Hey! I'm ATMunn.
I discovered Agora a little while back, and just decided it sounded
interesting, so I joined.
I've seen some of the messages that have been so far, and honestly I have
no idea what's going on, or what to do. :P
But it seems like there's a really friendly co
sticus
> > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Sep 21, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Welcome ATMunn!
> > >
> > > I haven't been to the IRC channel
gt; On Sep 21, 2017, at 9:35 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
>
> > Hey! I'm ATMunn.
> > I discovered Agora a little while back, and just decided it sounded
> interesting, so I joined.
> >
> > I've seen some of the messages that have been so far, and honestly I
> hav
in certain circumstances. Sometimes they
> > > show up
> > > on their own. I submit the following into evidence:
> > >
> > > CJF: ATMunn is a player.
> > >
> > > Welcome to Agora! =)
> >
> > CFJing whether registrations worked was such
gt; on their own. I submit the following into evidence:
>
> CJF: ATMunn is a player.
>
> Welcome to Agora! =)
>
> ~ Roujo
>
>
> Hah! Not a CFJ, though.
>
> -o
>
>
Yeah, I understood that it was posted to agora-discussion intentionally. My
post was mostly a joke.
I have come across the Spivak thing, and was wondering about it some.
Thanks for the explanation.
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Alex Smith
wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 20:09 -0400, ATM
This got out of hand quickly
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Perfectly legitimate usage, just wondering.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On Sep 23, 2017,
Maybe the person you're giving the pledge to needs to agree to it for it to
be in effect? That might work, but it might not. That's my two (noob) cents.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 5:10 AM, Alex Smith
wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-09-23 at 00:54 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> > The idea is that someone seeki
I've put together a list of various different questions I have. I don't
expect all of them to get answered, but feel free to answer any that you
can.
What is the whole "floating value" thing? What determines it, and what does
it do? It's not really clear in the ru
Thanks, everyone, for your answers.
I'm not too interested in the Superintendent office, so I don't think I'll
go for that.
I could go for the Referee, since o said e wouldn't mind me taking it, but
I'm not really sure I want it either.
One office that I could go for that doesn't seem too difficu
.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On Sep 23, 2017, at 3:48 PM, Alex Smith
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2017-09-23 at 15:26 -0400, ATMunn . wrote:
> >> One office that I could go for that doesn't seem too difficult is the
> >> Tailor. If an electi
A few more questions about offices:
When do elections happen? Just whenever the ADoP feels like starting one?
How exactly does deputisation work? Do you just say "I deputize for this
office" and if nobody objects, you get the office? The rule on that is
kinda tricky to understand.
On Sat, Sep 23
ibonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On Sep 24, 2017, at 10:41 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> >
> > A few more questions about offices:
> >
>
the ratio of Supporters/Objectors must
> exceed N.
>
> Support and objections an also be withdrawn.
>
> You're supposed to list your supporters/objectors when you do the
> action, but that's enforced with a SHOULD and hardly anyone ever does,
> and shorthand is u
Same.
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 11:07 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Uh... I got your previous email, trigon, but not that one. Sorry.
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Ørjan Johansen
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Sep 2017, Reuben Staley wrote:
> >
> >> If the majority of players are convinced to attack some
I got this. I think you're good.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Josh T wrote:
> I can hear you fine.
>
> 天火狐
>
> On Sep 25, 2017 08:40, "Nicholas Evans" wrote:
>
>> Somewhere on the wiki is instructions for a gmail filter that should save
>> any agora emails that might go to spam. It works fo
I vote the same as PSS does.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On Sep 25, 2017, at 1:01 AM, Aris Merchant gmail.com> wrote:
Oops, I don't know how that got sent here...
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:24 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> I vote the same as PSS does.
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> -
On second thought, I don't think I really want the responsibilities of an
office yet. I think I'll stay unemployed for now.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 3:26 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> Thanks, everyone, for your answers.
>
> I'm not too interested in the Superintendent office, so
I vote as G does as well.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > 7899* G.2.0 Arbitor's Union G. 1 AP
> > 7900* o 2.0 Come What Mayo 1 AP
> > 7901* o, [1]
?
Why did this get sent to discussion?
I didn't intend that.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:30 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> I vote as G does as well.
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 24 Sep 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
&g
I currently have 51 shinies.
I give Agora 17 shinies.
