[Ubnt_users] AF11 designations

[Clay Stewart]

I see occasionally submissions for AF=11FX links with an Emissions
Designation of 79M6D7D, which is basically 80Mhz CW. Since the AF-11FX has
a limit of 56Mhz CW, what are these companies doing?
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 900 disconnect issue

[Clay Stewart]

On over 15 900 APs, new ones and ones in field for years. It seems to have
started at OS 6.17 and then, no matter what OS you try, the APs will drop
all customers sometime multiple times a day, or every other day or so.
Nothing changed and on multiple networks and counties.

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020, 16:59 Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> Hardware failure it sounds like.  If it simply doesn't associate until it
> is rebooted it's either software (which is unlikely if you've tried various
> versions) or hardware.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 4:56 PM Clay Stewart 
> wrote:
>
>> For several weeks now, or longer, random 900 APs drop all customers and
>> have to be rebooted to get them back. Setting WatchDog is NOT a solution,
>> it only has customers interrupted often, and not down till a reboot.
>>
>> It does not seem to matter which OS we use.
>>
>> Has anyone found a solution?
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubnt_users Digest, Vol 1873, Issue 1

[Clay Stewart]

Nope, WPA2 change did nothing to cure issue.

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 3:50 PM Clay Stewart 
wrote:

> Thanks, Phil, will give it a try. Maybe Swan not using WPA2 between AP and
> CPE?
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 1:32 PM Phil Curnutt  wrote:
>
>> I have a couple of 900 APs running on v 6.2.0 running fine, but not until
>> I disabled WPA2.  If you check the radio log you will find that the with
>> WPA2 enabled the stations are forced to re-authorize hourly or daily (can't
>> remember which) and occasionally they don't.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:17 AM RickG  wrote:
>>
>>> I forgot to put YMMV ;P
>>> I'm truly glad for you Shawn. I saw an huge increase in disconnects &
>>> drops from the AP to the CPE.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 7:47 PM Shawn C. Peppers <
>>> videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have tons of isp clients running the latest fw on legacy xm devices
>>>> and they work perfectly fine.
>>>>
>>>> :: // Shawn Peppers
>>>> :: // DirectlinkAdmin.com
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 22, 2020, at 6:25 PM, RickG  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> Airmax Radios, especially XMs do NOT like AirOS 6.0+
>>>> I've still got my UBNT 900s running 5.6.3.!
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 12:05 PM Jerry Head II <
>>>> jerryh...@blountbroadband.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Definitely a firmware issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> v6.0.4-sign.31631 (XM
>>>>>
>>>>> Is the last stable firmware for these radios.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/22/2020 11:00 AM, ubnt_users-requ...@wispa.org wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Send Ubnt_users mailing list submissions to
>>>>>   ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>>>
>>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>>>   http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>>>   ubnt_users-requ...@wispa.org
>>>>>
>>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>>>   ubnt_users-ow...@wispa.org
>>>>>
>>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>>> than "Re: Contents of Ubnt_users digest..."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Today's Topics:
>>>>>
>>>>>1. 900 disconnect issue (Clay Stewart)
>>>>>2. Re: 900 disconnect issue (Josh Luthman)
>>>>>3. Re: 900 disconnect issue (Tommy Adams)
>>>>>4. Re: 900 disconnect issue (Robert Dillon)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Message: 1
>>>>> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:59:42 -0500
>>>>> From: Clay Stewart  
>>>>> Subject: [Ubnt_users] 900 disconnect issue
>>>>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group  
>>>>> Message-ID:
>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>>>
>>>>> For several weeks now, or longer, random 900 APs drop all customers and
>>>>> have to be rebooted to get them back. Setting WatchDog is NOT a solution,
>>>>> it only has customers interrupted often, and not down till a reboot.
>>>>>
>>>>> It does not seem to matter which OS we use.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone found a solution?
>>>>> -- next part --
>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>> URL: 
>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/private/ubnt_users/attachments/20200121/c93761ae/attachment-0001.html
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Message: 2
>>>>> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:58:48 -0500
>>>>> From: Josh Luthman  
>>>>> 
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 900 disconnect issue
>>>>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group  
>>>>> Message-ID:
>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>>>
>>>>> Hardware failure it sounds like.  If it simply doesn't associate until it
>>>>> is reboo

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubnt_users Digest, Vol 1873, Issue 1

[Clay Stewart]

Thanks, Phil, will give it a try. Maybe Swan not using WPA2 between AP and
CPE?

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 1:32 PM Phil Curnutt  wrote:

> I have a couple of 900 APs running on v 6.2.0 running fine, but not until
> I disabled WPA2.  If you check the radio log you will find that the with
> WPA2 enabled the stations are forced to re-authorize hourly or daily (can't
> remember which) and occasionally they don't.
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:17 AM RickG  wrote:
>
>> I forgot to put YMMV ;P
>> I'm truly glad for you Shawn. I saw an huge increase in disconnects &
>> drops from the AP to the CPE.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 7:47 PM Shawn C. Peppers <
>> videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I have tons of isp clients running the latest fw on legacy xm devices
>>> and they work perfectly fine.
>>>
>>> :: // Shawn Peppers
>>> :: // DirectlinkAdmin.com
>>>
>>> On Jan 22, 2020, at 6:25 PM, RickG  wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>> Airmax Radios, especially XMs do NOT like AirOS 6.0+
>>> I've still got my UBNT 900s running 5.6.3.!
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 12:05 PM Jerry Head II <
>>> jerryh...@blountbroadband.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Definitely a firmware issue.
>>>>
>>>> v6.0.4-sign.31631 (XM
>>>>
>>>> Is the last stable firmware for these radios.
>>>>
>>>> On 1/22/2020 11:00 AM, ubnt_users-requ...@wispa.org wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Send Ubnt_users mailing list submissions to
>>>>ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>>
>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>>ubnt_users-requ...@wispa.org
>>>>
>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>>ubnt_users-ow...@wispa.org
>>>>
>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>> than "Re: Contents of Ubnt_users digest..."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Today's Topics:
>>>>
>>>>1. 900 disconnect issue (Clay Stewart)
>>>>2. Re: 900 disconnect issue (Josh Luthman)
>>>>3. Re: 900 disconnect issue (Tommy Adams)
>>>>4. Re: 900 disconnect issue (Robert Dillon)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Message: 1
>>>> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:59:42 -0500
>>>> From: Clay Stewart  
>>>> Subject: [Ubnt_users] 900 disconnect issue
>>>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group  
>>>> Message-ID:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>>
>>>> For several weeks now, or longer, random 900 APs drop all customers and
>>>> have to be rebooted to get them back. Setting WatchDog is NOT a solution,
>>>> it only has customers interrupted often, and not down till a reboot.
>>>>
>>>> It does not seem to matter which OS we use.
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone found a solution?
>>>> -- next part --
>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>> URL: 
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/private/ubnt_users/attachments/20200121/c93761ae/attachment-0001.html
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Message: 2
>>>> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:58:48 -0500
>>>> From: Josh Luthman  
>>>> 
>>>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 900 disconnect issue
>>>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group  
>>>> Message-ID:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>>
>>>> Hardware failure it sounds like.  If it simply doesn't associate until it
>>>> is rebooted it's either software (which is unlikely if you've tried various
>>>> versions) or hardware.
>>>>
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 4:56 PM Clay Stewart  
>>>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>

[Ubnt_users] 900 disconnect issue

[Clay Stewart]

For several weeks now, or longer, random 900 APs drop all customers and
have to be rebooted to get them back. Setting WatchDog is NOT a solution,
it only has customers interrupted often, and not down till a reboot.

It does not seem to matter which OS we use.

Has anyone found a solution?
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] F-POE gen2 issue

[Clay Stewart]

It turned out to be a bad manufactured cat7 which pin 7 was missing. This
makes the cat7 run at 100Mbps! We use hundreds of these double-shielded
outdoorcat7s on our towers and never had an issue!

On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:59 AM Mimbres Communications 
wrote:

> What's it connected to on the copper side?  The F-POE does not support
> 10/100baseTX Ethernet.
>
> Is this an indoor or an outdoor application?
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 7:27 AM Clay Stewart 
> wrote:
>
>> Been working an issue for  couple days, thinking we had a fiber run issue
>> in new run, lateral, SFP, etc...
>>
>> But emulating the setup on a table, I find the issue is the gen2 is
>> connecting 1g on fiber end, and 100Mbps on cat5 side and NOT passing any
>> traffic.
>>
>> Anyone have any experience with this? We have dozens of 1st gens setup
>> for years with zero issues using same SFP and setup.
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] F-POE gen2 issue

[Clay Stewart]

Been working an issue for  couple days, thinking we had a fiber run issue
in new run, lateral, SFP, etc...

But emulating the setup on a table, I find the issue is the gen2 is
connecting 1g on fiber end, and 100Mbps on cat5 side and NOT passing any
traffic.

Anyone have any experience with this? We have dozens of 1st gens setup for
years with zero issues using same SFP and setup.
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AC rocket dish jumpers

[Clay Stewart]

Many, perhaps 10-12 units so far. Has caused big issues. Just had to send a
tower crew back out to complete an install by adding missing ant cables on
very large monopole. They went ahead and mounted dishes yesterday because
rope rigging was in place.

On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Jerry Head II <
jerryh...@blountbroadband.com> wrote:

> We have been shorted the jumpers on our last 4 AC Rocket Dishes, I am
> having trouble sourcing them and have run out of scavenged ones.
> Is anyone else having this problem?
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] Ospf and protected port edgepoint 16 switch

[Clay Stewart]

What is best method and code sample to split off 2 ports for OSPF?

Case is you are powering an AF5X upstream on port 4 and you have a router
on port 16 with OSPF and you want to isolate traffic from all other ports
to prevent OSPF loops and issues.

I read using protected ports is prefered over VLANs, but few years old.
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] EdgePoint and PowerBeam AC

[Clay Stewart]

I hate you Shawn! Yeah, someone had taken the new one out of the box,
played with VLANing and put it back in!

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Shawn C. Peppers <
videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sounds like vlan issues.
>
> :: // Shawn Peppers
> :: // DirectlinkAdmin.com
>
> > On Jul 13, 2018, at 6:56 PM, Clay Stewart 
> wrote:
> >
> > Having a Friday 300ft hissy fit.
> >
> > 2 different AC Gen2 PowerBeams, 2 new cables, 2 different 24vdc
> EdgePoint ports (5 and 6), get 1000Mbps connection with tx rx counts, but
> ni layer 2 or 3 connectivity.
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] EdgePoint and PowerBeam AC

[Clay Stewart]

No vlan, fresh new install, little programmed

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 8:16 PM Shawn C. Peppers <
videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sounds like vlan issues.
>
> :: // Shawn Peppers
> :: // DirectlinkAdmin.com
>
> > On Jul 13, 2018, at 6:56 PM, Clay Stewart 
> wrote:
> >
> > Having a Friday 300ft hissy fit.
> >
> > 2 different AC Gen2 PowerBeams, 2 new cables, 2 different 24vdc
> EdgePoint ports (5 and 6), get 1000Mbps connection with tx rx counts, but
> ni layer 2 or 3 connectivity.
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] EdgePoint and PowerBeam AC

[Clay Stewart]

Having a Friday 300ft hissy fit.

2 different AC Gen2 PowerBeams, 2 new cables, 2 different 24vdc EdgePoint
ports (5 and 6), get 1000Mbps connection with tx rx counts, but ni layer 2
or 3 connectivity.
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] Weak SSL PCI Compliance

[Clay Stewart]

Customer getting this on a core Edge Routerpro from a scan from Trustwave?
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNET 900Mhz

[Clay Stewart]

What to expect with the best of experiences. Expect 4-10Mbps in foliage and
at least 100' over treetops on a tower.  We have a bit of hill which makes
the difference for eight over the terrain. I would be hard press to deploy
in flat land with foliage. As with any frequency, it is Terrain, Terrain
Terrain... and height.

Get recommendations from someone who has similar terrain, as opinions will
always matter between those WISPs in various conditions.

If you have no pending competition in next 24-36 months and have customers
that can only be serviced via 900Mhz, then try it out.  That is enough time
to recover investment and make something.

I agree though, nothing has been done with 900Mhz in a long time, not even
a shielded radio like the TIs, or a better, lighter sector shielding which
costs wind load and weight issue for commercial leases.

We are converting from 900Mhz at a pace required for each market where
possible. But I expect we will have them for awhile in many spots. Hell, we
still have a few Alvarians collecting money!

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Clay Stewart 
wrote:

> You have to use Rocket Yagis with Shielded Sectors to make it work in
> foliage areas.
>
> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Ralf-Talking Head Productions <
> r...@thpi.net> wrote:
>
>> I am interested in Ubiquitie's 900Mhz radios and need real life
>> experience input.
>>
>> Do they cut through heavy pine trees?
>> What is the real distance I can archive through pine trees?
>> Does it have sufficient bandwidth throughput?
>>
>> I have 3 customers who would like to sign up. They are about one mile
>> away from the tower. The distance is through heavy pine trees about 80 to
>> 100 feet tall. Any suggestions?
>>
>> Thank you in advance for your reply.
>>
>>
>> *Ralf Gulf Wireless Inc. *
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNET 900Mhz

[Clay Stewart]

I guess I need to tell the several hundred subscribers on them for years to
cancel.

It is a tool in the radio box... just like any other, LTE, 2.4Ghz, 5.8Ghz,
2.5Ghz you grab the best tool for the unique terrain you deal with here
and there and tower attributes. There are no bad tools if it works
somewhere where others fail.

With those 900Mhz customers:

If I changed to 2.4Ghz or 5.8Ghz, I would lose 80% of them. LTE 3.65Ghz or
2.5Ghz maybe about a 30% lost or more. More micropops and LTE and 5.8Ghz is
the answer to 900Mhz... at a cost and risk on 3.65Ghz in 2020.


On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:16 AM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> Even then it doesn't really work well...
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Clay Stewart 
> wrote:
>
>> You have to use Rocket Yagis with Shielded Sectors to make it work in
>> foliage areas.
>>
>> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Ralf-Talking Head Productions <
>> r...@thpi.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I am interested in Ubiquitie's 900Mhz radios and need real life
>>> experience input.
>>>
>>> Do they cut through heavy pine trees?
>>> What is the real distance I can archive through pine trees?
>>> Does it have sufficient bandwidth throughput?
>>>
>>> I have 3 customers who would like to sign up. They are about one mile
>>> away from the tower. The distance is through heavy pine trees about 80 to
>>> 100 feet tall. Any suggestions?
>>>
>>> Thank you in advance for your reply.
>>>
>>>
>>> *Ralf Gulf Wireless Inc. *
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNET 900Mhz

[Clay Stewart]

You have to use Rocket Yagis with Shielded Sectors to make it work in
foliage areas.

On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Ralf-Talking Head Productions <
r...@thpi.net> wrote:

> I am interested in Ubiquitie's 900Mhz radios and need real life experience
> input.
>
> Do they cut through heavy pine trees?
> What is the real distance I can archive through pine trees?
> Does it have sufficient bandwidth throughput?
>
> I have 3 customers who would like to sign up. They are about one mile away
> from the tower. The distance is through heavy pine trees about 80 to 100
> feet tall. Any suggestions?
>
> Thank you in advance for your reply.
>
>
> *Ralf Gulf Wireless Inc. *
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] Airrouter

[Clay Stewart]

Since AirRouters are gone, and the new cubes are too poor in coverage and
you need an APP on cell phone to program them, for those who have been
using them, what are you going to for replacements that are as good as the
HP model AirRouter, and has that price point?
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] EP-S16

[Clay Stewart]

Most PSUs running at high end of voltage can cause noise. So be careful
there.

I wasn't making the voltage statement based on specs, based on experience.
If you 24VDCs drop off EP 16, while 48s stay on, you do not have enough
voltage. If you are getting packet loss on tower, turn down voltage to
54VDC, no more then 56.

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:42 PM, TJ Trout  wrote:

> Clay, this isn't true for the newer revision of the EP-S16 it's more like
> 39-58ish, check the spec sheet as they now actually conform to the spec
> sheet.
>
> You can't turn your +48V psu to 54v? Most supplies are adjustable (might
> need to open it) without using a dc-dc converter
>
> TJ
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Clay Stewart 
> wrote:
>
>> EP 16s MUST have power 53-56. preferably 54VDC. Less than 53 24VDC ports
>> will drop out. 57 or greater puts noise on the network.
>>
>>
>> I use Traco 48 360W din rail power supplies and a step up transformer to
>> 54VDC which has variable resistors to change power levels to adapt to the
>> length of cable run.
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Faisal Imtiaz 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> So.. FYI... Ceragon IP20c (ak 820? ) can be powered via Netonix 48VH
>>> IF you have a similar ability on the EP-S16, you should be able to power
>>> it.
>>> (FYI, it is the same 48VH that we use to power AF24's)
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>> http://www.snappytelecom.net
>>>
>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>>
>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> > From: "Kees H." 
>>> > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 8:47:25 AM
>>> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] EP-S16
>>>
>>> > Can it run a PTP820?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > -Original Message-
>>> > From: Shawn C. Peppers
>>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 7:22 PM
>>> > To: Ubiquiti Users Group
>>> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] EP-S16
>>> >
>>> > I use this exact setup on all my FM towers.  Works awesome...although i
>>> > still put them in a metal enclosure and put the cat5 in MC up on tower.
>>> >
>>> > :: // Shawn Peppers
>>> > :: // DirectlinkAdmin.com
>>> >
>>> >> On Mar 20, 2018, at 9:03 PM, Josh Luthman <
>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Have these been working well for people?
>>> >>
>>> >> I would absolutely love to hear they're the solution to our fiber+DC
>>> >> demands.
>>> >>
>>> >> Josh Luthman
>>> >> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> >> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> >> 1100 Wayne St
>>> >> Suite 1337
>>> >> Troy, OH 45373
>>> >> ___
>>> >> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> > ___
>>> > Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> >
>>> > ___
>>> > Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] EP-S16

[Clay Stewart]

EP 16s MUST have power 53-56. preferably 54VDC. Less than 53 24VDC ports
will drop out. 57 or greater puts noise on the network.


