DIS: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Initiating election for the Assessor and Herald

FUCK WHY DID I INITIATE AN ELECTION FOR HERALD WHEN I MEANT TAILOR WE JUST RE-ELECTED G. HERALD WHAT IS WRONG WITH ME!!! On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 3:50 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > You are not, by about 50 minutes. > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Alexis Hunt

DIS: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Initiating election for the Assessor and Herald

You are not, by about 50 minutes. On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > I think I'm seeing messages come in with weird timestamps, but if I am > eligible to vote, I will endorse G. in both elections for the time being > just to make sure that quorum is

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Vital History Gone Missing!

The Registrar's monthly report, which contains deregistration history, appears to still identify Writs of FAGE, however, that information is required to additionally appear in the weekly reports. On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 at 23:05 VJ Rada wrote: > Although I think the way he did it

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Vital History Gone Missing!

Although I think the way he did it might have been invalid? E said "I list the following as performable by agency, which will automatically resolve in 24 hours" but I don't think it is automatic? E never resolved that intent. On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:02 PM, VJ Rada wrote: >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Vital History Gone Missing!

Use Gaelan's agency: It's performable by GII for Gaelan to give anyone without a Package 20 shinies. On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: >> I register. >> >> I Point a

DIS: Re: BUS: Vital History Gone Missing!

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > I register. > > I Point a Finger at Publius Scribonius Scholasticus alleging that, as > Registrar, e has committed the Class-2 Crime of Tardiness by not reporting > last week on the players deregistered by Writ of Fage, as

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Slower Promotion

On Sep 26, 2017 9:42 PM, "Owen Jacobson" wrote: I hereby issue em a Pink Slip by summary judgement. Pretty amusing implications given that there's an election going on. -grok

DIS: Re: BUS: Vital History Gone Missing!

> On Sep 26, 2017, at 10:17 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > I register. Welcome back, your Excellency. -o signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

DIS: [Proto] Reposting

In light of our newer players’ issues with the groups, and my own, it might be nice to allow players to repost obviously-misposted messages on others’ behalves. I recognize that this is a risk-laden idea, though, so I wanted to float it here first: * Any player CAN repost a message to the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Initiating election for the Assessor and Herald

NttPF On Sep 26, 2017 9:06 PM, "Kerim Aydin" wrote: I vote (myself, Publius) for Herald (would like to run Karma). I vote (Publius, players who vote for themselves first in order of vote) for Assessor. -G.

DIS: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Initiating election for the Assessor and Herald

I vote (myself, Publius) for Herald (would like to run Karma). I vote (Publius, players who vote for themselves first in order of vote) for Assessor. -G.

DIS: Re: BUS: My first proposal!

On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 21:58 -0400, ATMunn . wrote: > Actually, can't you just state that you change things in a proposal > instead of retracting it and creating it again? You can't. This is at least partly a consequence of a scam several years ago in which someone got a dictatorship via editing a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: My first proposal!

(Oops, forgot about the sending-to-discussion-by-default thing. It seems to have still been sent to business though.) Thanks for the feedback, by the way. On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:43 PM, ATMunn . wrote: > I retract the proposal "Cheer Up" and create the following

DIS: Re: BUS: My first proposal!

I retract the proposal "Cheer Up" and create the following proposal in its place: Title: "Cheer Up" Author: ATMunn Co-Authors: none AI: 1 Create a power-1 rule titled "Emotions" { Emotion is a player switch, tracked by the registrar, with possible values Joyous, Melancholy, and Indifferent,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Weekly Report

I see. I forgot about that actually. Carry on. 天火狐 On Sep 26, 2017 21:15, "Owen Jacobson" wrote: > > > On Sep 26, 2017, at 11:25 AM, Josh T wrote: > > > > I haven't been credited with it, so I assumed it has failed, since my 1 > stamp is from

DIS: Re: BUS: My first proposal!

> On Sep 26, 2017, at 9:34 PM, ATMunn . wrote: > > I create the following proposal: Some initial feedback: this is fantastic as a first proposal goes. You’ve nailed the mechanical elements, it looks like, and taken advantage of existing systems where appropriate.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: My first proposal!

You're probably right. I'll remove that. On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:36 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > " > Failing to do so can result in a Green Card being issued to the player. > If a player thinks that another player's reason for changing eir > Emotion is invalid, e SHOULD

DIS: Re: BUS: My first proposal!

I don't mind this, except for the card SHOULD, which doesn't go with any potential rules violation. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 26, 2017, at 9:34 PM, ATMunn . wrote: > > I create the following proposal: > >

DIS: Re: BUS: My first proposal!

