Re: [U2] [UV] Programmatic Verification of Globally Cataloged Subroutine

2014-01-28 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Makes sense. It only outputs integers (user IDs, msg.text numbers,
SYS.MESSAGE IDs, etc.)


On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Gregor Scott <
gregor.sc...@pentanasolutions.com> wrote:

> I was also surprised to find it possible to ASSIGN a value to STATUS().
> A quick test program shows it only allows integer values. Decimals have
> the ABS() of the value assigned, and text produces a Nonnumeric runtime
> error and STATUS() is (as expected) set to "0".
>
>
> Gregor Scott
> System Group Manager
>
> 549 Blackburn Rd  Mount Waverley
> VIC 3149 Australia
> P: +61 3 9535 
> F: +61 3 9535 2274
> E: gregor.sc...@pentanasolutions.com
> W: pentanasolutions.com
>
>
> Pentana Solutions accepts no liability for the content of this email, or
> for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information
> provided, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in writing. If
> you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing,
> copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of
> this information is strictly prohibited.
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] [UV] Programmatic Verification of Globally Cataloged Subroutine

2014-01-28 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
You are correct. 52 works for globally cataloged programs. 12 for locally
cataloged programs.

For clarity, @RECORD[5,8] is the account where it was last cataloged (@WHO).

11 years ago I tried to have the user ID added but the data typing of the
header's structure didn't seem to allow it. That was then. It doesn't look
to have changed much if at all.

I wasn't able to find the date in the header, but one could use the date of
the object on disk in a pinch.

The MAP command displays this info as a report.




On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Keith Johnson [DATACOM] <
keith.john...@datacom.co.nz> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> LeRoy Dreyfuss said that you would have to change 52 to 12 for EXIST to
> work.
>
> The globally cataloged programs have an extra 40 characters put on the
> front, so that would cause a problem.
>
> @RECORD[1,4] is a count of the number of times the program has been used.
>
> @RECORD[5,8] is who cataloged it
>
> @RECORD[13,4] are the date and time (I think)
>
>
> Regards, Keith
>
>
>
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] [UV] Programmatic Verification of Globally Cataloged Subroutine

2014-01-28 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Legacy applications I imagine. 

You also wondered about why the 52nd character. Again, legacy from Pr1me I 
suppose. That predates my involvement or usage of UV but most of those 
subroutines were to make migrating easier.

Regards,

LeRoy

Sent from my iPhone 5s

> On Jan 28, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Wjhonson  wrote:
> 
> 
> I was just trying to think of a reason why I'd want specifically to know how 
> many arguments the subroutine has.
> That is, why was this particular fact chosen as the returned status code ?
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith Johnson [DATACOM] 
> To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org' 
> Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 3:10 pm
> Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Programmatic Verification of Globally Cataloged 
> Subroutine
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> LeRoy Dreyfuss said that you would have to change 52 to 12 for EXIST to work.
> 
> The globally cataloged programs have an extra 40 characters put on the front, 
> so 
> that would cause a problem.
> 
> @RECORD[1,4] is a count of the number of times the program has been used.
> 
> @RECORD[5,8] is who cataloged it
> 
> @RECORD[13,4] are the date and time (I think)
> 
> 
> Regards, Keith
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
> 
> 
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] [UV] Programmatic Verification of Globally Cataloged Subroutine

2014-01-28 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
To make APP.PROGS/EXIST work for UV, I believe you would change the number
52 to 12 and recompile/recatalog. That is decimal location where UV seems
to store the number of subroutine arguments within the object header.

The subroutine would place the number of arguments correctly in STATUS() to
be referenced by the calling routine.

Cheers,

LeRoy


On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Wjhonson  wrote:

>
> The routine returns your below RC which it calls "success" as a zero if
> either it cannot open the GLOBAL.CATDIR file, or if it cannot read the
> catalog name passed in that file.
>
> The STATUS() (which I didn't even know could be assigned) is assigned to
> the ASCII value (using SEQ) of the 52nd character of the first line of the
> record it does successfully read.
>
> What is the significant of the 52nd character ?  What would one find there?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Hona, David 
> To: U2 Users List 
> Sent: Mon, Jan 27, 2014 7:50 pm
> Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Programmatic Verification of Globally Cataloged
> Subroutine
>
>
> There is the !EXIST subroutine. It's a legacy Prime INFO subroutine -
> created
> for legacy code that need it. The source code is in UV APP.PROGS and just
> reads
> GLOBAL.CATDIR and also sets STATUS() with a return code too.
>
> CATALOGED.NAME = '*MYGLOBALSUB'
> call !EXIST(CATALOGED.NAME, RC)
>
> crt CATALOGED.NAME:" = ":(if RC then "exists" else "NOT found")
> crt CATALOGED.NAME:" STATUS() = ":STATUS():" = ":(if STATUS() then
> "exists" else
> "NOT found")
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:
> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org]
> On Behalf Of Perry Taylor
> Sent: Tuesday, 28 January 2014 4:06 AM
> To: U2-Users List
> Subject: [U2] [UV] Programmatic Verification of Globally Cataloged
> Subroutine
>
> Does anyone know of a good method in UniVerse BASIC to be able to verify
> if a
> subroutine is globally cataloged?
>
> Thanks.
> Perry Taylor
> Senior MV Architect
> Office (877) 494-7633 ext. 4392
> Direct (502) 779-4392
> ZirMed
> 888 West Market Street, Suite 400
> Louisville, KY 40202
> www.zirmed.com
>
> ** IMPORTANT MESSAGE *
> This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains
> information which may be
> confidential.
> If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return
> email,
> do not use or
> disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your
> system. Unless
> specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or
> commitment by the sender
> or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its
> subsidiaries.
> We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au.
> If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us,
> please
> reply to this
> e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line.
> **
>
>
>
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>
>
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] UniVerse Resize 30

2013-10-11 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
My testing on an empty type 18 file:
:RESIZE DUMMY 30 * *
:LIST DUMMY

0 records listed.
:ANALYZE.FILE DUMMY
File name ..   DUMMY
Pathname ...   DUMMY
File type ..   DYNAMIC
File style and revision    32BIT Revision 12
NLS Character Set Mapping ..   ISO8859-1+MARKS
Hashing Algorithm ..   GENERAL
No. of groups (modulus)    3 current ( minimum 3 )
Large record size ..   809 bytes
Group size .   1024 bytes
Load factors ...   80% (split), 50% (merge) and 0% (actual)
Total size .   5120 bytes
:

It kept the mod and sep. Notice that the minimum and current modulo are the
same and at 3. Note the group size is 1 K, which you cannot do when you
create the file initially.

I tried it again with a file that had data but otherwise the same. It
worked fine there two. It shouldn't matter that we use NLS here.

AIX 6.1/11.1.11



On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Mark Eastwood  wrote:

> What's even more twisted, is I tried the same scenario on my development
> box (Linux uv 10.2), and the "RESIZE XXX 30 * *" actually corrupted my test
> file
>
> >LIST XXX
> XXX...
>
> Read operation failure.  Internal file corruption detected.  File must be
> repaired.
> >
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:
> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of LeRoy Dreyfuss
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 9:55 AM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] UniVerse Resize 30
>
> What resize should have done was create the dynamic file, but preserve the
> current modulo of 11 and the group size. Perhaps it got itself in a twist
> because it was coming from a static-hashed structure and somehow couldn't
> work out the mod and sep like it should have. I am pretty sure this used to
> work back in 10.1.x- we had requests to make that work correctly.
>
> Cheers,
>
> LeRoy
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Mark Eastwood  wrote:
>
> > I had an interesting call from a customer this morning - he was
> > resizing some files, making them Dynamic using the command "RESIZE
> FILENAME 30 * *"
> > (normally you wouldn't enter the "* *" after 30) But then his session
> > was comsuming all of the CPU for over 20 minutes (until I killed it).
> > Just curious if anyone knows what the system was trying to do?
> >
> > We resized using the correct command format and everything is fine.
> > The files in question were type 18, empty and very small modulo 11.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mark
> > Uv 10 Windows
>
> **
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may be
> subject to copyright. They are intended solely for the use of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this
> message in error please notify AFS immediately by return email. Any views
> or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do
> not necessarily represent those of AFS, except where an authorized sender
> specifically states them to be the views of AFS. It is your responsibility
> to verify this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. AFS
> accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted.
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] UniVerse Resize 30

2013-10-11 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
What resize should have done was create the dynamic file, but preserve the
current modulo of 11 and the group size. Perhaps it got itself in a twist
because it was coming from a static-hashed structure and somehow couldn't
work out the mod and sep like it should have. I am pretty sure this used to
work back in 10.1.x- we had requests to make that work correctly.

Cheers,

LeRoy


On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Mark Eastwood  wrote:

> I had an interesting call from a customer this morning - he was resizing
> some files, making them Dynamic using the command "RESIZE FILENAME 30 * *"
> (normally you wouldn't enter the "* *" after 30)
> But then his session was comsuming all of the CPU for over 20 minutes
> (until I killed it).
> Just curious if anyone knows what the system was trying to do?
>
> We resized using the correct command format and everything is fine.
> The files in question were type 18, empty and very small modulo 11.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
> Uv 10 Windows
> **
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may be
> subject to copyright. They are intended solely for the use of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this
> message in error please notify AFS immediately by return email. Any views
> or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do
> not necessarily represent those of AFS, except where an authorized sender
> specifically states them to be the views of AFS. It is your responsibility
> to verify this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. AFS
> accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted.
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] UniVerse v11.2 Public Beta - Personal Edition

2013-09-13 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
On a busy system the AUDLOGn file can grow over time, but you can work out 
archive capabilities with the command-line tools provided. It's not a big deal, 
really.

Regards,

LeRoy
Sent from my iPhone 4

On Sep 13, 2013, at 6:11 PM, Daniel McGrath  wrote:

> Hi Will - great question. As you've noted, Audit Logging is one of the new 
> features coming out with UV 11.2, but not available in the Public Beta.
> 
> As there are only a few events that are always on, I don't believe any site 
> will run into that issue. The always on events are:
> 
> 1) SYS.CONFIG.CHANGE
> A system-level configuration changed, such and a uvconfig, audit 
> configuration, replication configuration change, and so forth.
> 
> 2) SYS.SECURITY
> SQL GRANT, REVOKE, future security operations.
> 
> 3) SYS.ADE
> Automatic Data Encryption operations: master key, key store, key creation, 
> key deletion, file encryption, index encryption, password related operations.
> 
> 4) SYS.DAEMON
> Starting or stopping of UniVerse background processes, such as U2Rep services.
> 
> It is hard to conceive (although granted, not impossible) a site managing to 
> run out of disk-space through the logging of those events.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dan
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org 
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wjhonson
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 3:42 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] UniVerse v11.2 Public Beta - Personal Edition
> 
> Reading the first part, regarding the Auditing, it appears that if a site 
> ignores the auditing entirely and progresses along with their normal 
> activity, *that*, ignoring that auditing, which is on and cannot be turned 
> off, will eventually result in their system halting and being unstartable.  
> Am I mistaken?
> 
> However the introduction of "local subroutines" is certainly a game changer 
> for many of us.
> That along might be worth the upgrade hassle.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel McGrath 
> To: U2 Users List (u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org) 
> 
> Sent: Fri, Sep 13, 2013 1:48 pm
> Subject: [U2] UniVerse v11.2 Public Beta - Personal Edition
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm excited to announce that Rocket is doing its first ever public beta for 
> UniVerse v11.2. As our first public beta, this will be a learning experience 
> for us. We will use this experience to shape how we conduct subsequent public 
> betas.
> 
> This will be a Personal Edition, so while it won't enable you to play with 
> all the new features currently being tested in our private beta, you will get 
> to see some significant new additions. It has the same restrictions of our 
> regular personal edition that can be found here: 
> http://www.rocketsoftware.com/products/rocket-universe/try-now
> 
> So, before I mention the new features, some quick housekeeping. While we 
> learn about how much interest a public beta will generate, we want to prevent 
> overwhelming our support team as to not affect customers. To this end, will 
> accept bugs and regressions via our u2supp...@rs.com email channel with the 
> following guidelines:
> 
>1) All issues submitted to u2supp...@rs.com need to have the subject 
> "UniVerse
> v11.2 Public Beta"
>2) Rocket requires any regressions not associated with new features to be 
> confirmed not to exist in the current UniVerse v11.1 Personal Edition
>3) Rocket will record issues sent in via a bug tracking system, but will 
> not respond to the reporter unless further clarification is required.
> 
> Some of the new features you can expect to see UniVerse v11.2 (that you can 
> play with in the Personal Edition) are:
> 
>1) Local subroutines & functions
>2) Additions to XDOM, such as XDOMQuery
>3) XML support in U2 Dynamic Objects
>4) Compiler DEFINES to enable condition compile basic on database type and 
> version
>$IFDEF U2_UNIVERSE
>$IFDEF U2_UNIVERSEv11
>$IFDEF U2_UNIVERSEv11.2
>5) 64-bit Windows Port
>6) SHA-256 support
>stat = DIGEST("SHA256",data,DATA__STRING,result)
>7) nbasic returns exit code 1 for success, 0 for failure
>8) New compiler directive $DIM.IN.SUB to support redimensioning in 
> subroutines
>9) CLEARCOMMON /named/ now supported.
> 
> Note: As mentioned before, this is only a subset of the new features that 
> will be released for UniVerse v11.2. Keep a look out for the official release 
> of UniVerse v11.2 later this year were you can find out everything!
> 
> Downloads for Windows Personal Edition:
>32bit PE: 
> https://myshare.rocketsoftware.com/myshare/d/0FECA68828544D92B2F6322EDE56E154
>64bit PE: 
> https://myshare.rocketsoftware.com/myshare/d/ADD04F9D82F44182B6983E7DBDE4849C
> 
> Part of our private beta documentation to help with local subroutines, XDOM 
> changes and XML support in U2 Dynamic Objects:
>
> https://myshare.rocketsoftware.com/myshare/d/D71648D5C05E4BBD8A5A36C

Re: [U2] [UV] Globally catalogs - source code

2013-08-20 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Many are in APP.PROGS in the UV account. 

Regards,

LeRoy
Sent from my iPhone 4

On Aug 20, 2013, at 10:06 PM, "Leverett, Brendon" 
 wrote:

> We are running UV on AIX
> 
> We have some programs that have been globally catalogued - they are visible 
> in the GLOBAL.CATDIR file.
> 
> I am aware some are system commands but a number are programs we have 
> globally catalogued as (shown as *ProgName). Any tips on the best way to find 
> which program library the source code resides in?
> 
> Buried in the GLOBAL.CATDIR record, along with all the compiled code 'junk' I 
> can see the path but viewing (via a CT or ED) it is not user friendly as the 
> 'junk' will often crash/lock the screen.
> 
> Regards,
> Brendon
> Information Services
> Spotless Services Australia Limited
> T: 03 9269 7738
> M: 0419 349122
> F: 03 8399 7013
> E-mail brendon.lever...@spotless.com.au
> W www.spotless.com
> 
> 
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] UniVerse LPTR

2013-07-08 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Or place a UV.LOGIN paragraph in the UV account's VOC. Everyone logging in will 
take the setting by default.

Regards,

LeRoy
Sent from my iPhone 4

On Jul 8, 2013, at 4:45 PM, "Martin Phillips"  
wrote:

> Hi again Bill,
> 
> You can execute a paragraph when UV is started by arranging to execute
>UV paragraph.name
> from the operating system level in the UV account as you bring up the system.
> 
> 
> Martin
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org 
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bill Brutzman
> Sent: 08 July 2013 21:19
> To: 'U2 Users List'
> Subject: Re: [U2] UniVerse LPTR
> 
> Thanks to Martin, Phil, and Anthony.
> 
> The SETPTR and then SETPTR.DEFAULT is the way to go.
> 
> I am remembering the ugh when the server is reBoots... the settings
> vanish.
> 
> Of course, this LPTR command appears in a legacy script.
> 
> Perhaps I can insert a little SETPTR 0...etc into the script so that we can
> bypass the server reboot problem.
> 
> Comments would be appreciated.
> 
> --Bill
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Martin Phillips
> Sent: Monday, July 8, 2013 2:57 PM
> To: 'U2 Users List'
> Subject: Re: [U2] UniVerse LPTR
> 
> Hi Bill,
> 
> It's in the UV account only. It sets the defaults by copying printer 0
> settings into shared memory. To use it, do something like
>   SETPTR 0,1,AT LASER
>   SETPTR.DEFAULT
> 
> The problem with this is that it isn't saved between UV restarts so you may
> need to set up a paragraph that runs as the machine is booted.
> 
> 
> Martin Phillips
> Ladybridge Systems Ltd
> 17b Coldstream Lane, Hardingstone, Northampton NN4 6DB, England
> +44 (0)1604-709200
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bill Brutzman
> Sent: 08 July 2013 19:47
> To: 'U2 Users List'
> Subject: Re: [U2] UniVerse LPTR
> 
> SETPTR.DEFAULT not in VOC.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Martin Phillips
> Sent: Monday, July 8, 2013 2:45 PM
> To: 'U2 Users List'
> Subject: Re: [U2] UniVerse LPTR
> 
> Hi Bill,
> 
> Take a look at SETPTR.DEFAULT
> 
> 
> Martin Phillips
> Ladybridge Systems Ltd
> 17b Coldstream Lane, Hardingstone, Northampton NN4 6DB, England
> +44 (0)1604-709200
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bill Brutzman
> Sent: 08 July 2013 19:36
> To: 'U2 Users List'
> Subject: [U2] UniVerse LPTR
> 
> Where can I change the default printer?  We have an HP-Ux machine.
> 
> --Bill Brutzman
> 
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
> 
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
> 
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
> 
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
> 
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
> 
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] External database

2013-01-13 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
UV 9.6 also supports 64-bit files




On Jan 13, 2013, at 3:17 AM, asad50089  wrote:

> Thanks for reply. Can you guide me by some example to do this task. In fact I
> have little bit experience of ODBC drivers and their usage. 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://u2-universe-unidata.1073795.n5.nabble.com/External-database-tp39618p39625.html
> Sent from the U2 - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Sleeping in Basic

2013-01-02 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
I do admit I've forgotten what the point of this was, since this thread was
about SLEEP and NAP.

That said, you are correct- the oconv conversion was not valid, so the
original string was returned.

Because UV can show time() and system(12) in milliseconds (system
dependent), it would seem to not need a mask for milliseconds.




