You persist in missing Lance's point. There are similar listings on the internet to this found below. No one is arguing that apocrapha is scripture. Continue with that line of debate and you are wasting time. JD Matthew 4:4 Wisdom 16:26 Matthew 4:15 1 Maccabees 5:15 Matthew 5:18 Baruch 4:1 Matthew 5:28 Sirach 9:8 Matthew 5:2ss Sirach 25:7-12 Matthew 5:4 Sirach 48:24 Matthew 6:7 Sirach 7:14 Matthew 6:9 Sirach 23:1, 4 Matthew 6:10 1 Maccabees 3:60 Matthew 6:12 Sirach 28:2 Matthew 6:13 Sirach 33:1 Matthew 6:20 Sirach 29:10s Matthew 6:23 Sirach 14:10 Matthew 6:33 Wisdom 7:11 Matthew 7:12 Tobit 4:15 Matthew 7:12 Sirach 31:15 Matthew 7:16 Sirach 27:6 Matthew 8:11 Baruch 4:37 Matthew 8:21 Tobit 4:3 Matthew 9:36 Judith 11:19 Matthew 9:38 1 Maccabees 12:17 Matthew 10:16 Sirach 13:17 Matthew 11:14 Sirach 48:10 Matthew 11:22 Judith 16:17 Matthew 11:25 Tobit 7:17 Matthew 11:25 Sirach 51:1 Matthew 11:28 Sirach 24:19 Matthew 11:28 Sirach 51:23 Matthew 11:29 Sirach 6:24s Matthew 11:29 Sirach 6:28s Matthew 11:29 Sirach 51:26s Matthew 12:4 2 Maccabees 10:3 Matthew 12:5 Sirach 40:15 Matthew 13:44 Sirach 20:30s Matthew 16:18 Wisdom 16:13 Matthew 16:22 1 Maccabees 2:21 Matthew 16:27 Sirach 35:22 Matthew 17:11 Sirach 48:10 Matthew 18:10 Tobit 12:15 Matthew 20:2 Tobit 5:15 Matthew 22:13 Wisdom 17:2 Matthew 23:38 Tobit 14:4 Matthew 24:15 1 Maccabees 1:54 Matthew 24:15 2 Maccabees 8:17 Matthew 24:16 1 Maccabees 2:28 Matthew 25:35 Tobit 4:17 Matthew 25:36 Sirach 7:32-35 Matthew 26:38 Sirach 37:2 Matthew 27:24 Daniel 13:46 Matthew 27:43 Wisdom 2:13 Matthew 27:43 Wisdom 2:18-20
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Does this apply to yourself JD, or is it just for "others"? Do you think DM is humored every time he is referred to as legalistic and a false prophet among other things and what about repaying Kevin evil for what you perceive to be evil? On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 09:50:48 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The decision to commit to actions and wording that is objectionable to others is living proof that those who do such things no longer care about those whom they insult. JD From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jt says 'to each his own, everyone has their own type of humour - it's a cultural thing, Lance.' Therefore we may assume that profaning the 'sacred' matters not to her. So make fun of or desecrate the flag, the Scriptures or Mormon undergarments, ...all in that which one finds humorouseh? Can I get an 'Amen' from all, Mormon and non-Mormon on this point by Judy? Try burning a Koran at a Mosque when the worshippers on walking in. Tell them it's just a 'cultural thingy'. From: Judy Taylor To each his own; everyone has their own type of humor - it's a cultural thing Lance. Do you think it was ungodly for Elijah to mock the prophets of Baal at Mt. Carmel by telling them their god just might be sitting on the toilet?
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
It is done for show & tell not humor. Some LDS are not initiated into the "meatier" doctrines of Mormonism and are shocked to learn of the protective undergarments. This creates a problem for the LDS, since they have to explain to their own members why they have kept it secret from them for possibly years. wearing magic underwear will not protect the wearer from harm anymore than a saint on the dashboard or scapular around the neck. They are a work of the flesh. Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: To each his own; everyone has their own type of humor - it's a cultural thing Lance. Do you think it was ungodly for Elijah to mock the prophets of Baal at Mt. Carmel by telling them their god just might be sitting on the toilet? On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:17:02 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: It's about as funny as it would be for you and your Jet-flying son to be present at a flag burning. It's about as funny as David or Kevin, while preaching at a 'sodomite' convention, to witness the desecration of the Holy Scriptures! Iz, these would be just 'downright funny'! From: ShieldsFamily Probably because its downright funny! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave HansenStreet preachers just quote what it says. IzzyDAVEH: Then why do some feel the need to wave underwear?ShieldsFamily wrote: DaveH, There are TT'ers who get criticized for quoting what the Bible says by those who don't quote what it says, but replacewhat it says with their own ideas of what they think it should say--that's why they don't quote and don't like those who quote. Street preachers just quote what it says. Izzy The Bible speaks for itself.DAVEH: Are you sure about that, Izzy??? If so, why are there so many TTers wanting to speak in its behalf? Hmm...If the The Bible speaks for itself, then why do Street Preachers feel the need to proclaim it from the street? -- ~~~Dave Hansen[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.langlitz.com~~~If you wish to receivethings I find interesting,I maintain six email lists...JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS. Discover Yahoo! Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM & more. Check it out!
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Lance, the gist of his reply was "I choose no answer, for the simple reason there is no serious answer to a rediculous question." So, I eliminated the trick questions and posed the two serious ones in hope that he would reconsider. They are not gobbledygook, or rediculous. Perhaps he does not want to share his witness because in this forum it will not sound like a valid witness. Nobody wants to hear that their subjective feelings are not a valid witness, especially when there are no bible verses to support that. That is fine, too. He is a big boy. He can reconsider and choose again not to answer. Perry From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:15:28 -0400 He already answered these. James 1:5 fg/ - Original Message - From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: June 07, 2005 09:01 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > Blaine, there were a couple of detractor questions, but here are the ones I > think you will be able to answer: > > 1. Is the "witness of the spirit" to which you referred the "burning in the > bosom" that mormons say they get as a witness? > > 2. Do you have any biblical references that this burning feeling (a.k.a., > the "burning in the bosom") is a valid witness of the spirit? > > Perry > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org > >To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org > >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > >Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 03:19:43 EDT > > > > > >In a message dated 6/6/2005 3:28:38 PM Mountain Standard Time, > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > >Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >Whoa, Blaine. Is your "witness of the spirit" that subjective heartburn > >feelings mormons say they get? AKA, the burning in the bazoom? Do you have > >any biblical references that this burning feeling is a valid witness? > >Could > >it instead possibly be the fires of hell being stoked by your resident > >demon? > > > > > > > >Blaine: Sorry, but none of the above rings a true sound for me. It > >sounds > >like goeldygook, or whatever. At best, it is a rediculous statement, > >which deserves no answer, or a rediculous answer. I choose no answer, for > >the > >simple reason there is no serious answer to a rediculous question. > > > -- > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Did someone burn Mormon underwear? When did holding something in your hand become a desecration. You guys are either loosing hold of reality, or as usual blowing it out of proportion to gain better traction. Another case of False witness & misrepresentation. Go d will hold you accountable no matter how lightly you percieve the consequences of twisting & misrepresenting and tale bearing falsehoods. No one "desecrated" "burned" "broke up weddings" called women "whores", or any such thing. LDS: "WAH WAH they are desecrating our undies!" LDS: "How would you like it if they burnt your prayer shawl?" WAH WAH WAH There shall be WAILING & GNASHING of TEETH Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jt says 'to each his own, everyone has their own type of humour - it's a cultural thing, Lance.' Therefore we may assume that profaning the 'sacred' matters not to her. So make fun of or desecrate the flag, the Scriptures or Mormon undergarments, ...all in that which one finds humorouseh? Can I get an 'Amen' from all, Mormon and non-Mormon on this point by Judy? Try burning a Koran at a Mosque when the worshippers on walking in. Tell them it's just a 'cultural thingy'. - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 08:30 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH To each his own; everyone has their own type of humor - it's a cultural thing Lance. Do you think it was ungodly for Elijah to mock the prophets of Baal at Mt. Carmel by telling them their god just might be sitting on the toilet? On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:17:02 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: It's about as funny as it would be for you and your Jet-flying son to be present at a flag burning. It's about as funny as David or Kevin, while preaching at a 'sodomite' convention, to witness the desecration of the Holy Scriptures! Iz, these would be just 'downright funny'! From: ShieldsFamily Probably because its downright funny! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave HansenStreet preachers just quote what it says. IzzyDAVEH: Then why do some feel the need to wave underwear?ShieldsFamily wrote: DaveH, There are TT'ers who get criticized for quoting what the Bible says by those who don't quote what it says, but replacewhat it says with their own ideas of what they think it should say--that's why they don't quote and don't like those who quote. Street preachers just quote what it says. Izzy The Bible speaks for itself.DAVEH: Are you sure about that, Izzy??? If so, why are there so many TTers wanting to speak in its behalf? Hmm...If the The Bible speaks for itself, then why do Street Preachers feel the need to proclaim it from the street? -- ~~~Dave Hansen[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.langlitz.com~~~If you wish to receivethings I find interesting,I maintain six email lists...JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS. Discover Yahoo! Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news & more. Check it out!
