+1 based on the following:
verified signatures
ran unit test suite - pass
loaded onto a small cluster and performed sanity checks (hbase shell, UI,
etc)
Cheers
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> Hello again devs,
>
> This "third time's the charm" edition release candidate o
At roughly how many column families would this change show performance boost ?
Cheers
> On Aug 27, 2015, at 4:56 PM, Himanshu Verma
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at following method:
>
> public void doBulkLoad(Path hfofDir, final Admin admin, Table table,
>>
>> RegionLocator reg
+1
built from the source
ran test suite - passed
exercised basic shell commands
Cheers
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:03 PM, wrote:
> +1
> - built from the source tag- installed with a one-node HDFS cluster
> (2.4.1)- created a table, loaded 100m rows- checked an older 100m row table
> that I had l
I looked at the code again.
When number of HFiles to be loaded times number of column families is a big
value, your suggestion may produce some speedup. If you have access to a
cluster, you can measure potential savings in your approach.
Cheers
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Ted Yu wrote
Have you checked hdfs ?
Master was waiting for namenode to exit safe mode.
> On Sep 1, 2015, at 9:44 AM, beeshma r wrote:
>
> HI
>
> i have issue with Hbase master
>
> Below is actual error
>
> hbase(main):001:0> list
> TABLE
>
> SLF4J: Class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings.
> SLF
Looking at the tip of 0.98 branch, the logic in doPut() is the same as
shown below.
You may want to open a JIRA and attach patch if you have time.
Cheers
On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 6:15 PM, wangyongqiang0...@163.com <
wangyongqiang0...@163.com> wrote:
> in hbase0.98.10, doPut is as follows:
>
> p
Design for the following is being finalized:
HBASE-13153 enable bulkload to support replication
Do you think it should be included ?
Cheers
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Matteo Bertozzi
wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> my list for 2.0 looks quite full, but I'm probably missing something.
>
> main poi
In HRegion#increment(), we lock the row (not region):
try {
rowLock = getRowLock(row);
Can you pastebin the complete stack trace ?
Thanks
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:01 AM, 鈴木俊裕 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We upgraded our cluster from CDH5.3.1(HBase0.98.6) to CDH5.4.5(HBase1.0.0)
> and we experie
t; > HBASE-13153 seems small enough that may also be considered for a
> > branch-1.
> > >
> > > it will take at least 3 months to have a branch-2,
> > > I don't want this thread to end up pointing out all minor jiras.
> > > so, my rule is: if it is
Can you come up with a test that shows the problem ?
Consider opening a JIRA with anonymized master log, your test and proposed
solution (if you have one).
Cheers
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:09 AM, zhou_shuaif...@sina.com <
zhou_shuaif...@sina.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I found a situation may c
Looks like your effort of adding Jianwei went through - I found his name in
contributors' list and assigned HBASE-14443 to him.
FYI
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> Heya folks,
>
> It seems our list of contributors in JIRA is so long that I'm unable to add
> anyone. The fa
I think you meant master branch - branch-2 hasn't been cut yet.
TestHFileBlockPositionalRead.java was added on Sept 11th.
I sync'ed with master branch but didn't reproduce the compilation error.
FYI
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> I have
Please see the following in HBaseTestingUtility.java :
* Start a mini ZK cluster. If the property
"test.hbase.zookeeper.property.clientPort" is set
* the port mentionned is used as the default port for ZooKeeper.
*/
private MiniZooKeeperCluster startMiniZKCluster(final File dir,
bq. remove branch-2 to avoid confusion
+1
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> Are we breaking apart branch-2 and master now?
>
> If not, can we remove branch-2 to avoid confusion?
>
> --
> Sean
>
27;m testing doesn't
> apply on trunk but applies on this one, so I took a chance ;)
>
> JM
>
> 2015-09-24 11:02 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu :
>
> > I think you meant master branch - branch-2 hasn't been cut yet.
> >
> > TestHFileBlockPositionalRead.java was a
For zookeeperless region assignment, can you try master branch for
comparison ?
Cheers
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 1:33 AM, wangyongqiang0...@163.com <
wangyongqiang0...@163.com> wrote:
> in hbase 0.98.10, we can set hbase to open region with or without
> zookeeper.
