I CFJ: G.'s citizenship switch is a player.
Arguments:
For ease of reference, let G_0 be G., and G_n be G_(n-1)'s citizenship
switch.
By R869 (How to Join and Leave Agora), citizenship is an entity switch,
implying that every switch has a citizenship switch. It follows that G_2
exists.
I CFJ: The Speed switch is a switch.
Arguments:
R2347/0 (Speed) fails to specify, in the words of R2162/1 (Switches),
[t]he type(s) of entity possessing an instance of that switch. In
particular, this information is specified nowhere in the rules. Thus,
the Speed fails the definition of a switch.
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 17:44 -0700, Sean Hunt wrote:
On 06/03/11 17:06, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
I CFJ: The Speed switch is a switch.
Arguments:
R2347/0 (Speed) fails to specify, in the words of R2162/1 (Switches),
[t]he type(s) of entity possessing an instance of that switch
6414 D 1 3.0 C-walkerFix Veto
FOR
6415 O 1 1.0 Wooble So much for that
endorse the Greetor, or if none endorse the most recent holder of the
office, or if none FOR*my voting limit.
6416 O 1 1.0 C-walkerEUDI Recognition
FOR*VL
6417 O 0 1.5 coppro
Kerim Aydin wrote:
Not an official opinion/judgement:
Fellow judges, I argue for AFFIRM with errror=50 (half right, the rule
does exist, but it was set to power 1 not 2). Three of us need to agree
on an error rating for affirm lest it remand, I'm open to other values.
-G.
I
6410 D 0 2.0 coppro
FOR
6411 D 1 2.0 Yally Terms and Vacancies 2.0
FOR
6412 O 1 1.0 allispaul A Standard Standard
FOR * my voting limit
6413 O 1 1.0 c-walkerOffice IIs with Agoran Consent
FOR * my voting limit
Pavitra
C-walker wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Benjamin
Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to see the EUDI (http://eudi.forumotion.net/) flipped to
Neutral. They're not *primarily* a nomic -- they're a player guild in an
online game I play -- but they have a formal charter
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
C-walker wrote:
{{
EUDI Recognition (AI = 1, II = 1, Coauthor = Pavitra)
Flip the Recognition of the EUDI (http://eudi.forumotion.net/) to Neutral.
}}
I make the above proposal Distributable (by announcement).
Whoops, that failed. I play Distrib-u-matic to make
C-walker wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree to the following contract:
{
1. The name of this public contract is Bob's Janitorial Service. Any
I join Bob's Janitorial Service.
I also join, and flip my AutoDeal to On. (I'm not currently a
6407 D 1 2.0 Wooble some cleanup
FOR
6408 D 1 2.0 coppro Fix Office Salary
FOR
6409 D 0 2.0 G. Right Power
FOR
I endorse Wooble in the Promotor election.
Pavitra
I vote FOR Proposal 6406.
I endorse allispaul for Anarchist.
Pavitra
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:32 AM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Listen up brothers and sisters,
So... I intend, with two support, to make
the player known as coppr'into a Bard.
Though c.'s intent (in my
== CFJ 2632 ==
The Conductor CAN publish a self-ratifying report.
The key question is whether the 'SHALL do X by mechanism Y' implies
'CAN do X by
6403 D 1 3.0 coppro Your Presence is Requested
FOR
6404 D 0 2.0 Murphy Fix expedited recusal
...PRESENT. Yes, active player interacts weirdly with judicial panels,
but appeal cases shouldn't be totally unexpeditable.
6405 D 3 3.0 coppro That's Just
Sean Hunt wrote:
This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decision to decide the
holder of the office of Janitor.
The candidates are coppro, ehird.
I endorse coppro.
Pavitra
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
=== CFJ 2619 (Interest Index = 0)
Wooble is party to at least one private contract containing the
word inferences.
It has become
Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2622
== CFJ 2622 ==
If a judicial case is submitted to and accepted by the
Justiciar, then the CotC CAN change its
Sean Hunt wrote:
I nominate Pavitra, c-walker, and Sgeo for Greetor.
I decline.
Pavitra
Ed Murphy wrote:
=== CFJ 2619 (Interest Index = 0)
Wooble is party to at least one private contract containing the
word inferences.
The history and circumstances of this
At 19:58 Thu 9 July 2009 UTC, comex wrote:
I CoE this one too, just in case. (The SLR should be non-empty.)