[I really have nothing better to do with them anyways, so I might as well
help out.]
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Per random.org, I give Agora 13 shinies
ws:
>
> 137 Shinies Agora
>1 Shinies Organization
>1 ShiniesASaAA
> 862 Shinies Player
> 51 ShiniesATMunn
> 12 ShiniesAris
> 65 ShiniesCuddleBeam
> 30 ShiniesG.
>
e SHOULD point eir finger at em."
>
> Remove this, it's implied.
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:34 AM, ATMunn .
> wrote:
> > I create the following proposal:
> >
> > Title: "Cheer Up"
> > Author: ATMunn
> > Co-Authors: none
&
I retract the proposal "Cheer Up" and create the following proposal in its
place:
Title: "Cheer Up"
Author: ATMunn
Co-Authors: none
AI: 1
Create a power-1 rule titled "Emotions"
{
Emotion is a player switch, tracked by the registrar, with possible
values Joyou
(Oops, forgot about the sending-to-discussion-by-default thing. It seems to
have still been sent to business though.)
Thanks for the feedback, by the way.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:43 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> I retract the proposal "Cheer Up" and create the following proposal i
AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> See my comment below. Also, I greatly appreciate the current usage of
> Spivak pronouns/
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> &
t; > * A repost is further INEFFECTIVE if the original author of the document
> would not reasonably become aware of the repost in a timely fashion.
> >
> > * If the original author of a document objects, by public message, in a
> timely fashion, to a repost, the objection imme
t;
> This could be read as mandating players provide reasons for changing
> another player's emotion.
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 3:53 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> > [Yay more spam! This time, fixed a typo and the weird text bug.]
> > Retract the proposal "Cheer Up v
Oh, you mean for when I post a new reply. Okay.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 9:27 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> Wait, did I not send it to a-b again? Crap.
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>>
>> > On Sep 27, 2017, at 9:20 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
>>
Wait, did I not send it to a-b again? Crap.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> > On Sep 27, 2017, at 9:20 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> >
> > [Okay. I think I've got it as I want. I'm going to pend it now, and this
> time for real.]
> > I
Sounds interesting. I also see that you're using Python, my favorite
programming language. Nice.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> > This is the first stage of an attempt to create an annotation system
> designed to formalize game state changes by attaching formal descripti
What exactly is quorum? I read rule 879 stating that it's a thing, but it
doesn't seem to explain what it is and what it means.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 7:37 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> >> On Sep 24, 2017, at 10:41 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> >
> > A few more questions
Okay, that makes sense now, thanks.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Alex Smith
wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 14:24 -0400, ATMunn . wrote:
> > What exactly is quorum? I read rule 879 stating that it's a thing,
> > but it doesn't seem to explain what it is and
I object, also because of Trust Tokens.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I object because of Trust Tokens.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On Sep 28, 2017,
To be honest, although Python is my favorite language, I really haven't
tried many. The only other languages I really know are C# (which I don't
really like anymore) and a bit of Lua and Javascript.
I have several friends who really like Javascript, (specifically Node.JS)
so that's one I have inte
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 3:27 AM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A player SHALL not take an irrational by announcement action, and any
> such
> actions fail.
>
Shouldn't this be "SHALL NOT" instead of "SHALL not"?
CoE: A while back I paid Agora 17 shinies, in response to a request someone
made for everyone to give 1/3 of their shinies to Agora. I don't see this
in the report.
(Or, did I send that to the wrong forum?)
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, VJ Rada w
ncorrect statement changed nothing. Therefore, the election is
> >> >> >> extended by another 7 days. The votes currently stand at this:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> ===Tailor===
> >> >> >> Alexis: Alexis
> >> >> &
Ah. I guess I'll vote then, so I stop being humiliated. :P
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> The rules require em to issue one, but it doesn’t do anything. It’s just
> that—a reminder.
>
> Gaelan
>
>
> On Oct 5, 2017, at 6:28 AM, ATMunn . wrote
Why exactly did you remove this? Was it discussed that it should be removed?
I don't have a problem with this being removed, I don't really care, I just
don't entirely understand why this was removed.
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As
ree, but pending one costs shinies or AP. So basically
> it's just maintenance, to make sure the proposal doesn't hang around
> forever.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 5:44 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> > Why exactly did you remove this? Was it discussed that it should
I vote Alexis for ADoP and myself for PM.
