On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 7:30 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 7/7/23 22:27, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> > (Some related CFJs)
>
> Arguments: IRRELEVANT. No punishment can be imposed in any case.
>
> --
> Janet Cobb
>
> Assessor, Rulekeepor,
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 12:12 AM 4st nomic via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> The thesis can be found here:
>
> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2023-June/051673.html
>
Thanks to Juan and Snail for the feedback! These are the changes
On 7/3/23 15:37, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> But you have made mistakes before (re: adoption index to change a rule's
> power) that could be mitigated via a mechanism of publishing the change to
> the ruleset separately from the rulesets required to be publish. I would
> think
4st nomic via agora-discussion [2023-06-30 22:50]:
> There is no standard here, or if there is, it should be set lower once
> again: this is a game, theses should be encouraged, and it's wild across
> the board. I'm sure there's a thesis waiting on the standards of theses.
>
> Finally, as a
I guess it's more like you'll likely look at them anyways, waiting for me
to screw up so you can impeach me and take it back! :)
Informal political power as in "we kinda try not to upset the Rulekeepor
too much because we kinda need them around". Overall, even my serious
attempt at taking the
The idea behind this thesis is solid, but the execution leaves some holes where
i'd expect more to be. I assign this REVISE AND RESUBMIT, and think it will be
worthy of a degree once the criticisms of myself and others are addressed.
> On Jun 9, 2023, at 7:27 PM, Forest Sweeney via
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 2:04 PM juan via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> 4st nomic via agora-discussion [2023-06-26 10:33]:
> > As herald, I have ultimate control over this process. If someone's
> > judgement is "preventative", then hopefully, that will be apparent
On 6/29/23 15:56, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 12:27 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On 6/29/23 10:28, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>>> Happy Birthday, Agora!
>>
>> It is Agora's birthday. Happy birthday,
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 12:27 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 6/29/23 10:28, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> > Happy Birthday, Agora!
>
>
> It is Agora's birthday. Happy birthday, Agora!
>
> I award myself a magenta ribbon if I do not have
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 2:14 PM juan via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> At the risk of ruining the fun, I'll just put this here if anyone is
> confused:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCP_Foundation
>
> --
> juan
>
I don't think this spoils the fun: I think
At the risk of ruining the fun, I'll just put this here if anyone is confused:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCP_Foundation
--
juan
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 1:45 PM 4st nomic <4st.no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:51 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On 6/26/23 12:35, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
>> >> Rule
>> >>> UNDEFINED is inevitable and
4st nomic via agora-discussion [2023-06-26 10:33]:
> As herald, I have ultimate control over this process. If someone's
> judgement is "preventative", then hopefully, that will be apparent from
> their response, and I can respond with a nomination anyways.
That is a terrible solution. I'd argue
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:51 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 6/26/23 12:35, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
> >> Rule
> >>> UNDEFINED is inevitable and unstoppable despite any appearance or event
> >>> that may indicate otherwise.
> >>>
>
On 6/26/23 12:35, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Rule
>>> UNDEFINED is inevitable and unstoppable despite any appearance or event
>>> that may indicate otherwise.
>>>
>>> Specifically, at this point in time, it is known that:
>>> - Rule UNDEFINED CANNOT amend itself, enact, re-enact, or
On 6/26/23 12:16, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 9:09 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On 6/26/23 12:07, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 4:27 AM juan via agora-discussion
>>> wrote:
Janet Cobb via
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:24 AM juan via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> 4st nomic via agora-business [2023-06-25 00:11]:
> > * If a player is selected, and a week passes without a verdict, e will be
> > removed from the review board and it will be considered as a
4st nomic via agora-business [2023-06-25 00:11]:
> * If a player is selected, and a week passes without a verdict, e will be
> removed from the review board and it will be considered as a nomination, as
> the thesis is therefore deemed to be too complex to review in a week,
> therefore making it
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 12:01 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 6/25/23 02:44, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> > Sorry!!! This has to be contained somewhere
> >
> > I have to submit the following proposal:
> > {
> > Title: Secure Contain
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 9:09 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 6/26/23 12:07, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 4:27 AM juan via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> >> Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-06-25 03:00]:
> Specifically, at this
On 6/26/23 12:07, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 4:27 AM juan via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-06-25 03:00]:
Specifically, at this point in time, it is known that:
- Rule UNDEFINED CANNOT amend itself, enact,
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 4:27 AM juan via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-06-25 03:00]:
> > > Specifically, at this point in time, it is known that:
> > > - Rule UNDEFINED CANNOT amend itself, enact, re-enact, or repeal rules.
