.
10MHz Channels with 64QAM is nothing I want to invest more money (we’ve
Purewave Wimax running and dont do more installs).
From: Stefan Englhardt<mailto:s...@genias.net>
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 1:52 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad
Channels with 64QAM is nothing I want to invest more money (we’ve
Purewave Wimax running and dont do more installs).
From: Stefan Englhardt <mailto:s...@genias.net>
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 1:52 PM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telra
ski
> *Sent:* Friday, February 12, 2016 2:17 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
>
>
> We crafted our packages and are selling the following on the platform
> http://www.silowireless.com/internet-packages/residential/nextpath-packages/
>
H, and 1 CAD = 0.72 USD. So those are actually pretty attractive prices.
From: Andreas Wiatowski
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 2:17 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
We crafted our packages and are selling the following on the platform
http
let’s say 20 Mbps, and talk like that
means we can sell 20 Mbps plans and put 100 subs on each sector.
From: Stefan Englhardt<mailto:s...@genias.net>
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 1:52 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
Yes. T
20 Mbps, and talk like that
means we can sell 20 Mbps plans and put 100 subs on each sector.
From: Stefan Englhardt
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 1:52 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
Yes. This gear has only a chance in regions where there is no other
An: af@afmug.com
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
I suppose if you can charge accordingly. People seem to think they should be
getting 50mbps for $20 with no install these days though...
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Stefan Englhardt mailto:s...@genias.net> >
cheap options.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Jason McKemie
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 12. Februar 2016 20:24
> *An:* af@afmug.com
> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
>
>
>
> Given the price it takes to get into a
Thought this. But if you need coverage with lower licensed frequencies there
are no cheap options.
Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Jason McKemie
Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Februar 2016 20:24
An: af@afmug.com
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
Given the
t;> __
>>>
>>> Andreas Wiatowski | CEO
>>>
>>> Silo Wireless Inc.
>>>
>>> Email andr...@silowireless.com
>>>
>>> 19 Sage Court
>>>
>>> Brantford, Ontario N3R 7T4 (CANADA)
>>>
>
l +1.519.449.5656 Extension-600|Fax +1.519.449.5536 |Toll Free
>> +1.866.727.4138
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com
>> *Sent:* February 12, 2016 11:57 AM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG
, Ontario N3R 7T4 (CANADA)
>
> Tel +1.519.449.5656 Extension-600|Fax +1.519.449.5536 |Toll Free
> +1.866.727.4138
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com
> *Sent:* February 12, 2016 11:57 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Telr
+1.519.449.5656 Extension-600|Fax +1.519.449.5536 |Toll Free
+1.866.727.4138
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: February 12, 2016 11:57 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
Didn’t make the connection between that LTE and the stuff
Juniper, Cisco, etc wouldn't like you very much when you call up to TAC
with an offbrand SFP :P
On Feb 12, 2016 11:56 AM, "Steve D" wrote:
> Well, there is nothing to say that it won't "Just Work". We just don't
> believe in paying for a support contract where the vendor can say "too bad
> so sa
Well, there is nothing to say that it won't "Just Work". We just don't
believe in paying for a support contract where the vendor can say "too bad
so sad" because we don't have all our eggs in their basket.
In this case, because it's standards-based and interoperable, we're going
with a vendor tha
But I thought it was all standards-based and interoperable. Say it ain't so.
On 2/12/2016 11:32 AM, Steve D wrote:
The gear and the tech are solid. It's the sales people being sales
people that cloud everything. We're waiting on a new core (as we
won't be using Telrad's since they have zero d
AM, wrote:
>
>> Didn’t make the connection between that LTE and the stuff Patrick was
>> pushing. So Andreas, does do all that super fantastic NLOS stuff Patrick
>> was promising?
>>
>> *From:* Ken Hohhof
>> *Sent:* Friday, February 12, 2016 9:52 AM
>>
ilto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Simon Westlake
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 11:19 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
I think that's actually being good at selling. You can sell something by being
dishonest about it's capabilities once.. but
Assuming you're selling a product that works... it's not likely to go too
well if you're telling everyone the thing you're trying to sell them
doesn't work :P
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Simon Westlake
wrote:
> I think that's actually being good at selling. You can sell something by
> bein
I think that's actually being good at selling. You can sell something by
being dishonest about it's capabilities once.. but you're not going to
be able to do it twice.
On 2/12/2016 11:18 AM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
I guess that's why I suck at sellingI call it as I see it. If it
works...
I guess that's why I suck at sellingI call it as I see it. If it
works... it works.. if it doesn't.. it doesn't I am honest when I test
gear they send me.
