, so it wasn't worth the bother. They were very
keen on HA though...
Mike.
d up going for a 100Gb LTO drive.
The 200Gb ones are quite expensive, as is SuperDLT, and AIT makes me
twitchy as Sony and openness have never really gone together well.
Thanks for the views though - that's 2/2 votes for LTO so far, which is
a good sign :-).
Mike.
er than libraries.
So, does anyone have any suggestions, good (or bad) experiences, or
other advice? Reliability is obviously by far the most important
thing... I'm also curious as to whether people favour internal or
external drives?
Any/all opinions would be much appreciated.
Mike.
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 10:25:17PM -0400, Joe Konecny wrote:
>
>
> I think I may have found the problem. Somehow I screwed
> up permissions on /tmp to drwxr-xr-x. Changed to
> drwxrwxrwx and things look much better. I'll know more
> after I switch the tape in the morning.
>
/tmp is normally
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 02:45:40PM +0200, Michael Schaller wrote:
> Am I right: Amanda WILL change tapes AUTOMATICALLY between different
> DLEs in ONE configuration if the rest of the tape doesn't fit for the
> next DLE
Yes. If runtapes is > 1, Amanda will move onto the next tape if a DLE
w
size is just a few GB smaller than my
35GB (uncompressed) AIT1 tapes, and I'm trying to get Amanda to schedule
level 0 dumps on different days (10 tapes and dumpcycle of 7 days), but
it can't do that if it won't bump the levels on the inactive volumes.
What else can I do?
Thanks,
Mike
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:11:06PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:36:31PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
Does amanda have any type of variables in its config files? I already
have a common file referenced by the three
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:36:31PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
Does amanda have any type of variables in its config files? I already
have a common file referenced by the three amanda.conf files, as well as
a common disklist. I'm thinking of a $profile so that I can d
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 07:45:17PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
So I have set up different holding disk directories for each profile.
Is this documented anywhere?
I don't recall seeing it specified, but I've done it from the start.
/{w|w2|w3|u|u2}/dumps/amanda/
n the holding disk and the headers don't identify
which profile they're associated with (probably for good reason -- what
if you changed a profile name?).
So I have set up different holding disk directories for each profile.
Is this documented anywhere?
Thanks,
Mike
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 04:47:06PM -0300, Leandro wrote:
> I have 2 tapes:
>
> Quantum Super DLT 320
> HP DDS-3 4MM DAT
>
> connected to Sun Enterprise 250
>
> Are these tapes compatible with Amanda?
> I can't find information about that.
Generally speaking, if your OS supports the drives, Aman
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 04:01:10PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Look for a few large subdirectories, and make a separate
DLE for those. Then group the other ones in meaning parts using
globbing (only the one level deep!!!). Make sure the globs cover
all
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Look for a few large subdirectories, and make a separate
DLE for those. Then group the other ones in meaning parts using
globbing (only the one level deep!!!). Make sure the globs cover
all names, even the one that don't exist yet.
See the last example in examples/disklist in
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 12:29:56PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
Hi,
Right now, most of everything is on one file server, but I'd like to
have some DLEs SW compress on the server, and some compress on the
client. The problem is that Amanda 2.4.4p3-1 (Debian) is still
Frank Smith wrote:
--On Wednesday, September 01, 2004 12:29:56 -0700 Mike Fedyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Right now, most of everything is on one file server, but I'd like to have some DLEs SW compress on the server, and some compress on the client. The problem is that Amand
ained.
Let me know if you need any more info.
Mike
srv-lnx2600 /share/letter_artcomp-tar-high0
srv-lnx2600 /share/accountingsrvcomp-tar-high 1
srv-lnx2600 /share/sales comp-tar-high0
define dumptype comp-tar {
default
pr
tar-child-b that includes /parent/b
Doesn't Amanda prevent you from several DLEs with the same path
("/parent" in this case)?
Mike
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:14:40PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
Is there any chance we can get this in the documentation?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=amanda-users&m=106277015010167&w=2
I don't know of any email messages included with the amanda docs.
Perh
Is there any chance we can get this in the documentation?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=amanda-users&m=106277015010167&w=2
All of my volumes are larger than a megabyte.
Is there any to show MB or GB instead of KB values so I don't have to
widen my columns so much?
about any kernel tweaks to get better
performance for lots of small files.
Are you using htree (indexed directories)[1]?
I would look into using the LD_PRELOAD library that sorts the directory
entries based on physical layout on disk (sort by inode number).
Mike
[1] tune2fs -l /dev/XXX |grep index
Frank Smith wrote:
limiting you and not the disks themselves. You could try commenting
out all the other filesystems in your disklist and see if the estimate
still takes as long.