On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Wjhonson  wrote:

>
>  Yes like I said the Oconv using MMHSM doesn't do anything.
> Your output 75575.6608 of the place TIME() is unchanged
> So what's MMHSM supposed to be doing?
> Because it's not changing the output at all
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: LeRoy Dreyfuss 
> To: U2 Users List 
> Sent: Wed, Jan 2, 2013 6:10 pm
> Subject: Re: [U2] Sleeping in Basic
>
>
> Top.
> *--: P
> 001: X = TIME()
> 002: Y = SYSTEM(12)
> 003: A = ICONV(X,'MM')
> 004: B = ICONV(Y,'MM')
> 005: PRINT X,A
> 006: PRINT Y,B
> 007: L = OCONV(X,'MMHSM')
> 008: M = OCONV(Y,'MMHSM')
> 009: PRINT L,M
> Bottom.
> *--: I
> *--: FIBR
> Filed "TEST.TIME" in file "BP".
> Compiling: Source = 'BP/TEST.TIME', Object = 'BP.O/TEST.TIME'
> *
>
> Compilation Complete.
> 75575.6608  7557566
> 75575.6608  7557566
> 75575.6608  75575.6608
> >
>
> This is 11.1.9 on Linux.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Wjhonson  wrote:
>
> > On Universe 11, OCONVing it as you suggested just returns the exact same
> > result as the plain TIME() function without any conversion.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: LeRoy Dreyfuss 
> > To: U2 Users List 
> > Sent: Wed, Jan 2, 2013 6:02 pm
> > Subject: Re: [U2] Sleeping in Basic
> >
> >
> > Don't ICONV it. Use OCONV.
> >
> > ex: OCONV(TIME(),'MMTHS')
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Wjhonson  wrote:
> >
> > > The 'MM' conversion works with the TIME() (which returns milliseconds)
> > > on Universe 11
> > >
> > > but for some reason is cutting off the display to only *hundredths* of
> a
> > > second, instead of the thousandths which the milliseconds counts.
> > >
> > > So TIME() shows 60814.304
> > > but ICONV(TIME(),'MM') shows 6081430
> > >
> > > without the trailing 4 milliseconds.
> > >
> > ___
> > U2-Users mailing list
> > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
> >
> >
> > ___
> > U2-Users mailing list
> > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
> >
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>
>
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Sleeping in Basic

2013-01-02 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
I should also mention that in your example, UV is not just dropping the
last two digits, it's really rounding them up (o down, based on standard
rounding rules) and showing hundredths. Not sure why Rocket did that,
though.


On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Wjhonson  wrote:

> On Universe 11, OCONVing it as you suggested just returns the exact same
> result as the plain TIME() function without any conversion.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: LeRoy Dreyfuss 
> To: U2 Users List 
> Sent: Wed, Jan 2, 2013 6:02 pm
> Subject: Re: [U2] Sleeping in Basic
>
>
> Don't ICONV it. Use OCONV.
>
> ex: OCONV(TIME(),'MMTHS')
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Wjhonson  wrote:
>
> > The 'MM' conversion works with the TIME() (which returns milliseconds)
> > on Universe 11
> >
> > but for some reason is cutting off the display to only *hundredths* of a
> > second, instead of the thousandths which the milliseconds counts.
> >
> > So TIME() shows 60814.304
> > but ICONV(TIME(),'MM') shows 6081430
> >
> > without the trailing 4 milliseconds.
> >
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>
>
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Sleeping in Basic

2013-01-02 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Top.
*--: P
001: X = TIME()
002: Y = SYSTEM(12)
003: A = ICONV(X,'MM')
004: B = ICONV(Y,'MM')
005: PRINT X,A
006: PRINT Y,B
007: L = OCONV(X,'MMHSM')
008: M = OCONV(Y,'MMHSM')
009: PRINT L,M
Bottom.
*--: I
*--: FIBR
Filed "TEST.TIME" in file "BP".
Compiling: Source = 'BP/TEST.TIME', Object = 'BP.O/TEST.TIME'
*

Compilation Complete.
75575.6608  7557566
75575.6608  7557566
75575.6608  75575.6608
>

This is 11.1.9 on Linux.


On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Wjhonson  wrote:

> On Universe 11, OCONVing it as you suggested just returns the exact same
> result as the plain TIME() function without any conversion.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: LeRoy Dreyfuss 
> To: U2 Users List 
> Sent: Wed, Jan 2, 2013 6:02 pm
> Subject: Re: [U2] Sleeping in Basic
>
>
> Don't ICONV it. Use OCONV.
>
> ex: OCONV(TIME(),'MMTHS')
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Wjhonson  wrote:
>
> > The 'MM' conversion works with the TIME() (which returns milliseconds)
> > on Universe 11
> >
> > but for some reason is cutting off the display to only *hundredths* of a
> > second, instead of the thousandths which the milliseconds counts.
> >
> > So TIME() shows 60814.304
> > but ICONV(TIME(),'MM') shows 6081430
> >
> > without the trailing 4 milliseconds.
> >
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>
>
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Sleeping in Basic

2013-01-02 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Don't ICONV it. Use OCONV.

ex: OCONV(TIME(),'MMTHS')


On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Wjhonson  wrote:

> The 'MM' conversion works with the TIME() (which returns milliseconds)
> on Universe 11
>
> but for some reason is cutting off the display to only *hundredths* of a
> second, instead of the thousandths which the milliseconds counts.
>
> So TIME() shows 60814.304
> but ICONV(TIME(),'MM') shows 6081430
>
> without the trailing 4 milliseconds.
>
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Fwd: [MailServer Notification]Content Filtering Notification

2012-11-22 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
That's the U2 Partner out of Midrand.

Regards,

LeRoy Dreyfuss
Sent from my iPad 2

On Nov 22, 2012, at 4:44 PM, "Tony Gravagno" <3xk547...@sneakemail.com> wrote:

> One of the annoying things about this list is that when you respond to
> a post it seems to go directly to the author as well as to the list.
> And people tend to Reply-All when they should just Reply. Because of
> this I sometimes get a direct response from the author as though I
> contacted him directly, and an off-list discussion ensues. *sigh*
> 
> Anyway, it looks like your posting went to someone in South Africa
> with an Exchange server and an overly aggressive filter.
> (Exchange.axiz.co.za) > AxizWorkgroup > axiz.com
> 
> HTH
> T
> 
>> From: Bill Haskett 
>> Anyone see anything like the below?  I just received two emails at
> the
>> same time as my post today.  I wonder if this is a U2 group thing.
>> 
>> The header information is below the message.  Thanks,
> --
> --
>> Received: from Exchange.axiz.co.za (exchange.axiz.co.za
> [41.160.73.125])
> 
>> Received: from nobody by rs.za.axiz.com with local (Exim 4.71)...
> 
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] training material on LOCKS

2012-05-09 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Chuck, wasn't the UV910 material useful?

Regards,

LeRoy
Sent from my iPhone 4

On May 9, 2012, at 12:43 PM, Charles Stevenson  wrote:

> Brian,
> 
> I'd agree with you, except for empirical evidence to the contrary.
> The Basic manual is a reference guide, & quite good, but not a teaching 
> guide.  Those are 2 different animals.
> For some reason, some otherwise talented people find locks very confusing.
> 
> cds
> 
> On 5/9/2012 10:21 AM, Brian Leach wrote:
>> Actually, Chapter 4 of the UniVerse Basic manual has quite a good treatment
>> on them.
>> 
>> Brian
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
>> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Charles Stevenson
>> Sent: 09 May 2012 14:45
>> To: U2 Users List
>> Subject: [U2] training material on LOCKS
>> 
>> Even though It is a foundational concept for any multi-user database
>> management, several times in my career I have come across seasoned MV
>> programmers who do not understand the basics of readu locks  (let alone
>> related topics like file locks, deadlocks, group locks, L-locks,
>> transactions, optimistic/pessimistic, lock table, monitoring&  configuring.)
>> 
>> Has anyone ever put that specific material into some kind of training
>> module?  An article in Spectrum?  Infocus?  A conference session?
>> 
>> TIA for any leads,
>> cds
>> 
> 
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Backspace sends break signal in UV

2012-04-29 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Bob,

You can either remap the keyboard in your emulator or use the PTERM cmd.

Regards,

LeRoy
Sent from my iPhone 4

On Apr 29, 2012, at 7:39 AM, Bob Little  wrote:

> I know someone asked about this recently but I cannot locate the thread that 
> provided the solution.
> 
> I have UV PE set up here on Linux.  If I am in the UV account and LOGTO my 
> development account, I get the Rocket banner then I'm at TCL.  At this point, 
> any time the backspace key is pressed, it sends a break signal instead of the 
> backspace character.
> 
> This only happens if I LOGTO this account from any other account.  I can 
> change to the account's directory and invoke a uv session right from there 
> and everything is fine.
> 
> Anyone know what the solution is?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> bob little
> 
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Turn a device and inode into file name

2012-03-16 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
A program that uses either the FILEINFO() function or the STATUS statement will 
produce what you need, and should work cross-platform. Select against the VOC 
and filter out what you don't need, i.e. remote files, Q-pointers etc.

Regards,

LeRoy
Sent from my iPhone 4

On Mar 16, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Wjhonson  wrote:

> 
> Anyone have an easy way to do this?
> In the past I've run a batch routine to just query each and every Universe 
> file for it's inode and device and build a table of these
> 
> Every week
> Seems like a great amount of overkill to me.
> You could also mod the CREATE-FILE command to sniff it and make an xref entry 
> but 
> 
> Any suggestions?
> This is NOT for the case where you know the file and want to find the inode 
> and device
> It's for the case where you know the inode and device (only) and want to find 
> the file.
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would wanttelnet-based tools

2012-02-20 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Just to throw my hat in the ring, I agree that a GUI is more desirable in this 
day and age. However, I've worked with Bro's mvToolbox for the last 6-7 years 
and it's been a godsend, shaving days and weeks from my efforts. I still keep a 
copy and recently reached out to Bro to bring it into my place of work.

It does have its learning curve, largely because it is so feature-rich. Let's 
not forget the objective of the tookbox is simplifying MV development 
cross-platform (Bro told me a few weeks ago he's working on a jbase port). With 
its integration into so many telnet clients, mouse clicks and all, I think it 
does a very good job meeting it's objective.

Do I wish it supported a true GUI front end? Sure. Does it get the job done 
without it? Sure does.

My 30 cents.

Regards,

LeRoy
Sent from my iPhone 4

On Feb 20, 2012, at 6:00 PM, "Tony Gravagno" <3xk547...@sneakemail.com> wrote:

>> From: Wjhonson
>> WED is not an inplace full screen editor. It's merely 
>> a hyped up Notepad.  Not the same thing. You cannot 
>> use WED to say "Oh by the way, go grab the cross 
>> reference files and show me every OTHER program that 
>> also reads the customer file."  You could however do 
>> that, with an inplace full screen editor
> 
> Keeping this on-topic, that is one of the thousands of features
> in mvToolbox.  The above functionality is something all of us
> wish we had when we're sitting in some editor X and we know the
> pain we face to get the information we need to just write that
> next line of code.  My message here is that there is a solution
> to those problems.
> 
> We can debate the aesthetics of the character UI (CUI) vs GUI,
> the relative productivity gains and losses, and the perceptions
> people have when they see one or the other.  But when it comes
> down to it, we just need to get a job of coding business apps
> done.  I would rather have the tools to do what I need, and
> debate the UI later, than to not have the functionality and
> therefore nothing to debate.
> (Doug, please don't jump in here, we've seen your ad in every
> other posting, this is NOT about YOUR software.  Have a little
> respect.)
> 
> For anyone who does take a look, learning mvToolbox can be a
> painful process.  I constantly struggle to decide whether I
> should take the time to do something myself (like look for file
> usage) or whether I should learn how mvToolbox does it.  I face
> the same problem with all developer tools.  But the reward of
> learning it once is that development is then streamlined from
> that point forward.  Bro Cope (author) has opened the software
> for free (limited time?) usage to get the software in the hands
> of people in order to drum up some demand for improvements.  In
> the spirit of collaboration for "free" but not "open source"
> software, I've offered to help with documentation, UI, website,
> etc, in an attempt to help minimize some of that pain.  (So far
> I've just written some docs, nothing else yet.  I'll try to help
> with the website too.  Eugene Perry has been working with Bro for
> years, as his own time permits, in the same spirit of making a
> contribution for a common cause.)  The product is evolving.  It
> might evolve to add a GUI (thus giving people both options),
> eliminating the need for us to discuss the CUI vs GUI arguments,
> and allowing us to focus on functionality.
> 
> I encourage people to give it a shot, and focus on functionality,
> with the understanding that the UI _may_ evolve and that the
> overall product experience _will_ evolve as more people use it.
> 
> T
> 
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] U2 soap server on startup

2011-02-23 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
What I've noticed is that on Windows the SOAP (Jetty) server runs as an
instance of javaw.exe. When you create the server and start it using Web
Services Developer, you can check the U2 SOAP Server log in the bottom
pane to ensure it started. By default it will listen using port 8181. You
change that when you create or edit the server.

You can see the port and status by running something like netstat -an from
a DOS command window. When you close Web Services Developer, you should
still see it listing on that port.

If all is well, you can deploy the SOAP server to another Windows host by
first exporting it, then deploying it. The instructions are in the Web
Services Developer manual under chapter 7. After completing the deployment
process, you can use the runsoapserver.bat and stopsoapserver.bat batch
files to manage it.

If you don't need to deploy it on a separate host, then simply use the
batch files as required on the local Windows host.

Regards,

LeRoy



On 2/23/11 4:28 PM, "Lettau, Jeff"  wrote:

>I just noticed a potentially bad thing.  The soap service will only run
>if you run it manually after logging into the server.  If I log off of
>the server the soap service stops running.
>I'm guessing the problem is that it is not actually running as a service,
>but I don't see how to make it run as a service.
>
>Does anyone have any suggestions on how to enable a soap server to run on
>startup?
>
>Jeffrey Lettau
>ERP Systems Manager
>polkaudio


___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] CPU Spikes to 100%

2010-03-26 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Hi Curt,

The keepalive setting affects the server where UV is running. The
connections are tested for the existence of a client by sending keepalive
packets. If the expected responses are not received within the parameters
specified, they will be closed. This is standard to the protocol. Older
versions of UV didn't allow for this, but I believe from 10.1 forward UV
did.


On 3/26/10 4:15 PM, "Curt Stewart"  wrote:

>
> Leroy, how would the keepalive option help if the user has closed the
> window? Would the socket be closed gracefully once keepalive didn't get its
> response back?
>
> Thanks again for the ideas and suggestions.
>
> Curt Stewart
> TRI-SYS Consulting
> Integrated Multi-Value Business Solutions
> (p) 262-432-3897
> (c) 262-227-9619
>


To read FRSTIA's disclaimer for the e-mail go to http://www.frstia.co.za/
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] CPU Spikes to 100%

2010-03-25 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Not disconnected sessions. Just locks. However, UniAdmin has a
configurable keepalive facility. Check it out.

LeRoy

Sent from my iPhone 3Gs

On 25 Mar 2010, at 7:11 PM, "Bill Haskett" 
wrote:

> Doesn't UV have a service/daemon that cleans these up, like UniData?
>
> Bill
>
> ---
> -
> Brian Leach said the following on 3/25/2010 6:19 AM:
>> Usually because a client has closed their terminal emulator without
>> disconnecting nicely. The process loops attempting to read from the
>> socket.
>> No remedy but to kill the process.
>>
>> Brian
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
>> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Curt
>> Stewart
>> Sent: 25 March 2010 9:46 AM
>> To: 'U2 Users List'
>> Subject: [U2] CPU Spikes to 100%
>>
>> The environment is a virtualized Windows 2003 Server and Universe
>> 10.2.10
>>
>> On occasion, I’ve been notified twice, it may have occurred more o
>> ften, a
>> Universe process (tl_server.exe) will consume 100% of the CPU.
>> When this
>> happens, support is automatically notified and they need an
>> explanation.  As
>> far as the application goes, there is only one background job and
>> all other
>> jobs would execute immediately.  I was last notified when it
>> occurred at
>> 2:20am on the 3rd and then again apparently this week.  There are
>> some users
>> based in India that could be using the system at the time these
>> occur, but I
>> have not been able to make a connection to a user process yet.
>>
>> Doe's anyone have any ideas why this might be happening or
>> suggestions on
>> how to identify what ever is causing the spike?  Is there a
>> Universe log
>> that might be able to give me a clue?
>>
>> Thanks for any suggestions.
>>
>> Curt Stewart
>> TRI-SYS Consulting
>> Integrated Multi-Value Business Solutions
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

To read FRSTIA’s disclaimer for the e-mail go to http://www.frstia.co.za/
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] svn with U2

2010-03-24 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Hi Stuart,

Long time no speak. I will put something together on how they are used
for you.

Cheers,

LeRoy

Sent from my iPhone 3Gs

On 25 Mar 2010, at 12:23 AM, "Boydell, Stuart"  wrote:

> Hi Leroy,
> Just had a quick look. I didn't even know those commands existed (or
> maybe I did and forgot). Loadfile sounds interesting.
> Just parsing UVread...
>
> $UVread
> usage: UVread [-q] [-f] [-s] file item ...
>
> $UVread -q VOC WHO
> 'V'
> 'WHO'
> 'I'
> 'G'
>
> $UVread -f /pathToOtherAccount/VOC WHO
> WHO V
>WHO
>I
>G
>
> $UVread -s VOC WHO
>
> I get the -f (formatted?) & -q (quoted?) options -s ? Is there any
> documentation on these OS calls anywhere? Could someone provide it?
> Pick Pocket Guide update maybe ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Stuart Boydell
>
> -Original Message-
> You can accomplish a complete solution using the tools UV comes
> with, i.e. the tools that are used to install & configure it, such
> as loadfile, UVread, UVwrite and so forth. Just determine how the .u
> files are structure, but take note that they are harder to user if
> you need to format one with records that are sub-valued. UV doesn't
> come with an example of how to do it.
>
>
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

To read FRSTIA's disclaimer for the e-mail go to http://www.frstia.co.za/
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] svn with U2

2010-03-24 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
You can accomplish a complete solution using the tools UV comes with, i.e. the 
tools that are used to install & configure it, such as loadfile, UVread, 
UVwrite and so forth. Just determine how the .u files are structure, but take 
note that they are harder to user if you need to format one with records that 
are sub-valued. UV doesn't come with an example of how to do it.

Wally Terhune may have some ideas about UniData.

From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org 
[u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen 
[syme...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 9:59 PM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] svn with U2

Only if they are held in type 1 files



-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Steve Romanow
Sent: 24 March 2010 19:07
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] svn with U2

Hi Symeon,

Have you a way of versioning SB+ objects and dict items?  I would really
like to devise a way to version reports, screens and FD's.

TIA,

Steve
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

To read FRSTIA's disclaimer for the e-mail go to http://www.frstia.co.za/
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] svn with U2

2010-03-24 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Outside of using PRC, you will have to script things. You can use executables 
like UVread loadfile, UVwrite, etc. Take a look in the sample director under 
the uv directory to get the format of the .u files you will need to build.


Regards,

LeRoy

From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org 
[u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Steve Romanow 
[slestak...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 9:07 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] svn with U2

Hi Symeon,

Have you a way of versioning SB+ objects and dict items?  I would really
like to devise a way to version reports, screens and FD's.

TIA,

Steve
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

To read FRSTIA's disclaimer for the e-mail go to http://www.frstia.co.za/
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Not Consistent Failure

2010-03-23 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Do they use the system's telnet or UV's?

