...ATMunn, Vij for ADoP.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:03 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> If you're interested, Aris endorsed o. for PM and voted
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 3:13 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
>> I intend without objection to ratify the following document in curly
>> braces. It is not accurate, as neithe
If you're interested, Aris endorsed o. for PM and voted
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 3:13 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> I intend without objection to ratify the following document in curly
> braces. It is not accurate, as neither of these players did win any
> election, I wish to ratify it because of equity. {
I point a finger at myself for not stating that the document was wrong.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 3:06 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> I intend to ratify the document contained in curly braces.
> {Just now, ATMunn won an election for ADoP. Just now, Alexis won an
> election for Prime Minister}.
>
> If anyone'
CoE: Missing my pended proposal "Appeals Procedure Fix".
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2017-October/036423.html
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
> I'm probably going to deny this, as there is (I think) a custom that the
> effective date of a r
I change my vote on proposal 6941 to AGAINST, and my vote on proposal 6942
to FOR.
(This does something.)
-Alexis
TTttPF (Is this my first time?)
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 06:20:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: Ørjan Johansen
Reply-To: "Agora Nomic discussions (DF)"
To: agora-discuss...@agoranomic.org
Subject: DIS: CFJ on another Campaigning mess (Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of
I intend without objection to ratify the following document in curly
braces. It is not accurate, as neither of these players did win any
election, I wish to ratify it because of equity. {Just now, ATMunn won
an election for ADoP. Just now, Alexis won an
election for Prime Minister}.
On Mon, Oct 16
I intend to ratify the document contained in curly braces.
{Just now, ATMunn won an election for ADoP. Just now, Alexis won an
election for Prime Minister}.
If anyone's interested, here's a vote-count.
PM
Three first preference Alexis votes, one for VJ Rada, ATMunn and PSS.
I eliminate the vote f
Oh, also, just in case, to stop self-ratification: CoE: there are more
proposals in the Proposal Pool than just these.
On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 at 21:10 Alexis Hunt wrote:
> I spend an AP to CFJ: The below-quoted document contains a self-ratifying
> list of proposals in the Proposal Pool. Arguments:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 at 23:21 Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
> quorum
I intend to revoke ORP: that was a bad idea.
I transfer the Community Chest to myself.
--
>From V.J. Rada
I create the following proposal
Title: Print more bucks. Or if people deregister, less bucks.
AI 2
Author: VJ Rada
Text:
Amend rule 2487 "Shiny Supply Level" by replacing the number "1000"
with the text "equal to 70 times the number of players" and by
replacing "may" with "CAN and SHALL" and replac
Ah, forgot that cleanup time could do that. I intend without objection to cause
Cleanup Time to amend the ruleset by replacing “registrar” in any places it
appears with “Registrar”.
Gaelan
> On Oct 15, 2017, at 8:26 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
> I mean put it in your list for the next "Cleanup Time"
I vote FOR on all.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
> quorum is 8.0 and th
O for the love of the light why? I retract Contracts v7, submit the
following, and pend it for a shiny.
-Aris
---
Title: Contracts v8
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Aris
Co-author(s): o, G., ais523, Gaelan, 天火狐, CuddleBeam, V.J Rada,
Trigon, Alexis, P.S.S.
Lines beginning with hashmarks ("#") and
It seems all of my major proposals will have 7 revisions. I withdraw
Contract v6, submit the following, and pend it for 1 shiny. It
contains some minor fixes.
---
Title: Contracts v7
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Aris
Co-author(s): o, G., ais523, Gaelan, 天火狐, CuddleBeam, V.J Rada,
Trigon, Alexis, P.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV5lzRHrGeg
I change my emotion to melancholy because the enabling proposal, which
I voted against, passed, and because I'm literally offering to pay
people to hold my money with no other condition and nobody is
accepting.
--
>From V.J. Rada
As do I.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017, 18:26 ATMunn ., wrote:
> Is this new or am I not aware of something?
>
> Well, either way, I guess I also claim a reward of two shinies for
> authoring and pending a passed proposal.
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 4:16 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
>> I claim the reward of tw
I spend an AP to CFJ: The below-quoted document contains a self-ratifying
list of proposals in the Proposal Pool. Arguments: does this count as a
portion of a purported Promotor's report? There is no information in the
report which isn't in the document, and this is clearly published by the
Promoto
I withdraw it; I had some revisions to do and it isn't ready.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017, 18:27 Aris Merchant, <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I pend this for 1 shiny.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > This is just a miscellaneous fix proposal:
> >
>
I pend this for 1 shiny.
-Aris
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> This is just a miscellaneous fix proposal:
>
> Proposal: High Power Cleanup (AI=3)
> {{{
> Text in square brackets is not a substantive part of this proposal and is
> ignored when it takes effect.
>
> Amend Rule
TTttPF
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 8:26 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> Is this new or am I not aware of something?
>
> Well, either way, I guess I also claim a reward of two shinies for
> authoring and pending a passed proposal.
