No Subject

2001-02-08 Thread richard
Dear sir,   I am using the amdump to do the backup.   But, in my /home directory, the size is about 3 Gi and I would like to backup them into two part:Part(a): /home/a to k Part(b): /home/l to z   How can I do this in my disklist file?   Yours, Richard Ao  

Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device

2001-02-08 Thread richard
Dear Alexandre, Thanks for your email. I have found out that you are right to the type setting in amanda.conf. I have not set tapedev "/dev/nst0" before. Now, it can be labelled. Yours, Richard Ao Newsbook Limited - Original Message - From: "Alexandre Oliva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:

Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device

2001-02-08 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 9, 2001, "richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ./amlabel DailySet1 DailySet100 > rewinding > amlabel: rewinding tape: Inappropriate ioctl for device What is the tape device configured in DailySet1/amanda.conf? -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/

Re: Failing on relatively large partition

2001-02-08 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 8, 2001, Chris Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If this is the case, then the culprit appears to be the first gtar, as > it has taken forever to start piping data into gzip That's indeed the way GNU tar works. > If these assumptions are correct, any suggestions? Increase dtimeout (ne

Re: Client Installation

2001-02-08 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 8, 2001, "John R. Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's too bad tar doesn't have a flag that enables certain errors to be > logged (which Amanda would note but not consider fatal) but not cause > a non-zero exit. It does. It's called --ignore-failed-read. It was a bug in older ver

Inappropriate ioctl for device

2001-02-08 Thread richard
Dear all,   When I try to rewind the tape, I have the following error message. Do you have any idea what is wrong?     ./amlabel DailySet1 DailySet100rewindingamlabel: rewinding tape: Inappropriate ioctl for device      Yours, Richard Ao Newsbook Limited    

Re: amanda mailing list

2001-02-08 Thread Dan Wilder
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 09:17:35PM -0500, Ryan Williams wrote: > Just a little pet peeve I would like to ask about. > > Would it be possable to put an [amanda-users] in the subject of everything > sent to the mailing list? I know that mailman is capable of this but I am > not shure of the capabil

Re: amanda mailing list

2001-02-08 Thread David Lloyd
The alternative is to do what my local LUG does would be to add: * X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/4749 (naturally amand-users wouldn't claim to be linuxsa :-P) And filter on that...every now and then someone will send you something directly and it will end up in the wrong b

Re: does any one know the setting of HP DDS-4 SureStore DAT40i Internal DAT drvie in amanda.conf?

2001-02-08 Thread richard
Dear all, I have just bought a new HP DAT40i. May I know if someone can tell me its setting for the amanda.conf file? Thanks for your help. Yours, Richard Ao Newsbook Limited - Original Message - From: "Mike O'Shaughnessy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: amanda mailing list

2001-02-08 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Ryan Williams wrote: > Just a little pet peeve I would like to ask about. And this request happens to be a pet peeve of mine. > Would it be possable to put an [amanda-users] in the subject of everything > sent to the mailing list? I know that mailman is capable of this bu

amanda mailing list

2001-02-08 Thread Ryan Williams
Just a little pet peeve I would like to ask about. Would it be possable to put an [amanda-users] in the subject of everything sent to the mailing list? I know that mailman is capable of this but I am not shure of the capabilitys of majordomo. Regards, Ryan Williams

Re: instructions

2001-02-08 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Tal Ovadia wrote: > Are there any good instructions on how to install, and restore using > amanda ? Have you read the files in the docs directory? And "the chapter" referenced on the web site? (www.amanda.org) I'd suggest starting with these. -Mitch

Re: Failing on relatively large partition

2001-02-08 Thread Chris Hobbs
"John R. Jackson" wrote: > * Run sendbackup by hand as the Amanda user like this: > > /path/to/sendbackup -t < /the/file > /tmp/index.out Two hours into this now and it seems to be running somewhat correctly - strace (no truss here) shows and has shown a lot of file activity on the firs

Re: Adic Scalar 1000

2001-02-08 Thread Jason Hollinden
I'm in the last stage of testing a script I wrote to use a Scalar 100 with Amanda. I would assume the hardware will respond in a similar fashion. I plan to post it to amanda-users tomorrow (need to comment some things better, etc). In the mean time, can you use the 'mtx status' program (ver. 1.

instructions

2001-02-08 Thread Tal Ovadia
Help, Are there any good instructions on how to install, and restore using amanda ? Tal

Re: amrmtape

2001-02-08 Thread John R. Jackson
>amrmtape Semanal Viernes01 > > amrmtape:preserving original database in >informacion.orig.2014(exported). > amadmin: WARNING: input is from different org: Cirsa_Diario What is "org" set to in the Semanal amanda.conf (please post the exact line). What does the first line of informaci

Re: need instructions for restore

2001-02-08 Thread Tal Ovadia
I am trying to come up with a procedure to: 1) detect what tape the needed backup is on. 2) mount the tape 3) perform the restore I am not sure what commands I need to run for each so I will be able to write a script to do the job. Tal "John R. Jackson" wrote: > >Does anyone have simple instru

Re: Request to nachine timed out.