> >
> >
> > Why not just "cause rule
4st nomic via agora-business [2023-06-24 23:44]:
> Sorry!!! This has to be contained somewhere
>
> I have to submit the following proposal:
> {
> Title: Secure Contain Protect
> Adoption Index: 1.0
> Author: 4st
Also great work, this is amazing.
I'd just like to say that I'd prefer, instead
Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-06-25 03:00]:
> > Specifically, at this point in time, it is known that:
> > - Rule UNDEFINED CANNOT amend itself, enact, re-enact, or repeal rules.
>
>
> Why not just "cause rule changes"?
>
> In any case, this prohibition is overridden by Rule 105.
Not
4st nomic via agora-discussion [2023-06-23 10:00]:
> (note that Murphy already initiated the election, so you join the existing
> election with candidates myself and juan)
Sorry. No. I am not a cadidate for Prime Minister.
--
juan
snail wrote:
I vote as follows in the prime minister election: [snail]
This vote was ineffective, as voting was not yet open.
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 9:38 AM secretsnail9 via agora-business
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 25, 2023, at 11:20 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> > wrote:
> >
> > I object. I don’t think this fixes the issue that nix is fixed as
> > surveyor, has abandoned the tournament, and can’t be replaced?
On 6/25/23 02:44, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> Sorry!!! This has to be contained somewhere
>
> I have to submit the following proposal:
> {
> Title: Secure Contain Protect
> Adoption Index: 1.0
> Author: 4st
> Co-Author:
>
> Enact the following rule entitled "Rule UNDEFINED":
> {
>
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 5:26 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 6/23/23 20:16, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> > I motion to reconsider 4044, but I still find it to be TRUE, because
> > continuity is implied, regardless of exactly "how" it works.
>
(note that Murphy already initiated the election, so you join the existing
election with candidates myself and juan)
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 8:58 AM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 6/13/23 18:40, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> > "Things are
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 4:07 PM juan via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> juan via agora-business [2023-06-21 20:02]:
> > 4st nomic via agora-business [2023-06-21 15:41]:
> > > I create and join the following contract:
> > > {
> > > ==Wonderland==
> > […]
> > > }
> >
> > I
Janet Cobb via agora-business [2023-06-18 19:46]:
> I place a token at C2. I name any resulting community Turquoise.
I don't think this works. There's already a community named that.
--
juan
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 7:17 PM 4st nomic via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I thought the number of active players was 15? half of that, rounded down,
> is 7?
> Sorry, what is the right number of active players at the time that dream of
> sharing gave you radiance?
I thought the number of active players was 15? half of that, rounded down,
is 7?
Sorry, what is the right number of active players at the time that dream of
sharing gave you radiance?
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:25 PM secretsnail9 via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> CoE:
I appreciate this appreciation! It's been tough to get reports out with my new
real life schedule, so this was really nice.
> On Jun 5, 2023, at 5:36 AM, Juan F. Meleiro via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> I transfer one juan stamp to snail, just in appreciation of eir job thid
> week.
> --
>
Forbidden vacation :o have a good one and good luck! I will do my best to
change everything for the worse! >:)
tir. 13. jun. 2023, 5:49 a.m. skrev nix via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org>:
> I deregister. I'm not really playing, or interested in playing,
> currently. No big
On 6/12/23 22:07, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
I judge CFJ 4037 FALSE, and recommend some sort of proposal to fix the
tournament.
I will not be posting more Surveyor reports. I'm already quite checked
out of Agora right now, and this kinda seals it for me.
--
nix
Prime Minister
oh crud I forgot I was the herald... Uh I'll figure this out soon properly
On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 5:27 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I submit another thesis, shorter, more to the point, more organised, and
> more fact based. Hopefully this makes
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 4:21 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Oooh, ok, I didn't read the rules, my bad. I also just forgot the case had
> been reopened by "I support and I do so"
Sorry, I usually try to remind people more explicitly, but also just
plain old forgot until you did
Oooh, ok, I didn't read the rules, my bad. I also just forgot the case had
been reopened by "I support and I do so"
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 4:18 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 4:07 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 4:07 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 4:01 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 6:38 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > >
> > > Agoran Court Gazette (Arbitor's Weekly Report)
> > > Sun 04 Jun 2023
> > >
> > >
>
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 4:01 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 6:38 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > Agoran Court Gazette (Arbitor's Weekly Report)
> > Sun 04 Jun 2023
> >
> >
> > DEADLINES (details below)
> >
On 6/4/23 14:22, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> Also, i think my number of accolades is wrong: I just gained 3.
Noted and corrected in the next report.
--
nix
Prime Minister
I feel this needs clarification then. It should be explicit. Or else, is there
a CFJ with specific tests for what changes?