I leave the Cookie Jar.
ais523 wrote:
WOIITT Edge Case [used for one-off CFJ test]
Sorry, thought I left that already. I leave Edge Case, which thereby
terminates due to having zero parties.
6395 D 1 2.0 coppro Emergency Powers
FOR
6396 D 1 2.0 Yally An Election Issue
FOR
6397 D 0 2.0 Pavitra Support Diplomacy
FOR
6398 D 0 3.0 C-walkerProposal Tweaking Part 1
FOR
6399 D 1 2.0 Wooble decriminalize self-recusals
FOR
Kerim Aydin wrote:
I deputize for the IADOP to initiate an Agoran Decision to determine the
new officeholder of the Grand Poobah office. The eligible voters are the
active first-class players. The valid options are PRESENT, G., and WOOBLE.
I vote G.
Pavitra
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Elliott
Hirdpenguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Bahahahaha! I initiate an equity case regarding that pledge, whose
parties are me, Warrigal and comex;
I disfavor this case.
Me too.
Sean Hunt wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2009, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 15:54, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
I intend, with the majority consent of {coppro, C-walker, BobTHJ}, to
cause the LPRS to intend with Agoran Consent to register.
Pavitra
I consent
I opine REMAND in CFJ 2510a, in order to allow the judge to consider the
further arguments that have been advanced since e published eir original
judgement.
Pavitra
=== CFJ 2605 (Interest Index = 2)
Bdi ta Askatasuna joined Warrigal's unnamed contract.
I will begin by observing that I don't actually understand any of the
arguments
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I initiate an Agoran decision to decide the holder of the Conductor
office. The eligible voters are the active first-class players, the
vote collector is the IADoP, and the valid options are coppro and
PRESENT.
COPPRO
[I'm publishing this semi-report to correct multiple inaccuracies in the
history section of the last one.]
Parties to the LPRS:
Pavitra [Pointer]
coppro
C-walker
BobTHJ
History (all times UTC):
03:52 18Jun2009 LPRS created
03:52 18Jun2009 Pavitra joins
03:52 18Jun2009 Pavitra
[I forgot about the LPRS because it hasn't been used. You can NoV me for
slacking off if you care, but I'm guessing you don't.]
Parties to the LPRS:
Pavitra [Pointer]
coppro
No Point Vouchers of either axis exist.
History:
17:52 17Jun2009 LPRS created
17:52 17Jun2009 Pavitra joins
17:52
6386 O 2 1.0 C-walkerThe Greetor
FOR*3
6387 O 1 1.5 Wooble disinterested judges
FOR*3
6388 D 1 2.0 Tiger No more sneaky contestmasters
FOR
6389 O 0 1.0 Yally Janitor Cleaning
FOR*3
6390 D 0 3.0 Yally Person Cleaning
FOR
6391
C-walker wrote:
{{ This is a Public Contract and a Pledge which has no name. Parties
to this Pledge SHALL NOT change their nicknames or names by which they
are referred to in a nomic except during the Birthday of that nomic.
}}
I agree to this pledge.
Pavitra
comex wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal 6385 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=2) by Yally
[This is the exact same version as before the recent Distributability
amendment.]
AGAINST. This should have an II of 0, not 2.
AGAINST for the
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend without objection to make the PerlNomic Partnership inactive;
the server seems to be gone.
I object. The PNP sent a public message less than 32 hours ago, and the
contract provides for a new server to be set up in the event of primary
server failure. I would
Sean Hunt wrote:
On 6/28/09, Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend without objection to make the PerlNomic Partnership inactive;
the server seems to be gone.
I object. The PNP sent a public message less than 32 hours ago, and the
contract
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I initiate an Agoran decision to decide the holder of the Registrar
office. The eligible voters are the active first-class players, the
vote collector is the IADoP, and the valid options are Wooble
(incumbent), Yally, and PRESENT.
I endorse Wooble.
Pavitra
Roger Hicks wrote:
With contest and contestmaster points now reduced, and the winning
threshold doubled I believe a higher score index is in order. My goal
(as Scorekeepor) is to regulate the flow of points so that wins by
High Score occur (on average) every 4-6 weeks.