> to compare open region speed o
Looking at master branch:
this.operationTimeout = this.conf.getInt(HConstants.
HBASE_CLIENT_OPERATION_TIMEOUT,
HConstants.DEFAULT_HBASE_CLIENT_OPERATION_TIMEOUT);
If I read code correctly, HBaseAdmin.execProcedure() uses the above.
Which procedure were you checking ?
Cheers
On Thu
Failed test in hbase-server prevented tests in hbase-shell module to run.
Locally I can reproduce:
http://pastebin.com/228jgfSM
FYI
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Andrew Purtell
wrote:
> TestShell didn't pick this up looks like. How I wonder.
>
>
> > On Sep 28, 2015, at 11:00 AM, Stephen J
Thanks Esteban for the quick turnaround.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Esteban Gutierrez
wrote:
> we should be good now.
>
> --
> Cloudera, Inc.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Andrew Purtell >
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Ted.
> >
> >
>
+1
Checked signatures
Ran unit test suite against hadoop-1, found HBASE-14553 (to be fixed in
0.98.16)
Exercised basic shell commands
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> The 1st HBase 0.98.15 release candidate (RC0) is available for download at
> http://people.apache.org/~ap
Here are the LoadBalancer classes in 0.98 branch:
/Users/tyu/98//hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/balancer/BaseLoadBalancer.java
/Users/tyu/98//hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/balancer/FavoredNodeLoadBalancer.java
/Users/tyu/98//hbase-server/src/m
hing to balance, then don't say anything unless
> trace-level logging.
> LOG.trace("Skipping load balancing because balanced cluster; " +
> "servers=" + cs.getNumServers() + " " +
> "regions=" + cs.getNumRegions() + "
Are you running hbase on secure cluster ?
As J-M said, hbck can come to the rescue if you encounter such a case.
Cheers
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:11 AM, wangyongqiang0...@163.com <
wangyongqiang0...@163.com> wrote:
>
> if we delete the tableInfo file by mistake, then if hbase is restated, the
dfs
>
>
>
> wangyongqiang0...@163.com
>
> From: Ted Yu
> Date: 2015-10-17 01:17
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> Subject: Re: add a task in master to check if tableInfo is missinig
> Are you running hbase on secure cluster ?
>
> As J-M said, hbck can come to the
Isn't such information already available in master log (though not on one
line) ?
bq. a process need to add cp so disable
Using online table alter feature, there is no need to disable the whole
table.
Cheers
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:07 AM, wangyongqiang0...@163.com <
wangyongqiang0...@163.com>
For multi-wal, some JIRAs (such as HBASE-6617) were only integrated to
branch-1 and master branch.
Once those JIRAs are backported, issue #1 should be resolved.
FYI
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Elliott Clark wrote:
> IT tests on a real cluster are completely green. So that's promising.
>
+1 on removing branch1.2
Don't know why some of my JIRAs showed up in the following list.
I verified that they were integrated into branch-1.2
Cheers
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> Seems that we have branch1.2 pushed (as opposed to branch-1.2). Probably a
> typo.
>
> I
bq. I'll volunteer to RM 1.3
+1
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> I haven't heard an user answer in the affirmative to wanting it.
>
> I'll volunteer to RM 1.3, whenever we need it. Premature to have that
> discussion without 1.2 even out the door yet, though.
>
>
>
> On
ott, Ted,
>
> Can y'all make sure there are appropriate jiras to track these? the
> post-commit builds are getting close (now passing 3 out of last 4),
> and I don't see them represented in the current blockers?
>
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> &g
bq. there are no logs to record why we not running balancer
Here was the reason:
bq. Not running balancer because 3 region(s) in transition:
bq. Could we just balance regions not in transition?
Yes. Please take a look at HBASE-14309
Cheers
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Heng Chen wrote:
>
eah, but balancer runs every 5 minutes, 3 region(s) in transition log
> > only show up only in a few places
> >
> > 2015-10-31 10:23 GMT+08:00 Ted Yu :
> >
> >> bq. there are no logs to record why we not running balancer
> >>
> >> Here was
bq. retiring 1.0 branch and releases
I would vote for the retirement of 1.0 release.
Cheers
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> Related, I was waiting on 1.2.0 RC to start the discussion, but we can do
> it now.