On June 5, 2023 7:45:36 PM GMT-03:00, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>On 6/5/23 16:57, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
On 6/5/23 18:38, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-06-05 17:07]:
>> Which specific stamp report? This makes it so that all stamp reports
>> would have ratified correctly, so every week there was a well-known
>> point, as intended. Picking one to ratify either
On 6/5/23 16:57, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-06-05 16:48]:
>> On 6/5/23 16:45, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> No, it's not. It's a blanket assertion that “everything” is as it
>>> would have been. We don't know that. Maybe the different bytes
Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-06-05 17:07]:
> Which specific stamp report? This makes it so that all stamp reports
> would have ratified correctly, so every week there was a well-known
> point, as intended. Picking one to ratify either doesn't actually make
> the present gamestate more
On 6/5/23 16:57, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-06-05 16:48]:
>> On 6/5/23 16:45, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> No, it's not. It's a blanket assertion that “everything” is as it
>>> would have been. We don't know that. Maybe the different bytes
Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-06-05 16:48]:
> On 6/5/23 16:45, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> > No, it's not. It's a blanket assertion that “everything” is as it
> > would have been. We don't know that. Maybe the different bytes stored on
> > the server changed the CPU heat emission
On 6/5/23 16:45, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> Janet Cobb via agora-business [2023-06-05 15:28]:
>> On 6/5/23 13:58, juan via agora-business wrote:
>>> 8998: AGAINST. Quite literally impossible to determine. Also, stamp reports
>>> ratify
>> ais523 got it right:
>>
8998* Janet
Janet Cobb via agora-business [2023-06-05 15:28]:
> On 6/5/23 13:58, juan via agora-business wrote:
> > 8998: AGAINST. Quite literally impossible to determine. Also, stamp reports
> > ratify
>
> ais523 got it right:
>
> >> 8998* Janet 3.0 Stamp fungibility correction
> >
On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 5:54 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2023-06-04 at 17:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 5:04 PM ais523 via agora-business
> > wrote:
> > > It's also worth noting that G. explicitly stated in eir message that e
>
On Sun, 2023-06-04 at 17:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 5:04 PM ais523 via agora-business
> wrote:
> > It's also worth noting that G. explicitly stated in eir message that e
> > consented to the Rice Plan – the subsequent withdrawal was sent in the
> >
On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 5:04 PM ais523 via agora-business
wrote:
> It's also worth noting that G. explicitly stated in eir message that e
> consented to the Rice Plan – the subsequent withdrawal was sent in the
> same message. Although Agora assumes that multiple actions listed in
> the same
juan via agora-discussion [2023-06-04 21:20]:
> Oh, come on. The earth is clearly flat.
This is a joke.
--
juan
Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-06-04 20:18]:
> On 6/4/23 20:18, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Janet Cobb via agora-business [2023-06-04 20:07]:
> >> On 6/4/23 20:06, juan via agora-business wrote:
> >>> juan via agora-business [2023-06-04 20:50]:
> I create, consent, sign,
On 6/4/23 20:18, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> Janet Cobb via agora-business [2023-06-04 20:07]:
>> On 6/4/23 20:06, juan via agora-business wrote:
>>> juan via agora-business [2023-06-04 20:50]:
I create, consent, sign, consent to signing, consent to have my signature
on, consent
Janet Cobb via agora-business [2023-06-04 20:07]:
> On 6/4/23 20:06, juan via agora-business wrote:
> > juan via agora-business [2023-06-04 20:50]:
> >> I create, consent, sign, consent to signing, consent to have my signature
> >> on, consent to have my signature put onto the following rice
On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 12:10 PM secretsnail9 via agora-business
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 1, 2023, at 4:17 PM, secretsnail9 wrote:
> >
> >
> > I wield the radiance stone. (This increases my radiance by 3.)
> > I reach for the Minty stone.
> > I wield the recursion stone as the soul stone,
er, I think this fails, as this rice plan was created in the last cycle of
rice plans, not the most recent one?
On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 11:44 AM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/28/23 19:57, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> > I create and
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 12:19 PM Juan F. Meleiro via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I create the following proposal, entitled “Game Theory”:
>
> {
> Create a Power 1.0 rule called “The Button” with text:
> {
> The Buttonmastor is an office.