I intend with Agoran
Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal, AI=2, II=0
{{{
In rule 2124 (Agoran Satisfaction), replace A Supporter of a dependent
action is a first-class player who has publicly posted (and not
withdrawn) support for an announcement of intent to perform the action.
with A Supporter of a dependent action is a
6377 O 0 1.0 coppro inflation
endorse the IADoP
6378 D 1 3.0 Murphy Changing votes
FOR
6379 D 2 3.0 allispaul Caste Anarchy
FOR
6380 O 0 1.0 Wooble transferable points
FOR*3
6381 O 0 1.5 coppro It's the Thought That Counts
FOR*3
Sean Hunt wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Parties to 3-Scroll Rodne
ais523
allispaul
BobTHJ
coppro
comex
c-walker
OscarMeyr
Pavitra
Quazie
Tiger
I raise an equity case regarding 3-Scroll Rodney, in that I accidentally
published the list of what contracts are what and the
Sean Hunt wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Parties to 3-Scroll Rodne
ais523
allispaul
BobTHJ
coppro
comex
c-walker
OscarMeyr
Pavitra
Quazie
Tiger
I raise an equity case regarding 3-Scroll Rodney, in that I accidentally
published the list of what contracts
Sean Hunt wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Parties to 3-Scroll Rodne
ais523
allispaul
BobTHJ
coppro
comex
c-walker
OscarMeyr
Pavitra
Quazie
Tiger
I raise an equity case regarding 3-Scroll Rodney, in that I accidentally
published the list of what contracts are what and the contract provides
== CFJ 2593 ==
The proposal entitled It's the Thought That Counts, if adopted,
would successfully cause the first Rule Change described in its
text.
== CFJ 2594
Taral wrote:
I sit up.
I CFJ: Taral is sitting.
Arguments: Immediately before the above-quoted message, Taral was
standing. Does I sit up mean I become sitting or I change my
posture from supine/leaning to sitting?
If Taral intended to flip eir posture from standing to sitting, e would
I agree to the following:
{
This is a public Legalistic pledge named Edge Case.
Any person CAN join this contract by announcement, but SHALL NOT do so
on a Sunday unless e is Pavitra.
Any party CAN leave this contract by announcement, but SHALL NOT do so
on a Sunday.
}
I CFJ on each of the
I leave the Conservative Party.
Warrigal wrote:
I act on behalf of ə to intend, with Agoran Consent, to register.
I support.
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Fine. But I still think I deserve a win from this, so I CFJ on the
following sentence. It would be legal for for the IADoP to submit eir report
with the date the report is being submitted, not the date eir previous
report was submitted.
I intend, without two objections,
Taral wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:25 AM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
The following is a Win Announcement: coppro and comex each have scores
x+yi such that xy = 2500.
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to declare a skunk.
I support.
Sean Hunt wrote:
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
I submit the following proposal:
AI=2, II=1
Title: No more sneaky contestmasters
(((
Amend the section of Rule 2198 now reading:
(
If a contract states that one or more of its switches have
certain values, then they do.
)
to read:
(
Elliott Hird wrote:
I Dance a Powerful Dance.
I hail Eris!
So do I, but in a bottom-posting fashion.
Pavitra
comex wrote:
I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
diff format). The eligible voters are the parties to the IBA, the
options are FOR, AGAINST, and PRESENT, and I am the vote collector. I
vote FOR the Motion to Amend.
@@ -256,6 +255,7 @@
days is waived,
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
comex wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
By this definition, I make the current list of those who are marvy:
{C-walker, Pavitra, Taral, ehird}. Note that allispaul is not on this
list. Therefore, FALSE.
NoV: Taral violated
== CFJ 2547 ==
Yally created a pledge in the above message
Caller's Evidence:
[Subject: BUS: Janitor Pledge]
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Aaron
I agree to the {}-delimited contract below.
With the majority consent of the set of myself, I cause the LPRS to
intend with Agoran Consent to register.
{
I. GENERAL CONTRACTY STUFF
This is a Public Legalistic contract named the Lesser Points Relay
Service (LPRS). The LPRS can incur
Alex Smith wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 12:39 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
I submit the following proposal (II=3, Title=A Terrible Proposal):
I intend, without /three/ objections, to make this proposal
distributable. (Messing with Distributability is a rather awkward area;
therefore, I've tried
6355 D 1 2.0 Yally Eliminate Annoying Judge Requirements
FOR
6356 D 1 2.0 Yally IADoP CAN and SHALL
FOR
6357 O 1 1.0 comex 3 support is boring
FOR
6358 D 0 2.0 Tiger Canadian Anarchy
FOR. Sorry, Canada.
6359 D 0 3.0 Quazie
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I initiate an Agoran decision to decide the holder of the Janitor office.
The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector is the IADoP,
and the valid options are Quazie (incumbent), Tiger, Yally, and PRESENT.
