No, Analog doesn't exclude any data that is in
your log file(s) unless you explicitly tell it to do
so via *INCLUDE or *EXCLUDE.
Hope that helps,
-- Duke
Glenn Vassallo wrote:
I was wondering if Analog does any checks/validation to see if a
request is coming from the same client machine (ip add
I was wondering if Analog does
any checks/validation to see if a request is coming from the same client
machine (ip address) repeatedly.
I had a referrer in my list who I was suspecting
was trying to bring up their numbers by repeatedly clicking through to the site.
The numbers just seemed
Chris L wrote:
> My referrer report has a lot of referrers with less that 20 referrals in
> total, can I get it to list these specifically? I tried REFARGSFLOOR but it
> is very confusing, I couldn't get any of the samples to work, it simply
> doesn't seem to want to list referers with < 20 referr
My referrer report has a lot of referrers with less that 20 referrals in
total, can I get it to list these specifically? I tried REFARGSFLOOR but it
is very confusing, I couldn't get any of the samples to work, it simply
doesn't seem to want to list referers with < 20 referrals.
Any help much a
In <017301c2a215$f6c9d2f0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Aengus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Michael Bluejay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How do I get Analog to show me all the referrers?
>
> REFFLOOR 1r
>
> will cause all referrers that have more than 1 request to be listed.
Or better, REFFLOOR 0r
Michael Bluejay ([EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thursday, December 12, 2002 12:00 PM):
> Here's a follow-up to the question I posted yesterday about omissions in
> the Referrer Report.
> I went to the raw log files and created a report of all the references
> from BicycleAustin.com to WebsiteHelpers.com,
Michael Bluejay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do I get Analog to show me all the referrers?
REFFLOOR 1r
will cause all referrers that have more than 1 request to be listed.
> I'm also interested in finding out exactly what "#reqs" and "#pages"
A request for xyz.gif counts as a request. a re
Here's a follow-up to the question I posted yesterday about omissions in the Referrer Report.
I went to the raw log files and created a report of all the references from BicycleAustin.com to WebsiteHelpers.com, which you can see here:
http://WebsiteHelpers.com/log.html
There are 484 references
There are tools out there that allow you to make a request to a
website and set the referrer to anything. In fact, it is pretty simple
to write a robot that will do the same. The referrer is reported by
the web client so all referrer statistics are accepted on-faith. The
majority of web clients (i
Thanks both to Michael and Stephen for responding.
Michael: I did use the "find" to check the html source code of their sites, but
didn't find any matches on any one of those sites.
I believe what Stephen said is true. They are faking the referrer. I know how to
block them using REF...EEXCLUDE.
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Hao wrote:
> Recently when I went through our analog stats, I found out a bunch of
> adult site were listed pretty high on the referrer session of the stats.
> And I tried to find the links to our site on some of their sites, but
> there are no links to our site on any of thos
Recently when I went through our analog stats, I found out a bunch of
adult site were listed pretty high on the referrer session of the stats.
And I tried to find the links to our site on some of their sites, but
there are no links to our site on any of those pages!
Does anybody know what caused t
Mark Farmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]; Friday, December 06, 2002 10:12 AM):
> Newbie question:
> A 'failed referrer' is a webpage trying to connect to some page on your site
> which can't be found, right? (correct me if I'm wrong)
Yes.
> If so, is there any difference between a failed referrer inte
Newbie question:
A 'failed referrer' is a webpage trying to connect to some page on your site
which can't be found, right? (correct me if I'm wrong)
If so, is there any difference between a failed referrer internal on your
own site and a 404 error?
Cheers.
>Doug Nelson (Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:19 AM):
>
>> I want my name and email removed from this mail archive to avoid spam and
>> viruses and for general privacy.
>
Only with great difficulty I believe. You participate in a public forum and
as such your email-address is broadcast around the w
In <003f01c29182$2139fe60$62438cc6@NELSON>, "Doug Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> I want my name and email removed from this mail archive to avoid spam and
> viruses and for general privacy.
>
> How is this done?
The only reliable way is to not post to a public mailing list. If you are
con
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Doug Nelson wrote:
> I am wondering who keeps this list, who keeps those archives, and what their
> relationship is.