Why do estimates all start and finish at the exact same time for all
volumes on a single client?
ges to a remote server over a VPN
connection (and possibly after encrypting the backup data also). Has
used AMANDA in a setup like this?
Anyway, I plan on using my shell and perl scripting skills to help when
I can, and especially fix the documentation!
Mike
[1]
if test -f /etc/foo
then
rm -f /etc/foo
else
touch /etc/foo
exit 0
fi
Kris Vassallo wrote:
The disks in the venus box are all SATA 150 drives, SCSI is way out of
the price range for this amount of space. If venus is the machine that
is taking forever to do the estimates, is it possible that 1.
estimates start on all machines, 2. the estimates finish on the
smalle
Frank Smith wrote:
--On Tuesday, July 20, 2004 14:41:43 -0700 Mike Fedyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The whole thing of having the backup host being the same machine as
the file server no longer looks like a good idea. However, I am in it
too deep to jump out now. I suppose that I could
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
As Frank pointed out, this is a big part of your problem. What OS and FS
are we talking here, and what backup program? And, again, sendsize*debug
Amanda works with other clients besides Amanda? Or are you asking
Amanda version?
Hi,
[ This is my first post to this list, and it looks like "reply to all"
is accepted here, so that's what I'm doing...]
Kris Vassallo wrote:
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 04:24, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
/On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 at 5:19pm, Kris Vassallo wrote
420GB is not the total amount per night. Somet
Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 12:18:59PM +0000, Mike Brodbelt wrote:
>
>
> If you are refering to the report you showed in your original posting,
> that was the size of data dumped, not taped.
>
> == Dump Time (hrs:min)6:39 6:39 0:00
Paul Bijnens wrote:
> Mike Brodbelt wrote:
> This is really an IO error. Probably due to hardware problems.
Could it not be due to an attempt to write beyond EOT? I'm reasonably
sure the hardware is OK.
> See in the system logs for more information. (/var/{adm,log}/messages
>
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Hi, Mike,
>
> on Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2004 at 11:21 you wrote to amanda-users:
>
> MB> So I'm wondering why I can't get ~32Gb of data onto a 35Gb tape. I'm a
> MB> bit suspicious that the tapetype may be causing problems
ctually comes
down to it it doesn't. I can live with having to re-organise my backups
and not doing level 0's of everything the same night, but I'd like
reliability on the backups I am doing...
Mike.
definition
originated
I could run tapetype on the drive, but that's likely to take some time,
and I was hoping someone might be able to give me a quick fix...
Mike.
how the ports are used.
I'll run the full backups tonight to see how they do. Thank you
kindly, your help is very appreciated.
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike:
The Amanda entries in /etc/services are
unchanged from the stock Amanda settings.
# AMANDA (Advanced Mar
Don, I'll give that a try, thanks. I'm recompiling the server and
clients as I write this.
Can you tell me what your /etc/services looks like for the amanda
services?
Thanks,
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike:
There may be a bit of misunderstanding here. The TCP ports may
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:32:22AM -0800, Mike Heller wrote:
I fixed the problem of the "high server load" by installing amanda
version 2.4.4p1 on the server and the clients.
...
But the backups fail. Checking the logs in /tmp/amanda (on the
clien
Gene,
Not if the drive is in the eject (operate handle) status, you can't do
anything with the tape at that point.
Mike
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 12 January 2004 14:34, Mike Heller wrote:
Note the tape error is because I haven't yet switched the tape, it's
n
Yes, I used essentially the same config string on both server and
clients except on the client side I added:
--without-server --without-restore
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike:
Did you install the modified Amanda software on both client and server?
They have to match so that their
but it still does not explain
why amanda is connecting on port 33xxx when I compiled with restrictions
to ports 850-854. I'm hoping someone can explain some of this to me.
Mike
Note the tape error is because I haven't yet switched the tape, it's not
the cause of the failed backups. Just wanted to clarify that.
Thanks,
Mike
Mike Heller wrote:
I fixed the problem of the "high server load" by installing amanda
version 2.4.4p1 on the server and t
I fixed the problem of the "high server load" by installing amanda
version 2.4.4p1 on the server and the clients.
amcheck daily now reports:
Amanda Tape Server Host Check
-
Holding disk /big/backup/amanda/dumps: 1034688 KB disk space available,
using 215488 KB
ERROR:
Paul, reply inline
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Mike Heller wrote:
I have amanda running on serveral servers and last night I tried to
back up one more to the tape server. When I arrived this morning,
the backups were still running and the new server had an extremely
high load
Am I correct that
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2004 14:55, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 at 2:40pm, Gene Heskett wrote
On Wednesday 07 January 2004 13:21, Mike Heller wrote:
I have amanda running on serveral servers and last
ee if it completes without problems.
