From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/Makefile |3 +-
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_mci.c | 1464 +++
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
send halt BT GPM if the chip is in network sleep and BT state
is awake
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c | 24
drivers/net/wireless/ath
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c | 14 +++---
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
b/drivers
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
Add support for MCI BT-Coex for AR9462. with AR9462 we have
WLAN and BT coexists via MCI protocol(Message Coexistence Interface)
WLAN and BT exchanges GPM, SCHED messages and few other messages
for coexistence.
this is not yet tested
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
these parameter will be utilized and modified in the MCI hardware codes
state machine
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c | 22 ++
1 files
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h | 10 ++
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h
b/drivers/net
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 5:14 AM, abhinav narain
abhinavnarai...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
Hi Abhinav,
I want to sniff all the packets from the network.
I am setting
sc-sc_ah-is_monitoring = true;
in ath9k_start()
but this gets set to false in in ath9k_config(..).
using the flag :
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Daniel Smith viscous.liq...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/3/2011 7:10 PM, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Daniel Smithviscous.liq...@gmail.com
wrote:
I recently upgraded to compat-wireless-3.1-rc8 from
compat-wireless-2.6.39-1-sn
Hi Zefir,
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com wrote:
This patch integrates the DFS module into ath9k, including
* building the module into ath9k_hw
* setting up DFS debugfs
* defining HW capability flag for DFS support
* setting this flag by DFS
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com wrote:
This initial DFS module provides basic functionality to deal with
radar pulses reported by the DFS HW pattern detector.
The reported data is evaluated and basic plausibility checks are
performed to filter false
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com wrote:
This initial DFS module provides basic functionality to deal with
radar pulses reported by the DFS HW pattern detector.
The reported data is evaluated and basic plausibility checks are
performed to filter false
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Zefir Kurtisi
zefir.kurt...@neratec.com wrote:
On 11/03/2011 04:27 PM, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
Hi Zefir,
Hello Mohammed,
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com
wrote:
[...]
+ if (ah-caps.hw_caps ATH9K_HW_CAP_DFS
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Daniel Smith viscous.liq...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently upgraded to compat-wireless-3.1-rc8 from
compat-wireless-2.6.39-1-sn and have discovered an interesting behavior.
When in monitor mode I use the signal strength field reported in
radiotap and
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Changyu Li ironyma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I started having this problem just recently. In short, everything is fine,
then no data is received, then after a while, a bunch of data is received at
once,
most tcp connections are not broken, some timed out
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 9:02 PM, David Summers
at...@summers5913.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
No switches on my card. Card came already attached to the MTB when I
bought it, looks like its just the raw AR9285 chip you can see here:
http://www.qca.qualcomm.com/media/product/product_79_file1.pdf
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:50 PM, changyu li ironyma...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is fixed and was not ath9k's problem. The problem was caused by
arpon daemon's response to bogus packets. It was fixed by making a static
entry for the default route.
thanks for reporting it. adding ath9k
BARRAL
-Message d'origine-
De : Mohammed Shafi [mailto:shafi.wirel...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 12 octobre 2011 06:20
À : BARRAL Adrien
Cc : ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Objet : Re: [ath9k-devel] Maybe a bug somewhere in the WIFI driver
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:29 PM, BARRAL Adrien
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Bryan Phillippe b...@terran.org wrote:
Thoughts on who's to blame and how to resolve?
its the driver, the rate is is taken as a HT rate,
if (rx_stats-rs_rate 0x80) {
/* HT rate */
rxs-flag |= RX_FLAG_HT;
if
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Mitch Davis mjd+ath9k@afork.com wrote:
Hello,
I am writing to you all on behalf of the many Fedora users with AR9287
chips. In Fedora 15, wireless performance with the AR9287 is
terrible. Here's a bug about it:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Pavel Roskin pro...@gnu.org wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:53:04 +0530
Mohammed Shafi shafi.wirel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Wendy,
sorry i have not tried on working with OpenWrt. please ask in the
OpenWrt list. i had also Cced Felix and Adrian, Pavel Roskin who
Hi Wendy,
sorry i have not tried on working with OpenWrt. please ask in the OpenWrt
list. i had also Cced Felix and Adrian, Pavel Roskin who might know about
this. may be you can just try with another OpenWrt package which has some
latest compat-wireless.
thanks,
shafi
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Julien Valroff jul...@kirya.net wrote:
Hi Mohammed,
Le mercredi 05 oct. 2011 à 06:24:06 (+0200 CEST), Julien Valroff a écrit :
Le mardi 04 oct. 2011 à 20:35:14 (+0200 CEST), Julien Valroff a écrit :
Le mardi 04 oct. 2011 à 07:46:58 (+0200 CEST), Mohammed
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Can you please grab a third device and grab a dump of the actual
probe/association frames?
looks like the tx-power is constrained due to regulatory (or) power
constraint element from AP?