2001-02-08 Thread John R. Jackson
>It's solved, I hope ;) > >I started this command manually >... >and time said: >real421m18.894s >user223m18.650s >sys 7m54.520s > >so I think I need to set dtimeout to more. The dtimeout variable controls how long dumper will wait **with no input** from the client. A "data timeout"

Re: Can I use only one tape for backing up all the week?

2001-02-08 Thread John R. Jackson
>Why not go one step further, >and write this information in the tapelabel. Because planner needs it to decide how much to do before taper will find it. It needs to be on the server in someplace like tapelist or the curinfo database. >> ... The problem is that the drive may screw up. You may

Re: Amanda installation on a client

2001-02-08 Thread John R. Jackson
>Where can i find the notes from Christopher? I was referring to his reply to you that appeared on the mailing list. You should already have seen it. If you missed it, let me know offline and I can forward a copy. >Bye Juergen John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Failing on relatively large partition

2001-02-08 Thread John R. Jackson
>1.13.17, which I understand is acceptable, correct? That's my understanding. I think 1.13.19 has some performance improvements and an obscure bug fix, but for what you're seeing I don't think they apply (I think you're seeing a hang, not a performance problem). >Should have been more clear her

AIT-1 tapetype, FAQ-O-Matic, and compression

2001-02-08 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
Just in case no one has noticed yet, FAQ-O-Matic is currently broken. Thus... I just got a SDX-300C (35GB native AIT-1) drive for archival dumps. Does anybody have any experience with these regarding a realistic guesstimate of hardware compressed capacity? Tapetype? Also, I'm running RedHat6.2

Re: Failing on relatively large partition

2001-02-08 Thread John R. Jackson
>His log also shows >started index creator: "/usr/bin/gtar -tf - 2>/dev/null |sed -e 's/ >^\.//'" >index tee cannot write [Broken pipe] > >Might this be the reason ? No, that's a symptom. It says the other side of the connection (dumper on the server side) went away, which we knew. >Chris,

Re: Failing on relatively large partition

2001-02-08 Thread John R. Jackson
First, quickly grab the amandad*debug file for this run. With luck, it will still be for the backup of /home. It has a command we'll use shortly. >So, sendbackup for /home begins at 23:08, amanda quits and sends out the >MAIL REPORT 30 minutes later at 23:38 with the "[data timeout]" error, Wh

Re: need instructions for restore

2001-02-08 Thread John R. Jackson
>I am trying to come up with a procedure to: >1) detect what tape the needed backup is on. amadmin find >2) mount the tape amtape slot >3) perform the restore amrestore -p $TAPE [] | /the/restore/program ... >Tal John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Failing on relatively large partition

2001-02-08 Thread Chris Hobbs
Some more info. The backup of /home on failed again last night, but I notice the following: >From sendbackup.debug: 1) sendbackup: debug 1 pid 25115 ruid 40582 euid 40582 start time Wed Feb 7 23:08: 22 2001 2) The AMANDA MAIL REPORT was sent at 23:38. 3) [root@svhsfiles /tmp/amanda]# ls -l se

Adic Scalar 1000

2001-02-08 Thread Adrian Oneil
Just wondering if anyone has ever used Amanda with Adic's Scalar 1000 unit. The Adic uses DLT 8000 tapes. Server OS does not matter to me, I can use whatever flavor of Unix -Adrian

Re: Can I use only one tape for backing up all the week?

2001-02-08 Thread Gerhard den Hollander
* Simon Mayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 04:14:39PM +0100) > something like > echo -en "A\nY\n" | /path/to/amflush -f config > is working. ( Arrrgh again! ;) Allright ... > What about the amanda database if i set up a "flush to nirvana" config > with /dev/null. Would it do any be

Re: Failing on relatively large partition

2001-02-08 Thread Chris Hobbs
Thanks for the quick reply! "John R. Jackson" wrote: > What version of tar are you using? 1.13.17, which I understand is acceptable, correct? > What kind of connection exists between client and server? Any firewalls > or that kind of thing? Should have been more clear here - svhsfiles is th

amrmtape

2001-02-08 Thread Monserrat Seisdedos Nuñez
I'm trying to reuse a tape, so first i amrmtape its label: Viernes01, Semanal is the configuration directory. I get this output from amrmtape: amrmtape Semanal Viernes01 amrmtape:preserving original database in informacion.orig.2014(exported). amadmin: WARNING: input is from diff

Re: Can I use only one tape for backing up all the week?