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I vote VJ Rada for ADoP and [myself, G., and o] for PM for not being the
> other people.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scri
Title: "Clearing up Language Confusion" [CuLC in short]
Author: ATMunn
AI: 1
Create a power-1 rule titled "The Language of Agora"
{
A language is a set of symbols, sounds and rules used to communicate
information.
The official language that should be used in all Agoran fora is
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Josh T wrote:
> I object to this for hopefully obvious reasons, given my history with
> playing with language.
>
> 天火狐
>
> On 12 October 2017 at 09:34, ATMunn . wrote:
>
>> Title: "Clearing up Language Confusion" [CuLC
New proto:
Title: "Clearing up Language Confusion" [CuLC in short]
Author: ATMunn
Co-Author(s): Alexis
AI: 1
Create a power-1 rule titled "The Language of Agora"
{
A language is a set of symbols, sounds, and rules used to communicate
information.
The official language of Agor
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> A power-1 rule can only amend rules with power at most 1.
>
>
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 12:57 ATMunn . wrote:
>
>> New proto:
>>
>> Title: "Clearing up Language Confusion" [CuLC in short]
>>
I had no idea that website existed. That would have been useful as a new
player (although by now I know pretty much all of them)
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Alex Smith
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-10
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 20:31 Alex Smith wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 20:28 -0400, ATMunn . wrote:
>> > Amend rule 2450 by adding the following text at the end:
>> > {
>> > If, at any time, a playe
Oh, okay, I see. Well, there goes my second attempt at taking advantage of
the cheap pend price. :P
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 8:41 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> This is actually a version of the rules so new our H. Rulekeepor
> hasn't written it yet :)
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at
My bad. Apparently this is actually possible as of very recently, so
recently in fact that the rulekeepor has not updated the online ruleset
yet. That makes this completely redundant.
I retract the proposal "Pledge Withdrawal."
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 8:28 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> Ear
I like this idea.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> How about doing it as a CoE fee? If a CoE is correct (and stops
> self-ratification),
> officer is required to pay a shiny to the error finder. Encouraging
> professional
> error-hunting might be a good thing.
>
> On F
I've noticed a whole lot of CFJ stuff going on recently. Should I try to
pay attention to and comprehend what's going on, or just ignore it for now?
I've never really been able to understand CFJs well. They just usually end
up being big walls of text, which my brain isn't a fan of.
Also, what is t
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:59 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> > I've noticed a whole lot of CFJ stuff going on recently. Should I try to
> pay
> > attention to and comprehend what'
I was starting to think about maybe getting myself an office, to get some
income and feel like I'm actually doing something. I looked over some of
the comments in my "Various questions" thread, and I think I know what I
want.
My first choice is Registrar. It seems like a fairly easy position, and
Title: A Reward for Obedience
Author: ATMunn
Co-Author(s):
AI: 1
Create a new power-1 rule titled "Badges of Honor"
{
Badges of Honor are an indestructible, player-owned asset. The Referee
is the recordkeepor for Badges of Honor.
At the beginning of every Agoran month, the R
.
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 8:50 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> > Title: A Reward for Obedience
> > Author: ATMunn
> > Co-Author(s):
> > AI: 1
> >
> >
y Election?
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 12:18 PM, ATMunn .
> wrote:
> > Thanks, both of you, for your suggestions. I'm working on a revised
> version
> > at the moment. One idea I had, regarding what Alexis said about the idea
> of
> > players declaring themselves
flaws. But it should be better. I'm just
going to post this and go to bed now. I'll see what people think in the
morning.
Title: "A Reward for Obedience v2"
Author: ATMunn
Co-Author(s): Aris, Alexis
AI: 1
Create a new power-1 rule titled "Medals of Honour"
{
Medal
I just finished reading this all through. I don't entirely understand all
of it, but most of it makes sense. One part that seemed a bit strange and
arbitrary is the fact that contracts always cost 1 shiny to create. Is
there a reason why this is a fixed value instead of, say, 1/20th of the
floating
Lockout G. OP
> [1]
> >> 7910x G.1.0 What is a rulekeepor G. OP
> [1]
> >> 7911* V.J. Rada 1.0 Infinite Money Fix V.J. Rada 1 sh.
> >> 7912* Alexis3.0 Election Campaigns
erm. what is going on here?