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Izzy, I have to vote for "this book" in Rev 22:18,19 applying specifically to the Revelation. I used to try to apply it to the whole Bible (in a debate with a mormon many years ago) , and I DO believe that the general principle applies to the whole Bible, but in particular believe that these verses are referring specifically to the Book of Revelation. Perry From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:35:51 -0500 Rev 2218I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are written in this book;19and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of life and from the holy city, which are written in this book. JD, tell me what does the word "Bible" mean? And what is the last book in the Bible? Izzy _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 12:03 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH When did the Bible come into existence -- before or after the Revelation? There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times. But, certainly, we should not be adding to what God has said. Jd -Original Message- From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:17:29 -0400 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Myth - It is finished already And this warning is not only in Revelation, it is also in Deuteronomy and in Proverbs. On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > writes: In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. From: ShieldsFamily You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
Am getting discouraged with this JD, it is a waste of my time - I can see no relation between scripture and the other. Also why are they all in Matthew? This is what I have found thus far - Can you find a common ground between them? Matthew 4:4 & Wisdom 16:26 1. He answered and said, “it is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeded out of the mouth of God” (spoken to the devil) 2. So that your children, whom you loved, O Lord, might learn that it is not the production of crops that feeds humankind but that your word sustains those who trust in you. Matthew 4:15 & 1 Maccabees 5:15 1. The land of Zabulon, and the land of Nephthalim by the way of the sea, beyond Jordan, Galilee of the Gentiles; (ppl in darkness seeing a great light) 2. They said that the people of Ptolemais and Tyre and Sidon, and all Galilee of the Gentiles had gathered together against them to annihilate us. Matthew 5:18 & Baruch 4:1 1. For verily I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. 2. She is the book of the commandments of God, the law that endures forever. All who hold her fast will live, and those who forsake her will die. Matthew 5:28 & Sirach 9:8 1. But I say unto you, that whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. 2. Turn away your eyes from a shapely woman, and do not gaze at beauty belonging to another; many have been seduced by a woman’s beauty, and by it passion is kindled like a fire. Matthew 5:2ss & Sirach 25:7-12 1. And he opened his mouth and taught them saying: (Sermon on the Mount). 2. I can think of nine whom I would call blessed and a tenth my tongue proclaims: A man who can rejoice in his children; a man who lives to see the downfall of his foes. Happy the man who lives with a sensible wife, and the one who does not plow with ox and ass together. Happy is the one who does not sin with the tongue, and the one who has not served an inferior. Happy is the one who finds a friend, and the one who speaks to attentive listeners. How great is the one who finds wisdom! But none is superior to the one who fears the Lord. Fear of the Lord surpasses everything; to whom can we compare the one who has it? On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:21:06 -0400 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Thanks JD, I appreciate the effort. Like a good Berean - I will check them all out and compare. jt From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You persist in missing Lance's point. There are similar listings on the internet to this found below. No one is arguing that apocrapha is scripture. Continue with that line of debate and you are wasting time. JD Matthew 4:4 Wisdom 16:26 Matthew 4:15 1 Maccabees 5:15 Matthew 5:18 Baruch 4:1 Matthew 5:28 Sirach 9:8 Matthew 5:2ss Sirach 25:7-12 Matthew 5:4 Sirach 48:24 Matthew 6:7 Sirach 7:14 Matthew 6:9 Sirach 23:1, 4 Matthew 6:10 1 Maccabees 3:60 Matthew 6:12 Sirach 28:2 Matthew 6:13 Sirach 33:1 Matthew 6:20 Sirach 29:10s Matthew 6:23 Sirach 14:10 Matthew 6:33 Wisdom 7:11 Matthew 7:12 Tobit 4:15 Matthew 7:12 Sirach 31:15 Matthew 7:16 Sirach 27:6 Matthew 8:11 Baruch 4:37 Matthew 8:21 Tobit 4:3 Matthew 9:36 Judith 11:19 Matthew 9:38 1 Maccabees 12:17 Matthew 10:16 Sirach 13:17 Matthew 11:14 Sirach 48:10 Matthew 11:22 Judith 16:17 Matthew 11:25 Tobit 7:17 Matthew 11:25 Sirach 51:1 Matthew 11:28 Sirach 24:19 Matthew 11:28 Sirach 51:23 Matthew 11:29 Sirach 6:24s Matthew 11:29 Sirach 6:28s Matthew 11:29 Sirach 51:26s Matthew 12:4 2 Maccabees 10:3 Matthew 12:5 Sirach 40:15 Matthew 13:44 Sirach 20:30s Matthew 16:18 Wisdom 16:13 Matthew 16:22 1 Maccabees 2:21 Matthew 16:27 Sirach 35:22 Matthew 17:11 Sirach 4
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
I guess the prophets in the Bible didn't care about the people they "insulted" either. No wonder John the Baptist was beheaded. (By people like you?) Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 7:51 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH The decision to commit to actions and wording that is objectionable to others is living proof that those who do such things no longer care about those whom they insult. JD -Original Message-From: Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:09:42 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Jt says 'to each his own, everyone has their own type of humour - it's a cultural thing, Lance.' Therefore we may assume that profaning the 'sacred' matters not to her. So make fun of or desecrate the flag, the Scriptures or Mormon undergarments, ...all in that which one finds humorouseh? Can I get an 'Amen' from all, Mormon and non-Mormon on this point by Judy? Try burning a Koran at a Mosque when the worshippers on walking in. Tell them it's just a 'cultural thingy'. - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 08:30 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH To each his own; everyone has their own type of humor - it's a cultural thing Lance. Do you think it was ungodly for Elijah to mock the prophets of Baal at Mt. Carmel by telling them their god just might be sitting on the toilet?
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
JD, join the "Why We Can't Believe What We Read in the Bible Club". Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 7:48 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH In addition, "proof-texting" is the misuse of scripture. All ae suspectible to this failure. We look for verses with similar wording and assume those passages have the same meaning and context. -Original Message-From: Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:24:11 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH 'Proof-texting' can apply to more than the Scriptures. Michael Moore and John Kerry both employed it vis a vis GWB. How did you respond when they did it? One may accurately quote someone, often absent appropriate context, with the intent of critiquing the person they quote. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 07:39 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH How would they know if they?ve never tried? Anyway, ?proof-texting? is a term THEY use to shoot down scripture quoters. Izzy
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Don't you think it is significant that the warning is written in the last chapter of The Book? Iz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Perry Locke Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:39 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Izzy, I have to vote for "this book" in Rev 22:18,19 applying specifically to the Revelation. I used to try to apply it to the whole Bible (in a debate with a mormon many years ago) , and I DO believe that the general principle applies to the whole Bible, but in particular believe that these verses are referring specifically to the Book of Revelation. Perry >From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >To: >Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH >Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:35:51 -0500 > > Rev 2218I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of >this >book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are >written in this book;19and if anyone takes away from the words of the >book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of >life and from the holy city, which are written in this book. > >JD, tell me what does the word "Bible" mean? And what is the last book >in the Bible? Izzy > > > > _ > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 12:03 PM >To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > > > >When did the Bible come into existence -- before or after the Revelation? >There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times. But, >certainly, we should not be adding to what God has said. > > > >Jd > > >-Original Message- >From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >Sent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:17:29 -0400 >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > >Myth - It is finished already > >And this warning is not only in Revelation, it is also in Deuteronomy >and in Proverbs. > > > >On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > writes: > >In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. > >From: ShieldsFamily > > > >You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or >subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy > > > -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
RE: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
I'm sure there are verses from the BoM that are just as "related" to those who think so. It all looks like the work of the Master Counterfiter to me. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy TaylorSent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:54 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: truthtalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha Am getting discouraged with this JD, it is a waste of my time - I can see no relation between scripture and the other. Also why are they all in Matthew? This is what I have found thus far - Can you find a common ground between them? Matthew 4:4 & Wisdom 16:26 1. He answered and said, “it is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeded out of the mouth of God” (spoken to the devil) 2. So that your children, whom you loved, O Lord, might learn that it is not the production of crops that feeds humankind but that your word sustains those who trust in you. Matthew 4:15 & 1 Maccabees 5:15 1. The land of Zabulon, and the land of Nephthalim by the way of the sea, beyond Jordan, Galilee of the Gentiles; (ppl in darkness seeing a great light) 2. They said that the people of Ptolemais and Tyre and Sidon, and all Galilee of the Gentiles had gathered together against them to annihilate us. Matthew 5:18 & Baruch 4:1 1. For verily I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. 2. She is the book of the commandments of God, the law that endures forever. All who hold her fast will live, and those who forsake her will die. Matthew 5:28 & Sirach 9:8 1. But I say unto you, that whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. 2. Turn away your eyes from a shapely woman, and do not gaze at beauty belonging to another; many have been seduced by a woman’s beauty, and by it passion is kindled like a fire. Matthew 5:2ss & Sirach 25:7-12 1. And he opened his mouth and taught them saying: (Sermon on the Mount). 2. I can think of nine whom I would call blessed and a tenth my tongue proclaims: A man who can rejoice in his children; a man who lives to see the downfall of his foes. Happy the man who lives with a sensible wife, and the one who does not plow with ox and ass together. Happy is the one who does not sin with the tongue, and the one who has not served an inferior. Happy is the one who finds a friend, and the one who speaks to attentive listeners. How great is the one who finds wisdom! But none is superior to the one who fears the Lord. Fear of the Lord surpasses everything; to whom can we compare the one who has it? On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:21:06 -0400 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Thanks JD, I appreciate the effort. Like a good Berean - I will check them all out and compare. jt From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You persist in missing Lance's point. There are similar listings on the internet to this found below. No one is arguing that apocrapha is scripture. Continue with that line of debate and you are wasting time. JD Matthew 4:4 Wisdom 16:26 Matthew 4:15 1 Maccabees 5:15 Matthew 5:18 Baruch 4:1 Matthew 5:28 Sirach 9:8 Matthew 5:2ss Sirach 25:7-12 Matthew 5:4 Sirach 48:24 Matthew 6:7 Sirach 7:14 Matthew 6:9 Sirach 23:1, 4 Matthew 6:10 1 Maccabees 3:60 Matthew 6:12 Sirach 28:2 Matthew 6:13 Sirach 33:1 Matthew 6:20 Sirach 29:10s Matthew 6:23 Sirach 14:10 Matthew 6:33 Wisdom 7:11 Matthew 7:12 Tobit 4:15 Matthew 7:12 Sirach 31:15 Matthew 7:16 Sirach 27:6 Matthew 8:11 Baruch 4:37 Matthew 8:21 Tobit 4:3 Matthew 9:36 Judith 11:19 Matthew 9:38 1 Maccabees 12:17 Matthew 10:16 Sirach 13:17 Matthew 11:14 Sirach 48:10 Matthew 11:22 Judith 16:17 Matthew 11:25 Tobit 7:17 Matthew 11:25 Sirach 51:1 Matthew 11:28 Sirach 24:19 Matthew 11:28 Sirach 51:23 Matthew 11:29 Sirach 6:24s Matthew 11:29 Sirach 6:28s Matthew 11:29 Sirach 51:26s Matthew 12:4 2
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
So then, CPL, 'his' subjective witness is unacceptable while yours is? He did not quote Ja 1:5fg but it was his obvious reference. - Original Message - From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: June 07, 2005 10:27 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > Lance, the gist of his reply was "I choose no answer, for the simple reason > there is no serious answer to a rediculous question." > > So, I eliminated the trick questions and posed the two serious ones in hope > that he would reconsider. They are not gobbledygook, or rediculous. Perhaps > he does not want to share his witness because in this forum it will not > sound like a valid witness. Nobody wants to hear that their subjective > feelings are not a valid witness, especially when there are no bible verses > to support that. That is fine, too. He is a big boy. He can reconsider and > choose again not to answer. > > Perry > > >From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org > >To: > >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > >Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:15:28 -0400 > > > >He already answered these. James 1:5 fg/ > > > > > >- Original Message - > >From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: > >Sent: June 07, 2005 09:01 > >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > > > > > > > Blaine, there were a couple of detractor questions, but here are the > >ones > >I > > > think you will be able to answer: > > > > > > 1. Is the "witness of the spirit" to which you referred the "burning in > >the > > > bosom" that mormons say they get as a witness? > > > > > > 2. Do you have any biblical references that this burning feeling > >(a.k.a., > > > the "burning in the bosom") is a valid witness of the spirit? > > > > > > Perry > > > > > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org > > > >To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org > > > >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > > > >Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 03:19:43 EDT > > > > > > > > > > > >In a message dated 6/6/2005 3:28:38 PM Mountain Standard Time, > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > > > >Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >Whoa, Blaine. Is your "witness of the spirit" that subjective > >heartburn > > > >feelings mormons say they get? AKA, the burning in the bazoom? Do you > >have > > > >any biblical references that this burning feeling is a valid witness? > > > >Could > > > >it instead possibly be the fires of hell being stoked by your resident > > > >demon? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Blaine: Sorry, but none of the above rings a true sound for me. It > > > >sounds > > > >like goeldygook, or whatever. At best, it is a rediculous > >statement, > > > >which deserves no answer, or a rediculous answer. I choose no answer, > >for > > > >the > > > >simple reason there is no serious answer to a rediculous question. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may > >know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) > >http://www.InnGlory.org > > > > > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a > >friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. > > > > > >-- > >"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may > >know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) > >http://www.InnGlory.org > > > >If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a > >friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. > > > -- > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