>
> How do you guys feel about retiring 1.0 branch and releas
For #1, I took a look at current 0.98 code but didn't find it.
Can you double check and tell us the updated line number ?
For #2, I think it makes sense - considering there may be large number of
snapshots in the cluster.
For #3, can you tell us the use case for the new API ?
Cheers
On Fri, Nov
t; ImmutableSet filteredFileSet =
> ImmutableSet.copyOf(filteredFiles);
> for (FileStatus file : deletableValidFiles) {
> if (!filteredFileSet.contains(file)) {
> LOG.trace(file.getPath() + " is not deletable according to:" +
> cleaner);
> }
>
filteredFileSet.contains(file)) {
> LOG.trace(file.getPath() + " is not deletable according to:" +
> cleaner);
> }
> }
> }
> i think these code can use set's difference operation instead, which
> is more straightforward
Lars:
Resolved issues for released versions should be closed.
Cheers
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Lars Francke
wrote:
> Thanks guys!
>
> Another related question: Resolved vs. Closed? Should all resolved issues
> (especially the old ones) be closed? If so I'd be happy to work a bit on
> thi
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14172
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14800, I saw
> that the current libthrift dependency on master was at 0.9.2, but the
> generated code still has the 0.9.0
bq. adding in a line for 2.6.1+ similar to the 2.7.1+ line
+1
We should periodically update the matrix with new hadoop releases.
Cheers
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> Heya folks,
>
> In response to our push the Hadoop community has been making patch releases
> on the 2.
+1
Ran unit test suite - passed against hadoop 2.6.2
Exercised basic shell commands
Cheers
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:09 PM, wrote:
> +1
>
> - Built from source, against Hadoop 2.4.1.- loaded some 100m rows,
> compacted, etc.
> - ran scan perf tests (scans, gets, puts)- nothing undue in the log
See this related thread:
http://search-hadoop.com/m/YGbbUzRN61T6Wdm1/hbase+shell+2.0&subj=Ruby+shell+versions+for+HBase+2+0
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Apekshit Sharma wrote:
> (Planning to do this tomorrow as part of our weekly code fixit. Will
> appreciate quick feedback.)
>
> Admin.rb e
+1 on creating branch for C++ client work.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Elliott Clark wrote:
> C++ client is going to be a reasonable undertaking. I was thinking that a
> branch for it would be best so that any new branches off of master wouldn't
> be held back by half done implementations.
+1
Checked signatures
Ran test suite against hadoop 2.6.2 - passed (see below for summary)
Exercised basic shell commands
Cheers
[INFO] Apache HBase - Assembly SUCCESS [
2.167 s]
[INFO]
[INFO]
bq. we should not remove it directly
My understanding is the same.
Cheers
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:22 PM, ashish singhi
wrote:
> Hello to all.
>
> I know that we can safely remove any APIs from a InterfaceAudience.Private
> class and the same is described in the HBase book.
>
> Now consider
HBASE-14523 has been integrated.
The other two are close.
Cheers
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Samir Ahmic wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to do some testing around
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14749 but i'm constantly
> hitting some of these issues:
>
> https://issues.apa
Appy:
Nice work.
In dev-support/test-patch.sh :
mv target/site/checkstyle.css $PATCH_DIR
This seems to give the following in console:
Determining number of patched Checkstyle errors.
==
==
-1 is given if value of $RESULT is not 0 :
submitJiraComment $RESULT
$RESULT is summation of return values of various checks:
checkAntiPatterns
(( RESULT = RESULT + $? ))
checkBuildWithHadoopVersions
(( RESULT = RESULT + $? ))
...
Looks like $RESULT was non-zeron somehow.
It was not clear whic
ogs anyway.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
>
> > -1 is given if value of $RESULT is not 0 :
> >
> > submitJiraComment $RESULT
> >
> > $RESULT is summation of return values of various checks:
> >
> > ch
> Hi,
> I noticed that there are a lot of checkstyle warnings in the following form:
>
> source="com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.
> checks.indentation.IndentationCheck"/>
>
> To my knowledge, we use two spaces for each tab. Not sure why all of a sudden
> we have so many IndentationCheck war
Appy:
In one JIRA I am working on (HBASE-15044), I tried to correct
non-IndentationCheck warnings to compensate for the new IndentationCheck
warnings.