I use Traco 48 360W din rail power supplies and a step up transformer to
54VDC which has variable resistors to change power levels to adapt to the
length of cable run.

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Faisal Imtiaz 
wrote:

> So.. FYI... Ceragon IP20c (ak 820? ) can be powered via Netonix 48VH
> IF you have a similar ability on the EP-S16, you should be able to power
> it.
> (FYI, it is the same 48VH that we use to power AF24's)
>
> Regards.
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> http://www.snappytelecom.net
>
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Kees H." 
> > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 8:47:25 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] EP-S16
>
> > Can it run a PTP820?
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Shawn C. Peppers
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 7:22 PM
> > To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] EP-S16
> >
> > I use this exact setup on all my FM towers.  Works awesome...although i
> > still put them in a metal enclosure and put the cat5 in MC up on tower.
> >
> > :: // Shawn Peppers
> > :: // DirectlinkAdmin.com
> >
> >> On Mar 20, 2018, at 9:03 PM, Josh Luthman 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Have these been working well for people?
> >>
> >> I would absolutely love to hear they're the solution to our fiber+DC
> >> demands.
> >>
> >> Josh Luthman
> >> Office: 937-552-2340
> >> Direct: 937-552-2343
> >> 1100 Wayne St
> >> Suite 1337
> >> Troy, OH 45373
> >> ___
> >> Ubnt_users mailing list
> >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] google search issue

[Clay Stewart]

Yeah, new and weird issue for me. One house is ok, then another one cannot
get to google. Router tracert at fiber gets that error on the google IP,
most of time but not always. I put in a support ticket to upstream fiber
provider.

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 8:02 PM, RickG  wrote:

> Clay, working here if that helps. See attached.
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Clay Stewart 
> wrote:
>
>> I am getting reports from few customers that they cannot search
>> Google.com, page not foound, for last couple days. When traceroute is ran
>> from core router, Edgerouter Pro, that has been unchanged and in services
>> for years, I get the error below:
>>
>>
>>
>> Any help?
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -RickG
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] google search issue

[Clay Stewart]

I am getting reports from few customers that they cannot search Google.com,
page not foound, for last couple days. When traceroute is ran from core
router, Edgerouter Pro, that has been unchanged and in services for years,
I get the error below:



Any help?
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x radio on dishes

[Clay Stewart]

Less interference is you have other rockets or other interference (like a
gazillion Comcast hotspots).

On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> For electrical or mechanical reasons?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Oct 21, 2017 2:17 PM, "Clay Stewart"  wrote:
>
>> Yes for both, but I would put an X adapter kit on the RD-5G30 to get 45
>> degree polarity.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Josh Luthman <
>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Do these Ubnt dishes work (without modification) with the af5x radio?
>>>
>>> RD‑5G31‑AC
>>> RD-5G30
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Uneven Chains

[Clay Stewart]

99% time is interference. If 8> difference, you need to drop MCS to single
chain.

1% of time it is a bad ant wire... loosen, dirt or water.

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Rory Conaway 
wrote:

> I agree.  Canopy interference on a single polarity is not unusual.  We put
> up probably 100 of the nanobeams and didn’t see the issues you are
> describing.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Shawn C. Peppers
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 18, 2017 1:51 PM
>
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Uneven Chains
>
>
>
> I have had, many times, interference causing the chains to be off.
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
>
> Video Direct
>
> 866-680-8433 <(866)%20680-8433> Toll Free
>
> http://www.video-direct.tv
>
>
> On Oct 18, 2017, at 3:45 PM, Ethan E. Dee  wrote:
>
> This is not a 19 or 16.
>
> It is a 300 or 400 dish.
>
>
>
> On 10/18/2017 03:08 PM, Phil Curnutt wrote:
>
> The lobs on the 19 and 16 skittles are big and the beam is not centered,
> but I believe points downward.  They make horrible PtP's.  Alignment.
>
>
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Ethan E. Dee 
> wrote:
>
> What did you replace with?
>
>
>
> On 10/18/2017 01:05 PM, Chris J. Ruschmann wrote:
>
> Single polarity interference?
>
> Also, we ripped out all our nano beams because of this.
> --
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org 
>  on behalf of Josh Luthman
>  
> *Sent:* Monday, October 2, 2017 6:48:00 AM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Uneven Chains
>
>
>
> 7db difference suggests obstruction, alignment, path, etc
>
>
>
> Could always be device too.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <%28937%29%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <%28937%29%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>
> On Oct 2, 2017 8:46 AM, "Ethan E. Dee"  wrote:
>
> Can anyone help?
>
> No visual physical damage, we have tried alignment twice.
>
> Also changed the channel.
>
> No obstructions.
>
> Tried upgrading firmware.
>
> Never seen a difference in the chains that was this drastic.
>
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> *E.F.A. Project* , and is believed to be
> clean.
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
>
> Ubnt_users mailing list
>
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> --
> Ethan Dee
> Network Admin
> Globalvision
> 864 704 3600 <%28864%29%20704-3600>
> e...@globalvision.net
> 
> For Support:
> gv-supp...@globalvision.net
> 864 467 1333 <%28864%29%20467-1333>
>
> For Sales:
> sa...@globalvision.net
> 864 467 1333 <%28864%29%20467-1333>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
>
> Ubnt_users mailing list
>
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> --
> Ethan Dee
> Network Admin
> Globalvision
> 864 704 3600 <(864)%20704-3600>
> e...@globalvision.net
> 
> For Support:
> gv-supp...@globalvision.net
> 864 467 1333 <(864)%20467-1333>
>
> For Sales:
> sa...@globalvision.net
> 864 467 1333 <(864)%20467-1333>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x radio on dishes

[Clay Stewart]

Yes for both, but I would put an X adapter kit on the RD-5G30 to get 45
degree polarity.

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> Do these Ubnt dishes work (without modification) with the af5x radio?
>
> RD‑5G31‑AC
> RD-5G30
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Edgeswitch interfaces disabling

[Clay Stewart]

I would bet that after changing and saving a configuration (turning Able
on), then later a power cycle turns them back off. Because you have to hit
in upper right corner, Save Configuration, after hitting the bottom save on
any screen.

The upper right button blinks read font, but contrast is so bad you can
easily miss it.

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Shawn C. Peppers <
videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have noticed on a few different edgeswitches here and there on different
> networks I have worked on, the interface will simply just disable on its
> own.  Almost like its flood protection or something.  Not sure if maybe i
> need to enable storm recovery level or what.  Anyone else dealt with this
> and can save me some troubleshooting time.
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
> Video Direct
> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
> http://www.video-direct.tv
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Multiple APs with same SSID

[Clay Stewart]

In the past, this was an issue... stations would associate with poorer ones
for some reason.

That said, I have not tried it in 2-3 years.

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> I had an AP with a bit too many people on it and we put up a second AP to
> overlap the coverage.  The customers all rebooted and they've been
> appropriately connected to the correct AP for the last few days.
>
> Has anyone ever changed the SSIDs to make sure they're locked to the right
> AP?  (I'm not willing to do lock to MAC).  Or have you just left multiple
> APs with the same SSID and things turned out all right?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Af5x chain problems

[Clay Stewart]

Finger tight and they WILL come loose with temp changes. More then a 1/4
turn WILL crimp rubber washer or break/crack circuit board. The check to do
is, tighten tiny bit, try to remove with fingers, continue until you can
not loosen with fingers no matter how hard you try.

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> I have always done finger tight because I read somewhere in ancient times
> overtightening​ is really bad (not sure why).  It's it generally practiced
> to tighten a little bit, ie quarter turn?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Jun 14, 2017 10:50 PM, "Clay Stewart" 
> wrote:
>
>> Don't believe in coincidences rain drop side... moisture or loose
>> ant nut. Latter is more common as techs sometimes forget to wrench 1/4
>> turn... finger tight will loosen. Also, many radios come with the curl nut,
>> under the male antenna plug on radio, is loose and under it is a tiny
>> rubber washer. So what happens is you tighten ant cable properly, but the
>> under curl nut is up some micro meters, enough for moisture to get in. You
>> should check every radio's curl nut with a small pliers before attaching
>> ant cable.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Josh Luthman <
>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Any guesses?
>>>
>>> I replaced one side and jumpers.  Can't do anything in this heavy rain
>>> on the other side :(
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Af5x chain problems

[Clay Stewart]

Don't believe in coincidences rain drop side... moisture or loose
ant nut. Latter is more common as techs sometimes forget to wrench 1/4
turn... finger tight will loosen. Also, many radios come with the curl nut,
under the male antenna plug on radio, is loose and under it is a tiny
rubber washer. So what happens is you tighten ant cable properly, but the
under curl nut is up some micro meters, enough for moisture to get in. You
should check every radio's curl nut with a small pliers before attaching
ant cable.

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> Any guesses?
>
> I replaced one side and jumpers.  Can't do anything in this heavy rain on
> the other side :(
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0

[Clay Stewart]

6.0 was a double edge sword, it did improve some PtMs, but was dropping
clients randomly. Not seeing that with 6.0.3.

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Troy Gibson, Byhalia.net 
wrote:

> I am on 5.6.15 for both XM and XW.  So far working well.  Waiting on
> feedback from others on final version 6 updates to use as I did not see
> good results when I tested 6.0 so staying clear for now.
>
> Troy
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>
>  Original message 
> From: Jan-OOLLC 
> Date: 5/8/17 11:22 AM (GMT-05:00)
> To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0
>
> What is the safest best release to use as of right now?
>
> Jan V
>
> On 05/08/2017 05:33 AM, Clay Stewart wrote:
>
> v6.0.4 is out... have not switch yet here
>
> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Scott Lambert 
> wrote:
>
>> Just checking, did you also note a drop in modulation to match the drop
>> in modulation? Just want to make sure the RSSI drop you've observed is not
>> purely cosmetic.
>>
>> We are late adopters here, so no experience.
>>
>> On May 7, 2017 4:57:42 PM CDT, Nick Bright 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> v6.0 is said to have disassociation problems.
>>>
>>> I tested v6.0.3 on several sites with a mix of XM/XW (mostly XM) 2.4GHz
>>> hardware. Mostly RM2 AP units, some BulletM2 units. Mostly AirGrid and
>>> PowerBeam SMs.
>>>
>>> It was stable, with no disassociation issues, but we had a non-trivial
>>> number of SM units exhibit a *significant* drop in RX signal strength - but
>>> it was not consistent across the AP. We also showed experimentally that
>>> restoring that one SM unit back to 5.6.15 (leaving the AP unit at 6.0.3)
>>> restored the signal strength to the previous level. Some clients lost as
>>> much as 18dBm RX strength.
>>>
>>> We chose to go back to 5.6.15 at that point.
>>>
>>> On 5/6/2017 5:49 PM, Daniel Peoples wrote:
>>>
>>> I sent him XW and XM, if anyone else has other versions, send them over.
>>>
>>> *Daniel Peoples*
>>> Resonance Broadband
>>> *Resonancebroadband.com* <http://Resonancebroadband.com>
>>> 918-429-3620
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Eduardo  wrote:
>>>
>>>> We have currently using v5.6.6 and want to try v6.0.3, was told that
>>>> v6.0 was more stable.
>>>>
>>>> Does someone have the v6.0 firmware?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ---
>>> -  Nick Bright-
>>> -  Vice President of Technology   -
>>> -  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
>>> -  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 <%2%29%20332-1616> / Fax 620-331-0789 
>>> <%28620%29%20331-0789>  -
>>> -  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
>>> ---
>>> - Are your files safe?-
>>> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
>>> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
>>> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
>>> ---
>>>
>>> This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of 
>>> the addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may contain 
>>> information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure 
>>> under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
>>> message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, 
>>> distributing, disseminating or otherwise using this transmission. If you 
>>> have received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by 
>>> reply E-mail and immediately delete this message from your system.
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0

[Clay Stewart]

We are not experiencing any issue yet with 6.0.3, but will be trying 6.0.4
this week. 6.0 has disconnect issues.

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Jan-OOLLC 
wrote:

> What is the safest best release to use as of right now?
>
> Jan V
>
> On 05/08/2017 05:33 AM, Clay Stewart wrote:
>
> v6.0.4 is out... have not switch yet here
>
> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Scott Lambert 
> wrote:
>
>> Just checking, did you also note a drop in modulation to match the drop
>> in modulation? Just want to make sure the RSSI drop you've observed is not
>> purely cosmetic.
>>
>> We are late adopters here, so no experience.
>>
>> On May 7, 2017 4:57:42 PM CDT, Nick Bright 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> v6.0 is said to have disassociation problems.
>>>
>>> I tested v6.0.3 on several sites with a mix of XM/XW (mostly XM) 2.4GHz
>>> hardware. Mostly RM2 AP units, some BulletM2 units. Mostly AirGrid and
>>> PowerBeam SMs.
>>>
>>> It was stable, with no disassociation issues, but we had a non-trivial
>>> number of SM units exhibit a *significant* drop in RX signal strength - but
>>> it was not consistent across the AP. We also showed experimentally that
>>> restoring that one SM unit back to 5.6.15 (leaving the AP unit at 6.0.3)
>>> restored the signal strength to the previous level. Some clients lost as
>>> much as 18dBm RX strength.
>>>
>>> We chose to go back to 5.6.15 at that point.
>>>
>>> On 5/6/2017 5:49 PM, Daniel Peoples wrote:
>>>
>>> I sent him XW and XM, if anyone else has other versions, send them over.
>>>
>>> *Daniel Peoples*
>>> Resonance Broadband
>>> *Resonancebroadband.com* <http://Resonancebroadband.com>
>>> 918-429-3620
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Eduardo  wrote:
>>>
>>>> We have currently using v5.6.6 and want to try v6.0.3, was told that
>>>> v6.0 was more stable.
>>>>
>>>> Does someone have the v6.0 firmware?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ---
>>> -  Nick Bright-
>>> -  Vice President of Technology   -
>>> -  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
>>> -  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 <%2%29%20332-1616> / Fax 620-331-0789 
>>> <%28620%29%20331-0789>  -
>>> -  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
>>> ---
>>> - Are your files safe?-
>>> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
>>> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
>>> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
>>> ---
>>>
>>> This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of 
>>> the addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may contain 
>>> information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure 
>>> under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
>>> message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, 
>>> distributing, disseminating or otherwise using this transmission. If you 
>>> have received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by 
>>> reply E-mail and immediately delete this message from your system.
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0

[Clay Stewart]

v6.0.4 is out... have not switch yet here

On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Scott Lambert 
wrote:

> Just checking, did you also note a drop in modulation to match the drop in
> modulation? Just want to make sure the RSSI drop you've observed is not
> purely cosmetic.
>
> We are late adopters here, so no experience.
>
> On May 7, 2017 4:57:42 PM CDT, Nick Bright  wrote:
>>
>> v6.0 is said to have disassociation problems.
>>
>> I tested v6.0.3 on several sites with a mix of XM/XW (mostly XM) 2.4GHz
>> hardware. Mostly RM2 AP units, some BulletM2 units. Mostly AirGrid and
>> PowerBeam SMs.
>>
>> It was stable, with no disassociation issues, but we had a non-trivial
>> number of SM units exhibit a *significant* drop in RX signal strength - but
>> it was not consistent across the AP. We also showed experimentally that
>> restoring that one SM unit back to 5.6.15 (leaving the AP unit at 6.0.3)
>> restored the signal strength to the previous level. Some clients lost as
>> much as 18dBm RX strength.
>>
>> We chose to go back to 5.6.15 at that point.
>>
>> On 5/6/2017 5:49 PM, Daniel Peoples wrote:
>>
>> I sent him XW and XM, if anyone else has other versions, send them over.
>>
>> *Daniel Peoples*
>> Resonance Broadband
>> *Resonancebroadband.com* 
>> 918-429-3620
>>
>>
>> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Eduardo  wrote:
>>
>>> We have currently using v5.6.6 and want to try v6.0.3, was told that
>>> v6.0 was more stable.
>>>
>>> Does someone have the v6.0 firmware?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ---
>> -  Nick Bright-
>> -  Vice President of Technology   -
>> -  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
>> -  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 <(888)%20332-1616> / Fax 620-331-0789 
>> <(620)%20331-0789>  -
>> -  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
>> ---
>> - Are your files safe?-
>> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
>> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
>> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
>> ---
>>
>> This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of 
>> the addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may contain 
>> information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure 
>> under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, 
>> you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, 
>> disseminating or otherwise using this transmission. If you have received 
>> this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by reply E-mail and 
>> immediately delete this message from your system.
>>
>>
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] Fiber POE

[Clay Stewart]

Lost half day on not knowing something about this unit. Thought I would
pass it along.

The unit does not come with a power brick. You can power it by direct wire
to lugs, by a POE in only port cat5, or in the main POE data port cat5.

We have many installed, but all are powered through the POE data port using
an EdgeRouter with POE ports. No problem. Then we had an install where we
used a standard 24Vdc and then a 48Vdc UBNT brick. Fiber POE lights up
properly, but we had no data. We assumed, wrongly, that it was either a
fiber issue or SFP issue, since we had just spent a few days with bad
splices and other issues, including SFP incompatibilities. Hours later, a
thought hit me to try a 1Gig POE, and bingo!
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber sale?