LeRoy

Sent from my iPhone 3Gs

On 23 Mar 2010, at 11:29 PM, "Karl Pearson" 
wrote:

> When ever I see someone post something that can't be replicated
> because
> it's inconsistent, I wonder what the answer is going to be.
>
> So, here goes:
>
> I have a client that has started experiencing a login anomaly.
> First, the
> use telnet, and second, they don't have passwords at the Unix level.
>
> They are on AIX 5.2.0.0 with Universe 10.2.12
>
> The things I've seen are:
>
> - the session doesn't make it into UV for their password prompt but
> drops
> straight to Unix.
>
> - I've checked permissions at various locations and at various levels.
>
> - I've commented out various parts of both /etc/profile and
> /u1/ACCT/.profile with no consistent noticeable change.
>
> - I've checked UV.LOGIN and ACCT > LOGIN as well and nothing has
> changed
> in either place, and they are performing minimal tasks.
>
> - I've added a sleep just before exec  /u1/uv/bin/uv  plus changed
> uv to
> uvsh to see if that mattered. It didn't change the failures.
>
> - Failures are either on the 2nd login, 4th login, 3rd and 4th, 6th
> and
> 7th, 2nd and 3rd and 5th or whenever the pattern can't be matched...
>
> In other words, there's no rhyme or reason that can be applied to this
> failure.
>
> This is a real head-scratcher for me and I'm hoping someone has seen
> this
> or has something to offer.
>
> TIA
>
> ---
> Karl Pearson
> ka...@ourldsfamily.com
> Owner/Administrator of the sites at
> http://ourldsfamily.com
> ---
> "To mess up your Linux PC, you have to really work at it;
> to mess up a microsoft PC you just have to work on it."
> ---
> Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have
> for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
> --Benjamin Franklin
> ---
> Children seldom misquote you. In fact, they usually
> repeat word for word what you shouldn't have said.
> ---
>
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

To read FRSTIA's disclaimer for the e-mail go to http://www.frstia.co.za/
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Pick Pocket Guide

2010-03-23 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
When I was still working at U2, we met with Mike Ruane of Revelation
Software to discuss projects of common interest to both companies. At
the time I had hoped there was a chance of greater collaboration then
what transpired after I left.

It's a shame that more wasn't possible then, but I suppose Big Blue
had something to do with that...

LeRoy

Sent from my iPhone 3Gs

On 23 Mar 2010, at 6:46 PM, "Tony Gravagno" <3xk547...@sneakemail.com>
wrote:

> Common thread winding through this post...
>
> At the TigerLogic Conference a few months ago, Susie Siegesmund
> was a key speaker.  Many of us joked/suspected/(hoped?) that TL
> had a Rocket in their pocket.  But Susie's excellent presentation
> really underscored both a desire and a need for collaboration
> amongst the MV DBMS providers.  Susie and Rick Koe (TL CEO and
> primary stockholder) stood together to talk about such
> collaboration.  I was reminded of the Spectrum Manufacturers'
> Association of the 80's.  We need something like SMA again, but
> while Susie and Rick openly recognize the problems I'm not
> convinced they're willing to dedicate resources to fixing the
> problems.  We need an independent agency to coordinate such
> efforts, driving the DBMS vendors to take action toward their own
> best interests.
>
> As Brian suggests below that U2UG will be taking on various
> projects, I'm thinking such UG time might be better spent on
> helping to coordinate the efforts of others - UG's for other DBMS
> platforms and perhaps a new "SMA-ish" oversight group.  This, as
> a separate effort from U2-specific endeavors.
>
> Similarly, rather than the DBMS vendors themselves coordinating
> resources for platform marketing, books, etc, I think their best
> approach would be to foster the creation of a new SMA-ish group,
> which would in turn drive the DBMS vendors to do more.
>
>> From: Brian Leach
>> ... the new user group board are going to be
>> discussing our projects for the coming year and introductory
>> materials/sample applications and such like are very much in
>> the frame.
>
> It's a shame that U2UG is the only real global MV group around.
> Efforts as described by Brian should be shared by those who
> support other MV platforms - share the burden, share the
> benefits.
>
> I don't think U2UG should be driving toward introductory/sample
> materials that are entirely U2-centric and not more generic and
> inclusive of the other Pick/Prime platforms.  Sure, this is all
> about U2 here but a user group that focuses only on U2 (for
> something like this) would be as guilty of self-serving efforts
> as the DBMS vendors.  Yes, of course we need better intro
> material for U2 but if the rest of the MV market is still
> suffering from a dearth of information then U2 vendors will
> continue to face uphill sales battles.
>
> So collaboration in the name of mutual expansion (more like
> self-preservation) is important.  With no other central entity or
> authority I think this is a project that should be undertaken by
> Spectrum, a neutral, for-profit business, with the same
> motivations as the rest of us, with co-op funding from DBMS
> providers and application vendors alike.
>
>
>> So nomenclature is something we will need to address if we're
>> not going to confuse people from the very start.
>
> I agree that nomenclature is important but I would put less
> emphasis on it.  If anything, let's go back to roots rather than
> proprietary branding: the platform is derived from Pick and
> Prime, let's use the terms from those platforms as the common
> base, acknowledging that all MV platforms have their own names
> for the same concept, but not trying to coerce users or vendors
> to conform to some new standard.  The commonly accepted name of
> the platform is now MultiValue.  Let's not, yet again, try to
> come up with something new.  It works, go with it.  Pick your
> battles carefully because there will be many of them, and some
> not worth fighting.
>
>
>> From that point of view, it's a pity that mvBase and
>> mvEnterprise exist otherwise we could carry the 'mv'
>> naming further as the standard, but they will be too
>> heavily associated with those products.
>
> mvEnterprise is almost a dead product.  mvBase is surprisingly
> not dead but the base is too small to worry about conflicts in
> nomenclature.
>
>> The Pick name has fallen out of favour, and in any
>> case largely describes the operating system which is
>> viewed very much as a historic platform.
>
> Again, in creating something new there would be a stigma of an
> unknown.  Under a MultiValue banner, the names Pick and Prime are
> fine as historical references.  We can't run away from history
> and attempting to do so will only elicit suspicion.  Proudly
> acknowledging 40 years of history in a world plagued by
> techno-ADD and paradigm fads might actually be a good approach.
>
> Tony Gravagno, mvWindbag
> remove.pleaseNebula-RnD.com/blog
> Visit PickWiki.com! Contribute!
> http://Twitter.com

Re: [U2] Pick Pocket Guide

2010-03-22 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
I still have mine :-) Close to 20 years now...

Sent from my iPhone 3Gs

On 22 Mar 2010, at 10:00 AM, "Jon Sisk"  wrote:

>
> Wow. You held on to that a long time.
> Sorry about losing your briefcase to some lowlife.
>
> As a point of reference, the last official PPG covered R81,
> which was renamed without many changes to R83.
>
> R90 was only used by Ian Sandler for his GA version.
> I did a CIE Pocket Guide which was closer to R90.
>
> By 1990, the Pick code had forked into Advanced Pick.
>
> And it was that release that I folded all of the previous
> Pocket Guides and Pick manuals into EPick.
>
> The good news is that I see notices from Google alerts when
> my books pop up on sites like Amazon and Abe Books.
>
> The bad news is that I have seen them listed for upwards
> of 300 bucks, but I suspect they can be found for less.
>
> I hope you are able to find a replacement.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jon Sisk
> http://jes.com jes.com
>
>
> MAJ Programming wrote:
>>
>> My briefcase was stolen and in it was one of these small JES Pick
>> Pocket
>> Guides.
>>
>> While I have access to all of the docs I need via the internet, I
>> still
>> refer to this for some efforts.
>>
>> With no distraction, could anyone donate or offer to sell me one of
>> these.
>> I don't recall the vintage of the one I had but it wasn't Microdata
>> (or
>> another flavor) specific. Probably good old solid R90.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Mark Johnson
>> ___
>> U2-Users mailing list
>> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>>
>>
>
>
> -
> http://jes.com On-demand 1 on 1 private training for all MultiValue
> platforms
> and languages.
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://old.nabble.com/Pick-Pocket-Guide-tp27982214p27983190.html
> Sent from the U2 - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

To read FRSTIA's disclaimer for the e-mail go to http://www.frstia.co.za/
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Terminal Emulator and Telnet Client for a MacBook Pro

2010-03-18 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
They will. I use Parallels.

Sent from my iPhone 3Gs

On 18 Mar 2010, at 6:36 PM, "George Gallen" 
wrote:

> I wonder if wintergate/accuterm would work under Parallels?
>
> Parallels will virtualize the apple, so you can install windows
> (or migrate an existing PC), once done, you can run pretty
> much any windows PC while still running os x.
>
> Parallels for 1 PC is under 100.00
>
> You will need from what I understand at least 2gb memory,
> 4gb better.
>
>> From my experience, running one parallel program along with osx
> isn't too bad, however, running two (from two different virtual
> PC's) will slow the system down pretty good.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-
>> boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Leroy Dreyfuss
>> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 5:19 AM
>> To: U2 Users List
>> Subject: Re: [U2] Terminal Emulator and Telnet Client for a MacBook
>> Pro
>>
>> Hear hear!
>>
>>
>> On 3/18/10 1:20 AM, "Clif Oliver"  wrote:
>>
>>> Aw, you're just jealous 'cause we get to use a real operating
>>> system.
>>>
>>> ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 17, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Symeon Breen wrote:
>>>
>>>> I recommend you buy a pc and use that instead
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry - i just don't like apple .
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
>>>> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Dave
>> Taylor
>>>> Sent: 17 March 2010 21:33
>>>> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>>>> Subject: [U2] Terminal Emulator and Telnet Client for a MacBook Pro
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have a recommendation for a terminal emulator and
>>>> telnet
>> client
>>>> for a MacBook Pro or any MAC OS X operating system that will
>>>> connect
>> to
>>>> Universe/Unidata?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Dave Taylor
>>>> Sysmark Information Systems, Inc.
>>>> 49 Aspen Way
>>>> Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274
>>>> (O) 800-SYSMARK (800-797-6275)
>>>> (F) 310-377-3550
>>>> (C) 310-561-5200
>>>> www.sysmarkinfo.com
>>>> ___
>>>> U2-Users mailing list
>>>> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
>>>> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> U2-Users mailing list
>>>> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
>>>> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>>>
>>> ___
>>> U2-Users mailing list
>>> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
>>> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>>
>>
>> To read FRSTIA's disclaimer for the e-mail go to
>> http://www.frstia.co.za/
>> ___
>> U2-Users mailing list
>> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

To read FRSTIA's disclaimer for the e-mail go to http://www.frstia.co.za/
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Terminal Emulator and Telnet Client for a MacBook Pro

2010-03-18 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Hear hear!


On 3/18/10 1:20 AM, "Clif Oliver"  wrote:

> Aw, you're just jealous 'cause we get to use a real operating system.
>
> ;-)
>
>
> On Mar 17, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Symeon Breen wrote:
>
>> I recommend you buy a pc and use that instead
>>
>>
>>
>> Sorry - i just don't like apple .
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
>> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Dave Taylor
>> Sent: 17 March 2010 21:33
>> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> Subject: [U2] Terminal Emulator and Telnet Client for a MacBook Pro
>>
>> Does anyone have a recommendation for a terminal emulator and telnet client
>> for a MacBook Pro or any MAC OS X operating system that will connect to
>> Universe/Unidata?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dave Taylor
>> Sysmark Information Systems, Inc.
>> 49 Aspen Way
>> Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274
>> (O) 800-SYSMARK (800-797-6275)
>> (F) 310-377-3550
>> (C) 310-561-5200
>> www.sysmarkinfo.com
>> ___
>> U2-Users mailing list
>> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>>
>> ___
>> U2-Users mailing list
>> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


To read FRSTIA's disclaimer for the e-mail go to http://www.frstia.co.za/
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Major time delays

2010-03-05 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Agreed.


On 3/5/10 3:20 PM, "Ross Ferris"  wrote:

> Sometimes I will have 2-3 days of silence, then suddenly a "catch up"
>
> Ross Ferris
> Stamina Software
> Visage > Better by Design!
>



To read FRSTIA's disclaimer for the e-mail go to http://www.frstia.co.za/
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] AUTOLOGOUT

2010-03-03 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Hi Marc,

AUTOLOGOUT is session based. Onceit is executed it remains in effect
regardless of where the user navigates.

Also, the session must be waiting for input from the user for the
logout counter to begin. Once the user enters someting as input, the
counter stops and starts over only at the next input.

Cheers,

LeRoy

Sent from my iPhone 3Gs

On 03 Mar 2010, at 8:03 PM, "Caminiti, Marc"  wrote:

> Have a quick couple of questions on the AUTOLOGOUT function.   This is
> on Red Hat Enterprise Server 5.3, Universe 10.2.7.  Is the AUTOLOGOUT
> function a global setting, or can we use this in just 1 account?  For
> example, we have 2 accounts, PROD and DEV.  If we put AUTOLOGOUT 15 in
> the DEV account, will those people that go to the DEV account be the
> only ones affected by it?  Also, if we have a select or program that
> is
> running that takes greater than the "15" minutes in the AUTOLOGOUT,
> will
> it kill the process, or wait until it is finished, then start the 15
> minutes idle time?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> marc
>
>
>
> Marc Caminiti
>
> IS Manager
>
> Nashbar Direct, Inc
>
> 6103 State Route 446
>
> Canfield, OH 44406
>
> 330.533.1989, ext 336
>
> 330.702.9733, fax
>
>
>
> All generalisations are dangerous, even this one.
>
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain
> confidential information that is legally privileged. The information
> is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any disclosure,
> copying, distribution, or other use of this information is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify
> the sender by return e-mail and delete this message.
>
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

To read FRSTIA's disclaimer for the e-mail go to http://www.frstia.co.za/
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


FW: [U2] fixtool

2008-08-04 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Hello Doug,

If you run the tool once, it may orphan one or more overflow buffers. Running 
it until it has no errors should reclaim the unlinked buffers, thus recovering 
the records from orphaned buffer(s).

The number of times you run fixtool depends on how many errors it finds as it 
traverses the file. Typically, it can only fix one blink [LeRoy Dreyfuss] (or 
other type of error, outside of some header errors) at a time as the file 
should be rescanned for additional errors once a fix is applied.

Regards,

LeRoy


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Chanco
Sent: Monday, 4 August 2008 4:22 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] fixtool

Hey all,

 is fixtool the best way to repair a universe file?  I read somewhere
that all it does is fix the broken link ("fixing" the file but losing the
data that the broken link pointed to).  The reason I ask is that we had data
corruption a few days ago and are now running into lots of uniobject errors.



When we upgrade to the latest version of uniobjects things improved a lot
(which is a question in of itself as to why)  but I am wondering if we are
now experiencing "logical errors" in that our code is chunking because it
cannot find certain customer info that lives in another files (this is one
example of what we are seeing)



if running fixtool -fix is not the best way to fix a universe file can
someone shed any light on a better way?



thanks again!



dougc



ps



if it matters we are running universe 10.1 on aix  5.2
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


This email message and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the 
addressee(s) and contain information which may be privileged, confidential 
and/or subject to copyright. Use, interference with, disclosure or reproduction 
of this material by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is unauthorised 
and prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately 
notify the sender by return email and delete this message from your system. 
Youi Pty Ltd respects your privacy. Our privacy policy can be accessed from our 
web site http://www.youi.com.au.

No representation is made that this email or any attachments are free of 
viruses. Virus scanning is recommended and is the responsibility of the 
recipient. Youi Pty Ltd accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email or for any loss or damage arising from the use of 
this email or attachments.

Youi Pty Ltd is committed to responsible environmental management in carrying 
out its operations. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Change SCHEMA name in UniVerse SQL

2008-02-10 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Hi David,

The reason for Ray's response is due to the SQL catalog, which itself is a 
schema. It is a major effort like you say because of the information about each 
schema and table that is stored in the catalog. There is no simple method I am 
aware of.

Regards,

LeRoy


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jordan
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 12:01 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Change SCHEMA name in UniVerse SQL

Hi Ray

To drop schema means that you have to drop all the tables as well?

The moving of scemas, copying schemas, etc in UniVerse is very painfull,
there must be better ways.

Ie copying a test account.


Regards

David Jordan

Managing Consultant
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] RE: Universe Replication

2007-12-09 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Hello Robin,

10.2.x is still pretty new, even though it has been out a whole year now. With 
most busy organizations, uptake on a new release can be pretty slow, so I doubt 
many folks have it going in a production environment.

When I worked for the U2 group, I did quite a bit of testing with replication. 
It is ideal for what you propose to use it for. In 10.2, the services changed 
to improve overall replication performance and recoverability after a network 
outage.

If you've never set it up before, there are some things to consider first. For 
example, how reliable are the file pointers? Can everyone of the file pointers 
be opened? Are they referencing files that live in other file systems and not 
where the account itself exists? Replication expects that the files not be 
UV/NET files and will skip them when you start looking for files within 
accounts to publish.

Like transaction logging, replication ships with TCL verbs to greatly speed up 
the selection, publish, and subscribe process when there are many files per 
account to be replicated. They are documented in the UV 10.2 documentation set. 
I made improvements to two of those programs-- just ping me off-line if you'd 
like the updated programs.

I intend to deploy replication across my Linux servers, with transaction 
logging running on each server as well. I am confident with 10.2's ability to 
handle them both quite well in the scenario I chose to deploy them.

I believe I can tell you quite a bit more about the process if you want to 
write me off-line.

Regards,

LeRoy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robin Smith
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 10:59 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Universe Replication

We are about to install Universe File Replication on a Windows 2003
server, using Universe 10.2.3 with replication to a similarly specified
Subscriber Server.  The subscriber will be used for reporting purposes
to reduce the load on the publishing server.  Most of the reporting is
done via UVODBC.

Has anyone had experience of installing Universe Replication in a
Windows 2003 server environment?  How stable is it?  What problems have
you encountered along the way?  Any  help/tips/advice would be much
appreciated.

Robin Smith
Reflex Data Systems Ltd
Tel: 01482 881152
Fax:01482 881195
Registered Office: Reflex House, Tokenspire Business Park, Beverley,
East Yorkshire, HU17 0TB
Registered in England No. 2767946. VAT Registration No. GB 599 0463 94



Scanned by MailDefender - managed email security from intY -
www.maildefender.net
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] RE: U2 SOAP Server

2007-12-01 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Hey folks,

Just thought I'd take a second to reply back to the recent posts...

The SOAP Server included with U2WSD gets installed when you install the tool. 
There isn't an option (during install) to install the SOAP Server by itself or 
elsewhere. That doesn't mean you can't relocate the SOAP Server somewhere else 
when you are ready to deploy. If you have no GUI desktop (Gnome/KDE/etc.) on 
your Linux server, then it will be hard to install U2WSD on that platform (and 
as such, gain access to the SOAP Server). That wouldn't be an issue for Windows 
server users since Windows has a GUI desktop.

At the end of the day, the SOAP Server is just a simple Jetty server enhanced 
to communicated only with U2 servers enabled for it. It is really light-weight. 
You don't have to fire up U2WSD to start/stop it, but I don't believe IBM 
includes that tidbit of info in there documentation.

Regards,

LeRoy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Walker
Sent: Saturday, 1 December 2007 5:36 AM
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: RE: [U2] RE: U2 SOAP Server

That WOULD make sense, but it's not indicated in LeRoys's reply. And there
are NO instructions on how to package this all up and run it under glassfish
or tomcat. I can ( and probably will, now ) dive into the subdirectories to
see if a jar/war file has been created, and if so, try to deploy it on my
glassfish server.

>> I cant see that you would have to install the developer tool as a server


My point exactly.
--
Dave Walker
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] RE: U2 SOAP Server

2007-11-29 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Hello Sarah,

The SOAP Server is installed with the U2 Web Services Developer tool, i.e. it 
is bundled with it. At present they are not intended to be on separate 
machines. However, IBM offers both a Linux and a Windows version of the tool 
(Linux needs a GUI desktop like Gnome or KDE to run the tool).

