We just had a new public library built here in town. The entire LAN
infrastructure is built on PON using the Tellabs ONT's.
http://www01.tellabs.com/products/tellabs1100ont.shtml I've briefly
looked around their site, and read some case studies, but Why would you
choose PON infrastructure in
It's probably part of a standard product delivery .. the GPON ends up being
a demarcation point to the customer.
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Nate Burke
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:49 AM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why
lt;https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> --
> *From: *"Nate Burke" >
> *To: *"Animal Farm" >
> *Sent: *Tuesda
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:49:14 AM
Subject: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why?
We just had a new public library built here in town. The entire LAN
infrastructure is built on PON using the Tellabs ONT's.
http://www01.tellabs.com/products/tellabs1100ont.shtml I've briefly
looked around
*From: *"Nate Burke"
*To: *"Animal Farm"
*Sent: *Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:49:14 AM
*Subject: *[AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why?
We just had a new public library built here in town. The entire LAN
infrastructure is built on PON using the Tellabs ONT's.
h
>
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> ----------
> *From: *"Nate Burke"
Burke"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:16:36 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why?
But Why? I understand Long haul PON for FTTH, to conserve miles and miles of
trunk fiber, but why in a building? Instead of having a single device (a
switch) you now have active ha
;
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> --
> *From: *"Nate Burke"
> *
://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
*From: *"Nate Burke"
*To: *af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:16:36
Was it done with E-Rate money?
Is the service provider managing the internal network?
Maybe this is their MTU architecture.
From: Nate Burke
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:44 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why?
If the Desktop NIC can talk directly to the PON, that
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Nate Burke"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:44:14 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why?
If the Desktop NIC can talk directly to the PON, that totally makes sense. But
why run PON to the wa
I agree. Does such a creature exist?
From: Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:01 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why?
Do they have just a standard PON box at each desktop? If so, that's critically
stupid. PON to the wall is friggin dumb. PON to an SFP i
ge
> http://www.midwest-ix.com <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> From: "Nate Burke" mailto:n...@blastcomm.com>>
>
uch a creature exist?
>
> *From:* Mike Hammett
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:01 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why?
>
> Do they have just a standard PON box at each desktop? If so, that's
> critically stupid. PON to the wall is fr
t;
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>> http://www.midwest-ix.com <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange&g
I think Calix has come down over time.
From: Cassidy B. Larson
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:33 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why?
Are you scared of vendor lock-in with PON? That’s what scares me. Calix
jacking up their rates without any recourse but swapping
: Re: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why?
I think Calix has come down over time.
From: Cassidy B. Larson <mailto:c...@infowest.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:33 AM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why?
Are you scared of vendor
Their support certainly has not.
On Tuesday, June 23, 2015, Chuck McCown wrote:
> I think Calix has come down over time.
>
> *From:* Cassidy B. Larson
>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:33 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why?
>
&g
change
>http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
>
>- Original Message -
>
>From: "Nate Burke"
>To: af@afmug.com
>Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:44:14 AM
>Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why?
>
>If the Desktop NIC can talk directly to the PON, that totally
ix.com
>>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>> --
>> *From: *"Nate Burke"
>> *To: *af@afmug.c
dwest Internet Exchange
>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>>>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>> --
IL>
>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>>
>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>>>
t;[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
From: "Nate Burke" mailto:n...@blastcomm.com>>
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:16:36 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Wh
;>> PON to the desktop would only have active gear in the NOC and in the
>>>>> device. Everything between is passive.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>> Intelligent Co
@afmug.com
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 3:10:48 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why?
Maybe it's a non-issue, but it seems like active layout is the way to go. You
wind up with a fiber or two to each house and you can still hook it up in a pon
configuration, but have the option to
e, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Mike Hammett
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> PON to the desktop would only have active gear in the NOC and in the
>>>>>> device. Everything between is passive.
>>>>>>
>>>>&
gt;>>>>>
>>>>>> The more PON we do, the more I like it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Chuck
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Mike Hammett
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
27 matches
Mail list logo
