- Original Message -
Hey Phil,
Why do you want to continue this part of the discussion after I politely
made
a retraction earlier this week to the statement above that you quoted me
on?
Mainly because I was going through some e-mails that had piled up over
several days and I did not
- Original Message -
From: Brian Sherrod
What does any of this K1MAN/W1AW stuff have to do with AM discussion?
Let's
get back on track here folks. I've already had two people leave the list
today.
Plenty, if you ever had an AM QSO disrupted by the broadcasts of either of
these
On Saturday 08 April 2006 10:50 am, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brian Sherrod
What does any of this K1MAN/W1AW stuff have to do with AM discussion?
Let's
get back on track here folks. I've already had two people leave the list
today.
Plenty, if you ever had an AM
What does any of this K1MAN/W1AW stuff have to do with AM discussion? Let's
get back on track here folks. I've already had two people leave the list
today.
K1MAN was a major source of QRM on 75 meter AM in the northeast with his
seemingly endless broadcasts, so to me the subject has quite a
From: Mike Sanders K0AZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This thread is painful at best.
In the late 50s the then sales manager for Walter Ashe Radio in St. Louis,
MO ran
A2 code practice on 10 meters. From letter recognition to maybe 10 WPM.
This
was
done on a regular schedule and was one way
Let's face the facts about this K1MAN issue... He never provided code
practice to the best of my knowledge ever, only endless voice material AND...
It appears he wasn't acting as a control operator at the control point AND it
appears he wasn't meeting the proper ID at the proper times... and
-
From: vince werber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 11:55 AM
To: Discussion of AM Radio
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] k1man fined
Let's face the facts about this K1MAN issue... SNIP
In this case K1MAN earned the fine...
73
Vince
ka1iic
--
No virus found
- Original Message -
From: Peter Markavage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] k1man fined
Slk said, As a non-member of the ARRgghhL, I do not get their
reports
or broadcasting (since
Tell that to the fellow op who just got his QSO squashed by W1AM firing up
on top of him!
Mod-U-Lator,
Mike(y)
W3SLK
- Original Message -
From: Peter Markavage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] k1man fined
Never
: [AMRadio] k1man fined
Slk said, As a non-member of the ARRgghhL, I do not get their
reports
or broadcasting (since it is a single transmission to the masses)
schedule.
Any of this information is available off the ARRL Web Site whether
you're a member or not. The complete W1AW
Message -
From: Peter Markavage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] k1man fined
Never said there was a FCC rule limiting Bulletin time. I timed them
on
7290 on 4 separate occasions over the last year. If we all had
of the ham bands and not cause any problems to anyone.
Mod-U-Lator,
Mike(y)
W3SLK
- Original Message -
From: Peter Markavage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] k1man fined
Slk
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 4:18 pm, Peter Markavage wrote:
Maybe you should drop Art, W1AM, a note, and ask him why it happened.
Pete, cwa
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 16:52:46 -0400 Mike Sawyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Tell that to the fellow op who just got his QSO squashed by W1AM
firing up
I meant W1AW.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Markavage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] k1man fined
Maybe you should drop Art, W1AM, a note, and ask him why it happened.
Pete, cwa
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 16:52:46
: Sunday, April 02, 2006 9:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discussion of AM Radio
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] k1man fined
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] k1man fined
Also I would think ARRL in Newington should be VERY
careful before they fire up their W1AW Broadcasts now
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] k1man fined
Slk said, As a non-member of the ARRgghhL, I do not get their
reports
or broadcasting (since it is a single transmission to the masses)
schedule.
Any of this information is available off the ARRL Web Site whether
you're a member or not. The complete W1AW
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] k1man fined
Also I would think ARRL in Newington should be VERY
careful before they fire up their W1AW Broadcasts now.
This precedent could easily be applied to them, if someone
wanted to entrap them.
The difference between the W1AW
I agree, Phil. I don't think the Amateur bands are the place for any
type of broadcasting. Whether the ARRL is for the benefit of the
Amateur Radio operator or not it is still a commercial entity. However,
where K1MAN crossed WAY over the line in my estimation is when he had a
call in radio
Interesting stuff...
The DISCUSSION section about mentioninmg a web site is
interesting - that may now be an issue, but I didn't see any firm
conclusion.
Also I would think ARRL in Newington should be VERY
careful before they fire up their W1AW Broadcasts now.
This precedent could easily be
: [AMRadio] k1man fined
Interesting stuff...
The DISCUSSION section about mentioninmg a web site is
interesting - that may now be an issue, but I didn't see any firm
conclusion.
Also I would think ARRL in Newington should be VERY
careful before they fire up their W1AW Broadcasts now.
This precedent
Slk said, As a non-member of the ARRgghhL, I do not get their reports
or broadcasting (since it is a single transmission to the masses)
schedule.
Any of this information is available off the ARRL Web Site whether
you're a member or not. The complete W1AW bulletin schedule and
frequencies are
- Original Message -
From: Peter Markavage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] k1man fined
Slk said, As a non-member of the ARRgghhL, I do not get their reports
or broadcasting (since it is a single transmission
This may be old news, but I just saw it.
k5xu
GLENN A. BAXTER. Issued a monetary forfeiture in the
amount of
$21,000 to Glenn A. Baxter, for violation of Sections
97.101(d),
97.113(a)(3), 97.105(a) and 97.113(b) of the
Commission Rules, and for
failure to file required information pursuant to
23 matches
Mail list logo