YALLY
Sean Hunt wrote:
I intend, without party objection, to amend 3-Scroll Rodney as follows:
- Change the Frequency of the Scrolls of Concentration and
Hallucination to 0.12.
- Add a new scroll, the Scroll of Fire. When read, the Dungeon Master
SHALL privately ask the reader for a player.
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I initiate an Agoran decision to decide the holder of the Grand Poobah
office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector
is the IADoP, and the valid options are coppro (incumbent), G.,
Wooble, and PRESENT.
I endorse coppro.
Pavitra
Sean Hunt wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2544a
I opine REASSIGN. REMAND would normally be appropriate in this
situation, however, the case now has an interest index higher than the
former judge's judicial rank; a reassignment does not seem
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I initiate an Agoran decision to decide the holder of the Anarchist
office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector
is the IADoP, and the valid options are allispaul, C-walker, Tiger
(incumbent), Yally, and PRESENT.
Note: If you have already
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I initiate an election to decide the holder of the Promotor office. The
eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector is the IADoP, and
the valid options are coppro, Wooble (incumbent), Yally, and PRESENT.
I endorse Wooble.
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Proposal: Harder High Score (AI = 1, II = 1)
In Rule 2187, change 2500 to 5000.
End Proposal
I intend, with three support, to make the above proposal distributable.
-Yally
I support.
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
2009/6/9 Rodlen rodlenj...@gmail.com:
I intend, with three support, to make the above proposal Distributable.
I support.
I support.
I support and do so.
Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal, AI=1, II=0, title=inflation
{{{
In rule 2138's text, replace each instance of International with
Intergalactic and then do the same replacement on the Rule's title.
}}}
I intend, with 3 Support, to make the above proposal Distributable.
I support.
Sean Hunt wrote:
{{{
This is a Public Equitable pledge entitled Distributability Sucks.
Any player CAN join or leave this pledge by announcement.
Any player CAN act on behalf of any party to this pledge to support an
intent to make a proposal Distributable.
}}}
I join this.
Pavitra
I retract any previous votes on Proposals 6344-54.
6344 O 1 1.0 BobTHJ Nicked Off
AGAINST*3. Creating a SHALL ASAP for new players is a bad idea.
6345 D 2 3.0 Pavitra Time travel
FOR
6346 O 2 1.0 coppro Ribbon oops
FOR*3
6347 O 0 1.0 coppro
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
2009/6/9 Rodlen rodlenj...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
chamber: ordinary
ai: 1.0
interest: 1
proposer: Rodlen
coauthors:
title: What embargo?
submit_date: 2009-06-05
submit_mid:
Roger Hicks wrote:
Rolden 1+ 1i
I CFJ: The recent Scorekeepor's report included Rodlen's score.
I CFJ: Rolden has published a message.
I request linked assignments.
Arguments:
{
The first CFJ is almost certainly TRUE, but I'm including it for
comparison just in case.
When a
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
C#D# F#G#A#
Player C D E F G A B Total
DbEb GbAbBb
Pavitra
Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:16 AM, Rodlen rodlenj...@gmail.com wrote:
I judge both CFJ 2553 and CFJ 2556 TRUE.
Ignoring the non-animal meaning of pig, some pigs fly. The inflatable pigs
used in the live shows of Pink Floyd have
Sean Hunt wrote:
I guess 7 proposals and 13 CFJs for next week.
5 proposals, 10 CFJs.
Pavitra
comex wrote:
Proposal: 3 support is boring
Amend Rule 1607 (The Promotor) by replacing:
A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable with 3
Support, or by spending 1 Note.
with:
A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable by
spending 1
Sean Hunt wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Proposal: s/object/either
(AI = 2, please)
Amend Rule 1607 (The Promotor) by replacing the sentence beginning
A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable with
the following sentence:
A player CAN flip a specified proposal to
Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2570
== CFJ 2570 ==
C-walker recently submitted a proposal containing the 'word'
'registeredcontinuously'.
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Proposal: s/object/either
(AI = 2, please)
Amend Rule 1607 (The Promotor) by replacing the sentence beginning
A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable with
the following sentence:
A player CAN
Rodlen wrote:
I CFJ on the following statement:
If the proposal called Newbie Friendly passes, and someone called Joe wished
to register, if they said JOE IZ HARE, that would be enough to register in
Agora.
