Re: [alto] RFC 9275 on An Extension for Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO): Path Vector

Hi Qin, Richard, all, Big thanks to all people who contributed to the improvement of this document with their comments, review and guidance. Best regards, Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of Y. Richard Yang Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2022 3:23 AM To: Qin Wu Cc: IETF ALTO Subject: Re: [alto] RFC

Re: [alto] Missing the meeting today

Dear all All my best of fast recovery to Kai for his back. I can't make it either, today due to other meetings. FYI I will be off next week and back on September 6th. Best regards, Sabine >-Original Message- >From: alto On Behalf Of kaigao >Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2022 1:01 PM >To: Qin

Re: [alto] WG adoption call for draft-schott-alto-new-transport-01

Hi all, I have read this draft and support its adoption as a WG document. It is in good shape and next iterations will among others clarify the motivation (current shortcomings & advantages), in the introduction and positioning in the requirements section. Best regards, Sabine From: alto On B

Re: [alto] Question on ANE name format

o: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) ; IETF ALTO ; martin.h.d...@gmail.com Subject: RE: Question on ANE name format Hi Sabine, all, I would go personally for option 1. Thanks. Cheers, Med De : Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) mailto:sabine.randriam...@nokia-bell-labs

Re: [alto] Question on ANE name format

Apologies, re-sending with Wendy and Richard in CC Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) Sent: Monday, May 9, 2022 6:20 PM To: IETF ALTO ; mohamed.boucad...@orange.com; Qin (Bill) Wu ; martin.h.d...@gmail.com; zaheduzzaman.sar...@ericsson.com Cc: Kai Gao

[alto] Question on ANE name format

Dear ALTO WG and chairs and area directors, The document draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-24 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-24.txt ) has now entered AUTH48 and is on its way to be published as RFC 9240, once it has been reviewed and approved by all co

Re: [alto] Call for adoption: draft-zhang-alto-oam-yang

+1, Best regards Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of Qiao Xiang Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 11:17 AM To: Luis M. Contreras Cc: roland.sch...@telekom.de; draft-zhang-alto-oam-y...@ietf.org; IETF ALTO ; alto-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [alto] Call for adoption: draft-zhang-alto-oam-yang Hi all, I

Re: [alto] Call for Adoption: draft-bw-alto-cost-mode-01

Hi Med, I went through the v01 and the update on https://tinyurl.com/alto-cost-mode-latest and would have a couple of questions & suggestions, listed below, to be discussed. Cheers, Sabine --- In draft-bw-alto-cost-mode-01 --- - Section 3.1. Update to Section 6.1.2

Re: [alto] Call for Adoption: draft-bw-alto-cost-mode-01

+1 And agree on the information to be added on the IANA registry cost mode entries. Best regards, Sabine >-Original Message- >From: alto On Behalf Of Qin Wu >Sent: Monday, March 7, 2022 2:26 PM >To: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com; kai...@scu.edu.cn; alto@ietf.org; >alto-cha...@ietf.org >S

Re: [alto] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-21: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) / updates on remaining COMMENTS

Hello Ben, Again, thank you very much for your review and guidance. While DISCUSS and COMMENTS on section 10 have been addressed in V22, we still owe you a reponse on the remaining comments. Please find inline how they have been addressed in V23. The text relating to DISCUSS and COMMENTS on

Re: [alto] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-21: (with COMMENT)

Thanks Murray, Best regards, Sabine From: Murray S. Kucherawy Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 10:57 PM To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) Cc: The IESG ; draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-...@ietf.org; alto-cha...@ietf.org; alto@ietf.org; Vijay Gurbani Subject: Re: Murray

Re: [alto] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-21: (with COMMENT)

-unified-props-new-24 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-24 From: Murray S. Kucherawy Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 4:09 PM To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) Cc: The IESG ; draft-ietf-alto

Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-24.txt

Hello, This version includes a few remaining updates, mostly editorial, upon the review of Murray Kurcherawy, that have been forgotten in V23. A diff from the previous version V23 is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-24 The diffs between V22 and V2

Re: [alto] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-21: (with COMMENT)

Hello Roman, Thanks a lot for your review and guidance. Please our proposed updates inline. We hope they meet your expectations. Best regards, Sabine >-Original Message- >From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker >Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 4:45 AM >To: The IESG >Cc: draft-ietf-alto-u