[Clay Stewart]

$199 for me on Prime

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Jonathan Taylor 
wrote:

> Show's as $139 for me. but still cheap
>
> *Jonathan Taylor*
> *WiSouth Networks, LLC*
> jtay...@wisouth.net
> *(334) 595-9521*
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Chris J. Ruschmann 
> wrote:
>
>> Anyone know why af-2x’s are showing up as 99.00 on amazon? I just bought
>> 6 of them and they are shipping already.
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B013Z7S3RQ/ref=oh_aui_deta
>> ilpage_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.03 firmware still has some bugs

[Clay Stewart]

And you are having no issue on 6.0? We have clients drop off one here one
there on APs?

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:40 AM,  wrote:

> We've been seeing throughput drop to shit on clients that are on 6.0.3. So
> we've rolled back those clients to 6.0
>
> -Mike
>
> On Apr 5, 2017, at 08:24, Clay Stewart  wrote:
>
> Rory, be aware we had issues on 6.0 with total client dropouts, especially
> 900s, but also with others.
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Rory Conaway 
> wrote:
>
>> Started updating APs and backhauls to 6.03.
>>
>>
>>
>> Started getting calls, users dropping, NetFlix buffering, etc…  Found out
>> throughput on backhauls went way down.  Checked the first backhaul which
>> was Powerbeam M5 and PowerBeam 400, xm and xw firmware, it went from
>> 130Mbps to 54Mbps on the backhaul even though signal levels were the same,
>> -54/-55dBm.  Even worse, throughput went to 1Mbps or less.  We change it
>> back to 6.0 and wham, everything goes back to normal.  Not sure what’s
>> going on be we are going back to 6.0 on all APs and backhauls.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •** CEO*
>>
>> *4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040*
>>
>> *602-426-0542 <(602)%20426-0542>*
>>
>> *r...@triadwireless.net *
>>
>> *www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net/>*
>>
>>
>>
>> “An optimist will tell you the glass is half-full; the pessimist,
>> half-empty; and the engineer will tell you the glass is twice the size it
>> needs to be”
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.03 firmware still has some bugs

[Clay Stewart]

Rory, be aware we had issues on 6.0 with total client dropouts, especially
900s, but also with others.

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Rory Conaway 
wrote:

> Started updating APs and backhauls to 6.03.
>
>
>
> Started getting calls, users dropping, NetFlix buffering, etc…  Found out
> throughput on backhauls went way down.  Checked the first backhaul which
> was Powerbeam M5 and PowerBeam 400, xm and xw firmware, it went from
> 130Mbps to 54Mbps on the backhaul even though signal levels were the same,
> -54/-55dBm.  Even worse, throughput went to 1Mbps or less.  We change it
> back to 6.0 and wham, everything goes back to normal.  Not sure what’s
> going on be we are going back to 6.0 on all APs and backhauls.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •** CEO*
>
> *4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040*
>
> *602-426-0542 <(602)%20426-0542>*
>
> *r...@triadwireless.net *
>
> *www.triadwireless.net *
>
>
>
> “An optimist will tell you the glass is half-full; the pessimist,
> half-empty; and the engineer will tell you the glass is twice the size it
> needs to be”
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Power needs

[Clay Stewart]

BUT, think about building for LTE or other future equipment. For instance,
Telrad and Baicells bases require more amps then WIFI and cannot be powered
by many existing POE units (EdgePoints, Netonixs, DLs). More watts. Also
are you going to add future PtPs? (eg; 11Ghz 36-40 watts each)

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Steve Barnes  wrote:

> What are you guys seeing for power needs at a tower in the way of watts?
> 3 or 4 Rocket AC Sectors, 2 backhauls AF or Mimosa, a Netonix and RB3011
> etc.  Peak and normal operating.
>
> >From the netonix that I have out it appears that most rockets and AF
> don't peak over 20 Watts.  So if I size for 10 Devices at 20 Watts that's
> 200 and an additional 50 for Battery charging shouldn't 250 Watts cover
> most towers? AT 24vdc that is about 10 Amps.  I have 10 amp fuses on lots
> of my batteries and never blown one.
>
>
> Steve Barnes
> Wireless Operations Manager
> New Lisbon Broadband
> NLBC.COM
> PCSWIN.COM
> 765-584-2288 ext:1101
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports

[Clay Stewart]

Ditto Steve, over crimping was an issue here too, or an old crimper which
will start to bend over pin 1. We had this happen with IDEAL crimpers once
about 3 years old. Not sure if those were the same model you stated. Good
crimpers, just have to watch for wear as with any crimper.

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Steve Barnes  wrote:

> I can say that I have at least 40 AF5x in the field.  I have never had a
> single bad Ethernet connection at the radio. We use the UBNT Tough
> Connectors and Shireen cable.  We used to have this issue all the time due
> to a crimper that was OVER crimping the connectors.  It was actually
> mashing the pins too far into the connector and mashing the clip on the
> back.  Client radios would fail to have a Ethernet connection but the radio
> was connected.  We went to the: Ideal 33-396 Data/Voice Crimp Tool
>
>
>
> Remember you don’t have to mass the ends to make the crimp better.
>
>
>
> *Steve Barnes*
>
> Wireless Operations Manager
>
> *New Lisbon Broadband*
>
> *NLBC.COM *
>
> *PCSWIN.COM *
>
> 765-584-2288 ext:1101 <(765)%20584-2288>
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Jeremy Smith
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 09, 2017 12:44 AM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports
>
>
>
> I coil up the drain wire and stuff it in the end before I crimp the strain
> relief down on it.  I've been using this method for years.
>
>
> --
>
> *From: *"James Wilson" 
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> *Sent: *Wednesday, March 8, 2017 6:34:42 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports
>
>
>
> My question exactly, how do they make positive contact with the drain
> wire...
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:33 PM, Kees H  wrote:
>
> do they take a drain wire?
>
>
>
> *From:* Jeremy Smith
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 08, 2017 2:41 PM
>
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports
>
>
>
> I use the Panduit connectors.  They have a spring-loaded clip, and high
> quality offset gold crimps.  We stopped having issues when I switched to
> these.  They aren't cheap, and this is the cheapest place online to buy
> them that I have found.  https://www.anixter.com/en_us/
> products/MPS588-C/PANDUIT/Copper-Connectors/p/355197?
> utm_source=google&utm_term=&utm_campaign=&utm_medium=cpc&
> utm_content=s_dc~106968659190~~&gclid=CMDcmPH8x9ICFUq5wAodHu8Fvg
>
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Kees H" 
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> *Sent: *Wednesday, March 8, 2017 2:24:12 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports
>
>
>
> For us the toughconnectors seem to work better than other brands
>
> *From:* Josh Luthman
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 08, 2017 1:14 PM
>
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports
>
>
>
> The cable?  ToughCable (Ubnt) with ToughConnectors (Ubnt) going to AF5x
> (Ubnt).
>
>
>
> Is that what you're asking or are you talking about the AF5X unit?  I
> haven't opened any of them up.
>
>
>
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Kees H  wrote:
>
> What brand are you using?
>
>
>
> *From:* Josh Luthman
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 08, 2017 12:39 PM
>
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports
>
>
>
> Well ya that's the whole issue here...
>
>
>
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Kees H  wrote:
>
> Sometimes I wonder about the quality of the connectors.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Josh Luthman
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 08, 2017 12:20 PM
>
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports
>
>
>
> I ended up using zip ties to make the cable as solid as a rock.  By hand I
> can't make the link drop, so I'm sure these 40 mph winds won't be able to
> now.
>
>
>
> I was hoping there was a long term fix rather than "use more zip ties and
> use grease" like a better ethernet jack that doesn't have this problem
> (like what's found in WBMFG cards, Rockets, Epmp, etc).
>
>
>
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Shawn C. Peppers <
> videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No fix but to try to rig it tightly somehow.
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
> Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
> 480-287-9960 Fax
> http://www.video-direct.tv
>
>
> > On Mar 8, 2017, at 1:47 PM, Josh Luthman 
> wrote:
> >
> > Anyone found a solution to this?  Just climbed to find the cable was
> slightly loose for Ethernet (power was fine).
> >
> > What do we need to do for

Re: [Ubnt_users] ISSUE AirRouter

[Clay Stewart]

Also, only on AirRouters with DHCP on WAN, not on static assignment.

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Clay Stewart 
wrote:

> Only with AirRouter are we seeing an issue, improvements on all radios.
>
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Rory Conaway 
> wrote:
>
>> That’s weird guys,  We’ve done hundreds of radios and haven’t seen the
>> issue including 900Mhz where we believe there was an improvement.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
>> *On Behalf Of *RickG
>> *Sent:* Friday, March 3, 2017 5:36 PM
>> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
>> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] ISSUE AirRouter
>>
>>
>>
>> Ditto but I backed down to 5.6.9. Why go all the way back to 5.5.11?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Mitch  wrote:
>>
>> Clay
>>
>> We have seen the same thing with 6.0 and also XM devices crashing
>>
>> So far the 6.0 has not worked well with any of our 2.4 or 900
>>
>> XW we have seen power drops and crashing.
>>
>> We have backed all air routers down to 5.5.11 and they are working great
>> now.
>>
>> We are working with the DEV firmwares and so far no changes
>>
>> Also are testing the new GEN2 AC and so far looks great!!
>>
>> Mitch Koep
>>
>> 218-851-8689 <(218)%20851-8689> cell
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03/03/2017 04:17 PM, Clay Stewart wrote:
>>
>> Never use AirGrids, sorry.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Steve Barnes  wrote:
>>
>> We are seeing Older AirGrids lose ½ their power after going to 6.0 and
>> also seeing many more Crash reports with XM radios.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Steve Barnes*
>>
>> Wireless Operations Manager
>>
>> *New Lisbon Broadband*
>>
>> *NLBC.COM <http://NLBC.COM>*
>>
>> *PCSWIN.COM <http://PCSWIN.COM>*
>>
>> 765-584-2288 ext:1101 <%28765%29%20584-2288>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
>> *On Behalf Of *Clay Stewart
>> *Sent:* Friday, March 03, 2017 3:22 PM
>> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
>> *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] ISSUE AirRouter
>>
>>
>>
>> We had a major issue today with 17 installs today where as the AirRouter
>> stops working after a minute or so after (or before) upgraded 6.00
>> firmware. If we down grade, it works. If we setup below 6.00 it works, then
>> upgrade it fails. We do not have this happening on hundreds of wireless
>> static IP customers. This is happening on one of our fiber networks which
>> is private IP DHCP.
>>
>>
>>
>> Clueless here, have any clues that is?
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>>
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Mitch Koep
>>
>>
>>
>> A Better Wireless
>>
>> 218-851-8689 <(218)%20851-8689> cell
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> -RickG
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] ISSUE AirRouter

[Clay Stewart]

Only with AirRouter are we seeing an issue, improvements on all radios.

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Rory Conaway  wrote:

> That’s weird guys,  We’ve done hundreds of radios and haven’t seen the
> issue including 900Mhz where we believe there was an improvement.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *RickG
> *Sent:* Friday, March 3, 2017 5:36 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] ISSUE AirRouter
>
>
>
> Ditto but I backed down to 5.6.9. Why go all the way back to 5.5.11?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Mitch  wrote:
>
> Clay
>
> We have seen the same thing with 6.0 and also XM devices crashing
>
> So far the 6.0 has not worked well with any of our 2.4 or 900
>
> XW we have seen power drops and crashing.
>
> We have backed all air routers down to 5.5.11 and they are working great
> now.
>
> We are working with the DEV firmwares and so far no changes
>
> Also are testing the new GEN2 AC and so far looks great!!
>
> Mitch Koep
>
> 218-851-8689 <(218)%20851-8689> cell
>
>
>
>
>
> On 03/03/2017 04:17 PM, Clay Stewart wrote:
>
> Never use AirGrids, sorry.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Steve Barnes  wrote:
>
> We are seeing Older AirGrids lose ½ their power after going to 6.0 and
> also seeing many more Crash reports with XM radios.
>
>
>
> *Steve Barnes*
>
> Wireless Operations Manager
>
> *New Lisbon Broadband*
>
> *NLBC.COM <http://NLBC.COM>*
>
> *PCSWIN.COM <http://PCSWIN.COM>*
>
> 765-584-2288 ext:1101 <%28765%29%20584-2288>
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Clay Stewart
> *Sent:* Friday, March 03, 2017 3:22 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
> *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] ISSUE AirRouter
>
>
>
> We had a major issue today with 17 installs today where as the AirRouter
> stops working after a minute or so after (or before) upgraded 6.00
> firmware. If we down grade, it works. If we setup below 6.00 it works, then
> upgrade it fails. We do not have this happening on hundreds of wireless
> static IP customers. This is happening on one of our fiber networks which
> is private IP DHCP.
>
>
>
> Clueless here, have any clues that is?
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
>
> Ubnt_users mailing list
>
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mitch Koep
>
>
>
> A Better Wireless
>
> 218-851-8689 <(218)%20851-8689> cell
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> -RickG
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] ISSUE AirRouter

[Clay Stewart]

Never use AirGrids, sorry.

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Steve Barnes  wrote:

> We are seeing Older AirGrids lose ½ their power after going to 6.0 and
> also seeing many more Crash reports with XM radios.
>
>
>
> *Steve Barnes*
>
> Wireless Operations Manager
>
> *New Lisbon Broadband*
>
> *NLBC.COM <http://NLBC.COM>*
>
> *PCSWIN.COM <http://PCSWIN.COM>*
>
> 765-584-2288 ext:1101 <(765)%20584-2288>
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Clay Stewart
> *Sent:* Friday, March 03, 2017 3:22 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
> *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] ISSUE AirRouter
>
>
>
> We had a major issue today with 17 installs today where as the AirRouter
> stops working after a minute or so after (or before) upgraded 6.00
> firmware. If we down grade, it works. If we setup below 6.00 it works, then
> upgrade it fails. We do not have this happening on hundreds of wireless
> static IP customers. This is happening on one of our fiber networks which
> is private IP DHCP.
>
>
>
> Clueless here, have any clues that is?
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] ISSUE AirRouter

[Clay Stewart]

We had a major issue today with 17 installs today where as the AirRouter
stops working after a minute or so after (or before) upgraded 6.00
firmware. If we down grade, it works. If we setup below 6.00 it works, then
upgrade it fails. We do not have this happening on hundreds of wireless
static IP customers. This is happening on one of our fiber networks which
is private IP DHCP.

Clueless here, have any clues that is?
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on APs

[Clay Stewart]

No issues here, but make sure every client is upgraded too. Saw
improvements, especially in 900Mhz rockets.

On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Roy  wrote:

> XW 6.0 seems to be fine.  Clients are on XM 6.0.
>
> Uptime is 8 days so stability seems to be OK.  Reason for 8 days was the
> massive power outage caused tby the storm in Northern CA.
>
>
> On 2/25/2017 5:17 PM, Rory Conaway wrote:
>
> Anyone else having this issue?
>
>
>
> *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •** CEO*
>
> *4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040*
>
> *602-426-0542 <(602)%20426-0542>*
>
> *r...@triadwireless.net *
>
> *www.triadwireless.net *
>
>
>
> “Baseball - we do not stop playing because we grow old, we grow old
> because we stop playing”
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] FW: Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.: Invoice #To Be Generated

[Clay Stewart]

If I heard, "it took weeks to hear back" from any vendor on an RMA I would
agree this is an issue. But over a week? Hearing back from any vendor in
less then two weeks on an RMA is a good rating in my experience, especially
if multiple units are involved. You have the shipping time, plus going
through testing team, then on to accounting and/or reshipping.