Can anyone tell me what may be happening? Would filling the tape on the
tape server cause this?
Any help appreciated,
Mike
t will save me much grief, I'm sure.
Mike.,
into hardware compressed mode. Can anyone give me a simple
technique for forcing compression to stay off.
Thanks,
Mike.
One for the archives.
define tapetype HP-Ultrium-1 {
comment "HP Ultrium 1 (100G uncompressed) Tape"
length 101376 mbytes
filemark 0 kbytes
speed 13878 kps
}
Cheers,
Mike
--
| Mike Grice Unmetered & ADSL solutions
| Operations Support Analyst
have your
assurance that the practice has stopped.
Regards,
Mike
--
Mike Causer Email - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG KeyID 1C2DDA07 WWW - http://www.mikecauser.org
Flood the fen again! - Wicken Fen enlargement - http://www.wicken.org.uk
rcServe on a windows box but CA's LicenseIT program is a pain.
Thanks for any help,
Mike
t that Amanda is the right solution? Given it's close
management of tapes I'm not sure if it is, but I like how it works.
Also, how would you suggest I submit data I've obtained from amtapetype
(I've done a 100G uncompressed HP Ultrium 1 tape on a TransTec 7600 tape
drive).
ommon. Maybe I'm wrong.
Try doing a "hdparm -d1 /dev/" and test the throughput again.
As long as it's doing DMA, the drive should work beautifully.
Mike
Is it normal to require about 3000 seconds for each of the three dump
estimates on a 1+ TB Linux ext3 filesystem that's only about 1% full?
Thanks,
Mike
;t
particularly clear, and I'd like to know whether the new tape drive is
incompatible, or whether I need some driver tuning options. Apart from a
Compaq label, the drive appears virtually identical, even down to the
layout of the logic board.
Mike.
Hello,
I'm trying to add a 2nd email address in amanda.conf
Is the syntax "[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
or "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
or something different alltogether?
Also, do I need to restart a deamon after modifying amanda.conf?
Thanks,
---Mike
selfcheck
> -rwxr-xr-x1 amanda disk 121096 Jun 7 11:23 sendbackup
> -rwxr-xr-x1 amanda disk 79692 Jun 7 11:23 sendsize
> -rwxr-xr-x1 amanda disk93117 Jun 7 11:23 taper
> -rwxr-xr-x1 amanda disk38117 Jun 7 11:23 versionsuffix
>
y 31 20:29 rundump
-rwsr-x---1 root disk35854 May 31 20:29 runtar
-rwxr-xr-x1 root disk59150 May 31 20:29 selfcheck
-rwxr-xr-x1 root disk 115915 May 31 20:29 sendbackup
-rwxr-xr-x1 root disk73858 May 31 20:29 sendsize
-r
put of xinetd in the message log when it starts up?
when xinetd starts up?
Jun 10 14:21:54 [xinetd] xinetd Version 20030122 started with libwrap loadavg
options compiled in.
Jun 10 14:21:54 [xinetd] Started working: 2 available services
> Last resort: pull out tcpdump or ethe
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 06:51:38PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 09 June 2003 15:03, Mike Eldridge wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:29:32PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> On Monday 09 June 2003 14:10, Mike Eldridge wrote:
> >> >all,
> >> >
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:36:57PM -0400, Wayne Richards wrote:
> Well, now Mike, here's my setup and it works fine:
:(
i've heard dozens of people say that. i've tried dozens of permutations
of setup.
> {
> socket_type = dgram
> pr
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:29:32PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 09 June 2003 14:10, Mike Eldridge wrote:
> >all,
> >
> >i'm having serious problems getting amanda to function on a server
> >running xinetd. the amanda setup on this particular box runs f
t_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {0x401592c0, [], 0x400}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0
[pid 27764] send(7, "<86>Jun 9 12:30:22 xinetd[27764"..., 75, 0) = 75
[pid 27764] rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {SIG_DFL}, NULL, 8) = 0
[pid
Hi --
> Any tips or tricks or other thoughts? Is this the Linux dump/restore
> problem I've seen talked about on the mailing list? I don't
> understand how the gzip file could be corrupted by a problem internal
> to the dump/restore cycle.
Answering my own question after a week of testing ..