Regards,

LeRoy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sara Burns
Sent: Friday, 30 November 2007 11:38 AM
To: U2 List
Subject: [U2] U2 SOAP Server

UV 10.2 is supposed to contain a SOAP Server for creating Web Services
from existing subroutines.
We have done this in a Proof of Concept environment using the U2 Web
Services Developer running on a PC linking to a version of UV 10.2 on
Linux - which is not yet in production.  Now we want to move all this
into our development environment - so want to install the SOAP Server in
the correct place.

I cannot find any reference in the documentation as to how or where to
install the SOAP Server.

Can anyone enlighten us as to how this is done and to where.  We are in
the process of creating an Enterprise Service Bus using Oracle
Application Server SOA Suite.  All was going very well until we
discovered this large gap in our knowledge.

It is probably very simple but we cannot find it in this new area of
functionality.

Any comments appreciated

Sara Burns


Sara Burns (SEB)


IS Development Manager

Public Trust
Phone: +64 (04) 978 4534 (DDI)

Mobile: 029 978 4534
 >




The information contained in this communication (including any attachment) is
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this
communication. You must not disclose, copy or use in any way the information
contained in this communication. Any views expressed in this communication are
not necessarily the views of Public Trust. No representation is made that this
communication is free of error, virus or interference.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] [UD] Possible causes of corrupt data on a UniData static file

2007-11-02 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
UV doesn't have guide, but it has uvfixfile and fixtool.

Regards,

LeRoy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arnold Bosch
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 3:53 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [UD] Possible causes of corrupt data on a UniData static file

Is guide only available on UD ?

It does not work with UV (10.0).  Is there a similar command available in
UV?

Thanks!

Arnold Bosch
IT Administrator
--
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Format Issue with AE

2007-08-14 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Ron,

This was a long-time defect in AE, which IBM ported from UniData to UniVerse. I 
believe it was corrected for both data servers around the time 10.1 was 
released, but it may have been slightly later than that. A newer version of 
10.1 or even 10.2 shouldn't display that issue. My copy of 10.2.3 doesn't.

Regards,

LeRoy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Hutchings
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 11:37 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Format Issue with AE

   rellevel

   10.0.11
   PICK
   PICK.FORMAT

   One of the developers using AE noticed a strange result.  After making some
   modifications and Formatting the result, the subroutine labels that were
   previously mixed case were converted to all upper case.  Is this just a
   feature of AE or is there some configuration setting that can be changed?

   Ron Hutchings
 _

   See what youre getting intobefore you go there
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] RE: UVTSORT config parameter

2007-08-10 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Thx Mr. Oliver. I recall our pal Pete Simonson telling me that some years ago. 
Just didn't want to stick my neck too far out without some caution :-)

Regards,

LeRoy


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clifton Oliver
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 3:46 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] RE: UVTSORT config parameter

Yes. According to my conversations with DG, the project was referred
to as "Firestorm" and had DG's affinity throughout.


--

Regards,

Clif

~~~
W. Clifton Oliver, CCP
CLIFTON OLIVER & ASSOCIATES
Tel: +1 619 460 5678Web: www.oliver.com
~~~


On Aug 9, 2007, at 6:35 PM, LeRoy Dreyfuss wrote:

> Not sure, but I believe VMark had DG do the actual development for
> affinity.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] RE: UVTSORT config parameter

2007-08-09 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
The threaded sort this speaks of (tsort) was originally introduced into 
UniVerse for DG systems back in the day. Not sure, but I believe VMark had DG 
do the actual development for affinity. However, for 10.1, U2 development 
looked at areas where they could improve UniVerse that would also fit within 
the scope of the development they were doing at the time. UVTSORT was one such 
enhancement.

After looking at operating systems where the function calls were supported, U2 
development implemented this for those specific platforms. For those not 
supporting this feature, this parameter has no effect. Most of your latest and 
greatest platforms would have this feature enabled, though I believe it was not 
enabled for SCO (10.1 supported does not support OpenServer 6.0, which in of 
itself probably does support the ability).

If memory serves, this parameter has the capability of creating up to 20 tsort 
processes for a single SSELECT or SORT operation.

Regards,

LeRoy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stevenson, 
Charles
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 2:18 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UVTSORT config parameter

UV 10.1 introduced a new configuration parameter.
Admin manual says:

UVTSORT  The value of this parameter can be either 1 or 0.
 A value of 1 enables multithreaded sort.
 A value of 0 disables multithreaded sort.


I don't see any further discussion of it than that.
Does anyone have any words of wisdom?

cds
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Serious problem with open files

2007-08-08 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
This is familiar to me. UNIX is throwing the "[EMFILE] Too many open files" 
error because you have reached a limit of open files. You'll need to tune the 
kernel a bit to allow for more open files on the system and possibly per 
process. Solaris used to need tuning more than others like HP-UX or AIX, but I 
haven't messed with Solaris 10 lately so I don't know how dynamic its kernel is.

Would seem to suggest why UV sessions hang during this condition as well.

Regards,

LeRoy


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Storm
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 7:48 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Serious problem with open files

All,

We are an application service provider running our application
dedicated on Universe. We are doing this for many years already but
with one of our accounts we have now hit a problem that we are unable
to explain.

There are 2 distinct problems that one some levels seem related in
some ways but in others not at all.

Problem one, one particular big report opening many (some distributed)
files hits some sort of maximum and then fails with:

Unable to open pipe for tsort process.
[EMFILE] Too many open files

During the "open" statement trying to open one more file. A problem is
that this specific error is not reproducible on different systems
running the same Universe/OS/Application versions.

The second problem is that at certain points in time the whole
universe environment freezes, every process that tries to do a "open"
statement hangs indefinitely, the processes are not killed even when
users disconnect, leading pretty quickly to a "out of licenses"
situation.

The two seem related in the fact that both problems have to do with
the "open" statement however the effects are rather different.

Running on Solaris 10 with Universe 10.1.18 on Sparc hardware.

I'm hoping that this sounds familiar to you and that you might have
found a solution to this problem if so, please help! (actually I'm
hoping for you that you are not familiar with the problem as it is a
rather nasty one ;-))


Any insights are a appreciated, more information can be provided if
that were to be helpful.


Regards,

John Storm
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Another gripe about IBM not letting end users access

2007-07-30 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
You need permission from your reseller as you will likely need to use their IBM 
Customer Number. Following the instructions in the link I provided earlier 
should help you.

Regards,

LeRoy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pamela J Robbins
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 10:44 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Another gripe about IBM not letting end users access

We've been trying for a week to get access to the knowledge base.  No
one is acknowledging us as a customer and we've had two of our people
trying to contact them.  Anyone have a good contact at IBM?  The page
suggested in the discussions does not recognize our customer number.
Pam


John Jenkins wrote:
> Brian
>
> I don't know, but it may already be there (In that part of U2 Online called
> "U2 Business Connect" and accessible to ISVs and Distributors). I don't have
> access myself so can't check.
>
> I'll make some enquiries
>
> Regards
>
> JayJay
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Leach
> Sent: 28 July 2007 18:33
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] Another gripe about IBM not letting end users access the
> articles in the knowledge base
>
> JayJay
>
> Can IBM set a link to this form so we can put the link on the website with
> some instructions?
>
> Thanks
>
> Brian
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Jenkins
>> Sent: 27 July 2007 21:55
>> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> Subject: RE: [U2] Another gripe about IBM not letting end
>> users access the articles in the knowledge base
>>
>> Brenda
>>
>> There have been a few postings about this in the group:
>> Basically your support/software provider has to submit a form
>> to U2 Business Connect (U2BC) authorising access for your
>> Company and named individuals. There is one form for OEM /
>> ISV partner end users and one for Distributor end users.
>>
>> The form should be available to the partner from U2BC on
>> request by the partner. Tech Support are not a part of this
>> process though they MAY (emphasis MAY) have the current forms
>> they could forward to the ISV/Distributor if asked.
>> Authorisation is a pure U2BC procedure - sorry IBM Tech
>> Support can't help here.
>>
>> So get in touch with your VAR and all being well U2BC will be
>> able to sort it out for you.
>>
>> Hope it helps,
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> JayJay
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brenda Price
>> Sent: 25 July 2007 18:57
>> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> Subject: [U2] Another gripe about IBM not letting end users
>> access the articles in the knowledge base
>>
>> We have a great VAR, we seldom need them but when we do they
>> come through with flying colors but even they can not get IBM
>> to get us an ID to access this.  I am posting the response
>> I've gotten from our VAR on this issue. They have tried to
>> get us access to the locked articles in the knowledge base
>> with this response from IBM.
>>
>>
>>
>> have emailed IBM U2 support on this several times, they have
>> never been able to tell me how to setup an additional IBM ID
>> for a customer.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Throws the lack of support right back to IBM and points out
>> the failure of IBM to address their paying customers and VARs
>> needs.  This is a problem that needs to be address to
>> facilitate growth in the U2 market.
>>
>>
>>
>> Brenda Price
>>
>> Affiliated Acceptance Corporation
>>
>> Sunrise Beach, MO
>> ---
>> u2-users mailing list
>> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
>> ---
>> u2-users mailing list
>> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
>>
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
>
>


--
Pamela J Robbins New Bolton Center
Senior Programmer AnalystSchool of Veterinary Medicine
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   University of Pennsylvania
610-925-6438
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Another gripe about IBM not letting end users access the articles in the knowledge base

2007-07-30 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Brian,

See my most recent post for this link... tt has been there for some time now.

Regards,

LeRoy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Leach
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 3:33 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Another gripe about IBM not letting end users access the 
articles in the knowledge base

JayJay

Can IBM set a link to this form so we can put the link on the website with
some instructions?

Thanks

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Jenkins
> Sent: 27 July 2007 21:55
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] Another gripe about IBM not letting end
> users access the articles in the knowledge base
>
> Brenda
>
> There have been a few postings about this in the group:
> Basically your support/software provider has to submit a form
> to U2 Business Connect (U2BC) authorising access for your
> Company and named individuals. There is one form for OEM /
> ISV partner end users and one for Distributor end users.
>
> The form should be available to the partner from U2BC on
> request by the partner. Tech Support are not a part of this
> process though they MAY (emphasis MAY) have the current forms
> they could forward to the ISV/Distributor if asked.
> Authorisation is a pure U2BC procedure - sorry IBM Tech
> Support can't help here.
>
> So get in touch with your VAR and all being well U2BC will be
> able to sort it out for you.
>
> Hope it helps,
>
> Regards
>
> JayJay
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brenda Price
> Sent: 25 July 2007 18:57
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: [U2] Another gripe about IBM not letting end users
> access the articles in the knowledge base
>
> We have a great VAR, we seldom need them but when we do they
> come through with flying colors but even they can not get IBM
> to get us an ID to access this.  I am posting the response
> I've gotten from our VAR on this issue. They have tried to
> get us access to the locked articles in the knowledge base
> with this response from IBM.
>
>
>
> have emailed IBM U2 support on this several times, they have
> never been able to tell me how to setup an additional IBM ID
> for a customer.
>
>
>
>
>
> Throws the lack of support right back to IBM and points out
> the failure of IBM to address their paying customers and VARs
> needs.  This is a problem that needs to be address to
> facilitate growth in the U2 market.
>
>
>
> Brenda Price
>
> Affiliated Acceptance Corporation
>
> Sunrise Beach, MO
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Another gripe about IBM not letting end users access the articles in the knowledge base

2007-07-29 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
This page can take you to the PDF pretty easily: 
https://www-927.ibm.com/software/data/u2/support/u2techconnect/entitleddocs.asp.
 The process is well documented in the PDF.


Regards,

LeRoy
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-19 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Thanks Tony. I am glad the white paper showed you what you were after.

Looks like you might be talking about a beta version of mv.NET. Up until the 
middle of January this year, I worked for IBM as the UD and UV product manager 
and was very involved with the project of bringing mv.NET into the U2 portfolio 
(was part of it from the beginning). When I left IBM, BF was beta testing their 
version 3 with AJAX support, and if I recall correctly, mv.NET hadn't fully 
supported UO.NET and its connection pooling methodology. As you can see, that 
wasn't so long ago.

Anyway, I think all of this was about being cognoscente of IBM's licensing 
model in terms of BF's version of mv.NET and also how one gets U2's CP up and 
running.

Have a good one!

Regards,

LeRoy


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 1:07 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

LeRoy Dreyfuss wrote:
> Tony,
> How long is "a long time now"? I have quite a bit of history with the
> product and if BF enabled it for UO.NET, it would only be from v3
> (and I haven't time to confirm if it is v3), which is a fairly new
> version.

Long time = over a year now.  Current release is v3.5.0.5.  I keep my
clients informed about the latest releases - your vendor should do you the
same favor.  ;)

> Having said that, mv.NET doesn't dictate whether connection
> pooling has been properly licensed (which in enables it as well) on
> the U2 server.

Correct, never said anything different.  Since mv.NET uses its own pooling,
the presence or absence of CP is irrelevant.

> Also, I provided a link in my previous post to an IBM
> white paper that should demonstrate coding with CP in mind.

After I hit the send button on my last note I kicked myself for not
expressing gratitude for that link to ibmu2.microsoftnet.pdf.  I have an
old v1 copy of that and I want to thank you very much for the v2 link.

Yes, I see the code in there:
  UniObjects.UOPooling = true;
  UniObjects.MinPoolSize = 1;
  UniObjects.MaxPoolSize = 10;
It looks very easy and one of these days I'm sure I'll make use of it.

Regards,
T
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-18 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Tony,

How long is "a long time now"? I have quite a bit of history with the product 
and if BF enabled it for UO.NET, it would only be from v3 (and I haven't time 
to confirm if it is v3), which is a fairly new version. Having said that, 
mv.NET doesn't dictate whether connection pooling has been properly licensed 
(which in enables it as well) on the U2 server. Also, I provided a link in my 
previous post to an IBM white paper that should demonstrate coding with CP in 
mind.

Regards,

LeRoy


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 5:46 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

Just to clarify - mv.NET can use standard UO but has also been enabled to
use UO.NET for a long time now, and standard UO might not even be supported
in a near-future release.  It's preferable to use managed components all
the way through, so UO.NET is the preferred pipe.
T

LeRoy Dreyfuss wrote:
> mv.NET from BlueFinity would be using standard UniObjects and as
> such, could not take advantage of connection pooling from U2 (CP).
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance

2007-07-17 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Bill,

mv.NET from BlueFinity would be using standard UniObjects and as such, could 
not take advantage of connection pooling from U2 (CP). There may be licensing 
implications with U2 that require one to acquire CP licenses to use mv.NET, 
though.

In any case, it is a simple matter of changing the license configuration (and 
paying the appropriate fee, of course) of either UniData or UniVerse to enable 
it. If you find the documentation from IBM not exactly what you need in terms 
of using CP in your application, there is a white paper on their (IBM U2) 
Website at: 
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/data/u2/pubs/whitepapers/ibmu2-microsoftnet.pdf
You might find the white paper useful.

Regards,

LeRoy


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 11:49 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance

Phil:

A quick example is I'm trying to find out how their Connection Pool license 
works.
Noone seems to know nor can I find out how this integrates with mv.Net using 
UO.NET
as the connection.  I can't find out how to configure a connection pool, 
monitor the
connections, or anything else.  [sigh]  :-(

Bill
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance

2007-07-17 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
These are interesting comments considering all the tools available with IBM U2 
and the many things they have in the hopper.

Regards,

LeRoy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 6:49 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance

This is one of the reasons that Cache is able to drum up some business
from shops that are using Universe, UniData, etc...  Cache is very
forward thinking, and now with their mvbasic support, a viable option
for those of us using MV databases and want to use newer technologies to
integrate with the database.  Cache's native web service support is very
cool, not to mention the .Net and java integration.  This is the
direction IBM needs to be heading in with U2 if they want to stay a
viable option.

Thanks,

Nick Cipollina

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of phil walker
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:22 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance

Nick,

Here, here to your following statements

To me, this is part of the problem that we have in the MV world.  We
look at how things are being done elsewhere and say, "Pick does it
better, we aren't going to do that."  The problem with this approach is
that everyone else is adopting these standards and using them.  We are
going to be left further behind if we don't start using some of the
technologies available to us.

.

And this is where this list breaks down in that a lot of the new
features IBM are building into the product are not used/discussed and
the documentation is VERY, VERY sparse. So people like myself and a few
others are left to trial and error techniques to implement these new
technologies because we HAVE to talk to the outside world and people
expect some sort of standard method to do this. Because of this approach
we take a lot longer to do something which I am sure is reasonably easy
if one was to have good quality examples available like most other
dbms/development environments have on the web


Phil (my 2c)


Nick Cipollina
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dawn Wolthuis
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 11:22 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance

I do understand the advantages to that approach, Nick. But that was
also the thinking of those who prepared the current industry
benchmarks by locking in on SQL.  My concern was that if you specify
technologies, you can make it difficult for solutions that are outside
the box.  --dawn

On 7/16/07, Nick Cipollina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the consumer of this data is going to be external, then I would
> definitely use web services.  Using a standard format (SOAP) will make
> it possible for anyone to consume the data.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nick Cipollina
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dawn Wolthuis
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 4:58 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance
>
> Yes, agreed. I think if you start with user requirements for services,
> then have folks design for those requirements according to each
> environment, that would be a good start.  I hesitate to say that it
> must be "web services" only because that might imply use of SOAP or an
> XML exchange that could prejudice the implementation, but otherwise
> defining the requirements as services makes a lot of sense. Each
> service implementation in different environments can then be judged
> and compared by a variety of measures.

---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserv

RE: [U2] UD Backups - DBPAUSE for UniVerse?

2007-07-04 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
>From the OS shell, uv -admin -L/R/U are synonyms to the SUSPEND.FILES TCL 
>command. The Users Reference guide documents both of these methods.

Regards,

LeRoy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Manu Fernandes
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 4:16 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] UD Backups - DBPAUSE for UniVerse?

SUSPEND.FILES ON/OFF

Manu
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Richardson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: [U2] UD Backups - DBPAUSE for UniVerse?


>I have followed this thread with much interest.
>
> I have scoured the U2 / UniVerse documentation, but I see no
> DBPAUSE command or equivilent for UniVerse. Are there any
> commands with similar functionaility for UV, or does IBM have any
> plans to introduce such command equilivents in UV as currently exist
> in UD?
>
> For any Backup solution that uses the Microsoft VSS Snapshot
> functionality, or an "Advanced Open File Manager" option, would it be
> safe to say that for UD applications, they should issue the DBPAUSE
> command, "grab a snapshot", then DBRESUME - *for each Backup
> requested*, to ensure optimal consistency of the Backup's integrity?
>
> Would it also be safe to say that for UV Applications, the only sure
> way to grab a consistent Backup of the UV environment would be
> when the UV Database is shutdown, or in a state where there are no
> users logged on and No PHANTOMs running?
>
> It would be nice if UV had the same operational level commands
> that UD has in this area.
>
> I would appreciate any insight on this.
>
> Happy Indepedence Day / "Fourth of July" to all.
>
> Thank you.
> Regards,
> Scott Richardson
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> Prime Information / UniVerse / Unidata / Sequoia PICK / mvBase
> Pr1me Computer \ Encore Computer Corporation \ Sequoia Systems
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> Senior Systems Engineer / Consultant
> Product Support Engineer
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Stephen O'Neal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 8:16 PM
> Subject: RE: [U2] UD Backups
>
>
>> Colin Alfke asked:
>> "Along that line - would there be anything else that may be holding up
>> DBPAUSE?"
>>
>> A cause of a slow response back from DBPAUSE is not enough disk drives
>> under a system.  When DBPAUSE is initiated, it flushes all of the UDT
>> disk
>> buffers to disk.  If there is a lot of data waiting to be written, it can
>> take a while.
>>
>> Another cause, is when a single disk drive is hot.  Example: if a file,
>> that has a lot of updates, is on a single disk drive.  Optimally, files
>> with a lot of updates should be striped across multiple disk drives.
>>Steve
>>
>>Stephen M. O'Neal
>>U2 Lab Services Sales Specialist
>>Information Management, IBM Software Group
>> ---
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] RE:

2007-05-21 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
So this object is the same, then on the live and dev systems?