Re: [alto] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-21: (with COMMENT)

Hello Murray, Thank you very much for your review and guidance. I apologize as I realized I have not integrated all of the related updates in the v23 that has been posted. To avoid confusion for the other reviewers, please find inline our related proposed updates. A v24 integrating these updates

Re: [alto] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-21: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

s types "ipv4" and "ipv6". Properties defined on "ipv4" and "ipv6" endpoints should be re-usable on "ipv4" and "ipv6" entities. Forbidding the usage of ":" in a non- private entity property type identifier would not

Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-23.txt

Hello, This revision addresses the review comments of Erick, Francesca, Roman and Benjamin. Great thanks to all for these thorough reviews and suggestions. We will formally respond to each reviewer e-mail inline on the list, but to gain time, will first send the updates that were made as an att

Re: [alto] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-21: (with COMMENT)

Hello Erick, Thank you very much for your review and apologies for coming back to you so late. Please fine inline, answers and proposed updates upon your comments. We look forward to having your feedback on our proposals. Best regards, Sabine and co-authors >-Original Message- >From: Eri

Re: [alto] [media-types] Application/alto-* Media Types Registration Request for second document draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new

Hi Alexey, Thank you for the confirmation, Best regards, Sabine From: Alexey Melnikov Sent: Wednesday, February 2, 2022 12:35 PM To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) ; Qin Wu ; media-ty...@ietf.org; Francesca Palombini Cc: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new@ietf.org; alto

Re: [alto] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-22: (with COMMENT)

HI Benjamin, Thanks for your further feedback on this version 22. Please see responses inline. Best regards, Sabine & co-authors >-Original Message- >From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker >Sent: Friday, January 28, 2022 5:25 AM >To: The IESG >Cc: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-...@ietf.or

Re: [alto] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-21: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) - DISCUSS + COMMENTS on section

Hi Benjamin, Thanks a lot, no worries. Please find my responses inline. Best regards, Sabine >-Original Message- >From: Benjamin Kaduk >Sent: Friday, January 28, 2022 5:23 AM >To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) > >Cc: The IESG ; draft-ietf-alto-unified-

Re: [alto] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-21: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Francesca, Thanks a lot for your feedback. We will proceed with the next revision. Best regards, Sabine & co-authors From: Francesca Palombini Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 3:01 PM To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) ; The IESG Cc: alto-cha...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-

Re: [alto] [media-types] Application/alto-* Media Types Registration Request for second document draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new

Hello Alexey, We have posted a revision v22 that addresses the DISCUSS points raised in Francesca's review. In particular, regarding the IANA registration, we would like to have your feedback. It is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new/ We have updated

Re: [alto] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-21: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Dear Francesca and Alexeï, We have posted a revision that addresses the DISCUSS points raised in Francesca's review. In particular, regarding the IANA registration, we would like to have the feedback of Alexeï. It is available here. We also addressed the COMMENTS of Francesca's review, except t

Re: [alto] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-21: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) - DISCUSS + COMMENTS on section

thorough review and guidance. Best regards, Sabine and co-authors >-Original Message- >From: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) > >Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2021 3:23 PM >To: Benjamin Kaduk ; The IESG >Cc: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-...@ietf.org; al

Re: [alto] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-21: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) - DISCUSS + COMMENTS on section

Hello Benjamin, Thank you very much for your thorough review and guidance. The present e-mail addresses your DISCUSS points and COMMENTS on section 10, as they relate to a DISCUSS point. Please see the responses inline. The other COMMENTS and NITS will be addressed in a separate e-mail. Best re

Re: [alto] New chair!