Oh, ok. Makes sense.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Alex Smith
wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-10-15 at 20:26 -0400, ATMunn . wrote:
> > Is this new or am I not aware of something?
>
> The reward's always been there, but only for shiny-pended proposals.
> AP-pending used to be
I just too impatient?
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 9:55 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> Okay, the second draft is finished. I've changed a bunch of stuff, it's
> almost a completely different proposal now. I've taken into consideration
> almost everything Aris and Alexis mentioned, so I&
rk as is, but didn't have thoughts on how to
> improve
> > it, therefore I didn't comment. I'm sorry that I wasn't very helpful,
> but I
> > don't have ideas on how I could be.
> >
> >
> > On 10/15/2017 08:35 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> >>
Oh, did I forget to capitalize that somewhere? Oops.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 10:18 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> By the way, Hon. Rulekeepor: in the new emotions rule, "Registrar"
> should be capitalized.
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:43 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV5lzRHrGe
It's an interesting idea, but as other players have said, it could be quite
scammable.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> There are many places where Agora essentially calls eval(T), where T is
> some text from a player. This includes:
>
> The rules, of course
> Proposals
>
Wait, you're not a player, right? Just a watcher?
Do the rules just say that persons can initiate CFJs instead of just
players?
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> I make two CFJ, and request that they be linked:
>
> There exists a Rule entitled "Campaign Proposals,
I'm confused at what's going on here.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:05 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 at 02:04 Aris Merchant gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I recommend a green card. Given the preceding a-d discussion, this was
>> clearly an accidental omission and not an attempt at fraud.
>>
Overall I like the idea; however, my only concern is with my new Medals of
Honour proposal I'm working on (and planning on publishing tonight).
If you haven't read the proto, basically it says that in the first week of
every month, anyone can declare emself to be eligible for a Medal of
Honour. Af
I think that would work. I've gone ahead and changed it. I'll go ahead and
submit the proposal now.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, ATMunn . wrote:
> > The reason why they're called Medals of Honour is because in o
Do not forget, please
It's not seven five seven
But five seven five
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Ørjan Johansen
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Josh T wrote:
>>>
About Silly p
guess
> the 7
> days).
>
The first 7 days is what I intended.
>
> Minor grammar point: Instead of "E's" it should be "Eir".
>
Oops.
>
> (and - apologies for not looking closely until you asked about the karma!
> I
> really like the idea.
; fashion after
>> > the second week (so net effect is it can't be done).
>> >
>> > There's a bit of confusion to me about what "the first week of an Agoran
>> > month" is - whether it's the 7 days after the start of the month - or
>&g
I believe it failed as I did not include the v3] and submit the following
proposal.
Title: "A Reward for Obedience v4"
Author: ATMunn
Co-Author(s): Aris, Alexis, G.
AI: 1
Repeal rule 2482, "Victory Elections"
Create a new power-1 rule titled "Medals of Honour"
{
So I know that earlier, VJ Rada intended ratified the document saying {Just
now, ATMunn won an election for ADoP. Just now, Alexis won an election for
Prime Minister}, however e then pointed the finger at emself for not
stating that the document was wrong. This was then followed by a bunch of
Oh, wait, the argument was about the resolution of proposals 7908-7921.
Still, the main focus of this was around this election.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 1:18 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> So I know that earlier, VJ Rada intended ratified the document saying
> {Just now, ATMunn won an election fo
h the mess of figuring out the
> status of the elections under the new ruleset.
>
> tl;dr you're not yet the ADoP.
>
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 at 13:20 ATMunn . wrote:
>
>> Oh, wait, the argument was about the resolution of proposals 7908-7921.
>> Still, the main
Rule 1728 states the following:
> A rule which purports to allow a person (the performer) to
> perform an action by a set of one or more of the following
> methods (N is 1 unless otherwise specified):
>
>1. Without N Objections, where N is a positive integer no
> gre
you could weaken the conditions (e.g.
> perform independent actions dependently, or perform an action with more
> support or without more fewer objections than required) but it was removed.