Regards,

LeRoy


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson 
(DSLWN)
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 10:11 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject:

Leroy wrote
>Are you able to copy the object from your live system to your dev
system to see if VLIST aborts there?
Because of the big upgrade in SB+ and the fact we were also upgrading
Universe, we upgraded the test system first to see what problems it
would bring.  Actually we built a temporary system on a loan machine
first, upgraded THAT, then upgraded the development/test machine, then
upgraded the production machine.
Thanks for the thought, though.
Regards, Keith
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] RE: (UV) - Is VLIST in version 10.2 fragile?

2007-05-21 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Keith,

Are you able to copy the object from your live system to your dev system to see 
if VLIST aborts there?

Regards,

LeRoy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson 
(DSLWN)
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 8:43 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] RE: (UV) - Is VLIST in version 10.2 fragile?

Hi Leroy,

Thanks for your comments.

I figured it might be a problem with opcode changes.  My problem is that
I'm not certain that the source code we have is correct.  To
recapitulate -

*   We have old object in production.
*   We have no source code in production
*   We have source code in development.
*   The development object is different because it was compiled more
recently (and from a different directory)
*   Any given development source program is very unlikely to be the
same as production *sigh*.


This is the situation where one most wants VLIST to work!  I would have
preferred to just scan the VLIST output but I guess I'll just have to
work it out by code analysis.

Regards, Keith
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] RE: (UV) - Is VLIST in version 10.2 fragile?

2007-05-20 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Hi Keith,

I hadn't noticed that VLIST was any different. What I did notice is that the 
object in question was last compiled on UV 8.3, You might want to recompile 
this routine as well to update it. My guess is that VLIST is struggling with 
the opcodes in the older code. Perhaps IBM changed some opcodes more recently 
that is confusing things. That is just a guess since I cannot diagnose it. It 
seems fine for me.

Regards,

LeRoy


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson 
(DSLWN)
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 1:15 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] (UV) - Is VLIST in version 10.2 fragile?

Hi there,

We have just upgraded both Universe and System Builder, going from UV
10.1.8 to 10.2.0 and from SB+ 3.4 to 5.4.

Because the SB+ common block changed slightly, I had to recompile all
programs that referenced it.  However, I have discovered that not all
the source code was on the production system.  I wanted to verify that
the development code was valid, but VLIST did not work properly.

When I try VLIST, it seems to get the testfw jump wrong on line 22 (or
24 in the development version).  From then on it gets stranger and
stranger until it falls over.  It looks like it gets out of step
somehow.

I realise it's not something anyone on the list can help with, but has
anyone else noticed VLIST is more fragile in UV version 10.2?

The development version of the source code and the VLIST from production
are below.  Don't bother criticising it - you can't be more scathing
than me because I've had more practise.

Regards (and thanks), Keith


001: $OPTIONS -F ;*WR631
002:   SUBROUTINE LWPINP.INTERVAL.SEQ
003:
**
004: * Description of subroutine
005: * Used for documentation purposes (including auto
documentation)
006:
**
007: *
008: $INCLUDE DMSKELCODE COMMON
009:   EQU AM TO CHAR(254), VM TO CHAR(253)
010: *
011: *PARAM(3) = 0
012:  ORIG.REC = 0
013:   INTERVAL.SEQ = WORK<3>
014:   LWOP.INTERVAL = 0
015:   LWOP.INTERVAL.FILE = ''
016:   OPEN.OK = @FALSE
017:   CALL PAN.FILE.HANDLE ('LWOP.INTERVAL', LWOP.INTERVAL,
LWOP.INTERVAL.FILE, OPEN.OK)
018:   IF NOT(OPEN.OK) THEN
019:  CALL SB.DISP (3, 'Can not open the file
LWOP.INTERVAL')
020:  RTN.FLAG = 1
021:   END
022:   FOUND = @TRUE
023:   BEGIN CASE
024:  CASE INTERVAL.SEQ = ''
025: KEY = WORK<1>: '|': WORK<2>: '|'
026: SEQ = 1
027: LOOP
028:READV DUMMY FROM LWOP.INTERVAL.FILE, KEY:
SEQ, 1 ELSE FOUND = @FALSE
029: WHILE FOUND DO
030:SEQ += 1
031: REPEAT
032: KEY = KEY: SEQ
033: WORK<3> = SEQ
034: *   PARAM(3) = 1
035:  ORIG.REC = 1
036:  CASE INTERVAL.SEQ = 'L'
037: KEY = WORK<1>: '|': WORK<2>: '|'
038: SEQ = 1
039: LOOP
040:READV DUMMY FROM LWOP.INTERVAL.FILE, KEY:
SEQ, 1 ELSE FOUND= @FALSE
041: WHILE FOUND DO
042:SEQ += 1
043: REPEAT
044: KEY = KEY: SEQ - 1
045: WORK<3> = SEQ - 1
046:  CASE 1
047: KEY = WORK<1>: '|': WORK<2>: '|': WORK<3>
048: READV DUMMY FROM LWOP.INTERVAL.FILE, KEY, 1
ELSE FOUND = @FALSE
049: IF NOT(FOUND) THEN
050:CALL SB.DISP (3, KEY: ' not on the LWOP
INTERVAL file')
051:RTN.FLAG = 1
052: END
053:   END CASE
054:
055:   RETURN



>VLIST SFPROGS LWPINP.INTERVAL.SEQ
Subroutine "SFPROGS.O/LWPINP.INTERVA/L.SEQ"
Compiler Version: 8.3.3.1
Object Level: 5
Machine Type: 10
Local Variables : 12
Subroutine args : 0
Unnamed Common  : 0
Named Common Seg: 1
Object Size : 540
Source lines: 52
Object Date Time:
00011 0 : 060 dyn_extractWORK 3 0 0  => INTERVAL.SEQ
00012 C : 0F8 move   0  => LWOP.INTERVAL
00013 00012 : 0F8 move   ""  => LWOP.INTERVAL.FILE
00014 00018 : 0F8 move   0  => OPEN.OK
00015 0001E : 0F8 move   "LWOP.INTERVAL"  => _T
00015 00024 : 01E call   "PAN.FILE.HANDLE" _T LWOP.INTERVAL
LWOP.INTERVAL.FILE OPEN.OK
00020 0005C : 0F8 move   1  => FOUND
00022 00062 : 06E eq INTERVAL.SEQ ""  => $R0
00022 0006A : 2DE testfw $R0 0:
00023 00074 : 0F4 mmatstore   [97]  => WORK
00023 0007A : 018 braces   

RE: [U2] [AD] Position available in the Sunshine Coast (Aus)

2007-02-08 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
'porrible' was supposed to be 'possible' :-)

Regards,

LeRoy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leroy Dreyfuss
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 4:56 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [AD] Position available in the Sunshine Coast (Aus)

We are looking for a motivated individual interested in a new and
challenging permanent position. This person is skilled in UniVerse, with
SB+ experience a nice plus. This person is responsible for documenting
our applications and IT environment. We are looking for someone to start
in the March at the latest and relocation from another area within
Australia is possible. Growth potential is also porrible.

Some skills and characteristics required for the position are:
* Self-starting with the drive to succeed
* Solid UniVerse development experience
* Excellent writing and communication skills
* The ability to understand product design and translate them to product
documentation
* The ability to be creative in developing new methods to generate and
manage system documentation

SB+ experience is preferred but not required

Anyone interested is encouraged to reply to me directly and, if
possible, provide a CV or resume in your reply.

Thanks!

Regards,

LeRoy Dreyfuss



Important Notice: This email is subject to important restrictions,
qualifications and disclaimers ("the Disclaimer") that must be accessed
and read at the following address or by copying and pasting the
following
address into your Internet browser's address bar:
http://www.frstia.co.za/Disclaimer.asp

The Disclaimer is deemed to form part of the content
of this email in terms of Section 11 of the Electronic Communications
and Transactions Act, 25 of 2002. If you cannot access the Disclaimer,
please obtain a copy thereof from us by sending an email to
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

FirstRand STI Admin (Pty) Ltd is an Authorised Financial Services
Provider
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Important Notice: This email is subject to important restrictions,
qualifications and disclaimers ("the Disclaimer") that must be accessed
and read at the following address or by copying and pasting the following
address into your Internet browser's address bar: 
http://www.frstia.co.za/Disclaimer.asp

The Disclaimer is deemed to form part of the content
of this email in terms of Section 11 of the Electronic Communications
and Transactions Act, 25 of 2002. If you cannot access the Disclaimer,
please obtain a copy thereof from us by sending an email to mailto:[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]

FirstRand STI Admin (Pty) Ltd is an Authorised Financial Services Provider
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] [AD] Position available in the Sunshine Coast (Aus)

2007-02-07 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
We are looking for a motivated individual interested in a new and
challenging permanent position. This person is skilled in UniVerse, with
SB+ experience a nice plus. This person is responsible for documenting
our applications and IT environment. We are looking for someone to start
in the March at the latest and relocation from another area within
Australia is possible. Growth potential is also porrible.

Some skills and characteristics required for the position are:
* Self-starting with the drive to succeed
* Solid UniVerse development experience
* Excellent writing and communication skills
* The ability to understand product design and translate them to product
documentation
* The ability to be creative in developing new methods to generate and
manage system documentation

SB+ experience is preferred but not required

Anyone interested is encouraged to reply to me directly and, if
possible, provide a CV or resume in your reply.

Thanks!

Regards,

LeRoy Dreyfuss



Important Notice: This email is subject to important restrictions,
qualifications and disclaimers ("the Disclaimer") that must be accessed
and read at the following address or by copying and pasting the following
address into your Internet browser's address bar: 
http://www.frstia.co.za/Disclaimer.asp

The Disclaimer is deemed to form part of the content
of this email in terms of Section 11 of the Electronic Communications
and Transactions Act, 25 of 2002. If you cannot access the Disclaimer,
please obtain a copy thereof from us by sending an email to mailto:[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]

FirstRand STI Admin (Pty) Ltd is an Authorised Financial Services Provider
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] [UV] LIST.READU program

2007-01-04 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
   You  can  use  the INTERNAL keyword with LIST.READU to get the results
   back  as  a  dynamic array. You also might wish to index the FILEINODE
   and  FILEDEV fields of the UNIVERSE.STAT.FILE so you can use something
   like  SELECTINDEX  in  BASIC to obtain the records quickly. Using this
   method, it shouldn't matter if you use Windows or UNIX.

   Regards,

   LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
   Product Manager
   IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Data Servers
   [cid:_2_0AA54ED00AA54C7C006A26B687257259]

   Tel: 303-773-7783  Fax: 303-773-5915
   Mobile: 720-341-4317 Tie-line: 656-7783
   External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2

   "John Hester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   01/04/2007 11:16 AM

 Please respond to
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

   To

   

   cc

  Subject

   RE: [U2] [UV] LIST.READU program

   > -Original Message-
   > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
   > Pflugfelder
   > Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 7:02 PM
   > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   > Subject: [U2] [UV] LIST.READU program
   >
   > Does anyone have a program written that would give us better
   > output for
   > LIST.READU that they wouldn't mind sharing?
   I use this on UV:
   0021: EXECUTE 'LIST.READU', OUT > READU.LIST
   0022: DEL READU.LIST
   0023: READU.ARRAY = TRIM(READU.LIST)
   0024: CONVERT ' ' TO @VM IN READU.ARRAY
   0025: LINES = DCOUNT(READU.ARRAY,@AM)
   0026: QUIT = 0 ; CUR.LINE = 1
   0027: FOR I = 1 TO LINES UNTIL QUIT
   0028:   IF NUM(READU.ARRAY) AND READU.ARRAY # '' THEN
   0029: INODE.NO = TRIM(READU.ARRAY)
   0030: EXECUTE 'SH -c "ls -i | egrep ':INODE.NO:'"', OUT > FILENAME
   0031: IF FILENAME<1,1,1> # '' THEN
   0032:   FILENAME = FIELD(TRIM(FILENAME<1,1,1>),' ',2) 'L#6'
   0033:   INODE.POS1 = INDEX(READU.LIST,INODE.NO,1)
   0034:   INODE.POS2 = INODE.POS1 + LEN(INODE.NO)
   0035:   IF LEN(INODE.NO) = 9 THEN
   0036: INODE.POS2 += 1
   0037: FILENAME = ' ':FILENAME:' '
   0038:   END
   0039:   READU.LIST =
   READU.LIST[1,INODE.POS1-1]:FILENAME:READU.LIST[INODE.POS2,99]
   0040: END
   0041:   END
   0042:   PRINT READU.LIST
   0043:   CUR.LINE += 1
   0044:   IF CUR.LINE = 24 THEN
   0045: PRINT 'Press any key to continue...':
   0046: INPUT DATA.IO, 1
   0047: QUIT = DATA.IO = 'Q'
   0048: IF NOT(QUIT) THEN
   0049:   CUR.LINE = 0
   0050: END
   0051:   END
   0052: NEXT I
   0053: END
   The only caveat is that it can only report file names for the account
   you run it in.  Works well for us since all of our users work in a
   single account.
   -John
   ---
   u2-users mailing list
   u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Who uses Transaction Logging in Universe ???

2006-11-02 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
   Transaction  Logging  has  become  very  tunable  and  supports common
   file-level  commands  (check  out  the improvements made in 10.2!), so
   some of the "gotchas" mentioned can be made non-issues.
   Much  of  the  overhead  can  be "tuned away" by carefully testing and
   examining the uvconfig parameters, system disks, system kernel, etc. A
   little effort ahead of time goes a long way...

   Regards,

   LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
   Product Manager
   IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Data Servers
   [cid:_2_087965DC08796388004FDF598025721A]

   Tel: 303-773-7783  Fax: 303-773-5915
   Mobile: 720-341-4317 Tie-line: 656-7783
   External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2

   "Dan Fitzgerald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   11/02/2006 01:17 AM

 Please respond to
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

   To

   u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

   cc

  Subject

   RE: [U2] Who uses Transaction Logging in Universe ???

   It's  working  fine.  Pretty robust, a lot of the things I thought I'd
   have to
   script/configure/modify work right outta the box.
   Biggest  gotcha  -  if  any  of  your item sizes are larger than 500K,
   you'll have
   to run with larger log files, increasing your exposure.
   If you're not using transaction commits, it doesn't guarantee data
   integrity.
   There's a performance penalty, exacerbated by poorly sized files.
   >From: "Patricia Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   >Reply-To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   >To: 
   >Subject: [U2] Who uses Transaction Logging in Universe ???
   >Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:35:06 -0500
   >
   >I  am  investigating using transaction logging on our Universe DB. We
   are
   >running 10.1.17 on AIX 5.3...
   >
   >
   >
   >* Who uses it - Love it or hate it?
   >* Downsides/Upsides/Gotchyas!
   >* Any 3rd party alternatives?
   >* General Remarks
   >
   >
   >
   >I need the 411 that the Universe PDF neglects to tell you about -
   >
   >
   >
   >Thanks
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >Patricia M. Wilson
   >
   >MIS Programmer
   >
   >x 3095
   >
   >813.635.3095
   >
   >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   >---
   >u2-users mailing list
   >u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   >To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
   _
   Stay  in  touch  with  old friends and meet new ones with Windows Live
   Spaces
   http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwsp007001msn/direct/01/?href=http
   ://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.asp
   x&mkt=en-us
   ---
   u2-users mailing list
   u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] UniVerse Personal Editions

2006-08-31 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
   All,
   Only  the  two 10.1 servers were updated. There is no need to download
   the clients again until they are replaced with those from 10.2.

   Regards,

   LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
   Product Manager
   IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Data Servers
   [cid:_2_0A4857540A4855478B87872571DB]

   Tel: 303-773-7783  Fax: 303-773-5915
   Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 656-7783
   External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2

   Information On Demand conference
   2006-[cid:_2_0A486E080A486AC000478B87872571DB] 

   "jpb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   08/30/2006 03:10 PM

 Please respond to
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

   To

   

   cc

  Subject

   Re: [U2] UniVerse Personal Editions

   My bad, I found the problem. Was using an old link to the program.
   - Original Message -
   From: "jpb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   To: 
   Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 3:13 PM
   Subject: Re: [U2] UniVerse Personal Editions
   >I also tried the new UniAdmin and now It won't connect to my servers.
   One
   >is  the  PC I am on, another is our Linux server, and the last is our
   Solaris
   >test system. None will connect. What's up?
   > Jerry
   > - Original Message -
   > From: "Leroy Dreyfuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   > To: 
   > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 4:33 PM
   > Subject: [U2] UniVerse Personal Editions
   >
   >
   >>   All,
   >> Because   the  current  UniVerse  10.1.11 (Windows) and 10.1.12
   (Linux)
   >>   Personal  Editions  were  about  to  expire  (31 August 2006), we
   have
   >>   reloaded  them  with  a  new  expiration date. The updated copies
   will
   >>   expire  on  31  October  2006,  and  will be replaced by UniVerse
   10.2
   >> versions   about a month before then. If you are running either
   10.1.11
   >> or   10.1.12   Personal   Edition,   you   should  download and
   install the
   >>   replaced copies to avoid interruption.
   >>
   >>   Regards,
   >>
   >>   LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
   >>   Product Manager
   >>   IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Data Servers
   >>   [cid:_2_0BF4A3E80BF4A19400765456872571D9]
   >>
   >>   Tel: 303-773-7783  Fax: 303-773-5915
   >>   Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 656-7783
   >>   External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   >>   WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2
   >>
   >>   Information On Demand conference
   >>   2006-[cid:_2_0BF4BA9C0BF4B75400765456872571D9]
   >>
   >> [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]
   >>
   >> [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]
   >> ---
   >> u2-users mailing list
   >> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   >> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
   > ---
   > u2-users mailing list
   > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
   ---
   u2-users mailing list
   u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] UniVerse Personal Editions

2006-08-29 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
   All,
   Because  the  current  UniVerse  10.1.11 (Windows) and 10.1.12 (Linux)
   Personal  Editions  were  about  to  expire  (31 August 2006), we have
   reloaded  them  with  a  new  expiration date. The updated copies will
   expire  on  31  October  2006,  and  will be replaced by UniVerse 10.2
   versions  about a month before then. If you are running either 10.1.11
   or  10.1.12  Personal  Edition,  you  should  download and install the
   replaced copies to avoid interruption.