Welcome, bienvenue Med, looking forward to working with you, Great thanks to Jan for his service as ALTO chair Best regards, Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of kai...@scu.edu.cn Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:46 PM To: LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO Cc: IETF ALTO ; Qin Wu Subject: Re: [alto] New

Re: [alto] IESG evaluation results

Hi Martin, Thanks a lot for this feedback. The authors of unified-props are preparing responses with a focus on the DISCUSSES. The intent is to address the DISCUSSES in separate dedicated e-mails and come back with later e-mails on the comments. Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of Martin Duke Sent

Re: [alto] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-20: (with COMMENT)

Bonjour Éric, Thanks a lot for your feedback, Best regards, Sabine >-Original Message- >From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) >Sent: Friday, November 26, 2021 3:11 PM >To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) >; The IESG >Cc: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-...@

Re: [alto] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-20: (with COMMENT)

t;From: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) > >Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 2:29 PM >To: Éric Vyncke ; The IESG >Cc: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-...@ietf.org; alto-cha...@ietf.org; >alto@ietf.org; Vijay Gurbani >Subject: RE: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-iet

Re: [alto] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-20: (with COMMENT)

Hello Éric, Thanks a lot for your review and comments. Please find our answers inline. A version 21 is under edition and will integrate the changes upon your feedback. Best regards, Sabine and co-authors >-Original Message- >From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker >Sent: Monday, November 22

Re: [alto] Meeting Info for Nov 23, 2021

Hi Kai and all, We may also want to allow some time to discuss the review of Erick Vyncke on Unified properties and Performance metrics. Best regards, Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of kai...@scu.edu.cn Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 4:32 PM To: alto-weekly-meet...@googlegroups.com; alto@ietf.org

[alto] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-20.txt

Dear ALTO WG and reviewers, This new version 20 fixes some typos in version 19, among which many may appear as errors. In particular, I had an issue with the markups and many "" disappeared. I also removed the "" from the EntityDomainName (5.1.2) and EntityPropertyName formats (5.2.2) To se

Re: [alto] [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-18

Hello Spencer and Mike, Thanks a lot for your comments and guidance. Please see inline how your comments have been addressed, starting with the ones from Mike and continuing with the 2nd feedback from Spencer. We hope the updates meet your expectations and look forward to having your feedback, B

Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-19.txt

Dear ALTO WG, The version below addresses the reviews received from our AD Martin Duke, the IANA with Sabrina Tanamal, the OPSDIR Scott Bradner, the ARTDIR Spencer Dawkins and the SECDIR Paul Wouters. Great thanks to all of you for your review, insight and valuable guidance. This v19 It has be

Re: [alto] Update RFC7285 for unified property new draft

n RFC7285, the protocol is extended in two major directions. Sabine >-Original Message- >From: Qin Wu >Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 3:36 AM >To: Sebastian Kiesel ; Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - >FR/Paris-Saclay) >Cc: alto-chairs ; draft-i

Re: [alto] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-18

Hello Paul, Thanks a lot for your feedback. You will see the updates in version 19 Best regards, Sabine >-Original Message- >From: Paul Wouters >Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 8:48 PM >To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) > >Cc: sec...@ietf.org; draft

Re: [alto] Update RFC7285 for unified property new draft

Hi Qin and Sebastian, Thanks for the discussion. I agree with your conclusions and do not see the need to indicate "updates" and definitely not "obsoletes". This extension does not oppose entities against endpoints. Therefore it does not intend to replace endpoints with entities but adds entit

Re: [alto] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-18

Hello Paul, Thanks a lot for your review. A new version is under edition to address your comments. Please see inline how we plan to address them. Can you let us know whether the proposed updates meet your expectations? Best regards, Sabine and co-authors >-Original Message- >From: Pau

Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-18.txt

Hi Martin, Thanks for your feedback and further comments. Please see inline. I will see to prepare the updates for the newt iterations of the document. Best regards, Sabine From: Martin Duke Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 10:33 PM To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) Cc: IETF

Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-18.txt

Hello Martin and ALTO WG, Thanks again Martin for your thorough review and discussions that allowed to improve the document and enrich the capabilities of this extension. This new version addresses the comments in the AD review and is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-iet

Re: [alto] New wikipedia page

Hello Martin, Great thanks for this initiative, the page is very informative, synthetic and pleasant to read. With the ALTO WG contributors, we will be more than happy to update it. Before doing so, if you think it makes sense, we plan to draft the potential additions on a wiki page, to ensure

Re: [alto] Moving unified-props version 17 ahead

Hi Vijay, Great thanks for your review. We will integrate your proposed updates in further versions that we will submit upon AD review. Best regards, Sabine From: Vijay Gurbani Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:29 PM To: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-...@ietf.org Cc: IETF ALTO Subject: Moving uni

Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-17.txt

Dear Vijay, A new version 17 of the "ALTO Extension: Entity Property Maps" has been uploaded and hopefully addresses the pending review comments. It can be found at the link below, by clicking on the number "16" on the ALTO status pages. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-

Re: [alto] Chair review of unified-props (Part 2 of 2)

Hello Vijay, Thank you for your review of Entity Property Maps. As promised, please find inline the answers from Jensen and myself on how your comments have been addressed, prefixed respectively by “[jensen]” and “(sabine)”. Responses on sections 9.3 and 11, with “*”, request further feedbac

Re: [alto] Chair review of unified-props (Part 1 of 2)

Hello Vijay, Thank you for your review of Entity Property Maps. As promised, please find inline the answers from Jensen and myself on how your comments have been addressed, prefixed respectively by “[jensen]” and “(sabine)”. Responses on sections 4.7.1 and 4.4.3, with “*” request further fee

Re: [alto] ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes(Internet mail)

on the values of Qi? Thanks, Sabine From: chunshxiong(熊春山) Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 7:38 AM To: Y. Richard Yang ; Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) Cc: alto-cha...@ietf.org; alto-...@ietf.org; Qin Wu ; IETF ALTO Subject: RE: [alto] ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review

Re: [alto] ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes

: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) Cc: Qin Wu ; IETF ALTO ; alto-cha...@ietf.org; alto-...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [alto] ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes Hi Sabine, Qin, Good discussions. I support the use cases of the design direction. One suggestion is

Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-16.txt

still have thoughts on comments regarding sections: 4.7.1, 4.4.3, 9.3, 11. I will send an “integrated” response tomorrow to the list. Thanks, Sabine From: Vijay Gurbani Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2021 9:18 PM To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) Cc: alto@ietf.org Subject: Re

Re: [alto] ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes

available levels of information “freshness” or length of validity intervals with policy attributes that can be used by the Client in its ALTO request. Sabine From: Qin Wu Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 11:41 AM To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) ; IETF ALTO Cc: alto-cha...@ietf.org

Re: [alto] ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes

Hi Qin, Please see inline, Thanks Sabine From: Qin Wu Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 9:32 AM To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) ; IETF ALTO Cc: alto-cha...@ietf.org; alto-...@ietf.org Subject: RE: ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes Hi, Sabine

Re: [alto] ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes

Hello ALTO WG, Regarding the proposed work item on "Protocol extensions to support a richer and extensible set of policy attributes in ALTO information update request and response" (GPE for short) , I would like to add the following: This work item can be useful, among others, to allow a UE get

Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-16.txt

Hi Vijay, Thanks a lot. In the meantime, we will provide you with inline responses to your review and considerations on review comments that need further discussions. Thanks, Sabine From: Vijay Gurbani Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2021 9:18 PM To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay

Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-16.txt

Dear all, This version 16 addresses most of Vijay's review comments part 1 and 2. We will come back in a few days with details on how the comments have been addressed. Thanks, Sabine >-Original Message- >From: alto On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org >Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 202

Re: [alto] Chair review of path-vector-13 (Part 2 of 2)

Hi Vijay, Thanks a lot for your Part 1 and 2 thorough reviews and wise guidance. We will get back with our proposed responses and updates. Best regards, Sabine From: Vijay Gurbani Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2021 5:23 PM To: draft-ietf-alto-path-vec...@ietf.org Cc: IETF ALTO Subject: Chair r

Re: [alto] Chair review of unified-props (Part 2 of 2)

Hi Vijay, Thanks a lot again for part 2 of your review. We will pay particular attention to your major points, that indeed require to update the specifications. Best regards, Sabine From: Vijay Gurbani Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 5:28 PM To: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-...@ietf.org Cc:

Re: [alto] Chair review of unified-props (Part 1 of 2)

Hi Vijay, Great thanks for your thorough review and guidance. We will attend to your comments and get back with our proposed updates. Best regards, Sabine From: Vijay Gurbani Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 5:06 PM To: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-...@ietf.org Cc: IETF ALTO Subject: Chair revi

[alto] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-15.txt

Dear Vijay, Jan and Qin The new version 15 below fully addresses the review comments and now includes a "navigation table" listing the new features and the section describing them. This table stressed the need to change some section titles for more coherency. Additionally, upon discussions with