On Feb 12, 2016 10:09 AM, "can...@believewireless.net" <
p...@believewireless.net> wrote:
> I personally called Patrick out on what
I'd expect to hear the same thing soon if Baicells enters the US market.
Maybe on Monday?
On Friday, February 12, 2016, can...@believewireless.net <
p...@believewireless.net> wrote:
> I personally called Patrick out on what I'm about to say so it's not like
> I'm talking behind his back. But I re
I personally called Patrick out on what I'm about to say so it's not like
I'm talking behind his back. But I remember
when he was, I think, with Alvarion to start and talked about how great
their version of Wimax was and how it was
FAR superior to everyone else's. Then, he went to Aperto and COMPLE
Wasn't it the BreezeCompact series of basestations in 3.65 GHz?
-Original Message-
From: ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 10:56 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
But was there a specific model? I don't even re
Didn’t make the connection between that LTE and the stuff Patrick was pushing.
So Andreas, does do all that super fantastic NLOS stuff Patrick was promising?
From: Ken Hohhof
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 9:52 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
Andreas
"Ken Hohhof" wrote:
>
>> Patrick’s Linkedin profile doesn’t seem to mention Telrad, so maybe
>> something did change?
>>
>>
>> *From:* Chuck McCown
>> *Sent:* Friday, February 12, 2016 10:09 AM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Telra
and the stuff Patrick was
> pushing. So Andreas, does do all that super fantastic NLOS stuff Patrick
> was promising?
>
> *From:* Ken Hohhof
> *Sent:* Friday, February 12, 2016 9:52 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
>
> Andreas
I think Chuck is referring to something pre-Telrad. Seems somewhat
familiar...
On Friday, February 12, 2016, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 2/12/16 08:35, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>
>> Remember the days of posting about the works through solid rock product
>> he was pitching. Which product was that an
e very weird issues just before
>>>> Christmas, they sent Guy from Israel on boxing day and we spent a week in
>>>> the field diagnosing problems and solving them. Most of the problems were
>>>> related to outside interference and on tower interference. This field
But was there a specific model? I don't even remember the frequency, only
the claims.
-Original Message-
From: Seth Mattinen
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 9:51 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
On 2/12/16 08:35, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
Rem
Andreas from Silo Wireless posted yesterday about their experience with it. I
assume that was the Telrad LTE product, evolved from Alvarion WiMAX.
From: ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 10:35 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
Remember the
On 2/12/16 08:35, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
Remember the days of posting about the works through solid rock product
he was pitching. Which product was that and did the testing ever prove out?
Telrad?
I don’t have a Linkedin account, so I only see the public info.
From: Forrest Christian (List Account)
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 10:22 AM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
Actually it shows an end date for telrad, followed by a new job entry which
doesn't
Remember the days of posting about the works through solid rock product he was
pitching. Which product was that and did the testing ever prove out?
From: Forrest Christian (List Account)
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 9:22 AM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the
refrigerator.gl. Guess he sells even that.
Sorry cant resist :)
Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Forrest Christian (List
Account)
Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Februar 2016 17:13
An: af
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
Linked in says he's switched
> *Sent:* Friday, February 12, 2016 10:09 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
>
> What was the product he was so hot on a while back? Did it ever pan out?
>
> *From:* Gino Villarini
> *Sent:* Friday, February 12, 2016 8:46 A
Patrick’s Linkedin profile doesn’t seem to mention Telrad, so maybe something
did change?
From: Chuck McCown
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 10:09 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
What was the product he was so hot on a while back? Did it ever pan out
ng day and we spent a week in
>>>> the field diagnosing problems and solving them. Most of the problems were
>>>> related to outside interference and on tower interference. This field
>>>> diagnosing and knowledge level that Guy has in the product defin
What was the product he was so hot on a while back? Did it ever pan out?
From: Gino Villarini
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 8:46 AM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
i recently sent patrick an email and it bounced... hmmm
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:29 AM
a week in
>>>> the field diagnosing problems and solving them. Most of the problems were
>>>> related to outside interference and on tower interference. This field
>>>> diagnosing and knowledge level that Guy has in the product definitely
>>>> instille
erence and on tower interference. This field
>>> diagnosing and knowledge level that Guy has in the product definitely
>>> instilled confidence in the product and sealed my faith in the decision I
>>> made to move forward with them.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>&g
has in the product definitely
>> instilled confidence in the product and sealed my faith in the decision I
>> made to move forward with them.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> ______________
>>
>> A
16 6:10 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com; af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
>
>
>
> who?