Hi --
Running Amanda 2.4.4 servers and clients, using a RedHat 7.3 tape
host, backing up using DUMP method (dump/restore) ext2 filesystems on
a RedHat 7.2 client host:
I tried to do an amrecover on the /home filesystem (~8 GB), which
recovered all of the directories (as expected) and about 2/3'
Dr. Kirkby --
I support about thirty or so UNIX servers (Solaris, AIX, Linux) that
represent the development, testing, and production environments for
the electronic resources of the University of Wisconsin at Madison
Libraries. I started using Amanda 2.4.x about two years ago to do
backups o
Hi --
In doing some simple testing with my new AIT-3 based tape libraries,
I note that they really seem to prefer larger block sizes, despite
the admonition in Sony's manual to use 512 byte blocks for best
performance. Here's what I'm seeing using "dd" to write to the tape
device (/dev/nst0)
there's any concensus among Amanda users running
XFS about this. What do most people do - just ignore them, or just apply
the patch? Is the concensus that these errors really are harmless, and
can be safely ignored, or does anyone have different information?
Mike.
Well I know for example
mt -f /dev/st0 status
Will cause the tape to rewind to the beginning after the completeing the command,
whereas
mt -f /dev/nst0
Will not. The tape will remain where it 'finished the command'
Hope that does some good.
-mj
>>> "Wayne Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fr
Folks --
I want to thank everybody for all the feedback. Diskwise, it's nice
to know that IDE solutions are workable, and I'm going to look into
them. Politically (isn't it always about the politics?) I'm in all
likelihood going to be forced into using Dell hardware, and as far as
I can tel
Folks --
I've been using amanda for a couple of years now on Sun hardware
(DLT8000-based L9 tape library, with stctl as the tape changer
controller). It's worked great, but I'm nearing capacity with the
current system and trying to decide whether to expand (another L9 and
a load of DLT-IV an
umns on reports out a bit more??
TIA,
Mike.
. My old machine had sed in /bin, not /sbin, as does the new one. Can
anyone tell me what's causing the problem?
Mike.
untar.c. I suppose you'll need to
patch --numeric-owner into your build of amanda to make it use that
option.
--
Mike Delaney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"...Microsoft follows standards. In much the same manner that fish follow
migrating caribou." "Now I have this image in my min
d and try it with /usr/ccs/bin ahead of /usr/local/bin
in your $PATH.
--
Mike Delaney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"...Microsoft follows standards. In much the same manner that fish follow
migrating caribou." "Now I have this image in my mind of a fish embracing and
extending a caribou." -- Paul Tomblin and Christian Bauernfeind in the SDM
":
/big/www/docs lev 0 FAILED [missing result for /big/www/docs in nova response]
I'm wondering if ipchains is maybe blocking the connection? I created a
default file using "lokkit". Do I need to open a port?
Any ideas on where to look? Some suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Mike
he same way.
Forunately, the drives are far more reliable in that regard. I've seen
only one broken DLT leader so far (knocks on wood).
--
Mike Delaney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"...Microsoft follows standards. In much the same manner that fish follow
migrating caribou." "N
...but "root" is not allowed to rsh to localhost as user "amanda"...
I don't like "rsh" as a security mechanism, amandad should be
tcpwrappered in inetd.conf or the equivalent for xinetd instead.
Try recompiling / reinstalling amanda with the
"--without-bsd-security" option.
- Michael Hogsett
I am trying to figure something and am looking for assistance. I have
checked the newsgroups without success.
The question is: When I backup an NT/2000 share does amanda/tar even touch
the archive bit on a file?? Can someone explain exactly what happens??
-
titions but not the third
(root). Is this a permissions issue? I exclude the following:
./mnt
./proc
./no_backup
./backup
./download
./usr/doc
./usr/man
./usr/src
./var/spool/mqueue
Thanks for any help or direction you can provide.
Mike
"inetd[15574]: auth/tcp:
bind: Address already in use"
The server is also the client (I want to backup the local filesystem to
tape). Any suggestions on where to go from here?
TIA,
Mike
system I intend to backup is a server that has an internal tape
drive. It will only backup itself, no outside clients (at least for the
time being). Is there any problem to using user/group = root/root?
That should give me access to all directories and the tape. Is there
any problems to doing this?
Thanks,
Mike
s above, there doesn't seem to be a match in the files and the specs
don't give me the needed values. Is there a default DLT setting?
Thanks for any help you can provide.
Mike
Anyone attempt to compile this beast on MacOS X yet? ( client only )
- Michael Hogsett
Sr. System Administrator
SRI International
Computer Science & System Design Laboratories
read the man page for amadmin
amadmin force
> How do you force Amanda to do all Zero Level Backups?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brook
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> You didn't have a tape in, so amanda went into degraded mode. By default,
> amanda "reserves" 100% of the holding disk for incrementals in degraded
> mode. But, since these were all new disks, amanda couldn't do
> incrementals. Thus the backup failed.