>
> The Button is a singleton
Which is why you press the button every 144 hours that are reliable to you:
or setup scheduled emails. I feel like also this is similar to apathy but
now you have to track it: anyone can block as long as they press the button
fre. 2. jun. 2023, 12:29 p.m. skrev ais523 via agora-discussion <
On Fri, 2023-06-02 at 14:18 -0300, Juan F. Meleiro via agora-business
wrote:
> I create the following proposal, entitled “Game Theory”:
>
> {
> Create a Power 1.0 rule called “The Button” with text:
This isn't really game theory, but "who has the most reliable Internet
connection / is best at
On 5/28/23 19:00, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I place a token at D5, merging Jade into Red.
Jade (9*) was actually bigger than Red (7*) at this point. ais523 and
snail's moves had grown it quite significantly since last report.
* Maybe less depending on the CFJ results
--
nix
Prime
On 5/28/23 19:00, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I place a token at C6, merging Burgundy into Jade.
Valid placement but I don't think they merge? Diagonals don't fit the
game's definition of adjacency ("Adjacency is defined by being at the
same cordinate on one axis, and exactly one
On 5/25/23 11:05, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> I invest in Olive.
> I play an H and 2 tile on H2 (merging Olive into Red).
Ope I just noticed this. This fails, H2 is already occupied.
--
nix
Prime Minister
Rule 2519, point 4; sorry.
On Sunday, May 28, 2023, Yachay Wayllukuq wrote:
> Just to add, I believe that consent is able to be "withdrawn", or at least
> not longer applicable, because of Rule 2519, point 5; where it allows us
> to infer if consent is present or not depending on context. I
Just to add, I believe that consent is able to be "withdrawn", or at least
not longer applicable, because of Rule 2519, point 5; where it allows us to
infer if consent is present or not depending on context. I believe the
context can include factors such as what time it is, or simply explicit
On 5/27/23 14:39, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 10:40 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-business
> wrote:
>> Thus, we reach that third interpretation: we are consenting to that rice
>> plan obtaining or not obtaining your signature. You consent to the change,
>> the
On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 10:40 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-business
wrote:
> Thus, we reach that third interpretation: we are consenting to that rice
> plan obtaining or not obtaining your signature. You consent to the change,
> the action that occurs, or you reaffirm consent that inaction is
>
On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 10:46 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-business
wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 10:46 AM Forest Sweeney
> wrote:
>
> > I withdraw my consent from all rice plans.
> >
What rules mechanism enabled you to do this?
-G.
I withdraw my consent from all rice plans.
I consent to all rice plans that will not be harvested.
(That is clearly stated, and there is no wiggle room: I am shaving all
barbers who do not shave themselves.
Under clause 4 of R2519, it is now reasonably clear which rice plans I have
consented to,
On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 8:13 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> That said, a
> new rule that has a "new" sort of toy - like Rice Plans - is a good
> potential target, but I'm pretty sure this attempt missed the mark.
Followup: Importantly, just recently, in CFJ 4013, I judged that
"consent" as a general
On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 2:34 AM Aspen via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 3:52 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-business
> wrote:
> >
> > I withdraw my consent from all rice plans.
> > If the Reimann hypothesis is true, I consent to all rice plans that will
> > not be harvested.
>
On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 2:34 AM Aspen via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 3:52 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-business
> wrote:
> >
> > I withdraw my consent from all rice plans.
> > If the Reimann hypothesis is true, I consent to all rice plans that will
> > not be harvested.
>
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 3:52 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-business
wrote:
>
> I withdraw my consent from all rice plans.
> If the Reimann hypothesis is true, I consent to all rice plans that will
> not be harvested.
> (I humbly request that I get to call the CFJ upon harvest-time, so that I
> may
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 11:33 AM juan via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion [2023-05-25 07:11]:
> > The currently guiding precedent is in CFJ 1361: "a nickname is a name
> > that a Player chooses for emself, that can be reliably used to pick em
> > out in the full range
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 12:17 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business
wrote:
>
> I'm kind of surprised that this kind of CfJ hasn't been raised yet.
>
> I CfJ: "There are some persons right now who have more than 0 Rice"
To avoid an INSUFFICIENT judgement, can you add some context or
reasons you
Crazy coincidence, I just made a CfJ about it
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 9:19 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/22/23 07:15, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-official wrote:
> > --
> >
On 5/25/23 14:17, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
I'm kind of surprised that this kind of CfJ hasn't been raised yet.
I CfJ: "There are some persons right now who have more than 0 Rice"
I disfavor this CFJ. I haven't bothered to learn the rice rules.
--
nix
Prime Minister, Herald
Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion [2023-05-25 07:11]:
> The currently guiding precedent is in CFJ 1361: "a nickname is a name
> that a Player chooses for emself, that can be reliably used to pick em
> out in the full range of Agoran contexts." The key here is "full
> range of Agoran contexts". If
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 9:28 AM Forest Sweeney
wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 8:12 AM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On 5/25/23 08:20, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 11:25 PM secretsnail9 via agora-business <
On 5/22/23 15:31, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
This is the second time Dynamite has been merged: I should now have 2
accolades?