>
> Sent from Outlook Mobile <https://aka.ms/qtex0l>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:47 PM -0800, "Keefe John"
> wro
+1
Jeremy Grip
North Branch Networks,LLC
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 6:10 PM
To: af@afmug.com; af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
who?
Sent from Outlook Mobile <https://aka
9.449.5656 Extension-600|Fax +1.519.449.5536 |Toll Free
> +1.866.727.4138
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* February 11, 2016 4:17 PM
>
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
&
ion-600|Fax
+1.519.449.5536 |Toll Free
+1.866.727.4138
Original message
From: Gino Villarini
Date: 2016-02-11 6:10 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: af@afmug.com, af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
who?
Sent from Outlook Mobile<https://aka.ms/qtex0l>
On Thu
Datum: 11.02.2016 23:46 (GMT+01:00)
An: af@afmug.com
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
I heard someone is launching something better than Telrad on
Monday. We'll see what it is!
On 2/11/2016 4:12 PM, Andreas Wiatowski
+1.519.449.5536 |Toll Free +1.866.727.4138
From: Af
[mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com]
On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: February 11, 2016 4:17 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad
ntford, Ontario N3R 7T4 (CANADA)
Tel +1.519.449.5656 Extension-600|Fax
+1.519.449.5536 |Toll Free
+1.866.727.4138
Original message
From: Keefe John
Date: 2016-02-11 5:47 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
Chartered to spearhe
Brantford, Ontario N3R 7T4 (CANADA)
Tel +1.519.449.5656 Extension-600|Fax +1.519.449.5536 |Toll Free
+1.866.727.4138
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
*Sent:* February 11, 2016 4:17 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
Are you do
0|Fax +1.519.449.5536 |Toll Free
+1.866.727.4138
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
*Sent:* February 11, 2016 4:17 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
Are you doing LTE or Wimax with Telrad, Sean?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
Are you doing LTE or Wimax with Telrad, Sean?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Sean Heskett
mailto:af...@zirkel.us>> wrote:
We deploy mainly LO
LTE
On Thursday, February 11, 2016, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Are you doing LTE or Wimax with Telrad, Sean?
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Sean Heskett > wrote:
>
>> We deploy mainly
Are you doing LTE or Wimax with Telrad, Sean?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
> We deploy mainly LOS with canopy 450 5ghz. However the telrad equipment
> has been amazing at con
We deploy mainly LOS with canopy 450 5ghz. However the telrad equipment
has been amazing at connecting clients that are buried in trees. I'm
extremely satisfied with the performance of the system...when it works. I
added the qualifier of "when it works" because I feel like we've been a bit
of a b
I saw that and left it alone
On Feb 11, 2016 11:46 AM, "Josh Reynolds" wrote:
> " On the other hand, I'd rather buy something from Satan than Patrick."
>
> LOL :)
> On Feb 11, 2016 5:46 AM, "Lewis Bergman" wrote:
>
>> That's a little higher than when we first started with canopy but not
>> s
" On the other hand, I'd rather buy something from Satan than Patrick."
LOL :)
On Feb 11, 2016 5:46 AM, "Lewis Bergman" wrote:
> That's a little higher than when we first started with canopy but not
> significantly so. On the other hand, I'd rather buy something from Satan
> than Patrick.
> In m
the web GUI is certainly an
improvement, physically it looks similar to Gemtek, I'm not a big fan of the
mounting bracket.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Moffett
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 9:46 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
We have 30
al Message- From: Adam Moffett
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 9:46 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad feedback, worth the $?
We have 30 BTS's deployed, but all of my experience is with Wimax
firmware. I don't really have anything particularly flattering to say,
but
We have 30 BTS's deployed, but all of my experience is with Wimax
firmware. I don't really have anything particularly flattering to say,
but I think most of my complaints are applicable to all wimax products.
I hate the CPE's. Gemtek needs a competitor.
On 2/11/2016 12:26 AM, TJ Trout wrote
That's a little higher than when we first started with canopy but not
significantly so. On the other hand, I'd rather buy something from Satan
than Patrick.
In my mind, it comes down to how little you have to baby an installed user.
You can afford to pay more for the CPE if you never have to think
It seems as if the telrad discussions have gone cold, seriously looking at
it for a new deployment but wanted to get some feedback from current users,
Gino? Etc
They have priced me out at about 45k for 4 radios, 4 sectors and the basic
EPC. $285 for the CPE. This is a fortune compared to anything
62 matches
Mail list logo