>
> I want to have my name and email purged from the archived files, and need to
> know who to contact.
>
There is no relationship. And I doubt you'll get yo
Someone, quite probably Doug Nelson, once wrote:
>I want to have my name and email purged from the archived files, and need to
>know who to contact.
You'll never manage it. If you truly object to your address being
stored in archives then the only way you'll stop it is to never post to
any mailin
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: mail archive, was: Re: [analog-help] Referrer Arguments
> Doug Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Who is "them"?
>
> There are lots of archives of this list (there are 3 listed at the bo
Doug Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Who is "them"?
There are lots of archives of this list (there are 3 listed at the bottom of this
message).
> Is it not the same people who run this list?
The people who provide the mailing list also provide an archive, but it's not the only
one.
> Wha
; From: "Jeremy Wadsack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 12:37 PM
> Subject: Re: mail archive, was: Re: [analog-help] Referrer Arguments
>>
>> Doug Nelson (Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:19 AM):
>>
M
Subject: Re: mail archive, was: Re: [analog-help] Referrer Arguments
>
> Doug Nelson (Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:19 AM):
>
> > I want my name and email removed from this mail archive to avoid spam
and
> > viruses and for general privacy.
>
> > How is this
Doug Nelson (Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:19 AM):
> I want my name and email removed from this mail archive to avoid spam and
> viruses and for general privacy.
> How is this done?
You'll have to talk to the folks at mail-archive.com. Unfortunately,
there are tons of other archives of this li
I want my name and email removed from this mail archive to avoid spam and
viruses and for general privacy.
How is this done?
- Original Message -
From: "Aengus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This was asked, and answered, earlier this week.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/analog-help@lists.isi
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Andrew Hill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to prevent the list of referrers in the referrer report being split
> by arguments, but I don't want to have it affect any of the search
> reports.
>
> At the moment, I have:
> REFARGSFLOOR -0p
> REFARGSSORTBY PAGES
>
> Setting the floor
Andrew Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to prevent the list of referrers in the referrer report being
> split by arguments, but I don't want to have it affect any of the
> search reports.
>
> Setting the floor to 0 just makes it display everything. Is there a
> way to make it display noth
Hi,
I want to prevent the list of referrers in the referrer report being split
by arguments, but I don't want to have it affect any of the search
reports.
At the moment, I have:
REFCOLS Pp
REFFLOOR -20P
REFSORTBY PAGES
REFARGSFLOOR -0p
REFARGSSORTBY PAGES
Setting the floor to 0 just makes it dis
Please disregard previous post. I found it. D'OH!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aengus
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [analog-help] referrer and refsite reports
From: "Mic
No I haven't. Do I do that in the IIS manager? I didn't see the properties
for that.
Have you configured IIS to log the referrer information? It doesn't do it
by default.
Aengus
+
+
From: "Michael Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Analog is working beautifully, I still need to install a reverse DNS to
> see names instead of IP numbers.
>
> However, even with all options ON I am not getting referrer or refsite
> reports. I am using w3c logs on IIS5.0 Is there something else I ne
Analog is working beautifully, I still need to install a reverse DNS to see
names instead of IP numbers.
However, even with all options ON I am not getting referrer or refsite
reports. I am using w3c logs on IIS5.0 Is there something else I need to
configure?
Thanks all.
+
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> I have installed Analog under Solaris and cannot get
> REFERRER and REFERRER SITE REPORT to display in the browser.
>
> These are set to ON in the analog.cfg file.
> I tried running the logresolve file in apache this did not work.
>
> Have yo
I have installed Analog under Solaris and cannot get
REFERRER and REFERRER SITE REPORT to display in the browser.
These are set to ON in the analog.cfg file.
I tried running the logresolve file in apache this did not work.
Have you any ideas on how to resolve this problem.
Regards
Mark Clos
Sent by: Subject: Re: [analog-help]
Referrer report oddity
owner-analog-help@lists
On 11/25/00 9:07 PM Mary's Gardens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Mary's Gardens wrote:
>
>>> In checking this out I see that I need help in defining a
>>> SEARCHENGINE wildcard command to cover all the principle search
>>> engines referring files to our web site.