   Regards,

   LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
   Product Manager
   IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Data Servers
   [cid:_2_0BF4A3E80BF4A19400765456872571D9]

   Tel: 303-773-7783  Fax: 303-773-5915
   Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 656-7783
   External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2

   Information On Demand conference
   2006-[cid:_2_0BF4BA9C0BF4B75400765456872571D9] 

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] [UD] Is a file opened?

2006-01-03 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
   Use  FILEINFO(filevariable,0). It returns a 1 if the file variable has
   been assigned.
   Regards,

   LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
   Product Manager
   IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
   [cid:_2_10A2B7D010A2B57C0051F19F872570EB] Information   Management
   Software

   Tel: 303-773-7783  Fax: 303-773-5915
   Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 656-7783
   External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2

   "Bill Haskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   01/01/2006 04:16 PM

 Please respond to
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

   To

   

   cc

  Subject

   [U2] [UD] Is a file opened?

   How  can  I  tell  if  a file is open in UniData (in ECLTYPE P)?  I've
   tried the
   UNASSIGNED() function and this doesn't work under certain conditions.
   For  instance,  in some code I want to open a file if it already isn't
   opened.
   Normally I'd do the following:
   COMMON FileVariable  (or COMMON /FILES/ FileVariable)
   IF UNASSIGNED(FileVariable) THEN
 OPEN 'FileName' TO FileVariable ELSE DoSomethingElse
   END
   or, in other mvDbms I might: IF NOT(ASSIGNED(FileVariable))...
   Although  this  works  fine  in  UV  and  all other mvDbms products it
   doesn't work
   in  UniData.   It  appears  it's because defining a variable as COMMON
   actually
   assigns it a value (zero or empty depending on UDT.OPTIONS 15).
   Of course, when I alter the critical line above to:
   IF UNASSIGNED(FileVariable) OR FileVariable = 0 THEN ...
   then  if  the  variable  has actually been assigned the program aborts
   with the
   message:  "...Illegal  use  of  the file, select, cursor, BCI, Socket,
   HTTP,
   XML, SCTX ,MQS, SOAP or database variable.".
   Is  there a function I can use in UniData, anywhere in any program, to
   test
   if a file has been opened in common?
   As always, thanks.
   Bill
   ---
   u2-users mailing list
   u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Using Esc

2005-12-19 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
   Try using CHAR(27), which is the escape key by default.
   Regards,

   LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
   Product Manager
   IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
   [cid:_2_103D8C40103D89EC006797D3872570DC] Information   Management
   Software

   Tel: 303-773-7783  Fax: 303-773-5915
   Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 656-7783
   External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2

   "Brutzman, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   12/19/2005 11:22 AM

 Please respond to
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

   To

   "'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'" 

   cc

  Subject

   [U2]  Using Esc

   I  am  trying  to  add  functionality  for  the Escape Key in UniBasic
   program for
   end-users to edit record data
   with  Dynamic  Connect and UV.  Terminal emulation is AddsVP moving to
   VT-100.
   The following code does not behave as intended.
Esc = char(251)
begin case
  case Ans = ''   ;  null
  case Ans = Esc  ;  return
end   case
   On the screen displays the characters...^[  appear.
   Suggestions would be appreciated.
   --Bill
   ---
   u2-users mailing list
   u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] RE: [UV] uvdlockd command

2005-12-14 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
   The  -z  options  allows non-root users to start the daemon, though it
   will still require root to stop it.
   Regards,

   LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
   Product Manager
   IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
   [cid:_2_131B3FDC131B3D8800627E36872570D7] Information   Management
   Software

   Tel: 303-773-7783  Fax: 303-773-5915
   Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 656-7783
   External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2

   "Jacques G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   12/14/2005 10:00 AM

 Please respond to
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

   To

   u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

   cc

  Subject

   [U2] RE: [UV] uvdlockd command

   When I do:  uvdlockd -?  I see the following options:
   uvdlockd [options]

   --

   -t timerinterval timer to have daemon check
   for deadlocks
   -r res  resolution to
   use(0=Random;1=Youngest;2=Fewest Locks)
   -l log  location of the log file

   -query  requests a report of current status

   -victim sig identifies the signature of the victim
   to be aborted
   -p  performs a check on dead process
   cleanup
   -stop   shutdown the daemon

   NOTE:  The -query, -victim, and -stop options cannot
   be used in conjunction with
   the other options

   But when I check for processes using this program, I
   see the -z switch being used.  For example:
   uvdlockd -z -p -22781
   Anyone know what the -z option does ?
   __
   Do You Yahoo!?
   Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
   http://mail.yahoo.com
   ---
   u2-users mailing list
   u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] Linux to Windows

2005-11-13 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
   I am actually looking for feedback from someone that has actually made
   the  switch  from  Linux  to  Windows with U2. Feel free to contact me
   off-list if you like.
   Regards,

   LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
   Product Manager
   IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
   [cid:_2_0B648E700B648C4862CF872570B9] Information   Management
   Software

   Tel: 303-773-7783  Fax: 303-773-5915
   Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 656-7783
   External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Linux to Windows

2005-11-13 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
   Good feedback. Thanks David.
   Regards,

   LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
   Product Manager
   IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
   [cid:_2_11885728118854D40073FB29872570B8] Information   Management
   Software

   Tel: 303-773-7783  Fax: 303-773-5915
   Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 656-7783
   External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2

   "David Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   11/13/2005 01:33 PM

 Please respond to
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

   To

   

   cc

  Subject

   RE: [U2] Linux to Windows

   Hi LeRoy
   If the partner is planning to implement on Windows boxes, the question
   is
   how  much  control  they  can get of the server.  We run into problems
   where
   another  application  runs  on  the box, and I have had 10 minute jobs
   blow out
   to  45  minutes.  It is important to ensure they have remote access to
   the box
   and  they  should  look  at using the remote administrator features of
   Win2003
   that  runs  as  a  terminal  server  session.   If  they  are going to
   implement in
   small  business  sites  that  do  not  have  qualified IT support, and
   particularly
   over  a  large  geographic  base,  they  should  really  explore small
   business
   server  (This is cheaper, easier to setup for non technical staff (and
   those
   with less windows experience) and there are a number of 3rd party
   consultants that can support this).
   An  alternative  to this is also to host the application centrally and
   allow
   customers  to access the application through the internet through VPN.
This
   is  an  area  we are investigating and due to the nature of U2 this is
   easier
   to achieve than with other database products.
   Regards
   David Jordan
   Managing Consultant
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   DACONO Holdings Pty Ltd
   www.dacono.com.au
   PO Box 909
   Lane Cove
   NSW 2066
   Australia
   Phn: 61 2 9418 8320
   Fax: 61 2 9427 2371
   ---
   u2-users mailing list
   u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Linux to Windows

2005-11-12 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
   David,
   Thanks very much.
   Regards,

   LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
   Product Manager
   IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
   [cid:_2_0B61A4340B61A1E000173825872570B8] Information   Management
   Software

   Tel: 303-773-7783  Fax: 303-773-5915
   Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 656-7783
   External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2

   "David Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   11/12/2005 08:19 PM

 Please respond to
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

   To

   

   cc

  Subject

   RE: [U2] Linux to Windows

   Hi LeRoy
   We  moved  a  UniVerse  application  from  Sun  to  Windows and had no
   problems.  We
   avoid using and O/S functionality so our system is transportable from
   Windows,  unix,  linux.  We use our own import and export utilities to
   move
   between platforms so we don't run into the bit order.
   With  Windows  2003  there  is  a  funny, where the RPC and telnet can
   suddenly
   drop  out  and  to  avoid  it  we  set in Windows Services to make the
   services
   interactive with the desktop.
   Our  application  is  not  a  transaction  intensive system, but we do
   heavily use
   select  lists and this seems to perform better on Windows than the Sun
   Box.
   The  one  thing  we  look forward to is for the UniVerse Administrator
   does not
   to  have  to be the administrator login, many large sites would prefer
   this to
   be case, particularly with server consolidation that is going on.
   Regards
   David Jordan
   Managing Consultant
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   DACONO Holdings Pty Ltd
   www.dacono.com.au
   PO Box 909
   Lane Cove
   NSW 2066
   Australia
   Phn: 61 2 9418 8320
   Fax: 61 2 9427 2371
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   On   Behalf   Of   Leroy
   Dreyfuss
   Sent: Sunday, 13 November 2005 5:56 AM
   To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   Subject: [U2] Linux to Windows
 Hello group,
  If   anyone   has   moved   their  U2-based  solution from Linux to
   Windows,
  please   contact   me  directly.  I  have  a partner that is asking
   this
  question   and would like to know if was difficult or not to do so,
   and
 whether or not you were successful. I will not be sharing names.
 Regards,
 LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
 Product Manager
 IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
[cid:_2_113C9694113C94400067EB67872570B7] Information
   Management
 Software
 Tel: 303-773-7783  Fax: 303-773-5915
 Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 656-7783
 External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]
   ---
   u2-users mailing list
   u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
   ---
   u2-users mailing list
   u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Linux to Windows

2005-11-12 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
   Hi Allen,
   Thanks  for the note. The partner would be deploying their application
   across  hundreds, and eventually thousands, of sites. Because of this,
   MKS isn't an option. I have MKS myself, and I am really glad I do, but
   this  partner  has never developed under Windows before, nor have they
   deployed anything but a Windows desktop to their customers. This would
   be a change for them, and they are curious about any pitfalls.
   Thanks again.
   Regards,

   LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
   Product Manager
   IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
   [cid:_2_0E7187740E71852000170A4D872570B8] Information   Management
   Software

   Tel: 303-773-7783  Fax: 303-773-5915
   Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 656-7783
   External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2

   "Allen E. Elwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   11/12/2005 02:40 PM

 Please respond to
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

   To

   

   cc

  Subject

   RE: [U2] Linux to Windows

   Hi Leroy,
   I  did an upgrade on Manage-2000 (runs on Unidata) at the same time as
   moving
   from  an alpha box running Unix to a four processor win-nt back in the
   90's.
   The  biggest issue was setting up printers and logons (and me learning
   NT).
   The  reason  *why* it was so easy was that there is this great product
   that
   allows  Unix (and now Linux) scripts, commands - INCLUDING tars, to be
   run in
   a windows environment.
   http://www.mks.com/press/releases/040503a.shtml
   ROI  (now owned by Epicor) had quite a few scripts written in Unix and
   using
   this  tool  there  was  really  zero  conversion issues other than the
   printers
   and  logons.   Really,  the code changes from Manage-2000 version 6 to
   6.2 was
   **much** more work (about a half a year).
   I  am  not  affiliated with MKS in any way, shape, or form, so this is
   not an
   adver, but I do highly recommend anyone that wants to minimize their
   problems at least check this product out before rewriting all your
   scripts
   Almost  forgot,  there  was the problem of NT and Unix having the high
   order
   bit  flipped  (or  something  like that) and I cannot remember for the
   life of
   me  whether  we  used FTP to move the data, or Explorer and then run a
   utility
   to correct it.  Just drawing a blank on that one...
   Allen
   www.tortillafc.com
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Leroy Dreyfuss
   Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 10:56
   To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   Subject: [U2] Linux to Windows
 Hello group,
  If   anyone   has   moved   their  U2-based  solution from Linux to
   Windows,
  please   contact   me  directly.  I  have  a partner that is asking
   this
  question   and would like to know if was difficult or not to do so,
   and
 whether or not you were successful. I will not be sharing names.
 Regards,
 LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
 Product Manager
 IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
[cid:_2_113C9694113C94400067EB67872570B7] Information
   Management
 Software
 Tel: 303-773-7783  Fax: 303-773-5915
 Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 656-7783
 External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]
   ---
   u2-users mailing list
   u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
   ---
   u2-users mailing list
   u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Linux to Windows

2005-11-12 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
   Dave,
   It  doesn't matter which U2 database or version. The Linux the partner
   is  using  is  RHEL3/4 and they are asking about Windows 2003. For the
   sake of argument, let's not look at anything less than 9.6.x.
   Regards,

   LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
   Product Manager
   IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
   [cid:_2_0F5E55140F5E52C000168F05872570B8] Information   Management
   Software

   Tel: 303-773-7783  Fax: 303-773-5915
   Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 656-7783
   External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2

   "Dave Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   11/12/2005 02:03 PM

 Please respond to
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

   To

   

   cc

  Subject

   Re: [U2] Linux to Windows

   LeRoy,
   Are you talking about Universe or Unidata?
   From what version to what version?
   Rgds,
   Dave
   Dave Taylor
   President
   Sysmark Information Systems, Inc.
   49 Aspen Way
   Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274
   800-SYSMARK (800-797-6275)
   (O) 310-544-1974
   (P) 800-339-1497
   (F) 310-377-3550
   Your Source for Integrated EDI Translation and DataSync Integration
   www.sysmarkinfo.com
   - Original Message -
   From: "Leroy Dreyfuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   To: 
   Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 10:55 AM
   Subject: [U2] Linux to Windows
   >Hello group,
   >  If   anyone   has  moved  their U2-based solution from Linux to
   Windows,
   >please  contact  me  directly.  I  have  a partner that is asking
   this
   >  question   and would like to know if was difficult or not to do
   so, and
   >whether or not you were successful. I will not be sharing names.
   >Regards,
   >
   >LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
   >Product Manager
   >IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
   >[cid:_2_113C9694113C94400067EB67872570B7] Information
   Management
   >Software
   >
   >Tel: 303-773-7783  Fax: 303-773-5915
   >Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 656-7783
   >External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   >
   > [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]
   > ---
   > u2-users mailing list
   > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
   ---
   u2-users mailing list
   u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Linux to Windows

2005-11-12 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
   Chuck,
   What  about porting an app from Linux, which you have been using for a
   long  time,  to  Windows,  which  you  haven't  used  yet? That is the
   situation  I am asking about. Did you encounter any issues doing that?
   Why did you choose Windows?
   Regards,

   LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
   Product Manager
   IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
   [cid:_2_0FFAAED80FFAACB00016B6FE872570B8] Information   Management
   Software

   Tel: 303-773-7783  Fax: 303-773-5915
   Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 656-7783
   External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2

   Results <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   11/12/2005 02:34 PM

 Please respond to
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

   To

   u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

   cc

  Subject

   Re: [U2] Linux to Windows

   Leroy,
   I'm doing a conversion, using Nucleus, right now. We are freely
   moving software between Linux and Wndows during the development. Since
   we  have  UniVerse  set  up  on  both machines, we are just moving the
   content
   of files. It has been effortless and transparent. You can feel free to
   share my name.
  - Chuck
   Leroy Dreyfuss wrote:
   >   Hello group,
   > If   anyone   has   moved  their U2-based solution from Linux to
   Windows,  please   contact   me  directly.  I  have  a partner that is
   asking  this  question  and would like to know if was difficult or not
   to  do  so,  and  whether  or  not  you were successful. I will not be
   sharing names.
   >
   >
   - Charles Barouch
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   (718) 762-3884 x 1
   P. O. Box 540957,
   Linden Hill, NY 11354-0957
   www.KeyAlly.com
   ---
   u2-users mailing list
   u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
   To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] Linux to Windows

2005-11-12 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
   Hello group,
   If  anyone  has  moved  their U2-based solution from Linux to Windows,
   please  contact  me  directly.  I  have  a partner that is asking this
   question  and would like to know if was difficult or not to do so, and
   whether or not you were successful. I will not be sharing names.
   Regards,

   LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
   Product Manager
   IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
   [cid:_2_113C9694113C94400067EB67872570B7] Information   Management
   Software

   Tel: 303-773-7783  Fax: 303-773-5915
   Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 656-7783
   External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects - database license expired

2005-05-21 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
There is no requirement to purchase the UVCS package. It is free. It's just
with 10.x, you get it pre-installed & licensed, while at 9.6 and lower you
don't.


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 Don Kibbey
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 com>   To
 Sent by:  u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  cc
 stserver.u2ug.org
   Subject
   Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects - database
 05/20/2005 01:26  license expired
 PM


 Please respond to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org






> >I'm trying to connect to a UV 9.6.2 database on a Linux server and

I believe that at 9.6 an additional license was required to use
UniObjects.  You probably don't have that license installed.  Upgrade
to 10.X, buy an additional license for UniObjects or download one of
the PE additions and install it on your pc for playtime fun...
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
pic17271.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] New U2 Personal Editions posted

2005-05-08 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Folks,

UniVerse 10.1.11 PE has been posted to the Website, as well as UniData
6.1.9. Both are for Windows. UniData 6.1.10 PE for Linux (x86) has also
been posted. UniVerse 10.1 PE for Linux (x86) will be posted in a week or
two, when it's ready.

You will find them at http://www.ibm.com/software/u2/, where under the
Highlights section is a graphic that links to the U2 Trials and Betas site.


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [Fwd: Re: [U2] IBM Licensing Requirement - MQ Series]

2005-04-22 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
It's both. You pose a scenario that have users interactively working with
an MQ-based iPhantom. The only reason why that is acceptable is that it is
in fact, an iPhantom charging a license. You will find that you will need
more than one to serve many requests because the response times will not be
desirable when many users are waiting for MQ itself to deliver the messages
from a single U2 MQ iPhantom. More than one would be needed, and each one
costs a license. Indeed, MQ could be viewed as multiplexing type of
technology, but the reality is that it's not practical to use MQ that way.

So, if you use MQ like a connection pool, that is not desirable
performance-wise, and is a breach of your license agreement. But if you use
it for applications to communicate (which is the purpose of MQ), you are
not violating the license agreement. Applications would send messages back
and forth as a result of something a user initiated and wasn't waiting for
an answer.




Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 Craig Bennett
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 au>To
 Sent by:  u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  cc
 stserver.u2ug.org
   Subject
   Re: [Fwd: Re: [U2] IBM Licensing
 04/22/2005 12:47  Requirement - MQ Series]
 AM


 Please respond to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org






Leroy,

I don't understand.

First you say:
 >However, remember that if you are using MQ as a
 >means of users communicating with the database in the scenario you
 >describe, you are using MQ as a de facto connection pool and violating
 >your U2 license agreement if you don't have the equivalent number of U2

and then you say:
> Message queues in the user scenario you suggest also does not violate the
> agreement because they consume licenses (as an iPhantom);  users are
> interactively working the U2 database, regardless of the method.

Which is it? if I use MQ series to pass messages to and from my web
application or an atm or whatever to support an application user to
access the database am I neccessarily correctly licensed because the
phantoms are each using a db licence or do I have to worry about the
number of users putting requests on the queue in relation to the number
of phantoms servicing the queue?


thanks,


Craig
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
pic24478.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [Fwd: Re: [U2] IBM Licensing Requirement - MQ Series]

2005-04-21 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
We would not consider and ATM a user because, like the license agreement
points out, the connection from that type of device would need to be
persistent one. But then MQ is probably not the most efficient technology
to use since ATMs typically wait for a response and the response time needs
to be fast.

Message queues in the user scenario you suggest also does not violate the
agreement because they consume licenses (as an iPhantom);  users are
interactively working the U2 database, regardless of the method.

Perhaps if you look at it this way, you'll understand where I am coming
from: Any access to the database should charge a license. The database by
itself does not have a cost. Access to it does, in the form of a user
license. Phantoms were designed to provide a means perform batch processing
in the background. But if you use them to perform work interactively with a
user, it becomes no different than a telnet connection or UO session.


