on 7/29/03 7:44 AM, robin pinning at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
see steve, now i know for certain you're trolling.
as ken says, it'd be nice to see what music you really enjoy. to see where
you're coming from when you post all your criticism of us 30something 80's
obssessed trend following
- Original Message -
on 7/29/03 7:44 AM, robin pinning at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
see steve, now i know for certain you're trolling.
I've come to the conclusion that spw is Luke Monteiro in disguise,
revisiting the scene of the crime.
Tristan
===
Text/Mixes/Pics:
- Original Message -
From: Phonopsia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: spw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 313 list 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: (313) Vestax or Technics
- Original Message -
on 7/29/03 7:44 AM, robin pinning at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Nah, not here to troll or to 313 hero worship.
I will say from reading J.T.'s reviews when it comes to newer music the
'tres demented (planet e)' sounds decent.
The last thing I bought on Planet E was The Climax.
I'm not into house like JT Donaldson, 3 Chairs, Moodyman, Russ Gabriel,
ect...
on
I will say from reading J.T.'s reviews when it comes to newer music the
'tres demented (planet e)' sounds decent.
At last, something I agree with you on!
k
this coming from someone who plays mostly '80s music
on his radio show. I know your jsut trying to educate
people but that's so typical why not more
minmal techno and early '90s techno?
mostly 80's? Really? I think you mean SOME, but definitely the
minority. The 80's is decade, not a
Mike Huckaby, 2 weeks ago: See in the beginning we didn't see no separation
between house and techno, it was all the same music.
Similarly, when they started making hip hop records in the 70s, they thought
they were just making disco their own way, something pointed up perfectly
in how Rapper's
i really like the sound of records played at minus 8. and believe me--i've
got plenty of records.
From: Langsman, Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:11:31 +0100
To: 'Sakari Karipuro' [EMAIL PROTECTED], 313
313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Vestax or Technics
not to diss
Straight up spw, I'd be interested to hear what records you yourself are
enjoying at the moment.
k
As funny and ridiculous as my statement must seem, people would have not
made statements like you must play records at normal tempo back in
the early
to mid '90s when minimal techno was all the
on 7/28/03 8:44 PM, Kent williams at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Huckaby, 2 weeks ago: See in the beginning we didn't see no
separation
between house and techno, it was all the same music.
yeah, Chicago house. (oooh that was a good one)
after 1990 you started to see a separation I'm sure
they were just making disco their own way, something pointed up perfectly
in how Rapper's Delight is Good Times note for note.
Good times go-good go-good times go-good go-good times, that's almost a
played out trick in turntablism.
The Invisible Scratch Pickles can run circles around the
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 07:05:58 -0500, spw [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
on 7/28/03 8:44 PM, Kent williams at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good times go-good go-good times go-good go-good times, that's almost a
played out trick in turntablism.
The Invisible Scratch Pickles can run circles around the
,
d$
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 5:43 PM
To: spw
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org; Matthew MacQueen
Subject: Re: (313) Vestax or Technics
But there is a difference between being trendy and having your tastes
develop along side
- Original Message -
From: Sakari Karipuro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 10:37 PM
Subject: RE: (313) Vestax or Technics
ian cheshire wrote on Sun, 27 Jul 2003 about following:
of practice) emulate the reverse action thus enhancing your
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (313) Vestax or Technics
lol! that's great :)
altho' ... remember that old song nine is a classic by Ace the Space?
that sounded pretty neat slowed wAy down (like -4 to -8 range).
lisa
Sakari Karipuro wrote:
not to diss anyone personally
2003 17:48:33 -0400
To: Sakari Karipuro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (313) Vestax or Technics
lol! that's great :)
altho' ... remember that old song nine is a classic by Ace the Space?
that sounded pretty neat slowed wAy down (like -4 to -8 range).
lisa
Sakari Karipuro wrote
hmmm - obviously I've missed some of the finer moments of the 313 list
(wasn't around when this was discussed previously) - hehe!
experimental is fun, but sometimes it goes horribly wrong. the chipmunk
vocals, the scary point of tipping into that awful European hi-energy
beat range (you know
Pitching up records has always been a part of Detroit techno.