" Failing to do so can result in a Green Card being issued to the player. If a player thinks that another player's reason for changing eir Emotion is invalid, e SHOULD point eir finger at em." Remove this, it's implied. On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:34 AM, ATMunn .

Re: DIS: Proto: Very Important Reportor Amendment

Yeah I'm good to do this for my next ADoP weekly. And my superintendent monthly, which I should get done today. On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > >> On Sep 26, 2017, at 8:27 PM, Nic Evans wrote: >> >> Quick proto idea (doesn't even

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Guaranteed Stampage

> On Sep 26, 2017, at 6:46 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > > I submit the following proposal. > > title: Guaranteed Stampage > ai: 1 > author: nichdel > co-authors: > > Amend 2499 "Welcome Packages" to read in full: > >If a player has not received one since e most recently

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Weekly Report

I paid Agora 17 shinies earlier today. You probably missed it. On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > > On Sep 26, 2017, at 6:28 PM, Trigon wrote: > > > > I'd love to contribute to the economic stabilization; however, being a >

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Weekly Report

> On Sep 26, 2017, at 6:28 PM, Trigon wrote: > > I'd love to contribute to the economic stabilization; however, being a > shiniless scrub, I cannot. I extend thanks to everyone who is involved in > this effort. As it happens, there are now enough Shinies in Agora’s

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Weekly Report

Try this on a public forum. However, the spirit of your generosity is very much appreciated. -o > On Sep 26, 2017, at 6:11 PM, ATMunn . wrote: > > I currently have 51 shinies. > I give Agora 17 shinies. > > [I really have nothing better to do with them anyways, so I

Re: DIS: Proto: Very Important Reportor Amendment

I would be happy to do this, for the Registrar's report. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 26, 2017, at 8:27 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > > Quick proto idea (doesn't even actually require a rule): have each > officer, when they

Re: DIS: Assessment

Would you mind if we made modifications? Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 26, 2017, at 8:18 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > > On 09/26/17 18:45, Gaelan Steele wrote: >> Could you provide your assessment script for your successor’s

Re: [Fwd: Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Clearing up the game state]

> On Sep 26, 2017, at 4:35 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > > One of the goals with my banking system si using loans to help more people > get money to do things. That was part of the reason for my general positivity about it, as well,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Weekly Report

> On Sep 26, 2017, at 11:25 AM, Josh T wrote: > > I haven't been credited with it, so I assumed it has failed, since my 1 stamp > is from August. > > 天火狐 I have two records for this: 2017-08-23 ! 天火狐 created a stamp 2017-09-08 ! 天火狐 created a stamp However, you

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Slower Promotion

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > I personally find it frustrating that we vote on things before the last > setis resolved. This should be a relatively safe way to slow down, if we > want to. > > Title: Slower Promotion > AI: 3 > author: nichdel > co-authors:

DIS: Proto: Very Important Reportor Amendment

Quick proto idea (doesn't even actually require a rule): have each officer, when they submit a report, also privately send the Reportor a short editorial about their relevant gamestate bits. The Reportor then includes all of them in the Newspaper. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Guaranteed Stampage

On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 19:08 -0500, Nicholas Evans wrote: > I was intending to propose a minimum value at least for stamps. Same > idea different implementation. It strikes me that it'd make a lot of sense for there to be a fixed cost for Stamp creation, in addition to the FV-scaling cost, but

Re: DIS: Assessment

On 09/26/17 18:45, Gaelan Steele wrote: > Could you provide your assessment script for your successor’s use? > > Gaelan > The kludge and example outputs are attached. Somewhere I have a nascent yaml version; if it ever gets done I'll post it. Didn't capture vote N Didn't capture vote N Didn't

DIS: Re: OFF: [Superintendent] Weekly Agency Report

I forgot to say that I deputize for the office. I deputize for the office, the below document is my report. On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 9:23 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > Superintendent’s Weekly Report > > Short List of agencies: > > ASC - Head: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > BÖÖ -

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Guaranteed Stampage

I was intending to propose a minimum value at least for stamps. Same idea different implementation. On Sep 26, 2017 7:00 PM, "Kerim Aydin" wrote: On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Nic Evans wrote: >If a player has not received one since e most recently became a >player, any

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Guaranteed Stampage

On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Nic Evans wrote: >    If a player has not received one since e most recently became a >    player, any player CAN, by announcement, cause em to receive a >    Welcome package. When a player receives a Welcome Package: > >   * Agora transfers em 1/10th the FV in shinies

Re: DIS: Assessment

Could you provide your assessment script for your successor’s use? Gaelan > On Sep 26, 2017, at 1:03 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > > I probably won't be able to keep up with assessment for a few months if > it continues at this volume. The bottom line of my excuse being that I'm >