However, checkstyle warning still showed -1.
Do you think IndentationCheck can be relaxed ?
Cheers
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Apekshit Sharm
HBASE-15044 didn't introduce any new file.
Error involving META-INF/LICENSE.vm should be unrelated.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Stack wrote:
> Is there a licensing issue here -- a file missing license or some such? Let
> me try rerunning the build...
>
> St.Ack
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 a
In newer build:
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK_matrix/jdk=latest1.8,label=Hadoop/601/console
There was no error involving META-INF/LICENSE.vm
Looks like the error below was intermittent.
HBASE-15044 didn't introduce any new file.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Stack wrote:
> See
bq. it looks like this is an oversight
I agree.
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:04 AM, wrote:
> Normally HBase triggers a compaction after a manual flush (of a region or
> table).
> Looks like in 1.0 and later the code is still there but not actually
> exercised, because FlushTableSubprocedure calls
ay, December 31, 2015 6:10 AM
> Subject: Re: Compact after manual flush broken in 1.0+?
>
> Indeed. I already informed the list about that months ago ;)
>
> 2015-12-31 9:09 GMT-05:00 Ted Yu :
>
> > bq. it looks like this is an oversight
> >
> > I agree.
> >
+1
Ran unit test suite
Exercised basic shell commands
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 01:44 h
[INFO] Finished at: 2016-01-03T09:12:35-08:00
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> Happy New Yea
Hi,
I was looking at checkstyle warnings for one of my patches.
I noticed that both trunkCheckstyle.xml and patchCheckstyle.xml were
truncated, resulting in bad-formed xml files.
I downloaded trunkCheckstyle.xml from another QA run (not for my patch) and
observed truncated xml:
https://builds.apac
Hi,
I recently worked on improving region normalization feature.
If region split request triggered by the execution of
SplitNormalizationPlan fails, there is no way of knowing whether the failed
split originated from region normalization.
Such association would give RegionNormalizer information so
nging procedures in master DDL. The change is local
> and
> > > low risk. Discussing with Sean and Matteo privately, they agreed to
> > > include them in 1.2. I will commit to branch-1.2 today so that the
> next
> > > 1.2RC would have the changes.
>
RSs with high failure rate
> and don't attempt to split regions hosted there in future?
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I recently worked on improving region normalization feature.
> >
> > If region split request triggered by the
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
>
> > bq. collect statistics to blacklist some RSs with high failure rate
> >
> > The metadata would help pinpoint the regions which consistently fail
> split
> > (merge) in the recent past. The failure could be due to c
This seems related:
HBASE-14128
FYI
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Deepti Bhogle wrote:
> We currently do exactly that. We create multiple instances of
> TableSnapshotScanner each with a unique dir location against the same
> snapshot. But doing so gives us the exception mentioned. Does that
There is RegionNormalizerTracker which tracks region normalizer state up in
ZK.
When user toggles normalizer switch through shell, the following method
in MasterRpcServices is called:
public boolean normalizerSwitch(boolean on) {
boolean oldValue = master.getRegionNormalizerTracker().isNor
For #1, yes, you can perform Put on another region from your coprocessor.
Though there is intricacy of managing handlers to avoid deadlock.
For #2, do you mean whether you can scan other region(s) from the
coprocessor ? Yes.
Cheers
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:34 AM, Avinash Dongre wrote:
> What
Suggest logging an INFRA ticket if you haven't done so.
Cheers
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've tracked an intermittent precommit build problem down when
> investigating HBASE-15069 and HBASE-15104 runs – this happens on all
> precommit hbase jobs that
+1
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Matteo Bertozzi
wrote:
> sounds good to me, it will be easier to look at and try out.
>
>
> Matteo
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Vladimir Rodionov >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi, folks
> >
> > I think we have to create separate branch for backup/restore work.
>
Interesting.
Can you share your use case where more than Integer.MAX_VALUE columns are
needed.
Consider filing a JIRA for the proposed change.
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Toshihiro Suzuki
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have lost the data in our development environment when a row has more
> than Inte
Looks like 1.2.0 RC is in near future.
I wonder if it is time to revive this thread (due to customer interest).