>
> Next time
I added directories and none of the ones I add get backed up. Here is
my mail.
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 14:20:47 +0600 (GMT-6)
From: Amanda user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR May 23, 2002
*** A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED: [no tape online].
Some dumps
Problem is the restore is to an NT share from a Unix (Solaris) based backup
server.
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Todd Trann wrote:
> I just ran into the "gzip: Broken Pipe" errors myself.
>
> I ended up doing using the "-c" flag with amrestore, so that it
> didn't uncompress the backup (it just pulled
I am currently running Amanda v2.4.1p1, with tar v1.13.17, gzip v1.3.3. I
am currently backing up an NT share that contains alot of files that total
up in size exceeding 4 gig. I am running with compression on the server,
and backing up the share from the backup server (yes, I know it is quic
for that dump.
The runtapes parameter is an upper bound on the number of tapes amanda
_may_ use in a single run, not the number that will be used. If all
of the data for a particular run fits on one tape, then only that one
tape is used.
--
Mike Delaney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"...Microsoft
etc.) to reflect
the environment amanda will be running in. Build and install as normal on
your build machine, and tar or package up the results.
--
Mike Delaney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"...Microsoft follows standards. In much the same manner that fish follow
migrating caribou.&
I am trying to figure something and am looking for assistance. I have
checked the newsgroups without success.
The question is: When I backup an NT/2000 share does amanda/tar even touch
the archive bit on a file?? Can someone explain exactly what happens??
-
the holding partition to
ReiserFS or maybe ext3 (it supports files larger than 2GB right?)
I'm assuming his amanda server is running on linux...
Cheers,
Mike
--
Mike Cathey - http://www.mikecathey.com/
Network Administrator
RTC Internet - http://www.catt.com/
Joshua Baker-LePain
Adding a second tape drive and using two tapes per run has done
wonders for our backups. Amanda is now promoting level 0 dumps from
as much as 8 days ahead.
Here is what "amadmin conf balance" is reporting :
due-date #fs orig KBout KB balance
I am in the process of configuring amanda and have been able to run the
amcheck cleanly. My current problem is how to configure my jukebox. I
have a
Quantum DLT8000-40 which holds ten tapes for which I found the description
with length, filemark, and speed. My question is do I use chg-multi for
The last 2 days I have tried to run the amstatus command for a currently
running dump and I have gotten the following error (running amanda
v2.4.1p1 on Solaris 2.7 Intel):
bash-2.03$ amstatus Daily
Using /var/adm/amanda/Daily/log/amdump
Modification of a read-only value attempted at
/usr/local/a
I ran "tapetype" just two days ago with a very similar configuration.
The tape drive is a Sony SDX-400C with a SDX1-35C tape. Here were the
results with hardware compression turned off.
define tapetype AIT-SDX1-35C {
length 33280 mbytes
filemark 0 kbytes
speed 4062 kps
}
The only
It has been a wonderful waste of bandwidth.
> I knew this would erupt into a flame war :)
>
> He deserved it.
>
> wab
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Christopher Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Rebecca Pakish'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Roy Andrè Tollefsen'"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Why doesn't amanda use as much tape as I am giving it? I have amanda
configured to use two tape drives ( AIT SDX1-25C tapes ). My tapetype
states that the tapes are 24192 Mb in size. It filled the first tape
and used only used 8+ Gb of the second. Does amanda ever promote dump
levels or only
...but "root" is not allowed to rsh to localhost as user "amanda"...
I don't like "rsh" as a security mechanism, amandad should be
tcpwrappered in inetd.conf or the equivalent for xinetd instead.
Try recompiling / reinstalling amanda with the
"--without-bsd-security" option.
- Michael Hogsett
that is what tapetype reported.
I am going to disable hardware compression since the dumps files are
compressed by amanda.
Thanks
Mike Hogsett
Computer Science Laboratory
SRI International
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 at 4:48pm, Mike Hogsett wrote
>
> > define tapetype AIT-SD
Sony SDX-400C with tape SDX1-25C
On Linux :
; cat /proc/scsi/scsi
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 06 Lun: 00
Vendor: SONY Model: SDX-300C Rev: 0700
Type: Sequential-AccessANSI SCSI revision: 02
Tapetype Results :
No Hardware Compression :
dip switch 7 off
101 - 200 of 230 matches
Mail list logo