>
>PS - I can
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Mary's Gardens wrote:
>> In checking this out I see that I need help in defining a
>> SEARCHENGINE wildcard command to cover all the principle search
>> engines referring files to our web site.
>>
>> At present I am using the command, improvised after reading the FAQ a
>> whi
You need to use REFFLOOR
--
Stephen Turner http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/
Statistical Laboratory, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge, CB3 0WB, England
"The new operating system will recover more easily from system crashes."
(Microsoft, aiming high with
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Mary's Gardens wrote:
>
> In checking this out I see that I need help in defining a
> SEARCHENGINE wildcard command to cover all the principle search
> engines referring files to our web site.
>
> At present I am using the command, improvised after reading the FAQ a
> whi
with 20 hits.
Obviously there must be other external referrers with less than 20 hits
hidden away.
It is these that I would like to know about.
TIA
Neil Jones
--
> From: neil jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [analog-help] Referrer report oddity
Can anyone help with this?
This is on analog 3.2 for unix
I have checked the FAQ and I notice from the archive that a similar proble
was
asked recently.
I still can't get it to worl
My referrer report has at the bottom
1151: [not listed: 286 URLs]
I want to know what these are
This is part of
Mary's Gardens wrote:
>> Why, for many referrer queries listed in the Referrer Report are none
>> of the query words listed also in the Search Query Report and/or
>> Search Word Report, even though one or more is clearly operative in
>> requesting a website file?
Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
> Becau
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
>
> > Why, for many referrer queries listed in the Referrer Report are none
> > of the query words listed also in the Search Query Report and/or
> > Search Word Report, even though one or more is clearly operative in
> > requesting a website file?
>
> B
Mary's Gardens wrote:
> Can the Referrer Report configuration command be augmented so the
> actual website files requested in the search engine referrals can be
> displayed, as well as the search engine and the query string?
No, see the FAQ item B20 (http://www.analog.cx/docs/faq.html#faq128)
Two Questions:
Can the Referrer Report configuration command be augmented so the
actual website files requested in the search engine referrals can be
displayed, as well as the search engine and the query string?
Why, for many referrer queries listed in the Referrer Report are none
of the quer
On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
>
> "Nancy S. Brown" wrote:
>
> > If someone is at siteA.com and then manually enters the URL for my
> > site does SiteA.com then show up as a referrer or does there actually
> > have to be a followed link from that site for it to show up as a
> > refer
If someone is at siteA.com and then manually enters the URL for my
site does SiteA.com then show up as a referrer or does there actually
have to be a followed link from that site for it to show up as a
referrer.
--
Nancy Brown Designing Web
http://designingweb.net
[EMAIL PRO
"Nancy S. Brown" wrote:
> If someone is at siteA.com and then manually enters the URL for my
> site does SiteA.com then show up as a referrer or does there actually
> have to be a followed link from that site for it to show up as a
> referrer.
No, the referrer usually shows up as "" or -. That
On Fri, 15 Oct 1999, Michael Erde wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The default behavior of Analog seems to be to list referring URLs
> with at least 20 requests. Is there a way to change that number? I'd
> like to bump it down to, say, 10.
>
> I've checked the docs, but can't seem to find
Hi all,
The default behavior of Analog seems to be to list referring URLs
with at least 20 requests. Is there a way to change that number? I'd
like to bump it down to, say, 10.
I've checked the docs, but can't seem to find an answer to my
question. Forgive me if it's in there
Hi
I'm trying to set my analog.cfg to use Apache's Referrer log and agent log
with no success.
What are the log file includes?
TIS
berber
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
mailing list, send m
Gail,
Check these:
1]Make sure you're log lines have referrer stats in them
2]Make sure your referrer report floors are set low (e.g. 1r or 0r) to
include evry referrer
3]Check to see if analog ignored line (General Report/Unwanted Logfile
Lines). If there are any, you may have exlcud
All,
I am trying to get a referrer listing and am having trouble. We are
running an NT server, Netscape Enterprise Server 3.5.1, common logfile
format.
I have referrer on, but it does not show on my reports. There is no line
in the bug report for referrer when I run the config file. What am I
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Michael Sobolev wrote:
>
> Thank you for the explanation. I just do not remember whether a similar
> information was put into dox.