No. It could have easily been in the front of the book. Take the copyright notices on movies and in our books today...always up front...but that does not alter their effectiveness...in fact, it may even increase it since most people don't read books cover to cover these days, or watch movies until the last frame of film has passed through the projector. Also, it does not matter what John thought Bible or book meant in the first century, as someone suggested...he was just writing down what he was being shown and told to write. Perry From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:16:43 -0500 Don't you think it is significant that the warning is written in the last chapter of The Book? Iz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Perry Locke Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:39 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Izzy, I have to vote for "this book" in Rev 22:18,19 applying specifically to the Revelation. I used to try to apply it to the whole Bible (in a debate with a mormon many years ago) , and I DO believe that the general principle applies to the whole Bible, but in particular believe that these verses are referring specifically to the Book of Revelation. Perry >From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >To: >Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH >Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:35:51 -0500 > > Rev 2218I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of >this >book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are >written in this book;19and if anyone takes away from the words of the >book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of >life and from the holy city, which are written in this book. > >JD, tell me what does the word "Bible" mean? And what is the last book >in the Bible? Izzy > > > > _ > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 12:03 PM >To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > > > >When did the Bible come into existence -- before or after the Revelation? >There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times. But, >certainly, we should not be adding to what God has said. > > > >Jd > > >-Original Message- >From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >Sent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:17:29 -0400 >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > >Myth - It is finished already > >And this warning is not only in Revelation, it is also in Deuteronomy >and in Proverbs. > > > >On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > writes: > >In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. > >From: ShieldsFamily > > > >You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or >subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy > > > -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
God knew. -Original Message- Also, it does not matter what John thought Bible or book meant in the first century, as someone suggested...he was just writing down what he was being shown and told to write. Perry -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
The unacceptability of my or Blaine's subjective witness is not the issue. Whether or not it is Biblical is the issue. Obvious references are made obvious by quoting scripture. No obvious quote, no obvious reference. Perry From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 11:22:02 -0400 So then, CPL, 'his' subjective witness is unacceptable while yours is? He did not quote Ja 1:5fg but it was his obvious reference. - Original Message - From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: June 07, 2005 10:27 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > Lance, the gist of his reply was "I choose no answer, for the simple reason > there is no serious answer to a rediculous question." > > So, I eliminated the trick questions and posed the two serious ones in hope > that he would reconsider. They are not gobbledygook, or rediculous. Perhaps > he does not want to share his witness because in this forum it will not > sound like a valid witness. Nobody wants to hear that their subjective > feelings are not a valid witness, especially when there are no bible verses > to support that. That is fine, too. He is a big boy. He can reconsider and > choose again not to answer. > > Perry > > >From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org > >To: > >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > >Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:15:28 -0400 > > > >He already answered these. James 1:5 fg/ > > > > > >- Original Message - > >From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: > >Sent: June 07, 2005 09:01 > >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > > > > > > > Blaine, there were a couple of detractor questions, but here are the > >ones > >I > > > think you will be able to answer: > > > > > > 1. Is the "witness of the spirit" to which you referred the "burning in > >the > > > bosom" that mormons say they get as a witness? > > > > > > 2. Do you have any biblical references that this burning feeling > >(a.k.a., > > > the "burning in the bosom") is a valid witness of the spirit? > > > > > > Perry > > > > > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org > > > >To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org > > > >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > > > >Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 03:19:43 EDT > > > > > > > > > > > >In a message dated 6/6/2005 3:28:38 PM Mountain Standard Time, > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > > > >Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >Whoa, Blaine. Is your "witness of the spirit" that subjective > >heartburn > > > >feelings mormons say they get? AKA, the burning in the bazoom? Do you > >have > > > >any biblical references that this burning feeling is a valid witness? > > > >Could > > > >it instead possibly be the fires of hell being stoked by your resident > > > >demon? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Blaine: Sorry, but none of the above rings a true sound for me. It > > > >sounds > > > >like goeldygook, or whatever. At best, it is a rediculous > >statement, > > > >which deserves no answer, or a rediculous answer. I choose no answer, > >for > > > >the > > > >simple reason there is no serious answer to a rediculous question. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may > >know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) > >http://www.InnGlory.org > > > > > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a > >friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. > > > > > >-- > >"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may > >know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) > >http://www.InnGlory.org > > > >If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a > >friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. > > > -- > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscr
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
I agree, and I think John recorded that effectively. From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:52:05 -0500 God knew. -Original Message- Also, it does not matter what John thought Bible or book meant in the first century, as someone suggested...he was just writing down what he was being shown and told to write. Perry -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] JS is a False Priest according to Blaine
Blaine: At least I don't run every person off the forum who disagrees with me --talk about weird--or, maybe a better word is self-admiring. Now, I will be the one to get in trouble for saying that, despite your constant trash-mouthing of my religion and my character, for which nothing will be done or even said. In a message dated 6/6/2005 11:45:31 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No implying Here Blaine I declare JS as a False Prophet, teacher and Pervert. The facts bear that out. You can not be serious! You have a double standard, what else should we expect from the most persecuted people in the world? You called CPL a clown see your own post belowYou have a wierd sense of standards Blaine,
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
So, you weren't waving it around? You were just walking around the streets holding someone's underwear in your hands? Jd -Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:35:55 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Did someone burn Mormon underwear? When did holding something in your hand become a desecration.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Do you believe that what I wrote is a crrect teaching or not? -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:17:23 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Does this apply to yourself JD, or is it just for "others"? Do you think DM is humored every time he is referred to as legalistic and a false prophet among other things and what about repaying Kevin evil for what you perceive to be evil? On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 09:50:48 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The decision to commit to actions and wording that is objectionable to others is living proof that those who do such things no longer care about those whom they insult. JD From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jt says 'to each his own, everyone has their own type of humour - it's a cultural thing, Lance.' Therefore we may assume that profaning the 'sacred' matters not to her. So make fun of or desecrate the flag, the Scriptures or Mormon undergarments, ...all in that which one finds humorouseh? Can I get an 'Amen' from all, Mormon and non-Mormon on this point by Judy? Try burning a Koran at a Mosque when the worshippers on walking in. Tell them it's just a 'cultural thingy'. From: Judy Taylor To each his own; everyone has their own type of humor - it's a cultural thing Lance. Do you think it was ungodly for Elijah to mock the prophets of Baal at Mt. Carmel by telling them their god just might be sitting on the toilet?
Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
If you cannot see a similarity between the two references below, stop reading. I see a very clear similarity. If you don't agree, so what? JD -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: truthtalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:53:47 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha Am getting discouraged with this JD, it is a waste of my time - I can see no relation between scripture and the other. Also why are they all in Matthew? This is what I have found thus far - Can you find a common ground between them? Matthew 4:4 & Wisdom 16:26 1. He answered and said, ?it is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeded out of the mouth of God? (spoken to the devil) 2. So that your children, whom you loved, O Lord, might learn that it is not the production of crops that feeds humankind but that your word sustains those who trust in you.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Was it the last chapter in the Bible when it was written? Jd -Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:16:43 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Don't you think it is significant that the warning is written in the last chapter of The Book? Iz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Perry Locke Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:39 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Izzy, I have to vote for "this book" in Rev 22:18,19 applying specifically to the Revelation. I used to try to apply it to the whole Bible (in a debate with a mormon many years ago) , and I DO believe that the general principle applies to the whole Bible, but in particular believe that these verses are referring specifically to the Book of Revelation. Perry >From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >To:>Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH >Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:35:51 -0500 > > Rev 2218I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of >this >book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are >written in this book;19and if anyone takes away from the words of the >book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of >life and from the holy city, which are written in this book. > >JD, tell me what does the word "Bible" mean? And what is the last book >in the Bible? Izzy > > > > _ > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 12:03 PM >To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > > > >When did the Bible come into existence -- before or after the Revelation? >There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times. But, >certainly, we should not be adding to what God has said. > > > >Jd > > >-Original Message- >From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >Sent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:17:29 -0400 >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > >Myth - It is finished already > >And this warning is not only in Revelation, it is also in Deuteronomy >and in Proverbs. > > > >On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ><_javascript_:parent.ComposeTo('[EMAIL PROTECTED]');> > writes: > >In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. > >From: ShieldsFamily ><_javascript_:parent.ComposeTo('[EMAIL PROTECTED]');> > > >You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or >subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy > > > -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
There is no similarity JD and this is the seedbed of heresy and hereticks; as someone has already noted, one may just as well try to correlate scripture and the book of Mormon as this. Why not allow the scriptures to speak to your heart rather than fill it with error and mixture? No worries about me stopping - my time is too valuable. jt On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 14:12:41 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you cannot see a similarity between the two references below, stop reading. I see a very clear similarity. If you don't agree, so what? JD From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Am getting discouraged with this JD, it is a waste of my time - I can see no relation between scripture and the other. Also why are they all in Matthew? This is what I have found thus far - Can you find a common ground between them? Matthew 4:4 & Wisdom 16:26 1. He answered and said, ?it is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeded out of the mouth of God? (spoken to the devil) 2. So that your children, whom you loved, O Lord, might learn that it is not the production of crops that feeds humankind but that your word sustains those who trust in you.
Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
Why have yoou written this? Why not allow the scriptures to speak to your heart rather than fill it with error and mixture?
Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
Because it is a lesson I had to learn the hard way and I fear some on TT have not learned it yet. jt On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 14:41:38 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why have yoou written this? Why not allow the scriptures to speak to your heart rather than fill it with error and mixture?
Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
There is need to worry about me in this regard, but thank you anyway. A personal relationship with the Lord has an intrinsic way of solving such a problem But, enough said. Jd Because it is a lesson I had to learn the hard way and I fear some on TT have not learned it yet. jt On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 14:41:38 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why have yoou written this? Why not allow the scriptures to speak to your heart rather than fill it with error and mixture?
Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
I don't know about that JD; I'd say King David of Israel had a very personal relationship with the Lord He fell hard and he paid dearly. jt On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 14:55:33 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There is need to worry about me in this regard, but thank you anyway. A personal relationship with the Lord has an intrinsic way of solving such a problem But, enough said. Jd Because it is a lesson I had to learn the hard way and I fear some on TT have not learned it yet. jt On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 14:41:38 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why have yoou written this? Why not allow the scriptures to speak to your heart rather than fill it with error and mixture?
[TruthTalk] WorldNetDaily: How and why we're going to win
FYI - I'd be interested in David/Christine Miller & Terry's take on this article since they are involved in the home-church movement. jt This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows. To view this item online, visithttp://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44629 Tuesday, June 7, 2005 How and why we're going to win Posted: June 7, 20051:00 a.m. Eastern By Jim Rutz © 2005 WorldNetDaily.com Far below the rusty radar of the portside press, the tide of history has turned against tyranny and in favor of the common man. The whole world, in fact, is changing hands for the first and last time. Tyrants and generals have swept across the Earth for centuries, crushing and raising empires. Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome and the dynasties of the East have all been driven by pharaohs, emperors and kings. For one brief blip of time, a nexus of freedom did blaze in the Near East, as early Christianity poured power into the hearts and hands of ordinary believers. But this fledgling participatory church, with plain folks meeting from house to house and urging each member to freely teach or sing or pray in turn, was soon subverted by its own leaders. Facing widespread heresy and persecution, the young church decided to copy the enemy (Rome). Reaching back into their past, they resurrected the Levitical priesthood and regrouped as a top-down hierarchy, starting about A.D. 90. Then, under Constantine in the 320s, Christianity totally collapsed into an institution, putting bishops over bishops over bishopsand squashing the common man. The fire went out, and Western Civilization collapsed into the Dark Ages in A.D. 476. A millennium later, the reformers restored basic Christian doctrine, and the Great Awakening stirred hope in individual hearts. But all the oppressive structures remained intact. The West then floundered desperately through a series of mindsets: Enlightenment philosophy, French-style revolution, Lockean limited government, Fabian socialism, and now a market-managing political bureaucracy from Roosevelt and Keynes (which has just suffered a whopping setback). Last week's rejection of a United States of Europe by independent-minded voters in Holland and France dovetails with the Busheffort to bring freedom and independence to the Middle East. And both events are subsets of a wider phenomenon: the transfer of power from the top of the pyramid to the bottom. Democracy is not the Kingdom of God, but in a free atmosphere, people more often choose to follow Him. This change is broader than government. In industry, the guys on the shop floor now just punch a computer to get the information that once had to be parsed out by middle management (R.I.P.). In the media, 8 million bloggers and websites like WorldNetDaily are starting to supplant the giant TV networks and newspapers. In education, homeschools have brokenthe National Education Association monopoly. In entertainment, G-rated films have mushroomed. But perhaps the most foundational changes are happening in the church, the traditional guardian of society's key values. If you've always been a Sunday-go-to-meetin' kind of Christian, you now have an exciting alternative. Without changing one iota of your beliefs, you can upgrade yourself from a pew potato to a world-changing pioneer. This has to be the biggest megashift in the history of mankind. Not only has it transformed the lives of over 100 million people worldwide during the past 50 years, it has also been attested by millions of miracles. This is not a rumor, it's a spiritual tsunami. In "Megashift," I've documented many such miracles (including true resurrections in 52 countries recently) with names and addresses. Joseph Farah, in his brilliant May 25 column and his book, "Taking America Back," states that turn-back-the-clock conservatives cannot win the battle for America because their strategy is purely defensive. He says we need a radically positive vision. Bingo. And here are the two main ways that vision is going to win. One, we're going to overwhelm the secular liberals by sheer numbers (see my first column), thus enabling us to pass a sweeping series of truly progressive reforms based on a radical vision like Mr. Farah's. And two, we're going to cooperate with God in re-creating the church, turning the people from a professionally led audience into proactive disciples who get their directions straight from the Spirit. (We can't change diehard spectators, but we can change many believers and bring in a billion more in the next 11 to 12 years.) Most of that bottom-to-top change is going to come through what you call house churches informal, but life-changing open fellowships in homes, offices, schools, Starbucks, wherever. They are free from programs, sermons, buildings and the heretically deadly split between clergy and laity. Why are people leaving t
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Lance are you equating the Bible & the Koran to a pair of skivvies? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 6:17 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH It's about as funny as it would be for you and your Jet-flying son to be present at a flag burning. It's about as funny as David or Kevin, while preaching at a 'sodomite' convention, to witness the desecration of the Holy Scriptures! Iz, these would be just 'downright funny'! - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 07:46 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Probably because its downright funny! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave HansenSent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:31 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Street preachers just quote what it says. IzzyDAVEH: Then why do some feel the need to wave underwear?ShieldsFamily wrote: DaveH, There are TT'ers who get criticized for quoting what the Bible says by those who don't quote what it says, but replacewhat it says with their own ideas of what they think it should say--that's why they don't quote and don't like those who quote. Street preachers just quote what it says. Izzy The Bible speaks for itself.DAVEH: Are you sure about that, Izzy??? If so, why are there so many TTers wanting to speak in its behalf? Hmm...If the The Bible speaks for itself, then why do Street Preachers feel the need to proclaim it from the street? -- ~~~Dave Hansen[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.langlitz.com~~~If you wish to receivethings I find interesting,I maintain six email lists...JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS. Discover Yahoo! Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news & more. Check it out!
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times. You are as crooked as the JW arguing against a Triune god, saying the word trinity is not in the bible From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 12:03 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH When did the Bible come into existence -- before or after the Revelation? There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times. But, certainly, we should not be adding to what God has said. Jd -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:17:29 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Myth - It is finished already And this warning is not only in Revelation, it is also in Deuteronomy and in Proverbs. On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. From: ShieldsFamily You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy Discover Yahoo! Find restaurants, movies, travel & more fun for the weekend. Check it out!
Re: FW: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Birds of a feather flock together!ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Then why watch them? J From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:18 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH In the movies sometimes they don't care about what God said. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 06, 2005 13:05 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH After God said not to add to it? I think NOT. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:01 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 06, 2005 12:38 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:06 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH I Blaine: Aren't you converted to Mormonism by now Izzy? :>) I'm shocked you don't know the answer. It is BOTH. Since they are the same individuals! I do, however understand why you might think otherwise. Anyone subjected to the watered-down doctrines of traditional Christianity would tend, I would think, to uphold these false niceties, even in the face of strong evidence to the contrary. Satan has a way of lulling the unwary into a sense of false security, engendered by his presentation of a few superficial truths with his fundamental falsehoods. This pairing is as old as the Garden of Eden, when Satan told Eve she would not surely die, AND that she would gain wisdom, the latter being the truth, and the former a lie. n a message dated 6/6/2005 9:23:07 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The Bible speaks for itself. According to JSmith the Bible is not enough. Who will you serve, the God of the Bible or the God of the Book of Mormon? Izzy Discover Yahoo! Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM & more. Check it out!
