Bill, mv.NET from BlueFinity would be using standard UniObjects and as such, could not take advantage of connection pooling from U2 (CP). There may be licensing implications with U2 that require one to acquire CP licenses to use mv.NET, though.
In any case, it is a simple matter of changing the license configuration (and paying the appropriate fee, of course) of either UniData or UniVerse to enable it. If you find the documentation from IBM not exactly what you need in terms of using CP in your application, there is a white paper on their (IBM U2) Website at: ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/data/u2/pubs/whitepapers/ibmu2-microsoftnet.pdf You might find the white paper useful. Regards, LeRoy -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 11:49 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance Phil: A quick example is I'm trying to find out how their Connection Pool license works. Noone seems to know nor can I find out how this integrates with mv.Net using UO.NET as the connection. I can't find out how to configure a connection pool, monitor the connections, or anything else. [sigh] :-( Bill ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