Re: [alto] Unified properties terminology clarification

Hi Wendy and Qin, Along your lines, my take is that this document extends the protocol in two major directions: - from endpoints restricted to IP addresses to entities covering a wider and extensible set of objects, - from properties on specific endpoints to entire entity property maps. The docu

Re: [alto] ALTO recharter: proposed item - General ALTO protocol extensions

Hi Luis, Thanks a lot for your feedback, please see inline Best regards, Sabine From: LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 11:41 PM To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) ; IETF ALTO Subject: RE: ALTO recharter: proposed item - General ALTO protocol

Re: [alto] ALTO recharter: proposed item - General ALTO protocol extensions

Hi Qin, Thanks a lot for your feedback, The text and slide deck presenting the proposed re-charter item hopefully address your comments. Please see inline. Best regards, Sabine From: Qin Wu Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 4:33 AM To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) ; IETF ALTO

Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-14.txt

Hi Vijay, Thank you for your suggestion. We will prepare the table and upload a v15. Best regards, Sabine From: Vijay Gurbani Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 11:58 PM To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) Cc: alto@ietf.org Subject: Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-unified

Re: [alto] Review for draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-12

Dear Luis, Thanks a lot for your review. Your comments have been addressed partly in v13 and v14, except providing a table listing the protocol extensions. I have attached a text file that lists your review comments and indicates where they were addressed in v13 and v14. The description text of

Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-14.txt

Dear all, Version 13 - draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-13.txt posted on Nov 2nd addresses the review comments of Danny and most comments of Luis. This version 14 addresses pending comments of the review provided by Luis. The only unresolved comment by Luis is providing a table listing the pro

Re: [alto] ALTO recharter: proposed item - General ALTO protocol extensions

IETF working groups that have a focus on the related use cases. The scope of extensions is not limited to those identified by the WIs and WGs, but is limited by the criteria set out below. ---- From: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) Sent:

Re: [alto] ALTO recharter: proposed item - General ALTO protocol extensions

items and IETF working groups that have a focus on the related use cases. The scope of extensions is not limited to those identified by the WIs and WGs, but is limited by the criteria set out below. ---- From: alto On Behalf Of Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia -

Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector

Hi Vijay, To my knowledge, - there is no implementation of Unified Properties that reflects the latest design updates, defined in 2019 and 2020, - I am not aware of any implementation of Path Vector. Best regards, Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of Vijay Gurbani Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020

Re: [alto] Welcome Qin Wu

Hello Qin, Welcome as a new chair for ALTO. Looking forward to working with you. All the best, Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of Martin Duke Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 4:48 AM To: IETF ALTO Subject: [alto] Welcome Qin Wu Hello ALTO, I'm pleased to welcome Qin Wu as the newest working group

[alto] ALTO recharter: proposed item - General ALTO protocol extensions

Dear all, Please find below a WG item proposal for "general ALTO protocol extensions", on which your feedback and suggestions will be more than welcome. Thanks, Sabine -- Context: the current ALTO charter o Extends the path cost values in several directions: - single to arr

Re: [alto] Meeting info for Oct 3, 2020

Dear all, Thanks for the fruitful discussions. There is a draft re-chartering topic proposal in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qP9jf-CMXvNiEE3YAnApTczAE4QkBW23Q1Eg99uOaEQ/edit , page 16 and

Re: [alto] Meeting Info for Oct 20, 2020

Hi Kai, Thanks a lot for the agenda. Maybe we can add: - where we stand with respect to WG Leader applications as requested by Martin. Thanks, Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of kai...@scu.edu.cn Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 4:46 PM To: alto@ietf.org; alto-weekly-meet...@googlegroups.com Subject:

Re: [alto] Review for draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-12

Hi Luis, Great thanks for this thorough review. Your comments will be attended in the next iteration of the draft. Best regards, Sabine & co-authors From: alto On Behalf Of LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 10:44 PM To: 'alto@ietf.org' Subject: [alto] Review for draf

[alto] Please fill the Doodle for the ALTO weekly meetings

Dear all, As you have seen in Kai's e-mail last Monday, there is a Doodle poll ongoing to find a suitable time for the ALTO weekly syn-up meetings. The reason is that the current slot on Wednesday 15-16h CET is not suitable for many people. Thanks a lot to those who already filled it. Please fil

Re: [alto] Status of alto-unified-props: Not encouraging?