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, you weren't waving it around? You were just walking around the streets holding someone's underwear in your hands? Jd Are you saying that somewhere in Salt Lake City there is a Mormon with no skivvies? That is common down here where it is still ninety degrees at bed time, but SLC is a little cool for that. Might freeze your equipment.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
We look for verses with similar wording and assume those passages have the same meaning and context. Speak for yourself. I KNOW what the Bible says. So does Lance that is why he will not answer me with one of those "numerous" alternate understandings of John 3:36 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In addition, "proof-texting" is the misuse of scripture. All ae suspectible to this failure. We look for verses with similar wording and assume those passages have the same meaning and context. -Original Message-From: Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:24:11 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH 'Proof-texting' can apply to more than the Scriptures. Michael Moore and John Kerry both employed it vis a vis GWB. How did you respond when they did it? One may accurately quote someone, often absent appropriate context, with the intent of critiquing the person they quote. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 07:39 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH How would they know if they?ve never tried? Anyway, ?proof-texting? is a term THEY use to shoot down scripture quoters. Izzy__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Personal EXPERIENCE?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The decision to commit to actions and wording that is objectionable to others is living proof that those who do such things no longer care about those whom they insult. JD -Original Message-From: Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:09:42 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Jt says 'to each his own, everyone has their own type of humour - it's a cultural thing, Lance.' Therefore we may assume that profaning the 'sacred' matters not to her. So make fun of or desecrate the flag, the Scriptures or Mormon undergarments, ...all in that which one finds humorouseh? Can I get an 'Amen' from all, Mormon and non-Mormon on this point by Judy? Try burning a Koran at a Mosque when the worshippers on walking in. Tell them it's just a 'cultural thingy'. - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 08:30 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH To each his own; everyone has their own type of humor - it's a cultural thing Lance. Do you think it was ungodly for Elijah to mock the prophets of Baal at Mt. Carmel by telling them their god just might be sitting on the toilet? __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
If you believe the Bible, you might consider the passages In the photo--part of the Brigham Young Monument in Salt Lake City Blaine The Hosanna Shout, given at the dedication of each new temple--also, 2 passages from Isaiah, believed to have been fulfilled when the Salt Lake temple was completed
Re: [TruthTalk] WorldNetDaily: How and why we're going to win
I am not certain that I have a take, Judy.On one hand, I believe that we are in the last days, and if so, things will get worse, not better. On the other hand, if what I believe is incorrect, I believe that God will bless the house church and it will multiply. More and more people are studying the Bible, and as they do, they see that the institutional church is so far from what the Lord has planned that it is a miracle that He still is able to use it. Like any giant business, it has a million paid employees and a few at the top are getting rich telling those at the bottom how to do it. If God is there, it is only because God is everywhere, not because He is thrilled to sit among the pew warmers and hear an expert speak. I am convinced that the mega churches of today are a temporary thing. You will either see a return to simple gatherings of small groups of Christians or you will see a great falling away, or both. I guess that is my take. Terry Judy Taylor wrote: FYI - I'd be interested in David/Christine Miller & Terry's take on this article since they are involved in the home-church movement. jt This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows. To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44629 Tuesday, June 7, 2005 How and why we're going to win Posted: June 7, 2005 1:00 a.m. Eastern By Jim Rutz © 2005 WorldNetDaily.com Far below the rusty radar of the portside press, the tide of history has turned against tyranny and in favor of the common man. The whole world, in fact, is changing hands for the first and last time. Tyrants and generals have swept across the Earth for centuries, crushing and raising empires. Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome and the dynasties of the East have all been driven by pharaohs, emperors and kings. For one brief blip of time, a nexus of freedom did blaze in the Near East, as early Christianity poured power into the hearts and hands of ordinary believers. But this fledgling participatory church, with plain folks meeting from house to house and urging each member to freely teach or sing or pray in turn, was soon subverted by its own leaders. Facing widespread heresy and persecution, the young church decided to copy the enemy (Rome). Reaching back into their past, they resurrected the Levitical priesthood and regrouped as a top-down hierarchy, starting about A.D. 90. Then, under Constantine in the 320s, Christianity totally collapsed into an institution, putting bishops over bishops over bishops and squashing the common man. The fire went out, and Western Civilization collapsed into the Dark Ages in A.D. 476. A millennium later, the reformers restored basic Christian doctrine, and the Great Awakening stirred hope in individual hearts. But all the oppressive structures remained intact. The West then floundered desperately through a series of mindsets: Enlightenment philosophy, French-style revolution, Lockean limited government, Fabian socialism, and now a market-managing political bureaucracy from Roosevelt and Keynes (which has just suffered a whopping setback). Last week's rejection of a United States of Europe by independent-minded voters in Holland and France dovetails with the Bush effort to bring freedom and independence to the Middle East. And both events are subsets of a wider phenomenon: the transfer of power from the top of the pyramid to the bottom. Democracy is not the Kingdom of God, but in a free atmosphere, people more often choose to follow Him. This change is broader than government. In industry, the guys on the shop floor now just punch a computer to get the information that once had to be parsed out by middle management (R.I.P.). In the media, 8 million bloggers – and websites like WorldNetDaily – are starting to supplant the giant TV networks and newspapers. In education, homeschools have broken the National Education Association monopoly. In entertainment, G-rated films have mushroomed. But perhaps the most foundational changes are happening in the church, the traditional guardian of society's key values. If you've always been a Sunday-go-to-meetin' kind of Christian, you now have an exciting alternative. Without changing one iota of your beliefs, you can upgrade yourself from a pew potato to a world-changing pioneer. This has to be the biggest megashift in the history of mankind. Not only has it transformed the lives of over 100 million people worldwide during the past 50 years, it has also been attested by millions of miracles. This is not a rumor, it's a spiritual tsunami. In "Megashift," I've documented many such miracles (including true resurrections in 52 countries recently) with names and addresses. Joseph Farah, in his brilliant May 25 column and his book, "Taking America Back," states that turn-back-the-clock conservatives cannot win the battle for America because their s
[TruthTalk] [Fwd: Fw: Chuck Pitman, Lt. Gen., US Marine Corps (Ret.) ~ " Apology "]
> > > >Subject: Chuck Pitman, Lt. Gen., US Marine Corps (Ret.) ~ " Apology > >A Letter of Apology from Lieutenant General Chuck Pitman, >US Marine Corps, Retired: > >"For good and ill, the Iraqi prisoner abuse mess will remain an >issue. On the one hand, right thinking Americans will harbor the >stupidity of the actions while on the other hand, political glee >will take control and fashion this minor event into some modern >day massacre. > >I humbly offer my opinion here: > >I am sorry that the last seven times we Americans took up arms and >sacrificed the blood of our youth, it was in the defense of >Muslims (Bosnia, Kosovo, Gulf War 1, Kuwait, etc.). > >I am sorry that no such call for an apology upon the extremists >came after 9/11. > >I am sorry that all of the murderers on 9/11 were Islamic Arabs. > >I am sorry that most Arabs and Muslims have to live in squalor >under savage dictatorships. > >I am sorry that their leaders squander their wealth. > >I am sorry that their governments breed hate for the US in their >Religious schools, mosques, and government-controlled media. > >I am sorry that Yasir Arafat was kicked out of every Arab country >and high-jacked the Palestinian "cause." > >I am sorry that no other Arab country will take in or offer more >than a token amount of financial help to those same Palestinians. > >I am sorry that the USA has to step in and be the biggest >financial supporter of poverty stricken Arabs while the insanely >wealthy Arabs blame the USA for all their problems. > >I am sorry that our own left wing, our media, and our own >brainwashed masses do not understand any of this (from the >misleading vocal elements of our society, like radical professors, >CNN and the NY TIMES). > >I am sorry the United Nations scammed the poor people of Iraq out >of the "food for oil" money so they could get rich while the common >folk suffered. > >I am sorry that some Arab governments pay the families of homicide >bombers upon their death. > >I am sorry that those same bombers are brainwashed thinking they >will receive 72 virgins in "paradise." > >I am sorry that the homicide bombers think pregnant women, babies, >children, the elderly and other non-combatant civilians are >legitimate targets. > >I am sorry that our troops die to free more Arabs from the gang >rape rooms and the filling of mass graves of dissidents of their own >making. > >I am sorry that Muslim extremists have killed more Arabs than any >other group. > >I am sorry that foreign trained terrorists are trying to seize >control of Iraq and return it to a terrorist state. > >I am sorry we don't drop a few dozen Daisy cutters on Fallujah. > >I am sorry every time terrorists hide they find a convenient "Holy >Site." > >I am sorry they didn't apologize for driving a jet into the World >Trade Center that collapsed and severely damaged Saint Nicholas >Greek >Orthodox Church -- one of our Holy Sites. > >I am sorry they didn't apologize for flight 93 and 175, the USS >Cole, the embassy bombings, the murders and beheadings of Nick Berg >and >Daniel Pearl, etc...etc! > >I am sorry Michael Moore is American; he could feed a medium sized >viallage in Africa. > >America will get past this latest absurdity. We will punish those >responsible because that is what we do. > >We hang out our dirty laundry for the entire world to see. We move >on. That's one of the reasons we are hated so much. We don't hide >this stuff like all those Arab countries that are now demanding an >apology. > >Deep down inside, when most Americans saw this reported in the >news, we were like--so what? We lost hundreds and made fun of a few >prisoners. Sure, it was wrong! Sure, it dramatically hurts our >cause, >but until captured, we were trying to kill those same prisoners. Now >we're supposed to wring our hands because a few were humiliated? > >Our compassion is tempered with the vivid memories of our own >people killed, mutilated and burned among a joyous crowd of >celebrating Fallujahans. > >If you want an apology from this American, you're going to have a >long wait! > >You have a better chance of finding those seventy-two virgins! > > >Chuck Pitman, Lt. Gen., US Marine Corps (Ret.) >Semper Fi > >
Re: [TruthTalk] Clowning Around
In a message dated 6/7/2005 7:14:22 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Oh, Blaine, if you took my response as serious, thinking the picture really is of me in a clown suit, then you did not catch the gist of my jest. Dave just forwarded some photo he got somehwere, most likely on the web, and posted it as though it was me. I was just playing along. But, still feel free to call me a clown whenever you like!Perry Perry I finally saw the photo, and saved it to My Pictures. I will treasure it always, but please be aware that I do not believe it is not you. I think you are just clowning around again with this fake denial. :>) Blaine
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Dear Minister of Questions, What did the word Trinity mean to the Apostle? How did Paul view Bible search engines?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The more important question IMO is "what did this word "bible" mean to the Apostle John in 98 AD. JD -Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:35:51 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Rev 2218I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are written in this book; 19and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of life and from the holy city, which are written in this book. JD, tell me what does the word ?Bible? mean? And what is the last book in the Bible? Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 12:03 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH When did the Bible come into existence -- before or after the Revelation? There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times. But, certainly, we should not be adding to what God has said. Jd -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:17:29 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Myth - It is finished already And this warning is not only in Revelation, it is also in Deuteronomy and in Proverbs. On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. From: ShieldsFamily You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy Discover Yahoo! Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM & more. Check it out!