2001-02-08 Thread Simon Mayr
Gerhard den Hollander wrote: > * Simon Mayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 03:28:07PM +0100) >> how do you non-interactivly amflush ? > > echo "all" | amflush -f whatever-your-config-is > > (I think , I haven't tried it ) Argh !!! something like echo -en "A\nY\n" | /path/to/am

Re: Can I use only one tape for backing up all the week?

2001-02-08 Thread Gerhard den Hollander
* Simon Mayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 03:28:07PM +0100) > how do you non-interactivly amflush ? echo "all" | amflush -f whatever-your-config-is (I think , I haven't tried it ) > at my site, we do something like that, but instead of flushing (as it > should be) we leave the in

Re: Can I use only one tape for backing up all the week?

2001-02-08 Thread Simon Mayr
Gerhard den Hollander wrote: > How about > As abovem 2 configs, each identical exept for allowed tapestring; > if(holdingdisk space is full){ > amflush totape && mt rewoffl && alert-person-to-change-tape > } > amdump todiskconfig i think this should work. btw: how do you non-interactivly a

Re: Planner - balance suggestions? FOLLOWUP

2001-02-08 Thread Bill Carlson
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Bill Carlson wrote: > Hey all, > > I've got a puzzler here, any suggestions on how to handle this would be > great (except using gnutar). > > I'm using amanda-2.4.2 on Solaris 2.6, works great. However, my file > systems are such that I have three file systems that are an ord

Re: Can I use only one tape for backing up all the week?

2001-02-08 Thread Xavier HUMBERT - Labo Informatique
Le 07/02/2001 a 15:22 -0500 , John R. Jackson ecrivait : > Second is that positioning sounds nice and logical to a programmer or > someone only used to working with disk, but when you throw in the reality > of a physical tape device, bad stuff starts to happen. On WinNt an Macs, that's the way D

Re: Amanda Client on FreeBSD

2001-02-08 Thread Greg Troxel
IMHO, on BSD, the culturally right way to set up AMANDA is to conform to the BSD Way as much as possible. This means: use dump(8). On FreeBSD 4.2 and NetBSD 1.5, /sbin/dump is sgid tty, but not suid: -r-xr-sr-x 2 root tty 331452 Nov 20 07:06 /sbin/dump leave the permissions on the r

Re: Can I use only one tape for backing up all the week?

2001-02-08 Thread Gerhard den Hollander
* Simon Mayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 01:20:52PM +0100) >>> What would it take to have some sort of config option that did exactly >>> that? ... >> >> Nothing. It's already there. Just leave the tape out of the drive and >> make as many runs as you want into the holding disk.

Re: Can I use only one tape for backing up all the week?

2001-02-08 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Gerhard den Hollander wrote: > * John R. Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 09:14:26PM -0500) > > >>Now, am not 100% certain on how taper does write the files to tape ... > > > > Very quick review: > > > > Rewind > > > > Read the label and verify > > > > R

Re: Can I use only one tape for backing up all the week?

2001-02-08 Thread Simon Mayr
John R. Jackson wrote: >> What would it take to have some sort of config option that did exactly >> that? ... > > > Nothing. It's already there. Just leave the tape out of the drive and > make as many runs as you want into the holding disk. Finetuning: For the 'holding disk runs' take an ot

Re: Can I use only one tape for backing up all the week?

2001-02-08 Thread Gerhard den Hollander
* John R. Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 09:14:26PM -0500) >>Now, am not 100% certain on how taper does write the files to tape ... > > Very quick review: > > Rewind > > Read the label and verify > > Rewind > > Write a new label and tapemark > > Write a header,

Re: Request to nachine timed out.

2001-02-08 Thread tomas morhac
> You are using gnutar. > It's slow (es. an incremental with gzip compression) > Make sure you have set your timeout to something large > > I have dtimeout set to 1800 . > > Also, did you check /tmp/amanda on the client for debug files > (sendbackup.*.debug ) ? > If so, what's in the last (timew

Re: Failing on relatively large partition

2001-02-08 Thread Gerhard den Hollander
* John R. Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 12:43:32AM -0500) >> svhsfiles /home lev 0 FAILED [data timeout] > This says dumper on the server last heard from sendbackup on the client > 30 minutes ago and gave up waiting. This (probably) has nothing to do > with your tapes or dr