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 1:26 AM, Rory Conaway 
wrote:

> Ben, to be clear, we submitted at least 10 devices if not more and it took
> at least a week to hear back on most of them.  I will confirm what you are
> saying in terms of proof of purchase being required only if it’s out of
> warranty but I do know most devices are pre-screened by date code to see if
> it’s even worth RMA’ing.  That also wasn’t the way it was presented to me
> by my staff but to be fair, I’ll confirm it in the morning.   Thanks for
> following up.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Ben Moore via Ubnt_users
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 25, 2017 10:39 AM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] FW: Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.: Invoice #To Be
> Generated
>
>
>
> So, just to make clear here...There isn't a new policy that has been put
> into place.  The unit that was being submitted was out of warranty period.
>
>
>
> According to RMA team there were 2 RMA's submitted on February 6th and 1
> was for out of warranty product (this is where proof of purchase must have
> come in).  The other RMA was received and was shipped back to you in 1-2
> days.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ben
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Rory Conaway 
> wrote:
>
> It wasn’t rejected but I think it took a week to hear back.  In fact,
> several more came through today.
>
>
>
> Look, this is kind of like Trump’s Executive Order.  It just seems like it
> got dropped on us with no notice and we weren’t prepared.  And it’s taking
> a long time to get a response so it seems like maybe it wasn’t ready
> internally either.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *James Craig via Ubnt_users
> *Sent:* Friday, February 24, 2017 8:56 AM
> *To:* Ben Moore
> *Cc:* James Craig; Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] FW: Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.: Invoice #To Be
> Generated
>
>
>
> Taking a look in this one.
>
>
>
> On Feb 24, 2017 10:51 AM, "Ben Moore"  wrote:
>
> Was this one rejected?
>
>
>
> James - can you check on this one and see what issue is?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Rory Conaway 
> wrote:
>
> Here is one we submitted last week for example.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* UBNT RMA [mailto:r...@ubnt.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 23, 2017 5:33 PM
> *To:* Rory Conaway
> *Subject:* Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.: Invoice #To Be Generated
>
>
>
>
> 2580 Orchard Parkway
> San Jose CA 95131-1033
> US
>
>
>
> *Replacement RMA*
>
> Date
>
>
>
> 02/23/2017
>
> Replacement #
>
>
>
> US1077722
>
> Ship Date
>
>
>
> 02/23/2017
>
> Tracking #
>
>
>
> 1ZA92T380351123711
>
> RMA No.
>
>
>
> Return Authorization #RM41
>
> End User Email
>
>
>
> r...@triadwireless.net
>
> Shipping Code (2)
>
>
>
>
>
> *Item*
>
> *Quantity*
>
> *Description*
>
> LocoM5(US)
>
> 1
>
> NanoLocoM5 MIMO CPE, AirMax US
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Edgepoint16 and AF5x issues

[Clay Stewart]

Sure would have been nice to have had a 48vdc model with high amps per
48vdc ports! I am just saying

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:12 PM, TJ Trout  wrote:

> They have a new revision I think it's 1641 on the EP-S16 that can handle
> 32 or 36v input, sorry I forgot the specific numbers.
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Clay Stewart  stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote:
>
>> IT IS A MUST that you have voltage at 54vdc, we found anything less
>> caused radio lans drop off, and not all of them. For instancer, at 48vdc,
>> the 24vdc radios will start ok, but evenually drop off while the 48vdc
>> radios hand in there.
>>
>> That said, we have several up and running with no issues.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Shawn C. Peppers <
>> videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone else having issues with compatibility on the Ethernet links
>>> between the edgepoint16 and the af5x?  I have a few of these setups out
>>> there but one tower in specific, i am direct dc powering the edgepoint and
>>> for some reason i will randomly loose the ethernet link for random amounts
>>> of time to two different AF5xs.  Sometimes the interface will flap and
>>> sometimes it just goes down and stays down.  The devices stays powered and
>>> the wireless link stays active.  This does not happen at the same time to
>>> both radios and I  have swapped the cables out which are about 15foot
>>> long.  I have zero issues with the mimosa b11, any of the 6 ubnt rocket ac
>>> prism radios, or any of the powerbeams hooked to this edgepoint also.  I
>>> was thinking maybe it was the af5x radios but we pulled it down one of them
>>> and bench tested it and its fine.  Voltage when under load is 52v and i am
>>> powering with a meanwell se-48-600.  Using a #10 wire at 300 footso i
>>> feel confident its not a power related issue.
>>>
>>> Shawn C. Peppers
>>> Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
>>> 866-680-8433 <(866)%20680-8433> Toll Free
>>> 480-287-9960 <(480)%20287-9960> Fax
>>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> --
>> Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
>> SCS Broadband
>> A Division of Acelanet, LLC
>>   434.263.6363 <(434)%20263-6363> O
>>   434.942.6510 <(434)%20942-6510> C
>>   cstew...@scsbroadband.com
>> “We Keep You Up and Running”
>>
>> Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
>> Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] Edgepoint 16 and Prisms

[Clay Stewart]

Ports 1-4 of a Edgepoint 16 are either 24vdc 4 wire or 48vdc 4 wire power.

So I assume that ports 1-4 cannot be used to power a Rocket Prism AC which
is 24vdc 2 wire plus return on 7/8 wires?

Wouldn't even ask question except someone (me), accidentally plugged 2
Rocket Prism ACs in ports 3 and 4 of the EdgePoint 16. Caught it before
powering the ports, but it does mean a 185' climb to switch the ports! So I
thought I would ask the stupid question anyhow, since the temps are coming
down to late Autumn levels. (What happened to winter?) Bonus question.
-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Different Build Numbers for AF-5x v3.2.1 (Was: Replacing a PBE-5AC with AF5x)

[Clay Stewart]

No one answered you because know ones knows I guess.

I would say the difference is 61, but it is not Friday.

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Sam Morris  wrote:

> I received some AF-5x radios. When I checked the firmware version I saw
> they were v3.2.1 Build number 28885. On one of them I "updated" the
> firmware with the v3.2.1 I downloaded from ubnt.com. Now the build
> number shows 28824.
>
> What is the difference in these? They are both reported as v3.2.1. Both
> of them seem to work great so it's likely something cosmetic, but I
> thought I'd ask.
>
> Thanks
> Sam
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Edgepoint16 and AF5x issues

[Clay Stewart]

IT IS A MUST that you have voltage at 54vdc, we found anything less caused
radio lans drop off, and not all of them. For instancer, at 48vdc, the
24vdc radios will start ok, but evenually drop off while the 48vdc radios
hand in there.

That said, we have several up and running with no issues.



On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Shawn C. Peppers <
videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Anyone else having issues with compatibility on the Ethernet links between
> the edgepoint16 and the af5x?  I have a few of these setups out there but
> one tower in specific, i am direct dc powering the edgepoint and for some
> reason i will randomly loose the ethernet link for random amounts of time
> to two different AF5xs.  Sometimes the interface will flap and sometimes it
> just goes down and stays down.  The devices stays powered and the wireless
> link stays active.  This does not happen at the same time to both radios
> and I  have swapped the cables out which are about 15foot long.  I have
> zero issues with the mimosa b11, any of the 6 ubnt rocket ac prism radios,
> or any of the powerbeams hooked to this edgepoint also.  I was thinking
> maybe it was the af5x radios but we pulled it down one of them and bench
> tested it and its fine.  Voltage when under load is 52v and i am powering
> with a meanwell se-48-600.  Using a #10 wire at 300 footso i feel
> confident its not a power related issue.
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
> Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
> 480-287-9960 Fax
> http://www.video-direct.tv
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UCRM

[Clay Stewart]

Anyone find any layman documentation for accounting staff?

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Shawn Burgei  wrote:

> Anyone been playing with the UBNT UCRM? Like to know if there is away to
> customize the invoicing template.
>
> Thanks
> Shawn
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Stupid AF5x behavior

[Clay Stewart]

*"Whoa, take 'er easy there, Pilgrim."*

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> That seems really dumb that it decides to use more power instead of a
> higher modulation rate.
>
> I don't have atpc on but I brought it down to 18 conducted power (47 eirp
> I think) to get more throughput.  Manually.  Like a pilgrim.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Jan 20, 2017 2:51 PM, "Clay Stewart"  stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote:
>
>> No lower, mid 40s usually. This one is at 44
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Josh Luthman <
>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If you have max power, say 55 eirp, the radio decides to do max power
>>> and lowest modulation (2x).  Why won't it turn the power down by default?
>>>
>>> Over in the advanced settings you can enable auto power backoff, is that
>>> what is expected to use?  Does everyone use the default tx power on this?
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> --
>> Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
>> SCS Broadband
>> A Division of Acelanet, LLC
>>   434.263.6363 <(434)%20263-6363> O
>>   434.942.6510 <(434)%20942-6510> C
>>   cstew...@scsbroadband.com
>> “We Keep You Up and Running”
>>
>> Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
>> Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Stupid AF5x behavior

[Clay Stewart]

No lower, mid 40s usually. This one is at 44

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> If you have max power, say 55 eirp, the radio decides to do max power and
> lowest modulation (2x).  Why won't it turn the power down by default?
>
> Over in the advanced settings you can enable auto power backoff, is that
> what is expected to use?  Does everyone use the default tx power on this?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] Docs for CRM

[Clay Stewart]

Anyone seen anything for documentation for new CRM? Our CFO would like to
learn but cannot find anything... laymans usage documentation.

-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput

[Clay Stewart]

Ok Scottie

On Nov 30, 2016 7:09 PM, "Mike Hammett"  wrote:

> I put a Mikrotik router between the upstream switch and the AP. I did a
> packet capture. Only 1% of the 25 megs it recorded was actually for that
> subnet. I setup bridge filters to only allow untagged and their VoIP VLANs.
> (I ended up needing more to get their VoIP working, but I didn't get it
> figured out before they fixed everything.) PC worked great. Speedtests
> worked great. Their networking department neglected to mention that they
> reconfigured their rings the night before and now the switch that I plug
> into is on the ring. All of the ports were trunk ports. They corrected it
> to being an access port and everybody is now happy!
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
>
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Mike Hammett" 
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> *Sent: *Tuesday, November 29, 2016 1:24:54 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput
>
> I swapped out the CPE and nope, not resolved yet.
>
> It works great (even get 140 megabit on a 40 MHz channel) shortly after
> power up or an airView, but give it some time and you're back down to crap
> performance.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
>
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Clay Stewart" 
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> *Sent: *Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:31:31 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput
>
> Get it resolved Mike?
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Mike Hammett 
> wrote:
>
>> Just turned down power. It ended up being 600 feet, not a couple hundred.
>> I believe them to be accurately aligned.
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>>
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>
>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>> --
>> *From: *"Clay Stewart" 
>> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
>> *Sent: *Monday, November 28, 2016 9:02:32 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput
>>
>> Such a short distance and -57? Turned down all the way, misaligned or
>> reflection? Actually, if just a couple undred feet, have you tried
>> misalignment by 2-5 degrees?
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Mike Hammett > > wrote:
>>
>>> I have a link that's a couple hundred feet. -57 or so signal with
>>> balanced chains. CCQ, AMC and AMQ are all above 95%. I only can get double
>>> digit KILObit throughput one direction. I've rebooted, upgraded to 5.6.9,
>>> sent in support fil

Re: [Ubnt_users] Edgepoint 16 power handling

[Clay Stewart]

Dont have that answer, but did find out if under power E16 you will have
big issues. We had a voltage drop in the run and low output 46VDC. All
48VDC outputs worked fine, but ALL 24VDC ports would come and go!

Our solution was this:

TSP-360-148 Traco PS, combined with Battery switch TSP-BCM48 for backup,
added PCS-C40 120VAC breakers for protection, and on 48VDC output at
battery switch we added an adjustable stepup regulator to get 56.5 VOLTS to
send up tower. Small footpring, DIN RAIL Solution. Fits in a NEMA 18x18
with lots of air space available. Batteries in separate box of course.



On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Shawn C. Peppers <
videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Anyone know the maximum total power that the edgepoint 16 can input/output
> in watts before it blows up?  I am using the direct DC terminals.
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
> Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
> 480-287-9960 Fax
> http://www.video-direct.tv
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput

[Clay Stewart]

Get it resolved Mike?

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Mike Hammett 
wrote:

> Just turned down power. It ended up being 600 feet, not a couple hundred.
> I believe them to be accurately aligned.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
>
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Clay Stewart" 
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> *Sent: *Monday, November 28, 2016 9:02:32 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput
>
> Such a short distance and -57? Turned down all the way, misaligned or
> reflection? Actually, if just a couple undred feet, have you tried
> misalignment by 2-5 degrees?
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Mike Hammett 
> wrote:
>
>> I have a link that's a couple hundred feet. -57 or so signal with
>> balanced chains. CCQ, AMC and AMQ are all above 95%. I only can get double
>> digit KILObit throughput one direction. I've rebooted, upgraded to 5.6.9,
>> sent in support files, checked CPU usage, etc. Modulations are 130/130 on
>> 20 MHz (was at least 240/240, usually 270/300 on 40 MHz). The worst noise
>> in the area is probably -87.
>>
>>
>> I have no clue.
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>>
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>
>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
> --
> Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
> SCS Broadband
> A Division of Acelanet, LLC
>   434.263.6363 O
>   434.942.6510 C
>   cstew...@scsbroadband.com
> “We Keep You Up and Running”
>
> Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
> Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput

[Clay Stewart]

Such a short distance and -57? Turned down all the way, misaligned or
reflection? Actually, if just a couple undred feet, have you tried
misalignment by 2-5 degrees?

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Mike Hammett 
wrote:

> I have a link that's a couple hundred feet. -57 or so signal with balanced
> chains. CCQ, AMC and AMQ are all above 95%. I only can get double digit
> KILObit throughput one direction. I've rebooted, upgraded to 5.6.9, sent in
> support files, checked CPU usage, etc. Modulations are 130/130 on 20 MHz
> (was at least 240/240, usually 270/300 on 40 MHz). The worst noise in the
> area is probably -87.
>
>
> I have no clue.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
>
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] EdgeRouter config not applied

[Clay Stewart]

Figure this one out? I was think of a corrupted config file from surge.

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Brett A Mansfield <
li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:

> This one has been rebooted several times in the past without losing its
> config, but this power outage caused it to. It's not a lack of saving the
> running config.
>
> Thank you,
> Brett A Mansfield
>
> On Nov 10, 2016, at 4:31 PM, Clay Stewart  stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah, if you do CLI and do Commit, but forget to do SAVE afterwards.
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Andy Trimmell 
> wrote:
>
>> You still have to click "Save configuration" after you've made changes
>> on the pages.  It usually flashes red if it hasn't been saved to memory.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
>> On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
>> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 2:25 PM
>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] EdgeRouter config not applied
>>
>> This is managed exclusively through the GUI.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Brett A Mansfield
>>
>> > On Nov 10, 2016, at 12:12 PM, Andy Trimmell
>>  wrote:
>> >
>> > Did someone make config changes but didn't "save configuration"? maybe
>>
>> > it was just on the running config.
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
>> > [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
>> > On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
>> > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 2:09 PM
>> > To: Ubiquiti Users Group
>> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] EdgeRouter config not applied
>> >
>> > Quick update, I changed config.boot to config.bootold and
>> > config.boot.invalid.~ to config.boot and then rebooted. All is well
>> now.
>> >
>> > Anyone have this happen before? Is there a way to prevent it besides
>> > adding this to a battery backup?
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> > Brett A Mansfield
>> >
>> >> On Nov 10, 2016, at 12:00 PM, Brett A Mansfield
>> >  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I have a huge customer running on an EdgeRouter Pro. They just had a
>> > power outage and router went back to default. It's running v1.8.0.
>> > Here is what I see in the CLI:
>> >>
>> >> 
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Can I rename that invalid file to config.boot and it will work? Or do
>> > I have to reconfigure from scratch?
>> >>
>> >> Thank you,
>> >> Brett A Mansfield
>> >> ___
>> >> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >
>> > _______
>> > Ubnt_users mailing list
>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> > ___
>> > Ubnt_users mailing list
>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> --
> Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
> SCS Broadband
> A Division of Acelanet, LLC
>   434.263.6363 O
>   434.942.6510 C
>   cstew...@scsbroadband.com
> “We Keep You Up and Running”
>
> Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
> Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] EdgeRouter config not applied

[Clay Stewart]

Yeah, if you do CLI and do Commit, but forget to do SAVE afterwards.

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Andy Trimmell 
wrote:

> You still have to click "Save configuration" after you've made changes
> on the pages.  It usually flashes red if it hasn't been saved to memory.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 2:25 PM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] EdgeRouter config not applied
>
> This is managed exclusively through the GUI.
>
> Thank you,
> Brett A Mansfield
>
> > On Nov 10, 2016, at 12:12 PM, Andy Trimmell
>  wrote:
> >
> > Did someone make config changes but didn't "save configuration"? maybe
>
> > it was just on the running config.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> > [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> > On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
> > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 2:09 PM
> > To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] EdgeRouter config not applied
> >
> > Quick update, I changed config.boot to config.bootold and
> > config.boot.invalid.~ to config.boot and then rebooted. All is well
> now.
> >
> > Anyone have this happen before? Is there a way to prevent it besides
> > adding this to a battery backup?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Brett A Mansfield
> >
> >> On Nov 10, 2016, at 12:00 PM, Brett A Mansfield
> >  wrote:
> >>
> >> I have a huge customer running on an EdgeRouter Pro. They just had a
> > power outage and router went back to default. It's running v1.8.0.
> > Here is what I see in the CLI:
> >>
> >> 
> >>
> >>
> >> Can I rename that invalid file to config.boot and it will work? Or do
> > I have to reconfigure from scratch?
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> Brett A Mansfield
> >> ___
> >> Ubnt_users mailing list
> >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Backhaul Radios freeze on Station side

[Clay Stewart]

If you saying stopped passing traffic on Lan side, but remained powered and
connected to AP, I would suspect a bad crimper and cold weather.

On Nov 7, 2016 1:04 PM,  wrote:

> I have had 3 towers in the past week have the Station side of the Backhaul
> link lock up and not transfer service to the tower until rebooted, but
> each stayed connected to the AP side of the Backhaul connection.  In all 3
> cases, I was able to log into both the AP and Station side of the backhaul
> link to reboot the station remotely.  Once rebooted every CPE came back
> online.
>
> These radios have been in operation for months and zero issues.  The
> details are below for the setup and firmware.
>
> The radio's are M series Rocket radios.
>
> Tower 1:  M5 5.6.4 XW to M5 5.6.4 XW
>
> Tower 2:  M365 5.6.4 XM to M365 5.6.4 XM
>
> Tower 3:  PBE M5 5.6.6 XW to M5 5.6.6 XM
>
> I have not seen this occur previously and wondered if it was a firmware
> issue.  Also, I am not using any DFS channels for either tower.  Any ideas
> or areas to monitor is appreciated.
>
> Troy
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam 5AC-19's and PowerBeam 5AC-300's

[Clay Stewart]

We have them as CPEs, PtPs. PtP 3 mile in noisy area getting 50Mbps. -65
sig -87 NF

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Nathan Babcock 
wrote:

> I have never had good luck with them.  We ended up giving ours away to
> anyone who would take them and just stopped buying them altogether.
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Phil Curnutt
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 6, 2016 3:39 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
> *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam 5AC-19's and PowerBeam 5AC-300's
>
>
>
> I had a short back bone link from one small AP to another so used a pair
> of NBE-5AC-19's expecting an Rx of around -55.  After connecting the link
> the best we could get was a -66 on Chain0 and a -77 on Chain1 when the
> radios were at the proper tilt and azimuth.  With help from the Alignment
> Tool we got it down to a -60/-70, but AP end of the link was aimed about 5
> degree down rather then 1 degree up.  We could achieve the same Chain0,
> Chain1 imbalance the other way with the AP aimed 1 degree up and the
> Station aimed 6 degrees down.  I replace the Station end with a PBE-5AC-300
> and dropped the Chain0/Chain1 signals to -60/-70, but no better.  So, today
> I replace the AP end with another 300 and the signal dropped to -47/-47.
>
>
>
> So, the question is has anyone else seen this behavior in the NanoBeam?
> We have a bunch of them in use on PtMP AP's using sectors and they work
> just as expected, but when used as PtP this weird astigmatism shows up.
>
>
>
> Phil
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] R5AC-PRISM-US

[Clay Stewart]

I do need to try a couple, I admit ;') I have a some towers with only a
narrow shot through foot mountains to populated valley road... I would
suspect that because of the narrow beam, I would see better signal.