As far as I can tell, the Mob related tests have been passing in the recent
past.
Thanks
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> I haven't heard an user answer in t
gt;
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Andrew Purtell
> wrote:
>
> > Pretty sure Sean expressed 1.2 is feature complete and I'd support that.
> > Can we wait for 1.3 for MOB ? Can look at Spark connector then too.
> >
> > > On Jan 19, 2016, at 4:52 PM, Ted Yu
bq. that only checked test-compile on jdk1.7 instead of the full unit test
suite.
This would be sufficient for branch-1.x and master branch.
Cheers
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> Alternatively, I could attempt to turn precommit into a matrix build that
> runs yetus agai
HBase already has the following:
./hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/filter/RowFilter.java
Can you illustrate how your RowFilter is different from the above ?
Cheers
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Nicolas Fabre wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I developed a custom HBase RowFilter for my own
+1
Ran test suite against hadoop 2.7.0 - passed
Exercised basic shell commands
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:51 PM, wrote:
> +1
> - build from source- loaded 100m rows- executed some custom scan, load,
> and perf tests- nothing undue in the logs
>
> -- Lars
>
> From: Andrew Purtell
> To: "
Is your cluster a secure cluster ?
Was there more log of zookeeper server you can share ?
Thanks
> On Jan 19, 2016, at 11:58 PM, Parmeet Arora wrote:
>
> Please help me to resolve the issue.
> I am using Hadoop-2.5.0 and Hbase-1.1.0
>
> 2016-01-20 13:30:57,024 INFO [NIOServerCxn.Factory:0.0
+1
- Checked signatures
- Ran unit test suite
- Exercised shell commands
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
> +1. (binding)
>
> - Compat report looks good.
> - Checked signatures, looks good
> - Built from source, site, docs, rat, looks good
> -- ('mvn clean test site -Dsk
Compilation didn't pass on the expanded source tar ball:
[ERROR]
/home/hbase/hbase-1.2.0/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/procedure/MasterProcedureQueue.java:[60,7]
error: MasterProcedureQueue is not abstract and does not override
abstract method poll() in Procedur
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
>
> > Compilation didn't pass on the expanded source tar ball:
> >
> > [ERROR]
> >
> >
> /home/hbase/hbase-1.2.0/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/procedure/MasterPro
+1
Ran test suite using Java 1.7.0_67
Exercised basic shell commands
[INFO] Apache HBase - Shaded - Client . SUCCESS [
0.493 s]
[INFO] Apache HBase - Shaded - Server . SUCCESS [
0.867 s]
[INFO]
-
bq. get all row keys in a range
Currently there is no metadata in HFile w.r.t. all row keys which appear in
the HFile.
As you have found out, there is no fast way of getting such information.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 9:41 PM, onealbao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In default region split policy, it first fin
+1 to reducing dependency on zookeeper
> On Feb 3, 2016, at 9:50 PM, 张铎 wrote:
>
> My opinion, use conf file as default, and use code to override the config
> in conf file.
> And we need to persist the overridden value somewhere, not zk I'd say. I
> agree with Matteo that we should reduce the d
+1
Checked signature
Ran test suite
Exercised shell commands
[INFO] Apache HBase - Shaded - Server . SUCCESS [
0.911 s]
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
---
If we go with shortened voting period, my assumption is that RC3 would be
RC2 + fix for HBASE-15252, right ?
Cheers
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Stack wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Sean Busbey
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On F
I did some validation today.
See my comment at the tail of HBASE-15219.
I reverted my patch until we find out which patch caused the
-treatFailureAsError
flag not to work.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Stack wrote:
> I just ran a small ITBLL against current 1.2 HEAD and it seems fine...
> no
Monday is a holiday.
Wednesday seems better for end of voting period.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> okay, I'll roll RC3 tomorrow.
>
> What are folks thinking on voting period? 72hrs (~tuesday)? Maybe Wednesday
> for a little extra?
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:07 PM, St
+1
Checked signatures
Ran test suite
Exercised shell commands
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> Hi Folks!
>
> I'm pleased to announce the next release candidate for HBase 1.2.0.
>
> Artifacts are available here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.2.0RC
+1
Checked signature
Ran unit test suite
Practiced basic shell commands
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> Hi Folks!