>
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017, 09:11 ATMunn ., wrote:
>
>> Rule 1728 states the following:
>&g
Alright. I think this looks pretty good. If nobody mentions anything else
in the next day or so, I'll pend it for real.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:40 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> Changes from last version:
> * Repealed victory elections
> * Clarified when certain things can happen (in ki
I change my vote as follows:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:30 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> Oops, I accidentally sent before I was finished. Here is the my full vote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:27 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Aris Merch
Eh, you'll get money soon enough. Welcome! I'm Agora's second-newest player
before you registered (I think), so I'm still learning the ropes.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Madeline wrote:
> That's both the most disappointing (but perhaps the most sensible)
> interpretation and means I'm stuck
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 1:15 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> Alright. I think this looks pretty good. If nobody mentions anything else
> in the next day or so, I'll pend it for real.
I pend the proposal "A Reward for Obedience v4" for 1 shiny.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:4
That's an interesting idea. I feel like this could be scammable though.
Then again, what isn't scammable?
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Why not just change it so a Welcome package Creates money rather than
> transferring it? (and to balance it, the secretary can dest
This is a very interesting conversation. I'll just say my opinions on
everyone's view, and throw in my two cents at the end.
Regarding the original tax idea, I think that the idea of tax in general
is something that is really lacking from Agora. I like to think of Agora as
a country, and the rule
not a rule
specifically allows it. (as long as it would not be ILLEGAL or IMPOSSIBLE
to auction off that thing) I don't exactly know how this would be worded,
however.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, ATMunn . wrote:
>
> > Thi
True. contracts ftw
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Easy enough for people to do that now with contracts, I think.
>
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 20:42 ATMunn . wrote:
>
>> This might be a good place to start, but it's certainly way too long in
>>
that since Agora
> > is, for game purposes, both omniscient and omnipotent, if a rule
> > permitted my intent it would succeed. This probably wouldn't do
> > anything though, because nothing would cause any aspect of the
> > gamestate to stop existing, or even necessarily the
That's a good point you have there. I blame Gmail.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> I CFJ on
>
> In a below quoted message of 19 October, ATMunn succeeded in changing
> eir votes.
>
> Argument: The plain text version of the message h
V.J. Rada 1 sh.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The full text of each adopted proposal is included below.
>>
>>
>> || 7923 | 7924 | 7025 | 7926 | 7927 | 7928 | 7929 |
>> |+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
>> |Alexis | A| P| F| F| F| F| P|
Also, "create and spend a shiny to pend the following" implies that you're
creating a shiny, and then spending it, which is IMPOSSIBLE.
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think you mean pend, not spend.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Sun, Oct 22, 201
This, this is why I hate Gmail.
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 at 20:11 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
>> > In a below quoted message of 19 October, ATMunn succeeded
That's true. I think I'd agree on that, especially for you, since you'll
soon lose ADoP.
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 7:54 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> It is 4 and 14 days, isn't it? That still gives em 3 to 4 days, if I
> prepare a report immediately after I'm allowed, which I doubt.
>
> I don't deny o's go
oh. I wasn't sure whether or not "I ratify the below document, which is:
{Just now, ATMunn won an election for ADoP. Just now, Alexis won an
election for Prime Minister}." actually meant that I hold ADoP and Alexis
holds PM. I guess I should have figured that out, however, sinc
ePender Pend
> fee
>
> ---
> 7931* G. 3.0 Registration fix finally G. 1 sh.
> 7932* ATMunn, [1]1.0 A Reward for Obedience v4ATMunn 1 sh.
> 7933* Alexis
A few more questions I've thought of recently.
What does the term "Class-N" crime mean? I couldn't find the definition
anywhere in the rules. Is it leftover from a previous ruleset?
I'm slowly starting to hate Gmail more and more as I use it. What's a good
desktop client for Agora?
When is it be
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:33 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> A few more questions I've thought of recently.
>
> What does the term "Class-N" crime mean? I couldn't find the definition
> anywhere in the rules. Is it leftover from a previous ruleset?
>
> I'm slowl
should probably
> find a better solution, but I haven't yet.
>
> --
> Trigon
>
> On Oct 23, 2017 7:34 AM, "ATMunn ." wrote:
>
> A few more questions I've thought of recently.
>
> What does the term "Class-N" crime mean? I couldn't fi
On 10/23/2017 8:29 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
Does anyone want to come forward as actually significantly tracking
their trust tokens? Because then I will admit that they have worth as
a wincon. But it seems to me they're just even less achievable Stamps
that nobody tracks.
I track my trust tokens. I wo
1 - 100 of 841 matches
Mail list logo
