As long as you can show into something on site, it will do the job... well,
it would for me, anyway.
On Feb 1, 2018 1:17 AM, "TJ Trout" wrote:
> they do but it's not direct TCP like I would like (aka dedicated static)
> but neat none the less, they have a very cheap monthly rate but they per MB
What if you set the OVPN to only come up if the primary interface fails?
Then you won't have all the handshakes eating through your data.
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 7:53 AM, Lewis Bergman
wrote:
> It won't fit every situation but if you only need occasional access and
> can work within the framewo
It won't fit every situation but if you only need occasional access and can
work within the framework there isn't a less expensive way to do it. We use
it in a few different scenarios and have a few more planned. We have a demo
setup of VoIP phones we use one on, It gets used a few times a month an
IPv6?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "TJ Trout"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 11:51:40 AM
Subject: [AFMUG] OOBE mikrotik
I was wanting to add out of band m
they do but it's not direct TCP like I would like (aka dedicated static)
but neat none the less, they have a very cheap monthly rate but they per MB
rate is very high compared to twilio and others
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:51 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
> But if Hologram has a way to access the dev
But if Hologram has a way to access the device like Lewis says, there's no
reason to maintain a persistent VPN connection.
On Jan 31, 2018 8:45 PM, "Eric Kuhnke" wrote:
Slightly more expensive, but t-mobile has plans that are $20-25/mo and
"unlimited" rate limited 128kbps x 128 kbps after that.
Slightly more expensive, but t-mobile has plans that are $20-25/mo and
"unlimited" rate limited 128kbps x 128 kbps after that. For a critical site
$20/mo can be worth it.
$2/mo is not a realistic figure if you're maintaining a persistent VPN
connection, the $ per MB rate for those sort of plans is
Hologram is 40 cents.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018, 8:19 PM Sean Heskett wrote:
> Interesting...I didn’t know there were plans for $2/mo. That definitely
> makes it worthwhile to have a backdoor LTE connection to towers.
>
> I’ll have to check into that
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:30 PM TJ Trout wro
Interesting...I didn’t know there were plans for $2/mo. That definitely
makes it worthwhile to have a backdoor LTE connection to towers.
I’ll have to check into that
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:30 PM TJ Trout wrote:
> Never, but it's not a bad idea to have out of band management? I can get
> the
Read up on hologram. They have a solution to reach any device on their
Network.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018, 6:30 PM Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> you don't, you set up a really small system at the site which can run
> openvpn. In Linux terminology it would have three interfaces, eth0 (private
> IP space hardwi
you don't, you set up a really small system at the site which can run
openvpn. In Linux terminology it would have three interfaces, eth0 (private
IP space hardwired to your serial console/core router/POP management
equipment), the LTE network interface, and tun0. Have it initiate, from
inside the
same as twilio which we use, problem is all LTE is NAT, how do i login to a
device behind nat when I cannot force the carrier to give me a port forward?
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Lewis Bergman
wrote:
> Hologram network and set up their site to do it for you. Pretty slick. I
> also like th
Hologram network and set up their site to do it for you. Pretty slick. I
also like that is really cheap if you don't use it. As a warning, don't let
the MT put a default route in for it or you will pay huge if your primary
goes down. Otherwise it is so close to free it is crazy.
On Wed, Jan 31, 20
Never, but it's not a bad idea to have out of band management? I can get
the LTE service for $2 a month + data used (ssh data = zero)
TJ
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
> Um how often are you loosing contact with your sites to necessitate this
> LTE backdoor?
>
> Seems lik
Um how often are you loosing contact with your sites to necessitate this
LTE backdoor?
Seems like a lot of overkill to make routing changes???
Am I missing something?
-sean
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:48 AM TJ Trout wrote:
> Does anyone want to trade a PPTP connection (prefer you are multiho
Does anyone want to trade a PPTP connection (prefer you are multihomed) for
the purpose of getting through LTE NAT? AKA I assign you a PPTP account
with a static IPV4 and you do the same, so that if either of our networks
go down we can use the others to tunnel back thru LTE to preform OOBM
functio
You can use PPTP through NAT on LTE. You can assign a static private IP
to both ends of that tunnel.
If PPTP won't pass something you need, you can run an EoIP tunnel using
the PPTP IP's as the endpoints of the EoIP tunnel. You end up with a
tunnel inside of a tunnel. It'll have a lowish real
17 matches
Mail list logo