As a general practice a techno label like UR (when it was a techno label)
would release a record a little slower then the
actual DJ speed.
on 7/27/03 9:48 PM, lisa at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sakari Karipuro wrote:
not to diss
lisa wrote on Sun, 27 Jul 2003 about following:
too-slowed songs/vocals that sound like a scary drug trip. I think if
DJs use judgement get creative great things can happen. It's good to
play around. There should be no limits.
of course, there's always some exceptions to the rule. i'm just
not to diss anyone personally, there is ABSOLUTELY no need for pitch
above +4% or less than -2%. if you come into such situation you don't
have enough records with you.
There is if you play GheTToStyle thankyou very much !!!
.. Oh yeah and that involves having far too many records !
Peace,
Message-
From: Chris Anglesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: zondag 27 juli 2003 22:46
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) Vestax or Technics
Hello 313 Peepz,
I've come into a bit of money (literally) and am looking to
invest in a pair of turntables; the question is what
?
I'm happy with them and I wouldn't trade them in for technics.
Joost
-Original Message-
From: Chris Anglesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: zondag 27 juli 2003 22:46
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) Vestax or Technics
Hello 313 Peepz,
I've come
Thanks for the comparison...I agree about the pitch, I like the resistencace
on the 1210s but vestax are definitely moving things forward quite
substantially especially with the straight arm etc.
all the vestax needed (imo) was diecast aluminium shell instead of the
plastic...
all that stuff
smells like Freeland ?? isn't that what it is ?
-Original Message-
From: DJ Nikadeemas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 July 2003 03:33
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Vestax or Technics
I think you're searching for track #8 which clocks in at 123 bpm's on
http
Sakari Karipuro wrote:
not to diss anyone personally, there is ABSOLUTELY no need for pitch
above +4% or less than -2%. if you come into such situation you don't
have enough records with you.
sakke
This sounds overly prscriptive to me. People play in a variety of ways with
a
For house I can understand that, kind of.. But are you for real sakari!?
|-Original Message-
|From: Odeluga, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: 28 July 2003 12:15
|To: 313@hyperreal.org; Sakari Karipuro
|Subject: RE: (313) Vestax or Technics
|
|
|
|
| Sakari Karipuro wrote
@hyperreal.org; Sakari Karipuro
Subject: RE: (313) Vestax or Technics
For house I can understand that, kind of.. But are you for real sakari!?
|-Original Message-
|From: Odeluga, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: 28 July 2003 12:15
|To: 313@hyperreal.org; Sakari Karipuro
|Subject: RE: (313
; Sakari Karipuro
Subject: RE: (313) Vestax or Technics
Sakari Karipuro wrote:
not to diss anyone personally, there is ABSOLUTELY no need for
pitch
above +4% or less than -2%. if you come into such situation you
don't
have enough records with you.
sakke
This sounds overly
I've come into a bit of money (literally)
Wow, can you give me some. ;)
To be fair, this is a statement that it's trendy now to play records at
normal
tempo and house music is more trendy than techno at least on this mailing
list.
People here seem to feed off the vibes of the deephousemusicpage but from
what I read even dj's like Ron Hardy had a reputation of
gy.net cc:
Subject: Re: (313) Vestax or
Technics
07/28/03 03:21 PM
To be fair, this is a statement that it's trendy now to
play records at normal tempo and house music is more trendy
than techno at least on this mailing list.
People here seem to feed off the vibes of the deephousemusicpage
Ha! Steve I always like how you keep us abreast of the latest
spw wrote on Mon, 28 Jul 2003 about following:
To be fair, this is a statement that it's trendy now to play records at
normal tempo
i've tried to follow my rule, (if i may say so) for the past 10
years i've played records. i couldn't care less if it's trendy or
not. (and to repeat myself,
As funny and ridiculous as my statement must seem, people would have not
made statements like you must play records at normal tempo back in the early
to mid '90s when minimal techno was all the rage.