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Clay Stewart <
cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote:

> Yes, and the description below pic of the first one says, for Prism AC.
> But have not tried one on our prisms. We are using UBNT AC sectors.
>
>
> On Monday, September 26, 2016, Evan Galvin  wrote:
>
>> Hey guys, just wanted to confirm that the R5AC-PRISM-US has a metal
>> shielded housing on it.
>>
>> Do you think it would pair up good with this combo:
>>
>> https://www.streakwave.com/Itemdesc.asp…
>> <https://www.streakwave.com/Itemdesc.asp?ic=TP-ADAP-R5AC-PR&o1=0>
>>
>> https://www.streakwave.com/Itemdesc.asp?ic=SH-TP-5-30&o1=0
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> *Evan* *Galvin*
>>
>> *In Charge of What’s Next*
>>
>>
>>
>> 10808 W. Monee Manhattan Road
>> Monee, IL 60449
>>
>> *e: Evan*@XLBroadband.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *t: *815.312.4454 *w: *XLBroadband.com <http://xlbroadband.com/>
>>
>> [image: Description: Description: Description:
>> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2VXpvNGl4OWx5b1U&export=download]
>>  [image: Description: Description: Description:
>> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2a0FfNXpyQjJQZ28&export=download]
>>  [image: Description: Description: Description:
>> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2X1FvUmw5YjJKaXc&export=download]
>>  [image: Description: Description: Description:
>> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2S1NrUDlFd2V6S1k&export=download]
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
> --
> Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
> SCS Broadband
> A Division of Acelanet, LLC
>   434.263.6363 O
>   434.942.6510 C
>   cstew...@scsbroadband.com
> “We Keep You Up and Running”
>
> Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
> Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] R5AC-PRISM-US

[Clay Stewart]

Yes, and the description below pic of the first one says, for Prism AC. But
have not tried one on our prisms. We are using UBNT AC sectors.

On Monday, September 26, 2016, Evan Galvin  wrote:

> Hey guys, just wanted to confirm that the R5AC-PRISM-US has a metal
> shielded housing on it.
>
> Do you think it would pair up good with this combo:
>
> https://www.streakwave.com/Itemdesc.asp…
> <https://www.streakwave.com/Itemdesc.asp?ic=TP-ADAP-R5AC-PR&o1=0>
>
> https://www.streakwave.com/Itemdesc.asp?ic=SH-TP-5-30&o1=0
>
> Thanks,
>
> *Evan* *Galvin*
>
> *In Charge of What’s Next*
>
>
>
> 10808 W. Monee Manhattan Road
> Monee, IL 60449
>
> *e: Evan*@XLBroadband.com
> 
>
>
>
>
> *t: *815.312.4454 *w: *XLBroadband.com <http://xlbroadband.com/>
>
> [image: Description: Description: Description:
> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2VXpvNGl4OWx5b1U&export=download]
>  [image: Description: Description: Description:
> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2a0FfNXpyQjJQZ28&export=download]
>  [image: Description: Description: Description:
> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2X1FvUmw5YjJKaXc&export=download]
>  [image: Description: Description: Description:
> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2S1NrUDlFd2V6S1k&export=download]
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] NEW Ubiquiti Power cable

[Clay Stewart]

That is more then 12 gauge low voltage stranded wire in a sealtight
conduit? Also which there power controller coming had battery charging and
auto switching.

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Eric Williams SDWISP 
wrote:

> Ubiquiti has a new DC cable on its way ! I know look for it In 6
> mounths..lol
>
> Looks like it will be a nice cable for DC installs.
>
> Power cable priced at just under $600.00 per 1,000 feet
> https://www.ubnt.com/accessories/powercable/
>
>
> Eric Williams W7EMW
>
> Network Administrator
>
> 619-698-3904 Office
>
> 9740 Campo Road #211
>
> Spring Valley Ca 91977
>
>
>
> WWW.SDWISP.COM <http://www.SDWISP.COM>
>
> www.myinternetsucks.com/
>
> SDWISP Begins Where Fiber Ends
>
>
> 4 Day Admin Monday - Thursday 8AM to 5PM {Yes, I’m hard to reach Friday –
> Sunday….Kids!!}
>
> Closed on all U.S., Bank, School and Mexican Holidays due to Social
> Obligations.
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Outdoor DC Wire Options

[Clay Stewart]

Yes, have lots in field for year Get 12 gauge instead of 14 gauge. Use
well pipe for underground ( helps in surges via roots) and use witertite
flex for towers, above ground.

On Saturday, September 17, 2016,  wrote:

> I am looking for recommendations for types of DC wire to run a Netonix DC
> switch.  I was looking at outdoor stranded 12 gauge as the distance is 200
> feet from 48 Volt 5 Amp 240 Watt DC power pack to the Netonix WS-12-250-DC
> switch on the tower.
>
> The wire will be ran in a conduit except for the top 10 feet which will be
> exposed to the elements.  Some conduit is underground, so I am sure it is
> not 100% dry either.  Home Improvement stores had single wire spools or
> landscape light wire as options I could find.  Would 12 gauge landscape
> wire work?
>
> Appreciate the support!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Troy
>
> Byhalia.net, LLC
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Unifi Video NVR performance issues

[Clay Stewart via Ubnt_users]

Atom processor can only do so much. Load software on a reasonable cost Dell
server or other computer...

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Shawn C. Peppers via Ubnt_users <
ubnt_users@wispa.org> wrote:

> So after adding a external usb hard drive my ubnt nvr appliance, the
> performance and stability is very poor now.  Half the time i have to reset
> the appliance to even gain access.  I am getting slot of "nvr is not
> reachable errors" and can barley view archives.  Hard drives seem fine.
> Anyone else experiencing this?
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
> Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
> 480-287-9960 Fax
> http://www.video-direct.tv
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] EdgePoint summary issue

[Clay Stewart]

I have decided that one of the AC ports has a bad wire (not likely,
pretested), bad UBNT surge (likely) or bad radio or port. As soons as I
turn port on, all 24VDC ports go low voltage.

We have had an occasional issue with UBNT surges when put on Gig VDC
radios. I guess another tower climb is in order.

On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Clay Stewart <
cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote:

> Screen shots: Poe Configuration and Port Summary
>
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Clay Stewart  stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote:
>
>> Actually, the radios were not available about 30 minutes after the status
>> tab said they were down. Since then, what I see is that the voltage looks
>> strange for the 24vdc ports being used (5-8)
>>
>> The voltage is showing 7-13 volts and current draw jumping from 50-500+-.
>> These ports have AC AirPrisms which use 24vdc .5Amp Gig power supplies.
>>
>> So, the EdgePoint says the radios are powered, with low voltage 15 or
>> less, and the radios are not staying on?
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Clay Stewart <
>> cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The summary screen of interfaces is showing 4 radios down on ports 4-7
>>> while the POE tab shows amps and power... and the radios are up and running.
>>>
>>> Anyone seen this?  It is running 1.3.0 (cant upgrade as a new brewery is
>>> on it with a grand opening today.)
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
>>> SCS Broadband
>>> A Division of Acelanet, LLC
>>>   434.263.6363 O
>>>   434.942.6510 C
>>>   cstew...@scsbroadband.com
>>> “We Keep You Up and Running”
>>>
>>> Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
>>> Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> --
>> Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
>> SCS Broadband
>> A Division of Acelanet, LLC
>>   434.263.6363 O
>>   434.942.6510 C
>>   cstew...@scsbroadband.com
>> “We Keep You Up and Running”
>>
>> Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
>> Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> --
> Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
> SCS Broadband
> A Division of Acelanet, LLC
>   434.263.6363 O
>   434.942.6510 C
>   cstew...@scsbroadband.com
> “We Keep You Up and Running”
>
> Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
> Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
>



-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] EdgePoint summary issue

[Clay Stewart]

Actually, the radios were not available about 30 minutes after the status
tab said they were down. Since then, what I see is that the voltage looks
strange for the 24vdc ports being used (5-8)

The voltage is showing 7-13 volts and current draw jumping from 50-500+-.
These ports have AC AirPrisms which use 24vdc .5Amp Gig power supplies.

So, the EdgePoint says the radios are powered, with low voltage 15 or less,
and the radios are not staying on?

On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Clay Stewart <
cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote:

> The summary screen of interfaces is showing 4 radios down on ports 4-7
> while the POE tab shows amps and power... and the radios are up and running.
>
> Anyone seen this?  It is running 1.3.0 (cant upgrade as a new brewery is
> on it with a grand opening today.)
>
> --
>
>
> --
> Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
> SCS Broadband
> A Division of Acelanet, LLC
>   434.263.6363 O
>   434.942.6510 C
>   cstew...@scsbroadband.com
> “We Keep You Up and Running”
>
> Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
> Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
>



-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] EdgePoint summary issue

[Clay Stewart]

The summary screen of interfaces is showing 4 radios down on ports 4-7
while the POE tab shows amps and power... and the radios are up and running.

Anyone seen this?  It is running 1.3.0 (cant upgrade as a new brewery is on
it with a grand opening today.)

-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Unexpected reboot warning in UBNT radios

[Clay Stewart]

We are seeing it too for awhile. I assumed it was a new feature when radio
is rebooted by repowering. Not watchdog.

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Eduardo  wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I’ve got this message in some of our M2, M5 and M365 radios after the
> upgrade to v5.6.5.
>
> Has anyone seen this Unexpected reboot warning? I tried to open the
> support file, but Notepad nor WordPad work to open it.
>
> I wonder if it’s a v5.6.5 performance issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Eduardo
> Webjogger Internet Services
> www.webjogger.net
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Streakwave has quit selling new UBNT?

[Clay Stewart]

They used to have a way to set an account to show the real stock numbers on
their website. Been awhile since I used that ID though. You have to request
it.

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Sam Tetherow  wrote:

> They are always out of stock.  I can't remember the last time I have
> ordered from Streakwave that they actually had everything I needed.
>
> On 08/30/2016 10:49 AM, James Wilson wrote:
>
> That's why they're out of everything!:)
>
> On Aug 30, 2016 11:48 AM, "Adair Winter" 
> wrote:
>
> What? I just ordered $30k worth of new ubnt yesterday...
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Jerry Head 
> wrote:
>
>> When?
>> Why?
>> What did I miss?
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Adair Winter
> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
> C: 806.231.7180
> http://www.amarillowireless.net
> <http://www.amarillowireless.net>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AC products

[Clay Stewart]

 LBE‑5AC‑23 ?

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Steve Barnes  wrote:

> What can you use as a station with the 5ACPrism that is in stock and
> bigger than the AC19s?  The PB5AC-400 are backordered FOREVER.
>
> Is there other cheaper Dish and radio combos that would work.
>
> Steve Barnes
> Wireless Operations Manager
> PCSWIN.COM
> NLBC.COM
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x flow control off by default?

[Clay Stewart]

I believe Netonix currently recommends FC off, as there newer firmware
turns it off automatically on their switches anyhow when there is a flood
of pause frames from an AF5. Believe also they said they are working on
issue.

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> Is there a reason this is off?  It looks like Airmax radios and ePMP have
> flow control either always on or on by default (not sure it's possible to
> disable them actually).  Looking at the Netonix it's the only device not
> giving me flow control so I'm wondering if everyone just simply turns it on.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] edge router pro

[Clay Stewart]

Our pascket and pin monitor seems to go crazy with high ping bouncing and
packet loss when logged into a master edge pro router anyone seeing
this?

-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] LTE & 5GHz

[Clay Stewart]

I am 3-4 days away from lighting up few ACs 15 feet under Verizon cell,
will let you know.

On Thursday, August 11, 2016, Kevin Lamothe  wrote:

> Has anyone seen any odd things with using 5GHz M or AC radios and
> 850&1.9GHz LTE band?
>
> I'm seeing an odd problem at two of my sites. The teleco's equipment is
> about 10 feet away from us.
>
> The one site has 15db signal difference between 2.4GHz and 5GHz. Shot is
> LoS, antenna/jumpers/radio has been replaced, even played with tilt.
> Airview scan shows the spectrum is completely destroyed. I only have
> 2.4, 24GHz and one other 5GHz sector on here. They both see each other
> in the -70s.
>
> There is also no other WISPs here or nearby.
>
> Is it possible that the LTE equipment is giving off harmonics that's
> wrecking havoc with the front in filter on these 5GHz radios? or
> possibly just a power over load?
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] More AF5x woes

[Clay Stewart]

Have had loose flat nuts on AF5x also and just had two finger loose on an
AC Prism this morning.

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> The issue is with AF5x, not Rockets.  The Rockets are working just fine
> (short of not meeting capacity needs).
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Clay Stewart  stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote:
>
>> We are finding on most rockets that the flat washer/nut on antennas are
>> loose, and can leave a tiny gap after the antenna is attached. There is a
>> rubber seal under the flat nut, but if it is too loose, moisture will get
>> into radio. Also, if installer did not give that finger tightening an
>> additional 1/4 turn, they will work loose with temperature fluctuation. A
>> serious mismatched chain is usually one of these issues, or a broken
>> antenna lead. (bent to much for instance during install). Visually check
>> female and male antenna connectors for 'stuff', once had screwed one onto a
>> spider or bug.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Mathew Howard 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We had a similar issue... I believe it was water in one of the antenna
>>> connectors, but we eventually ended up replacing everything.
>>>
>>> What kind of dish are you using?
>>>
>>> --
>>> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on
>>> behalf of Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com]
>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 08, 2016 12:03 PM
>>> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
>>>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] More AF5x woes
>>>
>>> They parallel each other, both sides have the same signals (from 60,85
>>> to 60,68).
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Aug 8, 2016 12:55 PM, "Steve Barnes"  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yeah switch to a new AF5x and all new jumpers.  If it does not go away
>>>> consider new dish.  Are both ends that far off.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Steve Barnes*
>>>>
>>>> Wireless Operations Manager
>>>>
>>>> *PCSWIN.COM <http://PCSWIN.COM>*
>>>>
>>>> *NLBC.COM <http://NLBC.COM>*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-bounces@wis
>>>> pa.org] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
>>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 08, 2016 12:50 PM
>>>> *To:* Matt Hardy ; Ubiquiti Users Group <
>>>> ubnt_users@wispa.org>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] More AF5x woes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Haven't tried really anything yet.  We'll be swapping the radio and
>>>> jumpers entirely first (of course pending what's discussed here) followed
>>>> by the old dish here.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Matt Hardy via Ubnt_users <
>>>> ubnt_users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Have you tried completely changing the pigtails? Maybe it's a bad
>>>> pigtail, especially if the bad chain follows when you change the pigtail to
>>>> the other port?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Matt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Josh Luthman <
>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm working back on this link again and I'm wondering if there isn't a
>>>> hardware issue.  Just wanted to bounce some thoughts.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We put up the link with two  2' dishes.  After aligning both sides we
>>>> get 60/85 ch0/ch1 (note it's exactly 25dbm off).  On Friday we changed ch0
>>>> to ch1 to verify the issue would follow suit, it did.  I emailed in on
>>>> Friday ~2pm and left it alone.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Between Saturday 22:00 and

Re: [Ubnt_users] More AF5x woes

[Clay Stewart]

We are finding on most rockets that the flat washer/nut on antennas are
loose, and can leave a tiny gap after the antenna is attached. There is a
rubber seal under the flat nut, but if it is too loose, moisture will get
into radio. Also, if installer did not give that finger tightening an
additional 1/4 turn, they will work loose with temperature fluctuation. A
serious mismatched chain is usually one of these issues, or a broken
antenna lead. (bent to much for instance during install). Visually check
female and male antenna connectors for 'stuff', once had screwed one onto a
spider or bug.

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Mathew Howard  wrote:

> We had a similar issue... I believe it was water in one of the antenna
> connectors, but we eventually ended up replacing everything.
>
> What kind of dish are you using?
>
> --
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on
> behalf of Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, August 08, 2016 12:03 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] More AF5x woes
>
> They parallel each other, both sides have the same signals (from 60,85 to
> 60,68).
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Aug 8, 2016 12:55 PM, "Steve Barnes"  wrote:
>
>> Yeah switch to a new AF5x and all new jumpers.  If it does not go away
>> consider new dish.  Are both ends that far off.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Steve Barnes*
>>
>> Wireless Operations Manager
>>
>> *PCSWIN.COM <http://PCSWIN.COM>*
>>
>> *NLBC.COM <http://NLBC.COM>*
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
>> *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
>> *Sent:* Monday, August 08, 2016 12:50 PM
>> *To:* Matt Hardy ; Ubiquiti Users Group <
>> ubnt_users@wispa.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] More AF5x woes
>>
>>
>>
>> Haven't tried really anything yet.  We'll be swapping the radio and
>> jumpers entirely first (of course pending what's discussed here) followed
>> by the old dish here.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Matt Hardy via Ubnt_users <
>> ubnt_users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>
>> Have you tried completely changing the pigtails? Maybe it's a bad
>> pigtail, especially if the bad chain follows when you change the pigtail to
>> the other port?
>>
>>
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Josh Luthman <
>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm working back on this link again and I'm wondering if there isn't a
>> hardware issue.  Just wanted to bounce some thoughts.
>>
>>
>>
>> We put up the link with two  2' dishes.  After aligning both sides we get
>> 60/85 ch0/ch1 (note it's exactly 25dbm off).  On Friday we changed ch0 to
>> ch1 to verify the issue would follow suit, it did.  I emailed in on Friday
>> ~2pm and left it alone.
>>
>>
>>
>> Between Saturday 22:00 and Sunday 22:00 the weak chain steadily climbed
>> up to -68.  I'm wondering if there isn't water in the dish/jumpers we can't
>> see externally.  Or the AF5x needed burnt in/is broken in some way.
>>
>>
>>
>> The link in parallel (Rocket M5) hasn't had more than a 2db swing in 30
>> days, I don't believe it would be an atmosphere or path issue.
>>
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Air Fiber 24 -DC input POE supply

[Clay Stewart]

Netonix WS-12-250-AC 48VH

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Seth Johannesen 
wrote:

> Hello UBNT AF-24 user:
>
> What poe model are you using to power UBNT Air Fiber 24ghz with either
> 24 or 48 VDC inputs and 56VDC output?
>
> Tycon has this one but it has different output polarities on the pinouts
> as the factory supplied UBNT AC input poe supply though they state it
> works for the Air Fiber:
>
> http://tyconsystems.com/documentation/Spec%20Sheets/
> TP-DCDC-xx56G-VHP_POE_Ins-Conv_UBNT_AirFiber_Spec_Sheet.pdf
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
> Seth/101Netlink
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ants in radios!