>
> I'm pleased to announce the next release candidate for HBase 1.2.0.
>
> Artifacts are available here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hba
You can add the column families to the HTableDescriptor which is passed to
HBaseAdmin#createTable(HTableDescriptor) call.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:39 AM, SaCvP125
wrote:
> Is possible to create multiple column families (with the same number and
> name
> columns) automatically?
>
>
>
> --
> View
bq. will we also be deprecating minor releases faster?
+1
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Elliott Clark wrote:
> > Is it time to branch for 1.3 ?
> >
> > Sean did a great job getting 1.2 out. However it was a hard difficult
> > process t
bq. 1.2 was cut off mid-June 2015
1.2.0 was released recently.
Did you mean another release ?
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Mikhail Antonov
wrote:
> To me it's not really about individual big features (besides, big features
> might be hard to accommodate in a minor release), but enough good
There is also hbase-spark module worth considering for backport.
Current active JIRA is HBASE-14801
FYI
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> Thanks Mikhail. Looks like a good enough list for justifying a minor
> release.
>
> HBASE-15181 is almost ready to go.
>
> What do you
5, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
>
> > There is also hbase-spark module worth considering for backport.
> >
> > Current active JIRA is HBASE-14801
> >
> > FYI
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Enis Söztutar
> wrote:
> >
> >
SCUSS] thread on mobs? I think last time the ball was
> dropped when Andrew asked around who already uses mobs in trunk, if I've
> not missed something?
>
> I think as was noted before, backporting of spark connector should be less
> risky as it's less intrusive. So I guess
and thus not as invasive.
> > >
> > > Jon.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> > andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Pretty sure Sean expressed 1.2 is feature complete and I'
ar and don't know if
>> they made it or not.
>>
>> Jon.
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15035
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Andrew Purtell
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think we need at least one success
Thanks for the information, Chris.
For HBase precommit, there is checkbox 'USE_YETUS_PRERELEASE' which
uses current
HEAD of apache/yetus.
Before Yetus 0.2.0 comes out, we can utilize this checkbox.
Cheers
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Chris Nauroth
wrote:
> Hi Enis,
>
> Hadoop pre-commit w
nch.
>
> Jon.
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Devaraj Das wrote:
>
> > Sounds good to me, Jonathan. Although I suspect that at the end this will
> > be close to what Ted Yu has in the backport patch but this is a more
> > structured / reliable way of doing it.
Hi,
As requested by Sean Busbey, I am starting a new thread w.r.t. backporting
MOB feature to branch-1.
This is to solicit discussion on the criteria for including MOB feature
backport in branch-1.
I can think of the following:
1. whether there is customer interest
There is.
See Jonathan's respo
what sem ver is supposed to mean (not the api guarantees,
> the actual meaning).
>
> Backporting major features is a bad habit that the Hadoop community seems
> to have. We shouldn't follow their lead.
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Stack wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Ma
ta driven assessment on stability, functionality,
> and
> > performance - both avoidance of regression and affirmative indication of
> > the alleged benefit.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> >
> > > In the middle of writing respons
y question are
>
> 1.How many Region the below command will create?
> *create 'test', 'cf', SPLITS=> ['a', 'b', 'c'**]*
>
> 2.To find exact number for regions can i use RegionID counts?
>
>
> cheers
>
> Beeshma
>
>
Running against jdk 7 only is fine by me.
> On Mar 7, 2016, at 6:43 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
>
> I tested things out, and while YETUS-297[1] is present the default runs all
> plugins that can do multiple jdks against those available (jdk7 and jdk8 in
> our case).
>
> We can configure things to o
For Spark, backporting to branch-1 makes sense since
it is in hbase-spark module - only adds one line to root pom.xml.
there has been frequent user query for when hbase-spark would be in an
hbase release
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Matteo Bertozzi
wrote:
> If we cut master now we have
> -
HBASE-15456 has been rolled back due to unit test failure.
FYI
> On Mar 15, 2016, at 10:10 PM, Stack wrote:
>
> Could these two commits have been responsible for the below? Caused fail in
> 1.7 and 1.8.
> St.Ack
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Apache Jenkins Server <
> jenk...@builds.ap
2001 - 2100 of 3276 matches
Mail list logo