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
I guess you just condemned a few Apostles, prophets and Jesus Christ! Or did the religious crowd enjoy be called full of dead mens bones? On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 09:50:48 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The decision to commit to actions and wording that is objectionable to others is living proof that those who do such things no longer care about those whom they insult. JD From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jt says 'to each his own, everyone has their own type of humour - it's a cultural thing, Lance.' Therefore we may assume that profaning the 'sacred' matters not to her. So make fun of or desecrate the flag, the Scriptures or Mormon undergarments, ...all in that which one finds humorouseh? Can I get an 'Amen' from all, Mormon and non-Mormon on this point by Judy? Try burning a Koran at a Mosque when the worshippers on walking in. Tell them it's just a 'cultural thingy'. From: Judy Taylor To each his own; everyone has their own type of humor - it's a cultural thing Lance. Do you think it was ungodly for Elijah to mock the prophets of Baal at Mt. Carmel by telling them their god just might be sitting on the toilet? __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
CMON the proof is right before your eyes. Try closing your eyes and saying "I wish I were a bible critic" then click your heels. Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Am getting discouraged with this JD, it is a waste of my time - I can see no relation between scripture and the other. Also why are they all in Matthew? This is what I have found thus far - Can you find a common ground between them? Matthew 4:4 & Wisdom 16:26 1. He answered and said, it is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeded out of the mouth of God (spoken to the devil) 2. So that your children, whom you loved, O Lord, might learn that it is not the production of crops that feeds humankind but that your word sustains those who trust in you. Matthew 4:15 & 1 Maccabees 5:15 1. The land of Zabulon, and the land of Nephthalim by the way of the sea, beyond Jordan, Galilee of the Gentiles; (ppl in darkness seeing a great light) 2. They said that the people of Ptolemais and Tyre and Sidon, and all Galilee of the Gentiles had gathered together against them to annihilate us. Matthew 5:18 & Baruch 4:1 1. For verily I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. 2. She is the book of the commandments of God, the law that endures forever. All who hold her fast will live, and those who forsake her will die. Matthew 5:28 & Sirach 9:8 1. But I say unto you, that whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. 2. Turn away your eyes from a shapely woman, and do not gaze at beauty belonging to another; many have been seduced by a womans beauty, and by it passion is kindled like a fire. Matthew 5:2ss & Sirach 25:7-12 1. And he opened his mouth and taught them saying: (Sermon on the Mount). 2. I can think of nine whom I would call blessed and a tenth my tongue proclaims: A man who can rejoice in his children; a man who lives to see the downfall of his foes. Happy the man who lives with a sensible wife, and the one who does not plow with ox and ass together. Happy is the one who does not sin with the tongue, and the one who has not served an inferior. Happy is the one who finds a friend, and the one who speaks to attentive listeners. How great is the one who finds wisdom! But none is superior to the one who fears the Lord. Fear of the Lord surpasses everything; to whom can we compare the one who has it? On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:21:06 -0400 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Thanks JD, I appreciate the effort. Like a good Berean - I will check them all out and compare. jt From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You persist in missing Lance's point. There are similar listings on the internet to this found below. No one is arguing that apocrapha is scripture. Continue with that line of debate and you are wasting time. JD Matthew 4:4 Wisdom 16:26 Matthew 4:15 1 Maccabees 5:15 Matthew 5:18 Baruch 4:1 Matthew 5:28 Sirach 9:8 Matthew 5:2ss Sirach 25:7-12 Matthew 5:4 Sirach 48:24 Matthew 6:7 Sirach 7:14 Matthew 6:9 Sirach 23:1, 4 Matthew 6:10 1 Maccabees 3:60 Matthew 6:12 Sirach 28:2 Matthew 6:13 Sirach 33:1 Matthew 6:20 Sirach 29:10s Matthew 6:23 Sirach 14:10 Matthew 6:33 Wisdom 7:11 Matthew 7:12 Tobit 4:15 Matthew 7:12 Sirach 31:15 Matthew 7:16 Sirach 27:6 Matthew 8:11 Baruch 4:37 Matthew 8:21 Tobit 4:3 Matthew 9:36 Judith 11:19 Matthew 9:38 1 Maccabees 12:17 Matthew 10:16 Sirach 13:17 Matthew 11:14 Sirach 48:10 Matthew 11:22 Judith 16:17 Matthew 11:25 Tobit 7:17 Matthew 11:25 Sirach 51:1 Matthew 11:28 Sirach 24:19 Matthew 11:28 Sirach 51:23 Matthew 11:29 Sirach 6:24s Matthew 11:29 Sirach 6:28s Matthew 11:29 Sirach 51:26s Matthew 12:4 2 Maccabees 10:3 Matthew 12:5 Sirach 40:15 Matthew 13:44 Sirach 20:30s Matthew 16:18 Wisdom 16:13 Matthew 16:22 1 Maccabees 2:21 Matthew 16:27 Sirach 35:22 Matthew 17:11 Sirach 48:10 Matthew 18:10 Tobit 12:15 Matthew 20:2 Tobit 5:15 Matthew 22:13 Wisdom 17:2 Matthew 23:38 Tobit 14:4 Matthew 24:15 1 Maccabees 1:54 Matthew 24:15 2 Maccabees 8:17 Matthew 24:16 1 Maccabees 2:28 Matthew 25:35 Tobit 4:17 Matthew 25:36 Sirach 7:32-35 Matthew 26:38 Sirach 37:2 Matthew 27:24 Daniel 13:46 Matthew 27:43 Wisdom 2:13 Matthew 27:43 Wisdom 2:18-20 Discover Yahoo! Find restaurants, movies, travel & more fun for the weekend. Check it out!
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
What did Paul think of Gay clothing in 98AD?ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: God knew. -Original Message-Also, it does not matter what John thought Bible or book meant in the first century, as someone suggested...he was just writing down what he was being shown and told to write.Perry--"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www..InnGlory.orgIf you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. Discover Yahoo! Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM & more. Check it out!
Re: [TruthTalk] JS is a False Priest according to Blaine
Just pointing out, (in your own post) YOU called CPL a clown, right after complaining about such behavoir. ?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Blaine: At least I don't run every person off the forum who disagrees with me --talk about weird--or, maybe a better word is self-admiring. Now, I will be the one to get in trouble for saying that, despite your constant trash-mouthing of my religion and my character, for which nothing will be done or even said. In a message dated 6/6/2005 11:45:31 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No implying Here Blaine I declare JS as a False Prophet, teacher and Pervert. The facts bear that out. You can not be serious! You have a double standard, what else should we expect from the most persecuted people in the world? You called CPL a clown see your own post belowYou have a wierd sense of standards Blaine, Discover Yahoo! Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news & more. Check it out!
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
I did not set it on fire. Although we did dry some on a clothesline. http://www.fairlds.org/apol/antis/200404gc.html (third pic down)[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, you weren't waving it around? You were just walking around the streets holding someone's underwear in your hands? Jd -Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:35:55 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Did someone burn Mormon underwear? When did holding something in your hand become a desecration. __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
If a EFFEMINATE PC faith, fits you see to it! Great peace have they which love thy law: and nothing shall offend them. Then came his disciples, and said unto him, Knowest thou that the Pharisees were offended, after they heard this saying? But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up. Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you believe that what I wrote is a crrect teaching or not? -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:17:23 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Does this apply to yourself JD, or is it just for "others"? Do you think DM is humored every time he is referred to as legalistic and a false prophet among other things and what about repaying Kevin evil for what you perceive to be evil? On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 09:50:48 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The decision to commit to actions and wording that is objectionable to others is living proof that those who do such things no longer care about those whom they insult. JD From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jt says 'to each his own, everyone has their own type of humour - it's a cultural thing, Lance.' Therefore we may assume that profaning the 'sacred' matters not to her. So make fun of or desecrate the flag, the Scriptures or Mormon undergarments, ...all in that which one finds humorouseh? Can I get an 'Amen' from all, Mormon and non-Mormon on this point by Judy? Try burning a Koran at a Mosque when the worshippers on walking in. Tell them it's just a 'cultural thingy'. From: Judy Taylor To each his own; everyone has their own type of humor - it's a cultural thing Lance. Do you think it was ungodly for Elijah to mock the prophets of Baal at Mt. Carmel by telling them their god just might be sitting on the toilet? Discover Yahoo! Find restaurants, movies, travel & more fun for the weekend. Check it out!
Re: [TruthTalk] prayer of a prophet
The Prayer of a Minor Prophet A W Tozer The covenant and prayer of a preacher This is the prayer of a man called to be a witness to the nations. This is what he said to his Lord on the day of his ordination. After the elders and ministers had prayed and laid their hands on him he withdrew to meet his Savior in the secret place and in the silence, farther in than his well-meaning brethren could take him. And he said: O Lord, I have heard Thy voice and was afraid. Thou has called me to an awesome task in a grave and perilous hour. Thou art about to shake all nations and the earth and also heaven, that the things that cannot be shaken may remain. O Lord, my Lord, Thou has stooped to honor me to be Thy servant. No man taketh this honor upon himself save he that is called of God as was Aaron. Thou has ordained me Thy messenger to them that are stubborn of heart and hard of hearing. They have rejected Thee, the Master, and it is not to be expected that they will receive me, the servant. My God, I shall not waste time deploring my weakness nor my unfittedness for the work. The responsibility is not mine, but Thine. Thou has said, "I knew thee - I ordained thee - I sanctified thee," and Thou hast also said, "Thou shalt go to all that I shall send thee, and whatsoever I command thee thou shalt speak." Who am I to argue with Thee or to call into question Thy sovereign choice? The decision is not mine but Thine. So be it, Lord. Thy will, not mine, be done. Well do I know, Thou God of the prophets and the apostles, that as long as I honor Thee Thou will honor me. Help me therefore to take this solemn vow to honor Thee in all my future life and labors, whether by gain or by loss, by life or by death, and then to keep that vow unbroken while I live. It is time, O God, for Thee to work, for the enemy has entered into Thy pastures and the sheep are torn and scattered. And false shepherds abound who deny the danger and laugh at the perils which surround Thy flock. The sheep are deceived by these hirelings and follow them with touching loyalty while the wolf closes in to kill and destroy. I beseech Thee, give me sharp eyes to detect the presence of the enemy; give me understanding to see and courage to report what I see faithfully. Make my voice so like Thine own that even the sick sheep will recognize it and follow Thee. Lord Jesus, I come to Thee for spiritual preparation. Lay Thy hand upon me. Anoint me with the oil of the New Testament prophet. Forbid that I should be come a religious scribe and thus lose my prophetic calling. Save me from the curse that lies dark across the modern clergy, the curse of compromise, of imitation, of professionalism. Save me from the error of judging a church by its size, its popularity or the amount of its yearly offering. Help me to remember that I am a prophet - not a promoter, not a religious manager, but a prophet. Let me never become a slave to crowds. Heal my soul of carnal ambitions and deliver me from the itch for publicity. Save me from bondage to things. Let me not waste my days puttering around the house. Lay Thy terror upon me, O God, and drive me to the place of prayer where I may wrestle with principalities and powers and the rulers of the darkness of this world. Deliver me from overeating and late sleeping. Teach me self-discipline that I may be a good soldier of Jesus Christ. I accept hard work and small rewards in this life. I ask for no easy place. I shall try to be blind to the little ways that could make life easier. If others seek the smoother path I shall try to take the hard way without judging them too harshly. I shall expect opposition and try to take it quietly when it comes. Or if, as sometimes it falleth out to Thy servants, I should have grateful gifts pressed upon me by Thy kindly people, stand by me then and save me from the blight that often follows. Teach me to use whatever I receive in such manner that will not injure my soul nor diminish my spiritual power. And if in Thy permissive providence honor should come to me from Thy church, let me not forget in that hour that I am unworthy of the least of Thy mercies, and that if men knew me as intimately as I know myself they would withhold their honors or bestow them upon others more worthy to receive them. And now, O Lord of heaven and earth, I consecrate my remaining days to Thee; let them be many or few, as Thou wilt. Let me stand before the great or minister to the poor and lowly; that choice is not mine, and I would not influence it if I could. I am Thy servant to do Thy will, and that will is sweeter to me than position or riches or fame and I choose it above all things on earth or in heaven. Though I am chosen of Thee and honored by a high and holy calling, let me never forget that I am but a man of dust and ashes, a man with all the natural faults and passions that plague the race of men. I pray Thee, therefore, my Lord and Redeemer, save me from myself and from all the injuries I may do myself
Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
I see more similarity with scrambled eggs![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you cannot see a similarity between the two references below, stop reading. I see a very clear similarity. If you don't agree, so what? JD -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: truthtalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:53:47 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha Am getting discouraged with this JD, it is a waste of my time - I can see no relation between scripture and the other. Also why are they all in Matthew? This is what I have found thus far - Can you find a common ground between them? Matthew 4:4 & Wisdom 16:26 1. He answered and said, ?it is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeded out of the mouth of God? (spoken to the devil) 2. So that your children, whom you loved, O Lord, might learn that it is not the production of crops that feeds humankind but that your word sustains those who trust in you. Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
The Minister of Questions wants to know.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Was it the last chapter in the Bible when it was written? Jd -Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:16:43 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Don't you think it is significant that the warning is written in the last chapter of The Book? Iz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Perry Locke Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:39 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Izzy, I have to vote for "this book" in Rev 22:18,19 applying specifically to the Revelation. I used to try to apply it to the whole Bible (in a debate with a mormon many years ago) , and I DO believe that the general principle applies to the whole Bible, but in particular believe that these verses are referring specifically to the Book of Revelation. Perry >From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >To:>Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH >Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:35:51 -0500 > > Rev 2218I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of >this >book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are >written in this book;19and if anyone takes away from the words of the >book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of >life and from the holy city, which are written in this book. > >JD, tell me what does the word "Bible" mean? And what is the last book >in the Bible? Izzy > > > > _ > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 12:03 PM >To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > > > >When did the Bible come into existence -- before or after the Revelation? >There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times. But, >certainly, we should not be adding to what God has said. > > > >Jd > > >-Original Message- >From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >Sent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:17:29 -0400 >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > >Myth - It is finished already > >And this warning is not only in Revelation, it is also in Deuteronomy >and in Proverbs. > > > >On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ><_javascript_:parent.ComposeTo('[EMAIL PROTECTED]');> > writes: > >In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. > >From: ShieldsFamily ><_javascript_:parent.ComposeTo('[EMAIL PROTECTED]');> > > >You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or >subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy > > > -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. Discover Yahoo! Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM & more. Check it out!
Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
Yea hath God said?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you cannot see a similarity between the two references below, stop reading. I see a very clear similarity. If you don't agree, so what? JD -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: truthtalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:53:47 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha Am getting discouraged with this JD, it is a waste of my time - I can see no relation between scripture and the other. Also why are they all in Matthew? This is what I have found thus far - Can you find a common ground between them? Matthew 4:4 & Wisdom 16:26 1. He answered and said, ?it is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeded out of the mouth of God? (spoken to the devil) 2. So that your children, whom you loved, O Lord, might learn that it is not the production of crops that feeds humankind but that your word sustains those who trust in you. Discover Yahoo! Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news & more. Check it out!
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
much more information than I care to consider !! JD -Original Message-From: Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 15:53:59 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, you weren't waving it around? You were just walking around the streets holding someone's underwear in your hands? Jd Are you saying that somewhere in Salt Lake City there is a Mormon with no skivvies?That is common down here where it is still ninety degrees at bed time, but SLC is a little cool for that. Might freeze your equipment.
Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
Home alone -Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 15:05:05 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha Yea hath God said?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you cannot see a similarity between the two references below, stop reading. I see a very clear similarity. If you don't agree, so what? JD -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: truthtalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:53:47 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha Am getting discouraged with this JD, it is a waste of my time - I can see no relation between scripture and the other. Also why are they all in Matthew? This is what I have found thus far - Can you find a common ground between them? Matthew 4:4 & Wisdom 16:26 1. He answered and said, ?it is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeded out of the mouth of God? (spoken to the devil) 2. So that your children, whom you loved, O Lord, might learn that it is not the production of crops that feeds humankind but that your word sustains those who trust in you. Discover Yahoo!Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news & more. Check it out!
Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
Have you found an alternate interpretation yet?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why have yoou written this? Why not allow the scriptures to speak to your heart rather than fill it with error and mixture? __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
JD says I see a very clear similarity. I SEE IT! I SEE IT! They both have the words "it is the but" in them! watch that ditch. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you cannot see a similarity between the two references below, stop reading. I see a very clear similarity. If you don't agree, so what? JD -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: truthtalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:53:47 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha Am getting discouraged with this JD, it is a waste of my time - I can see no relation between scripture and the other. Also why are they all in Matthew? This is what I have found thus far - Can you find a common ground between them? Matthew 4:4 & Wisdom 16:26 1. He answered and said, ?it is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeded out of the mouth of God? (spoken to the devil) 2. So that your children, whom you loved, O Lord, might learn that it is not the production of crops that feeds humankind but that your word sustains those who trust in you. Discover Yahoo! Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM & more. Check it out!
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Why frame it as an undewrwear debate? We hold the fig leaf aprons also. in the Temple Satan tells the LDS it is "a token of his priesthoods" and they put them on. A fig leaf will never cover your SIN! http://www.fairlds.org/apol/antis/200302.html I doubt that Bob was an eyewitness, but hey there is always poetic license to lie right? BOB lies or repeats a lie "One man, dressed in his church clothes, walked past in the crowd, saw the insults and desecrations, and grabbed the piece of clothing. To protect it. He was charged with robbery and taken to jail." I was an eyewitness Mr Basilio assualted from behind with a choke hold a guy half his size, while he was praying not "waving", to protect the sacred undies? If it is sacred surely LDS must assualt to protect it. MY Pastor does not assault people! What's with this HIGH PRIEST? http://tv.ksl.com/index.php?sid=51767&nid=39&template=print Jose Basilio Charged with Robbery "This person was talking against the Church, saying bad things against the Prophet. He was showing a garment. It was a woman's garment. The ones we wear as members of the LDS Church. I'm a High Priest. I was angry. I tried to take it from himHe said I tried to hit him. But I did not hit him. I know martial arts and if I would have wanted to hurt him, I could have broken his arm or leg. He was just a youth and I am an adult. I had no intention to hurt him." "DWAYNE BAIRD/SALT LAKE CITY POLICE: IN DOING SO IT TOOK THE MAN TO THE GROUND, THE VICTIM AND IT DRAGGED HIM A COUPLE OF FEET AS THIS MAN RAN AWAY WITH HIS PROPERTY." Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, you weren't waving it around? You were just walking around the streets holding someone's underwear in your hands? Jd Are you saying that somewhere in Salt Lake City there is a Mormon with no skivvies?That is common down here where it is still ninety degrees at bed time, but SLC is a little cool for that. Might freeze your equipment. Discover Yahoo! Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM & more. Check it out!