I disfavor this case due to conflict of interest.
comex wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:28 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
@@ -113,6 +113,11 @@
�A person CAN deposit an asset by transferring it to the IBA; e then
�gains the Effective Rate in zorkmids.
+If a person attempts to deposit multiple assets without specifying an
+order, and the
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
I join the IBA, deposit all my crops in it, and request subsidy.
I CFJ on: Pavitra owns at least 1 crop.
Evidence: comex claims the deposit fails because e didn't specify an
order
comex wrote:
I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
diff format). The eligible voters are the parties to the IBA, the
options are FOR, AGAINST, and PRESENT, and I am the vote collector. I
vote FOR the Motion to Amend.
[The diminishing returns system is
comex wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:58 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
diff format). �The eligible voters are the parties to the IBA, the
options are FOR, AGAINST, and PRESENT, and I am the vote collector. �I
vote FOR
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I initiate an election to decide the holder of the CotC office. The eligible
voters are the active players, the vote collector is the IADoP, and the
options are Murphy (incumbent), You May Call Me Big Fucking Edward, and
PRESENT.
MURPHY
Sean Hunt wrote:
Hmm... round 2:
I agree to the following:
{ This is a pledge named Test Subject 2. Its Disclosure is Public.
coppro can terminate this pledge by announcement.
This contract's Sentiment is Equitable. This contract's Sentiment is
Legalistic.}
I CFJ { I can initiate
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:34, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
Each of the following requests subsidization. �Disclaimer: Subsidization
requests fail if the Farmer has already requested subsidization this
week or if e owns at least as many lands as the Federal Subsidy.
* comex
Alex Smith wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 16:53 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
I CFJ {Test Subject is Green.}
I CFJ {Test Subject is Yellow.}
I CFJ { I can initiate an equity case regarding Test Subject 2.}
I intend, with 2 support, to flip the II of the
Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal, AI=1.7
{{{
Amend Rule 591 (Inquiry Cases) by appending to the list a new bullet
reading as follows:
{{
* ZOT, appropriate if the statement relates in some manner to
woodchucks.
}}
}}}
I intend, without Objection, to add ora...@cs.indiana.edu
I join the IBA, deposit all my crops in it, and request subsidy.
Pavitra
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
I join the IBA, deposit all my crops in it, and request subsidy.
Pavitra
Also, I intend without objection to terminate the PBA. It's dead in the
water.
Also, proposal AI=3 II=1 No sneaky intents:
{
Amend rule 107 (Initiating Agoran Decisions) by appending the paragraph
Ed Murphy wrote:
Pavitra wrote:
Also, proposal AI=3 II=1 No sneaky intents:
{
Amend rule 107 (Initiating Agoran Decisions) by appending the paragraph:
The Assessor's report contains a list of all Agoran decisions
currently in their voting periods.
}
[This should fix the
Roger Hicks wrote:
Rests (* = Fugitive)
-
2 Pavitra
I spend B B and F# C to destroy my Rests.
Pavitra
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I sit up and become Circuit.
Pavitra
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Pavitra wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:33 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Attitude
[See http://internomic2.wikidot.com/ruleset, rule 12]
Enact a new Rule, titled InterNomic Attitude:
I intend, with three support, to make this proposal distributable.
I submit the following proposal, Newbie Friendly, II=1, AI=2:
{
Amend Rule 869 (How to Join and Leave Agora) by replacing the text
A first-class person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or
prevented by the rules) register by announcing that e registers,
wishes to register,
I agree to the following:
{ The name of this pledge is Pledge that will Probably Cause Suspicion
and Controversy but Ultimately Does Nothing Except Appear in the History
Section of the Notary's Report. This pledge terminates immediately. }
Pavitra
6339 D 1 2.0 coppro Execution of Intent-on-Behalf
AGAINST.
This is specifically undesirable wrt partnerships, as it effectively
gives a free Support where one wouldn't normally be available. For
example, if Murphy intends to do something with 3 support, then e needs
3 other players
Sean Hunt wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 15:13, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2543
== CFJ 2543 ==
The IADoP's report includes the date eir
I agree to the contract below delimited by a { on its own line, and a }
on its own line.
I flip the Sentiment of The Conservative Party to Legalistic and amend
it by removing the first paragraph (paragraph -1).
The membership of The Conservative Party is {Pavitra}. Its text is below
delimited by
Sean Hunt wrote:
I transfer a prop from Goethe to Murphy because e has to keep track of this.
I transfer a prop from myself to Goethe because it's not eir fault.
Pavitra
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