[Clay Stewart]

Raccoons eat snakes. Coyotes eat Raccoons. Jaguars eat Coyotes... and
well... humans.

On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Cole Smith 
wrote:

> We released spiders to catch the ants. Then snakes to deal with the
> spiders. Now we are looking for an anti snake solution. Any suggestions?
>
>
>  Original message ----
> From: Clay Stewart 
> Date: 07/30/2016 8:31 AM (GMT-06:00)
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Ants in radios!
>
> Ant bait traps at bottom of towers and in equipment boxes. Keep a box or
> two in trucks for those tower trips.
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 7:04 PM, James Wilson 
> wrote:
>
>> We've had the occasional ant invasion in Loco M9s, NanoBridges, and
>> Rockets with the covers secured and using ToughCable.  But now we've had
>> ants take out an AF-5X!
>>
>> Somehow the ants are getting around Ubiquiti tolerances.
>>
>> What measures are you all using to keep ants out?
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
> --
> Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
> SCS Broadband
> A Division of Acelanet, LLC
>   434.263.6363 O
>   434.942.6510 C
>   cstew...@scsbroadband.com
> “We Keep You Up and Running”
>
> Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
> Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Unifi

[Clay Stewart]

Dop not know the equipment, but have had big issues in the past. In a large
event coming up, I had the event management to make sure that they are not
allowed to set up hot spot on their COWS.

On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 11:57 AM, James Ober  wrote:

> What equipment are the carriers using that's so pumped up?
>
> On Jul 30, 2016 8:34 AM, "Clay Stewart" <
> cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote:
>
>> Agreed, we have one coming up where we will have separate poles for each
>> drop area with a dedicated backhaul dish. Noise in events in 2.4Ghz goes
>> through the roof as vendors and visitors turn on their WIFI Ipads and
>> Phones. If there is music, then the bands use WIFI for their purposes. If
>> their is temporary cell services installed, the carriers may deploy WIFI
>> hot spots on steroids.
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Matt Hopkins 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I would not use the wireless uplink for this scenario. While it does
>>> work pretty reliably, I would only use it in a very low usage environment.
>>> Each downlink AP about halves performance. Even without knowing how many
>>> users and how large an area are you talking about, I would definitely go
>>> the separate backhaul route.
>>>
>>>
>>> On July 29, 2016 1:07:26 PM PDT, Steve Barnes  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Those of you who use Unifi.  I am about to do an outdoor event for 1
>>>> week.  Going to use Unifi to provide Wi-Fi.
>>>>
>>>> Question: How much bandwidth do you lose per AP if you use the Wireless
>>>> link ability of the AUP-Outdoor+ Aps (2.4 Only).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I will have 1GB fiber to the location.  3 Buildings and a large outside
>>>> area to cover so I have 4 outdoor Aps.  Should I setup a 5.8 Omni 40Mhz
>>>> wide with a Nanobeam 19 at each AP and building to feed each APs or will
>>>> the wireless link of the Unifi suffice?  Going to give 5MB per connection
>>>> and don’t want to kill the main Unifi AP.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> TThoughts
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Steve Barnes*
>>>>
>>>> Wireless Operations Manager
>>>>
>>>> *PCSWIN.COM <http://PCSWIN.COM>*
>>>>
>>>> *NLBC.COM <http://NLBC.COM>*
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> --
>> Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
>> SCS Broadband
>> A Division of Acelanet, LLC
>>   434.263.6363 O
>>   434.942.6510 C
>>   cstew...@scsbroadband.com
>> “We Keep You Up and Running”
>>
>> Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
>> Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Unifi

[Clay Stewart]

Agreed, we have one coming up where we will have separate poles for each
drop area with a dedicated backhaul dish. Noise in events in 2.4Ghz goes
through the roof as vendors and visitors turn on their WIFI Ipads and
Phones. If there is music, then the bands use WIFI for their purposes. If
their is temporary cell services installed, the carriers may deploy WIFI
hot spots on steroids.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Matt Hopkins  wrote:

> I would not use the wireless uplink for this scenario. While it does work
> pretty reliably, I would only use it in a very low usage environment. Each
> downlink AP about halves performance. Even without knowing how many users
> and how large an area are you talking about, I would definitely go the
> separate backhaul route.
>
>
> On July 29, 2016 1:07:26 PM PDT, Steve Barnes  wrote:
>
>> Those of you who use Unifi.  I am about to do an outdoor event for 1
>> week.  Going to use Unifi to provide Wi-Fi.
>>
>> Question: How much bandwidth do you lose per AP if you use the Wireless
>> link ability of the AUP-Outdoor+ Aps (2.4 Only).
>>
>>
>>
>> I will have 1GB fiber to the location.  3 Buildings and a large outside
>> area to cover so I have 4 outdoor Aps.  Should I setup a 5.8 Omni 40Mhz
>> wide with a Nanobeam 19 at each AP and building to feed each APs or will
>> the wireless link of the Unifi suffice?  Going to give 5MB per connection
>> and don’t want to kill the main Unifi AP.
>>
>>
>>
>> TThoughts
>>
>>
>>
>> *Steve Barnes*
>>
>> Wireless Operations Manager
>>
>> *PCSWIN.COM <http://PCSWIN.COM>*
>>
>> *NLBC.COM <http://NLBC.COM>*
>>
>> --
>>
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ants in radios!

[Clay Stewart]

Ant bait traps at bottom of towers and in equipment boxes. Keep a box or
two in trucks for those tower trips.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 7:04 PM, James Wilson  wrote:

> We've had the occasional ant invasion in Loco M9s, NanoBridges, and
> Rockets with the covers secured and using ToughCable.  But now we've had
> ants take out an AF-5X!
>
> Somehow the ants are getting around Ubiquiti tolerances.
>
> What measures are you all using to keep ants out?
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket M5 -> R5AC on DFS

[Clay Stewart]

Request labels here if you have not for UNII codes:
https://www.ubnt.com/fcclabelrequest/

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Clay Stewart <
cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote:

> Agreed, replace with two Prisms, get more customers, less freq issues.
>
> From UBNT forum: "Downgrading to XC7.2.4 enables me to enter UNII
> activation code, then upgrade back to beta 14.
>
> Kind of a pain, but at least its a work around until beta 15 which
> hopefully fixes this permanently."
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:32 AM,  wrote:
>
>> What about splitting it?  buy 60 degree antennas and split out that lobe
>> across two radios?  this will have the side effect of slightly increasing
>> your gain on the AP side as well.
>>
>>
>>
>> *- Original Message -*
>> *From:* Chris Fabien [mailto:ch...@lakenetmi.com]
>> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> *Sent:* Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:14:34 -0400
>> *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] Rocket M5 -> R5AC on DFS
>>
>> I have a Rocket M5 AP with 33 stations, mostly nanobridge M5-25, a few
>> Powerbeam M5 and few Rocket M5 stations. Currently on 5320Mhz. I need to
>> upgrade to address speed complaints.
>>
>> Couple questions:
>>
>> 1. If I upgrade to R5AC-Prism, what firmware do I have to run on AP and
>> STA, still beta firmware?
>> 2. Can I still run on 5320? I am never sure what ubnt radios are
>> certified for.
>> 3. With upgrading firmware on existing stations, will their power be
>> reduced?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Chris Fabien
>> LakeNet LLC
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
> --
> Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
> SCS Broadband
> A Division of Acelanet, LLC
>   434.263.6363 O
>   434.942.6510 C
>   cstew...@scsbroadband.com
> “We Keep You Up and Running”
>
> Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
> Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
>



-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket M5 -> R5AC on DFS

[Clay Stewart]

Agreed, replace with two Prisms, get more customers, less freq issues.

>From UBNT forum: "Downgrading to XC7.2.4 enables me to enter UNII
activation code, then upgrade back to beta 14.

Kind of a pain, but at least its a work around until beta 15 which
hopefully fixes this permanently."

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:32 AM,  wrote:

> What about splitting it?  buy 60 degree antennas and split out that lobe
> across two radios?  this will have the side effect of slightly increasing
> your gain on the AP side as well.
>
>
>
> *- Original Message -*
> *From:* Chris Fabien [mailto:ch...@lakenetmi.com]
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
> *Sent:* Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:14:34 -0400
> *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] Rocket M5 -> R5AC on DFS
>
> I have a Rocket M5 AP with 33 stations, mostly nanobridge M5-25, a few
> Powerbeam M5 and few Rocket M5 stations. Currently on 5320Mhz. I need to
> upgrade to address speed complaints.
>
> Couple questions:
>
> 1. If I upgrade to R5AC-Prism, what firmware do I have to run on AP and
> STA, still beta firmware?
> 2. Can I still run on 5320? I am never sure what ubnt radios are certified
> for.
> 3. With upgrading firmware on existing stations, will their power be
> reduced?
>
> Thanks
> Chris Fabien
> LakeNet LLC
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] M5 AC

[Clay Stewart]

😁 Getting tower mounts on today!

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Peter Kranz  wrote:

> Go AC.. The backwards computability software is coming along nicely and
> pretty close to production ready. If you use AC clients its definitely good
> to go.
>
>
>
>
> *Peter Kranz*www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/>
> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
> Mobile: 510-207-
> pkr...@unwiredltd.com
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Evan Galvin
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 05, 2016 2:08 PM
> *To:* ubnt_users@wispa.org
> *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] M5 AC
>
>
>
> Hey all,
>
>
>
> Just wondering what your experience is like with the M5 AC's vs the M5's.
> We are looking to sectorize a tower and was thinking maybe we should add
> some AC's up there as well and swap out some clients.  Thoughts?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> *Evan* *Galvin*
>
> *In Charge of What’s Next*
>
> [image: Description: Description: Description:
> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2c3B1U1FnMkFmcDQ&export=download]
>
> 10808 W. Monee Manhattan Road,
> Monee, IL 60449
>
> *e *e...@xlbroadband.com
>
> *t *815.312.4454  *w *XLBroadband.com
> <http://www.xlinternetnow.com/rc1/>
>
> [image: Description: Description: Description:
> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2VXpvNGl4OWx5b1U&export=download]
> <https://www.facebook.com/XLInternetNow>  [image: Description:
> Description: Description:
> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2a0FfNXpyQjJQZ28&export=download]
> <https://twitter.com/xlbroadbandinc>  [image: Description: Description:
> Description:
> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2X1FvUmw5YjJKaXc&export=download]
> <https://plus.google.com/111938154122549204679/posts>  [image:
> Description: Description: Description:
> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2S1NrUDlFd2V6S1k&export=download]
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCO1g1zOGWNeYJZQyODwp10w/feed>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5.6.5 APs loosing at STAs until reboot?

[Clay Stewart]

t;
>> >>> -Ty
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Tekwav Lists 
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Same here.  I show that the STA's are connected, but no data passing
>> >>> nor can I get in the STA's GUI.  This was a major issue a month or
>> >>> so ago for me but it's been quiet with no recent issues once I moved
>> >>> the offending AP's to non-DFS bands.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> JJ
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Rory Conaway
>> >>>  wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> We haven’t nailed it down to DFS but yes and it’s very random.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Rory
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
>> >>> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Darin Steffl
>> >>> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 9:16 AM
>> >>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
>> >>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 5.6.5 APs loosing at STAs until reboot?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> We see that happen until the AP is rebooted but only if running a
>> >>> dfs channel. Any other time it never happens.
>> >>>
>> >>> Sent from my smartphone. Please excuse any typos.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Jun 23, 2016 11:03 AM, < mike.l...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Having that problem too...
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Jun 23, 2016, at 08:59, Adair Winter 
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> We keep having problems with the station showing their connected but
>> >>> no data is moving
>> >>>
>> >>> On Jun 23, 2016 10:57 AM, < mike.l...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Anyone else seeing XW APs running 5.6.5 loose all of their connected
>> >>> STAs and then when you reboot the AP, they come back?
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Mike
>> >>> ___
>> >>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >>>
>> >>> ___
>> >>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ___
>> >>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ___
>> >>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ___
>> >>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> > ___
>> > Ubnt_users mailing list
>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> > ___
>> > Ubnt_users mailing list
>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> --
> ---
> -  Nick Bright-
> -  Vice President of Technology   -
> -  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
> -  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
> -  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
> ---
> - Are your files safe?-
> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
> ---
>
> This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the 
> addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may contain information 
> that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable 
> law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are 
> prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating 
> or otherwise using this transmission. If you have received this message in 
> error, please promptly notify the sender by reply E-mail and immediately 
> delete this message from your system.
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] M5 AC

[Clay Stewart]

Hang in there for a week or two... will report on the results of a fully
loaded tower of AC APs!

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Evan Galvin  wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> Just wondering what your experience is like with the M5 AC's vs the M5's.
> We are looking to sectorize a tower and was thinking maybe we should add
> some AC's up there as well and swap out some clients.  Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
>
> *Evan* *Galvin*
>
> *In Charge of What’s Next*
>
> [image: Description: Description: Description:
> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2c3B1U1FnMkFmcDQ&export=download]
>
> 10808 W. Monee Manhattan Road,
> Monee, IL 60449
>
> e e...@xlbroadband.com
>
> *t *815.312.4454  *w *XLBroadband.com
> <http://www.xlinternetnow.com/rc1/>
>
> [image: Description: Description: Description:
> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2VXpvNGl4OWx5b1U&export=download]
> <https://www.facebook.com/XLInternetNow>  [image: Description:
> Description: Description:
> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2a0FfNXpyQjJQZ28&export=download]
> <https://twitter.com/xlbroadbandinc>  [image: Description: Description:
> Description:
> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2X1FvUmw5YjJKaXc&export=download]
> <https://plus.google.com/111938154122549204679/posts>  [image:
> Description: Description: Description:
> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2S1NrUDlFd2V6S1k&export=download]
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCO1g1zOGWNeYJZQyODwp10w/feed>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT Antenna Flaw

[Clay Stewart]

+1 TowerOne.

Also, a simple rig taught to me my my older tower rigging friend which
saves time, equipment and agrevation. Using a separate equipment rope long
enough to go to radio hieght + 10' and back. tied onto solid base anchor at
20-50' ft from base of tower. Connect equipment with proper tool lanyard
and/or carabiner to free end of equipment rope AND fixed anchor rope... to
allow equipment on tool lanyard slide up (and down).

|
|
0
|\\
| \\
|  \\
|   \*\*
||\
|  )[] \
|\
| *\ *
|  \ *0*
|   {|]}
|/\

Other words, never lift straight up, hitting everything and causing safety
issues, slider-on-up.