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 Craig Bennett
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 au>To
 Sent by:  u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  cc
 stserver.u2ug.org
   Subject
   Re: [Fwd: Re: [U2] IBM Licensing
 04/21/2005 08:39  Requirement - MQ Series]
 PM


 Please respond to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org






Leroy,

> Since MQ is designed to be send and forget technology, and because you
can
> have multiple listeners, there is nothing to stop you, and is, in fact,
the
> purpose of the technology. However, remember that if you are using MQ as
a
> means of users communicating with the database in the scenario you
> describe, you are using MQ as a de facto connection pool and violating
your
> U2 license agreement if you don't have the equivalent number of U2
licenses
> that match the interactive users.

Thats OK, we don't do it; but thankyou for clarifying that using MQ
Series in this way would violate the licence.

Can you suggest how you would ask an enterprise customer to audit
licence usage in an environment where MQ series is used to connect
multiple systems (only one of which is running U2) and allowing them to
be queried from any system -- including systems running user interactive
  sessions on an AS/400 and an S/390. If they were a bank and an ATM
could request or update an account balance from U2 via MQ Series do we
need to include these users too?

If they has N non U2 systems each supporting M users all of which could
potentially send a simultaneous MQ request to U2 as part of their
application session do they need M*N licences?


Craig
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
pic14422.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [Fwd: Re: [U2] IBM Licensing Requirement - MQ Series] {Unclassified}

2005-04-21 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
>Aha!
>And what is the "equivalent number of U2 licenses " that I would need to
>buy?
>If I had an internet-facing U2 system for example - which I don't - how
>could I work out this number?  In theory it could be millions of
>prospective users, and while I'm sure IBM would love to sell me a
>million-seat license, I'm equally sure I couldn't afford it!

>LeRoy, I'm not trying to be difficult here, I'm genuinely interested in
>how, if I were back in the IT Manager role, I would license my U2
>database in a way that meet both IBM's reasonable expectation that they
>should receive a fair return for the use of their IP, and my
>management's equally reasonable expectation that I should provide the
>service they require at a cost that the business can sustain.

The answer here is RedBack. It is designed for exactly this purpose. We
have customers servicing millions of requests per day on a hundred or less
Webshares.

For those that want to use UO.NET or UniObjects for Java, we will be
releasing connection pooling in UniData 7.1 at the end of June. It is
separately licensed and does not consume database seats. This will follow
for UniVerse at its next major release.


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [Fwd: Re: [U2] IBM Licensing Requirement - MQ Series]

2005-04-21 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Craig,

Since MQ is designed to be send and forget technology, and because you can
have multiple listeners, there is nothing to stop you, and is, in fact, the
purpose of the technology. However, remember that if you are using MQ as a
means of users communicating with the database in the scenario you
describe, you are using MQ as a de facto connection pool and violating your
U2 license agreement if you don't have the equivalent number of U2 licenses
that match the interactive users.

With RedBack we do not require that, but that is because RedBack is
specifically designed to provide connection pooling. And let's not forget
that RB Webshares cost a bit more than database users.


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 Craig Bennett
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 au>To
 Sent by:  u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  cc
 stserver.u2ug.org
   Subject
   [Fwd: Re: [U2] IBM Licensing
 04/21/2005 05:07  Requirement - MQ Series]
 PM


 Please respond to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org






 >Since the process can only wait for messages one queue at a time, it is
 >assumed that if multiple message queues are used, multiple phantom
 >processes may be required, thus consuming additional licenses.

But multiple mq processes can listen to the same queue, so you can run
10 phantoms listening to MY.MQ.REQUEST.QUEUE and have 100 web sessions
putting messages to this queue (while listening to MY.MQ.RESPONSE.QUEUE
where the mq server processes place their responses).

You then use the msgid field to identify a request/response pair and all
of a sudden you have a way of running many more http application
sessions than concurrent phantoms.

This design pattern has been in the MQ series examples for at least 6
years.

Last time I checked, an MQ capacity unit (to run the MQ series server,
bought from the websphere part of IBM not the U2 part) was about twice
the price of a redback webshare, but I think you could make it do a lot
more work.


Craig
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
pic03468.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] IBM Licensing Requirement - MQ Series

2005-04-21 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
>It's like trying to plug a hole in a dike with a pickle.
>What's to stop someone from simply setting up one device to act as the
>phantom user and then funneling all requests through that device ?  There
would be
>no way to tell if one user had 10 sessions and was just "really busy" or
if you
>were creating 10 pseudo-phantoms.  And it would consume just the one
license.

When talking about a device serving multiple requests and only using one U2
process, that is a violation of the International Program License
Agreement. The agreement states the following:
"Program licenses for Programs used in conjunction with multiplexing
products (except for intermittently connected devices such as bar code
scanners), must equal Sessions or Devices, as applicable, and calculated at
the multiplexing front-end."

Our partners have similar wording in their contracts with us.

When talking about MQ- that is what it is for essentially. A single message
queue can serve multiple message. So one U2 MQ phantom can listen, process,
and respond to those multiple messages. That's the purpose. The difference
is that a user license is consumed now where it wasn't before. The reason?
Because it is assumed that human beings are placing those messages into the
message queue and perhaps waiting for a response or some action to occur at
some point.

Since the process can only wait for messages one queue at a time, it is
assumed that if multiple message queues are used, multiple phantom
processes may be required, thus consuming additional licenses.

If we are talking about server sockets, pooling can be served by a single
phantom, but is limited by system resources as to how many it can serve
efficiently. Multiple may be required, thus additional licenses are
consumed. Again, this is due to the assumption that a user is interactively
working through the socket.

Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Removing bad item

2005-04-07 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Sara,

You can delete it by using quotation marks. Double-quotes should do the
trick.


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 Sara Burns
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 cTrust.co.nz>  To
 Sent by:  "U2 List
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org)"
 stserver.u2ug.org 
cc

 04/07/2005 08:20  Subject
 PM[U2] Removing bad item


 Please respond to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org






I know Ray Wurlod had a way of achieving this - but I cannot find it.

UniVerse 9.6 on NT has a record with a % in the ID.  I can select the item
but not delete it, or do anything else with it.

Does anyone have Ray's nice little SQL statement which will rid me of this
record.  I suspect it got corrupted when an unscheduled halt happened.

Thanks in advance
Sara Burns

Sara Burns (SEB)


Integration Manager

Public Trust
Phone: +64 (04) 474-3841 (DDI)

Mobile: 027 457 5974
<  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

Information contained in this communication is confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient the information should not be used, disclosed,
copied
or commercialised. The information is not necessarily the views nor the
official communication of Public Trust. No guarantee or representation is
made that the communication is free of errors, virus or interference.



Public Trust is proud to be principal sponsor of The Carer, on stage in New
Zealand
15 March  7 May 2005.

Visit www.publictrust.co.nz for more details.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
pic20573.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] **** The Windows Versions of U2 Personal Editions Are Live ****

2005-04-01 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
You must me... I am the poor soul that answers them for the databases and
RedBack...


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 "Alfke, Colin"
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 son.com>   To
 Sent by:  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  cc
 stserver.u2ug.org
   Subject
   RE: [U2]  The Windows Versions
 04/01/2005 03:06  of U2 Personal Editions Are
 PMLive 


 Please respond to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org






For April Fools Day - you sure are taking me literally ;-)

Lots of patience. Just trying to think of the poor folks at u2ask us that
will have to field all the calls. I want them to have lots of time to
answer mine :-).

Have a great weekend.

Colin Alfke


>-Original Message-
>From: Leroy Dreyfuss
>
>It'll be changed- sheesh... no one has any patience!
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
pic24348.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] **** The Windows Versions of U2 Personal Editions Are Live ****

2005-04-01 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
It'll be changed- sheesh... no one has any patience!


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 "Alfke, Colin"
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 son.com>   To
 Sent by:  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  cc
 stserver.u2ug.org
   Subject
   RE: [U2]  The Windows Versions
 04/01/2005 11:43  of U2 Personal Editions AreLive
 AM


 Please respond to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org






Sorry, I don't expect the personal editions in the matrix.

My point was only that the page (
https://www-927.ibm.com/software/data/u2/support/u2techconnect/matrix.asp)
has a notice that they are not available (Notice: U2 Personal Editions have
been temporarily removed from this site. We expect to make the personal
editions of the latest versions of U2 databases available in early 2005.
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have any questions.).

I just like everything to be consistent

Colin Alfke

>-Original Message-
>From:Leroy Dreyfuss
>
>Colin,
>
>I am not sure I will put the personal editions in the product
>matrix as it
>is tied to U2BC and that system cannot dispense them or track them.
>
>U2TechConnect will have the new link after 6PM Mountain this evening
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
pic31440.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] **** The Windows Versions of U2 Personal Editions Are Live ****

2005-04-01 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Colin,

I am not sure I will put the personal editions in the product matrix as it
is tied to U2BC and that system cannot dispense them or track them.

U2TechConnect will have the new link after 6PM Mountain this evening


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 "Alfke, Colin"
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 son.com>   To
 Sent by:  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  cc
 stserver.u2ug.org
   Subject
   RE: [U2]  The Windows Versions
 04/01/2005 06:23  of U2 Personal Editions Are  Live
 AM


 Please respond to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org






That's great Leroy.

It's good that you sent the link. The techconnect and availability matrix
pages still state they are not available...

Colin Alfke

>-Original Message-
>From: Leroy Dreyfuss
>
>Dear All,
>
>UniVerse 10.1.10 Personal Edition and UniData 6.1.7 Personal
>Edition are
>now live! You can find them on the IBM's official Trials &
>betas website.
>You can find them by following this URL:
>http://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/download/search.jsp?go=y&r
s=u2trials.
You will need to create an IBM user ID if you don't already have one.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
pic18998.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] **** The Windows Versions of U2 Personal Editions Are Live ****

2005-04-01 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
UniAdmin is on the 10.A clients, also found at that link.


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 "Jerry Banker"
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ted.org>   To
 Sent by:  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  cc
 stserver.u2ug.org
   Subject
   Re: [U2]  The Windows Versions
 04/01/2005 07:50  of U2 Personal Editions Are  Live
 AM


 Please respond to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org






I installed the new version on my PC but now I can't get to it with the
Universe Admin (release 2.0). Do I need to get a newer version of the
Admin?

- Original Message -
From: "Leroy Dreyfuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 4:36 PM
Subject: [U2]  The Windows Versions of U2 Personal Editions Are Live



Dear All,

UniVerse 10.1.10 Personal Edition and UniData 6.1.7 Personal Edition are
now live! You can find them on the IBM's official Trials & betas website.
You can find them by following this URL:
http://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/download/search.jsp?go=y&rs=u2trials.
You will need to create an IBM user ID if you don't already have one.

Thanks to everyone for their patience!


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
pic15302.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] **** The Windows Versions of U2 Personal Editions Are Live ****

2005-03-31 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Dear All,

UniVerse 10.1.10 Personal Edition and UniData 6.1.7 Personal Edition are
now live! You can find them on the IBM's official Trials & betas website.
You can find them by following this URL:
http://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/download/search.jsp?go=y&rs=u2trials.
You will need to create an IBM user ID if you don't already have one.

Thanks to everyone for their patience!


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] uv pe

2005-02-17 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
John,

We are contractually bound to work though our valued business partners. We
do appreciate your loyalty, we really do. However, your contracts are with
your Master VAR. We happily assist our Master VARs and direct partners with
technical information. They in turn provide that information to you in the
form of technical support and training (if they offer it).

Here in the North America, we have some Master VARs, but generally we work
with partners directly. In other regions, they may sell more through
distributors and/or Master VARs. It has been this way for a very long time.

Work with your Master VAR and they'll work with us.


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 "John Kent"
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 m.au>  To
 Sent by:  "U2Users"
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 stserver.u2ug.org  cc

   Subject
 02/16/2005 07:06  Re: [U2] uv pe
 PM


 Please respond to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org






Kevin,
as far as i know there are only 2 in Australia and we are turned down
by
IBM not by my our master var

Good product, bad support and embarassing when your clients start
complaining about IBM

jak
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin P Lynch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 10:46 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe


> jak,
> perhaps you need a better master var.
>
> Lester,
> one thing I would ask though is
> why the Knowledgebase portion of techconnect is protected,
> is there some reason that ordinary website users can't look up old info ?
>
> kevin lynch
> The Systems House
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Kent
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 5:19 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] uv pe
>
> What a joke Leroy
>
> I cant get access to Tech connect as we get our universe licenses through
> a
> master var This annoys us plus our client sites with inhouse programmers
>
> Its hard to defend IBM when they treat you like this
>
> jak
> - Original Message -
> From: "Leroy Dreyfuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 4:05 PM
> Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe
>
>
>> They are coming. We haven't broken any promises. The quarter is only
half
>> over.
>>
>> I would have thought a fair number of you folks would have downloaded
>> earlier versions by now as they were on the U2TechConnect Website for a
>> couple of years. We know you all want the latest and greatest features
we
>> have to experiment with, and you'll have them with just a little
>> patience.
>> Because they are free evaluation copies, we are required to package them
>> a
>> bit differently, and the U2 group was not the only group involved in the
>> process. We, too, had to wait.
>>
>> They are nearly ready to be placed on the Web again, and we do regret
the
>> time it has taken to get this far. We will be sure to announce their
>> arrival as soon as they are ready.
>>
>> Thanks again for waiting.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
>> Product Manager
>> IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
>> IBM Information Management Software
>> Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
>> Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
>> External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2
>>
>>
>>
>> "Marc Harbeson"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> .com>
To
>> Sent by:  ,
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> stserver.u2ug.org
cc
>>
>>
Subject
>> 02/15/2005 09:28  RE: [U2] uv pe
>> PM
>>
>>
>> Please respond to
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>er.u2ug.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> I was so mad.  I had just sent the email to IBM asking them where PE
>> was just a few days ago and got put off again...  till march

Re: [U2] uv pe

2005-02-17 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
IBM isn't treating you unfairly, John. We sell through business partners
and they act according to their own business models and contractual
obligations with their clients as well as with their vendors. For technical
information, your reseller (in your case, your Master VAR) would be the
responsible party to provide it- that is the agreement your business has
with your reseller. That is the agreement they have with us.

A very good way to obtain technical information is to attend our annual
technical conferences. An excellent (and quicker) way is to post your
questions here on the u2-users list server, run by the U2 Users Group. This
is a great community of very knowledgeable and helpful individuals.

Having said that, U2TechConnect did not prevent you from accessing the
personal editions. Anyone, including those folks that do not work for a
business using U2 products could download them. That was the point.




Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 "John Kent"
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 m.au>  To
 Sent by:  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  cc
 stserver.u2ug.org
   Subject
   Re: [U2] uv pe
 02/16/2005 03:19
 PM


 Please respond to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org






What a joke Leroy

I cant get access to Tech connect as we get our universe licenses through a

master var
This annoys us plus our client sites with inhouse programmers

Its hard to defend IBM when they treat you like this

jak
- Original Message -
From: "Leroy Dreyfuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 4:05 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe


> They are coming. We haven't broken any promises. The quarter is only half
> over.
>
> I would have thought a fair number of you folks would have downloaded
> earlier versions by now as they were on the U2TechConnect Website for a
> couple of years. We know you all want the latest and greatest features we
> have to experiment with, and you'll have them with just a little
patience.
> Because they are free evaluation copies, we are required to package them
a
> bit differently, and the U2 group was not the only group involved in the
> process. We, too, had to wait.
>
> They are nearly ready to be placed on the Web again, and we do regret the
> time it has taken to get this far. We will be sure to announce their
> arrival as soon as they are ready.
>
> Thanks again for waiting.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
> Product Manager
> IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
> IBM Information Management Software
> Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
> Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
> External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2
>
>
>
> "Marc Harbeson"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> .com>  To
> Sent by:  ,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> stserver.u2ug.org  cc
>
>   Subject
> 02/15/2005 09:28  RE: [U2] uv pe
> PM
>
>
> Please respond to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>er.u2ug.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> :-)
>
> I was so mad.  I had just sent the email to IBM asking them where PE
> was just a few days ago and got put off again...  till march.
>
> This crap is beyond silly...   I can download all kinds of PE versions of
> Oracle 
>
> Have I lit a big enough fire yet?  Where's the gas!?!?
>
> LOL  MOVE IT IBM!!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Bruce Nichol
> Sent: Tue 2/15/2005 9:32 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Cc:
> Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe
>
>
>
> Goo'day,
>
> HeHe.
> At 20:24 15/02/05 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >IBM's inability to deliver development tools ON TIME makes
> myself wander
>
> Obviously a typo, but I can't help myself.(sorry!)
>

RE: [U2] uv pe

2005-02-17 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Exactly. You have the right to use the software for personal development
use, but it not to distribute it. It's free of charge but that doesn't
imply it's freeware.


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 Andrew Lakeland
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 Sent by:   cc
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 stserver.u2ug.org Subject
   RE: [U2] uv pe

 02/16/2005 12:51
 PM


 Please respond to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org






Sorry did not see that, to many emails to read properly,  just trying to
help.
What was the reason.  Distribution rights?

-Original Message-
From: Adrian Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 February 2005 19:02
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe

But as IBM posted earlier you're not allowed to give that to anyone.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Lakeland
Sent: 16 February 2005 13:30
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe

If someone needs a copy of PE,   I have version 10.01,  it's a 13mb
files.

andy

-Original Message-
From: Adrian Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 February 2005 11:37
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe

It might be an "Urban Myth" but what I heard was that it was very easy
to
remove the licensing/modulo restrictions on PE and give yourself a free
unlimited used version of Universe. Given the lengths that some people
seem
to
go to avoid paying license fees (hundreds of phantoms etc etc) I
wouldn't be
suprised and that would explain why they won't repost the older
versions.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Craig Bennett
Sent: Wed 16/02/2005 05:52
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] uv pe



Leroy,

 > They are nearly ready to be placed on the Web again, and we do regret
the
 > time it has taken to get this far. We will be sure to announce their
 > arrival as soon as they are ready.

would it be possible to leave the older versions up?
That way if someone quickly want to test something on an older U2
version than the current release, there might be a chance that they
could download it.

It would also mean there was always a version available to download even
if it wasn't the very latest :)


Craig
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for
the
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated.  If you are not
the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others
this
message or any attachment.  Please also notify the sender by replying to
this
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and
any
copies of it.  Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the
official
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor
endorsed
by
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by
the
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian
Securities
and Investments Commission.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which
had a
name of winmail.dat]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
pic16470.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] uv pe

2005-02-17 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Craig,

It wasn't that we just wanted to update them, we had to remove them for
legal reasons. I cannot go into the issues specifically, but suffice it to
say we had to make some changes and obtain certain approvals so that we
could have them on the Internet again. They will be hosted in another
location within our Website, and full details will be announced publically
as soon as we are able.


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 Craig Bennett
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 au>To
 Sent by:  u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  cc
 stserver.u2ug.org
   Subject
   Re: [U2] uv pe
 02/15/2005 10:52
 PM


 Please respond to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org






Leroy,

 > They are nearly ready to be placed on the Web again, and we do regret
the
 > time it has taken to get this far. We will be sure to announce their
 > arrival as soon as they are ready.

would it be possible to leave the older versions up?
That way if someone quickly want to test something on an older U2
version than the current release, there might be a chance that they
could download it.

It would also mean there was always a version available to download even
if it wasn't the very latest :)


Craig
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
pic00824.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] FW: [UD] 6.0PE on SuSE 9.1?