Now even Jeff Mills is mellowed out and mid tempo, trends change and a lot
of times people here
on 7/28/03 3:58 PM, Sakari Karipuro at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
spw wrote on Mon, 28 Jul 2003 about following:
To be fair, this is a statement that it's trendy now to play records at
normal tempo
i've tried to follow my rule, (if i may say so) for the past 10
years i've played records.
To: Matthew MacQueen; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Vestax or Technics
As funny and ridiculous as my statement must seem, people would have not
made statements like you must play records at normal tempo back in the
early
to mid '90s when minimal techno was all the rage.
Now even Jeff Mills
@hyperreal.org
cc:
07/28/03 04:02 PMSubject: Re: (313) Vestax or
Technics
quote
sh*t if we didn't develop and move along we'd all be discussing the
latest
tunes sung on Sesame Street.
/quote
Hey, cut down the Sesame bashing!! ^_^
--
--
Andrew Hodgson - Engineering x5235
--
Jim Henson's Creature Shop,
on 7/28/03 4:38 PM, Matthew MacQueen at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Irrelevant to my point. What I observed is your trend vigilance and I
perceive it as a waste of time and has nothing to do with most people
like or play. I think the only person so concerned with the trends is
music is you, so
spw wrote on Mon, 28 Jul 2003 about following:
on 7/28/03 3:58 PM, Sakari Karipuro at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've tried to follow my rule, (if i may say so) for the past 10
would you say you were mostly a techno or house person 10 years ago.
no, actually i was both. i've always been
sh*t if we didn't develop and move along we'd all be discussing the
latest
tunes sung on Sesame Street.
DBX's Rubber Ducky anyone?
Brent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 313@hyperreal.org
cc:
07/28/03 05:34 PMSubject: Re: (313) Vestax or
Technics
Hello 313 Peepz,
I've come into a bit of money (literally) and am looking to invest in a pair
of turntables; the question is what to go for, Technics or Vestax ? I've
had SL1210's before and although they are reliable i've always been
disappointed by their lack of features. I've heard good
Hello 313 Peepz,
I've come into a bit of money (literally) and am looking to invest in a pair
of turntables; the question is what to go for, Technics or Vestax ? I've
had SL1210's before and although they are reliable i've always been
disappointed by their lack of features. I've heard good
especially if you won't be
able to use it on a 1200 when playing out??
Ohhh and the Vestax is ugly! ;-)
Just my .02happy shopping,
m*
- Original Message -
From: Chris Anglesey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 4:46 PM
Subject: (313) Vestax
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 5:04 PM
Subject: Re: (313) Vestax or Technics ?
This one's been beat to death, but I'll reiterate the single most
important reason why you should get the Technics: that's what you'll be
playing on when you do gigs. Period. Always. The clubs will have
Technics
-Original Message-
From: Chris Anglesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 July 2003 21:46
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) Vestax or Technics
Hello 313 Peepz,
I've come into a bit of money (literally) and am looking to invest in a pair
of turntables; the question is what to go
ian cheshire wrote on Sun, 27 Jul 2003 about following:
of practice) emulate the reverse action thus enhancing your technique :) +
16 is a good feature but one simple turn of a screw and you'll have the same
not to diss anyone personally, there is ABSOLUTELY no need for pitch
above +4% or
- Original Message -
From: ian cheshire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chris Anglesey [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 5:19 PM
Subject: RE: (313) Vestax or Technics
Hi ya Chris
Well for me (I'll go out on the limb here :) would be Technics.
Sure the Vestax
lol! that's great :)
altho' ... remember that old song nine is a classic by Ace the Space?
that sounded pretty neat slowed wAy down (like -4 to -8 range).
lisa
Sakari Karipuro wrote:
not to diss anyone personally, there is ABSOLUTELY no need for pitch
above +4% or less than -2%. if you
- and i've said it few times here before..
Sakke's pet peeve is well documented;-)
51 matches
Mail list logo