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 4:16 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
>> I claim the reward of
I spend 1 AP to pend this. I spend 1 AP to pend Safety Regulations v2.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> I submit the following proposal.
>
> -Aris
>
> ---
>
> Title: Contracts v6
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-author(s): o, G., ais523, Gaelan, 天火狐, CuddleB
The decision was not initiated correctly, the initiation of the decision
lacked a list of valid votes.
On 10/15/2017 06:09 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
No it wasn't. The initiation of the Agoran Decision was illegal when
it happened and it's illegal now. I don'
I Point a Finger at Aris, alleging that e failed to distribute the proposal
identified below as pp3 last week, thereby failing to distribute all
pending proposals.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017, 17:38 Aris Merchant, <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This following is a revision to the proposa
As Promotor, I remove each of the following proposals from the proposal pool.
IDAuthor(s) AI Title
---
r1 nichdel3.0 Slower Promotion
r2 nichdel1.0 Guaranteed Stampage
I claim a five shiny reward for this report. I claim a five shiny reward
for publishing the Registrar's weekly report.
On 10/15/2017 03:39 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
I resolve the decision(s) to adopt proposal(s) 7908-7921 below.
--
I object.
This would take 2 weeks + 4 day objection period + pauses in between.
If instead you ratify that a decision started back when you said it
did (but with the new vote collector and all previous options as
present nominees), it could all be wrapped up this week.
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, VJ
TTttPF.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:41 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Darn, typo. I retract Safety Regulations. I submit the following proposal.
>
> -Aris
>
> ---
> Title: Safety Regulations v2
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-author(s): Alexis
>
> A
I submit the following proposal.
-Aris
---
Title: Contracts v6
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Aris
Co-author(s): o, G., ais523, Gaelan, 天火狐, CuddleBeam, V.J Rada,
Trigon, Alexis, P.S.S.
Lines beginning with hashmarks ("#") and comments in square brackets ("[]")
have no effect on the behavior of t
I submit the following proposal.
-Aris
---
Title: Safety Regulations
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Aris
Co-author(s): Alexis
Amend Rule 2493, "Regulations", by
* Replacing every instance of the word "instrument" with the words "textual
entity"; and
* Amending the second paragraph to read
I intend to ratify the following without objection. It is wrong as
there are or may be ongoing elections. I wish to ratify it to allow
new elections for the positions of ADoP and PM
{{There are no ongoing elections.}}
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> >By the rules of the time, the Decision was initiated correctly.
>
> THIS IS NOT TRUE. By the rules of the time, they were initiated
> wrongly. By the UNAMENDED rules of today (Initiating Agoran Decisions,
> rule 107), not changed at all by new proposals) th
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> No it wasn't. The initiation of the Agoran Decision was illegal when
> it happened and it's illegal now. I don't mean it's NEWLY illegal. I
> messed up and made an illegal initiation at the time, which can be
> remedied within 7 days, a period we are still i
No it wasn't. The initiation of the Agoran Decision was illegal when
it happened and it's illegal now. I don't mean it's NEWLY illegal. I
messed up and made an illegal initiation at the time, which can be
remedied within 7 days, a period we are still in.
I now, to a-b, officially "identify" the la
I judge CFJ 3570 FALSE. I judge CFJ 3571 TRUE.
First there's little doubt that "G is Overlord of Dunce" is not an
agency, because the name is invalid. Thus, it didn't enable any
abilities. The Superintendent's report does not self-ratify, so GOD
wasn't ratified into existence until VJ Rada ratifie
If anyone else wants to contradict me on what I think happens, go for it.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:39 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> I nominate myself as a candidate for both ADoP and Prime Minister. I
> am uncommitted.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:37 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
>> The election was validly i
I nominate myself as a candidate for both ADoP and Prime Minister. I
am uncommitted.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:37 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> The election was validly initiated. It looks like for four hours or so
> that we're still in the Nomination Phase: and then if there is more
> than one candidat
I submit the following proposal, "Appeals improvements", AI-1.7, and
pend it with shinies:
--
Amend Rule 911 (Motions and Moots) by replacing its first 2 paragraphs
with:
If a judgement has been in effect for less then s
I withdraw the proposal "Can or can't we?".
I submit the following proposal, "no we can't", AI-3, and AP-pend it:
--
Amend Rule 2125 (Regulated Actions) by replacing:
Restricted Actions CAN only be performed as describ
I designate 天火狐 to be next week's Silly Person.
I do the same.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 1:16 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> I claim the reward of two shinies for authoring and pending a passed proposal.
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 7:08 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
>> Quorums of 8 again ugh.
>>
>> Stop voting y'all lmao.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 6:39 A
I claim the reward of two shinies for authoring and pending a passed proposal.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 7:08 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Quorums of 8 again ugh.
>
> Stop voting y'all lmao.
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
>>
>> I resolve the decision(s) to ad
43 matches
Mail list logo