2005-02-15 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Kevin,

This happens from time to time with Linux. This not only happens with U2,
but other software products as well, especially with some JREs. The kernel
you are using has not been tested within U2 as yet. This has happened with
RedHat 9.0 as well, and RedHat did document a workaround in their release
notes when they shipped 9.0. I imagine the same applies to SuSE.

We haven't tested U2 with SuSE for Intel yet, but will ill in the next few
months.

The issue seems to be an incompatibility with the new Linux NPTL (Native
POSIX Thread Library). A similar issue was reported to the MQ group and
here is what they said:
























 The release notes for Red Hat 9 contain information about new POSIX threads
libraries that are
 shipped with Red Hat 9. Here is a quote:

 "Red Hat Linux 9 includes the Native POSIX Thread Library (NPTL), a new
implementation of POSIX
 threads for Linux."
 also
 "Applications that are known to have problems using NPTL include:
 - Sun JRE prior to version 1.4.1
 - IBM JRE
 We have scheduled some testing but we can not currently make any commitments
about the length
 of time it will take to complete testing. We must make it clear we have not
yet decided on a
 policy on whether we will support NPTL before the next release of MQ. (See
'Related Information
 ' further down in this item for an update). You are welcome to raise a
requirement using the
 normal processes, in which you can tell us the importance of this issue to
yourself.

 In the meantime, we would suggest you investigate Red Hat's suggested work
around, also
 documented in the Red Hat 9 release notes:


   "If an application does not work properly with NPTL, it can be run
using the old
   LinuxThreads implementation by setting the following environment
variable:
   LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=
   The following versions are available at the time of this posting:
   - 2.4.1 - Linuxthreads with floating stacks
   - 2.2.5 - Linuxthreads without floating stacks"
   There may be other versions of the Linux RED HAT product available.
Please choose the
   "kernel-version" appropriate to your environment.









Hope this helps.

Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 "Kevin King"
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ne.com>To
 Sent by:  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  cc
 stserver.u2ug.org
   Subject
   [U2] FW: [UD] 6.0PE on SuSE 9.1?
 02/15/2005 04:20
 PM


 Please respond to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org






This is a repost.  I did not see it come through the list earlier.

---

I have an zip of udt 6.0 PE that I'm trying to install on SuSE 9.1 w/
glibc 2.3.3.97.  Installation goes off without a hitch, but when I try
to start udt, the following message is displayed:


 ../udt: relocation error: ../udt: symbol errno version GLIBC_2.0 not
defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference.

It sounds like this install version is incompatible with this version
of glibc, so am I out-of-luck?  Or is there an installation available
that would work on this platform?


-Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PrecisOnline.com
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
pic02278.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] uv pe

2005-02-15 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
They are coming. We haven't broken any promises. The quarter is only half
over.

I would have thought a fair number of you folks would have downloaded
earlier versions by now as they were on the U2TechConnect Website for a
couple of years. We know you all want the latest and greatest features we
have to experiment with, and you'll have them with just a little patience.
Because they are free evaluation copies, we are required to package them a
bit differently, and the U2 group was not the only group involved in the
process. We, too, had to wait.

They are nearly ready to be placed on the Web again, and we do regret the
time it has taken to get this far. We will be sure to announce their
arrival as soon as they are ready.

Thanks again for waiting.


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 "Marc Harbeson"
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 .com>  To
 Sent by:  ,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 stserver.u2ug.org  cc

   Subject
 02/15/2005 09:28  RE: [U2] uv pe
 PM


 Please respond to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org






:-)

I was so mad.  I had just sent the email to IBM asking them where PE
was just a few days ago and got put off again...  till march.

This crap is beyond silly...   I can download all kinds of PE versions of
Oracle 

Have I lit a big enough fire yet?  Where's the gas!?!?

LOL  MOVE IT IBM!!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Bruce Nichol
Sent: Tue 2/15/2005 9:32 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Cc:
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe



 Goo'day,

 HeHe.
 At 20:24 15/02/05 -0500, you wrote:

 >
 >
 >IBM's inability to deliver development tools ON TIME makes
myself wander

 Obviously a typo, but I can't help myself.(sorry!)

 We "wandered" too.to a different MV...

 >--
 >No virus found in this incoming message.
 >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 >Version: 7.0.306 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date:
14/02/05

 Regards,

 Bruce Nichol
 Talon Computer Services
 ALBURYNSW 2640
 Australia

 http://www.taloncs.com.au

 Tel: +61 (0)411149636
 Fax: +61 (0)260232119

 If it ain't broke, fix it till it is!


 --
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.306 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date:
14/02/05




 --
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.306 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date:
14/02/05
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
pic20894.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] uv pe

2005-02-15 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
No, it wouldn't be legal to redistribute them in whole or in part.


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent by:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  To
 stserver.u2ug.org u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
cc

 02/15/2005 06:52  Subject
 PMRE: [U2] uv pe


 Please respond to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org






Marc Harbeson wrote: "To summarize my message to IBM:  CRAP, OR GET OFF THE
POT!!!  QUIT TELLING US IT WILL BE READY NEXT MONTH!"

To quote Willie Wonka "Open your mouth a little wider when you speak".  But
on a sidenote, IF some hypothetical person were to still have a download of
PE could they redistribute it ?  I mean legally and all?
Thanks
Will
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
pic06400.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger

2005-02-02 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Upgrade to the most current release for your platform and you'll find that
is no longer a problem.


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 "Mitchell,
 Stewart"
  "'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'"
 Sent by:  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  cc
 stserver.u2ug.org
   Subject
   RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
 02/02/2005 03:17
 PM


 Please respond to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org






Mike,

The line numbers get messed up in RAID if you have an inline comment after
the include.

This buggers the line numbers

$INCLUDE ARINCLUDE AR.MASTER  ;*In line comment

and this doesn't

$INCLUDE ARINCLUDE AR.MASTER


Get rid of the in line comment and the line numbers will be correct.

Regards,
Stewart

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Farrant
Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2005 1:28
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger


Talking of debuggers, can anyone remind me how the $INCLUDE s can mess
up the line numbers displayed within the RAID debugger.

I had a solution to this once which I seem to remember had something to
do with the configuration or placement of the $INCLUDE lines in the
source code.

I look forward to any response

Thanks

Mike Farrant
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


**
This email and any attachments are confidential. They may contain legally
privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy,
use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete the
original message and all copies. We do not accept liability in connection
with computer virus, data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised
access or unauthorised amendment.
**
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
pic10855.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] [UV] Run phantom as another user

2005-01-26 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
>From the UV 10.0.19 patchlist file:

Issue  Short Description
-  -
3766 In order to run a phantom process as a different user, an
 enhancement has been made to the PHANTOM command. The
 syntax is as follows:

 PHANTOM [BRIEF] [SQUAWK] command -U username
[password]

 When you are logged in as root, you can specify -U and the
 username to run the phantom process as a different user. On
 Windows platforms, you must also specify the password for the
 username.



Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM DB2 Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 "HENDERSON MIKE,
 MR"
 
 Sent by:   cc
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 stserver.u2ug.org Subject
   Unclassified RE: [U2] [UV] Run
   phantom as another user
 01/26/2005 11:18
 AM


 Please respond to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org






Oh good, it's not just me!

I too remember something coming out about it being a new feature (in
10.1 I think), but I can't find anything in my IBM or U2UG archives
about it either now.

Have the IBM people stopped lurking on this list?  I'd have expected
them to come back on this by now.


Mike

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matthews
Sent: Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:11
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Run phantom as another user

I can't seem to find it now but I'm sure I read in the release notes for
one of the new releases that a user name can be specified at the command
line when launching a phantom now.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Buss, Troy
(Logitek Systems)
Sent: 25 January 2005 02:20
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UV] Run phantom as another user

Is there a way to run a phantom process as another user using the
PHANTOM command?

[snip]
The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence
Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or
distribute this message or the information in it.

If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
pic02833.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] [UV] Device Licensing

2005-01-20 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Dianne,

Assuming you have a version of Accuterm that supports U2 Device Licensing,
you can run bin/uvlictool from the OS command line to see. An example using
my laptop:

C:\IBM\UV>bin\uvlictool
Device licensing is in effect.
No. Pid, Package  Device name IP address  Device sub-key
1   3532  lfdjrlaptop2192.168.  0.101

2076
1 license seats are in use.
24 license seats are available.


C:\IBM\UV>

Note there are two PIDs, but only one IP address and one license consumed.
This was a test using two Dynamic Connect telnet sessions.


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM DB2 Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 Dianne Ackerman
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 m> To
 Sent by:  U2 List Server
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 stserver.u2ug.org  cc

   Subject
 01/20/2005 12:21  [U2] [UV] Device Licensing
 PM


 Please respond to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org






Could someone tell me how to "test" whether device license is running?
I've opened a session with accuterm and then opened a second session.
When I do a LISTU the final count does include both sessions, which
would make me think that device licensing is not available.  But when I
do a CONFIG, it displays "Device licensing is in effect".  Is that a
conflict or is the LISTU not the way to check it?
Thanks!
-Dianne
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
pic16170.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] AE on UniVerse

2004-10-29 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
AE was ported to UV at release 9.6, but only for UNIX. I ported it to
Windows in 10.1.

>Hey all,
>I'd like to run AE (the UniData line editor) on UniVerse .. The source
code
>doesn't come with UniData .. Does anyone out there (maybe IBM?) have the
>source code available so that I can port it over?
>
>-Chuck
>---

We do not ship the source on UV either.


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM DB2 Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] How do I get the Universe Version number from the server

2004-10-20 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Peter,

>From within TCL, use .L RELLEVEL to display the version and flavor, from
the OS command line, cd to the 'uv' directory and type bin/uv -version
(UNIX) or bin\uv -version (Windows). If the uv or UniVerse bin directory is
in your path, then uv -version is sufficient.

Recent versions of 10.0 and 10.1 can display the build number by using uv
-buildno.


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM DB2 Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2



 "peter watson"
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 comeholidays.com>  To
 Sent by:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  cc
 stserver.u2ug.org
   Subject
   [U2] How do I get the Universe
 10/20/2004 09:37  Version number from the server
 PM


 Please respond to
 u2-users






How do I get the Universe Version number from the server

The information in this electronic mail message is Confidential and may be
legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressees. Access to this internet
electronic mail message by anyone else is unauthorized.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken
in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. The sender believes
that this E-mail and any attachments were free
of any virus, worm, Trojan horse, and/or malicious code when sent.
This message and its attachments could have been infected during
transmission. By reading the message and opening any
attachments, the recipient accepts full responsibility for taking
protective and remedial action about viruses and other
defects. The sender's employer is not liable for any loss or damage arising
in any way from this message or its attachments.
-VRG3a-
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of pic29122.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] UniSession.connect error

2004-09-13 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Note that what Mike refers to is only for Windows. UNIX users should start
the service in the background and use something like this: unirpcd -d9 >
rpc.out 2>&1 from a UNIX prompt.


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM DB2 Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line -770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2

Don't miss out on the IBM DB2 Information Management Technical Conference
September 19-24, 2004 - Las Vegas, NV



 "HENDERSON
 MICHAEL MR"
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Sent by:   cc
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 stserver.u2ug.org Subject
   RE: Unclassified RE: [U2]
   UniSession.connect error
 09/13/2004 04:34
 PM


 Please respond to
 u2-users






Bob,

>From the UniVerse 10.1.4 Release Notes:

Issue
Number Short Description
-- -
32480Beginning at this release, logging is available for the
 UniRPC services.

 To enable logging for the unirpc32.dll, you must define the
 logging level by setting the UNIRPC_DEBUG_LEVEL environment
variable.
 In addition, you must set the UNIRPC_DEBUG_LOGFILE environment
 variable to define the log file name.

 Logging is enabled for unirpc.exe by passing arguments to the
 service, as shown in the following example:

 -d9 c:\temp\unirpcd.log


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Little
Sent: Tuesday, 14 September 2004 03:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] UniSession.connect error

[snip]

To All:
Is there any way to get unirpcd to log it's activity to a file?  I've
tried nohup /usr/ibm/unishared/unirpc/unirpcd > /tmp/unirpcd.out 2>&1 &
but nothing gets dumped.  Maybe I'm expecting the wrong thing?
The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence
Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or
distribute this message or the information in it.

If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of pic25328.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] XML DOM. HOW TO GET XDOMGetNodeValue ?

2004-09-02 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Have you tried using XMLGetError() to get the error code and message? If
you use it after each function call, you will always have the reason for
any failure encountered available to you. That should help in your
diagnosis.


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM DB2 Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line -770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2

Don't miss out on the IBM DB2 Information Management Technical Conference
September 19-24, 2004 - Las Vegas, NV



 "Rajesh Menon"
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 C.com> To
 Sent by:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  cc
 stserver.u2ug.org
   Subject
   [U2] XML DOM. HOW TO GET
 09/02/2004 07:34  XDOMGetNodeValue ?
 PM


 Please respond to
 u2-users






Hello,

I am trying to read a simple XML file and get the node values using basic a
routine (uv 10.1)

XML file looks like,

 RAJESH
 MENON


The basic routine is:

STATUS = XDOMOpen(XMLFILENAME,XML.FROM.FILE,mydom)
STATUS = XDOMLocate(mydom,"NAME","",N1HANDLE)
STATUS = XDOMLocateNode(N1HANDLE, XDOM.CHILD, XDOM.FIRST.CHILD,
XDOM.ELEMENT.NODE, N2HANDLE)
STATUS = XDOMGetNodeName(N2HANDLE, MYNODENAME)
CRT "STATUS = ":STATUS:", NODE NAME ":MYNODENAME:
STATUS = XDOMGetNodeValue(N2HANDLE, MYNODEVALUE)
CRT "STATUS = ":STATUS:", NODE VALUE ":MYNODEVALUE

When I run the program, first CRT command shows "STATUS = 0 and NODENAME =
FIRSTNAME.

Second CRT shows, STATUS = -1 , NODEVALUE =

Why I am not getting any values here? What I am doing wrong?

Thanks
Rajesh
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of pic29185.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] U2 .Net Information

2004-08-31 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
>Is 'we' IBM or just the U2 side?  Googling "site:www.ibm.com .net data
>provider" returned a page saying...

>"IBMs integration efforts have earned DB2 the status of Microsoft Gold
>Certified Partner and enrollment in the Visual Studio .NET Integration
>Program. DB2 UDB also recently met the .NET Connected criteria."

>Perhaps you should ask the DB2 guys if you've got .NET 100% covered with
>UO.NET or if there's anything else to look at.

Actually, this was fully reviewed with several IBM Software Group
development teams before we began the project ourselves. Your comments do
not address the Designer Tool from VS.NET, and that is what I am referring
to. DB2 does not offer a provider certified for this tool- they cannot- as
MS will only support Oracle and their own SQL Server (follow the link I
provided and you will see for yourself). However, we have, DB2 has (and you
can too) written our own code as opposed to letting the Designer Tool do
it, and our provider works just fine under .NET.

BTW: When I say 'we', I am referring to the U2 group.


Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM DB2 Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line -770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2

Don't miss out on the IBM DB2 Information Management Technical Conference
September 19-24, 2004 - Las Vegas, NV



 "Simon Lewington"
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 e.com> To
 Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  cc
 stserver.u2ug.org
   Subject
   Re: [U2] U2 .Net Information
 08/31/2004 03:01
 AM


 Please respond to
 u2-users






"Leroy Dreyfuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The only item we are aware of that might affect ADO.NET is in a published
> article from Microsoft. I have included the link below. It deals with
using
> third party OLEDB providers with Visual Studio .NET Designer Tool. Here
is
> the link: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;811241

Is 'we' IBM or just the U2 side?  Googling "site:www.ibm.com .net data
provider" returned a page saying...

"IBMs integration efforts have earned DB2 the status of Microsoft Gold
Certified Partner and enrollment in the Visual Studio .NET Integration
Program. DB2 UDB also recently met the .NET Connected criteria."

Perhaps you should ask the DB2 guys if you've got .NET 100% covered with
UO.NET or if there's anything else to look at.

Simon
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of pic03708.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] U2 .Net Information

2004-08-30 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
>Are we going to be able to get it at the IBM DB2 Information Management
>Technical Conference?

At our conference, you will receive plenty of information on the subject.
You will get plenty of information, but you must order new copies of
UniData 6.1 or Universe 10.1 to receive it. It is not a separate offering
any more than the original UniObjects is. In fact, both are included on the
client CD. UO.NET is bundled with the databases.

Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM DB2 Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line -770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2

Don't miss out on the IBM DB2 Information Management Technical Conference
September 19-24, 2004 - Las Vegas, NV



 "Karjala Koponen"
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 press.com> To
 Sent by:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  cc
 stserver.u2ug.org
   Subject
   Re: [U2] U2 .Net Information
 08/30/2004 10:31
 AM


 Please respond to
 u2-users






LeRoy,

Are we going to be able to get it at the IBM DB2 Information Management
Technical Conference?

Karjala


>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/30/2004 9:43:04 AM >>>
>Is UO.NET included with the current version of uvpe that is available for
>download ?
>The online description doesn't mention it at all and the exact download
>version, as always, is not given other than that it is version 10.

No. As I  have previously mentioned, it can only be obtained with 10.1 of
UV and 6.1 of UD. I have also mentioned that we are working on posting the
new PE versions. As part of IBM, it is not as easy as one might think.

Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM DB2 Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line -770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2

Don't miss out on the IBM DB2 Information Management Technical Conference
September 19-24, 2004 - Las Vegas, NV
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of graycol.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of pic11136.gif]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of ecblank.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] U2 .Net Information

2004-08-29 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
>Sorry to keep banging on about this. But are you saying that the changes
are
>ALL client side? If so which versions of UV e.g. 10.1.0, 9.x will UO.NET
>work with?

UniData and UniVerse would not require server-side changes (check out the
link to the whitepaper I previously posted). We have not tested UO.NET
UniData 5.2 & older releases, nor have we tested it with UniVerse 9.6 &
older releases, thus we will certify them with UO.NET. However, UniData
6.0.x & 6.1.x and UniVerse 10.0.x & 10.1.x have been tested and therefore
are certified.

While the new client CD will ship with any 10.1 or 6.1, the older clients
that shipped with 6.0 and 10.0 still ship (and will continue to ship) with
those releases.

Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM DB2 Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line -770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2

Don't miss out on the IBM DB2 Information Management Technical Conference
September 19-24, 2004 - Las Vegas, NV
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] U2 .Net Information

2004-08-28 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
The only item we are aware of that might affect ADO.NET is in a published
article from Microsoft. I have included the link below. It deals with using
third party OLEDB providers with Visual Studio .NET Designer Tool. Here is
the link: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;811241

Yes, UO.NET is 100% managed code. You can learn more about UO.NET by
following this link:
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/data/u2/pubs/whitepapers/ibmu2-microsoftn
et.pdf


I believe your questions will be answered in this whitepaper. We will have
plenty of good information about this topic at the IBM technical conference
in Las Vegas this year. You may wish to register and take a look if you
can.

Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
IBM DB2 Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line -770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2

Don't miss out on the IBM DB2 Information Management Technical Conference
September 19-24, 2004 - Las Vegas, NV




>Where can I find some detailed documentation about the library?  I'd like
to
>know if and how it supports ADO.NET, how and when licenses are consumed,
>etc.  Is it 100% managed code or does any of it rely on the Win32 API?
I'm
>wondering if anyone at IBM has tried to compile the source with Mono yet
>over *nix.

Thanks.
Tony
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of graycol.gif]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


  1   2   >