Nachricht-
Von: Martin Gainty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Freitag, 10. Januar 2003 17:41
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: AntHill vs. CruiseControl vs. Gump
I wished that all of the build tools would standardise on 1 format for the
Configuration File
We have
: Freitag, 10. Januar 2003 19:10
An: Ant Users List
Betreff: Re: AntHill vs. CruiseControl vs. Gump
How long did it get you to get it working?
I am using anthill myself (against CVS)
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 22
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Rosendahl Sten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that the AntHill enhancements are in the upcoming Pro (non-open
source, commercial) version.
The link I've posted is, I realized that after posting, thanks.
But this one here http://www.urbancode.com/projects/anthill/faq.jsp
is
AntHill at least has a manual, CruiseControl's (lack of)
documentation is appalling.
There is a Documentation Wiki for CC:
http://c2.com/w4/cc/wiki.cgi?WelcomeVisitors
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have any recommendations for this. My initial thought was to
have a master build.xml file that calls into the component's build.xml.
But after doing to investigation I came across a couple of tools that
seem to be designed for this problem: AntHill, CruiseControl Gump.
Does
See:
http://archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=ant-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]msgId=502447
This was a comparison Steve and I did in our book, be sure to see the
attached PDF file there.
Update: we are now using Anthill *and* CruiseControl just because we
can and its interesting to
I came across a couple of tools that
seem to be designed for this problem: AntHill, CruiseControl Gump.
Does anyone have any recommendations as to which one is better?
These tools are great for such things. Eric Hatcher's book, Java
Development With ANT (http://www.manning.com/hatcher), has a
How long did it get you to get it working?
I am using anthill myself (against CVS)
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 22:11
Subject: AW: AntHill vs. CruiseControl vs. Gump
After reading the chapter in Eriks and Steves
- Original Message -
From: Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Maciej Zawadzki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 03:01
Subject: Re: AntHill vs. CruiseControl vs. Gump
p.s. I also have found it disheartening that CruiseControl was so
I have been assigned with setting up an integrated build process for all
of our software components. The idea being to build each component
working with the dependency tree in a top-to-bottom fashion. We
currently have approximately 25 components which are currently being
build individually with
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Freitag, 10. Januar 2003 03:03
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: AntHill vs. CruiseControl vs. Gump
I have been assigned with setting up an integrated build process for all
of our software components. The idea being to build each component
working
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After reading the chapter in Eriks and Steves book Java Development
with Ant I had chosen CruiseControl. They have written their views
of the pro´s and con´s to each continous-integration-tool so you
could make your own decision.
But
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Michael Nau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have any recommendations as to which one is better?
I'm afraid you'll have to evaluate yourself.
Note that Gump on the one side and CruiseControl and AntHill on the
other cover different scenarios to a certain degree.
Gump
-Matematik International (IMI) - THE ORDER COMPANY
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 8:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AntHill vs. CruiseControl vs. Gump
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After
14 matches
Mail list logo