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7905-7907

> >AGAINST. Fortunately it does nothing because voting strength can't be set at >AI-1 >(and "voting power" doesn't exist anyway). But regardless, this mob-rule >censure >is simply shameful, and it turns out its a good thing that Agora doesn't allow >straight majority-rule on many things. My

DIS: Re: BUS: needle and thread wanted

Anyone feel like a good old ELECTION? (jk, jk, maybe after somebody deputizes for it) On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 7:41 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I resign from the office of Tailor. > > Many apologies, I voted for myself in a bit of enthusiasm but, in trying to > catch >

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Weekly Report

I'd love to contribute to the economic stabilization; however, being a shiniless scrub, I cannot. I extend thanks to everyone who is involved in this effort. On 9/25/2017 10:41 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Mon, 25

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Weekly Report

On 09/25/2017 11:55 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: I will issue everyone who does this a trust token (all at once, with my charity report) and will try to think of a more substantial token of gratitude. Thank you. -Aris On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:53 PM VJ Rada

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Weekly Report

I currently have 51 shinies. I give Agora 17 shinies. [I really have nothing better to do with them anyways, so I might as well help out.] On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Per random.org, I give Agora 13

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Slower Promotion

Do four people or the ADoP want to support me so that an Assessor election can be started? On 9/26/2017 3:13 PM, Nic Evans wrote: On 09/26/17 16:02, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Nic Evans wrote: I personally find it frustrating that we vote on things before the last setis

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Slower Promotion

On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Nic Evans wrote: > On 09/26/17 16:23, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > I *do* appreciate the work involved, definitely - but I think it's important > > to consider where the frustration with the system comes from. > > I'm frequently frustrated with the ruleset not being

Re: BUS: Lime Ribbon Awarding and Unrelated Question (Was: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposal(s) 7876-7898)

On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 16:39 -0400, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > I award a Lime Ribbon to each of Aris, V.J. Rada, ais523, K, Ørjan, > and G., if each of them lacks it currently. a) you need three coauthored proposals in 7 days for the Lime Ribbon (so it's just V.J. Rada and me who get

Re: BUS: Lime Ribbon Awarding and Unrelated Question (Was: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposal(s) 7876-7898)

On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 15:46 -0500, Nic Evans wrote: > On 09/26/17 15:41, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > Oh, I forgot my question: > > > > I am soon planning to transition to Linux for most of my computing. > > What is the best email program (CLI or otherwise) that I could use > > for

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Frivolous but harmless scam attempt of the week

On 09/23/17 20:35, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Sat, 23 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > >> This is Cuddlebeam-esque and I'm ashamed of myself. But I >> will now copy and paste "Without objection, I intend to win by >> apathy", until there is thousands of  copies of that text, each of >> which is a

Re: BUS: Lime Ribbon Awarding and Unrelated Question (Was: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposal(s) 7876-7898)

On 09/26/17 15:41, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > Oh, I forgot my question: > > I am soon planning to transition to Linux for most of my computing. What is > the best email program (CLI or otherwise) that I could use for emailing for > Agora? Entirely up to preference. Thunderbird

Re: BUS: Lime Ribbon Awarding and Unrelated Question (Was: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposal(s) 7876-7898)

Oh, I forgot my question: I am soon planning to transition to Linux for most of my computing. What is the best email program (CLI or otherwise) that I could use for emailing for Agora? Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 26, 2017, at 4:39 PM,

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposal(s) 7876-7898

On 09/26/17 14:59, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, nichdel wrote: >> |VJ Rada | F    | A    | A    | F    | F    | F    | F    | F    | P    | > Does VJ Rada have 2 votes on everything for being prime minister? > > > Correct but luckily for me that doesn't change any results this

Re: [Fwd: Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Clearing up the game state]

One of the goals with my banking system si using loans to help more people get money to do things. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 26, 2017, at 1:07 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Alex Smith

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposal(s) 7876-7898

On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 21:19 +0100, Alex Smith wrote: > On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 14:49 -0500, nichdel wrote: > > ID: 7881 > > Co-authors: V.J Rada, Aris, ais523 > > > > ID: 7882 > > Co-authors: K, ais523 > > > > ID: 7886 > > Co-authors: ais523, Ørjan > > Could someone award me a Lime Ribbon,

DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposal(s) 7876-7898

On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 14:49 -0500, nichdel wrote: > ID: 7881 > Co-authors: V.J Rada, Aris, ais523 > > ID: 7882 > Co-authors: K, ais523 > > ID: 7886 > Co-authors: ais523, Ørjan Could someone award me a Lime Ribbon, please? It's one of the very few I don't already have, and as a non-player I can

DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposal(s) 7876-7898

On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, nichdel wrote: > |VJ Rada | F    | A    | A    | F    | F    | F    | F    | F    | P    | Does VJ Rada have 2 votes on everything for being prime minister?