Hi Vijay, Thank you for the reminder. A new version 13 is under edition and addresses the review of Danny. It will also address the second review comments once they will be available. Thanks, Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of Vijay Gurbani Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 4:59 PM To: IETF ALTO

Re: [alto] ALTO Weekly Meeting Info for Sep. 09, 2020

Dear all, I would like to add the following topic, regarding WG documents to finalize - ALTO Calendar RFC editor questions: answer to question N°6-C - Unified property review status These 2 topics would only take a couple of minutes but need to be addressed to finalize the WG documents. Thanks,

Re: [alto] WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-12

Hi Danny, Great thanks for your review. Best regards, Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of Danny Alex Lachos Perez Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 8:40 PM To: IETF ALTO Subject: Re: [alto] WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-12  Dear UP authors I have performed the review of this draft (-12).

Re: [alto] ALTO in IEEE Communications Standards Magazine

Indeed, great thanks for the reference and excellent overview. Already started to disseminate them. Cheers, Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of Y. Richard Yang Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 8:07 PM To: Vijay Gurbani Cc: IETF ALTO Subject: Re: [alto] ALTO in IEEE Communications Standards Magazine V

Re: [alto] Note takers and Jabber scribe

Hi Vijay, Unless somebody else already volunteered, I can be the second note taker Cheers, Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of Vijay Gurbani Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2020 1:29 AM To: Qiao Xiang Cc: IETF ALTO Subject: Re: [alto] Note takers and Jabber scribe Excellent. Thank you! On Fri, Jul 24, 2

Re: [alto] Are we on track to release the I-Ds ...

Hi Vijay, Yes, the Unified Properties draft will be posted today Thanks, Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of Vijay Gurbani Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 11:32 PM To: IETF ALTO Subject: [alto] Are we on track to release the I-Ds ... Dear Authors of path-vector, unified-props, and performance-metrics:

Re: [alto] Proposed update in PV on Persistent Entities

t this applies only for domains of persistent ANEs - harmonize with the IANA section Thanks, Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2020 9:00 PM To: kai...@scu.edu.cn; 'Richard Yang' ; Jensen Zhang Cc: IETF ALTO Subject: [alto]

[alto] Proposed update in PV on Persistent Entities

Hi Kai, Jensen, Richard, I have documented an update proposal for the Path Vector draft in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aqm4xjFDlcTfz_UdpBJnCV9fu49hSGUctJdEshpAqOk/edit The update proposes text and example (to be edited as necessary) for section "5.3.2. ANE Property: Persistent Entities".

Re: [alto] Finishing milestones: Status of drafts?

Dear Vijay, Jan and all, Here are some updates regarding the Unified Property and Path Vector drafts. Upon discussions during our weekly ALTO syncup calls, have adapted the Path-Vector (PV) design so as to enable standalone Property queries on particular ANEs. Up to now, the PV draft says: "

Re: [alto] ALTO Meeting Info for Jun. 10, 2020 - Unified Properties

updates related to the Path Vector extension and that are supporting cases of ANEs on which to further query properties off-line independently of a path vector transaction. Your feedback and proposals are more than welcome. Thanks, Sabine From: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) Sent

Re: [alto] ALTO Meeting Info for Jun. 10, 2020

Dear all, For some comments and updates for the Unified Properties draft please look up https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aqm4xjFDlcTfz_UdpBJnCV9fu49hSGUctJdEshpAqOk/edit Thanks, Sabine From: alto-weekly-meet...@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of Danny Alex Lachos Perez Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 202

Re: [alto] ALTO Meeting Info for May. 27, 2020

Dear all, Please look up the “UP reviews” doc below for progress, discussions and remaining TODOs on the draft https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aqm4xjFDlcTfz_UdpBJnCV9fu49hSGUctJdEshpAqOk/edit Thanks, Sabine From: alto-weekly-meet...@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURI

Re: [alto] Welcome your comments on new draft-huang-alto-mowie-for-network-aware-app(Internet mail)

you can receive the email directly. And I will write an email to the alto chairmans. BRs, Chunshan Xiong From: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) mailto:sabine.randriam...@nokia-bell-labs.com>> Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 2:45 AM To: chunshxiong(熊春山) mailto:chunshxi...@tence