I think it'd be helpful to see
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:31 AM, songzhang songzh...@tju.edu.cn wrote:
Thanks a lot Mohammed!
I change 40MHz preferences,HT40+ in wireless file,and then it starting
running!wow! That is to say my card can run at MCS 15 in 40MHz and short
GI,300Mbps.But there is another problem,the throughput
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Philipp Raich philipp.ra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
When using the ath9k module my system freezes in less than a few minutes, and
I'm not able to find out why. Could someone help me by telling me where to
find useful information on where or why this happens?
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Philipp Raich wrote:
I would really like to improve the situation for me and everyone
else, or at least help as much as I can, and I think I need a hint.
From experience I know that Atheros does not like to work with end
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Mohammed Shafi wrote:
From experience I know that Atheros does not like to work with end
users on debugging issues like this, even if end users happen to be
competent. The prefered modus operandi is to attempt to reproduce
true its an already reported platform specific issue, usually they use
this id for emulation testing. as a workaround this PID has to be
added to support this card in that specific platform
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
.. sounds like another PCI bus
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Daniel Golle dgo...@allnet.de wrote:
Sure, that's what I did already to make it work at least a bit, but run into
DMA
problems once there was any serious traffic (using Kernel 2.6.39 and
compat-wireless 2011-06-20)
Kernel 3.0.4 with compat-wireless 2011-10-05
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:25 PM, songzhang songzh...@tju.edu.cn wrote:
Hello all,
Using SR71-A with atheros 9160 chip and ath9k (2011-6-25 conpat),I still can
not put 40MHz and short GI into effect.Right now ,I only get MCS15 in
20MHz,130Mbps.
My question what should I configure to put 40MHz
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:29 PM, BARRAL Adrien
adrien.bar...@robopec.com wrote:
Hello,
Here is a description of my system :
Linux : 2.6.35-22-generic (on a ubuntu 10.04 LTS)
My wifi card is : 02:00.0 Network controller: Atheros Communications Inc.
AR9285 Wireless Network Adapter
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com wrote:
On 10/03/2011 08:15 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com
wrote:
Signed-off-by: Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com
---
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Julien Valroff jul...@kirya.net wrote:
[ please CC me when replying, I am not subscribed to the list ]
Hi,
I have recently purchased a new laptop (Asus X93S) with an Atheros AR9285
wireless chip which obviously uses the ath9k module.
When connecting to the
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
this extends the bits for rf kill GPIO selection to [7:2] from [4:2] as
we use GPIO pin 11 as rfkill for AR9480 and also remove few unused
macros
Cc: Wilson Tsao wt...@qca.qualcomm.com
Cc: Hu, Russell r...@qca.qualcomm.com
Signed-off
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
this patch fixes the assumption of maximum number of GPIO pins present
in AR9287/AR9300. this fix is essential as we might encounter some
functionality issues involved in accessing the status of GPIO pins which
are all incorrectly assumed
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
the AR_SREV register does not seems to indicate whether AR9480 is
pci_express capable or not though the other information like macVersion
etc can be obtained properly. this fix is essential as ASPM won't be intialized
and its related driver
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:41 PM, wendy_life wendy_l...@yeah.net wrote:
Hi,all!
with much effort , I only get MAX througthput 20Mbps at adhoc mode and
54Mbps at ap-client mode.
11n adhoc is not yet supported in mac80211, patches for 11n support
for adhoc are under review comments.
[Target
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
b/drivers/net
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
the AR_SREV register does not seems to indicate it properly though the
other information like macVersion etc can be obtained properly
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
proper dma_unmapping and freeing of skb's has to be done in the rx
cleanup for EDMA chipsets when the device is unloaded and this also
seems to address the following warning which shows up occasionally when
the device is unloaded
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Valentin Rouxel
valentin.rou...@etudiant.univ-rennes1.fr wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
I am a French student in computer science. I am working on a class project
where
we should modified a wireless driver.