Must be Friday  ;') = 😁


On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Nigel Newallo-Singh <
nigel.newallosi...@greendotgroup.co> wrote:

> Agreed on getting up the tower in one piece :) that's always good.
>
> I had the guys from TowerOne do the training with my climbers, learnt lots
> of neat tricks on rigging/lifting and getting gear up the tower in one
> piece.
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Ray Orsini  wrote:
>
>> We refer to that as “the toaster principle”. The minute you notify the
>> customer of any change you immediately get “my toaster doesn’t work, my car
>> won’t start”
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> *Ray Orsini – CEOOrsini IT, LLC – Technology Consultants**VOICE *–*DATA *
>> –* BANDWIDTH *–* SECURITY *–* SUPPORT*
>> *P**:* *305.967.6756 x1009 <305.967.6756%20x1009>*   *E: **r...@orsiniit.com
>> *   *TF:* *844.OIT.VOIP*
>> 7900 NW 155th Street, Suite 103, Miami Lakes, FL 33016
>> *http://www.orsiniit.com <http://www.orsiniit.com/> | **View My Calendar
>> <https://www.google.com/calendar/b/1/embed?src=r...@orsiniit.com&ctz=America/New_York>
>> **| **View/Pay Your Invoices <https://connect.orsiniit.com/support> | **View
>> Your Tickets
>> <https://orsiniit.deskdirector.com/?gtoken=9420267805614382426%5bcontactrecordid%5d763809868680959>*
>>
>>
>>
>> *[image: oit_banner]*
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
>> *On Behalf Of *Ty Featherling
>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 9:56 AM
>> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
>> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT Antenna Flaw
>>
>>
>>
>> "My wife doesn't like me."
>>
>> "I have athlete's foot."
>>
>> "My job sucks."
>>
>> "My kids are assholes."
>>
>>
>>
>> Those complaints.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Ty
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Shawn C. Peppers <
>> videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> What kind of complaints?
>>
>> Shawn C. Peppers
>>
>> Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
>>
>> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
>>
>> 480-287-9960 Fax
>>
>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>
>>
>> On Jun 9, 2016, at 8:22 AM, Aaron McKillip <
>> aaron.mckil...@hamiltontel.com> wrote:
>>
>> We were having issues with the sector. After changing everything except
>> the antenna we swapped it out. All of our issues and customer complaints
>> went away. After some investigation, We found that the Antenna had water
>> intrusion in it. The water is coming in through the screws that hold the
>> circuit board to the housing.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Aaron McKillip*
>>
>> *Hamilton.net <http://hamilton.net>*
>> --
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
>> This email and any attachments are confidential and may be protected by
>> legal privilege.
>> If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the
>> sender by return email
>> and delete all copies of this email.
>> --
>>
>> <20160609_130712651_iOS.jpg>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Warm Regards,
> Nigel Newallo-Singh
>
> http://www.gd.tt/
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, COO/CTO
SCS Broadband
A Division of Acelanet, LLC
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please... Part 2

[Clay Stewart]

Easy, FCC has moved lots of certification department funds to netnutrality
department. Not UBNT's fault

On Sunday, January 11, 2015, Eric Williams {WISP} 
wrote:

>   Mike, you called it. I have Rocket M5 as AP and Nano Station/Nano
> Bridge for SU. Full US band 5160 to 5825. Adding the Nano/power beam for
> SU, I only have 5700-5800 where all the RF noise is. I’m hoping for some
> words of wisdom from Ubiquiti like, “Hey, we can do that for you guys and
> why did we not think of that…..Good Idea, Eric!”  LOL……….All we can do is
> ask, right?
>
> It’s puzzling to me with the number of subscribers that the WISP industry
> adds every year and the continual Global WISP awareness, that it takes 6
> months for the #1 WISP hardware vendor to get new gear certified with only
> a hand full of hardware vendors.  So, I will ask has someone pissed
> someone off?  Who do we need to send flowers or a round of golf to, to
> get the Ubiquiti test moved to the top of the list so we can have more
> hardware to serve the underserved?
>
> There is a good chance I will be rolling a truck Monday to change out the
> SU so I can get out of the RF noise on the AP side.
>
> Thanks to all for the feedback and glad to see I’m not off base to ask for
> the 100 MHz of non DFS frequencies.
>
>
> Eric Williams W7EMW
> *Network Administrator*
> 9740 Campo Road #211
> Spring Valley Ca 91977
> 619-698-3904 Ext 101
> 619-415-0070 Dispatch
>
>
>
> *Where Fiber End’s SDWISP Begins*
>
> *Member of Ubiquiti World “Fixed Wireless” Networks {Not Satellite}*
>
>
>
> *WWW.SDWISP.COM <http://www.sdwisp.com/>*
>
> www.myinternetsucks.com
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, CEO
SCS Broadband
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please...

[Clay Stewart]

Has only one 5Ghz with same PtP do the same thing... So I assume it has
same issue as 2.4 where we definitively determined on multiple sets that
the issue happened. WDS was on on both.

On Sunday, January 11, 2015, Clay Stewart <
cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote:

> No, these were 2.4, and there is an issue when NanoBeam is downstream
> connected to upstream NanoBridge. All traffic downstream from NanoBeam
> drops.
>
>
> On Sunday, January 11, 2015, Mike Hammett  > wrote:
>
>> I'm assuming an AP with NanoBeams and NanoBridges as clients was set to a
>> DFS channel and the NanoBeam didn't connect. Assuming it had DFS, they
>> probably spun their tires looking for other causes.
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>
>> --
>> *From: *"Clay Stewart" 
>> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
>> *Sent: *Sunday, January 11, 2015 7:31:14 AM
>> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please...
>>
>> Eric, you did not fully explain the issue other then "one NanoBeam mixed
>> in with older NanoBridges" costing you time due to freq change. Wanted to
>> make sure you are aware that you cannot connect a NanoBeam to a NanoBridge.
>> It will drop traffic down stream eventually.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, January 10, 2015, Eric Williams {WISP} <
>> w...@williamsteldata.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Attn Ben and Matt @ Ubiquiti
>>>
>>> So we are all patiently waiting for the new stuff to get DFS compliant.
>>> My understanding is that the new 100 MHz, that became available last year,
>>> 5150 – 5250  is not a DFS frequency and it would be great if Ubiquiti
>>> could give us access to the new 100 MHz as I just got hosed on a Frequency
>>> change because I have one Nano Beam mixed in with the older Nano Bridges
>>> wasting an hour of my time.  Grrr
>>>
>>> Please and Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>> Eric Williams W7EMW
>>> *Network Administrator*
>>> 9740 Campo Road #211
>>> Spring Valley Ca 91977
>>> 619-698-3904 Ext 101
>>> 619-415-0070 Dispatch
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Where Fiber End’s SDWISP Begins*
>>>
>>> *Member of Ubiquiti World “Fixed Wireless” Networks {Not Satellite}*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *WWW.SDWISP.COM <http://www.SDWISP.COM>*
>>>
>>> www.myinternetsucks.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> --
>> Clay Stewart, CEO
>> SCS Broadband
>>   434.263.6363 O
>>   434.942.6510 C
>>   cstew...@scsbroadband.com
>> “We Keep You Up and Running”
>>
>> Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
>> Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> --
>
>
> --
> Clay Stewart, CEO
> SCS Broadband
>   434.263.6363 O
>   434.942.6510 C
>   cstew...@scsbroadband.com
> “We Keep You Up and Running”
>
> Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
> 
> Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
> 
>
>

-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, CEO
SCS Broadband
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please...

[Clay Stewart]

No, these were 2.4, and there is an issue when NanoBeam is downstream
connected to upstream NanoBridge. All traffic downstream from NanoBeam
drops.


On Sunday, January 11, 2015, Mike Hammett  wrote:

> I'm assuming an AP with NanoBeams and NanoBridges as clients was set to a
> DFS channel and the NanoBeam didn't connect. Assuming it had DFS, they
> probably spun their tires looking for other causes.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>
> --
> *From: *"Clay Stewart"  >
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group"  >
> *Sent: *Sunday, January 11, 2015 7:31:14 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please...
>
> Eric, you did not fully explain the issue other then "one NanoBeam mixed
> in with older NanoBridges" costing you time due to freq change. Wanted to
> make sure you are aware that you cannot connect a NanoBeam to a NanoBridge.
> It will drop traffic down stream eventually.
>
>
>
> On Saturday, January 10, 2015, Eric Williams {WISP} <
> w...@williamsteldata.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Attn Ben and Matt @ Ubiquiti
>>
>> So we are all patiently waiting for the new stuff to get DFS compliant.
>> My understanding is that the new 100 MHz, that became available last year,
>> 5150 – 5250  is not a DFS frequency and it would be great if Ubiquiti
>> could give us access to the new 100 MHz as I just got hosed on a Frequency
>> change because I have one Nano Beam mixed in with the older Nano Bridges
>> wasting an hour of my time.  Grrr
>>
>> Please and Thank you.
>>
>>
>> Eric Williams W7EMW
>> *Network Administrator*
>> 9740 Campo Road #211
>> Spring Valley Ca 91977
>> 619-698-3904 Ext 101
>> 619-415-0070 Dispatch
>>
>>
>>
>> *Where Fiber End’s SDWISP Begins*
>>
>> *Member of Ubiquiti World “Fixed Wireless” Networks {Not Satellite}*
>>
>>
>>
>> *WWW.SDWISP.COM <http://www.SDWISP.COM>*
>>
>> www.myinternetsucks.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
> --
> Clay Stewart, CEO
> SCS Broadband
>   434.263.6363 O
>   434.942.6510 C
>   cstew...@scsbroadband.com
> “We Keep You Up and Running”
>
> Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
> 
> Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
> 
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>

-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, CEO
SCS Broadband
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please...

[Clay Stewart]

Eric, you did not fully explain the issue other then "one NanoBeam mixed in
with older NanoBridges" costing you time due to freq change. Wanted to make
sure you are aware that you cannot connect a NanoBeam to a NanoBridge. It
will drop traffic down stream eventually.



On Saturday, January 10, 2015, Eric Williams {WISP} <
w...@williamsteldata.com> wrote:

>
>
> Attn Ben and Matt @ Ubiquiti
>
> So we are all patiently waiting for the new stuff to get DFS compliant. My
> understanding is that the new 100 MHz, that became available last year,
> 5150 – 5250  is not a DFS frequency and it would be great if Ubiquiti
> could give us access to the new 100 MHz as I just got hosed on a Frequency
> change because I have one Nano Beam mixed in with the older Nano Bridges
> wasting an hour of my time.  Grrr
>
> Please and Thank you.
>
>
> Eric Williams W7EMW
> *Network Administrator*
> 9740 Campo Road #211
> Spring Valley Ca 91977
> 619-698-3904 Ext 101
> 619-415-0070 Dispatch
>
>
>
> *Where Fiber End’s SDWISP Begins*
>
> *Member of Ubiquiti World “Fixed Wireless” Networks {Not Satellite}*
>
>
>
> *WWW.SDWISP.COM <http://www.SDWISP.COM>*
>
> www.myinternetsucks.com
>
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, CEO
SCS Broadband
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Panel Antenna for M5 Rocket Radio

[Clay Stewart]

We have used these for 5.8 and another model for 900s.

http://www.itelite.net/en/Katalog/5-GHz-80211a-Triband//SRA500192xdual-HV.html

On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Rory Conaway 
wrote:

>  We put up 8 of those antenna with the crappy ball joints.   All those
> Rocket 5M’s with ARC antennas are now PowerBeam-400’s.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Joey Craig
> *Sent:* Friday, January 9, 2015 4:29 PM
>
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Panel Antenna for M5 Rocket Radio
>
>
>
> Streakwave has them for $14.95.
>
> On Jan 9, 2015 4:36 PM, "heith"  wrote:
>
> Id be interested in that, the antenna rocked but that ball joint didn’t.
> Do you happen to know the part number of the Antenna? I came across ARC
> PD5820B88 but not sure if that’s the correct number
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Joey Craig
> *Sent:* Friday, January 09, 2015 4:25 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Panel Antenna for M5 Rocket Radio
>
>
>
> I use the ARC panels also but replace the ball joint style mount with
> their HD L-bracket mount. About $20 if I recall.
>
> On Jan 9, 2015 4:16 PM, "Josh Luthman" 
> wrote:
>
> Bunch of people have used the ARC dual pol panels with the ball joint
> mount.  It's stable enough to hold my 180 pound self.
>
>
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 5:10 PM, heith  wrote:
>
> A few years back I purchased a set of antennas to use on Rocket M5 radios.
> We had a link that used a set of M5 Power Bridges that we needed to
> replace, but the structure wouldn’t support a Rocket Dish. We ordered a set
> of panel MIMO antennas and used Rocket M5 radios on it. I want to say it
> was an ARC wireless antenna, but I bought it from a distributor and cant
> find what I did (bad record keeping). Anyways they worked out well with
> awesome signal, but the adjustment was via a ball joint that was fairly
> unstable. I had a rocket M5 fail on one these panels yesterday in this
> shitty weather and the panel was flopping in the wind. It was too windy or
> intolerable to try to pull off any part numbers but I don’t want to order
> another one of these again.
>
>
>
> Anyways if anyone has used a MIMO panel on a Rocket that has been good and
> are happy with it I would like to know
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Heith
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>  --
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2015.0.5577 / Virus Database: 4257/8833 - Release Date: 12/29/14
> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, CEO
SCS Broadband
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket5ac PTMP w/AirPrism availability

[Clay Stewart]

That was a great webinar by the way... everyone should watch it. Great news
with AC... can do AirView on CPE remotely! Man, which we had that on
standard AirMax.

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Ben Moore  wrote:

> We actually do call out what each are capable of on the data sheet.  The
> days are not gone of one device doing everything (this still applies with
> the majority of the products).  However, we have optimized a PTP product
> and a PTMP product.  Many have asked for this and I think it will be a
> welcome change.  We are not charging more for this.  we are just getting
> the most out of PTP and most out of PTMP.
>
> Yes, it will have DFS.  I would expect in Q1.  The lites are PTP and PTMP.
>
> The products are fully capable.  If you are referring to DFS, we release
> now because many want to use them now in the bands they are available in
> USA and also the rest of the world can use bands available.
>
> You may want to look at all of the enhancements/SW features discussed in
> our webinar yesterday:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQTg-XNlF4g
>
> This is not half baked.
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Chris Ruschmann 
> wrote:
>
>> So much confusion with UBNT equipment. Gone are the days when one device
>> could do everything I guess.
>>
>>
>>
>> Will it have DFS? Probably not. So none of the products are usable for
>> me. I have PTP Lites sitting on the shelf since release cause I can’t use
>> them.
>>
>>
>>
>> Why not wait to launch a fully capable product instead of half assed one.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
>> *On Behalf Of *Ben Moore
>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 8, 2015 10:32 AM
>> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
>> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket5ac PTMP w/AirPrism availability
>>
>>
>>
>> I assume you are talking about PTP (with airPrism) and not the lite
>> version right?  The Lite version can do PTP and PTMP.
>>
>>
>>
>> So, in summary, there are hardware differences for PTP and PTMP with
>> airPrism that maximize performance for PTP and PTMP.  There are also
>> software enhancements for PTP only version (TDMA framing, Long distance
>> mode, etc...).
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ben
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Tom Fadgen 
>> wrote:
>>
>> I guess I f. up with my assumption since I just ordered PTP that I do
>> not need. I guess I have to remember my old motto from the early '80's,
>> "Trail Blazers sometimes get arrows in their backs" or "bleeding edge
>> technology is called BLEEDING for a reason"
>>
>>
>>
>> Tom Fadgen
>>
>> coastinet.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday 08/01/2015 at 8:55 am, Ben Moore wrote:
>>
>> The PTP version will always be just PTP (at least as it currently
>> stands).  They have different hardware than the PTMP version (not yet
>> announced).  We are planning to start shipping PTMP AirPrism version this
>> month to distributors.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ben
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Tom Fadgen  wrote:
>>
>> I am hoping just like the non-prizm 5ac-lite's which originally came out
>> as PTP only, a firmware release will open up PTMP.
>>
>>
>>
>> Tom Fadgen
>>
>> coastinet.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday 08/01/2015 at 7:52 am, Jeremy Grip wrote:
>>
>> Not seeing this available yet from the usual suspects. Can we assume the
>> price will look like the PTP version?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jeremy Grip
>> North Branch Networks,LLC
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, CEO
SCS Broadband
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket5ac PTMP w/AirPrism availability

[Clay Stewart]

Lurking... great info Ben, thanks.

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Ben Moore  wrote:

> Yes, we don't have the larger channel widths available for PTMP and
> filters/airprism customized for those channel widths.
>
> PTP has the larger channel widths.  Will get updated data sheet online
> shortly when PTMP is officially launched.
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Mike Hammett 
> wrote:
>
>> Bigger channels on PTP, good enough for me.
>>
>> I wasn't meaning to cast doubt, just didn't know the differences.
>>
>> Are the extra channel widths 50, 60 and 80 MHz?
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>> --
>> *From: *"Ben Moore" 
>> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
>> *Sent: *Thursday, January 8, 2015 11:45:49 AM
>>
>> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket5ac PTMP w/AirPrism availability
>>
>> There are advantages to each...The filters and channel widths are also
>> unique (PTP having larger channel widths available).  airPrism is
>> customized for each.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Mike Hammett 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Okay.
>>>
>>> So now if there's no cost difference between PTP and PTMP AirPrisms,
>>> what advantages are there to the PTP? Surely there must be some to have the
>>> ability to connect more than one client removed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>> --
>>> *From: *"Ben Moore" 
>>> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
>>> *Sent: *Thursday, January 8, 2015 11:14:03 AM
>>>
>>> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket5ac PTMP w/AirPrism availability
>>>
>>> Between PTP and PTMP with airPrism?  They will be same price...
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Mike Hammett >> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> How much of a price difference or is there any?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *From: *"Ben Moore" 
>>>> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
>>>> *Sent: *Thursday, January 8, 2015 10:55:10 AM
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket5ac PTMP w/AirPrism availability
>>>>
>>>> The PTP version will always be just PTP (at least as it currently
>>>> stands).  They have different hardware than the PTMP version (not yet
>>>> announced).  We are planning to start shipping PTMP AirPrism version this
>>>> month to distributors.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ben
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Tom Fadgen 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  I am hoping just like the non-prizm 5ac-lite's which originally came
>>>>> out as PTP only, a firmware release will open up PTMP.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom Fadgen
>>>>> coastinet.com
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday 08/01/2015 at 7:52 am, Jeremy Grip wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Not seeing this available yet from the usual suspects. Can we assume
>>>>> the price will look like the PTP version?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeremy Grip
>>>>> North Branch Networks,LLC
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ___
>>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ___
>>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, CEO
SCS Broadband
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocketm900

[Clay Stewart]

No.