>
It's all in there, although not with such a long explanation of the reasons
behind the decisions.
--
Stephen Turner[EMAIL PROTECTED]h
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 02:48:56PM +, Stephen Turner wrote:
> I want to clear up some of the comments on this thread.
[ snip ]
Thank you for the explanation. I just do not remember whether a similar
information was put into dox.
--
Mike
--
I want to clear up some of the comments on this thread.
1)
REFALIAS http://*.freshmeat.net/* http://freshmeat.net/*
doesn't work. You can only have one * on the left hand side of an alias,
otherwise it's ambiguous. You may think it's 'obvious' in this case, but
here's a better example: after
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 02:44:23PM +1030, Gaelyne Gasson wrote:
> Here's the format that worked for me:
[ snip ]
Thank you. I got the idea, now I am going to form the output to suit
my tastes. :)
Thank you very much,
--
Mike
Michael,
Sorry for the delay - it took me a little bit, but I tested this, and it
works. I used Yahoo for my example since it uses several formats and the
assumption per your message was that you wanted to only know about
Freshmeat.net as a whole.
Here's the format that worked for me:
REFALI
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 11:01:17PM +1030, Gaelyne Gasson wrote:
> REFALIAS http://*freshmeat.net/* http://freshmeat.net/*
>
> OR...
>
> REFOUTPUTALIAS http://*freshmeat.net/* http://freshmeat.net/*
I tried them, both resulted into same error message:
/usr/bin/analog: Warning C: Bad argumen
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Michael Sobolev wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 11:43:09AM +, Stephen Turner wrote:
> > I'm not quite sure I understand what you're trying to do. But if you want
> > http://yahoo.com/stuff to look like http://www.yahoo.com/stuff
> > you can just do
> >
> > You wou
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 11:43:09AM +, Stephen Turner wrote:
> I'm not quite sure I understand what you're trying to do. But if you want
> http://yahoo.com/stuff to look like http://www.yahoo.com/stuff
> you can just do
> REFALIAS http://yahoo.com/* http://www.yahoo.com/*
>
> You would
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Michael Sobolev wrote:
> It looks like I just do not understand how to alias hosts
> from referrer log. I want all hosts that look like
>
> *.domain
>
> be considered as
>
> domain
>
> I use
>
> REFALIAS*.domaindomain
>
> It does not work.
>
I'm not quit
It looks like I just do not understand how to alias hosts
from referrer log. I want all hosts that look like
*.domain
be considered as
domain
I use
REFALIAS*.domaindomain
It does not work.
What's wrong?
--
Mike
--
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, CommerceCart wrote:
>
> Once I compile the reports and view the referrer section, in every case
> (about 45 individual reports) the first referrer is always the owners
> domain. In many cases, with thousands of "#reqs". Then it proceeds to list
> the major search engines, et
Greetings everyone:
New subscriber here...really, only joined up to find out one thing about the
referrer data. All this "analog stuff" is completely out of my league, but
the basics are quite necessary for my client services.
Once I compile the reports and view the referrer section, i
Dear Dr. Turner and Joe Rhett :
Thanks for your responses earlier.
Stephen wrote earlier:
Maybe it used to have a link, and you're analysing old
logfiles? Or maybe it includes an inline image from your
site?
~The logs I use are from the day before-always 24 hours.-mcbrand
~I view the source code
> Dear Analog List:
> Perhaps someone may know the answer to this question which has been
> puzzling me for a year.
> What may be the reasons for a Referring URL in the Referrer Report
> to show a referral when there is no evidence of a link to my domain
> in any way obvious? The fu
On Fri, 5 Nov 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear Analog List:
> Perhaps someone may know the answer to this question which has been
> puzzling me for a year.
> What may be the reasons for a Referring URL in the Referrer Report
> to show a referral when there is no evidence of a li
Dear Analog List:
Perhaps someone may know the answer to this question which has been
puzzling me for a year.
What may be the reasons for a Referring URL in the Referrer Report
to show a referral when there is no evidence of a link to my domain
in any way obvious? The full strin
68 matches
Mail list logo