Our teacher said Madwifi could be an interesting driver but
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:56 AM, Gabriel Burca gburca-at...@ebixio.com wrote:
kernel.org has been down for about 3 weeks now. Is there a git mirror for
the ath9k driver, compat and compat-wireless? Could someone mirror them to
github.com if they have a recent version?
please checkout
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:53 PM, shashikant ajegaonkar
ajegaon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Please forward the earlier mail thread if any or your views on using ath9k
adapter + Wireshark to disect/monitor wireless 802.11 abgn network traffic
either windows/linux platforms.
install ath9k in
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:32 AM, houchenda2006 houchenda2...@163.com wrote:
hello, I want to use ath9k_hw_computetxtime in my application programme.But
I don't know how to call the function. Does it have any interface to
application, or device file in /dev ? thanks!
not a good idea, best way
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Amr Al-Hamad amr.alha...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am a newbie in ath9k. and I am doing some research on wireless LANs. I want
to buy a wireless card that works on a 5 GHz frequency band, also I want it
to be supported by ath9k driver. I am currently
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Jun Xiao jun.x...@sixnet.com wrote:
Hi,
With all your great efforts developing the driver, our products with
AR9271 is on the way of FCC certification tests. Some features are
required:
1. Be able to turn on WiFi transmission constantly
rfkill?
2. Be able
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Mohammed Shafi
shafi.wirel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Jun Xiao jun.x...@sixnet.com wrote:
Hi,
With all your great efforts developing the driver, our products with
AR9271 is on the way of FCC certification tests. Some features
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Christian Kapeller
christian.kapel...@cmotion.eu wrote:
Hi,
when loading the ath9k_htc module for my TL-WN722N device, I get an
oops.
I use the openwrt backfire distribution on an arm device, with kernel
2.6.31.12 and compat-wireless-2011-06-22. The firmware
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:15 PM, pangyunong 029...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
that is the driver for ath9k indeed.
development is done in the git tree, please clone the source code
git clone
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-testing.git
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:27 PM, pangyunong 029...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I change the code in ath9k/main.c and net/mac80211/tx.c. how can i use
my new version of ath9k driver for my device? Should I make and install
the driver again, configure and compile kernel once more?
reinstall the
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:15 AM, John W. Linville
linvi...@tuxdriver.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 05:56:33PM +0530, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Larry Finger larry.fin...@lwfinger.net
wrote:
Kmemleak shows the following kind of memory leak for ath9k_htc
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
* changing regulatory not advisable
This may not be applicable if the amateur licence he has permits him
to transmit on these frequencies.
oh ok, i don't know much about regulatory
*second number is hw specific value
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Fabio Tignanelli
fabio.tignane...@paconsulting.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use compact-wireless to update the driver for an ath9K.
The reason why I am emailing you is that, despite trying to follow all the
guidelines on How To Ask Questions the Smart Way, I
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Larry Finger
larry.fin...@lwfinger.net wrote:
On 08/24/2011 10:53 AM, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:15 AM, John W. Linville
linvi...@tuxdriver.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 05:56:33PM +0530, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
this is the tx-power that seems to be used by the hardware code
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug.c | 43
1 files changed, 43
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:43 AM, pangyunong 029...@gmail.com wrote:
how can i watch the value in offset 0x8084 ? I have no debug
in /sys/kernel now. How can i use it?
pls read
http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k/debug
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 15:38 +0530, Mohammed Shafi wrote
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Alex S. al_91...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am working on an amateur radio project, so I'd like to get access to the
2.4GHz channels below 2412. I'm using OpenWRT and have modified my CRDA
regulatory.bin file to allow those frequencies, but I still only have
I am using Fedora 15(Lovelock), but the WLAN is not working in it.
My WLAN driver is ATHEROS AR9285. Can you tell me how to configure it. Is
any driver software needed? Can you send me the driver software (or a link
to download the driver sofware) for the same.
Hi Anoop,
please take
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:42 AM, mason myongsu.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
BTW, what is the difference between max_num_sta and MAX_STA_COUNT?
sorry MAX_STA_COUNT is 2007 only, i don't know where did i found it as 1024 :)
-
mason
This issue is rare and hard to reproduce. It has only happened once so
far in about 10 hours of testing.
:( I can try tomorrow in a noisy environment.
I am currently running with your patch (with the debug prints) and
waiting for this issue to reproduce.
sorry, that printk patch is to
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Catalin Drula
catalin.dr...@personalnetworks.ro wrote:
Hi,
I've reproduced again the issue with compat-wireless-2011-08-08; this
time I added some debug prints to ath9k/rc.c (as seen in the attached
patch).
Observations:
- the rate table seems to get messed
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Jan Sundman jan.sund...@aland.net wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure whether you have found a solution to this issue yet but I
thought that I should share my findings. I'm running Arch linux on my
laptop which have the AR9280 and I saw massive packet loss as well.
is it
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Harsha Chenji cjker...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list,
I was trying to get PSM working with a ath9k and a broadcom based STA
(which works with other APs). However, in ath9k's debugfs,
total_ps_buffered reads 0. iwconfig shows that power management is on.