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Chris Soiles  wrote:

> Any NB with reflectors? Similar performance?
>
> Sent from iPhone 5S
>
> Chris Soiles
> Owner
> Rio Cities
> csoi...@riocities.net
> 505-966-6389
>
> On Jan 6, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Clay Stewart <
> cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, UBNT YAGI with UBNT Rocket.
> http://www.ubnt.com/airmax/airmax-yagi-antenna/
>
> We have over 150 in field and another 40 in stock. Most all mounted on
> elbows, few on powder coat 1" 5'-10' poles.
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:58 AM, Chris Soiles 
> wrote:
>
>> Nanobridges with reflectors?
>>
>> Yogi 900, is that rocket with yagi?
>>
>> Chris Soiles
>> Owner
>> Rio Cities
>> csoi...@riocities.net
>> 505-966-6389
>>
>> On Jan 5, 2015, at 9:22 PM, Clay Stewart <
>> cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote:
>>
>> Farthest customers are usually 8 miles... Not the 12-13 we use to get
>> with Trangos, but 4-5 times the throughput! nLOS we expect from 5-12Mbps
>> depending on foliage and distance. That said, we have move a lot of 900
>> Yagi subs to NanoBeams 2.4 and 5.8 due to better throughput 2 to 3 times
>> better throughput. And with that said, Yagi 900s have their place still,
>> getting those which 2.4 and 5.8 are out of bounds.
>>
>> Our average Loco 900 is around 2 miles and average Yagi 900 around 5
>> miles. Preferably with our plans which have less then 8 Mbps.
>>
>> On Monday, January 5, 2015, Chris Soiles  wrote:
>>
>>> 10' separation needed or can use the RF armor  3 sector mount and just
>>> leave backside empty?
>>>
>>> What kind throughput and NLOS distance you seeing?
>>>
>>> Sent from iPhone 5S
>>>
>>> Chris Soiles
>>> Owner
>>> Rio Cities
>>> csoi...@riocities.net
>>> 505-966-6389
>>>
>>> On Jan 5, 2015, at 7:26 PM, Clay Stewart <
>>> cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> We run a few 900 UBNT sectors with RFShields in pairs with only 10'
>>> separation. But due to mountain side locations we on do pairs, not three.
>>> Bears up the mountain side have not requested service yet. These are loaded
>>> with 30-40 subs each on 8-10 CW. NF below -100. Channels 907 and 924. Shame
>>> you cannot set 3rd one on 915 or 916... With 3 on 8 CW at freq 907,
>>> 915, 924 shielded it would work with closer arrangement.
>>>
>>> On Saturday, January 3, 2015, RickG  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Blair, That makes sense. Let us know if you find any and I'll do the
>>>> same!
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Blair Davis  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  IME, bandpass filters are useful in 900MHz, if you are close to a
>>>>> pager tower.   Around here, those are on 930MHz or so and very hot.
>>>>>
>>>>> But if you want to co-locate a couple 900MHz UBNT AP's, I think
>>>>> channel filters are the way to go...  If I can find any.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/3/2015 1:43 PM, RickG wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I meant for 900MHz.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Blair Davis  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  IME, bandpass filters are useless on 2.4GHz unless you have a major
>>>>>> source of out of band interference...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And, being locked into a channel isn't too bad, in the country.
>>>>>> Don't know how well it would work in the city...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/2/2015 9:02 PM, RickG wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, getting locked into a channel is a real problem. Does filtering
>>>>>> below and above the range help by using a filter such as  this:
>>>>>> http://www.rflinx.com/products/filters/900/bpfx/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Chuck Hogg 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've used these with success, but it locks you into a channel.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.l-com.com/bandpass-filter-rf-splitter-24-ghz-indoor-8-pole-ultra-high-q-wifi-band-pass-filters
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocketm900

[Clay Stewart]

Yes, UBNT YAGI with UBNT Rocket.
http://www.ubnt.com/airmax/airmax-yagi-antenna/

We have over 150 in field and another 40 in stock. Most all mounted on
elbows, few on powder coat 1" 5'-10' poles.

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:58 AM, Chris Soiles  wrote:

> Nanobridges with reflectors?
>
> Yogi 900, is that rocket with yagi?
>
> Chris Soiles
> Owner
> Rio Cities
> csoi...@riocities.net
> 505-966-6389
>
> On Jan 5, 2015, at 9:22 PM, Clay Stewart <
> cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote:
>
> Farthest customers are usually 8 miles... Not the 12-13 we use to get with
> Trangos, but 4-5 times the throughput! nLOS we expect from 5-12Mbps
> depending on foliage and distance. That said, we have move a lot of 900
> Yagi subs to NanoBeams 2.4 and 5.8 due to better throughput 2 to 3 times
> better throughput. And with that said, Yagi 900s have their place still,
> getting those which 2.4 and 5.8 are out of bounds.
>
> Our average Loco 900 is around 2 miles and average Yagi 900 around 5
> miles. Preferably with our plans which have less then 8 Mbps.
>
> On Monday, January 5, 2015, Chris Soiles  wrote:
>
>> 10' separation needed or can use the RF armor  3 sector mount and just
>> leave backside empty?
>>
>> What kind throughput and NLOS distance you seeing?
>>
>> Sent from iPhone 5S
>>
>> Chris Soiles
>> Owner
>> Rio Cities
>> csoi...@riocities.net
>> 505-966-6389
>>
>> On Jan 5, 2015, at 7:26 PM, Clay Stewart <
>> cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote:
>>
>> We run a few 900 UBNT sectors with RFShields in pairs with only 10'
>> separation. But due to mountain side locations we on do pairs, not three.
>> Bears up the mountain side have not requested service yet. These are loaded
>> with 30-40 subs each on 8-10 CW. NF below -100. Channels 907 and 924. Shame
>> you cannot set 3rd one on 915 or 916... With 3 on 8 CW at freq 907,
>> 915, 924 shielded it would work with closer arrangement.
>>
>> On Saturday, January 3, 2015, RickG  wrote:
>>
>>> Blair, That makes sense. Let us know if you find any and I'll do the
>>> same!
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Blair Davis  wrote:
>>>
>>>>  IME, bandpass filters are useful in 900MHz, if you are close to a
>>>> pager tower.   Around here, those are on 930MHz or so and very hot.
>>>>
>>>> But if you want to co-locate a couple 900MHz UBNT AP's, I think channel
>>>> filters are the way to go...  If I can find any.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/3/2015 1:43 PM, RickG wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I meant for 900MHz.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Blair Davis  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  IME, bandpass filters are useless on 2.4GHz unless you have a major
>>>>> source of out of band interference...
>>>>>
>>>>> And, being locked into a channel isn't too bad, in the country.  Don't
>>>>> know how well it would work in the city...
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/2/2015 9:02 PM, RickG wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, getting locked into a channel is a real problem. Does filtering
>>>>> below and above the range help by using a filter such as  this:
>>>>> http://www.rflinx.com/products/filters/900/bpfx/
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Chuck Hogg  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I've used these with success, but it locks you into a channel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.l-com.com/bandpass-filter-rf-splitter-24-ghz-indoor-8-pole-ultra-high-q-wifi-band-pass-filters
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Regards,
>>>>>> Chuck
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Air Link 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you share your source for 2.4 filters?
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 11:52 AM, RickG  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any news on cavity filters for 900MHz?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Blair Davis 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  No.
>>>>>>&

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24 mile AF5

[Clay Stewart]

OK, now I am confused... only third time today...  how are you running
30Mhz CW on AF5? 30Mhz is greyed out on all possible selections on all of
my AF5s? I am running V2.1.

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Nate Burke  wrote:

>  30mhz channel  FDX 5833 and 5742.  The Rocket radio it's self is not
> shielded, but it's hooked up to a WBMFG 3' Dish.  AF5 is mounted right on
> top of the 3' dish so I think it's more the close proximity than anything.
>
>
>
> On 1/5/2015 9:30 PM, Clay Stewart wrote:
>
> Excellent Nate. Can you share freq and CW. On that rocket interfering, is
> the rocket itself shielded?  I have been using a third party rocket shield
> on 900, 5.8 and 2.4 with good results.
>
> On Saturday, January 3, 2015, Nate Burke  wrote:
>
>>  Here's a 22 mile hop.  Really we put it up just to see how they would do
>> at distance.
>>
>>
>>
>> Modulation is dipping on one end because of interference from a Rocket
>> that I can't re-frequency, but is going to licensed soon.
>>
>>
>>
>> Nate
>>
>> On 1/3/2015 6:43 PM, Clay Stewart wrote:
>>
>> Currently with rain and heavy fog Heavy rain earlier in week, and
>> more tomorrow...
>>
>> On Thursday, January 1, 2015, Mike Hammett 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>  Something I would very much recommend against. I run 3' dishes for
>>> links about that long. That's 22 dB less link margin than what I'd run.
>>> That's a big difference in speed\quality.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>> --
>>> *From: *"TJ Trout" 
>>> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
>>> *Sent: *Thursday, January 1, 2015 10:55:16 AM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] 24 mile AF5
>>>
>>> 24 miles using less than 2ft antennas?
>>> On Jan 1, 2015 8:12 AM, "Clay Stewart" <
>>> cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not bad Mostly self interference and planning issues. Running 20 CW
>>>> max so far.
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, January 1, 2015, Robert  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> How noisy is your band for that shot?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01/01/2015 07:39 AM, Clay Stewart wrote:
>>>>> > Got tied up with some power outages and such... Will be back on that
>>>>> > long shot this weekend to fine tune and get throughput. This is a
>>>>> great
>>>>> > LOS though... Mountain to mountain 800-1000 above terrain
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Tuesday, December 30, 2014, Daniel Peoples >>>> > <mailto:dpe...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > What does this link look like on a airview?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > /Daniel Peoples/
>>>>> > Resonance Broadband
>>>>> > /Resonancebroadband.com/ <http://Resonancebroadband.com>
>>>>> > 918-429-3620
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Mike Hammett
>>>>> > >>>> > >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It says the throughput it'll do in the screen shot.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > -
>>>>> >     Mike Hammett
>>>>> > Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>>> > http://www.ics-il.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>  
>>>>> > *From: *"Josh Luthman" >>>> > >>>> ');>>
>>>>> > *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" >>>> > >
>>>>> > *Sent: *Tuesday, December 30, 2014 3:14:29 PM
>>>>> > *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] 24 mile AF5
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Throughput?
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Josh Luthman
>>>>> > Office: 937-552-2340 
>>>>&g

Re: [Ubnt_users] Interface Usage Amounts

[Clay Stewart]

So the stats as is on INTERFACES is a little useless, if I am right and it
is counting UBNT compressed data on the WLAN side... unless there was a new
column that gave the compression ratio. That would be interesting to see,
especially in comparing OS versions and radio models.

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:13 AM, RickG  wrote:

> Clay, That's interesting too. I'd love to get Ubiquiti's input on this!
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Clay Stewart <
> cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote:
>
>> Rick, I think the counts are according to where in the stream the data is
>> being calculated, which seems to me to be at the bridging module code. Any
>>  RX data is counted twice, once at the port it comes in (LAN or WLAN) and
>> then again transferring the bridge. So adding the RX of both ports equals
>> the bridge total RX. Hat is the easy part.
>>
>> Now my best guess on the harder numbers.
>>
>> First the bridge TX count The program only counts Broadcast traffic,
>> thus only 8.44m out of bridge. Could be that chip does not have storage
>> bits to access?
>>
>> Next, the, I think the answer lies in AirMax perhaps. Wherever
>> compression/decompression is performed. For TX out of WLAN, you would
>> expect data from LAN to be compressed to send Wirelessly to another UBNT
>> AirMax unit... And it is. But in TX to LAN just the opposite, the data has
>> to be decompressed from UBNT proprietary formula into data that any non
>> UBNT unit can use... Thus data leaving out a LAN is bigger And it is.
>>
>> Just an old programmers guess [image: 🐸]
>>
>> On Monday, January 5, 2015, RickG  wrote:
>>
>>> I imagine it might be helpful if I attached a graphic rather than pdf so
>>> here it is.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:37 PM, RickG  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Referring to the attached graph: Why do the interfaces show such a
>>>> difference in bytes transferred?
>>>> --
>>>> -RickG KyWiFi
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -RickG KyWiFi
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> --
>> Clay Stewart, CEO
>> SCS Broadband
>>   434.263.6363 O
>>   434.942.6510 C
>>   cstew...@scsbroadband.com
>> “We Keep You Up and Running”
>>
>> Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
>> Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -RickG KyWiFi
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, CEO
SCS Broadband
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

[Clay Stewart]

5476 is lowest freq possible and that is at 10 CW.

Also, AF is unforgiving if you only put in one DFS channel and it detects a
hit... It goes off air and displays 'Radar Detected', and now you have a
tower trip. So either make sure it is clean well around channel or place
three spaced DFS channels for switching!

Good note, my 22.5 mile shot just went through days of fog, most and heavy
rain with no variance in QUAM or signal And it is still not fine tuned
for clearer frees and aiming.

On Saturday, January 3, 2015, Mike Hammett 
wrote:

> To be more precise, 5150 - 5350 are unavailable on the AF5 due to hardware.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> --
> *From: *"Mathew Howard"  >
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group"  >
> *Sent: *Saturday, January 3, 2015 7:27:00 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5
>
>  AF5 has been DFS approved since it first shipped. however, it will only
> go down to 5.4ghz due to hardware (filter/antenna) limitations, so 5.2ghz
> won't be happening on the current hardware.
>
>  --
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
>  [
> ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> ] on behalf
> of Chris Soiles [csoi...@riocities.net
> ]
> *Sent:* Saturday, January 03, 2015 7:17 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Group
> *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] AF5
>
>   If and When they get DFS approved, will the new channels just work?
>
>  Haven't bought any yet, but this could sway me to buy now vs wait
>
>  Chris Soiles
>  Owner
>  Rio Cities
> csoi...@riocities.net
> 
> 505-966-6389
>
> _______
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>

-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, CEO
SCS Broadband
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocketm900

[Clay Stewart]

Farthest customers are usually 8 miles... Not the 12-13 we use to get with
Trangos, but 4-5 times the throughput! nLOS we expect from 5-12Mbps
depending on foliage and distance. That said, we have move a lot of 900
Yagi subs to NanoBeams 2.4 and 5.8 due to better throughput 2 to 3 times
better throughput. And with that said, Yagi 900s have their place still,
getting those which 2.4 and 5.8 are out of bounds.

Our average Loco 900 is around 2 miles and average Yagi 900 around 5 miles.
Preferably with our plans which have less then 8 Mbps.

On Monday, January 5, 2015, Chris Soiles  wrote:

> 10' separation needed or can use the RF armor  3 sector mount and just
> leave backside empty?
>
> What kind throughput and NLOS distance you seeing?
>
> Sent from iPhone 5S
>
> Chris Soiles
> Owner
> Rio Cities
> csoi...@riocities.net
> 
> 505-966-6389
>
> On Jan 5, 2015, at 7:26 PM, Clay Stewart <
> cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> We run a few 900 UBNT sectors with RFShields in pairs with only 10'
> separation. But due to mountain side locations we on do pairs, not three.
> Bears up the mountain side have not requested service yet. These are loaded
> with 30-40 subs each on 8-10 CW. NF below -100. Channels 907 and 924. Shame
> you cannot set 3rd one on 915 or 916... With 3 on 8 CW at freq 907,
> 915, 924 shielded it would work with closer arrangement.
>
> On Saturday, January 3, 2015, RickG  > wrote:
>
>> Blair, That makes sense. Let us know if you find any and I'll do the same!
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Blair Davis  wrote:
>>
>>>  IME, bandpass filters are useful in 900MHz, if you are close to a pager
>>> tower.   Around here, those are on 930MHz or so and very hot.
>>>
>>> But if you want to co-locate a couple 900MHz UBNT AP's, I think channel
>>> filters are the way to go...  If I can find any.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/3/2015 1:43 PM, RickG wrote:
>>>
>>> I meant for 900MHz.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Blair Davis  wrote:
>>>
>>>>  IME, bandpass filters are useless on 2.4GHz unless you have a major
>>>> source of out of band interference...
>>>>
>>>> And, being locked into a channel isn't too bad, in the country.  Don't
>>>> know how well it would work in the city...
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> On 1/2/2015 9:02 PM, RickG wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, getting locked into a channel is a real problem. Does filtering
>>>> below and above the range help by using a filter such as  this:
>>>> http://www.rflinx.com/products/filters/900/bpfx/
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Chuck Hogg  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've used these with success, but it locks you into a channel.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.l-com.com/bandpass-filter-rf-splitter-24-ghz-indoor-8-pole-ultra-high-q-wifi-band-pass-filters
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  Regards,
>>>>> Chuck
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Air Link 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you share your source for 2.4 filters?
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 11:52 AM, RickG  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any news on cavity filters for 900MHz?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Blair Davis 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  No.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We did try shielding with metal plates, but it seemed to be
>>>>>>>> reflections.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll give it another shot when I find some cavity filters that
>>>>>>>> allow me to channelize the band.  That has worked extremely well on 
>>>>>>>> 2.4GHz.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/31/2014 12:09 PM, Rory Conaway wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Blair, did you use RF Armor shield kits?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rory
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>

[Ubnt_users] Interface Usage Amounts

[Clay Stewart]

Rick, I think the counts are according to where in the stream the data is
being calculated, which seems to me to be at the bridging module code. Any
 RX data is counted twice, once at the port it comes in (LAN or WLAN) and
then again transferring the bridge. So adding the RX of both ports equals
the bridge total RX. Hat is the easy part.

Now my best guess on the harder numbers.

First the bridge TX count The program only counts Broadcast traffic,
thus only 8.44m out of bridge. Could be that chip does not have storage
bits to access?

Next, the, I think the answer lies in AirMax perhaps. Wherever
compression/decompression is performed. For TX out of WLAN, you would
expect data from LAN to be compressed to send Wirelessly to another UBNT
AirMax unit... And it is. But in TX to LAN just the opposite, the data has
to be decompressed from UBNT proprietary formula into data that any non
UBNT unit can use... Thus data leaving out a LAN is bigger And it is.

Just an old programmers guess 🐸

On Monday, January 5, 2015, RickG > wrote:

> I imagine it might be helpful if I attached a graphic rather than pdf so
> here it is.
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:37 PM, RickG  wrote:
>
>> Referring to the attached graph: Why do the interfaces show such a
>> difference in bytes transferred?
>> --
>> -RickG KyWiFi
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -RickG KyWiFi
>


-- 


-- 
Clay Stewart, CEO
SCS Broadband
  434.263.6363 O
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@scsbroadband.com
“We Keep You Up and Running”

Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com
Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users