Re: [TruthTalk] JS is a False Priest according to Blaine
Blaine: That too. :>) In a message dated 6/6/2005 3:13:41 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You are confusing. Did you mean do not take me too seriously?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Blaine: Don't take me too personally, Kevin. I was hoping you guys would laugh with me, but, . . . I must have gotten to you w/o intending to. Are we having fun yet, Kev? :>)
Re: [TruthTalk] Clowning Around
Well, I do have to admit a slight resemblance. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Clowning Around Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:33:54 EDT In a message dated 6/7/2005 7:14:22 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Oh, Blaine, if you took my response as serious, thinking the picture really is of me in a clown suit, then you did not catch the gist of my jest. Dave just forwarded some photo he got somehwere, most likely on the web, and posted it as though it was me. I was just playing along. But, still feel free to call me a clown whenever you like! Perry Perry I finally saw the photo, and saved it to My Pictures. I will treasure it always, but please be aware that I do not believe it is not you. I think you are just clowning around again with this fake denial. :>) Blaine -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Re:WWCofG lives on
What then of this scripture? Col 2:16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath daysMarlin halverson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sunday worship in your eyes is then a symptom of what? Kevin Deegan I believe it, instead of Sabbath keeping, is a symptom of the strong delusion mentioned in 2 Thesolonians 2 and a fulfillment of Isaiah 56. - Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 12:19 AM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:WWCofG lives on Sunday worship in your eyes is then a symptom of what?Marlin halverson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Do you believe Sunday Worship is the mark of the beast? Kevin Deegan Although it, instead of Sabbath keeping, may be a symptom, it is not 'the' mark of the beast. - Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 12:26 AM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:WWCofG lives on Do you believe Sunday Worship is the mark of the beast?Marlin halverson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It seems that with very narrow exceptions, all roads lead to Rome. As the Virginia Slims cigarette commercial said to the 'liberated woman,' "You've come a long way baby." It is now time for that corporate body, which has a papal form of government, to take "Rome's Challenge" of 1893. --Marlin - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 9:12 PM Subject: [TruthTalk] Re:WWCofG lives on Years ago, when I too, was a legalist, I enjoyed listening to Herbert W Armstrong and Garner Ted. But they lost me with their emphasis on the Old LAw. Many of their arguments -- such as "against evolution" -- were actually very good. Anyway -- Carner Ted did the twist with one of the sisters and Herbert died in the mid 80"s and something very unusual happened to this fellowship. I don't know what to think about all the changes, but one very important change was the "end of the law" and life in a relationship with the Christ. You just might find this article interesting. http://www.wcg.org/lit/AboutUs/history.htm Jd __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
I don’t know for sure, but suspect so. However that is irrelevant, as God saw to it that it was the last book in the Bible. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 12:14 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Was it the last chapter in the Bible when it was written? Jd -Original Message- From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:16:43 -0500 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Don't you think it is significant that the warning is written in the last chapter of The Book? Iz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Perry Locke Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:39 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Izzy, I have to vote for "this book" in Rev 22:18,19 applying specifically to the Revelation. I used to try to apply it to the whole Bible (in a debate with a mormon many years ago) , and I DO believe that the general principle applies to the whole Bible, but in particular believe that these verses are referring specifically to the Book of Revelation. Perry >From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >To:>Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH >Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:35:51 -0500 > > Rev 2218I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of >this >book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are >written in this book; 19and if anyone takes away from the words of the >book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of >life and from the holy city, which are written in this book. > >JD, tell me what does the word "Bible" mean? And what is the last book >in the Bible? Izzy > > > > _ > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 12:03 PM >To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > > > >When did the Bible come into existence -- before or after the Revelation? >There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times. But, >certainly, we should not be adding to what God has said. > > > >Jd > > >-Original Message- >From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org >Sent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:17:29 -0400 >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH > >Myth - It is finished already > >And this warning is not only in Revelation, it is also in Deuteronomy >and in Proverbs. > > > >On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ><_javascript_:parent.ComposeTo('[EMAIL PROTECTED]');> > writes: > >In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. > >From: ShieldsFamily ><_javascript_:parent.ComposeTo('[EMAIL PROTECTED]');> > > >You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or >subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy > > > -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
RE: [TruthTalk] WorldNetDaily: How and why we're going to win
I believe that dovetailing with that I believe is the home-school movement. It’s all very exciting! Thanks Judy. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 1:32 PM To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: [TruthTalk] WorldNetDaily: How and why we're going to win FYI - I'd be interested in David/Christine Miller & Terry's take on this article since they are involved in the home-church movement. jt This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows. To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44629 Tuesday, June 7, 2005 How and why we're going to win Posted: June 7, 2005 1:00 a.m. Eastern By Jim Rutz © 2005 WorldNetDaily.com Far below the rusty radar of the portside press, the tide of history has turned against tyranny and in favor of the common man. The whole world, in fact, is changing hands for the first and last time. Tyrants and generals have swept across the Earth for centuries, crushing and raising empires. Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome and the dynasties of the East have all been driven by pharaohs, emperors and kings. For one brief blip of time, a nexus of freedom did blaze in the Near East, as early Christianity poured power into the hearts and hands of ordinary believers. But this fledgling participatory church, with plain folks meeting from house to house and urging each member to freely teach or sing or pray in turn, was soon subverted by its own leaders. Facing widespread heresy and persecution, the young church decided to copy the enemy (Rome). Reaching back into their past, they resurrected the Levitical priesthood and regrouped as a top-down hierarchy, starting about A.D. 90. Then, under Constantine in the 320s, Christianity totally collapsed into an institution, putting bishops over bishops over bishops and squashing the common man. The fire went out, and Western Civilization collapsed into the Dark Ages in A.D. 476. A millennium later, the reformers restored basic Christian doctrine, and the Great Awakening stirred hope in individual hearts. But all the oppressive structures remained intact. The West then floundered desperately through a series of mindsets: Enlightenment philosophy, French-style revolution, Lockean limited government, Fabian socialism, and now a market-managing political bureaucracy from Roosevelt and Keynes (which has just suffered a whopping setback). Last week's rejection of a United States of Europe by independent-minded voters in Holland and France dovetails with the Bush effort to bring freedom and independence to the Middle East. And both events are subsets of a wider phenomenon: the transfer of power from the top of the pyramid to the bottom. Democracy is not the Kingdom of God, but in a free atmosphere, people more often choose to follow Him. This change is broader than government. In industry, the guys on the shop floor now just punch a computer to get the information that once had to be parsed out by middle management (R.I.P.). In the media, 8 million bloggers – and websites like WorldNetDaily – are starting to supplant the giant TV networks and newspapers. In education, homeschools have broken the National Education Association monopoly. In entertainment, G-rated films have mushroomed. But perhaps the most foundational changes are happening in the church, the traditional guardian of society's key values. If you've always been a Sunday-go-to-meetin' kind of Christian, you now have an exciting alternative. Without changing one iota of your beliefs, you can upgrade yourself from a pew potato to a world-changing pioneer. This has to be the biggest megashift in the history of mankind. Not only has it transformed the lives of over 100 million people worldwide during the past 50 years, it has also been attested by millions of miracles. This is not a rumor, it's a spiritual tsunami. In "Megashift," I've documented many such miracles (including true resurrections in 52 countries recently) with names and addresses. Joseph Farah, in his brilliant May 25 column and his book, "Taking America Back," states that turn-back-the-clock conservatives cannot win the battle for America because their strategy is purely defensive. He says we need a radically positive vision. Bingo. And here are the two main ways that vision is going to win. One, we're going to overwhelm the secular liberals by sheer numbers (see my first column), thus enabling us to pass a sweeping series of truly progressive reforms based on a radical vision like Mr. Farah's. And two, we're going to cooperate with God in re-creating the church, turning the people from a professionally led audience into proactive disciples who get their directions straight from the Spirit. (We can't change diehard spectator
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
The rapture is Heresy? Does that mean that you will separate from those that teach such heresy? Since it is Heresy does it damn ones soul? Just what effect does your label of heresy have? Any real effect, other than to raise a controversy? According to Titus 3:9-10 a heretic follows his self willed questions, he is to be avoided But avoid foolish questions...A man that is an heretick after the first and second admonition reject; Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself. Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Two issues arise: 1. Which 'heretical doctrines' arise from 'them'? 2. IFF some actually do then, are they offset by those 'heretical doctrines' arising from the 'accepted canon'. Example:The 'rapture' doctrine from 1 Thess. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 07:43 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH And the RCC adopted them as canon to support their heretical doctrines. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin DeeganSent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:16 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH JD reaches back into his dusty old shelf of misinformation. The Apocrypha was part of the corrupt mss The apocrypha was not part of the 1611 it was printed as a tool like the maps we have in our bibles, not interspesed as part of the text as in the Oldest & best manuscripts The apocryphal books were not in the Jewish OT either only in the RC bibles. The minister of questions chooses to mislead.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.greatsite.com/timeline-english-bible-history/ You may find this interesting. As far as "adding" to the bible -- did you know that the Apocrapha was a part of nearly all Bibles until the mid to late 1800's. The so-called "Prostestant bible" is a little over 120 yers old. Christ and or the New Testament writers quoted from most of them, themselves. Jd -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:10:53 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH What were the more noble Bereans of Acts 17:11 checking Paul's teaching against? Also your favorite epistle James is said to have been written by the Lord's brother only 15yrs following the ascension. Could we be missing something here JD? On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:03:19 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When did the Bible come into existence -- before or after the Revelation? There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times. But, certainly, we should not be adding to what God has said. Jd From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Myth - It is finished already And this warning is not only in Revelation, it is also in Deuteronomy and in Proverbs. On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. From: ShieldsFamily You are wrong again, Blaine. Revelations says that no one is to add or subtract from the Bible. Did you miss that part? Izzy __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
RE: [TruthTalk] WorldNetDaily: How and why we're going to win
Terry, I think you are correct about some of the mega-churches, if they function as spectator church. However, some of the large churches are actually finding a way to return to first century style fellowship, as there is a large gathering together under the “church” roof, but it becomes a place where you meet others and find your way into cell home groups and into ministry. Our church (which is comparatively small but growing at an alarming rate) had a volunteer celebration night this week. It was shocking to see the percent of people who attend who also minister in one way or another. My husband is the percussionist in the band, which is mostly professional musicians who have only a couple of hours to practice together before the Sat pm service, and then play again twice Sunday, and yet make incredible music. I’m plugged into the ‘design team”, which puts together the setting according to the teaching theme going on each week—sometimes just long fabric drapes from the catwalks overhead, and sometimes quite amazing designs that set the atmosphere for opening hearts and minds to the message. The benevolence ministry, as I mentioned, does things that change the direction of many lives. I cannot mention all of the dozens of “ministries”, let alone the small group fellowships that spring from all of this activity. And the souls that are brought to the foot of the Cross in all of this are testimony to the fact that Jesus is lifted up in the multitude of ministries functioning there—like an Holy Ghost directed orchestra. It’s all very exciting, because everyone watching realizes that it is totally a “God thing”. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Clifton Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 3:20 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] WorldNetDaily: How and why we're going to win I am not certain that I have a take, Judy.On one hand, I believe that we are in the last days, and if so, things will get worse, not better. On the other hand, if what I believe is incorrect, I believe that God will bless the house church and it will multiply. More and more people are studying the Bible, and as they do, they see that the institutional church is so far from what the Lord has planned that it is a miracle that He still is able to use it. Like any giant business, it has a million paid employees and a few at the top are getting rich telling those at the bottom how to do it. If God is there, it is only because God is everywhere, not because He is thrilled to sit among the pew warmers and hear an expert speak. I am convinced that the mega churches of today are a temporary thing. You will either see a return to simple gatherings of small groups of Christians or you will see a great falling away, or both. I guess that is my take. Terry Judy Taylor wrote: FYI - I'd be interested in David/Christine Miller & Terry's take on this article since they are involved in the home-church movement. jt This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows. To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44629 Tuesday, June 7, 2005 How and why we're going to win Posted: June 7, 2005 1:00 a.m. Eastern By Jim Rutz © 2005 WorldNetDaily.com Far below the rusty radar of the portside press, the tide of history has turned against tyranny and in favor of the common man. The whole world, in fact, is changing hands for the first and last time. Tyrants and generals have swept across the Earth for centuries, crushing and raising empires. Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome and the dynasties of the East have all been driven by pharaohs, emperors and kings. For one brief blip of time, a nexus of freedom did blaze in the Near East, as early Christianity poured power into the hearts and hands of ordinary believers. But this fledgling participatory church, with plain folks meeting from house to house and urging each member to freely teach or sing or pray in turn, was soon subverted by its own leaders. Facing widespread heresy and persecution, the young church decided to copy the enemy (Rome). Reaching back into their past, they resurrected the Levitical priesthood and regrouped as a top-down hierarchy, starting about A.D. 90. Then, under Constantine in the 320s, Christianity totally collapsed into an institution, putting bishops over bishops over bishops and squashing the common man. The fire went out, and Western Civilization collapsed into the Dark Ages in A.D. 476. A millennium later, the reformers restored basic Christian doctrine, and the Great Awakening stirred hope in individual hearts. But all the oppressive structures remained intact. The West then floundered desperately through a series of mindsets: Enlightenment philosophy, French-style revolution, Lockean limited government, Fabi