DIS: Assessment

I probably won't be able to keep up with assessment for a few months if it continues at this volume. The bottom line of my excuse being that I'm currently sitting on the floor with my desktop on a coffee table, frustrated that my email client is ignoring my retention settings, sad that I have yet

Re: [Fwd: Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Clearing up the game state]

On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > Here's a message that, as a consequence of my email troubles, never > successfully sent. Although the immediate context is no longer > applicable, the general principles still are, so I thought I'd resend > it now that my email is working a bit better

[Fwd: Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Clearing up the game state]

Here's a message that, as a consequence of my email troubles, never successfully sent. Although the immediate context is no longer applicable, the general principles still are, so I thought I'd resend it now that my email is working a bit better than it was. Forwarded Message

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Weekly Report

I haven't been credited with it, so I assumed it has failed, since my 1 stamp is from August. 天火狐 On 26 September 2017 at 10:14, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > > On Sep 26, 2017, at 6:46 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7899-7904

> On Sep 26, 2017, at 9:35 AM, ATMunn . wrote: > > ? > Why did this get sent to discussion? > I didn't intend that. agora-business, agora-official, and agora-discussion all modify messages to set Reply-To to agora-discussion, causing the “reply” function of your

DIS: Re: BUS: Actions and Reportor Solicitations

> On Sep 26, 2017, at 9:46 AM, Josh T wrote: > > I buy a stamp for 1 sh. by transferring that amount to Agora. You also already created a Stamp this month. -o signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Weekly Report

> On Sep 26, 2017, at 6:46 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > > I purchase a stamp for 1 shiny. You last created a Stamp on Sept. 4th, which is within the same Agoran Month as this attempt. I _think_ this was ineffective: > Once per

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7899-7904

Replies to business and official messages have their To address set to discussion by default. You must change it if you want to send to BUS > On Sep 26, 2017, at 6:35 AM, ATMunn . wrote: > > ? > Why did this get sent to discussion? > I didn't intend that. > >> On

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7899-7904

? Why did this get sent to discussion? I didn't intend that. On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:30 AM, ATMunn . wrote: > I vote as G does as well. > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Kerim Aydin > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, 24 Sep 2017, Aris Merchant

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7899-7904

I vote as G does as well. On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Sun, 24 Sep 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > > 7899* G.2.0 Arbitor's Union G. 1 AP > > 7900* o 2.0 Come What Mayo

Re: DIS: Various questions

>> On Sep 24, 2017, at 10:41 AM, ATMunn . wrote: > > A few more questions about offices: > > When do elections happen? Just whenever the ADoP feels like starting one? >Whenever someone starts one with either support, vacancy, or the expiration of >90 days. Or when the

Re: DIS: Various questions

>One office that I could go for that doesn't seem too difficult is the >>> Tailor. If an election for it comes up, I'll definitely vote for >>> myself. G. actually won that election like two days ago :( On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:05 AM, ATMunn . wrote: > On second

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Weekly Report

Basically, with the current system, it's trading shinies around to see what happens. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 26, 2017, at 12:25 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > >> On Sep 25, 2017, at 11:50 PM, Kerim Aydin

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7905-7907

The automatic place of response for all messages is a-d. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 25, 2017, at 12:46 PM, ATMunn . wrote: > > Oops, I don't know how that got sent here... > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:24 AM,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: pledge

I realized you were trying to set quorum with the terrible proposal, but what was the quorum bug itself? I thought it was a side-effect of it working as intended (a feature not a bug). On Mon, 25 Sep 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > Thank you for your honesty. > > -Aris > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal ID fix

"If there exists no proposal 7845, I intend without objection to ratify the following statement: {{{ nichdel’s “Better Accounting” Proposal was numbered 7875. }}}" That's not the way to phrase it. You'll want to put the conditional in the document, because currently if you ratify that document,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: pledge

Thank you for your honesty. -Aris On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 23:24 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: >> Speaking of mysterious secrets: ais523, can you tell us why you >> submitted the repeal all rules proposal around the time

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: pledge

On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 23:24 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > Speaking of mysterious secrets: ais523, can you tell us why you > submitted the repeal all rules proposal around the time of your > junta? > Sorry if I already asked and forgot about it. First of all, the actual text of the proposal was

DIS: Re: BUS: pledge

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:07 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I pledge as follows: > > If a plaintext (ISO-8859-1) of the following SHA-512 hash is published, > where the plaintext is 42 characters or less in length, then I will have > performed as described in it: > >