Still,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Ming-Ching Tiew mct...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am using kernel 3.0.1 with
compat-wireless backport v3.0-2, and TL WN722N. The system
is compiled based on openwrt trunk sdk. I am using
htc_9271.fw version 1.3 downloaded from
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Mohammed Shafi
shafi.wirel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Ming-Ching Tiew mct...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am using kernel 3.0.1 with
compat-wireless backport v3.0-2, and TL WN722N. The system
is compiled based on openwrt trunk sdk. I am using
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Ming-Ching Tiew mct...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Fri, 8/12/11, Mohammed Shafi shafi.wirel...@gmail.com wrote:
if this already a supported device by ath9k_htc then
http://www.mailrepository.com/ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org/msg/3249192/
Sorry I am
Both interfaces are in station mode.
The APs (simulated with Atheros adapters on a different machine)
constantly go up and down and change encryption settings, frequency and
802.11n mode (also changing BSSID everytime they came up in a new
configuraiton).
Hi Catalin,
I am unable to
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Robert Högberg
robert.hogb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I know NetworkManager scans the network every two minutes. I've had
problems with this and disabled it by explicitly setting a BSSID so
this is not a problem anymore.
I have verified that my problem is
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:27 PM, pangyunong 029...@gmail.com wrote:
hi ,
I read the code all along today. I just know hostAP control nl80211
which is upper the cfg80211 and mac80211.
And then I read mac80211, but all functions are provided to be used by
upper layer. There is something
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Catalin Drula
catalin.dr...@personalnetworks.ro wrote:
Hi,
I get the following kernel panic after a few hours of stress testing
(continuous associations and sending data through) two Atheros AR928X
devices.
thanks for reporting.
*please provide lspci -xxx
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Robert Högberg
robert.hogb...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/8/11 Mohammed Shafi shafi.wirel...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Robert Högberg
robert.hogb...@gmail.com wrote:
I have verified that my problem is related to the noise floor
calibrations
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:39 PM, pangyunong 029...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I see something in
http://linuxwireless.org/en/developers/Documentation/nl80211
it said nl80211 still be under development. does the current version we
use use nl80211 already?
yes, when we use a command like
iw
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Bugs fr...@solprime.net wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to run a Atheros 5416 on a D-Link DWA-552 in host mode for
802.11n
I seem to be having a problem that looks like the one patched in
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/694461/ however I am running the current
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:21 PM, pangyunong 029...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is it ath9k more complex than ar9170? do you know something about the
difference between them? which you prefer?
no, i don't know. Ccing list and carl9170 maintainer.
I have seen into the code and found the
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de wrote:
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 08:48:12 Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hm, I just checked the reference code and it doesn't at all look like
that check is actually needed; it's only needed for Merlin.
So, good catch!
Thanks
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Alex Hacker hac...@epn.ru wrote:
I think it looks like misprint which can lead to incorrect calibration
process.
true. looks like a typo, I will check with Vasanth. thanks.
--- ar9003_phy.h.orig 2011-08-01 09:53:05.0 +0600
+++ ar9003_phy.h
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Mohammed Shafi shafi.wirel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Alex Hacker hac...@epn.ru wrote:
I think it looks like misprint which can lead to incorrect calibration
process.
true. looks like a typo, I will check with Vasanth. thanks
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi,
I was having some output power problems with a device using AR7240/AR9285.
After digging into the ath9k driver I realized that it would override the
power settings (txGainType) configured in the eeprom if the
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de wrote:
On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 12:09:59 Mohammed Shafi wrote:
lets be careful while changing this, we must also note things like,
/* PA CAL is not needed for high power solution */
if (ah-eep_ops
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de wrote:
On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 13:13:27 Adrian Chadd wrote:
Right, so it's an embedded board inside a wireless router? Which router? :)
The OM2P but how is this going to help ? I have the feeling we are not getting
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Mohammed Shafi shafi.wirel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de wrote:
On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 13:13:27 Adrian Chadd wrote:
Right, so it's an embedded board inside a wireless router? Which router
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:56 PM, pangyunong 029...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm very excited in the list. It's my first time to use a mailing
list, so I'm afraid there are some impolite to you. If there, please
tell me.
I have some question about mailing list of ath9k.