Re: [alto] Welcome your comments on new draft-huang-alto-mowie-for-network-aware-app

Hello Chunshan Xiong, Thanks a lot for bringing these 5G use cases to the ALTO WG, and for the comprehensive description of related experiments. Indeed apps such as Low Delay Live Show are getting highly important in the current context of confinement, where classes are all getting virtual and

Re: [alto] Considerations about More Flexible ALTO Query/Filter

Hi Jensen, Thank you for bringing these considerations. Do you have examples of filters or constraints that you would like to add to queries for Unified Properties or Path Vector and that cannot be achieved with the current ALTO design? Also, do you have examples that illustrate the limitations

Re: [alto] Draft agenda for IETF 107 virtual interim

Hello Vijay, Thank you for this information. So the target submission deadline would be April 7th . Thanks, Sabine From: Vijay Gurbani Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 3:16 PM To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) Cc: IETF ALTO Subject: Re: [alto] Draft agenda for IETF 107 virtual

Re: [alto] Draft agenda for IETF 107 virtual interim

Hi Vijay, Thanks a lot for the agenda. As the ID submission tool was re-opened pursuant to the F2F IETF107 cancellation, is there any new deadline to submit new versions for the drafts to be presented? Thanks, Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of Vijay Gurbani Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 5:37 PM

Re: [alto] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-19: (with COMMENT)

Hi Alexey and Francesca, Thanks again for your review and guidance. Your comments have been addressed as described in the responses inline. A new version v21 has been posted and is available here, hoping it meets your expectations. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-21

[alto] FW: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-20: (with COMMENT)

regards, Sabine -Original Message- From: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 7:18 PM To: Benjamin Kaduk ; The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-alto-cost-calen...@ietf.org; alto-cha...@ietf.org; alto@ietf.org; Vijay Gurbani ; vijay.gurb...@nokia.com Subject: RE

Re: [alto] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-19: (with COMMENT)

Richard From: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 2:40 PM To: Y. Richard Yang ; Roman Danyliw Cc: The IESG ; draft-ietf-alto-cost-calen...@ietf.org; alto-cha...@ietf.org; IETF ALTO ; Vijay Gurbani ; Gurbani, Vijay (Nokia - US) Subject: RE: Roman Danyliw&#

Re: [alto] ALTO Interim in lieu of IETF 107

Hi Vijay, Thanks for the information. I can do slots 0 and 1. 2 would also do, with a lower preference though. Cheers, Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of Vijay Gurbani Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 6:59 PM To: IETF ALTO Subject: [alto] ALTO Interim in lieu of IETF 107 All: The IESG has been worki

Re: [alto] Agenda requests

Hi Vijay, I would like to request the following slot: Length of presentation time: 15 mins Name of presenter: Sabine Randriamasy Related I-D: draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-21 draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-21 will be submitted next Monday at the latest Thanks, Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of

Re: [alto] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-20: (with COMMENT)

Hello Benjamin and all, Sorry, I mistakenly clicked the "Send" button and I still need to address a couple of comments. In the meantime however, I'll be happy to have your feedback on the proposed updates. Best regards, Sabine >-Original Message- >From: Randr

Re: [alto] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-20: (with COMMENT)

Hello Benjamin, Thanks again for your review. A version v21 is under edition to finish addressing all the review comments. Please see inline for my responses to your comments. Best regards, Sabine >-Original Message- >From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker >Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020

Re: [alto] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-20: (with COMMENT)

Hello Benjamin, All right, thanks for your suggestion. I will insert such a text. Best regards, Sabine >-Original Message- >From: Benjamin Kaduk >Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 2:24 AM >To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) bell-labs.com> >Cc: The IESG

Re: [alto] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-20: (with COMMENT)

Hello Benjamin, Thank you for your review and feedback. As you saw, in draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-20, there are still comments from v19 that will be addressed in the next update. I would have a question : in your sentence " I would suggest further clarifying that this reflects a limitation

Re: [alto] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-19: (with COMMENT)

Hello Alexey and Francesca, Thanks a lot for your review and feedback. We will get back to you shortly with our proposals to address your comments. Best regards, Sabine -Original Message- From: Alexey Melnikov via Datatracker Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2020 2:03 PM To: The IESG Cc: dra

  1   2   >