Correct, I just forgot to increment it.
--
nix
Prime Minister, Herald
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 8:02 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> It's legal, it's just generally bad form.
In this case, I'm not even sure it's bad form. Since radiance can
only be danced up to the highest player's score, it adds an almost
Winsome-like dynamic, where if someone gets
On Thu, 2023-05-25 at 17:00 +0200, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
> As annoying as it is, it seems perfectly legal to do, to me.
>
> I create and submit the following Proposal:
>
> Title: Go Home, You're Drunk
> AI: 3
> Author: Yachay
> Co-Authors: None
> // Comment: This is a hotfix
On 5/25/23 11:00, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
> As annoying as it is, it seems perfectly legal to do, to me.
>
> I create and submit the following Proposal:
>
> Title: Go Home, You're Drunk
> AI: 3
> Author: Yachay
> Co-Authors: None
> // Comment: This is a hotfix to the still-open
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 6:43 AM juan via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> nix via agora-discussion [2023-05-24 18:19]:
> > On 5/24/23 18:17, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> > >> If emails are different and there is no note mentioning they
> > >> are the same person, they are not.
> > > Oh also this
nix via agora-discussion [2023-05-24 18:19]:
> On 5/24/23 18:17, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> >> If emails are different and there is no note mentioning they
> >> are the same person, they are not.
> > Oh also this is entirely false on the registrar monthly. I am on there
> > in multiple
nix via agora-discussion [2023-05-24 18:17]:
> On 5/24/23 17:18, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> > If emails are different and there is no note mentioning they
> > are the same person, they are not.
>
> Oh also this is entirely false on the registrar monthly. I am on there
> in multiple places
On 5/25/23 02:32, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> On Tuesday I voted AGAINST on Proposal 8985. That was the first ballot i
> submitted this week.
>
> Specifying, for all anointments of ritual numbers below, the enabling
> ritual act as "snail submits eir first ballot on an Agoran Decision
On 5/24/23 18:17, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
>> If emails are different and there is no note mentioning they
>> are the same person, they are not.
> Oh also this is entirely false on the registrar monthly. I am on there
> in multiple places with entirely different, non-overlapping names and
>
On 5/24/23 17:18, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> If emails are different and there is no note mentioning they
> are the same person, they are not.
Oh also this is entirely false on the registrar monthly. I am on there
in multiple places with entirely different, non-overlapping names and
email
On 5/24/23 17:18, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> No! Not at all. What kind of annotation would that be? “This is not
> the same blob as the one that registered on such and such date”? It's
> uncalled for in the context of the report. On the monthly report,
> maybe. But then, there are other
nix via agora-discussion [2023-05-24 14:29]:
> On 5/24/23 14:28, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Kerim Aydin via agora-business [2023-05-24 11:47]:
> > > I make the same Claim of Error again.
> > >
> > > As we also established last week, blob is open to changing eir
> > > nickname. And
Simple: start requiring that all annotations now requires hats :3
old blob? hatless.
new blob? has "blob" for a hat.
now its blob(blob) :D
(alternative solution: ignore me and my shenanigans)
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 12:32 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org>
On 5/24/23 15:25, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-05-24 14:07]:
>> As Rulekeepor, I need some way to disambiguate in the FLR.
> You already do. The changes reference a proposal number and a date. Only
> one blob is registered at a time (unless it comes to
On 5/24/23 14:28, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
Kerim Aydin via agora-business [2023-05-24 11:47]:
I make the same Claim of Error again.
As we also established last week, blob is open to changing eir
nickname. And that's how we've always handled it, in respect to the
game's history.
Kerim Aydin via agora-business [2023-05-24 11:47]:
> I make the same Claim of Error again.
>
> As we also established last week, blob is open to changing eir
> nickname. And that's how we've always handled it, in respect to the
> game's history. Please give em a chance to respond so this does
Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-05-24 14:07]:
> As Rulekeepor, I need some way to disambiguate in the FLR.
You already do. The changes reference a proposal number and a date. Only
one blob is registered at a time (unless it comes to more than one
registering, but that is covered in my
nix via agora-discussion [2023-05-24 13:06]:
> On 5/24/23 13:02, juan via agora-official wrote:
> > we all know (and all shall know when looking upon
> > the archives) to which blob this refers.
> I'm a little suspicious about this claim. Reading 5+ year old archives can
> require a lot of reading
401 - 500 of 30836 matches
Mail list logo