I want modify NAV
of the
same via debug some random value...
anyway it always shows 0
/sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/ath9k#
echo 0x8084 regidx
cat regval
echo 0x5678 regval
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 14:43 +0530, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:56 PM, pangyunong 029...@gmail.com wrote
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Vic Demuzere v...@demuzere.be wrote:
On 29 July 2011 12:41, Mohammed Shafi shafi.wirel...@gmail.com wrote:
please provide lspci
I have attached the output of lspci.
what is the kernel version you are using , can you get debug messages
http
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Levi Civita
tullio.levi.civ...@gmail.com wrote:
Rajkumar Manoharan rmanoharan at atheros.com writes:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 04:06:45PM +0530, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:17:16PM +0530, Petr Štetiar wrote:
Mohammed Shafi
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
I've installed my Ubiquity SR71-E with a PCIe adapter but I get:
wlan0: direct probe to xx.xx.xx.xx.xx.xx (try 1/3)
wlan0: direct probe to xx.xx.xx.xx.xx.xx (try 2/3)
wlan0: direct probe to xx.xx.xx.xx.xx.xx (try 3/3)
wlan0:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Mohammed Shafi
shafi.wirel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
I've installed my Ubiquity SR71-E with a PCIe adapter but I get:
wlan0: direct probe to xx.xx.xx.xx.xx.xx (try 1/3)
wlan0: direct probe
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Vic Demuzere v...@demuzere.be wrote:
Hi there,
I have a really strange issue with my Atheros WiFi card. It doesn't
manage to connect to my wireless AP, except when I first boot windows
and then reboot to Arch linux. So it looks like ath9k doesn't manage
to
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Triangle Men triangle...@hotmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but ath9k currently does not support the delayed
block acknowledgement policy described in IEEE Std. 802.11-2007. Is there a
register on the AR9220 which sets the
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Fred Matthews fre...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Hi again,
I would heavily appreciate any response to my query regarding ath9k
-rate-control.
a basic outline, is a packet is tried at some rate(highest rate) and
the hw reports Tx Ack status and based on this
to ask doubts to the list... currently I am not up-to
the level of mastering ath9k rate control so that I can document it :)
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Mohammed Shafi
shafi.wirel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Fred Matthews fre...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Hi again,
I
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Y QM littlecircl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
These days I focused on the ath9k codes and function flows. Though I have
more understanding of the functionality of ath9k. I still confused about the
aggregation. I wonder which part do the real aggregation? In
looking into xmit.c modules
HTH,
Adrian
On 26 July 2011 18:07, Mohammed Shafi shafi.wirel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Y QM littlecircl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
These days I focused on the ath9k codes and function flows. Though I have
more understanding
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:21 PM, qingmei yao y.qing...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:46 AM, qingmei yao y.qing...@gmail.com wrote:
From my tracing part, the real tx path is: ip_queue_xmit - dev_queue_xmit
- sch_direct_xmit - dev_hard_start_xmit - ieee80211_subif_start_xmit
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Mohammed Shafi
shafi.wirel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:21 PM, qingmei yao y.qing...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:46 AM, qingmei yao y.qing...@gmail.com wrote:
From my tracing part, the real tx path is: ip_queue_xmit
occasionally get this with my older ubuntu install, on an AR2427
(AR9285 without 11n.)
So I don't think it's chipset specific.
Adrian
On 24 July 2011 21:21, Mohammed Shafi shafi.wirel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Lito Kriara l.kri...@sms.ed.ac.uk
wrote:
Hello
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Lito Kriara l.kri...@sms.ed.ac.uk wrote:
Hello all,
I have an issue with some AR9380 cards I am using.
* My first issue is that when I try to connect to a specific network
(e.g. iwconfig wlan0 essid OpenWrt), and I then want to see what has
happened by
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Mihai Moldovan io...@ionic.de wrote:
Just a typo fix changing regulaotry to regulatory.
Signed-off-by: Mihai Moldovan io...@ionic.de
please send to linux-wireless
http://linuxwireless.org/en/developers/Documentation/git-guide
---
net/wireless/reg.c | 2
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Mihai Moldovan io...@ionic.de wrote:
* On 24.07.2011 04:29 PM, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
please send to linux-wireless
http://linuxwireless.org/en/developers/Documentation/git-guide
Oh I'm sorry, I've seen several patches posted here and figured this was
the way
in driver
El 22/07/2011 02:03 a.m., Mohammed Shafi escribió:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Gabriel Tolóngto...@inti.gob.ar wrote:
Hi
I´ve been using an Atheros 9285 chipset in a 2.6.32-32 kernel with ath9k
and two virtual interfaces, one in ad-hoc mode and the other in master
mode
401 - 500 of 797 matches
Mail list logo
